7
Interrelationships between sh nutrition and health Camilo Pohlenz, Delbert M. Gatlin III Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences and Intercollegiate Faculty of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77840, USA abstract article info Article history: Received 30 January 2014 Received in revised form 7 February 2014 Accepted 10 February 2014 Available online xxxx Keywords: Immunonutrition Fish health Feed additives Immune responses An understanding of how to nurture and/or modulate the different components of the immune system is crucial for the prevention and control of diseases in animal husbandry. It is well established that proper nutrition is es- sential for maintenance of normal growth and health of all animals including aquatic species. As such, nutritious diets and appropriate feeding regimes play critical roles in intensive aquaculture. In recent years, heightened at- tention has been given to the development of nutritional strategies that positively inuence immunity and dis- ease resistance of cultured organisms to reduce disease-related economic losses. The availability of specic nutrients to immune cells plays a key role on how well those cells perform against a foreign invader. In this sense, research with several sh species has established that not only immunocompetence can be compromised by deciencies of various nutrients, but that dietary supplementation of some nutrients in excess of minimum requirement levels for optimal growth has been shown to signicantly enhance immune responses and disease resistance. For instance, ndings from recent studies indicate an important role of key amino acids and their de- rivatives, like arginine and glutamine, or vitamins, such as vitamin C and E, in modulating immune responses such as increasing phagocytosis and pathogen killing capacity, as well as increasing antibody production and im- munological memory. In addition, administration of non-nutritive compounds in the diet has become recognized as a viable means of enhancing immunocompetence of various aquatic species, mainly by the provision of cellular fractions such as β-glucans, complex oligosaccharides (mannanoligosaccharides, fructooligosaccharides or sulfated polysaccharides) or yeast and algae extracts. These compounds may act like Pathogen Associated Molec- ular Pattern (PAMP) molecules, interacting with the innate immune system through their Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) and increasing their capability for detecting and recognizing potential pathogens and readily triggering immune responses. This article will review the broad range of dietary constituents which have been shown to affect immunocompetence and health of aquatic species and how they may inuence components of the immune system. Further advancements in nutritional modulation of the immune response hold promise as an effective and relatively inexpensive alternative in combating diseases in aquaculture. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Aquaculture has become a major source of animal protein for human consumption and trends show it will be of even greater importance for future generations, as sh farming has seen an annual growth higher than other animal-production industries for the last several decades (FAO, 2012). Although diseases are natural events in all animal groups, the intensication of culture technologies has brought about an impor- tant increase in the emergence, dispersion and outbreak of infectious diseases, which have placed them as one of the main growth- constricting factors in the industry (Costello, 2009; Pridgeon and Klesius, 2013; Zagmutt et al., 2013). Therefore, the study of the defense mechanisms of cultured animals and the understanding of how to nurture and modulate the different components of the immune system are crucial for the prevention, treatment and/or control of sh diseases, hence for guaranteeing the sustainability and future of this important endeavor. Proper nutrition is critical not only to achieve optimal growth rates but also to maintain the health of cultured sh (Sealey and Gatlin, 2001). For a number of years, the sh nutrition eld focused mainly on establishing the minimum nutrient requirements for normal growth of different sh species (NRC, 2011). However, nowadays, the role of nutrition on health management through the modulation of immune response and disease resistance has turned into a research area of top priority with aims to lessen the dependence on chemotherapeutics and reduce disease-related economic losses (Kiron, 2012; Oliva-Teles, 2012). This has led to the emergence of the new discipline termed immunonutrition, which may be dened as the study of enhancing immunological functions by means of using specic nutrients and/or other dietary compounds which could be higher than those levels needed for optimal growth. Aquaculture xxx (2014) xxxxxx Corresponding author at: 216 Heep Laboratory Building, 2258 TAMUS, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Tel.: +1 979 847 9333; fax: +1 979 845 4096. E-mail address: [email protected] (D.M. Gatlin). AQUA-631033; No of Pages 7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.008 0044-8486/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquaculture journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aqua-online Please cite this article as: Pohlenz, C., Gatlin, D.M., Interrelationships between sh nutrition and health, Aquaculture (2014), http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.008

Interrelationships between fish nutrition and health

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Interrelationships between fish nutrition and health

Aquaculture xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

AQUA-631033; No of Pages 7

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Aquaculture

j ourna l homepage: www.e lsev ie r .com/ locate /aqua-on l ine

Interrelationships between fish nutrition and health

Camilo Pohlenz, Delbert M. Gatlin III ⁎Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences and Intercollegiate Faculty of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77840, USA

⁎ Corresponding author at: 216Heep Laboratory BuildinTX 77843, USA. Tel.: +1 979 847 9333; fax: +1 979 845

E-mail address: [email protected] (D.M. Gatlin).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.0080044-8486/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Please cite this article as: Pohlenz, C., Gatlin10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.008

a b s t r a c t

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 30 January 2014Received in revised form 7 February 2014Accepted 10 February 2014Available online xxxx

Keywords:ImmunonutritionFish healthFeed additivesImmune responses

An understanding of how to nurture and/or modulate the different components of the immune system is crucialfor the prevention and control of diseases in animal husbandry. It is well established that proper nutrition is es-sential for maintenance of normal growth and health of all animals including aquatic species. As such, nutritiousdiets and appropriate feeding regimes play critical roles in intensive aquaculture. In recent years, heightened at-tention has been given to the development of nutritional strategies that positively influence immunity and dis-ease resistance of cultured organisms to reduce disease-related economic losses. The availability of specificnutrients to immune cells plays a key role on how well those cells perform against a foreign invader. In thissense, research with several fish species has established that not only immunocompetence can be compromisedby deficiencies of various nutrients, but that dietary supplementation of some nutrients in excess of minimumrequirement levels for optimal growth has been shown to significantly enhance immune responses and diseaseresistance. For instance, findings from recent studies indicate an important role of key amino acids and their de-rivatives, like arginine and glutamine, or vitamins, such as vitamin C and E, in modulating immune responsessuch as increasing phagocytosis and pathogen killing capacity, as well as increasing antibody production and im-munologicalmemory. In addition, administration of non-nutritive compounds in the diet has become recognizedas a viablemeans of enhancing immunocompetence of various aquatic species,mainly by the provision of cellularfractions such as β-glucans, complex oligosaccharides (mannanoligosaccharides, fructooligosaccharides orsulfated polysaccharides) or yeast and algae extracts. These compoundsmay act like Pathogen AssociatedMolec-ular Pattern (PAMP) molecules, interacting with the innate immune system through their Pattern RecognitionReceptors (PRRs) and increasing their capability for detecting and recognizing potential pathogens and readilytriggering immune responses. This article will review the broad range of dietary constituents which have beenshown to affect immunocompetence and health of aquatic species and how they may influence components ofthe immune system. Further advancements in nutritional modulation of the immune response hold promise asan effective and relatively inexpensive alternative in combating diseases in aquaculture.

© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture has become amajor source of animal protein for humanconsumption and trends show it will be of even greater importance forfuture generations, as fish farming has seen an annual growth higherthan other animal-production industries for the last several decades(FAO, 2012). Although diseases are natural events in all animal groups,the intensification of culture technologies has brought about an impor-tant increase in the emergence, dispersion and outbreak of infectiousdiseases, which have placed them as one of the main growth-constricting factors in the industry (Costello, 2009; Pridgeon andKlesius, 2013; Zagmutt et al., 2013). Therefore, the study of the defensemechanisms of cultured animals and the understanding of how to

g, 2258 TAMUS, College Station,4096.

, D.M., Interrelationships betw

nurture and modulate the different components of the immune systemare crucial for the prevention, treatment and/or control of fish diseases,hence for guaranteeing the sustainability and future of this importantendeavor.

Proper nutrition is critical not only to achieve optimal growth ratesbut also to maintain the health of cultured fish (Sealey and Gatlin,2001). For a number of years, the fish nutrition field focused mainlyon establishing theminimum nutrient requirements for normal growthof different fish species (NRC, 2011). However, nowadays, the role ofnutrition on health management through the modulation of immuneresponse and disease resistance has turned into a research area of toppriority with aims to lessen the dependence on chemotherapeuticsand reduce disease-related economic losses (Kiron, 2012; Oliva-Teles,2012). This has led to the emergence of the new discipline termed“immunonutrition”, which may be defined as the study of enhancingimmunological functions by means of using specific nutrients and/orother dietary compounds — which could be higher than those levelsneeded for optimal growth.

een fish nutrition and health, Aquaculture (2014), http://dx.doi.org/

Page 2: Interrelationships between fish nutrition and health

2 C. Pohlenz, D.M. Gatlin III / Aquaculture xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

The aim of the present review is to give a clearer picture of the inter-relationships between fish nutrition and health. We do not intend tocite all studies in which additives/supplements have been tested inaquaculture, for this topic there are good broad or specific reviews pub-lished that the reader may consult (e.g. Dalmo and Bogwald, 2008;Kiron, 2012; Meena et al., 2012; Oliva-Teles, 2012; Torrecillas et al., inpress). Rather, we intend to focus on nutrients or additive groupswithinthe context of the fish's immune response, and their potential toenhance specific functions for better health and protection fromdisease-causing organisms.

2. Fish immune system

Teleost fish possess an immune system very similar to the one foundin higher vertebrates, but evolutionarily less developed and even moreless understood (Magnadottir, 2006; Sunyer, 2013). The immune sys-tem constitutes a highly complex defense mechanism that utilizes abroad range of individual components. It is composed of two majorbranches, the innate and the adaptive immune systems. During animmune response, both branches orchestrate an extremely close com-munication, fundamental for successful protection from and eradicationof pathogens (Tort et al., 2003).

The immune response is a process that involvesmultiple cellular andhumoral components of both immune branches (Table 1), includingdendritic cells, neutrophils, macrophages, lymphocytes, cytokines, im-munoglobulins, the complement system, among others (Bassity andClark, 2012; Rauta et al., 2012; Secombes, 2008). However, an importantcharacteristic inherent to fish, is that because of its evolutionary devel-opment, the immune system tends to rely more on its innate responsefor the clearance of an invading microorganism (Magnadottir, 2006),andwith this ismind, themacrophage could be considered themost im-portant immune cell, as it not only produces key cytokines, but it is alsothe chief cell in charge of phagocytosis and destruction of a pathogenafter initial recognition in naïve or pre-exposed animals (Bayne andGerwick, 2001; Shoemaker et al., 2001; Zhu et al., 2013). Although re-cently, dendritic cells – the most complete antigen presenting cell inhigher vertebrates (Banchereau and Steinman, 1998) – has been de-scribed in fish. These cells' complete functional characterization duringa fish's immune response is yet to be elucidated (Bassity and Clark,2012).

Noteworthy is that due to the great diversity of fish being cultured,substantial differences might be found among some important compo-nents of the immune system. For instance, some specieswill express im-munoglobulins (Ig)D, IgM and IgT/Z (Zhang et al., 2011) and others onlyIgD and IgM (Bengtén et al., 2006); in addition the recombination ofthese different immunoglobulin isotypes can vary among species(Mashoof et al., 2014). Although these differences could have an impacton specific interventions such as vaccine development, the overallimmune response is generally similar among fish species.

Table 1Main effector components of fish immune responses.

Immune system branch Cellular components Hum

Innate Physical barriers (mucosae)

MacrophagesNeutrophilsDendritic cellsa

ComLysAntPenAntNat

Adaptative B lymphocytesT lymphocytes

Ig MIg DIg Z

a Role during an immune response is not totally elucidated in fish.b Igs, immunoglobulins.c Not found in all fish species.

Please cite this article as: Pohlenz, C., Gatlin, D.M., Interrelationships betw10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.008

3. Immune responses and metabolism

There is a constant relation between a pathogen (true or opportunis-tic) trying to invade and a host limiting the invasion. An imbalanceamong components of the host–pathogen-environment will createideal conditions for the onset of a disease (Bowden, 2008), triggering adefense response (Fig. 1). The complexity and specificity of the re-sponse means that the limits or boundaries among participants arepoorly defined. For this review, the immune response may be divid-ed into three stages: 1) Detection and recognition of the pathogen,2) Phagocytosis, pathogen killing and antigen presentation, and3) Immune expansion and creation of immunological memory. Theinitial acute response against an infection (stages 1 and 2), charac-terized by a hypermetabolic stage (Lochmiller and Deerenberg,2000; Wang et al., 2012), is probably the most important for the sur-vival of an animal, because competence of the innate immune system,mainly fromphagocytes, is required to detect and activate a generalizedresponse against the invasion of a pathogen (Bayne and Gerwick, 2001;Magnadottir, 2006).

The disruption of homeostasis and the establishment of a defensestate and/or disease is a costly metabolic process for the host. Infec-tion promotes a complete shift in metabolic priorities towards nutri-ent needs associated with the immune system (Lochmiller andDeerenberg, 2000). In quiescent immune cells, the utilization of nutri-ents happens at basal levels, merely for cellular maintenance. However,during an immune challenge, the utilization of key nutrients dramati-cally increases, especially, there is an important demand for aminoacids (Kiron, 2012; Uribe et al., 2011). For instance, in vivo reports sug-gest important usage of glutamine in ill fish, represented by the rapiddecrease in plasma levels of this amino acid (Walker et al., 1996). Onthe other hand, in vitro studies point out that an activated macrophageconsumes energy at a rate comparable to that used by a cardiac musclecell at maximum capacity (Newsholme and Newsholme, 1989); evenmore, although the profile of the amino acids used will vary dependingon if there is phagocytic or lymphocytic response, arginine and gluta-mine will play a key role for the overall performance of these cells infish (Pohlenz et al., 2012a).

Besides the possible onset of an anorexic state after an initial infec-tion, a diseased statewill activate themobilization of protein and energyfrom reserves not only to support the initial acute phase of the immuneresponse, but also to sustain it until the resolution of the problem(Sealey and Gatlin, 2001). Hence, a typical result during this period isa negative nitrogen balance, which could vary depending on the sever-ity of the infection (Lochmiller and Deerenberg, 2000; Lönnström et al.,2001; Midtlyng and Lillehaug, 1998); such condition may be of greatimportance in fish culture due to their natural history of requiringhigh dietary levels of protein (NRC, 2011). Under this scenario, the ade-quate availability of specific nutrients plays a fundamental role in theactivation and performance of the immune system against an invadingpathogen.

oral components Specificity

plement systemozymeimicrobial peptidestraxinsiproteasesural Igsb

Pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)

/Tc

Antigen-specific epitopes

een fish nutrition and health, Aquaculture (2014), http://dx.doi.org/

Page 3: Interrelationships between fish nutrition and health

Pathogen detection and recognition

Fish:Pathogen encounterPRRs:PAMPs*

Innate ResponsePhagocytosis

Pathogen killingCytokine secretion

FailureDisease and death

SuccessLimitationof infection and

disease

Specific Response Initiation and Instruction

Antigen presentationMolecular co-stimulation

Cellular expansion

Humoral ResponseB lymphocyte activation

Synthesis of specific Igs**

Cellular ResponseT-helper lymphocytes

T-cytotoxic lymphocytes

Adaptive immunityImmunological memory

Memory B and T lymphocytesProtection vs. future infections

Survival

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 3

Fig. 1. General scheme of the three stages of a fish immune response. *PRRs: pathogen recognition receptors; PAMPs: pathogen associated molecular patterns. **Igs: immunoglobulins,secreted by plasma cells, which are derived from activated B-lymphocytes.Modified from Shoemaker et al. (2001).

3C. Pohlenz, D.M. Gatlin III / Aquaculture xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

4. Interrelationships between nutrition and the immune system

Nutrition is a complex andmultidimensional factor that will interre-late with the immune system, hence fish health, through a broad arrayof direct or indirectmechanisms (Kiron, 2012; Oliva-Teles, 2012; Sealeyand Gatlin, 2001). Together with the formerly mentioned fact of a vastrange of fish species being cultured, the lack of a full understanding ofthe teleost immune system represents a significant limitation on study-ing the interrelationships between these two components and thereforeon entirely comprehending immunonutrition (Ponton et al., 2013).Studies to date using a given nutrient as an immune system modulatorhave shown different results among species and even within species(Dalmo and Bogwald, 2008). For instance, contrary to the role of gluta-mine in mammalian leukocytes, which is consistent across species(Crawford and Cohen, 1985), in fish, the role of glutamine in leukocytemetabolism is complex and appears to be species specific. Conflictingreports document glutamine-dependent and -independent responsesof proliferating cultured lymphocytes (Ganassin et al., 1998; McBrideand Keast, 1997; Pohlenz et al., 2012a; Rosenberg-Wiser and Avtalion,1982).

Exogenous sources of nutrients should supply minimum levels tomeet requirements for normal immune system performance and toprotect/restore tissues from collateral damage. However, in certainsituations, providing additional nutrients at levels above those requiredfor normal fish maintenance and growth, or even provision of somecompounds that are not required at all, may sustain and/or enhanceone or more functions of the immune system, hence increasing its effi-cacy and protection capacity against an invading pathogen (Kiron,2012; Sealey andGatlin, 2001). In this sense, there are various nutrition-al tools that may be implemented to accomplish this objective of en-hancing the immune system. Following, we present results obtainedwith some of the most promising feed additives/supplement groupsfor functional aquafeeds targeted to the various components of thefish immune system within the context of each response stage.

Please cite this article as: Pohlenz, C., Gatlin, D.M., Interrelationships betw10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.008

4.1. Detection and recognition of the pathogen

The immune system recognizes and responds to a broad variety ofpathogens, mainly throughwarning signals named pathogen associatedmolecular patterns (PAMPs) detected by cellular or humoral patternrecognition receptors/proteins (PRRs) (Abbas et al., 2012; Tort et al.,2003). The encounter with PAMPs will trigger a cascade of cytokinesecretion (Roher et al., 2011) with aims to activate a general immuneresponse, including recruiting phagocytes and lymphocytes via chemo-taxis, and the activation or secretion of cellular and humoral antimicro-bial defense mechanisms, such as the complement system, lysozyme,antimicrobial peptides, etc. (Abbas et al., 2012; Bayne and Gerwick,2001; Reyes-Cerpa et al., 2012).

Providing specific additives to the diet (most of them non-digestible), such asmixed or purified extracts frommicrobial or vegeta-ble structural components, can take advantage of these warning signalsbecause they may act as PAMPs or PAMP-like molecules and may in-crease non-specific protection (Fierro-Castro et al., 2012), which hasproven to efficiently promote early functions of the immune responseof fish (Table 2). Mannanoligosaccharides, β-glucans, sulfated polysac-charides and/or nucleotides are some of the most common additivestested in aquafeeds and various reports indicate they may promotethe expression and/or secretion of important pro-inflammatory andchemotactic cytokines, such as Interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, tumor ne-crosis factor (TNF)-α and γ-interferon (IFN), along with up-regulationof important PRRs such as toll-like receptor (TLR)3, TLR5 and TLR9 indifferent fish species.

4.2. Pathogen phagocytosis/killing and antigen presentation

Phagocytosis is the internalization of a pathogenwith the purpose ofits destruction, and afterwards, under the correct conditions, to presentits antigens to lymphocytes. This process immediately follows the

een fish nutrition and health, Aquaculture (2014), http://dx.doi.org/

Page 4: Interrelationships between fish nutrition and health

Table 2Nutrients/additives of proven efficacy for the enhancement of detection and recognition of the pathogen (stage 1).

Nutrient/additive Species Effect Reference

Alginic acid Common carp, Cyprinus carpio Increased leukocyte migratory capacity Fujiki and Yano (1997)Rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss Up-regulation of IL-1β, IL-8, TNF- α after vaccination Gioacchini et al. (2008)

β-Glucan Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua Up-regulation of IL-1β after bacterial challenge Lokesh et al. (2012)Common carp Up-regulation of IL-1β Selvaraj et al. (2005)Pacific flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus Increased leukocyte migratory capacity Galindo-Villegas et al. (2006)Rainbow trout Primed the induction of TNF-α2 expression,

Up-regulation of IL-1β, IL-6 and C3 proteinIliev et al. (2005); Lovoll et al. (2007)

Snakehead, Channa striata Increased leukocyte count and total natural antibodies Talpur et al. (in press)Fructoligosaccharides Caspian roach, Rutilus rutilus Increased total natural antibodies Soleimani et al. (2012)

Stellate sturgeon, Acipenser stellatus Increased leukocyte count Akrami et al. (2013)Triangular bream,Megalobrama terminalis Increased leukocyte count and total natural antibodies Zhang et al. (2013)

Lipopolysaccharide Rainbow trout Up-regulation of IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α2, TLR-5 and TLR-9 Fierro-Castro et al. (2013); Iliev et al. (2005)Mannanoligosaccharides Atlantic cod Up-regulation of IL-1β, IL-8 after bacterial challenge Lokesh et al. (2012)

Common carp Increased lymphocyte % Akrami et al. (2012)Giant sturgeon, Huso huso Increased lymphocyte % Razeghi et al. (2012)Labeo rohita Increased leukocyte count Andrews et al. (2009)Rainbow trout Increased natural antibody titers Staykov et al. (2007)Snakehead Increased natural plasma antibodies and leukocyte count

after challenge with Aeromonas hydrophilaTalpur et al. (in press)

Marine algae extract Gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata Up-regulation of IL-1β, IL8 and β-defensin Reyes-Becerril et al. (2013)Senegalese sole, Solea senegalensis Increased leukocyte migratory capacity Diaz-Rosales et al. (2005)

Nucleotides Turbot, Psetta maxima Up-regulation of IL-1β in kidney Low et al. (2003)Rainbow trout Increased plasma natural antibodies Tahmasebi-Kohyani et al. (2011)

Pathogen extract Turbot Increased leukocyte migratory capacity,up-regulation of IL-1β, TNF-α

Leiro et al. (2006)

Peptidoglycans Pacific flounder Increased leukocyte migratory capacity Galindo-Villegas et al. (2006)Polyinosinic polycytidylic acid Rainbow trout Up-regulation of IL-1β, IL-8, TNF- α1/α2, Mx-1,

TLR-3, TLR-5 and TLR-9Fierro-Castro et al. (2013)

Yeast extract Labeo rohita Increased leukocyte count Andrews et al. (2009)Rainbow trout Increased total leukocyte, neutrophil andmonocyte count Tukmechi et al. (2011)Snakehead Increased leukocyte count and total natural antibodies Talpur et al. (in press)

4 C. Pohlenz, D.M. Gatlin III / Aquaculture xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

pathogen recognition by a macrophage or neutrophil, and possibly by adendritic cell (Shoemaker et al., 2001). Phagocytes respondwith an im-portant set of killing tools including superoxide anion, hydrogen perox-ide, nitric oxide, lysozyme, and other lytic enzymes (Magnadottir, 2006;Secombes and Fletcher, 1992; Tort et al., 2003; Uribe et al., 2011).

Supplementing dietswith nutrients that could bemetabolically usedby phagocytes has been an area of interest for enhancing this stage ofthe immune response (Table 3). For instance, certain amino acids playa crucial role in these immunological processes. Glutaminemay providemetabolic fuel to support reaction kinetics (Crawford and Cohen, 1985;Newsholme and Newsholme, 1989). Similarly, arginine is the uniqueprecursor of nitric oxide in activated macrophages (Buentello andGatlin, 1999; Neumann et al., 1995; Wu and Morris, 1998), and the lat-ter is a potent microbicidal compound and potent modulator of the eu-karyotic cytoskeleton (Kasprowicz et al., 2009; Moffat et al., 1996). Onthe other hand, another possible nutrition tool to enhance functionsduring this response stage is using nutrients that might modify thephysical (fluidity) nature of the plasma membrane and/or alter the ex-pression of receptors involved in these cellular processes, which couldenhance the synthesis and secretion of antimicrobial compounds bymodulating the protein kinase C pathway (Balfry and Higgs, 2001;Calder, 1998; Calder et al., 1990) or enhancing the synthesis ofmolecules that could be closely related to antigen processing andpresentation such as phospholipase A2 (PA2), prostaglandin E2 (PE2)or myeloid differentiation factor (MyD) 88 (Horsnell et al., 2013;Paduraru et al., 2013; Yen et al., 2011). Supplementing polyunsaturatedfatty acids n−3 or n−6, or antioxidant compounds such as vitamin Cand E has proven to be effective in this regard (Table 3). It is importantto state that even if the phagocytic activity is enhanced by a nutrient/additive, that does not necessarily correlate to the killing capacity of thecell. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate both parameters in order to havea better assessment of an immunomodulation effect (Pohlenz et al.,2012a).

Please cite this article as: Pohlenz, C., Gatlin, D.M., Interrelationships betw10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.008

4.3. Immune expansion and memory creation

The ability to developmemory is a fundamental characteristic of theimmune system. The successful destruction and processing of an invad-ing pathogen should result in the induction of a strong and lastingresponse of memory lymphocytes. Because the first contact with anantigen usually induces relatively short-lived effector cells (VanMuiswinkel and Nakao, 2014), the way by which clonal expansion ofT lymphocytes is induced and the dimension of the effector cell popula-tion generated is key for this process (Secombes, 2008). The capacity tocreate immunological memory correlates with the expansion of naïvelymphocytes after antigen presentation, cytokine stimulation and mo-lecular co-stimulation at the membrane level (Secombes, 2008; Uribeet al., 2011). Although the synthesis of specific immunoglobulins is animportant component of the adaptive immune system, in fish, the cor-relates of protection are minimal unless there are high circulating titersof these antibodies (Thune et al., 1997). As such, good activation andexpansion of B lymphocytes are required.

Similar to the previous stage, the supplementation of nutrients thatcould be used as energy sources, precursors for or used for cellular pro-liferation or may influence cellular membrane integrity are among thetop immunomodulating candidates (Table 4). As this stage requireshigh proliferation of lymphocytes for appropriate immune expansion,lymphoid tissue may have limited capacity for de novo synthesis ofimportant compounds, such as amino acids, nucleotides and theirderivatives, depending to a great extent on exogenous nutrientsupply (Navarro et al., 1996). Providing an external source of these nu-trients may increase the expression of the recombinant activating gene(RAG)-1 (Low et al., 2003), crucial for lymphocyte maturation (Hansenand Kaattari, 1995), as well as the up-regulation of IgM expression in Blymphocytes residing in the spleen (Low et al., 2003) or kidney (Reyes-Becerril et al., 2011) which are essential for antibody secretion androbust development of adaptive immunity.

een fish nutrition and health, Aquaculture (2014), http://dx.doi.org/

Page 5: Interrelationships between fish nutrition and health

Table 3Nutrients/additives of proven efficacy for the enhancement of pathogen phagocytosis and killing and antigen presentation (stage 2).

Nutrient/additive Species Effect Reference

Arachidonic acid Yellow croaker, Larimichthyspolyactis

Increased phagocytic activity and production of sPLA2 and PGE2 Li et al. (2012)

Arginine Channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus Increased phagocytic activity, phagocytic index, macrophage production ofnitric oxide, bactericidal capacity

Buentello et al. (2007); Buentello and Gatlin(1999); Pohlenz et al. (2012a)

Hybrid striped bass,Moronechrysops × M. saxatilis

Increased macrophage superoxide anion production Cheng et al. (2012)

Pacific flounder Increased phagocytic index, macrophage superoxide anion production Galindo-Villegas et al. (2006)Red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus Increased neutrophil respiratory burst and macrophage superoxide anion

productionCheng et al. (2011)

Senegalese sole Increased macrophage superoxide anion and nitric oxide production, up-regulation of HIF-I, MIP1-α and HAMP-1

Costas et al. (2011)

Astaxanthin Pacific flounder Increased phagocytic index and capacity, macrophage superoxide anionproduction

Galindo-Villegas et al. (2006)

β-Hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate

Rainbow trout Increased neutrophil respiratory burst, macrophage bactericidal capacity Siwicki et al. (2003)

Glutamine Channel catfish Increased phagocytic index Pohlenz et al. (2012a)Hybrid striped bass Increased neutrophil respiratory burst and macrophage superoxide anion

productionCheng et al. (2012)

Red drum Increased neutrophil respiratory burst and macrophage superoxide anionproduction

Cheng et al. (2011)

Linoleic acid Yellow croaker Increased phagocytic activity, macrophage superoxide anion production Zuo et al. (2013)n−3 HUFA Pacific flounder Increased macrophage superoxide anion production, complement activity Wang et al. (2006)Polyamines Gilthead seabream Increased phagocytic activity, up-regulation of MHC-I, CD8, Hep and C3 Reyes-Becerril et al. (2011)Vitamin C Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar Increased leukocyte phagocytosis activity Verlhac and Gabaudan (1994)

Gilthead seabream Increased phagocytic index and activity, macrophage superoxide anionproduction, complement activity

Ortuño et al. (2001); Ortuño et al. (1999)

Hybrid striped bass Increased macrophage superoxide anion production Sealey and Gatlin (2002a)Pacific flounder Increased macrophage superoxide anion production Galindo-Villegas et al. (2006)Rainbow trout Increase natural cytotoxicity and leukocyte phagocytosis activity Verlhac and Gabaudan (1994)Turbot Increased phagocytic index Roberts et al. (1995)Yellow croaker Increased phagocytosis activity and superoxide anion production Ai et al. (2006)

Vitamin E Gilthead seabream Increased phagocytic index and activity, and complement activity Ortuño et al. (2001); Ortuño et al. (2000)Hybrid striped bass Increased macrophage superoxide anion production Sealey and Gatlin (2002b)Pacific flounder Increased macrophage superoxide anion production Galindo-Villegas et al. (2006); Wang et al.

(2006)Rainbow trout Increased bactericidal activity Kiron et al. (1995)Yellow croaker Increased macrophage superoxide anion production, up-regulation of

MyD88Zuo et al. (2012)

5C. Pohlenz, D.M. Gatlin III / Aquaculture xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

5. Conclusions

The aim of the present review was to give insights on how nutritioninterrelates with health within the context of the fish's immune re-sponses, and to present a summary of data with promising compounds

Table 4Nutrients/additives of proven efficacy for the enhancement of expansion and creation of immu

Nutrient/additive Species Effect

Arginine Channel catfish Increased T and B lymphocyteagainst Edwardsiella ictaluri

β-carotene Japanese parrotfish,Oplegnathus fasciatus

Increased non-specific prolife

Spotted parrotfish,Oplegnathus punctatus

Increased non-specific prolife

β-Hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate Rainbow trout Increased non-specific T andters

Glutamine Channel catfish Increased non-specific T andcytes, memory specific lymph

n−3 HUFA Rainbow trout Increased antibody titers agaiNucleotides Atlantic salmon Increased plasma antibody tit

Channel catfish Increased antibody titers agaiHybrid tilapia, Oreochromisniloticus × O. aureus

Increased plasma antibody titliferation

Turbot Up-regulation of IgM and RAGPolyamines Gilthead seabream Up-regulation of IgMVitamin C Atlantic salmon Increased proliferation of T lym

ruckeriMilkfish, Chanos chanos Increased plasma antibody titRainbow trout Increased proliferation of T ly

Vitamin E Milkfish Increased plasma antibody tit

Please cite this article as: Pohlenz, C., Gatlin, D.M., Interrelationships betw10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.008

that might be used for making functional aquafeeds to be used underspecific situations. Although it is important to state, that even if a specif-ic compound will enhance early stages of the immune response, it doesnot mean that it may have positive effects on the final outcome of theintegrated immune response. Nutritional modulation of the immune

nological memory (stage 3).

Reference

proliferation, memory lymphocytes and antibody titer Pohlenz et al. (2012b);Pohlenz et al. (2012a)

ration of T lymphocytes Tachibana et al. (1997)

ration of lymphocytes Tachibana et al. (1997)

B lymphocyte proliferation and total plasma antibody ti- Siwicki et al. (2003)

B lymphocyte proliferation, tissue-residing B lympho-ocytes and plasma antibody titer against E. ictaluri

Pohlenz et al. (2012b);Pohlenz et al. (2012a)

nst A. salmonicida Kiron et al. (1995)ers against A. salmonicida Burrells et al. (2001)nst E. ictaluri Welker et al. (2011)ers against A. hydrophila, non-specific lymphocyte pro- Ramadan et al. (1994)

-1 Low et al. (2003)Reyes-Becerril et al. (2011)

phocytes, higher plasma antibody titers against Yersinia Erdal et al. (1991); Verlhacand Gabaudan (1994)

ers against Vibrio vulnificus, enhanced memory factor Azad et al. (2007)mphocytes Verlhac and Gabaudan

(1994)ers against Vibrio vulnificus, enhanced memory factor Azad et al. (2007)

een fish nutrition and health, Aquaculture (2014), http://dx.doi.org/

Page 6: Interrelationships between fish nutrition and health

6 C. Pohlenz, D.M. Gatlin III / Aquaculture xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

system continues to be a potentially powerful tool to improve thehealth and growth of cultured fish, hence to improve production yield.However, because of the great diversity of fish being cultured alongwith a lack of full understanding regarding the fish's immune system,immunonutrition is still not fully developed, but warrants a vast futureresearch in this field. In particular, there is an immense need to fine-tune dosing of various additives, feeding regimes, supplementationtimes, etc. so that immunonutrition can become more effective andused efficiently to benefit the industry.

References

Abbas, A.K., Lichtman, A.H., Pillai, S., 2012. Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Seventhed. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, USA.

Ai, Q., Mai, K., Tan, B., Xu, W., Zhang, W., Ma, H., Liufu, Z., 2006. Effects of dietary vitamin Con survival, growth, and immunity of large yellow croaker, Pseudosciaena crocea.Aquaculture 261, 327–336.

Akrami, R., Mansour, M.R., Chitsaz, H., Ziaei, R., Ahmadi, Z., 2012. Effect of dietary mannanoligosaccharide on growth performance, survival, body composition and some hema-tological parameters of carp juvenile (Cyprinus carpio). J. Anim. Sci. Adv. 2, 879–885.

Akrami, R., Iri, Y., Khoshbavar Rostami, H., Razeghi Mansour, M., 2013. Effect of dietarysupplementation of fructooligosaccharide (FOS) on growth performance, survival,lactobacillus bacterial population and hemato-immunological parameters of stellatesturgeon (Acipenser stellatus) juvenile. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 35, 1235–1239.

Andrews, S.R., Sahu, N.P., Pal, A.K., Kumar, S., 2009. Haematological modulation andgrowth of Labeo rohita fingerlings: effect of dietary mannan oligosaccharide, yeastextract, protein hydrolysate and chlorella. Aquac. Res. 41, 61–69.

Azad, I.S., Dayal, J.S., Poornima, M., Ali, S.A., 2007. Supra dietary levels of vitamins C and Eenhance antibody production and immune memory in juvenile milkfish, Chanoschanos (Forsskal) to formalin-killed Vibrio vulnificus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 23,154–163.

Balfry, S.K., Higgs, D.A., 2001. Influence of dietary lipid composition on the immune sys-tem and disease resistance of finfish. In: Lim, C., Webster, C.D. (Eds.), Nutrition andFish Health. Food Products Press, Binghamton, N.Y., pp. 213–234.

Banchereau, J., Steinman, R.M., 1998. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature392, 245–252.

Bassity, E., Clark, T.G., 2012. Functional identification of dendritic cells in the teleostmodel, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). PLoS ONE 7, e33196.

Bayne, C.J., Gerwick, L., 2001. The acute phase response and innate immunity of fish. Dev.Comp. Immunol. 25, 725–743.

Bengtén, E., Clem, L.W., Miller, N.W., Warr, G.W., Wilson, M., 2006. Channel catfish immu-noglobulins: repertoire and expression. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 30, 77–92.

Bowden, T.J., 2008. Modulation of the immune system of fish by their environment. FishShellfish Immunol. 25, 373–383.

Buentello, J.A., Gatlin, D.M., 1999. Nitric oxide production in activated macrophages fromchannel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus): influence of dietary arginine and culture media.Aquaculture 179, 513–521.

Buentello, J.A., Reyes-Becerril, M., Romero-Geraldo, M.J., Ascencio-Valle, F.J., 2007. Effectsof dietary arginine on hematological parameters and innate immune function ofchannel catfish. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 19, 195–203.

Burrells, C., Williams, P.D., Southgate, P.J., Wadsworth, S.L., 2001. Dietary nucleotides: anovel supplement in fish feeds: 2. Effects on vaccination, salt water transfer, growthrates and physiology of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture 199, 171–184.

Calder, P., 1998. n−3 Polyunsaturated fatty acids and mononuclear phagocyte function.In: Kremer, J. (Ed.), Medicinal Fatty Acids in Inflammation. Birkhäuser, Basel,pp. 1–27.

Calder, P.C., Bond, J.A., Harvey, D.J., Gordon, S., Newsholme, E.A., 1990. Uptake and incor-poration of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids into macrophage lipids and theireffect upon macrophage adhesion and phagocytosis. Biochem. J. 269, 807–814.

Cheng, Z., Buentello, A., Gatlin, D.M., 2011. Effects of dietary arginine and glutamine ongrowth performance, immune responses and intestinal structure of red drum,Sciaenops ocellatus. Aquaculture 319, 247–252.

Cheng, Z., Gatlin, D.M., Buentello, A., 2012. Dietary supplementation of arginine and/orglutamine influences growth performance, immune responses and intestinalmorphology of hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × Morone saxatilis). Aquaculture362–363, 39–43.

Costas, B., Conceição, L.E.C., Dias, J., Novoa, B., Figueras, A., Afonso, A., 2011. Dietary argi-nine and repeated handling increase disease resistance andmodulate innate immunemechanisms of Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858). Fish ShellfishImmunol. 31, 838–847.

Costello, M.J., 2009. The global economic cost of sea lice to the salmonid farming industry.J. Fish Dis. 32, 115–118.

Crawford, J., Cohen, H.J., 1985. The essential role of L-glutamine in lymphocyte differenti-ation in vitro. J. Cell. Physiol. 124, 275–282.

Dalmo, R.A., Bogwald, J., 2008. Beta-glucans as conductors of immune symphonies. FishShellfish Immunol. 25, 384–396.

Diaz-Rosales, P., Burmeister, A., Aguilera, J., Korbee, N., Morinigo, M.A., Figueroa, F.L.,Chabrillon, M., Arijo, S., Lindequist, U., Balebona, M.C., 2005. Screening of algalextracts as potential stimulants of chemotaxis and respiratory burst activity of phago-cytes from sole (Solea senegalensis). Bull. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol. 25, 9–19.

Erdal, J.I., Evensen, Ø., Kaurstad, O.K., Lillehaug, A., Solbakken, R., Thorud, K., 1991. Rela-tionship between diet and immune response in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.)

Please cite this article as: Pohlenz, C., Gatlin, D.M., Interrelationships betw10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.008

after feeding various levels of ascorbic acid and omega-3 fatty acids. Aquaculture98, 363–379.

FAO, 2012. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organiza-tion of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

Fierro-Castro, C., Barrioluengo, L., López-Fierro, P., Razquin, B.E., Carracedo, B., Villena, A.J.,2012. Fish cell cultures as in vitro models of pro-inflammatory responses elicited byimmunostimulants. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 33, 389–400.

Fierro-Castro, C., Barrioluengo, L., López-Fierro, P., Razquin, B.E., Villena, A.J., 2013. Fish cellcultures as in vitro models of inflammatory responses elicited by immunostimulants.Expression of regulatory genes of the innate immune response. Fish ShellfishImmunol. 35, 979–987.

Fujiki, K., Yano, T., 1997. Effects of sodium alginate on the non-specific defence system ofthe common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 7, 417–427.

Galindo-Villegas, J., Fukada, H., Masumoto, T., Hosokawa, H., 2006. Effect of dietaryimmunostimulants on some innate immune responses and disease resistance againstEdwardsiella tarda infection in Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Aquac. Sci.54, 153–162.

Ganassin, R.C., Barlow, J., Bols, N.C., 1998. Influence of glutamine on phytohemagglutininstimulated mitogenesis of leucocytes from the rainbow trout head kidney. FishShellfish Immunol. 8, 561–564.

Gioacchini, G., Smith, P., Carnevali, O., 2008. Effects of Ergosan on the expression ofcytokine genes in the liver of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposedto enteric red mouth vaccine. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 123, 215–222.

Hansen, J., Kaattari, S., 1995. The recombination activating gene 1 (RAG1) of rainbowtrout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): cloning, expression, and phylogenetic analysis. Immu-nogenetics 42, 188–195.

Horsnell, W.G.C., Darby, M.G., Hoving, J.C., Nieuwenhuizen, N., McSorley, H.J., Ndlovu, H.,Bobat, S., Kimberg, M., Kirstein, F., Cutler, A.J., DeWals, B., Cunningham, A.F.,Brombacher, F., 2013. IL-4Rα-Associated Antigen Processing by B Cells PromotesImmunity in Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infection. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003662.

Iliev, D.B., Liarte, C.Q., MacKenzie, S., Goetz, F.W., 2005. Activation of rainbow trout(Oncorhynchus mykiss) mononuclear phagocytes by different pathogen associatedmolecular pattern (PAMP) bearing agents. Mol. Immunol. 42, 1215–1223.

Kasprowicz, A., Szuba, A., Volkmann, D., Baluska, F., Wojtaszek, P., 2009. Nitric oxidemodulates dynamic actin cytoskeleton and vesicle trafficking in a cell type-specificmanner in root apices. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 1605–1617.

Kiron, V., 2012. Fish immune system and its nutritional modulation for preventive healthcare. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 173, 111–133.

Kiron, V., Fukuda, H., Takeuchi, T., Watanabe, T., 1995. Essential fatty acid nutrition anddefence mechanisms in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.A Physiol. 111, 361–367.

Leiro, J., Paramá, A., Arranz, J.A., Álvarez, M.F., Sanmartín, M.L., 2006. Modulation by ex-tracts of the scuticociliate Philasterides dicentrarchi of turbot leucocyte functionsand inflammatory cytokine gene expression. Rev. Iber. Parasitol. 66, 55–67.

Li, Q., Ai, Q., Mai, K., Xu, W., Zheng, Y., 2012. In vitro effects of arachidonic acid onimmune functions of head kidney macrophages isolated from large yellow croaker(Larmichthys crocea). Aquaculture 330–333, 47–53.

Lochmiller, R.L., Deerenberg, C., 2000. Trade-offs in evolutionary immunology: just whatis the cost of immunity? Oikos 88, 87–98.

Lokesh, J., Fernandes, J.M.O., Korsnes, K., Bergh, Ø., Brinchmann,M.F., Kiron, V., 2012. Tran-scriptional regulation of cytokines in the intestine of Atlantic cod fed yeast derivedmannan oligosaccharide or β-Glucan and challenged with Vibrio anguillarum. FishShellfish Immunol. 33, 626–631.

Lönnström, L.G., Rahkonen, R., Lundén, T., Pasternack, M., Koskela, J., Gröndahl, A.,2001. Protection, immune response and side-effects in European whitefish(Coregonus lavaretus L.) vaccinated against vibriosis and furunculosis. Aquacul-ture 200, 271–284.

Lovoll, M., Fischer, U., Mathisen, G.S., Bogwald, J., Ototake, M., Dalmo, R.A., 2007. The C3subtypes are differentially regulated after immunostimulation in rainbow trout, buthead kidney macrophages do not contribute to C3 transcription. Vet. Immunol.Immunopathol. 117, 284–295.

Low, C., Wadsworth, S., Burrells, C., Secombes, C.J., 2003. Expression of immune genes inturbot (Scophthalmus maximus) fed a nucleotide-supplemented diet. Aquaculture221, 23–40.

Magnadottir, B., 2006. Innate immunity of fish (overview). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 20,137–151.

Mashoof, S., Pohlenz, C., Chen, P.L., Deiss, T.C., Gatlin III, D.M., Buentello, A., Criscitiello,M.F., 2014. Expressed IgH μ and τ transcripts share diversity segment in ranchedThunnus orientalis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 43, 76–86.

McBride, S., Keast, D., 1997. Mitogenesis of snapper lymphocytes and their requirementfor glutamine. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 21, 91.

Meena, D., Das, P., Kumar, S., Mandal, S., Prusty, A., Singh, S., Akhtar, M., Behera, B., Kumar,K., Pal, A., Mukherjee, S., 2012. Beta-glucan: an ideal immunostimulant in aquaculture(a review). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 39, 431–457.

Midtlyng, P.J., Lillehaug, A., 1998. Growth of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar after intraperito-neal administration of vaccines containing adjuvants. Dis. Aquat. Org. 32, 91–97.

Moffat Jr., F.L., Han, T., Li, Z.M., Peck, M.D., Jy, W., Ahn, Y.S., Chu, A.J., Bourguignon, L.Y.,1996. Supplemental L-arginine HCl augments bacterial phagocytosis in humanpolymorphonuclear leukocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 168, 26–33.

Navarro, J., Ruiz-Bravo, A., Jiménez-Valera, M., Gil, A., 1996. Modulation of antibody-forming cell and mitogen-driven lymphoproliferative responses by dietary nucleo-tides in mice. Immunol. Lett. 53, 141–145.

Neumann, N.F., Fagan, D., Belosevic, M., 1995. Macrophage activating factor(s) secreted bymitogen stimulated goldfish kidney leukocytes synergize with bacterial lipopolysac-charide to induce nitric oxide production in teleost macrophages. Dev. Comp.Immunol. 19, 473–482.

een fish nutrition and health, Aquaculture (2014), http://dx.doi.org/

Page 7: Interrelationships between fish nutrition and health

7C. Pohlenz, D.M. Gatlin III / Aquaculture xxx (2014) xxx–xxx

Newsholme, P., Newsholme, E.A., 1989. Rates of utilization of glucose, glutamine andoleate and formation of end-products by mouse peritoneal macrophages in culture.Biochem. J. 261, 211–218.

NRC, 2011. Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. The National Academies Press,Washington, D.C.

Oliva-Teles, A., 2012. Nutrition and health of aquaculture fish. J. Fish Dis. 35, 83–108.Ortuño, J., Esteban, M.A., Meseguer, J., 1999. Effect of high dietary intake of vitamin C on

non-specific immune response of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish ShellfishImmunol. 9, 429–443.

Ortuño, J., Esteban, M.A., Meseguer, J., 2000. High dietary intake of α-tocopherol acetateenhances the non-specific immune response of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurataL.). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 10, 293–307.

Ortuño, J., Cuesta, A., Angeles Esteban, M., Meseguer, J., 2001. Effect of oral administrationof high vitamin C and E dosages on the gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) innateimmune system. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 79, 167–180.

Paduraru, C., Bezbradica, J.S., Kunte, A., Kelly, R., Shayman, J.A., Veerapen, N., Cox, L.R.,Besra, G.S., Cresswell, P., 2013. Role for lysosomal phospholipase A2 in iNKT cell-mediated CD1d recognition. PNAS 110, 5097–5102.

Pohlenz, C., Buentello, A., Mwangi,W., Gatlin III, D.M., 2012a. Arginine and glutamine sup-plementation to culture media improves the performance of various channel catfishimmune cells. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 32, 762–768.

Pohlenz, C., Buentello, A., Criscitiello, M.F., Mwangi, W., Smith, R., Gatlin III, D.M., 2012b.Synergies between vaccination and dietary arginine and glutamine supplementationimprove the immune response of channel catfish against Edwardsiella ictaluri. FishShellfish Immunol. 33, 543–551.

Ponton, F., Wilson, K., Holmes, A.J., Cotter, S.C., Raubenheimer, D., Simpson, S.J., 2013. In-tegrating nutrition and immunology: A new frontier. J. Insect Physiol. 59, 130–137.

Pridgeon, J.W., Klesius, P.H., 2013. Major bacterial diseases in aquaculture and theirvaccine development. In: Hemming, D. (Ed.), Animal Science Reviews 2012. CABIInternational, Oxfordshire, UK, pp. 141–156.

Ramadan, A., Afifi, N.A., Moustafa, M.M., Samy, A.M., 1994. The effect of ascogen on theimmune response of Tilapia fish to Aeromonas hydrophila vaccine. Fish ShellfishImmunol. 4, 159–165.

Rauta, P.R., Nayak, B., Das, S., 2012. Immune system and immune responses in fish andtheir role in comparative immunity study: A model for higher organisms. Immunol.Lett. 148, 23–33.

Razeghi, M.M., Akrami, R., Ghobadi, S.H., Amani Denji, K., Ezatrahimi, N., Gharaei, A., 2012.Effect of dietary mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) on growth performance, survival,body composition, and some hematological parameters in giant sturgeon juvenile(Huso huso Linnaeus, 1754). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 38, 829–835.

Reyes-Becerril, M., Ascencio-Valle, F., Tovar-Ramirez, D., Meseguer, J., Esteban, M.A., 2011.Effects of polyamines on cellular innate immune response and the expression ofimmune-relevant genes in gilthead seabream leucocytes. Fish Shellfish Immunol.30, 248–254.

Reyes-Becerril, M., Guardiola, F., Rojas, M., Ascencio-Valle, F., Esteban, M.Á., 2013. Dietaryadministration of microalgae Navicula sp. affects immune status and gene expressionof gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 35, 883–889.

Reyes-Cerpa, S., Maisey, K., Reyes-López, F., Toro-Ascuy, D., Sandino, A.M., Imarai, M.,2012. Fish Cytokines and Immune Response. InTech (298 pp.).

Roberts, M.L., Davies, S.J., Pulsford, A.L., 1995. The influence of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) onnon-specific immunity in the turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Fish ShellfishImmunol. 5, 27–38.

Roher, N., Callol, A., Planas, J.V., Goetz, F.W., MacKenzie, S.A., 2011. Endotoxin recognitionin fish results in inflammatory cytokine secretion not gene expression. InnateImmun. 17, 16–28.

Rosenberg-Wiser, S., Avtalion, R.R., 1982. The cells involved in the immune response offish. III. Culture requirements of PHA-stimulated carp (Cyprinus carpio) lymphocytes.Dev. Comp. Immunol. 6, 693–702.

Sealey, W.M., Gatlin, D.M., 2001. Overview of nutritional strategies affecting the health ofmarine fish. In: Lim, C., Webster, C.D. (Eds.), Nutrition and Fish Health. Food ProductsPress, Binghamton, N.Y., pp. 103–118.

Sealey, W.M., Gatlin, D.M., 2002a. Dietary vitamin C and vitamin E interact to influ-ence growth and tissue composition of juvenile hybrid striped bass (Moronechrysops ♀ × M. saxatilis ♂) but have limited effects on immune responses.J. Nutr. 132, 748–755.

Sealey, W.M., Gatlin, D.M., 2002b. In vitro manipulations of vitamin C and vitamin Econcentrations alter intracellular O2

− production of hybrid striped bass (Moronechrysops × Morone saxatilis) head-kidney cells. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 12, 131–140.

Secombes, C., 2008.Will advances in fish immunology change vaccination strategies? FishShellfish Immunol. 25, 409–416.

Secombes, C.J., Fletcher, T.C., 1992. The role of phagocytes in the protectivemechanisms offish. Annu. Rev. Fish Dis. 2, 53–71.

Selvaraj, V., Sampath, K., Sekar, V., 2005. Administration of yeast glucan enhances survivaland some non-specific and specific immune parameters in carp (Cyprinus carpio)infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 19, 293–306.

Shoemaker, C.A., Klesius, P.H., Lim, C., 2001. Immunity and disease resistance in fish. In:Lim, C., Webster, C.D. (Eds.), Nutrition and Fish Health. Food Products Press,Binghamton, N.Y., pp. 149–162.

Siwicki, A.K., Morand, M., Fuller, J., Nissen, S., Goryczko, K., Ostaszewski, P.,Kazun, K., Głombski, E., 2003. Influence of feeding the leucine metabolite

Please cite this article as: Pohlenz, C., Gatlin, D.M., Interrelationships betw10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.008

β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) on the non-specific cellular and humoral de-fence mechanisms of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 19, 44–48.

Soleimani, N., Hoseinifar, S.H., Merrifield, D.L., Barati, M., Abadi, Z.H., 2012. Dietary supple-mentation of fructooligosaccharide (FOS) improves the innate immune response,stress resistance, digestive enzyme activities and growth performance of Caspianroach (Rutilus rutilus) fry. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 32, 316–321.

Staykov, Y., Spring, P., Denev, S., Sweetman, J., 2007. Effect of a mannan oligosaccharide onthe growth performance and immune status of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).Aquac. Int. 15, 153–161.

Sunyer, J.O., 2013. Fishing for mammalian paradigms in the teleost immune system. Nat.Immunol. 14, 320–326.

Tachibana, K., Yagi, M., Hara, K., Mishima, T., Tsuchimoto, M., 1997. Effects of feedingof β-carotene-supplemented rotifers on survival and lymphocyte proliferation reac-tion of fish larvae (Japanese parrotfish (Oplegnathus fasciatus) and spotted parrotfish(Oplegnathus punctatus): preliminary trials. Hydrobiologia 358, 313–316.

Tahmasebi-Kohyani, A., Keyvanshokooh, S., Nematollahi, A., Mahmoudi, N., Pasha-Zanoosi, H., 2011. Dietary administration of nucleotides to enhance growth, humoralimmune responses, and disease resistance of the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchusmykiss) fingerlings. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 30, 189–193.

Talpur, A.D., Munir, M.B., Mary, A., Hashim, R., 2014. Dietary probiotic and prebioticsimproved food acceptability, growth performance, haematology and immunologicalparameters and disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in snakehead(Channa striata) fingerlings. Aquaculture 426–427, 14–20.

Thune, R.L., Hawke, J.P., Fernandez, D.H., Lawrence, M.L., Moore, M.M., 1997. Immuniza-tion with bacterial antigens: edwardsiellosis. Dev. Biol. Stand. 90, 125–134.

Torrecillas, S., Montero, D., Izquierdo, M., 2014. Improved health and growth of fish fedmannan oligosaccharides: Potential mode of action. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 36,525–544.

Tort, L., Balasch, J., Mackenzie, S., 2003. Fish immune system. A crossroads between innateand adaptive responses. Inmunología 22, 277–286.

Tukmechi, A., Rahmati Andani, H.R., Manaffar, R., Sheikhzadeh, N., 2011. Dietary adminis-tration of beta-mercapto-ethanol treated Saccharomyces cerevisiae enhanced thegrowth, innate immune response and disease resistance of the rainbow trout,Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 30, 923–928.

Uribe, C., Folch, H., Enriquez, R., Moran, G., 2011. Innate and adaptive immunity in teleostfish: a review. Vet. Med. 56, 486–503.

Van Muiswinkel, W.B., Nakao, M., 2014. A short history of research on immunity toinfectious diseases in fish. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 43, 130–150.

Verlhac, V., Gabaudan, J., 1994. Influence of vitamin C on the immune system ofsalmonids. Aquac. Res. 25, 21–36.

Walker, S.P., Keast, D., McBride, S., 1996. Distribution of glutamine synthetase in the snap-per (Pagrus auratus) and implications for the immune system. Fish Physiol. Biochem.15, 187–194.

Wang, Z., Mai, K., Liufu, Z., Ma, H., Xu, W., Ai, Q., Zhang, W., Tan, B., Wang, X., 2006. Effectof high dietary intakes of vitamin E and n−3 HUFA on immune responses and resis-tance to Edwardsiella tarda challenge in Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus,Temminck and Schlegel). Aquac. Res. 37, 681–692.

Wang, X., Wang, L., Zhang, H., Ji, Q., Song, L., Qiu, L., Zhou, Z., Wang, M., Wang, L., 2012.Immune response and energymetabolism of Chlamys farreri under Vibrio anguillarumchallenge and high temperature exposure. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 33, 1016–1026.

Welker, T.L., Lim, C., Yildirim-Aksoy, M., Klesius, P.H., 2011. Effects of dietary supplemen-tation of a purified nucleotide mixture on immune function and disease and stressresistance in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. Aquac. Res. 42, 1878–1889.

Wu, G., Morris Jr., S.M., 1998. Arginine metabolism: nitric oxide and beyond. Biochem. J.336, 1–17.

Yen, J.-H., Kocieda, V.P., Jing, H., Ganea, D., 2011. Prostaglandin E2 induces matrixmetalloproteinase 9 expression in dendritic cells through two independent signalingpathways leading to Activator Protein 1 (AP-1) activation. J. Biol. Chem. 286,38913–38923.

Zagmutt, F.J., Sempier, S.H., Hanson, T.R., 2013. Disease spread models to estimate highlyuncertain emerging diseases losses for animal agriculture insurance policies: Anapplication to the U.S. farm-raised catfish industry. Risk Anal. 33, 1924–1937.

Zhang, Y.-A., Salinas, I., Oriol Sunyer, J., 2011. Recent findings on the structure andfunction of teleost IgT. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 31, 627–634.

Zhang, C.-N., Li, X.-F., Xu, W.-N., Jiang, G.-Z., Lu, K.-L., Wang, L.-N., Liu, W.-B., 2013.Combined effects of dietary fructooligosaccharide and Bacillus licheniformis on innateimmunity, antioxidant capability and disease resistance of triangular bream(Megalobrama terminalis). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 35, 1380–1386.

Zhu, L.-y, Nie, L., Zhu, G., Xiang, L.-x, Shao, J.-z, 2013. Advances in research of fish immune-relevant genes: A comparative overview of innate and adaptive immunity in teleosts.Dev. Comp. Immunol. 39, 39–62.

Zuo, R., Ai, Q., Mai, K., Xu, W., Wang, J., Xu, H., Liufu, Z., Zhang, Y., 2012. Effects of dietaryn−3 highly unsaturated fatty acids on growth, nonspecific immunity, expression ofsome immune related genes and disease resistance of large yellow croaker(Larmichthys crocea) following natural infestation of parasites (Cryptocaryon irritans).Fish Shellfish Immunol. 32, 249–258.

Zuo, R., Ai, Q., Mai, K., Xu, W., 2013. Effects of conjugated linoleic acid on growth, non-specific immunity, antioxidant capacity, lipid deposition and related gene expressionin juvenile large yellow croaker (Larmichthys crocea) fed soyabean oil-based diets. Br.J. Nutr. 110, 1220–1232.

een fish nutrition and health, Aquaculture (2014), http://dx.doi.org/