22
Interpreting IDEA reports Diagnostic Form Short Form www.lvc.edu/idea

Interpreting IDEA reports

  • Upload
    peggy

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Interpreting IDEA reports. Diagnostic Form Short Form www.lvc.edu/idea. Page 1 of report. Page 1 of report. Guide says: “Report Responds to These Questions”. 1. Overall, how effectively was this class taught? 2. How does this compare with the ratings of other teachers ? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Interpreting IDEA reports

Interpreting IDEA reports

Diagnostic FormShort Form

www.lvc.edu/idea

Page 2: Interpreting IDEA reports

Page 1 of report

Page 3: Interpreting IDEA reports

Page 1 of report

Page 4: Interpreting IDEA reports

Guide says: “Report Responds toThese Questions”

1. Overall, how effectively was this class taught?2. How does this compare with the ratings of other teachers?3. Were you more successful in facilitating progress on some class objectives than on others?4. How can instruction be made more effective?*5. Do some salient characteristics of this class and its students have implications for instruction?* Diagnostic Form Report only.

Page 5: Interpreting IDEA reports

Our Modest Ambitions Today

• Understand summative scores– Raw averages– Converted scores– Adjusted scores– How used at LVC

• Formative use of p.2 – relevant objectives– POD papers on objectives

• Formative use of p.3 for Diagnostic only– POD papers on strategies

Page 6: Interpreting IDEA reports

Summative scores ….

Page 7: Interpreting IDEA reports

How “Summary Evaluation” Computed

• 41. Overall, I rate this instructor an excellent teacher. (25%)

• 42. Overall, I rate this course as excellent. (25%)

• Objectives 1-12 (21.-32) that are ranked as Important or Essential (50%)

Page 8: Interpreting IDEA reports

“Converted averages”

• Transform group’s mean to 50, s.d. to 10.• Examples:

– Score 57 means .7 group s.d.’s above average– That’s at 75.8 %-tile of Normal Distribution– … but these groups of IDEA scores not Normal

25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 750

1

2

3

4

5

6

NormalIDEA

Page 9: Interpreting IDEA reports

Adjusted Scores:Effects that are removed

P. 2 of Diagnostic Form report:

Page 10: Interpreting IDEA reports

Adjusted Scores:Effects that are removed

P. 2 of Diagnostic Form report:

Only these on Short Form

Page 11: Interpreting IDEA reports

Is unadjustedScore on

Progress towardObjectives high?

(≥4.2)

Are adjusted

scores lower or higher than unadjusted

scores?

Use adjusted scores

Useunadjusted

(raw) scores

Lower Yes

Higher

When to Use Adjusted Scores for Administrative Decisions:Where is there evidence of effective teaching? (old)

*Expectations defined by your unit.

No

Page 12: Interpreting IDEA reports

Dounadjusted (raw) scores meet or

exceed expectations?*

Are adjusted

scores lower or higher than unadjusted

scores?

Use adjusted scores

Useunadjusted

(raw) scores

Lower Yes

Higher

When to Use Adjusted Scores for Administrative Decisions:Where is there evidence of effective teaching? (new)

*Expectations defined by your unit.

No

Page 13: Interpreting IDEA reports

College Use for Evaluating Faculty

• Current:– Summative: Pay attention to extremes– Assess formative use of IDEA by instructor

• IDEA recommendation– Summative: Establish standards

• Faculty set standards• Department level or College level• Assess progress in meeting them

Page 14: Interpreting IDEA reports

Page 2: Objectives

Page 15: Interpreting IDEA reports

P. 3 of Diagnostic Form Report:Directions….

www.theideacenter.org/podidea

Follow the links…

Page 16: Interpreting IDEA reports

Teaching Methods Relevant toTarget Objectives

Page 17: Interpreting IDEA reports

Teaching Methods Relevant toTarget Objectives

Page 18: Interpreting IDEA reports

Try it1. Identify objective…

2. Find related teaching method…

3. Follow link: www.theideacenter.org/podidea

Page 19: Interpreting IDEA reports

Last page: Raw response frequencies… especially additional questions

We can retrieve the additional questions so you know which are which.

Page 20: Interpreting IDEA reports

Effects of Evals being On-Line?

• Study of on-line vs paper by IDEA published in 2010:– http://

www.theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/Technical Report 16.pdf

• Online avg response rate 57%– LVC response rates 70-75%

• No significant change in means or s.d.’s of responses– If loss of middle group, s.d. would go up.– On 12 objectives, s.d.’s slightly lower for on-line!

Page 21: Interpreting IDEA reports

Key questions for LVC (from IDEA)

• How much emphasis will you give student ratings in the evaluation of teaching?

• How many classes need to be rated? [LVC: all]• Performance categories: How many should you use?• Do you plan to authenticate objectives?• Will you weight the importance of items or groups of

items in the decision-making process? If so, how?• Will you use averages on a five-point scale or converted

averages?• Will you use adjusted or unadjusted scores?

Page 22: Interpreting IDEA reports

References

• www.lvc.edu/idea – Campus IDEA page• POD notes:

– The 20 methods: www.theideacenter.org/podidea– The 12 objectives:

www.theideacenter.org/podidea/PODNotesLearning.html

• IDEA: www.theideacenter.org• Technical: http://

www.theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/techreport-12.pdf - Data about adjusting, etc.