Upload
lelia
View
39
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
International Workshop: Istanbul – Twente – Sarajevo GROUP 2 Mees Beeker Sibel Kirca Serdar Köro ğlu Aida Kulenovi ć Mirjan Mehmedinovi ć Tjark van de Merwe Burcu Ölez. THREE CONCEPTS developed concepts: Plain & Easy. THREE CONCEPTS 1. Plain & Easy. 01. 02. 03. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
International Workshop: Istanbul – Twente – Sarajevo GROUP 2
Mees BeekerSibel Kirca
Serdar KöroğluAida Kulenović
Mirjan MehmedinovićTjark van de Merwe
Burcu Ölez
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
THREE CONCEPTS1. Plain & Easy
Plain and simple market stallEasy to install, maintain, disassemble and useVery light and permeable pavilion
01 Construction and floor plan02 Possible usage of pavilion03 Pavilion in its environment, connected
01 02 03
THREE CONCEPTS2. Open & Closed
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed
Patterns from the areaMoveable façades
Extendable area
01 Extending pavilion02 Pavilion in its environment03 Possibility for façade material
01 02 03
01 Unit mass02 Outer shell03 Structure04 The core
01 02
All functionalities are in the coreEasily extendable
03
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
THREE CONCEPTS3. Static & Dynamic
04
KEY CRITERIA COMPARISATIONTHREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparisonPoint of view of Municipality
Point of view of tenant
Point of view of visitor
SafeCleanUniformHistorical contextFast assemblyMultifunctional
Safe/SecureCleanWorkableMake moneyCooperate with other tenant
Safe/secureEnjoy festivalCleanEat/Drink/Buy/Sit
Plain & Easy Open & Closed Static & Dynamic
Architectural quality +/- + +
Multi-Functionality + + +
Transformability - +/- +
Sustainability +/- +/- +/-
Comfort and health +/- +/- +/-
Constructability and handling of components
+ - +/-
Cultural identity and local context
- - -
Score indecisive…Static & Dynamic has most potential
Plain & Easy Open & Closed Static & Dynamic
Architectural quality +/- + +
Multi-Functionality + + +
Transformability - +/- +
Sustainability +/- +/- +/-
Comfort and health +/- +/- +/-
Constructability and handling of components
+ - +/-
Cultural identity and local context
- - -
Potential - - +
Maximum capacity of the trams is estimated at 12000 visitors/hrFour axes in areaDesign will be permeable to discourage people to stay to long in entrance area
CONTEXT OF SITEorientation / approach / accessibility routing / zoning / relation
to adjacent buildings / scale/proportion
01 amount of people entering the park02 analyses of the park03 demand for permeability in the new design
01 02 03
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
CONTEXT OF SITEorientation / approach / accessibility routing / zoning / relation
to adjacent buildings / scale/proportion
01 Arrangement of functions to the area02 Possible arrangement of pavilions03 Key to simbols/lines of picture two
01 02
Functions of pavilions will be divided to maintain and boost the flow of people towards the desired area.The minimum street width at maximum capacity is 10 m.Configuration of pavilions will help steering visitors to desired areas.
03
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPTScenario 1 fast food restaurant, scenario 2 restaurant with seating; Scenario 3 tea room; Scenario 4 shop;
5 exhibition space, scenario
01
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPT
01 Unit mass02 Outer shell03 Structure04 The core
01 02
All functionalities are in the coreEasily extendable
03 04
01 02 03
SCENARIOSScenario 1 fast food restaurant, scenario 2 restaurant with seating; Scenario 3 tee room; Scenario 4 shop;
5 exhibition space, scenario
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPT
scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5
Text
SCENARIOSScenario 1 fast food restaurant, scenario 2 restaurant with seating; Scenario 3 tee room; Scenario 4 shop;
5 exhibition space, scenario
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPT
scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5
3D DIGITAL / PHYSICAL MODELS
01 Building level02 Articulated level03 Urban level
02 03
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPT
scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models
CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION
01 Possibility of stretching the pavilion02 Concept of closed and opened wall03 Concept of closed and opened pavilion
01 02
Text
03
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPT
scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models
CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATIONTHREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPT
scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models
CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION
KEY CRITERIA – MULTI FUNCTIONALITY & TRANSFORMABILITY
01 Multifunctional components
01
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPT
scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models
CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION
KEY CRITERIA
Multi functionality & Transformability
Building: restaurant, bookshopSystem: coreComponent: combine floor & roof
KEY CRITERIA – MULTI FUNCTIONALITY & TRANSFORMABILITY
01 Multifunctional components
01
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPT
scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models
CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION
KEY CRITERIA
Multi functionality & Transformability
Building: restaurant, bookshopSystem: coreComponent: combine floor & roof
KEY CRITERIA – SUSTAINABILITY
• Design for Disassembly• Seperated garbage collecting by tenants and visitors• Using solar energy for lighting
01 Functional Levels – Duffy and Brand02 Recycling bins, seperated garbage03 Solar panels, possibly installed at central area
01 02 03
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPT
scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models
CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION
KEY CRITERIA
Multi functionality & Transformability
Sustainability
KEY CRITERIA – COMFORT & HEALTH
Sub-criteria
01 Phase Changing Material for roof by Alderman, Robert J.02 Design to realize hygiene
01 02
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPT
scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models
CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION
KEY CRITERIA
Multi functionality & Transformability
SustainabilityComfort & health
Questions?
THREE CONCEPTS
developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy
2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic
key criteria comparison
CONTEXT OF SITE
BUILDING CONCEPT
scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models
CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION
KEY CRITERIA
Multi functionality & Transformability
SustainabilityComfort & health
QUESTIONS?