International Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB) Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2011

8/6/2019 International Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB) Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2011

1/78

In

F

ernati

oun

nal So

ertif

atio

Ve

ftware

ed T

Le

eleasedsion 201

Testin

este

el S

1

Quali

llab

icatio

s

s Board


2/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

CopyrigThis doc

CopyrigISTQB iCopyrigthe ISTCopyrigKlonk, RCopyrigFriedenCopyrig

Klaus OlAll rightThe aut(ISTQB)have ag1) Any

authandafteNati

2) Anyothecop

3) Anyits tr

ied Testtion Level S

011l Software Testing

t Noticeument may

t Notice Ia registere

t 2011 thB WG Foun

t 2010 thahul Verma)

t 2007 therg and Eri

t 2005, th

lsen, Maaret

reserved.

ors hereby t. The authorreed to the f

individual oors and theprovided thsubmissio

onal Board.

individual or derivativeright ownerISTQB-recoanslation) to

rllabus

ualifications Board

be copied in

nternationaltrademark

authors fodation Leve

authors fo

authors fovan Veene

e authors (

Pyhjrvi,

ransfer thes (as currenllowing con

training coISTQB aret any advefor official

r group of inwritings if tof the sylla

gnized Natiother partie

its entirety,

Software Teof the Intern

the updatel)

the update

the updatendaal)

homas Mll

eoff Thomp

opyright tocopyright h

ditions of us

pany mayacknowledgtisement ofaccreditati

dividuals mhe authorsbus.nal Board

s.

Page 2 of

or extracts

sting Qualifiational Soft

2011 (Thom

2010 (Thom

2007 (Thom

r (chair), R

son and Eri

he Internatiolders) ande:

se this sylld as the s

such a train of the tr

y use thisnd the IST

ay translat

8

ade, if the

cations Boarare Testing

as Mller (c

as Mller (c

as Mller (c

x Black, Sig

van Veene

nal SoftwarISTQB (as t

bus as theurce and cing courseining mate

yllabus as tQB are ack

this syllab

ource is ac

d (hereinaftQualificatio

air), Debra

air), Armin

air), Doroth

rid Eldh, Do

daal).

e Testing Qe future co

asis for a trpyright ownay mentio

ials to an

he basis fornowledged

s and licen

InternatioSoftware Tualifications

31-Ma

nowledged.

r called ISTns Board,

Friedenberg

eer, Martin

y Graham,

rothy Graha

alificationsyright holde

aining coursers of the s

the syllabISTQB reco

articles, bos the sour

se the sylla

nalstingBoard

-2011

QB)

, and

ebra

m,

Boardr)

e if thellabuss onlygnized

ks, ore and

us (or


3/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

RevisVersion

ISTQB 2

ISTQB 2

ISTQB 2

ISTQB 2ASQF V

ISEB V2



ion Hist

011

010

007 0

005 02.2 J

.0 2

rllabus

ualifications Board

ry

ate

ffective 1-A

ffective 30-

1-May-200

1-July-2005uly-2003

5-Feb-1999

pr-2011

ar-2010

Page 3 of

RemarkCertifiedMaintenNotesCertifiedMaintenNotesCertifiedMaintenCertifiedASQF SLehrpla

ISEB Sof25 Febru

8

Tester Founnce Releas

Tester Founnce Releas

Tester Founnce ReleasTester Founllabus FounGrundlage

tware Testinary 1999

dation Level see App

dation Level see App

dation Leveldation Leveldation Level

des Softw

g Foundatio


31-Ma

Syllabusndix E Re

Syllabusndix E Re

Syllabus

SyllabusVersion 2.2re-testens

n Syllabus

nalstingBoard

-2011

lease

lease

2.0


4/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

Table

Acknowl

IntroducPurpTheLearnTheAccreLevelHow t

1. Fu1.1

1.11.11.11.11.1

1.21.31.4

1.1.1.1.1.

1.51.6

2. Te2.1

2.12.12.1

2.22.22.22.22.2

2.32.32.32.32.3

2.43. St

3.13.2

3.23.23.23.2

3.34. Te

4.14.2



of Cont

edgements..

ion to this Sse of this Dertified Testing Objectivxamination .ditation ........of Detail ......his Syllabusndamentals

Why is T.1 Softwa.2 Cause.3 Role of.4 Testin.5 How M

What is TSeven TeFundame

.1 Test Pl

.2 Test A

.3 Test I

.4 Evalua

.5 Test ClThe PsycCode of

sting ThrougSoftware

.1 V-mod

.2 Iterativ

.3 TestinTest Lev

.1 Compo

.2 Integra

.3 Syste

.4 AcceptTest Typ

.1 Testin

.2 Testin

.3 Testin

.4 TestinMaintena

tic TechniqStatic TeReview P

.1 Activiti

.2 Roles

.3 Types

.4 SucceStatic An

st Design TeThe Test

Categorie

rllabus

ualifications Board

nts

...................

yllabus ........cument ......er Foundaties/Cognitive.........................................................is Organize

of Testing (sting Necesre Systems

of SoftwarTesting inand Qualit

uch Testingesting? (K2)sting Principntal Test Pranning andalysis andplementatioting Exit Critosure Activihology of Tethics ...........hout the SofDevelopmel (Sequenti

e-incrementwithin a Lif

ls (K2) ........nent Testintion TestingTesting (K

ance Testins (K2) .........of Functionof Non-funof SoftwarRelated toce Testinges (K2) .......hniques anrocess (K2) .s of a Formnd Respon

of Reviews (s Factors folysis by Tochniques (KDevelopme

s of Test De

....................

....................

....................n Level in SLevel of Kn

....................

....................

....................d ..................2)................sary (K2) .....Context (K1)

Defects (Koftware De(K2) ...........

is Enough?....................les (K2) .......cess (K1) ...

Control (K1)esign (K1) .

n and Execeria and Reies (K1) ......sting (K2) ........................tware Life Ct Models (Kl Developml DevelopmCycle Mod

....................(K2) ...........

(K2) ............) .................(K2)...........

....................(Functionaltional SoftwStructure/A

Changes: R(K2) .................................the Test Pr

....................al Review (ibilities (K1)K2) ..............r Reviews (ls (K2) ........4) ................t Process (

sign TechniPage 4 of

...................

...................

...................oftware Tesowledge ...........................................................................................................................................) ................elopment,...................(K2) ...........................................................................................................tion (K1) .....orting (K1) ..........................................................ycle (K2) .....) ................

ent Model) (ent Modelsel (K2) ..........................................................................................................................Testing) (Kare Charactrchitecture (-testing an......................................ocess (K2) .....................1) .....................................................2) .....................................................3) ...............

ues (K2) ....8

....................

....................

....................ting ..................................................................................................................................................................................................aintenance

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................K2) ..............K2) .........................................................................................................................................................) .................

eristics (NonStructural TRegressio

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................and Operati................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................-functionalsting) (K2) .Testing (K

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................


31-Ma

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................ons (K2) .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................esting) (K2)...................) ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

...................

nalstingBoard

-2011

............ 7

............ 8

............ 8

............ 8

............ 8

............ 8

............ 8

............ 9

............ 9

.......... 10

.......... 11

.......... 11

.......... 11

.......... 11

.......... 11

.......... 12

.......... 13

.......... 14

.......... 15

.......... 15

.......... 15

.......... 16

.......... 16

.......... 16

.......... 18

.......... 20

.......... 21

.......... 22

.......... 22

.......... 22

.......... 22

.......... 24

.......... 24

.......... 25

.......... 26

.......... 26

.......... 28

.......... 28......... 28.......... 29.......... 29.......... 30.......... 31.......... 32.......... 33.......... 33.......... 33.......... 34.......... 35.......... 36.......... 37.......... 38.......... 39


5/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

4.34.34.3

4.34.34.3

4.44.4.4.

4.54.6

5. Te5.1

5.15.1

5.25.25.25.25.25.25.2

5.35.35.35.3

5.45.5

5.55.5

5.66. To

6.16.16.16.16.16.16.16.16.1

6.26.26.2

6.37. Re

StandBook

8. ApHistoObjeObjeNoveEntry



Specificat.1 Equiva.2 Bound.3 Decisi.4 State.5 Use C

Structure.1 Statem.2 Decisi.3 Other

ExperienChoosing

st ManagemTest Org

.1 Test O

.2 TasksTest Plan

.1 Test Pl

.2 Test Pl

.3 Entry

.4 Exit Cr

.5 Test E

.6 Test StTest Prog

.1 Test P

.2 Test R

.3 Test CConfiguraRisk and

.1 Project.2 ProducIncident

ol Support foTypes of

.1 Tool S

.2 Test T

.3 Tool S

.4 Tool S

.5 Tool S

.6 Tool S

.7 Tool S

.8 Tool SEffective

.1 Potenti

.2 SpeciaIntroducin

ferences ......ards ...............................

pendix A y of this Dotives of thetives of the I

ber 2001) ..Requireme

rllabus

ualifications Board

ion-based olence Partitiry Value A

n Table Teransition Tese Testing (based or Went Testingn Testing atructure-bae-based TeTest Technient (K3) ......nization (K2rganizationf the Test L

ning and Esanning (K2)anning Actiriteria (K2) .

iteria (K2) ....timation (Krategy, Testress Monitoogress Monporting (K2ntrol (K2) ...

tion Managesting (K2)

Risks (K2) .t Risks (K2)anagementr Testing (Kest Tools (pport for Tol Classificpport for Mpport for Stpport for Tpport for Tpport for Ppport for S

se of Toolsal Benefitsl Consideratg a Tool int.........................................................yllabus Bacument ........oundation

International...................ts for this Q

r Black-boxning (K3) ...alysis (K3) ..

ting (K3) .....sting (K3) ....K2)..............ite-box Tec

and Coverad Coveraged Techniq

chniques (Kiques (K2) ........................) ..................nd Indepeneader and T

imation (K3)....................ities (K3) .............................................) .................Approach (ing and Coitoring (K1) ..) .......................................ment (K2) .......................

....................

....................(K3) ............

2).................2) ...............sting (K2) ...tion (K2) .....nagement

atic Testingst Specificast Executiorformanceecific Testin

: Potentialnd Risks ofions for Som

an Organiz............................................................kground ...........................ertificate QQualificatio....................ualification ...

Page 5 of

echniques......................................

...................

...................

...................hniques (Ke (K4) ........(K4) ...........

ues (K1) ......) ..........................................................................ence (K2) ..

ester (K1) ...

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................2) ..............trol (K2) ....................................................................................................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................f Testing an

(K1) ............ion (K1) ......and Loggin

nd Monitorig Needs (K

enefits andTool Suppoe Types ofation (K1) ..................................................................................................ualification ..

(adapted f......................................

8

(K3) .....................................................

....................

....................

....................) ......................................................................................................................................................................................................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................d Tests (K1........................................g (K1) .........g (K1) .........) .................

Risks (K2) ..t for Testingools (K1) ....

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................om ISTQB........................................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

......................................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................(for all tools

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................eeting at S

....................

....................


31-Ma

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................) (K2) .................................................................................................................................................................ollentuna,......................................

nalstingBoard

-2011

.......... 40

.......... 40

.......... 40

.......... 40.......... 41

.......... 41

.......... 42

.......... 42

.......... 42

.......... 42

.......... 43

.......... 44

.......... 45

.......... 47

.......... 47

.......... 47

.......... 49.......... 49

.......... 49

.......... 49

.......... 49

.......... 50

.......... 50

.......... 51

.......... 51

.......... 51

.......... 51

.......... 52

.......... 53

.......... 53.......... 53

.......... 55

.......... 57

.......... 58

.......... 58

.......... 58

.......... 59

.......... 59

.......... 59

.......... 60

.......... 60

.......... 60

.......... 62

.......... 62

.......... 62

.......... 64

.......... 65

.......... 65

.......... 65

.......... 67

.......... 67

.......... 67

.......... 67

.......... 67


6/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

Back9. Ap

Level

LevelLevelLevel

10.Foun

10.10.10.10.

11.12.

ReleRele

13.



round andpendix B L1: Rememb

2: Understa3: Apply (K4: Analyze (ppendix Cation Sylla1.1 Gener1.2 Curren1.3 Learni1.4 Overallppendix Dppendix E

se 2010 ......se 2011 ......

Index ...........

rllabus

ualifications Board

istory of thearning Objer (K1) ........

nd (K2) .......) .................K4) .............

Rules Appus ...............l Rules .......t Content ....g ObjectiveStructure ...

Notice toRelease N

...................

...................

...................

Foundationectives/Cog....................

....................

....................

....................lied to the I............................................................s ......................................raining Prootes .....................................................

....................

Page 6 of

Certificate iitive Level...................

...................

...................

...................TQB ..........................................................................................................iders ...................................................................

...................

8

n Softwaref Knowledg....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

esting ..........................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................


31-Ma

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

nalstingBoard

-2011

.......... 68

.......... 69

.......... 69

.......... 69.......... 69

.......... 69

.......... 71

.......... 71

.......... 71

.......... 71

.......... 71

.......... 71

.......... 73

.......... 74

.......... 74

.......... 74

.......... 76


7/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

Ackn

InternatiThomasArmin BSchaefethe curr

InternatiThomasreview tTuula PVeenen

Internati

Thomasteam thPetterss

InternatiThomasGeoff Tsuggesti



wledge

onal SoftwaMller (chaieer, Rex Blar, Stephanient version o

onal SoftwaMller (chaiam (Rex Blkknen, Maal) and all

onal Softwa

Mller (chainks the revion, and Wo

onal SoftwaMller (chaiompson anons.

rllabus

ualifications Board

ments

e Testing Qr), Debra Frick, Julie GaUlrich, Erikf the syllabu

e Testing Qr), Rahul Veck, Mette B

eile PosthuNational Bo

e Testing Q

r), Dorothyew team (Hil Kwon) an

e Testing Qr), Rex Blac

Erik van V

ualificationsedenberg. Tdiner, Judyvan Veenens.

ualificationsrma, Martinruhn-Pedera, Hans Sc

ards for thei

ualifications

raham, Dens Schaefeall the Nati

ualifications, Sigrid Eldenendaal a

Page 7 of

Board Workhe core teaMcKay, Tuuldaal) and all

Board WorkKlonk and Aon, Debra Fhaefer, Stesuggestion

Board Work

ra Friedenb, Stephanieonal Boards

Board Work, Dorothy G

nd the revie

8

ing Group Fthanks thela PkkneNational Bo

ing Group Frmin Beer. Triedenberg,hanie Ulrichs.

ing Group F

erg, and EriUlrich, Meilfor their sug

ing Group Fraham, Klau

team and

undation Lreview tean, Eric Riouards for the

undation Lhe core teaKlaus Olsen, Pete Willia

undation L

van VeenePosthuma,gestions.

undation Ls Olsen, Mall National


31-Ma

vel (Edition(Dan Almodu Cosquiesuggestions

vel (Editionthanks the

, Judy McKms, Erik van

vel (Edition

ndaal. The cAnders

vel (Editionaret Pyhjroards for th

nalstingBoard

-2011

2011):g,Hansfor

2010):

y,

2007):

ore

2005):vi,eir


8/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

Intro

PurpoThis syllLevel. TBoards flanguagfor accrInformat

TheThe Foupeople iaccepta

for anyomanageconsultatesting q

LearnLearnino K1:o K2:o K3:o K4:

Further

All termexplicitly

The

The Fouexaminsyllabus

The for

Examsexaminrequisit

AccreAn ISTsyllabusperformis allowFurther



ductio

se of thiabus forms the Internatioor them to ae. Training pditation. Thion on the hi

ertifiedndation Lev

roles suchce testers

ne who wantrs, softwarents. Holdersualification.

ing Objeobjectives

rememberunderstandapplyanalyze

etails and e

listed undementioned

xaminati

ndation Levtion questio. All section

at of the ex

ay be taketion centerfor the exa

ditationB National. Training pr

the accredid to have a

uidance for

rllabus

ualifications Board

to this

Documhe basis fornal Softwarccredit the troviders wille syllabus wstory and b

ester Fol qualificatias testers, tnd software

s a basic undevelopmenof the Foun

tives/Cre indicate

xamples of l

r Terms juin the learni

on

l Certificates may requof the sylla

mination is

as part ofr in a public.

oard may aviders sho

tation. An aISTQB exa

training pro

Syllab

ntthe InternatiTesting Qu

aining providetermine aill help candckground of

undationn is aimed

est analysts,developers.

derstandingt managers,dation Certif

gnitive Lfor each se

earning obj

t below chag objective

examinatioire the use ous are exa

multiple cho

n accrediteexam). Co

ccredit trainild obtain accredited comination as

iders is giv

Page 8 of

us

onal Softwaalificationsers and to

ppropriate tidates in thethe syllabu

Level int anyone intest engineThis Found

of softwarebusiness aicate will be

evel ofction in this

ctives are g

pter heading.

will be basf material binable.

ice.

training copletion of

ng providerscreditation grse is recogpart of the c

n in Appen

8

re Testing Qoard (ISTQerive examiaching met

ir preparatiocan be fou

Softwarolved in sof

ers, test conation Level

testing, sucalysts, IT diable to go o

nowledgsyllabus and

iven in Appe

s shall be re

ed on this sysed on mor

rse or taken accredited

whose couuidelines fronized as coourse.

ix D.

ualification) provides i

nation questods and pr

n for the exd in Appen

Testingware testinsultants, tesualification i

as projectectors andto a highe

eclassified a

ndix B.

membered (

llabus. Ansthan one s

independetraining co

se materialm the boardforming to t


31-Ma

t the Foundt to the Natiions in theirduce coursmination.ix A.

. This inclumanagers,

s also appro

anagers, qanagemen

-level softw

s follows:

K1), even if

ers toection of thi

tly (e.g., atrse is not a

ollows thisor body that

his syllabus,

nalstingBoard

-2011

tionnallocalware

esuserpriate

ualitytre

not

anpre-

and


9/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

LevelThe lev

order too Geno A lis

requo Lea

mino A liso A d

stan

The syllthe level

How tThere alearningexampl

2. TeThis heshown)chapter.objectiv

within th



of Detaill of detail in

achieve thiseral instructit of informatiiredning objectiset to be act of terms thscription ofdards

bus contentof detail to

his Syllae six majorobjectives t:

ting Thr

ding showsnd K2 (butWithin eachs and the a

e time for th

rllabus

ualifications Board

this syllabu

goal, the syonal objectiion to teach,

es for eachhievedat studentshe key con

is not a dee covered i

us is Ohapters. That is covere

oughou

that Chapteot K3), andchapter theount of tim

section.

allows inter

llabus consies describinincluding a

knowledge

ust be ableepts to teac

cription of thn Foundatio

ganizede top-level hd within the

t the Sof

2 has learnit is intendere are a nue required.

Page 9 of

nationally c

ts of:g the intentiescription,

rea, descri

to recall anh, including

e entire knoLevel traini

eading for echapter and

tware Li

ing objectivto take 11

ber of sectiubsections

8

nsistent tea

on of the Foand referen

ing the cog

understansources suc

wledge areaing courses.

ach chapterspecifies th

fe Cycle

s of K1 (assminutes tons. Each s

that do not h

ching and e

undation Lees to additi

itive learnin

as accept

of software

shows the htime for th

(K2)

umed whenteach the mction also have a time


31-Ma

amination. I

elnal sources

g outcome a

d literature

testing; it re

ighest levelchapter. F

115 mi

a higher levaterial in thes the learniiven are inc

nalstingBoard

-2011

n

if

nd

r

flects

ofr

utes

el is

ngluded


10/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

1.

LearnThe obj

1.1 WLO-1.1.1

LO-1.1.LO-1.1.LO-1.1.

LO-1.1.

1.2 WLO-1.2.1LO-1.2.

LO-1.2.

1.3 SeLO-1.3.1

1.4 FuLO-1.4.1

1.5 ThLO-1.5.1LO-1.5.



Funda

ing Objectives identi

y is TestiDescribperson,DistinguGive reaDescribcontribuExplain

mistake

at is TestRecall tProvidecycle (KDifferent

en TestiExplain t

damentaRecall t

(K1)

PsycholRecall tContrast

rllabus

ualifications Board

entals

tives fofy what you

ng Neces, with examo the enviroish betweensons why tewhy testin

es to highernd compar

and bug, usi

ing? (K2)e commonexamples fo)

iate testing f

g Princihe seven pr

l Test Pre five funda

ogy of Tee psycholothe mindse

of Tes

Fundawill be able t

sary? (K2ples, the wanment or tothe root causting is necis part of qquality (K2)the terms

ing example

bjectives ofr the objecti

rom debugg

les (K2)inciples in t

cess (K1mental test

sting (K2ical factors tof a tester

Page 10 of

ing (K

entals oo do followi

)in which a

a companyse of a defessary by giality assurarror, defect,

s (K2)

testing (K1)es of testin

ing (K2)

sting (K2)

ctivities an

hat influencnd of a dev

78

)

Testingg the compl

defect in sofK2)ct and its effing examplence and giv

fault, failure

in different

respective

e the succeseloper (K2)

1

etion of eac

tware can c

ects (K2)s (K2)examples

, and the co

phases of t

asks from p

s of testing


31-M

5 min

h module.

use harm t

f how testin

rresponding

e software l

lanning to cl

K1)

nalstingBoard

r-2011

tes

a

g

terms

ife

osure


11/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

1.1

TermsBug, def

1.1.1

Softwarproductexpectemoney,

1.1.2

A huma

code, or(or do sresult in

Defectscode, coFailureselectronichangin

1.1.3

OperaRigorouduring ocorrecteSoftwarstandar

1.1.4

With thefor bothusabilityseeChaSoftwarTestingdesignedefects,

Lessonsfound inreoccurrquality aTesting

standar



Why is

ect, error, fa

Softwar

systems ar(e.g., cars).. Software time or busi

Causes

being can

in a docummething it sfailures, but

occur becaumplexity of i

can be cauic fields, and

the hardw

Role of

ions (K2)testing of s

peration andbefore the

testing mas.

Testing

help of testifunctional a, efficiency,pter 2; for mProduct Q

can give contest that p

the quality o

should be lother projecing and, asssurance.

should be int

s, training a

rllabus

ualifications Board

Testin

ilure, fault,

System

e an integralMost peopl

hat does noess reputati

f Softwa

ake an err

nt. If a defehouldnt), canot all defe

se human bnfrastructur

ed by envirpollution care condition

esting in

ystems andcontribute tsystem is r

also be req

nd Quali

ng, it is posd non-functiaintainabili

ore informatality (ISO 9

fidence in thsses reducf the softwa

arned fromts, processeconsequen

egrated as

nd defect an

Neces

istake, qual

Context

l part of life,e have had

work correon, and coul

e Defect

r (mistake),

ct in code isusing a failuts do so.

eings are fal, changing t

nmental con cause fauls.

Software

documentatio the qualityleased for o

uired to me

y (K2)

ible to meaional softwaty and portaion on softw126).

e quality of ts the overale system in

previous prs can be imce, improve

ne of the q

alysis).Page 11 of

sary (K

ity, risk

(K1)

from businen experienctly can leadd even caus

(K2)

which prod

executed, thre. Defects i

lible and beechnologies

ditions asts in firmwar

Develop

ion can helpof the softwperational u

t contractu

ure the quale requirembility). For mare charact

he softwarel level of risreases wh

jects. By unroved, whicthe quality

ality assura

78

)

s applicatioe with softwto many proe injury or d

ces a defec

e system mn software,

ause there i, and/or ma

ell. For exae or influenc

ent, Mai

to reduce thare system,e.

l or legal re

lity of softwants and chaore informatristics see

if it finds fein a system

n those def

derstandingh in turn shof future syst

nce activitie

ns (e.g., banare that didblems, inclueath.

t (fault, bug)

y fail to doystems or d

s time pressy system int

mple, radiatie the execu

tenance

e risk of proif the defect

uirements,

re in termsacteristics (ion on non-foftware En

or no defe. When testicts are fixe

the root cauuld preventems. This is

(i.e., along


31-M

20 minu

king) to conot work as

ding loss of

in the progr

hat it shoulocuments m

ure, compleeractions.

on, magnetiion of softw

nd

blems occurfound are

r industry-s

f defects foe.g., reliabilitunctional teineering

ts. A properng does find.

ses of defecthose defectan aspect o

ide develop

nalstingBoard

r-2011

es

sumer

am

d doay

x

sm,re by

ring

pecific

nd,y,ting

ly

tss fromf

ment


12/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

1.1.5

Decidinsafety, afurther iTestingreleasecustom



How Mu

how muchnd businessChapter 5.

should proviof the softwrs.

rllabus

ualifications Board

h Testin

esting is enrisks, and p

e sufficientre or syste

is Enou

ough shouldroject const

informationbeing teste

Page 12 of

h? (K2)

take accouaints such

to stakeholdd, for the ne

78

t of the leves time and

ers to makext developm

l of risk, includget. Risk

informed deent step or


31-M

uding techniis discusse

cisions aboandover to

nalstingBoard

r-2011

cal,

t the


13/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

1.2

TermsDebuggi

BackgA commThis is pTest actichoosincriteria,activitie(includinBoth dyand willdevelopTestingo Findo Gaio Proo PreThe thotest basidocumedefects

Differenttesting (many faiacceptagain conbe to asstakeholtesting toperatioavailabilDebuggiDebuggiSubseqresponsiThe pro



What i

ng, require

roundon perceptioart of testing

ivities existtest conditi

reporting onafter a test

g source co

amic testinprovide infor

ent and te

can have thing defectsing confideiding informenting defe

ght processs via test dents (e.g., reqppearing in

viewpointse.g., compoilures as posce testing, tfidence thatsess the quders of the rat no new d

nal testing, tity.

ng and testing is the deent re-testin

ibility for the

ess of testi

rllabus

ualifications Board

Testin

ent, review,

n of testing i, but not all

efore and afons, designithe testingphase hase) and con

and static tmation thatting proces

following o

ce about thation for dects

and activitisign) can heuirements)the code.

in testing taent, integrasible so thathe main objit has met tlity of the soisk of releasefects havehe main obj

g are differelopment ag by a testee activities i

g and the t

g? (K2)

test case, t

is that it onlyof the testin

ter test exeng and execrocess andeen compleucting stati

esting can bcan be usedes.

jectives:

level of quision-makin

s involved ilp to prevennd the ident

e different oion and systdefects in t

ective maye requiremftware (withing the systbeen introdctive may b

nt. Dynamictivity that fir ensures this usually te

sting activiti

Page 13 of

sting, test o

consists ofactivities.

ution. Thesuting test casystem unded. Testinganalysis.

e used as ato improve

lity

designing tdefects fro

ification and

bjectives intem testing),e softwaree to confirmnts. In somno intentionm at a giveced during

e to assess

testing cands, analyzet the fix doters test an

es are expla

78

bjective

running test

e activities ises, checkinr test, and fialso include

means for aoth the syst

ests early inbeing intro

resolution o

o account. Fthe main ob

are identifiethat the syscases the

of fixing deftime. Maintevelopmen

system char

show failurs and removs indeed redeveloper

ined in Secti

, i.e., execu

clude planng results, enalizing or cs reviewing

chieving simem being te

the life cyclduced intof issues als

or example,jective may

and can betem works aain objecti

ects), to givenance testit of the chanacteristics s

s that are ces the causolve the faildebug.

on 1.4.


31-M

30minu

ting the soft

ing and conaluating exitompleting clocuments

ilar objectivsted and the

e (verifying tode. Reviehelp to pre

in developbe to causefixed. In

s expected,e of testinginformation

ng often inclges. Duringch as reliab

used by defof the failu

ure. The

nalstingBoard

r-2011

es

are.

rol,

osure

s,

hes ofent

entas

tomayto

udes

ility or

ects.re.


14/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

1.3

TermsExhaust

PrinciA numbguidelin

PrinciplTestingreducesfound, it

PrinciplTestingcases. Iefforts.

PrinciplTo finddevelop

PrinciplTestingmodulesrelease

PrinciplIf the salonger fireviewethe soft

PrinciplTesting idifferentl

PrinciplFindingneeds a



Seven

ive testing

lesr of testings common f

e 1 Testincan show ththe probabilis not a pro

e 2 Exhaueverything (stead of ex

e 3 Early tefects earlyent life cyc

e 4 Defeceffort shall b. A small nuesting, or is

e 5 Pesticme tests arend any new

and reviseare or syst

e 6 Testinis done diffely from an e

e 7 Absenand fixing dnd expectati

rllabus

ualifications Board

Testing

rinciples hor all testing

g shows prt defects ar

ity of undiscf of correct

stive testinll combinatiaustive test

esting, testing actile, and shall

clusteringe focused pmber of moresponsible

ide paradorepeated oefects. To, and newm to find po

g is contexently in diffcommerce

ce-of-errorfects doesns.

Princip

ve been su.

esence of de present, bovered defeess.

g is impossons of inputing, risk ana

ities shall bbe focused

oportionallyules usuallyfor most of t

er and oververcome thind differenttentially mor

dependenrent contextite.

fallacyot help if th

Page 14 of

les (K2)

gested over

efectst cannot prts remainin

ibleand precon

lysis and pri

e started ason defined

to the expecontains mhe operatio

again, evens pesticidetests need te defects.

s. For exam

system bui

78

the past 40

ve that therin the soft

ditions) is norities shoul

early as posbjectives.

ted and latest of the defal failures.

ually the saparadox, teo be written

ple, safety-c

lt is unusabl

years and o

e are no defare but, ev

t feasible ebe used to

sible in the

r observedects discov

e set of test cases neo exercise

ritical softwa

and does


31-M

35 minu

ffer general

ects. Testinn if no defe

cept for trivifocus testin

oftware or

efect densitred during

t cases willd to be regifferent part

re is tested

ot fulfill the

nalstingBoard

r-2011

es

ts are

alg

ystem

ofre-

nolarlys of

users


15/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

1.4

TermsConfirmtest covsummar

BackgThe moalso incland evalThe funo Testo Testo Testo Evalo TestAlthougTailoring

1.4.1

Test plain order

Test constatus, iand objthroughactivitieTest pla

1.4.2

Test antangible

The testo Revi

analo Evalo Iden

beho Desio Ideno Desio Cre

1The deg

system ch

reliability,



Funda

tion testing,rage, test dreport, test

roundt visible partude time toluating result

amental tesplanning ananalysis animplementuating exit cclosure acti

logically sethese main

Test Pla

nning is theto meet the

trol is the ocluding devctives of theut the proje.

nning and c

Test An

lysis and detest conditio

analysis aniewing the tysis reports,uating testatifying and pvior and str

igning and ptifying neceigning the teting bi-direc

ree to which sofaracteristics (e.

r cost) which

rllabus

ualifications Board

ental

re-testing,ata, test exeware

of testing ie spent ons.

t process cod controld designtion and exriteria and rvities

quential, thactivities wi

ning an

ctivity of debjectives a

going activitiations fromproject. Int. Test plan

ntrol tasks

lysis and

sign is the ans and test

design actist basis (suarchitecturility of the t

rioritizing teucture of therioritizing hisary test da

st environmtional trace

tware complies., software co

re defined to re

est Pr

xit criteria, icution, test l

test executiplanning the

nsists of the

cutionporting

activities inhin the cont

Control

fining the od mission.

y of comparthe plan. It irder to contning takes i

re defined i

Design (

ctivity durinases.

vity has theh as requir, design, intst basis ant conditionssoftwareh level testta to suppornt setup anbility betwe

or must complplexity, risk as

flect the importPage 15 of

cess (

ncident, regog, test plan

on. But to btests, desig

following m

the processext of the sy

K1)jectives of t

ing actual prvolves taki

rol testing, tto account t

Chapter 5

1)which gen

following mments, softrface specitest object

based on a

asesthe test coidentifying

n test basis

with a set of ssessment, safe

ance of the soft78

1)

ession testi, test proced

effective aning test ca

ain activities

may overlastem and th

sting and th

ogress agaig actions ne testing ache feedback

of this syllab

ral testing o

jor tasks:are integritications)

alysis of te

ditions andany requireand test ca

takeholder-selty level, securit

ware to its stak

g, test basiure, test pol

d efficient, tes, preparin

:

or take plaproject is u

e specificati

st the plan,cessary totivities shoulfrom monit

us.

bjectives ar

level1 (risk

t items, the

test casesinfrastructu

es

cted softwarey level, desired

eholders.


31-M

35 minu

, test conditicy, test suit

est plans shg for execut

ce concurresually requi

on of test ac

and reportineet the mis

d be monitoring and co

transforme

level), risk

specification

re and tools

nd/or softwareperformance,

nalstingBoard

r-2011

es

ion,, test

ouldion

tly.ed.

tivities

g thesionredtrol

into

,

based


16/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

1.4.3

Test imcombiniexecutioTest imo Finao Dev

harno Creo Verio Verio Exe

plano Log

undo Coo Rep

a dewas

o Repexeof aintrodefe

1.4.4

Evaluati

objectivEvaluatio Cheo Asso Writi

1.4.5

Test clotestwarsoftwarachieve



Test Im

lementationg the test cn, the enviro

lementationlizing, impleeloping andesses andting test suiying that thying and uputing test p

ned sequening the outcr test, test tparing actuorting discrefect in the cexecuted)eating test aution of a tecorrected teduced in uncts (regressi

Evaluati

ng exit criter

s. This sho

ng exit critercking test lossing if mor

ing a test su

Test Clo

ure activitie, facts and nsystem is r, or a maint

rllabus

ualifications Board

lementati

and executises in a panment is se

and executimenting andprioritizing triting autom

tes from thetest enviro

dating bi-dirocedures eieome of testools and tesl results wit

pancies as ide, in speci

ctivities as ast that previst and/or exhanged are

ion testing)

g Exit C

ia is the acti

ld be done f

ia has the fos against th

e tests aremmary repo

sure Acti

s collect datumbers. Teleased, a t

enance rele

on and E

on is the actticular orderup and the

on has the fprioritizing tst procedurated test sctest procedment has bctional trac

ther manuall

execution awareh expected rncidents anfied test dat

result of actusly failed icution of te

as of the sof

iteria and

ity where te

or each test

llowing majoe exit criterieeded or if tt for stakeh

ities (K1)

a from compt closure acst project isse has bee

Page 16 of

ecution (

ivity where tand includitests are ru

llowing majest cases (is, creatingiptsres for efficien set up cability betwy or by usin

d recording

esultsanalyzing t, in the test

ion taken fon order to cts in order ttware or tha

Reportin

st execution

level (see S

r tasks:specified i

he exit critelders

leted test activities occucompleted (

completed

78

K1)est procedurg any other.

or tasks:cluding the

test data an

ent test exeorrectlyeen the test

test execut

the identitie

hem in ordedocument,

r each discrnfirm a fix (o ensure tht defect fixin

g (K1)is assessed

ection 2.2).

test planniia specified

tivities to cor at projector cancelled.

es or scriptsinformation

identificatio, optionally,

ution

basis and tion tools, ac

s and versio

to establishr a mistake

pancy, foronfirmationt defects hag did not un

against the

gshould be c

nsolidate exilestones s

), a mileston


31-M

are specifieneeded for t

of test datapreparing t

st casescording to t

ns of the sof

their causein the way t

xample, re-testing), exve not beenover other

defined

anged

perience,ch as whene has been

nalstingBoard

r-2011

d byest

)st

e

tware

(e.g.,e test

cution

a


17/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

Test cloo Cheo Clo

o Doco Finao Hano Analo Usin



ure activitiecking whiching incident

umenting thlizing and arding over thlyzing lessog the inform

rllabus

ualifications Board

s include thplanned delireports or r

acceptancchiving testtestware to

s learned toation gather

following mverables haising chang

of the systare, the testhe maintedetermine

ed to improv

Page 17 of

ajor tasks:e been delirecords for

mt environmeance organihanges neee test matur

78

eredany that re

nt and the teizationded for futurity

ain open

st infrastruc

e releases


31-M

ure for later

nd projects

nalstingBoard

r-2011

reuse


18/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

1.5

TermsError gu

BackgThe minsoftwarresponsian indecarried

A certaiat findindevelopbe defino Testo Testo Test

teao Test

certiPeopleby manmeets itIdentifyiauthor.in the mpessimiexperienIf errors,testersduring rThe testdefects,defect insave timCommuunwantrelations



The P

essing, inde

roundset to be u

. With the riibility to a teendent viewut at any le

degree of idefects anrs can effici

ed as showns designeds designeds designed) or test sps designedfication by a

nd projectsgement andobjectives.

g failures ds a result, t

anagementm, a criticalce on which

defects or fnd the analviews as w

er and test lprogress anformation ce and mone

ication prod news abohips betwee

rllabus

ualifications Board

ycholo

endence

ed while teht mindsetter is typicaby trainedel of testing

dependencfailures. In

ently find mhere from ly the persoy another py a person(cialists (e.g.y a person(

n external b

are driven bother stakeTherefore, i

ring testingsting is oftf product rieye, attentito base err

ilures are csts, designll as in testi

ader needd risks in an help themlater, and

lems may ot defects. H

n testers an

y of Te

ting and revevelopers

lly done to hnd professi.

e (avoiding tdependenceny defects iw to high:

n(s) who wrerson(s) (e.s) from a diff., usability os) from a diffdy)

y objectives.holders, fort is importan

may be pern seen as aks. Lookingn to detail,r guessing.

ommunicaters and deveg.

ood interpeonstructiveimprove theduce risks.

ccur, particuowever, the

others:

Page 18 of

sting (K

iewing is diffre able to teelp focus effnal testing

he author biis not, how

n their own

te the softw., from theerent organiperformancerent organi

People tenxample, to

t to clearly s

eived as cridestructivefor failures iood commu

d in a constlopers can

rsonal skillsay. For the

ir skills. Def

larly if testere are sever

78

2)

erent from tst their ownort and provesources. In

as) often mver, a replaode. Sever

are under teevelopment

izational groe test speciization or co

to align theind defectstate the obje

ticism againactivity, even a system rnication wit

uctive way,e avoided.

to communiauthor of th

ects found a

s are seen ol ways to i

at used whicode, but side additiondependent t

kes the testcement for fl levels of i

st (low levelteam)

up (e.g., an ilists)

mpany (i.e.,

ir plans withr to confirm

ctives of tes

t the produthough it is

equires curidevelopme

bad feelingshis applies t

ate factual ie software ond fixed duri

nly as messprove com


31-M

25 minu

le developinparation of tl benefits, sesting may

er more effemiliarity, andependenc

of independ

independent

outsourcing

the objectivthat softwa

ting.

t and againvery constrsity, profesnt peers, an

between tho defects fo

nformationr document,ng testing w

engers ofunication a

nalstingBoard

r-2011

es

ghisuch ase

ctivedcan

ence)

test

or

es sete

t thectiveional

d

und

bout

ill

d


19/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

o Starqual

o Co

persfindi

o Try to Con



t with collabity systemsmunicate fi

on who crengso understanfirm that the

rllabus

ualifications Board

ration rathe

dings on th

ted it, for ex

d how the otother perso

r than battle

product in

ample, write

her person fhas under

Page 19 of

s remind e

neutral, fa

objective a

eels and whtood what y

78

veryone of t

t-focused w

d factual in

y they reactou have sai

he common

ay without c

ident report

as they doand vice v


31-M

goal of bett

riticizing the

s and review

rsa

nalstingBoard

r-2011

r


20/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

1.6

Involvecode ofinapprofollowinPUBLIC

CLIENTof their

PRODUand syst

JUDGMjudgmenMANAGethical aPROFEconsisteCOLLEpromote

SELF -professi

Refere1.1.5 Bl1.2 Bei1.3 Bei1.4 Het1.4.5 Bl1.5 Bla



Code

ent in softwethics is necriate use. Rcode of eth

- Certified s

AND EMPLlient and e

CT - Certifieems they te

ENT- Certifit

EMENT - Cpproach to t

SION - Cernt with the p

GUES - Cecooperation

ertified softn and shall

ncesack, 2001, Ker, 1990, Bler, 1990, Hel, 1988

ack, 2001,k, 2001, He

rllabus

ualifications Board

f Ethic

are testingessary, amoecognizing tics:

oftware test

YER - Certployer, con

software tt) meet the

d software t

rtified softwhe manage

tified softwaublic interes

tified softwwith softwa

are testerspromote an

aner, 2002ack, 2001,tzel, 1988,

raig, 2002zel, 1988

nables indivng other reahe ACM and

rs shall act

ified softwaristent with t

sters shallhighest prof

esters shall

are test manent of softw

re testers sht

re testers sre develope

shall particiethical appr

yers, 1979yers, 1979

Page 20 of

iduals to leasons to ensIEEE code

consistently

e testers she public int

nsure that tssional sta

maintain int

agers and lare testing

all advance

all be fair tos

pate in lifeloach to the

78

rn confidentire that the i

of ethics for

with the pub

all act in a mrest

e deliverabdards possi

grity and in

aders shall

the integrity

and suppor

ng learning rractice of th

al and privilnformation iengineers, t

lic interest

anner that i

les they proble

ependence

subscribe to

and reputati

ive of their

egarding the profession


31-M

10 minu

ged informnot put to

he ISTQB st

in the best

ide (on the

in their prof

and promot

on of the pr

olleagues,

practice of

nalstingBoard

r-2011

es

tion. A

ates the

interests

roducts

ssional

e an

fession

nd

their


21/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

2.

CyclLearnThe obj

2.1 SoLO-2.1.1

LO-2.1.

LO-2.1.

2.2 TeLO-2.2.1

2.3 TeLO-2.3.1

LO-2.3.LO-2.3.

LO-2.3.

LO-2.3.

2.4 MaLO-2.4.1

LO-2.4.

LO-2.4.



Testing

(K2)

ing Objectives identi

tware DeExplain tdevelopRecogniof projeRecall c

t LevelsCompartypical twho test

t Types (Comparrelated)RecogniIdentify(K2)Identify

or architDescrib

intenancComparwith resRecogni(K1)

. Describ

rllabus

ualifications Board

Throu

tives fofy what you

elopmenhe relationsent life cyc

ze the fact tt and produaracteristic

K2)the differe

rgets of test, types of d

K2)four softw

by exampleze that functnd describ

nd describ

ecture (K2)the purpos

Testingmaintenan

ect to test tze indicator

the role of

hout t

Testingwill be able t

t Modelship betweenle, by givingat softwaret characteri

s of good te

t levels of ting (e.g., fufects and fa

re test type(K2)ional and stnon-functio

test types

e of confirm

K2)ce testing (tpes, triggerfor mainten

regression t

Page 21 of

e Soft

Througho do followi

(K2)developmeexamples udevelopmestics (K1)ting that ar

sting: majoctional or st

ilures to be i

(functional,

uctural testnal test type

ased on the

tion testing

sting an exis for testingance testin

sting and i

78

are Li

ut the Sg the compl

t, test activising projectt models m

applicable t

objectives,ructural) andentified (K2

non-functio

occur at ans based on

analysis of

and regress

sting systeand amount(modificatio

pact analys

e

oftwareetion of eac

ies and worand productst be adapt

o any life cy

typical objerelated wo

)

nal, structur

y test level (on-function

a software s

ion testing (

) to testingof testing (n, migration

is in mainte


31-M

15 min

ife Cyclh module.

k products itypes (K2)d to the co

cle model (

ts of testing,k products,

l and chang

K1)al requirem

ystems stru

2)

new applic2)and retirem

ance (K2)

nalstingBoard

r-2011

utes

the

text

1)

people

e-

nts

cture

ation

ent)


22/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

2.1

TermsCommeverificati

BackgTestingDifferent

2.1.1

Althougcorresp

The fouro Coo Inteo Systo AccIn practidependiintegratiSoftwardesign d

more te(CMMI)test desi

2.1.2

Iterativeand testiApplicatisystem titeration.which sfirst one.

2.1.3

In any lifo Foro Eaco The

devo Test

devTest levarchitectproduct



Softwa

cial Off-Theon, V-model

roundoes not exidevelopme

V-model

variants ofnding to the

levels usedponent (unitration testinem testingptance testi

ce, a V-modng on the pron testing af

work produocuments a

t levels. Refor Softwaregn) can be

Iterative

-incrementaling a systemion Develophat is produ. An incremeould also b

. Verification

Testing

e cycle modevery develo

test level hanalysis anlopment acters shouldlopment life

ls can be cure. For exainto a syste

rllabus

ualifications Board

re Dev

-Shelf (COT

t in isolatiot life cycle

(Sequent

the V-modelfour develo

in this sylla) testingg

ng

l may haveject and ther compon

cts (such asd code) pro

erences forlife cycle prarried out d

increme

developmein a seriesent (RAD),ed using thnt, added totested. Reand validati

ithin a L

el, there arepment activias test objedesign of t

ivitye involved icycle

mbined or rmple, for th, the purch

lopmen

S), iterative-i

; test activitiodels need

ial Devel

exist, a copment level

us are:

more, fewersoftware pr

nt testing, a

business sduced durin

generic worcesses (IEring the de

tal Devel

t is the prof short devRational Un

ese modelsothers devression teston can be c

ife Cycle

several chaity there is atives specifists for a giv

reviewing

eorganizedintegrationser may pe

Page 22 of

t Model

incremental

ies are relatdifferent ap

pment M

mon type o.

or differentoduct. For end system in

enarios or ug developm

products inE/IEC 122elopment of

pment M

ess of estalopment cyified Procesmay be testloped previing is increarried out on

odel (K

racteristicscorrespondic to that leven test level

ocuments a

epending oof a Commrform integr

78

s (K2)

developmen

d to softwaproaches to

del) (K2)

V-model us

levels of dexample, thetegration te

se cases, rent are often

clude Capa7). Verificatthe softwar

odels (K2

lishing requiles. Exampl

s (RUP) andd at severalusly, formssingly importeach incre

)

f good testing testing alshould begi

s soon as d

n the naturercial Off-Thtion testing

t model, vali

e developmtesting.

es four test

elopment ae may be cting after sy

quirementsthe basis of

ility Maturition and vali

work prod

)rements, dees are: protagile develtest levels

a growing pant on all itent.

g:tivity

n during the

afts are ava

of the proje-Shelf (CO

at the syste


31-M

20 minu

dation,

ent activities

levels,

d testing,mponentstem testing

specificationtesting in o

Model Inteation (and ects.

signing, builtyping, Rappment moduring eachrtial systemrations after

correspondi

ilable in the

t or the systS) softwarelevel (e.g.,

nalstingBoard

r-2011

es

.

.

s,e or

rationarly

ingidels. A

,the

ng

em


23/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

integrati(function



on to the infral and/or no

rllabus

ualifications Board

astructure an-functional,

nd other sysand user a

Page 23 of

tems, or sysd/or operati

78

tem deployonal testing)

ent) and ac.


31-M

ceptance te

nalstingBoard

r-2011

ting


24/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

2.2

TermsAlpha teintegratitest envi

BackgFor eacproduct(being teand speTesting

2.2.1

Test bao Coo Deto Cod

Typical to Coo Proo Dato Dat

Componverifies ttestable.developComponsuch asstructurspecificTypicalldevelop

testing uthey are

One apcalled abased oexecutin



Test L

sting, beta ton, integratironment, te

roundof the test l

s) being refsted), typicalcific approac

a systems c

Compon

is:ponent requiled designe

est objects:ponentsramsconversionbase modul

ent testing (he functioniIt may be dent life cyc

ent testingresource-bel testing (e.tion of the c

, componenent enviro

sually involvfound, with

roach to cotest-first apn cycles of dg the compo

rllabus

ualifications Board

vels (K

sting, compn testing, nt level, test-

evels, the forenced for ddefects anhes and res

onfiguration

ent Testi

irements

/ migrationes

also knowng of, softwa

one in isolatile and the s

ay include thavior (e.g.,., decisionomponent, t

t testing occment, such

es the progut formally

ponent testroach or teseveloping tenent tests c

2)

onent testinn-functional

driven devel

llowing caneriving testfailures to

ponsibilities.

data shall b

g (K2)

rograms

s unit, modre modules,ion from thestem. Stub

esting of fusearching foverage). T

he software

urs with accas a unit tes

ammer whoanaging th

ing is to pret-driven devst cases, thorrecting an

Page 24 of

, driver, fiell requiremenopment, us

be identifiedases (i.e., te found, tes

considere

ule or progrprograms, orest of the s, drivers an

ctionality anr memory l

est cases ardesign or th

ess to the ct framework

wrote the cse defects.

pare and auelopment. Tn building aissues and

78

testing, fut, robustnesr acceptanc

: the generice test basis

t harness re

during test

m testing) sbjects, clasystem, depe

simulators

d specific naks) or robue derived fro

data mode

de being teor debuggin

de. Defects

omate testis approach

nd integratiniterating unt

ctional requs testing, st

testing

objectives,), the test oquirements

planning,

earches fores, etc., thanding on thmay be use

n-functionalstness testim work prol.

ted and witg tool. In pr

are typicall

ases beforeis highly iteg small piecil they pass.


31-M

40 minu

irement,b, system t

the workject (i.e., wnd tool sup

efects in, at are separacontext of t.

characteristg, as well aucts such a

the supporactice, com

fixed as so

coding. Thirative and ises of code,

nalstingBoard

r-2011

es

sting,

at isport,

ndtelyhe

ics,ss a

of aonent

n as

is

nd


25/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

2.2.2

Test bao Softo Arco Woro Use

Typical to Subo Dato Infro Inteo SystIntegratisystem,

There mvarying1. Co

afte2. Syst

hardorgBusiissu

The grecomponSystembottom-or compbe increTestingtesting

At eachare intethe mod

testing.

Ideally, ttests arorder re



Integrati

is:are and sy

itecturekflowscases

est objects:systemsbase implestructurefacesem configur

on testing tesuch as the

ay be moreize as folloponent intecomponent

em integratiware and sonization maness proceses may be si

ter the scoent or syste

tic integratip), function

onents. In omental rathe

of specific ns well as fu

stage of interating moduules, not the

oth functio

esters shoulplanned beuired for m

rllabus

ualifications Board

on Testin

stem design

entation

ation and co

sts interfaceoperating s

han one levs:ration testintesting

on testing teftware andcontrol onl

ses implemignificant.

e of integrat, which ma

n strategiesl tasks, trander to easer than big b

n-functionalctional testi

gration, testle A with mfunctionalit

al and struc

d understanfore compost efficient t

g (K2)

nfiguration d

s between cstem, file sy

el of integrat

g tests the i

sts the interay be donone side of

nted as wo

ion, the morlead to inc

may be bassaction profault isolatioang.

l characterisg.

ers concentrdule B theyof the indivi

tural approa

d the architeents or systesting.

Page 25 of

ata

omponents,stem and h

ion testing

teractions

ctions betwafter systethe interfac

kflows may

e difficult iteased risk

ed on the sessing sequn and detect

ics (e.g., pe

ate solely oare interestidual modul

ches may b

cture and inems are buil

78

interactionsrdware, and

nd it may b

etween soft

een differenttesting. In

e. This mighinvolve a se

ecomes to ind addition

stem architences, or sodefects earl

rformance)

the integratd in testingas that wa

used.

luence intet, those com

with differeninterfaces

carried out

ware compo

systems orthis case, tht be consideies of syste

olate defecl time for tr

cture (suchme other asy, integratio

ay be inclu

ion itself. Fthe commundone durin

ration plannponents can


31-M

t parts of aetween syst

on test obje

nents and is

betweene developinred as a riss. Cross-pl

s to a specifubleshootin

as top-downpect of then should nor

ded in integr

r example, iication betwcomponen

ing. If integrbe built in t

nalstingBoard

r-2011

ems.

cts of

done

.atform

icg.

andystemmally

ation

f theyeen

atione


26/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

2.2.3

Test bao Systo Useo Funo Risk

Typical to Systo SystSystembe clearlIn systeenvironbeing foSystemprocessinteractiSystemdata qurequirespecificdecisionbased trespect

An inde

2.2.4

Test bao Useo Systo Useo Busio Risk

Typical to Busio Opeo Useo Foro Repo ConAcceptastakeholThe goaspecificaccepta



System

is:em and softcasestional specianalysis re

est objects:em, user anem configur

esting is coly addressed

testing, thent as muc

und in testin

esting mays, use casens with the

esting shoulity charactents. Systetion-based (table may bchniques (wo a structur

endent test

Accepta

is:r requiremenem requirecasesness procesanalysis re

est objects:

ness procesrational andr proceduress

ortsfiguration da

nce testing iders may b

l in acceptanon-functionce testing.

rllabus

ualifications Board

esting (

are require

ficationorts

d operationation and co

cerned within the Mast

test enviroh as possibl.

include tests, or other hoperating s

ld investigatristics. Test

testing ofblack-box) te created fohite-box) ml element, s

team often

ce Testi

tsents

sesorts

ses on fullymaintenanc

ta

often the rinvolved as

ce testing ial charactericceptance

2)

ment specifi

anualsnfiguration d

the behavier and/or Le

nment shoulin order to

based on riigh level texstem, and s

functionalrs also neeunctional reechniques fr combinatioy then be uuch as men

arries out s

g (K2)

integrated se processes

sponsibilitywell.

to establishistics of thetesting may

Page 26 of

cation

ata

r of a wholevel Test Pla

d corresponminimize th

sks and/or odescriptionstem resou

nd non-funto deal wit

quirementsr the aspectns of effectsed to assesstructure o

stem testin

stem

of the custo

confidenceystem. Find

assess the

78

system/profor that tes

to the finalrisk of envi

n requiremes or modelsrces.

tional requih incomplettarts by usiof the systedescribed is the thorour web page

.

mers or use

in the systeing defects iystems rea

uct. The tet level.

target or prronment-sp

nts specificof system b

ements of tor undocug the most

m to be testbusiness r

ghness of thavigation (

s of a syste

, parts of ts not the miness for d


31-M

ting scope

ductioncific failures

tions, businhavior,

e system, aented

appropriateed. For exales. Structue testing witee Chapter

; other

e system orin focus inployment a

nalstingBoard

r-2011

hall

not

ss

nd

ple, are-h4).

d


27/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

use, althintegratiAcceptao A Co Acco AccTypical fUser acTypicallOperatiThe acco Test

o Diso Useo Maio Dato PeriContraContractcustom-contract.to, such

Alpha a

Developcustomis perforfield-testOrganiztesting f



ough it is noon test may

nce testingTS softwarptance testiptance testi

orms of acc

ceptance teverifies the

nal (accepeptance of ting of backu

ster recoverr managemtenance tasload and m

odic checks

t and regulacceptanceeveloped s

. Regulationas governm

nd beta (or

ers of markrs in their mmed at the ding, is perfo

tions may ur systems t

rllabus

ualifications Board

t necessarilcome after t

ay occur ate product mng of the usng of a new

ptance testi

stingfitness for u

ance) testie system bp/restore

yntksigration taskof security v

tion acceptesting is pftware. Acc

acceptanceent, legal or

field) testin

t, or COTS,arket beforeeveloping omed by cus

se other terat are teste

the final lee acceptan

various timy be accept

ability of a cfunctional e

ing include t

se of the sy

gthe system

sulnerabilitie

tance testinrformed ag

eptance crittesting is pesafety regul

g

software oftthe softwarganizationstomers or p

s as well,d before an

Page 27 of

el of testingce test for a

s in the lifeance testedmponent mhancement

e following:

tem by busi

administrat

ginst a contrria shouldrformed agtions.

en want to gproduct issite but nottential cust

uch as factoafter being

78

. For exampsystem.

cycle, for exwhen it is inay be donemay come

ness users.

rs, includin

acts accepte defined winst any reg

et feedbackut up for saby the devemers at thei

ry acceptanmoved to a

le, a large-s

ample:stalled or inturing compefore syste

:

nce criteriaen the partilations that

from potentile commerciloping team.r own locati

ce testing acustomers


31-M

ale system

egratedonent testinm testing

for producines agree tomust be ad

al or existinally. Alpha tBeta testinns.

d site acceite.

nalstingBoard

r-2011

gtheered

sting, or

tance


28/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

2.3

TermsBlack-bmaintainstress te

BackgA groupon a spA test tyo A fuo

A no Theo Cha

for uA modelmodel osecurityor a plai

2.3.1

The funproduct

be undoFunctiontesters)tests for

SpecificfunctionbehavioA type odetectiointeropespecifie

2.3.2Testin

Non-funtesting,testing oNon-funthe testsvaryingquality



Test T

x testing, coability testinsting, struct

roundof test activicific reason

pe is focusenction to be

n-functionalstructure ornge related,nintended c

of the softwr menu structhreat moden language

Testing

tions that asuch as a r

cumented. T

al tests areand their intcomponent

tion-basedlity of the sof the soft

f functional tof threats,

rability testincomponent

Testing) (K2)

ctional testinsability testf how the

ctional testinrequired tocale, suchodel such a

rllabus

ualifications Board

pes (K

de coveragg, performaral testing,

ties can beor target for

on a particperformed b

quality chararchitecturei.e., confirmihanges (reg

are may beture model),ling), and fupecification

f Functi

system, subequirements

he function

based on furoperabilitymay be ba

echniquesftware or sare (black-b

esting, secusuch as virug, evaluates or system

f Non-fu

g includes,ing, maintaiystem work

g may be pmeasure chs responses the one d

)

, functionalce testing,

usability test

imed at veritesting.

ular test objy the softwa

acteristic, suof the softwing that deferession testi

eveloped anon-functioctional testi.

n (Functi

system or cspecificatio

are what t

ctions and fwith specified on a co

ay be usedstem (see Cox testing).

rity testing, ises, from mthe capabili.

ctional

ut is not limability testin

s.

rformed ataracteristicstimes for pefined in Sof

Page 28 of

testing, inteortability teing, white-b

fying the sof

ctive, whichre

ch as reliabiare or systects have beg)

nd/or used ial testing (

ng (e.g., a p

onal Testi

mponent arn, use case

he system d

eatures (desystems, aponent spe

to derive tehapter 4). F

nvestigateslicious outsty of the sof

oftware

ited to, perfog, reliability

ll test levelsof systemsrformance ttware Engin

78

operability tting, reliabilix testing

tware syste

could be a

ility or usabiln fixed (con

structural t.g., performrocess flow

ng) (K2)

e to perform, or a functi

oes.

cribed in dod may be p

cification).

st conditionsunctional te

he functioniders. Anothware produ

haracteri

rmance testtesting and

. The term nnd softwarsting. Theseering Sof

sting, load tty testing, s

(or a part

y of the foll

ity

firmation te

esting (e.g.,ance model,

odel, a sta

may be desnal specific

cuments orerformed at

and test cating consid

(e.g., a firer type of fut to interact

tics (No

ing, load tesortability te

on-functionthat can betests can bware Produ


31-M

40 minu

esting,curity testin

f a system)

wing:

ting) and lo

a control flousability m

te transition

cribed in wotion, or the

understoodall test level

es from thers the exter

all) relatingctional testiwith one or

-function

ting, stressting. It is th

l testing desquantified o

e referencect Quality (I

nalstingBoard

r-2011

es

g,

based

king

delmodel

rkmay

y the(e.g.,

al

tong,more

al

cribesn ato aO


29/78

CertifFounda

Version Internation

9126). Nuses bla

2.3.3Structurused aftthrough

Coveragpercentto test thChapter

At all tebe usedtesting

Structurtesting l

2.3.4

After a ddefect hdefect) iRegressdiscover

either inperformbased oTests shtesting.

Regressstructurregressi



on-functionck-box test

Testingl (white-box

er specificatiassessment

e is the extege of the iteose items th4.

t levels, butto measureay be base

l testing apvels (e.g., t

Testing

efect is deteas been sucs a develop

ion testing iany defects

the softward when the

n the risk of

ould be rep

ion testingl testing. Re

on testing is

rllabus

ualifications Board

l testing coesign techn

f Softwa) testing maon-based teof coverage

nt that a strms being coat were mis

especially ithe code co

on the arc

roaches cabusiness

elated t

cted and fixessfully reent activity,

the repeatintroduced

being testesoftware, ornot finding d

atable if the

ay be perfogression tea strong ca

siders the eiques to acc

e Structuy be performchniques, inof a type of

cture has bvered. If cosed to incre

componenterage of elitecture of t

n also be apodels or m

Change

d, the softwoved. This inot a testin

d testing ofor uncovere

d, or in anotits environefects in sof

y are to be

rmed at all tt suites aredidate for a

Page 29 of

xternal behomplish that

re/Archited at all tesorder to helstructure.

en exerciserage is notse coverag

testing andments, suc

he system,

plied at systnu structur

: Re-testi

are shoulds called con

activity.

an already tas a result

her relatedent, is chantware that w

sed for conf

st levels, arun many titomation.

78

vior of the s.

cture (Stlevels. Stru

p measure t

d by a test100%, then. Coverage

componentas stateme

uch as a cal

em, system is).

ng and R

e re-testedfirmation. D

sted prograof the chan

r unrelatedged. The extas working

irmation test

d includes fes and gen

oftware and

uctural Tctural technie thorough

uite, expresmore teststechniques

integration tnts or decisiling hierarc

ntegration o

gression

o confirm thbugging (lo

m, after moe(s). These

oftware coent of regrereviously.

ing and to a

unctional, nrally evolve

InternatioS

Documents

International Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB) Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus 2011