Intergenerational mobility and institutional change .Intergenerational mobility and institutional

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Text of Intergenerational mobility and institutional change .Intergenerational mobility and institutional

  • Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

    ScienceDirect

    Explorations in Economic History xx (2015) xxxxxx

    YEXEH-01169; No of Pages 30

    www.elsevier.com/locate/eeh

    Intergenerational mobility and institutional change in20th century China

    Yuyu Chena, Suresh Naidub,d, Tinghua Yub, Noam Yuchtmanc,d,

    a Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Chinab Columbia University, United States

    c Haas School of Business, UC-Berkeley, United Statesd NBER, United States

    Received 10 December 2014

    Abstract

    We examine the persistence of socioeconomic status across generations, measured by educational attainment, among urbanChinese born between 1930 and 1985. The persistence of status follows a pronounced, robust U-shaped pattern, falling amongcohorts educated following the Communist revolution of 1949, and rising among cohorts educated following the reforms of the late1970s. The pattern is not driven by the Cultural Revolution or by changing associations between education and income. The U-shape also appears in complementary datasets covering rural China. We discuss the policies behind a non-monotonic relationshipbetween educational expansion and social mobility across the institutional regimes we study. 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Social mobility; China; Economic transition; Educational policyJEL classification: J62; N35; P36; I24; I28

    1. Introduction

    Economists are increasingly interested in documentinglong-run trends in economic inequality and social mobility,which both shed light on the consequences of economicand political changes across time, and also informcontemporary social policy by placing current outcomes

    Corresponding author at: UC-Berkeley, Haas School of Business,545 Student Services Building, 1900, Berkeley, CA 94720, UnitedStates.

    E-mail addresses: chenyuyu@gsm.pku.edu.cn (Y. Chen),sn2430@columbia.edu (S. Naidu), ty2229@columbia.edu (T. Yu),yuchtman@haas.berkeley.edu (N. Yuchtman).

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2015.07.0010014-4983 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Please cite this article as: Chen, Y., et al., Intergenerational mobility and i(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2015.07.001

    in historical perspective.1 Recent work by Lee and Solon(2009), Chetty et al. (2014), and Clark (2014)suggests that rates of social mobility may be bothlow and stubbornly stable across time and acrosscountries, which would suggest that social andeconomic policies aimed at increasing mobility mayhave little effect, and that current inequality willinevitably be replicated in future generations.2 Other

    1 See, for example, Goldin and Margo (1992), Katz and Murphy(1992), Piketty and Saez (2003), Clark (2014), and Chetty et al. (2014).2 Piketty (2014) makes a related argument, that in the absence of

    negative shocks to the stock of wealth (such as wars), relatively highrates of return to capital tend to produce a class of individuals whoaccumulate ever larger shares of wealth over time.

    nstitutional change in 20th century China, Explor. Econ. Hist.

    mailto:mailto:mailto:mailto:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2015.07.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2015.07.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2015.07.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2015.07.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2015.07.001Imprint logoJournal logo

  • 5 The next several decades saw both economic growth andhumanitarian disasters such as the failed Great Leap Forward andthe associated famine (Meng et al., 2014), and then the CulturalRevolution. The effects of radical institutional change on economicoutcomes are studied by Acemoglu et al. (2011), among others.6 Nybom and Stuhler (2014) show that variation in social mobility

    across time need not result from contemporaneous policy changes, butrather may result from echoes of earlier changes in the distributionof education. Importantly, our findings of increased social mobility inthe Maoist era, followed by reduced mobility in the Reform era, arelikely not produced by the sort of non-monotonic effects ofeducational expansion across generations studied by Nybom and

    2 Y. Chen et al. / Explorations in Economic History xx (2015) xxxxxx

    work suggests that social mobility might vary quitesignificantly across time and place (see, for example,Hertz et al., 2007, and Long and Ferrie, 2014).

    In this paper, we use a retrospective, representativesurvey of urban Chinese households (the Chinese UrbanHousehold Education and Employment Survey, 2004, orUHS) to examine social mobility among cohorts ofChinese children born between 1930 and 1985. We findthat the intergenerational transmission of status follows apronounced and robust U-shaped pattern over the 20thcentury. While we cannot identify specific causal factorsbehind the U-shaped pattern of status persistence, there isa striking match between the timing of changes in socialmobility and changes in Chinese political, economic, andeducational institutions. Cohorts educated under theMaoist regime (born between the mid-1940s and themid-1960s, and educated between the 1950s and the1970s) experienced significantly greater social mobility(significantly lower status persistence) than individualseducated in Republican China (born in the 1930s and early1940s). Then, social nobility fell (status persistenceincreased) among cohorts educated under the post-Mao,Reform regime of Deng Xiaoping (cohorts born in themid-1960s or later, educated in the middle of the 1970sand later).3 We find this pattern not only among arepresentative sample of urban Chinese, but also incomplementary data sources on rural China (the WorldBank's Living Standards Measurement Surveys used byHertz et al., 2007, and the China Health and RetirementLongitudinal Study).

    In Fig. 1, we present raw data illustrating our basicfindings, plotting children's educational attainmentourmeasure of socioeconomic statusagainst father's edu-cational attainment for the three institutional regimes westudy (Pre-Mao, Mao, and Post-Mao).4 In theleft-hand panel of Fig. 1, educational attainment is simplymeasured as years of schooling, and one can see that theslope of the relationship between fathers' and children'sschooling flattens as one moves from the Pre-Mao to theMao-era cohorts, then steepens again moving from theMao-era cohorts to the post-Mao cohorts. In theright-hand panel, we use the percentile rank of a child's

    3 The economic consequences of China's reforms have beenwidely discussed (for example, Naughton, 1995; Brandt and Rawski,2008). Note that political institutions, too, have evolved in recentdecadessee Martinez-Bravo et al. (2013).4 We use fathers' education as an indicator of parents' status

    because women's access to education varied significantly across timeand space, thus making it a noisier measure of parental status (for adiscussion of changes in women's education across time, see Lavelyet al., 1990). Including mother's education level as an input in ourmeasure of parents' status does not affect our results, however.

    Please cite this article as: Chen, Y., et al., Intergenerational mobility and i(2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2015.07.001

    education within their five-year birth cohort (a rank of100 indicates the highest education level in the cohort) asa measure of children's education and fathers' educationrank among fathers of children in that cohort as a measureof fathers' educational attainment. Using this alternativemeasure of educational status, one sees the same pattern:fathers' education has a much larger effect on children'seducation among the Pre-Mao and post-Mao cohorts thanamong the Mao-era cohorts.

    Our findings suggest that social mobility is notimmutable, although meaningfully altering the persis-tence of socioeconomic status may require fundamentalinstitutional and policy changes. While our primary focusis on documenting the broad pattern of social mobility inChina over the 20th century (rather than isolating andidentifying particular causal mechanisms), historicalevidence suggests that differences in educational policymay be an important determinant of the social mobilitypatterns we observe. Shortly after taking power, in 1949,the Chinese Communist Party implemented a radicalprogram in the 1950s aimed at increasing economicequality, and increasing the poor's access to education.5

    Our findings suggest that schooling expansion that isexplicitly aimed at improving access to mass educationcan generate increased social mobility, though we cannotidentify here the relative importance of schoolingexpansion and other policy changes.6

    We also find evidence that expansionary educationalpolicies need not be equalizing: educational attainmentand expenditures continued to grow in the Reform era,as social mobility fell.7 We present qualitative and

    Stuhler (2014). The non-monotonicity in their work comes fromhigher correlations between parents' endowments and incomes when amore meritocratic education system is implemented for the parents'generation. In our setting, the expansion of schooling in the Maoist erawas explicitly notmeritocraticit was equalizing, using affirmativeaction (we discuss this in detail in Section 3). Thus, if anything, onewould expect a lower correlation between incomes and ability amongthe parents of children born in the Reform era, which would tend toproduce greater social mobility in the Reform era, not less.7 Parman (2011) finds that educational expansion in the United

    States was associated with reduced social mobility across the 20thcentury.

    nstitutional change in 20th century China, Explor. Econ. Hist.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2015.07.001

  • 9 Corak (2013) shows that, within OECD countries, cross-sectionalinequality is correlated with intergenerational persistence of income,

    Fig. 1.