Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER Northern Ontario Multimodal Transportation Strategy
Intercommunity Passenger Transportation
Consulting Team: IBI Group | Hemson Consulting Ltd. November 2016
Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016
This draft technical backgrounder was prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines by the consultant team to assist the ministries in developing the Northern Ontario Multimodal Transportation Strategy. The opinions and ideas in this backgrounder are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the ministries or of the Government of Ontario.
Cette publication hautement spécialisée Intercommunity Passenger Transportation Technical Backgrounder n'est disponible qu'en anglais conformément au Règlement 671/92, selon lequel il n’est pas obligatoire de la traduire en vertu de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir des renseignements en français, veuillez communiquer avec le Ministère des Transports au 1-844-505-5006 ou par courriel à [email protected].
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Table of Contents
November 2016 i
1 Overview .................................................................................................... 5
2 Jurisdiction, Policies and Programs...................................................... 12
2.1 Passenger Rail ............................................................................... 12
VIA Rail ............................................................................................... 12
Ontario Northland Transportation Commission ................................... 12
Agawa Canyon Excursion Train .......................................................... 12
2.2 Intercommunity Bus ........................................................................ 13
Provincial Role .................................................................................... 13
2.3 Community Transportation Services ............................................... 15
Provincial Community Transportation Pilot Grant Program ................. 16
2.4 Climate Change Considerations ..................................................... 17
3 Potential Intercommunity Passenger Transportation Ridership Markets ..................................................................................................... 20
3.1 Passenger Vehicle Traffic ............................................................... 20
3.2 Travel Grant Origins and Destinations ............................................ 24
3.3 Locations of Common Intercommunity Transportation Destinations .................................................................................... 29
4 Rail Passenger Services ......................................................................... 31
4.1 Current Service Provision and Ridership ........................................ 31
The VIA Transcontinental Train (“The Canadian”) .............................. 31
The “Northern Ontario” VIA Train ........................................................ 32
The Polar Bear Express ...................................................................... 32
4.2 Recent Rail Service Changes and Discontinuances ....................... 32
VIA Rail ............................................................................................... 32
Ontario Northland Services ................................................................. 35
Algoma Central Rail Services ............................................................. 35
4.3 Past Trends in Passenger Rail Ridership ....................................... 36
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Table of Contents (continued)
November 2016 ii
5 Intercommunity Bus Services ................................................................ 38
5.1 Scheduled Intercommunity Bus Operators and Services ................ 38
Inter-Regional Operators .................................................................... 39
Regional Operators ............................................................................. 40
Fares 41
5.2 Recent Scheduled Service Reductions and Discontinuances ........ 42
5.3 Ridership on Scheduled Services ................................................... 45
Travel Purposes .................................................................................. 45
5.4 Bus Stops and Terminals ................................................................ 46
5.5 Vehicle Types ................................................................................. 46
5.6 Charter Bus Services ...................................................................... 47
6 Community Transportation Services ..................................................... 48
6.1 Sample Community-Based Services .............................................. 48
6.2 Issues and Challenges ................................................................... 50
7 Outlooks for Intercommunity Passenger Transportation in Northern Ontario...................................................................................................... 51
7.1 Population Forecasts ...................................................................... 51
7.2 Passenger Rail ............................................................................... 51
7.3 Intercommunity Bus ........................................................................ 52
7.4 Community Services ....................................................................... 53
8 Issues and Opportunities ....................................................................... 54
8.1 Intercommunity Passenger Transportation — General ................... 54
8.2 Rail Passenger Services ................................................................. 55
Issues ................................................................................................. 55
Opportunities ...................................................................................... 56
8.3 Intercommunity Bus ........................................................................ 57
Issues ................................................................................................. 57
Opportunities ...................................................................................... 60
8.4 Community Transportation Services ............................................... 61
Issues ................................................................................................. 61
Opportunities ...................................................................................... 62
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Table of Contents (continued)
November 2016 iii
References ....................................................................................................... 63
Alternate Text for Exhibits .............................................................................. 64
Appendix A: List of Community Transportation Services ............................ 1
Northwestern Ontario ........................................................................................ 1
Northeastern Ontario ......................................................................................... 3
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1.1: Passenger Rail Services in Northern Ontario ......................... 7
Exhibit 1.2: Scheduled Intercommunity Bus Services in Northern Ontario 8
Exhibit 1.3: Summary of Scheduled Commercial Intercommunity Bus Service Characteristics in Northern Ontario ................................. 9
Exhibit 1.4: Scheduled Air Passenger Services in Northern Ontario ....... 11
Exhibit 2.1: Indicative Comparison of Energy Use per Passenger-Kilometre by Travel Mode .......................................................... 18
Exhibit 2.2: Indicative Comparison of Carbon Dioxide-Equivalent Emissions per Passenger-Kilometre by Travel Mode ................ 18
Exhibit 3.1: Flows of Passenger Vehicles using the Northern Ontario Highway Network, 2011 and 2041 ............................................. 22
Exhibit 3.2: Travel Grant Recipient Home Community/Municipality Locations, March 2014 to April 2015 .......................................... 25
Exhibit 3.3: Travel Grant Recipient Service Locations, March 2014 to April 2015 ........................................................................................... 26
Exhibit 3.4: Northern Ontario Travel Grant Service Locations by Recipient Home Location, March 2014 to April 2015 ................................. 27
Exhibit 3.5: Percentages of Northern Ontario Travel Grant Recipients by Service Location: March 2014 to April 2015............................... 28
Exhibit 3.6: Bus and Taxi Connections to Post-Secondary Institutions and Health Care Services ................................................................. 30
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
Table of Contents (continued)
November 2016 iv
Exhibit 4.1: VIA Rail Boardings by Station for “The Canadian” Transcontinental Line by Destination Zone, 2015 ...................... 33
Exhibit 4.2: VIA Rail Boardings by Station for “Northern Ontario” Line, 2015 ........................................................................................... 34
Exhibit 4.3: VIA “The Canadian” Trips to/from Northern Ontario, 2009 – 2015 ........................................................................................... 37
Exhibit 4.4: VIA "Northern Ontario" Boardings, 2009 – 2015 ................... 37
Exhibit 5.1: Adult Fare Comparison for Selected Origin-Destination Pairs by Mode ..................................................................................... 41
Exhibit 5.2: Northern Ontario Bus Service Levels, 2000 and 2016 .......... 43
Exhibit 5.3: Recent Scheduled Intercommunity Bus Service Reductions and Discontinuances .................................................................. 44
Exhibit 5.4: Traditional Full-Size Coach Example: Ontario Northland ...... 47
Exhibit 8.1: Communities by Select Highway Corridor without Scheduled Intercommunity Bus Service ...................................................... 59
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 5
1 Overview
In Northern Ontario, as in other jurisdictions, a viable network of intercommunity
passenger transportation options is an essential piece of the multimodal system.
It is, in fact, vital to the wellbeing of many individuals. Many residents in
communities of all sizes are dependent upon such transportation to access
essential social services (primarily health and education) and activities located in
larger centres. Intercommunity passenger transportation also provides an option
that is potentially safer, more convenient, more economical, and more
environmentally sustainable than driving a personal vehicle between
communities. However, providing intercommunity transportation in Northern
Ontario is especially challenging, given the long distances, severe weather
conditions, low population densities and the need for enhanced coordination
among providers.
The purpose of this backgrounder is to describe intercommunity ground
passenger services that are available in Northern Ontario, including existing
conditions and historic trends, outlooks, issues and opportunities. The term
“intercommunity” is used to mean travel between cities, municipalities, or
settlements of varying sizes.
Intercommunity passenger transportation in Northern Ontario includes four
primary types:
Rail passenger services: These rail transportation services areprovided to the public for travel along a rail line between rail stations for a fare. A map of Northern Ontario rail passenger services indicating service frequencies is shown in Exhibit 1.1.
Commercial intercommunity bus services: These are public services provided by commercial carriers along a defined route on highways and other roads between cities and communities for a fare.
A map of Northern Ontario bus passenger services is shown in Exhibit 1.2, and key bus service characteristics are summarized in Exhibit 1.3.
Community transportation services: These are transportation services that are often provided on a smaller scale (e.g. by van) and cover shorter distances than commercial intercommunity bus services, and often rely on volunteer staff. They are typically not fully public, but targeted to a certain market, such as health-care trips, seniors or Indigenous groups. A listing of over 150 services of this type in Northern Ontario is provided in Appendix A.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 6
Scheduled air passenger travel: Where available, scheduled air passenger services between Northern Ontario’s 67 public national, municipal, and remote airports are in competition with available ground-based intercommunity passenger transportation. This is especially true as lower-cost carriers have expanded their services in Northern Ontario. Some communities have neither ground-based scheduled service nor scheduled air transportation services (e.g. Chapleau and Manitoulin); many communities with municipal airports have both ground and air transportation services, and some have only one or the other (e.g. Red Lake has scheduled air transportation, but no scheduled ground-based transportation). Scheduled passenger flights in Northern Ontario are shown in Exhibit 1.4 for context and for comparison to ground intercommunity transportation options. This technical backgrounder focusses on ground-based passenger services, as noted above. Air passenger services are described in detail in separate Municipal Airports and Remote Airports technical backgrounders.
In addition to the above, a number of other small-scale services are used to
transport individuals and groups between communities, including carpooling and
taxis.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 7
Exhibit 1.1: Passenger Rail Services in Northern Ontario
Note: Sault Ste.-Marie Agawa Canyon service is offered seasonally as well. Services are current as of August 2016
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 8
Exhibit 1.2: Scheduled Intercommunity Bus Services in Northern Ontario
Note: Schedules can change on a regular basis. Effective August 17, 2016, Caribou Coach temporarily suspended scheduled service between Thunder Bay and Longlac.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 9
Exhibit 1.3: Summary of Scheduled Commercial Intercommunity Bus Service Characteristics in Northern Ontario
Service
Approx. Adult Fare, Full Trip
Frequency per Direction Route Operation Notes Fare Notes
Greyhound Canada
Sudbury-Winnipeg $240 1/day Hwy 17 Reservation-based system Senior, student and child fares Discounts: advance-purchase,
web, group rates Refundable fares Other adult fares:
$250 Toronto-Winnipeg $250 Ottawa-Winnipeg
Toronto-Sudbury $80 9/week Hwy 400, Hwy 69
Two trips on Fri/Sun; no local stops
Ottawa-Sudbury $80 1/day Hwy 17
Ontario Northland
Toronto-North Bay $80 4/day Hwy 11 One express trip, extra express trips on Fri/Sun
Reservation-based system Senior, student and child fares Discounts: advance-purchase,
group, military, family and medical rates
Refundable fares Other adult fares:
$140 Toronto-Timmins $200 Toronto-Hearst
North Bay-Matheson $70 2/day Hwy 11
Matheson-Cochrane $20 1/day Hwy 11
Matheson-Timmins $15 3/day Hwy 101
Toronto-Sudbury $80 3/day Hwy 400, Hwy
69 One express trip
Sudbury-Timmins $60 1/day Hwy 144, Hwy
101
Timmins-Cochrane $20 2/day Hwy 655 No local stops
Cochrane-Kapuskasing
$25 1/day Hwy 11
Kapuskasing-Hearst $20 3/week Hwy 11 Mon/Wed/Fri
Sudbury-North Bay $28 6/week Hwy 17 Mon/Thu/Fri/Sat/Sun
North Bay-Sudbury $100 3/week Hwy 17 Thu/Fri/Sun
Autobus Maheux
North Bay-Rouyn-Noranda
$65 1/day Hwy 63, QC 101 Fixed-price fares Discounts: return trips $130
Continued on next page.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 10
Exhibit 1.3: Summary of Scheduled Commercial Intercommunity Bus Service Characteristics in Northern Ontario
(continued)
Service
Approx. Adult Fare, Full Trip
Frequency per Direction Route Operation Notes Fare Notes
Caribou Coach Lines
Thunder Bay-Fort Frances
$65 3/week Hwy 11 Tue/Fri/Sun Fixed-price fares Senior, student and child fares Discounts: advance-purchase,
group, military, family and medical rates
Thunder Bay-Longlac (“Temporarily suspended” as of August 17, 2016)
$60 5/week Hwy 11 East: Sun/Tue/Wed/Thu/Fri West: Mon/Wed/Thu/Fri/Sat
Kasper
Thunder Bay-Sioux Lookout
$75 5/week Hwy 17, Hwy 72 Mon-Fri Fixed-price fares Discounts: return trips $130
Thunder Bay – Longlac
$65 5/week Hwy 11 Mon-Fri Fixed-price fares
A.J. Bus Lines (Public: contracted by the City of Elliot Lake)
Elliot Lake-Hwy 17 $20 7/week Hwy 108 Mon-Thu, twice Friday, Sun
Fixed-price fares
Note: Schedules can change on a regular basis.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 11
Exhibit 1.4: Scheduled Air Passenger Services in Northern Ontario
Note: Services are current as of October 2016
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 12
2 Jurisdiction, Policies and Programs
This section describes the governmental roles, policies and programs as they relate to intercommunity passenger transportation in Northern Ontario, by mode.
2.1 Passenger Rail
VIA Rail
Under the Canadian Constitution, interprovincial railways fall under federal
jurisdiction. The major railways, including Canadian National (CN) and Canadian
Pacific Railway (CP) hold federal charters.
A federal corporation, VIA Rail Canada Inc., operates most passenger rail
services across Canada and two services in Northern Ontario on CN and CP
railways. VIA receives subsidies for operating rail passenger services through
Transport Canada. It reports to the federal Minister of Transport.
Transport Canada is responsible for safety standards, equipment inspection, and regulating railway operating practices. Through delegation of the provincial jurisdiction, even shortline railways operating under provincial charters licensed under the Ontario Shortline Railways Act are overseen by Transport Canada with respect to safety.
Ontario Northland Transportation Commission
The Ontario Northland Transportation Commission (ONTC, or Ontario
Northland), a Crown agency of the Government of Ontario, operates a combined
rail freight and passenger rail service under the ONTC Act, a provincial charter.
This service is supported by the Ontario Government through the ONTC and the
Ministry of Northern Development and Mines.
Agawa Canyon Excursion Train
An additional rail service is not shown on the map, as it operates only
seasonally: the Agawa Canyon Tour Train, operated by CN on the CN rail line
between Sault Ste. Marie and Hearst. The tour train runs from Sault Ste. Marie
183 km north to the Agawa Canyon and is a same-day, round-trip excursion to
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 13
the canyon. (Year-round passenger services had been provided on this line as
far north as Hearst until 2015, as will be discussed in Section 4.2.)
2.2 Intercommunity Bus
Provincial Role
ONTC also operates Ontario Northland motor coach services (or “Ontario
Northland”), connecting a number of communities in Northeastern Ontario and
providing connections to Southern Ontario.
With the exception of ONTC, intercommunity bus service in Northern Ontario is
provided by private businesses and regulated by the Ontario and federal
governments, as described below. Few governmental programs are directly
applicable to the intercommunity bus mode.
Currently, intercommunity bus services in Ontario are regulated through the
Ontario Highway Transport Board (OHTB), whose mandate is defined in the
Ontario Highway Transport Board Act, 1990, and which reports to the Minister of
Transportation (MTO). The OHTB administers the economic regulatory regime
for inter-municipal, for-hire operators of passenger transportation services, as
prescribed in the Public Vehicles Act, 1990. The OHTB is responsible for
licensing operators throughout the province as well as operators providing
services that extend beyond Ontario to other provinces and the United States.
The OHTB also oversees market entry control for scheduled and charter
services. ONTC is exempt from the licensing requirements of the Public
Vehicles Act (Metrolinx has a similar exemption for its services in Southern
Ontario.
The OHTB controls operators entering the market through the granting of
operating licences. A prospective bus operator may apply for an operating
licence for a given route by filing an application with the OHTB, including a
business plan for the service and public evidence supporting the entrant. After
the application is submitted, it is published in the Ontario Gazette (the official
Government of Ontario publication for public notices). If no objection is filed
against the applicant, the OHTB reviews the application, completes a one-time
insurance check and finally issues a public vehicle licence. Other parties with an
economic interest in the outcome of the matter may file an objection within 29
days of publication in the Ontario Gazette. The applicant is given an opportunity
to reply to the objection. A hearing may be held on filed objections, after which
the Board may deny or grant the application, following an insurance check. The
Board adjudicates matters and assesses applications based on public necessity
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 14
and convenience criteria. The decision of the Board is final and binding; there is
no appeal.
Operators providing scheduled services are required to file a timetable with the
OHTB detailing the number of trips per day including the departure and arrival
times, as well as fares. Service reductions of more than 25% require a 30-day
notice to both the Minister of Transportation and the public. Service
discontinuation requires a 90-day notice period. Any subsequent changes to
timetables and fare structures must also be filed with the Board. Fares and
schedule changes are not regulated by the OHTB, thereby permitting operators
to adjust fares and schedule timing without approval from the Board.
Intercommunity Bus Policy Proposal
MTO is currently conducting a review of its intercommunity bus
policy to appropriately regulate intercommunity bus
transportation and modernize regulations to increase travel
options and to improve the overall travelling experience on
intercommunity buses in Ontario. The process has included
several rounds of engagement with the public and industry
stakeholders on the current state of intercommunity bus as well
as potential needs and opportunities. Results to date are
summarized in a discussion paper published in June 2016,
Intercity Bus Modernization: Creating Opportunities and
Connecting Ontario Communities. Community engagement
sessions took place through the summer months in 2016 and
separate engagement sessions with Indigenous partners are
planned for October/November 2016. Input received through engagement with
the intercommunity bus industry and communities will inform the development of
recommendations for an improved intercommunity transportation regime
expected in the fall.
Federal Role
Federal regulations related to the intercommunity bus industry are primarily
safety-related, with the Motor Vehicle Transport Act (MVTA) providing a
framework for safety regulations based on the National Safety Code for Motor
Carriers.
Transport Canada has also issued an Intercity Bus Code of Practice. Operators
have voluntarily committed to providing accessible service, and the standards of
service are documented in the Code. The Code of Practice covers all routes by
carriers offering scheduled services, but not charter carriers. It is important to
note that this Code of Practice is not legally binding.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 15
The federal government is responsible for extra-provincial bus services. The
federal government, through provisions in the MVTA, adopts the licensing
regime in each individual province, to be applied “in like manner” to applications
for bus services that go beyond a provincial boundary. For example, the Ontario
portion of an application for a scheduled service between Kenora and Winnipeg
would be considered based on Ontario’s regime, while the Manitoba portion
would be considered based on Manitoba’s regime.
2.3 Community Transportation Services
As a result of the limited provision of scheduled rail and bus intercommunity
passenger services in Northern Ontario, other means of mobility have been
developed, as noted above, to provide transportation for people who cannot
make the trip by private automobile for a variety of reasons. These services tend
to be very targeted to certain clients, patients, or some other pre-defined, eligible
person affiliated with a specific program or organization, including several dozen
providing services for Indigenous populations. These are most notable in the
non-urgent medical transport field where various services (and subsidies) are
available. In addition to medical/health related access, many community
transportation programs provide client or program participant transportation for a
range of trip purposes, including social/ recreational, shopping, etc.
There is a range of governance, administrative, operational and service delivery
scenarios for these non-public transit transportation service providers. These
include transportation operated by volunteer organizations such as the Red
Cross and the Canadian Cancer Society, municipal transit/specialized transit
services, school/student transport, hospitals/medical centre non-emergency
transport, and services by First Nations or by Indigenous agencies.
With the exception of school bus transport such as that provided by the
Northwestern Ontario Student Services Consortium, no other community
transportation services that accommodates education or school trips has been
identified.
Transportation funding for these services can include user fees/fares, subsidies
from program budgets (typically general funds), and donations. In some cases,
government aid is supplied, such as through the Community Care Access
Centres (CCAC).
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 16
Provincial Community Transportation Pilot Grant Program
In 2014, the Ministry of Transportation launched a two-year Community
Transportation Pilot Grant Program. The objective of the Pilot is to improve
transportation services for seniors, persons living with disabilities, youth and
other residents who need transportation. Through the Pilot Program, up to
$100,000 in financial assistance has been provided to Ontario municipalities and
their partnering community organizations to leverage existing local
transportation services by sharing resources and coordinating services. Of the
twenty-two municipalities that have received funding under this program, seven
projects are located in the NOMTS study area:
Terrace Bay ($81,397)
Atikokan ($91,586)
Dryden ($100,000)
Black River-Matheson ($30,500)
Papineau-Cameron ($100,000)
Temiskaming Shores ($40,000)
White River ($81,650)
The two-year pilot program allows funded municipalities flexibility in designing community transportation service and the area to be served. Eligible projects include providing transportation services within a single municipality/county/region, or between municipalities, such as those listed below. Some community transportation projects that are being implemented also include same-day intercommunity bus service (via bus or van), for example: Terrace Bay is providing services for residents in five communities between Jackfish and Pays Plat First Nation to travel along Highway 17 to Thunder Bay for medical appointments.
Black River-Matheson is providing a new service using school buses to transport seniors from Black River-Matheson to Timmins and Iroquois Falls for medical appointments, shopping, and visiting friends and relatives.
Papineau-Cameron has established a transportation program connecting eight municipalities in the Highway 17 corridor between Mattawa and North Bay, using a school bus operator and a centralized intake, booking, and scheduling process.
The Pilot Program is scheduled to end on March 31, 2017, after which the
Ministry of Transportation will evaluate the projects to determine the
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 17
effectiveness of municipalities and partnering community organizations to work
together to optimize existing resources and provide more travel options to more
people, thereby improving service. At this time, the Ministry of Transportation will
also review the key elements of the design and implementation of the program
such as eligibility requirements and scope of projects (i.e., eligibility for First
Nations, not-for-profit organizations, and others in unincorporated areas).
The current two-year pilot program will be completed in the spring of 2017. A
final report will include recommendations as to whether to continue the program.
The pilot program involved partnerships with private sector bus companies.
2.4 Climate Change Considerations
Climate change, energy efficiency, and other environmental concerns are of
interest to all levels of government, including related considerations with respect
to intercommunity passenger transportation, and the potential for these modes
to reduce energy use and emissions. As the leading sector in emissions,
reducing emissions due to transportation is an action area identified in Ontario’s
Climate Change Action Plan.
Exhibit 2.1 and Exhibit 2.2 show indicative energy use and carbon dioxide
emissions per passenger-kilometre for travel by private car (including 1 person
and 2 persons per car), domestic air travel, diesel powered intercity rail, and
motor coach. These figures are based on the averages for a wide sample of
companies in the United States, as summarized for the American Bus
Association (MJ Bradley & Associates, 2014). For private cars, the plots include
figures for “average” (US fleet average fuel economy), “low” (reflecting use of a
hybrid car), and “high” (reflecting use of a “typical” SUV-style vehicle). Note that
domestic air, intercity rail and motor coach are industry averages only and
results can vary greatly based on changes in passenger loading and operating
conditions. For example, running a train at half of the typical loading doubles the
energy use and carbon dioxide emissions per passenger-kilometre.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 18
Exhibit 2.1: Indicative Comparison of Energy Use per Passenger-Kilometre by Travel Mode
Source: IBI Group analysis of data summarized by MJ Bradley & Associates for the American Bus Association (2007). Note that domestic air, intercity rail and motor coach are industry averages only and results can vary greatly based on changes in passenger loading and operating conditions.
Exhibit 2.2: Indicative Comparison of Carbon Dioxide-Equivalent Emissions per Passenger-Kilometre by Travel Mode
Source: IBI Group analysis of data summarized by MJ Bradley & Associates for the American Bus Association (2007). Note that domestic air, intercity rail and motor coach are industry averages only and results can vary greatly based on changes in passenger loading and operating conditions.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 19
The following can be noted from these figures:
Motorcoach, at typical passenger loads, is generally the most fuel efficient and has the least emissions of all the modes of travel, followed by diesel-powered intercity rail. Very low passenger loads can greatly increase the fuel use and emissions for these modes.
Having two or more people share a ride in a private vehicle for an intercommunity trip can result in a trip that has approximately the same energy use and emissions as a public transportation mode, especially with ongoing improvements in fuel efficiency and emissions reductions in the vehicle fleet.
Air travel results in greater fuel use and emissions than intercity rail and motorcoach modes. The figure shown is for domestic air travel, which typically is more efficient than international travel through the use of smaller planes and because they need to carry smaller fuel loads than long-distance international flights do. Fuel consumption and emissions per passenger-kilometre for air travel are increased when there is an increased number of take offs and landings along the route.
While the air travel energy use and emissions may not be much greater on a per-kilometre basis than other passenger travel modes according to the figures in the charts, the cumulative environmental impact of each trip is greater. Air travel can make long-distance travel much easier and quicker than ground-related travel and can induce additional long-distance trips to be made; the greater total distance of travel can result in greater total emissions.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 20
3 Potential Intercommunity Passenger Transportation Ridership Markets
To gain a broad understanding of the potential ridership markets for
intercommunity passenger transportation, the following highlights are discussed
in this section:
Passenger vehicle (i.e. automobiles, light-duty trucks and
motorcycles) traffic flows in Northern Ontario, as an indicator of existing and future passenger travel demand levels – and potential demand levels for intercommunity passenger transportation services -- in key corridors;
health-care trips as an example of essential travel required by residents of Northern Ontario; and
more broadly, the locations of health care services and post-secondary institutions in Northern Ontario, as trips to these are generally the main markets served by intercommunity bus transportation.
Typically, intercommunity passenger transportation ridership figures by private carrier are not readily available; however, VIA rail ridership is
discussed in Section 4.
3.1 Passenger Vehicle Traffic
Exhibit 3.1 shows passenger-vehicle (i.e. automobiles, light-duty trucks and
motorcycles) traffic volumes on the Northern Ontario highway network, showing
2011 passenger-vehicle traffic levels and anticipated levels in 2041. This plot is
based on assigning NOMTS Part 1 survey origin-destination data collected at
select locations such as Northern Ontario gateways to the road network, in
combination with traffic classification count data throughout the Northern Ontario
highway network. (The survey data, assignments, and traffic forecasting
methodology are described more fully in the Highways and Roads technical
backgrounder). Note that in this plot, traffic flows continuing beyond Northern
Ontario represent only the continuation of trips using the Northern Ontario
highway network, as opposed to total flows.
The potential intercommunity passenger transportation market for travel along a
corridor is generally proportional to the passenger vehicle flows along the
corridor. Using existing passenger vehicle flows as an indicator of potential
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 21
intercommunity transportation demand is common practice in transit planning.
Higher passenger vehicle traffic levels along a corridor indicate a potentially
greater market for passenger transportation services along that corridor.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 22
Exhibit 3.1: Flows of Passenger Vehicles using the Northern Ontario Highway Network, 2011 and 2041
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 23
As can be seen in the exhibit, some of the highest passenger volumes are on
highway links connecting North Bay and Sudbury southerly toward Toronto
(approximately 6,000 to 9,000 average daily passenger vehicles, with higher
flows in the summer months). As could be noted from Exhibit 1.1 and Exhibit 1.2
and will be discussed later in this document, these Northern-Southern Ontario
corridors are served as follows: Sudbury and Toronto are connected by VIA Rail,
as well as Greyhound, and Ontario Northland bus services, and North Bay and
Toronto are connected by Ontario Northland bus services.
Close in magnitude to these Northern-Southern Ontario flows are flows along
Highway 17 between the Sudbury area and North Bay.
The majority of the Highway 17 corridor in Northern Ontario is served only by a
once-daily Greyhound route that runs between Sudbury and North Bay easterly
only in the overnight period, but westbound in daytime hours. In response to
Greyhound’s service frequency reduction in late 2015 resulting in this once-daily
service only, ONTC added 6 times weekly service between Sudbury and North
Bay in January 2016, with 3 of these trips continuing between North Bay and
Ottawa. This additional service helps meet the apparent demand between two
these Northern urban centres, as indicated by the levels of passenger vehicle
flows on Highway 17 between them. This new ONTC service is weekend-
focused, with no service between Sudbury and Ottawa on Tuesdays or
Wednesdays except for the daily Greyhound service.
Similarly, travel demand between Manitoulin and Sudbury, two areas not
currently connected by intercommunity bus transportation but with moderate
passenger vehicle travel flows between them, could also support intercommunity
bus service if service were to be provided.
Another section of Highway 17 with higher passenger vehicle volumes but also
only serviced by the once-daily Greyhound service is the section between the
Ontario-Manitoba border and Dryden, and service in the eastbound direction is
only provided during the overnight hours in this section. Passenger-vehicle flows
in the Kenora area are more oriented toward Winnipeg as the closest regional
urban centre, and many residents of the area travel to Winnipeg for health care
and other services.
There are moderate passenger vehicle flows between Thunder Bay and the
Nipigon area on Highway 11&17. This corridor is served by Greyhound bus, by
Kasper Minibus and by Caribou Coach (though Caribou Coach service is
“temporarily suspended” as of August 2016). The latter two continue easterly on
Highway 11 toward Geraldton. Beyond Geraldton easterly on Highway 11,
passenger vehicle flows are markedly low until east of Highway 631
approaching Hearst. Highway 11 between Geraldton and Hearst is a challenge
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 24
for bus operators to service due to the low volumes, as well as a lack of cell
phone coverage in the event of emergencies.
3.2 Travel Grant Origins and Destinations
The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care provided summarized information
relating to recipients of travel grants through the Northern Health Travel Grants
program for a one-year period, between April 2014 to March 2015, including
patient place of residence and service provision. To qualify, grant recipients
must travel at least 100 km one-way to access a medical specialist or approved
health care facility services that are not available locally.
Exhibit 3.2 is a map of home community/municipality locations for patients
receiving a travel grant, and also includes grants for companions and third-party
travellers (e.g. an adult accompanying a patient under 16 years of age, a parent
accompanying their child, or a third-party organization that receives the grant on
the patient’s behalf). Similarly, Exhibit 3.3 is a plot of the service locations for the
grant recipients, their companions, and third-party travellers (the two exhibits
use different scales to depict relative volumes). Companions and third-party
travellers are more commonly part of longer-distance travel, such as to specialty
care in Toronto. The longer-distance health care trips tend to originate within the
larger Northern Ontario urban centres.
The plots indicate that residents in communities of various sizes along the
provincial highway network, generally along the Trans-Canada highway, have a
need to travel to the larger urban centres for health care. A few sizable patient
origin locations that are not on the Trans-Canada highway include Timmins, Red
Lake at the north end of Highway 105, Chapleau on Highway 101 west of
Timmins, and Manitouwadge north of Marathon.
Exhibit 3.4 is a table summarizing the number of patients, the grant recipients’
home location and service locations, while Exhibit 3.5 shows this information by
percentage of patients. A few observations are noted:
Sudbury is the most common health care service location for Northern Ontario under the travel grant program for the 2014–15 year; it is the service provision location for 28% of Northern Ontario health care travel grants, or 55,000 patients. However, Sudbury is the focus of travel grants to recipients in Northeastern Ontario only, as patients in Northwestern Ontario travel to Thunder Bay as well as to Winnipeg for health care services under this grant program. Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie and North Bay are also significant centres for health care services in Northeastern Ontario.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 25
Exhibit 3.2: Travel Grant Recipient Home Community/Municipality Locations, March 2014 to April 2015
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 26
Exhibit 3.3: Travel Grant Recipient Service Locations, March 2014 to April 2015
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 27
Exhibit 3.4: Northern Ontario Travel Grant Service Locations by Recipient Home Location, March 2014 to April 2015
GRANT RECIPIENT HOME DISTRICT: NUMBER OF PATIENTS
Service Location Ke
no
ra
Ra
iny
Riv
er
Th
un
de
r
Ba
y
Co
ch
ran
e
Alg
om
a
Su
db
ury
Gre
ate
r
Su
db
ury
Ma
ni-
tou
lin
Tim
is-
ka
min
g
Nip
iss
ing
Pa
rry
So
un
d
To
tal
Vis
its
Other Canada
Manitoba Winnipeg 11,819 3,294 730 - - - 1 - - - - 15,844
Northern Ontario
Kenora Kenora 1,082 271 - - - - - - - - - 1,353
Dryden 1,203 146 73 - - - - - - - - 1,422
Sioux Lookout 791 - 38 - - - - - - - - 829
Rainy River Fort Frances 19 235 82 - - - - - - - - 336
Thunder Bay Thunder Bay 7,247 7,502 18,669 657 486 12 2 - - - - 34,575
Terrace Bay - - 12 - - - - - - - - 12
Marathon - - - - 6 - - - - - - 6
Manitouwadge - - - - 22 - - - - - - 22
Algoma Wawa - - - - 37 57 - - - - - 94
Sault Ste. Marie - 9 445 38 10,848 555 80 121 - 8 - 12,104
Blind River - - - - - - 3 - - - - 3
Elliot Lake - - - - 48 - 9 11 - - - 68
Cochrane Hearst - - 42 33 79 - - - - - - 154
Kapuskasing - - - 74 73 - 1 - - - - 148
Cochrane - - - 320 - 15 1 - 158 - - 494
Iroquois Falls - - - - - - - - 6 - - 6
Timmins 6 - 30 12,652 193 2,631 32 - 4,408 27 - 19,979
South Porcupine - - - - - - - - 11 - - 11
Sudbury Chapleau - - - - 48 7 - - - - - 55
Espanola - - - - 79 - - 262 - - - 341
Greater Sudbury Sudbury 13 - 105 10,299 12,556 3,650 - 10,450 5,614 8,202 4,498 55,387
Manitoulin Mindemoya - - - - - - - 29 - - - 29
Little Current - - - - - - - 175 - - - 175
Timiskaming Kirkland Lake - - - 635 - 10 - - 69 10 - 724
New Liskeard - - - 14 - - 7 - 222 6 - 249
Nipissing Sturgeon Falls - - - - - 7 1 - 6 - - 14
North Bay - - 10 1,137 57 124 611 22 5,984 120 640 8,705
Parry Sound Parry Sound - - - 8 15 119 233 60 - 16 107 558
Southern Ontario
GTA and Hamilton Toronto, etc. 252 150 3,336 4,053 3,930 911 6,758 573 1,741 5,082 3,873 30,659
Central Ontario Barrie, Orillia, etc. - - 11 66 91 111 1,018 59 282 1,670 4,488 7,796
SW Ontario London, etc. 26 23 434 301 942 67 321 62 83 370 139 2,768
Eastern Ontario Ottawa, etc. 20 18 269 1,538 318 144 1,017 63 566 1,823 204 5,980
Total
All Service Locations 22,478 11,648 24,286 31,825 29,828 8,420 10,095 11,887 19,150 17,334 13,949 200,900
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 28
Exhibit 3.5: Percentages of Northern Ontario Travel Grant Recipients by Service Location: March 2014 to April 2015
GRANT RECIPIENT HOME DISTRICT: PROPORTION OF PATIENTS (%) BY HOME DISTRICT
Service Location Ke
no
ra
Ra
iny
Riv
er
Th
un
de
r
Ba
y
Co
ch
ran
e
Alg
om
a
Su
db
ury
Gre
ate
r
Su
db
ury
Ma
ni-
tou
lin
Tim
is-
ka
min
g
Nip
iss
ing
Pa
rry
So
un
d
To
tal
Vis
its
Other Canada
Manitoba Winnipeg 52.6 28.3 3.0 - - - 0.0 - - - - 7.9
Northern Ontario
Kenora Kenora 4.8 2.3 - - - - - - - - - 0.7
Dryden 5.4 1.3 0.3 - - - - - - - - 0.7
Sioux Lookout 3.5 - 0.2 - - - - - - - - 0.4
Rainy River Fort Frances 0.1 2.0 0.3 - - - - - - - - 0.2
Thunder Bay Thunder Bay 32.2 64.4 76.9 2.1 1.6 0.1 0.0 - - - - 17.2
Terrace Bay - - 0.0 - - - - - - - - 0.0
Marathon - - - - 0.0 - - - - - - 0.0
Manitouwadge - - - - 0.1 - - - - - - 0.0
Algoma Wawa - - - - 0.1 0.7 - - - - - 0.0
Sault Ste. Marie - 0.1 1.8 0.1 36.4 6.6 0.8 1.0 - 0.0 - 6.0
Blind River - - - - - - 0.0 - - - - 0.0
Elliot Lake - - - - 0.2 - 0.1 0.1 - - - 0.0
Cochrane Hearst - - 0.2 0.1 0.3 - - - - - - 0.1
Kapuskasing - - - 0.2 0.2 - 0.0 - - - - 0.1
Cochrane - - - 1.0 - 0.2 0.0 - 0.8 - - 0.2
Iroquois Falls - - - - - - - - 0.0 - - 0.0
Timmins 0.0 - 0.1 39.8 0.6 31.2 0.3 - 23.0 0.2 - 9.9
South Porcupine - - - - - - - - 0.1 - - 0.0
Sudbury Chapleau - - - - 0.2 0.1 - - - - - 0.0
Espanola - - - - 0.3 - - 2.2 - - - 0.2
Greater Sudbury Sudbury 0.1 - 0.4 32.4 42.1 43.3 - 87.9 29.3 47.3 32.2 27.6
Manitoulin Mindemoya - - - - - - - 0.2 - - - 0.0
Little Current - - - - - - - 1.5 - - - 0.1
Timiskaming Kirkland Lake - - - 2.0 - 0.1 - - 0.4 0.1 - 0.4
New Liskeard - - - 0.0 - - 0.1 - 1.2 0.0 - 0.1
Nipissing Sturgeon Falls - - - - - 0.1 0.0 - 0.0 - - 0.0
North Bay - - 0.0 3.6 0.2 1.5 6.1 0.2 31.2 0.7 4.6 4.3
Parry Sound Parry Sound - - - 0.0 0.1 1.4 2.3 0.5 - 0.1 0.8 0.3
Southern Ontario
GTA, Hamilton Toronto, etc. 1.1 1.3 13.7 12.7 13.2 10.8 66.9 4.8 9.1 29.3 27.8 15.3
Central Ontario Barrie, Orillia, etc. - - 0.0 0.2 0.3 1.3 10.1 0.5 1.5 9.6 32.2 3.9
SW Ontario London, etc. 0.1 0.2 1.8 0.9 3.2 0.8 3.2 0.5 0.4 2.1 1.0 1.4
Eastern Ontario Ottawa, etc. 0.1 0.2 1.1 4.8 1.1 1.7 10.1 0.5 3.0 10.5 1.5 3.0
Total
All Service Locations 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 29
Thunder Bay is the second most common health care service location, and is the service location for approximately 35,000 grant recipients, virtually all from Northwestern Ontario.
Close to 16,000 health care travel grants were for travel to health care service provision in Winnipeg. This includes the 52% of travel grant recipients (11,800 patients) in Kenora and 28% in Rainy River (3,300 patients).
When grant recipients within Thunder and Sudbury travel outside of their respective districts under the travel grant program, it is typically to specialized services in Southern Ontario, such as in Toronto. A total of 47,000 patients received travel grants for health care services in Southern Ontario.
3.3 Locations of Common Intercommunity Transportation Destinations
Exhibit 3.6 shows health care services and post-secondary institutions, which
are common intercommunity passenger transportation destinations. These are
shown in relation to the provision of intercommunity bus connections and taxi
services. Some of the health care service locations are the focus of the Northern
Health Care Grant trips noted in the previous section.
The exhibit shows that hospitals and health care centres are located in a
number of communities along the Highway 11 and 17 corridors, as well as in
Timmins, Red Lake, Sioux Lookout, Manitouwadge, Hornepayne, Chapleau, and
Elliot Lake, and in the James Bay communities. Communities that have
hospitals but do not have taxi service include Atikokan, Chapleau, Mattawa,
Attawapiskat and Fort Albany.
Eighteen communities have post-secondary education institutions, Red Lake
being the only such community without some form of scheduled intercommunity
bus service, although scheduled air passenger services are available.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 30
Exhibit 3.6: Bus and Taxi Connections to Post-Secondary Institutions and Health Care Services
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 31
4 Rail Passenger Services
4.1 Current Service Provision and Ridership
Overall, passenger rail services are fairly limited in the North. There are currently only three regular routes in service, as was shown in Exhibit 1.1 together with service frequencies. These are described below. In addition to these, a seasonal tourist excursion train is operated by CN between Sault Ste. Marie and Agawa Canyon.
The VIA Transcontinental Train (“The Canadian”)
This service runs on the CN mainline from Toronto to Vancouver, two days per
week in the winter, and three days per week in the summer. The train serves
many communities in Northern Ontario. Major stops and train servicing take
place in Capreol, Hornepayne and Sioux Lookout. All other stops in Northern
Ontario, with the exception of Sudbury Junction, are flag stops where the train
only stops if a reservation is made in advance. The service’s main markets are
trips within Western Canada and between Western Canada and Southern
Ontario. Of approximately 90,000 total annual boardings on this service (Via
Rail, 2016) about 12% of trips are to, from or within Northern Ontario.
Among Northern Ontario-related trips on “The Canadian”, trips within Northern
Ontario, trips to/from Southern Ontario, and trips to/from Western Canada each
represent approximately one-third of trips. Exhibit 4.1 shows boardings by
Northern Ontario Station on this line for 2015. The busiest stations are Sudbury
Junction and Sioux Lookout (with over 1,000 boardings each in 2015), as well as
Hornepayne (approximately 750 boardings in 2015). For stations between Sioux
Lookout and Nakina, communities that are at some distance from the primary
highway network, the predominant trip purpose is to connect to other Northern
Ontario communities.
Service times on this line are based on transcontinental service needs and can
be inconvenient in Northern Ontario. The westbound service departs Toronto at
10:00 p.m., serving Sudbury Junction (the closest stop to Sudbury) at about 5
a.m. continuing westbound, it reaches Sioux Lookout at midnight. The
eastbound route leaves Winnipeg at 10:30 p.m. and reaches Sioux Lookout
approximately 5 a.m., and Sudbury Junction about 1:00 a.m. the following day.
As this service operates between Toronto and Vancouver, a distance of
4,466 km, on almost all single-track lines together with a relatively dense nexus
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 32
of freight train services, schedule adherence can be major issues, with trains
sometimes hours late. Travel times can also be long in comparison to other
transportation options. For example, the scheduled rail journey time from
Sudbury to Toronto is 7 hours, whereas the road journey from Sudbury to
downtown Toronto is approximately 4 hours.
The “Northern Ontario” VIA Train
This service runs on Canadian Pacific (CP) tracks from Sudbury to White River,
operating three days per week in each direction. The route was established to
serve a number of communities that do not have road or air access, and VIA rail
is mandated to provide the service by the Government of Canada (Via Rail,
2014). Since the route was established, road connections have been built to
these communities. Boardings by station for this line are shown in Exhibit 4.2.
This service has among the highest subsidy levels per passenger among VIA
services, stated to be $3.98 per passenger-mile (Via Rail, 2015); the average
total boardings per train trip on this service is approximately 15. The service is
operated out of Sudbury using self-propelled rail cars originally built in the
1950s. Cars have to be taken to Toronto or Montreal for major repairs.
The Polar Bear Express
Ontario Northland provides the Polar Bear Express passenger rail and rail freight service between Cochrane and Moosonee. This is the only year-round ground-based connection transportation to Moosonee and the James Bay coast.
4.2 Recent Rail Service Changes and Discontinuances
VIA Rail
In 2012, service on “The Canadian” line was reduced to 2 days per week from
November to April, and maintained at 3 days per week May to October.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 33
Exhibit 4.1: VIA Rail Boardings by Station for “The Canadian” Transcontinental Line by Destination Zone, 2015
Source: IBI Analysis of VIA Rail Data
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 34
Exhibit 4.2: VIA Rail Boardings by Station for “Northern Ontario” Line, 2015
Source: IBI Analysis of VIA Rail Data
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 35
Ontario Northland Services
In 2012, a passenger rail service from Toronto to Cochrane, operated by the
ONTC, was canceled; however the ONTC continued to provide its existing bus
service to the communities previously served by the train. As part of a broader,
organizational transformation, the ONTC continues to explore its market needs
and find efficiencies in its service provision.
Algoma Central Rail Services
On the line where CN operates the Agawa Canyon Tour Train (noted above), year-round service had been provided the full distance between Sault Ste. Marie and Hearst until July 2015.
Recently, the Algoma Central Railway passenger service between Sault Ste. Marie and Hearst was suspended. The service connected a number of First Nations, small hamlets, and camps without conventional road access or intercommunity bus service.
The service had been subsidized under the federal Remote Passenger Rail Program, which is available where rail is the only method of access to remote communities. However, most communities along the line are now considered to have road access (sometimes by forest access roads only). This subsidy for the Algoma line was cut in 2014, then reinstated for one more year. A three-year subsidy was negotiated with the Federal Government in March 2015, but challenges in finding an operator and in negotiating a subsidy with the Federal Government have affected the efforts to reinstate the service. Local efforts, which include support from the City of Sault Ste. Marie and local First Nations, continue to explore options for ensuring this service is available in the future.
On this same line, CN continues operating the Agawa Canyon Tourist Train (as
well as some freight rail to Hearst). The tourist train is a same-day, round-trip,
seasonal excursion to the canyon. This route was also run in the winter as the
“Snow Train” until the 2014–2015 winter season. The train peaked in popularity
in the 1970s and 1980s, when approximately 100,000 visitors toured the Agawa
Canyon annually on average. Ridership remained approximately 80,000 through
the 1990s, but dropped significantly after 2001 with increased border security, a
weaker US dollar, and reduced US tourism in Canada overall. There were an
estimated 40,000 visitors in 2006, with further declines since then (Malone,
Givens, Parsons Ltd., 2007). With increased marketing efforts and a stronger
US dollar, ridership in 2015 was the highest it has been in recent years, with
over 30,000 passengers in that year (MNDM, personal communication, 2016). In
comparison, the regular passenger train service between Sault Ste. Marie and
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 36
Hearst carried 10,600 passengers annually (about 200 passengers per week)
between 2001 and 2006 (Malone, Givens, Parsons Ltd., 2007).
4.3 Past Trends in Passenger Rail Ridership
Exhibit 4.3 shows historic annual ridership trends in Northern Ontario-related
trips on VIA’s “The Canadian” line from 2009 to 2015. Overall, Northern Ontario-
related ridership has declined by almost one third over that period due to service
reductions, inconvenient service hours, and increasingly frequent and
convenient air passenger services. However, trips within Northern Ontario have
been much more consistent over this period and have dropped only about 10%,
highlighting the relatively stable demand for passenger rail to connect
communities within Northern Ontario.
Exhibit 4.4 shows that ridership on “The Northern Ontario” line has also been
fairly consistent over the same period.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 37
Exhibit 4.3: VIA “The Canadian” Trips to/from Northern Ontario, 2009 – 2015
Source: IBI Group analysis of VIA Rail data
Exhibit 4.4: VIA "Northern Ontario" Boardings, 2009 – 2015
Source: IBI Group analysis of VIA Rail data
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 38
5 Intercommunity Bus Services
The intercommunity bus mode in Northern Ontario provides connections for
passengers travelling between major urban centres, and also connects smaller
communities to major urban centres.
In Northern Ontario, most intercommunity bus services operate along provincial
highways, particularly the Highway 11 and Highway 17 corridors.
Relative to more densely populated regions in North America, private-sector bus
companies have found the Northern Ontario market challenging to turn a profit.
Northern Ontario has been experiencing service reductions and discontinuances
over the years by all of the major bus operators, which in turn contributes to
decreasing ridership levels, further challenging the situation.
This section profiles the operators of bus services in Northern Ontario and the
services provided by these operators. Two types of intercommunity bus
operations are provided in Northern Ontario:
Scheduled service, with posted frequencies and individual fares available
for purchase by the general public; and
Charter service, where operators deliver service on an on-demand basis to
meet the needs of a client group; the operator receives one payment for
the trip.
5.1 Scheduled Intercommunity Bus Operators and Services
A map of scheduled intercommunity bus services in Northern Ontario was
shown as Exhibit 1.2 with service levels and fares summarized in Exhibit 1.3.
(Note that schedules can change on a regular basis to adapt to fluctuating
demand, and services depicted are current as of summer 2016).
Scheduled service provided by the five current operators covers most of the
Highway 11 and 17 corridors (with the exception of Highway 11 between
Longlac and Hearst), as well as Highway 144 between Sudbury and Timmins,
Highway 101 east of Timmins, and Highway 655 between Timmins and Highway
11. Despite the service coverage, there is often an unmet need for effective
service between regional centres that enables same-day travel.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 39
Inter-Regional Operators
Both Greyhound and Ontario Northland provide daily services connecting
Northern Ontario with Southern Ontario, and provide connections between major
Northern Ontario urban centres situated on or close to Highways 11 and 17, the
main corridors through the North. Greyhound also connects to Winnipeg, Ottawa
and beyond. Autobus Maheux provides a link between North Bay and Rouyn-
Noranda, Quebec. The services of inter-regional bus operators are summarized
below:
Greyhound Canada provides service between Toronto and Winnipeg. From Toronto to Sudbury, the route operates express, stopping only in Barrie. From Sudbury, the route then follows Highway 17 from Sudbury through Sault Ste. Marie, Thunder Bay, and Kenora to the Manitoba border, and represents the only intercommunity bus connection between Northeastern and Northwestern Ontario. Because this service is anchored in Toronto and Winnipeg, and given the long travel distances through Northern Ontario, the route passes through Many Northern Ontario communities at inconvenient times.
Greyhound also provides daily service between Sudbury and Ottawa via Highway 17 and North Bay, transiting to a convenient transfer point in Ottawa for interprovincial trips to Quebec.
Ontario Northland, a shortened marketing name for the Ontario Northland Transportation Commission (ONTC), a Crown agency of the Government of Ontario, provides intercommunity bus service in Northeastern Ontario with connections to Southern Ontario.
Ontario Northland provides four round trips daily between Toronto and North Bay. Two buses daily continue north from North Bay along Highway 11 to Highway 101 at Matheson. Connections can then be made with Cochrane to the north or to Timmins to the west on Highway 101.
Ontario Northland also provides three daily round trips between
Toronto and Sudbury along Highways 400 and 69 — this service includes multiple stops compared to the express service provided by Greyhound. One trip daily continues north of Sudbury to Timmins via Highway 144. Twice-daily express service connects Timmins to Cochrane via Highway 655.
The Highway 11 corridor previously served by “The Northlander” passenger train, was discontinued in September 2012. Ontario Northland continues to provide bus service to every community previously served by the Northlander.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 40
ONTC also provides a Sudbury-North Bay-Ottawa intercommunity bus service, which was started in January 2016, partly in response to recent Greyhound service cuts in the corridor. This new service was intended to be a six-month pilot. The initial six-month pilot phase has ended and the ONTC has approved the extension of the pilot for an additional six months.
During periods of peak demand additional services may be operated.
Autobus Maheux, an operator based in Quebec, serves a network in Western Quebec with a direct link between Rouyn-Noranda and North Bay. Autobus Maheux also provides service between Rouyn-Noranda and Montreal, and other communities in Quebec.
There are no scheduled intercommunity bus services across the Canada-US
international border; however, the Sault Ste. Marie Transit International Bridge
Bus in Sault Ste. Marie provides a connection between the Greyhound stops in
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario and Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan.
Regional Operators
Caribou Coach and Kasper Mini-Bus provide services connecting communities
in Northwestern Ontario with the regional centre of Thunder Bay:
Caribou Coach provides three trips weekly linking Fort Frances to Thunder Bay via Highway 11 west of Thunder Bay. Caribou Coach also provided five trips weekly linking Thunder Bay and Longlac via Highway 11 east of Thunder Bay, though this scheduled service has been “temporarily suspended” since August 2016. Caribou Coach additionally provides a specialized mine-run from the Thunder Bay airport and Atkinson’s Camp (50 km northwest of Fort Frances, east of Highway 71); and
Kasper Mini-Bus is the newest bus service provider in Northern Ontario,
providing scheduled service since July 2015 on weekdays between
Thunder Bay and Sioux Lookout along Highway 17, with additional stops
on request. Kasper provides scheduled services between Thunder Bay
and Longlac, having amalgamated with Porky’s bus service, who
previously served the route.
In addition, A. J. Bus Lines is contracted by the City of Elliot Lake to provide daily service between Elliot Lake and the closest Greyhound stop on Highway 17, timed to coincide with the Greyhound service schedule.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 41
Fares
Intercommunity bus fares are substantially less expensive compared to air
travel, as can be seen in Exhibit 5.1, a comparison table of fares by mode for
select origin-destination pairs by mode. The table shows that one-way adult
fares for these origin-destination pairs are between $50 and $240, while the air
fares are between approximately $200 and $400. Rail fares are comparable to
bus fares for travel between the same locations.
Ontario Northland and Greyhound offer multiple adult discounts, and Ontario
Northland, Greyhound, Autobus Maheux and Caribou Coach offer senior,
student, and child fares.
There are two general types of fare structures among the intercommunity bus
providers:
Reservation-based fares: customers book tickets with pricing that may
fluctuate based on demand and available capacity; and,
Fixed-price fare: ticket prices for a given route that do not change based on
demand or availability.
Details on the fare system used by each carrier were included in Exhibit 1.3.
Exhibit 5.1: Adult Fare Comparison for Selected Origin-Destination Pairs by Mode
Lowest Fare by Mode
Route Bus Air Rail
Sudbury-Winnipeg $240 $400 $175
Toronto-Sudbury $80 $185 $60
Ottawa-Sudbury $80 $271 -
Toronto-North Bay $80 $210 -
Sudbury-Timmins $60 $210 -
Thunder Bay-Sioux Lookout $75 $240 -
Sioux Lookout-Winnipeg N/A $420 $65
Timmins-Moosonee N/A $375 $50 (to/from Cochrane)
Notes:
“-” indicates that no option is available for that mode.
The lowest fare available is includes. Note that some airlines have fare options that are considerably more expensive
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 42
5.2 Recent Scheduled Service Reductions and Discontinuances
A number of service reductions and discontinuances have taken place in recent
years on the Northern Ontario intercommunity bus network. Changes in service
levels between 2000 and 2016 are summarized in Exhibit 5.2, which shows that
service levels have decreased considerably and several routes abandoned.
Service changes in recent years are also shown in map form in Exhibit 5.3 and
include the following:
November 2015: Ontario Northland service on the Cochrane-Timmins
route was reduced from three trips per day to two and the Cochrane – Iroquois Falls/Matheson route was reduced from two trips per day to one. Service on Highway 11 between Kapuskasing and Hearst was reduced from daily to three times a week.
In the past, Ontario Northland provided bus service between Timmins and Wawa via Highway 101. This service ended in the 1990s.
September 2015: Greyhound nearly halved service from twice daily to once daily on its Winnipeg to Toronto and Sudbury to Ottawa routes; two additional weekly express Toronto-Sudbury trips (Fridays and Sundays) were spared.
March 2015: Caribou Coach service between Longlac and Hearst was suspended indefinitely, severing a link between Northeastern and Northwestern Ontario. As a result of this cut, riders needing to travel between locations on the Highway 11 corridor north of North Bay to locations west of Hearst must travel to North Bay or Sudbury, then take the Greyhound route to Thunder Bay.
Kasper minibus temporarily introduced a Longlac to Hearst service in May 2016. The service was “temporarily suspended” in May 2016; however, Kasper has indicated via social media that it is exploring options to reinstate the service.
January 2014: Caribou Coach stopped providing service on Highway 105, leaving the Red Lake community without an intercommunity bus connection to Highway 11. Services previously ran three times per week.
December 2013: Caribou Coach stopped providing service between Fort Frances and Kenora via Highway 71, servicing smaller communities in the Kenora District such as Sioux Narrows and Crow Lake. This service ran three times a week.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 43
Exhibit 5.2: Northern Ontario Bus Service Levels, 2000 and 2016
Service Routing
Year 2000 Service Frequency
Year 2016 Service Frequency
Greyhound Canada
Sudbury - Winnipeg Hwy17 3/day 1/day
Toronto - Sudbury Hwy 400, Hwy 69 3/day 9/week
Ottawa - Sudbury Hwy17 3/day 1/day
Thunder Bay - Kirkland Lake Hwy 11 1/day Discontinued
Timmins- Kirkland Lake - Toronto Hwy 101, Hwy 11 3/day Discontinued
Ontario Northland
Toronto-North Bay Hwy 11 2/day 4/day
North Bay-Matheson Hwy 11 2/day 2/day
Matheson-Cochrane Hwy 11 2/day 1/day
Matheson-Timmins Hwy 101 6/week 3/day
Toronto-Sudbury Hwy 400, Hwy 69 6/day 3/day
Sudbury-Timmins Hwy 144 1/day 1/day
Timmins-Cochrane Hwy 655 1/day 2/day
Cochrane-Kapuskasing Hwy 11 not served 1/day
Kapuskasing-Hearst Hwy 11 not served 3/week
Autobus Maheux
North Bay - Rouyn-Noranda Hwy 63, QC 101 1/day 1/day
Kirkland Lake - Rouyn-Noranda Hwy 66, QC 117 1/day Discontinued
Grey Goose Bus Lines
Winnipeg - Fort Frances Hwy 17, Hwy71 2/day Discontinued
Fort Frances - Thunder Bay Hwy 11 1/day Discontinued
Caribou Coach Lines
Thunder Bay - Fort Frances Hwy 11 1/day 3/week
Thunder Bay - Longlac
(“temporarily suspended” as of August 2017)
Hwy 11 - 5/week
Kasper
Thunder Bay - Sioux Lookout Hwy 11, Hwy 72 - 5/week
Thunder Bay - Longlac Hwy 11 - 5/week
A.J. Bus Lines
Elliot Lake – Hwy 17 Hwy 108 - 7/week
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 44
Exhibit 5.3: Recent Scheduled Intercommunity Bus Service Reductions and Discontinuances
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 45
5.3 Ridership on Scheduled Services
Ridership information for Northern Ontario intercommunity bus services was not
available for Strategy development purposes, though reduced ridership levels
have been cited as a reason for reducing service levels, and it is known that
reducing service levels tends to have a further negative impact on ridership, in a
continuing downward spiral.
Anecdotal information about bus ridership levels was shared during Strategy
engagement sessions. The most highly-used services are connections from
North Bay and Sudbury to Toronto, where buses have been reported to be often
full upon arrival at intermediary stops. At the same time, buses on Highway 17
west of Sudbury often operate at less than capacity, and Caribou Coach
Services have been observed to be carrying only a fraction of their capacity.
According to feedback from intercommunity bus stakeholders, the major markets
served include students, seniors, and lower-income individuals.
With significant travel time savings compared to ground-based modes, air travel
is gaining ridership, which may contribute to the downward trend of bus
ridership. For example, both Porter and Bearskin Airlines have increased service
to several communities in Northern Ontario, often with introductory and
competitive fares. Airline service frequencies are detailed in the Municipal
Airports Technical Backgrounder.
Travel Purposes
Based on feedback from intercommunity bus stakeholders, the major markets
served include students, seniors, and lower-income individuals. Common trip
purposes were identified as follows, though the relative proportion of each is not
known:
Social, e.g. visiting friends or relatives;
Non-emergency health care and medical appointments;
Shopping/groceries;
Post-secondary schools;
Religious or cultural events;
Personal appointments such as banking, court related or legal meetings; and
Employment.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 46
5.4 Bus Stops and Terminals
Major urban centres in Northern Ontario tend to have a sheltered terminal for
intercommunity buses: In Northeastern Ontario, most terminals are operated by
Ontario Northland, providing a sheltered waiting area, restrooms, and ticketing
services.
Ontario Northland terminals are located in North Bay, Sudbury, Timmins,
Cochrane and Kirkland Lake.
In Sudbury, Greyhound and Ontario Northland operate from the same terminal
as of June 2016, whereas they previously had separate terminals over 9 km
apart. In Northwestern Ontario, each operator has its own terminal in Thunder
Bay. The Greyhound and Caribou Coach terminals are adjacent, and Kasper
Mini-Bus operates in a terminal 800 m away. Greyhound operates a bus depot
providing ticketing services and shelter in Kenora.
Other stops are a mix of agency stops, where a local business (often a gas
station/convenience store) sells tickets on behalf of the bus operator, and flag
stops, with no ticket agent. Agency stops only feature whatever amenities are at
the local business, and in some cases do not include a sheltered waiting area.
Flag stops do not have any amenities, and the bus only stops if flagged down.
These flag stops are often poorly lit and have no sheltered waiting area or other
amenities. This means that passengers must wait for buses on the side of the
road with no protection from winter weather and general inclement weather.
Poorly lit stops are also safety concerns for individuals waiting for buses at night.
5.5 Vehicle Types
Greyhound Canada, Ontario Northland, and Caribou Coach all operate
traditional, highway-style coaches (capacity of 47 to 56 seats) on their
intercommunity routes, such as shown in Exhibit 5.4. Kasper differs from
traditional operators by utilizing 16-seat minibuses, customized for long-distance
journeys. Smaller vehicles such as these can reduce costs and increase the
financial viability of providing a new bus service where the anticipated ridership
is too low to fill a full-size bus.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 47
Exhibit 5.4: Traditional Full-Size Coach Example: Ontario Northland
Photo Source: Ontario Northland (used with permission)
5.6 Charter Bus Services
Thirty-five charter carriers based in Northern Ontario are registered with the
Ontario Highway Transport Board. Around half of these charter carriers are
based in major Northern Ontario urban areas, with others based in smaller
communities such as Hearst and Sioux Lookout. Additional carriers based
elsewhere in Ontario are registered to offer charter service in Northern Ontario.
Charter carriers offer service for group travel in Northern Ontario for a wide
variety of trip purposes, including social, shopping, and work-related. Many
charter carriers are also tour providers, organizing tourism-related travel in
Northern Ontario.
Charter carriers are also important in supporting shuttle service for employees to
the remote Northern Ontario mining locations. For example, Tisdale Bus Lines
has been chartered to provide scheduled service to Cochrane from the Detour
Lake mine. Chartered carriers are important for remote industrial operations,
providing employee transport service from major urban centres to employee
camps.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 48
6 Community Transportation Services
Numerous small-scale transportation services have been established to help
close the gaps in intercommunity rail and bus passenger transportation, and
serve a variety of trip purposes. Often these are geared to specific markets,
such as non-emergency health care, seniors, or people with disabilities. While
many of these services address intra-community transportation needs, the focus
of this technical backgrounder is on intercommunity transportation services.
6.1 Sample Community-Based Services
This section highlights several examples of community-based transportation
services in Northern Ontario. An extensive list is included as Appendix A. Some
examples of these services are described below:
Atikokan Native Friendship Centre: Life Long Care Program:
Provides programs and services to address needs of elderly Aboriginal
people with chronic illness and/or any form of disability;
Provides transportation within the municipality to all events at the Centre,
the hospital or clinic and for errands around town including grocery
shopping;
Arranges transportation for out of town specialist appointments when no
other arrangements are available;
Must be registered in the Life Long Care program to qualify for
transportation;
Out-of-town transportation determined by program coordinator based on
discussion with client to ensure no other transportation is available;
No fee or fare for transportation; Centre receives some Provincial and
Federal funding.
Canadian Red Cross Society – Kenora and District (Cochrane, Kenora District,
Rainy River District): Seniors Transportation Program
Offers door-to-door transportation;
Provides rural and local residents transportation for medical or health
related appointments in/out of town;
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 49
Acts as a third-party designate for travel grants, so that local individuals
can sign the travel grant over to cover some or all of the cost for out of
town and/or overnight trips;
Accommodates folding wheelchairs for individuals able to get in and out
without assistance;
Eligibility criteria:
Must not be able to access the public transportation services (i.e., too far to walk/bus stairs too difficult)
Must not be able to drive themselves
Must not live in a long-term care facility
Must be able to get in and out of the vehicle with minimal assistance.
Municipality of Machin, Vermilion Bay
Offers a service to assist seniors with independently living
Provides transportation to the City of Dryden for medical appointments,
shopping, etc.
West Parry Sound Community Support Services
Offers non-emergency transportation to local and long-distance medical
appointments and regular activities (such as grocery shopping and
banking).
Volunteer drivers.
Timiskaming Home Support, Kirkland Lake
Local Accessible Transit - Non-emergency door-to-door wheelchair-
accessible transportation to medical appointments, shopping, church,
school or other destinations;
Advance reservations required;
Fee per ride and billed on a monthly basis;
Last-minute cancellations are billed;
Escorts/companions may be required during the trip and ride at no cost.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 50
Patricia Region Senior Services, Dryden
Partners with Dryden Native Friendship Centre to provide transportation
services;
Provides transportation to medical appointments, shopping, and social
activities;
Provides up to six discount taxi vouchers per month;
Must meet one of the following criteria:
The client is in receipt of or eligible to receive other long-term care community services
The client is isolated and requires social interaction or stimulation.
6.2 Issues and Challenges
Despite operators’ best efforts, there are issues and challenges in operating
community-based transportation services that were identified at a recent
community engagement meeting. The top issues are as follows:
It can be difficult to attract qualified volunteer drivers;
There is a cost in training drivers;
There is a shortage of vehicles, including a shortage of wheelchair-accessible vehicles;
Vehicle maintenance costs are high;
Typically, the focus is on transportation for seniors and other identified client groups, which can exclude the general public also in
need of transportation;
There are issues with cost and user affordability;
There are cultural sensitivity issues with some drivers when serving Indigenous populations;
Services are often not advertised and therefore not widely known in the community;
There are many trip requests that go unmet; and
Community based services are financially strained.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 51
7 Outlooks for Intercommunity Passenger Transportation in Northern Ontario
7.1 Population Forecasts
In the Draft Socio-Economic Context Working Paper issued February 2016,
Reference, Low and High population forecasts were prepared. For the study
area as a whole, population changes for the period from 2011 to 2041 were -
1.0%, -5.0% and +1.0% for the three scenarios respectively. In other words the
Northern Ontario population is anticipated to be relatively stable. Areas within
Northern Ontario with the highest anticipated levels of growth under the
Reference scenario through 2041 include Manitoulin (10% growth), Kenora (5%
growth), Nipissing and Sudbury (both with 4% growth).
Changes in travel behaviour will generally result from changes in demographic
trends, economic and social activities in Northern Ontario, as well as the
spectrum of passenger services offered by transportation operators and
agencies. The aging demographic will have a notable impact on the
intercommunity passenger transportation needs. The overall population will be
the same or lower, but more people will require specialized transportation
services for medical appointments, shopping, social visits, and other reasons.
7.2 Passenger Rail
As discussed in Section 4.2, ridership on the existing VIA passenger rail
services are at best stable and in some respects declining. This is at least in part
because of competition with faster air services and increased levels of car
ownership. The highway network is also being improved, increasing the
feasibility and/or attractiveness of travel by private vehicle instead of by rail, with
resulting increased fuel use and emissions compared to travel by rail.
In general, passenger rail services require capital-intensive facilities and
equipment and multi-person crews. Therefore, this mode has less flexibility than
other modes to scale its service to the need and population served. These
factors can make passenger rail less competitive with intercommunity bus
service. Because of these factors it is unlikely that the federal government,
through VIA Rail Canada, will implement new scheduled passenger rail services
in Northern Ontario. There could be some potential for a tourist service in some
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 52
areas based on the model of the several Rocky Mountaineer excursions that
have been implemented in Western Canada, though the potential has not been
assessed to any degree.
An argument could also be made that although rail is costly to provide, there
could be a net benefit, economic or otherwise, to the region for providing
strategic passenger rail services.
7.3 Intercommunity Bus
Recent trends indicate that the existing method of providing conventional
scheduled bus services is running into serious difficulties in Northern Ontario.
While high passenger vehicle volumes between some major centres in the North
such as Sudbury and North Bay indicate that there is potential market for viable
intercommunity bus service, the current service delivery model is resulting in
depressed ridership and subsequent service cuts. Previous revenue generators
such as parcel/mail delivery are less frequently used than in the past because of
increased courier services, and no longer provide additional revenues to offset
the costs of passenger services as they have in the past. Travel frequencies are
low and travel schedules are often inconvenient. Any new services that could be
implemented will likely benefit from being based on a different model, perhaps
using smaller vehicles to serve both individuals and groups travelling together,
matching supply to demand on a real-time basis with a form of dynamic
scheduling.
There is currently an MTO initiative to modernize the regulatory environment for
intercommunity bus province-wide. A potential improvement could be to reduce
the entry controls of OHTB to reduce the time and legal fees involved in starting
a new service and to foster competition. The revised regulatory context as a
result of the MTO review of intercommunity bus regulations would have a direct
impact on the strategic options put forward as part of NOMTS. Alternative
service delivery models are also being studied, and may be proposed as part of
other strategic options for NOMTS.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 53
7.4 Community Services
Over the years, a range of community-based transportation services have
emerged to fill in service gaps or meet both general ridership and specialized
transportation needs (i.e. seniors, persons with disabilities, low income earners
and youth). Looking forward, community transportation initiatives and alternative
service delivery models provided by municipalities and/or local health service
groups, social service agencies, and/or other volunteer organizations will likely
continue to play a role to meet new and growing intra and intercommunity
transportation needs in the North.
Through the Provincial Community Transportation Pilot Grant Program,
municipalities and partnering community organizations are able to carry out pilot
projects that optimize existing resources and provide more travel options to
more people, thereby improving service. In many cases, using smaller vehicles,
internet technology and dynamic scheduling, these projects can help residents
in smaller communities travel more conveniently to necessary services and
other opportunities in larger urban centres.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 54
8 Issues and Opportunities
8.1 Intercommunity Passenger Transportation — General
A revised framework for providing a network of intercommunity passenger
transportation services is needed in the North to make intercommunity rail and
bus travel more coordinated and to provide more viable transportation options,
from both a service provision and a ridership point of view. Building on the
existing intercommunity passenger network as a base between larger centres
and/or along primary provincial highways (save for between Hearst and
Longlac), community-based transportation solutions can better fill in community
transportation gaps.
Overarching planning principles to consider in Strategy development relating to
intercommunity transportation include the following:
Ensuring a basic level of service connectivity between regional hubs/centres along major provincial highways (e.g. ensuring the provision of same-day return travel options to and from regional centres) and effective service between regional centres;
Coordination of travel schedules between modes and providers to optimize connections;
Helping connections between travel modes to be more seamless by supporting multimodal transportation;
Ensuring equitable access to provincial government services that are usually provided in regional centres for all ages and for all social groups
Providing safe shelters/waiting areas at major pick-up points with basic services and communications (e.g. covered shelter, cell-phone/telephone service, and in the longer-term, real-time bus/train arrival information);
Access to reliable and optimal internet access while travelling; and
Enhanced information about available intercommunity transportation services, including connections to other transportation modes and services.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 55
8.2 Rail Passenger Services
Issues
VIA Rail passenger service in Northern Ontario is more sparse, slow, and
infrequent than desirable to serve as a primary regional intercommunity
transportation mode. The schedule of the most important service route in the
North, “The Canadian,” is designed to cater to trans-continental travellers,
resulting in inconvenient travel schedules for Northern Ontario travellers.
Since most rail lines in the north are single-track and passenger trains have to
reduce speed when they overtake freight trains moving in the same direction
and wait for freight trains moving in the opposite direction to find sidings,
commercial speeds are low and delays are common.
Scheduled travel times by rail can be longer than road travel time. As an
example, the scheduled time for “The Canadian” to Sudbury is 7 hours, while the
road journey from downtown Toronto is approximately 4 hours.
Aside from the larger urban centres, rail stations or shelters are not generally
provided at stops.
The costs of providing passenger rail service are very high compared to road-
based modes, given the costs of maintaining train equipment and infrastructure,
and the minimum crew size needed to safely operate the train. Only when rail
ridership is very high, such as in high-volume urban corridors, can rail
passenger service come close to being provided on a cost-recovery basis.
Therefore, rail passenger transportation services are subsidized by the
government. In examining the effectiveness and efficiency of such services,
however, the larger benefits of passenger rail should be taken into
consideration, such as ensuring a minimum level of accessibility to services for
the resident population, making the region more attractive to tourism, and/or
potential environmental benefits such as reduced GHG and other emissions.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 56
Opportunities
Availability of a Network of Railway Infrastructure
One important opportunity for expanding or reconfiguring rail service in Northern
Ontario is that rail track is already in place and is being maintained for freight
use. For example, this could allow VIA service to be extended to serve the
largest community in Northwestern Ontario, Thunder Bay, by either:
Extending the “Northern Ontario” line on the CP route from Sudbury to White River westerly to Thunder Bay, directly connecting the two
largest urban centres of Northern Ontario, and allowing the opportunity for scheduling that would serve both centres well; or
Rerouting “The Canadian” service from the CN line to the CP route to Winnipeg; this also would also connect the two largest Northern Ontario centres, though likely with less convenient schedules for Northerners, and would allow transcontinental riders to take advantage of the Lake Superior scenery. In this case, a remote area service would probably still be required on the CN line between Sudbury and Sioux Lookout.
Based on results from the NOMTS Part 1 passenger vehicle survey in
2011/2012, there is an average of 218 people per day travelling between
Sudbury and Thunder Bay, in addition to air travellers, and individuals who do
not make the trip because of a lack of suitable service. Some of these trips could
be served or induced by rail with one of the two options described above.
In many cases where passenger rail service is not currently provided on existing
rail track, the track would need significant improvements to allow for viable
passenger rail operating speeds. For example, in the Huron Central Rail corridor
between Sault Ste. Marie and Sudbury, which currently operates only freight
trains, the rail speed limit is low because of the quality of the track; according to
Huron Central sources reinstatement of passenger services would require
investment in upgrading.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 57
8.3 Intercommunity Bus
Issues
Low Service Frequencies for Existing Services
Intercommunity bus services are an important part of mobility for Northern
Ontario residents, but service levels are lower than required to encourage their
use and make the services more viable. Service frequencies and schedules are
not conducive to same-day trips to urban centres for shopping, social activities,
and medical and other appointments, which are a primary trip purposes for
intercommunity bus transportation. This greatly increases the cost of travel by
requiring an overnight stay for these travellers.
Participants in strategy engagement activities have noted that with the reduction
of Greyhound service provision, the now once-daily Greyhound buses are often
sold out/full when they arrive at a station or stop, leaving passengers with no
other means of transportation — resorting to hitchhiking is not uncommon. Many
stops in rural areas have no shelter whatsoever, which makes long wait times
and the lack of coordination between services even more problematic and
potentially dangerous for waiting passengers.
Inconvenient Schedules
Scheduled travel times for services can be very inconvenient and greatly
discourage use of available services. For example, on days when ONTC does
not provide service between North Bay and Sudbury, the only eastbound bus
departs Sudbury at 12:30 a.m. and arrives at North Bay at 2:20 a.m. (The
westbound route’s scheduling is better: the bus departs North Bay at 3:20 p.m.
and arrives at Sudbury at 5:45 p.m.).
Even where bus terminals are provided, the terminals or facilities tend not to be
open to accommodate the night-time busses.
Geographic Coverage
The intercommunity bus service network in Northern Ontario is focused on the
Highway 11, 17 and 144 corridors to connect major urban centres. Notable gaps
include the following:
There is currently a scheduled intercommunity bus service on the entire
extent of Highways 11 and 17 in Northern Ontario except for the 210 km
section between Hearst and Longlac on Highway 11, where the only
significant population centre is Constance Lake First Nation with a
population of 849. As this section of road has low travel demand as shown
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 58
by low passenger vehicle volumes, it is very difficult for any scheduled
passenger service to be financially viable; intercommunity transportation
may best be provided by alternate, more flexible transportation services;
e.g. such as discussed in Sections 2.3, 7.3and 7.4. There are also no
scheduled passenger rail or air services connecting to Hearst. Travelling
from Hearst to Thunder Bay by bus requires travelling from Hearst to
Sudbury by Ontario Northland, then from Sudbury to Thunder Bay by
Greyhound; coordinated services would greatly benefit this trip.
There is no intercommunity bus service along Highway 101 between
Timmins and Wawa; a corridor with a population of 2,605. With some
industry in the vicinity and a handful of First Nations communities in the
corridor, scheduled services could provide economic support and mobility
benefits, and increase tourism opportunities. As for Highway 17 between
Longlac and Hearst, given the low passenger traffic volumes,
intercommunity transportation may best be provided by alternate, more
flexible transportation services that can dynamically match service supply
to fluctuating demand.
Dryden is currently underserved by intercommunity transportation services.
The only available intercommunity travel option is the Greyhound service
between Winnipeg and Thunder Bay, where eastbound bus comes through
town only at 2:45 a.m. (westbound departs at 8:15 p.m.). While residents of
Sioux Lookout and Dryden commonly have a need to travel between their
two communities, Kasper Minibus connects Sioux Lookout only easterly to
Thunder Bay, although Kasper has applied to also provide a bus
connection between Sioux Lookout and Dryden.
The community of Red Lake is not served by any scheduled intercommunity bus service as it was in the past. Red Lake has a hospital and post-secondary school, but no longer has any intercommunity bus connections with communities on Highway 17.
There are approximately 18 First Nations communities and 14
municipalities and townships with a total population of approximately
31,000 without scheduled intercommunity bus service, as noted by
selected highway corridor in Exhibit 8.1. There are also numerous other
unincorporated communities, as well as First Nations communities and
municipalities that are not adjacent to a provincial highway but could be
within the potential service area if there were a scheduled intercommunity
service along the highways.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 59
Exhibit 8.1: Communities by Select Highway Corridor without Scheduled Intercommunity Bus Service
Highway Corridor
First Nations Municipalities/ Townships
Total Population (2011)
Northwestern Ontario
71 Rainy River (444) Ojibways of Onigaming (467) Naotkamegowanning (753) Animakee Wa Zhing #37 (217)
Chapple (741) Sioux Narrows (720)
2,942
105 Wabuskang First Nation (135) Red Lake (4,366) Ear Falls (1,026)
5,527
527 Gull Bay (371) Whitesand (354)
Armstrong (1,216) 1,941
584 - Greenstone (4,724) 4,724
599 Ojibway Nation of Saugeen (83) Mishkeegogamang (1,062)
Pickle Lake (425) 1,570
Total 9 total 7 total 18,809
Northeastern Ontario
6 Aundek Onmi Kaning (495) Sheguiandah (155) Wikwemikong (2,520) Whitefish River (485)
Assigninack (960) Central Manitoulin (1,958) Tehkummah (406) Northeastern Manitoulin and
the Islands (2,706)
9,685
101 Brunswick House (207) Chapleau Ojibway Cree (30) Chapleau Cree First Nation (59)
Chapleau (2,116) 2,412
614 Ojibway Nation of Saugeen (83) Mishkeegogamang (1,062)
Pickle Lake (425) 1,570
631 - Hornepayne (1,050) 1,050
Total 9 total 7 total 12,097
Population sources: INAC, Statistics Canada
Rest Stops
Intercommunity bus services would benefit from enhanced highway rest stops.
Very long travel distances mean some travel is necessarily done at night, when
even bus terminals are not open. The ability to stop at highway rest areas with at
least basic services available at night would benefit both the drivers and
passengers of intercommunity bus services.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 60
Opportunities
Significant Passenger Traffic Volumes in the Sault Ste. Marie – North Bay
Corridor and to/from Manitoulin
One geographic market that is a potential opportunity for improved
intercommunity bus service in Northern Ontario is the Highway 17 corridor
between Sault Ste. Marie and North Bay. The passenger vehicle traffic on this
corridor is higher than in most Northern Ontario highway corridors and includes
three major urban hubs/centres. The only intercommunity passenger transit
service west of Sudbury is once-daily Greyhound service as part of its Toronto-
Winnipeg service. Sudbury to Ottawa also has once-daily Greyhound service as
part of the service to Ottawa, which operates at travel times that are generally
inconvenient for local travel. ONTC has recently added daytime bus service
between Sudbury and Ottawa as part of an ongoing pilot project.
Another potential opportunity for improved intercommunity bus service is in the
corridor connecting Manitoulin Island to Sudbury, which also has significant
passenger vehicle flows. Sudbury is the primary destination for trips for health
care and other services for residents of Manitoulin.
While the population of Northern Ontario is expected to remain relatively stable
through 2041, with some areas seeing a slight decline, Manitoulin is anticipated
to have the highest rate of growth with a 10% increase from 13,300 in population
in 2011 to 14,600 by 2041. Nipissing (including North Bay) and Greater Sudbury
are both anticipated to have 4% population growth (87,600 to 91,500 in
Nipissing and 164,900 to 172,300 in Greater Sudbury). The above opportunities
reflect these favourable demographic trends while addressing current
deficiencies in service.
Regulatory Environment
The current regulatory environment can be a deterrent to new service provision.
Once a service is approved, the operator has to continue operation or provide at
least 90 days’ notice to discontinue. The MTO initiative to modernize the
regulatory environment may benefit the provision of intercommunity bus
transportation in Northern Ontario.
Flexibility in Service Models and Vehicle Sizes
The Kasper Minibus option illustrates the potential of using smaller vehicle sizes
to reduce costs and increase the financial viability of providing a new bus
service where the anticipated ridership is too low to fill a full-size bus. These
services are also able to provide schedules that are more convenient because
they are based in the North and not operating long-distance through services.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 61
Other possibilities for non-conventional vehicles include sleeper buses to more
comfortably accommodate long-distance travellers.
Seasonal Travel Flows
Northern Ontario tends to host significantly more tourists and people travelling
for recreational purposes in summer than in winter. As noted in the Highways
and Roads technical backgrounder, passenger vehicle volumes on the Northern
Ontario highway network increase on average 65% overall between winter and
summer months, and summer average daily passenger vehicle traffic is 30%
higher than annual average daily passenger vehicle traffic. The amount of
seasonal increase varies by area, and much of this additional traffic is seen on
summer weekends.
VIA Rail has a reduced winter schedule on “The Canadian” route and the Agawa
Canyon Train operates only seasonally; meanwhile most other intercommunity
passenger transportation services are provided at the same frequencies year-
round. Similarly, there may be an opportunity for other passenger transportation
modes to take greater advantage of increased summer travel demand in
Northern Ontario and either increase frequencies in the summer or introduce
more seasonal services to make intercommunity passenger transportation more
profitable and to make Northern Ontario more attractive to tourists during the
peak travel season.
8.4 Community Transportation Services
Issues
A number of issues relating to keeping community-based transportation services
in operation were noted during consultation findings; commonly noted among
these were funding challenges including the fact that funding is transferred to
municipalities and not directly to service providers, and challenges in recruiting,
training, and retaining quality staff and volunteers.
Most of these services are set up for a single purpose and may therefore not
realize their full potential; for example a service set up to provide connections to
health facilities in a regional centre would likely also be used by students going
to and from post-secondary school facilities if the client group of the service
were expanded.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 62
Opportunities
An effective network of commercial intercommunity passenger bus or rail
transportation services between major centres in Northern Ontario can provide a
good foundation for community-based transportation services to build on and
connect into.
Based on Strategy development consultation findings, in general, there also
seems to be openness to increased coordination and partnerships to share and
pool resources together in order to increase efficiencies and deliver improved
intra- and inter-community-based transportation services. One challenge that
would need to be addressed is the fact that many organizations providing
community transportation services compete with each other for funding, have
differing mandates, and serve different but overlapping markets or groups such
as seniors or health-care trips.
There is an opportunity to strengthen, promote and facilitate the sharing and
exchange of experiences, ideas, best practices and information on community
transportation services and models in Ontario. The recently launched Ontario
Community Transportation Network provides the opportunity to enhance
community transportation services in Ontario by connecting individuals,
organizations, and transportation service providers through its website,
newsletters, blogs and discussion forums, webinars, events and other
networking activities. The Network was developed by the Rural Ontario Institute
and the Ontario Healthy Communities Coalition with funding support from MTO.
The Network is open to all community transportation stakeholders and the
general public. There is no charge to join.
There is an also increased interest in leveraging shared mobility technologies
and models to advance on-demand or ridesharing coordinating platforms to
benefit communities in the North, and especially more rural and lower-density
communities. There are some examples of ridesharing coordinating platforms
that are being utilized and expanding in Southern Ontario (i.e., OpenRide1),
which may be applicable to community based transportation service delivery in
Northern Ontario.
1 https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2016/08/21/inter-city-ride-sharing-company-targets-the-gta.html
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 63
References
Malone Given Parsons Ltd. (2007). Algoma Central Railway: Wilderness
Tourism by Rail Opportunity Study. Retrieved August 24, 2016 from
<http://usaskstudies.coop/documents/social-economy-reports-and-
newsltrs/Algoma%20Railway.pdfF>
M.J. Bradley & Associates (2014). Updated Comparison of Energy Use &
Emissions from Different Transportation Modes. Submitted to American Bus
Association, Washington DC. April. Retrieved September 22, 2016 from <
https://www.buses.org/assets/images/uploads/general/Report%20-
%20Energy%20Use%20and%20Emissions.pdf>.
Ontario Ministry of Transportation. (2016). Intercity Bus Modernization: Creating
Opportunities and Connecting Ontario Communities. Retrieved August 24, 2016
from <http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/transit/pdfs/intercommunity-bus-
proposal.pdf>.
VIA Rail (2014). Annual Report 2014. Retrieved April 27, 2016 from
<https://www.viarail.ca/sites/all/files/media/pdfs/About_VIA/our-company/annual-
reports/2014/VIA%20Rail_2014%20Annual%20Report_EN.pdf >.
Via Rail (2015). Annual Report 2015. Retrieved August 24, 2016 from
<http://www.viarail.ca/sites/all/files/media/pdfs/About_VIA/our-company/annual-
reports/2015/ViaRail_AnnualReport_2015_EN.pdf>.
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 64
Alternate Text for Exhibits
Exhibit 1.1: Passenger Rail Services in Northern Ontario
This map shows passenger rail services in Northern Ontario by line and
operator. The operators and lines are VIA Rail (Toronto to Winnipeg), VIA Rail
(Sudbury to White River), and Ontario Northland (Moosonee to Cochrane). The
map also shows the days of operation of each service, in addition to major stops
and flag stops. Roads are also included and are classified as primary,
secondary, secondary local, or major out of province.
Return to Exhibit 1.1
Exhibit 1.2: Scheduled Intercommunity Bus Services in Northern Ontario
This map shows the intercity bus services in Northern Ontario being run by
Autobus Maheux, Caribou Coach, Greyhound, Kasper, and Ontario Northland.
The map shows routes differentiated by trip frequency, as well as stop locations.
Return to Exhibit 1.2
Exhibit 1.4: Scheduled Air Passenger Services in Northern Ontario
This map depicts all of the scheduled passenger air services in Northern
Ontario. Airports in Northern are distinguished as remote, municipal, or
international. Airlines are distinguished as international, regional, or international
seasonal. The international airlines are Air Canada, Porter, and WestJet. The
Regional airlines are Air Creebec, Bearskin, Nakina Air, North Star Air,
Perimeter Aviation, Slate Falls Airways, Thunder Airlines and Wasaya. The
international seasonal airlines are Air Transat and Sunwing. Roads are also
included and are classified as primary, secondary, secondary local, or major out
of province.
Return to Exhibit 1.4
Exhibit 2.1: Indicative Comparison of Energy Use per Passenger-Kilometre
by Travel Mode
This chart shows the comparative energy usage in BTU per passenger-kilometre
by travel mode. High, average and low values are shown. Average values are as
follows: Car - 1 Person, 1,417; Car - 2 Person 708; Domestic Air, 1,565; Intercity
Rail 1,006; and Motorcoach 357.
Return to Exhibit 2.1
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 65
Exhibit 2.2: Indicative Comparison of Carbon Dioxide-Equivalent
Emissions per Passenger-Kilometre by Travel Mode
This chart shows the comparative carbon dioxide emissions as grams per
passenger-kilometre by travel mode. High, average and low values are shown.
Average values are as follows: Car - 1 Person, 229; Car - 2 Person, 114;
Domestic Air, 117; Intercity Rail, 91; and Motorcoach, 27.
Return to Exhibit 2.2
Exhibit 3.1: Flows of Passenger Vehicles using the Northern Ontario
Highway Network, 2011 and 2041
This map shows average daily passenger vehicle flows using the Northern
Ontario highway network. Flows are differentiated as 2011 values less
decreases to 2014, increases from 2011 to 2041, and decreases from 2011 to
2041.
Return to Exhibit 3.1
Exhibit 3.2: Travel Grant Recipient Home Community/Municipality
Locations, March 2014 to April 2015
This map of Northern Ontario indicates travel grant recipient home locations as
graduated pie charts sized according to the number of recipients in each
location. Patients, companions, and third parties are indicated as separate pie
chart segments.
Return to Exhibit 3.2
Exhibit 3.3: Travel Grant Recipient Service Locations, March 2014 to April
2015
This map of Northern Ontario shows travel grant recipient service locations as
graduated pie charts sized according to the number of recipients in each
location. Patients, companions, and third parties are indicated as separate pie
chart segments. The largest service locations are Sudbury, Thunder Bay,
Toronto, Winnipeg, Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie, North Bay, and Ottawa.
Return to Exhibit 3.3
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 66
Exhibit 3.6: Bus and Taxi Connections to Post-Secondary Institutions and
Health Care Services
This map shows hospitals, nursing stations, health centres, and post-secondary
institutions within Northern Ontario, and intercity bus lines and taxi service
ranges that can potentially be used to access these services where available.
Taxi service ranges are based on a 50-km radius of the service provider.
Return to Exhibit 3.6
Exhibit 4.1: VIA Rail Boardings by Station for “The Canadian”
Transcontinental Line by Destination Zone, 2015
This chart shows annual VIA Rail boardings by Northern Ontario station for The
Canadian train route. Boardings are also broken down into trips destined to
Northern Ontario, to Southern Ontario, and to Western Canada. The busiest
stations are Sudbury Junction, Sioux Lookout, Hornepayne, and Armstrong.
Return to Exhibit 4.1
Exhibit 4.2: VIA Rail Boardings by Station for “Northern Ontario” Line,
2015
This chart shows annual VIA Rail boardings and alightings by station for
Northern Ontario train route. Sudbury is the busiest station for both boardings
and alightings, with 1,852 boardings and 1,360 alightings. The next busiest
station is White River, with approximately 700 boardings and 650 alightings,
followed by Chapleau, Cartier and Biscotasing.
Return to Exhibit 4.2
Exhibit 4.3: VIA “The Canadian” Trips to/from Northern Ontario, 2009 –
2015
This chart shows total trips on VIA Rail's The Canadian train within Northern
Ontario, to/from Southern Ontario, and to/from Western Canada annually from
2009 to 2015. There were approximately 16,000 trips in 2009 decreasing to
11,000 in 2015. The component of trips within Northern Ontario stayed relatively
constant over that time, between 4,000 and 5,000 trips.
Return to Exhibit 4.3
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 67
Exhibit 4.4: VIA "Northern Ontario" Boardings, 2009 – 2015
This chart shows VIA Rail Northern Ontario train boardings annually from 2009
to 2015. There is a slight downward trend from 5,500 boardings in 2009 to 4,900
boardings in 2015.
Return to Exhibit 4.4
Exhibit 5.3: Recent Scheduled Intercommunity Bus Service Reductions
and Discontinuances
This map of Northern Ontario shows current scheduled intercommunity bus
services together with recent scheduled intercity bus service reductions and
discontinuances by Greyhound, Kasper, Caribou Coach and Ontario Northland.
Return to Exhibit 5.3
Exhibit 5.4:
This exhibit shows a full size Ontario Northland Motorcoach on a rural highway.
Return to Exhibit 5.4
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 A.1
Appendix A: List of Community Transportation Services
Northwestern Ontario
KENORA DISTRICT
Animbiigoo Zaagi'igan Anishinaabek - Health Office – Medical Transportation Program
Anishinaabeg of Naongashiing - Band Office - Medical Transportation Program
Canada. First Nations and Inuit Health - Northern Ontario - Kenora - First Nations and Inuit Health Office
Canadian Red Cross Society - Kenora and District - Dryden - Seniors Transportation Program
Cat Lake First Nation - Margaret Gray Nursing Station - Medical Transportation Program
Deer Lake First Nation - Nursing Station - Medical Transportation Program
District of Kenora Home for the Aged - Kenora - Pinecrest Home - Transportation
District of Kenora Home for the Aged - Red Lake Branch - Transportation
Dryden Handi Transit - Transportation Services
Dryden Native Friendship Centre - Community Connections Program
Dryden Native Friendship Centre - Life Long Care Program
Eabametoong First Nation - Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Kenora Handi Transit
Lac Seul First Nation - Kejick Bay Health Clinic - Medical Transportation Program
Machin (Municipality of) - Transportation
McDowell Lake First Nation - Band Office
Métis Nation of Ontario - Northwest Métis Council - Long Term Care
Mishkeegogamang First Nation - Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Mishkeegogamang First Nation - Health Centre - Travel Clerk
Ne Chee Friendship Centre - Kenora - Railway St - Life Long Care Program
Neskantaga First Nation - Band Office - Medical Transportation Program
Nibinamik First Nation - Nursing Station - Medical Transportation Program
Nishnawbe Gamik Friendship Centre - Life Long Care Program
North Caribou Lake First Nation - Sena Memorial Nursing Station - Travel Clerk
North Spirit Lake First Nation - Stanley Rae Memorial Health Station - Medical Transportation Program
Northwest Angle 33 First Nation - Main Band Office - Angle Inlet - Medical Transportation Program
Northwest Angle 37 First Nation - Windigo Island
Health Office - Medical Transportation Program
Ochiichagwe'Babigo' Ining Ojibway Nation - Band Office - Referral Clerk
Patricia Region Senior Services - Transportation
Rainy River District Home Support Program - Atikokan - Transportation Program
Red Lake Indian Friendship Centre - Site 2 - Canada Prenatal and Nutrition Program
Sachigo Lake First Nation - Isaac Barkman Memorial Nursing Station - Medical Transportation Program
Shoal Lake 40 First Nation - Shoal Lake Medical Centre - Medical Transportation Program
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 A.2
KENORA (continued)
Sioux Lookout First Nations Health Authority - Sioux Lookout - Meno Ya Win Way - Transportation Services
Sioux Lookout Handi Transit
Slate Falls Nation - Band Office - Medical Transportation Program
Wabaseemoong Independent Nations - Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Wabauskang First Nation - Wabauskang Health Office - Medical Transportation Program
Wapekeka First Nation - Nursing Station - Medical Transportation Program
Wauzhushk Onigum Nation - Band Office - Medical Transportation Program
Webequie First Nation - Nursing Station - Medical Transportation Program
RAINY RIVER DISTRICT
Atikokan Native Friendship Centre - Life Long Care Program
First Nations and Inuit Health - Northern Ontario - Fort Frances - First Nations and Inuit Health Office
Couchiching First Nation - Fort Frances - 201 Frog Creek Rd - Medical Transportation Program
Lac La Croix First Nation - Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Métis Nation of Ontario - Sunset Country Métis Council - Long Term Care
Mitaanjigamiing First Nation - Band Office - Medical Transportation Program
Naicatchewenin First Nation - Band Office - Medical Transportation Program
Nigigoonsiminikaaning First Nation - Health Office - Medical Transportation Program
Rainy River District Home Support Program - Fort Frances - Transportation Program
Rainy River First Nation - Band Office - Medical Transportation Program
Seine River First Nation - Band Office - Long Term Care Program
Seine River First Nation - Band Office - Medical Transportation Program
THUNDER BAY DISTRICT
Aroland First Nation - Aroland Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Biinjitiwaabik Zaaging Anishinaabek - Rocky Bay First Nation Health Station - Medical Transportation Program
Canada. First Nations and Inuit Health - Northern Ontario - Geraldton - First Nations and Inuit Health Office
Ginoogaming First Nation - New Ginoogaming Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Matawa First Nations Management - Health and Social Services
Long Lake 58 First Nation - Longlac - 209B Otter Rd - Medical Transportation Program
Ojibways of the Pic River First Nation - Pic River First Nation Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Pays Plat First Nation - Pays Plat Health Centre
Pays Plat First Nation - Pays Plat Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Red Rock Indian Band – Medical Transportation Program
Thunderbird Friendship Centre - Aboriginal Life Long Care Program
Upsala Volunteer Ambulance Services Association
Whitesand First Nation – Medical Transportation Program
Wilson Memorial General Hospital - Seniors' Services Van
THUNDER BAY CITY
Canadian Cancer Society - Northwestern Region - Thunder Bay
Driving Miss Daisy - Transportation Services
Elevate NWO
Evi's New Quality Home Care
Fort William First Nation - Fort William First Nation Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Superior Elder Care
Thunder Bay (City of). Municipal Services - Lift Plus
Thunder Bay Indian Friendship Centre - Aboriginal Life Long Care Program
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 A.3
Northeastern Ontario
COCHRANE DISTRICT
Canadian Cancer Society - Timmins Unit – Transportation
Canadian Red Cross - Cochrane Office - Community Health and Wellness - Rides and Transportation
Canadian Red Cross - Hearst Branch - Community Health and Wellness - Rides and Transportation
Canadian Red Cross - Kapuskasing Branch - Community Health and Wellness - Rides and Transportation
Canadian Red Cross - Moosonee Office - Community Health and Wellness - Rides and Transportation
Canadian Red Cross - Timmins Branch - Community Health and Wellness - Scheduling Transportation
Centre de santé communautaire de Kapuskasing et région - Aging at Home - Transportation and Grocery Aid Program
Golden Manor Home for the Aged - Timmins - Community Home Support Services - Volunteer Transportation Service
Ininew Friendship Centre - Cochrane - Life Long Care Program - Medical Transportation
Metis Nation of Ontario - Timmins - Community Support Services Program
Moose Cree First Nation - Medical Transportation
Services de Counselling Hearst, Kapuskasing, Smooth Rock Falls Counselling Services - Programs and
Services for Victims - Victim Services Program - Hearst
Services de Counselling Hearst, Kapuskasing, Smooth Rock Falls Counselling Services - Programs and Services for Victims - Victim Services Program - Kapuskasing
Smooth Rock Falls Hospital - Aging At Home - Transportation
Taykwa Tagamou First Nation - Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Timmins Native Friendship Centre - Life Long Care Program (LLCP)
Timmins Native Friendship Centre - Moosonee - First St - Life Long Care Program (LLCP)
Wahgoshig First Nation - Matheson - Health Clinic - Medical Transportation Program
Weeneebayko Area Health Authority - Non-Insured Health Benefits Program (NIHB)
ALGOMA DISTRICT
Algoma Public Health - Sault College - Health Support and First Aid Centre
Blind River District Health Centre - Community Support Services - Generic Transportation
Canadian Cancer Society - Algoma Community Office
Canadian Red Cross - Sault Ste Marie and District Branch - Community Support Services - Rides and Transportation
Canadian Red Cross - Wawa Office - Community Health and Wellness - Rides and Transportation
Dr H S Trefry Memorial Centre (The) - Richards Landing - Transportation
Garden River First Nation - Naan Doo We'an - Wellness Centre - Life Long Care Program - Transportation Services
Garden River First Nation - Naan Doo We'an - Wellness Centre - Medical Transportation Services
Hornepayne Community Hospital - Transportation
Huron Lodge - Elliot Lake - Community Support Services - Volunteer Transportation
Huron Lodge - Elliot Lake - Specialized Transit
Indian Friendship Centre of Sault Ste Marie (The) - Life Long Care Program - Medical Transportation
Mississauga First Nation - Blind River - Health Centre - Medical Transportation
Serpent River First Nation - Cutler - Geka Wigwam Seniors Lodge - Home and Community Care Program - Transportation
Wawa Consumer Initiative, Iris Place
TIMISKAMING DISTRICT
Matachewan First Nation - Health Services - Medical Transportation Program
Timiskaming Home Support - Haileybury - Transportation
Timiskaming Home Support - Kirkland Lake - Transportation
IBI GROUP DRAFT TECHNICAL BACKGROUNDER: INTERCOMMUNITY PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Ministry of Northern Development and Mines
November 2016 A.4
NIPISSING DISTRICT
Canadian Red Cross - North Bay - Community Support Services - Seniors' Transportation
Community Counselling Centre of Nipissing - Counselling for Women
Nipissing First Nation - Health Services - Lawrence Commanda Health Centre - Local Medical Transportation
Senior's Helping Hands Services - Sturgeon Falls - Errands and Transportation Services
Temagami First Nation - Doreen Potts Health Centre - Medical Transportation
MANITOULIN/SUDBURY DISTRICT
Aboriginal Peoples' Alliance of Northern Ontario (APANO) - Chapleau
Atikameksheng Anishnawbek - Naughton - Shawenekezhik Health Centre - Patient Transportation Program
Aundeck Omni Kaning First Nation - Little Current - Naandwehgiigamik Community Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Brunswick House First Nation - Chapleau - Health Centre - Medical Transportation Services
Brunswick House First Nation - Chapleau - Health Centre - Transportation Services
Canadian Cancer Society - Sudbury and District Unit - Transportation
Canadian Red Cross - Sudbury Branch - Community Support Services - Seniors’ Transportation
Chapleau Cree First Nation - Health Centre - In-Home and Community Support Services - Transportation
Circle of Care - Sudbury
For Seniors Only Inc - Sudbury
M'Chigeeng First Nation - Wellness Centre - Long-Term Care Program - Transportation Services
Mattagami First Nation - Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
N'Swakamok Native Friendship Centre - Sudbury - Life Long Care Program - Transportation
N'Swakamok Native Friendship Centre - Sudbury - Translation Program and Healing and Wellness Program
Noojmowin Teg Health Centre - Aging at Home Transportation
Sagamok Anishnawbek First Nation - Massey - Community Wellness Department
Services de santé de Chapleau Health Services - Chapleau General Hospital - Transportation
Services de santé de Chapleau Health Services - Senior Transportation Van
Sheguiandah First Nation - Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Sheshegwaning First Nation - Health Centre - Medical Transportation Program
Sudbury-East Seniors Support - Noelville - Transportation Services
Universal Home Care (Medical/Non-Medical Rehabilitation and Home Maintenance Services) - Greater Sudbury - Non Medical Services
VON Victorian Order of Nurses - North East District - Espanola Site - Transportation
VON Victorian Order of Nurses - North East District - Mindemoya Site - Transportation
Wahnapitae First Nation - Community Support Services - Transportation
Wahnapitae First Nation - Home and Community Care - Transportation
Wahnapitae First Nation - Medical Transportation Program
Wikwemikong Health Centre - Amikook Seniors' Centre - Generic Transportation
Wikwemikong Health Centre - Medical Transportation
PARRY SOUND DISTRICT
Eastholme Home for the Aged - Powassan - East Parry Sound Community Support Services Program - Volunteer Transportation and Wheelchair Accessible Van - Burk's Falls
Eastholme Home for the Aged - Powassan - East Parry Sound Community Support Services Program - Volunteer Transportation and Wheelchair Accessible Van - Powassan
Henvey Inlet First Nation - Health Centre - Medical Van
Magnetawan First Nation - Health Centre - Community Support Services - Medical Transportation
Royal Canadian Legion - Branch 415 - Northern Memorial
Serenity Seniors Residence - Parry Sound
Shawanaga First Nation - Nobel - Healing Centre - Medical Transportation
Wasauksing First Nation - Parry Sound - Health and Social Services – Transportation
West Parry Sound Community Support
Services - Volunteer Transportation