Upload
rupert
View
163
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Interaction of Charged Particles with Matter. Survey: Interactions of Radiation with Matter : Massive Particles. Literature/Tutorials. James Ziegler. Atomic excitation ionization fluorescence phosphorescence. Dominant type of interaction: inelastic collisions with electrons. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r
Interaction of Charged Particles with
Matter
1
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r
Literature/Tutorials
James Ziegler2
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r
Main Interactions of Charged Particles
Dominant type of interaction: inelastic collisions with electrons
Atomic excitation ionization fluorescence phosphorescence
Less important (CP) collisions with nuclei :
2 2 26 22 10 6
2 16 210 10 10
10nucl nucl
atom Z
R Z cm Za cm
Most interactions of charged particles with material components are collisions with atomic electrons.Nuclear collisions are noticeable only at low kinetic energies.
3
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r
Stochastic Multiple Scattering and Straggling
U ions, 60 keV, straggling in range and angle Target of layers (“absorbers” Be, Au, Si)
Prob
abilit
y
Range (Å)
Range is diffuse: “Range straggling”
4
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r
Phenomenological Model of Energy Loss in MatterBethe et al. (1930-1953), Lindhardt’s electron theory Describes energy loss through ionization, incoming ions are fully stripped
Estimate of trends/Order of magnitude E=particle kinetic energy, e- at rest
2p
e Coul coll 2
22 e
ee
4 22p
e2e
e Z 2rp F tvr
pd E( r , x ) 2 r dr dx N
2m
4 e Zd E( r , x ) 1Ndr dx rm v
r
dx
electron
shell
dr
Zp,v
5
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r
Phenomenological Model of Energy Loss in MatterIntegrate over radial coordinate:
r 2max
rmi
min
n4 2
e2e
axp m
dE( x) d E( r , x )drdx dr dx
4 e ZdE( x) N lndx v r
rm
Estimate of radial limits: Ne = e- density le = electronic wave length, IE=ionization energy
2e e e
2 2coll e
mi
x
e
n
m ea
h p h 1 m v
t v T 1 1 1
non adiabati
IE / h average e orbital f
c motion
requ y
r
r
enc
l
r
dx
electron
shell
dr
Zp,v
6
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r
Phenomenological Model of Energy Loss in Matter
Further: 4 2 2
p ee2 2
e e
4 e Z 2m vdE N lndx m v h 1
Insert: r = number density of atoms (#atoms/volume),
ZT = atomic number of target Ne = ZT · r
T Te 0.19
T T T
(12 Z 7 ) eV for Z 13IE h
(9.76 Z 58.8 Z ) eV for Z 13
Remember: This is only a rough estimate! Calibrate real detectors
7
4 2 2
p eT2 2
e
e Z 2m v1 dE 4 Z lndx m v IE 1
r
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r
Bethe-Bloch Equation
Quantum mechanical calculation (for heavy particles M»me):
r = matter densityZT = atomic number of targetAT = mass number of target
T Te 0.19
T T T
(12 Z 7 ) eV for Z 13IE h
(9.76 Z 58.8 Z ) eV for Z 13
dx
(Zp, Ap, E)
E-dE
ZT AT r
8
22 2 2p 2eT2 22
T
Z 2m cZ1 dE MeV0.1535 ln 2dx A g cmIE 1
r
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r
Minimum Ionizing Particles
Specific Energy Loss of Protons in Silicon
2 2p 2 2eT
2 2 2T
Z 2m cZ1dE 2 2 MeV0.1535 ln ln 1 2dx A IE g cm
r
Bethe-Bloch Formula
At high (relativistic energies, the terms become dominant. In addition, radiation losses (bremsstrahlung) and r-dependent plasma effects become important.dE/dx(E) has
minimum“minimum-ionizing
particles (mip)”examples: e±, m±
9
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r10
Theoretical E-Loss Curves
Mg
He
Units MeV/Nucleon
Loss:MeV/A per mg/cm2
Bragg maximum
Semi-quantitative only: Expt values smaller both at small and large energies recharging effects for projectile
MathCad Program
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r11
Theory and Practice for Heavy Ions
Theoretical energy loss in material of finite thickness is obtained from integration of the Bethe-Bloch formula or equivalent.Actual data may differ: Calibration required
Energy lost by various ions in a 15.9 mm Si transmission detector vs. ion energy per nucleon (mass number A). Curves represent different theories.
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r12
Range and Stopping Power
Path length of trajectory
1
0
E
s sdE'R(E ) ds cos dE ' cosds
Range
S(E ) ds R(E )
Scattering angle s path variable sStochastic multiple scattering process produces straggling in range, energy loss, angle
dEds
Stopping power
Prob
abilit
y
Range (Å)
s
sds
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r13
Range and Specific Ionization
Stopping power dE/dx (specific energy loss) depends on energy E and therefore on x
3
# e ion pairsdEdx unit length
particles :1 dE 7 10 pairsIE dx mm
Bragg Curve
p
6600 ip/mm
2750 ip/mm
Highest E loss close to end of path Bragg maximum
Main E-loss mechanism: ionization, production of d electrons, electron-ion pairs
E-loss in Air: 1atm, 150C
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r14
Stopping Power Isotopic Scaling Laws
2p 2
pp
2p
p
1p2p
d m v 2dE EZ fdx dx A
Zdv g vdx A
AdvR(v) dv h vdx Z
p2p
A0.56
Z
p2p
A0.12
Z
R(Be)/R(Ar)=2.97 expt 4.67 theoZeff ŧ Zp effective charge
Describes well the difference of R for different isotopes of a given element, but:
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r 1
5
Interactions of Neutrons via Secondaries
Characteristic secondary nuclear radiation/products: 1.charged particles (n,p), (n, ),…2.neutrons (n,n’), (n,2n’),…3.fission fragments (n,f) 4. g-rays (n, g)
No electric charge no direct atomic ionization only collisions and reactions with nuclei 10-6 x weaker absorption than charged particlesProcesses depend on available n energy En:En ~ 1/40 eV (= kBT) Slow diffusion, capture by nucleiEn < 10 MeV Elastic scattering, capture, nucl. excitationEn > 10 MeV Elastic+inel. scattering, various nuclear
reactions, secondary charged reaction products
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r 1
6
Neutron Cross Sections
1b=10-24cm2=100fm2
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r 1
7
Neutron Mean Free Path
FWHM 2.35
xN x N 0 e1 1 mfp
l
lm r
r: atomic density : cross sectionl = average path length in medium between 2 collisions
Mean Free Path of Neutrons in Water
Data: Neutron-mfp-Water
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r18
Neutron mean free path data (H2O): http://t2.lanl.gov/data/ E_n [MeV] l [cm] E_n [MeV] l [cm] E_n [MeV] l [cm] E_n [MeV] l [cm] E_n [MeV] l [cm]
0.1000 1.0503 2.1000 4.5418 4.1000 6.7341 6.1000 8.6268 8.1000 10.7469
0.2000 1.3682 2.2000 4.7218 4.2000 6.3284 6.2000 9.0019 8.2000 10.3833
0.3000 1.6434 2.3000 5.0593 4.3000 6.3865 6.3000 9.1267 8.3000 10.3864
0.4000 1.7509 2.4000 5.2179 4.4000 6.5267 6.4000 8.5441 8.4000 10.6130
0.5000 2.0080 2.5000 5.1503 4.5000 7.0251 6.5000 9.6126 8.5000 10.8536
0.6000 2.2918 2.6000 5.2246 4.6000 7.1931 6.6000 9.3369 8.6000 10.9526
0.7000 2.4905 2.7000 5.3192 4.7000 7.4256 6.7000 9.3898 8.7000 10.7028
0.8000 2.6619 2.8000 5.4220 4.8000 7.4753 6.8000 9.0214 8.8000 10.7549
0.9000 2.7671 2.9000 5.5134 4.9000 7.4738 6.9000 9.7500 8.9000 11.2191
1.0000 2.4332 3.0000 5.5816 5.0000 7.7694 7.0000 9.7829 9.0000 11.2089
1.1000 2.9994 3.1000 5.5637 5.1000 7.1211 7.1000 9.7458 9.1000 11.2229
1.2000 3.2368 3.2000 5.3438 5.2000 7.7259 7.2000 8.9141 9.2000 11.5291
1.3000 2.9841 3.3000 5.1413 5.3000 8.0052 7.3000 9.5904 9.3000 11.6197
1.4000 3.5503 3.4000 5.2553 5.4000 8.1302 7.4000 9.6767 9.4000 11.4938
1.5000 3.7253 3.5000 5.3606 5.5000 8.2333 7.5000 9.9481 9.5000 11.6236
1.6000 3.8713 3.6000 5.4129 5.6000 7.7892 7.6000 10.0526 9.6000 11.6833
1.7000 4.0133 3.7000 5.5222 5.7000 7.9558 7.7000 9.9804 9.7000 11.6929
1.8000 4.1584 3.8000 5.6811 5.8000 8.3626 7.8000 9.8558 9.8000 11.6684
1.9000 3.9563 3.9000 5.9759 5.9000 8.1980 7.9000 10.0483 9.9000 11.8299
2.0000 4.3883 4.0000 6.1664 6.0000 8.1528 8.0000 10.8018 10.0000 11.8221
W. Udo Schröder, 2009
Sur
v P
art I
nt. w
ith M
atte
r19