Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2007 - 2011
FOR
GOVAN MBEKI MUNICIPALITY
REVIEWED 2010
2
Table of Contents
1. IDP OVERVIEW 1.1 Introduction [Mission & Vision] 9 1.2 Municipal Overview 1.2.1 Locality 10 1.2.2 Area 10 1.2.3 Study Area 10 1.2.4 Boundaries and Neighbours 12 1.2.5 Key Features 12 1.2.6 Climate and Air Quality 12 1.2.7 Topography / Geology / Soil Potential 12 1.2.8 Hydrology / Wetlands 13 1.2.9 Biodiversity 13 1.2.10 Spatial 14 1.2.11 Institutional Capacity / Institutional Plans 15 1.3 Population 16 1.4 Socio-economic 22 1.5 Financial viability 26 1.6 Development Objectives of Development for the Political Term 27 2. IDP PLANNING PROCESS 2.1 Analysis of Provision of Service Delivery 29 2.2 SWOT Analysis 41 2.3 Govan Mbeki Organisational Structure 42 2.4 Govan Mbeki Objectives and Strategies 43 2.5 Roles and Responsibilities 47 2.6 Municipal Integration with Sector Departments and Key Role Players 49 2.7 Department Local Government and Housing Assessment Comments 52 2.8 District Comments 52 2.9 Process Overview 52 2.10 Institutional Arrangements, Roles and Responsibilities 53 2.11 Adoption and Review of the IDP 53 2.12 Performance Management 54 2.13 Summary of community inputs 54 2.14 Public Participation Schedule: 2009/2010 56 3. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND KEY FOCUS AREAS: 3.1 Powers, Duties and Functions: 58 3.1.1 Provision of Bulk water, sanitation, roads, storm water and electricity 58 3.1.2 Municipal Health Services (Service Level Agreement with District) 59 3.1.3 Disaster, Fire and Emergency Services 60 3.1.4 Traffic Law Enforcement and Licensing 61 3.1.5 Town Planning and Building Control 62 3.1.6 Housing 63 3.1.7 Integrated Development Planning and Community Participation 64 3.2 Organisational Restructuring and Transformation 65 3.3 Financial Services 66 3.4 Inter-governmental Relations, Social and Community Services 67 3.5 Corporate Services 68 3.6 Planning and Economic Development Services 69 3.7 Infrastructure and Technical Services 70 3.8 Development Objectives, Strategies and Key Performance Indicators 71 As per the 5-year Strategic Agenda
3
4. FIVE YEAR CAPEX 4.1 Executive and Council 78 4.2 Finance 79 4.3 Corporate Services 81 4.4 Environmental Affairs and Tourism 82 4.5 Health and Community Services 92 4.6 Technical and Engineering Services 98 4.7 Public Safety 114 4.8 Summary of GMM Capital Projects: 2009/2010 5. KEY PROJECTS: 5.1 Key Internal Projects: 2009/2010: 5.1.1 Local Economic Development 118 5.1.2 Projects Supporting Provincial Flagships (PGDS) 120 5.2 Key External Projects: 2009/2010 5.2.1 Department of Health 121 5.2.2 Department of Local Government 121 5.2.3 Department of Housing 122 5.2.4 Department of Agriculture and Land Administration 123 5.2.5 Department of Social Development / Infrastructure 123 5.2.6 Department of Safety and Security 123 5.3 Gert Sibande Projects: 2009/2010 125 5.4 MIG Projects: 2009/2010 126 5.5 Potential Projects A: 2009/2010 128 5.6 Potential Projects B: 2009/2010 130 6. IDP ASSESSMENT: NEEDS PER WARD: 2008/2009 137 7. SECTOR PLANS 143
4
ACRONYMS ABET Adult Based Education and Training AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome CBOs Community Based Organisations CETA Construction Education and Training Authority CHBC Community Home Base Care CMIP Consolidated Municipal Infrastructure Programme CPTR Current Public Transport Record DACE Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Environment DBSA Development Bank of South Africa DEAT Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism DAC District AIDS Council DALA Department of Agriculture and Land Administration DLA Department of Land Affairs DLGH Department of Local Government and Housing DPLG Department of Provincial and Local Government DTI Department of Trade and Industry DM District Municipality DMA District management Area DME Department of Minerals and Energy DPW Department of Public Works DWAF Department of Water Affairs and Forestry ECA Environmental Conservation Act EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIP Environmental Implementation Plan EHS Environmental Health Services EMP Environmental Management Plan EMS Environmental Management System EPWP Expanded Public Works Programme FBS Free basic Services FBE Free Basic Electricity FPA Fire Protection Association GIS Geographic Information System GSDM Gert Sibande District Municipality GSDC Gert Sibande District Council HDI Human Development Index HOD Head of Department IDP Integrated Development Planning IGR Intergovernmental Relations IEM Integrated Environmental Management IMEP Integrated Municipal Environmental Programme IWIAMP Integrated Water Infrastructure and Asset Management Plan IWMP Integrated Waste Management Plan INEPBPU Integrated National Electrification Programme Business
Planning Unit IS Information System IT Information Technology ITP Integrated Transport Plan KPA Key Performance Area KPI Key Performance Indicator LDO Land Development Objective LED Local Economic Development LM Local Municipality LRAD Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development
5
ACRONYMS (continued) LUMS Land Use Management System MAM Multi Agency Mechanism MEC Member of Executive Committee MFMA Municipal Finance Management Act MHS Municipal Health Services MIG Municipal Infrastructure Grant MPCC Multi Purpose Community Centres MSIG Municipal Systems Improvement Grant MSP Master Systems Plan NEMA National Environmental Management Act NEPAD New Partnership for Africa‘s Development NER National Electricity Regulator NGO Non Governmental Organization NSDP National Spatial Development Perspective NWMS National Waste Management Strategy OLS Operating Licence Strategy PGDS Provincial Growth and Development Strategy PHC Primary Health Care PMS Performance Management System PPP Public Performance Areas REDS Regional Electricity Distribution System RSC Regional Service Council SABS South Africa Bureau of Standards SACOB South Africa Chamber of Business SALGA South Africa Local Government and Administration SANAC South African National AIDS Council SANCO South Africa National Civic Organization SAPS South African Police Service SETA Sector Education Training Authority SDF Spatial Development Framework SLA Service Level Agreement SOER State of the Environment Report WSA Water Services Authorities WSDP Water Services Development Plan WWTP Waste Water Treatment Plant
6
FOREWORD BY THE EXECUTIVE MAYOR CLLR S.S NKOSI IDP REVIEW 2010/2011
Local government operates in an ever changing macroeconomic environment. The dynamic nature of local, national and global environments constantly presents local government with new challenges and demands. Similarly the needs of local communities continuously change. Our five year Integrated Development Plan (IDP) is reviewed annually so that we can always be confident that it addresses the real and relevant needs of our populace. Govan Mbeki Municipality is experiencing rapid urban growth which directly results in enormous pressure on the environment. To comply with the growing needs of the Govan Mbeki’s population the municipal council must ensure all development within our municipal area is economically competitive and socially acceptable. It is also crucial that we recognize and effectively manage the environment within which social and economic development occurs in order to ensure a sustainable environment. Within a year another cycle of the IDP prepared in terms of the Municipal Systems Act , 2000 will come to an end a new cycle will commence in 2010/2011. With this in mind, our municipality as part of its desire to continuously improve its performance expressed the need to revisit its current development-planning model. It is for this reason the municipal council resolved to phase in Ward Based Planning as part of the effective IDP process and we are confident that the populace has adequately participated in this process to ensure that their valuable inputs inform municipal planning and the next budget. I thank you.
7
FOREWORD BY THE MUNICIPAL MANAGER: DR L H MATHUNYANE 2010/2011 FINANCIAL YEAR
It has been noted by the Ministerial Task Team interim report that one of the many challenges in local Government which contributed to the flaring-up of service delivery was the misalignment of the integrated Development Plan to the Budget: The system Act:32 of 200, chapter 4 compels the institution to engage with Communities on Development matters. The IDP review process is fundamental in addressing service delivery related matters, and this must be taken advantage of by all stakeholders. There is a legislation injunction that Municipal planning cycle is done within a set timetable, so as to coincide with the planning of both Provincial and National sphere of government. It is therefore imperative that all IDP Review engagements (Community meetings and IDP forums) are being attended by all stakeholders so as to make their input before the Plan is adopted by Council. Equal important to be considered by the council is the issue of the municipally turnaround strategy as well the usage of household survey statistical information to base on the planning of the municipality.. Thank You
8
1. IDP OVERVIEW 1.1 INTRODUCTION Vision: “To lead in service delivery and economic development“ Mission: “Championing an integrated service delivery and sustainable economic growth with stakeholder involvement” Corporate Values: • Transparency • Accountability • Excellence • Consultation Strategic Focus Areas Strategic Objectives Infrastructure and Services To provide, improve and sustain
infrastructure and services Social and Economic Development To promote socio-economic development
in rural and urban areas Institutional Transformation To enable and speed up institutional
transformation and effectiveness Democracy and Good Governance To strengthen democracy and good
governance Financial Management and Viability To improve and sustain financial
management The 2008 – 2011 Integrated Development Plan document is meant to guide development and planning for the new political office bearers with emphasis on improving socio-economic situation, meeting millennium targets, improving service delivery mechanisms, strengthening and improving inter-governmental relations and community participation. The aim of the documents is to ensure comprehensive Integrated Planning and Economic Development within the Govan Mbeki Municipality. IDP must reflect the municipal / council’s vision for the long term development of the municipality and cite critical development and internal transformation needs. An assessment of the existing level of development in the municipal jurisdiction, identification of communities that are indigent, communities who do not have access to basic municipal services. The IDP as the strategic business plan of government institution will allow one to identify together with the community that is affected sustainable projects that can be funded by government or by private sector, and projects that demand co-funding by both the private sector and public sector.
9
It can also be used as tool for community building and transformation. The IDP should also contain information relevant to the following key components viz Financial Planning, Disaster Management Plan, Spatial Development Framework, Local Economic Development Planning which collectively assist to attract direct investment and foreign indirect investments. The IDP of the institution must also capture key performance indicators and performance targets of the institution, business case of the institution to reflect the municipal priorities, objectives of the political leg of the institution, fusion of all the spheres of government in terms of planning as well as capture all the sectoral plans. Using the IDP one will be able to reverse the legacy of the past by utilizing tools provided in the IDP to restructure cities, towns and rural areas, promote social equity, align and coordinate resources across the spheres of government. It is through the integrated development planning process that issues cutting across the spheres of government are handled without any duplication. The following strategies will also assist in guiding development within the municipality viz: Human Resource Management and Development, Housing Chapter, Local Economic Development.
1.2 MUNICIPAL OVERVIEW
1.2.1 Locality:
• Govan Mbeki Local Municipality is located in the north western side of the
Gert Sibande District Municipality and in the south-western part of Mpumalanga Province, abutting Gauteng, approximately 150 km east of Johannesburg and approximately 300 km southwest of Nelspruit.
• The municipality is strategically placed between KwaZulu Natal, Free State, Gauteng and Swaziland and is linked by national roads and railway lines.
1.2.2 Area:
• Govan Mbeki is 2958.9 km² in extent • This equates to 9.3 % of the Gert Sibande land mass. 1.2.3 Study Area:
• Secunda: was established in 1975 as a direct result of the establishment of the Suid-Afrikaanse Steenkool en Olie (SASOL) plant to produce alternative fuel for South Africa during the height of international isolation of the previous Government.The town was established firstly to provide close accommodation for workers employed by SASOL and secondly to serve as a local service centre for the sub-region. The first extension of Secunda was proclaimed in 1977 and the town has now grown to accommodate 40400 (1996 figures) people.
• Trichardt: The town is situated to the east of Secunda with the railway line to the SASOL plant forming a major constraint to the total spatial integration of the two urban nodes. Trichardt was established in the early 1900’s as an agricultural station. Trichardt had the fastest growth after the
10
establishment of SASOL in 1975. After the establishment of SASOL however, the agricultural character of the town has gradually diminished and today Trichardt resembles a fully fledged town with sufficiently well developed infrastructure. The town has however, not grown significantly in terms of spatial growth over the years and it currently has a population of about 3800 people.
• Kinross: was established as an agricultural service centre. It forms a linear stretch along the N17 and the railway line to the south of the town and is directly linked to Secunda an SASOL via a dual carriageway south of the towns. The town is largely reliant on SASOL for employment as well as to a lesser extent, the surrounding Power Stations and commercial farming activities. The area of Thistle Grove to the west of Kinross has provided an important dormitory to the majority of labour to both SASOL and the nearby Matla Power Station. Economically, Kinross relies mainly on through traffic from Gauteng to Secunda and the N17 road is therefore very significant to the business activity of Kinross. Together with Thistle Grove, Kinross has an estimated population of about 10 000 people including Siphumelele [ext 25].
• Evander: Was established in 1955 as a result of the discovery of gold in the Highveld Ridge area. It was established primarily to accommodate mining employees from “Gengold” and Kinross gold mines to the extent that even to date about 90% of the residents of Evander are employees of Harmony Mine Company. It is situated about 8 km west of Secunda and like Secunda; it is endowed with good infrastructure and other Engineering Services. The town was proclaimed in 1960 and obtained her full municipal status in 1972. Evander still has a limited commercial service component and her 12 500 residents depend largely on Secunda for most of their commercial service needs and employment opportunities.
• Embalenhle: With the growth of Sasol Synthetic Fuels as the major employer and its increased drive to recruit labour from a field in the late seventies, it became necessary to establish a dormitory town within the Highveld Ridge complex to accommodate the increased workers employed by Sasol Synthetic Fuel. As a result, eMbalenhle was established in 1978 on the farm Langverwacht 282 IS The town is based on a mixture of traditional gridiron and modern town planning designs and boasts some of the modern community facilities within the sub-region. eMbalenhle has grown significantly from its inception in 1978 and today it has approximately 210 000 inhabitants.
• Charl Cilliers: Situated about 30 kilometers south of Sasol lies the township Charl Cilliers. Mainly residential stands, that serves in the housing need of the HRTLC area although only 10% are yet developed. A Church, Police Station, Post Office and several General Dealers are situated within Charl Cilliers. The community of Charl Cilliers relies mainly on through traffic (105-1) to create business opportunities for the residents. Some of the internal roads are tarred. Eskom, provides electricity and sewerage disposal tanks are provided within the township. Lately, some squatters moved into the area and this already created tension and conflict between different parties living in the same area.
• Bethal: In the late seventies of the nineteenth century the distribution of the population was such that the need for an independent congregation gave rise to the Parish of Bethal. In 1904, Bethal was declared a municipality and Mr George Hutchinson was elected the first chairman of the Municipal Council of Bethal. In 1905, the railway line from Springs to the North Coast reached
11
Bethal and contributed to the prosperity of the town. Today, Bethal has approximately 20 000 residents depending on her.
• Emzinoni: The eMzinoni extension has a virtually square shape and has the following logical physical boundaries: North: The Baanbreker road – provincial road no 456; West: the western boundary of portion 4, Blesbokspruit 148 IS; South: the proposed provincial road – P109-1; East: the Bethal -= Standerton road – P30-2. eMzinoni and its environs are located within the Highveld region consisting of a rolling hill landscape at an average elevation of about 1640 m above sea level. The area drains into the south flowing Blesbokspruit located to the west of eMzinoni. Topography is essentially level in the flood plains and vegetation comprises thick grass. Over the remainder of the site vegetation comprises maize, Lucerne, sun flower and bean fields and typical Highveld grass in uncultivated areas. There is approximately 100 000 residents in eMzinoni Township.
• Leandra: The Leandra Local Council is within the area of jurisdiction of the Gert Sibande District Council. The town consists of the towns of Eendracht, Leslie and Lebohang. Leandra was established to fulfil a service centre role for either the mining and or agricultural sectors in the district. The district is close to Gauteng and the Witbank-Middelburg complex. The centre benefit directly from spill-over effects from development in these centres. Today, Leandra has approximately 80 000 residents.
1.2.4 Boundaries and Neighbours:
• Govan Mbeki Local Municpality is bounded by Msukaligwa Local Municipality to the east, Lekwa Local Municipality to the south, Dipaleseng Local Municipality and Gauteng Province (Sedibeng Municipality) to the west and Nkangala District Municipality to the north.
• The spill over effects of Gauteng and the Witbank-Middleburg developments has direct benefits for the economy of the Municipality.
1.2.5 Key Features:
• The largest towns in the municipality are Secunda and Bethal. • Smaller settlements include Kinross, Evander, Embalenhle, Leandra,
Lebohang, Trichardt, Emzinoni and Charl Cilliers. • The N17 freeway passes through the municipal area. • Rail routes run through Govan Mbeki from Gauteng to KwaZulu-Natal but are
used for the transportation of goods only. • The main land use in the area is farming, the majority of which is commercial
farming. • The petro-chemical industry is the key industry in the area with SASOL being
the major investor in this sector. • SASOL Mining is operating 5 Coal Mines and Harmony Mining 3 gold Mines
1.2.6 Climate and Air Quality:
The Municipality is situated in a subtropical climate zone, where rainfall occurs in the summer months between September and May. Throughout the region, 95% of the rainfall is received during the summer six months, October to March, but the month of maximum precipitation is either January or February. The western portions of the municipality can receive between 600-800mm/year and the eastern portion can receive between 800-1000mm/year. In summer, temperatures range from as high as 40 degree Celsius during the day to 10 degree Celsius in the evenings. Winters are milder and temperatures usually vary
12
between 20 degrees Celsius during the day and 10 degree Celsius in the evenings. Frost does occur, but apart from light frost which may occur from May to August, the period during which ordinary frosts may be expected is less than 30 days per year. Five pollution transport pathways across the Highveld with regards to wind direction were determined according to wind directions over South Africa. The most relevant transport pathways in the Gert Sibande District Municipality are the direct transport towards the Indian Ocean and recirculation over the subcontinent.
1.2.7 Topography / Geology / Soil Potential:
Govan Mbeki is fairly flat with no areas with a slope of more than 9%. The municipality falls within the Karoo Supergroup. The underlying rock types of the area are dominated by the presence of dolerine intrusion, arenite and rhyolite deposits. The soil potential varies from a poor suitability for agriculture on the northern border and south western regions. The soil potential in the area is impacted upon by mining activities as well as by unsuitable agricultural activities and the use of pesticides which inflict negative impact on the quality and arability of the soil.
1.2.8 Hydrology and Wetlands:
Govan Mbeki Municipality straddles the divide between the Upper Vaal Water Management Area, and the Olifants River WMA in the Noorth of the municipality. Due to the location of a major continental divide (watershed) which runs east to west across the municipality, the rivers in the municipality flow either in a northerly or southerly direction. The Trichartspruit flows northwards from the municipality, and forms the part of the upper catchment of the Olifants River. The Blesbokspruit, which flows through Bethal, and the Waterval River, drains southwards towards the Vaal River in the South. The headwaters of the Suikerbosrant River rise in the municipality and flow out of the municipality in the west. Both the upper Olifants and Waterval (Vaal) catchments are seriously impacted by concentration of mining and industry in the Secunda area. River ecosystems in this area are generally in a fair to poor condition. Both pans and palustrine (marsh/vlei) wetlands occur in the municipality. A large (vlei) wetland system occurs along the Suikerbosrant River and a number of small non-perennial pans exist. Extensive seepage areas exist in the streams and rivers draining northwards from\the municipality. These areas play an important role in the hydrological functioning of the Olifants River, attenuating water and through the slow release of water ensuring perennial flow within the upper catchment. The drainage of wetlands as well as the industrial and agricultural activities that are taking place in the municipality have a negative impact upon the water quality and hydrological systems of the municipality.
1.2.9 Biodiversity:
Govan Mbeki Municipality does not have areas of particularly high biodiversity. However, the highest biodiversity in the municipality is located in the northern sections, to the north of the N17 Highway. The municipality is dominated by Acocks Themeda Veld (Turf Highveld) with a band of Bankenveld to the north west of Bethal. These veld types have all been transformed over the entire Mpumalanga to some degree by various land uses.
13
Negative impacts on biodiversity in this area are related to mining, industry and agriculture. Many of these impacts are significant and should be managed on a site specific basis. Natural and untouched habitants are rapidly decreasing and becoming increasingly fragmented into unsustainable habitants, which leads to loss of biodiversity. Agriculture, grazing, forestry, mining, industry and urban development impact on biodiversity whether it’s through mechanical clearance of existing vegetation or pesticides and pollution entering the ecosystem. 1.2.10 Spatial: As far as its regional content is concerned, Govan Mbeki is situated on the Gauteng/Richards Bay Corridor formed by the National Road N17 and the Richards Bay rail line running through the area in an east-west direction. Govan Mbeki has the most diversified economy within the Gert Sibande District, dominated by the petrochemical industry (the SASOL II and III complexes) and coal and gold mining. Govan Mbeki has the largest underground coal mining complex in the world which makes it an important strategic area within the national context. The area can be described as mostly agricultural / rural, with 3 urban conglomerations situated within it, namely Leandra / Lebohang on the western edge, the Greater Secunda (Trichardt, Evander, Kinross and Secunda/eMbalenhle) conurbation in the central part and Bethal / eMzinoni on its eastern edge. The municipality has major mining (both coal and gold) industries like the Sasol Mines, Sudo-Coal, Isibonelo and others; Sasol and its companies and various production companies. The most prevalent land uses in rural areas are commercial agriculture, coal and gold mining. A number of rural informal settlements occur in the area. 51,5% of the total population reside in the central Greater Secunda Complex, 21,6% reside in Bethal/eMzinoni, 14,1% reside in Leandra/ Lebohang and 12,8% stay in rural hinterland. There is a huge socio-economic gap between the previous white areas and the previous disadvantaged township areas. The economy of the municipality is dominated by SASOL, coal and gold mining and commercial agriculture. The Johannesburg – Richards Bay freight rail line and National Road N17 traverse the area in an east-west direction and are augmented by a number of provincial roads connecting it to a wider region. Municipal services infrastructure in the municipality is located mostly within the urban areas. Some infrastructure backlogs exist, especially within the previously disadvantaged township areas. As far as the outlying rural areas are concerned, these rely almost exclusively on borehole water and septic tanks / pit latrines, while electricity is provided by Eskom. Developmental projects are initiated and carried out through PPP and in support of the government initiative of the EPWP. As far as housing demand is concerned, there are still a number of homeless people living in informal settlements throughout the study area. The total housing backlog is estimated at approximately 60 000 units. A number of major low cost housing projects are currently being implemented, whilst there are a number of other developments taking place, amongst others, the duplex complexes, flats and office
14
complexes and recently the first township mall at eMbalenhle that hosts approximately 50 chain stores. Secunda / Trichardt is by far the most active business zone in Govan Mbeki. Secunda’s regional role is underlined by the fact that 45% of the financial, administrative and professional concerns are situated here. Industrial activity in the area is completely dominated by SASOL, whose site area makes up to 85,7% of the total industrial / commercial land in the study area. Community facilities tend to be clustered within the existing urban areas. Except for some farm schools, the outlying, sparsely populated rural areas do not have community facilities. Substantial backlogs exist in the provision of some community facilities. The development of LUMS will enhance the revitalisation of all towns within the municipality. The SDF seeks to provide future developmental opportunities within the municipal area. As far as the environment is concerned, sensitive environments within the study area include the grassland biome as well as aquatic and wetland habitats. Pollution emanating from SASOL, the coal-fired power stations in adjacent areas and the various mining activities is a huge problem.
15
• Further information on the engineering and infrastructure is available on the SDF document
16
1.2.11 Institutional Capacity / Institutional Plans:
ISSUES GOVAN MBEKI MUNICIPALITY
Organisational Structure Approved. New structure under review Total staff composition 1 431 Filled positions : Permanent 1 587 Filled positions : Temporary 115 Unfilled positions 132 Job Evaluation Process not finalised Delegation of Powers Approved: A7/02/2009 Performance Management System Framework Approved: B506/11/2002 Employment Equity Plan Approved: B140/03/2002 Website www.govanmbeki.gov.za Communication Plan Draft to be submitted to council for approval Indigent Policy Approved: A11/05/2007 Workplace HIV/AIDS Plan Included in Employment Equity Plan Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan / Budget 2007/08
Approved: A11/05/2007
Local Economic Development Strategy Approved: B42/04/2008 Supply Chain Management Policy Approved: B77/09/2006 Spatial Development Framework Approved: B72/08/2006 Land Alienation Policy Approved: B51/10/2007 Human Resource Development and Management: • Skills Development Plan • Employee Assistance • Recruitment Policy
Approved: B48/10/2007
Housing Charter Policy Approved: B212/11/2005 Housing Policy Approved: B362/11/2004 Anti-Corruption Policy Approved: B48/02/2004 Transport and Equipment Policy Approved: B47/02/2004 1.3 POPULATION:
Formal Households
2006
Informal Households
2006
Traditional Households
2006
Population Census
2001
Population growth
projection
Govan Mbeki 82 169 5 247 1 191 221 747 2% Source: StatsSA 2001 / GSDM WSDP 2006
1.3.1 Populations Size and Growth: The table below depicts the following that population growth in Govan Mbeki has experience an increase of 1,6% growth between the period 2001-2007.
17
Table 1: Gert Sibande Population Size and Number of Households
1996 2001 2007Annual
Growth1996 2001 2007
Albert Luthuli 186 750 189 051 191 311 0.2% 36 351 42 354 46 130 4.15
Msukaligwa 111 308 116 894 140 480 2.4% 26 347 34 337 39 729 3.54
Mkhondo 103 554 141 843 148 401 3.9% 19 362 30 724 33 566 4.42
Pixley ka Seme 71 653 77 565 91 091 2.5% 14 912 19 305 22 627 4.03
Lekwa 94 298 95 559 116 353 2.1% 21 526 27 668 31 942 3.64
Depaleseng 40 003 36 766 39 901 0.0% 9 741 10 993 11 726 3.40
Govan Mbeki 216 406 198 536 254 031 1.6% 51 295 62 874 73 078 3.48
Gert Sibande 823 973 856 214 981 569 1.7% 179 534 228 256 258 798 3.79
Mpumalanga 3143 918 3442 199 3680 733 1.6% 674 875 832 070 969 997 3.79
National 41780 470 45145 618 47963 626 1.3% 9370 586 11 364 451 13043 694 3.68
Number of Households (HH)Population by Municipality [000] HH
Density
[2007]
Source: Global Insight: Regional eXplorer 388 (2.2b)
1.3.2 Population Groups and Gender The following table depicts the population in Govan Mbeki Municipality in 2007 the blacks constituted 211 807, the white constituted 37 901, the coloured 1 944, the Asian 2 380. There were more males (129 440) across colour line than females (124 592).
18
Table 2: Population Groups and Gender
Black White Coloured Asian Male Female
Albert Luthuli 187 402 3 370 240 300 91 241 100 070
Msukaligwa 127 249 11 956 304 971 69 906 70 574
Mkhondo 141 653 5 355 480 913 73 212 75 189
Pixley ka Seme 84 390 5 824 332 545 43 999 47 092
Lekwa 100 948 12 676 1 603 1 125 59 360 56 993
Depaleseng 36 345 3 168 53 336 19 966 19 935
Govan Mbeki 211 807 37 901 1 944 2 380 129 440 124 592
Gert Sibande 889 793 80 250 4 956 6 570 487 122 494 446
Mpumalanga 3410 305 234 565 22 313 13 550 1815 502 1865 230
National 37821 955 4791 354 4174 477 1175 842 23587 609 24376 018
Population by Gender
[Numbers, 2007]
Population by Population Group
[Numbers, 2007]
Source: Global Insight: Regional eXplorer 388 (2.2b)
With 254 031 people chart 1 shows that the Govan Mbeki municipality accounts for the largest share (26%) of the Gert Sibande population followed respectively by Albert Luthuli (19%), Msukaligwa (14%) and Mkhondo (15%). Dipalaseng on the other hand is the least populated municipality within the Gert Sibande, accounting for 39 901 people (4%) of the population. Chart 2 depicts the following that Govan Mbeki Municipality is experience population growth (17.4%). The municipality is experiencing a huge in migration due to employment opportunities offered by SASOL and the surrounding mines
19
Chart 1: Population by Municipalities (%) 2007 Chart 2: Population Growth
Albert
Luthuli, 19%
Msukaligwa, 14%
Mkhondo, 15%
Pixley ka
Seme, 9%
Lekwa, 12%
Depaleseng, 4%
Govan Mbeki, 26%
2.4%
26.2%
43.3%
27.1%
23.4%
-0.3%
17.4%
Albert Luthuli
Msukaligwa
Mkhondo
Pixley ka Seme
Lekwa
Depaleseng
Govan Mbeki
Population Growth (%)
Ge
rt S
iba
nd
e M
un
icip
ali
tie
s
Source: Global Insight: Regional eXplorer 388 (2.2b)
1.3.3 Population by Age and Gender
In 2007 women made up the majority (50.7%) of the Gert Sibande population. During the same period the population is below the age of 14 was estimated at 326 459 or 33.5% of the GSDM population while those aged 60 and above were estimated at 66 957 (6.8%) of the population. The youth (aged between 15 and 34 years) constitute 35.5% while the economically active population (ages of between 15 and 64 years) account for 62.3% of the total population. Another important observation is that the youth account for 56.9% of the economically active
Source: Global Insight: Regional eXplorer 388 (2.2b)
20
1.3.4 HIV Estimates:
HIV and AIDS impacts on the economy indirectly through morbidity as well as mortality. The former refers to loss of labour productivity due to illnesses and the increased health care costs. AIDS related deaths result in the reduction of the population growth rates which in turn affect the skills availability. It has been variously observed that youth, especially young women are particulary vulnerable to infections for a variety of reasons including social and cultural power relations. The Govan Mbeki population is quite young and therefore predisposed to the risk of HIV infections 1.3.5 Demographic Implications for Govan Mbeki Municipality: A relatively high population of people below age 14 which mean that health and education must be given a priority status in development planning. The concentration of the economically active population below age 35 implies that employment and economic opportunities must reflect a bias towards youth which may include intensive skills development, on the job training etc. The youth, in particular young women, are considered to be more vulnerable to social and economic deficits and the risk of contracting HIV. The future size and quality of the economically active population will depend in large part on the ability of the municipality to develop the appropriate skills and most importantly, to retain these skills within the District municipality. To a large extent these implications are the same for the district, region, province and country. GOVAN MBEKI MUNICIPALITY; HOUSEHOLD INFORMATION 2009
TOWN Population PPH Households (Popul/PPH)
Proclaimed Residential Stands TOTAL
Informal Res units: Not on stands
ZONE 1: URBAN
EMZINONI 92,333 6.50 14,205 8,068 3,154
MILAN PARK 4,971 4.50 1,105 852
BETHAL 15,920 3.82 4,168 5,049
SUB-TOTAL 113,224 4.94 19,477 13,969 3,154
ZONE 2: URBAN
SECUNDA 46,167 4.00 11,542 4,850
TRICHARDT 4,826 4.30 1,122 620
EVANDER 10,439 4.30 2,428 2,000
KINROSS 20,846 4.30 4,848 3,232
SUB-TOTAL 82,277 4.23 19,939 10,702 0
ZONE 3: URBAN
EMBALENHLE 186,935 5.81 32,175 20,176 4,000
CHARL CILLIERS 1,576 4.37 361 296
SUB-TOTAL 172,514 5.09 32,535 20,472 4,000
21
ZONE 4: URBAN
LEBOHANG 64,745 6.30 10,277 7,994 500
LESLIE & EENDRACHT 8,963 4.37 2,051 1,096
SUB-TOTAL 67,453 5.34 12,328 9,090 500
URBAN- TOTAL 457,575 5.50 83,195 54,233 7,654
RURAL- TOTAL(12%) 62,180 12.00 5,182
TOTAL 519,755 8.75 88,377 54,233 7,654
POPULATION GROWTH 2009-2019 PROJECTED AT (3%)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
95,103 97,956 100,895 103,922 107,039 110,251 113,558 116,965 120,474
4,971 5,120 5,273 5,432 5,594 5,762 5,935 6,113 6,297
16,398 16,890 17,396 17,918 18,456 19,009 19,580 20,167 20,772
116,471 119,965 123,564 127,271 131,089 135,022 139,073 143,245 147,542
47,552 48,978 50,447 51,961 53,520 55,125 56,779 58,482 60,237
4,971 5,120 5,273 5,432 5,594 5,762 5,935 6,113 6,297
10,752 11,075 11,407 11,749 12,102 12,465 12,839 13,224 13,620
21,471 22,115 22,779 23,462 24,166 24,891 25,638 26,407 27,199
84,746 87,288 89,907 92,604 95,382 98,243 101,191 104,226 107,353
192,543 198,319 204,269 210,397 216,709 223,210 229,906 236,804 243,908
1,623 1,672 1,722 1,774 1,827 1,882 1,938 1,997 2,056
172,514 172,514 172,514 172,514 172,514 172,514 172,514 172,514 172,514
66,687 68,688 70,748 72,871 75,057 77,309 79,628 82,017 84,477
9,231 9,508 9,794 10,087 10,390 10,702 11,023 11,354 11,694
67,453 67,453 67,453 67,453 67,453 67,453 67,453 67,453 67,453
471,302 485,441 500,004 515,004 530,454 546,368 562,759 579,642 597,031
63,113 64,060 65,021 65,996 66,986 67,991 69,010 70,046 71,096
534,415 549,501 565,025 581,000 597,440 614,359 631,769 649,687 668,127
SOURCE;URBAN & RURAL DEVELOPMENT JANUARY 2009
22
1.3.6 Development Profile:
� Human Development Index
According to Global Insight (2007) the Human Development Index (HDI) is a composite, relative index that attempts to quantify the extent of human development of a community. It is based on measures of life expectancy, literacy and income. It is thus seen as a measure of people’s ability to live a long and healthy life, to communicate, to participate in the life of the community and to have sufficient resources to obtain a decent living. The HDI can assume a maximum level of 1, indicating a high level of human development, and a minimum value of 0. Table 3 below shows that, at (0.63) the HDI for Govan Mbeki is higher than both the Mpumalanga (0.53) and the national one (0.60). Also that, in addition to Govan Mbeki, only Msukaligwa (0.53) and Lekwa (0.55) are have HDI’s equal to or above that of Mpumalanga. Of concern is that the indices for Mkhondo, Pixley ka Seme and Lekwa have not changed in past 7 years while that of Msukaligwa has decreased. Similarly, where improvements were observed, they were found to have been slower compared to the national levels. The improvements in HDI suggest that the various development interventions have had some impact albeit marginal over the past 11 years.
Table 3: Gert Sibande State of HDI, Gini Coefficient and Poverty Rates
Source: Global Insight: Regional eXplorer 388 (2.2b)
1996 2001 2008 1996 2001 2009 1996 2001 2009
Albert Luthuli 0.45 0.46 0.57 0.62 0.63 63.0% 62.9% 62.5%
Msukaligwa 0.53 0.54 0.53 0.57 0.65 0.68 44.3% 50.5% 47.8%
Mkhondo 0.44 0.43 0.43 0.58 0.65 0.66 50.8% 58.1% 56.1%
Pixley ka Seme 0.45 0.48 0.48 0.61 0.67 0.68 53.7% 57.1% 53.6%
Lekwa 0.53 0.55 0.55 0.57 0.62 0.65 37.5% 48.8% 48.0%
Depaleseng 0.48 0.48 0.49 0.56 0.60 0.63 55.1% 70.1% 68.6%
Govan Mbeki 0.58 0.62 0.60 0.61 0.66 0.66 32.1% 38.4% 35.6
Gert Sibande 0.50 0.53 0.54 0.61 0.67 0.68 47.8% 53.4% 48.8%
Mpumalanga 0.49 0.52 0.53 0.61 0.66 0.68 50.4% 56.0% 51.2%
National 0.56 0.59 0.60 0.62 0.66 0.67 40.8% 48.1% 42.8%
Gini Coefficient % People Living in Poverty
Human Development
Index (HDI)
23
Gini coefficientMP307: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality (Highveld), African
0.48
0.50
0.52
0.54
0.56
0.58
0.60
0.62
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008Source: IHS Global Insight Regional eXplorer version 459
Gini coefficientMP307: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality (Highveld), White
0.41
0.42
0.43
0.44
0.45
0.46
0.47
0.48
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: IHS Global Insight Regional eXplorer version 459
24
Gini coefficientMP307: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality (Highveld), Coloured
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: IHS Global Insight Regional eXplorer version 459
Gini coefficientMP307: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality (Highveld), Asian
0.47
0.47
0.48
0.48
0.49
0.49
0.50
0.50
0.51
0.51
0.52
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: IHS Global Insight Regional eXplorer version 459
25
Poverty OverviewMP307: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality (Highveld), Total
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Nr of people in poverty
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
% in Poverty
Nr of people in poverty % in Poverty
Source: IHS Global Insight Regional eXplorer version 459
Local Municipalities (2005-12 boundaries)
D301 MP301: Albert Luthuli Local Municipality 53.7% D302 MP302: Msukaligwa Local Municipality 49.1% D303 MP303: Mkhondo Local Municipality 69.5% D304 MP304: Pixley Ka Seme Local Municipality 52.6% D305 MP305: Lekwa Local Municipality (Standerton) 46.0% D306 MP306: Dipaleseng Local Municipality 52.4%
D307 MP307: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality (Highveld) 35.6%
26
Progress in EducationMP307: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality (Highveld), African
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Matric & Postgrad degree
Matric & Bachelors degree
Matric & certificate / diploma
Matric only
Less than matric & certif/dip
Grade 10-11
Grade 7-9
Grade 3-6
Grade 0-2
No schooling
Source: IHS Global Insight Regional eXplorer version 459
Progress in EducationMP307: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality (Highveld), White
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Matric & Postgrad degree
Matric & Bachelors degree
Matric & certificate / diploma
Matric only
Less than matric & certif/dip
Grade 10-11
Grade 7-9
Grade 3-6
Grade 0-2
No schooling
Source: IHS Global Insight Regional eXplorer version 459
27
Progress in EducationMP307: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality (Highveld), Coloured
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Matric & Postgrad degree
Matric & Bachelors degree
Matric & certificate / diploma
Matric only
Less than matric & certif/dip
Grade 10-11
Grade 7-9
Grade 3-6
Grade 0-2
No schooling
Source: IHS Global Insight Regional eXplorer version 459
Progress in EducationMP307: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality (Highveld), Asian
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Matric & Postgrad degree
Matric & Bachelors degree
Matric & certificate / diploma
Matric only
Less than matric & certif/dip
Grade 10-11
Grade 7-9
Grade 3-6
Grade 0-2
No schooling
Source: IHS Global Insight Regional eXplorer version 459
28
Households by toilet facilitiesMP307: Govan Mbeki Local Municipality (Highveld)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
No toilet
Bucket system
Pit toilet
Ventilation Improved Pit (VIP)
Flush toilet
Source: IHS Global Insight Regional eXplorer version 459 � Gini Coefficient
IHS Global Insight (2007) defines the Gini coefficient is a summary statistic of income inequality, which varies from 0 (in the case of perfect equality where all households earn equal income) to 1 (in the case where one household earns all the income and other households earn nothing). A low Gini coefficient indicates more equal income or wealth distribution, while a high Gini coefficient indicates more unequal distribution. In practice the coefficient is likely to vary from approximately 0.25 to 0.70. In terms of Table 3 above, most Gert Sibande local municipalities have relatively high Gini coefficients or high levels of income inequality. While the levels of inequality are broadly characteristic of the broader South Africa, the fact that they have continued to increase since 1996 and remain above the national level is a cause for great concern. � Income Poverty
Poverty is often defined as deprivation of those things that determine the quality of life, including food, clothing, shelter and safe drinking water, as well as "intangibles" such as the opportunity to learn and to enjoy the respect of fellow citizens. One of the important indicators of poverty in a region is the number of households with an income below the Minimum Living Level (MLL). The MLL is annually determined by the Bureau of Market Research (UNISA). It is calculated for different regions, racial groups, household sizes, and reflects the minimum amount a household needs to earn to meet its basic needs. In terms of Table 3 above Dipaleseng has the highest number (68.6%) of people living below the MLL while the number is lowest (29.2%) in Govan Mbeki. While it is encouraging that poverty rates have declined across all municipalities since 2001 they remain above the national rate of 42.9%. The decline has been widely attributed to the extension of the state’s social security network.
29
Another important variable in measuring poverty is the poverty gap. This measure is used to derive the difference between each poor household’s income and the poverty line. It thus measures the depth of poverty of each poor household. The aggregate poverty gap is calculated by summing the poverty gaps of each poor household. It is thus equivalent to the total amount by which the incomes of poor households need to be raised each year to bring all households up to the poverty line and hence out of poverty. It is the amount of income that would be required to bring every poor person exactly up to the poverty line, thereby eliminating poverty. According to IHS Global Insight (2007) the poverty gap has seen a marked increase in all municipalities since 1996. Halving poverty by 2014 is the policy goal of South African government. Attaining this goal requires better targeting, effective coordination and integration of poverty intervention programmes across all spheres of government. This, in turn depends on the ability of all stakeholders to understand both the causes, manifestations, spatial characteristics and impact of poverty across age, gender of poverty. The increase in the number of people living in poverty suggests that, the current interventions are beginning to have desired impact. � Literacy and Education Levels
Functional literacy is defined as the proportion of persons aged 20 and above that has completed Grade 7. It is the inability of an individual to use reading, writing and computational skills efficiently in everyday life situations. An increase in the basic literacy skills of adults has a positive effect on any economy. Functionally illiterate people are unlikely to take advantage of opportunities that are thrown up by the permeation of the information and communication technologies (ICT’s). Research has found that, adults with better literacy skills are more likely to be employed, and to earn more, than those with poorer literacy skills, even when taking account of other factors which affect work performance. Table 4 below indicates that Govan Mbeki has the highest (74.3%) number of functionally literate people and Mkhondo has the least (50.1%). With the exception of Govan Mbeki, the literacy rates of all the Gert Sibande municipalities remains below the national average of 71.3%. It is generally accepted that education expands the range of options from which a person may choose and thus creates opportunities for a fulfilling life. It satisfies the basic human need for knowledge and skills. It provides a means of meeting basic needs, provided that adequate employment opportunities exist, and also helps sustain and accelerate overall development. The level of education of the population in a region influences its welfare through the indirect effects on health, fertility and life expectancy. Education helps to increase the value of other forms of social and physical investment.
30
Table 4: Highest Level of Education: Age 15+
Education Levels National MpumalangaGert
SibandeAlbert Luthuli Msukaligwa Mkhondo
Pixley ka
SemeLekwa Depaleseng
Govan
Mbeki
No schooling 11.5% 17.6% 16.7% 21.6% 17.2% 21.4% 23.0% 12.4% 18.3% 10.4%
Grade 0-2 1.7% 1.8% 2.2% 1.8% 1.7% 2.8% 2.7% 3.3% 3.7% 1.6%
Grade 3-6 11.2% 11.2% 13.0% 11.4% 12.3% 15.2% 14.8% 15.6% 15.6% 11.2%
Grade 7-9 23.5% 22.6% 23.3% 23.0% 23.6% 23.1% 23.5% 25.5% 23.6% 22.5%
Grade 10-11 20.8% 20.3% 20.3% 21.3% 21.1% 18.7% 16.9% 19.4% 19.6% 21.8%
Less than matric & certif/dip 0.8% 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6%
Matric only 22.2% 19.9% 18.4% 16.1% 18.3% 14.9% 13.9% 18.0% 14.9% 24.0%
Matric & certificate / diploma 5.4% 4.5% 4.1% 3.5% 4.0% 2.6% 3.4% 4.0% 2.8% 5.7%
Matric & Bachelors degree 1.9% 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 1.0% 0.7% 0.9% 1.0% 0.6% 1.5%
Matric & Postgrad degree 0.8% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.7%
Source: Global Insight: Regional eXplorer 388 (2.2b)
The table above depicts that 10.4% of the Govan Mbeki population aged 15 and above no form of schooling, 1.6% has gone up to grade, that 21.8% has gone up to grade 10-11, that only 24.0% has gone up to matric, that 0,7% has gone up to matric and postgraduate degree. This alone speaks volumes about the skills potential of the area and its ability to influence and inform development.
1.4 SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE 1.4.1 Dwelling types (Statssa 2006):
Formal Informal Traditional Other
Govan Mbeki 36 413 23 687 1 422 192 Source: GSDM WSDP 2006
1.4.2 Labour Market Status (economically active population StatsSA 2006):
Employed Unemployed Not economically active
Govan Mbeki 1.246 40 189 50 746 Source: GSDM WSDP 2006
The table above reflects the labour force within the municipality and demonstrates a huge challenge on the number of economically active population that is not employed nor engaged in any economic activity. 1.4.3 Extent, Population and People below minimum living standard and household income:
Extent (ha)
Population StatsSA
2006
Population below min.
living standards
% People below min.
living standards
Total Household
income R
% to total household income for
GSDM
295 470 221 731 102 287 45,83 3,115,704,748 43,36 Source: GSDM WSDP 2006
31
1.4.4 Economically Active Population in 2007:
Gender Grouping
Govan Mbeki
Gert Sibande
Male 73 573 220 690
Female 59 727 190 881 Total 133 300 411 571
Source: Global Insight: Regional eXplorer 388
Ages Percentage
15 – 34 35.8 35 - 64 24.8
65> 24.8 Total 100
Source: DWAF figures – April 2005
The tables reflect the huge number of people that need skills and capacity to support and sustain the municipality’s economic growth and development. The challenge is also to redirect the available pool of potential labour force to acquire the needed technical skills to drive our economy. (Chart 4)
• 68 % of the total population falls within the working age group. • 40 % of the economically active population is unemployed. This equates to a
dependency ratio of 1:3.6 which is lower than the District’s dependency ratio of 1:5.
Working Age Population 2006
(Govan Mbeki Local Municipality)
68%
32%Working Age Group
Non-working AgeGroup
32
(Chart 5)
• The key economic sectors within which the majority of the labour force is
employed are mining and quarrying (19.9%), manufacturing (16.9%) and wholesale and retail at 13.5%.
(Chart 6)
• The model income is between R 8001.00 and R3200.00 per month whereas
more than one in five households (21.6%) receives no monthly income. In terms of the charts above, the challenges of creating more employment opportunities are a reality. 1.4.5 Tourism:
Municipality GVA (R)
Govan Mbeki 121 640 Source: Global insight: Ricon (Pty) Ltd. Regional Economic Explorer Version 2.0c
The above table reflect the estimated contribution of the municipality to the regional economy and the province. There is still more the municipality can do expand its economic contribution through its economic growth and development strategy. 1.4.6 Mining and Quarrying:
Municipality Mining and Quarrying (tons)
Govan Mbeki 4 186 523 Source: Global insight: Ricon (Pty) Ltd. Regional Economic Explorer Version 2.0c
0% 5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Monthly Household Income 2006(Govan Mbeki Local Municipality)
Employment Status of Labour Force 2006
(Govan Mbeki Local Municipality)
Unemployed
40%
Employed 60%
33
The above table reflects the amount of mining and quarrying activities that takes place in Govan Mbeki Municipality. 1.4.7 Manufacturing – Labour Intensive:
Municipality Manufacturing – Labour Intensive (personnel)
Govan Mbeki 10 969 693 Source: Global insight: Ricon (Pty) Ltd. Regional Economic Explorer Version 2.0c
The above table reflects number of the labour intensive personnel absorbed in the manufacturing sector. The main challenge for the municipality is the shortage of critical skills to support the major economic contributors; Petro- Chemical Industry and government institutions, to grow and sustain economic growth and development. 1.4.8 Construction and Infrastructure Projects:
Municipality Number (R)
Govan Mbeki 1 146 799 Source: Global insight: Ricon (Pty) Ltd. Regional Economic Explorer Version 2.0c
The above table reflects the infrastructure investments made by the municipality in minimizing the infrastructure and construction backlog. The continuous contribution to its local economy through these investments is aimed at providing sustainable services and creating a conducive environment for economic growth and development. Employment totals in 2007 and Annual Growth (% Constant 2000 Prices)
Sectors Govan Mbeki Gert Sibande Annual
Growth in GMM
Annual Growth in
GSDM
Agriculture 2 968 34 861 2.6% 1.7% Mining 17 521 29 054 -6.3% -6.6% Manufacturing 21 818 31 285 5.7% -2.5% Electricity 695 3 184 2.1% -1.3% Construction 5 991 13 649 25.1% 15.4% Trade 21 849 45 153 8.5% 0.0% Transport 3 821 8 720 11.1% 2.5% Finance 4 642 8 912 14.8% 9.1% Community Services
8 551 30 425 2.7% 2.7%
Households 6 071 16 334 Total 93 928 221 576 Source: Global insight: Ricon (Pty) Ltd. Regional Economic Explorer Version 2.0c
The table captured depicts the following viz fluctuation and stability in agricultural sector, decline in mining of gold and uranium ore, mining of coal and lignite. Growth in the following sectors viz manufacturing, electricity, construction, trade, transport finance, community services
34
Poverty Indicators: Poverty Gap (Rmillion) in 2007
Population Group Govan Mbeki Gert Sibande
Black 110 116.09 White 6 2.15 Coloured 1 0.50 Asian 0 0.09 Total 117 118,83
Source: Global insight: Ricon (Pty) Ltd. Regional Economic Explorer Version 2.0c
1.4.9 Communication Networks:
Service Providers Number
No. of cellphone networks available 3 No. of internet services 15 Public phone services 40 Total 58 Source: Local Municipalities data
The above table reflects the different communication networks available in the municipality. These IT sectors need to further make investments in partnership with other stakeholders to increase access of such services to the rural communities. 1.5 FINANCIAL VIABILITY: 1.5.1 Revenue Breakdown:
GOVAN MBEKI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
Budget 2009-2010 Adjusted Actuals Projections OPERATING REVENUE
Indicative 2010-2011
Indicative 2011-2012
-154,550,000 154,550,000 -103,707,000 -
155,560,500
Property Rates - Monthly -166,312,445
-177,954,316
-446,816,000 446,816,000 -312,238,000 -
468,357,000
Service Charges -529,617,090
-602,568,497
-3,568,000 3,568,000 -3,008,000 -4,512,000 Rent of Facilities & Equipment -5,267,500
-5,794,250
-6,905,000 6,905,000 -1,018,000 -1,527,000 Interest Earned – Ext Invest -7,848,956
-7,949,000
-42,729,000 42,729,000 -20,904,000 -31,356,000 Interest Earned – Outs. Debtors -36,461,647
-42,000,000
0 0 0 0 Dividends Received -
-
-4,332,000 4,332,000 -1,574,000 -2,361,000 Fines -2,760,000
-2,980,800
-
631,000
631,000
-
119,000
-178,500 Licenses & Permits -687,500
-742,500
-10,455,000 10,455,000 -3,948,000 -7,896,000 Income from Agency Services -11,645,400
-12,538,532
-124,445,000 127,462,000 -93,794,000 -
140,691,000
Grants & Subs. Rec. – Operate. -158,482,000
-179,823,000
-93,272,000 122,142,000 -38,149,000 -57,223,500 Grants & Subs. Rec. – Capital -111,311,882
-97,795,000
-1,001,000 1,001,000 1 2 Public Contr. & Donations -
-
-12,369,000 12,369,000 -6,478,000 -9,717,000 Other Revenue -11,064,230
-12,060,011
-3,000,000 3,000,000 -2,595,000 -3,892,500 Gain on Disposal of PPE -10,000,000 -15,000,000
35
-904,073,000 935,960,000 -587,531,999 -
883,271,999
Total Direct Revenue -1,051,458,650 -1,157,205,905
29,972,000 -29,972,000 19,319,000 28,978,500 Less Income foregone 31,500,000
32,400,000
-45,911,000 45,911,000 -28,044,000 -42,066,000 Internal Recoveries -56,150,000
-65,716,300
-920,012,000 951,899,000 -596,256,999 -
896,359,499
Total Revenue -1,076,108,650 -1,190,522,205
94,022,000 -122,892,000 38,149,000 57,223,500 Total Excluding Grant funding
capital 111,311,885
97,795,000
14,648,000 -14,648,000 0 0 Trasfer CRR 18,918,000
18,624,150
-811,342,000 814,359,000 -558,107,999 -
839,135,999
Total Revenue -945,878,765 -1,074,103,055
Budget 2009-2010 Adjusted Actuals Projections OPERATING EXPENDITURE
Indicative 2010-2011
Indicative 2011-2012
262,223,000 266,755,000 178,813,000 268,219,500 Employee Related Costs 300,378,955
323,580,907
13,219,000 11,689,000 7,892,000 11,838,000 Remuneration of Councilors 15,540,909
17,776,683
55,258,000 55,258,000 35,712,000 53,568,000 Bad Debts 57,697,000
63,655,206
10,100,000 10,100,000 1,885,000 2,827,500 Collection Costs 3,650,000
2,140,000
67,818,000 67,818,000 33,909,000 50,863,500 Depreciation 70,444,808
73,962,367
45,094,000
34,559,000
21,386,000
32,079,000 Repairs and Maintenance 55,010,217
63,817,441
24,244,000 24,244,000 7,548,000 11,322,000 Interest Expenses 24,896,425
27,757,185
210,832,000 218,832,000 188,680,000 283,020,000 Bulk Purchases 271,036,721
313,558,070
70,281,000 70,281,000 52,504,000 78,756,000 Water Purchases 84,452,682
97,120,584
140,551,000 140,551,000 136,176,000 204,264,000 Electricity Purchases 186,584,039
216,437,485
33,938,000
42,460,000
22,315,000
33,472,500 Contracted Services 44,028,200
68,942,156
141,462,000 163,807,000 37,004,000 55,506,000 Grants and Subsidies Paid 167,172,394
155,539,212
76,003,000 70,703,000 45,945,000 68,917,500 General Expenses – Other 84,004,836
96,657,885
940,191,000
958,225,000
581,089,000
871,633,500
Direct Operating Expenses
1,093,860,466
1,207,387,113
32,991,000 32,991,000 26,618,000 39,927,000 Internal Charges 33,774,992
37,770,975
973,182,000 991,216,000 607,707,000 911,560,500 Total Operating Expenditure 1,127,635,458 1,245,158,088
0 Other Adjustment Transfers
14,648,000 14,648,000 1,020,000 1,530,000 Asset Financing Reserve 18,918,000
18,624,150
-67,818,000 -67,818,000 -33,909,000 -50,863,500 Depreciation Reserve -70,444,808
-73,260,032
920,012,000 938,046,000 574,818,000 862,227,000 Total Expenditure 1,076,108,650 1,190,522,205
-108,670,000 -137,540,000 -974,000 -1,461,000 Less Capital Grant funding &
CRR -130,229,885
-116,419,150
0 Surplus/deficit
811,342,000 814,359,000 573,844,000 860,766,000 Total Expenditure 945,878,765 1,074,103,055
36
(Table 7)
Revenue
10/11 10/11 10/11 10/11 10/11 10/11
Equitable Share
LGFMG MSIG MIG DPLG HOUSING DME GSDM EPWP OTHER OWN REVENUE
(R’000) (R’000) (R’000) (R’000) (R’000) (R’000) (R’000) (R’000) (R’000) (R’000) (R’000)
167,32 1000 750 62,987 550 10 000 19 000 2070 1750 824,069
Information as provided by National Treasury Report, 2007
1.523 Municipal Infrastructure Expenditure: (Table 9)
2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012
Capital Budget
(R)
Capital Expenditure
(R)
Capital Budget
(R)
Capital Expenditure
(R)
Capital Budget
(R)
Capital Budget
(R)
Capital Budget
(R)
81,522 16,720 110,851 81,791 108,670 135,556 145,814
1.5.3 Capital Expenditure vs. Operating Expenditure Ratio: (Table 10)
2009/2010 BUDGET
Capital Expenditure
R mil
Operating Expenditure
R mil
Total Budget R mil
136,079 963,333 1099,413 Audit Statements for the past three financial years Financial Year Findings 2006/2007 Unqualified Report 2007/2008 Qualified Report 2008/2009 Unqualified Report The above tables reflect the financial viability of the municipality and the capacity it has in order to ensure proper and effective service delivery. The main focus of the investments will be: • To address community needs • To meet the millennium targets • To create jobs • To improve service delivery • To improve communication and community participation All communities will have access to clean water and decent sanitation by 2010. All houses will have access to electricity by 2012. Housing developments in particular inclusive development will ensure that people are located closer to places of work.
37
The municipality in partnership with the provincial department of housing will strive to put more resources to build more and better roads, infrastructure for water and sanitation, and schools and clinics where they are needed, in rural and urban areas alike. By using the approach of the expanded public works programme in providing infrastructure, we will strive to ensure that more people have work opportunities and are given skills. Implement other special programmes in rural and urban areas where the poorest people live, including assistance in setting up food gardens and enviro-clubs and promotion and protection of the environment. Assist those who want to set up small businesses with skills, and other forms of support in partnership with SEDA. The municipality has strengthened its public participation by making Ward Committees more effective. Comprehensive consultations are done through the Integrated Development Plan (IDP) processes and budget process; Izimbizo forums to ensure effective consulting with communities. The municipal IDP forums are functioning and ensure participation of all stakeholders. Some Provincial Department are assisting in the refinement of the IDP this augurs well for inter-sectoral collaboration. The municipality will strive to facilitate partnerships to accelerate programmes for youth women empowerment (transversal issues), skills development and employment opportunities. The municipality will also strive to have a One Stop Government Centre [Thusong Service Centre] where citizens can get government services and information.
2. IDP PLANNING PROCESS: 2.1 ANALYSIS OF PROVISION OF SERVICE DELIVERY: The Govan Mbeki still has a huge legacy in terms of addressing the basic needs of its community, much has being done to accelerate the provisions of free basic services and more people are enjoying the benefits of a new democracy and access to basic services. The municipality notes also, due to its spatial nature, the main challenge is on ensuring that rural communities also enjoy the same rights and benefits as urban communities in terms of basic services, much is being done to provide water [bore holes] and sanitation [VIP toilets] in most farms despite the resistance by same farm owners. Continuous engagements will be used to resolve and address these challenges. Access to free basic electricity and housing is still a major challenge, the level of access (roads & transport) to key service facilities (clinics, schools, government services, etc) need attention as the district is rural by its spatial nature. 2.1.1 Strategy: Both the national and provincial government provide policy guidelines on handling service delivery issues/priority matters. The IDP representative forum assist the
38
institution to formulate jointly objectives on all priority issues and means of attaining the goals set , the targeted matters must be in line with the vision of the municipality, the same structure will ensure that a list of projects emanate from the strategy. 2.1.2 Projects phase: The IDP representative forum must resolve on the following project proposal i.e. objectives, outputs, location, activities, timing, responsibility and funding. 2.1.3 Integration Phase: The IDP representative forum must resolve on the following i.e. integrated institutional programme, consider the following sector plan viz disaster management plan, financial plan, spatial development framework, local economic development plan, performance management plan. 2.1.4 Approval Phase: The draft copy of the IDP must be ratified by virtue of the council resolution, thereafter comments must be solicited from the community, district, sector department organised labour and organised business. Finally council must approve the final document taking into account comments if any emanating from the internal and external stakeholders. The final IDP must incorporate the budget. 2.1.5 National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP): The aforementioned strategic guide allows government wide planning to be possible given financial limitations and resource scarcities. The same strategy envisages tradeoffs between and across spheres of government. National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP) was launched by the Presidency in May 2003. The NSDP outline the national spatial development vision of government. The vision and principles serve as a guide for meeting government’s objectives of economic growth, employment creation, sustainable service delivery, poverty alleviation and the eradication of historic inequities including spatial distortions. In essence the principles are intended to improve the functioning of the state principally to assist government in dealing with the challenges arising from the need to grow the economy and halving unemployment and the social transition (increase in number of households, growth in economically active population, massive migration, social consequences of social changes & social exclusion). The NSDP link well with the following strategic documents viz; Integrated Development Plans (IDP) and Provincial Growth and Development Strategies (PGDS). Government’s national spatial development vision is as follows: South Africa will become a nation in which investment in infrastructure and development programmes support government’s growth and development objectives: • By focusing economic growth and employment creation in areas where this is
most effective and sustainable; • Supporting restructuring where feasible to ensure greater competitiveness;
39
• Fostering development on the basis of local potential; and • Ensuring that development institutions are able to provide basic needs
throughout the country. The basic principles of the NSDP underpinning this vision are: • Economic growth is a prerequisite for the achievement of other policy objectives,
key among which would be poverty alleviation. • Government spending on fixed investment, beyond the constitutional obligation to
provide basic services to all citizens (such as water, electricity as well as health and educational facilities), should therefore be focused on localities of economic growth and/or economic potential in order to attract Private-sector investment, stimulate sustainable economic activities and/or create long-term employment opportunities.
• Efforts to address past and current social inequalities should focus on people not places. In localities where there are both high levels of poverty and development potential, this could include fixed capital investment beyond basic services to exploit the potential of those localities. In localities with low development potential, government spending, beyond basic services, should focus on providing social transfers, human resource development and labor market intelligence. This will enable people to become more mobile and migrate, if they choose to, to localities that are more likely to provide sustainable employment or other economic opportunities.
• In order to overcome the spatial distortions of apartheid, future settlement and economic development opportunities should be channeled into activity corridors and nodes that are adjacent to or link the main growth centers.
The NSDP therefore uses the two crucial notions of need and potential to describe the space economy and thereby frame the parameters within which infrastructure investment and development spending are to be planned. In this sense the NSDP provides a concrete mechanism in terms of which integrated development planning in the local sphere, provincial planning and national spatial guidance can be formally linked in support of national priorities and objectives. The coordinated achievement of national objectives guided by the vision and principles of the NSDP as set out above; however is dependent on: • Awareness of and buy-in to the NSDP vision and its principles by all organs of
government; • The linkage and alignment of the PGDS, IDPs, as well as sectoral, departmental
and financial planning in all spheres of government; • The extent to which the NSDP and its principles find practical manifestation in the
PGDS, IDPs and sector department plans; • Dialogue between spheres and between departments and institutions within
spheres on development potential and poverty/need within particular localities; • Annual comments and reports by organs of government on how their strategies
are informed by the NSDP principles and their comments on the spatial narrative and maps in the NSDP.
The NSDP is not a plan but a perspective that acts as a policy co-ordination and indicative planning tool for all spheres of government. It is therefore characterized by an ongoing process of elaboration, refinement and revision that requires input from all three spheres of government. In this regard project teams are currently reviewing and updating the NSDP in three parallel projects:
40
• Key interventions for the harmonization and alignment of IDPs, PGDSs and the NSDP
• Updating Development Potential and • Monitoring the Space Economy 2.1.6 The Millennium Development Goals (MDG’s): The Millennium Development Goals (MDG’s) are eight goals to be achieved by 2015 that respond to the world’s main development challenges. The MDG’s are drawn from the actions and targets contained in the Millennium Declaration that was adopted by 189 Nations and signed by 147 heads of state and governments during the United Nations Millennium Summit in September 2000. The MDG’s are an agreed set of goals that can be achieved if all actors work together and do their part. Poor countries have pledged to govern better, and invest in their people through health care and education. Rich countries have pledged to support them, through Aid, debt relief, and fairer trade. The 8 MDG’s breakdown into 18 quantifiable targets that are measured by 48 indicators: Objective 1: Develop a global partnership for development
• Address the special needs of the least developed countries • Develop further an open, rule-based, predictable, non-discriminatory trading and
financial system( includes commitment to good governance, development and poverty reduction- both internationally and nationally)
• Address the special needs of landlocked countries and small island developing states
• Deal comprehensively with debt problems of developing countries through national and international measures in order to make debts sustainable in the long run
Objective 2: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
• Reduce poverty by half between 1990 and 2015, proportion of people whose income is less than US$1 a day
• Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people who suffer from hunger Objective 3: Achieve universal primary education
• Ensure that, by 2015, children everywhere, boys and Girls alike, will be able to complete a full course of primary schooling
Objective 4: Promote gender equality and empower women
• Eliminate gender disparity in primary and secondary education preferably by 2005 and in all levels of education no later than 2015
Objective 5: Reduce child mortality
• Reduce by two-thirds, between 1990 and 2015 , the under-five mortality rate Objective 6: Improve maternal health
• Reduce by three quarters, between 1990 and 2015, the maternal mortality rate Objective 7: Combat HIV/AIDS, Malaria and other diseases
• Have halted by 2015, and begin to reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS • Have halted by 2015, begin to reverse the incidence of malaria and other major
diseases
41
Objective 8: Ensure environmental sustainability
• Integrate the principles of sustainable development into country policies and programmes and reverse the loss of environmental resources
• Halve, by 2015, the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water
• Achieve significant improvement in lives of at least 100 million slum dwellers, by 2020
• In cooperation with developing countries, develop and implement strategies for decent and productive work for youth
• In cooperation with pharmaceutical companies, provide access to affordable drugs in developing countries
• In cooperation with private sector, make available the benefits of new technology, especially information and communications
2.1.7 Provincial Growth and Development Strategy (PGDS): Another important government initiative implemented during the past few years is the Provincial Growth and Development Strategy programme. The Provincial Growth and Development Strategies were compiled within the parameters set by the National Spatial Development Perspective, as well as the Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Strategy as defined by national government. A PGDS is a “strategic and integrated provincial development plan that provides direction and scope for province-wide development programmes and projects, within the context of a long-term perspective and taking into consideration resources available and constraints.” Furthermore, a PGDS provides “a spatially referenced framework for both public and private sector investment, indicating areas of opportunity and development priorities and enabling intergovernmental alignment.” In essence then, the Provincial Growth and Development Strategies are aimed at providing strategic directives to District and Local Municipalities in formulating their more detailed Integrated Development Plans (IDPs), and Spatial Development Frameworks (SDF). It is thus essential that the issues and directives emanating from PGDSs’ be compatible with the vision, priority areas, and guidelines of SDFs of local and District municipalities. Flowing out of a thorough SWOT analysis and identified trends, the Province has identified six priority areas of intervention as part of the PGDS, namely: • Economic Development (i.e. investment, job creation, business and tourism
development and SMME development); • Infrastructure Development (i.e. urban/rural infrastructure, housing and land
reform); • Human Resource Development (i.e. adequate education opportunities for all); • Social Infrastructure (i.e. access to full social infrastructure); • Environmental Development (i.e. protection of the environment and sustainable
development); and • Good Governance (i.e. effective and efficient public sector management and
service delivery). In line with strengthening the intergovernmental planning system and to ensure that there is sustainable growth and development in the province, the PGDS has adopted the following as guiding posts: • Internationally, the United Nation’s Millennium Development Goals (MDGs); and
42
• Nationally, the Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative for South Africa (ASGISA) and the National Spatial Development Perspective (NSDP) of South Africa
2.1.8 Accelerated Shared Growth Initiative of South Africa (ASGISA): The mandate by the South African government in 2004 to half poverty and unemployment by 2014 resurrected commitment in the public sector delivery trajectory. Dismal malfunction of the previous highly contentious GEAR to address economic Backlogs resulted in the formation of a new economic strategy today known as AsgiSA. The South African government's AsgiSA aims to guide and improve on the country's remarkable economic recovery, raising economic growth to 6% and halving poverty and unemployment by 2014. AsgiSA is a micro-economic strategy that strives to accelerate growth. It is a national shared growth initiative that was informed by extensive consultation from all sectors. The two main objectives of AsgiSA include: • To align its efforts by halving poverty by 50% in 2014; and • To realize annual growth rates that averages 4.5% or higher between 2005 and
2009 and average growth rate of at least 6% of gross domestic product (GDP) between 2010 and 2014.
• AsgiSA is also informed by the following binding constraints that have been identified as major stumbling blocks to growth and require commitments based on uprooting them:
• Continuous instability and level of currency; • The cost, efficiency and capacity of the national logistics system; • Lack of suitably skilled labor amplified by the impact of apartheid spatial patterns
on the cost of labor; • Obstacles to entry, limits to competition and limited new investment opportunities; • Regulatory environment and the burden on small and medium businesses; and • Deficiencies on state organization, capacity and leadership. Interventions responding to the binding constraints include: • Infrastructure programmes: aimed at improving the availability and reliability of
infrastructure services in response to rapidly growing demand through the municipal and provincial infrastructure grant programmes;
• Sector investment (or industrial) strategies: To promote private-sector investment, sector investment programmes that are identified include tourism, agriculture, manufacturing, mining and business process outsourcing programmes;
• Second economy interventions: Government has already initiated interventions to address deep-seated inequalities and target the marginalized poor, to bridge the gap with the Second Economy, and ultimately to eliminate the Second Economy. One key mechanism is to use the leverage of the First Economy to address the Second Economy. This includes leveraging the increased levels of public expenditure through promotion of small businesses, broad-based empowerment and development of Sector strategies;
• Macro-economic issues: The development of a new capital expenditure management information system by the National Treasury was recently
43
introduced to address the issue of poor expenditure and budgeting at macro level;
• Public administration issues: The focus of this intervention is to realize a people’s contract on economic matters, the effective implementation of agreed BEE Charters and leveraging benefits from offsets. On local government and service delivery, focus is placed on addressing the skills problems through Project Consolidate; and
• Skills and education initiatives: Skill shortages have been an impediment on infrastructure programmes and private sector investment. The AsgiSA response ranges from medium-term educational interventions to raise the level of skill in areas needed by the economy, to immediate measures to acquire skills needed for the implementation of AsgiSA projects. Programmes identified by AsgiSA to address the skills and education backlog include the QUIDS-UP programme, the Maths and Science (Dinaledi) Programme and the Joint Initiative for Priority Skills Acquisition (JIPSA).
JIPSA is tasked to identify urgent skills needed and to provide feasible, sound and effective remedies. Major remedies include special training programmes, attracting South Africans currently working abroad, bringing back retirees, mentoring and overseas placement of South African trainees to fast track their development and encouraging highly skilled emigrants back into the mainstream employment. 2.1.9 Integrated Sustainable Development Rural Strategy (ISDRS): Countless efforts by the South African government to undertake joint ventures with an assortment of stakeholders had assumed multiple instruments. One of the recent instruments is the ISRDS aimed at enhancing opportunities and well-being of rural people. ISRDS is defined as a federal policy designed to realize a vision that will “attain socially cohesive and stable rural communities with viable institutions, sustainable economies and universal access to social amenities, able to attract and retain skilled and knowledgeable people, who are equipped to contribute to growth and development”. The ISRDP calls for the progressive coordination and integration of programmes by various government departments and stakeholders to maximize the development of rural communities. This vision is a radical one in that it envisages transformed rural economies, which move away from subsistence economic activities. Local government is the point of delivery and the implementation of the ISRDP. Specifically, the implementation process aims to strengthen the quality of Integrated Delivery Plans (IDPs) and the delivery of these IDPs. The vision of ISRDP is informed by four elements, which include: • Rural development: going beyond just the poverty alleviation connotation, but
focusing on changing rural environments to create enabling platforms for people to earn more and to invest in themselves and their communities. This emphasizes that rural people must be the masters of their own destiny and to survive and improve their own economic packages within their environments;
• Sustainability: sustainability evolves from increased local growth, with people enjoying own gains and maintaining available resources for future development;
• Integrated: this calls for coherent coordination across traditional sectors in all spheres of government. It requires the Municipal five year plan (IDP) to establish coordination and maintain integration at the municipal sphere; and
44
• Rural Safety net: in responding to the continuous crisis facing rural people, social assistance has been extended to all rural people and the ISRDP is also consolidating that effort.
2.1.10 Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development (LRAD): Land reform encompasses three distinct components, namely the restitution, tenure reform and the redistribution programmes. The redistribution programme, in turn, has different components, or 'sub-programmes', which includes:
• Agricultural Development: to make land available to people for agricultural purposes;
• Settlement: to provide people land for settlement purposes; and • Non-agricultural enterprises: to provide people land for non-agricultural
enterprises, for example eco-tourism projects. LRAD has two distinct parts. Firstly, LRAD deals with the transfer of agricultural land to specific individuals or groups. Secondly, LRAD deals with commonage projects, which aim to improve people with access to municipal and tribal land, primarily for grazing purposes. The strategic objectives of the sub-programmes include: • Contributing to the redistribution of 30% of the country’s agricultural land over 15
years; • Improving nutrition and incomes of the rural poor who want to farm on any scale; • De-congesting over-crowded former homeland areas; and • Expanding opportunities for women and young people who stay in rural areas.
2.1.11 Water Provision: Estimated Backlog on Bulk Infrastructure
Water no. of household
Sanitation No. of household
Est. Rural Water & Sanitation Backlog
980 6 510 807
Source: GSDM – WSDP May 2006
The challenge during the current financial year is to ensure that the backlog is addressed in order to be in line with the set millennium targets. Proclaimed formal areas with access to water
No. of households No. of households with access
Estimated Backlog
69 167 64 735 1787
Source: DWAF Figures – April 2005
In support of the Provincial Flagship projects, Govan Mbeki Municipality needs to engage the Department of Local Government and Housing in addressing the backlog and utilise local labour in doing so.
45
Types of access to water (GMM 2008):
Type of Service Govan Mbeki Municipality
In-house 38 047 Yard connection 26 688 Bore Holes 116 Spring 18 Rain water tank 69 Dam / Pool 92 Rivers / streams 86 Vendor 58 Other 1 265 Source: GSDM WSDP 2008
The municipality plans to ensure that all residents have access to clean water by 2010.
Residential Consumer Units: Water
No. of Consumers units
with:
Urban Rural: Dense
Rural: Village
Rural: Scattered
Rural: Farmland
None / inadequate 9 613 7 500 6 000 2 300 11 907 Communal Water Supply
17 014 12 803 3 803 284 6 202
Uncontrolled volume supply: yard tap / house connection
139 713 7 016 5 033 155 33 786
Total served (2+3+4)
156 728 19 819 8 836 439 39 988
Total (1+5) 166 341 21 796 12 183 1 238 51 962 Source: GSDM WSDP – May 2006
It is very crucial for all water supplies to be regulated and measured, which will further determine the water loss in a quantitative manner. 2.1.12 Sanitation:
Municipality Population
Govan Mbeki 221 747 Source: Population StatsSA 2006 In order to meet the set millennium targets of 2010, the municipality has to set targets of total bucket eradication and ensuring that all inhabitants have access to proper sanitation by the end of 2007. Proclaimed areas with access to sanitation
No. of households
Bucket system before
2004
Buckets eradicated
In-process of
eradication
Households below RDP standards (rural)
69 167 7 865 5300 4518 228 Source: DWAF figures – April 2005
46
The above table reflects the number of people with access to sanitation in proclaimed areas. The current backlog to provide water and sanitation in line with the millennium goal is a challenge to the municipality and for the municipality to be able to reach these goals it will have to get more resources from all stakeholders. 2.1.13 Electricity: Proclaimed areas with access to electricity
Approach No. of households
Registered indigents
FBE: Municipality
FBE: Eskom
Estimated Backlog
Broad-based 69 167 17 259 53 223 8 000 12 906 Source: DWAF figures – April 2005
Through PPP with ESKOM the municipality seeks to achieve the set targets of FBE to all residents. 2.1.14 Housing: Proclaimed areas with access to housing
Unit Allocations (2000 – 2005)
Estimated backlog on housing units needed
Estimated Rural Backlog
11 044 28 000 1 181 Source: DLG & H figures – April 2005
Housing backlog will be addressed through the Department of Local Government and Housing within the municipal area. The SDF makes it possible for future developments within the municipality. The LUMS encourages the further town developments. 2.1.15 Roads: Municipal Roads
Status Govan Mbeki Municipal Roads
Total Km 1050 km Improvements per Km from 2000 25,95 km Budget spent since 2000 R45,701 Million Informal areas 90,4 km Gravel roads 555 km Tarred roads 495 km Unpaved to be converted 555 km Paved Roads to be Upgraded 311 km Funding needed for upgrading R338 million Source: Source: GMM PMS - November 2008)
The challenge for the municipality is to continuously maintain roads and pave or tar gravel roads. 2.1.16 Health Facilities: (Table 16)
Facilities Govan Mbeki
47
Private Hospitals 2 Primary Health Clinics 10 Mobile Clinics 4 Government Hospitals 2 Private Doctors 36
Specialists
Dentists 15 Gynaecologist 4 Internists 3 Ear Specialists 3 Eye Specialists 0 Social Workers 12 Pension Pay-out Points 6 Places of Care 0 Hospices 3 Institutions for Disabled 4 Old Age Homes 5 Day Care Centres / Créches 97 Police Stations 8 MPCC 1 Post Offices 6 Community Halls 9
2.1.17 Education: Education facilities breakdown (Table 17)
Status Govan Mbeki
Independent Schools 5 Public Primary Schools 62 Public Secondary Schools 21 FET Colleges 5 Tertiary Institutions 2 2.1.18 Waste Management: Formal and informal household receiving waste collection services (Table 18a)
No. of Formal
h/h
No. of Informal
h/h
Total no. Formal & Informal
h/h
No. of Traditional
h/h
Total no. Formal, Informal,
Traditional
Formal & Informal
h/h receiving
solid waste
removal
Percentage of Formal & Informal
h/h serviced
39 423 24 126 63 549 1 413 64 962 50 832 80%
48
Source: GSDM IWMP 2006
The municipality is in consultation with all stakeholders in ensuring that we succeed in removing refuse, waste management and uplifting the municipal landfill sites as per legislative requirements. (Table 18b)
Town Air Space
Bethal 1 259 582 Evander 615 787 Leandra 419 861 Secunda 3 414 003 Kinross 400729 Govan Mbeki Municipality (80%) (Table 18c)
Town Mass – 2008
(tons)] 12 months period
Mass – 2026 (tons)
Air Space remaining
Bethal 28 852 87 972 1 222 286 Evander 20 299 38 453 569 491 Leandra 10 821 38 453 419 861 Secunda 80 464 203 880 3 310 035 Kinross 12866 Govan Mbeki 153 302
371 297
5 506 073
Waste Quantities Waste quantities generated and categories of waste are important in order to devise a plan for waste collection and determine the staff numbers that are needed. From the population sizes above Govan Mbeki is expected to have the highest waste quantities. In the municipality waste is divided into the following categories: • Domestic; • Building Rubble; • Garden; • Hazardous; and • Industrial The table below shows the 2005 waste quantities per category: (Table 18d)
Domestic (Tons per month)
Building rubble (Tons per
month)
Garden (Tons per
month)
Hazardous (Tons per month)
Industrial (Tons per month)
Total Waste
produced (Tons per month)
Total Waste
Produced (Tons per annum)
12 525
1442
22377
*0 86
36430
437160
* Hazardous waste within the municipality is handled by private contractors.
49
Using the tons per annum column, the table above shows that Govan Mbeki produces 65% of the Gert Sibande District Municipality’s total waste per annum. In terms of GSDM Integrated Waste Management Strategy will in partnership with local municipalities, private sector and civil society strive to partner to achieve the following goals. • Waste Minimization • Waste Management and improved service delivery • Waste control and eradication awareness • Efficient waste management (Planning and Control) Number of Formal Households with access to Waste Collection (Table 18e)
Level of Service
No. of Households
No. of Households
serviced (formal)
No. of Households
serviced (informal)
Challenges
Household removal once a week using compactors, tractors with trailers and 45 X 6m skips
69 167 31 042 2 043
Financial resources, inadequate equipment and unregistered land fill sites.
Source: GSDM IWMP figures – April 2005
Estimated budget to eradicate waste management backlogs (Table 18f)
Type of Settlement (R million)
Type of Service (R million)
Total (R million)
%
80 510 52 297 35 164 97 644 132 807 15%
Intensive programmes are in the pipeline to address the backlogs of waste management in partnership with all relevant stakeholders. 2.2 INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES AND SWOT ANALYSIS: (Table 19)
Strengths Weaknesses Experienced, Competent Workforce
Lack of motivation.
Community Participation Poor Attendance of meetings in historically urban areas Communication
Technical Expertise Lack of a proactive maintenance plan. Old / obsolete infrastructure
Broad Tax Base Increasing indigent households and increasing unemployment rate / slow development
Service Delivery Systems and Mechanisms
Over reliance on outside service providers
Potential Growth in LED Pending finalisation of Local Economic Development Strategy
50
Opportunities Threats Economic Development and Growth on identified economic nodes in line with the provincial growth and development strategies Opportunities on downstream development / industrial development demands to meet the petrol chemical expansion needs.
Lack of Coordination, Integration & Implementation/ absence of local economic development strategies / lack of comprehensive investment packages or incentives Uncoordinated initiatives and support from major stakeholders.
Stakeholders Participation on community development, job creation and social responsibility projects.
Competition among stakeholders
Community input & support on economic development, social development and service delivery.
HIV/AIDS pandemic & Social Instability / increase population and service delivery demands / unavailability of land for development due to under mining.
Business Support & Participation in the growth and development of local economy and SMME’s
Lack of Integration and Support for BBBEE & SMME’s, exploitation of opportunities by people outside the municipality and district to the detriment of local communities.
51
2.3
G
OV
AN
MB
EK
I O
RG
AN
ISA
TIO
NA
L S
TR
UC
TU
RE
CO
RPO
RA
TE
SER
VIC
ES
FIN
AN
CE
PU
BLIC
SA
FE
TY
TEC
H. &
EN
G.
SER
VIC
ES
MU
NIC
IPA
L M
AN
AG
ER
SPE
AK
ER
EXEC
UTIV
E M
AYO
R /
MEM
BER
S O
F M
AYO
RA
L C
OM
MIT
TEE
CH
IEF W
HIP
HE
ALTH
&
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
UN
CIL
EN
VIR
ON
MEN
TA
L
AFFA
IRS &
TO
UR
ISM
IDP
52
2.4 GOVAN MBEKI OBJECTIVES AND STRATEGIES:
Priority Areas Implementing Strategy and Priority Issues
Intergovernmental Relations, Social & Community Services
• The municipality will facilitate community development and participation through Mayoral Izimbizo, LED Forums, and IDP Forums.
• GSDM in participation with provincial departments will support GMM to provide disaster, fire and emergency management through training, infrastructure development, equipment and fleet.
• GSDM and GMM in partnership with Sports and Recreation will promote and support development of Sports and Recreation within the municipal jurisdiction through provision of infrastructure, sports, arts and culture programmes.
• GMM will partner with civil society, NGOs, CBOs to facilitate and provide support for HIV/AIDS programmes and projects.
• GMM in partnership with GSDM and sector departments and the private sector will support the provision of Community Services through infrastructure and support programmes.
• GMM municipality will in partnership with all stakeholders facilitate and contribute towards the development of skills and provision of training to enhance the municipal to have a pool of skills needed to support government and economic development.
• GMM in partnership with GSDM and other stakeholders and the government will promote and support tourism initiatives and developments.
• GMM will attract skilled experienced staff to assist in coordinating the efforts of the municipality, district, other spheres of government and private sectors.
Management and Corporate Services
• GMM will strive to support its service delivery mechanisms through effective and efficient administration (Council and Mayoral Services).
• GMM will strive to provide effective and efficient Human Resources.
• GMM will strengthen its accountability and transparency through its Communication and Marketing strategies and programmes.
• GMM will strive and contribute to Youth, Gender and Disability development programmes and projects as initiated by GSDM.
• GMM will strive to implement efficient and effective Information Technology (GIS).
Planning and Economic Development
• GMM will strive through the Integrated Development Plan that is aligned to Provincial Growth Strategy, to address the following development priorities: • Provision of Bulk Water and Sanitation
Infrastructure. • Facilitate provision of electricity. • Provision of efficient transport network (airports,
53
Priority Areas Implementing Strategy and Priority Issues
rail and roads) • Provision of integrated waste management • Provision of integrated environmental plan
GMM will strive through its Town and Regional Planning initiatives will support the following key objectives: • Formalize and Protect a Municipal Wide, Linked
Open Space System • Promote A System of Functionally Defined Activity
Nodes/Areas • Optimize Linkages and Connectivity • Strengthen Existing Urban Areas and Nodes • Promote High Density Mixed-Use Development
Along Main Linkages • Focus Upgrading on Previously Disadvantaged
Township Areas • Feasibility studies for development of Agri-villages • Integrated land use management systems • Spatial Local Economic Development (Economic
Development Nodes) • Facilitate Township Establishment • Regional planning for sports centres, landfill sites,
cemeteries and fresh produce markets • Feasibility studies for future developmental needs
(Housing, water, sanitation, transport, community facilities, economic nodes and tourism).
GMM and GSDM in partnership with other government spheres and the Traditional Authorities will facilitate and support the following: • Land reform and land administration • Economic development and Integrated Rural
Planning Water and Sanitation Services
• GMM will, in partnership with the other spheres of government through GSDM, support and capacitate the establishment and support of water services authorities through the following: • Water quality control and monitoring • Lab Development • Water Services Development Plans • Water Loss Management • Institutional Development and Capacity Building
Municipal Transformation and Organisational Development
• GMM will through its Budget and Treasury office guide the compliance to all MFMA requirements and regulations, including its Audit Committee.
• A new organisational structure will be formulated to respond to all the municipal service delivery challenges
• All the section 57 Employees have signed performance management contracts.
• The Municipality has appointed 3 female as part of senior management team
Proposed Shared Services
• GMM will with the support of GSDM strengthen its local administration and strive to create a platform that will facilitate capacity building and support in the following
54
Priority Areas Implementing Strategy and Priority Issues
key areas: • Internal Audit Services • Human Resources Management • Integrated Spatial Planning • Coordination of Service Delivery Mechanisms • Project Management • Municipal Health & Disaster Management
Services Infrastructure and Technical Services
• GMM will, through partnerships and support of GSDM and the private sector and other spheres of government will strive to provide: • Bulk infrastructure Provision (Planning and
Implementation) • Project Management and Implementation • Infrastructure Maintenance and Development • Housing (planning and support) • Technical Support
Local Economic Development
• A draft Led Strategy document has been formulated.
Municipal Financial Viability and Management
• The municipality has in place the following policies: • Rates policy, • Indigent Policy
• The 2007/08 financial statements submitted to the Auditor General receive an unqualified audit report.
• The municipality has formally adopted a policy on Preferential Procurement and all the required supply chain management committees have been established.
• The municipality has formally adopted a policy on anti-corruption with a hot line number that is widely branded from the municipal building and marketing paraphernalia.
Good Governance and Public Participation
• The municipality has formalised its public participation structures as captured on the IDP Process Plan.
• As part of Good Governance a workshop was conducted on the Batho Pele principles and are they currently displayed throughout the municipal offices.
Support Delivery Strategies include: • Development of LED and Tourism Strategy and LED plan by GMM, which will
focus on the areas identified in the District Spatial Framework Plan and GMM SDF on areas with economic opportunities. The Municipality has lots of potential in this regard and the strategy outlines how these opportunities can be strengthened and ensures sustainability is reached and maintained. Poverty alleviation initiative will also be highlighted by the strategy. These will be implemented in line with Sector Department’s partnership with all stakeholders including the national programmes such as ASGISA,.
• GMM as a water authority will develop and strengthen Water Service Development Plans.
• Ensure total eradication of buckets and proper sanitation to all inhabitants by the end of 2008.
55
• Develop long-term capital development plans. • Strengthen Inter-Governmental Relations • Improve community participation and communication. 2.5 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Structure Terms of Reference / Roles and Responsibilities
Executive Mayor and Mayoral Committee
The Mayoral Committee must: • Decide on the Process Plan for IDP Review • Responsible for overall political direction of the IDP
process, and may assign responsibilities to the Municipal Manager
• Submit review IDP framework and draft IDP to Council Municipal Manager with delegated powers to the IDP Manager
The Municipal Manager is responsible for the management and co-ordination of the preparation and of the IDP process which include but not limited to the following: • Responsible for the day to day management of the
planning process plan; • Responsible for the day to day management of the
planning process and ensuring that timeframes are being adhere to and resources are and managed effectively and efficiently;
• Co-ordinate the involvement of all different role players; • Ensuring the horizontal and vertical alignment in the
process, including Sectors; • Ensure that the links between the processes of
performance management, monitoring, evaluation and review are maintained;
• Ensuring the horizontal and vertical alignment in the process, including Sectors Departments Strategic Plans;
• Ensure that the links between the processes and procedures of performance management, monitoring, evaluation and review are maintained;
• Ensuring compliance with National and Provincial requirements, legislations and IDP Guide Packs;
• Ensure appropriate participation; • Ensure proper documentation of outcomes; • Chairing the Steering Committee, Extended Technical
Committee; and • Management of consultants. • Apply for external funding / donors
Municipal Council • The Municipal Council will have a final say / comment and approval of the reviewed IDP.
• Will consider the process plan which should set out the process for the IDP Review.
• The Executive Mayor or Member of the Mayoral Committee designated by the ExecutiveMayor to formally submit to the municipal council a proposal to amend the IDP and also give reasons why it should be amended
• Considers and adopts revised IDP in line with budget
56
Structure Terms of Reference / Roles and Responsibilities
• Approve organogram IDP Technical Committee / Steering committee
• Provides terms of reference for the various planning activities
• Commissions research studies or investigations • Considers and comments on:
• Inputs from sub-committee/s, study teams and consultants
• Inputs from provincial sector departments and support providers
• Analyse inputs from stakeholders IDP Representative Forum
• Inform affected and interested groups, communities and organisations, on relevant planning activities and their outcomes;
• Analyse issues, determine priorities, negotiate and reach consensus;
• Participate in the designing of project proposals and/or assess them;
• Make recommendations on planning issues to the municipal council
2.6 MUNICIPAL INTEGRATION WITH SECTOR DEPARTMENTS AND KEY ROLE PLAYERS:
Role Players Roles and Responsibilities
Municipal Council • The Municipal Council will approve the reviewed IDP. • Will consider the process plan which should set out
the process for the new IDP cycle. Executive Mayor and Mayoral Committee
The Executive Mayor must: • Decide on the Process Plan for IDP Review • Responsible for overall management, co-ordination
and monitoring of the review process, and may assign responsibilities to the Municipal Manager
• Submit review IDP framework and draft IDP to Council
• Develop terms and criteria for Representative Forum. • Give political direction
Municipal Manager with delegated powers to the IDP Manager
The Municipal Manager is responsible for the management and co-ordination of the preparation and of the IDP process which include but not limited to the following: • Responsible for the day to day management of the
planning process plan; • Responsible for the day to day management of the
planning process and ensuring that timeframes are being adhere to and resources are and managed effectively and efficiently;
• Co-ordinate the involvement of all different role players;
57
Role Players Roles and Responsibilities
• Ensuring the horizontal and vertical alignment in the process, including Sectors;
• Ensure that the links between the processes of performance management, monitoring, evaluation and review are maintained;
• Ensuring the horizontal and vertical alignment in the process, including Sectors;
• Ensure that the links between the processes of performance management, monitoring, evaluation and review are maintained;
• Ensuring compliance with National and Provincial requirements, legislations and IDP Guide Packs;
• Ensure appropriate participation; • Ensure proper documentation of outcomes; • Chairing the Steering Committee, Extended
Technical Committee; and • Management of consultants.
IDP Steering Committee • Process Plan management body; • Allocation of duties and monitoring; • Overall management including the appointment of
technical consultants; • Decision on roles and responsibilities; • Identification of consultation with other role-players/
adverts; • Manage draft action programme; • Commission research studies and recommend
appointment of service providers; • Decide on matters to be referred to the extended to
the extended technical committee for alignment and integration.
IDP Representative Forum
• The Executive Mayor or Representative chair the forum meeting.
• The HODs, CBO’s, NGO’s, Business Forums, Community Forums, Youth, Woman Organisations, Political parties, Disabled and Traditional Leadership.
• This Forum consist of community participation structure/stakeholders and are to represent the interests of all stakeholders and ensure proper communication to guarantee representative participation during the review process;
• Will provide an organizational mechanisms for discussion, negotiations and decision making between the stakeholders including municipalities and government departments during the review process;
• Monitor the performance of the planning and implementation process.
• Make recommendations to the council on planning and development priorities.
IDP Management Committee
• Will be chaired by the Municipal Manager / IDP Manager. Consists of heads of departments as well
58
Role Players Roles and Responsibilities
as representatives from sector departments. • Will deal with matters relevant and relating to district
wide issues; • Consider municipal wide programs and integration to
PGDS; • Consider and advise the Steering Committee on the
evaluation of sector plans; • Attend to the alignment of the Municipality’s IDP to
that of the GSDM; • Deliberate on inter sectoral programs and
recommendations to the Representative Forum; • Give advise to the municipality and foster sectoral
alignment; and • Will timeously and report on progress which then be
forwarded to the Steering Committee PIMMS Centre (Gert Sibande District)
PIMS will provide the following functions: • Provide methodological guidance and support the
municipality during the IDP implementation and review as well as other planning processes;
• Support the planning and implementation management process of the municipality;
• Establish and maintain close links with public and private service providers for proper programme alignment in municipal planning;
• Provide information to the municipality on relevant national and provincial policy and legislative frameworks;
• Organize/conduct relevant training events for the municipality to build its planning and implementation management capacity;
• Liaise with donors and other state agencies for funding for the municipality.
Traditional Leaders • Amakhosi / Izinduna should work with close councillors on identifying priority issues.
• Facilitate community consultation in collaboration with ward councillors.
Mayoral Outreach • Through road shows / outreach programmes to get community inputs and provide feedback.
Ward Committees • Consulted via the Executive Mayoral Outreach. CBWs / NGOs / CDWs • To provide vital information and support during
planning, evaluation, monitoring through the Representative Forum.
59
2.7 DEPARTMENT CO-OPERATIVE GOVERNANCE AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS COMMENTS ON 2007-20011 IDP:
The Department of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs acknowledged the receipt of the 2009/10 IDP as adopted by council on the 29 May 2009, furthermore the municipality did comply with section 32 (1) of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act, No 32 of 2000 which stipulates the following” The Municipal Manager must submit a copy of its Integrated Development Planning to the MEC in the Province within (10) days of the adoption”. The IDP was assessed against the following Viz;
� Compliance in relation to Chapter 5 of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act No. 32 of 2000.
� Technical assessment in terms of the quality and presentation of the information in the IDP.
� Alignment of the IDP with the PGDS. The following issues are emphasised VIZ;submission of the IDP to be accompanied by a process plan , the municipality manage to provide an analysis of its sector plans with council resolution numbers and status quo of all its plans. The municipality must finalised all its outstanding plans, the notices for public meetings should be captured on the IDP,. The acknowledged that the IDP does clearly outline the municipal key delivery priorities. The Department also noted with concern the lack of support and participation by sector departments. The municipality was advised to consider ward/community based planning to enhance public participation in its affairs. Finally the municipality was commended for its commitment to tackling service delivery challenges for the improvement of the lives of the communities. Response from Govan Mbeki Municipality: Govan Mbeki Municipality, in addressing the comments raised by HOD Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs in 2009, has committed itself and completed the following: � Council adoption of the Ward based model of planning � All the planning phases will be captured on the document � Copies of the Process Plan will be forwarded to the department � Information on community consultation will form part of the document 2.8 GERT SIBANDE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY ASSESSMENT COMMENTS: No comments /issues were received from the Gert Sibande Municipality following the submission of the 2007-2011 IDP. 2.9 PROCESS OVERVIEW: 2.9.1 Analysis Phase: The municipality during its analysis put emphasis on the following key issues as baseline information to prepare for planning: 1. Statistics from Global Insight
60
2. Progress made from previous projects and programs [infrastructure projects] 3. Services Backlog Data 4. Sector Departments comments 5. Issues rose during the review by the ward committees and community development workers, business and other stakeholders 6. DPLG comments on IDP 2.9.2 Consultative Forums and Mechanisms for Community Participation used by the municipality: 1. Echo 2. Ridge Times 3. Ekasi News 4. Ikwekwezi FM 5. Imbizos 6. Ward Meetings 7. Sector Departments Consultation 8. Website (www.govanmbeki.gov.za) 2.10 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES: There are six departments in the municipality namely: 1. Financial Services: This department will focus on municipal budgets, accounting, financial management and supply chain management issues. 2. Technical and Engineering Services: This department focuses on infrastructure development and maintenance, projects, provision of bulk services, project management and policy development, supply as well as develop partnerships to fulfil water services functions as a water authority. 3. Public Safety: This department focuses on traffic services, disaster management and fire rescue, licensing and registration, mechanical workshop, police services, emergency services, public transport infrastructure, rail and air infrastructure, goods and freight infrastructure and transport services. 4. Corporate Services: This department focuses on administration, human resources, legal matters and labour relations management services, information technology, etc.
5. Environmental Affairs and Tourism: This department focuses on cemeteries, landscaping, grass cutting, sports field development and maintenance, environmental impact assessments, environmental education, culture, sports, arts and recreation, tourism and libraries, etc. 6. Health and Community Services:
61
This department focuses on Primary Health Care Services, emergency health services, mental health and substance abuse, health promotion and awareness, rehabilitation, food safety and security, occupational health and safety, environmental health and specialised services, business licenses, etc. 2.11 ADOPTION AND REVIEW OF THE IDP:
The Municipality will on an annual basis during August to November engage in consultation with its communities and key stakeholders to review the IDP, the following will be the key issues to be reviewed annually: 1. Service Delivery Mechanisms 2. Projects and Programs [MTF] 3. Community inputs 4. Institutional arrangements & capacity 5. Financial Resources 6. Stakeholders 7. Performance of the municipality against KPA’s 8. Sector Departments progress / programs and inputs 9. Strategies & Partnerships 10. Sector Plans The Municipal Council after consultation with its stakeholders and relevant partners will provide a draft document; the document will then be advertised for public comments and input, after consideration of the inputs from the stakeholders the Municipal Council will adopt a review document with the budget annually between April and May. 2.12 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The Municipality will strive to continuously improve its performance not only limited to compliance to the Department of Provincial and Local Government and the compliance to Chapter 6 of the Municipal Systems Act, these will be done through continuous benchmarking and adoption of best practices on Service Delivery, Administrative Systems, Planning and Financial Management. The Municipality aims to ensure that its performance management system ensures accountability, transparency, efficient and efficient service delivery, good governance and community responsiveness. The following will be key Performance Indicators in line with the guidelines for the performance contract for section 57 managers in terms of the Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000. 2.12.1 Objectives of Performance Management
• To excel in good governance • To provide good infrastructure development • To strengthen community and Stakeholder Participation • To ensure efficient and effective administrative systems and • To facilitate and support human resource development 2.12.2 Principles Governing Performance Management
• Customer focus • Accountability • Responsiveness
62
• Excellence and • Service oriented
2.12.3 Performance, Monitoring and Review The municipality’s performance will be monitored and measured on an annual basis based on its core mandate in terms of bulk service delivery. Performance review in terms of service delivery will be done quarterly and should there are gaps the evaluators will provide recommendations to address such shortfalls. The municipality will review its performance management twice a year and subscribe to the best model that will consistently enhance the municipality’s performance and give early indications if some functions and processes are not functioning adequately. 2.13 SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER INPUTS
• During the IDP representative forum 2009 the Executive Mayor of the Govan Mbeki Municipality that the municipality need to engage residents in all the activities that the municipality intends rolling out. The issue of the employment equity as well as continuous training of staff members was also highlighted as strategic in employment relations context.
2.13.1 GOVAN MBEKI EMPLOYMENT EQUITY COMMITMENT
Govan Mbeki Conforms to the stipulations of Employment Equity act to promote and drive organizational transformation to ensure the elimination of unfair discrimination and ensure equitable representation of employees in all Occupational levels of the workforce. The Objective of GMM is the eradication of discrimination in relation to employment through race, gender and disability that has denied access to opportunities for education, employment, promotion and to the majority of South Africans. We are committed to the idea of affirmative action and employment equity to achieve a diverse workforce that is broadly representative of our people. In terms of GMM Institutional transformation, we remain committed to address and ensure the following: creating a workplace that reflects the diversity of South African society, and contributes to maximising the human resource potential of all people. Creating a harmonious, open, fair and democratic workplace based on human dignity, freedom and equality
The right to equality and employment opportunities between males and females, including people with disabilities. To ensure that our workplaces are free of discrimination in the working environment. Taking pro-active measures to remove and prevent all direct and indirect barriers that adversely affect equal employment and employment opportunities. Ensuring that policies, procedures and work practices are monitored to ensure legal compliance, adherence to best practice and integration of employment equity in every aspect and area of employment.
63
Enhancing and advancing skills by providing employment opportunities and training to designated and non-designated groups. GMM is committed to comply with legislative requirements of Employment Equity and strive to give maximum effect to its obligations of Equality.
64
2.14 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SCHEDULE FOR 2009/10:
ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE BUDGET AND INTEGRATED DEVELOMENT PLAN FOR 2009/10 Notice is hereby issued in terms of Chapter 4 of the Local Government Municipal Systems Act, 2000 and the Municipal Finance Management Act 2003 to inform the public about the review of our annual Budget and IDP. All interested individuals, community organisations, organised business and organised formations are invited to submit their contact details for inclusion in the database of the Municipality, in order to be invited in meetings of the Budget and IDP The required information may be sent to the office of the Municipal Manager (017 620-6044) Website;www.govanmbeki.gov.za DR L H MATHUNYANE MUNICIPAL MANAGER GOVAN MBEKI MUNICIPALITY PRIVATE BAG X 1017 SECUNDA
65
GOVAN MBEKI MUNICIPALITY
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC AND ALL RELEVANT ROLE PLAYERS: REVIEW OF INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP) AND KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS /
TARGETS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2009/2010 The COMMUNITY and relevant ROLE PLAYERS, within the Govan Mbeki Local Municipal area of jurisdiction, are hereby invited, in terms of the provisions of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 2000, to participate in the reviewing of the Integrated Development Plan (IDP) and Performance Management. � DEVELOPMENT NEEDS AND PRIORITIES: (All services / activities including: Spatial Planning, Local Economic Development, Financial Planning and Budget 2009/2010) � KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND PERFORMANCE TARGETS: (in terms of the Performance Management System) Community Participation Meetings are scheduled as follows:
IDP REVIEW CONSULTATION PROGRAMME: 2009/10
DATE VENUE TIME WARDS/Representation RESPONSIBLE PERSON
20.10.2009 Community Hall- Raymond Mavuso
17H00 All Councillors, CDW”S, Ward Committees
MAYOR’S OFFICE , MUNICIPAL MANAGER ,DIRECTORS, SPEAKER’S OFFICES, CHIEF WHIP
21.10.2009 Community Hall-Leandra
17H00 All Councillors, CDW”S, Ward Committees
MAYOR’S OFFICE , MUNICIPAL MANAGER ,DIRECTORS, SPEAKER’S OFFICES, CHIEF WHIP
22.10.2009 Kinross Ext 25 17H00 All Councillors, CDW”S, Ward Committees
MAYOR’S OFFICE , MUNICIPAL MANAGER ,DIRECTORS, SPEAKER’S OFFICES, CHIEF WHIP
28.10.2009 Kgotso Lapa 17H00 All Councillors, CDW”S, Ward Committees
MAYOR’S OFFICE , MUNICIPAL MANAGER ,DIRECTORS, SPEAKER’S OFFICES, CHIEF WHIP
Please note that all comments must be sent to the Municipal Offices (017 620-6044). DR L H MATHUNYANE, MUNICIPAL MANAGER GOVAN MBEKI MUNICIPALITY, PRIVATE BAG X 1017, SECUNDA, 2302 TEL: (017) 620 6000 Fax: (017) 634 8019
66
IDP CONSULTATION PROGRAMME 2010
DATE VENUE TIME WARDS
08.02.2010 Civic/Lebohang Hall
16H00 1,2,3, & 6 Ward Committee & CDW’s Broader Community
09.02.2010 eMbalenhle Community Hall
16H00 4,9,11,19 Ward Committees CDW’s Broader Community
11.02.2010 Lillian Ngoyi Centre
18H00 05,21,25,30 Ward Committees & CDW’s Broader Community
16.02.2010 Raymond Mavuso Community Hall
16H00 24,26,27 Ward Committees & CDW’s Broader Community
18.02.2010 G.S College 17H30 17 & 18 Ward Committees & CDW’s Broader Community
20.02.2010 Kinross Ext 25 16H00 16 Ward Committees & CDW’s Broader Community
21.02.2010 Basil Read Ground 08H30 22 &23 Ward Committees & CDW’s Broader Community
24.02.2010 Kiriyatswana High School
16H00 7 & 29 Ward Committees &CDW’s Broader Community
25.02.2010 Vukuzithathe P. School
16H00 10,12,13,14 Ward Committees & CDW’s Broader Community
28.02.2010 Bethal Town Hall 09H00 15,28 Ward Committees & CDW’s Broader Community
* Take note that these are community meetings
67
3.
GO
ALS
, O
BJEC
TIV
ES
AN
D K
EY F
OC
US
AR
EA
S:
3.1
P
OW
ER
S, D
UTIE
S A
ND
FU
NC
TIO
NS
:
3.1
.1
Pro
vis
ion o
f B
ulk
Wate
r, S
anitation, R
oads a
nd S
torm
Wate
r and E
lectr
icity:
Obje
ctive:
To
acce
lera
te th
e P
rovi
sion
of W
ater
, San
itatio
n, R
oads
& S
torm
Wat
er &
Ele
ctri
city
Ser
vice
s in
par
tner
ship
with
key
sta
keho
lder
s to
m
eet m
illen
nium
targ
ets
and
impr
ove
the
livin
g co
nditi
ons
for
all.
Strategies and intervention for key focus areas:
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
will
im
plem
ent
proj
ects
tha
t ar
e id
entif
ied
in i
ts w
ater
and
san
itatio
n bl
ue p
rint
on a
nnua
l ba
sis
in
part
ners
hip
with
the
dist
rict m
unic
ipal
ity a
nd s
ecto
r de
part
men
ts.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
will
ens
ure
inte
grat
ed p
lann
ing
and
prov
isio
n of
roa
ds a
nd s
torm
wat
er,
sani
tatio
n, w
ater
and
ele
ctric
ity
to a
ll un
-ser
vice
d co
mm
uniti
es.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
will
con
duct
ann
ual
audi
ts t
o de
term
ine
the
leve
l of
ser
vice
s to
be
give
n to
eac
h co
mm
unity
, ef
fect
ive
mec
hani
sms
to d
eliv
er s
uch
serv
ices
in c
onsi
dera
tion
to s
patia
l circ
umst
ance
s an
d ot
her
circ
umst
ance
s an
d av
aila
ble
reso
urce
s.
�
Gov
an
Mbe
ki
Mun
icip
ality
w
ill
cont
inue
to
ca
rry
its
task
as
th
e W
ater
S
ervi
ce
Aut
horit
y in
pa
rtne
rshi
p w
ith
all
rele
vant
st
akeh
olde
rs.
Pri
vate
Secto
r
Secto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ips
in a
ccel
erat
ing
impl
eme
ntat
ion
and
inve
stm
ent i
nfra
stru
ctur
e.
Sup
port
in
de
velo
pmen
t an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of
WS
DP
/
Tra
nspo
rt a
nd E
lect
ricity
Pla
ns.
Ski
lls tr
ansf
er a
nd tr
aini
ng o
f mun
icip
al s
taff
C
o-fu
ndin
g fo
r ke
y pr
ojec
ts to
acc
eler
ate
serv
ice
deliv
ery.
F
orm
par
tner
ship
s an
d pr
ovid
e te
chni
cal e
xper
tise
Pro
vide
adv
ice
and
tech
nica
l ass
ista
nce
(han
ds-o
n su
ppor
t)
68
3.1
.2
Munic
ipal H
ealth S
erv
ices:
Obje
ctive:
To
acce
lera
te th
e P
rovi
sion
of q
ualit
y M
unic
ipal
hea
lth S
ervi
ces
to a
ll C
omm
uniti
es in
line
with
Nat
iona
l Dep
artm
ent o
f Hea
lth
Gui
delin
es, t
o en
sure
effe
ctiv
e, a
fford
able
and
acc
essi
ble
Mun
icip
al H
ealth
Ser
vice
s to
all
Strategies and Key intervention for key focus areas:
�
Gov
an
Mbe
ki
Mun
icip
ality
th
roug
h th
e di
stri
ct’s
In
tegr
ated
W
aste
M
anag
emen
t P
lan
will
ad
dres
s ba
cklo
gs
and
Sec
tor
depa
rtm
ents
fund
key
iden
tifie
d pr
ojec
ts.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
in
corr
obor
atio
n w
ith t
he d
istr
ict
will
und
ergo
a S
ectio
n 78
ass
essm
ent
in l
ine
with
the
MS
A t
o de
term
ine
the
best
ser
vice
del
iver
y m
echa
nism
for
the
deliv
ery
of M
unic
ipal
Hea
th S
ervi
ces.
�
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity t
oget
her
with
the
dis
tric
t w
ill s
triv
e to
dev
elop
a C
ompr
ehen
sive
Mun
icip
al H
ealth
Pla
n, A
ir Q
ualit
y M
anag
emen
t Pla
n an
d an
Int
egra
ted
Env
ironm
enta
l Fra
mew
ork
Pla
n in
Pro
mot
ing,
Pro
tect
ing
and
Con
serv
ing
the
Env
iron
men
t �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill a
lign
its b
y- la
ws
and
spat
ial d
evel
opm
ent p
lans
to in
corp
orat
e th
ese
pla
ns o
nce
com
plet
ed.
P
rivate
Secto
r S
ecto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artic
ipat
ion
in a
ccel
erat
ing
Pro
visi
on,
Pro
mot
ion
of M
unic
ipal
Hea
lth S
ervi
ces
S
uppo
rt
in
the
deve
lopm
ent
and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
M
unic
ipal
H
ealth
P
lan,
In
tegr
ated
D
evel
opm
ent
Pla
n,
Air
Qua
lity
Man
agem
ent P
lan.
S
kills
tran
sfer
and
trai
ning
of m
unic
ipal
sta
ff
Co-
fund
ing
for
key
proj
ects
id
entif
ied
to
acce
lera
te
serv
ice
deliv
ery.
F
orm
par
tner
ship
s an
d pr
ovid
e te
chni
cal e
xper
tise.
P
rovi
de a
dvic
e an
d te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e (h
ands
-on
supp
ort)
69
3.1
.3
Dis
aste
r M
anagem
ent, F
ire a
nd E
merg
ency S
erv
ices:
Obje
ctive:
To
prov
ide
a co
mpr
ehen
sive
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t, F
ire a
nd E
mer
genc
y S
ervi
ces
that
will
ens
ure
that
all
com
mun
ities
are
saf
e an
d ge
t tim
ely
and
adeq
uate
ass
ista
nce
and
resp
onse
s in
tim
e of
nee
d.
Strategies and key intervention for key focus areas:
�
Thr
ough
Ser
vice
Lev
el A
gree
men
ts w
ith G
SD
M, G
MM
will
pro
vide
the
se s
ervi
ces
thro
ugh
part
ners
hips
, inf
rast
ruct
ure
deve
lopm
ent,
trai
ning
and
pro
visi
on o
f crit
ical
equ
ipm
ent
need
ed.
�
The
dis
tric
t w
ill in
vest
igat
e th
roug
h pr
ovin
cial
and
nat
iona
l ins
titut
e fo
r di
sast
er m
anag
emen
t an
d ot
her
reco
gnis
ed b
odie
s an
as
sess
men
t mec
hani
sm fo
r ex
istin
g fa
cilit
ies,
flee
t and
trai
ning
nee
ds fo
r th
e M
unic
ipal
ity.
�
Tra
inin
g of
sta
ff a
nd v
olun
teer
s in
dis
aste
r m
anag
emen
t will
be
cond
ucte
d th
roug
h th
e di
stri
ct in
ter
ms
of th
e A
ct.
�
T
he d
istr
ict
will
, in
part
ners
hip
with
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
, dev
elop
a s
tand
ard
serv
ice
deliv
ery
mec
hani
sm to
pla
n an
d im
prov
e cu
rren
t ser
vice
del
iver
y in
its
disa
ster
man
agem
ent c
entr
e an
d sa
telli
te d
isas
ter
man
agem
ent o
ffice
s.
P
rivate
Secto
r
Secto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artic
ipat
ion
in a
ccel
erat
ing
Pro
visi
on o
f di
sast
er
man
agem
ent,
fire
and
emer
genc
y se
rvic
es.
S
uppo
rt in
the
dev
elop
men
t an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of M
unic
ipal
and
D
istr
ict D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lans
.
Sup
port
mec
hani
sms
with
res
ourc
es a
nd te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e.
P
rovi
de r
esou
rces
to
mun
icip
aliti
es t
o im
prov
e th
eir
infr
astr
uctu
re
and
serv
ice
deliv
ery
mec
hani
sm.
Tim
eous
ly g
uide
the
dis
tric
t in
line
with
the
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t A
ct.
70
3.1
.4
Tra
ffic
Law
Enfo
rcem
ent and L
icensin
g:
Obje
ctive:
To
incr
ease
vis
ibili
ty o
f T
raff
ic O
ffice
rs a
nd p
rom
pt li
cens
ing
of v
ehic
les
with
in th
e G
ovan
Mbe
ki m
unic
ipal
are
a.
Strategies and Key intervention for key focus areas:
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
will
str
ive
to p
rovi
de r
esou
rces
and
fac
ilita
te p
artn
ersh
ips
for
all r
ole
play
ers
to e
nsur
e go
od s
ervi
ces
in
term
s of
traf
fic la
w e
nfor
cem
ent a
nd li
cens
ing.
�
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill f
acili
tate
the
for
mat
ion
of a
pla
tform
for
all
role
pla
yers
to
shar
e sk
ills
and
good
pra
ctic
es,
men
tors
hip
and
shar
ed g
row
th.
�
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill s
triv
e, i
n pa
rtne
rshi
p w
ith a
ll st
akeh
olde
rs,
to h
ave
a co
mpr
ehen
sive
mar
ketin
g an
d aw
aren
ess
driv
e to
pro
mot
e co
mpl
ianc
e to
req
uire
d le
gisl
atio
ns
deal
ing
with
traf
fic la
w e
nfor
cem
ent
and
licen
sing
in t
he m
unic
ipal
ity.
�
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity t
hrou
gh t
he s
igni
ng o
f a
Mem
oran
dum
of
Und
erst
andi
ng (
MO
U)
carr
y th
ese
dutie
s on
beh
alf
of t
he
Pro
vinc
e.
P
rivate
Secto
r
Secto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artic
ipat
ion
in s
uppo
rt o
f th
e im
plem
enta
tion
and
sust
aina
bilit
y of
the
se in
itiat
ives
.
Sup
port
GM
M i
n th
e de
velo
ping
bus
ines
s pl
ans
ad c
apac
ity t
o im
plem
ent a
nd s
uppo
rt th
ese
initi
ativ
es.
P
artic
ipat
e in
loca
l and
pol
icin
g fo
rum
s.
Fac
ilita
te p
artn
ersh
ips
and
supp
ort f
or t
he m
unic
ipal
ity.
C
apac
ity b
uild
ing
and
tech
nica
l sup
port
. S
hare
str
ateg
ic p
lans
and
inte
rven
tions
in ti
me.
71
3.1
.5
Tow
n P
lannin
g a
nd B
uildin
g C
ontr
ol:
Obje
ctive:
To
incr
ease
cap
acity
of
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
to
have
a c
ompr
ehen
sive
Urb
an a
nd R
ural
Dev
elop
men
t S
trat
egy,
thr
ough
the
S
DF
, in
supp
ort o
f Eco
nom
ic G
row
th a
nd d
evel
opm
ent.
Strategies and Key intervention for key focus areas:
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
will
, in
par
tner
ship
with
the
sec
tor
depa
rtm
ents
, de
velo
p a
com
preh
ensi
ve S
patia
l D
evel
opm
ent
Fra
mew
ork
that
will
res
pond
to
the
curr
ent d
evel
opm
enta
l nee
ds a
nd e
cono
mic
gro
wth
. �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill p
artn
er w
ith t
he p
riva
te s
ecto
r an
d th
e se
ctor
dep
artm
ents
to
mee
t th
e ch
alle
nges
pos
ed b
y pr
ovid
ing
adeq
uate
Tow
n P
lann
ing
faci
litie
s th
at m
eet
the
need
s of
the
com
mun
ity in
clud
ing
acce
ss t
o co
mm
unity
fac
ilitie
s.
�
Gov
an M
beki
M
unic
ipal
ity
will
in
part
ners
hip
with
al
l st
akeh
olde
rs f
acili
tate
an
d pr
omot
e in
tegr
atio
n o
f al
l T
own
Pla
nnin
g P
roce
sses
. �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill, t
hrou
gh T
echn
ical
exp
ertis
e en
sure
tha
t Bui
ldin
g C
ontr
ol is
in c
ompl
ianc
e to
rel
evan
t leg
isla
tion.
Pri
vate
Secto
r
Secto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artic
ipat
ion
in s
uppo
rt o
f th
e im
plem
enta
tion
and
sust
aina
bilit
y of
the
se in
itiat
ives
.
Sup
port
GM
M i
n th
e de
velo
ping
bus
ines
s pl
ans
ad c
apac
ity t
o im
plem
ent a
nd s
uppo
rt th
ese
initi
ativ
es.
P
artic
ipat
e in
loca
l Tow
n P
lann
ing
For
ums.
F
acili
tate
par
tner
ship
s an
d su
ppor
t fo
r th
e m
unic
ipal
key
tow
n pl
anni
ng p
roje
cts.
C
apac
ity b
uild
ing
and
tech
nica
l sup
port
. S
hare
str
ateg
ic p
lans
and
inte
rven
tions
in ti
me.
72
3.1
.6
Housin
g:
Obje
ctive:
To
faci
litat
e pr
ovis
ion
of a
dequ
ate
hous
ing
serv
ices
to m
eet c
omm
unity
nee
ds a
nd s
timul
ate
econ
omic
gro
wth
and
dev
elop
men
t.
Strategies and Key intervention for key focus areas:
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
in p
artn
ersh
ip w
ith o
ther
sta
keho
lder
s w
ill in
vest
igat
e th
e fe
asib
ility
and
nee
d fo
r de
velo
pmen
t of P
HP
/ R
DP
hou
sing
pro
ject
s in
line
with
the
grow
th d
irect
ion
as in
dica
ted
in th
e S
DF
. �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill a
sses
s th
e cu
rren
t sta
te o
f its
loca
l hou
sing
nee
ds in
ord
er to
pre
pare
for
forw
ard
plan
ning
and
fu
ture
nee
ds.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
thro
ugh
the
Pro
vinc
ial H
ousi
ng w
ill in
volv
e st
akeh
olde
rs in
ass
essi
ng th
e ne
eds
for
furt
her
hous
ing
with
in th
e m
unic
ipal
are
a.
P
rivate
Secto
r
Secto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic
Priv
ate
Par
ticip
atio
n in
su
ppor
t of
th
e im
plem
enta
tion
and
sust
aina
bilit
y of
the
se in
stitu
tions
and
infr
astr
uctu
re.
S
uppo
rt
GM
M
in
the
deve
lopi
ng
busi
ness
pl
ans
ad
capa
city
to
im
plem
ent a
nd s
uppo
rt th
ese
serv
ices
.
Par
ticip
ate
in lo
cal F
orum
s.
Fac
ilita
te p
artn
ersh
ips
and
supp
ort f
or t
he m
unic
ipal
ity.
C
apac
ity b
uild
ing
and
tech
nica
l sup
port
. S
hare
str
ateg
ic p
lans
and
inte
rven
tions
in ti
me.
73
3.1
.7
Inte
gra
ted D
evelo
pm
ent P
lannin
g &
Com
munity P
art
icip
ation:
Obje
ctive:
To
deve
lop
and
impl
emen
t a
com
preh
ensi
ve m
unic
ipal
ID
P th
at w
ill m
eet a
ll th
e ba
sic
serv
ice
back
logs
, inf
rast
ruct
ural
sho
rtag
es,
inst
itutio
nal a
rran
gem
ent c
halle
nges
, ca
paci
ty b
uild
ing,
etc
. To
stre
ngth
en p
ublic
par
ticip
atio
n th
roug
h Iz
imbi
zo, I
DP
For
ums
and
othe
r C
omm
unic
atio
n pl
atfo
rms.
Strategies and Key intervention for key focus areas
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
will
ens
ure
that
gap
s id
entif
ied
in te
rms
of s
ervi
ce b
ackl
og, i
nstit
utio
nal a
rran
gem
ents
, dev
elop
men
tal
stra
tegi
es, e
tc in
the
loca
l mun
icip
aliti
es a
re a
ddre
ssed
in a
str
ateg
ic a
nd h
olis
tic m
anne
r.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
thro
ugh
part
ners
hip
with
oth
er s
take
hold
ers
will
dur
ing
its ID
P r
evie
ws
enha
nce
capa
city
and
impr
ove
its s
trat
egic
dev
elop
men
tal a
ppro
ach.
�
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill s
triv
e to
hav
e po
sitiv
e st
akeh
olde
r pa
rtic
ipat
ion
on th
e ID
P F
orum
s.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
will
str
ive
to h
ave
sect
or d
epar
tmen
t giv
ing
the
nece
ssar
y ha
nds-
on s
uppo
rt a
nd te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e th
roug
h en
gage
men
t
Private
Secto
r
Secto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artic
ipat
ion
in a
ccel
erat
ing
prov
isio
n of
ser
vice
s an
d ad
dres
sing
infr
astr
uctu
ral c
halle
nges
.
Sup
port
G
MM
in
itiat
ives
in
ad
dres
sing
ba
sic
serv
ices
ba
cklo
g,
infr
astr
uctu
ral
chal
leng
es,
inst
itutio
nal
arra
ngem
ent
s in
or
der
to
mee
ting
its m
unic
ipal
man
date
.
Par
ticip
ate
in lo
cal F
orum
s.
Fac
ilita
te p
artn
ersh
ips
and
supp
ort f
or t
he m
unic
ipal
ity.
C
apac
ity b
uild
ing
and
tech
nica
l sup
port
. S
hare
str
ateg
ic p
lans
and
inte
rven
tions
in ti
me.
74
3.2
O
RG
AN
ISA
TIO
NA
L R
ES
TR
UC
TU
RIN
G A
ND
TR
AN
SFO
RM
ATIO
N:
Obje
ctive:
To
unde
rtak
e an
org
anog
ram
re-
deve
lopm
ent a
nd /
or r
e-en
gine
erin
g so
as
to p
ositi
on G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity to
func
tion
at it
s op
timal
leve
l in
carr
ying
out
it’s
man
date
.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
is u
nder
goin
g in
stitu
tiona
l res
truc
turin
g to
be
able
to m
eet i
ts n
ew m
anda
te, m
issi
on a
nd v
isio
n.
�
The
res
truc
turin
g is
aim
at
capa
cita
ting
the
mun
icip
ality
to
impr
ove
serv
ice
deliv
ery.
Organogram:
GM
M is
cur
rent
ly f
inal
izin
g th
e O
rgan
ogra
m w
hich
will
be
adop
ted
by C
ounc
il . T
he c
hang
es in
the
cur
rent
Org
anog
ram
are
mea
nt t
o al
ign
the
mun
icip
al o
rgan
isat
iona
l str
uctu
re to
mee
t the
new
cha
lleng
es a
nd s
ervi
ce d
eliv
ery
need
s.
Org
anog
ram
/ E
quity
targ
ets
/ alig
nmen
t with
vis
ion
and
mis
sion
and
the
obj
ectiv
es fo
r th
e po
litic
al te
rm o
f off
ice.
All
Sec
tion
57 M
anag
ers
have
bee
n ap
poin
ted
in li
ne w
ith t
he m
unic
ipal
ity’s
Em
ploy
men
t Equ
ity t
arge
ts a
nd it
s m
anda
te t
o tr
ansf
orm
th
e m
unic
ipal
ity.
In
sup
port
to
the
visi
on,
mis
sion
and
str
ateg
ic v
alue
s of
the
mun
icip
ality
, ad
dres
sing
the
obj
ectiv
es f
or t
he p
oliti
cal t
erm
of
offic
e, t
he
mun
icip
ality
will
con
tinue
to
striv
e to
add
ress
issu
es o
f re
stru
ctur
ing
and
tran
sfor
mat
ion.
75
3.3
FIN
AN
CIA
L S
ER
VIC
ES
: O
bje
ctive:
To
ensu
re t
hat G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity d
evel
ops
finan
cial
pol
icie
s, p
roce
dure
s an
d sy
stem
s so
as
to h
ave
soun
d fin
anci
al
man
agem
ent.
�
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill s
triv
e to
hav
e G
ood
Fin
anci
al M
anag
emen
t and
Fin
anci
al C
ontr
ol S
yste
ms.
�
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill m
aint
ain
good
fina
ncia
l man
agem
ent S
yste
ms.
�
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill s
triv
e to
tim
eous
ly c
ompl
y to
the
req
uire
men
ts o
f M
unic
ipal
Fin
ance
Man
agem
ent
Act
and
rel
ated
re
gula
tions
. �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill p
rom
ote
effe
ctiv
e an
d ef
ficie
nt im
plem
enta
tion
of it
s S
uppl
y C
hain
Man
agem
ent P
olic
y.
P
rivate
Secto
r
Secto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ips
in s
uppo
rt t
he i
mpl
emen
tatio
n an
d su
stai
nabi
lity
of t
hese
initi
ativ
es.
Sup
port
G
MM
in
de
velo
ping
bu
sine
ss
plan
s an
d ca
paci
ty
to
impl
emen
t and
sup
port
thes
e in
itiat
ives
P
artic
ipat
e in
loca
l tou
rism
foru
ms
Fac
ilita
te p
artn
ersh
ips
and
supp
ort f
or t
he m
unic
ipal
ity
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
g an
d te
chni
cal s
uppo
rt
Sha
re s
trat
egic
pla
ns a
nd in
terv
entio
ns in
tim
e
76
3.4
IN
TE
R-G
OV
ER
NM
EN
TA
L R
ELA
TIO
NS
, S
OC
IAL A
ND
CO
MM
UN
ITY S
ER
VIC
ES
: O
bje
ctive:
To
faci
litat
e an
d su
ppor
t the
pro
visi
on o
f com
preh
ensi
ve s
ervi
ces
to t
he c
omm
uniti
es th
roug
h ac
cele
rate
d se
rvic
es d
eliv
ery
and
ensu
ring
that
com
mun
ities
can
hav
e ac
cess
to s
ervi
ces
whi
ch a
re c
lose
r to
them
. �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill F
acili
tate
and
Con
trib
ute
its R
esou
rces
to
Sup
port
Pro
tect
ion
Ser
vice
s an
d C
rime
Pre
vent
ion
Initi
ativ
es a
nd P
olic
e F
orum
s �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity in
Par
tner
ship
with
GS
DM
will
fac
ilita
te a
nd c
ontr
ibut
e R
esou
rces
to
Pro
mot
e an
d S
uppo
rt S
port
s an
d R
ecre
atio
n D
evel
opm
ent
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
tog
ethe
r w
ith G
SD
M w
ill s
triv
e to
Con
trib
ute
Res
ourc
es a
nd S
uppo
rt f
or Y
outh
Dev
elop
men
t, G
ende
r an
d D
isab
ility
and
its
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g In
itiat
ive
s.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
will
sup
port
Gov
ernm
ent
Com
preh
ensi
ve P
lan
on H
IV /
AID
S i
nclu
ding
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g of
tho
se
Infe
cted
and
Affe
cted
, Sup
port
Gro
ups
and
Car
e G
iver
s.
�
Gov
an
Mbe
ki
Mun
icip
ality
w
ill
striv
e to
fa
cilit
ate
and
sour
ce
reso
urce
s to
en
sure
ef
fect
ive
and
adeq
uate
pr
ovis
ion
and
mai
nten
ance
of
Com
mun
ity F
acili
ties
(MP
CC
’s)
with
in th
e m
unic
ipal
are
a.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
with
the
hel
p of
GS
DM
will
fac
ilita
te a
com
preh
ensi
ve E
nviro
nmen
tal
Man
agem
ent
pla
n an
d pr
ovid
e re
sour
ces
to p
rom
ote
and
impl
emen
t its
key
pro
ject
s fo
r P
rom
otio
n, P
rote
ctio
n an
d C
onse
rvat
ion
of th
e E
nviro
nmen
t. �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill f
acili
tate
and
sup
port
tar
gete
d E
duca
tion
and
skill
s T
rain
ing
in p
artn
ersh
ip w
ith a
ll ro
le p
laye
rs a
nd
SE
TA
’s t
o su
ppor
t eco
nom
ic a
nd d
evel
opm
enta
l cha
lleng
es a
nd n
eeds
.
Pri
vate
Secto
r
Secto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ips
in s
uppo
rt t
he i
mpl
emen
tatio
n an
d su
stai
nabi
lity
of t
hese
initi
ativ
es.
Sup
port
G
MM
in
de
velo
ping
bu
sine
ss
plan
s an
d ca
paci
ty
to
impl
emen
t and
sup
port
thes
e in
itiat
ives
P
artic
ipat
e in
loca
l tou
rism
foru
ms
Fac
ilita
te p
artn
ersh
ips
and
supp
ort f
or t
he m
unic
ipal
ity
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
g an
d te
chni
cal s
uppo
rt
Sha
re s
trat
egic
pla
ns a
nd in
terv
entio
ns in
tim
e
77
3.5
C
OR
PO
RA
TE
SE
RVIC
ES
: O
bje
ctive:
To
incr
ease
the
Cap
acity
of
the
Mun
icip
ality
, to
pro
vide
effi
cien
t and
eff
ectiv
e S
uppo
rt S
ervi
ces
to it
s ad
min
istr
atio
n an
d P
oliti
cal
Off
ice
Bea
rers
. �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill s
triv
e to
hav
e ef
fect
ive
and
effic
ient
adm
inis
trat
ion
and
hum
an r
esou
rces
ser
vice
s �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity a
ims
to p
rom
ote
soun
d la
bour
rel
atio
ns w
ithin
mun
icip
al a
dmin
istr
ativ
e un
its
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
is s
triv
ing
to im
prov
e co
mm
unic
atio
n an
d m
arke
ting,
bet
wee
n st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd p
oten
tial i
nves
tors
in
supp
ort o
f its
vis
ion.
�
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill s
triv
e to
con
tinuo
usly
pro
vide
eff
ectiv
e an
d ef
ficie
nt a
dmin
istr
atio
n su
ppor
t and
Cou
ncil
serv
ices
Pri
vate
Secto
r
Secto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ips
in s
uppo
rt t
he i
mpl
emen
tatio
n an
d su
stai
nabi
lity
of t
hese
initi
ativ
es.
Sup
port
G
MM
in
de
velo
ping
bu
sine
ss
plan
s an
d ca
paci
ty
to
impl
emen
t and
sup
port
thes
e in
itiat
ives
P
artic
ipat
e in
loca
l for
ums
Fac
ilita
te p
artn
ersh
ips
and
supp
ort f
or t
he m
unic
ipal
ity
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
g an
d te
chni
cal s
uppo
rt
Sha
re s
trat
egic
pla
ns a
nd in
terv
entio
ns in
tim
e.
78
3.6
P
LA
NN
ING
AN
D E
CO
NO
MIC
DEV
ELO
PM
EN
T S
ER
VIC
ES [EC
ON
OM
IC N
OD
ES
]:
Obje
ctive:
To
prom
ote
Bro
ad B
ased
Bla
ck E
cono
mic
Em
pow
erm
ent b
y cr
eatin
g an
ena
blin
g en
viro
nmen
t for
par
ticip
atio
n in
Loc
al E
cono
mic
ac
tiviti
es b
y th
e pr
evio
usly
mar
gina
lised
com
mun
ities
. �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill t
hrou
gh i
ts I
DP
str
ive
to m
eet
the
Bas
ic N
eeds
of
the
com
mun
ity,
Pro
mot
e an
d en
cour
age
Eco
nom
ic g
row
th a
nd D
evel
opm
ent t
hrou
gh S
patia
l Dev
elop
men
t Pla
nnin
g fr
ame
wor
k to
be
revi
ewed
. �
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ith t
he h
elp
of G
SD
M w
ill f
acili
tate
a C
ompr
ehen
sive
and
Int
egra
ted
App
roac
h to
Rur
al,
Urb
an a
nd
Reg
iona
l Pla
nnin
g in
ord
er to
max
imiz
e th
e M
unic
ipal
Pot
entia
l and
Adv
anta
ge.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
will
thr
ough
its
Eco
nom
ic G
row
th &
Dev
elop
men
t S
trat
egy
seek
par
tner
ship
with
all
role
pla
yers
to
prom
ote
Inve
stm
ents
and
eco
nom
ic G
row
th a
nd d
evel
opm
ent.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
will
inve
st in
Geo
grap
hic
Info
rmat
ion
Sys
tem
to im
prov
e its
Pla
nnin
g an
d S
ervi
ce D
eliv
ery
Mec
hani
sm.
�
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icip
ality
will
sup
port
and
par
tner
the
Sec
tor
Dep
artm
ent
in i
ts L
and
Res
titut
ion
Pro
gram
, La
nd R
efor
m a
nd
Adm
inis
trat
ion.
�
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity,
thro
ugh
Ger
t S
iban
de D
istr
ict
Mun
icip
ality
, w
ill c
omm
issi
on a
stu
dy t
o m
axim
ise
Eco
nom
ic P
oten
tial
and
Ben
efic
iatio
n in
the
follo
win
g K
ey E
cono
mic
Nod
e in
line
with
the
Dis
tric
t SD
F:
-
Gov
an M
beki
– M
inin
g, A
gric
ultu
re a
nd M
anuf
actu
ring
Pri
vate
Secto
r
Secto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ips
in s
uppo
rt t
he i
mpl
emen
tatio
n an
d su
stai
nabi
lity
of t
hese
initi
ativ
es.
Sup
port
G
MM
in
de
velo
ping
bu
sine
ss
plan
s an
d ca
paci
ty
to
impl
emen
t and
sup
port
thes
e in
itiat
ives
P
artic
ipat
e in
loca
l for
ums
Fac
ilita
te p
artn
ersh
ips
and
supp
ort f
or th
e m
unic
ipal
ity
Cap
acity
bui
ldin
g an
d te
chni
cal s
uppo
rt
Sha
re s
trat
egic
pla
ns a
nd in
terv
entio
ns in
tim
e.
Inve
stm
ents
In
cent
ives
and
sup
port
for
inve
stor
s
79
Pro
posed d
evelo
pm
enta
l nodes:
•
N17
Dev
elop
men
t Cor
ridor
•
Nel
son
Man
dela
Cor
ridor
•
eMba
lenh
le C
entr
al &
Cor
ridor
•
eMba
lenh
le S
outh
•
eMba
lenh
le/ K
inro
ss C
orri
dor
•
Sec
unda
Cor
ridor
3.7
IN
FR
AS
TR
UC
TU
RE
AN
D T
EC
HN
ICA
L S
ER
VIC
ES
: O
bje
ctive:
To
enha
nce
mun
icip
al c
apac
ity to
pro
vide
bul
k in
fra
stru
ctur
e in
pro
vidi
ng b
asic
ser
vice
s an
d pr
ojec
t man
agem
ent.
�
G
ovan
Mbe
ki M
unic
ipal
ity w
ill, t
hrou
gh it
s in
stitu
tiona
l arr
ange
men
ts in
par
ticul
ar in
crea
sing
its
tech
nici
ans
and
tech
nica
l sta
ff to
en
hanc
e its
cap
acity
to
prov
ide
the
follo
win
g se
rvic
es e
ffec
tivel
y an
d ef
fect
ivel
y.
•
Bul
k In
fras
truc
ture
Dev
elop
men
t •
Pro
ject
pla
nnin
g an
d Im
plem
enta
tion
•
Pro
ject
Man
agem
ent
•
Infr
astr
uctu
re M
aint
enan
ce
•
Hou
sing
Private
Secto
r
Secto
r D
epart
ments
Pub
lic
Priv
ate
Par
tner
ship
s in
su
ppor
t th
e im
plem
enta
tion
and
sust
aina
bilit
y of
the
se in
itiat
ives
. S
uppo
rt G
MM
in d
evel
opin
g bu
sine
ss p
lans
and
cap
acity
to im
plem
ent
and
supp
ort t
hese
initi
ativ
es
Par
ticip
ate
in lo
cal p
lann
ing
and
sect
or c
olla
bora
tion
foru
ms
F
acili
tate
par
tner
ship
s an
d su
ppor
t for
the
mun
icip
ality
Sup
port
GM
M w
ith s
peci
alis
ed s
kills
and
tech
nica
l exp
ertis
e in
clud
ing
skill
s tr
ansf
er.
S
hare
str
ateg
ic p
lans
and
inte
rven
tions
in ti
me.
80
3.8
D
EV
ELO
PM
EN
T
OB
JEC
TIV
ES
, S
TR
ATE
GIE
S
AN
D
KE
Y
PER
FO
RM
AN
CE
IN
DIC
ATO
RS
A
S
PER
FIV
E
YE
AR
STR
ATE
GIC
AG
EN
DA
(K
PA
):
Priority
Are
a
Obje
ctive
Str
ate
gy
Indic
ato
r Fre
quency
Baseline
Targ
et
Responsib
le
Dir
ecto
r
W
ate
r
To
prov
ide
drin
king
w
ater
to a
ll ho
useh
olds
in t
he
area
s T
o de
velo
p th
e w
ater
ser
vice
de
velo
pmen
t pla
n
Lay
stan
d pi
pes
with
in 1
50m
to
all h
ouse
hold
s an
d d
rill
bore
hole
s in
fa
rm a
reas
Im
plem
ent
the
wat
er s
ervi
ce
deve
lopm
ent
plan
No
of
hous
ehol
ds
prov
ided
with
ba
sic
wat
er in
er
adic
atin
g th
e ba
cklo
g in
ru
ral a
reas
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
ort
All
hous
ehol
ds
in th
e R
ural
are
as
rece
ive
pipe
d dr
inki
ng
wat
er
Pro
vidi
ng a
ba
sic
leve
l of
drin
king
w
ater
to
all
resi
dent
s in
the
mun
icip
ality
Tec
hnic
al
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ser
vice
s
S
anitation
To
Dev
elop
men
t of
Wat
er S
ervi
ce
Dev
elop
men
t Pla
n
Impl
emen
t the
w
ater
ser
vice
D
evel
opm
ent
plan
No
of
hous
ehol
ds
prov
ided
with
ba
sic
sani
tatio
n in
er
adic
atin
g th
e ba
cklo
g in
ru
ral a
reas
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
ort
Wat
erbo
rne
dise
ases
re
port
ed
Upd
ated
W
SD
P
Tec
hnic
al
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ser
vice
s
Roads a
nd
Sto
rm w
ate
r
To
inst
all a
n ef
fect
ive
stor
m
wat
er
drai
nage
sys
tem
in
all a
reas
Dev
elop
a
stor
m w
ater
m
aste
r pl
an
Impr
oved
ac
cess
ibili
ty
and
safe
roa
ds
betw
een
area
s
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
ort
Num
ber
of k
m
of
stor
m w
ater
dr
aina
ge
pipe
s al
ong
stre
ets
Layi
ng o
f st
orm
w
ater
dra
inag
e pi
pes
alon
g st
reet
s
Tec
hnic
al
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ser
vice
s
To
upgr
ade
all
exis
ting
grav
el
Upg
radi
ng o
f gr
avel
roa
ds to
N
umbe
r of
ki
lom
etre
s of
Q
uart
erly
R
epor
t U
nsat
isfa
ctor
y qu
ality
Im
prov
ing
the
qual
ity o
f T
echn
ical
an
d
81
Priority
Are
a
Obje
ctive
Str
ate
gy
Indic
ato
r Fre
quency
Baseline
Targ
et
Responsib
le
Dir
ecto
r
road
s in
the
tow
nshi
p
pave
d ro
ads
ne
wly
co
nstr
ucte
d ro
ads
and
road
co
nnec
tions
of g
rade
d ro
ads
grad
ed
road
s E
ngin
eerin
g S
ervi
ces
To
mai
ntai
n
exis
ting
road
s
Pav
emen
t M
anag
emen
t S
yste
m (
PM
S)
is u
sed
to
dete
rmin
e m
aint
enan
ce
optio
ns
Usa
ge o
f th
e ro
ad m
aste
r pl
an
Mai
ntai
ned
road
s th
roug
h
Pav
emen
t M
anag
emen
t S
yste
m (
PM
S)
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
ort
Hig
h nu
mbe
r of
roa
ds
dam
aged
by
truc
k ha
ulag
e
Mai
ntai
ned
road
s T
echn
ical
an
d E
ngin
eerin
g S
ervi
ces
Ele
ctr
icity
T
o m
aint
ain
and
upgr
ade
the
exis
ting
netw
orks
To
deve
lop
and
Impl
emen
t a
mai
nten
ance
pl
an
Upg
rade
d an
d m
aint
aine
d ne
twor
ks
Ann
ual
Rep
ort
on
prog
ress
m
ade
mai
ntai
ning
an
d up
grad
ing
the
exis
ting
netw
orks
Poo
rly
mai
ntai
ned
elec
tric
ity
netw
orks
Wel
l fu
nctio
ning
in
fras
truc
ture
Tec
hnic
al
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ser
vice
s
82
Priority
Are
a
Obje
ctive
Str
ate
gy
Indic
ato
r Fre
quency
Baseline
Targ
et
Responsib
le
Dir
ecto
r
Era
dica
tion
of
elec
tric
ity b
ackl
og
To
prov
ide
acce
ss to
el
ectr
icity
to
each
ho
useh
old.
% r
educ
tion
in
the
curr
ent
HH
ele
ctric
ity
supp
ly
back
log
Ann
ual
Rep
ort
on
prog
ress
m
ade
in
erad
icat
ing
the
curr
ent
back
log
Not
all
pove
rty
stric
ken
hous
ehol
ds
have
acc
ess
to a
ll fr
ee b
asic
se
rvic
es
Ens
urin
g th
at
all
dese
rvin
g ho
useh
olds
pa
rtic
ipat
e in
th
e C
ounc
il’s
Fre
e B
asic
S
ervi
ces
Pro
gram
me
Tec
hnic
al
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ser
vice
s
To
deve
lop
RE
DS
R
ing
fenc
e an
d H
and-
ove
r o
f in
fras
truc
ture
Con
side
ratio
n of
the
optio
ns
repo
rt
Mon
thly
re
port
T
echn
ical
an
d E
ngin
eerin
g S
ervi
ces
Waste
m
anagem
ent
Dev
elop
men
t of
was
te m
anag
emen
t pl
an
Impl
emen
t w
aste
m
anag
emen
t pl
an
% r
educ
tion
in
was
te
gene
ratio
n in
m
ajor
was
te
gene
rato
rs
Ann
ual
Rep
ort
on
was
te le
vels
in
the
mun
icip
ality
Info
rmal
re
cycl
ing
cent
res
For
mal
ise
recy
clin
g ce
ntre
s an
d dr
op z
one
area
s
Hea
lth a
nd
Com
mun
ity
serv
ices
To
man
age
the
land
fill s
ite
acco
rdin
g to
th
e co
nditi
ons
pres
crib
ed in
the
perm
it
Per
mitt
ing
of
land
fill s
ite
Per
mitt
ed
land
fill s
ite
No
of p
roje
cts
initi
ated
fro
the
reha
bilit
atio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce
of th
e La
ndfil
l si
tes
Ann
ual
Rep
ort
on
the
stat
us o
f la
ndfil
l site
s ac
ross
the
mun
icip
ality
Info
rmal
la
ndfil
l site
s O
ne le
gal a
nd
cent
ralis
ed
land
fill s
ite
Hea
lth a
nd
Com
mun
ity
serv
ices
Housin
g
To
prov
ide
hous
ing
in li
ne w
ith t
he
Impl
emen
t na
tiona
l A
vaila
ble
serv
iced
site
s N
umbe
r of
ad
ditio
nal
Inad
equa
te
serv
iced
C
reat
ion
and
serv
icin
g of
H
ealth
and
C
omm
unity
83
Priority
Are
a
Obje
ctive
Str
ate
gy
Indic
ato
r Fre
quency
Baseline
Targ
et
Responsib
le
Dir
ecto
r
Nat
iona
l hou
sing
po
licy
hous
ing
chap
ter/
soci
al
hous
ing
optio
ns
for
low
cos
t ho
usin
g al
loca
tions
/ su
bsid
ies
site
s cr
eate
d an
d se
rvic
ed fo
r lo
w
cost
hou
sing
site
s fo
r lo
w
cost
ho
usin
g de
velo
pmen
t
site
s fo
r lo
w c
ost
hous
ing
deve
lopm
ent
serv
ices
Park
s,
Recre
ation
and
Cem
ete
ries
To
ensu
re th
at th
ere
is s
uffic
ient
bur
ial
spac
e
Pro
vide
ad
ditio
nal l
and
for
buria
l
New
land
for
buria
l
Lim
ited
spac
e fo
r bu
rial
Ano
ther
land
id
entif
ied
for
buri
al p
urpo
ses
Env
ironm
enta
l A
ffai
rs a
nd
Tou
rism
To
keep
the
exis
ting
cem
eter
ies
clea
n T
o en
sure
re
gula
r m
aint
enan
ce o
f th
e ex
istin
g ce
met
erie
s
Cle
an
cem
eter
ies
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
orts
U
nfen
ced
cem
eter
ies
Cem
eter
ies
bein
g ta
ken
care
of.
Env
ironm
enta
l A
ffai
rs a
nd
Tou
rism
Look
at A
ltern
ativ
e w
ays
of b
uria
l D
evel
op a
by
law
(s)
for
buria
l pu
rpos
es
Alte
rnat
ive
way
of
buria
l (c
rem
atio
n)
Rep
orte
d ca
ses
of
alte
rnat
ive
wa
y of
bur
ial
Onl
y on
e w
ay
of b
uria
l M
ultip
le w
ays
of
bur
ial
Env
ironm
enta
l A
ffai
rs a
nd
Tou
rism
Dev
elop
an
Env
iron
men
tal
byla
w
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
a p
olic
y(ie
s)
and
byl
aw
Num
ber
of
polic
ies
and
b
ylaw
im
plem
ente
d
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
orts
on
polic
ies
or
byl
aws
in
plac
e
pol
icie
s or
by
law
s in
pl
ace
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
a p
olic
y(ie
s)
and
byl
aw
Env
ironm
enta
l A
ffai
rs a
nd
Tou
rism
Dev
elop
an
Env
iron
men
tal
Man
agem
ent P
lan
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
the
Dev
elop
men
t of
an
E
nviro
nmen
tal
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n (E
MP
) fo
r th
e m
unic
ipal
ity
% in
crea
se in
th
e nu
mbe
r of
w
ater
po
llutio
n sa
mpl
es ta
ken
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
orts
on
sam
ples
ta
ken
on
wat
er
pollu
tion
sam
ples
on
wat
er p
ollu
tion
take
n
An
incr
ease
of
% in
th
e nu
mbe
r of
sa
mpl
es ta
ken
on
wat
er
pollu
tion
Env
ironm
enta
l A
ffai
rs a
nd
Tou
rism
84
Priority
Are
a
Obje
ctive
Str
ate
gy
Indic
ato
r Fre
quency
Baseline
Targ
et
Responsib
le
Dir
ecto
r
Land-u
se
Managem
ent
syste
m
To
deve
lop
a sp
atia
l D
evel
opm
ent
Fra
mew
ork
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
a S
patia
l D
evel
opm
ent
Fra
mew
ork
Alig
nmen
t of
SD
F,ID
P,
LUM
S a
nd
LED
ME
C’s
co
mm
ents
on
alig
nmen
t of
SD
F,ID
P,
LUM
S a
nd
LED
App
rove
d S
DF
T
o ha
ve a
n ap
prov
ed S
DF
T
echn
ical
an
d E
ngin
eerin
g S
ervi
ces
Dev
elop
an
Urb
an
Des
ign
Fra
mew
ork
(ND
PG
)
Impl
emen
t the
U
rban
Des
ign
Fra
mew
ork
(ND
PG
)
Hab
itabl
e hu
man
se
ttlem
ent
with
nod
es,
tran
spor
t sy
stem
and
am
eniti
es
Qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
on
prog
ress
m
ade
in
impl
emen
t Q
uick
win
s pr
ojec
ts
Lack
of
node
s,
tran
spor
t sy
stem
and
am
eniti
es
Hab
itabl
e hu
man
se
ttlem
ent w
ith
node
s,
tran
spor
t sy
stem
and
am
eniti
es
Tec
hnic
al
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ser
vice
s
Dev
elop
men
t of
LUM
S
Impl
emen
t the
LU
MS
P
rope
r La
nd -
us
e Q
uart
erly
re
port
s on
im
prop
er
Land
- u
se
Insu
ffic
ient
si
tes
avai
labl
e fo
r pu
rcha
se
Ser
vici
ng o
f si
tes
for
purc
hase
Tec
hnic
al
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ser
vice
s D
evel
op T
own
Pla
nnin
g sc
hem
es
Impl
emen
t T
own
Pla
nnin
g sc
hem
es
Num
ber
of
enfo
rcem
ent
done
.
Qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
enfo
rcem
ent
done
Lim
ited
enfo
rcem
ent
of T
own
Pla
nnin
g sc
hem
es
enfo
rcem
ent o
f T
own
Pla
nnin
g sc
hem
es
Tec
hnic
al
and
Eng
inee
ring
Ser
vice
s
Socia
l W
elfare
Pro
mot
e su
ppor
t to
soci
al a
nd w
elfa
re
prog
ram
mes
To
esta
blis
h an
d pa
rtic
ipat
e to
a s
ecto
r co
llabo
ratio
n fo
rum
Num
ber
of
soci
al a
nd
wel
fare
pr
ogra
mm
es
prom
oted
Ann
ual
repo
rt o
n so
cial
and
w
elfa
re
prog
ram
mes
pr
omot
ed
Lim
ited
acce
ss
to s
ocia
l and
w
elfa
re
prog
ram
mes
Acc
essi
bilit
y to
so
cial
and
w
elfa
re
prog
ram
mes
Hea
lth a
nd
Com
mun
ity
serv
ices
To
Dev
elop
an
HIV
/AID
S P
lan
Impl
emen
t the
H
IV/A
IDS
Pla
n A
ll th
e ci
tizen
s in
R
epor
t on
cam
paig
ns
Aw
aren
ess
cam
paig
ns o
r C
ondu
ct a
t le
ast
Hea
lth a
nd
Com
mun
ity
85
Priority
Are
a
Obje
ctive
Str
ate
gy
Indic
ato
r Fre
quency
Baseline
Targ
et
Responsib
le
Dir
ecto
r
th
e m
unic
ipal
ar
ea h
ave
acce
ss
to h
ealth
car
e se
rvic
es
or
wor
ksho
ps
cond
ucte
d
wor
ksho
ps o
n H
IV/A
IDS
w
ere
cond
ucte
d
HIV
/AID
S
awar
enes
s ca
mpa
igns
or
wor
ksho
ps
serv
ices
Youth
, G
ender
&
Dis
able
d
To
prom
ote
and
supp
ort
Gen
der
Dis
able
d, Y
outh
C
hild
ren
Dev
elop
men
t pr
ogra
mm
es
Impl
emen
t the
G
ende
r,
Dis
able
d Y
outh
, Chi
ldre
n D
evel
opm
ent
prog
ram
mes
No.
of
cons
ulta
tions
do
ne w
ith
You
th,
Gen
der,
D
isab
led
on
deve
lopm
ent
and
empl
oym
ent
issu
es
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
orts
on
You
th,
Gen
der,
D
isab
led
on
deve
lopm
ent
and
empl
oym
ent
issu
es
Lim
ited
num
ber
of
Gen
der
Dis
able
d Y
outh
Chi
ldre
n D
evel
opm
ent
prog
ram
mes
Incr
ease
d nu
mbe
r of
G
ende
r D
isab
led
You
th
Chi
ldre
n D
evel
opm
ent
prog
ram
mes
Hea
lth a
nd
Com
mun
ity
serv
ices
Lib
raries,
Art
s a
nd
Culture
To
deve
lop
prog
ram
mes
that
re
cogn
ize
cultu
ral
dive
rsity
Impl
emen
t and
en
cour
age
com
mun
ity
awar
enes
s an
d pa
rtic
ipat
ion
No
of
prog
ram
mes
th
at r
ecog
nize
cu
ltura
l di
vers
ity
Qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
on a
nu
mbe
r of
pr
ogra
mm
es
and
even
t th
at p
rom
ote
cultu
ral
dive
rsity
Lim
ited
num
ber
of
cultu
ral
prog
ram
mes
Incr
ease
nu
mbe
r of
cu
ltura
l pr
ogra
mm
es
Hea
lth a
nd
Com
mun
ity
serv
ices
Pro
vidi
ng fa
cilit
ies
and
reso
urce
s D
evel
op
prog
ram
mes
th
at p
rom
ote
the
cultu
re o
f re
ader
ship
and
le
arni
ng.
Incr
ease
in
the
num
ber
of
peop
le
visi
ting
the
libra
ries
for
info
rmat
ion
and
Rep
ort o
n a
num
ber
of
peop
le
visi
ting
libra
ry p
er
wee
k
No
base
line
avai
labl
e In
crea
se th
e nu
mbe
r of
pe
ople
vi
sitin
g th
e lib
rarie
s
Env
ironm
enta
l A
ffai
rs a
nd
Tou
rism
86
Priority
Are
a
Obje
ctive
Str
ate
gy
Indic
ato
r Fre
quency
Baseline
Targ
et
Responsib
le
Dir
ecto
r
stud
ying
S
afe
ty a
nd
Securi
ty
To
esta
blis
h an
d pa
rtic
ipat
e to
the
MA
M s
truc
ture
s
Enc
oura
ge
sect
or
colla
bora
tion
and
com
mun
ity
part
icip
atio
n
No
of M
AM
st
ruct
ures
op
erat
ing
Qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
on
stat
istic
s of
ca
ses
repo
rted
MA
M
stru
ctur
es n
ot
oper
atin
g in
all
area
s
Ens
ure
ever
yone
is
part
icip
atin
g to
M
AM
st
ruct
ures
Pub
lic S
afet
y
To
ensu
re p
rope
r tr
affic
man
agem
ent
Adh
ere
to
deve
lope
d tr
affic
m
anag
emen
t pr
ogra
mm
es
Red
uced
nu
mbe
r of
tr
affic
co
llisi
ons
at
high
ris
k ar
eas
Ann
ual
repo
rts
on
traf
fic fi
nes
and
pros
ecut
ions
co
nduc
ted
Tra
ffic
offic
ers
not
oper
atin
g in
all
high
ris
k ar
eas
Ens
ure
mon
itorin
g on
an
ongo
ing
basi
s of
all
high
ris
k ar
eas
by tr
affic
of
ficer
s
Pub
lic S
afet
y
Sport
s a
nd
Recre
ation
To
prov
ide
acce
ss
to p
rope
r sp
ortin
g fa
cilit
ies
for
the
diffe
rent
spo
rtin
g co
des
Enc
oura
ge
utili
zatio
n an
d ow
ners
hip
of
spor
ting
faci
litie
s.
Num
ber
of
faci
litie
s ut
ilize
d
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
orts
on
func
tiona
lity
and
owne
rshi
p of
sp
ortin
g fa
cilit
ies
Lack
of a
cces
s to
pro
per
spor
ting
faci
litie
s fo
r th
e di
ffere
nt
spor
ting
Pro
mot
e ac
cess
to
prop
er s
port
ing
faci
litie
s fo
r th
e di
ffer
ent
spor
ting
code
s
Env
ironm
enta
l A
ffai
rs a
nd
Tou
rism
To
deve
lop
spor
ting
polic
ies
Impl
emen
t the
de
velo
ped
spor
ting
polic
y
Spo
rtin
g po
licy
docu
men
t
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
orts
on
devi
atio
ns
from
the
Spo
rtin
g po
licy
Usa
ge o
f the
na
tiona
l of
spor
ting
polic
y
Dev
elop
sp
ortin
g po
licy
Env
ironm
enta
l A
ffai
rs a
nd
Tou
rism
Est
ablis
hmen
t of
a S
port
C
ounc
il/pa
rtic
ipat
ion
in S
ALG
A
sanc
tione
d ga
mes
Fac
ilita
te
part
icip
atio
n in
S
port
Cou
ncil
All
spor
ting
code
s pa
rtic
ipat
ing
in
spor
t cou
ncil
Qua
rter
ly
Rep
orts
on
func
tiona
lity
of th
e sp
ort
Cou
ncil
Poo
r fu
nctio
ning
of
the
spor
t co
unci
l
Enc
oura
ge th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent
of s
port
cou
ncil
Env
ironm
enta
l A
ffai
rs a
nd
Tou
rism
87
Priority
Are
a
Obje
ctive
Str
ate
gy
Indic
ato
r Fre
quency
Baseline
Targ
et
Responsib
le
Dir
ecto
r
Em
erg
ency
serv
ices
To
deve
lop
em
erge
ncy
man
agem
ent
plan
Impl
emen
t em
erge
ncy
man
agem
ent
plan
No
of tr
aini
ng
prog
ram
mes
pe
r ye
ar
Bi-A
nnua
l R
epor
ts
0 O
ne
emer
genc
y m
anag
emen
t pl
an
Hea
lth a
nd
Com
mun
ity
serv
ices
To
deve
lop
a di
sast
er
man
agem
ent
plan
fo
r th
e w
hole
m
unic
ipal
are
a
Impl
emen
t the
di
sast
er
man
agem
ent
polic
y an
d co
ntin
genc
y pl
an
% r
educ
tion
in
post
s th
at a
re
vaca
nt
Bi-A
nnua
l M
onth
ly
repo
rt
0 O
ne d
isas
ter
H
ealth
and
Pri
mary
H
ealth C
are
Pro
vide
co
mpr
ehen
sive
pr
imar
y he
alth
car
e se
rvic
es
Impl
emen
t pr
escr
ibed
le
gisl
ated
he
alth
car
e st
anda
rds,
po
licie
s,
prot
ocol
s an
d gu
idel
ines
No
of H
ealth
C
are
cent
res
prov
ided
Ann
ual
repo
rt o
n th
e no
of
Prim
ary
Hea
lth C
are
Cen
tres
es
tabl
ishe
d
Lim
ited
num
ber
of
Hea
lth c
are
cent
res
Pro
vide
a
sign
ifica
nt
num
ber
com
preh
ensi
ve
prim
ary
heal
th
care
ser
vice
s
Hea
lth a
nd
Com
mun
ity
serv
ices
Act
ive
part
icip
atio
n in
hea
lth p
rom
otio
n,
activ
ities
and
pr
ojec
ts.
To
invo
lve
activ
e pa
rtic
ipat
ion
of
all c
omm
unity
st
akeh
olde
rs in
al
l hea
lth
prom
otio
n ac
tiviti
es a
nd
proj
ects
i.e.
A
IDS
Cou
ncil,
pe
er e
duca
tors
, ho
me
base
d ca
re g
iver
s,
No
of
prog
ram
mes
an
d ev
ents
to
prom
ote
heal
th
Qua
rter
ly
repo
rts
on
the
no o
f pr
ogra
mm
es
and
even
ts
to p
rom
ote
heal
th
Aw
aren
ess
cam
paig
ns o
r w
orks
hops
on
HIV
/AID
S
wer
e co
nduc
ted
HIV
/AID
S
awar
enes
s ca
mpa
igns
or
wor
ksho
ps
Hea
lth a
nd
Com
mun
ity
serv
ices
88
Priority
Are
a
Obje
ctive
Str
ate
gy
Indic
ato
r Fre
quency
Baseline
Targ
et
Responsib
le
Dir
ecto
r
trad
ition
al
heal
ers,
sc
hool
s et
c.
89
4.
FIV
E Y
EA
R C
APEX
:
4.1
EXE
CU
TIV
E A
ND
CO
UN
CIL
P
roje
ct
ID
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Year
2008/9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
4.1
.1 M
UN
ICIP
AL M
AN
AG
ER
:
EC
001
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent /
Cap
acity
bu
ildin
g 10
,000
10
,000
10
,000
10
,000
10
,000
50,0
00
GM
M
4.1
.2 E
XEC
UTIV
E M
AYO
R:
EC
002
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent /
Cap
acity
bu
ildin
g 20
,000
20
,860
42
,000
44
,000
48
,000
174,8
60
GM
M
EC
002
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent /
Cap
acity
bu
ildin
g(M
MC
’s)
40,0
00
40,0
00
GM
M
4.1
.3 S
PE
AK
ER
S O
FFIC
E
EC
003
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent /
Cap
acity
bu
ildin
g
40,0
00
40,0
00
GM
M
EC
003
Fur
nish
er &
Equ
ipm
ent/C
apac
ity
build
ing(
Chi
ef-W
hip)
40
,000
40,0
00
GM
M
4.1
.4 C
OU
NC
IL –
WA
RD
CO
MM
ITTE
ES
F
urni
ture
& E
quip
men
t / C
apac
ity
build
ing
100,
000
100,0
00
GM
M
TO
TA
L
30,0
00
30,8
60
272,0
00
54,0
00
58,0
00
1304,0
00
90
4.2
FIN
AN
CIA
L S
ER
VIC
ES
: P
roje
ct
ID
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Year
2008/9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
FS
01
MS
IG s
ervi
ces:
GA
MA
P /
GR
AP
R
equi
rem
ents
20
0,00
0
2
00,0
00
GM
M
FS
02
MS
IG s
ervi
ces:
GR
AP
im
plem
enta
tion
70
,000
70,0
00
GM
M
FS
03
App
oint
men
t of
5 In
tern
s
60
0,00
0
600,0
00
GM
M
FS
04
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t Sys
tem
150,
000
150,0
00
GM
M
FS
05
Fur
nitu
re a
nd E
quip
men
t – B
udge
t O
ffic
e / S
CM
G
MM
FS
06
Upg
rade
/Rep
lace
Fin
anci
al S
erve
r
500,
000
500,0
00
GM
M
FS
07
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent
25
0,00
0
250,0
00
GM
M
FS
8 A
sset
Unb
undl
ing
proj
ect
1,
500,
000
1
,500,0
00
GM
M
FS
9 Im
plem
enta
tion
of D
ebt C
olle
ctio
n S
trat
egy
1,
000,
000
1,0
00,0
00
GM
M
91
4.2
FIN
AN
CIA
L S
ER
VIC
ES
: P
roje
ct
ID
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Year
2008/9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
FS
10
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t Sys
tem
250,
000
250,0
00
GM
M
FS
11
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent (
0507
)
400,
000
150,
000
160,
500
171,
735
882,2
35
GM
M
FS
12
Fin
anci
al M
anag
emen
t Sys
tem
7,
000,
000
2,00
0,00
0 2,
140,
000
11,1
40,0
00
GM
M
FS
13
Cre
dit C
ontr
ol &
Deb
t Col
lect
ion
Sys
tem
(05
16)
50
,000
50
,000
53
,500
0 57
,245
210,7
45
MS
IG
TO
TA
L
4,9
70,0
00
7,2
00,0
00
2,2
14,0
00
2,3
68,9
80
16,7
52,9
80
4.3
C
OR
PO
RA
TE
SE
RVIC
ES
: P
roje
ct
ID
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Year
2008/9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
92
4.3
C
OR
PO
RA
TE
SE
RVIC
ES
: P
roje
ct
ID
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Year
2008/9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
CR
P01
U
pgra
de C
ounc
il C
ham
bers
( 02
01)
70
0,00
0
700,0
00
GM
M
CR
P02
F
urni
ture
& E
quip
men
t (0
201)
10,0
00
100,
000
100,
000
100,
00
320,0
00
GM
M
CR
P03
F
urni
ture
& E
quip
men
t(02
04)
20
,000
22,4
70
24,0
43
66,5
13
GM
M
CR
P04
F
urni
ture
& E
quip
men
t (02
07)
20
,000
21
,000
22
,470
24
,043
87,5
13
GM
M
CR
P05
F
urni
ture
& E
quip
men
t
30,0
00
32,0
00
34,2
40
36,6
37
132,8
77
GM
M
TO
TA
L
780,0
00
153,0
00
179,1
80
184,7
23
1306,9
03
93
4.4
EN
VIR
ON
MEN
TA
L A
FFA
IRS A
ND
TO
UR
ISM
P
roje
ct ID
P
roje
ct / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Year
2008/9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
4.4
.1
TO
UR
ISM
:
ET
tou0
1 IC
T in
Lib
rari
es
77
0,00
0 55
0,00
0 59
4,00
0 64
1,52
0
DA
C
ET
tou0
2 B
uild
new
prim
ary
Hea
lth C
are
Clic
in L
eboh
ang
(Leb
ohan
g)
9,95
9,45
1
9,9
59,4
51
DO
N
ET
tou0
3 U
pgra
ding
the
exi
stin
g Le
boha
ng C
omm
unity
Hea
lth
Car
e cl
inic
in L
eand
ra
5,54
5,43
1
DO
N
ET
tou0
4 C
omm
unity
Hal
l – B
etha
l
5,
000,
000
5,0
00,0
00
DO
N
ET
tou0
5 C
onst
ruct
ion
of R
egio
nal P
ark
Em
zino
ni
80
0,00
0
800,0
00
MIG
ET
tou0
6 C
omm
unity
Hal
l- E
mba
lenh
le
Sou
th
2,
000,
000
1,
000,
000
3,0
00,0
00
MIG
ET
tou0
7 F
enci
ng o
f Cem
eter
ies
81
3,10
0
2,00
0,00
0
2,8
13,0
00
MIG
ET
tou0
8 C
onst
ruct
ion
of R
egio
nal P
ark
Sec
unda
1,
300,
000
1,30
0,00
0
2,6
00,0
00
MIG
ET
tou9
C
onst
ruct
ion
of R
egio
nal P
ark
Lebo
hang
1,
100,
000
1,10
0,00
0
2,2
00,0
00
MIG
94
4.4
EN
VIR
ON
MEN
TA
L A
FFA
IRS A
ND
TO
UR
ISM
P
roje
ct ID
P
roje
ct / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Year
2008/9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
ET
tou1
0 R
enov
atio
n of
Em
zino
ni
Thu
song
Cen
tre
1,20
0,00
0
1,2
00,0
00
MIG
ET
tou1
1 P
urch
ase
Cem
eter
y gr
ound
(0
740)
250,
000
250,0
00
MIG
ET
tou1
2 A
ircon
ditio
ning
in S
ecun
da
(073
0)
50
,000
50
,000
100,0
00
MIG
ET
tou1
3 P
rovi
sion
of f
urni
ture
for
Li
brar
ies
(073
0)
50
,000
50,0
00
MIG
ET
tou1
4 C
omm
unity
Hal
ls (
0725
)
300,
000
300,0
00
MIG
ET
tou1
5 C
omm
unity
Hal
ls
Bet
hal/E
mzi
noni
(07
25)
2,
000,
000
2,0
00,0
00
MIG
ET
tou1
6 R
epla
cem
ent
non-
dire
ctio
nal
beac
ons
(075
0)
50
.000
53
,000
56
,710
60
,680
220,3
9
MIG
TO
TA
L
7,8
03,1
00
24,7
57,8
82
9,2
50,7
10
702,2
00
744,0
11,6
90
95
4.4
EN
VIR
ON
MEN
TA
L A
FFA
IRS A
ND
TO
UR
ISM
P
roje
ct ID
P
roje
ct / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Year
2008/9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
4.4
.2
ET
th1
Pur
chas
e G
rass
C
uttin
g E
quip
men
t (07
10)
10
0,00
0 20
,000
10
7,00
0 11
4,49
0 341.4
9
GM
M
ET
th2
Upg
radi
ng
Lebo
hang
sta
dium
(0
719)
500,
000
10
7,00
0 11
4,49
0 721.4
9
GM
M
ET
th3
Fur
nitu
re a
nd E
quip
men
t –
Sta
dium
(07
19)
30
,000
30,0
00
GM
M
ET
th4
Pro
vide
Fen
ce &
Gat
e
25
8,50
0
258,5
00
MIG
ET
th 5
B
uy b
ack
Cen
tre
1,
000,
000
1,0
00,0
00
MIG
ET
th 6
U
pgra
de S
ecun
da L
andf
ill s
ite
33
,000
33
,000
35
,310
37
,782
139.0
92
GM
M
TO
TA
L
631,2
91,5
00
53,0
00
249,3
10
266,7
62
4.4
.3
FA
CIL
ITIE
S
TO
TA
L
96
4.4
EN
VIR
ON
MEN
TA
L A
FFA
IRS A
ND
TO
UR
ISM
P
roje
ct ID
P
roje
ct / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Year
2008/9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
4.4
.4
RE
CR
EA
TIO
N:
TO
TA
L
4.4
.5
EN
VIR
ON
MEN
TA
L M
AN
AG
EM
EN
T:
TO
TA
L
4.4
.6
LIB
RA
RIE
S:
TO
TA
L
TO
TA
L
97
4.5
H
EA
LTH
AN
D C
OM
MU
NIT
Y S
ER
VIC
ES:
Ref
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Year
2008/9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
HC
S01
In
form
al T
radi
ng
20
0,00
0
200,0
00
GM
M &
ext
erna
l
HC
S02
H
ealth
Adm
in –
Fur
nitu
re &
E
quip
men
t (03
01)
10
,000
10,7
00
11,4
49
32,1
49
GM
M &
ext
erna
l
HC
S03
H
ealth
& S
afet
y T
rain
ing
Cen
tre
(031
0)
5,
000
10,0
00
5,35
0 5,
725
26,0
75
GM
M &
ext
erna
l
HC
S04
H
ealth
adm
in –
Fur
nitu
re &
E
quip
men
t (03
01)
40,0
00
40,0
00
GM
M &
ext
erna
l
HC
S05
In
fras
truc
ture
for
Ani
mal
Con
trol
(0
304)
50,0
00
30,0
00
72,7
60
77,8
54
230,6
14
GM
M &
ext
erna
l
HC
S06
R
enov
ate
Em
zino
ni T
huso
ng
Cen
tre
41
3,10
0
413,1
00 MIG
HC
S07
F
enci
ng o
f Sec
unda
Lan
dfill
site
1,
000,
000
1,0
00,0
00
GM
M &
ext
erna
l fu
nder
s
98
4.5
H
EA
LTH
AN
D C
OM
MU
NIT
Y S
ER
VIC
ES:
Ref
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
2007/8
2008/9
2009/1
0
2010/1
1
2011/1
2
Tota
l
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
TO
TA
L
678,1
00
80,0
00
72,7
60
77,8
54
941,9
38
4.6
TE
CH
NIC
AL A
ND
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G S
ER
VIC
ES:
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
jects
W
ard
Year
2008/0
9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e F
undin
g
PU
BLIC
WO
RK
S
B
uild
ing
Mas
ter
Pla
n A
ll w
ards
G
MM
C
onst
ruct
ion
of R
oads
3,
500,
000
3,5
00,0
00
GS
DM
R
oads
in B
etha
l
4,00
0,00
0
4,0
00,0
00
GS
DM
Le
andr
a R
oads
3,00
0,00
0
3,0
00,0
00
GS
DM
99
4.6
TE
CH
NIC
AL A
ND
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G S
ER
VIC
ES:
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
jects
W
ard
Year
2008/0
9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e F
undin
g
R
ural
Roa
ds
500,
000
500,0
00
GS
DM
N
ew R
oads
Z1
in E
mzi
noni
24
,27
90
0,00
0 3,
000,
000
3,00
0,00
0
906,0
00,0
00
MIG
N
ew R
oads
Z3
Em
bale
nhle
90
0,00
0 2,
500,
000
3,00
0,00
0
905,5
00,0
00
Loan
E
radi
catio
n of
Gra
vel
Roa
ds
994,
000
2,07
0,00
0
996,0
70,0
00
Loan
N
ew R
oads
in Z
4
Lebo
hang
90
0,00
0 2,
500,
000
3,00
0,00
0
905,5
00,0
00
Cap
ital f
rom
ext
. Lo
ans
C
onst
ruct
ion
of L
ow w
ater
br
idge
s in
GM
M
1,
000,
000
1,0
00,0
00
Loan
U
pgra
de T
ar R
oads
in
GM
M
2,
500,
000
4,00
0,00
0
6,5
00,0
00
Loan
C
onst
ruct
ion
of p
aved
R
oads
in E
mzi
noni
22
,23,
24,
26
12,0
00,0
00
6,00
0,00
0
18,0
00,0
00
GM
M
C
onst
ruct
ion
of p
aved
R
oads
in E
mba
lenh
le
12
,000
,000
6,
000,
000
18,0
00,0
00
MIG
C
onst
ruct
ion
of G
rave
l R
oads
/ S
torm
wat
er E
xt22
E
mba
lenh
le
4,20
0,00
0
3,00
0,00
0
5,2
00,0
00
MIG
100
4.6
TE
CH
NIC
AL A
ND
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G S
ER
VIC
ES:
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
jects
W
ard
Year
2008/0
9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e F
undin
g
TO
TA
L
12,6
94,0
00
45,9
57,0
00
36,5
35,0
00
572,4
50
667,6
36,0
00
ELEC
TR
ICIT
Y
TE
S 3
1 E
lctr
. Of
178n
hou
seho
lds-
Em
ba E
xt16
War
d 20
–
Pha
se3
D
ME
TE
S32
E
lect
r. O
f 87
3 ho
useh
olds
- E
mba
Ext
26
War
d 7
Pha
se
1
1,99
9,20
0
1,9
99,2
00
GS
DM
TE
S34
E
lect
r. O
f hu
ses
Em
zino
ni
Ext
13,
6 P
hase
1-4
21
Hou
ses
49
2,80
0
492,8
00
DM
E
TE
S35
E
lect
rific
atio
n of
hou
ses
15
,000
,000
18
,000
,000
33,0
00,0
00
DM
E
TE
S36
E
lect
rific
atio
n of
S
alpi
eter
tekr
ans
Far
m
14
0,00
0
DM
E
TE
S37
E
lect
rific
atio
n of
Lee
upan
F
arm
187,
200
187,2
00
DM
E
TE
S38
E
lect
rific
atio
n of
N
aude
sfon
tein
Far
m
57
6,00
0
576,0
00
DM
E
TE
S39
E
lect
rific
atio
n of
E
mba
lenh
le E
xt 2
2
9,09
6,80
0
9,0
96,8
00
DM
E
TE
S40
P
rovi
sion
of
elec
tric
ity in
25
6,00
0
256,0
00
MIG
101
4.6
TE
CH
NIC
AL A
ND
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G S
ER
VIC
ES:
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
jects
W
ard
Year
2008/0
9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e F
undin
g
rura
l are
as
TE
S42
E
lect
rici
ty I
nsta
llatio
n on
Lo
an
1,59
2,66
2
1,5
92,6
62
GS
DM
TE
S43
In
stal
latio
n of
hig
h M
ast
Ligh
t in
GM
M X
8
3,
000,
000
3,0
00,0
00
MIG
TE
S44
P
ublic
L ig
htin
g
98
3,70
0
983,7
00
MIG
TE
S45
P
ublic
Lig
htin
g Z
one1
1,
050,
000
1,0
50,0
00
MIG
TE
S46
P
ublic
Lig
htin
g Z
one
3
1,
050,
000
1,0
50,0
00
MIG
TE
S47
P
ublic
Lig
htin
g Z
one4
1,
050,
000
1,0
50,0
00
MIG
TE
S48
In
stal
latio
n of
Str
eet
light
ning
in E
mba
lenh
le
2,
100,
000
2,1
00,0
00
MIG
TE
S49
M
IG P
roje
cts
92
,111
,000
92,1
11,0
00
MIG
TE
S50
S
tree
tligh
t upg
rade
20
0,00
0 10
0,00
0 16
0,50
0 17
1,73
5 632,2
35
GM
M
102
4.6
TE
CH
NIC
AL A
ND
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G S
ER
VIC
ES:
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
jects
W
ard
Year
2008/0
9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e F
undin
g
TE
S51
E
quip
men
t an
d T
ools
10
0,00
0 50
,000
150,0
00
GM
M
TO
TA
L
8,7
74,,362
15,2
50,0
00
15,1
60,5
00
110,2
82,7
35
149,4
67,5
90
WA
TE
R &
SEW
ER
TE
S53
V
IP
5,90
7,33
8 1,
000,
000
6,9
07,3
38
GS
DM
TE
S54
B
etha
l Ele
tric
al N
etw
ork
2,00
0,00
0 10
,000
,000
12,0
00,0
00
GS
DM
TE
S55
W
aste
Wat
er M
anag
emen
t
1,
000,
000
1,0
00,0
00
GS
DM
TE
S56
W
aste
Wat
er M
anag
emen
t
71
4,28
5
714,2
85
GD
SM
TE
S58
P
rovi
sion
of f
ull W
ater
bo
rne
Sew
er K
inro
ss
400,
000
400,0
00
MIG
TE
S59
C
onve
rsio
n of
VIP
Ext
24
1,97
0,00
0
1,9
70,0
00
MIG
T
ES
60
Con
vers
ion
of V
IP E
xt18
2,
901,
200
2,9
01,2
00
MIG
TE
S61
C
onve
rsio
n of
VIP
’s
Em
zino
ni E
xt 5
1,
988,
500
3,70
0,00
0
1,9
88,5
00
MIG
TE
S62
F
enci
ng o
f Eva
nder
an
d S
ecun
da C
emet
erie
s
1,
000,
000
2,00
0,00
0
3,0
00,0
00
MIG
TE
S63
In
stal
latio
n of
VIP
toile
t in
Rur
al A
reas
3,70
0,00
0
3,7
00,0
00
MIG
103
4.6
TE
CH
NIC
AL A
ND
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G S
ER
VIC
ES:
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
jects
W
ard
Year
2008/0
9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e F
undin
g
TE
S64
C
onve
rsio
n of
VIP
’s
Em
zino
ni E
xt6
23
2,
000,
000
4,00
0,00
0 2,
000,
000
8,0
00,0
00
MIG
TE
S65
C
onve
rsio
n of
VIP
's
Kin
ross
Ext
25
61
2,25
0
612,2
50
MIG
TE
S66
E
mba
lenh
le P
ump
Sta
tion
80
0,00
0
800,0
00
MIG
TE
S69
E
mba
lenh
le W
WT
P -
U
pgra
ding
MIG
TE
S70
P
rovi
sion
of f
ull W
ater
bo
rne
sew
er (
Tha
mbo
)
2,
500,
000
4,20
0,00
0
MIG
TE
S71
W
WT
P E
mzi
noni
/ B
etha
l
MIG
TE
S72
W
WT
P K
inro
ss
1,88
2,80
0
13,0
00,0
00
14,8
82,8
00
MIG
TE
S73
W
WT
P L
eand
ra /
Lebo
hang
1,
773,
300
1,7
73,3
00
MIG
TE
S74
C
apita
l Ite
ms
500,
000
300,
000
321,
000
343,
470
1464,4
70
MIG
104
4.6
TE
CH
NIC
AL A
ND
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G S
ER
VIC
ES:
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
jects
W
ard
Year
2008/0
9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e F
undin
g
TE
S75
C
apita
l Ite
ms
570,
000
300,
000
481,
500
515,
205
1866,7
05
MIG
TE
S76
D
evel
opm
ent
of in
tegr
ated
sa
nita
tion
infr
astr
uctu
re
Inve
ntor
y an
d A
sset
M
anag
emen
t Pla
n
30
0,00
0 15
0,00
0
450,0
00
MIG
TE
S78
B
oreh
ole
Han
d pu
mp
Rur
al
1,00
0,00
0 1,
000,
000
2,0
00,0
00
GS
DM
TE
S79
U
nallo
cate
d M
DR
F P
roje
cts
M
DR
F
TE
S80
Le
boha
ng b
ulk
wat
er
supp
ly
19,5
00
19,5
00
MIG
TE
S81
W
ater
Res
ervo
ir E
mba
lenh
le
5,97
2,20
0
5,9
72,2
00
MIG
TE
S82
P
ipel
ine
to E
mba
lenh
le
1,11
5,10
0
1,1
15,1
00
MIG
TE
S83
P
ump
Sta
tion
Em
bale
nhle
60
0,00
0
600,0
00
MIG
TE
S84
A
sset
Man
agem
ent P
lan
– W
ater
GS
DM
TE
S85
Z
onal
met
erin
g
M
IG
TE
S86
W
ater
Equ
ipm
ent
405,
000
405,0
00
MIG
105
4.6
TE
CH
NIC
AL A
ND
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G S
ER
VIC
ES:
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
jects
W
ard
Year
2008/0
9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e F
undin
g
TE
S87
10
MI R
eser
voir
5,
000,
000
5,0
00,0
00
GS
DM
TE
S88
2.
0 M
I Sto
rage
Cap
acity
–
Kin
ross
MIG
TE
S89
5.
0 M
I Sto
rage
Cap
acity
–
Bet
hal /
Em
zino
ni
2,50
0,00
0
10,0
00,0
00
12,5
00,0
00
MIG
TE
S90
C
onst
ruct
and
rev
italiz
e bo
reho
les
in r
ural
are
as
M
IG
TE
S91
C
onst
ruct
Inte
rnal
R
etic
ulat
ion
netw
ork
in
Cha
rl C
illie
rs
M
IG
TE
S92
C
onst
ruct
Inte
rnal
R
etic
ulat
ion
netw
ork
in
Em
bale
nhle
M
IG
TE
S93
C
onst
ruct
Inte
rnal
R
etic
ulat
ion
netw
ork
in
Kin
ross
167,
300
167,3
00
MIG
TE
S94
C
onst
ruct
Inte
rnal
R
etic
ulat
ion
netw
ork
in
Lean
dra
2,00
9,00
0
2,,009,0
00
MIG
TE
S97
P
urch
ase
tool
s an
d E
quip
men
t
83
0,00
0 20
0,00
0 21
4,00
0 22
8,98
0
GM
M
TE
S98
W
ater
Pro
visi
on
1,
750,
000
2,04
0,00
0 2,
300,
000
M
IG
106
4.6
TE
CH
NIC
AL A
ND
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G S
ER
VIC
ES:
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
jects
W
ard
Year
2008/0
9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e F
undin
g
TO
TA
L
42,0
32,7
73
36,6
00,0
00
30,4
61,5
00
861,2
03,9
80
970,2
98,2
53
PH
YSIC
AL D
EV
ELO
PM
EN
T
TE
S2-
08
Fin
aliz
atio
n of
out
stan
ding
Tow
nshi
p es
tabl
ishm
ent:
Em
zino
ni (
4430
Sta
nds)
E
mba
lenh
le (
5793
sta
nds)
Leb
ohan
g (3
049
stan
ds)
4,
000,
000
4,0
00,0
00
DA
LA
TE
S3-
08
Pur
chas
e la
nd fo
r T
owns
hip
esta
blis
hmen
t/ R
epla
cem
ent o
f The
atre
ro
of/G
ert S
iban
de M
useu
m
10
,500
,000
10,5
00,0
00
DA
LA
TE
S4-
08
MS
IG S
ervi
ces
: GIM
S s
yste
m
1,
100,
000
1,1
00,0
00
DA
LA
TE
S5-
08
PM
U-
Cos
t co
mpo
nent
2,81
0,60
0
3,75
0,00
0
6,5
60,6
00
MIG
TE
S6-
08
Geo
grap
hic
Info
rmat
ion
Sys
tem
s (G
IS)
(061
1)
10
0,00
0
100,0
00
MIG
TE
S7-
08
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent(
0601
)
20,0
00
25,0
00
21,4
00
22,8
98
89,2
89
GM
M
TE
S8-
08
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent (
0604
)
270,
000
270,
000
192,
600
206,
082
938,6
82
GM
M
TE
S9-
08
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent (
0605
)
30,0
00
30,0
00
32,1
00
34,3
47
126,4
47
GM
M
TE
S10
-08
F
urni
ture
& E
quip
men
t (06
07)
30
,000
30
,000
30
,000
30
,000
120,0
00
GM
M
TE
S11
-08
F
urni
ture
& E
quip
men
t (06
07)
100,
000
53,5
00
57,2
45
2
10,7
45
GM
M
107
4.6
TE
CH
NIC
AL A
ND
EN
GIN
EE
RIN
G S
ER
VIC
ES:
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
jects
W
ard
Year
2008/0
9
Year
2009/1
0
Year
2010/1
1
Year
2011/1
2
Year
2012/1
3
Tota
l C
ost
Sourc
e F
undin
g
TE
S12
- F
urni
ture
& E
quip
men
t (06
13)
30
,000
30
,000
32
,100
34
,347
126,4
47
GM
M
TE
S13
-08
U
pgra
ding
of
Cou
ncil
Bui
ldin
gs (
0616
)
800,
000
300,
000
321,
000
343,
470
1,7
64,4
70
GM
M
TE
S14
-08
La
nd u
se M
anag
emen
t Sys
tem
(06
10)
1,
500,
000
500,
000
214,
000
228,
980
944,4
80
GM
M
TO
TA
L
21,1
90,6
00
1,2
85,0
00
4,6
46,7
00
957,3
69
984,4
91,3
00
GR
AN
D T
OTA
L
Pro
ject ID
D
escription
2008/9
2009/1
0
2010/1
1
2011/1
2
2012/1
3
Secto
r D
epart
ments
SP
ATIA
L D
EVELO
PM
EN
T F
RA
MEW
OR
K P
RO
JEC
TS
PU
BLIC
CA
PIT
AL IN
VE
STM
EN
T
SD
F 0
1 T
rans
port
infr
astr
uctu
re in
clud
ing
rail
road
s an
d tr
ansp
orta
tion
faci
litie
s su
ch a
s ta
xi
rank
s;
SD
F 0
2 S
ervi
ces
infr
astr
uctu
re in
clud
ing
stor
m
wat
er,
wat
er s
ewer
and
ele
ctric
ity n
etw
orks
an
d so
lid w
aste
dis
posa
l ser
vice
s,
SD
F 0
3 A
wid
e ra
nge
of c
omm
unity
ser
vice
s an
d fa
cilit
ies
(sch
ools
, cl
inic
s, p
arks
, spo
rt fi
elds
,
108
Pro
ject ID
D
escription
2008/9
2009/1
0
2010/1
1
2011/1
2
2012/1
3
Secto
r D
epart
ments
SP
ATIA
L D
EVELO
PM
EN
T F
RA
MEW
OR
K P
RO
JEC
TS
safe
ty a
nd s
ecur
ity,
etc.
) an
d S
DF
04
Loca
l eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent a
nd
tran
sfor
mat
ion
PR
IVA
TE
CA
PIT
AL IN
VES
TM
EN
T
BE
TH
AL/E
MZIN
ON
I A
ND
LE
AN
DR
A / L
EB
OH
AN
G
SD
F 0
7 A
gric
ultu
ral S
ecto
r:
Pou
ltry
and
pig
feed
, Tex
tiles
, Oil
seed
pr
oces
sing
. Li
vest
ock
by-p
rodu
cts,
bio
-di
esel
, Mea
t pr
oces
sing
.
SD
F 0
8 M
inin
g:
Pro
tect
ive
clot
hing
. Soa
ps a
nd p
olis
hes,
B
oots
& s
hoes
. V
eget
able
s, c
lean
ing
equi
pmen
t, P
rote
ctiv
e ja
cket
s, b
ucke
ts a
nd
cans
.
MU
NIC
IPA
L W
IDE
PR
OJEC
TS
SD
F 0
9 R
ural
Dev
elop
men
t st
rate
gy
SD
F 1
0 Lo
cal E
cono
mic
Dev
elop
men
t Str
ateg
y
SD
F 1
1 E
nvir
onm
ent M
anag
emen
t Fra
mew
ork
SD
F 1
2 V
acan
t La
nd A
udit
SD
F 1
3 La
nd I
nvas
ion
and
Rel
ocat
ion
Str
ateg
y
SD
F 1
4 H
ousi
ng P
lan
SD
F 1
5 La
nd U
se M
anag
emen
t Sch
eme
SD
F 1
6 G
eogr
aphi
c In
form
atio
n S
yste
m
SD
F 1
7 In
tegr
ated
Tra
nspo
rt P
lan
SD
F 1
8 N
17 C
orrid
or
DE
TA
IL P
LA
NN
ING
PR
OJE
CTS
109
Pro
ject ID
D
escription
2008/9
2009/1
0
2010/1
1
2011/1
2
2012/1
3
Secto
r D
epart
ments
SP
ATIA
L D
EVELO
PM
EN
T F
RA
MEW
OR
K P
RO
JEC
TS
SD
F 1
9 D
evel
opm
ent P
lan
Wes
t of
Sec
unda
SD
F 2
0 E
mba
lenh
le/S
ecun
da C
orrid
or (
Man
dela
C
orri
dor)
SD
F 2
1 E
mba
lenh
le/K
inro
ss C
orrid
or
SD
F 2
2 S
ecun
da C
orrid
or d
evel
opm
ent P
lan
SD
F 2
3 E
mba
lenh
le C
entr
al a
nd C
orri
dor
deve
lopm
ent P
lan
SD
F 2
4 U
rban
Ren
ewal
Str
ateg
y fo
r E
mba
lenh
le
Sou
th
SD
F 2
5 E
mba
lenh
le L
SD
F
SD
F 2
6 T
richa
rdt L
SD
F
SD
F 2
7 K
inro
ss L
SD
F
SD
F 2
8 T
ouri
sm D
evel
opm
ent P
lan
SD
F 2
9 Le
andr
a/Le
boha
ng L
SD
F
SD
F 3
0 S
ecun
da L
SD
F
SD
F 3
1 B
etha
l LS
DF
SD
F 3
2 E
mzi
noni
LS
DF
SD
F 3
3 B
etha
l prio
rity
Res
iden
tial I
nfil
area
SD
F 3
4 E
mzi
noni
Sou
th U
rban
Ren
ewal
Str
ateg
y
UR
BA
N R
EG
EN
ER
ATIO
N A
ND
RE
STR
UC
TU
RIN
G P
RO
JEC
TS
SD
F 3
5 E
mba
lenh
le C
entr
al a
nd S
outh
SD
F 3
6 E
mzi
noni
SD
F 3
7 Le
boha
ng
SD
F 3
8 M
ilan
Par
k B
usin
ess
area
SD
F 3
9 T
richa
rdt C
BD
SD
F 4
0 S
ecun
da C
BD
110
TE
CH
NIC
AL &
EN
GIN
EER
ING
SER
VIC
ES
: N
EW
PR
OJEC
TS
Ref
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Zone
2007/8
2008/9
2009/1
0
2010/1
1
2011/1
2
Tota
l
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
P
urch
ase
of ti
pper
tr
ucks
Z
one
1
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of ti
pper
tr
ucks
Z
one
2
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of ti
pper
tr
ucks
Z
one
3
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of ti
pper
tr
ucks
Z
one
4
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of M
otor
G
rade
r Z
one
1
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of M
otor
G
rade
r Z
one
2
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of M
otor
G
rade
r Z
one
3
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of M
otor
G
rade
r Z
one
4
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of F
ront
Lo
ader
Z
one
1
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of F
ront
Lo
ader
Z
one
2
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of F
ront
Lo
ader
Z
one
3
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of F
ront
Lo
ader
Z
one
4
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of
Com
pact
or
Zon
e 1
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of
Com
pact
or
Zon
e 2
GM
M
111
TE
CH
NIC
AL &
EN
GIN
EER
ING
SER
VIC
ES
: N
EW
PR
OJEC
TS
Ref
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Zone
2007/8
2008/9
2009/1
0
2010/1
1
2011/1
2
Tota
l
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
P
urch
ase
of
Com
pact
or
Zon
e 3
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of
Com
pact
or
Zon
e 4
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of W
ater
tr
uck
Zon
e 1
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of W
ater
tr
uck
Zon
e 2
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of W
ater
tr
uck
Zon
e 3
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of W
ater
tr
uck
Zon
e 4
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of A
bbys
Z
one
1
G
MM
Pur
chas
e of
Abb
ys
Zon
e 2
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of A
bbys
Z
one
3
G
MM
Pur
chas
e of
Abb
ys
Zon
e 4
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of L
DV
Z
one
1
G
MM
Pur
chas
e of
LD
V
Zon
e 2
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of L
DV
Z
one
3
G
MM
Pur
chas
e of
LD
V
Zon
e 4
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of
Sta
mpe
r Z
one
1
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of
Sta
mpe
r Z
one
2
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of
Sta
mpe
r Z
one
3
G
MM
P
urch
ase
of
Zon
e 4
GM
M
112
TE
CH
NIC
AL &
EN
GIN
EER
ING
SER
VIC
ES
: N
EW
PR
OJEC
TS
Ref
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
Zone
2007/8
2008/9
2009/1
0
2010/1
1
2011/1
2
Tota
l
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
Sta
mpe
r
F
enci
ng o
f R
eser
voirs
A
ll
G
MM
F
enci
ng o
f S
ubst
atio
ns
All
GM
M
U
pgra
ding
of
Bet
hal
Sew
er N
etw
ork
Zon
e 1
T
LB
Zon
e 1
GM
M
T
LB
Zon
e 2
GM
M
T
LB
Zon
e 3
GM
M
T
LB
Zon
e 4
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of
Gen
erat
ors
Zon
e 1
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of
Gen
erat
ors
Zon
e 2
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of
Gen
erat
ors
Zon
e 3
GM
M
P
urch
ase
of
Gen
erat
ors
Zon
e 4
GM
M
TO
TA
L
113
4.7
PU
BLIC
SA
FE
TY:
Ref
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
2008/9
2009/1
0
2010/1
1
2011/1
2
2012/1
3
Tota
l
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
PS
01
Bui
ldin
g E
mzi
noni
Fire
Sta
tion
1,
470,
900
1,
470,
900
MIG
PS
02
Bui
ldin
g E
mba
lenh
le F
ire
Sta
tion
2,
200,
000
2,
200,
000
MIG
PS
04
Upg
radi
ng o
f E
vand
er F
ire
Sta
tion
MIG
PS
05
Upg
radi
ng o
f Le
andr
a F
ire
Sta
tion
2,
100,
000
2,
100,
000
MIG
PS
06
Sec
unda
Dis
aste
r c
entr
e
1,90
0,00
0
1,90
0,00
0 M
IG
PS
07
Fen
cing
of T
richa
rdt T
raff
ic
Off
ice
(041
3)
30
,000
30
,000
35
,310
37
,782
13
3,09
2 M
IG
PS
08
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent (
0401
)
10,0
00
100,
000
10,7
00
11,4
49
132,
149
GM
M
PS
09
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent (
0404
)
30,0
00
80,0
00
34,2
40
36,6
37
180,
877
GM
M
PS
10
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent (
0407
)
10,0
00
10
, 00
0 G
MM
PS
11
Fur
nitu
re &
Equ
ipm
ent (
0410
)
20,0
00
20,0
00
21
,400
22
,898
84
,298
G
MM
114
4.7
PU
BLIC
SA
FE
TY:
Ref
Pro
ject / A
ctivitie
s
Description
2008/9
2009/1
0
2010/1
1
2011/1
2
2012/1
3
Tota
l
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
P
S12
A
cqui
sitio
n of
New
Veh
icle
s
20,0
00
8,00
0,00
0 6,
420,
000
6,86
9,40
0 41
,289
4 G
MM
PS
13
Upg
radi
ng o
f M
echa
nica
l W
orks
hop
(Pha
se 1
)
1,00
0,00
0
1,00
0,00
0 G
MM
TO
TA
L
7,7
90,0
00
8,2
30,0
00
6,5
21,6
50
6,9
78,1
66
590,3
763
115
4.8
SU
MM
AR
Y O
F G
MM
CA
PIT
AL P
RO
JEC
TS
: 2010/2
011:
Depart
ment
2009/2
010
2010/1
1
2011/1
2
2012/1
3
Exe
cutiv
e an
d C
ounc
il
715,
000
94,0
00
99,0
40
104,
391
Fin
anci
al S
ervi
ces
4,
970,
000
7,20
0,00
0 2,
214,
000
2,36
8.98
0 C
orpo
rate
Ser
vice
s
780,
000
153,
000
179,
180
184,
723
Pla
nnin
g an
d D
evel
opm
ent
21,1
90,6
00
1,28
5,00
0 4,
646,
700
957,
369
Hea
lth
265,
000
80,0
00
72,7
60
77,8
54
Com
mun
ity a
nd S
ocia
l Ser
vice
s
7,08
3,10
0 24
,757
,882
9,
250,
710
702,
200
Hou
sing
41
3,10
0
Pub
lic S
afet
y
7,79
0,90
0 8,
230,
000
6,52
1,65
0 6,
978,
166
Spo
rt a
nd R
ecre
atio
n
630,
000
20,0
00
214,
000
228,
980
Env
iron
men
tal P
rote
ctio
n
40,0
00
420,
000
52,8
00
45,7
96
Was
te M
anag
emen
t 1,
291,
500
33,0
00
35,3
10
37,7
82
Was
te W
ater
Man
agem
ent
27,8
19,6
73
24,6
50,0
00
17,8
02,5
00
858,
675
Roa
d T
rans
port
12
,694
,000
45
,967
,000
36
,535
,000
57
2,45
0 W
ater
14
,213
,100
7,
950,
000
12,6
59,0
00
2,52
8,98
0 E
lect
rici
ty
8,77
4,36
2 15
,250
,000
15
,160
,500
11
0,28
2,73
5 TO
TA
L
108,6
70,3
35
136,0
79,8
82
105,4
43,1
50
125,9
29,0
80
116
4.9
W
AR
D B
ASE
D P
RO
JEC
TS
2010/1
1
R
EFE
REN
CE
/
DEP
AR
TM
EN
T
PR
OJEC
T
FIN
AN
CIA
L
YE
AR
W
AR
DS
SO
UR
CE
BU
DG
ET
ID
P S
urve
y, T
oolk
it,
Reg
istr
atio
n G
loba
l Ins
ight
20
10/1
1 A
ll G
MM
2,
000,
000
LE
D S
urve
y,R
egis
trat
ion
20
10/1
1 A
ll G
MM
2,
000,
000
HC
S/T
ES
R
esid
entia
l S
tand
s/T
owns
hip
Est
ablis
hmen
t
2010
/201
1 1
9 M
IG
TE
S
Pav
ing
of R
oads
and
S
idew
alks
20
10/2
011
19
MIG
2,
000,
000
HC
S
RD
P H
ouse
s 20
10/2
011
19
HS
DE
AT
S
port
Fie
lds
2010
/201
1 1
9 M
IG
600,
00
HC
S
RD
P H
ouse
s
2010
/201
1 1
1 H
S
T
ES
P
avin
g of
Roa
ds
2010
/201
1 1
1 M
IG
1,00
0,00
0 D
EA
T
Spo
rt G
roun
d 20
10/2
011
11
MIG
60
0,00
H
CS
/TE
S
Res
iden
tial S
tand
s 20
10/2
011
11
MIG
DE
AT
R
enov
atio
n of
Dav
is C
ourt
(S
port
Fie
lds)
20
10/2
011
21
MIG
1,
000,
000
TE
S
Ren
ovat
ions
of
Ligh
ts in
G
reen
Str
ips
2010
/201
1 2
1 M
IG
3,00
0,00
0
TE
S
Pav
ing
of R
oads
20
10/2
011
12
MIG
3,
000,
000
TE
S
Ele
ctri
city
Upg
rade
Ext
22
2010
/201
1 12
E
skom
7,
000,
000
TE
S
Pub
lic L
ight
s E
xt21
& 2
2 20
10/2
011
12
MIG
30
0,00
D
EA
T
Par
ks fo
r C
hild
ren
Ext
21
&22
20
10/2
011
12
MIG
20
0,00
PS
In
stal
latio
n of
Rob
ots
Ext
11
4 w
ays
20
10/2
011
11
MIG
30
0,00
HC
S
Bui
ldin
g of
Sch
ool
2010
/201
1 11
D
E
117
TE
S
Ligh
ts E
xt 1
1,26
20
10/2
011
11
MIG
20
0,00
T
ES
P
avin
g of
Wal
kway
s E
xt 4
,9
2010
/201
1 11
M
IG
1,50
0,00
0 D
EA
T
Net
ball
and
Ten
nis
Cou
rt
Spo
rt F
ield
Ext
9,1
1 20
10/2
011
11
MIG
60
0,00
DR
T
Con
stru
ctio
n of
Tax
i Ran
k E
xt 2
6 20
10/2
011
11
DR
T
TE
S
Str
eet L
ight
s E
xt 4
,7,9
20
10/2
011
11
MIG
60
0,00
D
EA
T
Ren
ovat
ions
of
Flo
ur D
anie
l S
tadi
um
2010
/201
1 11
M
IG
200,
00
TE
S
Sto
rm W
ater
Dra
inag
e E
xt11
,26
2010
/201
1 11
M
IG
4,00
0,00
0
PS
F
oot B
ridge
s E
xt 4
,7,9
,11,
26
2010
/201
1 11
M
IG
1,00
0,00
0 D
EA
T
Pla
ying
Par
ks E
quip
men
t 20
10/2
011
11
MIG
90
0,00
T
ES
U
pgra
ding
of W
ater
Met
er (
80
0)
2010
/201
1 8
MIG
M
aint
enan
ce
TE
S
Spe
ed H
umps
in A
lber
t Lu
thul
i Dri
ve E
xt14
20
10/2
011
8 M
IG
Mai
nten
ance
HC
S
Bui
ldin
g of
Lib
rary
20
10/2
011
8 M
IG/ID
T
3,00
0,00
0 T
ES
In
stal
latio
n of
Mid
Blo
ck
Ligh
ts n
ext t
o th
e B
ridg
e
Ext
14
2010
/201
1 8
MIG
10
0,00
TE
S
Foo
t B
ridge
s 20
10/2
011
8 M
IG
1,00
0,00
0 D
EA
T
Spo
rt F
ield
s 20
10/2
011
8 M
IG
700,
00
TE
S
Str
eet R
egra
velin
g 20
10/2
011
8 M
IG
Mai
nten
ance
T
ES
P
avin
g of
Roa
ds S
tree
t no:
35
Ext
15,
J.B
Nhl
apho
Ext
14
and
John
son
Mak
hath
ini
Ext
14
2010
/201
1 8
MIG
3,
500,
000
TE
S
Pav
ing
of R
oads
20
10/2
011
20
MIG
3,
000,
000
HC
S/T
ES
R
esid
entia
l S
tand
s/T
owns
hip
2010
/201
1 20
M
IG
118
Est
ablis
hmen
t T
ES
P
avin
g of
Roa
ds
2010
/201
1 29
M
IG
100,
00
TE
S
Spe
ed H
umps
20
10/2
011
29
MIG
M
aint
enan
ce
TE
S
Upg
radi
ng o
f S
torm
Wat
er
2010
/201
1 29
M
IG
4,00
0,00
0 T
ES
R
egra
velli
ng o
f Roa
ds
2010
/201
1 29
M
IG
Mai
nten
ance
T
ES
Li
ghts
20
10/2
011
29
MIG
M
aint
enan
ce
TE
S
Pav
ing
of P
edes
tria
ns
Roa
ds
2010
/201
1 29
M
IG
2,00
0,00
0
TE
S
Pav
ing
and
Sto
rm-W
ater
D
rain
age
2010
/201
1 24
M
IG
1,50
0,00
0
DE
AT
R
aym
ond
Mav
uso
Hal
l (S
econ
d P
hase
) 20
10/2
011
24
MIG
3,
000,
000
TE
S
Spe
ed H
umps
20
10/2
011
24
MIG
M
aint
enan
ce
DE
AT
R
ecyc
ling
Equ
ipm
ent (
You
th
Dev
elop
men
t)
2010
/201
1 24
M
IG/L
ED
10
0,00
TE
S
Str
eet L
ight
s 20
10/2
011
24
MIG
40
0,00
T
ES
N
ew E
xten
tion
24
2010
/201
1 24
T
ES
P
aved
Roa
d an
d S
torm
W
ater
Dra
inag
e (
Cow
-V
illag
e)
2010
/201
1 26
M
IG
4,00
0,00
0
TE
S
Str
eet L
ight
s (C
ow-V
illag
e)
2010
/201
1 26
M
IG
Mai
nten
ance
T
ES
H
umps
(C
ow-V
illag
e)
2010
/201
1 26
M
IG
Mai
nten
ance
T
ES
P
aved
Roa
ds a
nd S
torm
W
ater
Dra
inag
e E
xt 2
3 20
10/2
011
26
MIG
3,
000,
000
TE
S
Ele
ctri
city
Ext
23
2010
/201
1 26
E
SK
OM
4,
000,
000
TE
S
San
itatio
n E
xt 2
3 20
10/2
011
26
MIG
5,
000,
000
TE
S
Cat
ch P
its E
xt 2
3 20
10/2
011
26
MIG
5,
000,
000
HC
S
Hou
ses
Ext
8
2010
/201
1 26
H
S
T
ES
S
anita
tion
Ext
8
2010
/201
1 26
M
IG
5,00
0,00
0 T
ES
W
ater
Pro
visi
on E
xt 8
20
10/2
011
26
MIG
2,
000,
000
TE
S
Ele
ctri
city
Ext
8
2010
/201
1 26
D
ME
3,
000,
000
119
TE
S
Roa
ds E
xt 8
20
10/2
011
26
MIG
4,
000,
000
TE
S
Hig
h M
ass
Ligh
ts E
xt8
2010
/201
1 26
M
IG
200,
00
HC
S/T
ES
T
oile
ts
2010
/201
1 22
M
IG
3,00
0,00
0 H
CS
H
ousi
ng
2010
/201
1 22
H
S
H
CS
Li
brar
y 20
10/2
011
22
DC
SR
HC
S
Sch
ool
2010
/201
1 22
D
E
T
ES
R
oads
and
Sto
rm W
ater
20
10/2
011
22
MIG
3,
800,
000
DE
AT
P
arks
20
10/2
011
22
MIG
4,
000,
000
PS
F
oot B
ridge
s
2010
/201
1 22
M
IG
200,
00
TE
S
8X H
ighm
ast L
ight
s 20
10/2
011
2 M
IG
200,
00
DE
AT
S
port
Fie
ld
2010
/201
1 2
MIG
60
0,00
H
CS
G
reen
Fie
ld H
ouse
s D
evel
opm
ent
2010
/201
1 2
HS
TE
S
Pav
ing
of a
ll R
oads
20
10/2
011
27
MIG
1,
500,
000
TE
S
Pro
per
Sto
rm W
ater
D
rain
age
on a
ll R
oads
20
10/2
011
27
MIG
4,
000,
000
TE
S
Toi
lets
, Wat
er E
xt 3
, 9,
Par
ama
2010
/201
1 27
M
IG
1,50
0,00
0
TE
S
Ele
ctric
ity E
xt 3
,9,
Par
ama
2010
/201
1 27
M
IG
4,00
0,00
0 T
ES
A
Mul
tipur
pose
C
entr
e(fo
rmer
Lam
lile
S
choo
l Yar
d)
2010
/201
1 27
M
IG
9,00
0,00
0
DE
AT
U
pgra
ding
Sta
dium
20
10/2
011
27
DC
SR
6,
000,
000
HC
S
Bui
ldin
g R
DP
Hou
ses
2010
/201
1 27
H
S
TE
S
Put
ting
Spe
ed-h
umps
on
all
maj
or r
oads
20
10/2
011
27
MIG
M
aint
enan
ce
TE
S
Pav
ing
of S
ide
Wal
ks
2010
/201
1 27
M
IG
3,00
0,00
0
120
DE
AT
O
ld A
ged
Fam
ily U
nits
20
10/2
011
27
Soc
ial S
ervi
ces
T
ES
P
edes
tria
n B
ridg
e ov
er
Sta
nder
ton
Roa
d 20
10/2
011
27
MIG
7,
000,
000
TE
S
Upg
radi
ng o
f E
xist
ing
Ele
ctri
cal N
etw
ork
2010
/201
1 27
M
IG
10,0
00,0
00
TE
S
Pav
ing
and
linki
ng o
f 1st
stre
et a
nd 3
rd A
venu
e w
ith
Fre
edom
Squ
are
2010
/201
1 27
M
IG
2,50
0,00
0
TE
S
2km
Pav
ing
of R
oad
Ext
15 &
17
20
10/2
011
31
MIG
3,
000,
000
TE
S
2.5
km P
avin
g R
oad
Ext
20
2010
/201
1 31
M
IG
3,00
0,00
0 P
S
Foo
t Brid
ges
Ext
15 &
20
2010
/201
1 31
M
IG
4,00
0,00
0
TE
S
Wat
er B
asin
at E
xt 2
0,
300h
ouse
hold
20
10/2
011
31
LED
30
0,00
0
HC
S
Low
Cos
t Hou
ses
at
Ext
17&
20
2010
/201
1 31
H
S
TE
S
Reg
rave
ling
of R
oads
Ext
20
20
10/2
011
31
MIG
M
aint
enan
ce
DE
AT
B
uild
ing
of C
omm
unity
F
acili
ty C
entr
e
2010
/201
1 31
LE
D
DE
AT
P
arks
20
10/2
011
31
MIG
60
0,00
T
ES
E
lect
rici
ty
2010
/201
1 3
Esk
om
2,00
0,00
0 T
ES
R
oads
20
10/2
011
3 M
IG
Mai
nten
ance
H
CS
T
oile
ts
2010
/201
1 3
MIG
80
0,00
H
CS
H
ouse
s 20
10/2
011
3 H
S
T
ES
S
torm
Wat
er
2010
/201
1 3
MIG
40
0,00
D
EA
T
Upg
radi
ng o
f E
vand
er
Sta
dium
20
10/2
011
17
DC
SR
3,
000,
000
121
TE
S
Ele
ctri
city
sup
ply
Sak
hisi
zwe,
Win
kel H
aak,
B
iosc
ope
Far
m
2010
/201
1 17
E
SK
OM
9,
000,
000
PS
F
oot B
ridge
s at
Sak
hisi
zwe
Far
m
2010
/201
1 17
M
IG
2,00
0,00
0
TE
S
Pav
ed M
ain
Roa
d E
xt21
&
22
2010
/201
1 10
M
IG
3,00
0,00
0
HC
S/T
ES
B
uild
351
Sta
nds
Toi
let
Str
uctu
re
2010
/201
1 10
M
IG
500,
00
TE
S
Pav
ed E
mba
lenh
le
Cem
eter
y E
ntra
nce
2010
/201
1 10
M
IG
500,
00
TE
S
Ele
ctri
city
for
ext
22 S
econ
d P
hase
20
10/2
011
10
DM
E
9,00
0,00
0
DE
AT
P
layi
ng P
arks
for
Kid
s 20
10/2
011
10
MIG
40
0,00
T
ES
H
umps
on
Roo
deba
nk
Pro
vinc
ial R
oad
at E
xt 2
2 20
10/2
011
10
MIG
M
aint
enan
ce
DE
AT
S
port
Fie
lds
20
10/2
011
10
MIG
40
0,00
T
ES
S
tree
t lig
hts
2010
/201
1 10
E
SK
OM
TE
S
Clin
ic (
Cha
rl C
illie
rs)
2010
/201
1 10
M
IG
3,00
0,00
0 T
ES
P
aypo
int
(Cha
rl C
illie
rs)
2010
/201
1 10
M
IG
2,00
0,00
0 T
ES
S
tree
t Lig
hts
(Cha
rl C
illie
rs)
2010
/201
1 10
E
SK
OM
50
0,00
T
ES
P
aved
Roa
ds (
Cha
rl C
illie
rs)
2010
/201
1 10
M
IG
2,00
0,00
0
HC
S
RD
P (
Cha
rl C
illie
rs)
2010
/201
1 10
H
S
H
CS
/TE
S
Fir
e S
tatio
n (
Cha
rl C
illie
rs)
2010
/201
1 10
M
IG
3,00
0,00
0 T
ES
V
IP T
oile
ts (
Rur
al)
2010
/201
1 10
M
IG
1,40
0,00
0 T
ES
E
lect
rici
ty
2010
/201
1 10
E
SK
OM
TE
S
Bor
e H
oles
20
10/2
011
10
MIG
85
0,00
H
CS
H
ouse
s 20
10/2
011
10
HS
122
TE
S
Pro
vinc
ial G
rave
l Roa
ds b
e M
aint
aine
d 20
10/2
011
10
MIG
M
aint
enan
ce
TE
S
Mul
ti P
urpo
se C
entr
e 20
10/2
011
23
MIG
4,
000,
000
TE
S
Sta
dium
20
10/2
011
23
MIG
70
0,00
T
ES
R
oads
and
Sto
rm W
ater
all
Roa
ds
2010
/201
1 23
M
IG
300,
00
TE
S
Cem
eter
y D
evel
opm
ent
20
10/2
011
23
MIG
80
0,00
T
ES
N
ew R
esid
entia
l D
evel
opm
ent
2010
/201
1 23
D
ALA
HC
S
RD
P H
ouse
s 20
10/2
011
23
HS
TE
S
Sto
rmw
ater
Dra
inag
e 20
10/2
011
28
MIG
2,
000
000
TE
S
Str
eetli
ghts
Sta
nder
ton
Roa
d 20
10/2
011
28
DM
E
4,00
0 00
0
TE
S
Pav
ing
of L
ink
Roa
d E
xt
22/2
3 20
10/2
011
28
MIG
5,
000
000
HC
S
Bui
ldin
g of
a C
linic
20
10/2
011
28
DH
6,
000
000
TE
S
San
itatio
n fo
r E
xt
8/S
ewer
lines
20
10/2
011
28
GM
M
5,00
0 00
0
TE
S
Bui
ldin
g of
a C
linic
20
10/2
011
28
DH
6,
000
000
HC
S
Sta
nds
Allo
catio
n 20
10/2
011
16
HS
TE
S
Bui
ldin
g of
a H
igh
Sch
ool
2010
/201
1 16
D
E
T
ES
R
oad
and
Sto
rm w
ater
20
10/2
011
16
MIG
7,
000
000
HC
S
Com
mun
ity H
all
2010
/201
1 16
M
IG
6,00
0 00
0 D
EA
T
Spo
rts
Fie
ld
2010
/201
1 16
D
CS
R
5,00
0 00
0
123
5.
KE
Y P
RO
JEC
TS
: 2010/2
011:
5.1
K
EY IN
TER
NA
L P
RO
JEC
TS
: 2010/2
011:
5.1
.1
Local E
conom
ic D
evelo
pm
ent:
Pro
ject
No.
Pro
ject / A
ctivity
Ward
Tota
l A
mount
Funded b
y
A.
Uxo
lolw
ethu
Bak
ery
8
B..
Indw
e M
etal
Gen
eral
T
radi
ng
8
C.
Sis
onke
dro
p in
Cen
tre
8
D.
Gar
den
Pro
ject
s at
V
ukuz
ithat
he,S
ukum
ani,I
mbo
kode
,and
E
nten
deni
8
124
Pro
ject
Ward
Tota
l A
mount
Funded B
y
1.
Eva
nder
op
erat
ion
inte
rnsh
ip P
rogr
amm
e G
MM
R
3,64
6,91
7,00
H
arm
ony
2.
Eva
nder
ope
ratio
n co
mm
unity
AB
ET
pro
ject
G
MM
R
2,84
9,70
9,00
H
arm
ony
3.
SM
ME
s de
velo
pmen
t G
MM
R
2,76
2,81
6,00
H
arm
ony
4.
Siy
alin
ga s
mal
l sca
le f
arm
ing
19
R
500,
000
,.00
Har
mon
y
5.
Le
andr
a m
ini i
ndus
tria
l par
k 06
R
700,
000,
00
Har
mon
y
6.
M
anur
e pr
oduc
tion
09
R15
0,00
0,00
H
arm
ony
7.
R
ecyc
ling/
buy
back
cen
tre
05 e
xt 1
1 R
1,05
0,00
0 A
nglo
-Coa
l
8.
SM
ME
hub
05
R
1,55
5,00
0 A
nglo
-Coa
l
9.
Ado
pt a
str
eet f
or u
pgra
de
and
mai
nten
ance
G
MM
Ang
lo -
Coa
l
10.
Isip
heph
o co
-ope
rativ
e(ca
r fit
men
t cen
tre
and
carw
ash)
R50
0,00
0,00
S
asol
11.
Agr
o-ba
sed
LED
pro
ject
s G
MM
R
4,40
0,00
0,00
S
asol
12.
Sto
rm w
ater
dra
inag
e 6
R2,
500,
000,
00
Sas
ol
13
. F
oot
brid
ges
14,2
6 R
2,50
0,00
0,00
S
asol
14.
Com
mun
ity H
ealth
Cen
tre
23
R4,
000,
000,
00
Sas
ol
15
. B
uy-b
ack
cent
re
05 e
xt 1
1 R
4,40
0,00
0,00
S
asol
16.
Upg
rade
of
the
med
ium
vo
ltage
line
s B
etha
l R
10,0
00,
000
Ang
lo C
oal
17.
Upg
rade
of
the
Lebo
hang
co
mm
unity
hea
th c
are
cent
re
Lebo
hang
R
5, 5
45, 4
34
Ang
lo C
oal
18.
Bui
ld n
ew p
rimar
y he
alth
ca
re c
entr
e in
Leb
ohan
g Le
boha
ng
R9,
.959
, 451
A
nglo
Coa
l
19.
Com
mun
ity h
all i
n B
etha
l B
etha
l R
5, 0
00 ,0
00
Ang
lo C
oal
125
20.
Sus
tain
able
hum
an
settl
emen
t G
MM
R
6, 4
50, 0
00
Har
mon
y
21.
Com
mun
ity p
orta
ble
skill
s G
MM
R
200
,000
H
arm
ony
22
. E
duca
tion
G
MM
R
882,
000
H
arm
ony
23
. F
urth
er L
ED
sup
port
G
MM
R
2, 0
00 0
00
Har
mon
y
24.
Ass
essm
ent ,
Iden
tific
atio
n of
E
cono
mic
Opp
ortu
nity
in
min
ing,
man
ufac
turin
g, a
nd
Agr
icul
ture
GM
M
R 1
20,
000
GM
M
25.
Con
duct
res
earc
h in
SM
ME
on
siz
e an
d sc
ope
GM
M
R 1
2, 0
00
GM
M
26.
Bui
ld S
MM
E c
apac
ity in
m
anag
emen
t, en
trep
rene
ursh
ip a
nd
tend
erin
g
GM
M
R 1
20,
000
GM
M
27.
Est
ablis
h a
one
stop
in
form
atio
n ce
ntre
for
SM
ME
G
MM
R
100
, 00
0 G
MM
5.1
.2
Pro
jects
Support
ing the P
rovin
cia
l Fla
gship
s (PG
DS
): 2
010/2
011
Pro
ject A
ctivitie
s /D
escription
2007/8
2008/9
2009/1
0
2010/1
1
2011/1
2
Tota
l Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
Acc
eler
ated
Cap
acity
Bui
ldin
g
20
0,00
0
20
0,00
0 O
ffic
e of
the
Pre
mie
r
Dev
elop
men
t of
The
Lib
erat
ion
Str
uggl
e E
xhib
ition
s at
Nom
oya
Mas
ilela
Mus
eum
Bet
hal
5,00
0,00
0
5,
000,
000
Off
ice
of th
e P
rem
ier
126
Wat
er-f
or-A
ll S
ub-P
roje
ct (
PM
U)
500,
000
500,
000
Off
ice
of th
e P
rem
ier
Tou
rism
Sub
Pro
ject
s (F
an
Par
ks)
2,
000,
000
2,00
0,00
0
Off
ice
of th
e P
rem
ier
TO
TA
L
7,7
00,0
00
7,7
00,0
00
K
EY E
XTER
NA
L P
RO
JEC
TS: 2010/2
011:
PR
OVIN
CIA
L D
EP
AR
TM
EN
TS
5.2
.1
Depart
ment of A
griculture
and L
and A
dm
inis
tration
Agro
-based P
roje
cts
Pro
ject N
am
e
W
ard
/Are
a
Fin
ancia
l Year
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
B
udget
Vegeta
ble
s P
roduction
Secunda (G
roots
pru
it
2010/1
1
DA
LA
4,0
64,4
74
127
Farm
)
Vegeta
ble
s Pro
duction
Leandra
(B
rakfo
nte
in
Farm
) 2010/1
1
DA
LA
2,0
54,5
77
Bro
iler Pro
duction
Kin
ross (Zondagskra
al
Farm
) 2010/1
1
DA
LA
16,3
52,1
60
Pig
Pro
duction
Beth
al (B
lesbokspru
it
Farm
) 2010/1
1
DA
LA
3,1
63,3
33
Depart
ment of Education
Pro
ject N
am
e
W
ard
/Are
a
Fin
ancia
l Year
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
B
udget
School Ele
ctr
ific
ation
Govan M
beki
Munic
ipality
2010/1
1
Education
2, 232,0
00
Com
munity S
afe
ty a
nd L
iais
on
Pro
ject N
am
e
W
ard
/Are
a
Fin
ancia
l Year
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
B
udget
Socia
l C
rim
e a
nd
Com
munity R
ela
tions
Govan M
beki
Munic
ipality
2010/1
1
CSSL
1,6
22,0
00
Depart
ment of C
o-o
pera
tive G
overn
ance T
raditio
nal A
ffairs
Pro
ject N
am
e
W
ard
/Are
a
Fin
ancia
l Year
Sourc
e o
f Fundin
g
B
udget
Support
to L
ocal
Munic
ipality
G
ovan M
beki
Munic
ipality
2010/1
1
CO
GTA
3,5
01,0
00
128
Depart
ment of H
um
an S
ettle
ment
Pro
gra
mm
e
Instr
um
ent
Num
ber of
Units
Budget
Rec
tific
atio
n pr
e 94
O
nly
asse
ssm
ent
200
R 1
,000
,000
Soc
ial a
nd E
co F
acili
ties
Pla
nnin
g: C
omm
unity
hal
l and
cr
eche
R 1
,000
,000
P
HP
150
R 9
,245
,025
In
form
al s
ettle
men
t U
pgra
de
40
0 R
24,
000,
000
Soc
ial a
nd R
enta
l
200
R 6
,000
,000
C
omm
unity
Res
iden
tial
units
R
10,
670,
000
*Form
al le
tter confirm
ing the s
tate
d p
roje
cts
is a
waited fro
m the s
aid
depart
ment
5.3
G
ER
T S
IBA
ND
E P
RO
JEC
TS 2
009/2
010:
Capital B
udget – G
ert
Sib
ande F
undin
g
129
Pro
ject D
escri
ption
2009/1
0
Locality
Pro
visi
on o
f B
oreh
oles
with
Han
dpum
ps
1,00
0,00
0 G
MM
Ref
urbi
shm
ent
of E
mba
lenh
le W
WT
W (
PH
2)
6,40
7,33
8 E
mba
lenh
le
Ref
urbi
shm
ent
of B
etha
l WW
TW
(P
H 2
) 2,
000,
000
Bet
hal /
Em
zino
ni
Ref
urbi
shm
ent
of E
vand
er (
PH
2)
4,00
0,00
0 E
vand
er
Con
vers
ion
of V
IP T
oile
ts t
o fu
ll w
ater
-bor
ne s
yste
m
1,00
0,00
0 G
MM
Loan
Rep
aym
ent-
Ele
ctric
ity
1,59
2,66
2 B
etha
l
TO
TA
L
16,0
00,0
00
GER
T S
IBA
ND
E P
RO
JEC
TS 2
010/1
1
Bore
hole
s w
ith H
andpum
ps
1,0
00,0
00
GM
M
Ele
ctr
ical N
etw
ork
10,0
00,0
00
Beth
al
130
VIP
Rura
l A
reas
1,0
00,0
00
GM
M
Leandra
Roads
3,0
00,0
00
Leandra
Beth
al R
oads
4,0
00,0
00
Beth
al
TO
TA
L
19,0
00,0
00
5.4
M
IG P
RO
JEC
TS: 2
010/2
011
Project
Descriptions
Amount Source
Construction of Emzinoni Regional Park
1,300,000
MIG
Construction of Secunda Regional Park
1,100,000
MIG
Renovation of Emzinoni Thusong Centre
1,200,000
MIG
Installation of High Mast Light in GMM
3,000,000
MIG
Installation of Streetlights in Embalenhle
2,100,000
MIG
New Roads Z1 Emzinoni
3,000,000
MIG
New Roads Z3 Embalenhle
2,500,000
MIG
New Roads Z4 Lebohang
2,500,000
MIG
131
Construction of Low Water Bridges in GMM
1,000,000
MIG
Upgrade Tar Roads in GMM
2,500,000
MIG
Construction of Paved Roads in Emzinoni
12,000,000
MIG
Construction of Paved Roads in Embalenhle
12,000,000
MIG
Rehabilitation of Roads in Rural Areas
887,000
MIG
Fencing of Evander and Secunda Cemeteries
1,000,000
MIG
Installation of VIP ‘s Toilets in Rural Areas
3,700,000
MIG
Conversion of VIP’s Emzinoni Ext 6
4,000,000
MIG
Provision of full water borne sewer(Thambo)
4,200,000
MIG
10 ML Reservoir
5,000,000
MIG
TO
TA
L
62,8
97,0
00
132
133
-1-
1.
PREAMBLE
The Turn Around Strategy of the Govan Mbeki Municipality (GMMTAS) is informed by the Department of Cooperative Government &
Traditional Affairs’ Local Government Turn Around Strategy (LGTAS) as the basis of the Ten Point Plan for Local Government (2010 – 2014).
The goal of the GMMTAS is to work towards turning the Govan Mbeki Municipality into a responsive, accountable, effective and efficient
municipality to restore the confidence of the majority of its inhabitants and achieve objectives such as:
- Accelerate service delivery on basic services i.e. water, sanitation, electricity, human settlement, refuse removal;
- Address immediate financial and administrative problems;
- To eradicate indiscriminate hiring and firing;
- Eliminate fraud and corruption;
- Ensure and implement transparent supply chain management system;
- Strengthen Ward Committee capacity and implementation of yet to be approved ward governance model;
134
- Include national and provincial commitments in IDP;
- Differentiate responsibilities and simplified IDP;
- Funding and capacity strategy for municipal infrastructure;
- Upgrade of informal settlements; and
- Implement revenue enhancement.
2.
IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
The GMMTAS will ensure:
- The active participation of all senior managers in its development and implementation;
- Financial support for implementation through necessary budgetary requirements;
3.
DEVELOPMENT THROUGH STRATEGIC REVIEW AND PLANNING INTERVENTION
3.1.
BACKGROUND
135
It is a standard practice and also a requirement of the Municipal Systems Act, Act No. 32 of 2000, for the Govan Mbeki Municipality to hold
annual Strategic Review and Planning Interventions to examine progress made for the preceding year and to review/debate and craft its tactical
plans/SDBIP’s going forward.
Management Skills Intervention was appointed to provide facilitation and support for the intervention held 24-26th of June 2009, in Selbourne
Park, Pennington and then finalized in Kinross, 17-18th September 2009.
3.2.
SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES OF STRATEGIC REVIEW AND PLANNING INTERVENTION
The scope and deliverables (objectives) of the Strategic Review and Planning Intervention sessions were:
- Review achievements of the strategic objectives set during the previous session.
- Presentation on performance management systems (best practices and recommendations).
- Review of the 2007/2008 Service Delivery & Budget Implementation Plans (SDBIP’s) and analysis of the 2009/2010 departmental
SDBIP’s and alignment to 2009/2010 Section 57 Managers’ performance plans.
- Discussion of the organogram and reaching agreement on the phasing-in process/method.
- Team building Interventions.
-3-
- To produce a workshop report that documents the key issues debated, agreed on and observed with recommendations to inform the
development of the strategic and operational plans and strategic management processes going forward.
136
3.3.
APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY TO STRATEGIC REVIEW AND PLANNING INTERVENTION
A basic input-process-output model was used to plan and facilitate the strategic intervention sessions. Firstly (input) the aim of the strategic
intervention sessions was determined; secondly (process) the strategic intervention sessions were held and thirdly (output); the compilation of a
report concerning the deliverables. The following were the key areas designed to ensure the main deliberations (objectives) of the strategic
intervention sessions were achieved:
- Strategic guidance from the Executive Mayor;
- Review of the 2007-2011 Integrated Development Plan;
- Review of the Legotla Resolutions;
- Review of the of the 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 Service Delivery & Budget Implementation Plans;
- Organogram review; and
- Performance management best practices.
3.4.
SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STRATEGIC REVIEW AND PLANNING INTERVENTION
The purpose of this section is not to duplicate the detailed/specific findings, critical or otherwise, arising from the strategic intervention sessions
but to flag the strategic observations and recommendations worthy of consideration at the management level and Executive Mayor’s Meetings.
These issues/findings/recommendations are:
3.4.1. The Integrated Development Plan of the municipality will be reviewed from time to time owing to internal and external changes. The
goal of such changesl is inter alia not only to revise and capture the municipality’s five strategic objectives as driven by the constitution
and legislation but also to reflect the critical national key performance indicators as defined in Section 53 of the Municipal Systems Act,
Act No. 32 of 2000, read with Section 5(1) of the MPMR, enabling an outcomes based focus for IDP implementation in the next term.
137
-4-
3.4.2. The proposed organogram was recommended for submission to Council for adoption subject to further modification as discussed at the
last day of the strategic intervention sessions with allowance for further review once the new term starts and a new IDP/strategy had been
formulated.
3.4.3. Once an IDP/strategy is finalized containing a swot analysis, a strategic assessment of the municipality’s performance will be undertaken
based on the outcomes on a municipal balanced scorecard which will include the results of the monitoring and evaluation efforts as well
as project management unit outcomes to decide if the structure needs further amendments. At this point Directors will be consulted to
make proposals which will be expertly evaluated independently. A detailed business case/motivation for the proposed changes with
attendant costs/budgetary implications will be compiled and proposed to Council with the results of the independent evaluation. To
prevent subjective changes a cost guideline of 30% of the personnel emoluments to total cost per department (based on National Treasury
Guidelines) will be a preset and pre-Communicated criteria for all departments.
3.4.4. A good number of proposals to the organogram were informed by the absence of effective co-ordination or presence of “functional silos”
between the various departments which could be causing duplication of effort/resources and undermining service delivery. The problem
could be worsened by the absence of a balanced scorecard system of aligning the municipality’s performance to ensure all critical
functional linkages/dependencies and value chain is fully understood.
3.4.5. The status quo regarding the M&E Unit and PMU which was maintained following the delay in supporting the creation of a Chief
Operating Officer position pending further political consultation could continue to constrain performance oversight. With the imminent
development of PMS it may be useful urgently revisit this decision. Given the possible concerns around reporting lines if a Chief
Operating Officer position is created and/or potential for conflicts if a Deputy Municipal manager position is created we see such
significant synergies between some aspects of the statutory functions of PMU, the M&E Unit and the PMS that it will be sensible to
rather create a Directorate of Strategic Planning & Performance Reporting which will house the IDP unit, PMS Unit as well as the M&E
Unit which should incorporate all aspects of PMU other than project definition and delivery which should remain within the PMU in
Technical & Engineering Services. This will not only assist the Municipal Manager and strengthen performance oversight across the
138
municipality but will also resolve the complex matrix reporting line problems under the proposed structure and resolve the potential skills
shortage if the PMU was moved to the Municipal Manager’s office thus leaving the Municipal Manager with overall accountability for
the functioning and performance of the municipality.
3.4.6 The municipality lacks a formal PMS that meets the prescripts and intent of the MSA and related performance management legislation
making it impossible to evaluate the overall performance of the municipality. The MSA requires that a municipality’s PMS be linked to
its IDP to reflect how implementation of the IDP will be monitored and how the key stakeholders will play their respective roles and be
held accountable. The absence of such a system has allowed the current IDP to only devote a few paragraphs and yet without any
specifics on hoe PMS will be implemented. There is an urgent need to develop s comprehensive PMS that will meet all legislative intent
which at minimum should demonstrate the cascading of the IDP into a municipal wide scorecard to which departmental scorecards will
be
-5-
developed and aligned and linked to the KPI’s of the Section 57 Managers and from which SDBIP’s will be developed and cascaded to
the lower levels of the organization.
3.4.7. Insufficient strategic clarity/fit between the municipality’s constitutional mandate and the 12 IDP priorities. The municipality’s vision
and mission is well crafted but the strategic priorities in the IDP are not focused and do not provide a sound framework for achieving
operational effectiveness through the SDBIP’s. A structured municipal scorecard was proposed and adopted leading to the following as
agreed framework for strategic planning:
LOCAL GOVERNMENT MANDATE AS PER CONSTITUTION / STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA
AGREED STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE
Infrastructure and Services
To provide, improve and sustain infrastructure and services
Social and Economic Development
To promote socio-economic development in rural and urban areas
Institutional Development
To enable and speed-up institutional transformation and effectiveness
Democracy and Good Governance
To strengthen democracy and good governance
Financial Management and Viability
To improve and sustain financial management
139
3.4.8. The absence of an effective performance management framework/system cascaded down the organization contributing to a misalignment
of the SDBIP’s and hinders operational effectiveness. Instead of formulating performance objectives on the SDBIP’s based on the
strategic objectives, these are being formulated around the various departments contributing to possible dilution of cross-departmental
co-ordination around strategic objectives. Although the municipality has a well established process for drawing up its SDBIP’s, gaps
noted in the 2008/2009 SDBIP’s could significantly impact on its ability to focus correctly and evaluate its own services delivery
achievements. It is commonly said if you do not know where you are going any road will take you there and also that if you cannot
measure it you cannot manage it. All senior managers had the opportunity to present their SDBIP’s and the generic weaknesses in all
these include the lack of alignment of operational performance objectives to the strategic objectives because goals were being formulated
from the department instead of the strategic objectives which themselves had not been well clarified in the IDP, making a disconnect
between vision/mission and operational focus. KPI’s appeared to focus more on process than results/outcomes, critical performance
targets did not appear to be well aligned to the approved budgets. All managers made significant improvement to their departmental
SDBIP’s in accordance with the principles espoused at the sessions. However due to the fact that the budgets have already been
approved, the resulting changes will only come into full effect from 2010/2011.
3.4.9. There is generally a satisfactory level of implementation of Lekgotla Resolutions and the 2007/2008 SDBIP’s. The following however
remain the key challenges:
- MIG Working Committee established but is not functioning effectively hence the problems that it was designed to resolve remain;
- Long delays in filling vacancies;
- No consultant yet appointed for job evaluations; and
- Organogram review and issues relating to geographical pay differentials.
-6-
3.4.10. The Bid Committees are functioning poorly and creating supply chain hold-ups and operational bottlenecks. The supply chain process
currently is malfunctioning largely due to ineffectiveness of the various Bid Committees, slowing procurement throughput and resulting
sometimes in forfeiture of budgeted funds back to the National Treasury.
3.5.
CONCLUSION AND THE WAY FORWARD TO STRATEGIC REVIEW AND PLANNING INTERVENTION
140
The foregoing issues/findings/observations and recommendations mainly represent the matters that we deemed strategic to warrant
executive attention and by no means intends to detract from the numerous resolutions adopted at the strategic intervention sessions that
require focused and concerted management action to fully realize the ends of the overall intervention. Accordingly management attention
is called upon to follow through on the detailed commitments and resolutions reached.
We have gained and retained significant institutional memory about the municipality and will resolve the foregoing problems whilst
implementing the strategic recommendations contained in the Strategic Review and Planning Intervention Report. This will include the
design of a comprehensive and world class municipal balanced scorecard and performance management system that meets and exceeds
legislative intent and cascade it down to the lower management levels; the set-up of the Directorate of Strategic Planning & Performance
Reporting with its IDP, M&E and PMU units; set-up and functioning of a Risk and Internal Audit system/structures.
141
-7-
GOVAN MBEKI MUNICIPAL TURN AROUND STRATEGY
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
1. IN
FRAS
TRUC
TURE
AND
SER
VICE
S:
To pr
ovid
e, im
prov
e an
d su
stai
n in
fras
truc
ture
and
ser
vice
s
1.
1.
Basic S
ervi
ce D
eliv
ery
1.
1.1.
Acces
s to
wat
er
Bu
lk
Tota
l bac
klog
Inad
equa
te ca
pacit
y: 957
67kl
wat
er sto
rage
capa
city
existin
g
Com
plet
e 10
000k
l re
serv
oir b
y 12
/201
0
EMba
lenh
le
rese
rvoi
r 40%
co
mpl
ete
Appo
inte
d Se
rvice
Pr
ovid
er fo
r 10
000k
l res
ervo
ir
EMba
lenh
le
rese
rvoi
r to
be co
mpl
eted
by
Dec
‘10
10 0
00kl
re
serv
oir
func
tiona
l
COGT
A &
GSDM
: To
assist w
ith
fund
ing
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R1
3 66
5 85
1-44
R6
0 00
0 00
0-00
In
crea
se ca
pacit
y (w
ater
sup
ply)
with
30 00
0kl
Subm
itted
tech
nica
l re
port fo
r Le
andr
a/Em
zino
ni
Appr
oval
of
Tech
. rep
ort b
y DW
A/Fu
ndin
g/MIG
/COG
TA
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R0
Conn
ecto
r W
ater
boo
ster
pum
p st
atio
ns n
ot
oper
atio
nal;
14 b
oost
er p
ump
stat
ions
not
suf
ficie
nt
Com
plet
e bo
oste
r pu
mp st
atio
n at
eM
bale
nhle
by De
c ‘1
0
Proc
urem
ent:
adju
dica
tion
stag
e
The ap
prov
al of t
he
bids
and
app
oint
5 Ne
w boo
ster
pu
mp st
atio
ns
by D
ec ‘1
0
COGT
A to
as
sist w
ith
fund
ing MIG
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R600
000
-00
R5 0
00 0
00-0
0
eM
zino
ni/L
eand
ra
boos
ter p
ump
stat
ion
are in
stal
led
by D
ec ‘1
0
Tech
nica
l rep
ort
subm
itted
to D
WA
Follo
w-u
p with
DW
A Ap
prov
al
from
DW
A CO
GTA:
To
assist w
ith
fund
ing MIG
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R0
Retic
ulat
ion
100
000m
asb
esto
s pi
pes
*Era
dica
te 5
000m
AC
pip
es b
y 12
/201
0
Tech
nica
l rep
ort
appr
oved
by
DWA
Appl
ied fo
r fun
ds
Repl
aced
50
00m
of A
C pi
pes
COGT
A: To
assist w
ith
fund
ing MIG
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R0
R2 5
00 0
00-0
0
23 b
oreh
oles
exi
st; r
equi
re 4
00
Prov
isio
n of
50
Tech
nica
l rep
ort
Appo
int S
ervi
ce
50 b
oreh
oles
CO
GTA:
To
Dire
ctor
/Dep
R2 5
50 0
00-0
0 R2
550
000
-00
142
to ben
efit
909
hous
ehol
ds
bore
hole
s by
12
/201
0 ap
prov
ed by
DWA/
quot
atio
ns
rece
ived
awai
t ap
prov
al b
y MM
prov
ider
by
instal
led by
De
c ‘10
as
sist w
ith
fund
ing MIG
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
1518
hou
seho
lds ha
ve n
o ac
cess
to
wat
er (y
ard co
nnec
tions
)
Ap
ply fo
r fun
ding
COGT
A: To
assist w
ith
fund
ing MIG
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R0
R4 0
00 0
00
-8-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
1.
1.2.
Acces
s to
san
itatio
n
Bulk
-8.5
Ml/d
=30
24m
3 /d
Com
plet
e re
furb
ishm
ent b
y De
c ‘10
Refu
rbishm
ent i
n pr
ogre
ss
Appo
inte
d Se
rvice
Pr
ovid
er
Func
tiona
l W
WTP
COGT
A: To
assist w
ith
fund
ing MIG
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R
R
2Ml/d
=19
82m
3 /d,
ext
end
the
plan
t by 2M
l/d
Increa
se K
inro
ss
WW
TP ca
pacit
y with
2M
l/d by De
c ‘10
The pr
ojec
t is
unde
r des
ign
stag
e
To fa
st tr
ack
the
impl
emen
tatio
n by
12
/201
0
The pl
ant
increa
sed
with
2Ml/d
COGT
A: To
assist w
ith
fund
ing MIG
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R0
R15
000
000-
00
16.5
Ml/d
=69
14m
3/d,
requ
ire
refu
rbishm
ent
Refu
rbishm
ent t
o be
com
plet
ed b
y De
c ‘10
Refu
rbishm
ent i
n pr
ogre
ss
Appo
inte
d Se
rvice
Pr
ovid
er
CO
GTA:
To
assist w
ith
fund
ing MIG
Serv
ice
Prov
ider
R R
9.6M
l/d
Oper
atio
nal 5
.6 M
/d=
9822
m3 /d,
re
quire
refu
rbishm
ent a
nd
increa
se ca
pacit
y by
20M
l/d
Refu
rbishm
ent t
o be
com
plet
ed b
y De
c ‘10
Refu
rbishm
ent i
s 50
% pro
gres
s Ap
poin
ted Se
rvice
Pr
ovid
er fo
r re
furb
ishm
ent
Follo
w up with
GS
DM to
increa
se
capa
city
Com
plet
e th
e re
furb
ishm
ent
by D
ec ‘1
0 To
hav
e m
ore
20Ml/d
ca
pacit
y by
De
c ‘10
COGT
A: To
assist w
ith
fund
ing MIG
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R5 0
00 0
00-0
0 R6
0 00
0 00
0-00
8.5 Ml/d
=50
44m
3 /d,
requ
ire
Su
bmitt
ed
COGT
A: To
Dire
ctor
/Dep
R0
R5 0
00 0
00-0
0
143
refu
rbishm
ent
tech
nica
l rep
ort
assist w
ith
fund
ing MIG
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
Conn
ecto
r 33
sew
er p
ump stat
ions
exi
stin
g Up
grad
ing of
ten
sewer
pum
p stat
ions
by De
c ‘10
Pum
p st
atio
ns
iden
tifie
d, fu
nds
secu
red th
roug
h MIG
To app
oint
Ser
vice
Pr
ovid
er
Ten se
wer
pu
mp st
atio
ns
com
plet
ely
upgr
aded
COGT
A with
MIG
fund
Di
rector
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R500
000
-00
R5 0
00 0
00-0
0
Retic
ulat
ion
2280
VIP
toile
ts
Conv
ersion
of V
IP
toile
ts (1
039
units
) by
Dec
‘10
Proc
urem
ent
Appo
int S
ervi
ce
Prov
ider
by
1039
ho
useh
olds
ha
ve
wat
erbo
rne
sewer
COGT
A: To
assist w
ith
fund
ing MIG
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R1 9
00 0
00-0
0
R7
000
000
-00
1059
Pit-
latrin
es
Prov
isio
n of
wat
erbo
rne
sewer
to
624
hou
seho
lds
by D
ec ‘1
0 Pr
ovisio
n of
wat
erbo
rne
sani
tatio
n to
147
ho
useh
olds
in
eMba
lenh
le Ext
00
Proc
urem
ent
Proj
ect u
nder
co
nstruc
tion
Appo
int S
ervi
ce
Prov
ider
by
25/0
3/10
Mon
itor a
nd
com
plet
e th
e pr
ojec
t
624
hous
ehol
ds
have
full
wat
erbo
rne
sewer
14
7 Ho
useh
olds
ha
ve fu
ll wat
erbo
rne
sani
tatio
n
COGT
A/GS
DM:
To ass
ist w
ith
fund
ing
GS
DM fo
r as
sistan
ce
with
fund
ing
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R4 2
00 0
00-0
0
R2 5
16 3
65-3
2
R10
000
000-
00
R2
516
365
-32
426 Se
ptic
tank
s Co
mpi
latio
n an
d su
bmission
of
te
chni
cal
repo
rt t
o DW
A co
mpl
ete
Asse
ssm
ent
of
sani
tatio
n with
in
the co
mm
unity
To
appl
y fo
r fu
ndin
g Ap
prov
al
of
tech
nica
l re
port b
y De
c ‘1
0
COGT
A with
MIG
fund
, DW
A fo
r app
rova
l of
tech
nica
l re
port
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R0
R5 0
00 0
00-0
0
-9-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
Rura
l are
as: n
o sa
nita
tion
499h
ouse
hold
s Pr
ovisio
n of
VIP
to
ilets fo
r 304
ho
useh
olds
by
12/2
010
Proc
urem
ent:
adju
dica
tion
stag
e To
app
oint
Ser
vice
Pr
ovid
er by Ap
ril
2010
Instal
latio
n 30
4 VI
P to
ilets
COGT
A with
MIG
fund
, DW
A fo
r app
rova
l of
tech
nica
l re
port
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/PMU
R3 7
00 0
00-0
0 R3
700
000
-00
1.1.
3. A
cces
s to
ele
ctric
ity
Curren
tly G
MM h
as 96,
2MVA
eM
bale
nhle
nee
ds
Feas
ibili
ty
Appl
icatio
ns w
ere
Sinc
e th
e MIG
/DoE
/Mun
icDi
rector
/Dep
R 0
Estim
atio
n is
144
Bu
lk
capa
city in
tota
l. Ba
cklo
g ca
pacit
y in
nee
d in
the
next
five
ye
ars is est
imat
ed at 1
05 M
VA
an u
pgra
ding
of
10MVA
from
20M
VA
notif
ied m
axim
um
dem
and to
30M
VA.
Secu
nda
need
s an
up
grad
ing
of 9MVA
from
35M
VA
notif
ied m
axim
um
dem
and to
44M
VA
quot
atio
ns fo
r bo
th u
pgra
ding
ha
ve bee
n sign
ed
by M
unici
palit
y an
d su
bmission
was
mad
e to
Es
kom
in Ja
n ‘1
0 fo
r fur
ther
pr
oces
sing
.
subm
itted
to Esk
om
by th
e Mun
icipa
lity
and
awai
ting
Esko
m on
impl
emen
tatio
n th
ereo
f.
upgr
adin
g of
NM
D is not
ph
ysica
l onc
e th
e pr
ocur
emen
t pr
oces
s be
twee
n Es
kom
and
Mun
icipa
lity is
com
plet
ed
then
the
upgr
adin
g ca
n be
effe
cted
an
y tim
e be
fore
Dec
‘10
ipal
ity/C
OGTA
/DB
SA
uty
Dire
ctor
/Man
ager
Elec
trica
l
arou
nd R
10m
for
eMba
lenh
le sub
-stat
ion
and
R10m
for
Secu
nda
sub-
stat
ion.
Th
e ba
cklo
g fo
r fu
ture
de
velo
pmen
ts
arou
nd 2
013
is
estim
ated
at
R240
m.
Hous
e ho
ld co
nnec
tions
Th
e ph
ysica
l hou
sing
bac
klog
in
the Mun
icipa
lity is aro
und
2340
in
eMba
lenh
le Ext
22
Com
plet
e th
e el
ectrifi
catio
n of
13
98 hou
seho
lds in
eM
bale
nhle
Ext
22
Proc
urem
ent
stag
e an
d ap
poin
tmen
t of a
co
ntra
ctor
is
antic
ipat
ed in
Ap
ril 201
0.
Cons
ulta
nt h
as
been
app
oint
ed fo
r th
e de
sign
and
su
perv
isio
n of
the
proj
ect.
The pr
ojec
t is
expe
cted
to
be co
mpl
eted
by
Nov
embe
r 20
10.
Fund
s al
read
y co
mm
itted
by
the Do
E fo
r 20
10/1
1 fin
ancia
l yea
r.
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/Man
ager
Elec
trica
l
R9 2
26 8
00-0
0 R9
226
800
-00
Stre
et li
ghts
Mos
t of t
he stree
t lig
hts ar
e in
ba
d co
nditi
on a
nd a stu
dy w
ill
soon
be un
dertak
en b
y a se
rvice
pr
ovid
er to
aud
it an
d su
bmit
a bu
sine
ss ca
se th
at ass
ist i
n fu
nds so
licita
tion fo
r upg
radi
ng
proj
ects.
Com
plet
e th
e er
ectio
n of
40
stre
etlig
hts in
eM
bale
nhle
and
up
grad
ing
of 7
0 stre
etlig
hts in
Le
andr
a.
Proc
urem
ent
stag
e an
d ap
poin
tmen
t of a
co
ntra
ctor
is
antic
ipat
ed in
Ap
ril 201
0.
Cons
ulta
nt h
as
been
app
oint
ed fo
r th
e de
sign
and
su
perv
isio
n of
the
proj
ect.
The pr
ojec
t is
expe
cted
to
be co
mpl
eted
by
July
201
0.
Fund
s al
read
y co
mm
itted
by
COGT
A with
MIG
fund
ing
for 2
010/
11
finan
cial y
ear
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/Man
ager
Elec
trica
l
R2 1
00 0
00-0
0 R2
100
000
-00
High
mas
t lig
hts
Th
e to
tal f
utur
e ba
cklo
g is
stan
ding
at 2
00 hig
h m
asts
To
com
plet
e th
e in
stal
latio
n of
new
8 hi
gh m
ast l
ight
s.
Quot
atio
ns w
ere
requ
este
d from
th
e pa
nel o
f co
nsul
tant
and
th
e su
bmission
is
on 3
0 Mar
ch 201
0.
In fi
rst w
eek
of
April
the
Mun
icipa
lity will
ap
poin
t a
Cons
ulta
nt fo
r de
sign
s an
d su
perv
isio
n of
the
proj
ect.
Firs
t wee
k of
May
20
10 a co
ntra
ctor
will
then
be
appo
inte
d.
The pr
ojec
t will
take
two
mon
ths to
be
com
plet
ed.
The ex
pected
to
tal
com
plet
ion of
th
e pr
ojec
t will
be in
Au
gust 2
010.
Fund
s al
read
y co
mm
itted
by
COGT
A with
MIG
fund
ing
for 2
010/
11
finan
cial y
ear
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty
Dire
ctor
/Man
ager
Elec
trica
l
R2 0
00 0
00-0
0 R2
000
000
-00
1.1.
4. A
cces
s an
d m
aint
enan
ce o
f m
unici
pal r
oads
466k
m o
f pav
ed ro
ads
417k
m u
npav
ed ro
ads
38km
of p
aved
ro
ads
8.4%
mos
t pr
ojec
ts
adve
rtised
Cons
truc
tion
of
38km
of n
ew pav
ed
road
s
38km
of
pave
d ro
ads
COGT
A al
read
y co
mm
itted
fu
nd
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty Di
r /M
anag
er
R64
200
000-
00
R1 7
00 0
00 0
00-
00
-10-
145
PERF
OR
MA
NCE
ARE
A /
PRI
ORI
TY T
UR
N
ARO
UN
D F
OCA
L A
REA
/ O
UTP
UTS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
1.
1.5.
Re
fuse
rem
oval
and
so
lid w
aste
dispo
sal
55%
of h
ouse
hold
s / b
usin
esse
s ar
e se
rvice
d af
ter h
ours
and
wee
kend
s du
e to
veh
icles
’ do
wnt
ime (re
quire
12
com
pactor
s)
Illeg
al dum
ping
of w
aste
in P
.O.S
5 was
te dispo
sal s
ites ar
e no
t pe
rmitt
ed i.
t.o. E
CA, 1
973
Inac
cess
ible
/insu
fficie
nt spa
ce to
di
spos
e was
te –
Eva
nder
La
ndfil
l Site
65%
of c
olle
ctio
n is
achi
eved
by De
c 20
10 (3
com
pactor
s)
20%
redu
ctio
n by
12
/’10
Secu
nda
land
fill s
ite
perm
ittin
g pr
oces
s co
mm
ence
d by
Aug
‘1
0 Pe
rmit
Evan
der
Land
fill-s
ite fo
r clo
sure
Subm
itted
requ
est
to PS/
Fina
nce
Enfo
rcer
s in
pla
ce,
draf
t ed
ucat
ion/
awar
enes
s pl
an
Spec
ifica
tions
co
mpl
eted
for
appo
intin
g a
prov
ider
Sp
ecifi
catio
ns
com
plet
ed fo
r ap
poin
ting a
prov
ider
2010
/11
budg
et
allo
catio
n &
proc
urem
ent
Coun
cil ado
pt p
lan,
su
ppor
t by W
ard
coun
cillo
rs/ M
MC’
s.
2010
/11
budg
et
allo
catio
n &
proc
urem
ent
2010
/11B
udge
t al
loca
tion &
proc
urem
ent
Sale
ag
reem
ents
x3 tr
ucks
, Re
ductio
n in
ov
ertim
e by
25
%
Awar
enes
s ca
mpa
ign in
31
war
ds
(not
ices/
regi
ster
/fee
dbac
k fo
rms)
Sign
ed
deliv
ery
cont
ract w
ith
prov
ider
Sign
ed
deliv
ery
cont
ract w
ith
prov
ider
GSDM
&
COGT
A: M
P to
fu
nd
DEDE
T as
sist
with
fa
cilita
tion,
W
ard
com
mitt
ees /
CDW
’s fo
r m
obili
satio
n GS
DM to
fund
/ DE
DET fa
st
trac
k pe
rmitt
ing
GSDM
to fu
nd/
DEDE
T fa
st-
trac
k pe
rmitt
ing
Dire
ctor
/ Man
ager
/ DP
S / C
FO
Dire
ctor
/ Man
ager
/ CF
O Di
rector
/ Man
ager
/ CF
O Di
rector
/ Man
ager
/ CF
O
R0
R0
R0
R0
R5 5
00 0
00-0
0 R1
000
000
-00
R500
000
-00
R500
000
-00
1.2.
Fo
rmal
izat
ion of
info
rmal
se
ttlem
ents (t
o co
mpl
ete
outsta
ndin
g To
wns
hip
Esta
blishm
ent f
or
proc
lam
atio
n
Towns
hip es
tabl
ishm
ent:
eMzino
ni Ext
7 u
nder
way
, eM
bale
nhle
Ext
22 un
der w
ay
Prov
isio
n of
wat
er co
mpl
ete;
sa
nita
tion
and el
ectrici
ty u
nder
way
Fina
lize
proc
lam
atio
n of
bo
th
See Ba
sic S
ervi
ces
80%
50
%
See Ba
sic S
ervi
ces
The m
unici
palit
y is
impl
emen
ting th
e pr
ojec
t Se
e Ba
sic S
ervi
ces
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d tran
sfer
of
sta
nds
See Ba
sic
Serv
ices
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Hu
man
Se
ttlem
ent
See Ba
sic
Serv
ices
Own
pers
onne
l an
d se
rvice
pr
ovid
er
See Ba
sic
Serv
ices
R600
000
-00
See Ba
sic S
ervi
ces
R600
000
-00
See Ba
sic
Serv
ices
Proc
lam
atio
n of
eMba
lenh
le
Exte
nsio
ns 1
8, 20
& 21
(±
551
5 stan
ds).
SG Pla
ns app
rove
d, co
nditi
ons of
es
tabl
ishm
ents a
ppro
ved.
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d tran
sfer
of s
tand
s to
ben
efici
arie
s.
70 %
exp
endi
ture
un
know
n du
e to
im
plem
enta
tion
Follo
w-u
p le
tter t
o be
writ
ten to
DHS
an
d m
eetin
g to
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d tran
sfer
of
sta
nds to
DHS to
eng
age
cons
ulta
nt to
sp
eed
up
Snr T
own
Plan
ner –
GM
M, D
HS
Unkn
own
Unkn
own
146
done
by DH
S ar
rang
ed b
etwee
n DH
S/GM
M/C
onsu
ltant
.
bene
ficia
ries
proj
ect.
offic
ial a
nd
Cons
ulta
nt
Proc
lam
atio
n of
eMba
lenh
le
Exte
nsio
ns 5
, 11,
12
(±
3000
sta
nds).
Towns
hip Re
gister
ope
ned.
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d Tr
ansfer
of s
tand
s to
ben
efici
arie
s.
70 %
exp
endi
ture
un
know
n du
e to
im
plem
enta
tion
done
by DH
S
Follo
w-u
p le
tter t
o be
writ
ten to
DHS
an
d m
eetin
g to
ar
rang
ed b
etwee
n DH
S/GM
M/C
onsu
ltant
.
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d Tr
ansfer
of
sta
nds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
DHS to
eng
age
cons
ulta
nt to
sp
eed
up
proj
ect.
Snr T
own
Plan
ner –
GM
M, D
HS
offic
ial a
nd
Cons
ulta
nt
Unkn
own
Unkn
own
-11-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
Pr
ocla
mat
ion
of e
Mba
lenh
le
Exte
nsio
n 24
(± 234
sta
nds).
Towns
hip Re
gister
ope
ned.
Pr
ocla
mat
ion
and
Tran
sfer
of s
tand
s to
ben
efici
arie
s.
70 %
exp
endi
ture
un
know
n du
e to
im
plem
enta
tion
done
by DH
S
Follo
w-u
p le
tter t
o be
writ
ten to
DHS
an
d m
eetin
g to
ar
rang
ed b
etwee
n DH
S/GM
M/C
onsu
ltant
.
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d Tr
ansfer
of
sta
nds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
DHS to
eng
age
cons
ulta
nt to
sp
eed
up
proj
ect.
Snr T
own
Plan
ner –
GM
M, D
HS
offic
ial a
nd
Cons
ulta
nt
Unkn
own
Unkn
own
Proc
lam
atio
n of
eMba
lenh
le
Exte
nsio
n 25
(±
841
sta
nds).
SG pla
ns app
rove
d. Con
ditio
ns o
f es
tabl
ishm
ent a
ppro
ved
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d Tr
ansfer
of s
tand
s to
ben
efici
arie
s.
70 %
exp
endi
ture
un
know
n du
e to
im
plem
enta
tion
done
by DH
S
Follo
w-u
p le
tter t
o be
writ
ten to
DHS
an
d m
eetin
g to
ar
rang
ed b
etwee
n DH
S/GM
M/C
onsu
ltant
.
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d Tr
ansfer
of
sta
nds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
Prov
incia
l CO
GTA
to
tran
sfer
Lan
d to
GMM.
Prov
incia
l DHS
to
fina
lise
proc
lam
atio
n.
Prov
incia
l DHS
to
ens
ure
tran
sfer
of
indi
vidu
al
Stan
ds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
Snr T
own
Plan
ner –
GM
M, D
HS
offic
ial a
nd
Cons
ulta
nt
Unkn
own
Unkn
own
Proc
lam
atio
n of
eMba
lenh
le
Exte
nsio
n 22
(± 236
2 st
ands
). Dr
aft L
ayou
t com
plet
ed,
appl
icatio
ns sub
mitt
ed fo
r ap
prov
al to
GMM to
geth
er w
ith
Cond
ition
of E
stab
lishm
ent
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d Tr
ansfer
of s
tand
s to
ben
efici
arie
s.
40 %
GMM
budg
et 2
009/
2010
– R50
0 00
0.00
Saso
l to with
draw
ob
jectio
n. G
MM to
ap
prov
e ap
plica
tion.
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d Tr
ansfer
of
sta
nds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
Prov
incia
l CO
GTA
to
tran
sfer
Lan
d to
GMM
Snr T
own
Plan
ner –
GM
M and
Co
nsul
tant
R500
000
-00
R1.5
mill
ion
147
Cons
ulta
nt to
su
bmit
SG and
ob
tain
app
rova
l. Pr
ocla
mat
ion
of
Towns
hip an
d tran
sfer
of s
tand
s to
ben
efici
arie
s.
(Gro
otsp
ruit
279 IS
). GM
M to
fin
alise
proc
lam
atio
n.
Proc
lam
atio
n of
Em
zino
ni
Exte
nsio
ns 1
, 2, 4
, 5
(± 463
2 stan
ds).
Towns
hip pr
ocla
imed
and
to
wns
hip
Regi
ster
has
bee
n op
ened
.
Tran
sfer
of s
tand
s to
ben
efici
arie
s.
70 %
exp
endi
ture
un
know
n du
e to
im
plem
enta
tion
done
by DH
S
Follo
w-u
p le
tter t
o be
writ
ten to
DHS
an
d m
eetin
g to
ar
rang
ed b
etwee
n DH
S/GM
M/C
onsu
ltant
.
Tran
sfer
of
stan
ds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
Prov
incia
l CO
GTA
and
DHS to
ens
ure
tran
sfer
of
indi
vidu
al
Stan
ds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
Snr T
own
Plan
ner –
GM
M, D
HS
offic
ial a
nd
Cons
ulta
nt
Unkn
own
Unkn
own
Proc
lam
atio
n of
Em
zino
ni
Exte
nsio
n 7 (±
493
sta
nds).
Draf
t Lay
out c
ompl
eted
, ap
plica
tions
sub
mitt
ed and
ap
prov
ed by
GMM to
geth
er w
ith
Cond
ition
of E
stab
lishm
ent.
SG
appr
oved
.
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d Tr
ansfer
of s
tand
s to
ben
efici
arie
s.
80 %
GMM
budg
et 2
007/
2008
– R80
0 00
0.00
Mee
ting
to b
e ar
rang
ed b
etwee
n Ex
ecut
ive May
or
and MEC
to fa
st
trac
k tran
sfer
of
land
. Pro
clam
atio
n of
Tow
nshi
p an
d tran
sfer
of s
tand
s to
ben
efici
arie
s.
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d tran
sfer
of
sta
nds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
Prov
incia
l CO
GTA
and
DHS to
tran
sfer
Lan
d to
GMM.
(Ble
sbok
spru
it 15
0 IS
)
Snr T
own
Plan
ner –
GM
M and
Co
nsul
tant
R800
000
-00
R800
000
-00
Proc
lam
atio
n of
Em
zino
ni
Exte
nsio
n 3
and
9 (±
67
stan
ds)
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d tran
sfer
of
sta
nds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
-12-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
Pr
ocla
mat
ion
of Em
zino
ni
Exte
nsio
n 10
(± 213
sta
nds).
Proc
lam
atio
n an
d Tr
ansfer
of
sta
nds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
Proc
lam
atio
n of
Leb
ohan
g Ex
tens
ions
2, 9
, 10,
12,
13 &
17 (±
304
9 stan
ds).
Towns
hip pr
ocla
imed
and
to
wns
hip
Regi
ster
has
bee
n op
ened
.
Tran
sfer
of s
tand
s to
ben
efici
arie
s.
70 %
exp
endi
ture
un
know
n du
e to
im
plem
enta
tion
done
by DH
S
Follo
w-u
p le
tter t
o be
writ
ten to
DHS
an
d m
eetin
g to
ar
rang
ed b
etwee
n DH
S/GM
M/C
onsu
lta
Tran
sfer
of
stan
ds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
Prov
incia
l CO
GTA
and
DHS to
ens
ure
tran
sfer
of
indi
vidu
al
Snr T
own
Plan
ner –
GM
M, D
HS
offic
ial a
nd
cons
ulta
nt
Unkn
own
Unkn
own
148
nt.
stan
ds to
be
nefic
iarie
s.
1.3.
Ac
cess
to h
ousing
Hous
ehol
d ba
cklo
gs
49 0
00 h
ousing
bac
klog
in n
eed
of hou
ses an
d se
rvice
d st
ands
In
crea
sing
num
ber o
f pot
entia
l be
nefic
iarie
s in
nee
d of
low co
st
hous
es (1
4 00
0)
Bloc
kade
d/ in
com
plet
e an
d slow
de
liver
y of
hou
sing
pro
jects(
1416
not
com
plet
ed sin
ce
2003
/04)
Di
lapi
datin
g an
d de
cayi
ng sta
te
of hos
tels (
eMzino
ni,
Emba
lenh
le and
Leb
ohan
g)
Land
aud
it to
be
final
ised
by
end
of
Dec.
2010
Id
entif
icatio
n of
qu
alify
ing
bene
ficia
ries,
war
ds w
here
pr
ojec
ts w
ill be
impl
emen
ted.
To
requ
est D
HS to
ap
poin
t dev
elop
ers
to fi
nalis
e al
l bl
ocka
ded
proj
ects
Fu
ndin
g ap
prov
ed
for e
Mzino
ni
hostel
s (9
2 m
). Bu
sine
ss P
lans
to
be sub
mitt
ed fo
r Em
bale
nhle
/ Le
andr
a)
60%
of m
unici
pal
owne
d la
nd
audi
ted
DHS on
ly
allo
cate
d 12
71
subs
idie
s (2
010/
11)
488
units
not
star
ted,
365
fo
unda
tions
/ slab
s ca
sted
, 475
at
wal
l pla
te le
vel
Serv
ice Pro
vide
rs
appo
inte
d,
cons
truc
tion
com
men
ced
on
May
200
9
To sou
rce
fund
ing
for l
and
and to
ap
poin
t ser
vice
pr
ovid
ers
Liai
se w
ith D
HS to
ap
poin
t ser
vice
pr
ovid
ers by
31
/03/
2010
Co
mm
uniq
ués/
m
eetin
gs h
eld with
DH
S to
term
inat
e/
repl
ace
unde
r-pe
rfor
min
g co
ntra
ctor
s Fa
cilita
tion an
d pr
ovisio
n of
Te
chni
cal s
uppo
rt,
Appr
oval
of
build
ing pl
ans an
d pr
oces
sing
of
paym
ent
certifi
cate
s
Proc
laim
ed
exte
nsio
ns
Appr
oval
le
tter o
f qu
alify
ing
bene
ficia
ries,
serv
ice
prov
ider
ap
poin
tmen
t Mee
ting
held
be
twee
n GM
M/ D
HS/
Serv
ice
Prov
ider
s 4 Bl
ocks
co
nsists o
f 30
fam
ily fl
ats
com
plet
ed.
DHS to
fund
for
land
pur
chas
e DH
S to
app
oint
se
rvice
s pr
ovid
ers
GMM to
pr
ovid
e fa
cilita
tion &
Tech
nica
l su
ppor
t DH
S to
te
rmin
ate/
re
plac
e no
n-pe
rfor
min
g co
ntra
ctor
s,
GMM to
fa
cilita
te
DHS to
app
oint
se
rvice
s pr
ovid
ers,
GMM to
fa
cilita
te and
to
giv
e te
chni
cal
supp
ort
Dire
ctor
s TE
S to
fina
lise
proc
lam
atio
nsH
CS to
al
loca
te site
Di
rector
s HC
S/TE
S,
Man
ager
s,
Offic
ials fr
om
DHS
Dire
ctor
s HC
S/ TES
/ Man
ager
s/
DHS Of
ficials
Dire
ctor
HCS
, TE
S, D
HS &
LN
G
Insu
fficie
nt
allo
catio
n of
127
1 su
bsid
ies
This 141
6 al
loca
tions
are
bu
dget
ed fo
r and
be
nefic
iarie
s ar
e ap
prov
ed.
R92m
for h
oste
l up
grad
e.
To sou
rce
fund
/ al
loca
tions
whi
ch w
ill
addr
ess ho
usin
g ne
ed
To fi
nalis
e/
com
plet
e th
is
long
out
stan
ding
ho
usin
g pr
ojec
ts/
back
log
To sou
rce
fund
ing fo
r Em
bale
nhle
and
Le
boha
ng
hostel
s
-13-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
149
Inte
rven
tion
s Re
quir
ed
expe
ndit
ure)
O
THER
SP
HER
ES A
ND
A
GEN
CIES
(e
.g.
inte
rven
tion
or
tec
hnic
al
supp
ort)
In
tegr
ated
Hum
an Set
tlem
ents
(Bre
akin
g Ne
w G
roun
d)
Esta
blishm
ent /
Ren
ovat
ion of
3
Thus
ong
Serv
ice C
entres
(Em
bale
nhle
, Leb
ohan
g an
d Em
zino
ni)
Prom
otio
n of
Prim
ary He
alth
Car
e
Dila
pida
ting RD
P ho
uses
co
nstruc
ted by
loca
l em
ergi
ng
cont
ractor
s an
d de
velo
pers
In
crea
sing
hou
sing
nee
d on
di
ffere
nt h
ousing
typo
logi
es
(low/ m
iddl
e/ hig
h in
com
e ca
tego
ries)
Inad
equa
te sup
ply of
in
form
atio
n to
sur
roun
ding
co
mm
uniti
es by se
ctor
de
partm
ents
7 PH
C fa
ciliti
es pre
sent
ly not
in
a go
od co
nditi
on (l
eaki
ng ro
of,
crac
ked wal
ls &
insu
fficie
nt
spac
e)
Land
iden
tifie
d fo
r con
stru
ctio
n of
new
clin
ic at
Eva
nder
Up
grad
e an
d bu
ild new
CHC
and
PH
C in
Lea
ndra
Affe
cted
ho
useh
olds
to b
e id
entif
ied by
the
end
of M
ay 201
0 Ad
vertise
for
cons
ulta
nts to
un
dertak
e EI
A St
udie
s &
Tow
nshi
p es
tabl
ishm
ent b
y 12
/201
0 Ren
ovat
e ex
istin
g bu
ildin
g at
Em
zino
ni m
unici
pal
offic
es b
y 12
/201
0 Re
nova
te/e
xten
d 5
existin
g fa
ciliti
es
by D
ec ‘1
0 an
d bu
ild a n
ew
facil
ity by De
c ‘10
DHS al
loca
ted
fund
s to
reno
vate
20
0 un
its (2
010/
11
) La
nd id
entif
ied
and
purcha
sed
in
Kinr
oss X9
(100
0 site
s)
Appr
oved
Cou
ncil
Reso
lutio
n Sp
ecifi
catio
ns on
build
ing pl
ans
final
ised
Sp
ecifi
catio
ns
final
ized
and
MIG
fu
ndin
g ap
prov
ed
Dono
rs to
fina
lize
build
ing pl
ans
Tech
nica
l in
spec
tion
to b
e co
nduc
ted on
af
fected
hou
ses
Adve
rtisem
ents
and
appo
intm
ent o
f se
rvice
pro
vide
r Ap
prov
al of b
ids
and
adve
rts to
ap
poin
t ser
vice
pr
ovid
ers.
Adve
rtisem
ent a
nd
appo
intm
ent o
f se
rvice
pro
vide
rs
Com
pile
d lis
t to
DHS
, Te
chni
cal
repo
rt and
ap
poin
ted
serv
ice
prov
ider
s.
Fina
lised
EIA
, To
wns
hip
Esta
blishm
ent
, app
oint
ed
serv
ice
prov
ider
s Ap
prov
ed
layo
ut p
lans
Ap
poin
ted
serv
ice
prov
ider
Ap
prov
ed
layo
ut p
lans
Ap
poin
ted
serv
ice
prov
ider
DHS to
fund
an
d gi
ve
tech
nica
l su
ppor
t, GM
M
to fa
cilita
te
DHS, COG
TA,
MIG
, SAS
OL,
Harm
ony to
fu
nd, G
MM to
fa
cilita
te
COGT
A, G
SDM,
MIG
for
fund
ing,
GMM
to fa
cilita
te
MIG
, SAS
OL,
Angl
o Co
al fo
r fu
ndin
g
Dire
ctor
HCS
, TE
S, D
HS
offic
ials
Dire
ctor
HCS
, TS
, DHS
of
ficia
ls,
serv
ice
prov
ider
s Di
rector
s,
HCS/
TES
Man
ager
Th
uson
g Di
rector
, HC
S/TE
S Man
ager
PHC
200
units
allo
cate
d R0
R1
200
000
-00
R1 5
00 0
00 (K
in)
R650
000
(eMzi)
R400
000
(Tric
h)
R2 0
00 0
00
(eMzino
ni Sea
d)
R5 5
45 4
31 (L
eb)
R9 9
59 4
51 (L
eb)
R3 0
00 0
00-0
0 R3
000 00
0-00
R1
200
000
-00
1.4.
24
hou
r em
erge
ncy
serv
ice /
107
Com
mun
icatio
n Ce
ntre
Rend
erin
g em
erge
ncy
and
107
serv
ices to
Gov
an M
beki
Mun
icipa
l are
a with
8 p
erso
nnel
an
d a sh
orta
ge o
f 8 p
erso
nnel
.
Appo
intm
ent o
f ex
tra
8 pe
rson
nel.
Subm
ission
mad
e fo
r the
revi
ewin
g of
org
anog
ram
.
Appr
oval
of t
he
orga
nogr
am.
Budg
etin
g fo
r the
ad
ditio
nal 8
pe
rson
nel.
And
appo
intm
ent.
8 ap
poin
ted
pers
onne
l. Co
rpor
ate
Serv
ice fo
r or
gano
gram
an
d re
crui
tmen
t. an
d trai
ning
.
Corp
orat
e al
so
addr
ess th
e pr
oble
mat
ic te
leph
one sy
s
Dire
ctor
, De
puty
Di
rector
and
Se
ctio
nal
Man
ager
.
No bud
get f
or th
e ad
ditio
nal 8
pe
rson
nel.
R1..5
mill
ion fo
r ad
ditio
nal 8
pe
rson
nel
150
tem
Fina
nce fo
r bu
dget
. End
of
May
201
0
-14-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
1.
.5.
Disa
ster
Man
agem
ent
1.6.
Fire
and
Res
cue
Serv
ices
Appr
oved
Disas
ter M
anag
emen
t Pl
an 200
9/20
10
Cond
uct f
ire sup
pres
sion
and
em
erge
ncy re
spon
se fr
om th
e six fir
e stat
ions
.
Revi
ew D
isas
ter
Man
agem
ent P
lan
for 2
010/
2011
. Up
grad
ing of
eM
bale
nhle
Fire
St
atio
n.
Build
ing of
eM
zino
ni Fire
St
atio
n.
Upgr
adin
g of
Le
andr
a Fire
St
atio
n.
Cons
ulta
tive
mee
tings
taki
ng
plac
e with
stak
ehol
ders
be
fore
30
/05/
2010
. Co
ntra
ctor
on
site
. Co
ntra
ctor
on
site
. Co
ntra
ctor
ab
ando
ned
proj
ect.
Appr
oval
of
revi
ewed
disas
ter
Man
agem
ent p
lan
by co
uncil
by May
20
10.
Mon
itorin
g Mon
itorin
g
Appo
intm
ent o
f ne
w co
ntra
ctor
.
Appr
oved
Di
saster
Man
agem
ent
Plan
– M
ay
2010
. Co
mpl
eted
an
d fu
nctio
nal
fire stat
ion by
en
d Ju
ne 2
010
Com
plet
ed
and fu
nctio
nal
fire stat
ion by
en
d Ju
ne
2010
. Co
mpl
eted
an
d fu
nctio
nal
fire stat
ion by
en
d Ju
ne 2
010
Coun
cil fo
r re
solu
tion.
CO
GTA,
ad
justm
ent o
f al
loca
tion.
Dire
ctor
, De
puty
Di
rector
and
Se
ctio
nal
Man
ager
. Di
rector
, De
puty
Di
rector
and
Se
ctio
nal
Man
ager
. Di
rector
, De
puty
Di
rector
and
Se
ctio
nal
Man
ager
. Di
rector
, De
puty
Di
rector
and
Se
ctio
nal
Man
ager
.
R2 1
10 0
00
R2 1
16 0
06
R1 9
20 0
00-0
0
R3 4
00 0
00-0
0 R5
.300
000
-00
R1 9
20 0
00-0
0
151
Shor
tage
of p
erso
nnel
- cu
rren
tly
ther
e ar
e 5 Se
nior
Fire
-figh
ters
an
d 23
Fire
-figh
ters
and
3
Stat
ion Of
fices
.
Appo
intm
ent o
f ad
ditio
n al
3 Sta
tion
Offic
ers, 7 Sen
ior
Fire
-figh
ters
.
Subm
ission
mad
e fo
r the
revi
ewin
g of
org
anog
ram
.
Appr
oval
of t
he
orga
nogr
am.
Budg
etin
g fo
r the
ad
ditio
nal 8
pe
rson
nel a
nd
appo
intm
ent.
20 a
ppoi
nted
pe
rson
nel.
Corp
orat
e Se
rvice
for
orga
nogr
am
and
recrui
tmen
t. an
d trai
ning
.
Corp
orat
e al
so
addr
ess th
e pr
oble
mat
ic te
leph
one
system
Fina
nce fo
r bu
dget
. End
of
May
201
0
Dire
ctor
, De
puty
Di
rector
and
Se
ctio
nal
Man
ager
.
Not b
udge
ted
for.
R3 5
00 0
00-0
0
-15-
PERF
OR
MA
NCE
ARE
A /
PRI
ORI
TY T
UR
N
ARO
UN
D F
OCA
L A
REA
/ O
UTP
UTS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
Int
erve
ntio
ns
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TOR
UN
BLO
CKIN
G
ACT
ION
N
EED
ED F
ROM
O
THER
SP
HER
ES A
ND
A
GEN
CIES
(e
.g.
inte
rven
tion
or
tech
nica
l su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PRO
JECT
ED
1.
.7.
Mec
hani
cal
Wor
ksho
p -
Flee
t Man
agem
ent
83 old
and
unu
sabl
e (5
7 in
a g
ood
cond
ition
.) 22
x b
akki
es
Disp
osal
old
flee
t.
No –
(83)
Pu
rcha
se n
ew fl
eet
45 b
akki
es
List of v
ehicl
es
disp
osal
com
pile
d
Prep
ared
and
su
bmit
cou
ncil
item
with
rega
rds
to auc
tion
of fl
eet
(83)
En
gage
d with
na
tiona
l tre
asur
y
45 b
akki
es
2 co
mpa
ctor
Fina
nce au
ctio
n ol
d fle
et b
efor
e De
cem
ber 2
010
Dire
ctor
, De
puty
Di
rector
and
Man
ager
W
orks
hop.
R8 0
00 0
00-0
0
R 15
0 m
il th
at
inclu
des al
l ye
llow
equi
pmen
ts, f
ire
engi
nes an
d m
onito
ring
system
for a
ll
coun
cil fl
eet
152
3 x trac
tors
12
x co
mpa
ctor
s 11
x tr
ucks
4 x gr
ader
s 3 x tlb
2 x lo
ader
s Mai
ntai
n an
d re
pair
curr
ent
usab
le fl
eet (
274)
Th
is ham
pers
ser
vice
de
liver
y fo
r use
r de
partm
ent.
Vehi
cle abu
sed
is also a
chal
leng
e.
2 co
mpa
ctor
truc
ks
6 trac
tors
6 tip
per t
ruck
s
to par
ticip
ate in
the
tran
sver
sal
cont
ract
Repa
ir, m
aint
ain
and se
rvice
ex
istin
g fle
et. (
331)
Gi
ve re
gula
r trai
ning
and
testin
g of
Mun
icipa
l dr
iver
s to
redu
ce
abus
e.
Redu
ce tr
ansp
ort
cost o
f use
r de
partm
ent t
o pu
rcha
se e
xtra
fle
et.
truc
ks
6 trac
tors
6 tip
per
truc
k 6m
3
List of
driv
ers
trai
ned.
1.8.
Tr
affic
Sec
tion
-
Road
m
arki
ngs
and
road
sig
ns.
Road
mar
king
and
road
sig
ns
rend
ered
with
9 p
erso
nnel
with
the sh
orta
ge of 1
9 pe
rson
nel.
Appo
intm
ent o
f 19
addi
tiona
l pe
rson
nel.
Subm
ission
mad
e fo
r the
revi
ewin
g of
org
anog
ram
.
Appr
oval
of t
he
orga
nogr
am.
Budg
etin
g fo
r the
ad
ditio
nal 8
pe
rson
nel.
And
appo
intm
ent.
19
appo
inte
d pe
rson
nel.
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Ro
ads an
d Tr
ansp
ort f
or
road
mar
king
s an
d ro
ads sign
s on
Pro
vinc
ial
road
s.
Dire
ctor
, De
puty
Di
rector
and
Ch
ief o
f Tr
affic
.
From
19 ad
ditio
nal
peop
le, 6
hav
e be
en allo
cate
d fo
r.
13 p
erso
nnel
ne
ed to
be
budg
eted
for
with
an am
ount
of
R1
000 00
0-00
-16-
PERF
OR
MA
NCE
ARE
A /
PRI
ORI
TY T
UR
N
ARO
UN
D F
OCA
L A
REA
/ O
UTP
UTS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
Int
erve
ntio
ns
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TOR
UN
BLO
CKIN
G
ACT
ION
N
EED
ED F
ROM
O
THER
SP
HER
ES A
ND
A
GEN
CIES
(e
.g.
inte
rven
tion
or
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PRO
JECT
ED
153
tech
nica
l su
ppor
t)
Im
prov
e vi
sibi
lity of
road
sign
s an
d ro
ad m
arki
ngs in
Mun
icipa
l / Pro
vinc
ial r
oads
.
Road
sig
ns a
nd
pain
t pur
chas
ed.
Sche
dule
dra
fted.
Na
tiona
l (N1
7)
road
s co
nstruc
tion
in pro
gres
s. Roa
ds
mar
king
s an
d sign
s no
t don
e at
Ki
nros
s in
ters
ectio
n.
Pro
vinc
ial r
oads
m
ust t
ake ch
arge
in
thei
r roa
ds b
y pu
tting
road
s sign
s an
d ro
ad
mar
king
s.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
sc
hedu
le:
Jan – A
pril
201
0 Tr
ichar
dt /
Secu
nda
May
– Ju
ne 201
0 Be
thal
/ eM
zino
ni
July
– Sep
201
0
eMba
lenh
le
Oct –
Nov
201
0
Leslie
De
c 201
0
Evan
der
Writ
e a le
tter t
o De
partm
ent o
f Ro
ads an
d Tr
ansp
ort t
o at
tend
to
Pro
vinc
ial r
oads
.
Visibl
e ro
ad
sign
s an
d ro
ad
mar
king
s with
in
GMM.
Mai
ntai
ned
road
sig
ns
and ro
ad
mar
king
s.
Lean
dra,
/ St
ande
rton
R50
, Ki
nros
s /
Evan
der /
eM
bale
nhle
R5
64, E
vand
er /
Secu
nda
R77,
Se
cund
a /
Delm
as R58
0,
Secu
nda
/ Tr
ichar
dt P18
5,
Kinr
oss / K
riel,
Grac
elan
d ro
ad
/ eMba
lenh
le,
Beth
al /
Erm
elo
road
, and
Tr
ichar
dt /
Beth
al.
R7
50 0
00
R1 0
00 0
00-0
0
1.9.
Se
curit
y
117 Gr
ade D
priv
ate se
curit
y co
mpa
ny has
bee
n ap
poin
ted
for p
hysica
l gua
rdin
g of
Co
uncil
pro
perty an
d eq
uipm
ents.
Mun
icipa
l pre
mises
are
not
ad
equa
tely
sec
ured
.
Upgr
ade se
curit
y gu
ards
to
Grad
e C.
, CCT
V ca
mer
a,
auto
mat
ed acces
s co
ntro
l sy
stem
, ala
rm sys
tem
and
ex
tra
30 sec
urity
gua
rds.
117 se
curit
y gu
ards
and
ala
rm
system
in som
e of
th
e bu
ildin
gs.
Secu
rity au
dit i
s do
ne.
To adv
ertis
e se
curit
y te
nder
by
end
of M
ay 201
0.
Proc
ure au
tom
ated
ac
cess
cont
rol
system
by
Dece
mbe
r 201
0.
Appo
inte
d se
curit
y co
mpa
ny
(Gra
de C
Secu
rity
Guar
ds) b
y en
d of
Se
ptem
ber
2010
. In
stal
led
acce
ss
cont
rol
system
by
Dece
mbe
r 20
10.
GMM Tec
hnica
l an
d En
gine
erin
g Se
rvice
s fo
r fe
ncin
g.
Fina
nce
Depa
rtm
ent t
o pr
ovid
e fu
ndin
g fo
r pro
curin
g of
au
tom
ated
for
acce
ss co
ntro
l sy
stem
.
Dire
ctor
Pu
blic
Safe
ty,
Depu
ty
Dire
ctor
of
Head
of
Secu
rity.
R14
000
000
Not b
udge
ted
for,
Tech
nica
l Ser
vice
s to
bud
get f
or
fenc
ing.
R14 0
00 000
154
-17-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
1.
10.
Lice
nsin
g -
Regi
stra
tion an
d lic
ensing
of
vehi
cles.
Func
tion re
nder
ed a
s an
age
nt
for D
epar
tmen
t of P
ublic
Wor
ks,
Road
s an
d Tr
ansp
ort w
ith 15
Exam
iner
s, 16 Cl
erica
l As
sistan
ts, 4
Lab
oure
rs and
a
shor
tage
of 6
Exa
min
ers an
d 6
Cler
ical A
ssista
nts.
High
vol
ume of
app
lican
ts fr
om
neig
hbou
ring
Prov
ince
s an
d ot
her M
unici
palit
ies – ope
ratin
g with
15 co
mpu
ters
and
sho
rtag
e of
9 co
mpu
ters
Appo
intm
ent o
f 6
addi
tiona
l Exa
min
er
– 2 in
Lea
ndra
, 2
Secu
nda
and 2
Lean
dra.
Ap
poin
tmen
t of
addi
tiona
l Sen
ior
Cler
ical A
ssista
nt –
4 Se
cund
a, 2 Les
lie
and
2 Be
thal
. Ac
quire
add
ition
al 9
com
pute
rs fo
r Se
cund
a, Lea
ndra
an
d Be
thal
.
Subm
ission
mad
e fo
r the
revi
ewin
g of
org
anog
ram
. Bu
dget
ing
for t
he
addi
tiona
l 12
pers
onne
l and
ap
poin
tmen
t.
Oper
atin
g with
15
com
pute
rs a
nd
shor
tage
of 9
co
mpu
ters
Appr
oval
of t
he
orga
nogr
am.
Su
bmit
a re
ques
t to
Depa
rtm
ent o
f Pu
blic
Wor
ks,
Road
s an
d Tr
ansp
ort b
y 30
Ap
ril 201
0.
Appo
intm
ent
of 6
Exam
iner
s an
d 6 Cl
erica
l As
sistan
t.
Deliv
ery of
9
addi
tiona
l co
mpu
ters
.
Corp
orat
e fo
r Or
gano
gram
an
d re
crui
tmen
t. Fina
nce fo
r bu
dget
of
pers
onne
l De
partm
ent
Publ
ic W
orks
, Ro
ads an
d Tr
ansp
ort f
or
prov
isio
n of
0
addi
tiona
l co
mpu
ters
.
Dire
ctor
, De
puty
Di
rector
and
Ch
ief
Lice
nsin
g Of
ficer
. De
partm
ent
Publ
ic W
orks
, Ro
ads an
d Tr
ansp
ort f
or
prov
isio
n of
0 ad
ditio
nal
com
pute
rs
Not b
udge
ted
for
Not b
udge
ted
for
the ad
ditio
nal
com
pute
rs.
R3 0
00 0
00 0
0 fo
r add
ition
al
pers
onne
l.
R70
000
00 fo
r ad
ditio
nal
com
pute
rs
(Dep
artm
ent
Publ
ic W
orks
, Ro
ads an
d Tr
ansp
ort )
1.11
. In
dige
nt R
egiste
r upd
ated
Un
der r
evie
w, l
ast u
pdat
e was
in
June
20
09
for
2009
/201
0 im
plem
enta
tion
Fina
lise
revi
ew: E
nd
June
201
0 fo
r 201
0/
2011
im
plem
enta
tion
Colle
ctin
g ne
w
data
and
ca
ptur
ing al
l ap
plica
nts
Raise pu
blic
awar
enes
s on
the
on g
oing
indi
gent
ca
mpa
ign
for 2
010/
20
11 by
the
Fina
nce,
co
mm
unica
tion
offic
er a
nd
Spea
kers
offi
ce
Upda
ted an
d ac
cura
te
regi
ster
None
R50
000-
00
155
1.12
. Gr
ass cu
tting
GM
M ha
s 29
7 50
8 he
ctar
es of
gr
ass: 3
500
hec
tare
s ex
pected
to
cut
p/m
onl
y 16
00 is
cut p/
m
(5x 45
kw tr
acto
rs
10x
75kw
trac
tors
1x
110
kw tr
acto
rs
And
10x
larg
e rid
e on
mow
ers
need
to
be rep
lace
d an
d 10
new
LD
V’s m
ust b
e pu
rcha
sed)
1640
he
ctar
es
cut
per p
/m b
y 12
/’10
2x sm
all r
ide-
on
mow
ers (1
7.5k
w)
2010
/11
budg
et
allo
catio
n 16
40 of
hectar
es cu
t, re
duce
d pu
blic
com
plai
nts by
2%
(co
mpl
aint
s re
gister
)
COGT
A, G
SDM
to fu
nd &
so
licit
supp
ort
from
SAS
OL &
ot
her m
inin
g ho
uses
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty/
Man
ager
R1
00 000
-00
R6 0
00 0
00-0
0
-18-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
1.
12.
Cem
eter
ies
All 1
2 ce
met
erie
s ar
e co
vere
d by
m
uddy
/cla
y so
il whi
ch
mak
es
acce
ss d
ifficu
lt. G
rave
s ar
e fil
led
with
wat
er.
Lebo
hang
: La
y &
com
pact
Dole
rite
for
easy
ac
cess
. (te
mpo
rary
in
terv
entio
n)
Layi
ng
& co
mpa
ctin
g in
pr
ogre
ss
at
Lebo
hang
ce
met
erie
s
Pavi
ng/tar
ring
of
acce
ss
road
s (p
erm
anen
t in
terv
entio
n)
& al
loca
te b
udge
t
Lebo
hang
Ce
met
ery
acce
ss
impr
oved
. 5
500m
ro
ads
and
path
way
s ne
ed
to
be
tarred
or
pa
ved
per
cem
eter
y,
truc
ks
to
be
purcha
sed.
Nego
tiate
with
SA
NRAL
to
as
sist, CO
GTA/
GS
DM t
o fu
nd
pavi
ng
Dire
ctor
/Dep
uty/
Man
ager
R5
00 000
-00
R800
000
-00
per c
emet
ery
2.
SOC
AIL AN
D EC
ONOM
IC D
EVEL
OPMEN
T:
156
To p
rom
ote
socia
l-eco
nom
ic de
velo
pmen
t in
ru
ral a
nd urb
an a
reas
2.1.
Lo
cal
Econ
omic
Deve
lopm
ent
2.1.
1. M
unici
pal
cont
ribut
ion
to
LED
Coor
dina
tion
of: S
tart u
p bu
sine
sses
-S
mal
l, m
ediu
m and
em
ergi
ng
busine
sses
-S
ocia
l and
labo
ur pla
ns
-Em
ergi
ng fa
rmer
s de
velo
pmen
t -D
evel
opm
ent a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the LE
D stra
tegy
Achi
eved
4 ag
ricul
tura
l pr
ojec
ts p
lann
ed
2 ag
ric pro
ject u
p an
d ru
nnin
g 2 se
win
g ce
ntre
1 m
anuf
actu
ring
proj
ect b
eing
pl
anne
d
------
----
Proj
ects
and
smal
l bu
sine
sses
------
----
1 x of
ficer
R9
0 00
0-00
R3
00 000
-00
2.1.
2. L
ED Pla
n al
igne
d to
PGD
S As
sess
men
t and
iden
tifica
tion of
ec
onom
ic op
portun
ities
in
agric
ultu
re, m
anuf
actu
ring
and
min
ing be
nefic
iatio
n Co
nduc
t res
earc
h to
det
erm
ine
SMME size
and
sco
pe, p
ractica
l ch
alle
nges
, dev
elop
sup
port pla
n an
d SM
ME da
taba
se
Build
SMME ca
pacit
y
------
----
Not s
tarted
No
t sta
rted
Budg
et
for
the
appo
intm
ent
of
a se
rvice
pro
vide
r Bu
dget
fo
r th
e ap
poin
tmen
t of
a
serv
ice pro
vide
r
Iden
tifie
d op
portun
ities
Re
sear
ch
repo
rt
COGT
A to
co-
fund
im
plem
enta
tion of
the LE
D stra
tegy
Fu
ndin
g
1 x of
ficer
1x
offi
cer
None
None
R800
000
-00
R5
00 000
-00
-19-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
157
Esta
blish
one
stop
inf
orm
atio
n ce
ntre
fo
r SM
ME
to
avai
l pr
ocur
emen
t op
portun
ities
an
d bu
sine
ss sup
port in
form
atio
n.
Coor
dina
te w
ith th
e de
partm
ent o
f la
bour
and
oth
er
gove
rnm
ent
institu
tions
to
prov
ide
trai
ning
Pr
ovid
e of
fice
spac
e at
the
Thus
ong
Cent
res
Num
ber
of
capa
citat
ed
SMME.
Info
rmat
ion
cent
re
Fund
ing
Fu
ndin
g
1 x of
ficer
1 x of
fice
None
None
R400
000
-0
R8
0 00
0
2.1.
3. L
ED Strat
egy
LED
Stra
tegy
ado
pted
In
form
atio
n di
ssem
inat
ion to
po
tent
ial
inve
stor
,SMM’e
Pack
agin
g of
In
vest
men
t op
portun
ities
in
line with
the
Distric
t In
vest
men
t Pla
n,
PGDS
Pack
agin
g of
op
portun
ities
A
num
ber o
f op
portun
ities
pa
ckag
ed
Cogt
a,Di
stric
t,DE
DET fo
r fu
ndin
g an
d su
ppor
t
R4
0 00
0-00
R1
00 000
-00
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
LED
Strat
egy
LED
stra
tegy
ado
pted
Pa
ckag
ing
of
inve
stm
ent
oppo
rtun
ities
in
line with
the
distric
t in
vestm
ent p
lan
and
PGD’
s.
None
Pa
ckag
ing
of
oppo
rtun
ities
Pa
ckag
e of
in
vestm
ent/ec
onom
ic op
portun
ities
COGT
A, D
EDT
and
distric
t co
uncil
for
supp
ort a
nd
fund
ing
1xof
ficer
R4
0 00
0-00
R1
000
000
-00
Dete
rmin
e SM
ME: s
ize
and
scop
e ,p
ractica
l cha
lleng
es a
nd d
evel
op
supp
ort p
lan
No in
form
atio
n/da
taba
se o
n SM
ME’s
Cond
uct r
esea
rch
None
Re
sear
ch
SMME
data
base
and
su
ppor
t pla
n
COGT
A, D
EDT,
distric
t and
pr
ivat
e ag
encie
s fo
r fu
ndin
g an
d su
ppor
t
1xof
ficer
No
ne
R400
000
-00
Staf
fing
Only
1x Of
ficer
To
em
ploy
1x
Man
ager
and
1x
Cler
ical A
ssista
nce
Orga
nogr
am
revi
ew
Adop
t or
gano
gram
an
d fil
l the
new
po
sts
Adop
ted
orga
nogr
am
and
appo
intm
ents
None
Co
rpor
ate
Serv
ices
Pers
onne
l
None
R4
00 000
-00
2.14
. In
tegr
ated
De
velo
pmen
t Pl
an
W
ard ba
sed
plan
ning
Cons
olid
atio
n of
Com
mun
ity
Inpu
ts in
to th
e Dr
aft I
DP
Trai
ning
of W
ard
Coun
cillo
rs,
Offic
ials, W
ard
Com
mitt
ees
Mem
bers
on (W
BP)
Bid pr
oces
ses
Appo
intm
ent o
f the
Ex
tern
al Ser
vice
Pr
ovid
er
A Nu
mbe
r of
Tr
aine
d In
tern
al and
Ex
tern
al ro
le
play
ers on
(W
BP)
Appr
oved
IDP
with
(WBP
) co
nten
t
None
ID
P Man
ager
R1 0
00 0
00-0
0
Staf
fing of
IDP Se
ctio
n 1x
IDP Man
ager
, 1x St
uden
t Ap
poin
tmen
t of 1
x ID
P Of
ficer
, 1x ID
P Cl
erica
l Ass
ista
nce
None
Ap
prov
al of t
he
Orga
nisa
tiona
l St
ructur
e,
Pers
onne
l Bu
dget
ing(
Allo
catio
Appo
intm
ent
of ID
P Su
ppor
t St
aff
None
ID
P Man
ager
R535
182
-95
158
n)
-20-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
Pa
rtici
patio
n by
Sec
tor
Depa
rtm
ents
Min
imal
par
ticip
atio
n or
non
-pa
rtici
patio
n Sign
ing of
SLA
’s
with
the
affe
cted
se
ctor
dep
artm
ents
None
Pa
ckag
ing
of
proj
ects,
Prep
arat
ion
of
SLA’
s
Sign
ed SLA
’s
CO
GTA
to
revi
ve th
e pl
anni
ng
foru
m,
New
enga
gem
ent
plan
by
Distric
t, CO
GTA
Prem
ier
IDP Man
ager
, Le
gal S
ectio
n R4
0 00
0-00
R1
00 000
-00
2.2.
Sp
atia
l Dev
elop
men
t
Unlo
ck
Fund
ing
in
Evan
der,
Kinr
oss, Lea
ndra
La
nd p
urch
ased
and
tra
nsfe
rred
fo
r hum
an set
tlem
ent
Secu
ring fu
ndin
g No
ne
Busine
ss p
lans
co
mpi
led
Conf
irmat
ion
from
fund
ers
Hum
an
Settl
emen
t, Na
tiona
l Tr
easu
ry
(NPD
G),
othe
r ex
tern
al
agen
cies,
COGT
A (sta
keho
lder
m
obili
satio
n)
Dire
ctor
TES
R12
000
000-
00
2.2.
1. S
patia
l De
velo
pmen
t (SDF
Im
plem
enta
tion)
Tran
sfer
of S
tate
Owne
d la
nd to
GM
M fo
r fin
alisat
ion
of
outsta
ndin
g To
wns
hips
and
im
plem
enta
tion
of n
ew
Gree
nfie
lds to
wns
hip
esta
blishm
ent.
(B
lesb
oksp
ruit
150 IS
, Drie
font
ein
137 IS
, Gro
otsp
ruit
279
IS
Num
erou
s le
tters
writ
ten
to D
HS
and
Prov
incia
l COG
TA.
Land
tra
nsfe
rred
to
GMM t
o gi
ve e
ffect
to p
rocla
mat
ion
of
towns
hips
.
0 %
, o
expe
nditu
re to
da
te
Exec
utiv
e May
or to
en
gage
MEC
and
Pr
emie
r to
fast
trac
k tran
sfer
of
land
Land
ow
ners
hip
vested
in
the
nam
e of
GMM
DHS,
COGT
A (n
atio
nal
and
prov
incia
l) to
as
sist G
MM t
o tran
sfer
land
Prem
ier,
MEC
, Ex
ecut
ive
May
or,
Offic
ials fr
om
DHS,
COGT
A an
d GM
M
None
No
ne
Unlo
ck
Fund
ing
for
Towns
hip
Esta
blishm
ent
and
BNG
Impl
emen
tatio
n fo
r La
nd A
lread
y
Land
pur
chas
ed a
nd tra
nsfe
rred
fo
r hum
an set
tlem
ent
Secu
ring Fu
ndin
g No
ne
Busine
ss P
lans
Co
mpi
led
Conf
irmat
ion
from
fund
ers
Hum
an
Settl
emen
t, Na
tiona
l
1 x HO
D-TE
S
None
R4 0
00 0
00-0
0
159
purcha
sed
by
DHS
–
Kinr
oss
Exte
nsio
n 9
and
Evan
der
– P
tn
132 &
133W
inkl
e Ha
ck)
Trea
sury
(NPD
G),
Othe
r Ex
tern
al
Agen
cies,
Natio
na
Cogt
a,(Sta
keho
lder
Mob
ilisa
tion
-21-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
Un
lock
fund
ing
for N
ew
Gree
nfie
lds To
wns
hip
Esta
blishm
ent :
Em
zino
ni A
irfie
lds (3
000 st
ands
) W
est o
f Sec
unda
(1
000 st
ands
) Ev
ande
r (20
0 st
ands
) EM
bale
nhle
Eas
t (5
000 st
ands
) Ki
nros
s (2
000 st
ands
) Le
andr
a (1
000 st
ands
)
Land
Iden
tifie
d fo
r New
Gr
eenf
ield
Tow
nshi
p Es
tabl
ishm
ent.
Land
owne
d by
GM
M. L
and al
so pur
chas
ed b
y DH
S fo
r BNG
impl
emen
tatio
n.
Secu
ring Fu
ndin
g No
ne
Busine
ss p
lans
co
mpi
led
Conf
irmat
ion
from
fund
ers
Hum
an
Settl
emen
t, Na
tiona
l Tr
easu
ry(N
PDG
), Ot
her
Exte
rnal
Ag
encie
s,
Natio
na
Cogt
a,(Sta
keho
lder
Mob
ilisa
tion
1 x HO
D-TE
S No
ne
R24
000
000-
00
Purcha
se o
f Lan
d fo
r New
Gr
eenf
ield
s To
wns
hip
Esta
blishm
ent –
Ptn
29
Braa
kfon
tein
310
IR a
nd P
tn
2Rie
tfont
ein
313I
R.
Land
Iden
tifie
d in
line
with
SDF
Se
curin
g Fu
ndin
g No
ne
Busine
ss p
lans
co
mpi
led
Conf
irmat
ion
from
fund
ers
Hum
an
Settl
emen
t, Na
tiona
l Tr
easu
ry(N
PDG
), Ot
her
1 x HO
D-TE
S No
ne
R10
000
000-
00
160
Exte
rnal
Ag
encie
s,
Natio
nal
COGT
A,(Sta
keh
olde
r Mob
ilisa
tion
Land
Use
Man
agem
ent S
yste
m:
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
LU
Sche
me
Deve
lop
elec
tron
ic ap
plica
tion
Man
agem
ent S
yste
m:
RMIC
S:DP
from
Tsh
wan
e Met
ropo
litan
Cou
ncil:
Ph
ase
1:Bu
ildin
g pl
an
man
agem
ent s
yste
m (B
IMAS
) Ph
ase
2: Lan
d us
e ap
plica
tion
man
agem
ent s
yste
m (L
UMAS
) Ph
ase
3: Law
Enf
orce
men
t m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
(LEM
AS)
Phas
e 4:
Inte
grat
ion
of
man
agem
ent s
yste
ms (p
ases
1-3)
Land
Use
Sch
eme de
velo
ped,
ap
prov
ed and
impl
emen
ted.
Mee
ting co
mpl
eted
with
Offi
cials
from
Tsh
wan
e.
None
Sc
ope of
com
plet
ed fo
r m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
. RFQ
co
mpl
eted
and
app
rove
d.
None
No
ne
Secu
ring Fu
ndin
g 30
%, 2
009/
2010
fin
ancia
l yea
r –
R500
000
.00
allo
cate
d
Appo
int c
onsu
ltant
to
dev
elop
LUS
Man
agem
ent
System
. Im
plem
ent
proj
ect
Increa
se
Coun
cil
inco
me.
Elim
inat
e frau
d an
d co
rrup
tion.
Se
cure
dat
a in
tegr
ity.
Effe
ctiv
e La
w
enfo
rcem
ent
COGT
A an
d Na
tiona
l Tr
easu
ry to
as
sist and
fa
cilita
te
tran
sfer
of
Tshw
ane
system
to
GMM
Offic
ials –
CO
GTA
, Ts
hwan
e an
d GM
M
Unkn
own
Unkn
own
-22-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
SD
F Pr
ojec
ts:
Unde
rtak
e CB
D ur
ban De
sign
pla
n an
d re
vita
lisat
ion.
CID
Stak
ehol
der C
omm
ittee
set
-up
. Se
curin
g Fu
ndin
g an
d ge
t co
mm
itmen
t fro
m
None
Fa
cilita
te m
eetin
gs
betw
een la
nd
owne
rs; A
ssist i
n
100 %
buy
-in
from
land
ow
ners
in
COGT
A an
d Na
tiona
l Tr
easu
ry to
COGT
A,
Natio
nal
trea
sury
,
Unkn
own
Unkn
own
161
Facil
itate
the fo
rmat
ion
of a
CID
in
the CB
D.
CBD
Rege
nera
tion St
rate
gy and
Ur
ban De
sign
Pla
n.
all l
and ow
ners
with
in CBD
. th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent
of a w
orki
ng
com
mitt
ee,
appr
oval
pla
ns fo
r ur
ban
design
.
CBD.
Es
tabl
ishe
d CI
D.
Rege
nera
ted
and
upgr
aded
CB
D.
assist w
ith
acce
ss to
fu
ndin
g
GMM O
fficia
ls
and
CBD
Land
ow
ners
Ge
ogra
phic
Info
rmat
ion Sy
stem
: Im
plem
ent G
IS Strat
egy.
Mai
nten
ance
of W
EB b
ased
GIS
da
ta in
form
atio
n sy
stem
. An
alys
es o
f inf
orm
atio
n to
be
used
as m
anag
emen
t too
l. In
tegr
atio
n of
oth
er m
anag
emen
t da
ta set
s in
suc
h a m
anne
r tha
t th
ey ca
n be
geo
-ref
eren
ced.
De
eds do
wnl
oad an
d up
date
s
GIS de
velo
ped
and
impl
emen
ted.
GI
S stra
tegy
dev
elop
ed.
Cons
ulta
nt a
ppoi
nted
by
GSDM
.
Mai
nten
ance
of G
IS,
esta
blishm
ent o
f W
EB bas
ed G
IS dat
a in
form
atio
n sy
stem
. In
tegr
atio
n of
oth
er
GMM m
anag
emen
t da
ta set
s
50 %
20
09/2
010
finan
cial y
ear –
R7
00 000
.00
budg
eted
.
Tran
sfer
of
Cons
ulta
nt fr
om
GSDM
to G
MM in
te
rms of
MFM
A.
Mai
ntai
n GI
S an
d m
onito
r con
sulta
nt
Redu
ced
time
and co
st
rela
ted
to
serv
ice
deliv
ery
Man
agem
ent
and wor
king
to
ol fo
r GMM
empl
oyee
s.
Cred
ible
in
form
atio
n se
rvice
to th
e pr
ivat
e an
d pu
blic
sector
s
GSDM
to
facil
itate
the
tran
sfer
of
thei
r ap
poin
ted
cons
ulta
nt to
GM
M
Offic
ials
GSDM
, GMM
and
Cons
ulta
nt
R700
000
-00
R700
000
-00
GI
S In
stru
men
ts (e
.g. H
and
held
GP
S)
Need
iden
tifie
d fo
r the
pur
chas
e of
GPS
to e
nhan
ce ser
vice
de
liver
y
Deve
lop sc
ope
of
wor
k an
d RF
Q do
cum
ent.
Adve
rtise
for
Quot
atio
ns.
Proc
ure GP
S.
0 %
, 201
0/20
11
finan
cial y
ear –
R2
00 000
.00
budg
eted
Deve
lop sc
ope
of
wor
k an
d RF
Q do
cum
ent.
Adve
rtise
for
Quot
atio
ns.
Proc
ure GP
S.
Proc
ured
GPS
Sy
stem
GM
M Fin
ance
De
partm
ent t
o fa
cilita
te
proc
urem
ent.
Offic
ials -
GMM
R200
000
-00
R400
000
-00
La
nd Sur
veyi
ng –
rectify
ing of
St
and pe
gs
Requ
est r
ecei
ved from
GMM
Hous
ing De
partm
ent t
o re
ctify
stan
d pe
gs
Deve
lop sc
ope
of
wor
k an
d RF
Q do
cum
ent.
Adve
rtise
for
Quot
atio
ns.
Appo
int C
onsu
ltant
. Re
ctify
sta
nd p
egs.
0 %
20
10/2
011
finan
cial y
ear –
R1
00 000
.00
budg
eted
Deve
lop sc
ope
of
wor
k an
d RF
Q do
cum
ent.
Adve
rtise
for
Quot
atio
ns.
Appo
int C
onsu
ltant
. Re
ctify
sta
nd p
egs.
Rectifi
ed
pegs
, co
nstruc
tion
of RDP
’s
GMM Fin
ance
de
partm
ent t
o fa
cilita
te
appo
intm
ent
of Con
sulta
nt
Offic
ials G
MM
R100
000
-00
R100
000
-00
Ne
w O
rtho
phot
o m
appi
ng fo
r GM
M are
a of
juris
dictio
n (U
rban
an
d Ru
ral a
reas
)
Orth
opho
to m
appi
ng ta
ken in
20
06 and
link
ed to
GIS
Secu
ring Fu
ndin
g 0 %
Co
mpi
le Bus
ines
s pl
an to
sec
ure
fund
ing/
gran
t
Upda
ted
Orth
opho
to
map
ping
to b
e lin
ked to
GIS
COGT
A to
as
sist w
ith
acce
ss to
fu
ndin
g
COGT
A an
d GM
M offi
cials
None
No
ne
Ru
ral D
evel
opm
ent S
trat
egy
None
Se
curin
g Fu
ndin
g 0 %
Co
mpi
le Bus
ines
s pl
an to
sec
ure
fund
ing/
gran
t
Adop
ted ru
ral
deve
lopm
ent
Stra
tegy
COGT
A to
as
sist w
ith
acce
ss to
fu
ndin
g
COGT
A an
d GM
M offi
cials
None
None
162
-23-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
GM
M Eco
nom
ic St
udy,
Re
sear
ch Stu
dies
and
Sur
veys
No
ne
Deve
lop sc
ope
of
wor
k an
d RF
Q do
cum
ent.
Adve
rtise
for
Quot
atio
ns.
Appo
int C
onsu
ltant
. Im
plem
ent p
roje
ct
0 %
R1
00 000
.00
budg
eted
for
2010
/201
1 fin
ancia
l yea
r
Deve
lop sc
ope
of
wor
k an
d RF
Q do
cum
ent.
Adve
rtise
for
Quot
atio
ns.
Appo
int C
onsu
ltant
. Im
plem
ent p
roje
ct.
Econ
omy
uplif
tmen
t. Av
aila
bilit
y of
stat
istic
al
data
for
proj
ect
iden
tifica
tion
and
mot
ivat
ion
GMM to
im
plem
ent
proj
ect
Offic
ials G
MM
R100
000
-00
R500
000
-00
La
nd Red
istrib
utio
n fo
r Ag
ricul
tura
l dev
elop
men
t (LRA
D)
None
Se
curin
g Fu
ndin
g 0 %
Co
mpi
le Bus
ines
s pl
an to
sec
ure
fund
ing/
gran
t
Land
pu
rcha
sed
and
distrib
uted
for
Agric
ultu
ral
deve
lopm
ent
COGT
A to
as
sist w
ith
acce
ss to
fu
ndin
g
COGT
A an
d GM
M offi
cials
None
No
ne
3.
INST
ITUT
IONA
L TR
ANSF
ORMAT
ION:
To
en
able
an
d sp
eed-
up
institu
tiona
l tran
sfor
mat
ion
and ef
fectiv
enes
s
3.
1.
Adm
inistrat
ion
3.1.
1. R
ecru
itmen
t and
sel
ectio
n po
licy an
d pr
oced
ures
3.
1.1.
1 Fina
lise th
e Or
gano
gram
Appr
oved
Rec
ruitm
ent &
Se
lectio
n Po
licy
Achi
eved
---
-- Re
crui
tmen
t Of
ficia
ls &
all
Dept
s. im
plem
ent
Appr
oved
Po
licy –
Coun
cil
Reso
lutio
n A3
8/11
/200
9
3.
1.2.
Pol
icy on su
spen
sion
of
empl
oyee
s No
pol
icy –
Util
ize th
e Di
scip
linar
y Pr
oced
ures
as
cont
aine
d in
the
Colle
ctiv
e Ag
reem
ent
Utili
ze Col
lectiv
e Ag
reem
ent a
s in
stru
cted
by
SALG
BC
-----
Indu
stria
l Rel
atio
ns
offic
ials &
all
Dept
s. im
plem
ent
SALG
BC
Colle
ctiv
e Ag
reem
ent
3.
1.3.
Vac
ancie
s (to
p fo
ur, M
M,
CFO,
Pla
nner
and
Eng
inee
r) MM –
fille
d CF
O po
sitio
n va
cant
–
adve
rtisem
ent c
lose
d 26
/02/
2010
(inc
umbe
nt a
ctin
g)
Appo
intm
ent
To be m
ade by
01
May
201
0
-----
MM and
Cou
ncil
to
appo
int
Appo
intm
ent
lette
r, Em
ploy
men
t Co
ntra
ct a
nd
Perfor
man
ce
Cont
ract
R900
000
-00 CT
C (C
FO)
(do no
t disclo
se)
Budg
eted
for
(fpr a
ll sa
larie
s)
163
Dire
ctor
Tec
hnica
l & Eng
inee
ring
Serv
ices – fi
lled
3.
1.4.
Vac
ancie
s ot
her S
57
Dire
ctor
He
alth
&
Com
mun
ity
Serv
ices
–
positio
n va
cant
(A
ctin
g in
cum
bent
)
Appo
int b
y en
d May
en
d 20
10
(App
eal)
rem
ove
targ
et
-----
MM &
Cou
ncil
to
appo
int
Appo
intm
ent
lette
r, Em
ploy
men
t Co
ntra
ct a
nd
Perfor
man
ce
Cont
ract
-----
R7
50 000
CTC
(d
o no
t disclo
se0
-24-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on o
r te
chni
cal
supp
ort)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PRO
JECT
ED
3.
1.4.
1 Se
rvice
Del
iver
y Re
late
d:
Vaca
ncie
s MM’s O
ffice
: Ex
ec Sec
reta
ry, v
acan
t Ri
sk and
C.I.
Aud
itor,
vaca
nt
Heal
th &
Com
m Ser
vice
s:
17 la
bour
ers
Chie
f Was
te
TES:
5 W
&S
3 Elec
trici
ans
DEAT
: 3 la
bour
ers O.
P.S
P.S:
1 Mec
hani
c Fina
nce:
10
Cl
erks
De
bt
Colle
ctio
n/Ca
shie
rs
3 Ac
coun
tant
s:
Cred
itors
, Co
nsum
er, Cr
edit
cont
rol &
debt
co
llectio
n Ch
ief O
pera
tions
Offi
cer
3 x Re
gion
al M
anag
er
End May
‘10
01/0
5/’1
0 En
d May
‘10
End May
‘10
End May
‘10
End May
‘10
End May
‘10
End May
‘10
End Ju
ne ‘1
0 En
d May
‘10
End Au
g ‘1
0 En
d Au
g ‘1
0
Shor
tlisted
/Awai
t ap
prov
al
Shor
tlisted
List don
e Su
mm
arie
s List don
e Su
mm
arie
s do
ne
CVs with
DEA
T Su
mm
arised
Sh
ortli
st don
e In
terv
iew
date
s:
24 &
25/
03/’1
0
Inte
rvie
w/A
ppoi
nt
Inte
rvie
ws
Inte
rvie
ws
Shor
tlist/Int
ervi
ew
Shor
tlist/in
terv
iew
Verif
y sh
ortli
st
DEAT
fina
lise
Shor
tlist/Int
ervi
ew
Inte
rvie
w/a
ppoi
nt
Appo
int
Adve
rtise,
in
terv
iew, a
ppoi
nt
Appo
intm
ent
lette
r Ap
poin
tmen
t le
tter
None
MM, Di
rector
, HR
Man
ager
on
all
R119
151
R4
10 036
R978
894
R2
05 018
R289
260
R3
57 453
R172
746
R119
151
R888
460
R530
046
164
3.
1.5.
To
p 4
appo
inte
d with
sign
ed
perfor
man
ce
agre
emen
ts
MM –
agr
eem
ent s
igne
d Di
rector
Tec
hnica
l & E
ngin
eerin
g ag
reem
ent s
igne
d
Achi
eved
---
-- Mun
icipa
l Man
ager
Ag
reem
ents
on
pers
onal
fil
es
None
3.1.
6.
All
S57
with
sign
ed p
erfo
rman
ce agr
eem
ents
Di
rector
Co
rpor
ate
Serv
ices
–
sign
ed
Dire
ctor
Pub
lic Saf
ety – sig
ned
Dire
ctor
Env
ironm
enta
l Affa
irs &
To
urism
– sig
ned
Dire
ctor
He
alth
&
Com
mun
ity
Serv
ices to
sig
n whe
n ap
poin
ted
Achi
eved
---
-- Mun
icipa
l Man
ager
Ag
reem
ents
on
pers
onal
fil
es
None
3.1.
7.
Orga
niza
tiona
l Pe
rfor
man
ce
Man
agem
ent
System
No
system
in
pl
ace
for
orga
nisa
tion –
(Cou
ncil
appr
oved
Sco
re-C
ard
in
prin
ciple
)
System
to
be
de
velo
ped
and
appr
oved
by
De
c.
2010
Prop
osal
fin
alized
Fina
lise
appo
intm
ent
of
prov
ider
Appr
oved
Po
licy
and
Coun
cil
Reso
lutio
n by
Dec
. 201
0
Requ
ire
fund
ing
to
impl
emen
t
Mun
icipa
l Man
ager
–
All
Dire
ctor
s &
PMS Of
ficer
R0
R1 0
00 0
00
3.1.
8.
Skill
s De
velo
pmen
t Pla
n 3.
1.9 St
aff R
eten
tion (M
oral
e)
Appr
oved
Wor
kpla
ce S
kills
Pla
n – 200
9/20
10
(Dra
ft Re
tent
ion
Stra
tegy
in
pl
ace0
Deve
lop
Wor
kpla
ce
Skill
s Pl
an
for
2010
/201
1
2010
/ 2
011
WSP
be
ing
deve
lope
d (re
ques
t trai
ning
ne
eds)
Dire
ctor
Cor
pora
te
Serv
ices
ensu
res
com
plia
nce
Appr
oved
W
SP b
y en
d May
201
0
None
R1 2
00 0
00
R2 1
00 0
00
3.2.
La
bour
rela
tions
-25-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on o
r te
chni
cal
supp
ort)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PRO
JECT
ED
3.
2.1.
Lo
cal
Labo
ur
Foru
m m
eetin
gs
Appr
oved
sch
edul
e of
mee
tings
So
me
mee
tings
not
sitt
ing
due
to
lack
of q
uoru
m
All
sche
dule
d m
eetin
gs
to
sit
ever
y m
onth
-----
Exec
utiv
e May
or /
Sp
eake
r /
Chie
f W
hip
to r
eprim
and
Coun
cillo
rs
not
atte
ndin
g
All
mee
tings
he
ld:
Atte
ndan
ce
Regi
ster
s an
d Min
utes
Se
cret
aria
t
165
MM to
re
prim
and
HOD’
s no
t at
tend
ing
3.2.
2.
Orga
niza
tiona
l Ri
ghts A
gree
men
t Ut
ilize
curren
t ORA
from
SAL
GA
Func
tion of
SAL
GA
-----
OR
A do
cum
ent
SALG
A In
dust
rial
Rela
tions
of
ficia
ls
and
Loca
l La
bour
Fo
rum
4.
DEMOC
RACC
Y AN
D GO
OD
GOVE
RNAN
CE:
To s
tren
gthe
n de
moc
racy
and
goo
d go
vern
ance
4.
1.
Gove
rnan
ce
4.
1.1.
Pol
itica
l m
anag
emen
t an
d ov
ersigh
t Co
uncil
Mee
ting
, Ex
ecut
ive
May
or’s m
eetin
g, P
ortfo
lio
and
Audi
t Co
mm
ittee
Mee
tings
are
sitti
ng as sc
hedu
led
11 C
ounc
il Mee
tings
Sc
hedu
led
for 2
010
11
Exec
utiv
e May
or’s
Mee
tings
Sc
hedu
led
for 2
010
11
Portfo
lio
Com
mitt
ees’
Mee
tings
Sch
edul
ed
for 2
010
4 Au
dit
Com
mitt
ee
Mee
tings
(o
wn
com
mitt
ee)
(All
37
mee
tings
he
ld)
Notic
es,
min
utes
an
d at
tend
ance
re
gister
s
Notic
es,
min
utes
an
d at
tend
ance
Re
gister
s No
tices
, m
inut
es an
d at
tend
ance
Re
gister
s No
tices
, m
inut
es an
d at
tend
ance
Re
gister
s
MM/D
irector
/Man
ager
/Chi
ef
4.1.
1.1.
St
abili
ty of C
ounc
il
-26-
166
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on o
r te
chni
cal
supp
ort)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PRO
JECT
ED
4.
1.1.
2.
Dele
gatio
n of
func
tions
be
twee
n po
litica
l an
d ad
min
istrat
ion
4.1.
1.3 St
andi
ng O
rder
s 4.
1.1.
4 By
-Law
s 4.
1.1.
5 Ov
ersigh
t Com
mitt
ees
4.1.
1.6
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
Re
solu
tions
Appr
oved
th
roug
h re
solu
tion
A40/
10/2
008
and
is u
nder
goin
g re
view
St
andi
ng O
rder
s ar
e in
pla
ce
All
existin
g By
-Law
s ar
e un
der
revi
ew: 3
7rev
iews
1 Ov
ersigh
t Co
mm
in
plac
e re
-An
nual
Re
port
(ad-
hoc)
(Non
-ex
iste
nce
of O
/Cs as
req
uire
d by
la
w)
MM S
ubm
its Q
uarter
ly rep
orts to
Co
uncil
Appr
oval
by
31 M
arch
201
0 Ac
hiev
ed/im
plem
enta
tion
37
By-L
aws
appr
oved
by
12/’1
0 3
perm
anen
t O/
C’s
to
be
esta
blishe
d by
31
/03/
’10
(C/S
&FIN
/
HCS&
DEAT
/
P.S&
TES)
Ongo
ing
N/A
Coun
cil
reso
lutio
n to
revi
ew
1 O/
C in
pla
ce (a
d-ho
c); C
onsu
lting
to
esta
blish
the
3 O/
Cs
All
repo
rts
are
subm
itted
N/A
Draf
t do
ct/a
ppro
val/w
orks
hop
by e
nd M
ay
‘10
Subm
ission
/App
rova
l MM
ensu
res
subm
ission
Appr
oved
De
lega
tion
of
Auth
oriti
es
docu
men
t an
d Co
uncil
re
solu
tion
num
ber
1 Ap
prov
ed
docu
men
t CO
GTA-
MP&
Nat
to
fund
(top
-up)
Es
tabl
ishe
d 3
O/Cs
in
pl
ace/
Coun
cil
Res..
All
repo
rts
subm
itted
/item
s/re
solu
tion
s
N/A
N/A
MM/A
ll Di
rector
s/Man
age
r L&P
N/
A Ex
ecut
ive
May
er/O
-Cs
in
non-
subm
ission
Spea
ker
Man
ager
MM/E
MC
MM/D
ir C.
S
R0 RO
R2
000
000
-00
RO
4.2.
Pu
blic
Partici
patio
n
167
-27-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on o
r te
chni
cal
supp
ort)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PRO
JECT
ED
4.
2.1
IDP Mee
tings
The
mee
tings
star
ted
in
Sept
embe
r 20
09 u
ntil
30 M
arch
20
10
Held
m
eetin
gs
&
crea
ted
awar
enes
s in
all
the3
1 W
ards
by
03/
’10
Proj
ect c
ompl
eted
Mob
iliza
tion
of
com
mun
ities
th
roug
h ha
iling
and
no
tices
31
war
d co
mm
ittee
m
eetin
gs
, 11
war
d co
mm
unity
m
eetin
gs
held
, 2
mee
tings
with
se
ctor
de
partm
ents
(N
otice
s/SM
S an
d at
tend
ance
re
gister
/ m
inut
es)
Partici
patio
n of
se
ctor
de
partm
ents
is
a ne
cess
ity
5 em
ploy
ees
R1
0 00
0-00
R1
00 000
-00
4.2.
2.
Budg
et
Cons
ulta
tive Mee
tings
4.2.
3.
War
d Co
mm
ittee
Mee
tings
W
ard
Com
mitt
ee m
eetin
gs h
eld
mon
thly
. Som
e po
orly
atte
nded
Ot
her
War
d Co
uncil
lors
no
t ca
lling
mee
tings
No
n-su
bmission
of r
epor
ts
31x1
2=31
0
Mon
thly
Mob
iliza
tion of
co
mm
uniti
es
thro
ugh
haili
ng a
nd
notic
es
Mon
thly
re
ports
Notic
es/S
MS
and
atte
ndan
ce
Partici
patio
n of
va
rious
stak
ehol
ders
is
a ne
cess
ity
168
re
gister
4.2.
4.
May
oral
Ou
trea
ch
Prog
ram
me/
Izim
bizo
Qu
arte
rly
with
so
me
poor
ly
atte
nded
La
ck
of
supp
ort
from
se
ctor
de
partm
ents
Four
per
ann
um
Aw
aitin
g ap
prov
al
by
Coun
cil
Mob
iliza
tion
of
Com
mun
ities
Repo
rts
Partici
patio
n of
va
rious
stak
ehol
ders
is
a ne
cess
ity
12
empl
oyee
s
R80
000-
00
R5
00 000
-00
4.2.
5.
Spea
ker’s
W
ard
Visits
Ensu
re
effe
ctiv
enes
s of
W
ard
Com
mitt
ees an
d CD
Ws
31 w
ards
Pr
ogra
mm
e star
ted
on
11
Mar
ch 2
010
Mon
thly
re
ports
Notic
es/S
MS
and
atte
ndan
ce
regi
ster
N/A
4.2.
6.
May
or’s C
up
Ensu
re y
outh
par
ticip
atio
n an
d Sp
ort D
evel
opm
ent
01
Pr
ogra
mm
e star
ts
on 2
2 Mar
ch 201
0
Mob
iliza
tion
of
Com
mun
ities
th
roug
h ha
iling
, no
tices
, fly
ers
and
poster
Wel
l at
tend
ed
even
t
N/A
15
empl
oyee
s R3
0 00
0-00
R100
000
-00
4.2.
7.
Med
ia Tou
rs
Give
m
edia
ex
posu
re to
hi
gh
impa
ct ser
vice
del
iver
y pr
ojec
ts
04
Quar
terly
In
vita
tion to
med
ia
R1
0 00
0-00
R1
0 00
0-00
4.2.
8.
Func
tiona
lity
of
war
d co
mm
ittee
s 31
War
d Co
mm
ittee
s La
unch
ed
Som
e no
t ful
ly fu
nctio
nal
R350
mon
thly
stip
end
paid
to a
ll m
embe
rs
31x1
2=31
0 Mon
thly
Notic
es,
Mon
thly
re
ports
and
atte
ndan
ce
regi
ster
R1.3
m
R1.3
m
-28-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on o
r te
chni
cal
supp
ort)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PRO
JECT
ED
4.
2.9.
Bro
ader
pub
lic
partici
patio
n po
licie
s an
d pl
ans
Curren
tly
rely
ing
on
COGT
A Gu
idel
ines
on
Pu
blic
Partici
patio
n Po
licy on
Pub
lic Pet
ition
s dr
afte
d
30 Ju
ne 2
010
On goi
ng
Partici
patio
n by
stak
ehol
ders
ne
cess
ary
Polic
y ap
prov
ed b
y Co
uncil
4.2.
10
Inte
rnal
Co
mm
unica
tion
System
(Tel
epho
ny)
80%
of
new t
elec
oms’ s
yste
m
instal
led
End Ju
ne ‘1
0 In
stal
ling Ev
ande
r St
abili
sing
ne
twor
k/sn
ags
Netw
ork
Man
gers
to co
-op
erat
e in
m
anag
ing
budg
ets
107,
P.S fi
nalis
e
15%
on
bill
redu
ctio
n Re
cord
of
co
mpl
aint
s
Telk
om: m
ove
PRI l
ine fo
rm
Evan
der t
o Se
cund
a
2x M
anag
ers
R4 0
00 0
00-0
0 R2
500
000
-00
(2nd pha
se-C
all
Cent
re)
169
mig
ratio
n-co
st
redu
ctio
n 10
7 Ce
ntre
: sy
stem
mig
ratio
n
relo
catio
n of
107
Ce
ntre
to new
lo
catio
n
SAPS
/SAS
OL:
mov
e ra
dios
to
new lo
catio
n (1
07)
Haili
ng s
yste
m i
s ou
tdat
ed a
nd
not f
unctio
ning
pro
perly
Mun
icipa
l Web
site
is fu
nctio
nal
10 0
00 visito
rs in
a y
ear
4 ne
w
haili
ng
system
nee
ded
by
June
20
10
and
2 m
ore by
De
cem
ber 2
010
June
201
0
Crea
te
publ
ic
Awar
enes
s of
th
e Mun
icipa
l web
site
In
crea
se
the
amou
nt o
f vi
sito
rs
to 20
000 by
12/
’10
Mar
ketin
g/Co
mm
uni
catio
ns M
anag
er &
Al
l Dire
ctor
s Mar
ketin
g/Co
mm
uni
catio
ns M
anag
er &
Al
l Di
rector
s:
Subm
ission
of
co
nten
t
Prop
erly
fu
nctio
ning
an
d au
dibl
e Ha
iling
sy
stem
pr
ocur
ed
Flye
rs
Notic
es
20 0
00
visito
rs
Publ
ic aw
aren
ess
Cam
paig
n on
web
site
us
age
by
head
of
co
mm
unica
tion
Web
site
Ed
itor
R0
R1
00 000
4.2.
11. C
ompl
aint
s m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
Co
mpl
aint
Man
agem
ent
Syst
em
is in
pla
ce
Com
plai
nts
offic
es
wer
e es
tabl
ishe
d in
all
4 zo
nes
Othe
r de
partm
ents
are
not
using
th
e sy
stem
, m
ainl
y us
ed b
y TE
S an
d 10
7 ce
ntre
.
Depa
rtm
ents t
o be
en
cour
aged
to
ut
ilise
the
com
plai
nt
syst
em
fully
Tr
ain de
partm
ents
Pu
blic
Awar
enes
s th
at
the
syst
em
exist
Circul
ate
mem
os
to D
irector
s In
clude
in
In
ductio
n pr
oces
s
Dire
ctor
s to
use
the
sy
stem
and
mon
itor
com
plai
nts
rece
ived
an
d at
tend
ed
MM in
stru
ct de
pts.
to atte
nd tr
aini
ng
Publ
ic co
mpl
aint
re
duce
d Man
agem
ent
is
able
to
ex
trac
t co
mpl
aint
s re
port
and
use
them
for
fu
ture
pl
anni
ng
Dire
ctor
s re
prim
ands
of
ficia
ls th
at d
o no
t cap
ture
pu
blic
com
plai
nts in
th
e sy
stem
and
Man
ager
s who
fa
ils to
act o
n th
e co
mpl
aint
s
4 cle
rical
as
sistan
t of
ficer
s
R0
RO
-29-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
170
Inte
rven
tion
s Re
quir
ed
expe
ndit
ure)
O
THER
SP
HER
ES A
ND
A
GEN
CIES
(e
.g.
inte
rven
tion
or
tec
hnic
al
supp
ort)
4.
2.12
. Fe
edba
ck to
co
mm
uniti
es
May
oral
Imbi
zo
Outrea
ch
Spea
ker’s
War
d Vi
sits
04
31
On-g
oing
Mob
ilisa
tion of
the
publ
ic th
roug
h ha
iling
, not
ices an
d th
e m
edia
.
4.2.
13 G
ener
al Val
uatio
n Ro
ll:
2012
to 2
016
Roll
for 2
008/
2012
in pla
ce
Roll
for 2
012/
2016
: pro
cess
star
ted
Coun
cil Res
. De
clarin
g ne
xt R
oll
for 2
012
-201
6 by
31
/04/
’10
Appo
int V
alue
r End
Ju
ne ‘1
0
Draf
ting Ite
m
Draf
ting pr
ojec
t pl
an
Draf
ting Bi
d Sp
ecs
for V
alue
r
Coun
cil app
rove
s de
clara
tion &
proj
ect p
lan
Valu
er
appo
int
lette
r/co
ntra
ct
Coun
cil
reso
lutio
n de
clara
tion
date
COGT
A:
appo
int n
ew
Appe
al B
oard
&
supp
ort t
he
valu
atio
n pr
oces
s
Depu
ty, C
FO,
4 Man
gers
R1
50 000
-00
R10
000
000-
00
5.
FINA
NCIA
L MAN
AGEM
ENT
AND
VIAB
ILIT
Y:
To im
prov
e an
d su
stai
n fin
ancial
m
anag
emen
t
5.
1.
Reve
nue
enha
ncem
ent
prog
ram
me
70%
of t
he m
onth
ly bill
s ar
e ac
cura
te.
80%
of m
onth
ly
bills
are
accur
ate
by D
ec ’1
0.
Repl
acem
ent o
f de
fectiv
e m
eter
s;
field
wor
k to
ve
rify/
correc
t co
nsum
er dat
a
Supp
ort f
rom
war
d co
uncil
lors
and
Of
fice of
the
Spea
ker
Bills
accur
acy
is in
crea
sed
by 1
0% by
Dec ’
10
COGT
A:
fund
ing-
MSI
G CF
O/De
puty
/Man
ger
R500
000
-00
R500
000
-00
24%
ele
ctric
ity d
istrib
utio
n lo
sses
is exp
erie
nced
by th
e Mun
icipa
lity.
Elec
trici
ty
distrib
utio
n lo
sses
sh
ould
be
decrea
sed
by 1
0%
by 1
2/20
10
Seal
ing of
el
ectrici
ty m
eter
s,
cutti
ng o
f ser
vice
s whe
n br
idgi
ng
occu
rs.
On re
side
ntia
l ar
eas to
cond
uct
met
er a
udits
sp
ecia
lly,
eMba
lenh
le and
eM
zino
ni by May
20
10 and
co
mpl
etio
n ex
pected
by
Sept
embe
r 201
0.
To ca
rry ou
t the
pi
lot p
roje
ct o
n au
tom
ated
mas
ter
read
ing
syst
em by
conv
ertin
g 30
co
nven
tiona
l m
eter
s of
larg
e
14%
el
ectrici
ty
loss
es
None
CF
O/De
puty
/Man
ger
R500
000
-00
R1
000
000
-00
R500
000
-00
R3
000
000
-00
171
power
use
rs. B
y May
201
0. The
ex
tra
reve
nue
real
ised
will
be
ring fe
nced
to
conv
ert t
he
rem
aini
ng.
-30-
15%
Wat
er distrib
utio
n lo
sses
is
expe
rienc
ed by
the
mun
icipa
lity
Wat
er distrib
utio
n lo
sses
sho
uld be
b
decrea
sed
by 5
%
by 1
2/20
10
Wat
er re
stric
tion
devi
ces fo
r by-
pass
ed w
ater
m
eter
s, f
ixin
g of
le
akag
es b
y wat
er
depa
rtm
ent
To cu
rb th
e lo
sses
th
e m
unici
palit
y will
cont
inue
to
disc
onne
ct
serv
ices whe
n br
idgi
ng occ
urs.
Cont
ractor
id
entif
ies th
e pr
oble
mat
ic m
eter
s whi
le
doin
g m
eter
re
adin
g an
d th
e re
port w
ill be
forw
arde
d by
fin
ance
to wat
er
depa
rtm
ent f
or
repa
irs
10%
Wat
er
loss
es
None
CFO/
Depu
ty/
Reve
nue
Man
ger/
wat
er
man
ager
No
ne
No
ne
5.2.
De
bt m
anag
emen
t pr
ogra
mm
e
Lack
of d
ebt m
anag
emen
t sys
tem
Acqu
ire a D
ebt
Man
agem
ent
system
by 12
/ 20
10
Debt
Man
agem
ent
proc
esse
s ar
e do
ne
man
ually
whi
ch
then
resu
lts to
de
lays
in d
ebt
colle
ctio
n ac
tions
.
To acq
uire
a deb
t co
llectio
n sy
stem
th
at w
ill be
inte
grat
ed w
ith
Fina
ncia
l Man
agem
ent
system
by Ju
ly
2010
.
95%
Co
llectio
n ra
te.
Rem
ittan
ce
advi
ce o
r pa
ymen
t Sch
edul
es,
espe
cially
from
Go
vern
men
t De
partm
ents.
Deve
lop
a fram
ewor
k whe
rein
the
CDW
’s and
war
d co
mm
ittee
s will
be
com
pelle
d to
as
sist w
ith
CFO/
Depu
ty/
Man
ger
R0
R1 0
00 0
00-0
0
172
Non-
appl
icatio
n fo
r the
indi
genc
e sc
hem
e by
the ne
edy ho
useh
olds
.
Regi
stra
tion of
all
indi
gent
ho
useh
olds
.
Non-
affo
rdin
g cu
stom
ers
surfac
ing
whe
n th
e Cr
edit
Cont
rol
mea
sure
s ar
e im
plem
ente
d.
Cond
uct t
he
indi
gent
s ca
mpa
ign
year
ly
None
Debt
Col
lectio
n fu
nctio
ns.
Increm
ent o
f eq
uita
ble by
Na
tiona
l trea
sury
CFO/
Depu
ty/
Man
ger
Lack
of i
nteg
ratio
n of
fina
ncia
l sy
stem
s with
oth
er sys
tem
s e.
g.
Pre-
paid
sys
tem
Inte
grat
ion of
sy
stem
s.
Deve
lopm
ent o
f sp
ecifi
catio
n fo
r th
e sy
stem
s.
Appo
intm
ent o
f se
rvice
pro
vide
r by
Jul
y 20
10
Full
inte
grat
ion
of
the
system
s.
Increm
ent o
f MSI
G CF
O/De
puty
/Man
ger
R0
R5 0
00 0
00-0
0
The av
erag
e pa
ymen
t rat
e fo
r the
m
unici
palit
y is 80%
and
the
mon
thly
pay
men
t rat
e is 9
0%.
The av
erag
e pa
ymen
t sho
uld be
85
% and
mon
thly
be
95%
. The
95 %
is -
5% sho
uld be
lo
ng out
stan
ding
de
bts from
60
days
plu
s an
d 90
%
for
0-30
day
s
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
De
bt C
olle
ctio
n St
rate
gy by
bloc
king
afte
r 7
days
, disco
nnec
tion
of ele
ctric
ity if
no
paym
ent a
fter 7
da
ys w
e re
stric
t wat
er
Ensu
re th
e co
ntin
uous
im
plem
enta
tion
of
the De
bt C
olle
ctio
n St
rate
gy.
95%
Co
llectio
n ra
te.
Assistan
ce
from
the Of
fice
of th
e Sp
eake
r in
im
plem
entin
g th
e De
bt
Colle
ctio
n St
rate
gy.
CFO/
Depu
ty/
Man
ager
/Spe
aker
-31-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
5.
3.
Cash
flo
w
man
agem
ent
mod
el
Stro
ng re
lianc
e on
ove
rdra
ft fa
cility
to p
ay big
pay
men
ts e
.g.
Esko
m, R
and W
ater
and
Sal
arie
s.
The Mun
icipa
lity cu
rren
tly h
as a
n ov
erdr
aft f
acili
ty of R
11 m
illio
n th
at sup
ports th
e m
onth
ly ca
sh
oper
atio
ns. T
his du
e to
the
fact
that
cons
umer
acc
ount
s ar
e on
ly
due
by th
e 7t
h of e
very
mon
th.
The ac
coun
t is ov
erdr
awn
roun
d th
e 25
th and
then
afte
r the
7th it
To sav
e 5%
of t
he
Colle
cted
Rev
enue
to
crea
te ca
sh
back
ed re
serv
es.
Curren
tly
asse
ssin
g co
st
savi
ng
mec
hani
sms.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
De
bt C
olle
ctio
n St
rate
gy.
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
co
st cu
rtai
lmen
t stra
tegy
by Ju
ly
2010
5%
Inve
stm
ents
of
am
ount
s co
llected
on a
mon
thly
bas
is
Sche
dule
of
paym
ent o
f eq
uita
ble
shar
es a
nd
timel
y pa
ymen
t th
ereo
f
CFO/
Depu
ty/
Man
ger
173
beco
mes
favo
urab
le.
5.4.
Fu
ndin
g pl
an fo
r cap
ital
expe
nditu
re
Curren
tly d
epen
dant
on th
e MIG
, DM
E, Exp
ande
d Pu
blic
Wor
ks
Prog
ram
me.
To ch
anne
l 10%
of
the bu
dget
reve
nue
for t
he ca
pita
l in
vestm
ent
5% of C
apita
l In
vest
men
t Pr
ogra
mm
e is
fund
ed th
roug
h gr
ants
: MIG
, Ger
t Siba
nde,
DME
10%
of t
he ca
pita
l ex
pend
iture
be
fund
ed th
roug
h CR
R.
10%
of
capi
tal b
udge
t be
fund
ed
thro
ugh
CRR.
Enco
urag
emen
t of p
rivat
e pu
blic
partne
rshi
p with
co
mpa
nies
like
SA
SOL, A
NGLO
co
al and
Ha
rmon
y
CFO,
Dep
uty,
PM
U Man
ager
/ Di
rector
Te
chni
cal
None
5.5.
Cl
ean au
dit p
lan
The
mun
icipa
lity
achi
eved
an
un
qual
ified
Aud
it Re
port for
the
ye
ar 2
008/
09.
To
mai
ntai
n th
e stat
us q
uo f
or t
he
curren
t ye
ar
till
2014
Com
pile
all
reco
ncili
atio
ns
mon
thly
(Ban
k,
Cred
itors
, Ass
ets,
Debt
ors,
Valu
atio
n Ro
ll,
VAT, Con
ditio
nal
Gran
ts,
Inve
stm
ent a
nd
loan
s, In
vent
ory)
. Up
date
and
m
aint
ain th
e fo
llowin
g re
gister
s: Lea
se,
Loan
s,
Inve
stm
ents
and
As
sets.
Cond
uctin
g St
ock
Coun
t. Im
plem
enta
tion
of I
nter
nal
Audi
t Re
com
men
datio
ns
as wel
l as
AG
’s
reco
mm
enda
tions
The
mon
thly
stat
emen
ts ar
e to
be
rev
iewed
by
the
Inte
rnal
Aud
it un
it to
en
sure
co
mpl
ianc
e.
Unqu
alifi
ed
Audi
t Rep
orts.
Fina
lisat
ion of
Gr
adin
g of
Mun
icipa
litie
s in
ord
er to
re
tain
co
mpe
tent
staf
f by
SALG
A.
Trai
ning
of
staf
f on
GRA
P stan
dard
s by
Pr
ovin
cial
or
Natio
nal
Trea
sury
.
All
Dire
ctor
ates
R2
50 000
-00
R350
000
-00
-32-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
174
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
5.
6.
Subm
ission
of
an
nual
fin
ancia
l sta
tem
ents
Su
bmitt
ed
AFS
on
the
4th
of
Sept
embe
r 200
9.
Subm
ittin
g AF
S by
th
e 31
st o
f Au
gust
20
10.
Inte
rnal
Au
dito
rs
are
revi
ewin
g th
e in
tern
al co
ntro
ls
Trai
ning
of
man
ager
s on
pr
epar
atio
n of
in
terim
fina
ncia
l stat
emen
ts a
s at
th
e en
d of
31 May
20
10 in
pr
epar
atio
n fo
r the
20
10/1
1 AF
S
Subm
ittin
g fin
ancia
ls
by
the
31st
of
Augu
st 2
010.
GRAP
Tr
aini
ng
by N
atio
nal or
Pr
ovin
cial
Trea
sury
.
CFO/
Al
l Fina
nce
Man
ager
s.
R250
000
-00
R100
000
-00
5.7.
%
MIG
spe
ndin
g at
end
of
finan
cial y
ear
67%
was
spe
nt o
n MIG
by
end
of
June
20
09 an
d th
e re
st was
co
mm
itted
.
To s
pend
100
% o
n MIG
. 45
%
was
sp
ent
by
the
end
of
Janu
ary 20
10.
Redu
ced
adve
rtisem
ent
perio
d to
7 d
ays to
ex
pedi
te th
e sp
endi
ng.
Bi
d Co
mm
ittee
s sit
ever
y wee
k to
fast
trac
k th
e ap
poin
tmen
t of
serv
ice
prov
ider
s/co
ntra
cto
rs.
100%
sp
endi
ng o
n MIG
Appr
oval
of
pr
ojec
ts
on
time
by
the
DPLG
.
PMU
sectio
n/Bi
d Co
mm
ittee
s
5.8.
As
set
Man
agem
ent
Regi
ster
Man
ually
gen
erat
ed ass
et
regi
ster
. Un
bund
ling
of
infras
truc
ture
as
sets stil
l ong
oing
pro
cess
.
Acqu
ire an
asse
t m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
. Fu
ll co
mplia
nce
with
GRA
P 17
.
The as
set r
egiste
r is upd
ated
m
onth
ly.
Inte
rnal
Aud
itors
bu
sy w
ith
verif
ying
of
asse
ts.
To acq
uire
an as
set
man
agem
ent
system
to
auto
mat
e th
e pr
oces
ses.
To im
plem
ent t
he
reco
mm
enda
tions
of
the In
tern
al
Audi
tor.
GRAP
17
com
plia
nt
asse
t reg
iste
r an
d un
qual
ified
au
dit r
epor
t.
GRAP
trai
ning
by
Pro
vinc
ial
Trea
sury
.
CFO/
Man
ager
Ex
pend
iture
R1
00 000
-00
R1 m
illio
n
5.9.
Ap
plica
tion
of
Supp
ly
Chai
n Man
agem
ent P
olicy
Ac
quisiti
on fu
nctio
n is
dece
ntra
lized
. De
partm
ents a
re
sour
cing
thei
r own qu
otat
ions
.
Full
cent
raliz
atio
n of
pr
ocur
emen
t fu
nctio
n.
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g of
th
e Su
pply
Cha
in
Unit
proc
ess
curren
tly ru
nnin
g.
Firs
t pha
se
com
plet
ed
iden
tifica
tion
of
gaps
and
re
com
men
datio
ns
Revi
ew th
e SC
M
Polic
y.
Inte
rrog
ate th
e or
gano
gram
to
cate
r for
add
ed
resp
onsibi
litie
s on
ce th
e pr
ocur
emen
t fu
nctio
n is fu
lly
cent
raliz
ed.
Fully
ce
ntra
lized
SC
M fu
nctio
ns
in th
e Fina
nce
Depa
rtm
ent.
Trai
ning
of
SCM sta
ff to
m
eet
com
pete
ncy
leve
ls.
CFO/
Depu
ty/
Man
ager
/All
othe
r Di
rector
ates
/Bi
d Co
mm
ittee
s.
R427
000
-00
175
-33-
PE
RFO
RM
AN
CE A
REA
/ P
RIO
RITY
TU
RN
A
ROU
ND
FO
CAL
ARE
A /
OU
TPU
TS
ACT
IVIT
Y
JAN
UA
RY
2010
(c
urre
nt s
itua
tion
/ b
asel
ine)
/
Stat
us Q
uo /
Cha
lleng
es
TARG
ET F
OR
2010
(c
hang
ed s
itua
tion
) /
Mea
sure
s of
In
terv
enti
ons
Requ
ired
PRO
JECT
STA
TUS
(Cur
rent
sta
tus
and
rele
vant
ex
pend
itur
e)
MU
NIC
IPA
L RE
COM
MEN
DED
A
CTIO
N
IND
ICA
TORS
U
NB
LOCK
ING
A
CTIO
N
NEE
DED
FRO
M
OTH
ER
SPH
ERES
AN
D
AG
ENCI
ES
(e.g
. in
terv
enti
on
or t
echn
ical
su
ppor
t)
HU
MA
N
RESO
URC
E A
LLO
CATE
D
BU
DG
ET
ALL
OCA
TED
PR
OJE
CTED
Lack
of
inte
grat
ed S
CM s
yste
m
and
man
ually
ope
rate
d su
pplie
r da
ta b
ase sy
stem
.
Acqu
iring
SC
M
mod
ule
that
will
be
com
patib
le w
ith th
e fin
ancia
l sy
stem
. Au
tom
atio
n of
su
pplie
r da
taba
se
regi
ster
.
Busy
with
the
com
pila
tion of
sy
stem
sp
ecifi
catio
n.
The re
quisiti
ons
are m
anua
lly
gene
rate
d whi
ch
dela
ys th
e pr
ocur
emen
t fu
nctio
ns.
To acq
uire
a SCM
sy
stem
that
will
be
inte
grat
ed w
ith
Fina
ncia
l Man
agem
ent
system
by Ju
ly
2010
to b
e fu
lly
func
tiona
l by
Octo
ber 2
010.
Ac
quire
new
SCM
sy
stem
to
elim
inat
e m
anua
l pr
oces
ses.
Havi
ng a
inte
grat
ed
finan
cial
man
agem
ent
system
.
Fund
ing from
Na
tiona
l Tr
easu
ry
(MSI
G).
CFO/
Supp
ly
Chai
n Man
ager
R0
R1 M
illio
n
5.10
. Es
tabl
ishm
ent
of
Bid
Com
mitt
ees
176
5.5
PO
TEN
TIA
L P
RO
JEC
TS A
: 2010/2
011:
Pro
ject N
am
e
Pro
ject Location
Pro
ject O
bje
ctive
Key P
erf
orm
ance Indic
ato
r
Res
urfa
ce r
oad
betw
een
Eva
nder
and
Sec
unda
E
vand
er –
Sec
unda
R
esur
faci
ng a
nd fi
of
poth
oles
M
illen
nium
Tar
gets
Dev
elop
men
t of O
ld A
ge
Hom
es
Em
bale
nhle
E
mzi
noni
Le
boha
ng
Est
ablis
hing
Old
Age
Hom
es in
pr
evio
usly
dis
adva
ntag
ed
com
mun
ities
.
Wel
l dev
elop
ed O
ld A
ge
Hom
es.
Par
ks
Em
bale
nhle
E
mzi
noni
Le
boha
ng
Dev
elop
men
t of p
arks
in
supp
ort o
f “G
reen
ing
Mpu
mal
anga
Pro
ject
”
Mill
enni
um T
arge
ts
Libr
arie
s
Em
bale
nhle
E
mzi
noni
Le
boha
ng
Est
ablis
hmen
t of L
ibra
ries
in
prev
ious
ly d
isad
vant
aged
are
as.
Wel
l est
ablis
hed
libra
ries
Agr
icul
tura
l Pro
ject
s
All
GM
M a
reas
P
rom
otin
g an
d ca
paci
tatin
g em
erge
nt fa
rmer
s
Eco
nom
ical
ly a
ddin
g va
lue
to
farm
ing
scal
e E
lect
rific
atio
n of
hou
ses
E
mba
lenh
le
Em
zino
ni
Lebo
hang
Ele
ctrif
icat
ion
of a
ll ne
w
deve
lope
d an
d ex
istin
g ho
uses
M
illen
nium
Tar
gets
Str
eet a
nd H
igh
Mas
t Lig
hts
E
mba
lenh
le
Ere
ctio
n of
str
eet l
ight
s an
d hi
gh
Mill
enni
um T
arge
ts
177
Pro
ject N
am
e
Pro
ject Location
Pro
ject O
bje
ctive
Key P
erf
orm
ance Indic
ato
r
Em
zino
ni
Lebo
hang
m
ast l
ight
s
Com
mun
ity H
alls
E
mba
lenh
le
Em
zino
ni
Lebo
hang
Bui
ldin
g of
com
mun
ity h
alls
in
prev
ious
ly d
isad
vant
aged
are
as.
Wel
l est
ablis
hed
com
mun
ity
halls
Tar
ring
of a
ll ro
ads
G
MM
T
o ta
r / p
ave
all r
oads
with
in th
e m
unic
ipal
are
a.
Tar
red
and
/ or
pave
d ro
ads
Spe
ed h
umps
G
MM
D
evel
opm
ent o
f spe
ed h
umps
at
all
mai
n st
reet
s.
Wel
l con
trol
led
traf
fic
Wat
er s
uppl
y
GM
M
Pro
visi
on o
f wat
er to
all
hous
ehol
ds w
ithin
GM
M
Mill
enni
um T
arge
ts
Tar
ring
of r
oad
betw
een
BM
W
and
Sas
ol R
oad
Sec
unda
T
arrin
g / p
avin
g of
the
road
co
nnec
ting
to S
asol
Roa
d an
d U
muz
i Lod
ge
Tar
red
/ pav
ed r
oad
Sto
rm w
ater
dra
inag
e E
mba
lenh
le
Em
zino
ni
Lebo
hang
Ens
ure
prop
er w
ater
dra
inag
e sy
stem
w
ell f
unct
ioni
ng s
torm
wat
er
drai
nage
Clin
ics
G
MM
E
stab
lishm
ent o
f fur
ther
clin
ics
with
in G
MM
H
ealth
Car
e F
acili
ties
Sta
dium
s
Em
bale
nhle
E
mzi
noni
Le
boha
ng
Upg
radi
ng o
f sta
dium
s to
mee
t re
quire
d st
anda
rds
Mill
enni
um T
arge
ts
Mai
n ro
ads
stre
etlig
hts
E
mba
lenh
le
Em
zino
ni
Lebo
hang
Put
ting
stre
et li
ghts
at a
ll m
ain
road
s w
ithin
GM
M
Saf
ety
of C
omm
unity
Fen
cing
at a
ll ce
met
erie
s
GM
M
App
licat
ion
of a
n ef
fect
ive
fenc
ing
syst
em a
t all
cem
eter
ies
Cem
eter
ies
prot
ecte
d ag
ains
t va
ndal
ism
and
str
ay a
nim
als.
H
ousi
ng
GM
M
Bui
ldin
g of
all
type
s of
hou
ses
E
stab
lishe
d re
side
ntia
l are
as
Ren
ovat
ion
of M
unic
ipal
G
MM
U
pgra
ding
and
ren
ovat
ion
of a
ll W
ell l
ooke
d af
ter
build
ing
s
178
Pro
ject N
am
e
Pro
ject Location
Pro
ject O
bje
ctive
Key P
erf
orm
ance Indic
ato
r
Bui
ldin
gs
mun
icip
al b
uild
ings
P
ay O
ffice
C
harl
Cill
iers
E
stab
lishm
ent o
f a m
unic
ipal
pa
y of
fice
F
ully
fled
ged
offic
e
Rob
ots
G
MM
R
obot
s in
all
tow
ns
Tra
ffic
Con
trol
5.6
PO
TEN
TIA
L P
RO
JEC
TS B
: 2010/1
1
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
ject N
am
e
Estim
ate
d C
ost
(R)
Sourc
e F
undin
g
EA
T01
U
pgra
de T
heat
re F
acili
ty o
f C
omm
unity
Cen
tre:
(C
urta
ins
and
Lig
htin
g fa
cilit
y, p
rodu
ctio
ns,
build
ing
s an
d te
chni
cal).
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T 0
2 U
pgra
de a
nd m
aint
ain
The
atre
fac
ilitie
s in
Com
mun
ity H
alls
18
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
EA
T03
S
kills
dev
elop
men
t for
sta
ff
56,3
70
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T04
M
ain
tain
The
atre
and
Offi
ce A
ir C
ondi
tione
rs
150,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
179
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
ject N
am
e
Estim
ate
d C
ost
(R)
Sourc
e F
undin
g
EA
T05
S
port
s, r
ecre
atio
n an
d in
dig
enou
s g
ames
eq
uipm
ent
43,9
33
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T06
D
isab
le R
amp
60
,000
G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
EA
T07
T
heat
re C
lean
ing
Eq
uipm
ent
120,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T08
S
port
s, A
rts
and
cultu
re
600,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T09
R
egio
nal S
port
s S
tadi
um
400,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T10
F
enci
ng o
f C
emet
erie
s 1,
000,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T11
E
nviro
nmen
tal P
rom
otio
ns
400,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T12
P
rovi
sion
and
upg
rade
of s
tudy
fac
ilitie
s
800,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T13
E
nsur
e sa
fe a
nd h
ealth
y en
viro
nmen
t 15
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
EA
T14
M
ain
tena
nce
of u
pgra
de o
f lib
rary
bui
ldin
gs,
sto
ck a
nd e
qui
pmen
t 27
5,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
180
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
ject N
am
e
Estim
ate
d C
ost
(R)
Sourc
e F
undin
g
EA
T15
P
rovi
sion
of
Libr
ary
furn
iture
and
eq
uipm
ent
100,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T16
P
rovi
sion
of
libra
ry f
acili
ties
3,
500,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T17
P
rovi
sion
and
impr
ovem
ent
of L
ibra
ry in
fras
truc
ture
, IC
T, S
ecur
ity
and
reso
urce
s
1,60
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
EA
T18
P
rom
otio
n of
com
mun
ity p
artic
ipat
ion,
out
reac
h pr
ogra
mm
es a
nd
LIS
15
,000
G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
EA
T19
P
rovi
sion
of
exte
nsio
n se
rvic
es
235,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T20
E
stab
lish
Tou
rism
Sat
ellit
e in
form
atio
n of
fices
60
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
EA
T21
T
ouris
m in
form
atio
n se
rvic
es t
o co
mm
unity
8,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
EA
T22
E
stab
lish
tour
ism
cur
io a
nd c
offe
e sh
op
3,00
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
EA
T23
B
etha
l Dam
Res
ort
Sup
ertu
be
500,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
HC
S01
S
afet
y, H
ealth
and
Env
ironm
enta
l Tra
inin
g C
entr
e
500,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
181
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
ject N
am
e
Estim
ate
d C
ost
(R)
Sourc
e F
undin
g
HC
S02
P
rovi
de w
eig
hbrid
ge
and
wei
ghb
ridg
e co
ntro
l roo
m
4,50
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
HC
S03
S
tree
t and
Pub
lic T
oile
t Cle
anin
g e
qui
pmen
t 2,
700,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
HC
S04
P
repa
re a
n In
tegr
ated
Was
te M
anag
emen
t Pla
n
500,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
HC
S05
R
eloc
ate
Eva
nder
Clin
ic
1,00
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
HC
S06
8-
hour
Clin
ic –
Cha
rl C
illie
rs
500,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
HC
S07
R
enov
atio
n of
Bet
hal C
linic
45
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
HC
S08
C
omm
unity
Hea
lth C
entr
e –
Thi
stle
Gro
ve
1,50
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S01
U
pgra
de o
f ad
min
bui
ldin
gs
– G
MM
2,
850,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S02
U
pgra
de o
f re
crea
tiona
l fac
ilitie
s
2,14
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S03
U
pgra
de o
f re
crea
tiona
l fac
ilitie
s
110,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
182
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
ject N
am
e
Estim
ate
d C
ost
(R)
Sourc
e F
undin
g
TE
S04
U
pgra
de o
f w
orks
hop
and
stor
es
950,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S05
U
pgra
de o
f w
orks
hop
and
stor
es
50,0
00
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S06
E
mba
lenh
le E
xt 1
0, S
ervi
ce 4
20 s
tand
s –
Cou
ncil
cont
ribut
ion
3,
800,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S07
F
urni
ture
and
eq
uipm
ent
- P
MU
24
,000
G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S08
E
lect
roni
c B
uild
ing
Pla
n M
anag
emen
t S
yste
m (
BIM
AS
)
800,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S09
G
eog
raph
ical
Info
rmat
ion
Sys
tem
(G
IS)
1,
300,
000
G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S10
La
nd R
edis
trib
utio
n fo
r A
gric
ultu
ral D
evel
opm
ent
2,00
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S11
La
nd U
se M
anag
emen
t Sys
tem
(LU
MS
)
2,00
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S12
Lo
cal S
patia
l Dev
elop
men
t F
ram
ewor
ks (
LSD
Fs)
800,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S13
O
rtho
phot
o M
appi
ng (
GIS
)
2,70
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
183
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
ject N
am
e
Estim
ate
d C
ost
(R)
Sourc
e F
undin
g
TE
S14
P
urch
ase
land
for
Tow
nshi
p E
stab
lishm
ent
30,5
00,0
00
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S15
R
esea
rch
stud
ies
and
surv
eys
22
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S16
R
ural
Dev
elop
men
t S
trat
egy
1,
000,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S17
T
owns
hip
Est
ablis
hmen
t (C
ompl
etio
n, S
urve
ying
and
P
rocl
amat
ion)
3,
975,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S18
C
onst
ruct
ion
of g
rave
l roa
ds (
Kin
ross
and
Sec
unda
– 5
.6km
)
2,00
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S19
C
onst
ruct
ion
of g
rave
l roa
ds (
Bet
hal –
20k
m)
6,
500,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S20
C
onst
ruct
ion
of n
ew g
rave
l roa
ds (
eMba
lenh
le –
40k
m)
12
,000
,000
G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S21
C
onst
ruct
ion
of n
ew g
rave
l roa
ds (
eMzi
noni
– 2
0km
)
6,50
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S22
C
rack
sea
ling
and
Mill
ing
layi
ng (
Bet
hal –
290
km)
10
,000
,000
G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S23
C
rack
sea
ling
and
Mill
ing
layi
ng (
Lebo
hang
– 2
0km
)
2,50
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
184
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
ject N
am
e
Estim
ate
d C
ost
(R)
Sourc
e F
undin
g
TE
S24
C
rack
sea
ling
(eM
bale
nhle
- 20
0km
)
7,50
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S25
C
rack
sea
ling
(T
richa
rdt –
20k
m)
2,
500,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S26
R
epla
cem
ent
of p
lant
and
veh
icle
s
25,0
00,0
00
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S27
T
rans
port
Mas
ter
Pla
n
1,96
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S28
U
[gra
de o
f Tar
roa
ds (
GM
M –
20k
m)
2,
000,
000
GM
M &
E
xter
nal F
undi
ng
TE
S29
U
pgra
de o
f ta
r ro
ads
(GM
M -
20k
m)
13
,500
,000
G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S30
R
ebui
ld in
ters
ectio
ns –
Bet
hal
1,30
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S31
C
onst
ruct
ion
of s
torm
wat
er (
Kin
ross
, Tric
hard
t and
Sec
unda
–
4km
)
5,00
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S32
C
onst
ruct
ion
of s
torm
wat
er (
Em
bale
nhle
– 8
.5km
)
2,00
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S33
C
onst
ruct
ion
of s
torm
wat
er (
Lebo
hang
– 7
.4km
)
1,60
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
185
Pro
ject
ID
Pro
ject N
am
e
Estim
ate
d C
ost
(R)
Sourc
e F
undin
g
TE
S34
C
onst
ruct
ion
of s
torm
wat
er (
Bet
hal,
eMzi
non
i – 2
0km
)
5,00
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TE
S35
S
torm
wat
er m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
(G
MM
)
1,00
0,00
0 G
MM
&
Ext
erna
l Fun
ding
TO
TA
L
184,5
22,3
03
6.
IDP A
SSESSM
EN
T: N
EED
S P
ER
WA
RD
: 2009/2
010
GO
VA
N M
BEK
I M
UN
ICIP
ALIT
Y
IDP
AS
SE
SS
ME
NT N
EE
DS
PE
R W
AR
D - 2
009/2
010
Ward
:
Sanitation
Ele
ctr
icity
Wate
r H
ousin
g
Roads &
Sto
rm
wate
r Park
s
Cem
ete
ries
Footb
ridges
Oth
er (P
lease S
pecify)
1
√
√ √
√
P
rocl
aim
ing
of L
and
2 √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ F
enci
ng o
f ce
met
erie
s, m
aint
enan
ce
of C
omm
unity
Hal
l
3 √
√ √
√ √
√
C
linic
, A
gric
ultu
ral l
and,
LE
D
Pro
ject
s
4 √
√ √
√ √
√
S
port
s fie
ld.
Mob
ile C
linic
, G
rass
cu
ttin
g at
sch
ool
s
186
GO
VA
N M
BEK
I M
UN
ICIP
ALIT
Y
IDP
AS
SE
SS
ME
NT N
EE
DS
PE
R W
AR
D - 2
009/2
010
Ward
:
Sanitation
Ele
ctr
icity
Wate
r H
ousin
g
Roads &
Sto
rm
wate
r Park
s
Cem
ete
ries
Footb
ridges
Oth
er (P
lease S
pecify)
5 √
√ √
√ √
M
aint
enan
ce o
f in
fras
truc
ture
, ga
rde
ns, H
aw
kers
by-
law
s
6 √
√ √
√ √
√
C
linic
, A
gric
ultu
ral l
and,
LE
D
Pro
ject
s
7 √
√ √
√
M
PC
C, H
IV/A
IDS
Pro
gram
mes
, R
obot
s an
d S
cho
ol
8 √
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ C
omm
unity
Ha
ll, S
cho
ol,
Crè
che,
La
nd f
or L
ives
tock
, Dev
elo
pmen
t of
stan
ds
9
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
Re-
deve
lopm
ent o
f ho
ste
ls,
LED
P
roje
cts,
Yo
uth
De
velo
pmen
t, H
ousi
ng
Inst
rum
ents
, pa
vin
g of
ro
ads,
Hig
h M
ass
Ligh
ts,
Mid
lig
hts,
T
owns
hip
Est
ablis
hmen
t, H
umps
10
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
Pub
lic L
ight
s, S
top
Sig
n on
Roa
d R
546,
mun
icip
al p
ay
poin
t, cl
inic
, F
ire S
ervi
ces,
Soc
cer
field
, P
lant
tr
ees
and
gra
ss in
cem
eter
ies.
11
√
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ S
occe
r fie
ld, f
enci
ng o
f ce
met
erie
s
12
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
Crè
che,
Hos
pita
l, C
omm
unity
Hal
l, P
olic
e S
tatio
n, S
port
s a
nd r
ecre
atio
n fa
cilit
ies,
Pri
mar
y sc
hoo
l, sp
eed
hu
mps
13
√
√ √
√ √
Com
mun
ity H
all,
Lib
rary
, fe
ncin
g of
ce
met
erie
s 14
√
√ √
√ √
√
√
187
GO
VA
N M
BEK
I M
UN
ICIP
ALIT
Y
IDP
AS
SE
SS
ME
NT N
EE
DS
PE
R W
AR
D - 2
009/2
010
Ward
:
Sanitation
Ele
ctr
icity
Wate
r H
ousin
g
Roads &
Sto
rm
wate
r Park
s
Cem
ete
ries
Footb
ridges
Oth
er (P
lease S
pecify)
15
See
Far
ms
16
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
Spo
rts
field
s, C
omm
unity
Hal
l, L
ED
P
roje
cts,
Mor
e R
DP
Hou
sin
g an
d S
anita
tion
17
√
√ √
√ √
√ √
Ren
ova
tion
of E
van
der
Lap
a,
Com
mun
ity H
all,
Sp
orts
Fa
cilit
ies
, m
aint
enan
ce o
f A
nder
son
Par
k
18
√ √
√
√ √
√
Pro
per
billi
ng s
yste
m, m
aint
ena
nce
of P
arks
and
upg
rade
of
stor
mw
ater
an
d sa
nita
tion.
19
√ √
√ √
√ √
√
MP
CC
, HIV
/AID
S P
rogr
amm
es,
Sch
ool,
Inst
alla
tion
of R
obo
t 20
√
√ √
√ √
√
√ S
choo
ls
21
√ √
√ √
√
Mai
nten
ance
of
infr
astr
uctu
re,
gard
ens
, Ha
wke
rs b
y-la
ws
22
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
Pro
clam
atio
n o
f La
nd,
LE
D P
roje
cts,
C
omm
unity
Ha
ll, U
rgen
t: R
oads
, S
anita
tion
and
Hou
sin
g
23
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
MP
CC
, La
nd P
rocl
amat
ion
Soc
cer
stad
ium
, Tax
i Ran
k, L
ED
Pro
ject
s,
Old
Age
Hom
es.
24
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
Air-
cond
ition
ing
in C
omm
unity
Ha
ll,
Tow
nshi
p E
stab
lishm
ent,
Lan
d fo
r Li
vest
ock.
Hig
h M
ass
Ligh
ts, P
avi
ng
Sto
rm W
ater
Cha
nnel
, P
hase
tw
o C
omm
unity
Ha
ll, S
torm
Wat
er M
ain
188
GO
VA
N M
BEK
I M
UN
ICIP
ALIT
Y
IDP
AS
SE
SS
ME
NT N
EE
DS
PE
R W
AR
D - 2
009/2
010
Ward
:
Sanitation
Ele
ctr
icity
Wate
r H
ousin
g
Roads &
Sto
rm
wate
r Park
s
Cem
ete
ries
Footb
ridges
Oth
er (P
lease S
pecify)
Roa
d, S
ew
er T
ambo
Sec
tion
25
√ √
√ √
√
Mai
nten
ance
of
infr
astr
uctu
re,
gard
ens
, Ha
wke
rs b
y-la
ws,
ser
vice
s in
Pan
aram
a se
ctio
n, S
torm
wat
er
chan
nel M
ain
Ro
ad
26
√ √
√ √
√
√ √
MP
CC
, Tow
nshi
p E
sta
blis
hm
ent,
Ren
ova
tion
of M
use
um a
nd
Com
mun
ity H
all,
LE
D P
roje
cts
27
√ √
√ √
√
√ √
Spe
ed h
umps
, ren
ova
tion
of
stad
ium
an
d ho
ste
l, M
PC
C,
Land
fo
r ho
usin
g
28
√ √
√ √
√ √
√
Rec
reat
iona
l Fac
ilitie
s, U
pgra
de o
f M
unic
ipal
Gar
den
s
29
√
√
√
√
√ H
ighm
ast a
nd s
tre
et li
ght
s, R
DP
and
al
tern
ativ
e ho
usin
g fo
r ev
icte
d re
side
nts,
Rob
ot a
t Fon
o S
ibiy
a S
ectio
n
30
√ √
√ √
√
Mai
nten
ance
of
infr
astr
uctu
re,
gard
ens
, Ha
wke
rs b
y-la
ws
31
√ √
√ √
√ √
√ √
Sto
rmw
ater
dra
inag
e, C
omm
unity
H
all,
MP
CC
, S
choo
l, S
pee
d hu
mps
, A
ccur
ate
wat
er m
eter
rea
ding
.
189
GO
VA
N M
BEK
I M
UN
ICIP
ALIT
Y
IDP
AS
SE
SS
ME
NT N
EE
DS
PE
R W
AR
D - 2
009/2
010
Ward
:
Sanitation
Ele
ctr
icity
Wate
r H
ousin
g
Roads &
Sto
rm
wate
r Park
s
Cem
ete
ries
Footb
ridges
Oth
er (P
lease S
pecify)
FA
RM
S - W
AR
D 3
AN
D W
AR
D 1
5
Ward
Sanitation
Ele
ctr
icity
Wate
r H
ousin
g
Roads &
Sto
rm
wate
r Park
s
Cem
ete
ries
Footb
ridges
Farm
3 √
√
√ √
K
wag
gala
gte
3
√ √
√
√
Vaa
lban
k (d
e V
illie
rs)
3
√ √
√ √
√
Moe
dve
rlor
en
(H
ans
en)
3
√
√ √
√
Wel
terv
rede
(S
nym
an)
3
√ √
√ √
√
Vaa
lban
k (E
rasm
us)
3
√ √
√ √
√
Wel
terv
rede
(T
rute
r)
3 √
√ √
√ √
M
anie
(E
rasm
us)
3
√ √
√
√
Moe
dve
rlor
en
(S
tre
iche
r)
3 √
√
D
itmoe
d (E
rsm
us)
3
√
√ √
√
Wel
terv
rede
(C
amer
on)
3
√ √
√ √
√
Kor
tlagt
e (V
ent
er)
3
√ √
√ √
√
Kor
tlagt
e (B
ezu
iden
hou
d)
3 √
√ √
√ √
B
lesb
oksp
riut
3 √
√ √
√ √
F
reis
gew
agt
e
15
√ √
√ √
√
Goe
deho
op
15
√
√ √
√ √
K
alag
te
15
√ √
√ √
√
Joub
erts
pru
it
15
√ √
√ √
√
Kal
aboo
sfon
tein
15
√
√ √
√ √
F
aith
Hill
Est
ate
15
√
√ √
√ √
B
ekke
rrus
t 15
√
√ √
√ √
B
lesb
oksp
riut
190
GO
VA
N M
BEK
I M
UN
ICIP
ALIT
Y
IDP
AS
SE
SS
ME
NT N
EE
DS
PE
R W
AR
D - 2
009/2
010
Ward
:
Sanitation
Ele
ctr
icity
Wate
r H
ousin
g
Roads &
Sto
rm
wate
r Park
s
Cem
ete
ries
Footb
ridges
Oth
er (P
lease S
pecify)
15
√ √
√ √
√
Blin
k W
ater
15
√
√ √
√ √
B
osch
kron
s
15
√ √
√ √
√
Baa
nbre
ker
15
√
√ √
√ √
D
orsf
onte
in F
loks
prui
t
15
√ √
√ √
√
Eer
steg
eluk
1 &
2
15
√
√ √
√ √
T
richa
rdtf
onte
in
15
√ √
√ √
√
Tw
eefo
nte
in
15
√ √
√ √
√
Vaa
lkop
15
√
√ √
√ √
V
laks
prui
t Nel
spa
n
15
√ √
√ √
√
Witr
and
15
√
√ √
√ √
K
anom
boyi
15
√
√ √
√ √
K
epen
15
√
√ √
√ √
K
lipkr
aal
15
√ √
√ √
√
Krie
l roa
d V
aalk
op
15
√ √
√ √
√
Legd
aal
15
√ √
√ √
√
Moo
ifont
ein
15
√
√ √
√ √
N
aud
esfo
ntei
n
15
√ √
√ √
√
Ong
esie
n
15
√ √
√ √
√
Pal
men
tfon
tein
15
√
√ √
√ √
P
hum
ula
15
√
√ √
√ √
R
ietk
uil
15
√ √
√ √
√
Ska
kfon
tein
15
√
√ √
√ √
S
chaa
pskr
aal
15
√ √
√ √
√
Sch
uw
ekop
15
√
√ √
√ √
S
takf
onte
in
191
GO
VA
N M
BEK
I M
UN
ICIP
ALIT
Y
IDP
AS
SE
SS
ME
NT N
EE
DS
PE
R W
AR
D - 2
009/2
010
Ward
:
Sanitation
Ele
ctr
icity
Wate
r H
ousin
g
Roads &
Sto
rm
wate
r Park
s
Cem
ete
ries
Footb
ridges
Oth
er (P
lease S
pecify)
15
√ √
√ √
√
Lano
linbe
rg
15
√ √
√ √
√
Tje
bisa
15
√ √
√ √
√
Top
font
ein
192
7.
SEC
TO
R P
LA
NS:
Nr.
Description
Council
Resolu
tion
Purp
ose o
f pla
n
Imple
mente
d
1.
Ser
vice
Del
iver
y an
d B
udge
t Im
plem
enta
tion
Pla
n
A11
/05/
2007
Im
plem
enta
tion
of 5
yea
r op
erat
iona
l an
d ca
pita
l bud
get
Yes
2.
Spa
tial D
evel
opm
ent F
ram
ewor
k
B72
/08/
2006
G
uida
nce
rela
ted
to
spat
ial
deve
lopm
ent
Yes
3.
LED
Str
ateg
y
B31
/07/
2007
G
uida
nce
rela
ted
to e
cono
mic
gro
wth
an
d su
stai
nabi
lity
No,
fin
al
docu
men
t to
be
appr
oved
by
Cou
ncil
4.
HIV
/AID
S P
lan
B
48/1
0/20
07
Gui
danc
e re
late
d to
HIV
/AID
S
Incl
uded
in
th
e
Em
ploy
men
t Equ
ity P
lan
5.
Dis
aste
r R
ecov
ery
Pla
n
B48
/10/
2007
Id
entif
y a
wel
l-reg
ulat
ed
off
site
ba
ckup
to s
afeg
uard
dat
a Y
es
6.
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t Pla
n
B17
2/4/
2001
G
uida
nce
rela
ted
to d
isas
ters
Y
es
7.
Per
form
ance
Man
agem
ent F
ram
ewor
k B
31/0
2/20
05
Ena
bles
th
e ev
alua
tion
of
orga
nisa
tiona
l per
form
ance
Y
es
8.
Em
ploy
men
t Equ
ity P
lan
B
140/
03/2
002
Add
ress
issu
es o
f em
ploy
men
t eq
uity
an
d el
imin
ate
disc
rimin
atio
n ba
sed
on
race
, gen
der,
rel
igio
n
Yes
, nee
ds to
be
upda
ted
9.
Ski
lls D
evel
opm
ent P
lan
B
48/1
0/20
07
Enh
ance
ski
lls a
nd tr
aini
ng o
f sta
ff Y
es
10.
Em
ploy
ees
Ass
ista
nce
Pla
n (P
rogr
amm
e)
B48
/10/
2007
P
rovi
de
assi
stan
ce
to
empl
oyee
s ex
pose
d to
tr
aum
atic
si
tuat
ions
, al
coho
l and
dru
g ab
use.
Yes
193
Nr.
Description
Council
Resolu
tion
Purp
ose o
f pla
n
Imple
mente
d
11.
Rec
ruitm
ent P
olic
y an
d P
roce
dure
B
48/1
0/20
07
Iden
tifie
s pr
oces
s to
be
follo
wed
on
recr
uitm
ent.
Yes
12.
Sta
ndin
g O
rder
s: T
raffi
c an
d F
ire,
Res
cue
and
Dis
aste
r M
anag
emen
t
T
o m
anag
e th
e de
part
men
tal
expe
ctat
ions
fo
r th
e co
nduc
t of
pe
rson
nel
Dra
ft D
ocum
ent
13.
Veh
icle
Tra
nspo
rt a
nd E
quip
men
t Pol
icy
B47
/02/
2004
T
o en
sure
tha
t C
ounc
il ve
hicl
es a
nd
equi
pmen
ts a
re u
sed
and
mai
ntai
ned
prop
erly
Yes
14.
Indi
gent
Pol
icy
A11
/05/
2007
T
o pr
ovid
e su
bsid
ised
ser
vice
s to
the
in
dige
nt h
ouse
hold
Y
es
15.
Per
form
ance
Man
agem
ent S
yste
m
A
too
l to
pla
n, m
onito
r, m
easu
re a
nd
revi
ew p
erfo
rman
ce
Yes
16.
Ant
i- C
orru
ptio
n P
olic
y B
48/0
2/20
04
To
prev
ent f
raud
and
cor
rupt
ion
at th
e w
ork
plac
e Y
es
17.
Com
mun
icat
ion
Str
ateg
y
To
info
rm,
educ
ate,
bui
ld t
ies
with
the
in
tern
al a
nd e
xter
nal s
take
hold
ers
Dra
ft do
cum
ent f
inal
ised
18.
Sup
ply
Cha
in M
anag
emen
t Pol
icy
B77
/09/
2006
T
o ad
dres
s th
e im
bala
nces
of
th
e pa
st th
roug
h pr
ocur
emen
t Y
es
19.
Rat
es P
olic
y
T
o ad
dres
s se
rvic
e de
liver
y pr
iorit
ies,
ap
ply
unifo
rmity
in r
ates
N
o, S
till i
n dr
aft
20.
Land
Alie
natio
n P
olic
y B
51/1
0/20
07
Util
ised
fo
r lo
cal
inha
bita
nts
in
allo
catio
n of
str
ateg
ical
ly l
ocat
ed la
nd
for
econ
omic
ben
efit.
Yes
21.
Hou
sing
Cha
rter
Pol
icy
B21
2/11
/200
5 T
o in
tegr
ate
the
com
mun
ities
. Y
es
22.
Hou
sing
Pol
icy
B
362/
11/2
004
To
ensu
re h
uman
e liv
ing
cond
ition
s fo
r al
l.
Yes
194
195
GOVAN MBEKI MUNICIPALITY
CONTACT DETAILS
Department of Finance: Clearances: M Brits, L de Beer 017 620 6130 V Roberts /A Sukazi 017 620 6139 P Chipatame / J Mbatha 017 620 6115 Credit Control and Debt Collection: M Monamudi 017 620 6131 B Motha 017 620 6241 J Mthimunye 017 620 6152 D Cupido 017 620 6119 Y Blom 017 620 6245 L Masilela 017 620 6134 T Mashilo 017 620 6105 W Mabusela 017 620 6154 E Harrinarian, V Hlatswayo 017 620 6292 F Kunene / Z Mdakane 017 620 6138 P Madonsela / L Sebotse 017 620 6261 B Magudulela 017 620 6133 Customer Care: Evander: P Swarts 017 620 6305 H Jacobs 017 620 6306 Customer Care: Kinross: L Basini 0176871155 X207 T Motshotshi 0176871155 X219 B Bacela 0176871155 X209 M Moodley 0176871155 X201 Customer Care: Embalenhle: R Khanyile, N Qeja , B April, P Dladla, T Nkosi 017 685 4611 Ext 17: G Madonsela, M Tsotetsi 017 685 5412 Customer Care: Emzinoni: V Mayisela, D Simelane, R Mathebula, F Mokoena 017 647 5168 V Mabena, I Mdhluli 017 646 5201 Customer Care: Secunda: E Sekwane 017 620 6107 M Malaza 017 620 6253 S Masango 017 620 6156 P Moduse 017 620 6186 L Masilela / W Mayane 017 620 6120 N Kegakilwe 017 620 6158 J Paliam 017 620 6149
Department of Corporate Services: Administration and Support Services: Lungi Maisa 017 620 6043 IT Section: Ivy Mkhwanazi 017 620 6294 Legal and Property Section: Abitha Sikosana 017 620 6036 Human Resources: Dudu Maseko 017 620 6030 Records: Vinolia Seloane 017 620 6020 Mientjie Nieman 017 620 6081 Department of Health and Community Services: Waste Management Services: Mapule Mthimkhulu 017 620 6255 Municipal Health Services: Catherine Gumbi 017 620 6272 Primary Health Care: Elsabe Louw 017 620 6260 Community Development: Alicia Joeli 017 620 6155 Department of Public Safety: Licensing and Registration: S T Ndaba 017 620 6203 Disaster Management, Fire and 107 Communications: Vusi Dhlangalala 017 620 6197 Traffic Section: P C Mahlangu 017 638 0600 Dept. Environmental Affairs & Tourism: Facilities: Thandi Ramatsoma 017 620 6232 Libraries: Tersa Griesel 017 620 6184 Environmental Affairs: Mike Knowles 017 620 6265 Siegfried Nkogatse 017 620 6240 Culture, Recreation and Tourism: 017 620 6004
196
Dept of Technical & Engineering: Complaint Hotline: Sarah Mashiloane Secunda 017 620 6038 Mildred Khumalo Lebohang 017 683 3007 Irene Sithole Embalenhle 017 685 4611 Poppy Maphosa Bethal 017 624 3078 / 017 624 3131 Public Works: Elize Yssel 017 620 6011 Physical Development: Tiffany Ramage 017 620 6010 Building Control: Charmain Visagie 017 620 6083
Satellite Offices:
Bethal: Chris Hani Street, Bethal Tel: 017 624 3000
Kinross: 27 Rasool Malek Street Tel: 017 687 1155
Trichardt: 05 Bekker Street Tel: 017 638 0600
Evander: Cnr Solly Zwane & Pietersburg Street; Tel: 017 620 6300
Embalenhle: Stand 3868 Lindile Nxiweni Drive; Tel: 017 685 4212
Lebohang: 3265 X10 Butana Nkambule Road; Tel: 017 683 3000
eMzinoni: Cnr Victor Khayiyana and 1st Street; Tel: 017 647 3741