Upload
francesca-brathwaite
View
212
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Installation of Incinerator
Sangster International Airport
Environmental Impact Assessment
Presented by Eleanor Jones
Environmental Solutions Ltd July 6, 2004
THE PROJECT – CONTEXT AND RATIONALE
Purpose built incinerator East of terminal building& 200 feet south of runway Covers area of about 650 ft² - compacted marl
surface Requirement of IFC/World Bank/MBJ Improve Solid Waste Management Health Implications – international and domestic
waste Control rummaging - Scavengers from outside
compound, Bird Hazard
The Waste Stream 2001 Survey 1680 kg/day – int’l waste 0.181kg/passenger/day Combustible fraction – 83%
TYPE OF WASTE INTERNATIONAL WASTE %
Paper 34.4
Plastic 24.7
Vegetable matter 24.2
Glass 9.0
Metal 7.2
Unclassified 0.5
The EIA Approach Project description Receiving Environment Legislative & regulatory Context Potential Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of alternatives Outline Monitoring Plan Outline Emergency Response Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Scanship Environmental
AS and consists of a multichamber incinerator that uses a semi-pyrolitic two stage cumbustion
Main components of the incinerator system consists of a garbage shredder, silo feeding conveyor screw, garbage silo, incinerator, flue gas fan and emission stack
EXISTING ENVIRONMENT- PHYSICAL
Short duration torrential downpours characteristic of Montego Bay
Wind direction - diurnal variation Daytime - from the northeastern
sector Night from southeast
WIND DIRECTION DISTRIBUTION (1962-1970)
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESESE
SSE SSSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW
N
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
WIND DIRECTIONDIRECTION
EXISTING ENVIRONMENT- BIOLOGICAL
Highly altered ecology – site & situation of airport environment
Site adjacent to highly degraded, isolated wetland – remnant of old coastal vegetation
Robust bird life in wetlands and ponds Airport site adjacent to Montego Bay
Marine Park
EXISTING ENVIRONMENT- SOCIAL
Airport environment – visitor population and airport staff.
Communities on northern fringe – Whitehouse, Sandals ,
Southern extent – Flankers, mixed commercial establishments, north coast main road
TERMS OF REFERENCE – KEY ISSUES
Site preparation and Construction phase site clearance (burnt garbage) material sourcing and storage, dust control, construction site management, synergy with on-going expansion work
…Key Issues - Operation Phase
Waste collection, sorting,transport, loading Ash handling and disposal HazMat Air dispersion modeling – ambient air quality
and public health in the airshed Occupational Health and Safety issues Focus on Sox, Nox, particulates(TSP,PM10),
PAPS – dioxins and furans Environmental Monitoring Plan Emergency Response Plan
APPROACH TO STUDY Multidisciplinary team Charette style investigation and
analysis Review of existing documentation Field investigations & analysis Air dispersion modeling Public presentation
LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS
Local and International NEPA – Draft air Regs Public Health Airport Operations Waste handling NSWMA – Ash handling and Landfill
guidelines
AIR QUALITY SCREENING MODEL
NEPA requirements – Screening Initial assessment of emission levels and
range of dispersion Compliance with local a/q standards If compliant – no further modeling If non-compliant – recommendations for
a/q control device(s) If major disparity – then detailed
dispersion modeling
SCREENING MODEL ScreenView Software Basic Inputs
Emission stack configuration,i.e. height, internal diameter for respective incinerator
Emission characteristics,i.e. flue gas flow rate, temperature
Emission rates of pollutants (USEPA emission factors)
Findings Parameters Emission Rates,
g/sEmission Rates
mg/m3
Emission Standards mg/m3
Particulate Matter 0.217 152.5 200
Carbon Monoxide 0.019 13.3 100
Sulphur Dioxide 0.204 143.6 300
…Findings
All parameters in compliance with AAQS and PAPs
EXCEPTFuransDioxinsREQUIRES Air Pollution Control (APC)
Device
NAAQG (2x10-8) µg/m3
Results with APC Installed Pollutant Predicted Ambient
Impact, ug/m3 (Annual)
Uncontrolled 2.35 x 10-6
CDD/CDF (Fabric Filter only) 1.88 x 10-7
CDD/CDF (Dry Sorbent Injection/Fabric Filter)
1.17 x 10-8
NAAQG (2x10-8) µg/m3
IMPACTS & MITIGATION
AIR QUALITYISSUES MITIGATION
MEASURESCONSTRUCTION PHASE Dust Emissions from transport & storage of construction materials
Covering trucks & material stockpilesUse of dust masks by workers
OPERATION PHASE Stack emissions - SOX, NOX PAPs and particulates Model indicates these parameters within acceptable limits.
Air pollution control devices - Furans and dioxins comply with the national standards.Scheduled Maintenance & operation
IMPACTS AND MITIGATION WASTE MANAGEMENT
Construction Debris Worker generated waste
Separation & storage Removal by certified
contractors HazMat handling Training re worker
disposal of packaging etc. Chemical toilets & proper
disposal
...WASTE MANAGEMENT Operation Collection, transport,
sorting, loading of waste to incinerator
Ash generation, removal and disposal
Scavenging
Procedures established NSWMA guidelines –
Containerize ash Separate special /medical
waste-get NSWMA and Min Health approval for this component
Security to guard against scavenging
ALTERNATIVES No Action
Not an option Alternative Incinerator
AAJ selection after due diligence – purpose built to meet specs Alternative Sites Disposal Method -
Health guidelines incineration of international waste. Landfill exposure Burial on site – impractical
MONITORING PLAN Ensure compliance with relevant legislation,
implementation of the mitigation measures and long-term minimization of negative environmental impacts.
Programme of stack emission testing including medium term monitoring provisions.
Comprehensive Waste Management Plan- various aspects of the incinerator operations.
Include Emergency Response Plan- specific procedures for dealing with natural and man-made emergencies.