Upload
nevada-brown
View
43
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Individual Freedom vs. Group Welfare. How much control should a democratic government have over an individual’s freedom of action?. Rev. Martin Niemoller. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
How much control should a democratic government have over an individual’s freedom of action?
Individual Freedom vs. Group Welfare
Rev. Martin NiemollerIn Germany they first came for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.
Then they came for me — and by that time no one was left to speak up.
Canadian Bill of Rights (1960)Individuals “remain free only when freedom
is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law.”
The state protects your freedom by restraining mine.
Obligation to obey the lawAmerican democracy “is founded on the principle
that observance of the law is the eternal safeguard of liberty and defiance of the law is the surest road to tyranny. ...Americans are free in short, to disagree with the law, but not to disobey it. For in a government of laws and not of men, no man, however prominent or powerful, and no mob, however unruly or boisterous, is entitled to defy a court of law.” President John F. Kennedy
No justification in disobedience because there is no guarantee that they will disobey only unjust laws.
Right to DisobeyDisobedience does settle some problems,
often for the better. Civil Rights movement of 1950s and 60s.
Brought about an end to legal segregation of African Americans
1955, in Montgomery, Alabama, Rosa Parks arrested and fined for not giving up her seat to a white passenger.
Martin Luther King Jr.King encouraged boycotting the
city’s bus company.Refused to answer violence with
violenceKing argued that it was
permissible to disobey unjust laws that were immoral and broke God’s laws.
Courage and leadership eventually contributed to the removal of legal segregation.
April 4, 1968, MLK Jr. assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee.
Mohandas GandhiBorn in India in 1869. Educated in
England as a lawyer.Moved to South Africa to help
improve position of Asians there.Returned to India in 1914, worked
to improve labour workers conditionsHunger strike
1920 began to work towards independent India.Non-cooperation movement; no
paying taxes, attending schools , hospitals or courts
GandhiBloody riots in 1921 leads Gandhi to teach
non-violence to IndiansMid 1920s protest on salt taxMarch to the coast with thousands of
supportersArrested by BritishHunger strike leads to British compromiseReturns to India to promote individual
disobedience rather than mass disobedience.
1948 assassinated “The light has gone out of our lives and there is darkness everywhere.” Nehru
Nelson Mandela, 1918-Worked with the African National
Congress (ANC) to help end racial segregation (apartheid)
ANC banned in 1960Mandela arrested in 1963, tried for
treason and sentenced to life imprisonment.Violence had become inevitable; he had
offered responsible leadership. Without violence, there would be no way open for African to succeed in struggle against White supremacy. Of the four forms of violence possible, sabotage was chosen...
Frederick W. De Klerk, president of South Africa, freed black prisoners in 1990 as a sign of good will in ending apartheid.
Civil disobedience in CanadaRiel rebellionWinnipeg General Strike 1919Doukhobor rebellion 19291935 On-to-Ottawa trek1960 FLQ crisis1990 Oka crisis
issuesDoes one have a moral responsibility to
disobey unjust laws?If one believes that civil disobedience can
sometimes be justified, what are the limits to its uses?
Is a democratic society ever justified in suspending democratic rights?
Is Canada’s protection of individual rights interfering with our ability to deal with crime?