1
LETTER TO THE EDITOR Incontinence during intercourse: myths unravelled: reply to Serati et al. Swati Jha Published online: 28 April 2012 # The International Urogynecological Association 2012 Dear Editor, We would like to thank Dr Serati and colleagues for their interest in our article [1]. Regarding the prevalence of coital incontinence (CI), Dr Serati references his own paper [2], a review article which failed to look at data from several other studies that quote a much higher prevalence, i.e. Vierhout et al. [3] (34 %), Bo et al. [4] (33 %) and Clark et al. [5] (56 %), to mention but a few. Dr Serati goes on to describe a study by Kahn et al. [6]. Unfortunately the validity of any study which relies on a sample size of 3 is questionable. The subsequent compari- son with their own study [7] is of greater significance. Their study may contradict the findings of ours, but the sample size was only one third that in our study, which may explain the discrepancy. Moreover, a study by El Azab et al. [8] demonstrated findings identical to those in our own series. We therefore conclude, as stated in our paper, that The exact mechanism of coital incontinence remains unclearand requires further research. A systematic review might be better placed to answer this question. We do not feel we have omitted any part of the available evidence, but rather have striven to present the findings of our own study without bias and prejudice in an attempt to unravel the mystery of CI. References 1. Jha S, Strelley K, Radley S (2012) Incontinence during intercourse: myths unravelled. Int Urogynecol J 23:633637. doi:10.1007/s00192- 011-1583-0 2. Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S et al (2009) Female urinary incon- tinence during intercourse: a review on an understudied problem for womens sexuality. J Sex Med 6:4048 3. Vierhout ME, Gianotten WL (1993) Mechanisms of urine loss during sexual activity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 52(1):4547 4. Bo K, Talseth T, Vinsnes A (2000) Randomized controlled trial on the effect of pelvic floor muscle training on quality of life and sexual problems in genuine stress incontinent women. Acta Obstet Gyne- col Scand 79(7):598603 5. Clark A, Romm J (1993) Effect of urinary incontinence on sexual activity in women. J Reprod Med 38(9):679683 6. Kahn Z, Bhola A, Starer P (1988) Urinary incontinence during orgasm. Urology 31:279282 7. Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S et al (2008) Urinary incontinence at orgasm: relation to detrusor overactivity and treatment efficacy. Eur Urol 54:911915 8. El Azab AS, Yousef HA, Seifeldein GS (2011) Coital incontinence: relation to detrusor overactivity and stress incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn This reply refers to the comment available at doi:10.1007/s00192-012- 1787-y . S. Jha (*) Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHSFT, Tree Root Walk, Sheffield, UK S10 2SF e-mail: [email protected] Int Urogynecol J (2012) 23:967 DOI 10.1007/s00192-012-1788-x

Incontinence during intercourse: myths unravelled: reply to Serati et al

  • Upload
    swati

  • View
    216

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Incontinence during intercourse: myths unravelled:reply to Serati et al.

Swati Jha

Published online: 28 April 2012# The International Urogynecological Association 2012

Dear Editor,We would like to thank Dr Serati and colleagues for theirinterest in our article [1]. Regarding the prevalence of coitalincontinence (CI), Dr Serati references his own paper [2], areview article which failed to look at data from several otherstudies that quote a much higher prevalence, i.e. Vierhout etal. [3] (34 %), Bo et al. [4] (33 %) and Clark et al. [5](56 %), to mention but a few.

Dr Serati goes on to describe a study by Kahn et al. [6].Unfortunately the validity of any study which relies on asample size of 3 is questionable. The subsequent compari-son with their own study [7] is of greater significance.Their study may contradict the findings of ours, but thesample size was only one third that in our study, whichmay explain the discrepancy. Moreover, a study by ElAzab et al. [8] demonstrated findings identical to those in ourown series.

We therefore conclude, as stated in our paper, that “Theexact mechanism of coital incontinence remains unclear”and “requires further research”. A systematic review mightbe better placed to answer this question.

We do not feel we have omitted any part of the availableevidence, but rather have striven to present the findings of

our own study without bias and prejudice in an attempt tounravel the mystery of CI.

References

1. Jha S, Strelley K, Radley S (2012) Incontinence during intercourse:myths unravelled. Int Urogynecol J 23:633–637. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1583-0

2. Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S et al (2009) Female urinary incon-tinence during intercourse: a review on an understudied problem forwomen’s sexuality. J Sex Med 6:40–48

3. Vierhout ME, Gianotten WL (1993) Mechanisms of urine loss duringsexual activity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 52(1):45–47

4. Bo K, Talseth T, Vinsnes A (2000) Randomized controlled trial onthe effect of pelvic floor muscle training on quality of life and sexualproblems in genuine stress incontinent women. Acta Obstet Gyne-col Scand 79(7):598–603

5. Clark A, Romm J (1993) Effect of urinary incontinence on sexualactivity in women. J Reprod Med 38(9):679–683

6. Kahn Z, Bhola A, Starer P (1988) Urinary incontinence duringorgasm. Urology 31:279–282

7. Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S et al (2008) Urinary incontinence atorgasm: relation to detrusor overactivity and treatment efficacy. EurUrol 54:911–915

8. El Azab AS, Yousef HA, Seifeldein GS (2011) Coital incontinence:relation to detrusor overactivity and stress incontinence. NeurourolUrodyn

This reply refers to the comment available at doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1787-y.

S. Jha (*)Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHSFT,Tree Root Walk,Sheffield, UK S10 2SFe-mail: [email protected]

Int Urogynecol J (2012) 23:967DOI 10.1007/s00192-012-1788-x