Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Including Homeless Families and Children in the Social Protection System:
A Brief Review of International Experience and an Analysis of Data on the Philippine Pilot Program
David Barua Yap (Asian Institute of Management Policy Center, Philippines)
Child Poverty and Social Protection Conference 10–11 September 2013
2
Overview
1. Primer on the Philippine Cash Transfer Program: Pantawid PamilyangPilipino Program
2. Explanation of the Philippine social protection program for the homeless: Modified Conditional Cash Transfer for the Homeless Street Families or MCCT-HSF
3. Summary of statistics from the pilot implementation of the MCCT-HSF
4. Overview of social protection programs from selected countries
5. Discussion of mechanisms employed by the social protection programs of other countries that could be adopted by the MCCT-HSF
3
Introduction
• The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) is a rights-based and social development program of the national government which aims to contribute to medium-term and long-term poverty reduction efforts.
4
Introduction
• The beneficiaries are identified through a Proxy Means Test.
– The proxy means test was employed to ensure that the basis involved more than just income-based measurements
• As of May 2012, the program has provided financial assistance to almost eight million children belonging to over three million families living below the poverty line.
5
Introduction
• The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) is a conditional cash transfer program. Targeted beneficiaries are given a maximum of P1400 a month for five years provided that the beneficiaries meet the conditionality provisions.
– Education: P300 for every child 3-14 years old, up to a maximum of three children.
– Health: P500 for the household
6
SOCIAL SAFETY NET (POLICIES TO PROTECT)
PUBLIC GOODSREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH POLICY
POVERTY REDUCTION POLICIES (POLICIES TO EMPOWER)
INFRA AND PPPs
7
Conditional Transfers to the Homeless
• The 4Ps, however, is limited to poor families with permanent residences.
– The homeless are beyond the coverage of the 4Ps
• The Modified Conditional Cash Transfer for Homeless Street Families (MCCT-HSF) was designed to extend social protection to the homeless.
– It is designed to provide immediate relief to homeless street families
– It is designed as a means for homeless street families to graduate to the formal CCT program
8
Conditional Transfers to the Homeless
• The MCCT-HSF intends to provide homeless families education grants, health grants, transportation grants, and housing grants.
– Education: P300 for every child 3-14 years old, up to a maximum of three children.
– Health: P500 for the family
– Transportation or Housing Grant: P7000 for the family to either return to their province of origin or avail of affordable housing options.
• The MCCT-HSF also provides families support services. Older children are provided opportunities to enroll in alternative learning programs and accelerated programs to help them return to school.
9
Pilot Implementation of the MCCT-HSF
• The pilot implementation of the MCCT-HSF was conducted during the latter half of 2012.
– The program was implemented in the National Capital Region
– 507 families divided into four batches
– The pilot implementation was conducted from August to November 2012
10
Introduction
• Rapid urbanization has resulted in resulted in a geographically imbalanced growth pattern.
– Over 50% of the Philippine Population live in urban areas
• Over 47 Million
– Economic growth is concentrated in urban centers
11
Introduction
Source: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs
62.52%
56.95%
51.41% 51.71% 52.01% 51.97% 51.35%
37.48%
43.05%
48.59% 48.29% 47.99% 48.03% 48.65%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
RURAL
URBAN
12
Limitations
1. Not all of the respondents elected to answer all of the questions included in the survey.
2. The datasets from the third and fourth batches of the pilot implementation of the survey are incomplete
3. The datasets do not have a lot of continuous variables.
13
Motivations
1. The dataset still has the capacity to reveal important insights into the characteristics and motivations of people who belong to the homeless population of Metro Manila
2. These insights are invaluable to developing the social protection framework that would best address the needs of the homeless.
3. These insights are also critical in ensuring that the programs subsumed within the framework will not incentivize homelessness or create similar adverse systems of incentives.
14
Region of Origin
NCR
CAR Region I
Region II
Region IIIRegion IV-A
Region IV-B
Region V
Region VI
Region VII
Region VIII
Region IX
Region X
Region XI
Region XII
CaragaARMM
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 5 10 15 20 25
Po
vert
y in
cid
en
ce a
mo
ng
fam
ilie
s %
Homeless street families' region of origin %
15
Results from Pilot Implementation
16
Reasons for Being Homeless
10
34
34
54
91
115
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
MARRIAGE / WANT TO LIVE APART
LOSS OF JOB / DEATH OF FAMILY MEMBER WITH JOB
NATURAL DISASTER
FAMILY CONFLICT
DEMOLITION / EVICTION
NO MONEY / NO LIVELIHOOD
17
Length of Homelessness
1
24
33
10
68
51
72
27
145
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
LESS THAN A MONTH
1 TO 3 MONTHS
3 TO 6 MONTHS
6 TO 11 MONTHS
1 TO 3 YEARS
3 TO 4 YEARS
5 TO 7 YEARS
8 TO 10 YEARS
ABOVE 10 YEARS
18
Family Size Statistics
20
50
38
32
17
12
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
FS 2
FS 3
FS 4
FS 5
FS 6
FS 7
FS 8
FS 9+
19
Number of Children
8
52
54
32
15
11
8
1
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
NONE
NC 1
NC 2
NC 3
NC 4
NC 5
NC 6
NC 8
NC 9
20
Homeless Families with Children
8, 4%
175, 96%
NO CHILDREN BELOW 18
WITH CHILDREN BELOW 18
21
Educational Attainment
10
5
67
33
44
25
3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
NO FORMAL EDUCATION
PREPARATORY SCHOOL
ELEMENTARY LEVEL
ELEMENTARY GRADUATE
HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE
COLLEGE
22
Sources of Livelihood
56
37
20
18
11
24
21
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
DRIVER
SCAVENGER
VENDOR
BARKER
LABORER
OTHERS
NONE
23
Programs for the Homeless
• South Africa - Housing for the Poor:
– The South African program for the poor places emphasis on improving the living, specifically housing, conditions of the poorest South Africans. The system provides transitional shelters to the homeless to help them accumulate enough savings to afford housing of their own.
24
Programs for the Homeless
• India – Shelter and Sanitation Facilities
– The Indian program for the homeless is similar to the South African program. The government provides temporary shelters for the homeless. The design of the program was motivated by the desire to provide immediate relief to the homeless.
25
Programs for the Homeless
• Chile - Solidario:
– Solidario is the social protection system of Chile. It was introduced in 2002. The program design was motivated by the recognition of poverty as a multidimensional problem that not only centers on low income but also considers lack of social, economical, human, and psychosocial assets. Beyond cash transfers, Solidario provides psychosocial support to beneficiaries.
26
Programs for the Homeless
• Brazil – Bolsa Familia
– Bolsa Familia shares several characteristics with Solidario. It also goes beyond conditional cash transfers and places emphasis on improving the psychosocial conditions of the poor.
27
Programs for the Homeless
1
• Identification of Eligible Households
• Social Protection Scorecard – Chile
• Specialized Social Assistance Reference Center - Brazil
2• Provision of Cash Transfers and Grants
• Provision of Specialized and Personalized Psychosocial Programs
3
• Provision of Graduation Programs
• Skills Training for Reintegration or better Integration into the (Formal) Labor Market
28
Programs for the Homeless
CountryProgram for the
homeless
Psychosocial
support
Cash
transfer
Temporary
shelters
Subsidized
housing
development
Chile Calle
Chile Solidario
South AfricaDept. of Human
Settlements
Dep’t. of Social
Development
IndiaNight Shelter for
Urban Shelterless
Supreme Court
Brazil CREAS
Bolsa Familia
29
Programs for the Homeless
• High-quality, high-capacity, and cost-efficient temporary shelters are important to providing immediate relief to the homeless.
• Development and implementation of personalized psychosocial support systems for the poor and the homeless.
• Development of an integrated and efficient targeting and monitoring system.
• Inter-agency cooperation.
30
Conclusions
• The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program is a criticalcomponent of the Philippine long-term development agenda.
• The Modified Conditional Cash Transfer for the Homelessenhances the capacity of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Programto provide social protection to the poor who are counted amongthe most socioeconomically vulnerable.
• The surveys have to be improved and implemented properly inorder to ascertain the specific vulnerabilities and motivations ofthe homeless.
31
Questions• Developing better survey instruments for the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program
and the Modified Conditional Cash Transfer for Homeless Street Families is crucial to answering the following questions:
– Who among the homeless are the most vulnerable? What kind of interventions do the homeless street families want? Are these interventions within the ambit of the social protection agenda?
– Are homeless street families open or receptive to specific kinds of interventions such as returning to their respective home provinces?
– How do the beneficiaries respond to being given conditional cash transfers? Do they find the imposition of conditions demeaning?
– Upon determination of the best interventions and the most needy, it is also important to ask: Can the government afford to provide these interventions to most, if not all, the homeless? If not, would it be better to provide adequate relief to as many than to provide meager relief to all?