Upload
phungtuong
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
In vitro anti-leishmanial and anti-trypanosomal activity of hydrazones,
pyrazoles, pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines and pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine,
synthesized from 6-substituted-3-formylchromones
Elier Galarraga1,*, Neudo Urdaneta 1, and Julio C. Herrera1
1 Chemistry department, Simón Bolívar University , 89000 Caracas 1080A,
Venezuela.
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
1
Graphical Abstract
In vitro anti-leishmanial and anti-trypanosomal activity of hydrazones,
pyrazoles, pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines and pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine,
synthesized from 6-substituted-3-formylchromones
2
Abstract
Led by the biological and pharmacological relevance of the 3-
formylchromone derivatives and its interesting chemistry, in this work we present the
synthesis of a series of pyrazoles (4a-c), hydrazones (5a-c), pyrazolo[1,5-
a]pyrimidines (6a, 6b) and one pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine (7) and the report on their in
vitro anti-leishmanial and anti-trypanosomal activity. Chemical results showed that the
formation of regioisomer 7 may arise from an imine intermediary that undergoes 1,4-
addition by attack of C-4' from the pyrazole. To the best of our knowledge, this is the
first report regarding formation of pyrazolo[3,4-b]-pyridines by intramolecular attack of
an sp2 carbon atom.
The in vitro studies were performed against strains of Leishmania mexicana
(bel 21) and Tripanosoma cruzi (DM28). Compounds 5a and 5b showed activity at
micromolar level and good selectivity index (SI) with IC50 values of 6.3 (SI = 3.4) and
15 (SI = 1.9) mM for L. Mexicana and 4.1 (SI = 5.2) and 10 (SI = 3) mM for T. cruzi
respectively. From the above-mentioned, compounds 5a and 5b may be considered
for further chemical modifications in order to increase their activity as potential
antiparasitic agents.
Keywords: Anti-leishmanial, anti-trypanosomal, 6-substituted-3-formylchromones
3
Introduction
The research of compounds with antiparasitic properties is a matter of great
importance. Chaga’s disease is present mostly in countries of South America with about 5-6
million individuals infected and 25 million at risk [1]. Leishmaniasis on the other hand, is a
growing public health problem, with an annual incidence of about 1.3 million cases [2].
Nitrogenated derivatives such as hydrazones, pyrazoles, pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines
and pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridines are widely recognized as an important class of biological active
substances [3-8]. They have shown several biological and pharmacological activities, including
cytotoxic, antitrichomonal, antischistosomal, antichagasic and antimalarial effects. The
presence of these nitrogenated groups is also observed in commercial drugs. Mebendazole
[9], a well known antiparasitic compound, presents amino imidazole and methanone moieties
while the antileishmaial drug allopurinol [10] bears a pyrazolo[1,5-a]-pyrimidine nucleus.
In a previous work, high toxicities of pyrazole 4a-c hydrazones 5a-c pyrazolo[1,5-
a]pyrimidines 6a, 6b and pyrazolo [3,4-b]pyridine 7 compounds were observed against
Artemia salina through the brine shrimp lethality assay (BSLA) [11]. This anti-larvae property
may be indicative of trypanocidal action [12]. In this study we decided to evaluate the in vitro
antileishmanial and antitrypanosomal activity of those nitrogenated derivatives, against strains
of L. mexicana and T. cruzi.
4
Results and discussion
Synthesis
The products 4a-c, 5a-c, 6a and 6b were obtained from the reaction between
equimolar quantities of 3-formylchromone derivatives 1a-c, with the corresponding hydrazines
2a, 2b or aromatic amine 3 in anhydrous THF (Scheme 1).
The pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine 7 was obtained in two steps: the reaction of 1b with 3
produced a precipitate which was then refluxed using AcOH as solvent in presence of I2
(Scheme 1). The formation of regioisomer 8 may arise from an imine intermediary (Scheme 2)
that undergoes 1,4-addition at C-2 by attack of C-4' from the pyrazole instead of the nitrogen
atom N-2'. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report regarding formation of
pyrazolo[3,4-b]-pyridines by intramolecular attack of an sp2 carbon atom.
All reactions were monitored by TLC and obtained in good yields (80–95%). The
compounds were fully characterized using NMR, IR and MS methods; all physical constants and
spectroscopic data were in accordance with those reported in the literature [11,13,14,19].
5
6
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (i) THF, reflux
(2h); (ii) AcOH/I2, reflux (4h)
Scheme 2. Formation of pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine 7
Antileishmanial and anti-trypanosomal activity
The nitrogenated compounds 4a-c, 5a-c, 6a, 6b and 7 were tested for leishmanicidal and
trypanocidal activities. Primary cultures of human dermal fibroblast were used as reference. The
selectivity action of the compound over the parasite was calculated using the selectivity index
(SI), which is expressed as the ratio of IC50 on fibroblast to the IC50 of the corresponding
parasite strain.
As observed in Table 1, all tested compound showed good to moderate activity.
Compound 5a exhibited the strongest antiparasitic activity against both parasites L. mexicana
and T. cruzi with IC50 values of 6.3 ± 0.7 M and 4.1 ± 0.3 M respectively. Compound 5a also
displayed the highest SI with values of 3.4 for L. mexicana and 5.2 for T. cruzi. Therefore, 5a
was the most effective compound tested against both parasites. Compounds 5b and 5c also
exhibited good antiparasitic activity since their IC50 values were relatively low. When 5b was
tested against L. Mexicana, the IC50 was 15 ± 3 M having a SI value of 1.9, while against T.
cruzi the IC50 value was 10 ± 1 M with a SI value of 3. 5c showed activity only for T.cruzi (IC50 =
13 ± 1 M) with SI value of 2. Compounds 4b and 7 exhibited moderate activity against L.
mexicana (IC50 = 25 ± 2 and 35 ± 2 M, respectively) but in the case of compound 7 the
selectivity was poor.
7
8
We compared the antiparasitic results action of 4a-c, 5a-c, 6a-6b and 7 with their
antilarvae properties [11], and found that the most active compounds against L. mexicana
and T. cruzi were also among the most toxic to A. salina. We also evaluated the correlation
between leishmanicidal and trypanocidal activities of the synthesized compounds, using a
linear regression method. There was a significant association (p<0.05) between both
antiparasitic effects. The correlation coefficient was 0.71, indicating a moderately strong
relationship. So the most active compounds could be evaluated in a wider range of parasite
strains.
The strongest antiparasitic activity was found in the series 5a-c, which has a
hydrazone-type structure bearing a 2,4-dinitrophenyl moiety. The hydrazone nucleus has
been found to be important in the leishmanicidal activity [15]. The presence of the nitro
groups could also contribute to the activity since they are able to play a role in antiprotozoal
substances [16-18].
From the above-mentioned, compounds 5a and 5b may be considered for further
chemical modifications, in order to increase their activity and selectivity as potential
antiparasitic agents.
9
Table 1: In vitro leishmanicidal and trypanocidal activities of synthesized compounds
against L. mexicana and T. cruzi.
IC50: concentration of the compound that induces 50% growth inhibition in 48 h. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD; SI:
selectivity index, is defined as the ratio of IC50 on fibroblasts to the IC50 on the corresponding parasite; ND: not determinated.
Comp. L. mexicana T. cruzi Fibroblasts
IC50 (M) SI IC50 (M) SI IC50 (M)
4a 37 ± 4 0.3 57 ± 9 <0.7 11 ± 1
4b 25 ± 2 3.0 > 90 <0.8 73 ± 11
4c 53 ± 13 - 174 ± 60 - ND
5a 6.3 ± 0.7 3.4 4.1 ± 0.3 5.2 22 ± 5
5b 15 ± 3 1.9 10 ± 1 3.0 28 ± 7
5c > 23 1.3 13 ± 1 2.2 29 ± 4
6a 89 ± 9 - 107 ± 25 - ND
6b 60 ± 3 - 93 ± 16 - ND
7 35 ± 2 0.6 35 ± 4 0.6 19.5 ± 0.4
Materials & Methods
General procedure for the synthesis of 4a-c and 5a-c
3-Formylchromone derivative 1a-c (1.0 mmol) was dissolved in hot anhydrous THF (4
mL) and a solution of hydrazines 2a, 2b (1.0 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was added slowly. The
mixture was refluxed for 1–2 h, and once cooled the solid was filtered, washed with water and
recrystallized from absolute EtOH.
General procedure for the synthesis of 6a and 6b
3-Formylchromone derivative 1a or 1c (1.0 mmol) was mixed with aminopyrazole 3
(1.0 mmol) and refluxed in 10 mL of anhydrous THF for 1 h. After cooling, the solid was filtered,
washed repeatedly with hot THF and recrystallized from EtOH to give TLC pure compounds.
General procedure for the synthesis of 7
Equimolar quantities of 1b and 3 (1.0 mmol) were refluxed in anhydrous THF for 1-2
h, until the formation of a precipitate. Once separated from the solution, this precipitate was
dissolved in AcOH (7 mL) in presence of I2 (1.0 mmol) and refluxed for a period of 3-4 h. After
completion of the reaction by TLC, the mixture was poured into crushed ice and treated with
NaHCO3 and Na2SO3. The solid was filtered, washed with cold water and dried.
10
Antileishmanial and antitrypanosomal activity
Epimastigotes of T. cruzi and promastigotes of L. mexicana were grown at 26°C in
liver infusion tryptose (LIT) medium with penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL), and
10% heat-inactivated FBS. A modified MTT assay was used to determine the compounds IC50
on each parasite strain [20]. Briefly, 199 μL per well of exponential growing parasites at a
dilution of 2×106 cells per mL, were trasfered into a 96-well flat-bottom plate, and compounds or
solvents (1 µL compound or DMSO) were added to evaluate different concentrations. Plates
were incubated at 26°C for 48h and 5 days for L. mexicana promastigotes or T. cruzi
epimastigotes respectively. Then, parasites were seeded, the medium was removed, and the
cells were incubated with MTT solution in PBS (0.2 mg/ml for L. mexicana or 0.5 mg/ml for T.
cruzi), F-formazan crystals were dissolved by addition of 100 µL DMSO after plates were
centrifuged and MTT solution was removed. The following equation was used to calculate the
percentage of growth inhibition (%GI):
%GI = [1 – (Ap – Ab)/ Ac – Ab)] × 100
Ap is the absorbance of compound-treated cells, Ac is the absorbance of solvent-
treated cells, and Ab is the absorbance of culture medium. The IC50 value was calculated
applying a sigmoidal analysis when %GI and the corresponding concentration were plotted
using the Origin 8.0® software (OriginLab Corporation). For each condition evaluated at least
three independent assays were performed in triplicate.
11
Conclusions
All synthesized compounds exhibited good to moderate antiparasitic activities
against strains of L. mexicana and T. cruzi.
Compounds 5a and 5b showed the strongest activities with good selectivity
indexes. The results suggest that these molecules are suitable candidates for
further chemical modification and evaluation as potential anti-leishmanial and anti-
trypanosomal agents.
The good correlation exhibited for the results between both parasite lines
indicates that the most active compounds 5a and 5b, could be used in a wider
range of parasite strains.
Finally, the comparison of the antiparasitic results with the previous BSLA study
allowed us to conclude that this anti-larvae test may be a good and inexpensive
tool in predicting trypanocidal action.
12
References
[1] WHO Fact sheet. Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis). March 2016.
[2] WHO Fact sheet N° 375. Leishmaniasis. February 2015.
[3] Senga, K.; Novison, T.; Springer, R.H.; Rao, R.P.; O’Brien, D.E.; Robins R.K.; Wilson, H.R. J. Med. Chem., 1975, 18, 312-314.
[4] Senga, K.; Novison, T.; Wilson, H.R. J. Med. Chem., 1981, 24, 610-613.
[5] Diaz, L.R.S.; Santos, M.B.; Albuquerque, S.; Castro, H. C.; de Souza, A.M.T.; Freitas, A.C.C.; DiVaio, M.A.V.; Cabral, L.M.; Rodrigues, C.R. Bioorg
Med. Chem., 2007, 15, 211-219.
[6] Melnyk, P.; Leroux, V.; Sergheraert, C.; Grellier, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2006, 16, 31-35.
[7] Rathelot, P.; Azas, N.; El-Kashef, H.; Delmas, F.; Di Giorgio, C.; Timon-David, P.; Maldonado, J.; Vanelle, P. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2002, 37, 671-679.
[8] Keter, F.K.; Darkwa, J. BioMetals, 2012, 25, 9-21.
[9] Navarrete-Vazquez, G.; Yepez, L.; Hernandez-Campos, A.; Tapia, A.; Hernandez-Luis, F.; Cedillo, R.; Gonzalez, J.; Martınez-Fernandez, A.;
Martınez-Grueiro, M.; Castillo, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2003, 11, 4615-4622.
[10] Marr, J.J.; Berens, R.L. J. Infect. Dis., 1977, 136, 724-732.
[11] Galarraga, E.; Urdaneta, N.; Gutierrez, K.J.; Herrera, J.C. Z. Naturforsch., 2015. 70, 305-310.
[12] Zani, C.L.; Chavez, P.P.; Queiroz, R.; De Oliveira, A.B.; Cardoso, J.E.; Anjos, A.M.; Grandi, T.S. Phytomedicine 1995, 2, 47-50.
[13] Quiroga, J.; Mejía, D.; Insuasty, B.; Abonía, R.; Nogueras, M.; Sanchez, A.; Cobo, J.; Low, J.N. J. Heterocycl. Chem., 2002, 39, 51-54.
[14] Zimmerman, J.R.; Myers, B.J.; Bouhall, S.; McCarthy, A.; Johntony, O.; Manpadi, M. Tetrahedron Lett., 2014, 55, 936-940.
[15] Martins, F.J.; Lima, R.B.; dos Santos, J.A.; de Almeida Machado, P.; Coimbra, E.S.; da Silva, A.D.; Barboso Raposo, N. R. Lett. Drug Des.
Discovery, 2016, 13, 107-114.
[16] Melloni, P.; Metelli, R.; Bassini D.F.; Confalonieri, C.; Logemann, W.; de Carneri, I.; Trane, F. Arzneimittelforschung, 1975, 25, 9-14.
[17] Esposito, M.; Stettler, R.; Moores, S.L.; Pidathala, C.; Müller, N., Stachulski, A.; Berry, N.G.; Rossignol, J.F.; Hemphill, A. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother., 2005, 49, 3715-3723.
[18] Delmas, F.; Di Giorgio, C.; Robin, R.; Azas, N. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 2002, 46, 2588-2594.
[19] Reddy, G.J.; Latha, D.; Thirupathaiah, C.; Rao, K.S. Heterocycl. Commun., 2003, 9, 391-394.
[20] Novoa, M.L.; Escalante, Y.; Maldonado, L.; Galindo-Castro, I.; Álvarez, A.; Figarella, K; Marsiccobetre, S.; Arocha, I.; Nieves, J.; Salazar, F.; Gámez,
C.; Canudas, N.; Tropper, E.; González, T.; Villamizar, J.E. Nat Prod Res., 2015, 29, 207-212.
13