culture. According to Braddock, it is obvious AlainLocke and art collector Albert Barnes both “insisted

on the interrelationship of modernism and black cul-ture” (6). Curator Alfred Barr or art lovers like Dun-

can Phillips and Gertrude Stein were influential as wellin their own way, considering the selected works they

imported from France, from Henri Matisse to the mostprovocative Cubist paintings, to be exhibited in galler-

ies and museums in the US (81). Collecting as Modern-

ist Practice not only explains how art is consumed, butit also analyzes how art circulates, not freely, but

according to choices made by people who enjoy eitherpower, influence, or fortune. The author not only tells

how things happened, but he also links decisions withconsequences, in a process coined “enlightened patron-

age” (84). Historians of ideas, sociologists of art andculture, and advanced students in cultural studies will

surely benefit from this elegant, well-written book.

–-Yves Laberge

Universit�e Laval

Qu�ebec City, Canada

In the Peanut Gallerywith “Mystery

Science Theater 3000”: Essays on Film,

Fandom, Technology and the Culture of

RiffingRobert G. Weiner and Shelley E. Barba, Editors. Jefferson:

McFarland, 2011.

In the Peanut Gallery is the first scholarly book

that has been written about the Emmy-nominated andPeabody Award-winning cult television series Mystery

Science Theater 3000 (MST3K). The only other bookon the subject is The Mystery Science Theater 3000

Amazing Colossal Episode Guide (1996), a companionthat was treated more like a comedic extension of theseries. In the Peanut Gallery with Mystery Science

Theater 3000 focuses on multiple areas of Americanculture studies, including fandom, the culture of riff-

ing, satire and gender, technology, and history and willserve as a plumb line for any and all future scholarly

work onMST3K.The book is divided into eight parts that are written

by a myriad of credible experts: librarians, researchers,professors, critics, PhD candidates, and pop culture afi-

cionados affiliated with a variety of institutions, includ-ing New York University, Harvard University, MIT,

and the Smithsonian. The book receives its distinctionby including contributions from MST3K founding

member Kevin Murphy andMST3Kwriter/actor MaryJo Pehl. The most interesting article is Matthew H.

Hersch’s “The Semiotics of Spaceflight on the Satelliteof Love.” His essay looks at the space race as a techno-

logical military monstrosity from which the world maynever recover and shows how this vision is mirrored by

MST3K, a show in which a lone man is imprisoned on amilitary-grade satellite and forced to endure experi-ments by his overseers/rulers. Other highlights include

Cynthia J. Miller’s essay on the ten films of Roger Cor-man dissected by Mystery Science Theater, Kris M.

Markman and John Overholt’s fascinating look at howfans work at “Becoming ‘The Right People,’” and edi-

tor Robert G. Weiner’s examination of MST3K direc-tor Jim Mallon’s cheesy 1987 slasher film Blood Hook.

The book succeeds in providing unique insight intoAmerican culture at various times: when the films were

originally made, when the film was riffed on Mystery

Science Theater, and when the book was released.Aside from the blatant spelling and grammatical

errors strewn throughout (the most obvious being twopicture captions: one in which Blood Hook is referred

to as Blook Hook and another in which director RickSloane loses the “e” in his name, then regains it), the

only real criticism for the book is the first essay,“There’s Been an Accident at the Studio: How We

Made Hobgoblins!” by director Rick Sloane. Havingthe firsthand knowledge of a director can greatlyimprove the credibility of any text on American

cinema; however, in this case, it does not. Although therationale for including an article written by a director

of a film riffed by MST3K is understood, this article iscontradictory and inconsistent throughout, much like

Sloane’s Hobgoblins. Scholars should read this chapterwith the understanding that it was written with the

point of view one would expect from a director whosefilm was selected for riffing byMystery Science Theater

3000. Having this chapter first could potentially harmthe book, but most scholars will venture further tolocate subjects relating to their specific interests.

The reviewer highly recommends this work for anyacademic collection of popular culture. Scholars

should start with Miller’s essay, the second article, andthen return to the Sloane essay for an understanding of

what it is like to create a cheesy movie and then see ithumiliated byMST3K.

–-Rodney Donahue

Texas Tech University

Book reviews 143