Implementation of Directive 2004/52 status at the end of 2005 European Commission - DG TREN

Implementation of Implementation of Directive 2004/52Directive 2004/52

status at the end of 2005status at the end of 2005

European Commission - DG TRENEuropean Commission - DG TREN

Commission EuropéenneDirection Générale de l’Énergie et des

Transports

EFC DIRECTIVEEFC DIRECTIVE

1. THE STATUS OF THE DIRECTIVE1. THE STATUS OF THE DIRECTIVE

• Adopted in March 2004 by the Council Adopted in March 2004 by the Council and in April 2004 by the Parliamentand in April 2004 by the Parliament

• In force since end of May 2004In force since end of May 2004

• Should be put in national legislation for Should be put in national legislation for 20 November 200520 November 2005


Transports

COMITE TELEPEAGECOMITE TELEPEAGE

It is a It is a Regulatory CommitteeRegulatory Committee• First meeting December 2004First meeting December 2004• Next meetings foreseen April /June 2005Next meetings foreseen April /June 2005

The The EFC Expert GroupEFC Expert Group advises DG TREN on advises DG TREN on the documents and resolutions proposed the documents and resolutions proposed for adoption by the Commission with the for adoption by the Commission with the assistance of the Regulatory Committeeassistance of the Regulatory Committee


Transports

COMITE TELEPEAGECOMITE TELEPEAGE

Regulatory CommitteeRegulatory Committee limited to the limited to the 25 EU Member States25 EU Member States

Expert GroupExpert Group : 25 MS + candidate : 25 MS + candidate countries (HR – RO – BG – TR) + EFTA countries (HR – RO – BG – TR) + EFTA countries (NO – CH – Iceland) + countries (NO – CH – Iceland) + associations (ASECAP – IRU – ERIC – associations (ASECAP – IRU – ERIC – IRF – ACEA)IRF – ACEA)


Transports

Definition processDefinition process

Project or Expert Group

ReportEUROPEAN

COMMISSION

EFC Expert Group

Advices

Regulatory Committee(vote)

Proposals

yes

DEFINITION

Road Platform

noCOUNCIL OF MINISTERS

WORK PROGRAMWORK PROGRAMUNTIL 2006UNTIL 2006


Transports

Work ProgramWork Program

1. 1. technologiestechnologies supporting the EFC supporting the EFC service and their evolutionservice and their evolution• GNSS / CNGNSS / CN• CEN DSRCCEN DSRC• TelepassTelepass

In the future, after 2006 :In the future, after 2006 :• UMTSUMTS• Galileo vs GPSGalileo vs GPS

Other technologies (infrared…)Other technologies (infrared…)


Transports


WORKING GROUPSWORKING GROUPS• Call launched for CVs of expertsCall launched for CVs of experts• Open until 30 June 2006Open until 30 June 2006• CVs put in a data base where from people are CVs put in a data base where from people are

chosen to buid a task forcechosen to buid a task force• Already around 120 CVs in the data base Already around 120 CVs in the data base • Task forces contracted by EC for limited Task forces contracted by EC for limited

number of days and very detailed working number of days and very detailed working scopescope

• Report endorsed by DG TREN and then Report endorsed by DG TREN and then submitted for comments to the EFC Expert submitted for comments to the EFC Expert GroupGroup


Transports

Working GroupsWorking Groups• 1. 1. DSRC technologiesDSRC technologies led by Jesper Engdahl led by Jesper Engdahl

(RAPP AG)(RAPP AG) Report studied by EFC Expert Group : 8 June 2005Report studied by EFC Expert Group : 8 June 2005

• 2. 2. Classification of vehiclesClassification of vehicles led by Ken Perrett led by Ken Perrett Report finalized 02 / 2005Report finalized 02 / 2005

• 3. 3. enforcement of offensesenforcement of offenses Jean Mesqui (ASFA) Jean Mesqui (ASFA) Report studied by EFC Expert Group : 06 / 2005Report studied by EFC Expert Group : 06 / 2005 MS comments due for 30 November 2005MS comments due for 30 November 2005

• 4. 4. certification centerscertification centers Fransisco Soriano – Fransisco Soriano – (LISITT)(LISITT)

Report provided October 2005, discussed by EFC Report provided October 2005, discussed by EFC expert Group : 7 December 2005expert Group : 7 December 2005


Transports

Working GroupsWorking Groups• 5. 5. GNSS/CN technologies for EFCGNSS/CN technologies for EFC led by led by

Wolfgang Beier (Toll Collect)Wolfgang Beier (Toll Collect) Report studied by EFC Expert Group 06 / 2005Report studied by EFC Expert Group 06 / 2005

• 6. 6. integration of OBU in vehiclesintegration of OBU in vehicles, Mike , Mike Hollingsworth ACEAHollingsworth ACEA

Report provided July 2005 – EFC Expert Group 7 Report provided July 2005 – EFC Expert Group 7 /12/05/12/05

• 7. 7. the role of the financial institutions in the the role of the financial institutions in the system : system : to be definedto be defined

• 8. 8. Verification of the Telepass SpecificationVerification of the Telepass Specification, , follow-up of EG 1 , led by Jesper Engdahlfollow-up of EG 1 , led by Jesper Engdahl

Report provided 09 / 2005, discussed EFC Expert Report provided 09 / 2005, discussed EFC Expert Group March 2006Group March 2006


Transports

Working GroupsWorking Groups

• 9. 9. Specifications for a pan-European satellite Specifications for a pan-European satellite EFC systemEFC system : led by Ian Catling : led by Ian Catling

Report expected end of 2005, discussed EFC expert Report expected end of 2005, discussed EFC expert Group March 2006Group March 2006

• 10. 10. Technologies and specification for Technologies and specification for enforcementenforcement : led by Joao Pecegueiro (Via : led by Joao Pecegueiro (Via Verde – PT)Verde – PT)

Report expected end of 2005, discussed EFC Expert Report expected end of 2005, discussed EFC Expert Group March 2006Group March 2006

• 11. 11. specifications for a pan-European EFc specifications for a pan-European EFc application on microwavesapplication on microwaves led by Bernhard led by Bernhard Oerhy (RAPP AG)Oerhy (RAPP AG)

Report expected end of 2005 / Jan 2006, discussed Report expected end of 2005 / Jan 2006, discussed EFC Expert Group March 2006EFC Expert Group March 2006


Transports

EC Decision on Technical EC Decision on Technical definitionsdefinitions

From the reports of the 10 Groups :From the reports of the 10 Groups :• First DG TREN proposal for a First DG TREN proposal for a

Commission Decision discussed with EFC Commission Decision discussed with EFC Expert Group March / April 2006Expert Group March / April 2006

• Takes only into account elements on Takes only into account elements on TechnologyTechnology

• Internal Consultation Process April / MayInternal Consultation Process April / May• Submitted to the Regulatory Submitted to the Regulatory

Committee : June 2006Committee : June 2006


Transports


RCIRCI• Project for demonstration under the frame of Project for demonstration under the frame of

the 6th RTD FPthe 6th RTD FP• Launched in July 2005 for 36 monthsLaunched in July 2005 for 36 months• Led by ERTICO and involves most of motorway Led by ERTICO and involves most of motorway

and toll operators in Europeand toll operators in Europe• Demonstration of transactions by DSRC as well Demonstration of transactions by DSRC as well

as GNSS / CN with the same onboard unitas GNSS / CN with the same onboard unit• Call for tenders to choose two electronic Call for tenders to choose two electronic

integrators for the OBU : Jan / Feb 2006integrators for the OBU : Jan / Feb 2006• 25 expressions of interest already received25 expressions of interest already received


Transports

CEN DSRC interface

Telepass Interface

CARDME specification

European application(to be defined)

GNSS interface

ISO 17575

MISTER

GPRS interface

HMI interface


Transports

Market strategyMarket strategy

Some elements for the futureSome elements for the future : :• The price between the GNSS part and The price between the GNSS part and

the DSRC part is now very different in the DSRC part is now very different in range of magnitude (400 € versus 20 €)range of magnitude (400 € versus 20 €)

• The Directive does not prevent The Directive does not prevent operators to offer to their clients OBUs operators to offer to their clients OBUs corresponding to their needs corresponding to their needs

CEN DSRC onlyCEN DSRC only CEN DSRC + TELEPASSCEN DSRC + TELEPASS GNSS + DSRCGNSS + DSRC


Transports


• Clients request that these should be used for Clients request that these should be used for all onboard applications which require the all onboard applications which require the same technologiessame technologies

TollingTolling Freight and fleet managementFreight and fleet management Management of dangerous goodsManagement of dangerous goods RoutingRouting … …

Some trucks are already equipped with Some trucks are already equipped with fleet and freight management terminals fleet and freight management terminals containing GPS and GPRScontaining GPS and GPRS


Transports


• Therefore, the OBU designed for EFC Therefore, the OBU designed for EFC should also be open to other should also be open to other applicationsapplications

• And OBUS used for Freight and Fleet And OBUS used for Freight and Fleet Management should be open to tolling Management should be open to tolling applications applications

• Integration of functions is the key to an Integration of functions is the key to an unexpensive EFC OBUunexpensive EFC OBU


Transports


• However, all OBUS used for EFC must be However, all OBUS used for EFC must be certified for the needs of EFC operators, certified for the needs of EFC operators, including all security mechanismsincluding all security mechanisms

• Integration of functions will lead to Integration of functions will lead to integration of the onboard unit in the integration of the onboard unit in the vehicle by manufacturers, when they vehicle by manufacturers, when they construct and deliver the truck or coachconstruct and deliver the truck or coach

• This paves the way to other ITS services This paves the way to other ITS services (emergency call, management of (emergency call, management of dangerous goods…)dangerous goods…)


Transports

CESARE IIICESARE III Projet between ASECAP (PT – AT - DK - ES – FR – Projet between ASECAP (PT – AT - DK - ES – FR –

IT – NO – SLO - EL – HR – HU) and the Stockholm IT – NO – SLO - EL – HR – HU) and the Stockholm group (UK – NL – DE – SV – FI – CH – SLO)group (UK – NL – DE – SV – FI – CH – SLO)

Follow-up of CESARE I and IIFollow-up of CESARE I and II Cesare II has provided important results for Cesare II has provided important results for

cooperation between road concessionnaires cooperation between road concessionnaires levying tollslevying tolls

Results applied in PISTA inside ES and between Results applied in PISTA inside ES and between ES and FRES and FR

CESARE III aims to adapt CESARE II to the needs CESARE III aims to adapt CESARE II to the needs of the Stockholm group organizationsof the Stockholm group organizations


Transports

CESARE IIICESARE III

Aims of the project :Aims of the project :• Service definitionService definition• Procedural interoperabilityProcedural interoperability• Memorandum of understanding between Memorandum of understanding between

operatorsoperators• Single contract with clientsSingle contract with clients• Service conditionsService conditions


Transports

CESARE IIICESARE III Structure of the projectStructure of the project : :

• WP 1and 2WP 1and 2 : revise business model and provide : revise business model and provide service definitionservice definition

• WP 3 and 4WP 3 and 4 : organisational arrangements and : organisational arrangements and documents for contractual interoperability documents for contractual interoperability between operators of all kindsbetween operators of all kinds

• WP 5WP 5 : procedural interoperability : procedural interoperability• WP 6WP 6 : liaison with external bodies like the : liaison with external bodies like the

Comité TélépéageComité Télépéage• Duration 18 months starting April 2005Duration 18 months starting April 2005• Contact : Claude Bidaud (ASF – France)Contact : Claude Bidaud (ASF – France)

Tel : +33.1.72.71.90.20Tel : +33.1.72.71.90.20 [email protected]@asf.fr


Transports

CESARE IIICESARE III End of the project : October 2006End of the project : October 2006 Results of the project discussed EFC Expert Group Results of the project discussed EFC Expert Group

December 2006 December 2006 Preparation of the Commission Decision related to Preparation of the Commission Decision related to

contractual and procedural issues in Jan 2007contractual and procedural issues in Jan 2007 Commission Decision discussed EFC Expert Group Commission Decision discussed EFC Expert Group

Feb 2007Feb 2007 Internal EC process for adoption Feb / April 2007Internal EC process for adoption Feb / April 2007 Submitted to the Regulatory Committee Submitted to the Regulatory Committee

May 2007May 2007


Transports

Work ProgramWork Program 3. Pan-European 3. Pan-European Certification proceduresCertification procedures and and

label for equipment, including those for label for equipment, including those for enforcement of violationsenforcement of violations• Onboard units (key issue)Onboard units (key issue)• Enforcement tools providing the evidence of the offenceEnforcement tools providing the evidence of the offence• Integration of OBU in the vehiclesIntegration of OBU in the vehicles

Need a Need a network of certification centersnetwork of certification centers and and common procedurescommon procedures

How to do itHow to do it ? ?• project to launch by DG TREN under a call for tenders in project to launch by DG TREN under a call for tenders in

20062006• Specs prepared by Expert Group 4Specs prepared by Expert Group 4


Transports


4. 4. Exception handlingException handling • VERA 2 leads to :VERA 2 leads to :

new EC draft Directivenew EC draft Directive Because no MS has started to implement the Council Because no MS has started to implement the Council

Decision of 8/5/03Decision of 8/5/03 eNFORCE network : eNFORCE network : deployment of a first version with deployment of a first version with

AT – ES – FR – NL under preparation (AT – ES – FR – NL under preparation (VERA 3VERA 3)) Certification proceduresCertification procedures for the equipment for the equipment

• But VERA 2 might be more efficient for criminal But VERA 2 might be more efficient for criminal offences than for civil ones like EFCoffences than for civil ones like EFC

• Therefore, MS should do their best to fight Therefore, MS should do their best to fight fraud on their own territoryfraud on their own territory


Transports

Thanks for your attentionThanks for your attention

Documents

Implementation of Directive 2004/52 status at the end of 2005 European Commission - DG TREN