UCM 60202U2 ASSESSMENT BRIEF
POSTER AND ORAL PRESENTATION
Students are required to form pairs of two (2) or a maximum of 3
people in a group. In your respective pair, you are required to
present your literature search in a specific presentation format
(scientific poster and oral presentation of the poster topic). Each
pair is to come up with ONE scientific poster based on a selected
literature topic that is relevant to the main theme provided in the
next section. However for the oral presentation, it should be
presented individually.The assessment marks will be shared by all
group members for Poster designing (10%) while the assessment marks
will be based on each individual students presentation for Oral
component (10%).
POSTER THEME AND CONTENTThe general theme for your poster is
Historical Building or Historical Architecture.Assessment: GROUP
ASSESSMENT (10%)1. Choose and analyze ONE building or architecture
that has historical essence. The chosen building/architecture must
be unique. Each pair is to submit their topic to the lecturer in
Week 2 based on first come first served basis.
2. You may present on the aspects of its historical or societal
background, structure plan/layout/concept, functions or
contributions of the building and any other features that relate to
architecture. Below are some ideas on how you can expand the
descriptions of the chosen building/architecture:
a. What introduce or provide a brief summary of the buildingb.
Why the significant of the building/architecturec. Who the
people/society involved; the architect/builder?d. When the
time/period setting e. How the functions or use of the
building/architecturef. Where location which
area/country/civilizationg. Others feel free to include interesting
facts/analysis based on your creativity3. Poster format:
a. A3 size
b. Scientific poster format
4. Each poster should include:a. Clear sections (a minimum of
three (3) that you want to highlight on your selected topic)
b. Information about the members in the pair: Full Name and
Schools Address and Taylors Logo
c. A list of all references i. A minimum of five (5)
references
ii. Attached on a separate page after conclusioniii. Provide
information of the referred sources:
1. Name of original author/owner/institution/organisation. 2.
Date of publication/date of released of information3. Title of the
sources4. Website links (if applicable)5. Date of access of
information (when referring to websites only)SUBMISSION
Students are required to submit the poster in .png, .jpeg or any
other suitable format. (Please remember your document should be
able to be opened in multiple devices and doesnt require a download
of external or uncommon software to be accessed.)
Poster submission due date: Week 6 (5th May 2015; Tuesday) to
[email protected]
You can refer to Scientific Poster Formatting for more
clarification (Links for Format will be posted in the TiMES module
page.
VISUAL-ORAL PRESENTATION
Assessment: INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT (10%)Students are required to
record and upload their presentation, with each student allocated 2
- 4 minutes each to cover the required content on the selected
sections of the topic. Each group can have a set of shared slides,
but the assessment will be on individual basis.The recorded oral
presentation can be by group or individual. Uploaded video links
and a copy of the slides used should be submitted by 8th May
2015.
Each Presentation should also include:
1. Student Introduction.
2. Concise explanation of the chosen building/architecture.
3. Additional video enhancement (to present the topic in a more
creative manner)4. Examples of specific resources and sources used
in your information collection activity (different for each person
in the pair)
SUBMISSION
Students are required to present the content from a streaming
platform (Youtube, Dailymotion, Vimeo,ect). In the recorded visual,
students may present the poster, a prepared slide show of the
poster content, or any appropriate delivery methods. Oral
presentation due date: Week 6 (8th May 2015; Friday) to
[email protected] (Oral)
Presentation Marking Rubric:CriteriaExcellent (5)Good (4)Neutral
(3)Fair (2)Poor (1)Score
Presentation-Clear and concise. Presentation flow is interesting
and information was not repetitive or diverted from the
presentation content.
-Minimal reference to the slides.
-Questions answered based on referred resources:
1. Sources explained with apparent understanding of the
content.
2. Sources selected relates to the selection of the app.-Clear
and concise. Presentation of information was slightly repetitive
and sometimes diverted from the presentation content.
-Minimal reference to the slides with some obvious glancing at
the slides.
-Questions answered based on referred resources:
1. Sources explained with general understanding of the
content.
2. Sources selected generally relates to the selection of the
app.-Content was somewhat clear but requires some explanation for
clarity.
- Reference to the slides with some obvious glancing at the
slides.
-Questions answered based on referred resources:
1. Sources explained with slight understanding of the
content.
2. Sources selected somewhat relates to the selection of the
app.- Content was explained but requires a lot of explanation for
clarity.
-Most of the presentation content is being read off the
slides.
-Questions answered based on referred resources:
1. Sources explained with limited understanding of the
content.
2. Sources selected barely relates to the selection of the
app.-Presentation does not show any knowledge of the topic
selected
-Slides are not conducive in providing related information.
-Questions answered based on referred resources:
1. Sources explained with no understanding of the content.
2. Sources selected does not relate to the selection of the
app.
Referred Content
All referred content are from credited sources of suitable
accuracy and authority.Most of the main referred content is from
credited sources of suitable accuracy and authority.Less than half
of the referred content is from credited sources of suitable
accuracy and authority.Barely any referred content are from
credited sources of suitable accuracy and authority.None of the
referred content is from credited sources of suitable accuracy and
authority.
Presentation Aid-All expected components are present, clearly
laid out, and easy to follow in the absence of the presenter.
-Text is concise, free of spelling or typographical errors;
background is unobtrusive.
-Figures and tables are appropriate and labeled correctly.
-Photographs/tables/graphs improve understanding and enhance
visual appeal.-All components are present, but layout is crowded or
confusing to follow in absence of presenter.
-Text is relatively clear, mostly free of spelling and
typographical errors; background is unobtrusive.
-Most figures and tables are appropriate and labeled
correctly.
-Photographs/ tables/graphs improve understanding-Most expected
components are present, but layout is confusing to follow in the
absence of the presenter.
-Text is relatively clear, but some spelling and typographical
errors; background may be distracting.
-Figures and tables not always related to text, or are not
appropriate, or poorly labeled.
-Photographs/ tables/graphs were limited and do not improve
understanding.-Some expected components are present, but layout is
untidy and confusing to follow in the absence of the presenter.
-Text is hard to read due to font size or color, some spelling
and typographical errors; background may be distracting.
-Figures and tables not related to text, or are not appropriate,
or poorly labeled.
-Photographs/ tables/graphs limited and do not improve
understanding.-Some of the expected components are present, but
poorly laid out and confusing to follow in the absence of the
presenter.
-Text hard to read, messy and contains multiple spelling
and typographical errors; very poor background.
-Figures and tables poorly done.
-Visual aids not used.
Total score
Marking calculations: Total marks/15 x 10= Percentage gained out
of 10 %
