I.B.1. Cayetano v

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    1/12

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    2/12

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    3/12

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    4/12

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    5/12

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    6/12

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    7/12

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    8/12

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    9/12

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    10/12

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    11/12

  • 7/29/2019 I.B.1. Cayetano v

    12/12

    Page 12 of12

    there is no occasion for the exercise of the Court's corrective power,

    since no abuse, much less a grave abuse of discretion, that wouldamount to lack or excess of jurisdiction and would warrant the

    issuance of the writs prayed, for has been clearly shown.

    Additionally, consider the following:

    (1) If the Commission on Appointments rejects anominee by the President, may the Supreme Court

    reverse the Commission, and thus in effect confirmthe appointment? Clearly, the answer is in the

    negative.

    (2) In the same vein, may the Court reject thenominee, whom the Commission has confirmed? Theanswer is likewise clear.

    (3) If the United States Senate (which is theconfirming body in the U.S. Congress) decides to

    confirm a Presidential nominee, it would be incrediblethat the U.S. Supreme Court would still reverse the

    U.S. Senate.

    Finally, one significant legal maxim is:

    We must interpret not by the letter that killeth, but by

    the spirit that giveth life.

    Take this hypothetical case of Samson and Delilah. Once, theprocurator of Judea asked Delilah (who was Samson's beloved) for

    help in capturing Samson. Delilah agreed on condition that

    No blade shall touch his skin;

    No blood shall flow from his veins.

    When Samson (his long hair cut by Delilah) was captured, theprocurator placed an iron rod burning white-hot two or three inches

    away from in front of Samson's eyes. This blinded the man. Uponhearing of what had happened to her beloved, Delilah was beside

    herself with anger, and fuming with righteous fury, accused theprocurator of reneging on his word. The procurator calmly replied:

    "Did any blade touch his skin? Did any blood flow from his veins?"

    The procurator was clearly relying on the letter, not the spirit of the

    agreement.

    In view of the foregoing, this petition is hereby DISMISSED.

    SO ORDERED.

    Fernan, C.J., Grio-Aquino and Medialdea, JJ., concur.

    Feliciano, J., I certify that he voted to dismiss the petition. (Fernan,C.J.)

    Sarmiento, J., is on leave.

    Regalado, and Davide, Jr., J., took no part.