Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GC WWW.GoodnightConsulting.com
Goodnight Consulting, Inc.8418 Hunt Valley Drive, Suite 200 Vienna, Virginia 22182Voice: (703) 448-6820 Fax: (703) 448-8443 Voice: (703) 448-6820 Fax: (703) 448-8443 1
Operating Organization StructuresFor Nuclear Power
International Atomic Energy Agency
IAEA Regional Workshop IAEA Regional Workshop –– Strategic Planning of Strategic Planning of Sustainable Human ResourcesSustainable Human Resources
Santa Domingo, Dominican RepublicSanta Domingo, Dominican Republic2121––25 Sept 200925 Sept 2009
2September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Presentation Outline
• Perspectives On Organizational Structures
• Organizational Structures – Stand Alone
• Organizational Structures - Fleets
• Conclusions
3September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Many Different Organizational Structures Are Applied By Nuclear Power Operating Entities
• After working for more than 30 USA and international nuclear power operating companies, we have seen many different organizational structures
• Although they are different, many appear to work well, as shown by:– High levels of plant performance– Relatively low cost of operations– Good reviews by national nuclear regulatory agencies– Good reviews by international organizations (WANO)
• This presentation provides examples and discussion materials for nuclear operating organizations
– USA (Stand-alone and Fleet models)– Europe (Fleet Models)
4September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Goodnight Consulting, Inc. Maintains Organizational Databases Related To Nuclear Plant Operations
• In the USA, there are 26 commercial nuclear power generation companies, with 67 sites and a total of 104 operating reactors
• Our nuclear power organizational database includes information from 17 of these 26 companies (65%)
• We also have organizational information from 4 international nuclear power companies, three of which are from Europe
• Individual plant/company organizational information is confidential, but the information included in this presentation is aggregated sufficiently to protect the identity of each of the nuclear plants’ operators
5September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Layers Of Management Can Affect Internal Communications And Impact Staffing Levels
• Assuming “layers or management” are defined as the number of people above the
– Several organizations typically have fewer layers of management:
Engineering:• 1st line Supervisors/Principal Engineers• Discipline Engineering Manager (Design, Sys)• Director of Engineering• Site Vice President/Chief Nuclear Officer
Quality/Oversight• Quality Assurance Supervisors• Quality Assurance Manager• Site Vice President/Chief Nuclear Officer
• Assuming “layers or management” are defined as the number of people above the individual contributor up to, and including, the senior nuclear officer:
– Several organizations typically have 5 layers of management:
Maintenance:• 1st line Supervisors• Discipline (Elect, Mech, I&C) Superintendent• Maintenance Manager• Plant Manager• Site Vice President/Chief Nuclear Officer
Operations• Shift Supervisor• Shift Manager• Operations Manager• Plant Manager• Site Vice President/Chief Nuclear Officer
6September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Very Large Or Very Small Spans of Control Can Create Problems (Example From A USA Plant)
3- Performance Excellence
X%X%X%X%Benchmark Percent
7%23%43%27%Client Percent
8264931Total
22- Nuclear Licensing
22- Nuclear QA
56- Training
1Org Effectiveness - Director
1- Controller
21- Supply Chain
11- Business Apps
12- Strategic Planning
1Nuclear Support
>158-154-7<4
NUMBER OF MGRs/SUPVs WITH SPANS OF CONTROL……
PLANT ORGANIZATIONS (Continued)
41- Nuclear System Engr
21- Performance Engr
21- Nuclear Fuels
12- Engr FIRST Team
211- Plant Support Engr
1Nuclear Engineering -Director
7185- Maintenance
286- Rad Protection/Chem
5121- Operations
122- Outage Mgt/WC
1Nuclear Production -Director
1Vice President
>158-154-7<4
NUMBER OF MGRs/SUPVs WITH SPANS OF CONTROL……
PLANT ORGANIZATIONS
7September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Functional Alignment Is Also An Important Aspect Of Nuclear Organizational Design
• Direct reports to the Site VP are fairly standardized, however several organizational groupings at the next level vary by company
– RP and Chemistry are separate at most plants, but some do have them combined
– Maintenance Planning is found either in Work Control, or Maintenance; both approaches appear effective
– Engineering First Team may be appropriate given plant age and equipment reliability issues
– Document Control may be found in either an Engineering or a Site Support organization
– Engineering Programs typically found in a Technical Engineering Group– Reactor Engineering typically found in either Systems Engineering or
Operations (rarely)– Training typically found as a direct report to the Plant Manager or the
Director of Plant Support
8September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Presentation Outline
• Perspectives On Organizational Structures
• Organizational Structures – Stand Alone
• Organizational Structures - Fleets
• Conclusions
9September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
A Typical USA Nuclear Organizational Design Includes The Major Functional Organizations Reporting To A Senior Officer
Site VP
Plant Operations Engineering Support Services Quality/Oversight Strategic
Projects
Budget/Finance
• In Some European nuclear organizations, the financial leader is a peer to the technical leader, working to ensure that there is a increased focus on costs
• Many European nuclear organizations also outsource many functions directly to the vendors that design and build components and systems
• On the next page, a more detailed version of this USA model is provided…
10September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
This Organizational Model Incorporates The Most CommonUSA Approaches, And Can Be Applied At 1- or 2-Unit Sites
Site VP
Plant Operations Engineering Support Services Quality/Oversight Strategic Projects
Operations
Maintenance
Chemistry
Rad. Protection
Work Control
Design Engineering
Systems Engineering
Technical Engineering
Licensing
Doc Control/Records
Quality Assurance
Quality Control/NDE
Nuclear Safety Review
S/G Replacement
Turbine Rotor
Extended PowerUprate
SAPImplementation
Etc.
Human Resources
Information Systems
Supply Chain
Security
EmergencyPlanning
Project Management
Rx Engr &Nuc Fuels
Admin/Clerks
Training
Budget/Finance
11September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Presentation Outline
• Perspectives On Organizational Structures
• Organizational Structures – Stand Alone
• Organizational Structures - Fleets
• Conclusions
12September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
We Have Analyzed Many USA And Some European Nuclear Fleet Operating Characteristics
• Goodnight Consulting, Inc. has collected and analyzed nuclear fleet operating characteristics
– Organizational approaches– Areas of standardization– “Key Enablers” for success
• Information was collected from 7 U.S. and 1 European nuclear fleets, in addition to the client– E-On (Germany) - Dominion– Duke - FENOC– Exelon - Progress Energy– TVA - Nuclear Management Company
13September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
There Is Consistency In 4 Service Areas Provided By Parent Companies To Nuclear Fleets
Legend: Activity partially performed at company corporate above nuclear, and partially by nuclear corporateActivity performed by company corporate above nuclear, and nuclear personnel supporting the activity report to company corporate
Non-Nuclear Corporate ServicesFleet A Fleet B Fleet C Fleet D Fleet E Fleet F Fleet G Fleet I
Budget/Finance/Payroll
Communications/Pub Affairs
Environmental
Human Resources
Industrial Safety
Information Technology
Legal
Records Management
Supply Chain
e e e ee
14September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
There Is Variety In Centralized Nuclear Corporate Functions (1 of 3 pages)
Legend: Activity partially centralized within nuclear corporate level, partially performed by staff on-site at plant
Activity performed only at corporate nuclear
Centralized Nuclear Corporate ServicesFleet A Fleet B Fleet C Fleet D Fleet E Fleet F Fleet G Fleet I
Budget/Finance/Payroll
Chemistry
Centralized Maintenance
Communications/Pub Affairs
Employee Concerns
Emergency Preparedness
Engineering - Mods
Engineering - Programs e e
15September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
There Is Variety In Centralized Nuclear Corporate Functions (2 of 3 Pages)
Legend: Activity partially centralized within nuclear corporate level, partially performed by staff on-site at plantActivity performed only at corporate nuclear
Centralized Nuclear Corporate ServicesFleet A Fleet B Fleet C Fleet D Fleet E Fleet F Fleet G Fleet I
Environmental
Human Resources
Information Technology
Legal
Licensing/Reg Affairs
Nuclear Fuels
Outage Planning/Scheduling
Process Improvement In Progress
p
16September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
There Is Variety In Centralized Nuclear Corporate Functions (3 of 3 Pages)
Legend: Activity partially centralized within nuclear corporate level, partially performed by staff on-site at plant
Activity performed only at corporate nuclear
Centralized Nuclear Corporate ServicesFleet A Fleet B Fleet C Fleet D Fleet E Fleet F Fleet G Fleet I
Projects/Project Management In Progress
Quality Assurance/QC
Radiation Protection Program
Safety/Health
Security
Supply Chain
Training In Progress
17September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Nuclear Fleets Have Centralized Many Activities And Realized Significant HR Efficiencies
• 19 functional areas were consistently found at the corporate nuclear level and are key to realizing economies of scale that produce labor savings
– Budget/Finance - Licensing
– Chemistry - Nuclear Fuels
– Communications/Pub Affairs - Outage Planning/Scheduling
– Employee Concerns - Projects
– Emergency Preparedness - Quality Assurance
– Engineering – Modifications - Radiation Protection (Program & Dosimetry)
– Engineering – Programs - Safety/Health
– Human Resources - Security
– Information Technology - Supply Chain
- Training
18September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
There Is Variety In Where Nuclear Fleets Have Applied Standardization
Legend: Activity partially standardized (either intentionally leaving flexibility to each plant site, or due to the standardization process currently incomplete
Activity is completely standardized
Nuclear Fleet Standardization AreasFleet A Fleet B Fleet C Fleet D Fleet E Fleet F Fleet G Fleet I
Corrective Action
Document Control
Information TechnologyEngineering Design Change Process Plant Organizations/ Reporting Chains
Procedures In Progress
Quality Assurance
Safety Management
Security
Training
Work Control In Progress
19September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Areas Of Nuclear FleetStandardization Summary
• 10 areas of standardization are consistently found at other nuclear fleets and were identified as key to supporting a fleet operations model
– Corrective Action - Quality Assurance
– Information Technology - Safety Management
– Engineering Design Change Process - Security
– Procedures (Some) - Training
– Plant Organizations/Structures - Work Control
20September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Nuclear Fleets Identified 7 Consistent “Key Enablers”But Some Are Driven By Each Company’s Culture
Legend: Key enabler area is an important element of the fleet, but not fully implemented
Key enabler is fully implemented and seen as a critical element of success
Key Enablers Identified For Nuclear Fleet OperationsFleet A Fleet B Fleet C Fleet D Fleet E Fleet F Fleet G Fleet I
Collective Motivation Program
Company Size Minimum
IT - Single Point/Enterprise
Manager RotationsFrequent & Clear CommunicationsPeer Teams/Internal Benchmarking
Process Standardization In Progress
One Culture
Organizational ConsistencySeparation of O&M vs Common Services
Strategic/Life Cycle Planning
21September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
“Key Enablers” of Success Summary
• 7 “Key Enablers” were consistently identified by nuclear fleet management
– Standardized Information Technology (IT) Approach/Single Point Implementation
– Frequent & Clear Communications
– Peer Teams/Internal Benchmarking
– Process Standardization
– One Culture
– Organizational Consistency
– Strategic/Life Cycle Planning
22September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
Presentation Outline
• Perspectives On Organizational Structures
• Organizational Structures – Stand Alone
• Organizational Structures - Fleets
• Conclusions
23September 2009International Atomic Energy Agency
We Developed Several Conclusions About Organizational Issues After Analyzing Many Different Companies
• While many different organizational approaches may be successful, several key principals should be applied:
– Minor differences are needed for a 1-unit compared to a 2-unit site• Larger operations shift contingents, but same structures, at multi-unit sites• Larger maintenance contingents, but same structures, at multi-unit sites• Application of “shared services” approach for site support functions
– Fleets of plants offer efficiencies• Centralization of non-site functions• Economies of scale in the application of human resources
– Keep the organization shape in balance• Neither too many, nor too few, layers of management (about 5-6)• Neither too many, nor too few spans of control (about 7-10)• Align related functions aligned under the same leadership