Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Study Area
Broadway Rd
Roeser Rd
University Dr
Broadway Rd
Southern Ave
Baseline Rd Baseline Rd
Guadalupe Rd
Grove Pkwy
Elliot Rd
Warner Rd
Ray Rd
Chandler Blvd Chandler Blvd
Knox Rd
Ray Rd
S 24th St
S 16th St
S 48th St
S 40th St
S 32nd St
S 48th St
S 40th St
Priest Dr
Hardy Dr
Rural Rd
Mill Ave
Priest Dr
Rural Rd
Kyrene Rd
Phoenix
Tempe
Chandler
Guadalupe
South Mountain Park
Salt River
Western Canal
Map not to scale
Study Area
LEGEND
PreviousStudies
These previous studies have informed the current I-10 Broadway Curve Study. Some of the I-10 Broadway Curve proposed improvements were ini�ally iden�fied in these earlier studies.
2009 I-10 Corridor Improvement Study
2014 I-10/I-17 Maricopa Associa�on of Governments “Spine” Corridor Master Plan
2014 I-10 Near-Term Improvement Study
2019 I-10 Broadway Curve Study
What isNEPA?
The Na�onal Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires an analysis of impacts to the natural and human environment for all federally funded projects, and a descrip�on of ways to avoid, minimize or mi�gate these impacts. NEPA’s goal is to protect, restore, and enhance the natural and human environment while engaging the public and stakeholders through the decision-making process.
ADOT was granted NEPA assignment in April 2019.
The current study is known as an Environmental Assessment (EA) and is required by NEPA.
Purposeand Need
The Preferred Alterna�ve would address the needs in the study area by:
• Maintaining the current func�onality and mobility of the I-10 corridor
• Providing regional mobility and access for economic centers
• Accommoda�ng current and planned system linkages for bus services using I-10
The purpose of the I-10 Broadway Curve project is to improve traffic opera�ons and reduce conges�on on I-10 while maintaining regional mobility and access for economic centers and providing an improved transporta�on system linkage.
StudyOutcomes
The study outcome is for ADOT to choose an alterna�ve. There are two poten�al alterna�ves: • Preferred Alterna�ve • No Build Alterna�ve – The Condi�on that would exist if ADOT did nothing (used for comparison).
After the comment period for the Draft EA, a Final EA will be prepared that will respond to all comments and identify ADOT’s selected alternative.
NEW COLLECTOR-DISTRIBU
TOR RO
ADS
1 H
OV
LAN
E +
4 G
ENER
AL P
URP
OSE
LAN
ES +
AU
XILI
ARY
LAN
ES
2 HOV LANES + 6 GENERAL PURPOSE LANES + AUXILIARY LANES
60
14310
10
17
24TH
ST
16TH
ST
32N
D S
T
40TH
ST
UNIVERSITY DR
BROADWAY RD
SOUTHERN AVE
BASELINE RD
GUADALUPE RD
ELLIOT RD
WARNER RD
RAY RD
CHANDLER BLVD
SALT RIVERBRIDGE WIDENING
SR143 INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION & NEW HOV DIRECT CONNECTOR I-10 TO SR143
NEW BROADWAY RD BRIDGE
NEW 48TH ST BRIDGE
PreferredAlterna�ve
Exis�ng Freeway
2 HOV Lanes +6 General Purpose Lanes +Auxiliary Lanes
1 HOV Lane +4 General Purpose Lanes +Auxiliary Lanes
New Collector - Distributor RoadsEB SR143 to Baseline Rd. & WB Baseline Rd. to SR143 & 40th St
Widened Facility(to connect to I-10 improvements)
Poten�al New Pedestrian Bridge
EnvironmentalResources
The following environmental resources have been studied as part of the Dra� EA: • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Drainage and Floodplain Considera�ons • Hazardous Materials • Land Ownership, Jurisdic�on, and Land Use • Noise • Sec�on 4(f) Resources • Secondary and Cumula�ve Impacts • Social and Economic Considera�ons • Title VI and Environmental Jus�ce • Traffic and Transporta�on • U�li�es • Visual Resources • Wetlands and Waters of the U.S.
LEGENDProposed Roadways
Approximate Study Area Boundary
Proposed BridgesExisting BridgesProposed Trails
Scale in Miles
0.25 0.50
4 + 1 HOV + 1 AUX 6 + 2 HOV + 3 CD
P R O P O S E D
E X I S T I N G
143
Hohokam Expy.
Broadway Rd.
52nd
St.
55th St.48th
St.
Pries
t Dr.
San Francisco Canal
University Dr.
6 + 2 HOV + 1 AUX
Eastbound Lanes
P R O P O S E DE X I S T I N G
4 + 1 HOV + 1 AUX
14th St.Westbound Lanes
Eastbound Lanes
3 + 1 HOV + 2 AUX
6 + 2 HOV + 2 CD
P R O P O S E DE X I S T I N G
Westbound Lanes
4 + 1 HOV + 2 AUX 6 + 2 HOV + 3 CD
P R O P O S E D
E X I S T I N G
ApproximateStudy AreaBoundary
KEY MAP
Not to Scale
New Trail Bridge
SR 143 ProposedImprovements
LEGENDProposed Roadways
Approximate Study Area Boundary
Proposed BridgesExisting BridgesProposed Trails
Scale in Miles
0.25 0.50
New TrailNew Trail New Trail Bridge
48th
St.
Pries
t Dr. Ha
rdy D
r.
Baseline Rd.
Southern Ave.
60
Eastbound Lanes
3 + 1 HOV + 2 AUX
6 + 2 HOV + 2 CD
P R O P O S E DE X I S T I N G
Eastbound Lanes
3 + 1 HOV + 3 CD
4 + 1 HOV + 4 CD
P R O P O S E DE X I S T I N G
Eastbound Lanes
3 + 1 HOV + 1 AUX6 + 1 HOV
P R O P O S E DE X I S T I N G
Westbound Lanes
6 + 1 HOV 6 + 2 HOV + 3 CD
P R O P O S E D
E X I S T I N G
ApproximateStudy AreaBoundary
KEY MAP
Not to Scale
Westbound Lanes
3 + 1 HOV + 3 CD 4 + 1 HOV + 4 CD
P R O P O S E D
E X I S T I N G
Westbound Lanes
5 + 1 HOV + 1 AUX
P R O P O S E D
3 + 1 HOV + 1 AUX
E X I S T I N G
New Trail Bridge
Western Canal
Highline Lateral Canal
Aven
ida d
el Ya
qui
ProposedImprovementsat US 60
Collector-Distributor(C-D) Roads
MAINLINE
C – D ROAD
NoiseMi�ga�on
• A noise analysis was conducted to determine loca�ons where noise levels are projected to exceed state and federal standards.
• As a result, seven new proposed noise barriers are recommended, where feasible and reasonable, to provide noise reduc�on.
Broadway Rd
Roeser Rd
University Dr
Broadway Rd
Southern Ave
Baseline Rd Baseline Rd
Guadalupe Rd
Grove Pkwy
Elliot Rd
Warner Rd
Ray Rd
Chandler Blvd Chandler Blvd
Ray Rd
S 24th St
S 16th St
S 48th St
S 40th St
S 32nd St S 48th St
S 40th St
Priest Dr
Hardy Dr
Rural Rd
Mill Ave
Priest Dr
Rural Rd
Kyrene Rd
South Mountain Park
Salt River
Western Canal
EX-2
EX-1
NB-6 NB-7
NB-5
NB-4
NB-3
NB-2
NB-1
Phoenix
Tempe
Chandler
Guadalupe
Map not to scale.
LEGEND
EX-1
NB-1
Proposed Lanes
I-10, Salt River to 40th Street
I-10, 40th Street to 48th Street
EXISTINGI-10 MEDIANWESTBOUND EASTBOUND
12’C – D Lanes
12’General Purpose
Lanes
12’General Purpose
Lanes
12’Auxiliary
Lane12’
HOV Lanes12’
HOV Lanes
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
EXISTINGI-10 MEDIANWESTBOUND EASTBOUND
12’Auxiliary
Lane
12’Auxiliary
Lane
12’General Purpose
Lanes
12’General Purpose
Lanes12’
HOV Lanes12’
HOV Lanes
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
PRELIMINARYCONCEPTS
Not to Scale
Proposed Lanes
I-10, Broadway Road to Alameda Drive
I-10, Alameda Drive to US-60
EXISTINGI-10 MEDIANWESTBOUND EASTBOUND
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
4’
12’C – D Lanes
12’General Purpose
Lanes
12’General Purpose
Lanes12’
HOV Lanes12’
HOV Lanes12’
C – D Lanes
Shou
lder
EXISTINGUS-60 HOV RAMP
WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lderShou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
12’C – D Lanes
12’C – D Lanes
12’General Purpose
Lanes
12’General Purpose
Lanes
12’HOVLane HOV Lanes
12’HOVLane
PRELIMINARYCONCEPTS
Not to Scale
Proposed Lanes
I-10, US-60 to Baseline Road
I-10, Baseline Road to Elliot Road I-10, Elliot Road to Ray Road
Shou
lderSh
ould
er
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
EXISTINGI-10 MEDIAN
US-60RAMP W-E
WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
12’C – D Lanes
12’C – D Lanes
12’General Purpose
Lanes
12’General Purpose
Lanes
12’HOVLane
12’HOVLane
PRELIMINARYCONCEPTS
Not to Scale
EXISTINGI-10 MEDIANWESTBOUND EASTBOUND
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
11’Auxiliary
Lane
11’Auxiliary
Lane
11’General Purpose
Lanes
11’General Purpose
Lanes
11’HOVLane
11’HOVLane
EXISTINGI-10 MEDIAN
WESTBOUND EASTBOUND
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
Shou
lder
11’Auxiliary
Lane
11’Auxiliary
Lane
11’General Purpose
Lanes
11’General Purpose
Lanes
11’HOVLane
11’HOVLane
EA ScopingProcess
PROGRESSTO DATE
Early2019
2020 2020-24
Draft EA andPublic Hearing YES
NO
ProjectDevelopment
No Build
Design andConstructionADOT Determines
if FONSI* Issued
*Finding Of NoSignificantImpact
2020Late2019
For the Study…• Incorporate comments into Final EA• Prepare Final EA• ADOT will determine if Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) is issued
Next Steps