View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Hydropower – a regulatory perspective
Jacques Sisson
EA North Wales Area Account Manager HEP
Area Environmental Planning Team
Environment Agency Policy on Hydropower
shaped by the need for climate change mitigation
supports the Government’s targets for the use of renewable energy (15% by 2020)
duty to protect the environment and balance the benefits/impacts
facilitate DECC ‘Feed in Tariff’ initiative
Feed in Tariffs (FIT):
FITs introduced in 2008 Energy Act
Tariff for every KWh produced, for own use and for feeding into the National Grid.
Additional bonus payments for electricity you export into the grid
A reduction on your standard electricity bill, from using energy you produce yourself
Developer
NCCC
PSC
Team Leader
Account Manager
Advice:•What type of permit?•Indicative score (HH)•Site visit if needed•Amount of water to be licensed•Any pipeline route issues•Advice to contact CCW, SNP, LA
Virtual Team•Fisheries•Hydrology•Biodiversity•WFD•Flood risk management•Planning Liaison
NPS
Formal application
1. WR135 pre-app
(20 days)
(10 days)
Pre-application
2. Allocation
3. Consultation WR49
4. Advise formal application
HEP permitting process
3-4mths
No statutory time limit
Agency Permits
Impounding licence
Abstraction licence (full/transfer)
Flood defence consent
Fish pass approval
Impoundment licence
Structure that obstructs or impedes flow of inland water
Examples dams, weirs
Not time limited
Cost £135 application fee + £100 advertising fee + costs
Abstraction licence
Required to remove or abstract water from:
a surface source e.g. river, stream, canal, reservoir, lake;
an underground source e.g. aquifer
Generating less than 5MW – no annual charge
Resource assessment
How much water is there?
How much water can be abstracted?
How much water does the ecology require?
What would the impacts of abstraction be?
LegislationDomestic:
Water Resources Act 1991Water Act 2003Environment Act 1995Land Drainage Act 1991. Technical Advice Note 15, Development and Flood Risk (July 2004) Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries Act 1975 The Marine and Coastal Access Act (eels)
Legislation
European
Natura 2000 aka Habitats Directive
Water Framework Directive 2000
Eels Directive 2007
Freshwater Fish Directive 2006
Shellfish Waters Directive 2006
Consider: Abstraction Regime
Impacts on stream flow:
Flow depletion
Flow variability
Reduced in-river & marginal habitat
Flow barriers to fish passage
Environmental score – High Head HEP
Depleted reach: assessed for potential impact on the sensitivity of the river to abstraction
Scores for river physicality, fish, macro-phytes and macro-invertebrates
Score will determine the percentage of flow available for abstraction, the more sensitive the river, the less water available.
A % of the available flow above the HoF (HH).
WALES Scores for High Head HEP
Maximum abstraction percentage allowed
BAND Env. Score
Percentage allowable take above HoF
Seasonal variation(additional %age where applicable)
A 41 – 48 40 Up to +20%
B 31 – 40 50 Up to +20%
C 21 – 30 60 Up to +20%
D 11 – 20 70 Up to +20%
E 10 or less 80 - 100
Low Head HEP
Abstraction of the available flow above HoF (LH) ‘Fish friendly turbines’: archimedes screw kaplan.No abstraction licence required if turbine is in the weir