View
218
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
How to Find the Right PartnersHow to Find the Right Partnersto Maximize Your ROIto Maximize Your ROI
Barb Eccles, HBSc JDBarb Eccles, HBSc JD
Innovation Management Office Innovation Management Office
Lakehead UniversityLakehead University
for thefor the
FPTT Conference, May 30, 2003FPTT Conference, May 30, 2003
National Arts Centre, OttawaNational Arts Centre, Ottawa
The Question:The Question: How do you find the How do you find the
right partners to right partners to maximize your ROI?maximize your ROI?
The Question:The Question: How do you find the How do you find the
right partners to right partners to maximize your ROI?maximize your ROI?
The Answer:The Answer: It depends.It depends.
The DetailsThe Details
1.1. What is a partnership?What is a partnership?2.2. Why partner? Why not?Why partner? Why not?3.3. How to Find PartnersHow to Find Partners4.4. How to Pick PartnersHow to Pick Partners5.5. Designing the co-operationDesigning the co-operation6.6. How to Keep PartnersHow to Keep Partners7.7. Role of the Tech Transfer ProfessionalRole of the Tech Transfer Professional8.8. The GGI ExampleThe GGI Example
1. What is a partnership?1. What is a partnership?
Source: Walker et. al.
“a long term commitment between two or more organisations for the purpose of achieving specific business objectives by maximizing the effectiveness of each partner’s resources … The relationship is based upon trust, dedication to common goals, and an understanding of each other’s individual expectations and values.”
Pros of Partnering:Pros of Partnering:
Raising financing & mentorshipRaising financing & mentorship Head-start on exit strategyHead-start on exit strategy Reduced costsReduced costs Enhanced credibility and legitimacyEnhanced credibility and legitimacy Access to other/bigger marketsAccess to other/bigger markets Achieve fast and economical growthAchieve fast and economical growth Improve competitivenessImprove competitiveness Retain autonomyRetain autonomy Enhance and speed organisational learningEnhance and speed organisational learning More control over supplier qualityMore control over supplier quality
Pros of Technology AlliancesPros of Technology Alliancesfor Large Firmsfor Large Firms
adequate internal technical capacityadequate internal technical capacity market powermarket power established key linkages to customers, distributors, established key linkages to customers, distributors,
suppliers, regulatorssuppliers, regulators access to capital marketsaccess to capital markets potential synergy with current products and operationspotential synergy with current products and operations better protection of proprietary technologybetter protection of proprietary technology professional management for later-stage growthprofessional management for later-stage growth ability to absorb large, fixed transaction costsability to absorb large, fixed transaction costs
Pros of Technology AlliancesPros of Technology Alliancesfor Early-Stage Partnerfor Early-Stage Partner
strong commitment to the technologystrong commitment to the technology ability to move rapidlyability to move rapidly lower costs of development and operationslower costs of development and operations less bureaucratic, more innovativeless bureaucratic, more innovative more efficient job and wealth creatorsmore efficient job and wealth creators entrepreneurial management for early-stage entrepreneurial management for early-stage
growthgrowth increase firm valueincrease firm value
Cons of Partnering:Cons of Partnering:
Loss of flexibilityLoss of flexibility Increased external scrutinyIncreased external scrutiny Difficulties in future financing roundsDifficulties in future financing rounds Potential co-dependencyPotential co-dependency Costs associated with partneringCosts associated with partnering Confidentiality issues & loss of proprietary Confidentiality issues & loss of proprietary
knowledgeknowledge Organizational disruptionsOrganizational disruptions Damage to firm’s reputationDamage to firm’s reputation
The BaitThe Bait
Put your best foot Put your best foot forward, but ensure forward, but ensure accuracyaccuracy
Connect the dots for Connect the dots for the potential partnerthe potential partner
4.4. How to Pick Partners:How to Pick Partners:Due DiligenceDue Diligence
Track recordTrack record Budget for project is adequateBudget for project is adequate Competencies of preferred Competencies of preferred
partnerspartners Complementary specialized Complementary specialized
skills and strengthsskills and strengths Scrutinize values, commitment, Scrutinize values, commitment,
and capabilitiesand capabilities Partners Benchmarking Partners Benchmarking
Assessment SystemAssessment System
Success Factors for Alliance-MakingSuccess Factors for Alliance-Making
TrustTrust Strategic compatibilityStrategic compatibility Cultural FitCultural Fit Top management alignmentTop management alignment Appropriate governance mechanismsAppropriate governance mechanisms Careful strategic planningCareful strategic planning Good partnership preparationGood partnership preparation Recognize time requirementsRecognize time requirements
5. Designing the Co-operation5. Designing the Co-operation Define rights and dutiesDefine rights and duties Equal contributions from all partnersEqual contributions from all partners Emphasize the potential for joint value creationEmphasize the potential for joint value creation Keep and protect core competenciesKeep and protect core competencies Continue building trustContinue building trust Agree on objectivesAgree on objectives Create plan with fixed milestonesCreate plan with fixed milestones Dispute resolution planDispute resolution plan Formulate a termination planFormulate a termination plan
Implementation and ManagementImplementation and Management
Establish information & Establish information & coordination systemscoordination systems
Establish required resourcesEstablish required resources Ensure top management supportEnsure top management support Protect your secretsProtect your secrets Encourage learning from partnersEncourage learning from partners Move quicklyMove quickly Continual review of performanceContinual review of performance
How Close Should You Get?How Close Should You Get?
Avoid co-dependencyAvoid co-dependency Minimizing dependency risksMinimizing dependency risks Forced competitionForced competition Watch the balance of powerWatch the balance of power
Why do Alliances Fail?Why do Alliances Fail?
Failure to detect/handle expectation shortfallsFailure to detect/handle expectation shortfalls Differing pain thresholdsDiffering pain thresholds Changing expectations by parent companyChanging expectations by parent company Lack of commitment to partnershipLack of commitment to partnership
Hexagon and NAMCOHexagon and NAMCO
J.V. to produce and distribute a new J.V. to produce and distribute a new ecological cleaning liquid worldwideecological cleaning liquid worldwide
Partner contributions:Partner contributions:– Hexagon: trademarks, production technology Hexagon: trademarks, production technology
and know-howand know-how– NAMCO: access to global distributor network NAMCO: access to global distributor network
for manufacturing, packaging and distributionfor manufacturing, packaging and distribution
Hexagon and NAMCO (2)Hexagon and NAMCO (2) Early in relationship, JV unilaterally decided to Early in relationship, JV unilaterally decided to
change direction, which cannibalized change direction, which cannibalized NAMCO’s productsNAMCO’s products
Chain reaction of several different unilateral Chain reaction of several different unilateral moves by partners followed:moves by partners followed:– NAMCO negotiated special compensation with JVNAMCO negotiated special compensation with JV– Hexagon delayed key R&D, threatened to make Hexagon delayed key R&D, threatened to make
deal with NAMCO’s main rivaldeal with NAMCO’s main rival Result: relationship dissolvedResult: relationship dissolved
How to keep partnersHow to keep partners
managing expectationsmanaging expectations conflict resolutionconflict resolution building and maintaining trustbuilding and maintaining trust be flexiblebe flexible open communicationopen communication joint assessment of problems & expectation shortfallsjoint assessment of problems & expectation shortfalls manage conflict of interestmanage conflict of interest
Rescuing Troubled AlliancesRescuing Troubled Alliances
Know your partner’s interestsKnow your partner’s interests Understand the value your partner Understand the value your partner
attributes to intermediate outcomesattributes to intermediate outcomes Tell your partner when you are Tell your partner when you are
troubledtroubled Before blaming partner, think of Before blaming partner, think of
alternate causes of troublesalternate causes of troubles If problems are caused by partner, If problems are caused by partner,
consider partner’s organisational consider partner’s organisational constraintsconstraints
7. The role of technology transfer 7. The role of technology transfer professionalsprofessionals
Think: do you really want to go there?Think: do you really want to go there? Devote: assign proper resourcesDevote: assign proper resources Networks: use your networks to find Networks: use your networks to find
appropriate partnersappropriate partners Experience: enlist the help of those who Experience: enlist the help of those who
have done this beforehave done this before Infrastructure: work with other T2 profs Infrastructure: work with other T2 profs
to create/maintain gap filling initiativesto create/maintain gap filling initiatives
The Base Technology
Recognizable changes in Mitochondrial DNA that are associated with certain disease states
What makes it practical?• The small size of Mitochondrial
Genome
• The test can be performed on everyone
Genesis Genomics Inc.Genesis Genomics Inc. Initial cost estimates to “make it” $77M & 10yInitial cost estimates to “make it” $77M & 10y Strategic outsourcing reduced to $20M & 3yStrategic outsourcing reduced to $20M & 3y Credibility gain extremely valuable to GGICredibility gain extremely valuable to GGI Partnership selection through networkingPartnership selection through networking Negotiation involved site visitsNegotiation involved site visits Some procedural issues solved through close Some procedural issues solved through close
communicationcommunication Benefits accrued to both partiesBenefits accrued to both parties
Special thank you to …Special thank you to …
Morna Paterson, FPTTMorna Paterson, FPTT Sean Wise, E&Y EBCSean Wise, E&Y EBC George Macey, NWO Innovation TeamGeorge Macey, NWO Innovation Team
ReferencesReferences Africa Arino and Yves Doz, “Rescuing Troubled Alliances … Before Africa Arino and Yves Doz, “Rescuing Troubled Alliances … Before
It’s Too Late”, It’s Too Late”, European Management JournalEuropean Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. , Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 173-182, 2000173-182, 2000
Werner H. Hoffmann and roman Schlosser, “Success Factors of Werner H. Hoffmann and roman Schlosser, “Success Factors of Strategic Alliances in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises – An Strategic Alliances in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises – An Empirical Survey”, Empirical Survey”, Long Range PlanningLong Range Planning 34 (2001) 357-381 34 (2001) 357-381
Pratibha A. Dabholkar and Sabrina M. Neely, “Managing interdependency: a taxonomy for business-to-business relationships”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, VOL. 13 NO. 6 1998, pp. 439-460
H.C.W. Lau, W.B. Lee and Peter K.H. Lau, “Development of an intelligent decision support system for benchmarking assessment of business partners”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 8 No. 5, 2001, pp. 376-395.
Elias G. Carayannis, Suleiman K. Kassicieh, Raymond Radosevich, “Strategic alliances as a source of early-stage seed capital in new technology-based firms”, Technovation 20 (2000), pp. 603-615.
References (2)References (2) Andrew D. Brown, Inger Boyett and Phil Robinson, “The Dynamics
of Partnership Sourcing”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 15 No. 7, 1994, pp. 15-18.
Matthew J. Robson, “Partner Selection in Successful International Strategic Alliances: The Role of Co-operation”, Journal of General Management, Vol. 28 No. 1 Autumn 2002.
Ramesh Kolluru and Paul H. Meredith, “Security and trust management in supply chains”, Information Management Computer Security, 9/5 [2001] 233-236
Derek H.T. Walker, Keith Hampson and Renaye Peters, “Project alliancing vs project partnering: a case study of the Australian National Museum Project”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2 (2002), pp. 83-91.
Joseph E. Coombs and David L. Deeds, “International Alliances as Sources of Capital: Evidence from the Biotechnology Industry”, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Volume 11, Number 2, pages 235–253
References (3)
Charles D. Kerns, “Strengthen Your Business Partnership: Charles D. Kerns, “Strengthen Your Business Partnership: A Framework and Application”, A Framework and Application”, Business Horizons, July-August 2000, pp. 17-22.
Monica L. Perrya, Sanjit Senguptab, Robert Krapfelc, “Effectiveness of horizontal strategic alliances in technologically uncertain environments: are trust and commitment enough?”, Journal of Business Research 5871 (2002) 1– 6.
John D. Neilla, Glenn M. Pfeifferb, Candace E. Young-Ybarrab, “Technology R&D alliances and firm value”, Journal of High Technology Management Research 12 (2001) 227–237.
For More Information:For More Information:
Barb EcclesBarb EcclesInnovation Management OfficeInnovation Management OfficeLakehead UniversityLakehead University955 Oliver Road955 Oliver RoadThunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5E1Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5E1
Phone: (807) 343-8184Phone: (807) 343-8184Fax: (807) 346-7749Fax: (807) [email protected]@lakeheadu.cawww.lakeheadu.ca/~techtxwww.lakeheadu.ca/~techtx