Upload
tarun-sahni
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
1/23
Financial StatementFinancial StatementFinancial StatementFinancial StatementAnalysisAnalysisAnalysisAnalysis
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
2/23
Use financial statement analysis to assess the solvency ofa business.
Describe basic financial statement analytical methods.
of a business.
Describe the contents of corporate annual reports.
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
3/23
Basic Analytical Methods
Users analyze a companys financial statements using a
variety of analytical methods. Three such methods are as
follows:
.
2. Vertical analysis
3. Common-sized statements
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
4/23
Horizontal Analysis
The percentage analysis of increases and decreases in
related items using comparative financial statements is
calledhorizontal analysis.
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
5/23
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
6/23
Horizontal Analysis:Horizontal Analysis:
Difference $17,000
Base year (2009) $533,000= 3.2%
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
7/23
Comparative Schedule of Current Assets
Horizontal Analysis
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
8/23
Comparative Income StatementHorizontal Analysis
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
9/23
Vertical Analysis
A percentage analysis used to show the relationship of
each component to the total within a single statement iscalled vertical analysis.
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
10/23
Vertical Analysis of Balance Sheet
In a vertical analysis of the balance sheet, each
asset item is stated as a percent of the totalassets. Each liability and stockholders equity item
is stated as a percent of the total liabilities and
stockholders equity.
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
11/23
Vertical Analysis:Vertical Analysis:
Current assets $550,000Total assets $1,139,500
= 48.3%
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
12/23
Vertical Analysis of the Income Statement
In a vertical analysis of the income statement, each item is stated
as a percent ofnet sales.
Vertical Analysis:Vertical Analysis:
Selling expenses $191,000
Net sales $1,498,000= 12.8%
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
13/23
Solvency Analysis
All users of financial statements are interested in the ability of a
company to do the following:
1. Meet its financial obligations (debts), called
solvency.
2. Earn income, calledprofitability.
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
14/23
Working Capital
The excess of current assets of a business over its currentliabilities is called working capital. The working capital is often
used in evaluating a companys ability to pay current liabilities.
Working Capital = Current Assets Current Liabilities
Current assets $550,000 $533,000Current liabilities 210,000 243,000Working capital $340,000 $290,000
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
15/23
Current Ratio
Thecurrent ratio, sometimes called the working capital ratio orbankers ratio measures a companys ability to pay its current
liabilities.
Current Ratio =Current Assets
Current Liabilities
2010 2009
Current assets $550,000 $533,000Current liabilities $210,000 $243,000Current ratio 2.6 2.2Current ratio 2.6 2.2
$550,000$210,000
$533,000$243,000
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
16/23
Quick Ratio
A ratio that measures the instant debt-paying ability
of a company is called the quick ratio oracid-test
ratio.
2010 2009
Quick assets:
Cash $ 90 500 $ 64 700
Temporary Investments 75,000 60,000Accounts receivable (net) 115,000 120,000
a. Total quick assets $280,500 $244,700
b. Current liabilities $210,000 $243,000
Quick ratio (a b) 1.3 1.0
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
17/23
Accounts Receivable Turnover
The relationship between sales and accounts receivable may be
stated as theaccounts receivable turnover. Collecting accounts
receivable as quickly as possible improves a companys solvency.
Accounts Receivable Turnover =Net Sales
Average Accounts
Receivable
a. Net sales $1,498,000 $1,200,000
Accounts receivable (net):
Beginning of year $ 120,000 $ 140,000
End of year 115,500 120,000
Total $ 235,000 $ 260,000b. Average (Total 2) $ 117,500 $ 130,000
Accounts receivable turnover
(a
b) 12.7 9.2
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
18/23
Number of Days Sales in Receivables
Thenumber of days sales in receivables is an estimate of the lengthof time (in days) the accounts receivable have been outstanding.
Number of Days Sales inReceivables
Average Accounts
Receivable
Average Daily Sales=
Net Sales
365
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
19/23
2010 2009
a. Average accounts receivable
(Total accounts
receivable 2) $ 117,500 $ 130,000
Number of days sales in
receivables (a b) 28.6 39.5
Net sales 1,498,000 1,200,000
b. Average daily sales
(Sales 365) $ 4,104 $ 3,288
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
20/23
Inventory Turnover
The relationship between the volume of goods (merchandise) soldand inventory may be stated as the inventory turnover. The purpose
of this ratio is to assess the efficiency of the firm in managing its
inventory.
Inventory Turnover =
Cost of Goods Sold
Average Inventory
2010 2009
a. Cost of goods sold $1,043,000 $ 820,000Inventories:
Beginning of year $ 283,000 $ 311,000
End of year 264,000 283,000
Total $ 547,000 $ 594,000
b. Average (Total 2) $ 273,500 $ 297,000
Inventory turnover (a b) 3.8 2.8
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
21/23
Number of Days Sales in Inventory
Thenumber of days sales in inventory is a rough measure of thelength of time it takes to purchase, sell, and replace the inventory.
Number of Days
Sales in Inventory
Average Inventory
Average Daily Cost ofGoods Sold
====
Cost of Goods Sold
Number of days sales in
inventory (a b) 95.7 132.2
a. Average inventory (Total 2) $ 273,500 $ 297,000
Cost of goods sold $1,043,000 $ 820,000
b. Average daily cost of goodssold (COGS 365 days) $2,858 $2,247
2010 2009
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
22/23
Ratio of Fixed Assets to Long-Term Liabilities
Theratio of fixed assets to long-term liabilities is a solvency
measure that indicates the margin of safety of the noteholders or
bondholders. It also indicates the ability of the business to
borrow additional funds on a long-term basis.
Ratio of Fixed Assets to Long- Fixed Assets (net)
Term Liabilities Long-Term Liabilities
=
2010 2009
Ratio of fixed assets to
long-term liabilities (a b) 4.4 2.4
a. Fixed assets (net) $444,500 $470,000
b. Long-term liabilities $100,000 $200,000
8/3/2019 Horizantol and Vertical Analysis
23/23
Ratio of Fixed Assets to Long-Term Liabilities
Theratio of fixed assets to long-term liabilities is a solvencymeasure that indicates the margin of safety of the noteholders or
bondholders. It also indicates the ability of the business to borrow
additional funds on a long-term basis.
Ratio of Fixed Assets to Long-
Term Liabilities
Fixed Assets (net)
Long-Term Liabilities=
2010 2009
Ratio of fixed assets tolong-term liabilities (a b) 4.4 2.4
a. Fixed assets (net) $444,500 $470,000b. Long-term liabilities $100,000 $200,000