14
HOLOCENE REEF BACKSTEPPING - SOUTHWESTERN PUERTO RICO SHELF Dennis K. Hubbard, Ivan P. Gill, Randolph B. Burke and Jack Morelock Abstract Twelve cores document the Holocene history of reef development along the 8-km wide insular shelf off SW Puerto Rico. The earliest Holocene reefs formed along the shelf break at 8,200 ybp and were dominated by branching Acropora palmara. Reef development focused along an antecedent rim at 26-28 m below present sea level, By 6,000 ybp, all active accretion on this outer reef had ceased. Concurrently (between 7,199 and 6,200 ybp), reefs backstepped toward shore and shallower water; The new reefs were dominated by more sediment-tolerant species, in particular Montastrea annularis. A final line of reefs, shoals and islands began to develop around 4,000 ybp. These features are dominated by loose sediment and widely scattered corals, and are in some instances capped by mangroves. The causes of the 6,000-ybp backstepping event are equivocal. The shelf-edge reefs were tracking rising sea level up to the time of their demise. It is unlikely that a sudden increase in the rate of sea-level rise triggered the event, While land-derived sediment and nutrients likely played an important role in controlling the dynamics of reef development, it is difficult to understand the advantages of more protected, nearshore sites that would presumably be closer to any terrestrial source. While the precise causes of backstepping remain in question, the event itself is well documented. Furthermore, its spatial scale is comparable to well-known examples from the Devonian of Canada and Australia. Introduction Central to our models of both modern and ancient reefs is an understanding of the conditions under which they thrive or falter. From a geologic perspective, the geometric relationship between reefs and their surrounding facies reflects a dynamic interplay (Figure 1) between the average rate of sea- level rise and the long-term production of carbonate along the margin that is being affected. Along highly productive margins, reefs either build vertically or prograde, As rising sea level increasingly overwhelms the ability of calcification to keep pace, the reefs will gradually shift landward if possible, and will eventually be left behind. Figure 1. Backstepping compared to other accretion processes In some instances, the demise of one reef will be accompanied by the establishment of a new reef trend on higher ground. This latter process has been referred to as backstepping. Some of the best examples in the ancient record come from Devonian reefs in Australia Playford 1980 and central/western Canada. Wendte and Stokes 1982; Viau 1983 Shelf-edge reefs have attained thicknesses near 20 m suddenly shifted landward over horizontal distances of 1 - 2 km.

holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

HOLOCENE REEF BACKSTEPPING - SOUTHWESTERN PUERTO RICO SHELF Dennis K. Hubbard, Ivan P. Gill, Randolph B. Burke and Jack Morelock

Abstract Twelve cores document the Holocene history of reef development along the 8-km wide insular shelf off SW Puerto Rico. The earliest Holocene reefs formed along the shelf break at 8,200 ybp and were dominated by branching Acropora palmara. Reef development focused along an antecedent rim at 26-28 m below present sea level, By 6,000 ybp, all active accretion on this outer reef had ceased. Concurrently (between 7,199 and 6,200 ybp), reefs backstepped toward shore and shallower water; The new reefs were dominated by more sediment-tolerant species, in particular Montastrea annularis. A final line of reefs, shoals and islands began to develop around 4,000 ybp. These features are dominated by loose sediment and widely scattered corals, and are in some instances capped by mangroves.

The causes of the 6,000-ybp backstepping event are equivocal. The shelf-edge reefs were tracking rising sea level up to the time of their demise. It is unlikely that a sudden increase in the rate of sea-level rise triggered the event, While land-derived sediment and nutrients likely played an important role in controlling the dynamics of reef development, it is difficult to understand the advantages of more protected, nearshore sites that would presumably be closer to any terrestrial source. While the precise causes of backstepping remain in question, the event itself is well documented. Furthermore, its spatial scale is comparable to well-known examples from the Devonian of Canada and Australia.

Introduction Central to our models of both modern and ancient reefs is an understanding of the conditions under which they thrive or falter. From a geologic perspective, the geometric relationship between reefs and their surrounding facies reflects a dynamic interplay (Figure 1) between the average rate of sea-level rise and the long-term production of carbonate along the margin that is being affected. Along highly productive margins, reefs either build vertically or prograde, As rising sea level increasingly overwhelms the ability of calcification to keep pace, the reefs will gradually shift landward if possible, and will eventually be left behind. Figure 1. Backstepping compared to other accretion processes In some instances, the demise of one reef will be accompanied by the establishment of a new reef trend on higher ground. This latter process has been referred to as backstepping. Some of the best examples in the ancient record come from Devonian reefs in Australia Playford 1980 and central/western Canada. Wendte and Stokes

1982; Viau 1983 Shelf-edge reefs have attained thicknesses near 20 m suddenly shifted landward over horizontal distances of 1 - 2 km.

Page 2: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

Backstepping has traditionally been interpreted as a response to a sudden increase in the rate of sea-revel rise (e.g., Longmen 1980). However, the studies of Ian Macintyre and Walter Adey of the Smithsonian Institution, among others, }have demonstrated that Holocene accretion rates of 10-12 m/1000 y can occur in reefs dominated by fast-growing Acropora palmata. If we compare this to either the average rate of sea-level rise over the past 10,000 years (ca- 2.6 m/1000 y - m/ka) or the higher rates of sea-level rise during early Holocene shelf flooding (between 9 and 6 ka before present - 4-6 m/ka: Lighty et al 1982) then it becomes somewhat enigmatic as to how reefs capable of these high rates of accretion can ever be left behind (the drowning paradox of Schlager 1981).

Two common explanations of this seemingly paradoxical situation are:

• many Holocene and older reefs were dominated by organisms that probably grew more slowly than A. palmata and were, therefore, not capable of such high accretion rates, and

• some factor ether than rising sea level has come into play. This latter hypothesis involves the introduction of colder water in subtropical latitudes (e.g. Walker et al 1982 in Florida) or more turbid/nutrient-laden waters that in a sense "shut down the carbonate factory" Adey et. al., 1977; Hallock and

Schlager, 1986

This latter hypothesis involves the introduction of colder water in subtropical latitudes (i.e. Walker et al., 1982 in Florida) or more turbid/nutrient-laden waters that, in a sense "shut down the carbonate factory." Adey et al.,

1977; Hallock and Schlager, 1986

Holocene reefs can provide analogs to test the likelihood of various driving forces that have been proposed for older reefs, This paper describes reef development across the shelf system (Figure 2) in SW Puerto Rico.

Figure 2. Reef development at La Parguera

in the following pages, we document that:

• geologically instantaneous abandonment occurred along deeper, shelf-edge reefs in favor of shallower sites - "backstepping"

• this abandonment occurred at a time when shelf-edge reef accretion equaled or exceeded the rate of sea-level rise, and

• the scale of this backstepping event is analogous to what has been documented in the fossil record

Page 3: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

Study Area A broad, insular shelf extends for over 100 km along the southern coast of Puerto Rico. (Figure 3) Off La Parguera, it extends for 8 km before dropping abruptly (Figure 4) to oceanic depths. The inner shelf is generally shallow (ca 3-4 m) and is confined by a shore-parallel line of muddy shoals that sit a kilometer from land "inner reefs/shoals." (Figure 5) Some are capped by well-developed mangrove stands. (Figure 6).

Figure 3. South coast carbonate platform

Figure 4. La Parguera shelf and shelf break – change to dark blue

Page 4: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

Figure 5. Inner shelf is bounded by reef shoals

Figure 6. Mangrove capped reef flats

Between 2 and 4 km from shore, a number of mid-shelf reefs (Figure 7) rise from water depths of 14-16 m to the water's surface. Exposed ramparts of coral rubble pushed up by storm waves form a crescentic rim around the Southern and eastern (i.e., seaward) sides of the platforms which extend over a kilometer in their longest dimension. The typical Caribbean reef zonation that grades from head corals (primarily

Page 5: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

Montastrea annularis) and Acropora cervicornis in deeper water (ca. 10-20 m) to branching Acropora palmata in shallower water is present but variable. Along the eastern fore reef of one of these features (Cayo Turrumote), numerous colonies of M. annularis attain heights exceeding 4 meters.

Figure 7. Mid shelf reefs lie south of the inner shelf

Along the outer third of the shelf, a trough reaching water depths of 25 m separates the mid-shelf reefs from a broad band (1 - 1.5 km wide) of deeper-water features that occur along the shelf edge. The outer reef complex is highly variable and discontinuous. To the west of the coring sites, it is cut by distributaries from the deeper landward trough. In the eastern two thirds of the study area, the complex is comprised of roughly parallel but discontinuous ridges. The shallowest of these reaches minimum water depths of 13 meters near the top of the shelf-break (cores PAR-2, 3 and 11), with the inner (PAR-A) arid outer ridges being slightly deeper (ca. 15 - 17 m). The upper surfaces of the reef are dominated by head corals that cover up to 65% of the bottom on individual reefs.

Methods Cores were recovered from 12 sites (Figure 8) representing all three major reef trends using the SCARID submersible coring system. The NQ-2 drill string recovered a 5-cm (diameter) core using a standard wire-line system. The drill string was raised and lowered the with a hand crank and chain drive that provided tactile feedback to the diver/operator. Detailed notes were taken on any changes in drilling character and referenced to a scale on the drilling frame. This careful logging allowed the precise location of samples within each 1,53 m (5 m) interval to an accuracy of a few centimeters. An additional core (PAR-A) was recovered using a small portable drill similar to the one described in Macintyre (1975). Each core piece was slabbed longitudinally; one half was used for descriptions and sub-sampling, and the remaining half was kept as an archive. Clean pieces of coral were sent for radiocarbon dating; ages are reported in uncorrected radiocarbon years (± 60-100 yBP).

Page 6: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

Figure 8. Turrumote Basin is a trench between the mid shelf reefs and the outer shelf ridges

Results A total of twelve cores were recovered, with the longest exceeding 30 meters. Recovery averaged 27% (Table 1). All but three cores passed through the entire Holocene section into Pleistocene and older deposits. One core (PAR-8) passed through Pleistocene carbonates into older terrigenous muds at a depth of 22.5 meters below sea level (MSL). The initial interpretation of the Holocene/ Pleistocene contact was based on an abrupt change from whole corals and unconsolidated sediment to cemented packstones and wackestones, often capped by a blackened and heavily cemented layer up to 5 cm thick. This interpretation was confirmed by three "radiocarbon dead" ages (ca. 28-31 ka) and a single U/Th age of 102,370 - 3400 ybp.

Page 7: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

Table 1. Recovery data for Parguera cores

Shelf edge reef core

Four cores were recovered from a line of reefs located at the shelf break (Figure 9). The core PAR-A was drilled through a pinnacle just landward of the main trend. The shelf-edge reefs are comprised of the branching coral A. palmata along with varying intervals of rubble and loose sediment. The top of the Pleistocene was encountered near 28 meters below present sea level in core PAR-11. Based on similar ages in corresponding samples from Cores PAR-2 and 3, the Pleistocene probably occurs at a similar depth further west along the shelf break. Figure 9. Shelf edge cores

Page 8: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

Shelf Edge Reefs

Two samples sitting just above the Holocene/ Pleistocene contact in cores PAR-3 and PAR-11 yielded uncorrected C14 ages of 8,240 and 8,220 ybp, respectively, constraining the time at which the main shelf edge reef started to accrete. The youngest ages from near the reef surface at a water depth of 13.1-13.4 m ranged from 5,960 ybp in core PAR-11 to 6,140 ybp in core PAR-3, again reflecting a short interval over which accretion ceased at the shelf edge. During the interval from 8,200 to 6,000 ybp, accretion rates averaged between 2.05 and 6.10 m/ka with maximum accretion rates ranging from 8 to 10 m/ka.

To the east, core PAR-4 was comprised of mostly rubble and detrital coral fragments. A single date of 5,350 ybp was taken from a poorly preserved sample and represents a minimum age only. The surface of the Pleistocene was much shallower in this core (13.5 m below sea level), probably a reflection of the headland that cuts the width of the shelf in half in this area. Seismic evidence suggests that the difference in Pleistocene elevation from east to west may be, at least in part, fault controlled. J. Morelock, unpubl, data

Mid-Shelf Reef/Shoals

Six cores were recovered from the mid-shelf reefs. (Figure 10) Cores PAR 5, 6 and 12 were from exposed coral cays; cores PAR-l, 9 and 10 were from submerged ridges south or east of Cayo Turrumote.

Figure 10. Mid shelf reef cores

Page 9: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

All the mid-shelf cores were dominated by head corals in particular Montastrea annularis. Depth to the Pleistocene ranged from 20 to 24 m beneath Cayo Turrumote (PAR-1, 5 and 10) to 16 meters or less beneath Cayo Corral (PAR-6) and Cayo Enrique (PAR-12). The time frame for reef start-up in the mid-shelf region ranges from 7,100 to 6,200 ybp. With the exception of core PAR-10 (1,610 ybp), the radiocarbon ages near the reef surface were essentially Modern (i.e., 0-700 ybp). Accretion rates generally average between 1.5 m/ka (core PAR-12; Cayo Enrique) to 3.f m/ka (core PAR-10; eastern Turrumote ridge).

Inner Shelf Reefs/Shoals

Because of local environmental restrictions, only two cores (Figure 11) were recovered from a single shoal within the province (cores PAR-7 and 8). This partially cemented mud bank sits near the seaward edge of the inner-shelf platform and presumably traps finer grained sediment derived from land or generated within the nutrient-laden nearshore waters. The lowermost 9 m of core PAR-8 consisted of tight, terrigenous clay that is markedly dissimilar from the overlying Pleistocene {?) marine wackestones. The texture of this material and the lobate trend of the line of shoals implies a possible fluvial deltaic control to this feature. The mangrove-capped shoals where coring was not permitted probably represent the mature end-member in the transformation from submerged ridges to emergent islands. The interior of the inner shoals is comprised of widely scattered intervals of head corals and A. cervicornis, interspersed with common intervals of unconsolidated sediment. The high rates of accretion in core PAR-9 are thought to reflect hydro mechanical deposition of sediment delivered from the surrounding bay. Figure 11. Inner shelf reef cores

Discussion The earliest recorded deposition along the main shelf-edge reefs started at about 8,200 ybp. Reef development (Figure 12) was focused along an antecedent rim that is visible in seismic records (present depth -27 m). Based on the regional sea-level curve of Lighty et al 1982 and the local A. palmata curve, water depths over the reefs were near 6 m, beyond the optimum range for branching acroporids (Figure

Page 10: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

13). Nevertheless, the dominantly A. palmata reefs accreted at rates up to 10 m/ka, maintaining a constant depth below rising sea level.

Figure 12. History of coral reef accretion, La Parguera shelf

Page 11: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

Figure 13. Sea level rise and reef core recovery

By 6,000 ybp, accretion had ceased along the shelf break. At about the same time, active reef development was being recorded within the mid-shelf region, starting first at more seaward sites (e.g., Cayo Turrumote) at about 7,000 ybp and moving successively landward to Cayo Corral (6,900 ybp), Cayo Enrique (6,200 ybp) and in all probability other nearby reefs. Seismic data Seismic data suggest a strong control by antecedent highs that provided advantageous sites for reef development in the probably turbid environment of the Parguera embayment as sea level flooded the shelf. These shallower-water reefs were dominated by head corals, especially Montastrea annularis. Accretion on the mid-shelf reefs has continued through to the present and all sites have built broad platforms to sea level.

Figure 14. Seismic sections at La Parguera

Page 12: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

At around 4000 ybp, active accretion started along the inner shoals typified by cores PAR-7 and 8. Accretion was rapid, and it is proposed that much of this was related to hydro mechanical deposition of muddy sediment derived from the adjacent hillsides and from the production of algae such as Halimeda and Penicillus. Accretion along the mid-shelf and inner reefs/shoals continued through to today.

Timing of reef "start up"

The general uniformity of start-up times on the outer reefs is probably the result cf a similar elevations all along the shelf edge that was cored. As rising sea level flooded the shelf, the raised rim that is seen in several seismic records would have provided an ideal site for reef development. Proximity to deep water and an elevated position above the surrounding bottom would have encouraged active circulation and facilitated sediment removal. The 900 y range of start-up across the middle shelf more closely follows an offshore-to-onshore trend than anything related to absolute antecedent depth, This argues for an intrinsic control such as turbidity or elevated nutrient input from land.

Timing of backstepping

The timing of abandonment of the shelf-edge reefs is tightly constrained (5,960-6,140 ybp at two sites separated by over 2 km) and falls near the younger end cf the start-up range for the mid-shelf reefs. The shift in position is also accompanied by a change in dominant coral type from branching A. palmata at the shelf break to M. annularis atop the shelf. If we are to invoke a sudden change in the larval supply, then we must identify the sources of those larvae and adequately explain the sudden change in availability. Similarly, whatever type of coral took over, it is odd that recruitment shifted closer to shore - presumably the primary source of sediment and nutrients.

Alternately, hydrologic conditions all across the shelf could have changed from those that encouraged A. palmata to those that favored a more sediment-tolerant species (i.e., M. annularis). On Lang Bank, east of St. Croix (250 km to the east), Adey et al. (1977) proposed that rising sea level resuspended Pleistocene soil horizons as the bank flooded, thereby reducing visibility and killing early reefs formed there. With the steep hillsides that dominate the shores of SW Puerto Rico, it is easy to imagine similar deposits from the shelf being reworked and moved seaward onto the earlier reefs near the shelf break. It is difficult to imagine the inner shelf being an ideal site for reef development at this time, however, By 6,000 ybp, the shelf edge had an elevation equal to or slightly above that along the antecedent mid-shelf region, probably creating at least a semi-enclosed basin to landward. The higher levels of circulation and close proximity to clear sea water would seem to favor continuation of reef development along the shelf margin over a shift to a more landward site.

Similarly, any meteorological change that initiated a sudden influx of terrestrial sediment would seemingly have an even greater impact on reefs starting up closer to shore. Whatever the reason [or the shift from branching corals to head corals, it remains somewhat enigmatic that the change was accompanied by a landward shift in reef position.

Based on the data from this one site some sort of intrinsic stress appears as the most likely explanation. Along with increased sedimentation, one could easily imagine an increase in nutrient loading. also detrimental to reef development. (Halleck and Schlager, 1986). A sudden rise in sea level (Longman, 1980) cannot be invoked for this site as there is no evidence of such a sudden rise at the time when the shelf-edge reef "gave up." Furthermore, the shelf-edge reef was successively tracking rising sea level throughout its accretionary history and up to the instant that the Acropora reefs gave up.

Page 13: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

To add to the confusion, new core data from St. Crcix (Hubbard, unpubl, data) seem to be revealing a nearly identical history of reef start up along the shelf edge followed by sudden abandonment. The haunting similarity of start-up times, antecedent depths and reef give-up scenarios along the eastern St. Croix shelf margin is problematic as tha mechanisms proposed for the Parguera shelf are hard to visualize on eastern St. Crcix. There, the shelf extends over 10 km to windward, with the nearest updrift source of either suspended sediments or nutrients being over 100 km away. In contrast to the evidence presented in this paper, these facts argue for extrinsic forcing functions such as temperature or sea level. The ultimate answer probably rests in some combination of all of these.

Analogies to the Ancient

While the specific causes for the events reflected in the Puerto Rico cores still remain unclear, at least to the authors, the occurrence of a "backstepping event" is nevertheless unequivocal. Between 7~000 and 6,000 ybp, the main reef systegn in the study area moved nearly 6 km landward. If we compare this event to what has been documented from Devonian reefs, we are struck by the similarity of scale between southern Puerto Rico the example from Canada. In fact, the landward reef shift of 4~6 km off SW Puerto Rico exceeds that seen in the Swan Hills section.

Likewise, the scale of the basin-to-platform transition in the Bugle Gap area of the Canning Basin Playford,

1980 is of similar scale to what exists off southwestern Puerto Rico, as is the case with the nearby Limestone Billy Hills platform described by Hall. 1984 The fact that a single Holocene accretionaly pulse had nearly equaled the thickness produced by several Devonian cycles (even if we allow for compaction) likely reflects higher rates of carbonate production in our modern example. Unraveling the backstepping histories of this and other Holocene systems, along with a better understanding of the mechanisms that are responsible, may hold the key to modeling the behavior of similar reefs both backward and forward through time.

Click in this box to return to coral reef papers

References Cited Adey WH, Macintyre IO, Stuckenrath R., Dill RF (1977) Relict barrier reef system off St. Crcix; its implications with respect to late Cenezoic coral reef development in the western Atlantic. Proc. Third Intl, Coral Reef Symp. 2: 15-21. Hall WDM (1984) The stratigraphic and structural development of the Givetian-Frasnian reef complex, Limestone Billy Hills, western Pillara Range, W.A. ln: Purcell PG (ed.) The Canning Basin, W.A., Proc. Geol. Soc. Australia/Petr. Soc. Australia Symp. 215-222. Hallock P, Schlager W (1986) Nutrient excess and the demise of coral reefs and carbonate platforms. Palaios 1~389-398. Hubbard DK, Zankl H, vanHeerden I, Schwabe H (in press) Holocene Reef Development and Sea-Level Rise: Northern St. Croix Shelf, U, S. Virgin Islands. Facies. Lighty RG, Matintyre IG, Stuckenrath R (1982) Aeropore palmara reef framework: a reliable indicator of sea level in the western Atlantic for the past 10,000 years. Coral Reefs 1: 125-130. Longman, MW (1980) A process approach to recognizing facies ct reef complexes, In; Toomey DF (ed.)

Page 14: holocene reef backstepping - southwestern puerto rico shelf

European Fossil Reef Models. SEPM Spec. Pub. No. 30: 9-40. Macintyre, IG, (1975) A diver-operated hydraulic drill for coring submerged substrates- Atoll Research Bull. 185: 21-26. Neumann AC, Macintyre IG (1985) Reef response to sea level rise: keep up, catch up or give up. Proc. Fifth Intl. Coral Reef Symp. 3: 104-110. Playford, PW 1980 Devonian Great Barrier Reef~ of Canning Basin, Western Australia. AAPG Bull. 64: 814-840. Schlager W (1980) The paradox of drowned reefs and carbonate platfort~s. GSA Bull. 92: 197-211. Viau C (1983) Dcpositional sequences, facies and evolution of the upper Devonian Swan Hills reef buildup, central Alberta, Canada. In: Harris PM (ed,) carbonate Buildups - A Core Workshop. SEPM Core Workshop Nc. 4: 112-143. Walker ND, Roberts JL, Rouse LJ Jr., Huh OK (1982) Thermal history of reef~as~ociaLed environments during a record cold-air outbreak event. Coral Reefs l: 83-88. Wendte JC, Stokes FA (1982) Evolution and corresponding porosity distribution of th~ Judy Creek reef complex, Upper Devonian, Central Canada. In: Cutler WG (ed.) Canada's Giant Hydrocarbon Reservoirs: CSPG 1982 Core Workshop p 63-81.