4208986*9 1 7 Z. 13857 MUSSY LAKE ^,-010

. 188 5NORANDA EXPLORATION COMPANY, LIMITED

(no personal liability)

REPORT ON 1990

HLEM AND TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC SURVEYS

N.T.S. 42 D/9

MAPLE LEAF EXTENSION

NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO DIVISION

RECEIVED

JAN l 7 1991

MINING LANDS SECTION

PROJECT NO. 2076 JOHN GINGERICH THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO SR. DIVISION GEOPHYSICIST JANUARY 9, 1991

4a009SE0ei7 2.13657 HUSSY LAKE

Table of Contents010C

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS

3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

4.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

5.0 PERSONNEL

6.0 INSTRUMENTATION6.1 Magnetometer Survey6.2 HLEM Survey

7.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS7.1 Magnetometer Survey7.2 HLEM Survey

8.0 CONCLUSIONS

9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

Figure l Figure 2

Map l Map 2 Map 3

Location Map Claim Map

List of Figures

List of Maps

Magnetometer Profiles HLEM Profiles (444 Hz) HLEM Profiles (1777 Hz)

l

l

1

2

3

333

334

4

5

Scale

1:5000 1:5000 1:5000

l .0 INTRODUCTION

A total of 7 km of HLEM and total field geomagnetic surveying was completed between Nov. 15th and Nov. 19th, 1990 on 200m spaced lines. The objective of the survey was to define an untested HEM conductor (Dighem 1988, Aerodat 1985) which flanked a large magnetic body.

Initial prospecting and mapping failed to explain the anomaly. Subsequent to the HLEM survey defining the anomaly locations additional mapping and prospecting failed to adequately define the source of the conductor.

2.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS (Figure 1)

The property is located in the southwestern portion of the Hemlo greenstone belt approximately 20 km southeast of Marathon and 20 km southwest of Hemlo. Access to the property is via an Ontario Hydro service road. The road turnoff is approximately 20 km (via road) east of Marathon on Highway 17. The claim group is 7 km south of the turnoff.

3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Figure 2)

The property consists of 14 claims which join the International Maple Leaf-Golden Trio joint venture which was terminated in November of 1990.

v\ PUKASKWA lNATIONALPARK

LAKE SUPERIOR

/VfAl^iK \ :"j^ \ :Y^

fe V 33?

LOCATION MAPFIGURE l

Scol*:i:i,584,000 or l"*25mlle*

MUSSY LAKE MAP AREA ike

1 T* , rt 10.5615 'I06*4S 00*61 IO4SO*HOMOSCLAIM GROUP

' f]'*'" t**"" ^*" 7 ' ^T^ ! Ti~' " I"

* 'i; -* *~ T "" ** 'Tt Tt T Tt

ttM ttM 'r '

MAPLE LEAF EXTENSION PROPER? Y

SCALE r ~ 1 /2 Mile

Claim List

Claim

TB 1106604 TB 1106605 TB 1106606 TB 1106607 TB 1106608 TB 1106609 TB 1106610 TB 1106611 TB 1106612 TB 1106613 TB 1106614 TB 1106615 TB 1106616 TB 1106617

Recording Date

3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90 3/9/90

Asses. Due man/davs

20202020202020202020202020

.20280

4.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The area is underlain predominantly by metavolcanic and volcanic derived metasedimentary rocks of the Heron Bay greenstone belt which occupies the southwestern end of the Wawa subprovince of the Superior Province.

Structurally, the rocks of this belt strike east-west, have steep northerly dips and have a strongly developed FI, foliation parallel to bedding. East-west faults and lineaments indicate possible strike and/or dip-slip fault movements.

In the northern part of the map area tuffaceous and metasedimentary rocks are intruded by granodioritic rocks of the Heron Bay Pluton.

Muir (1982) has presented the regional geology in more detail in O.G.S. Report 218, "Geology of the Heron Bay Area, District of Thunder Bay".

5.0 PERSONNEL

The surveys were carried out by J. Maclsaac and T. Walmsley, all employees of Noranda Exploration Company, Limited.

6.0 INSTRUMENTATION

6.1 Magnetometer Survey

A Scintrex MP-3 proton precession magnetometer was utilized on the survey. Measurements of the earth's total geomagnetic field (accuracy of 0.1 nts) were taken at 12.5m stations. Diurnal corrections were made by integrating synchronized time variations of the earth's magnetic field from a base station magnetometer with the field magnetometer.

6.2 HLEM Survey

The HLEM survey employed a MaxMin II system manufactured by Apex parameterics. A coil separation of 100m was utilized. Two operation frequencies 444, 1777 Hz were used.

The system uses moving transmitter and receiver coils which maintain a fixed separation and horizontal coplanar orientation. The coils are connected by a reference cable and in-phase and out-of-phase components of the generated secondary field, measured at the receiver coil, are expressed as percentages of the primary transmitted field.

7.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

7.1 Magnetometer Survey

The survey defined an area of active magnetic response ranging from 58600 to 69000 gammas with an average of 59850 gammas. Magnetic trends are ostensibly east- west conformable with geologic strike.

An annular area of high magnetic relief greater than 1000 gamma is defined in the east-central portion of the survey area. The character of the magnetic response is indicative of mafic intrusive or coarse flow.

In the west-central portion of the survey area a linear zone of weak magnetic response (200-300 gammas) is defined. Central to the zone a discrete very high magnetic feature is resolved which is interpreted to map a small lense of banded magnetite.

An HLEM conductor strikes central to the magnetic zone indicating the magnetic response is probably related to disseminated pyrrhotite and magnetite associated with a mineralized chert (sediments) unit observed locally in outcrop.

7.2 HLEM Survey

The survey defined an intermediate strength subcropping conductor (1-6 mhos, depth w 30m) in the western portion of the survey area. The conductor (HI) has a defined strike of 400m and displays increased conductivity and width to the west. The strongest response occurs on the most westerly line 12E.

Conductor HI displays a weak, direct magnetic association and is located in a swamp within an area underlain by felsic to intermediate ash/lapilli tuffs and agglomerate. A mineralized (po, py 2-30Xo) outcrop of banded siltstone and chert is located near the conductor strike on line 14E. The conductor is thought to map more a massive sulphide lense.

Sampling in the area has not returned any significant gold or base metal values. Despite the negative results, continued surveying to the west to fully define the conductive limits is recommended. A line of gravity over the strongest portion of the conductor should also be considered if the conductor's strike is substantially increased.

Other weak, high frequency HLEM anomalies are also resolved by the survey. These appear to be related to surficial conductors.

8.0 CONCLUSIONS

1) An intermediate strength conductor (6 mhos, 20m width) with weak magnetic association was defined in the west central portion of the survey area. The limits of the conductor are not completely resolved with the strongest response occurring on the most westerly line.

2) The conductor is located with a swampy area and prospecting and mapping failed to adequately explain the anomaly.

3) Sampling in the area has returned negative results. An outcrop located local to the conductors strike suggests the conductor likely maps a sulphide py, po lense within an intercalated unit of banded siltstone and chert within a broad unit of

felsic to intermediate ash/lapilli tuffs and agglomerate.

9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

1) Despite negative results, the full extent of the conductor should be defined. The strongest portion of the conductor should be surveyed with gravity if the limits of the conductor are substantially increased.

2) Soil surveying over the conductive strike is recommended to assist evaluation of its base metal potential.

Respectfully submitted,

NORANDA EXPLORATION COMPANY, LIMITED (no personal liability)

Thunder Bay, Ontario January 9, 1991

John GingerichSr. Division GeophysicistNorthwestern Ontario Division

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentarvl Mines

Report of Work Mining Act (Geophysical. Geological and Geochemical Surveys)

2.13057 MUSSY LAKE

Instructions- Please type or print- Refer lo Section 77. the Mining Act lor assessnwit i'.'

and maximum credit* tilowM per survey type H number of mining claims traversed exceeds spar

900

Technical Reports and Mining Landt Section.

type of Surveyls)HLEM ft MAGNETOMETER

Mining Division

Thunder BayTownship or Are* f lMuuy Creek Area4A4fr((? J;7i \

Recorded Holder(s) ^ 1 O /O l" *""1

Noranda Exploration Company, Umlted ^ |^ O^ "fAddressP.O. Box 2656, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 502

^^nda^xploration Company, Limited, P.O. Box 2656,Name and Address of Author (ol Geo-f echnical Report)

John Gineerich, P.O. Box 2656, Thunder Bay, OntarioCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (lor each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter lolal(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys

Geophysical

. Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Other

Days per Claim

20

40

Days perClaim

Days porClaim

Total miles flown over claim(s).Dale

Jan. 14/91Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Mining

Thunder Bay, Ontario

P7B 502Claims Traversed (List inMining Claim

Prefix

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

-

Number

1106610

1106611

1106612

1106613

1106614

1106615

1106616

1106617

Prospector's Lce"rv:e No ^

A.34387Teior^one No

(807) 623-4339

P7B 5G2

numerical

Oatt ol Survey (from 4 D)

cfil/OS/ap, i .19/11/90sequence)

Mining Claim

Prefix

-l

Number

RCT4ricVsl

N

JUMIM/rltTMtn\

J AN 3

HAN

Tolal nun 'her o mining claims c by tins 'e: j" o

Mm r',, i: - \

Prel.i ' r ..-!.-..;

j

i

EIVBDi

01991

3S SECTION.-.. .

-. ..

- i ; i

overc.1 8V.C-v

Certification Verifying Report of Work

l hereby certily (hat l have a personal and intimale knowledge ol the (acts set lonh in this Report ol Work having performed the work or witness" 1 sa"i? tin- - : ,- : her its completion and annexed report is true

Name and Address ol Person Certifying

Cecilia M. Barrett, P.O. Box 2656, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 6G2

For Office Use Only

loia^oays^ Cf Recorded

Udip HecotdecJ

Date Approved as Recorded

'SEE REVISED

^-Cl

Telephone No.

(807) 623-4339

"iff. .

^^Provincial Manage^. Mining Lftnds

WORK STATEMENT

Date l Certified By (SjgQgtuie) -,

Jan. 14/91 X C^^^^f - -.Received Stamp ' ^ w

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

Mining Lands Section4th Floor, 159 Cedar StreetSudbury, OntarioP3E 6A5

Telephone: Fax;

Your File: Our File:

(705) 670-7264 (705) 670-7262

W. 9140. 003 2. 13857

April 21, 1991

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Developmentand Mines435 James Street, SouthP. O. Box 5000THUNDER BAY, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Sir/Madam:

RE: Notice of Intent dated March 21, 1991 for Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Surveys on mining claims TB. 1106610 et al in Mussy Lake Area.

The assessment work credits, as Notice of Intent have been

Please inform the recorded indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

ith the above-mentioned the above date.

ining claims and so

Ron. C. Gashinski, Provincial Manager, Mines 8c Minerals

fJ/jl

cc: Noranda Explo Thunder Bay,

Y. v , Resident Geologist fy ^tfhunder Bay, Ontario

•rttfMnMTtchnloal AftMttmwt WoricCrwltt

March 25/91

2.1385713857OlUo*rt(

|M9rVVQ W19i^^

Nnrwnrtfl Pvplfir*iHnn PnmpAny LimH-grlfrjMiMp w ATM

Musfjy Lake Area, - — , , . .Typ* of ourvoy *nd numbw of

*t*wmtNt *y* oradK p* (Mm1 '^W^^^Wy*^^^

tlKUomoinotte ——— L2ju8 ——————— *v*

Mopiilii flour ————— 2.fi . fi ——————— dtyi

fMtonwtrte ————————————————— *V*

Indueodpolorltttloii ————————————— o^yi

Othor. ————————— —————————— '•w

StOtion 77 (10) So* "Mining CUmi AnMtwT column

OoOtofllC*! ———————————————————— diy*

OooehomiMl. —————————————— *v*

ItontftyiQ Mrbom*D

IpwWprovWonQ Ground Q

Q3 C(**U new bMn reduced btcouM of ptrtM oovoraoi of cMrm.

Q Orodlti htvt boon reductd DMMM of comctlonif toworkdttMtndfifluntoftppllconti

MftNCWmiAMtlot

TB. 1106610 to 617 incl.

tpodol crodlt* uixkr Motion 77 (16) for th* following mining dolmi

4" ?1"

lo ertdHt havt botn •Jlowvd for tht following mining dtlrntQ not Mtfflcltntly oovw*d by tht torvty Q Imufflcltnt ttchnlctl d*U flM

kL:

Tht Mnlnt ftocoroV ray reduot tfw tbow cndto H ntoMitry In ordtr thtt tht total numbtr of pprowd MMHtntnt d*y* reoordtd on Mch eltJm doit not xoMd tht mtximum allowtd M fonowi: Otophyilctl -10; O*o*o8*e*l - 40; Otochtmlco! - 40; Stetlon 77(19) - W.

ic ho

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

(tt*Geophyslcal-Geologlcal-Geochemical Technical Data Statement

Ontario

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

FiiQ c:o o

Type of Survey(s).

Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s^

MteALT0.

Survey Company i\)Qft4A?OA

Author of Report.

Address of A. .thor AftV,

Covering Dates of Survey_

Total Miles of Line

Ol-nQ-QO(linecutting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

—Electromagnetic——Magnptomptpr M Q

—Radiometric—————

—Other————————

DAYSper claim

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer..

HATR. 3ttV\

.Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE:ort or Agent

Res. Geol.. Qualifications - T O

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix)

.......IXQJfefaU.(number)

..jm.i.i.mi

TOTAL CLAIMS.

637 (85/12)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations 2 Z-H (lUfn} W 8 ( MA/^_____Number of Readings 83(e(H0BM) W8

Station interval Z.S"ifv\ ^Xjg-.^ rf\——————————————Ljne sparing 2.C)Qrv\-^————————

Profile scale____IOYW * ioVo____,Contour interval.

Instrument _________Sc-irJTg,feX_____Mf 3

z; C

i

O

Accuracy — Scale constant ———————3k Diurnal correction method -————Base Station check-in interval (hours) ^a/yyypk fCOVfi,

Base Station location and value

Instrument ______M/VxlAlfO TT, Coil configuration -—— Coil separation ——-—-.

rt AccuracyoJ Method: CH Fixed transmitter D Shoot back 53ln line CH Parallel line

Frequency_____HHH K& ^ Illl \\l

Parameters measured____/t(specify V.L.F. station)

Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.

Base station value and location,

Elevation accuracy.

zg<NfrM

V.•4

2OHa(4 OJ-J Q

EH

Pt—i f'1

Method D Time Domain D Frequency DomainParameters - On time Frequency , ,,, .,.

Off time Range

— Delay t 'm f— Integration time. . . .——— ,.

Power ____ — —— - ————————— — —— — ————————————————————————————————————Electrode array ——————— — ————————————————————————————————————————— - ——— — —Electrode soaciner . - ————————————————————————————— - —————— — ———————————

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIALInstrument.————————————————-—————-——————————^— Range.Survey Method ___________________________________________

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument^———

Values measured.Energy windows (levels) ——--————....^——--.——————.-——————.———.———Height of instrument____________________________Background Count.Size of detector—————.—-.———.^—-—.———--————^--——.—————.—.—^-—. Overburden —--——^--——.-————--———^^———.———-——————.—..——-——.—.—

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey—————————————————————————Instrument —^^—^——————^^—^^————^— Accuracy,——————————————^^^^—————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy—————————————-^—.—

(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used-———-—————-—-—..—.———-——^—.-..———Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude-—————.....-—--—-.-———-———.———..——.^Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight—————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent D

p. p. m. Dp. p. b. O

Cu, Pb,

Others—.

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field AnalysisExtraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ———-————

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis^—^—

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used.——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory.— Extraction Method— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used -———-

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General.

LEC

OU

RS

G28

63

"^ ~

" ~

~

" ~

,TB

BSO

S30

* KO

O3Z

T KH

OSM

IO

H37

T

l KJ3

O37

6

TB

lO3O

3?4

.KD3

O37

S IK

UO

STZ

'

'103

0371

' '

l l-

U'l C

. -

' -

- v

;-

- ,

- —

—

, ^

T? y ;

^

\ y V

*—-

X i

Lin

f-t

.•MiM

^^i-ft-n

tefT

- ;-

r ^

^^Jr*

**?

TS

'T

B

,T3

f l

IO3O

3B

t 10

3037

8 l

IO3O

37*

'6S

JBS

3 J.*

***ff

*

!fi*

S-*

*t1

13

'T

3

,TB

\ .T

BTB

' T

B \

i TB

i

TB!

. I

. K

J3O

343

' I0

3033

Z

l 10

3032

5 H

O3O

3I6

, IO3

O3M

K

BO3V

O9

'103

03*6

l

M30

M7

1030

306

KK

5046

K

J303

51

' W3O

342

TOO

333

1 T

.TB

'T

B

- *

T9

ITB

~

- ^

-* i

1030

340^

: K

)3O

335f

r .IO

3O32

210

*053

K

XS

OS

4 KM

5O65

•* ia

s4szr^

ti*g

^A

rea

Res

erve

d fo

r S

mal

l B

oat

Anc

hora

ge

•e

I630O

9

ITS

- .

SS

M

l S

SM

,

SS

M

V S

SM

^-^

TS

SM

SSM

js

sv

64

19

73

', 0

4 1

97 B

j 641977)6

4198 O

1*4198)

'•-

641*

54

J —

——

\

-j_

___ _

_ i_

_ _

_ _ t

__

_ J

__

*1

__

.__ j_

e _

_ _

_ J _

_ _—

_

_

_ —

l —

— —

5SM

4 "

SSfc

i ^

SJ

M^

*31*

.^

s^

*Ut

ss-

1F

S*

' SS

" '

SSM

'S

SM

l

SS

M

l SS

M

. l

54

i 9T

5*

64

I97

B

U^

i.a

aU

ias

-1'"

7*'1'"

"7^

'"

7**-

-*^

!,? C

—-t

—Z

."1C

-^^

!I^

1 ^

^- —

^

1^

—il!

I!!i!

!l j^

r^e^

^^rr

^ll'l

lLis

s.-

, .T5

v ,SSM

,s

r^s"

-1.

7^-

- -i ^

J'^

^."

r-^ J

3--

s-:v

^^f

ffi7

JW^,J

sW^;^

^ig

B^^i

SS

M

SS

M

SS

M

SS

MS

SM

f

SS

U

SS

M

,—

SSM

l SSM

l "SSM

| SSM

) SSM

I SSM

t SSM

s~s*

T" (

"ssM

?"

" Ts

sfi"

" s5

MP

:oy'tf

Ha

rbo

ur

-x-_

_^__

_.4

— -

J

ssw

SS

M

iSSM

IS

SM

jssv

issM

i S

SV

l

SS

M

] S

SM

i

SS

M

J S

SM

J

SS

M

l liH

ayw

ard^

f

AL

L

ISLA

ND

S

WIT

HIN

2

MIL

E

LIM

IT"

FO

RM

P

AR

T

OF

NA

T. P

AR

K

2-52

6^—

——

\c^7

- ;

PU

KA

SK

WA

N

AT

ION

AL

PA

RK

O, C

. I7

Q-7

8

20

0

-- -

v.--x

- -^

Vi ^

^-^

y-y

^r^

^.v

^

V^#

^\-

:-X^V

**v^

v v^t^

-v^v

r ~ -

: '^

."*

^ r

; ^

^

r.-'-^

*-.^

^'^--t

--.-:^

.-*-rv

;,'-w

. -.

.^**

rr-:

^ ^

^:^

-~^

* -

-***

- /.*

7v*-

...-.4

-\x v

j^?

-*'y

^—

-1-

*-- '

••:;

r^v\

i-,^:

---v-

.':.-i

:.vs^

v--.v

.--^ vv-^

--^--

^^,.

^"'"^

--;-

^ V

. --

^ -

v;--

.-,v

.*-v

. *

i *-

v^-'-

v V

s*-

- -^

r^-^

---

-X^ ^

•'-:

t^C

..-^

s*.

?-.

-j--

*: ;

-^-r

-*

- rr

- -

s^^*

'?^^

AREA

. O

F

MUS

SY DIS

TRIC

T O

F TH

UN

DER

BA

YS

AU

LT

ST

E.

MA

RIE

TH

UN

DER

BA

YM

ININ

G

DIVI

SIO

N

SC

ALE

' 1-IN

CH *

40

CH

AIN

S

LEG

END

PATENTED LAND

CROWN LAND SALE

LEASES

LOC

ATE

D

LAN

DLI

CE

NS

E

OF

OCC

UPAT

ION

MIN

ING

R

IGH

TS

ON

LYSU

RFA

CE

RIG

HTS

O

NLY

RO

AD

SIM

PRO

VED

R

OA

DS

KIN

G'S

H

IGH

WA

YS

-fR

AIL

WA

YSPO

WER

LI

NE

SM

AR

SH

OR

M

USK

EGM

INE

S

(f

C.S e Loc

M. R

C

S R

. O

- **

v

— —

——

l!^

'NO

TE

S^^^^^^^^^

File

IF

389O

.

Ail

Mm

mg

Clai

ms

Arou

nd

Whi

teLa

kes

Subf

eet

to

Sect

ion

41

of

4OO

' S

urfa

ce**.

Rfe

serv

a*io

n or

oaod

oil

Long

un

der

Lcke

S

upw

stoK

*ng

by3O

. 19

12

-*IT

u \M

i^

i fc

b - ft

r rli t *

NA

TIO

NA

L TO

POG

RA

PHIC

PLA

N^N

Q,

M-Z

9*.

**r*

:'

UJOoCM

UJo o

UJ OoCO

r

1200N..

D

HI ^-30m*

o't : 6mhos

1000N BASELINE 90'

SOON.

..^

44

.

(A

,

,

"1

-1

-1

-1

-1

i -1

, | -t

i: -2

. -2

-1

: "1

: ~~ '

—7

1

2

1

0-1•—1-2-1-1

0

1

0

0

600N——.

Hou

i i

-i-i-i-i-i-i-2-4-5-4

O1

2 ^321

-2-2-2t-2-2-2

D

O

O

O

O

O

o o

laJ O Ooo

UJo o oOJ

UJo oCM

rKr f3 7

y*Vi-iBi ll—2

—2

K -2—2

rf -1Y -2

-'i 9K!

. -2, -2

V -2*L~3* M M

: -2•' —9 id 'r;r* J

A7 l \22222211122

^ 2

2 "

2 . .

2

2

2

1

0-1-2

"*-2^

-2

-1

0

0

-1

UJo o ^^CX|

\

D

1385

\

Instrument : MAXM1N H

Coil Spacing : 100m

Vertical Scale: 1 cm - 105!

Frequency : 444 Hz

In Phase :

Quadrature :

100m Mm Oml__LI__LI—

100mi

200m

NORTHEAST GRIDHLEM SURVEY

FREQ. 444 HERTZPROJECT: MAPLE LEAF PROJECT # : 2076

BASELINE AZIMUTH : 90 Deg.

SCALE ~ 1 : 5000 DATE : 11/22/90 SURVEY BY : JM/TW NTS : 42 D/16

FILE: H2076NOR NORANDA EXPLORATION

10W.5N Strtaf l HM140 ftafMmd Uwr i NOHANOA FXPLOWATKW42D69SEW17 2. 13857 MUSSY LAKE 210

llJ

OoCM

LJ O O

LJJ

o oCO

UJo o00

oooCM

UJo oCM CM

1200N.

tf\- 6 mhos

1000N BASELINE 90*

SOON.

LU OoCM

x

x

O 1 Q Q c; '7 *w . J, o o o *g 8

:A cr-V'/M

: MAXMIN l!

Coil Spacing : 100m

Vertical Seal*: 1 cm - l OX

Frequency : 1777 Hz

In Phase : -^ ^ —-.

Quadrature : ,. A ... A ......

100m 50m O*i t i i i IMmi300m

l

NORTHEAST GRIDHLEM SURVEY

FREQ. 1777 HERTZ PROJECT: MAPLE LEAF PROJECT # :

BASELINE AZIMUTH : 90 Deg.2076

SCALE - 1 : 5000 DATE : SURVEY BY : JM/TW NTS :

FILE: H2076NOR NORANDA EXPLORATION

11/22/90 42 D/16

*aO*9SEWI7 E . 13857 MUSSY LAKEC X 1M2.3N Swtal f HM140 Uwr l NCftANOA EXPLORATION

•;COM...

- i-

1000N-BASELINE 90'

SOON..

600N..

175129922653239525662775276427102586337821351882197524242373190217222026182417165414991523153?

16261901 165? 14961C•m 1493

NTRUSIVE/

491 479

, 497 . 470 , 479

482 w M.

N

2. 13857

420M8EM17 2.13857 MUSSY LAKE 230 Koflto c*ntr*d an 7 W. O t f S*rtot ^ MB9140 R*4*tor*d UMT : NORANDA EXPIjOWTIDM

Instrument

field

Datum

: mp--3

: TOTAL

: 5850C.C nT

Contour interval :

profile Scale : 250 nT / C m (logarithmic)

Conductor Axis

100m 50m Onl i l l l

100ml

200ml

MAPLE LEAFMAGNETOMETER SURVEY

PROJECT: MAPLE LEAF PROJECT # i 2076. BASELINE AZIMUTH : 90 Deg.

SCALE s 1 : 5000 DATE : 11/15/90 SURVEY BY : JM NTS :

FILE: M2076MAP NORANDA EXPLORATION