Upload
lammien
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
‡
1
HIV and ageing
Dr Marta Boffito MD, PhD
Head of Clinical Trials, St. Stephen’s Centre (SSAT) Consultant Physician, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
Reader, Imperial College
‡
2
Summary1 Managing older patients could be quite challenging
2 Do patients with HIV age prematurely?
3 What do we know from cohort studies
4 Setting up an over 50 clinic: my experience at C&W
‡
3
Mr W.• 61 y.o. MSM • HIV + since 2001 • VL<50, CD4 821 • Transfer of care in 2011 on TDF + 3TC + DRV/r • AUG 2015 switched to TDF/FTC + DTG • Baseline RT not available but no Hx of failure
reported
‡
4
Mr W.
Medical Hx: Depression, hypertension, peripheral neuropathy, hypercholesterolemia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, osteoporosis.
Co-medications: Citalopram, amitryptiline, amlodipine, bisoprolol, tamsulosin, vitamin D. He is intolerant to statins and therefore on rosuvastatin 5mg
At the last visit: Serum creatinine 154 microM/L; eGFR 40 mL/min. It was 57 six months ago and deteriorated BP 145/95
‡
5
Increasingage,
ageingprocess1
Lifestyle(drugs,
alcohol)1
Drug toxicity(e.g. TDF and
Nephrotoxicity1
)
Persistentimmune
dysfunctioninflammation1 PREMATURE
AGEING1
Polypharmacy1
Cancer1,3
Bonedisease1,5
Kidney disease1,7
Neurological Impairments1,2
CVD1,4
Liver disease1,6
1. Deeks SG et al. BMJ 2009;338:a31722. McArthur JC et al. Ann Neurol 2010;67:699–714
3. Nguyen ML et al. 18th IAC. Vienna, Austria 2010. Abstract WEAB01054. Freiberg MS et al. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:614–22
5. Brown TT et al. AIDS 2006;20:2165–746. Towner WJ et al. JAIDS 2012;60:321–77. Lucas GM et al. Clin Infect Dis 2014;59
Do patients with HIV age prematurely?
‡
6
AANCC2
(age-associated non-communicable co-morbidities)
NCD1 (Non-communicable
disease)
Terms used in studies on comorbidities among PLWHIV
NICM3
(non-infectious comorbidity) NADI4
(non-AIDS-defining illness)
NADM/C5
(non-AIDS-defining malignancies/cancers)
Comorbidities in PLWHIV: today’s definitions
1. Smit M et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15(7):810–82. Schouten J et al. Clin Infect Dis 2014:59:1787–97
3. Guaraldi G et al. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2013;5:481–8.4. Mocroft A et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55:262-70
5. Shiels MS et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:753-62
‡
7
Part
icip
ants
(%)
45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 ≥65 . 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 ≥65
0 12 3+
Age (years) 45–49 50–54 55–59 60–64 ≥65 45–49 50–54 55–59 60–64 ≥65
Mean number of AANCC 0.83 1.18 1.34 1.52 1.96 0.79 0.75 1.11 1.08 1.51
Number of participants 184 126 97 58 55 193 130 84 66 41
HIV-infected (N=540)Mean AANCC/person = 1.3 (SD 1.14)
HIV-uninfected controls (N=524)Mean AANCC/person = 1.0 (SD 0.96)
AANCC incidence stratified by age in the AGEhIV Cohort Study, 2010–2012
Schouten J et al. Clin Infect Dis 2014:59:1787–97AANCC, age-associated non-communicable co-morbidities
Comorbidities are prevalent among ageing PLWH
‡
8
16,000
4,000
2,000
2010 20302015
Num
ber o
f peo
ple
6,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
2020 20250
3 or more
Year
Co-morbidities: 2 1 0
8,000
The number of PLWHIV with NCDs is predicted to rise
• Proportion of PLWHIV with ≥1 NCD predicted to increase
o 2010 29%
o 2030 in 84%
• Driven by
o CVD in 78%
o Diabetes in 17%
o Malignancies in 17%
Predicted burden of NCDs in PLWHIV 2010–2030*
*Predictive model based on data from the ATHENA cohort (n=10,278)NCDs, non-communicable diseases
Smit M et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2015;15(7):810–8
‡
9
Age (years)
20 30 40 50 60 70+
No medications ART onlyART + 1 comedication ART + 2 comedicationsART + 3 comedications ART + 4 comedicationsART + 5 comedications
Number of co-medications by age
100
80
60
40
20
0
Patie
nts (
%)
In the Positive Voices Survey (2015), among PLWHIV seen at HIV clinics (n=778), 64% reported ≥1 chronic condition, increasing to 77% among those >50 years of age
The most common co-medications were anti-depressants, antihypertensives and statins
Kall M et al. and the Positives Voices Study Group. EACS 2015
PLWHIV are taking medications in addiction to their ARVs
‡
10
Knowledge on aging with HIVMajority of clinical trial populations include people under the age of 50 years and very few (if any?) above 60 years Our knowledge limited to
▪ Cohort studies (e.g. AGEhiv, POPPY, etc) ▪ Clinical experience
Trial Drug(s) Study population Median age
GS - 104&1111 ECFTAF vs ECFTDF Naïve 33
ARTEMIS2 DRV/r vs LPV/r Naïve 36
SPRING-23 DTG vs RAL Naïve 37
STAR4 EFV vs RPV Naïve 37
FLAMINGO5 DTG vs DRV/r Naïve 34
GS-US-292-01126 ECFTAF Switch 58
GS-US-292-1826* TDF based regimen to ECFTAF
Switch >60*recruiting
1 Wohl, Lancet 2015; 385. 2 Orkin, HIV Med. 2013. 3 Raffi, Lancet 2013; 381. 4 Cohen Journal of the International AIDS Society 2012. 5 Cloet Lancet 2014. 6 Pozniak JAIDS 71, 2015
‡
11
What do we know from cohort studies
Cancer
Bonedisease
Kidney disease
Neurological Impairments
CVD
Liver disease
‡
12
Central nervous system
Hypotheses tested
Despite suppressive cART, compared to an appropriate control population, HIV+ individuals will have evidence of:
• Poorer cognitive performance • Grey and white matter atrophy • White matter microstructural abnormalities
Structural brain and cognitive abnormalities would occur together and be more common in HIV+ individuals
HIV + N = 134 – HIV – N = 79 All underwent: cognitive testing and MRI scanning (several modalities) AGE (median, IQR; years) HIV + = 55, 51-62 – HIV- = 57, 52-64
Brain MRI changes associated with poorer cognitive function in treated HIV-infection1
Underwood et al. CROI 2016
‡
13
Cognitive function
p < 0.001 p = 0.01
p < 0.01 p < 0.001
p < 0.001
p = 0.4 p = 0.4
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Attention Executivefunction
Language Memory Motorfunction
Processingspeed
Global
Cog
nitiv
e do
mai
n T
scor
e
HIV-status
HIV-
HIV+
Boxplots of demographically adjusted cognitive domain T-scores by HIV-serostatus. P values calculated using Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Underwood et al. CROI 2016
PLWHIV have poorer scores in almost all tasks except language and memory compared to controls
‡
14
Conclusions
HIV+ individuals have evidence of cognitive impairment, grey matter atrophy and white matter microstructural injury
• despite fully suppressive cART • compared to an appropriate control population
Structural brain abnormalities tend to occur together • found more commonly in HIV+ individuals • associated with poorer cognitive function • associated with markers of immune dysregulation
Limitations – cohort study • unmeasured differences could confound group comparisons • but mitigated against this with an appropriate HIV- control group
Underwood et al. CROI 2016
‡
1. Anastos K et al. Antivir Ther 2007;12(7):1049–58, 2. McComsey GA et al. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51(8):937–46,3. Triant VA et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(9):3499–504, 4. Bedimo R et al. AIDS 2012;26:825–31
15
Antiretroviral exposure and risk of osteoporotic fractures: 1996–20094
Haz
ard
Ratio
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8TDF ABC ZDV/D4T NNRTI rPI
Fracture prevalence PLWHIV and non-infected controls3*
Frac
ture p
revale
nce/
100 p
erson
s7.06.05.04.03.02.01.00.0
Male
20–29 30–39 40–49 60–6950–59Age
p<0.0001(overall comparison)
Frac
ture p
revale
nce/
100 p
erson
s
7.06.05.04.03.02.01.00.0
Female
30–39 40–49 50–59 70–7960–69Age
p=0.002(overall comparison)
HIV Non-HIV
Increased BMD issue risk from HIV infection
Increased BMD issue risk from HIV treatment
*U.S. healthcare system data
• PLWHIV have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than the uninfected population1
• Prevalence of fractures of the spine, hip, and wrist, sites commonly associated with osteoporosis can be 60% higher in PLWHIV compared with the uninfected3
PLWHIV are at increase of low BMD and fractures
• ARVs can exacerbate low BMD issues
• Initiation of therapy is associated with a 2–6% decrease in BMD over the first two years of treatment2
‡
16
Fractures Occur at a Younger Age in HIV+ Men
Gonciulea A, et al. CROI 2016. Boston, MA. #699
MACS Study (2001-2015)In
cide
nce
Rat
e/10
00 p
erso
n-yr
0
7.5
15
22.5
30
Overal
l40
-49 Yr o
f Age
50-59
Yr of A
ge≥6
0 Yr o
f Age
Overal
l40
-49 Yr o
f Age
50-59
Yr of A
ge≥6
0 Yr o
f Age
OverallHIV-negativeHIV-infected
All fractures Osteoporotic fracturesIncidence Rates of All Fractures and Osteoporotic Fractures
Overall Overall40-49 40-4950-59 50-59 ≥60≥60Age (Years)
The increase in incidence of all fractures and osteoporotic fractures occurred at an earlier age in HIV+ men compared to uninfected controls. This analysis highlights the importance of early screening for
osteoporosis in HIV+ men, particularly after the age of 50.
Ongoing, prospective cohort study of ART-treated HIV+ (n=1221) and HIV- (n=1408) men age ≥40 ▪ Incidence of all fractures and osteoporotic fractures was similar among younger HIV+ and HIV-
men, but increased at an earlier age in HIV+ (age 50-59) vs HIV- men (age ≥60 years) ▪ Compared to HIV- men (age 40-49), HIV+ men (age 50-59) and (age ≥60) had higher adjusted
incidence rate ratios of all fractures (1.99 and 1.84, respectively); similar trends were seen for osteoporotic fractures.
▪ eGFR <60 was associated with higher risk of all fractures
‡
17
PLWHIV have higher risk of CKD
• Data from Danish cohort 1995 - 2014 o 5897 cases o 53073 matched controls
The age-standardised risk of chronic kidney disease Increased with time after cART Initiation.
Rasmussen et al Lancet HIV 2015aIRR = adjusted incidence rate ratio
‡
18
… and higher risk of CV disease
Rasmussen et al Lancet HIV 2015aIRR = adjusted incidence rate ratio
‡
19
CardiovascularCardiovascular (CV)-related/AIDS-related death ratio and age of death in the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) trial,4 between 1996 and 2004.
Freiberg MS et alJAMA Intern Med 2013
‡
20
6
5
4
3
2
040 45 50 55 60 65
Age (years)
Rela
tive
haza
rd o
fde
velo
ping
CV
D
Reducing systolic BPb
Reducing cholesterola
Smoking cessation
Relative risk of CVD
Model for change in relative risk of CVD in a cohort of 24,323 HIV-positive individuals without prior CVD (D:A:D Study)
Effective treatment of modifiable risk factors can significantly reduce an individual’s CVD risk
aReduced by 1 mmol/L; bReduced by 10 mmHg
Reducing traditional CDV risk factors can decrease risk of CVD in older PLWHIV
Petoumenos K et al. HIV Med 2014;15:595–603
‡
21
PLWHIV are diagnosed with cancer at an earlier age than uninfected adultsM
ean
age
of
canc
er d
iagn
osis
0
20
40
60
80
5345
52514142
52
7161
6967656658
SCC, squamous cell carcinoma, SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results 1. National Cancer Institute Fact Sheet. HIV Infection and Cancer Risk. National Institutes of Health. 2013, 2. Nguyen ML et al. 18th IAC, 2010. Vienna, Austria. Abstract WEAB0105
Average age at cancer diagnosis for 516 HIV-positive individuals and uninfected individuals (SEER database), by cancer type, 2000–20072
Uninfected (SEER database)
HIV-positiveindividuals
Anal/rectal SCC
Non-Hodgkinlymphoma Liver Head
and neck Lung Breast Prostate
p=0.0001 for all comparisons
‡
22
Polypharmacy
• Has been variously defined
• In research studies a commonly applied definition has been the concomitant use of five or more drugs
• Has been linked to heightened risk of occurrence of drug-related problems (toxicities and DDIs) and a detrimental health outcome
≥ 5
‡
23
Mechanism of PK drug-drug interaction
Roden DM & George AL, Jr. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002;1:37–44
Absorption
Metabolism
Excretion
Inhibition/induction of intestinal cytochromes or drug transporters Gastric pH
Food, mineralsupplements
Inhibition of renaldrug transporters
Inhibition/inductionof hepatic
cytochromes,glucuronidation,
or drug transporters
Enterocyte
Small intestineKidney
Liver
Portal vein
Systemic circulation
Bile
‡
24
Drug interaction resources HIV
‡
25HIV=human immunodeficiency virus; TDM=therapeutic drug monitoring; CACS=coronary artery calcium scores; BMD=bone mineral density
Waters L, et al. Int J STD AIDS 2012;23:546‒52
…full medication and drug interactions review, neurocognitive assessment, adherence self-
assessment and investigations, including TDM, CACS and BMD.
…osteoporosis……prostate cancer…
The clinic has improved general practitioner (GP) liaison…
A dedicated clinic for the over 50’s at C&W
‡
26
1 – Drug history• N of drugs • Type of drugs
o Prescribed o OTC o Herbals o Recreational o Alcohol
• Drug interactions
‡
27
2 – Endocrine systemMEN
Check for hypogonadism • low libido • depression • osteoporosis
WOMEN Menopausal clinic • depression • osteoporosis • ….
Transexual • symptomatology • drug interactions
TestosteroneTotal and FREE
Full hormonalprofile
Full hormonalprofile with
appropriate referral
‡
28
3 - Cancer screening
MEN • PSA • Anal cytology • Referral to anoscopy
clinic if cytology is abnormal
WOMEN • Cervical smear* • Ensure mammography
is done or planned
*cervical smear test is recommended every year regardless of patient’s age
‡
29
3 - Cancer screening
… anal cytology results reflected the fact that an ageing HIV-positive population is more at risk of having abnormalities; it is important that this group continues to be offered regular screens and educated about anal malignancy.
Mohabeer-Hart EACS 2015
‡
30
4 – CV risk assessmentCoronary artery calcification score
‡
31
5 – Bone mineral density• DEXA scan • Vitamin D • FRAX score
‡
32
5 – Bone mineral density
BHIVA 2012
‡
33
6 – Cognitive assessment▪ HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND)▪ SOCIAL SITUATION: combination of all social factors that come into play
at any one time
Are you concerned about your memory/concentration/cognition?Has anybody around you expressed concern about your memory/concentration/cognition?
PHQ – 9GAD - 7
‡
34
6 – Cognitive assessment: EMQ
‡
35
6 – cognitive assessment
‡
36
Questions?• Are we ready to manage an aeging HIV
population? • Do we need to pay particular attention when it
comes to choose the right ARV regimen, to avoid adding toxicity?
‡
37
‡
38
HIV duration of 20 Years in 75 year olds doubles multimorbidities & polypharmacy ratesSilver champions from the GEPPO cohort (GEriatricPatients living with HIV/AIDS): A case control study of people above 75 years of age addressing Multimorbidity Polypharmacy and Antiretrovirals’ Prescription in old HIV patients
‡
39
Results• A total of 492 patients were included (292 HIV+ and
200 HIV-neg • At logistic regression analysis HIV duration above 20
years was an independent predictor of MM (OR=2.31) and PP (OR=2.36)
• Less drug regimens (LDR) were used in 101 patients (35.31%) and included dual therapy in 82 (28.67%) and mono therapy in 19 subjects (6.64%)
• PP was a significant predictor of LDR (aOR=3.08`0 • Tenofovir was used in only 8 patients (2.7%) and NRTI-
sparing and booster free regimens in 163 (56.4%) and 127 (59.3%)
‡
40
‡
41
‡
42
Questions?