Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11/6/2012
1
Education in
Finland
History / Context
• 1600s – ability to read and write was required to be married in the church
• Literacy and education deeply embedded in the culture – emphasis on learning at the heart of the family and community
11/6/2012
2
History / Context
• 1970s – major shift in education policy � all students will receive the same comprehensive education: peruskoulu (9 year compulsory)
– Based on belief that all children can learn given the proper accommodations and support
– Teacher training “seminars” converted to university degree programs
• Now - top 10% of upper secondary graduates are selected to earn a teaching degree
– Masters degree required – 5 year program
History / Context
• 2001 – Finland outperforms Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) nations
– Ended criticism from politicians and business leaders who claimed that peruskoulu lowered standards for all
11/6/2012
3
A few facts
• Finland
– Population: 5.4 million
– Student population: 800,000 (comprehensive and
upper secondary/professional institute)
• Massachusetts
– Population: 6.5 million
– Public school student population: 950,000
Finnish Education Structure
11/6/2012
4
Finnish Education Structure
Funding
• Per pupil financing from federal government:
– $9,500 for basic education (grades 1-9)
– $8,700 for upper secondary
– $14,500 for professional institute (vocational)
– Additional funding criteria based on grade range of the school and special programming
– Municipality/school determines budget and can add funding to government allocation.
• Teachers’ salaries average $45,000
11/6/2012
5
Common Starting Point for All
• Equal/guaranteed access for all to:
– Comprehensive heath services
– Daycare (teachers with BA)
– Specialized support when not meeting benchmarks
• Voluntary, free preschool for children at age 6
– Teachers have BA in teaching and early childhood development
– 99% of students attend
• Childhood poverty rate 4% (compared to US rate of 20%)
Emphasis on Learning for All
• Immediate support/early intervention when a student is not meeting expected benchmarks [up to 50% of students receive some support]
• Three tiers: general, intensified, and specialized support.
• Only 2% of the population repeats a grade
11/6/2012
6
Emphasis on Learning for All
• 0.3% drop out of school
• 96% continue studies immediately after compulsory education
• Ministry of Education: Youth Guarantee (new law that takes effect in 2013) to support the 4% who don’t continue after compulsory education
Special Education - Finland
11/6/2012
7
University of Helsinki
• Annually receives 1,200-1,300 applications for
120 spots in the teacher education program
• Bachelors degree (3 years) required to be a
preschool teacher
• Masters degree (5 years) required to be a
primary teacher(grades 1-6) or subject
teacher (grades 7-9 and upper secondary)
• Rigorous application process
Teacher Education
• Working in schools with professors from the university throughout 5 year program
• Coursework in subject and pedagogy
• Significant coursework on how to conduct research
����Solid preparation for the becoming a teacher which requires conducting research to know
what students have learned as well as what
instructional strategies work
11/6/2012
8
Finnish
EducationPerformance is the result of a consistent national policy based on:
•Equity
•Trust in the institution, the schools, and the educators to ensure that all children learn
Result
• All Finnish universities provide the same rigorous and high quality teacher preparation
• All Finnish schools deliver high quality education following a national curriculum framework but with curriculum and instruction designed at the school level.
11/6/2012
9
Finland
• The key is not the teaching but the teachers…
– Very smart
– Very well educated
– Very skilled in the art of teaching
– And empowered and expected to spend
significant time collaborating with colleagues to:
• Develop curriculum,
• Measure learning, and
• Support all students to achieve high standards.
Finland �Sweden
11/6/2012
10
Swedish Education System
• Inconsistent national policy
• Open market allows non-profit and for-profit schools to compete with municipal schools
• By 2015, all educators must be licensed
• Education is not a competitive career path
Victor Rydberg Foundation SchoolsStockholm, Sweden
• Founded by nonprofit foundation
• Focus on creativity and student engagement through project-based learning across multiple disciplines
• “Mini Finland” within Swedish system in terms of ability to hire/select best teachers
11/6/2012
11
BelmontWhat do we have in common with Finnish and Swedish
schools?
• Selective hiring process
• High standards for all educators and leaders
• Expectation of ongoing research and
development (PLTs, data meetings, common
planning, professional development)
• Response to Intervention model to support
learners not meeting benchmarks
Belmont What can we learn from Finnish and Swedish schools?
• How can we expand the opportunities for educators to work together?
• How can we provide more training to teachers on how to conduct research and deeply understand students’ learning?
• How can we improve RtI for literacy, math, and behavior/social-emotional development?
• How do we increase creativity and engage allstudents, especially in grades 6-12?
• How do we increase trust in the work that the district, schools, and educators do?
11/6/2012
12
Sources
• http://prezi.com/jnm83nw9fob3/education-
system/ - presentation by Leo Pahkin, Councellor
or Education, Finnish National Board of Education
• http://oph.fi/english - Finnish National Board of
Education web site
• http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/?lang=en – Finnish
Ministry of Education and Culture
• Sahlberg, Pasi. Finnish Lessons. New York:
Teachers College Press, 2011.