61
Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Page 2: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Historical change

• Late 19th Century till 1940s saw a fear of powerful media effects

• 1940s through early 1970s was the era of ‘limited effects’

• From 1980s media studies splinter into a wide variety of approaches, with the mainstream view moving toward partial and mediated effects

Page 3: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Today?

• What ‘effects’ on media content are people concerned about?

• How are you different because of the media you have used and currently use?

• Is it detrimental?

• ‘Theory’ – understanding why we do things, how we do things, how humans behave…

Page 4: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method
Page 5: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Early 20th century

• Professionalization of advertising

• Development and growth of new mass media technologies

• The Great War– England and the U.S. develop propaganda on a

large scale– After the war, Bernays and others claim to be

able to ‘engineer consent’

Page 6: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Popular fears of mass manipulation

• Sudden and rapid growth of mass media– Newspapers– Periodicals– Movies– Radio

Page 7: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Social fears

• Growth and increasing sophistication of persuasion ‘professions’– Advertising– Public relations/propaganda

• Massive WWI propaganda output– Exorbitant post-warclaims of efficacy post-war

by Creel Committee members• Creel• Bernays

Page 8: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Committee on Public Information• Woodrow Wilson re-elected President

in 1916– Ran on a platform emphasizing “He kept

us out of war”• Within a year, was leading the country

into war with Germany• Created the Committee on Public

Information (CPI) on April 13, 1917

Page 9: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• "Lead this people into war, and they'll forget there was ever such a thing as tolerance. To fight, you must be brutal and ruthless, and the spirit of ruthless brutality will enter into the very fibre of national life, infecting the Congress, the courts, the policeman on the beat, the man in the street."

Page 10: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Edward L. Bernays

• Freud’s nephew– Attempted to apply psychoanalysis to

propaganda

• Used psychological research methods, advertising methods to “manufacture consent”

• Tireless promoter of PR as way to control public opinion

Page 11: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Lasswell’s study of propaganda• Interested in the application of symbol

manipulation to influence psychological unconscious– Nationalism and ego-involvement– Manipulation of emotions via propaganda– Tried to take a distanced, ‘uninterested’ position toward

propaganda

• Identified goals and methods of propaganda • Harold D. Lasswell, Propaganda Technique in the

World War (New York: Knopf, 1927).

Page 12: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method
Page 13: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Creel Committee Emphases in their propaganda

• Emotional Appeals

• Demonization

• The War to End All Wars

• Dishonesty

Page 14: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• "Propaganda in the broadest sense is the technique of influencing human action by the manipulation of representations. These representations may take spoken, written, pictorial or musical form."

Page 15: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Payne Fund Studies: The effects of movies on children

Conducted in the late 20's and early 30’s, series of studies occurred in two categories:

1. assess content of films and audience size and composition (Dale)

2. audience effects of themes and messages a. acquisition of information (Holaday and Stoddard) b. attitude change (R.C. Peterson and Thurstone) c. stimulating emotions (Dysinger and Ruckmick)d. harming health (Renshaw, Miller and Marquis)e. eroding moral standards (C.C. Peters)f. influencing conduct (Shuttleworth and May, Blumer and

Hauser)

Page 16: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Payne Fund

• Conclusions:– Movies affected the way children dressed, their

expectations with regard to sex, led to fear and lost sleep.

– Movies also provided some positive role models, innocent entertainment, etc.

– Some disconfirmation of the worst fears found in popular culture

Page 17: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

The War of the Worlds

• An accidental occurrence seemed to validate some of the worst fears about mass society and the power of the newest mass medium, the radio

• Orson Welles’ Mercury Theater of the Air’s broadcast of an adaptation of H.G. Wells’ War of the Worlds on Halloween eve, 1938

Page 18: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method
Page 19: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method
Page 20: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Research on the broadcast

• The invasion from Mars: A study in the psychology of panic (1940: Princeton University) – Cantril, Gaudet, Herzog

Page 21: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

The establishment of the ‘limited effects’ paradigm

End of the ‘powerful effects’ model of media influence

Page 22: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Columbia School

• Paul Felix Lazarsfeld emigrated from Austria to the U.S. in the 1930s. – A mathematician– Interested in the application of mathematics, especially the new statistics,

to study of social problems• Sets up research programs at Princeton (Radio Research Bureau)

and at Columbia (Bureau of Applied Social Research) that combine study of practical problems with academic methods of research– Model that would be followed by the field from then on.

• First studies focus on audience size, reactions to and use of radio programming– As well as a wide array of social concerns that were not communication-

oriented

Page 23: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

The People’s Choice• Lazarsfeld, Berelson, and Gaudet

• Study of the 1940 presidential election in Erie county, Ohio

• 20th Century--strong, commercially successful newspapers, radio, magazines, that had the ability to say what they wanted to in Western European countries

• The research comes from vague ideas of what is worth studying

Page 24: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Research Questions

1. How do people decide to vote as they do?

2. What were the major influences on them?

• "Social characteristics determine political preference."

Page 25: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Results

• Lazarsfeld could predict with 76% accuracy which candidate someone would vote for based on his demographics. That was better than the people themselves could predict.– Prediction is taken as the criterion of validity– "Cross-Pressures"

• Opinion Leaders (21%) – ("Have you tried to influence someone on a political issue

recently?"; "Has anyone asked your advice recently on a political issue?")

– opinion leaders were thought to be a relatively small group of influential people

• Lacked evidence of actual influence

Page 26: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Media influence

Whenever a person in the sample changed his/her vote intention, the interviewer asked why:

• Democrats mentioned radio most often (30% vs. 20% for newspapers)

• Republicans mentioned newspapers (31% vs. 17% for radio).

• Note time period of this study

Page 27: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• Over half the voters said the media had the most important impact, 2/3 said news media were “helpful”

• “Two-step flow”

• Conclusion--interpersonal communication most important

Page 28: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• Those most likely to be predisposed to vote Democratic were exposed to more pro-Democratic propaganda – the analogous situation was true for Republicans

• Lazarsfeld decided this showed ‘selective exposure’--those who were predisposed to vote one way or another chose to expose themselves to propaganda that was positive toward the preferred party

Page 29: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Impact of the studies

• The studies set the parameters of political communication research for over a decade and still influence the field now

• Major studies of elections did not even ask about media for several election cycles

Page 30: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Hovland

• Experiments on mass communication: Persuading the American soldier in World War II– Hovland, Lumsdaine and Sheffield (1949)

• Studied the impact of showing Frank Capra’s propaganda films in “Why We Fight” series to American soldiers in a training camp– Many were draftees and did not want to fight

• Attempted to measure the effects of movies on information acquisition and modification of soldiers' interpretations and opinions, attitudes toward allies, and motivation

Page 31: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Why We Fight

• Films from the series included in the study: Prelude to War, The Nazis Strike, Divide and Conquer, The Battle of Britain

Page 32: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Battle of Britain

• Men in two camps--some were exposed to a film, some not– 2100 in one camp (before/after control group)– 900 in another camp (before/after control

group)– 1200 (after-only control group)– Sampling by company units

• Units were matched on several demographic variables

Page 33: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

The Battle of Britain

• Before and after questionnaires were slightly different– Tried to distract men from wondering why they

were answering twice by writing “revised” on the questionnaire

• One week between exposure and the second measure

• Anonymity was assured

Page 34: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Results

• The movies had a significant impact on factual knowledge

• Ex. Why weren’t the Germans “successful at bombing British planes on the ground”?

• Ans. “because the British kept their planes scattered at the edge of the field”

• Experimental group: 78% correct• Control group: 21% correct

Page 35: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Results: Learning from films dependent upon education

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Grade School High School College

Test Score

Page 36: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Results

• Opinions and interpretations– Effects were not as great

– “the heavy bombing attacks on Britain were an attempt by the Nazis to . . .”

– Answer: “invade and conquer England” • Experimental group: 58%• Control group: 43%

Page 37: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Results

• General attitudes– Effect was slight

– “Do you feel that the British are doing all they can to help win the war?”• Experimental group 7% greater than control• In many cases, only 2-3% positive difference

was found

Page 38: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

“Sleeper effect”

• 9 weeks after exposure– Factual material was forgotten

• Retained only about 50% of factual items that 1-week groups remembered

– On 1/3 of opinion issues, the long-term group showed less change

– However, on more than half of the fifteen issues under study, the long term group showed greater change than the short-term group

Page 39: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Yale School

• Hovland et al. set up Yale School of research on persuasion

• Studied the effect of:– Source characteristics– Message characteristics– Order of presentation– Psychological characteristics of audience

Page 40: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Source characteristics

• Credibility– Topic: Atomic submarines

• Sources: J. Robert Oppenheimer/Pravda

– Topic: Future of Movie Theaters• Sources: Fortune magazine/A woman movie gossip

columnist

– Greater persuasion with more credible source• However, after 4 weeks differences had disappeared

Page 41: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Content

• Fear appeals – The more fearful the message, the greater the

effect on interest, tension– Less fearful message had a greater effect on

intension to change behavior– Fear was thought to invoke some sort of

interference

Page 42: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Channel

• The main study here tends to indicate that interpersonal channels are more effective at changing attitudes than are mass media channels.

Page 43: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Personality

Personality variables such as self-esteem, anxiety and depression have an influence on persuadability. Research suggested that people with low self-esteem are likely to be relatively easily persuaded.

Page 44: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Katz and Lazarsfeld

• Personal influence: The two-step flow of communication– Katz and Lazarsfeld (1955)

• Based on ideas originating in the "People's Choice"

• Concerned with the movement of information from media through interpersonal networks

• Decatur study of opinion leaders conducted by the Bureau of Applied Social Research at Columbia

Page 45: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• Assessed opinion leaders’ role in four areas of influence: – 1. marketing

– 2. fashion

– 3. public affairs

– 4. film choice

• Delineated the characteristics of opinion leaders – position in the life cycle, SES, social contacts

• Marketing—middle-aged women, especially with families

• Fashion—younger and single women

• Public affairs—older and more educated

• Film choice—younger and single

Page 46: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• 1. Mass communication ordinarily does not serve as a necessary and sufficient cause of audience effects, but rather functions among and through a nexus of mediating factors and influences.

Klapper’s (1960) The Effects of Mass Communication

Page 47: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• 2. These mediating factors are such that they typically render mass communication a contributory agent, but not the sole cause, in a process of reinforcing the existing conditions.

Page 48: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• 3. On such occasions as mass communication does function in the service of change, one of two conditions is likely to exist. Either:– a. the mediating factors will be found to be

inoperative and the effect of the media will be found to be direct; or

– b. the mediating factors, which normally favor reinforcement, will be found to be themselves impelling toward change.

Page 49: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• 4. There are certain residual situations in which mass communication seems to produce direct effects, or directly and of itself to serve certain psycho-physical functions.

Page 50: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• 5. The efficacy of mass communication, either as a contributory agent or as an agent of direct effect, is affected by various aspects of the media and communications themselves or of the communication situation (including, for example, aspects of textual organization, the nature of the source and medium, the existing climate of public opinion, and the like).

Page 51: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• People just don’t change their minds all that easily– They have stable attitudes that flow from their

socialization and experience • Can predict attitudes from demographics

Page 52: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• An excellent example of this is provided by Kendall and Woolf's analysis of reactions to anti-racist cartoons. The cartoons featured Mr Biggott whose absurdly racist ideas were intended to discredit bigotry. In fact 31% failed to recognise that Mr Biggott was racially prejudiced or that the cartoons were intended to be anti-racist (Kendall & Wolff (1949) in Curran (1990)).

Page 53: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Selectivity

• Selective exposure

• Selective attention

• Selective perception

• Selective interpretation

• Selective recall

• Usually tied to ‘balance models’ of cognitive psychology– Especially ‘cognitive dissonance’

Page 54: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Modern effects study

• In the 1970s and 1980s effects study came under powerful attack from more critical approaches, many developed in Europe

• British cultural studies (neo-Marxist) and popular culture studies, postmodernist philosophy, etc. criticized many of the underlying assumptions of effects research

Page 55: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

• Followed the lead within psychology away from social psychology to cognitive information processing– Move away from a narrow focus on persuasion

to learning, beliefs, etc.

Page 56: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Renewed belief in media power

• Move toward a belief in stronger effects– Agenda setting effect– Spiral of silence– Social construction of reality– Cognitive effects/learning– Mediation

• Lowered expectations for the ‘effects’

Page 57: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Contemporary media effects

• Search for multiple types of effects and the impact of medium and context as well as content

• Interactions with multiple concepts

– For example, what types of appeals are most effective with elderly men with regard to influencing exercise behavior?

– What forms of humor are the most enjoyable for teen girls?

– What are the relative influences of fantasy violence on television, movie and videogame audiences?

Page 58: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Common methods

• Laboratory experiments

• Surveys

• Becoming more common:– Focus groups– Depth interviews– Content analyses tied to social statistics

Page 59: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Cognitive information processing

• Contemporary models of learning/thinking present a series of steps in these processes– Modeled after computers, information theory

• Patterns of stability and change have been identified that need explanation– When do similar stimuli elicit similar

behaviors, different behaviors or simple inattention?

Page 60: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

CIP

• Steps:– Stimulation of sense organs– Maintenance in sensory registers– Short-term memory– Working memory– Stimulation of content in long-term storage– Evaluation and encoding– Storage– Behavioral response

Page 61: Historical trends in the study of media effects: Theory and method

Our text

• Diffusion of Innovations

• Critical Mass Theory

• Social Information Processing

• Use & Gratifications

• Social Leaning / Social Cognitive Theory

• Theory of the Long Tail

• Critical & Cultural theories