11
High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF V. N. Goncharov University of Rochester Laboratory for Laser Energetics 1 58th Annual Meeting of the American Physical Society Division of Plasma Physics San Jose, CA 31 October–4 November 2016 25 0 25 50 0 50 Distance (nm) 100 200 300 Distance (nm) t (g/cm 3 ) 0 0 0 10 20 1 2 Time (ns) Ignition hydroequivalent OMEGA design, R b /R t = 0.75 (R75) ASTER simulation OMEGA R75 SDD NIF R75 design E L = 1.6 MJ Power (TW) DT vapor 450 nm 8 - n m C D 7 0 - n m D T i c e E L = 26 kJ 0 0 150 300 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.0 4 8 12 16 Time (ns) Power (TW) tDr total (g/cm 2 ) DT vapor 1724 nm 2 4 - n m C D 2 0 0 - n m D T i c e

High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF

V. N. GoncharovUniversity of RochesterLaboratory for Laser Energetics

1

58th Annual Meeting of theAmerican Physical SocietyDivision of Plasma Physics

San Jose, CA31 October–4 November 2016

–25

0

25

–50 0 50Distance (nm)

100

200

300

Dis

tan

ce (n

m)

t (g/cm3)

00

0

10

20

1 2Time (ns)

Ignition hydroequivalentOMEGA design, Rb/Rt = 0.75 (R75)

ASTER simulationOMEGA R75

SDD NIF R75 designEL = 1.6 MJ

Po

wer

(T

W)

DTvapor

450 n

m

8-nm CD

70-nm DT ice

EL = 26 kJ

00

150

3001.2

0.8

0.4

0.04 8 12 16

Time (ns)

Po

wer

(T

W)

tD

r to

tal (

g/c

m2 )

DTvapor

1724

nm

24-nm CD

200-nm DT ice

Page 2: High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

TC13024

Summary

Reducing cross-beam energy transfer (CBET) losses improves stability properties of ignition spherical direct-drive (SDD) designs at the National Ignition Facility (NIF)

• Hot-spot energy in direct-drive (DD) implosions is a factor of 5 or more larger than that of indirect-drive (ID) implosions

– the required hot-spot pressure in an igniting NIF-scale DD design must exceed 120 Gbar (350 Gbar in ID)

• Without CBET mitigation, SDD designs on the NIF have in-flight aspect ratios in excess of 30

– CBET mitigation in hydroequivalent designs on OMEGA involves reducing beam size relative to the target size* to Rb/Rt = 0.75

– high-yield and ignition SDD designs on the NIF require both beam-size reduction and wavelength detuning**

2

* I. V. Igumenshchev, Phys. Plasmas 17, 122708 (2010); I. V. Igumenshchev, CI3.00002, this conference (invited). ** J. A. Marozas et al., NO5.00009 and P. B. Radha et al., NO5.00005, this conference.

Page 3: High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

Collaborators

T. J. B. Collins, J. A. Marozas, S. P. Regan, P. B. Radha, E. M. Campbell, D. H. Froula, I. V. Igumenshchev,

R. L. McCrory, J. F. Myatt, T. C. Sangster, and A. ShvydkyUniversity of Rochester

Laboratory for Laser Energetics

3

Page 4: High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

TC12311e

The hot-spot pressure in an ignition design must exceed a threshold value

4

Direct-drive designs are in a less-challenging hydrodynamic regime with CR K 22 and Phs > 120 Gbar; indirect-drive–ignition targets require CR = 30 to 40 and Phs > 350 Gbar.

~ /P E1th hs

00

100

200

300

400

500

20 40

Pth

(G

bar

)

60Hot-spot energy Ehs (kJ)

80 100

Current high-foot indirect driveRequired: Phs = 350 to 400 GbarAchieved: Phs = 230 Gbar

Energy-scaled current OMEGA (Ehs = 0.44 kJ)Required: 140 GbarAchieved:* 56!7 Gbar

Mitigated CBET

IFAR: in-flight aspect ratio * S. P. Regan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 025001 (2016).

• Pressure threshold for ignition

• For direct drive

~ ~ IFARP V P P/ //hs imp a a

1 3 5 30 1 3 a

Page 5: High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

TC12872a

Coupling losses caused by CBET are larger on the NIF-scale targets because of longer density scale length

5

Laser intensity (#1014 W/cm2)

no CBET

with CBET

NIF

OMEGAA

bla

tio

n p

ress

ure

Pa

(Mb

ar)

250

200

150

100

50

05 6 7 8

Phs ~ PaIFAR5/3

9

Direct-drivedesigns

10

Page 6: High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

TC13056

CBET losses make ignition target designs too unstable during acceleration

6

20

Yie

ld1-

D (

×10

16)

1

5

10

50

100

500

25 30IFAR

35 40

NIF SDD designsVimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/sFull CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar

Current stability thresholdfor OMEGA cryogenic implosions

1-D LILAC simulations

Gain = 1Ya

Yno a

a = 4.1Phs = 72 GbarCR = 18.5

a = 2.9Phs = 90 GbarCR = 19 a = 1.4

Phs = 130 GbarCR = 21

CR: convergence ratio

Page 7: High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

Beam 1

Beam 2

CBET

TargetTarget

Beam 1

Beam 2

CBET

R bR b

RtRt

0.10

0.08

0.06

0.04

0.02

0.00700 800 900 1000 1100

Target diameter (nm)

CBETreduction**

Hyd

roef

ficie

ncy

(sh

ell K

E/l

aser

en

ergy

)

Increase in density scale length

TC13057

CBET reduction* and improved laser coupling have been demonstrated on OMEGA by reducing Rbeam/Rtarget

7

** V. N. Goncharov et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 717, 012008 (2016); S. P. Regan et al., presented at the 57th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics, Savannah, GA, 16–20 November 2015 (CI3.00005) (invited).

KE: kinetic energy * I. V. Igumenshchev, Phys. Plasmas 17, 122708 (2010); D. H. Froula et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 125003 (2012).

The performance of larger shells is limited by drive asymmetries. The near-term goal is to quantify and reduce laser power imbalance (part of the “100-Gbar” campaign).

Page 8: High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

Combination of Rb/Rt < 1 and wavelength detuning leads to robust high-yield SDD designs on the NIF

TC13025

8

00

150

3001.2

0.8

0.4

0.04 8 12 16

Time (ns)

201

510

50100

Ya Ya

Rb = Rt

Rb = 0.75 Rt

Yno a

Yno a

500

25 30 35 40

IFAR

R75 with wavelength separation (Dm = !6 Å) Gain = 5; SDD NIF design

Yie

ld1-

D (

×10

16)

Po

wer

(T

W)

tD

r to

tal (

g/c

m2 )

DTvapor

1724

nm

24-nm CD

200-nm DT ice

Initial experiments on the NIF with Dm = !2.3 Å confirmed predicted CBET reduction.*

*J. A. Marozas et al., NO5.00009, this conference.

Page 9: High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

201

510

50100

Ya Ya

Rb = Rt

Rb = Rt

Rb = 0.75 Rt

Rb = 0.75 Rt

Yno a

Yno a

500

25 30 35 40

IFAR

R75 with wavelength separation (Dm = !6 Å)

Yie

ld1-

D (

×10

16)

20

16

18

20

22

25 30 35 40

IFAR

CR

21

34

5

Ad

iab

at

Combination of Rb/Rt < 1 and wavelength detuning leads to robust high-yield SDD designs on the NIF

TC13058

9

Page 10: High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

The effect of improved laser coupling on target performance will be tested using an R75 design on OMEGA with improved power balance

TC13059

10

–25

0

25

Dis

tan

ce (n

m)

–25

0

25

–50 0 50Distance (nm)

100

200

300

Dis

tan

ce (n

m)

t (g/cm3)

0

100

200

300

t (g/cm3)

0

00

10

20

1 2Time (ns)

• The effect of CBET is smaller on OMEGA because of shorter scale lengths

• Ignition hydroequivalent OMEGA design Rb/Rt = 0.75, IFAR = 21.8, a = 3Vimp = 3.7 × 107 cm/s

3-D ASTER* simulationsat peak neutron production

Current OMEGAnonuniformitiesPhs = 70 Gbar

“100 Gbar” illuminationuniformity and offsetPhs = 100 GbarP

ow

er (

TW

)

DTvapor

450 n

m

8-nm CD

70-nm DT ice

EL = 26 kJ

*I. V. Igumenshchev et al., Phys. Plasmas 23, 052702 (2016).

Page 11: High-Performance Cryogenic Designs for OMEGA and the NIF1-D (× 1 0 16) 1 5 10 50 100 500 25 30 IFAR 35 40 NIF SDD designs Vimp = 3.8 × 107 cm/s Full CBET, Pa = 90 Mbar Current stability

TC13024

11

Summary/Conclusions

* I. V. Igumenshchev, Phys. Plasmas 17, 122708 (2010); I. V. Igumenshchev, CI3.00002, this conference (invited). ** J. A. Marozas et al., NO5.00009 and P. B. Radha et al., NO5.00005, this conference.

Reducing cross-beam energy transfer (CBET) losses improves stability properties of ignition spherical direct-drive (SDD) designs at the National Ignition Facility (NIF)

• Hot-spot energy in direct-drive (DD) implosions is a factor of 5 or more larger than that of indirect-drive (ID) implosions

– the required hot-spot pressure in an igniting NIF-scale DD design must exceed 120 Gbar (350 Gbar in ID)

• Without CBET mitigation, SDD designs on the NIF have in-flight aspect ratios in excess of 30

– CBET mitigation in hydroequivalent designs on OMEGA involves reducing beam size relative to the target size* to Rb/Rt = 0.75

– high-yield and ignition SDD designs on the NIF require both beam-size reduction and wavelength detuning**