20
1 High Energy Rechargeable Li-S Cells for EV Application. Status, Challenges and Solutions Yuriy Mikhaylik, Igor Kovalev, Riley Schock, Karthikeyan Kumaresan, Jason Xu and John Affinito Sion Power Corporation 2900 E. Elvira Rd. Tucson AZ 85756 USA www.sionpower.com

High Energy Rechargeable Li-S Cells for EV Application. Status

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

High Energy Rechargeable Li-S Cells for EV Application.

Status, Challenges and Solutions

Yuriy Mikhaylik, Igor Kovalev, Riley Schock, Karthikeyan Kumaresan, Jason Xu and John Affinito

Sion Power Corporation 2900 E. Elvira Rd. Tucson AZ 85756 USA

www.sionpower.com

2

Outline

• Why lithium-sulfur technology?– Specific energy.– Rate capability.– Low temperature performance.

• Status of lithium-sulfur technology.• Addressing the challenges.• New approach pursued by Sion in

collaboration with BASF for EV applications.• Conclusions.

3

• Lithium ions are stripped from the anode during discharge and form Li-polysulfides in the cathode.

– Li2 S in the cathode is the result of complete discharge.

• On recharge the lithium ions are plated back onto the anode as the Li2 Sx moves toward S8

• High order Li-polysulfides (Li2 S3 to Li2 S8 ) are soluble in the electrolyte and migrate to the anode scrubbing off any dendrite growth.

Li+

Li+ S8

Li2S8

Li2S6

Li2S4

Li2S3

Li2S2

Li2S

Li0

Discharge (Li stripping)Charge (Li plating)

Anode (-)

Cathode (+)

Load / Charger

LiLiS

SS

SS

SSS

LiLiS

SS

SS

S

Li LiS

SS

LiLiS

S

Li LiS

Li LiS

LiLiS

S

LiLiS

SS

S

Li LiS

SS

LiLiS

SS

SS

S

LiLiS

SS

S

Polysulfide Shuttle

Li+

Li+

Li+Li+

Li+

Li+Li+

Li+

Li+

Li+

Li+

Li+

+-

Theoretical Energy: ~2800Wh/l and 2500 Wh/kg

Why Lithium Sulfur Technology?

4

Typical experimental discharge and charge profiles with strong shuttle.

Charge and discharge profiles with shuttle inhibitor.

With NO3- additives Sion Power controls shuttle and achieves 100% of high

plateau sulfur utilization, 99.5% charge efficiency and 350 – 450 Wh/kg

1.8

1.9

2.0

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Specific capacity mAh/g

Volta

ge First discharge

Second and following discharges

Following recharge

1.8

1.9

2

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

Specific capacity, Ah/g

Volta

ge

Following recharges

First discharge

Second and following discharges

Why Lithium Sulfur Technology? Specific Energy

5

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

0 1000 2000 3000 4000Specific Power, W/kg

Spec

ific

Ener

gy, W

h/kg

Ni-Cd

Li-ion 18650

Ni-MH

Sion Power Li-S

Li-ion High Power

Why Lithium Sulfur Technology? Rate Capability

6

Charge and Discharge Profiles at -60 oC

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Ah

Volta

ge

Charge50 mA to 2.95 V

Discharge2500 mA to 1.0 V

Batteries with optimized solvent and salt concentrations delivered:

1)~160 Wh/kg at -60oC at 1C,

2)~130 Wh/kg at -70oC at 1C,

3) The battery can be recharged at -60°C.

2.5A Discharge Profiles

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

Discharge Capacity, Ah

Volta

ge

- 70oC - 60oC

+ 20oC

Why Lithium Sulfur Technology? Low Temperature Performance

Work partially support by NASA Glenn Contract NNC06CA85C

7

Status of Lithium Sulfur Technology

Limiting Mechanisms: 1) Rough lithium surface during cycling 2) Li/electrolyte depletion.

USABCSion

0%

100%

200%

300%

400%Power Density (W/L)

Specific Power (W/kg)

Recharge Time (hr)

Specific Energy (Wh/kg)

Energy Density (Wh/L)Lower Temp (oC)

Upper Temp(oC)

Rate Cap @1C (%)

Cycle Life

8

Addressing the Challenges Keys to the EV Market for Lithium-Sulfur

• Challenges - cycle life and high temperature stability:– Dynamics of lithium surface roughness and cycling.– Solvent depletion chemistry.

9

Surface Roughness vs Li DoD

0

0.1

0.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Li DoD

Surf

ace

Rou

ghne

ss

• Initially, surface roughness increases in direct proportion to Li depth of discharge (DoD).

• Maximal surface roughness can be observed at ~50-70% of Li DoD.

• The typical scenario is cycling at low Li DoD.

• The best scenario is cycling Li anodes at 100% DoD – but only with a current collector.

The Dynamics of Lithium Surface Roughness Monte-Carlo Simulation

10

30 cycles

26% Li DoD

330cycles

100% Li DoD

352 cycles

100% Li DoD

Cycling at 100% DOD of lithium prevents surface roughness but lithium/electrolyte depletion still occurs.

The Dynamics of Lithium Surface Roughness Experimental Observations

11

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

0 20 40 60 80 100Cycle

Wei

ght (

g)

DOL

Lithium

DME

Solvent and metallic Li mass vs. Cycle Number (2.5 Ah Li-S battery).

• 1,2-Dimethoxyethane(DME) is mainly responsible for depletion.

• Mass of metallic Li in the cell did not change dramatically.

• However, visually Li looks completely depleted at 60-80 cycles due to roughening and disintegration of Lithium foil.

• The slopes suggests that Lithium and DME may react in a molar ratio of 1:1 to 1:2. Several Lithium alcoholates can form by reaction with DME.

The Chemistry of Solvent Depletion Experimental Observations

12

O O

O OLi

MeOLi

O

CH4

MeSxLi

Li/Li2Sx

O O

O OLi

Li/Li2Sx

H2

RO

O OLin

High amount, highly soluble and highly detrimental for S cathode performance.

Moderate amount, low solubility, neutral.

Small amount, soluble, consumes S.

Traces.

Traces.

Increases anode polarization

Traces

Highly soluble and highly detrimental for S cathode performance.

Identified at Sion Power

Identified at Sion Power and by D. Aurbach, J. Electrochem. Soc.156,8. 2009.

DME

DOL

Identified depletion products and their impact on battery performance.

The Chemistry of Solvent Depletion Products and Effects

13

New Approaches Pursued by Sion in Collaboration with BASF for EV Application

• Reduction of lithium roughness.– Proprietary anode design.

• Development of innovative materials– Structurally stable cathodes.

• Materials developed by Sion/BASF– Physical protection of lithium with multi-functional

membrane assemblies.

14

47 um60 um

Conventional design

Proprietarydesign

Lithium Roughness Development Proprietary Anode Design

Proprietary design allowed for increased charging rate without increase in surface roughness.

0

400

800

1200

1600

0 50 100 150Cycle

Spec

ific

Cap

acity

, mA

h/g

Conventional design

Proprietary design

Charge Current Changed from: an 8-hour charge to a 2.5-hour charge

Experimental batteries cycling behavior

15

24 μm

Li Figure of Merit (FoM) exceeds 100 at Li DoD ~26-30%.

FoM = DoD x Number of Cycles.

Li anode after 450 cycles. Initial and final Li thickness ~24 µm.

Lithium Roughness Development Proprietary Anode Design

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 100 200 300 400Cycle

mA

h

Conventional design

Proprietarydesign

FoM ~34 FoM ~110

Experimental batteries cycling behavior

16

• Cathode structure improvement resulted in sulfur utilization increase from 1.2 Ah/g to 1.45 Ah/g.

• This development paves the way to increasing specific energy from the current 350 Wh/kg to the 550 Wh/kg needed to achieve a 500 km EV range

Development of Innovative Material Structurally Stable Cathodes

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

0 20 40 60 80Cycle No.

Spec

ific

Cap

acity

(Ah/

g) Improved structure

Conventional cathode

Experimental batteries cycling behavior

17

Thermal Ramp Test of Fully charged Li-S batteries after 20 cycles at 5 oC/min.

Development of Innovative Material Multi-functional Membrane Assemblies

With Sion-BASF protective layer on anode, there is no thermal runaway.

-5

15

35

55

75

95

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240Heater Temperature, oC

T cel

l - T

Hea

ter,

o C

Sulfur melting

Li melting

Conventional design Proprietory

design

Sion-BASFProtective

Layer

18

ConclusionsReduction of lithium surface roughness with new anode design, and better cathode structure, resulted in:

•Recharge time reduced to less than 3 hours.

•Substantial cycle life increase if lithium surface roughness suppressed.

•Sulfur utilization increased to 87%, or 1.45 Ah/g, paving the way to 550 Wh/kg Li-S battery.

Innovative anode design, and Sion Power-BASF protective membranes, increased thermal stability of Li-S cells – eliminating thermal runaway. Batteries passed the melting point of the Li without violent events.

19

Sion Power Corporation, in collaboration with BASF, is very optimistic that the future of all electric EV applications will be dominated by Sion Power’s lithium-sulfur technology.

Takeaway

20