Upload
junior-bailey
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Helen CainesYale University
Yale Colloquium – April 2006
Sampling the flavor of the Quark-Gluon Plasma.
QGP – Phase of matter where quark and gluons are the relevant degrees of freedom
Outline• Motivation: What is the QGP?• Understanding its properties• The future
Sampling the flavour of the Quark-Gluon Plasma.
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 2
Have we created a system that is not hadronic?
Have we created a weakly interacting gas of quarks and gluons (the Quark-Gluon Plasma)?
What have we created then?
The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider has been operationalsince 2000 to study matter at extreme temperatures.
Have the accelerator and experiments been successfully commissioned and operated?
Yes
Yes
No
That’s the rest of this talk
The bottom line
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 3
Strong color fieldForce grows with separation !!!
Confinement - QCD
“white” proton
quark
quark-antiquark paircreated from vacuum
“white” proton(confined quarks)
“white” 0
(confined quarks)
Confinement: fundamental & crucial (but not understood!) feature of strong force - colored objects (quarks) have energy in normal
vacuum
To understand the strong force and confinement: Create and study a system of deconfined colored quarks and gluons
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 4
/T4 ~ # degrees of freedom
confined:few d.o.f.
deconfined:many d.o.f.
TC ≈ 173 MeV ≈ 21012 K C 0.7 GeV/fm3 (~6x normal nuclear densities)
QGP expectation came from Lattice calculations
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 5
RHIC BRAHMSPHOBOS
PHENIXSTAR
AGS
TANDEMS
1 km
v = 0.99995c
Au+Au @ sNN=200 GeV
Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC)
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 6
“A first-order QCD phase transition that occurred in the early universe would lead to a surprisingly rich cosmological scenario.” Ed Witten, Phys. Rev. D (1984)
The order of the phase transition
Apparently it did not !Thus we suspect a smooth cross over or
a weak first order transition
NASA/WMAP
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 7
3. Properties of the Plasma
Medium’s effect on partons/hadrons
Outline of the rest of the talk
How we use the different quark flavors to:
1. Final State
Chemical and Thermal equilibrium
(Yields of particles)
2. Initial State
A perfect fluid?
(flow)
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 8
Heavy-ion collision terminology
Number of participants (Npart): number of incoming nucleons (participants) in the overlap regionNumber of binary collisions (Nbin): number of equivalent inelastic nucleon-nucleon collisions
Reaction plane
x
z
y
Non-central collision
“peripheral” collision (b ~ bmax)“central” collision (b ~ 0)
Nbin Npart
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 9
Head-on Au+Au collision in STAR TPC
~1500 charged hadrons and leptons
39.4 TeV in a central Au-Au collision
26 TeV is removed from the colliding beams.
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 10
R2
Energy density in central Au-Au collisions
BJ 5.0 GeV/fm3
~30 times normal nuclear density ~ 5 times above critical from lattice QCD
Bjorken-Formula for Energy Density:
Time it takes to thermalize system (t0 ~ 1 fm/c)
R~6.5 fm
dy
dE
RV
E TTBj
02
11
dydz 0
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 11
5 GeV/fm3. Is that a lot?
Last year, the U.S. used ~100 quadrillion BTUs of energy:
At 5 GeV/fm3, this would fit into a volume of:
In other words, in a box of the following dimensions:
mfm 5105 9
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 12
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 13
Chemical equilibrium after hadronization?
• Statistical Thermal Models:– Assume a system that is thermally (constant Tch) and
chemically (constant ni) equilibrated
– System composed of non-interacting hadrons and resonances
– Obey conservation laws: Baryon Number, Strangeness, Isospin
• Given Tch and 's (+ system size), ni's can be calculated in a grand canonical ensemble
22
0/))((
2
2 ,12
iiTpEi mpEe
dppgn
ii
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 14
Chemical equilibration of hadrons
Au-Au √sNN = 200 GeVSTAR Preliminary
• Data are very well described.
• Tch ~ Tc
• Disagreement of resonances hints at significant lifetime of the hadronic phase.
Tch = 168 ± 6 MeV
Strange particles also in chemical equilibrium
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 15
Initial state
What state is the system in before hadronization?
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 16
Tampa press release, April 2005
•“The truly stunning finding at RHIC that the new state of matter created in the collisions of gold ions is more like a liquid than a gas gives us a profound insight into the earliest moments of the universe. … It may well have a profound impact on the physics of the twenty-first century.” Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director of the DOE
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 17
Applicability of hydrodynamics at RHIC• Assumes local thermal equilibrium (zero mean-free-path limit) and solves
equations of motion for fluid elements (not particles)
• Equations given by continuity, conservation laws, and Equation of State (EOS)
• EOS relates quantities like pressure, temperature, chemical potential, volume• Most hydro calculation no viscosity
• Fluid elements system will flow
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 18
Strong collective radial expansion
• Different spectral shapes for particles of differing mass strong collective radial flow
mT1/m
T d
N/d
mT
light
heavyT
purely thermalsourceexplosive
source
T,
mT1/m
T d
N/d
mT light
heavy
mT = (pT2 + m2)½
Au+Au central , √s = 200 GeV
Hydro pQCD
Good agreement with hydrodynamicprediction for soft EOS (QGP+HG)
Tfo~ 100 MeV T ~ 0.55 c
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 19
Aniotropic/Elliptic flow
Almond shape overlap region in coordinate space
Anisotropy in momentum space
Interactions/ Rescattering
dN/d ~ 1+2 v2(pT)cos(2) + …. =atan(py/px) v2 =cos2
v2: 2nd harmonic Fourier coefficient in dN/d with respect to the reaction plane
Elliptic flow observable sensitive to early evolution of system
Mechanism is self-quenching
Large v2 is an indication of early thermalization
Time –M. Gehm, S. Granade, S. Hemmer, K, O’Hara, J. Thomas - Science 298 2179 (2002)
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 20
Strong elliptic flow observed
Compatible with early equilibration
200 GeV Au+AuSTAR preliminary
v2(p
T)
pT (Gev/c)
0
0.1
0.2v2(K) > v2() > v2()
Hydrodynamical models with soft Equation-of-State describe data well for pT (< 2.5 GeV/c)
Although poor statistics even flows - low hadronic cross-section.
Evidence v2 built up in partonic phase
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 21
Hydro: small mean free path,lots of interactions NOT plasma-like
The perfect fluidFirst time: hydrodynamics quantitatively describes heavy ion reactions at low pT.
Prefers a QGP EOS
Hydro without any viscosity.An ideal (perfect) fluid
Thermalization time t=0.6 fm/c and =20 GeV/fm3
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 22
What interactions can lead to equilibration in < 1 fm/c?Need to be REALLY strong
Microscopic picture
R. Baier, A.H. Mueller, D. Schiff, D. Son, Phys. Lett. B539, 46 (2002).MPC 1.6.0, D. Molnar, M. Gyulassy, Nucl. Phys. A 697 (2002).
Perturbative calculations of gluon scattering lead to long equilibration times (> 2.6 fm/c) and small v2.
v2
pT (GeV/c)
2-2 processes with pQCD = 3 mb
Clearly this is not the weakly coupled perturbative QGP we started looking for.
s(trong)QGP
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 23
Perfect fluid - caveats
Hydrodynamic calculations only just gone “3D” and don’t yet fully describe the longitudinal motion.
Calculations of two particle correlations are not properly described. “A theory that agrees with all available data must be wrong, since some data is always wrong.” - Sir Arthur
Eddington
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 24
Probes of the Plasma State
Looking at plasma properties using “auto-generated” probes
3. Properties of the Plasma
Medium’s effect on partons/hadrons
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 25
Produced photonsProduced photons
High energy probes are well described NLO perturbative QCD.
pQCD calculations work in p-p
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 26
Schematically partons (quarks and gluons)
Scattered partons on the “near side” lose energy, but emerge;
those on the “far side” are totally absorbed
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 27
Schematically photons
Scattered partons on the “near side” lose energy, but emerge;
the direct photon always emerges
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 28
pQCD in Au-Au?
ddpdT
ddpNdpR
TNN
AA
TAA
TAA /
/)(
2
2
<Nbinary>/sinelp+p
p+p cross section
Compare Au+Au with p+p Collisions RAA
NuclearModification Factor:
R < 1 at small momentaR = 1 baseline expectation for hard processesR > 1 “Cronin” enhancements
(as in pA)R < 1: Suppression
A+A yield
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 29
Photons
0, from quark and gluon jets
RAA Au-Au central events
0 = 0.43 (vacuum fragmentation ratio)partonic level absorption
~ 15 GeV/fm3
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 30
Au-Au
d-Au
The control experiment – d-Au
Suppression not caused by initial state effects
• d-Au - no medium - no suppression
Initial state effects:
- Intrinsic KT
- Cronin
Charge particles
STAR
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 31
Species dependence of RAA
• Use peripheral Au-Au data since lack of available p-p
• All particles suppressed
Au-Au0-5%/40-60%
Baryon/meson splitting at intermediate pT
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 32
Parton recombination at medium pT
• Parton pT distribution is
~exponential+power-law
•7 GeV particle via :
Fragmentation from high pT
Meson - 2 quarks at ~4 GeV
Baryon - 3 quarks at ~2.5 GeV
Recombination - more baryons than mesons at medium pT
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 33
Recombination and v2
Works for p, , K0s, ,
v2s ~ v2
u,d ~ 7%
The complicated observed flow pattern in v2(pT) for hadrons
is predicted to be simple at the quark level pT → pT /n
v2 → v2 / n ,
n = (2, 3) for (meson, baryon)
)2cos( )( 21 2
2
T
T
pvddp
Nd
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 34
Suppression unique to RHIC?√sNN=200 GeV
√sNN=62 GeV 0-5%
40-60%
0-5%
40-60%
NA57, PLB in print, nucl-ex/0507012
√sNN=17.3 GeV
See Baryon/Meson splitting even at SPS
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 35
STAR Preliminary
NA57: G. Bruno, A. Dainese: nucl-ex/0511020
Baryon/meson splitting at SPS and RHIC is the
same
Plasma present in all systems?
The Rcp double ratio
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 36
The heavy quark sector
c, b D, B
1)
production
2)
medium energy loss
3)
fragmentation
light
M.Djordjevic PRL 94 (2004)
ENERGY LOSS
Energy loss a) depends on properties of medium (gluon densities, size) b) depends on properties of “probe” (color charge, mass)
Gluon radiation suppressed for
< m/E “Dead cone effect”
Y. Dokshitzer & D. Kharzeev PLB 519(2001)199Expectation: Little suppression for heavy flavor particles
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 37
Detecting charm/beauty via semileptonic decaysHadronic decay channels: Only small B.R. very hard Non-photonic electrons:
Semileptonic channels: c e+ + anything (B.R.: 9.6%)
– D0 e+ + anything (B.R.: 6.87%) – D e + anything (B.R.: 17.2%)
b e+ + anything (B.R.: 10.9%)– B e + anything (B.R.: 10.2%)
Drell-Yan (small contribution for pT < 10 GeV/c)
Photonic electron background: conversions (0 ; e+e- ) 0, ’ Dalitz decays , … decays (small) Ke3 decays (small)
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 38
Non-photonic e- RAA in central Au-Au
Very strong suppression at high pT
•Theory agrees only when: ignore b e contributions very high gluon density
– Is our understanding of c and b production correct?
– Is our understanding of partonic energy loss correct?
– How strong are the in-medium interactions?
– How dense is the medium?
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 39
Heavy quarks also flow
• PHENIX also measures non-photonic electron v2
nucl-ex/0502009
Greco,Ko,Rapp.
PLB595, 202 (2004)
Another puzzle!
Time for charm 7 larger than for light quarks
(t > 10 fm/c)
Need large cross-sections - Further evidence of strong coupling
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 40
We have successfully createdthe Quark Gluon Plasma!
- but its not what we expected when we started out
Now we have many exciting properties to understand...
• what causes the strong coupling?• what is the exact viscosity?• rapid equilibration?• novel hadron formation mechanisms?• what is the exact energy loss mechanism?• initial temperature determination?
Conclusions
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 41
What about the future
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN will be commissioned in 2008 with over an order of magnitude higher energy than at RHIC.
3 experiments with dedicated heavy-ion experiments
ALICE ATLASCMS
Instead of 40 TeV, 1000 TeV !
Can make more detailed measurements at the LHC
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 42
Preliminary
Prediction from statistical model
Tpart
B
B
BeN
nBV
VnB
/
/
part
partT
Tpart
TT
N
Ne
eNee
Vn
S
BSB
/
/// )(
partT
partTT
Tpart
TT
Ne
Nee
eNee
Vn
B
SB
BSB
/2
//2
/// )(
Behavior as expected
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 43
Su
ppre
ssio
n F
acto
rJ/cc) yields are suppressed
Heavy quarks produced in initial violent collisions.
Expect:
YieldAuAu/(Nbin*Yieldpp) = 1
Significant suppression of J/ in central events
|y|<0.35
Helen Caines
Yale Colloquium - April 2006 44
Quarkonia suppression
0.8 Tc 2 Tc 2.5 Tc
” ’J/’
Tdis(’) < Tdis(”) < Tdis(J/) < Tdis(’) < Tdis()
Color Screening
cc
Measurement of initial temperature
Matsui & Satz (1986):
Heavy quark bound states suppressed due to color screening in the QGP.
T < 3 Tc or new regeneration mechanisms?