Upload
harold-greene
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
15/2/08
William Horowitz
Zeroth Order Heavy Quark Photon/Gluon
Bremsstrahlung
William HorowitzColumbia University
Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS)May 2, 2008
With many thanks to Miklos Gyulassy, Simon Wicks, Ivan Vitev, Hendrik van Hees
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
25/2/08
William Horowitz
A Talk in Two Parts
pQCD vs. AdS/CFT Drag
0th Order Production Radiation
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
35/2/08
William Horowitz
Testing pQCD vs. AdS/CFT Drag Energy Loss Mechanisms
(In Five Slides)
arXiv:0706.2336 (LHC predictions)arXiv:0710.0703 (RHIC predictions)
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
45/2/08
William Horowitz
(Proper) Subset of Mechanisms
• DGLV, AdS/CFT Drag, Diffusion…
• Use heavy quark RAA to test these twodpT/dt ~ -(T2/Mq) pTLPM: dpT/dt ~ -LT3 log(pT/Mq)
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
55/2/08
William Horowitz
– LHC Prediction Zoo: What a Mess!– Let’s go through step by step
– Unfortunately, large suppression pQCD similar to AdS/CFT– Large suppression leads to flattening– Use of realistic geometry and Bjorken expansion allows saturation below .2– Significant rise in RAA(pT) for pQCD Rad+El– Naïve expectations met in full numerical calculation: dRAA(pT)/dpT > 0 => pQCD; dRAA(pT)/dpT < 0 => ST
LHC c, b RAA pT Dependence
WH, M. Gyulassy, arXiv:0706.2336
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
65/2/08
William Horowitz
LHC RcAA(pT)/Rb
AA(pT) Prediction
• Recall the Zoo:
– Taking the ratio cancels most normalization differences seen previously– pQCD ratio asymptotically approaches 1, and more slowly so for
increased quenching (until quenching saturates)– AdS/CFT ratio is flat and many times smaller than pQCD at only
moderate pT
WH, M. Gyulassy, arXiv:0706.2336 [nucl-th]
WH, M. Gyulassy, arXiv:0706.2336 [nucl-th]
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
75/2/08
William Horowitz
RHIC Rcb Ratio
• Wider distribution of AdS/CFT curves at RHIC due to large n power law production: increased sensitivity to input parameters
• Advantage of RHIC: lower T => higher AdS speed limits
WH, M. Gyulassy, arXiv:0710.0703
pQCD
AdS/CFT
pQCD
AdS/CFT
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
85/2/08
William Horowitz
Conclusions• AdS/CFT Drag observables calculated• Generic differences (pQCD vs.
AdS/CFT Drag) seen in RAA
– Masked by extreme pQCD
• Enhancement from ratio of c to b RAA
– Discovery potential in Year 1 LHC Run
• Understanding regions of self-consistency crucial
• RHIC measurement possible
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
95/2/08
William Horowitz
Some Investigations of 0th Order Production Radiation
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
105/2/08
William Horowitz
Motivation• Previous work: test pQCD or
AdS/CFT energy loss– Heavy quark RQ
AA and RcAA/Rb
AA
• Future goal: additional energy loss test using photon bremsstrahlung
• Zeroth Order Calculation– Recent p + p fragmentation data– Good warm-up and test problem
• Investigate running , low-pT, etc.
– Reevaluate magnitude of Ter-Mikayelian
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
125/2/08
William Horowitz
Motivating Example: Running s
– Fixed s is simplification to speed up code• Not a free parameter
– Running s will most likely introduce a large error
– Want to understand systematics in 0th Order
S. Wicks, WH, M. Djordjevic, M Gyulassy, Nucl.Phys.A783:493-496,2007
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
135/2/08
William Horowitz
• Quark mass => Dead cone– Ultrarelativistic “searchlight” rad.
pattern
• Gluon mass => Longitudinal modes, QCD Ter-Mikayelian
– Reduction of production radiation compared to vacuum• Alters DGLAP kernel
Quark and Gluon/Photon Mass Effects
~ Mq/E
Y. Dokshitzer and D. Kharzeev, Phys.Lett.B519:199-206,2001
M. Djordjevic and M. Gyulassy, Phys.Rev.C68:034914,2003
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
145/2/08
William Horowitz
Previous Calculation of Ter-Mikayelian
• Reduction of E-loss for charm quarks by ~ 30%• E-loss from full HTL well approx. by fixed mg = m∞
• Small-x pQCD 0th Order result:
M. Djordjevic and M. Gyulassy, Phys.Rev.C68:034914,2003
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
155/2/08
William Horowitz
Compare Classical E&M to “pQCD”
– Classical E&M• Recall Jackson:
• Soft photon limit =>
– Note charge conserved
– Usual pQCD approach
– Charge explicitly not conserved=> Ward identity ( ) violated
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
165/2/08
William Horowitz
Classical/QFT Inconsistency
– For mQ = mg = 0 and in the small x, large E+ limit, both are equal:
– For mQ, mg ≠ 0 and the small x, large E+ limit, they differ:
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
175/2/08
William Horowitz
Not a Classical Error– Wrong classical calculation?
• Plugged in massive 4-vectors into massless formulae
• Rederive classical result using Proca Lagrangian
– After several pages of work…
• Identical to
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
185/2/08
William Horowitz
Error from QFT Ward Violation• Identical expressions are not a
surprise• QFT Calculation
– Photon momentum carried away crucial for cancellation of photon mass• Classical case neglects both; effects
cancel
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
195/2/08
William Horowitz
Resulting Expression– To lowest order in 1/E+
– New:• (1-x)2 prefactor: naturally kills hard
gluons
• mg2 in numerator: fills in the dead cone!?!
– What are the sizes of these effects?Call this LO
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
205/2/08
William Horowitz
LO Gluon Production Radiation
• Prefactor => 50-150% effect
– Implications for in-medium radiative loss?
• Filling in dead code => 5-20%
– Numerics includes kT and x limits
» x large enough to create mg
» x small enough that EJet > Mq
– Fixed = .5 GeV and s = .5» Similar to Magda full HTL
propagator with running s
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
215/2/08
William Horowitz
LO vs. All Orders Production Rad.
• Ter-Mikayelian similar for both
• Different normalizations– 0-60% effect
• All orders calculation self-regulates for mg = 0 and pT → 0
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
225/2/08
William Horowitz
Conclusions• No single satisfactory energy loss model• Search for tests sensitive to mechanism
– Ratio of charm to bottom RAA for pQCD vs. AdS/CFT
– Future tests using photon bremsstrahlung
• Inclusion of away-side jet fills in dead cone– Ultimately leads to a relatively small (5-
20%) effect
• Radiative calculations integrate over all x; importance of large x behavior?
Yale-Columbia Fest 2008
245/2/08
William Horowitz
Reasonable Consistency with Magda
b
c
M. Djordjevic and M. Gyulassy, Phys.Rev.C68:034914,2003