33
Harvest • Harvested v. unharvested populations – Why are some species not harvested? – Why are some species harvested at different rates? – Why does harvest not seem to affect some species?

Harvest Harvested v. unharvested populations –Why are some species not harvested? –Why are some species harvested at different rates? –Why does harvest

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Harvest

• Harvested v. unharvested populations– Why are some species not harvested?

– Why are some species harvested at different rates?

– Why does harvest not seem to affect some species?

• Harvestable surplus (Leopold 1933)

– Originally only the “doomed” surplus

Harvest

• Assuming a surplus– Overharvest

• Extinction– Regulated hunting has never led to an extinction!

– Underharvest• Environmental degradation (Think like a mountain!)• Loss of recreational opportunities (value!)

Harvest

• Characteristics of harvested populations– Population size– Population stability– Fecundity– Life span– Mortality from other causes

• Unknown effects– Trophy’s smaller?– Genetics?

Harvest

Harvest

• Principles– Yield*– Diminishing returns– Compensatory harvest mortality

– So which one happens?

• History, Trial & Error, and Human Dimensions

Harvest

• When populations are limited by some resource (density-dependence/logistic growth; from Caughley

& Sinclair 1994)

– A population is harvested at its growth rate

– A population must be stimulated to produce a yield

– Harvesting trades off yield against population size

Harvest

• Sustained yield, harvest rate, & population sizeN

Time

Accelerating Phase

K

Inflection Point (½ K)

DeceleratingPhase

Nd

N/d

t

Inflection Point (½ K)

K

HarvestY

ield

200

100

0

Population Size

0 1000750500250

• Sustained yield, harvest rate, & population size

N

dN

/dt

Inflection Point (½ K)

K

Harvest50

150

100

200

0

Surplus or Yield

MSY

potentially sustainable harvestno harvest sustainable

HarvestY

ield

200

100

0

Population Size

0 1000750500250

MSY

Lower SY Upper SY

• Harvestable surplus– Sustained yield (SY)– Maximum sustained yield (MSY)– Optimal sustained yield (OSY)

Harvest

Pop

ulat

ion

Siz

e +

Rec

ruits

(Y

ield

)

750

450

300

150

0

Population Size

0 1000750500250

600

900

1050

1200

75

100

75

Yield

MSY

Lower SY

Upper SY

Harvest

• When populations are not limited by resources (exponential growth)?

N

Time

N

dN

/dt

Yie

ld200

150

100

50

0

Population Size

0 1000750500250

Harvest

200

150

100

50

0

Harvest

• Do we need strict regulations or is the harvest self-regulating?– The Law of Diminishing Returns

Abundance

Tot

al H

arve

st

Abundance

Hun

ter

Effo

rt

Abundance

Har

vest

Rat

e

Harvest

• Additive v. Compensatory Mortality

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

# D

yin

g/y

r

Unhun

ted

Hunte

d A

Hunte

d B

Hunte

d C

Harvest

Predation

Starvation

Exposure

Accidents

Disease

Harvest

• Additive v. Compensatory Mortality– Temporal studies

Harvest Mortality Rate

Ann

ual S

urvi

val R

ate

A

Harvest Mortality Rate

Ann

ual S

urvi

val R

ate

B

C

c = critical threshold

Harvest

• Additive v. Compensatory Mortality– Large scale experiments

– SHunting = SNo Hunting

– Late season harvest

Harvest

• Additive v. Compensatory Mortality– Management implications

• Harvest as compensatory mortality– Doomed surplus– Harvestable surplus

Murray and Frye (1964)

Harvest

• When density independent factors are controlling populations– Harvestable surplus?

• K

N

Time

Harvest

• What if we don’t know enough?

• What if regulations are impractical?

Harvest

• Harvest Management (Ideal)– Determine the status of the resource– Determine the objectives & goals– Establish management strategies– Determine how closely the management

strategy achieved the objectives & goals– Adjust management strategies

• Adaptive harvest management

Harvest

• Harvest Management– Determine the status of the resource

• Research & monitoring– Mandatory reporting– Check stations– Surveys– Large scale studies

Harvest

• Harvest Management– Determine the objectives & goals

• Biological, social, economic, & enforcement considerations– Increase, decrease, maintain, or stabilize population size*

» Wildlife viewing, hunting, fishing, etc.» Wildlife damage» Wildlife disease (e.g., CWD, rabies)» Habitat & community effects (e.g., brain worm)» MSY or OSY» Quality v. quantity

Harvest

• Managing for the hunter, fisher, or trapper– Quality v. quantity

• E.g., QDM– Deer, habitat, & experience

(U.S Fish & Wildlife Service)

(U.S Fish & Wildlife Service)

(U.S Fish & Wildlife Service)

Harvest

• Harvest Management– Establish management strategies

• Seasons– Opening day phenomenon

• Bag limits• Methods• Sex & age taken• Permits• Areas• Effects on and of farming, timber, & non-consumptive

wildlife uses • Safety• Enforcement

Harvest

• Harvest Management– Determine how closely the management

strategy achieved the objectives & goals• Research & monitoring

– Mandatory reporting– Check stations– Surveys– Large scale studies

Harvest

• Harvest Management– Adjust management strategies & start again

• Adaptive management

• History, Trial & Error, and Human Dimensions

Harvest

• Harvests can stabilize populations– A management tool

N

Time

Harvest

• Economics: Billions of dollars & hundreds of thousands of jobs!

• Costs of not harvesting

Harvest

• Illegal taking (poaching)– Equal to the legal harvest?– Fair chase?

– This is not hunting!

– Implications• Population & habitat management

– SY considerations

– Estimate illegal take

Harvest

• Differential Vulnerability– Sex– Age

• Mating habits

– Effects on sex ratios & age structure• Productivity

Harvest

• Differential Vulnerability– Flook (1970): Unhunted elk

• Sex ratio of newborn calves: 100:100• Sex ratio of yearlings: 131:100• Sex ratio of 2 year olds: 31:100

• Why?– Fat, teeth, mating system

Harvest• Differential Vulnerability

– Hunted black bears • Sex ratio of population: 72:100• Sex ratio of harvest:145:100

• Why?– Movements: male home range size = 30.8 km2 female

home range size = 5.2 km2

– Harvest technique: 4% of harvest using bait is female 40% of harvest using dogs is female

– Harvest timing: denning

• Management

Harvest

• Differential Vulnerability– Management implications

• Sex & age structure• Mating habits

Harvest

• Federal v. state management

• Public v. private lands– Private lands harvest management initiatives