Upload
christine-sullivan
View
222
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Hard vs. Soft Physics at RHIC - Insights from PHENIX
Why hard vs. soft? Soft physics: thermal, flow effects Hard processes at RHIC Conclusion
Barbara JacakStony Brook
Why hard vs. soft?
Soft physics : thermalsystem with T ~ 200 MeVcollective flow boosts pt spectra
Hard processeshappen earlycreate useful probes of the system
J/, charm, jets QGP signals
calculable via pQCDsensitive to parton
distribution evolutioni.e. gluon saturation
Theoretical tools very differentGyulassy/Wang: boundary 1-2 GeV/c
from partonstructure functions
from Glaubermodel
Experimental challenge: constrain which to be used where!
)()()( sss softjetqq
PHENIX at RHIC
2 Central spectrometers2 Forward spectrometers3 Global detectors
Philosophy: optimize for signals / sample soft physics
PHENIX configuration
RUN1:DAQ recorded EACH of ~5M events
RUN2:full centralarmsS muonarm (
running now!
Centrality selection
In PHENIX “min bias” = 92% of geometriccross section
Use Glauber model to calculate Npart
Charged particle multiplicity:
with quenching
No jet quenchingSTARPHENIXBRAHMS
PRL86, 3500 (2001)Find A = 0.88 0.28B = 0.34 0.12 hard: scales with Ncollsoft: scales with Npart
hard processes arebecoming significant
ch binpart0dN d A N B N
Fit with
ET per charged particle
ET grows because of particle number!
4.6 GeV/fm3
PRL87, 052301 (2001)
NB. Does not include mass of baryons
Does include MB
>50% higher thanat CERN
TOF to identify the hadrons
Measure momentum & flight timecalculate particle mass
mT spectra
See mass dependence collective radial expansion
Integrate spectra, extrapolating to pT=0
antiproton dN/dy = 20!
hadron dN/dy at y=0
per participant pair:
K,p perparticipantrise withNpartmorethan !
K/ at y=0
PHENIX preliminary
s=17 GeV Pb+PbPhys.Lett.B 471, 6 (1999)
Both K+/ and K-/increase with NpartPeripheral collisions near pp valueK+/ and K-/do not diverge as at SPS,AGS
K/ ats=200 p+p
Z.Phys.C41,179(1988)(UA5)
Net baryons per participant
PHENIX preliminary
Mid-rapidity
Net baryon density increases somewhat with Npart more stopping in central collisions
Pb+Pb at SPS: net baryon density per participant = 0.18
(NB: in PHENIX ~50% of decays included)
Fit spectra with mt exponential
Teff = Tfo + m <radial>2
Tfo = 140 - 150 MeV radial = 0.5 - 0.6 (higher for central collisions)
was 0.4 at SPS
less flow in peripheral collisions!
range mT-m0 < 1 GeV/c
HBT in PHENIX
Identified pions in 15% central collisions :high resolution TOF in East armEMCAL TOF in West arm
See R parameters are rather small (5-6 fm)!very similar to those at SPSagreement with STAR
Qualitatively to be expected if radial flow is large ...
Many high pt baryons!
Not been seen before!
boosted by thecollective outwardexpansion
hydrodynamicalcalculation by Teaneyagrees with data
soft physics to ~ 3 GeV/c pt!
<pt> increases with centrality
Expect such trend from radial flowbut also from partonic multiple scatteringand gluon saturation
final or initial state effect???
Turn now to hard probes
beams of hard probes:jets, J/ ….
vacuum
QGP
1. dE/dx in QGP jet quenching2. Deconfinement J/suppression
hadrons
q
q
hadronsleadingparticle
leading particle
schematic view of jet productionJets: primarily from gluons at RHIC
produced early
Observed via fast leading particles orazimuthal correlations between them
PHENIX measures 0 in PbSc and PbGl calorimeters
0’spT >2 GeV, asym<0.8
in PbSc
excellentagreement!
Compare h and 0
Peripheral collisions (60-80% of geom):
~ p-p scaled by <N bin coll> = 20 6
central (0-10%):shape different (more exponential)below scaled p-p!(<N bin coll> = 905 96)
Compare central Au-Au to p-p
central coll central
pp
/Yield N
Yield
Comparing CERN-SPS Pb-Pb to p-p
RAA exhibits “Cronin effect” behavior
X.N.Wang
soft/hardtransition?
parton energy loss, if any, overwhelmedby initial state soft multiple scattering!
tppA ppA
Is SPS-RHIC comparison fair?
Same pt implies different x!
RHIC
if pT(had) / pT(jet) ~ 1 then xT ~ x(parton) at y=0
xT =
Shadowing at RHIC?Zheng Huang, Hung Jung Lu, Ina Sarcevic: Nucl.Phys.A637:79-106,1998 (hep-ph/9705250 )
Shadowingof structure functions small in RHIC x range!!
Gluon shadowingeven less (accordingto theory)
pt comparison is fair!deficit shadowing!
quark structure function
central coll central
peripheral coll peripheral
/
/
Yield N
Yield N
different systematics: <N binary coll> instead of pp extrapolation
depletion remains!/h smaller in central vs. peripheral!
Identified electrons in PHENIX
All tracks:
0.8>p>0.9 GeV/c
Electron enriched
sample (using RICH)p
Associate trackswith RICH andEMCAL
Inclusive electron pt spectrum
Coming this year
Statistics! Reach pT ~ 15 GeV/c
Fully instrumented central arms South muon arm ready to go
large acceptance for J/ Selective L1, L2 triggers Electron pairs
Conclusions
Soft physics at RHIC
4.6 GeV/fm3, driven by more Nch
K, p / part. increase in central collisionsdNpbar/dy ~ 20 but net baryon density is lowlarge radial flow
baryons cross p at pT 2 GeV/csoft physics extends to nearly 3 GeV/c!
Hard processescontribute to particle productionPHENIX observes a deficit at high pT
vs hard scattering expectationslikely NOT shadowingopposite direction from Cronin effectpA data will settle underlying physics
This run: spectra to pT ~ 15 GeV/c
back-to-back correlationsJ/, electron pairs, direct photons...
hadron dN/dy at y=0
statistical errors in table;
syst = 13%, 15%, 14% K p, pbar
Integrate spectra, extrapolate to pT=0PHENIX preliminary