66
SODIUM TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS REPORT JULY-SEPTEMBER 1980 Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory Compiled by J.M. Atwood DOE R#chlan~l, WA I DISCLAIMER I Thli book was prepared as an acmuni of wak rwnwrrd by an agency of the UnltRl Stare Governrnm!. Neliher !he united Stater Gowrnmen! mr any agencv thereof. mr any of the#. emolovm. makerany warranty, exorerr or ~mol~m. or amre any legal lbbtliry or r-nsibnlirv for the arm. cornoleleneu, or urefulneu of any ~nformalion. ~PWR~UI. product. w pr- didored. or rwrewntr that 175 u= rrould not tnfr~nge pr!~Iehl ormm righlr Referee herein to any rwclflc Stales Government or any asencv ~hermf. The "#em and oe&nianrof suthors exor& herein do mt neceuar,lv state oi reflect !hose 01 the united Stam Gowrnmpi or any apw thereof. December 1980 APPLIED TECHNOLOGY HANFORD ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY Operated by Westinghouse Hanford Company P.O. Box 1970 Richland, WA 99352 A Subsidiary of Westinghouse Electric Corporation Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC1676FF02170

Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

SODIUM TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS REPORT

JULY-SEPTEMBER 1980

Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory

Compiled by J.M. Atwood

DOE R # c h l a n ~ l , W A

I DISCLAIMER I

Thli book was prepared as an acmuni of w a k rwnwrrd by an agency of the UnltRl Stare Governrnm!. Neliher !he united Stater Gowrnmen! mr any agencv thereof. m r any of the#. emolovm. makerany warranty, exorerr or ~ m o l ~ m . or a m r e any legal lbbtliry or r-nsibnlirv for the a r m . cornoleleneu, or urefulneu of any ~nformalion. ~PWR~UI . product. w pr- didored. or rwrewntr that 175 u= rrould not tnfr~nge p r ! ~ I e h l ormm righlr R e f e r e e herein to any rwclflc

Stales Government or any asencv ~hermf . The "#em and oe&nianr of suthors exor& herein do mt neceuar,lv state oi reflect !hose 01 the united S t a m Gowrnmpi or any apw thereof.

December 1980

APPLIED TECHNOLOGY

HANFORD ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY Operated by Westinghouse Hanford Company

P.O. Box 1970 Richland, WA 99352 A Subsidiary of Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC1676FF02170

Page 2: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

DISCLAIMER

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Page 3: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document.

Page 4: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and
Page 5: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

HEDL-TME 80-32 UC-79a

SODIUM TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS REPORT

JULY - SEPTEMBER 1980

Compiled by J. M. Atwood

AB STR ACT

T h i s report presents a quarterly summary o f progress made a t Westinghouse U a n f o r d Company i n the areas of radioactivity control technology and sodium s y s t e m s technology.

iii

Page 6: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

J

Page 7: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

CONTENTS

A b s t r a c t

F igures

Tab1 es

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY

I. R A D I O A C T I V I T Y CONTROL TECHNOLOGY

A. RADIONUCLIDE TRAP DEVELOPMENT

B. F I S S I O N PRODUCT AND FUEL TRANSPORT BEHAVIOR AND CONTROL

C. FFTF HEAT TRANSFER SYSTEM R A D I O A C T I V I T Y SURVEILLANCE

D. R A D I A T I O N LEVELS I N F F T F HTS CELLS

E. DECONTAMINATION OF BREEDER REACTOR COMPONENTS

F. FFTF SUPPORT

11. SODIUM SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY

A. S I L I C O N COMPOUND PARTICULATE EFFECTS

B. SODIUM FROST TECHNOLOGY

C. COLD TRAP TESTING

D. FFTF SODIUM SYSTEMS SUPPORT

E. FFTF FUEL F A I L U R E MONITORING

F. FUEL F A I L U R E MONITORING -- E B R - I 1 PROOFTEST

111. REFERENCES

P a g e

iii

v i

v i i

1

3

3

5

9

12

13

26

27

28

30

39

45

47

50

55

V

Page 8: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

FIGURES

Figure

1

2

Page

6 Depos i t i on Sampl er

Radioactive Corrosion Product Monitoring Pene tr a t i on s 11

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Optical Micrographs of Specimen 2E( 304-C-1)

Optical Micrographs of Specimen OE(304-C-3)

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Op t i cal Micrographs of Specimen l F ( 304-C-2)

Optical Micrographs of Specimen 3E(316-C-3)

Optical Micrographs o f Specimen 4F( 316-C-2)

Optical Micrographs of Specimen 5F(316-C-l)

Op t i cal Micrographs o f Specimen 6F( 316-W-1)

Optical Micrographs of Specimen 7E(316-W-2)

Optical Micrographs of Specimen 8E( 304-W-1)

Optical Micrographs of Specimen 9E(304-W-2)

Photographs Showing Change in Distribution of Sod i um Accumul a t i on on Condenser P1 a te 32

R u n 29 Apparatus and Results of the Sodium Vapor Deposition on Parallel Plates

14 34

Apparatus f o r Study of Sodium Vapor Deposition i n Pipes

15 37

Deposition of Sodium in 3/4;in. Tubing from Flowing Argon Stream

16 39

Velocity Profiles f o r Mercury Next to a Heated P1 ate

17 42

Temperature Profiles f o r Mercury Next to a Heated P1 ate

18 43

Packing Effects on Natural Conduction Heat Transfer from a Vertical Heated Plate

19 44

vi

Page 9: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

TABLES

Tab1 e

1 c

2

3

4

5

6

7

a 9

10

Concentrations o f Contamination Deposits on ST-1A Deposi ti on Sampl er Surf aces

Carbon Concentration o f Metal1 ography Specimens

FFTF Si 1 icon Analysis Summary

Sodium Vapor Deposition on Fla t Plate Condenser Inclined a t 90°

Sodium Vapor Depos i t ion on Parallel Plate Baffles

Sodium Deposition i n Cover Gas P i p i n g Tests on 3/4-in. Tub ing w i t h Gas Flow o f 100 cc/min

MIST P1 uggi ng Temper a t ures

Detector l/GLASS 1 Ratios vs A/C Position

Detector 2/GLASS 2 Ratios v s A/C Position

Gama Ray Reduction Factor Comparisons vs A/C Position and Detector

Page

7

25

29

31

35

46

52

53

54

38

v i i

Page 10: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

SODIUM TECHNOLOGY PROGRESS REPORT

JULY - SEPTEMBER 1980

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY

Sodium technology programs prov ide the t e c h n i c a l bas i s f o r safe and e f f i c i e n t use o f sodium as a reac to r coolant .

broad base o f technology, t h e HEDL programs p rov ide support f o r Fast F lux Test F a c i l i t y s t a r t - u p and operat ion. Overa l l program o b j e c t i v e s are t o e s t a b l i s h sodium and cover gas p u r i t y requirements; develop and demonstrate

p u r i f i c a t i o n , sampling, and analys is methods, components, and instrumen- t a t i o n ; c h a r a c t e r i z e mass and a c t i v i t y t r a n s p o r t e f f e c t s i n r e a c t o r systems;

develop r a d i o a c t i v i t y c o n t r o l methods requ i red t o pe rm i t con tac t maintenance on t h e p r imary heat t r a n s p o r t system; and develop a decontamination process

f o r removing r a d i o a c t i v i t y f rom pr imary system components r e q u i r i n g main-

tenance and reuse.

I n a d d i t i o n t o developing a

Dur ing t h i s r e p o r t i n g per iod, t h e f o l l o w i n g were accomplished:

. Two p r o t o t y p e r a d i o n u c l i d e t raps have each f i n i s h e d two cyc les i n

Source Term Contro l Loop 3 (STCL-3) was being gama-scanned a t 60 se lected l o c a t i o n s t o determine r a d i o n u c l i d e d i s t r i b u t i o n i n sodium loops w i t h o u t r a d i o n u c l i d e t raps.

An 8000-hour t e s t was completed t o evaluate r a d i o n u c l i d e depo- s i t i o n and pene t ra t i on i n t o AIS1 304 and 316 s t a i n l e s s s tee l s .

Based on p o t e n t i a l t r a n s p o r t of 58C0 from the core reg ion, an improved c o n f i g u r a t i o n f o r r a d i o n u c l i d e t raps would have n i c k e l c o a t i n g on o n l y the gas plenum r e g i o n o f f u e l p ins.

Planning cont inued f o r t h e s u r v e i l l a n c e o f r a d i o a c t i v i t y b u i l d u p i n t h e FFTF heat t r a n s p o r t system.

EBR- 11.

.

.

.

.

. Examination o f t h e depos i t i on sampler f rom the E B R - I 1 Breached Fuel Test F a c i l i t y was completed. deposited i n t h e sampler was associated w i t h f u e l p a r t i c u l a t e s .

Most o f the contaminat ion

1

Page 11: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

0

0

e

0

A t e s t w i t h an improved cesium t r a p design was s t a r t e d i n t h e F i s i o n Product Transpor t Loop.

Laboratory equipment was s e t up f o r i n v e s t i g a t i o n of oxygen-s i l icon chemist ry i n sodium, as p a r t o f the program t o charac ter ize and c o n t r o l p a r t i c u l a t e fo rmat ion i n h igh temperature sodium systems.

A data base was es tab l i shed dur ing 800OF t e s t i n g o f FFTF, i n p repara t ion f o r s u r v e i l l a n c e o f s i l i c o n e f f e c t s i n FFTF systems dur ing f u l l power operat ion.

Sodium f r o s t t e s t s were completed t o charac ter ize depos i t ion p a t t e r n and r a t e s w i t h f l a t p l a t e condensors and w i t h vary ing i m p u r i t y l e v e l s i n t h e argon cover gas. Add i t i ona l t e s t s were s t a r t e d t o determine p lug fo rmat ion t ime and cond i t i ons i n cover gas l ines , bo th heated and unheated.

Cold t r a p performance was evaluated dur ing the f i n a l Maximum Isothermal Sodium Temperature t e s t p e r i o d on FFTF.

Studies were completed on ef fects of mesh packing on na tu ra l convect ion i n a cold t r a p c r y s t a l l i z e r .

I n s t a l l a t i o n and acceptance t e s t i n g of the Fuel F a i l u r e Mon i to r ing System on FFTF were completed.

Responses o f two absorber /co l l imator devices were measured, and a mod i f i ed gamma r a y sub t rac t i on device was tes ted on t h e E B R - I 1 Fuel F a i l u r e Mon i to r i ng equipment p roo f tes t .

1

2

Page 12: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

2. Accompl ishments

I , RADIOACTIVITY CONTROL TECHNOLOGY W. F. Brehm

The R a d i o a c t i v i t y Con t ro l Technology Program i s developing technology t o p r e d i c t , measure, c o n t r o l and remove r a d i o a c t i v i t y f rom sodium-cooled

r e a c t o r systems. Act1 vated co r ros ion products , fue l p a r t i c u l a t e s , t r i t i u m

and f i s s i o n products species are o f i n t e r e s t . The complex i ty and magnitude o f r a d i o n u c l i d e t r a n s p o r t and depos i t i on r e q u i r e i n v e s t i g a t i o n and develop-

ment o f severa l c o n t r o l methods. Th is q u a r t e r ' s r e p o r t descr ibes progress i n r a d i o n u c l i d e t r a p development, decontamination process development,

examinat ion o f depos i t i on and d i f f u s i o n specimens, cesium t r a p t e s t i n g , and r a d i a t i o n l e v e l c a l c u l a t i o n s .

A. RADIONUCLIDE TRAP DEVELOPMENT J. C. McGuire and W. F. Brehm

1. O b j e c t i v e

The o b j e c t i v e o f t h i s program i s t o develop a method f o r removing long-

l i v e d g a m a - e m i t t i n g rad ionuc l i des f rom LMFBR p r imary loop sodium t o c o n t r o l

d e p o s i t i o n i n areas where maintenance i s required.

EBR-11 Radionucl ide Traps 3 and 4 (X-356 and X-357) have each completed t w o i r r a d i a t i o n cyc les w i t h o u t i nc iden t . d r i v e r pins, w i l l be removed du r ing Run 112, disassembled, one p l a t e d dumny

p i n removed, and t h e experiment r e c o n s t i t u t e d f o r f u r t h e r i r r a d i a t i o n . Examination o f t he removed p i n w i l l p rov ide e s s e n t i a l i n f o r m a t i o n on weight

loss, n i c k e l corros ion, 58C0 generation, downstream e f f e c t and 54Mn g e t t e r - ing. Specimens o f FFTF f u e l c ladd ing were success fu l l y sput ter -coated w i t h

n i c k e l .

N i cke l th icknesses o f 0.0003 in. and 0.003 in. have been appl ied.

X-357, t h e t e s t of n i c k e l - p l a t e d

. . The c o a t i n g appears t o be d u c t i l e , smooth and very adherent.

3

Page 13: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

Source Term Control Loop 3 (STCL-3) has operated w i t h o u t a radionuclide trap f o r 9000 hours. ac t iv i ty to determine ac t iv i ty movement i n the absence of a t rap . The scans to date show that ac t iv i ty has not only b u i l t up i n the cold leg, b u t t h a t i t has moved through the system. Cobal t i s now seen i n a l l parts of the l o o p w i t h a significant concentration i n the area where sodium i s being heated before entering the hot sample stringer. This indicates that cobalt i s present in the sodium stream throughout the loop, and t h a t i t deposits preferentially in the hot zone, even af ter passing through a cooler area.

We are now completing a detailed gamma scan of loop

In an investigation of a1 ternative approaches fo r instal l ing radio- nuclide traps i n future reactors, a single 28-in. diam x 24-in. l o n g rolled nickel sheet trap installed i n the outlet pipe of each primary c i rcu i t w i l l provide over twice the getter area of a conventional trap unit mounted i n every core assembly.

3. Future Work

Design a trap u n i t w i t h 0.060-in. spacing between layers fo r low pres- sure drop .

Test the properties of sputter-coated cladding.

B. FISSION PRODUCT AND FUEL TRANSPORT BEHAVIOR AND CONTROL R . P. Colburn , H. P. Maffei and M . B. Hall

1. Objective

The objectives of this program are: 1) t o determine f iss ion product and fuel particulate transport kinetics and deposition patterns i n LMFBR primary heat transport systems, 2 ) t o determine impacts t h a t transport and deposition of these radionuclides will have on plant maintenance, 3) to

4

Page 14: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

develop methods to monitor and control their deposition, and 4 ) t o provide i n terpret i ve i nf ormat i on for the Run-Beyond -C 1 add i ng-Breach ( R B C B ) Program.

c 2. Accompl i s hmen t s 1

Examination of the deposition sampler, ST-lA, used i n the Breached Fuel Test Fac i l i ty (BFTF) a t EBR-I1 during the XY-2 breached fuel t e s t was com- pleted. This examination included disassembly of the sampler, gama scan- n i n g of the individual pieces and characterizations of the deposits. Analysis of these data is continuing. The sampler i s i l lus t ra ted schema- t i c a l l y i n Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, i t s exposure conditions and a sumary of preliminary examination f i n d i n g s were given i n References 1, 2 and 3. I t was previously noted t h a t over 80% of the total contamination ac t iv i ty deposited i n the sampler was deposited on the f i l t e r . Further analysis indicates over 90% of the total was associated w i t h the f i l t e r , w i t h 40% of that material contained i n the loose debris that accumulated around the standpipe below the f i l t e r (Sample Position 1 i n Figure 1).

The concentrations of some of the major contaminants on various sur- faces are shown i n Table 1. The calculated fuel and f ission product inven- to r i e s in the breached pin a t the time of cladding fa i lure are also shown, The ratios o f Pu to U i n the deposits on the f i l t e r and around t h e stand p ipe

below the f i l t e r (Sample Positions 1, 2 and 3 ) were similar to the r a t i o in the source p i n . These data, together w i t h the general coincidence of alpha and gama ac t iv i ty dis t r ibut ions on a microscopic scale on the f i l t e r sur- face, suggest that most of the contamination transport of these species was by fuel par t iculate entrainment i n the sodium.

The contaminants on the inner surface of the top piece (Sample Posi- t ion 4 ) represent the deposition downstream from the f i Iter. on the outer surface of the top piece represents deposition a t the out le t of the unfiltered flow path. surface fo r similar mass transfer conditions indicates substantial removal

Contamination

The much lower concentrations on the inner

5

Page 15: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

t 6 cm

I IST

84 CIp7

2N D CUT

22 crn

[ SODIUM 1 FLOW

HEDL 8007-028.1

FIGURE 1. Deposition Sampler.

6

Page 16: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

TABLE 1

CONCENTRATIONS OF CONTAMINATION DEPOSITS ON ST-1A DEPOSITION SAMPLER SURFACES

Sample Locat ion Fuel (vqm/cm2)

- No. D e s c r i p t i o n Pu U

2 F i l t e r - Lower End 0.59 1.23

3 F i l t e r - 25 cm from Lower End 1.31 4.25

4 Top Piece I D 0.0001 0.014

5 Top Piece OD 0.0091 0.022 Ring 35 0.014 0.027

6 Outer Casing I D 0.013 0.028

7 Outer Casing OD , 0.0008 0.0046

1 Loose Deposits near (pgml ( w m )

Base o f Standpipe 400 1400

0 0 Fuel Pin* 16.8 52.3

F i s s i o n Products (pCi/cm2)

9 5 ~ r

54.0

68.6

0.27

2.29 2.25

2.66

0.23

(uCi)

57 35

( C i )

186

141ce

13.90

28.51

1.36

1.29 0.41

0.71

0.81

(pCi)

6239

( C i )

320

144ce

2.15

3.52

0.017

0.08 0.12

0.11

0.006

(uCi)

967

( C i )

39.7

103R u

6.35

8.86

0.19

( C i )

1501

68.2

*Tota l q u a n t i t y i n t h e f u e l p i n a t t ime o f breach *Not determined

7

Page 17: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

Q of these contaminants by the f i l t e r . Similarly, a comparison of the deposit concentrations on the inner and outer surfaces o f the outer casing (Sample Positions 6 and 7 ) re f lec ts changes i n the contamination concentration in the sodium stream. sodium during the i n i t i a l upward f low through the sampler. They correspond ?

well w i t h the concentrations found on the deposition rings on the opposite annular wall. The concentrations on the outer surface, reflecting deposi- t i on from the sodium stream returning from the upper end of the BFTF, were much lower, suggesting that substantial deposition of these species occurred in the upper end of the BFTF. larger concentration on the outer surface. This may be explained by a transport mechanism i n which some of the 141Ce was released from the breached pin as i t s volat i le short-lived precursor 141Cs ( T ~ , ~ = 25 s) . While existing as a Cs species, i t tends to remain dissolved i n the sodium and not depos i t on surfaces .

deposit rapidly and once deposited, decays in place to 141La and 141Ce. This type of transport and deposition behavior was observed for 137Cs-137Ba in flowing sodium systems. ( 4 ) downstream concentrations of 14'Ba-14'La observed a t the upper end of the BFTF. the upper end of the BFTF d u r i n g a af ter i t s removal from the reactor. Subsequent decay prior t o the disassembly prevented accurate dis t r ibut ion measurements d u r i n g the detailed exami na t i on.

The inner surface re f lec ts the deposition from the

14'Ce was a notable exception, showing a

However, a f t e r decay to 14'Ba, i t t e n d s to

A similar mechanism could explain the large

These re la t ive ly large concentrations of 140Ba-140La were observed at ama scan of the f a c i l i t y two weeks

A second deposition sampler tes t (ST-1B) was started i n E B R - I 1 d u r i n g Run 108 i n conjunction w i t h the XY-5 breached fuel tes t . The tes t pins contain h i g h b u r n u p (14 at .%) mixed oxide fuel . t ical to the previous u n i t (ST-1A). No p i n breaches were detected through the middle of R u n 109. Two additional sampler units were fabricated and shipped to EBR-I1 to be used i n future breached fuels tes t s i n the BFTF.

The ST-1B sampler i s iden-

8

Page 18: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

A cesium trap test was started i n the Fission Product Transport Loop w i t h an improved trap design t h a t is expected t o achieve lower Cs con- centrations i n the sodium and to make more e f f ic ien t use of the trap packing.

3. Future Work

L Complete analysis of ST-1A deposition sampler data and issue topical report.

Examine the ST-1B sampler at the conclusion of the XY-5 RBCB t e s t .

Perform two additional deposition sampler t e s t s in the BFTF.

Complete Cs t r a p t e s t in FPTL.

C. FFTF HEAT TRANSFER SYSTEM RADIOACTIVITY SURVEILLANCE H. P. Maffei

1. Objective

Maintenance operations for any nuclear plant are s ignif icant ly affected by radiation levels in equipment ce l l s . expected cel l radiation levels must be available during plant startup t o f a c i l i t a t e planning and designing for maintenance. Accurate r ad ia t ion level

predictions wi l l answer the questions of whether plants should be designed for "hands-on" or remote maintenance.

Reasonably accurate predictions of

2. Accompl ishments

Significant progress was made in predicting activated corrosion product b u i l d u p i n sodium-cooled reactor systems. the heat transport system (HTS) need t o be validated dur ing the startup of the FFTF. Without such validation, present calculated levels must be con- si dered "best e f for t" predict ions, with future maintenance techniques

These calculated predictions for

9

Page 19: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

based on these ca l cu la t i ons . Ac tua l measurements of r a d i a t i o n l e v e l s w i l l

a l l o w s e l e c t i o n o f t h e c o r r e c t maintenance techniques p r i o r t o need.

Dur ing FFTF cons t ruc t ion , f i v e penet ra t ions were made i n t h e opera t ing f l o o r over HTS C e l l 3 f o r mon i to r i ng r a d i o a c t i v e co r ros ion products w i t h i n t h a t c e l l . These pene t ra t i on p o s i t i o n s are show i n F igure 2.

t i o n s 1 and 2 are p o s i t i o n e d over t h e pr imary sodium hot leg. i s over t h e crossover p i p i n g between t h e pr imary pump and heat exchanger, w h i l e Penet ra t ions 4 and 5 w i l l moni tor t h e c o l d l e g p i p i n g and check valve,

respec t i ve l y . Each pene t ra t i on i s a 2- in . diameter ho le through the concrete ope ra t i ng f l o o r . The leng th o f each hole i s %7 ft except f o r Penet ra t ion 3 over t h e crossover p ip ing , which i s 4 f t i n length. The holes

w i l l supply a c o l l i m a t e d beam o f r a d i o a c t i v i t y f rom an area o f ‘ ~ 3 2 0 crn2

(50 in.*) o f p ip ing .

Penetra-

Penet ra t ion 3

C a l i b r a t i o n o f the penet ra t ions and count ing equipment was p rev ious l y

r e p or t e d . (5) I n o rder t o ‘ cor re la te the n u c l i d e concentrat ion, which w i l l

be measured a t t h e t e s t ho les w i t h actual r a d i a t i o n exposure l eve l s , addi- t i o n a l ins t rumenta t ion w i l l be requi red. I o n i z a t i o n - t y p e r a d i a t i o n l e v e l de tec tors have been purchased f o r i n s t a l l a t i o n i n HTS C e l l 3. t h e inst rument w i l l a l l ow i n s t a l l a t i o n o f on l y the i o n i z a t i o n probe i n t h e

c e l l , thereby avo id ing r a d i a t i o n damage t o t h e inst rument dur ing r e a c t o r

power ,operation. Two probes w i l l be i n s t a l l e d i n c lose p r o x i m i t y ( ~ 1 m )

t o t h e p ip ing . Penet ra t ion 5. I n order t o ensure long probe l i f e , t h e inst ruments w i l l be k e p t w i t h power o f f u n t i l t he 24Na has decayed f o l l o w i n g power shutdown.

The design o f

One probe w i l l be under Penet ra t ion 1 and the second under

D. RADIATION LEVELS I N FFTF HTS CELLS

W. F. Brehm

1. Ob jec t i ve

The o b j e c t i v e o f t h i s work i s t o use t h e l a t e s t a v a i l a b l e n u c l i d e

re lease data and FFTF parameters t o c a l c u l a t e r a d i a t i o n l e v e l s f o r rad io - a c t i v e m a t e r i a l t ranspor t .

10

A

Page 20: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

FIGURE 2: Radioactive Corrosion Product Monitoring Penetrations.

Page 21: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

2. Accompl i shmen t s

I n the l a t e s t two quarterly reports ( 2 9 3 ) estimates were made of radia- t i on levels at 36OoC (68OoF), 316OC (60OOF) FFTF core in le t temperatures, and a t 36OoC core in le t w i t h radionuclide traps installed. the radionuclide trap used a 0.0076-mm (0.3-mil) thick coating of nickel as the trap material, which coated the ent i re length of the fuel pin. question was raised of 58C0 release and transport from the reaction 58Ni(n,p) Co and subsequent corrosion.

One concept of

The

58

The situation can be analyzed as follows: The equilibrium radiation levels in FFTF hot leg and cold leg sections of the HTS cell due to !j8Co

are 0.08 and 0.06 R/h, respectively. T h i s material comes almost ent i re ly from the corrosion of material i n the core (fuel s tack) region of the p i n , s ince the 58Ni(n,p) Co r e a c t i o n i s a h igh energy t ransmutat ion, which

occurs only i n the core region and not i n the f iss ion gas plenum region of the fuel p i n . The fuel cladding s t a r t s irradiation exposure a t 1.12% nickel; leaching of the nickel by sodium reduces the nickel concentration a t the surface to as l i t t l e as 2% (hence reducing the potential for 58C0 production and transport).

potential for 58C0 transport, if the ent i re fuel p i n i s nickel coated, would be a t l eas t 100/12 = 8.3 times as h i g h , and perhaps 100/2 = 50 times as h i g h . T h i s release would lead to radiation levels o f a t least 0.66 R / h i n the h o t leg and 0.50 R/h i n the cold, possibly much higher. levels, added to the 6oCo and (reduced) !j4Hn levels, would s t i l l resu l t in radiation levels at l eas t 1 R/h.

58

T h i s f a c t was accounted fo r by K u h n ( 6 ) i n his original calculations of radiation level; and i n subsequent estimates. ( 2 9 3 ) The

Such radiation

Therefore, we recommend that nickel coating of the f iss ion qas plenum region only be considered fo r this concept of radionuclide t raps . coating i n that region will produce negligible 58C0.

Nickel

12

Page 22: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

n 3. Future Work

The temperature and flux parameters used i n Reference 6 were 1974 values. changes are present that would affect radiation level estimates.

These will be compared w i t h the l a t e s t data to see if significant

E. DECONTAMINATION OF BREEDER REACTOR COMPONENTS R. P. Anantatmula, J. M . Lu t ton , S. J. Bos and M. B. Hall

1. Objective

The objective of this ac t iv i ty i s to develop and demonstrate decontami- nation processes t h a t will permit contact maintenance and requal i f icat ion of breeder reactor primary system components.

2. Accomplishments

Test DECON-I, a study of radionuclide deposition and penetration i n t o AISI 304 and AISI 316 s ta inless s tee ls was completed. The s ta inless steel t e s t specimens were downstream from the radionuclide source a t a tempera- ture of 534OC and were exposed for a total time period of 8000 h i n Source Term Control Loop 3 (STCL-3). irradiated AISI 316 s ta in less s teel kept in the 549% hot leg of the pumped AT l o o p (STCL-3) ups tream from t h e test s p e c i m e n s . T h i s arrangement

i s assumed to simulate the temperature drop from reactor out le t to a hot leg pump. Two specimen arrangements were used: to a h i g h velocity sodium flow of 3.5 m/s (11 f t / s ) , the other perpendicular

The radionuclide sources were pieces of

one w i t h the coupons parallel

to the flow, a t a nominal velocity of 0.3 to 0.6 m/s (1 to 2 f t / s ) . ( 7 )

The ac t iv i t i e s of the radionuclides deposited on the specimens were counted w i t h a Ge-Li detector and a mu1 ti-channel analyzer, and corrections were applied fo r detector efficiency and geometry. Incremental radio- chemical analysis for the d e p t h dis t r ibut ion of 54Mn and 6oCo was also performed on selected specimens. 54Mn diffusion coefficients measured from the analysis of Phase I (2500 h ) and Phase I1 (4500 h ) specimens were

13

Page 23: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

repor ted e a r l i e r . ( 8 ) O p t i c a l metal lography o f as-received specimens was

also repor ted. A t t he complet ion o f t e s t DECON-I, t he t e s t specimens were weighed and counted, and p o s t - t e s t meta l lography was performed on 4000-h specimens encompassing a l l heats o f t he A I S I 304 and A I S I 316

ma te r ia l s . Incremental radiochemical ana lys is i s a l so c u r r e n t l y be ing

performed on a few se lec ted specimens.

O p t i c a l micrographs o f cas t and wrought A I S I 304 and A I S I 316 s t a i n l e s s

s t e e l exposed f o r 8000 h a t 534OC are presented i n F igures 3 through 12. D i f fe ren t heats o f the m a t e r i a l s had d i f f e r e n t carbon concentrat ions. Table 2 l i s t s the specimens examined by o p t i c a l metal lography w i t h t h e i r

carbon compos i t i on s .

As mentioned i n t h e prev ious q u a r t e r l y repor t ( ' ) , t h e amount o f f e r r i t e i s more i n AISI 316 cas t ma te r ia l than i n AISI 304 cas t s tee l c o n t r i b u t i n g t o a l a r g e r l a t t i c e d i f f u s i o n c o e f f i c i e n t f o r 54Mn.

p o r o s i t y can be seen i n a l l the cas t m a t e r i a l s and i s exempl i f ied by l a r g e

ho les i n specimen OE (F igure 4).

b ide, near t h e sodium-exposed sur face o f a l l t h e cas t mater ia ls . p r e c i p i t a t i o n seems t o have a c t u a l l y s t a r t e d a t t he f e r r i t e - a u s t e n i t e i n t e r -

face, and p r e c i p i t a t i o n cont inued i n t o the f e r r i t e is lands. A small amount of carb ide p r e c i p i t a t i o n was no t i ced a t t h e a u s t e n i t e - f e r r i t e i n t e r f a c e of

t he as-received ma te r ia l s .

t rans format ion o f f e r r i t e .

Cast ing

There i s p r e c i p i t a t i o n , presumably car -

Carbide

Sodium exposure a t 534OC f o r 8000 h l e d t o

The wrought s t a i n l e s s s t e e l s genera l l y d isp layed equiaxed g r a i n Exposure t o 534OC sodium f o r 8000 h s t r u c t u r e w i t h anneal ing twins.

r e s u l t e d i n carb ide p r e c i p i t a t i o n around g r a i n boundaries and a l so w i t h i n

t h e gra ins . In a d d i t i o n t o carbides, Specimen 9E (F igure 12) had s t r i n g e r -

type i nc lus ions . The amount o f carb ide p r e c i p i t a t i o n genera l l y seems t o be cons is ten t w i t h t h e amount of carb ide present i n the a l l o y . There are f i n e

unresolved p r e c i p i t a t e s a t 1000~ m a g n i f i c a t i o n w i t h i n the aus ten i te g ra ins . I n add i t ion , specimen 8E w i t h 0.08 w t % carbon has l a r g e p r e c i p i t a t e s w i t h i n

some aus ten i te g ra ins . These p r e c i p i t a t e s were no t i d e n t i f i e d . Some or a l l

14

Page 24: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and
Page 25: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

( b ) 30 urn C 1

FIGURE 4. O p t i c a l Micrographs o f Specimen OE (304-C-3).

16

Page 26: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

FIGURE 5. Optical Micrographs o f Specimen 1 F (304-C-2).

1 7

Page 27: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

FIGURE 6. Optical Micrographs o f Specimen 3E (316-C-3).

18

Page 28: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and
Page 29: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

( b ) c 30 ptn I

F I G U R E 8. Optical Micrographs o f Specimen 5F (316-C-1).

20

Page 30: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

(a 1 1 120 pm I

FIGURE 9. O p t i c a l Micrographs o f Specimen 6F (316-W-1).

2 1

Page 31: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

F I G U R E 10. Optical Micrographs ' o f Specimen 7E (316-W-2).

22

Page 32: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

FIGURE 11. Optical Micrographs o f Specimen 8E (304-W-1).

23

Page 33: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

FIGURE 12. Optical Micrographs o f Specimen 9E (304-W-2).

24

Page 34: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

TABLE 2

CARBON CONCENTRATION OF METALLOGRAPHY SPECIMENS

SamPle No. Ma te r ia l *

2E OE 1F

3E 4F

5F

6F

7E 8E

9E

304-C- 1 304-C- 3 304 -C -2 316 -C-3 316-C-2 316-C-1

316-W-1

317-W -2 304-W-1

304-W-2

*C - Cast; W - Wrought

o f these p r e c i p i t a t e s may be carb ides t h a t

p a r t i c l e s . Al though i t has been theor ized

W t % Carbon

0.09 0.07 0.05 0.06

0.05 0.08

0.04 0.07

0.08

0.03

have agglomerated t o l a rge -s i ze

i n the l i t e r a t u r e (lo t h a t

sigma-phase p r e c i p i t a t e s are favored i n A I S 1 304 SS w i t h a h igh carbon

content, t h e sodium-exposure temperature o f 534OC i s no t h igh enough t o promote the d i f f u s i o n o f s u b s t i t u t i o n a l elements l e a d i n g t o the f o r m a t i o n o f

sigma phase.

As p a r t o f t he decontamination s tud ies, t h ree p i l o t p l a n t runs were

made t o evaluate t h e on - l i ne co r ros ion meter.

ve ry we l l dur ing one of the runs as compared t o t h e e lect rochemical c e l l .

However, t r o u b l e was experienced i n t r y i n g t o r e s t a r t t h e opera t ion a f t e r t h e decontaminat ion s o l u t i o n was changed. The decontaminat ion s o l u t i o n

seemed t o be concent ra t ing over a p e r i o d o f t ime; and t h e r e c i r c u l a t i n g pumps were leak ing, presumably due t o a c i d a t tack . The pump seals have been

rep1 aced.

The co r ros ion meter performed

25

Page 35: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

3. Future Work

Comp 1 e te t h e ev a1 u a t i on o f i nc remen t a 1 chemi c a 1 and r a d ioc hemi c a 1

ana lys i s data and gamma coun t ing data and prepare a f i n a l i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of r a d i o n u c l i d e depos i t i on on s t a i n l e s s s tee l s .

F. FFTF SUPPORT J. M. L u t t o n and S. J . Bos

1. Ob jec t i ve

The o b j e c t i v e o f t h i s program i s .I provic ethnical suppor i n sodium removal f o r FFTF.

2. Accomplishments

A t h i r d c o n t r o l rod d r i v e mechanism was cleaned i n t h e p i l o t p l a n t and

re tu rned t o Eng i neer i ng .

Par ts f rom a f a i l e d per iscope were sent t o us f o r c lean l i ness evalua- t i o n . l u b r i c a n t s was developed and used t o c lean s i x teen long sect ions and

numerous small pieces.

A c lean ing technique f o r removing r e s i d u a l g r a p h i t e from thread

26

Page 36: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

11. SODIUM SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY

J. J. McCown ( FF058, FOOOl, F0003)

Sodium Systems Technology programs cover development of methods for sampling, monitoring and controll ing impurities i n sodium and cover gas i n experimental loops and on sodium-cooled reactors. The programs include Fuel Failure Monitoring studies f o r the detection and location of elements containing cladding breaches.

To ensure that the FFTF and subsequent sodium-cooled reactors operate u s i n g sodium and cover gas of adequate purity, methods f o r sampling and on-line monitoring of impurities were developed and tested on sodium f a c i l - i t ies. Continuous on-line cover gas monitoring as well as gas tagging methods were established for fuel f a i lu re monitoring purposes.

The major program emphasis is upon laboratory studies on sodium f r o s t , preparation for laboratory studies of s i l icon control by chemical inter- actions w i t h other sodium impurities and f ina l loop checkout of small oxygen, hydrogen and carbon meters as inserts i n the Multipurpose Sampler. Technical support continued to be provided i n the areas of sodium and cover gas purification and characterization and f i ss ion product monitoring.

This section of the report discusses work underway i n Sodium Systems Technology including: par t iculate control and surveillance f o r effects i n FFTF; sodium f r o s t formation and control i n cover gas p ip ing; monitoring of FFTF chemistry d u r i n g MIST-3; modification and tes t ing of Fuel Failure Monitoring (FFM) equipment on EBR-I1 and completion of preparations on FFTF FFM systems prior to f u l l power operations.

27

Page 37: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

A. SILICON COMPOUND PARTICULATE EFFECTS W. Yunker and D. Paine

1. Objective

The objectives of the Silicon Compound Particulate Effects program are t o determine 1) methods for control of the si l icon compound i n l i q u i d sodium systems and 2 ) effects o f the material on FFTF startup and operation.

Data from the preceding Flow Impedance Phenomena program proved that a sodium-silicon compound caused changes in the thermal/hydraulic performance of sodium heat transfer systems.

2. Accompl ishments

Results of Flow Impedance Phenomena t e s t s on the FIAS/PAL System (11 1 indicate that the oxygen impurity i n sodium and perhaps other chemical components interact w i t h si l icon and affect the mass transfer process. Since a cold trap i s the primary device in most sodium systems for control 1 i ng both oxygen and si 1 icon concentrations, some understanding of this interaction should be useful to control the si l icon concentration to a value that i s harmless to a specific system. Laboratory equipment is being assembl ed t e s t s w i 1 measur i ng co 1 1 ec ted pur i f i cat

and installed for conducting pot t e s t s du r ing FY 1981.

specific sodium impurities. has included 1) an iner t atmosphere glovebox, gas recirculation/ on t ra in , and gas atmosphere monitoring equipment for t e s t

These be designed to c la r i fy the FIAS resu l t s by controlling and

During this quarter, the equipment

preparations; 2 ) t e s t furnace power service and temperature measurement and control equipment, and a high vacuum pumping system for atmospheric control of the t e s t vessel.

The f i n d i n g s of the Flow Impedance Phenomena program (I1) are being applied to an FFTF observation program for i t s f u l l power operation. observations are to determine whether any effects on the plant are from

These

28

Page 38: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

si l icon compound particulates. Operations, observations are planned of the main heat transport system flow resistance, subassembly flow and temperature dis t r ibut ions and the perfor- mances of the intermediate heat exchangers, the primary cold-trap heat exchanger and auxi l l ia ry p l u g g i n g meter. par t iculates is a lso b e i n g planned. from the data base being placed on the Boeing Computer Services, Richland UNIVAC computer. The necessary processing codes are being written. The MIST-I11 FFTF t e s t i n Augus t 1980 provided a useful opportunity t o col lect 30-1111 reference samples fo r s i l icon analysis and t o check the Auxiliary Plugging Temperature Indicator for operation i n the 350°F t o 8OO0F range. The recent s i l icon analyses are summarized i n Table 3.

In conjunction w i t h FFTF Engineering and

Overflow cup sampling for s i l icon Most of the data for analysis wil l be

TABLE 3

FFTF SILICON ANALYSIS SUMMARY

MI ST- I I I

Si 1 i con Reactor

Temperature

400 780

( O F )

Date

1/79 2/ 79 3/79 4/ 79

10/79 6/80

(Estimated) Solub i 1 i t y Si 1 icon

0 (wppm)

0.02 0.001

0.06 0.004 - + ( x 10)

PR EV IOUS ANALYSES

Concentration System (wppm)

Sec-1 0.4 PR I 0.2 Sec-3 0.3 Sec-2 c o . 1 PR I 0.1 Sec-3 0.5

29

Page 39: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

3. Future Work

The tes t pot/furnace design will be completed and procurement started of components and materials.

Plans for si l icon particulate effects in FFTF will be completed and implemented d u r i n g the i n i t i a l two days of operation a t f u l l power.

B. SODIUM FROST TECHNOLOGY G. B. Barton and A. P. Bohringer

1. Objective

The purposes of this program are t o prevent sodium vapor deposits from a f f e c t i n g ope ra t ion of FFTF and to develop ope ra t ing and design c r i t e r i a f o r

liquid metals systems. Deposit Accumulation (SVDA) rates fo r forecasting maintenance requirements. The scope includes the effects o f sodium pool temperature, condenser sur- face configurations, cover gas impurities, p i p i n g configuration and tempera- ture, and gas flow rates .

Tests are intended for developing Sodium Vapor

2. Accompl ishments

F l a t plate condenser tes t s were continued to examine the effect o f higher oxygen concentration than previously reported, hydrogen impurity, and the effect of plating the condenser surfaces so that i t was wetted by sodium. The resul ts are sumnarized i n Table 4.

The ra te of evaporization and the ra te of accumulation on the condenser How- plate are only very s l igh t ly affected by changing the gas composition.

ever, the retention on the plate does vary w i t h the atmospheric and surface conditions of the plate. i n distribution and accumulation of the deposit.) viscosity of the molten sodium as i t piles up ( R u n 26).

(See Figure 13, which i l l u s t r a t e s the difference Oxygen increases the

The t in coating was

30

Page 40: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

TABLE 4

SODIUM VAPOR DEPOSITION OF FLAT PLATE CONDENSER INCLINED AT 90'

Na Pool R u n (OCie;l;Fl Time a t No. Temp ( h )

24 538 1000 24

_.

25 538 1000 24

26 538 1000 24

27 538 1000 24

538 1000 24 W I- 28

Atmospheric Compos i t i o n

Ar 0.68 ppm H20

Ar, 23 ppm H2 7.5 ppm H20

Ar, HO ppm 02 0.62 ppm H20

Ar 0.67 ppm H20

Ar 0.65 ppm H20

Evapor i z a t i on Condensation Condenser Rate** Rate***

Inc l (0 ) . S u r f a c F (g/s. m2) (q/s.m2)

9 Used 0.218 0.0195

9 Used 0.210 0.0180

9 Used 0.215 0.0185

9 Tinned 0,214 0.0198

g Ag P la t ed 0.218 0.0171

Frac t ion Fraction of Condensate Effected on Remaining on

Condenser (%) Condenser (%)

35.5 31.4

33.9 30.9

34.1 42.1

36.7 36.5

31.1 53.8

*The condenser used fo r these experiments had been used f o r 9 previous t e s t s . The co l l ec t ion and removal of sodium leaves a t a rn i sh on t he sur face of the s t a in l e s s s t e e l . f l u x . The s i l v e r p l a t e was generated by using Rocdelle s a l t s mirror s i l v e r i n g so lu t ion . Both coatings were applied only t o the upper sur face .

***Condenser top sur face area = 221 cm2; a l l the sodium c o l l e c t e d on i t appears to have been from s e t t i n g o f mist p a r t i c l e s . Temperature d i s t r i b u t i o n on condenser p l a t e :

The t i nned sur face was generated by melting pure t i n u n d e r a so lde r ing

**Sodium container ID = 3.32 in. , and calculated sur face a rea = 55.85 cm2.

I n l e t end = 500 2 1 5 O F , middle = 402 2 8OF; o u t l e t end = 370 - + 8OF.

Page 41: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

R u n 24 Run 25 View o f Condenser Top a t 9' Incline

Run 26 View o f Condenser Surface

R u n 27 R u n 28 Frost Test

FIGURE 13. Photographs Showing Change in Distribution of Sodium Accumulation on Condenser Plate. variables.)

(See Table 1 for operating condition

32

Page 42: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

removed by the sodium and formed massive patches of an i n t e r m e t a l l i c com-

pound. coa t ing increased t h e w e t t i n g o f the condenser p l a t e by sodium and may have

increased the v i s c o s i t y s ince drainage was not as complete as on other t e s t s .

(See area a t l e f t center o f photograph o f Run 27). The s i l v e r

Three t e s t s were performed on a p a r a l l e l p l a t e b a f f l e system s i m i l a r t o t h e thermal b a f f l e s used i n var ious pieces o f equipment.

was g rea te r t o a l l ow examination o f a wider temperature range i n a s i n g l e

t e s t . The general apparatus i s shown i n F igu re 14 along w i t h p i c t u r e s o f

t h e b a f f l e s wi th t h e i r sodium accumulation, The data are s u m a r i z e d i n

Table 5 .

The p l a t e spacing

The f i r s t conc lus ion i s t h a t convect ive c i r c u l a t i o n o f m i s t i s t h e major sodium t r a n s p o r t mechanism. The f i r s t t e s t (No. 29) showed evidence

o f sodium r e f l u x i n g o f f t h e bottom p l a t e so t h e subsequent t e s t s were

shortened. Comparing t h e accumulation r a t e s ca l cu la ted f o r t he t h r e e runs, t h e r e does n o t appear t o have been s i g n i f i c a n t d i s t o r t i o n o f t he depos i t i on

p a t t e r n by r e f l u x i n g . The h ighe r evaporat ion r a t e s f o r t h e two s h o r t e r runs r e s u l t f rom t h e neg lec t o f t he evaporat ion o c c u r r i n g du r ing heatup and coo l -

down. I n the photograph through the viewport , P la tes 4 and 5 are v i s i b l e . P l a t e 4 i s j u s t below the l e v e l of the s i d e arm.

expanded gas volume around t h i s p l a t e increases the depos i t i on ra te .

It appears t h a t t he

On t h e lower two p l a t e s the sodium was molten; on the center one, par-

t i a l l y so; and on t h e upper two, it was a sponge.

A t t h e oxygen l e v e l tested, it appears evaporat ion i s s l i g h t l y reduced

over t h a t i n pure Ar, t he d e p o s i t i o n p a t t e r n i s s l i g h t l y modif ied, and a sma l le r f r a c t i o n deposi ts on t h e p la tes. With t h e b a f f l e c learance o f

0.42 in., convect ion r e a d i l y occurs. Whether t h i s c e l l i s go ing up one s i d e and down t h e o the r or i s laminar i s n o t c lea r , b u t t h e unsymnetr ical deposi t

on P l a t e 4 suggests t h e former.

The fo rma t ion of sodium vapor deposi ts i n pipes -- p a r t i c u l a r l y t he FFTF gas e q u a l i z a t i o n l i n e s and t h e reac to r vessel e x i t l i n e -- t h a t c o u l d

33

Page 43: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

General View o f Apparatus View o f Upper Two Pla tes Showing Sodium Deposi t

Top View o f P la tes Bottom View o f P la tes Showing Small Amount o f Accumulated Sodium on Bottom of Bottom P l a t e

FIGURE 14. Run 29 Apparatus and Resu l t s o f the Sodium Vapor Depos i t ion on P a r a l l e l P la tes.

34

Page 44: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

6

R u n No.

29

-

30

31

W Ln

R u n No.

29

-

30

31

TABLE 5

SODIUM VAPOR DEPOSITION ON PARALLEL PLATE BAFFLES

Na Pool Evaporation Bottom Pla te 2nd Plate Time a t AtmosDheric Total Rate Sod i urn Sod i urn

538 1000 5 Ar 21.03 0.209 249 480 2.12 0.424 157 315 1.54 0.308 0.30 ppm H20

0.40 ppm H20

0.40 ppm H20

538 1000 1.5 Ar 8.53 0.283 249 480 0.52 0.347 163 326 0.52 0.347

558 1000 1.5 Ar, 140 ppm 02 7.95 0.264 249 490 0.41 0.273 197 387 0.34 0.227

4th Plate Top P la t e Total Deposits 3rd Plate Temp e r a t u r e Sod i urn Temperature Sod i um Temperature Sod 1 um Sodium on Plates ( O C ) ( O F ) (9) (g/h) ( O C ) ( O F ) (9) ( g / h ) ( O C ) ( O F ) (9) 0 0 0 112 233 1.44 0.288 78 172 1.71 0.342 62 143 1.47 0.297 8.28 39.4

118 245 0.46 0.307 88 190 0.53 0.352 68 155 0.43 0.287 2.46 28.8

142 287 0.36 0.240 93 200 0.45 0.300 63 146 0.33 0.220 1.83 23.0

Dimensions: ( i n . )

Vessel Inner Diameter 3.84 Plate Diameter 3.00 Plate Spacing 2.5

Overall Height o f Vessel 20.5 Top Plate to Flane 5.

Page 45: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

impede gas f l o w i s a quest ion o f concern. and t h e i r mode o f fo rmat ion are be ing examined on a l abo ra to ry sca le t o

provide understanding for control o f these deposits.

The character o f these deposi ts

The exper imental setup i s shown i n F igu re 15. The bas ic sodium

evaporator i s t h e same as t h a t used f o r t h e f l a t p l a t e condenser exper i -

ments. The photograph shows a g lass c o l l e c t i n g tube i n p lace f o r Run 35. This was used f o r v i s u a l observa t ion o f t he l o c a t i o n and d i s t r i b u t i o n o f the

deposi t . Runs 33 and 34 employed s t a i n l e s s s tee l tubing, 3/4 x 0.035-in. The tub ing was c u t i n t o lengths; t h e sodium conta ined i n it was then removed

and the q u a n t i t y determined.

The r e s u l t s are sumnarized i n Table 6 and F igure 16. Test 32 employed

a 3 - f t v e r t i c a l sec t i on o f 3/4- in. SS tub ing. The data are i n t e r p r e t e d as i n d i c a t i n g f l o w o f gas up the center o f the tube u n t i l near t h e t o p t h e f l o w

changes d i r e c t i o n i n a tee. Th is d i r e c t i o n change induces turbulence i n t h e gas t h a t c a r r i e s m i s t p a r t i c l e s t o t h e wa l l . Between t h e tee and t h e vapor t r a p the re i s a swagelok reducer f rom 3/4- in. t o 1/2- in. tub ing .

opening o f the smal le r sec t i on o f t h i s reducer was covered by the sodium

deposi t , bu t i t had no t stopped the gas f low.

The

The r e s u l t s f rom Tests 33 through 35 demonstrate t h a t sodium c o l l e c t i o n

Test 34 shows t h a t r a i s i n g the w a l l temperature above the i n t h e tube i s by s e t t l i n g o f m i s t p a r t i c l e s w i t h a very minor d i r e c t conden- s a t i o n o f vapor.

m e l t i n g p o i n t o f sodium reduces t h e c o l l e c t i o n on t h e wa l l and moves t h e

depos i t i on f u r t h e r downstream. Some r e f l u x i n g o f sodium f rom the heated

zone occurred.

Since it appears t h a t sodium depos i t i on i n cool o r c o l d p ipes i s

l a r g e l y a m i s t depos i t i on process, more knowledge i s needed o f t he genera-

t i o n and t r a n s p o r t o f m i s t as a f u n c t i o n o f sodium poo l temperature, cover gas p u r i t y , temperature grad ien t , f low r a t e ( v e l o c i t y ) and p i p i n g geometry. It i s planned t o conduct more experiments t o e luc ida te some e f f e c t s .

36

Page 46: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

FIGURE 15. Apparatus f o r Study of Sodium Vapor Depos i t i on i n Pipes. ~e~ 8008649-3cn

Page 47: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

Run No.

32

-

TABLE 6

SODIUM DEPOSITION I N COVER GAS P I P I N G TESTS ON 3 /4 - INCH TUBING WITH GAS FLOW OF 100 cc/min

Na Pool E v a p o r a t i o n Time a t Atmospher ic T o t a l Rate u& Temp (h) Composi t ion & jg/s.m2)

470 8 00 97 A r 23.9 ~ 0 . 1 ppm H20

0.01225

33 427 800 97 A r 26.84 0.01376 ~ 0 . 1 ppm H20

w M

34

35

427

427

800 97 Ar 22.86 ~ 0 . 1 ppm H20

800 96 A r 22.2 ~ 0 . 1 ppm H20

0.01172

0.01 150

Na” ( g j

0.38 0.0025 0.0029 0.0024 0.0029 1.5 1.4 1.1

0.015 1.6 2.6 0.32 0.15 0.055 0.020 0.019 0.012 0.00086 0.00097 0.00021 0.0076 0.0047 0.0016 0.0072

0.34 0.83 1.0 0.74 0.10 0.0091 0.020 0.049 0.0017 0.030

0.032 4.7 1.1 0.22 0.073 0.0022 0.015 0.022 0.0025 0.050

Na C o l l e c t i o n S e c t i o n Length Weiaht of

No.

1 6 2 6 3 6 4 6 5 6 6 6

Tee Vapor Trap

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

2-3/8

6-5/8

6-1/4

5-1/2

6

6 6 6 6 8 8-3/4 ELL

10-1/2 10

8 7 9 9 6

12 7

15

Vapor Trap

1 6 2 10 3 7 4 7 5 9 6 7 10 8 7-1/4 9

Vapor T r a p

( w t / i n . )

0.063 0.00042 0.00048 0.00040 0.00048 0.250

0.0063 0.29 0.39 0.053 0.024 0.0092 0.0033 0.0032 0.0020 0.00011 0.00011

0.00072 0.00047

0.043 0.12 0.11 0.082 0.017 0.00076 0.0029 0.0033

0.0053 ‘ 0.47 0.16 0.031 0.0081

0.0015 0.0030

Comnents

V e r t i c a l V e r t i c a l V e r t i c a l V e r t i c a l V e r t i c a l V e r t i c a l 90° change i n d i r e c t i o n

V e r t i c a l V e r t i c a l t o h o r i z o n t a l bend (50 r a d i u s ) H o r i z o n t a l , s t r a i g h t H o r i z o n t a l , s t r a i g h t H o r i z o n t a l , s t r a i g h t H o r i z o n t a l , s t r a i g h t H o r i z o n t a l , 900 bend H o r i z o n t a l , s t r a i g h t H o r i z o n t a l t o v e r t i c a l bend V e r t i c a l , s t r a i g h t V e r t i c a l , s t r a i g h t 90° elbow H o r i z o n t a l , s t r a i g h t H o r i z o n t a l , 45O bend Tee and reducer Vapor t r a p

(50 r a d i u s ) V e r t i c a l 2-3/4 i n . & 90° bend 5-1/4 i n . H o r i z o n t a l end o f heated s e c t i o n (350OF) H o r i z o n t a l end o f heated s e c t i o n (350OF) H o r i z o n t a l end o f heated s e c t i o n (35OOF) 90° bend t o v e r t i c a l V e r t i c a l 90° bend H o r i z o n t a l Union & reducer

V e r t i c a l , SS 90° bend, g l a s s H o r i z o n t a l , g l a s s H o r i z o n t a l , g 1 ass 90° bend, g l a s s S t a i n l e s s s t e e l , swagelok connector 90° bend, SS H o r i z o n t a l , SS Union & reducer

Page 48: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

PIPE (in.) HEDL 8011-111.4

FIGURE 16. Deposi t ion o f Sodium i n 3/4-in. Tubing from Flowing Argon Stream. (Sodium pool temperature i s 427OC (800oF) w i t h cover gas f l o w r a t e a t 100 cc/min and v e l o c i t y a t 0.71 cm/s.)

C. COLD TRAP TESTING G. R . Bloom and J. R . Welty*

1. Objec t ive

The o b j e c t i v e o f t h i s program i s t o p rov ide t e c h n i c a l support f o r

design, procurement and opera t ion o f t h e FFTF and HEDL t e s t f a c i l i t y c o l d

t raps. t r a n s f e r f i l m c o e f f i c i e n t s were determined f o r s imulated c o l d t r a p heat

t r a n s f e r s u r f aces.

Crys ta l1 i z e r packing e f f e c t s on l i q u i d metal n a t u r a l convect ion heat

*Mechanical Engineer ing Department, Oregon State Un ivers i ty , C o r v a l l i s , OR.

39

Page 49: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

2. Accompl i s hmen t s

Laboratory studies were performed t o determine the crystal l izer packing effect on sodium velocity and temperature generated by the natural convec- tion heating in the core region of a cold t r a p crystal l izer . by Humphreys and We1 ty('*) determined velocity profiles for mercury contacting a heated bare vertical plane. The original work w i t h the bare heated wall was extended from a Grashoff number (Gr*) of 10l1 t o 2 x 10l2. The data are presented as generalized plots of Nussult number vs Grashoff number.

Previous work

For a vertical heated plate the Grashoff number i s defined as:

where:

ql1 = heat f l u x from heated wall $ = thermal coefficient of volumetric expansion g = gravitational acceleration v = kinematic viscosity k = f l u i d thermal conductivity X = vertical distance along the plate

The Nussult number is defined as:

where:

h = fi lm heat transfer coefficient X = vertical distance along the plate k = f lu id thermal conductivity

40

Page 50: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

Mercury is a liquid metal w i t h heat transfer properties that can be used to model heat transfer i n a sodium cold trap crystal l izer . Modeling i s accomplished by matching the Grashoff number of the mercury tes t system t o that typical of a "similar" sodium system. because velocity profiles can be measured experimentally while sodium velo- c i t y measurements w i t h hot wire anemometer methods are not possible. mercury temperature prof i le experiments are less expensive and easier to perform than similar sodium experiments.

63

Mercury studies are valuable

The

The velocity prof i le and temperature prof i le data were extended f o r the case of higher Grashoff numbers. laminar flow regime. The higher Grashoff number data now extend into the transit ional region between laminar and turbulent flow. was increased i n these experiments by increasing X ( the vertical distance a1 ong the plate) . f o u r t h power of the distance X .

Previously data were fo r the case of the

The Grashoff number

The Grashoff number increases proportionally to the

The velocity and temperature profiles for the mercury a t three d i f fe ren t Grashoff numbers are given i n Figures 17 and 18. were measured 27.3 cm from the bottom of the bare heated plate w i t h similar data being obtained a t 2.6 cm.

The prof i les

The mercury flow is concentrated into a narrow region w i t h the majority of the flow being w i t h i n 15 mn of the wall. The thermal boundary layer i s

also concentrated w i t h i n 15 mn of the heated surface. These resu l t s are simil ar to previously reported velocity profiles ( I3 ) for mercury obtained a t lower Grashoff numbers.

A generalized plot of Nussult number vs Grashoff number is presented i n Figure 19 where the e f fec ts o f cold trap c rys ta l l izer packing wire diameter are shown. wire cold trap packing having diameters o f 0.25 mn and 0.12 m. The woven wire packing density was varied to re ta in a constant specif ic surface area

The heated vertical plate was convered w i t h prototypic woven

41

Page 51: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

HORIZONTAL DISTANCE FROM HEATER (mm) FIGURE 17. V e l o c i t y P r o f i l e s f o r k r c u r y Next t o a Heated Plate.

X = 27.3cm

0 Grx*= 7.34 x 1011

* Gr,*= 1.24 x 101*

0 Grx*= 1.92 x 1012

Page 52: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

b

30.00

I I

X = 27.3 cm - Gr:= 7.34 x 1011

A Gr,*= 1.24 x 1012 I

0 GrXu= 1.92 x 1012 - -

-

-

-

-

- -..

HORIZONTAL DISTANCE FROM HEATER (mm) HEDL 8011-111.3

IGURE 18. Temperature Profiles for Mercury Next to a Heated Plane.

m.oo

65.00

- - - d

I I I I I I 1 I , I I I 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00

Page 53: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

40

30

3 Z

P P 20

10

I I 1 I I 0.25-mm DIAMETER PACKING -

- -

NO PACKING

-

I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

HEDL 8011-111.2 Gr* x

FIGURE 19. Packing E f f e c t s on Natura l Conduction Heat T rans fe r f rom a V e r t i c a l Heated Plate.

Q . c>

Page 54: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

2 3 3 o f 82 m /m i n t h e packed reg ion. The packing d e n s i t y was 0.33 kg/m f o r the 0.25-mn diameter w i r e packing and 0.2 kg/m f o r t he 0.12-mn diameter

p ack i ng . 3

The w i r e diameter was observed t o a f f e c t t he f i

c i e n t . The 0.25-mn diameter w i r e increased the heat

about 50% compared t o the 0.12-mn diameter packing.

c o e f f i c i e n t f o r t he 0.12-m diameter packing was s i m bare heated p l ate.

The e f f e c t s o f n a t u r a l convect ion heat t r a n s f e r

m heat t r a n s f e r c o e f f i -

t r a n s f e r c oef f i c i en t The heat t r a n s f e r

l a r t o t h a t f o r t he

have been t o increase

t h e amount o f heat t r a n s f e r and t o cause channel ing near the c o l d t r a p

c r y s t a l l i z e r w a l l . heat t r a n s f e r and increase f l o w channeling even f u r t h e r . The 0.12-mm diam- e t e r w i r e packing has l i t t l e o r no e f f e c t on the heat t r a n s f e r c o e f f i c i e n t

when t h e Grashoff number i s below 10l1 and does no t increase t h e f l o w

The 0.25-mn diameter w i re packing i s seen t o increase

channeling. t o a 0.2-kg/m d e n s i t y prov ides b e t t e r packing ma te r ia l .

These r e s u l t s demonstrate t h a t t h e 0.12-mm diameter w i r e packed 3

D. FFTF SODIUM SYSTEMS SUPPORT

G. B. Barton, G. R. Bloom, G. E. Meadows and W. Yunker

1. O b j e c t i v e

This program prov ides t e c h n i c a l and engineer ing support t o FFTF

operat ions, moni tors performance of FFTF p u r i f i c a t i o n and c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n systems, and evaluates i m p u r i t y behavior i n t h e sodium and cover gas.

2. Accomplishments

I m p u r i t i e s i n t h e sodium and cover gas systems were fo l l owed and t h e

The bu lk sodium tem- i m p u r i t y behavior evaluated. Isothermal System Temperature (MIST) was conducted.

pe ra tu re was increased from 204OC (400OF) t o 42loC (790OF) f o r severa l days w h i l e the performance o f system components was evaluated. I m p u r i t y changes

During t h i s r e p o r t p e r i o d a t h i r d Maximum

@ 45

Page 55: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

in the sodium and cover gas systems were of less magnitude than during the other two MIST tests. tes ts .

Table 7 gives the plugging temperatures for the MIST

TABLE 7

MIST PLUGGING TEMPERATURES

MIST I MIST I1 MIST I11 System 2/79 ( O C ) 8/79 ( O C L 7/80 ( O C )

Primary 167 145 146 HTS-1 146 % 135 < 127 HTS -2 146 Q 135 < 127 HTS-3 146.5 %147 < 127

The primary cold trap was increased from l l O ° C to 1 2 7 O C d u r i n g the 42loC operation. 1 1 6 O C during the 42loC operation.

The second cold traps were increased from l l O ° C to

Oxygen, hydrogen and carbon i n the primary sodium averaged 1.5 ppm 0, 0.05 ppm H and 0.6 ppm C. ar ies averaged 0.97 ppm 0, 0.04 ppm H and 0.033 ppm C . impurities i n the primary and secondary sodium core were w i t h i n acceptable 1 imi t s and were (5 ppm for each element.

The oxygen, hydrogen and carbon i n the second- Trace metal

Hydrogen in the primary cover gas increased from %3 pprn a t 204OC to a maximum of 54 ppm during the temperature increase to MIST. While a t MIST the hydrogen decreased to ~ 2 0 ppm and remained steady u n t i l the systems temperature was decreased to 204OC.

~4 ppm. Methane in the primary cover gas remained below the detectable l imit ("2 ppm) of the gas chronograph. Other impurities were (20 ppm i n the primary cover gas. No changes were detected i n the secondary cover gas sys tems .

The hydrogen then decreased t o

FFTF secondary loop cold trap pressure drops have continued t o increase to a maximum of about 5 psi. The pressure drop in the Loop 1 cold trap has

46

Page 56: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

held f a i r l y constant and i s now at 4.7 psi a t 14 gpm sodium flow. The secondary Loop 2 and Loop 3 cold trap pressure drops increased from a maximum of 1.5 psi to near 3.8 psi a t 13 gpm sodium flow.

Q

The pressure d rop increases in Loops 2 and 3 are within the predicted value of 4 psi reported i n the las t quarterly. ( 3 ) The pressure drop rate increase accelerated d u r i n g the FFTF heatup t o near 78OoF d u r i n g MIST 111. The pressure drop increases are attr ibuted to redistribution of impurities deposited in the cold t rap c rys ta l l izers , and increasing the cold t rap in l e t temperature accelerated this process. The cold t r ap pressure drops are not expected to increase s ignif icant ly above 5 psi unless additional impurities are introduced into the secondary systems. In i t i a l startup impurity burdens have already been removed and deposited i n t o the cold trap. No additional burdens are expected in the secondary sodium systems except for system maintenance or the proposed steam generators.

Technical support was provided on cover gas monitoring in the areas of o i l vapor analysis, oxygen levels in RAPS, f ro s t formation i n unheated argon lines and f ros t behavior i n shield p l u g a n n u l i .

3. Future Work

Surveillance of sodium sampling and cover gas characterization and purification systems wil l continue. gas system impurities from sodium f i l l t o the f i r s t power r u n wi l l be made.

A study o f the FFTF sodium and cover

E. FFTF FUEL FAILURE MONITORING 0. V . Archer and F. E. Holt

1. Objective

This task provides technical support for the development, instal la t ion and startup of the Fuel Failure Monitoring System.

47

Page 57: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

2. Accompl i s hmen t s

F a i l u r e Detec t ion Subsystem -- Technical ass is tance was provided t o

P1 ant Engineer ing and Operat ions t o rect i fy cu r ren t and expected problems and t o determine ac t ions t o be taken i n response t o F i s s i o n or Absorber Gas H i alarms.

Two problems were reso lved and recommendations made t o P lan t Engineer-

i n g t o prevent the LN2 f l o w r a t e t o the de tec tor Dewar f rom dropping sha rp l y and recorder power supp l ies f rom burn ing out.

dropped because the an t i -sp lash f i l t e r , a closed-end tube o f s in te red bronze i n s i d e the de tec to r Dewar, became f i l l e d w i t h debr is . The f i l t e r was

rep laced and the f l o w r a t e re tu rned to normal.

t h i s problem Engineer ing p lans t o make the recommended mod i f i ca t i ons t o the anti-splash device and venting o f the Dewar. One o f the channels on a

recorder f a i l e d because overheat ing caused i t s power supply t o burn out.

The LN2 f l o w r a t e

To prevent recurrence o f

Add i t i ona l v e n t i l a t i o n o f a l l recorders was recommended t o prevent recurrence and i s be ing imp1 emen ted.

Recommended responses t o F i s s i o n o r Absorber Gas H i a1 arms du r ing normal and i n i t i a l s t a r t u p operat ions were t ransmi t ted t o P lan t Operations.

The recomnended responses du r ing normal ope ra t i on s p e c i f i e d cover gas

a c t i v i t y concentrat ions t h a t would r e s u l t i n a r e a c t o r Scram, Power Descent, o r Operat ion a t Power. Dur ing the i n i t i a l ascent t o power and two-day power runs, i t was determined t h a t very l i t t l e f i s s i o n gas was present i n the f u e l

p ins. Consequently the recomnended ac t i on was t o cont inue opera t ion even i n the event o f an alarm and t o o b t a i n o ther samples.

F a i l u r e Charac te r i za t i on Subsystem (FCS) -- The mu1 t ichannel analyzer, mini-computer and da ta l i n k s t h a t make up the FCS were checked and o f f i -

c i a l l y turned over t o Operat ions w i t h several t e s t except ions l e f t outstand- ing. the Subsystem. Operator t r a i n i n g on the Subsystem i s being pursued.

Most o f the t e s t except ions are minor and do no t prevent opera t ion of

48

Page 58: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

The FCS s tores data on a magnetic tape f o r h i s t o r i c a l and f u r t h e r s tudy

purposes. Ths program i s about 20% complete.

A computer program i s be ing w r i t t e n to decode t h a t s tored data. Q

F a i l u r e Locat ion -- A i r and hydrocarbons cont inued t o appear i n mass

spec t romet r ic analyses o f gas obta ined us ing the Gas Tag Sampling Trap (GTST) b u t no t i n the small, U-tube l a b o r a t o r y t rap. Valves on a t l e a s t two

of t he GTST assemblies were determined to be l e a k i n g i n both d i r e c t i o n s and may be the cause o f the problems.

i n order t o make cor rec t ions .

FFTF Operations i s examining the valves

A l i gh te r -we igh t , somewhat smal ler t r a p design was proposed t h a t could

be used throughout most of the p l a n t ' s l i f e .

were designed and f a b r i c a t e d f o r use under cond i t i ons o f the f a i l u r e of two h i g h rod power pins, an u n l i k e l y event du r ing most of the p l a n t ' s l i f e . The

proposed des ign recommends us ing 80 g o f charcoal ins tead o f 175 g t o reduce the impact o f 23Ne and '41Ar on the dose ra tes , w h i l e no t compromising

the Xe and K r t rapp ing c a p a b i l i t y . a c t i v i t y l e v e l s i n the cover gas under f a i l e d f u e l cond i t i ons makes p o s s i b l e

the use o f aluminum i n p lace of s tee l as s h i e l d m a t e r i a l w h i l e s t i l l r e t a i n i n g the 500 mR/h dose r a t e l i m i t .

Smaller, l i g h t e r and l e s s sub jec t t o i m p u r i t y d i f f i c u l t i e s .

The present GTST assemblies

That reduc t i on combined w i t h expected

The proposed des ign would be

The fo rma t ion of a F a i l e d Element Locat ion Team, a small group t h a t would n o t i f y P l a n t opera t ions o f the l o c a t i o n o f a f a i l e d f u e l o r absorber

element, was begun. a n a l y t i c a l da ta and core in format ion, the l o c a t i o n o f the f a i l e d element by

assembly number, and f o r recommending t o P lan t Operat ions the course of a c t i o n to be taken.

The team would be respons ib le f o r de termin ing f rom GTST

n

49

Page 59: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

3 .

F.

1.

F u t ure W or k

Provide technical support as needed.

Provi de Fai 1 ure Character i z a t i on Subsys tem t ra i ni ng . FUEL FAILURE MONITORING - EBR-I1 PROOFTEST F. E. Holt and D. V. Archer

Objective

This task provides design verification and performance evaluations of Fuel Failure Monitoring (FFM) components on an operating f a s t reactor.

2. Accompl i shmen ts

Absorber/Collimator ( A / C ) Test -- The responses of the two A/C devices were tested dur ing this quarter to determine their effectiveness. The Detector and A/C device No. 1 responded as expected, equivalent t o labora- tory tes t s , and resulted i n gama ray intensi ty reduction factors that increased the range of count ra tes accommodated. The Detector and A/C device No. 2 data yielded unexpected, and as yet unexplained, resul ts f o r Position 3 b u t agreed w i t h laboratory tes t s for Positions 2 and 4.

Each A / C device was manually set over a four-day period to count in C o u n t i n g times were three of i t s four positions for a fixed period of time.

se t a t 700, 2000, 7000 and 9000 seconds. The counting time chosen was dependent on the amount of intensi ty reduction expected and the predicted cover gas act ivi ty .

There is generally excellent agreement between the Proof t es t and GLASS data as evidenced by the percent, 1 CY precisions. various energies ranged from 7 x 10-3/s to lOOO/s.

Counting rates for the

50

Page 60: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

A t the end o f the test period, the several outputs from each detector and A/C posit ions were compared against the EBR-I1 p lan t ' s corresponding GLASS monitoring system o u t p u t s . c/s per d/s-ml values in the Tables, one obtains the intensi ty reduction factors versus A/C position. for 133Xe 81 keV gama ray when counting in Position 3 versus Position 1 i s 0.0714/0.00218 = 32.7 - + 1.9.

Tables 8 and 9 l i s t the resu l t s . From the

For example from Table 8 the reduction factor

Table 10 l i s t s the calculated factors and the laboratory measured ones from the l a s t quarterly report. (3 1

Conversion of Computer Program -- The computer program used to decode the Prooftest ' s data stored on magnetic tape i s being converted from CYBER t o VAX processing. Conversion of the applicable programs i s almost complete.

The CYBER computer i s being phased ou t of service,

Gamma Ray Subtract (GRS) Module Modification -- The GRS prototype module was modified to add a t h i r d set of countrate multipliers. set o f mult ipl iers will be used to normalize A/C Position 4 countrates to Postiion 1 countrates. The added f l e x i b i l i t y is needed whenever the Posi- t ion 4 configuration is not a simple combination of Positions 2 and 3 . s i tua t ion occurs w i t h the lead plug used in A/C Position 4, Detector No. 2 and w i t h the use of "compound" absorber/col limators in d i f fe ren t tungsten col 1 imators .

The added

That

The modification was accomplished by an outside vendor and tested i n the laboratory. The outputs obtained were as expected. The prototype control panel and microprocessor with the new program were sent t o EBR-I1 f o r further testing. panels were wired s l igh t ly d i f fe ren t ly as the t e s t s could not a l l be completed. and finish the requested tests.

Unfortunately, the prototype and instal led control

Personnel a t EBR-I1 will modify the Prooftest ' s control panel

3. Future Work

Determine cause of A/C No. 2, Position 3 reduction factor discrepancy. Complete Prooftest computer program conversion. Test modified GRS module a t EBR- 11.

51

Page 61: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

TABLE 8

DETECTOR l/GLASS 1 RATIOS VS A/C POSITION

Counting A/C Time ( s r poS 133Xe a t 81 keV 135Xe a t 250 keV 135Xe a t 608 keV

c/s Der c/s per c /s Der . I

c/nCi -ml d/s-ml c/nCi -ml d/s-ml c/nCi -ml d/s-ml - - -

700 1 X7 = 1850 7.14 E-2 x9 = 584 2.26 E-2 X7 = 2.70 1.04 E-4 + 1.1% - + 1.3% - + 8.7% -

- - - 2000 3 Xi4 = 150 2.08 E-3 X i 3 = 131 1.77 E-3 Xi3 = 3.89 5.27 E-5

+ 5.7% - + 2.9% - + 15% -

- - - 7000 4 X4 = 14.2 5.48 E-5 X4 = 24.6 9.50 E-5 X4 = 1.32 5.10 E-6

+ 8.2% - + 43% - + 1.3% -

- - - 9000 4 X 1 1 = 19.7 5.92 E-5 X10 = 31.7 9.52 E-5 X12 = 1.67 5.02 E-6

+ 8.9% - + 24% - + 15% -

Page 62: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

TABLE 9

DETECTOR 2/GLASS 2 RATIOS VS A/C POSITION

A /C - Pos 133Xe a t 81 keV 135Xe a t 250 keV 135Xe a t 608 keV

c/s per c/s per c/s per c/nCi -ml d/s-ml c/nCi -ml d/s-ml c/nCi-ml d/s-ml

700 If Xi0 = 22144 0.855 Xi0 = 14305 0.552 X i 0 = 97.0 0.00375 - - -

- + 1.3% - + 0.8% - + 1.1%

- - - Xi4 = 1108 0.0150 Xi4 = 807 0.0109 X i4 = 11.1 0.00015 2000 2

- + 3.4% - + 2.2% - + 12%

- - - 700 3 x6 = 489 0.0189 x6 = 991 0.0383 x6 = 49.6 0.00192

- + 4.6% - + 1.0% - + 3.2%

- - - '4 = 4921 0.0190 x4 = 9901 0.0382 X4 = 491 0.00189 7000 3

+ 2.6% - + 1.0% - + 0.9% -

- - 9000 4 - - Xg = 60.2 0.00018 X i 1 = 248 0.00074

- + 5.6% - + 6.3% ~ ~~

*Data from 5/3/80 (Position 1 not used during this 7/29 t o 8/4/80 A/C t e s t ) .

Page 63: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

A /C

TABLE 10

GAMMA RAY REDUCTION FACTOR COMPARISONS VS A/C POSITION AND DETECTOR

Detector No. 1 Detector No. 2 A I C Lab A I C Lab . ., -

Test - Pos N i Test Test Test - 2 133Xe a t 8 1 keV

135Xe a t 250 keV 135Xe a t 608 keV

57 - + 2 55 51 - + 1 45

25 - + 3 22

3 1 3 3 ~ e 33 - + 2 25 45 - + 2 1070*

135 Xe 12.7 - + 0.4 10 1.44 - + 0.3 270*

1 3 5 ~ e 2.0 - + 0.3 2 2.0 - + 0.1 23*

1206 + 180 1070 - - 4 133~e - 135 ~e 237 - + 21 27 0 3050 - + 170 3300

1 3 5 ~ e 21 - + 5 23 5.0 - + 0.3 5.5

*Cannot e x p l a i n t h i s discrepancy. EBR- I 1 personnel determined t h a t t he c o r r e c t A/C c o n f i g u r a t i o n i s i n t h i s p o s i t i o n .

54

Page 64: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

I1 I . REFERENCES

1. J. M. Atwood, e t al. , Sodium Technology Progress Report, October- December 1979, HEDL-TME 79-27, Hanford Engineer ing Development Laboratory , Richland, WA, A p r i l 1980.

2. J. M. Atwood, e t al., Sodium Technology Progress Report, January- March 1980, HEDL-TME 80-30, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, WA, June 1980.

3. J. M. Atwood, e t al., Sodium Technology Progress Report, A p r i l - June 1980, HEDL-TME 80-31, Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory, Richland, WA, September 1980.

4. J. M. Atwood, e t al., Sodium Engineer ing and Technology Technical Progress Report, January, February, March 1978, HEDL-TME 78-20, Hanford Engineer ing Development Laboratory, R i c h l and, WA, August 1978.

5. J. M. Atwood, e t al., Sodium Technology Progress Report, July-September - 1979, HEDL-TME 79-26, Hanford Engineer ing Development Laboratory, Rich1 and, WA, January 1980.

6. W. L. Kuhn, A c t i v a t e d Corrosion Product Rad ia t i on Levels i n t h e FFTF Heat Transpor t System C e l l s and Closed Loop System Modules, HEDL-TME 16-10 , Hanford Enqineer inq Development Laboratory, - - . Richland, WA, September 1977.

7. R. P. Anantatmula, J. M. Lut ton, and M. 8. H a l l , "Decontamination o f Breeder Reactor Components," Sodium Technology Progress Report, Ju l y - Se tember 1979, HEDL-ME 79-26, Hanford Engineer ing Development re----- aboratory, Richland, WA, January 1980.

8. R. P. Anantatmula. et al,. "Decontamination o f Breeder Reactor Components,'' Sod i im Technology Progress Report, January-March 1980, HEDL-TME 80-30, Hanford Engineer ing Development Laboratory, Richland, WA, September 1980.

9. R. P. Anantatmula, e t al., "Decontamination o f Breeder Reactor Components,'I Sodium Technology Progress Report, Ap r i l - June 1980, HEDL-TME 80-31. WA, September 1980.

Hanford Engineer ing Development Laboratory, Richland,

10. C. Bagnal l and S. A. Shiels, " E q u i l i b r i u m S t ruc tu res o f Type 304 and Type 316 S t a i n l e s s Steel i n t h e Temperature Range 8OOOF - 15OO0F," <meta l l og raph ic review, presented a t t h e Ninth-Annual Conference of t h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l Me ta l l og raph ic Society, Seat t le , WA, J u l y 1976.

55

Page 65: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

REFERENCES (Cont I d )

11.

12.

13.

W. H. Yunker, " S i l i c o n Mass Trans fer i n Sodium Loops and the Resu l t i ng Thermal /Hydrau 1 I c Ef fec ts , I' i n Proceedings of t h e Second I n t e r n a t i o n a l Conference on L i q u i d Metal Technology i n Energy Production, R ich 1 and, WA 9 A p r i l 1980.

W. W. Humphreys and J. R. Welty, "Natura l Convection w i t h Mercury i n a Un i fo rmly Heated Channel Dur ing Unstable Laminar and T r a n s i t i o n Flow," Journal o f AIChE, pp. 268-274, March 21, 1975.

J. M. Atwood, Sodium Technology Progress Report, October-December 1978, HEDL-ME 78-93, Hanford Engineer ing Development Laboratory, Rich land, WA, March 1979.

56

Page 66: Hanford Engineering Development Laboratory/67531/metadc...The sampler is illustrated schema- tically in Figure 1. A detailed description of the sampler, its exposure conditions and

HEDL-TME 80-32 UC-79a

DISTRIBUTION

UC-79 (130)

UC-79a (24)

DOE/FFTFPO ( 5 )

D i r e c t o r

DOE/RRT-HQ ( 2 ) Ma i l StoD B-107 Washington, DC 20545

Program D i v i s i o n D i rec to r

HEDL (41)

RP Anatatmula JM Atwood ( 2 ) GB Barton RA Bechtold GR Bloom WF B r e h m RW Carr DW C h r i s t i ansen LR Chulos RP Colburn JM Dahlke MG Dodson EA Evans FR F ishe r WM Gajewski FE H o l t JM L u t t o n HP M a f f e i

W/C-51 w/c-45 w/c-53 W/C-51 w/c-53 W/C-51 W/B-81 W/B-48 W/C-51 W/C-51 W /C- 115 W/A-11 W/C-23 W/A-11 W/B-82 w/c-53 W/C-51 W /C- 51

JL Marshal l JJ McCown JC McGuire GE Meadows LD Muhleste in JE Nolan BH Noordhoff FH Nunamaker WE Roake CT Schaedel JD Schaffer WF Sheely WL Thorne HH Yoshikawa WH Yunker Cent ra l F i 1 es Pub1 Services

W/B-86 w/c-53 W/C-51 w/c-53 W/221T W/B-63 W/D-37 W/A-11 W/C-16 W/A-46 W/D-19 W/A-62 W/A-11 w/c-44 w/c-53 w 1 1 0 /c- W 1 1 5 /C-

D i s t r - 1