Upload
dangduong
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Global Environment Facility Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Bharathi Integrated Rural Development Society Strategic Pilot on Adaptation to Climate Change
Half‐yearly Progress Report ‐ 6 (1st July – 31st December, 2013)
Project Management Office
H. No. 1‐2‐7/1, Habsiguda Polyclinic Compound, Kakatiyanagar, Habsiguda, Hyderabad – 500 007, A.P., India.
Phone: +91 40 27173351 | Fax: +91 40 27173361 | web: http://birds‐spacc.org Email : [email protected] | [email protected]
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 ii
List of Contents List of Contents ii
Abbreviations iii
Supervision missions/visits celebrated in the reporting period 2
A.1 Progress and Output 3
Component 1: Information tools 3
Component 2: Pilots 6
Component 3: Dissemination and Uptake 8
Project Management: 9
A.2 Progress in reaching target indicators as established in the project Logical
Framework/Results Framework 11
B Inputs 17
1a. List of national professional staff assigned to the project during the reporting period 17
1b. List of National Consultants assigned to the project during the reporting period 20
1c. Equipment procured/received during the reporting period 22
1d. Training activities during the reporting period 22
C.1 Problems encountered and risks identified 23
C.2 Actions taken to address any project shortcomings, problems or risk encountered 23
C.3 Actions planned to address any project shortcomings, problems or risk encountered 24
C.4 Budget Revision B, proposed 25
D. Work plan and expected output targets by component for the next reporting period 31
E. Reports 37
F. Attachments 37
Attachment 1: GEF Financial Statement of Expenditures for Project Six months period 38
Attachment 2: FAO NEX financial statement of expenditures for Project Six months period 45
Attachment 3: GEF Cash Advances Request 51
Attachment 4: FAO NEX Cash Advances Request 60
Attachment 5: LC KIND ‐ Detailed statement of expenditures for the reporting period
[July 2013] to [December 2013]: 65
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 iii
Abbreviations
AP Andhra Pradesh AWPB Annual Work Plan and Budget BIRDS Bharathi Integrated Rural Development Society CAF Community Adaptation Fund CARE Centre of Applied Research and Extension CARVE Collective Activity for Rejuvenation of Village Arts and Environment CBO Community Based Organization CCA Climate Change Adaptation CCAC Climate Change Adaptation Committee CCAP Climate Change Adaptation Plans CCS Climate Change Schools CIG Climate Impact Group CMSA Community Managed Sustainable Agriculture CWB Crop Water Budget CWBW Crop Water Budget workshop DA Dearness Allowance DIPA Development Initiatives and People’s Action ED Executive Director FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FAOIN Food and Agriculture Organization India FAOR Food and Agriculture Organization Representative FCS Farmer Climate School FDCMA Field Data Collection Monitoring Assistant GCP Government Cooperative Programme GEF Global Environment Facility GoAP Government of Andhra Pradesh GOE General Operational Expenditure GoI Government of India GVS Gram Vikas Samstha HPR Half‐yearly Progress Report HS Highly Satisfactory HU Highly Unsatisfactory HU Hydrological Unit HUN Hydrological Unit Network ICFRE Indian Council for Forest Research and Education ID Identity IND India LCKIND Local Contribution in Kind LTU Lead Technical Unit LTU FAO Lead Technical Unit, Food and Agriculture Organization LWM Land and Water Management MA Mass Awareness MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forests
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 iv
MoW Ministry of Water Resources MRPM Monthly Review and Plan Meeting MS Marginally Satisfactory MU Marginally Unsatisfactory NEX Nationally Executed Project NFE Non Formal Education NGO Non Governmental Organization NPC‐LW National Program Coordination – Land and Water NRL Land and Water Division, FAO NSC National Steering Committee PARTNER People’s Activity and Rural Technology Nurturing Ecological Rejuvenation PCM Participatory Climate Monitoring PM Project Manager PMO Project Management Office PMS Project Management System PMU Project Management Unit PNGO Partner Non Governmental Organization PPM Project Partners Meeting PPR Project Progress Report PSC Project Steering Committee RBM Result Based Management S Satisfactory SAFE Society for Sustainable Agriculture and Forest Ecology SAID Social Awareness for Integrated Development SE Subject Expert SE‐CO Subject Expert – Community Organization SE‐SA Subject Expert –Sustainable Agriculture SE‐WM Subject Expert – Water Management SLEM Sustainable Land and Ecosystem Management SLWM Sustainable Land and Water Management SPACC Strategic Pilot on Adaptation to Climate Change SYA Star Youth Association TA Travel Allowance TCI Investment Centre Division, FAO TFO Technical Facilitation Organization ToR Terms of References TS Technical Support U Unsatisfactory UN United Nations USD United States Dollar WED World Environmental Day
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 1
PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT Trust Fund Programme
Funding source Reporting period Progress report due at FAO Headquarters
Global Environment Facility (GEF) 6th Six months: July to December 2013
31st January 2014
Project symbol GCP/IND/181/GFF
Title “Reversing Environmental Degradation and Rural Poverty through Adaptation to Climate Change in Drought Stricken Areas in Southern India: A Hydrological Unit Pilot Project Approach”
Reporting period 1st July to 31st December, 2013
Operating Unit TCI
Lead Technical Unit NRL
EOD‐date 21/12/2010
NTE‐date 30/06/2014
Total project budget US$ 3,762, 654
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 2
Supervision missions/visits celebrated in the reporting period
Dates and FAO staff participating
Supervision activities and participants Issues treated
4th October 2013 Prabhjot Sodhi Country Programme Manager, GEF Small Grants Program (SGP), UNDP‐CEE
Filed visit to CARE‐SPACC with Project Manager SPACC and Chief functionary CARE‐SPACC
To understand the project concept and practice.
5th October 2013 Prabhjot Sodhi Country Programme Manager, GEF Small Grants Program (SGP), UNDP‐CEE
Meeting with partner NGOs Discussions on emerging partnerships, at a mutually convenient venue and date; the suggestion on more number of demonstrations using a Zonal approach is valid but a more refined strategy is required to absorb with the current HU‐approach; suggestion on marketing linkages is very much relevant and some partners would definitely try methods to implement the same in the remainder of the project period, raising local resources
5th November 2013 Dr. Peter Kenmore, FAO Country Representative
This visit of FAOR is focused to take a stock of overall situation and review the progress of the project
Review the progress made in developing SLWM pilots from individual pilot sites, results on best adaptive production methods, manual, guidelines, dissemination material A clear cut road map illustrating that what has been covered in a realistic manner to ensure that project outputs and outcomes are delivered by May 2013 and before
20th December 2013 Dr. Peter Kenmore, FAO Country Representative Dr. Satya Priya, NPC‐LW, FAO India
Sixth Project Steering Committee meeting Members of PSC included those from: Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF)of Government of India; Ministry of Rural Development of Government of Andhra Pradesh; Project partner NGOs; and PMO
Strategies to assist farmers suggested: i) look at onset of monsoon, dry spells, their impact on crop productivity and options for adaptation; ii) improve gender equity in the project; and iii) integrate FCS with PCM, SLWM Pilots, and Institutional linkages
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 3
A.1 Progress and Output The project is implemented under three main components: 1) Information tools 2) Pilots; and 3) Dissemination and Uptake. This section gives a narrative description of component activities and outputs produced in the reporting period (July – December 2013). Component 1: Information tools
Implementation of activities under component 1 is expected to result in two outcomes, stated as: Outcome 1A: Farmers and community based organizations (CBO) make informed decisions of land and water management taking into account impacts of climate variations based on scientific and local knowledge; and Outcome 1B: CBOs have capacity to integrate climate variability adaptation measures in sustainable land and water management (SLWM). Outcome 1A: Farmers and community based organizations (CBO) make informed decisions of land and water management taking into account impacts of climate variations based on scientific and local knowledge. Impact, so far: 295 (35 percent women), trained PCM volunteers collect, record and disseminate data on 7 climate parameters viz., temperature, humidity, rainfall, evaporation, sunshine hours, wind speed and wind direction. The data is disseminated using Short Messaging Service (SMS) across the HU and written on display boards located in each pilot habitation. As a result, local climate data is available at doorsteps of the farmers to enable them to understand the climate variability on daily basis. Farmers1 feel that climate data is an important decision making tool in farming operations. Earlier, they depended on information from stations located far away from their village. Temperature and humidity indicate the likely incidence of pests and diseases. Farmers say that if temperatures fall, leaves fold and drop. When night temperatures fall below 150C, crops show yellowing symptoms2. Infestation of pests and diseases increases when temperatures rise. The incidence of insect pests and diseases is more under high humidity conditions3. Leaf growth and photosynthesis depends on relative humidity, moderately low atmospheric humidity and broad sunshine is favourable for plant growth as observed in SLWM Pilots (cotton, groundnut and castor). Moderately low air humidity (60‐70 percent) is favourable for plant growth. Pollen does not disperse when humidity is high. High temperature reduces the growth of shoot and this in turn reduces root growth. Rainfall data is an important source for selection of crops and irrigation scheduling. Wind direction and speed data helps farmers assess the monsoon clouds. Strong winds affect the shoot of the plant. The probability of sunflower plants shoot breaking is more in high speed winds. Further, soil deposition by wind causes poor aeration in root zone. Long sunshine hours reduce the soil moisture content and water resources availability. Exit Strategy: Equipment and infrastructure will be formally handed over to HU‐CCAC by the partner NGO, end of April 2014. CCAC will be encouraged to raise funds from its members to meet the operation and maintenance costs, after project withdrawal. Matching grant, also called Community Adaptation Fund (CAF), of about INR 100,000 will be transferred to the account of HU‐CCAC at the time of handing over, as per the suggestion of the Project Steering Committee4. This CAF would be used for operation and maintenance of PCM assets, apart from promotion of climate‐smart agricultural practices among the farming community in the HU. Also, it would serve as a revolving
1 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/progress/PCM_case_studies.pdf 2 At this temperature nutrients translocation from root to leaves might decrease, leading to yellowing. 3 High humidity condition as know to be favourable for egg‐laying and hatching of pests such as Spodaptera and Helicoverpa in
groundnut and pulses. Outbreak of leaf spot disease in groundnut and Botrytis Gray Mold disease in castor observed at Anatapur and Mahbubnagar, respectively.
4 Please refer to points of agreement (point no. 3 b), in the minutes of 6th PSC meeting. The seed money is budgeted under GEF 5924: ‘O & M’. Link: 6th project steering committee minutes
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 4
fund to encourage interested farmers to continue to experiment with adaptation strategies (soil and water conservation activities, rain water harvesting structures, NPM practices, etc.). Historical and real‐time data collected by the project during its implementation will be handed over to the PNGO, who is expected to provide skeletal technical support to HU‐CCAC, post project. Line departments5 will be provided with the details of PCM, including the list of volunteers involved in data collection, analysis and dissemination. PNGO level dissemination workshops were organized in December 2013 to forge functional linkages with government departments, local research institutes and universities. Two outputs are expected to contribute to generation of outcome 1A, stated as: Output 1.1: Completed study on local and scientific knowledge on impacts of climate variability/ change on natural resources in Andhra Pradesh; and Output 1.2: Local monitoring system of climate variability and its impacts operating. Output 1.1: Completed study on local and scientific knowledge on impacts of climate variability/
change on natural resources in Andhra Pradesh Indicators for realization of Output 1.1 were: a) at least 450 farmers interviewed with balanced representation of gender and vulnerable groups/sectors in at least 9 pilots HUs, covering key indicators on climate variability and its impact; b) farmers understanding of climate change in pilot HUs documented and combined with available scientific data; and c) Climate change impact data established on Soil moisture, Soil organic carbon, water saved, water harvested and crop yield. It is maintained at each Pilot HUs. Plan for the 2nd Semester 2013 is: a) printing of baseline study report after proof‐reading and light editing, in July; and b) computer database updating with inputs from PCM and SLWM pilots. Progress during the reporting period: a) Baseline study report was published and uploaded on project website; and b) Management of PCM database started in February, while the database of SWLM pilots became operational since June. Database6 is updated on a monthly basis with inputs from field units. PCM and SLWM databases are maintained separately. Output 1.2: Local monitoring system of climate variability and its impacts operating Indicator for realization of Output 1.2 was: at least 9 CBOs in pilot HUs are collecting data on at least 3 key indicators, by the end of the second project year. Plan for the 2nd Semester 2013: a) PCM data collection and storage will continue; b) data collection and storage of all the climate impact parameters through SLWM pilots will continue; and c) compilation of manual on PCM will start. d) 180 more school and college students will be oriented on PCM, at 6 HUs; e) convergence activities with Government of Andhra Pradesh (Department of Rural Development), at 9 villages (one per PNGO); f) erection of 6 additional display boards at the 1 HU (DIPA). Progress during the reporting period: a) PCM data collection and storage continued; b) data collection and storage of all the climate impact parameters through SLWM pilots (average crop yields, water harvested, water saved, and organic carbon content and soil moisture) continued. c) Compilation of technical note7 on PCM started in October 2013. Subject Expert – Water Management left for higher studies. The technical note (for internal circulation only) will be ready by May 2014. d) 189 School children and college students oriented on PCM at 6 HUs. e) Convergence
5 District Agriculture Department, District Groundwater Department, and District Rural Water Supply Department 6 PNGO wise PCM data: BIRDS, CARE, CARVE, DIPA, GVS, PARTNER, SAFE, SAID and SYA 7 Notes/technical notes are internal drafts contributing to reports and manuals and do not require FAO clearance.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 5
with women groups of Community Managed Sustainable Agriculture (CMSA), Government of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Rural Development in Farmer Climate Schools (FCS) and SLWM pilot implementation started at 9 villages (one per PNGO). f) erected 6 display boards at 1 HU (DIPA) and 9 additional display boards on climate impact variability parameters through SLWM pilots (Soil moisture, Organic carbon, water saved and water harvested) were erected in one village each in 9 HUs, at educational institutions and offices of people’s representatives. Plan 2014 consists of: a) PCM data collection and storage will continue; b) data collection and storage of all the climate impact parameters through SLWM pilots will continue (monthly); and c) A detailed matrix develop to compare data collected in PCM with the SLWM pilots interventions by April. Outcome 1B: CBOs have capacity to integrate climate variability adaptation measures in sustainable land and water management (SLWM) Impact, so far: Farmers are able to relate the usefulness of PCM data in their farming operations8. They perceive that temperature data helps them in deciding when to harvest and to irrigate. Farmers also opine that chances of rain are highly likely when humidity recorded is 80‐90 percent for three consecutive days. Farmers have been using rainfall data, since APWELL/APFAMGS days, in estimation of groundwater balance and arriving at a cropping pattern that suits groundwater balance. Farmers have been adopting water conservation practises, including use of drip and sprinkler systems, apart from choosing drought tolerant crop varieties. Farmers are using wind direction and speed data to schedule sowing and spraying of fertilizers and pesticides. Information on sunshine hours is used by farmers to schedule weeding, irrigation, and application of fertilizers. Farmers now link the climate data with soil moisture conservation practises (deep furrows, field bunds, and organic manuring). Exit Strategy: 9 pilot HU‐CCACs are registered under Societies Registration Act 35 of 2001. The Executive Committee of the HU‐CCAC meets once a quarter to deliberate on PCM and SLWM data and their dissemination for the benefit of farmers, apart from strategic planning for effective implementation of project activities. The deliberations of CCAC are documented in the minutes of the meeting and action plans developed in the quarterly meeting are followed up by the office bearers. Sub‐committees were formed to assist the office bearers and the Executive Committee in day‐to‐day monitoring of key activities, including PCM, SLWM Pilots, and FCS. All the information collected or generated during the project implementation will be handed over to the HU‐CCAC or partner NGO for their future use. Equipment and infrastructure will be formally handed over to HU‐CCAC by the partner NGO, end of April 2014. One output is expected to generate outcome 1A, stated as below. Output 1.3: CBOs with capacities to integrate climate variability adaptation measures in
Sustainable Land and Water Management (SLWM) Target values and dates for realization of Output 1.3 were: a) at least 9 Committees formed; b) at least 100 leaders and representatives trained; c) at least 9 CBOs have participated and identified measures; and d) at least 7 CBOs have adaptation plans.
8 Statements in this paragraph with regards to “farmer perceptions” are based on case studies collected by Field Facilitators of 9 Field Units. In all 46 case studies have been collected by 9 Field Units.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 6
Plan for the 2nd Semester 2013: a) drafting of 9 HU level Climate Change Adaptation Plans (CCAPs), by December; b) one (at DIPA) CCAC orientation camp9 will be conducted to strengthen CBO leaders skills in Institutional Management; and c) establish functional linkages for SLWM pilots through conduct of two (CARE and PARTNER) CBO leaders officers and scientists workshops. Progress during the reporting period: a) 9 HU level Climate Change Adaptation Plans10 (CCAPs) were drafted by December; b) one (at DIPA) CCAC orientation camp was conducted to strengthen CBO leaders skills in Institutional Management; and c) functional linkages for SLWM pilots were established through conduct of two (CARE and PARTNER) CBO leaders officers and scientists workshops. CBO leaders’ officers and scientists workshops in the remaining 7 pilot HUs were completed by June 2013. Plan 2014 consists of: a) Consolidation of HU‐level CCA plans, by February; b) Consolidation and compilation of note on SLWM measures and technologies11 identified by CCACs, by February; and c) Handing over of assets and products developed in each Pilot HU to HU‐CCACs, in April. Component 2: Pilots
Implementation of activities under component 2 is expected to result in two outcomes, stated as: Outcome 2A: Farmers have acquired skills in managing climate variability and testing adaptation technologies in farming systems through participation in farmer climate schools (FCS); and Outcome 2B: Adequate adaptation technologies and practices identified based on pilot testing in drought prone areas. Outcome 2A: Farmers have acquired skills in managing climate variability and testing adaptation technologies in farming systems through participation in farmer climate schools (FCS) Impact, so far: FCS provides the platform for integrating PCM and learning from SLWM pilots. Farmer participants shared that knowledge on soil moisture management and pest control measures have reduced water stress and input costs, while ensuring sustained yields. Farmers also said that they are more inclined to growing drought tolerant crops over commercial crops. This point to farmers making informed decisions on climate resilient crop varieties (Groundnut – K9; Finger millet – Endapu 8; Castor‐PCH111; Cotton ‐ Kaveri‐Jaddo BG II, Kaveri KCH 189, Ankur 3028, Thulasi 9). It is observed that the attendance of women in exclusive women’s FCS is very good. They participate more actively in small group discussions. Women participants’ shared that climate variability is increasing infestation of pests and diseases. As a result, production costs are rising and crop yields are reducing. They believe NPM practices help reduce production costs. They expressed that knowledge of these practices is very useful. Women FCS participants12 also said that they have gained in confidence and that they are keen to disseminate their learning from participation in FCS in CCAC meetings and SHGs federation meetings. Few women have also shared that participation in FCS has improved their leadership skills. Exit Strategy: FCS resource kit (curricula13, session guides14, and NFE materials15) will be handed over to HU‐CCAC in April 2014. HU‐CCAC will be encouraged to run FCS courses for other farmers in the
9 Participants reviewed current institutional linkages and benefits thereof, apart from deriving an action plan to further explore possibility
of functional linkages that are beneficial to farming community, including taking advantage of convergence with CMSA. 10 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/progress/CCA_Plans/ 11 Summary note of adaptation measures identified by 9 Pilot HU‐CCACs in consultation with officers and scientists in the CBO Leaders
Officers and Scientists workshops held in 2012 and 2013. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3 (Activity 1.3.2). 12 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/progress/FCS_case_studies.pdf 13 PNGO wise FCS Kharif 2013 Curricula: BIRDS, CARE, CARVE, DIPA, GVS, PARTNER, SAFE, SAID and SYA 14 PNGO wise FCS Kharif Session Guides 2013: Session1, Session2, Session3, Session4, Session5, Session6 and Session7 15 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/fcs_training_materials.php
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 7
HU, on payment basis (alternatively by tapping from on‐going government programs). List of FCS graduates will be provided to local government departments and related institutions. One output is expected to generate outcome 2A, stated as below. Output 2.1: Farmers acquire skills in managing climate variability and testing adaptation
technologies in farming systems through participation in farmer climate schools (FCS)
Target values and dates for realization of Output 2.1 were: a) curriculum developed for Farmer Climate Schools (FCS); b) at least 7 FCS functioning; and c) at least 350 female and male farmers will be organized to attend FCS. Plan for the 2nd Semester 2013: a) curricula for second cycle of FCS, based on crop cycles at respective field units, developed by November16; b) 3 Kharif FCS will start by July and, while the 18 Rabi FCS will start in November; c) 450 farmers (225 female and 225 male) will graduate from 18 Kharif and 18 Rabi FCS. Progress during the reporting period: a) curricula for second cycle of FCS, based on crop cycles at respective field units, was developed by November; b) 3 Kharif FCS started by July and, 18 Rabi FCS were started in November; c) 445 farmers (265 female and 180 male) graduated from 18 Kharif FCS. Plan 2014 consists of: a) curricula for rabi cycle of FCS, based on crop cycles at respective field units, developed by March; b) of the 18 Rabi FCS, 9 to be completed in February and the remaining in March; c) 450 farmers (225 female and 225 male) will graduate from 18 Rabi FCS, in March. Outcome 2B: Adequate adaptation technologies and practices identified based on pilot testing in drought prone areas. Impact, so far: Major crops grown in the project area are: groundnut, cotton, vegetables, and rice. Key climate controlled land and water management issues identified were: soil moisture stress, low soil organic carbon, soil fertility, and increased pest and disease infestation. Excess use of chemical fertilizers, low yield and increase cost of cultivation were identified as other factors affecting crop yields. Key land and water management practices field tested in SLWM pilots were: conservation furrows, deep ploughing once in three years, use of rice husk as soil mulching material in between the crop rows. These have increased the soil moisture retention for longer period and improved available water content. Towards inculcating the habit of scientific farming, CCACs were provided with skills and equipment to monitor soil moisture level and soil nutrient status (including soil carbon). Non‐pesticide management interventions in the pilots include, use of Neem oil, bird perches, bio‐fertilizers, and seed treatment with Trichoderma viridi and Rhizobium. It is observed that these practices not only improved the yield and quality of grains but produce is superior than the control plot, as farmers used organic practices in the SLWM pilot. It is also significant that farmers are using weather information to maximize yields given climate variability. Key strategies that farmers are adopting include: early maturing varieties in response of short rainfall season, crop rotation, and improved soil fertility and yields. Most farmers also indicated that they are applying organic manure and practicing crop rotation to deal with the soil degradation problem. Exit Strategy: Package of practices, specific to HU, will be compiled and handed to HU‐CCAC in April. Each partner NGO will be encouraged to evolve a “market transformation plan” for sustaining farmer income under variable climatic conditions, with support from other development agencies. 16 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/fcs_training_materials.php
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 8
One output is expected to generate outcome 2B, stated as below. Output 2.2: Pilot testing of alternative adaptation technologies and practices in SLWM Target values and dates for realization of Output 2.2 were: a) at least 3 pilots produce results on adaptation performance of technologies and practice; b) at least 7 CBOs and 50 female and male farmers have participated in the pilots; and c) at least three manuals elaborated on SLWM pilots. Plan for the 2nd Semester 2013: a) Implementation of 9 Kharif pilot June‐October; and launching of 9 Rabi pilots in November; b) continued engagement of 9 CBOs in SLWM pilots, 33 Kharif 2013 and 27 in Rabi 2013‐13; and c) Finalization of the note on SLWM in groundnut cultivation and drafting of notes on SLWM in cotton, maize and vegetables. Progress during the reporting period: a) Implementation of SLWM Pilots started at all 9 Field Units; b) 9 CBOs and 33 (13 female and 10 male) farmers have participated in the Kharif pilots, while 9 CBOs and 33 (23 female and 10 male) farmers were part of Rabi pilots; and c) Note on SLWM in groundnut cultivation draft was prepared. A team of consultants are hired (revision of their ToR is not foreseen) to finalize the note, which is included in plan 2014. These notes will essentially include HU‐specific “package of practices” and are expected as critical inputs into the agro‐climatic wise manuals planned in 2014. Plan 2014 consist of: a) Technical note on status of soil moisture and soil organic in SPACC project by April; b) Technical note (including package of practices) on adaptation to climate variability in pilot crops17 by end of March; c) SLWM pilots Implementation will continue till March 2014; d) Manual on Adaptation in Scarce Rainfall Agro Climatic Zone by March; e) Manual on Adaptation in Southern Telangana Agro‐climatic Zone by Mid‐April; f) Manual on Adaptation in Southern Agro‐climatic Zone by end of April; and g) Manual on Adaptation in Krishna Agro ‐Climatic Zone by mid‐May. Component 3: Dissemination and Uptake
Implementation of activities under component 3 is expected to result in one outcome, stated as: Outcome 3A: Dissemination of package of methods, tools and institutional approaches in support of district and state level natural resource management initiatives to address impacts of drought. Outcome 3A: Dissemination of package of methods, tools and institutional approaches in support of district and state level natural resource management initiatives to address impacts of drought. Impact, so far: Dissemination of results is right now mainly through project website, which shares information on daily climate variability, project events, and reports. The baseline study report is now printed and shared with stakeholders at the state as well as national level. District level dissemination workshops18 held in December gave field units an opportunity to show‐case their products and learning and helped consolidate their linkages with the line departments and local scientific institutions. If required, we will request MoEF for a support letter to assist in consolidating these linkages.
Exit Strategy: At the project level, PMO is consolidating the implementation experience and learning to bring out technical notes (for internal use only) on PCM, FCS, and SLWM pilots. These notes would serve as inputs into agro‐climatic zone based manuals. These could be disseminated widely and will serve as a resource for other projects and initiatives working on climate change adaptation. A state‐
17 Technical note will include package of practices on adaptation for each of the pilot crop grown across nine Hydrological Units. 18 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/progress/District_level_dissemination_workshops/
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 9
level dissemination workshop is planned in April/May to share lessons, results, and products from project implementation with multiple stakeholders.
One output ‐ “Project lessons, results, and products (FCS Curriculum, field testing methods, adaptation technology and practices manuals, and institutional approaches) documented and disseminated” was originally envisaged to occur as a result of the implementation of the activities under Component 3. Output 3.1 was later split‐up into two outputs viz., i) platform for dissemination; and ii) institutional linkages reinforced. Output 3.1: Platform for dissemination Target values and dates for realization of Output 3.1 were: project lessons, results and products available on platform website with 100 visitors per month. Plan for the 2nd Semester 2013: project lessons, results and products available on platform website with 170 visitors per month. 9 CWB workshops by November Progress during the reporting period: project lessons, results and products available on platform website with 204 visitors per month. 9 CWB workshops with 748 (Male‐503; Female‐245) participants were conducted in October and November. CWB data is discussed in FCS sessions and will be used in Technical Note on PCM. Plan 2014 consists of: a) Website updating, project lessons, results and products available on platform website; b) Database on Record of website visitors by June 2014 with 170 visitors per month; d) Database on Images of events by June 2014 (Field visit, CWBW, WED etc.; e) Scanned document of Press clipping on project activities continuing every month; Output 3.2: Institutional linkages re‐enforced Target values and dates for realization of Output 3.2 was: at least 3 dissemination workshops with at least 150 participants have been held by the end of the project. Plan for the 2nd Semester 2013 is: i) 7 district level dissemination workshops with at least 350 (around 50 participants are expected to participate at each of 7 districts) participants in December 2013; and ii) uptake of climate data in SLWM pilots and FCS will continue. Progress during the reporting period: i) 9 district level dissemination workshops with 813 (276 female and 537 male) participants were conducted in December 2013; and ii) uptake of climate data in SLWM pilots and FCS is continuing. Plan 2014 consists of: a) State‐level dissemination workshop19, in April/May. Project Management:
Project Management tasks expected to be carried out (based on the project document) were: i) liaise and closely work with FAO National Program Coordinator – Land and Water; ii) coordinate with project partners; iii) coordinate and guide all project activities; iv) facilitate national and local inter‐institutional collaboration; v) act as Secretariat to the Project Steering Committee; vi) sub‐contract partner NGOs and Consultants; vii) recruitment and supervision of project staff; viii) prepare and coordinate implementation of Annual Work Plans and Budgets; ix) develop and implement a system to monitor project outputs and outcomes; x) monitor information sources (reports, website, FCS
19 Products for state level dissemination workshop: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/Products_for_State‐level_dissemination_workshop.pdf
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 10
curriculum, list of participants, and manuals); xi) Report to FAO (six‐monthly progress reports, annual project implementation and review, terminal report, technical reports, co‐financing reports, and terminal report); and xii) and finance management and reporting (financial statements, responsibility of cost overruns, quarterly internal audits, and annual audit reports). Plan 2013 (July – December 2013): i) teleconferencing and visits to FAO, as an when required; ii) coordinate with PNGO Chiefs through 3 project partner’s meetings; iii) coordinate and guide project activities through 3 monthly review and plan meetings (MRPM); iv) facilitate national and local inter‐institutional collaboration, by participating in 1 project steering committee (PSC) meetings v) 1 national steering committee (NSC) of SLEM; vi) act as secretariat to the PSC and convene 1 meetings; vii) recruit and supervise project staff and national consultants, procurement of goods; viii) develop and implement a system to monitor project outputs and outcomes, through a project monitoring system (PMS); ix) monitor information sources (reports, website, FCS curriculum, list of participants, and manuals); x) report to FAO, through six‐monthly progress report; and xi) and finance management through 3 internal audits, 3 field support in finance management and reporting (financial statements, quarterly internal audits, and annual audit reports) Progress during the reporting period (July‐December 2013): i) 5 teleconferences were held and two visit to FAO India Office were made; ii) 4 project partner’s meeting (PPM) were held; iii) 3 monthly review and plan meetings (MRPM) were held; iv) 1 project steering committee (PSC) meeting was held; v) acted as secretariat to the sixth PSC meetings; vi) contracted 3 Consultants for the year 2013 ‐ 2014; vii) 13 new staff recruited and goods were procured; viii) a system to monitor project outputs and outcomes was developed in the form of a project monitoring system (PMS) for 2013; ix) information sources are monitored regularly through internal reviews; x) one six‐monthly progress report (January‐June 2013 was prepared and submitted to FAO; and xi) 3 internal audit and 1 field support in finance management was undertaken for finance management. Plan 2014 consists of: i) teleconferencing and visits to FAO, as an when required; ii) coordinate with PNGO Chiefs through 2 project partner’s meetings20; iii) coordinate and guide project activities with Field Officers through 3 monthly review and plan meetings (MRPM); iv) facilitate national and local inter‐institutional collaboration, by participating in 1 project steering committee (PSC) meetings and 1 national steering committee (NSC) of SLEM; v) act as secretariat to the PSC and convene 1 meeting; vi) sub‐contract 9 partner NGOs for 4 months and 4 Consultants (207 person‐days21) for the year 2014; vii) recruit and supervise project staff, procurement of goods; viii) develop and implement a system to monitor project outputs and outcomes, through a project monitoring system (PMS) for 2014; ix) one SLEM Half yearly Progress Report and SLEM Annual Progress Report; x) monitor information sources (reports, website, FCS curriculum, list of participants, and manuals); xi) report to FAO, through six‐monthly progress reports and Terminal Report document; and xii) and finance management through 2 internal audits, 2 field support in finance management and reporting (financial statements, quarterly internal audits, and annual audit reports); and xiii) Facilitate Final Project Reviews.
20 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/progress/project_partner_meetings_agenda.pdf 21 Link to time‐schedule of consultant’s inputs: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/time‐schedule_of_consultants.pdf
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 11
A.2 Progress in reaching target indicators as established in the project Logical Framework/ Results Framework
Table A.2.1 gives the summary of the progress, at the end of the reporting period, in terms of envisaged (in the results based framework of the project document) project results/source of verification/deliverable or products.
Table A.2.1: Project results/products/sources of verification22 in place, per 31st December 2013
Code Result/Product/Source of verification Date achievedO1.1‐A Report: Baseline Study Report March 2013O1.1‐B Database: Baseline Study Database May 2011O1.2‐A Infrastructure: 9 Weather Monitoring Stations July 2012O1.2‐B Database: Weather Database (real time) July 2012O1.3‐A Scanned document: Registration Certificates of 9 CCACs June 2012O1.3‐B Scanned document: CCAC meeting minutes Nov 2011O1.3‐C Database: Lists of CCAC trainees Nov 2011O1.3‐E Scanned document: 9 Adaptation Plans singed by CCAC functionaries Dec 2013O2.1‐E Database: Images of NFE tools/models May 2013O3.1‐A Project Website Feb 2012O3.1‐B Database: Record of website visitors Feb 2012O3.1‐C Database: Images of events (field visits, CWBW, WED, etc.) Jan 2011O3.1‐D Scanned document: Press clippings on project activities Jan 2011O3.2‐A Report: Dissemination Workshop for Project Partners March 2013PM‐1 Report: Project Inception Report March 2011PM‐2 Report: Annual Plan and Budget Workshops May 2011PM‐6 Database: Minutes of the Project Partners Meetings Aug 2011PM‐7 Database: Minutes of Monthly Plan and Review Meetings June 2011PM‐8 Database: Minutes of the Project Steering Committee meetings March 2011PM‐10 Database: Contracts/Agreements executed Jan 2011PM‐11 Database: Project Monitoring Frameworks Jan 2011
A detailed list of indicators for monitoring the project progress was included in the Results Based Management (RBM) Framework in the AWPB 2013 document. Their respective targets for the year 2013 and for the reporting period July – December 2013 were proposed in the half‐yearly progress report (HPR) 5. The following table gives the progress or achievement against the targets in HPR 5. The SLWM technical notes could not be delivered by the end of the reporting period (December 2013). Long list of products and lengthy procedure for reviews at different levels delayed the finalization of the structure of the case study. The number of technical notes and the structure are now finalized. Also, external consultants are hired and working on the technical notes. The target will now be achieved by end‐March 2014.
22 Extracted from the project document (Annex 2: Project Results Framework)
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 12
Output Activities Target 2013
Revised Target Achievement Balance Rating
2nd Semester July‐Dec 2013 end of Dec 2013Component 1: INFORMATION TOOLS Outcome 1A: Farmers and Community Based Organisations (CBO) make informed decisions on land and water management taking into account impacts of climate variations based on scientific and local knowledge
Output 1.1: Completed study on local and scientific knowledge on impacts of climate variability/change on natural resources in Andhra Pradesh
S
Indicator a): Balanced representation of gender and vulnerable groups/sectors in at least 9 pilot HU in farmer survey covering key indicators on climate viability and its impact
Activity 1.1.1: Baseline Study Report (TS) 1 0
Indicator b): Farmers understanding of climate change in pilot HUs documented and combined with available scientific data in completed study document, 9 months from project start.
Activity 1.1.2: Village assembly 143 0
Indicator c): Climate change impact database established
Activity 1.1.3: Base line database (TS) 1 1 1 0
Output 1.2: Local monitoring system of climate variability and its impacts operating S Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs in pilot HU are collecting data on at least 3 key indicators by the end of the second project year. Along with Average crop yields, water harvested or water saved, soil moisture availability and/or organic carbon content maintained or increased in pilot
Activity 1.2.1: PCM data collection 3285 165623 1656 0Activity 1.2.2: Data classification entry 120 60 60 0Activity 1.2.3: Training of PCM volunteers (TS) 9 0Activity 1.2.4: Maintenance of scientific equipment 108 54 54 0Activity 1.2.5: Average crop yields (TS) 18 9 9 0Activity 1.2.6: Water harvested (TS) 18 9 9 0Activity 1.2.7: Water Saved (TS) 18 9 9 0Activity 1.2.8: Soil moisture availability (TS) 432 216 216 0Activity 1.2.9: Organic carbon content (soil test) (TS) 27 45 45 0
23 Records (184 days x 9 HUs) of climate variability (Rainfall, maximum and minimum temperature, Humidity, Evaporation, wind speed, wind direction and sunshine hours) records will be available in 9 HUs across
the project.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 13
Output Activities Target 2013
Revised Target Achievement Balance Rating
2nd Semester July‐Dec 2013 end of Dec 2013areas are monitored. Activity 1.2.10:Orientation to school children’s and College
students on PCM 270 180 189 ‐9
Activity 1.2.11: Display Boards 70 6 15 ‐9
Outcome 1B: CBOs have capacities to integrate climate variability adaptation measures in Sustainable Land and Water Management (SLWM)
Output 1.3: CBOs with capacities to integrate climate variability adaptation measures in Sustainable Land and Water Management (SLWM) ‐ Climate Resilient Communities
MS
Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs have established climate change adaptation committees 6 months after project start
Activity 1.3.1: HUN Meetings 36 18 18 0
Indicator b): At least 100 CBO leaders and representatives trained in climate variability monitoring and adaptation measures integrated in SLWM by the end of year two
Activity 1.3.2: CCAC Orientation camps (TS) 39 1 1 0
Activity 1.3.3: Hiring consultant for institutions and gender (TS)
25 0
Indicator c): At least 9 CBOs have participated in and identified adaptation measures with agricultural scientists 18 months after project start
Activity 1.3.4: CBO Leaders exposure visit (TS) 9 9 9 0
Activity 1.3.5: CBO leaders – Officers & Scientists workshop (TS)
9 2 2 0
Indicator d): At least 7 CBOs have local climate change adaptation plans 18 months after project start
Activity 1.3.6: Develop CCA Plan (TS) 9 9 9 0
Activity 1.3.7: CCA plan workshop (TS) 9 9 9 0
Component 2: PILOTS Outcome 2A: Farmers have acquired skills in managing climate variability and testing adaptation technologies in farming systems through participation in Farmers Climate Schools (FCS)
Output 2.1: FCS Pilots: Farmers acquire skills through participation in FCS S Indicator a): 2 Curriculum developed for CFS with focus on adaptation in drought‐prone areas including methods on identification and field testing of
Activity 2.1.1: Curriculum development workshop (TS) 18 9 9 0
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 14
Output Activities Target 2013
Revised Target Achievement Balance Rating
2nd Semester July‐Dec 2013 end of Dec 2013adaptation measures, 18 months after project start Indicator b): At least 7 FCS are functioning with at least 350 female and male farmers attending and disseminating best experimental practices for adaptation measures by the end of the project
Activity 2.1.2: FCS Training of Trainers (TS) 18 0Activity 2.1.3: Staff training external (TS) 9 0Activity 2.1.4: Staff training internal (TS) 9 0Activity 2.1.4: CRP training external (TS) 18 0Activity 2.1.5: Preparation of training material (TS)24 135 54 251 ‐197Activity 2.1.6: FCS Session (TS) 162 165 161 425
Activity 2.1.7: Hiring consultant for institutions and gender 25 0Outcome 2B: Adequate adaptation technologies and practices identified based on pilot testing in drought prone areas
Output 2.2: Technology and Practice Pilots on alternative adaptation technologies in SLWM MU Indicator a): At least 3 pilots with the participation of at least 7 CBOs and 50 female and male farmers produce results on adaptation performance of technologies and practices by the end of the project
Activity 2.2.1: Training on SLWM pilots planning to staff & pilots farmers (TS)
9 1 1 0
Activity 2.2.2: Workshop on capacity building for women (Agri. Hari., Vet., Seri. Etc.)
2 0
Activity 2.2.3: Vermi compost unit establishment 11 6 6 0Activity 2.2.4: CCAC Leaders meeting 9Activity 2.2.5: Hiring Consultant for Soil Management 26
(TS) 75 12 0 12
Activity 2.2.6: Hiring Consultant for Organic Agriculture(TS) 100Activity 2.2.7: Hiring Consultant for Irrigation Management (TS)
25
Activity 2.2.8: Hiring Consultant for Climate Change Adaptation (TS)
25
Activity 2.2.9: Hiring Consultant for Integrated Pest Management27 (TS)
45 30 0 30
24 Link to materials uploaded on website: http://birds‐spacc.org/fcs_training_materials.php 25 A backlog of one session is reported in the four schools implemented at SAID and SYA. Farmers were busy with harvesting and marketing of paddy and groundnut crops in these two field units, respectively. The
target will be achieved by mid‐January. 26 Consultant‐Soil Management, waiting to receive post‐soil test reports and completion of Rabi season pilots. Database to be completed on Soil organic carbon Pre Pilot and Post Pilots and soil moisture
measurement in pilots.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 15
Output Activities Target 2013
Revised Target Achievement Balance Rating
2nd Semester July‐Dec 2013 end of Dec 2013Activity 2.2.10: Hiring Consultant for Dryland Agriculture28 (TS)
110 40 0 40
Activity 2.2.11: Implement SLWM Pilots (TS) 18 9 9 0Activity 2.2.12: Field Workshop (TS) 18 9 9 0
Indicator b): At least three best adaptation practices and technology manuals by the end of the project
Component 3: DISSEMINATION AND UPTAKEOutcome 3A: Dissemination of a package of methods, tools and institutional approaches in support of District and State level natural resource management initiatives to address the impacts of drought
Output 3.1: Platform for dissemination S Indicator a): Project lessons, results and products available on platform website with 100 visitors per month.
Activity 3.1.1: Website updating (TS) 12 6 6 0
Indicator b): At least 3 dissemination workshops with at least 150 participants have been held by the end of the project
Activity 3.1.2: CWB Workshop (TS) 9 9 9 0Activity 3.1.3: Media field visit 1 1 1 0Activity 3.1.4: Segregation of website dissemination material into: i) Lessons; ii) Results and iii)Products
1 1 0
Activity 3.1.5: World Environmental day 5Output 3.2: Institutional linkages reinforced MS Indicator a): Functional relationship established with local (district) level functionaries
Activity 3.2.1: Hiring consultant for institutions and Gender (TS)
40
Activity 3.2.2: District‐level Dissemination workshop (TS) 9 7 9 ‐2Activity 3.2.3: Dissemination workshop 1 1 0 129
27 As per the approved HPR‐5 planned to hire consultant for Integrated Pest Management and it was revised and planned to take up balanced days available in approved HPR 5 to take up the assignment to
consolidate the SLWM pilot’s climate smart agriculture technical reports. Hired three consultants namely Agriculture Scientist, Climate Data Analyst and Editor to complete the compilation of reports to complete the task of technical reports
28 As per the approved HPR‐5 planned to hire consultant for Dry‐land Agriculture and it was revised and planned to take up balanced days available in approved HPR 5 to take up the assignment to consolidate the SLWM pilot’s climate smart agriculture technical reports. Hired three consultants namely Agriculture Scientist, Climate Data Analyst and Editor to complete the compilation of reports to complete the task of technical reports
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 16
Output Activities Target 2013
Revised Target Achievement Balance Rating
2nd Semester July‐Dec 2013 end of Dec 2013PROJECT MANAGEMENT S Activity 4.1.1: Project Partner’s Meeting 30 4 3 4 ‐1 Activity 4.1.2: Monthly Review and Plan Meetings 31 12 3 3 0 Activity 4.1.3: NSC Meetings 2 1 0 1 32
Activity 4.1.4: SLEM Partner Meetings 2 1 3 ‐2 Activity 4.1.5: PSC Meeting 33 2 1 1 0 Activity 4.1.6: PNGOs contracted (TS) 8 Activity 4.1.7: Consultants hired 34 5 2 3 ‐1 Activity 4.1.8: AWPB 2013 Workshop 1 Activity 4.1.9: FAO Support Mission 1 Activity 4.1.10: Mid‐term Review 1 Activity 4.1.11: Project Monitoring System 12 1 1 0 Activity 4.1.12: Internal Audit 4 3 3 0 Activity 4.1.13: Field support in Finance Management 4 3 1 235
Activity 4.1.14: Document AWPB 2013 1 Activity 4.1.15: Document Half‐yearly Progress 2 1 1 0 Activity 4.1.16: Procurement 1
* Use GEF Secretariat required six‐point scale system: Highly Satisfactory (HS), Satisfactory (S), Marginally Satisfactory (MS), Marginally Unsatisfactory (MU), Unsatisfactory (U), and Highly Unsatisfactory (HU). Based on inputs by the Execution Partner and BH, the FAO LTU will provide the progress rating.
29 State‐level Dissemination workshop is rescheduled for May 2014. 30 2 Project Partner’s Meetings were conducted at CARE‐SPACC Office and 2 at SAFE‐SPACC Office with partner NGOs 31 3 Monthly Review and Plan Meetings were conducted at Project Management Office with Field Officers 32 One NSC meeting was not called for by SLEM, this semester 33 2 PSC meetings were conducted with Members of PSC included those from: FAO, MoEF GoI, and Ministry of Rural Development of GoAP; Project partner NGOs; and PMO 34 3 Consultants hired for 2013‐2014 Agriculture Scientist, Climate Change Data Analyst and Editor 35 No transportation was available during the 3 months, due to the agitation on state division.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 17
B Inputs
1a. List of national professional staff assigned to the project during the reporting period
Name Duration Functions
Mr. V. Paul Raja Rao LC Kind
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Executive DirectorReceive funds from FAO; management of project funds; financial monitoring and reporting; monitor and supervise the work of local partner NGOs to ensure that they follow procedures suiting fiduciary requirements of FAO; and prepare disbursement requests and corresponding justification of expenditure based on an updated annual work plan
Dr. S. V. Govardhan Das GEF
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Project ManagerCoordinate and guide all project activities directed to achieve the objectives of the project; prepare and coordinate the implementation of annual work plans and budgets; develop and implement a system to monitor project outputs and outcomes; perform the monitoring and reporting tasks; prepare all relevant documentation; act as the Secretary to the PSC; and liaise and work closely with the FAO NPC‐LW and all project partners
Mr. S. S. Kandagal FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Subject Expert ‐ Sustainable AgricultureAssessing present agricultural practices, in pilot HUs; and designing, implementing and monitoring integration of sustainable agricultural practices with climate variability adaptation
Mr. C. Konda Reddy FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Subject Expert ‐ Community OrganizationAssessing present institutional capacities, in pilot HUs; and designing, implementing and monitoring the capacity building for integration of land and water management practices with climate variability adaptation.
Mr. Anil Rautray GEF
1st July 2013 – 31st July 2013
Subject Expert – Water Management Assessing present water management practices, in pilot HUs; and designing, implementing and monitoring integration of water management practices with climate variability adaptation
Mr. Robinson John GEF
26th September 2013 – 31st December 2013
Subject Expert – Water Management Assessing present water management practices, in pilot HUs; and designing, implementing and monitoring integration of water management practices with climate variability adaptation
Mr. B. Umamaheswara Rao FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Project Officer – Land and Water Management Assessing present land and water management practices, in pilot HUs; and designing, implementing and monitoring integration of land and water management practices with climate variability adaptation
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 18
Name Duration Functions
Mr. N. Rambabu FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Project Officer Documentation Designing, updating and operation of platform website for documentation of project lessons, results and products.
Mr. S. Sivaprasad FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Project Officer – Non Formal EducationDesigning Non Formal Education (NFE) tools and strategies for the Community level project intervention and providing technical support to the Field Units, in view of climate variability and change.
Mr. V. N. S. Santosh Mohan FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Administrative Officer Ensuring that all the agencies sub‐contracted by BIRDS adhere to the fiduciary requirements of FAO; and Human Resources Management, procurement and Administration of PMO
Mr. R. Arun Kumar GEF
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Finance Officer, BIRDS Nodal Desk Contribute to the preparation of work plans and budgets, and financial reports; participate in field reviews to ensure funds are spent properly and activities are implemented cost‐effectively; contribute to comprehensive internal audits; and evaluate the systems of management controls and support their effectiveness
Mr. P. Shravan Kumar FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Finance Officer, PMO Contribute to the preparation of work plans and budgets, and financial reports; participate in PMO reviews to ensure funds are spent properly and activities are implemented cost‐effectively; and facilitate internal audits of PMO
Mr. Y. Sudhakar GEF
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Field Officer, BIRDS, Allagadda Field UnitFacilitate the selection and recruitment of the field team in consultation with the PMO; coordinate field team activities at partner NGO level; guide the field team in planning, implementation, monitoring and review of activities; and lead compilation of team reports and report to the PMO on technical, financial and administrative matters
Mr. M. Sreenivasulu GEF
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Field Officer, CARE, Achampet Field UnitSame as previous
Mr. G. Dhanunjaya Rao GEF
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Field Officer, CARVE, Markapur Field UnitSame as previous
Mr. Y.R.K. Satya Prasad GEF
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Field Officer, DIPA, Giddalur Field Unit Same as previous
Mr. G.S. Madhu Kumar GEF
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Field Officer, GVS, Madanapalle Field UnitSame as previous
Mr. T. Venugopal GEF
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Field Officer, PARTNER, Porumamilla Field Unit, Same as previous
Ms. K. Anuradha GEF
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Field Officer, SAFE, Cumbum Field UnitSame as previous
Mr. N. Manmadha ReddyGEF
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Field Officer, SAID, Miryalaguda Field UnitSame as previous
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 19
Name Duration Functions Mrs. R. Lakshmi GEF
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Field Officer, SYA, Guthi Field Unit Same as previous
Mr. V. S. Diwakar FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional ‐ NFE, BIRDS Capacity building of CBO leaders in one of the technical aspects viz., water management, agriculture and climate change schools; and facilitating implementation of project components/activities in coordination with concerned line departments.
Ms. T. Pavani FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 30th
October 2013 Professional – LWM, BIRDS Same as previous
Ms. K. Uma Maheswari FAO NEX
1st November 2013 –16th November 2013
Professional – LWM, BIRDS Same as previous
Mr. S. Venkata Shekar FAO NEX
18th November 2013 –31st December 2013
Professional – LWM, BIRDS Same as previous
Mr. T. Jagadeeswara Reddy FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional ‐ NFE, CARE Same as previous
Mr. M. Praveen Kumar FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional – LWM, CARE Same as previous
Mr. K. Ravindar Reddy FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional ‐ NFE, CARVE Same as previous
Mr. Y. Ranjit Kumar FAO NEX
12th August 2013 – 31st
December 2013 Professional – LWM, CARVE Same as previous
Ms. S. Sailaja FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional ‐ NFE, DIPA Same as previous
Mr. S. Abdul Khadar FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st
December 2013 Professional – LWM, DIPA Same as previous
Mr. K. Sankaraiah FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional ‐ NFE, GVS Same as previous
Mr. K. Raghavendra Reddy FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional – LWM, GVS Same as previous
Mr. P. Sangyamaiah FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional ‐ NFE, PARTNER Same as previous
Mr. K. Madhu Babu FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional – LWM, PARTNER Same as previous
Mr. B. Vijaya Kumar FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional ‐ NFE, SAFE Same as previous
Mr. K. Vishnuvardhan RaoFAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional – LWM, SAFE Same as previous
Mr. P. Karunakar FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st August 2013
Professional ‐ NFE, SAID Same as previous
Ms. Ch. Lalitha Kumari FAO NEX
1st September 2013 –31st December 2013
Professional ‐ NFE, SAID Same as previous
Mr. P. Narender FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional – LWM, SAID Same as previous
Ms. H. Hayathun FAO NEX
5th July 2013 – 13th August 2013
Professional ‐ NFE, SYA Same as previous
Ms. V. Narmada FAO NEX
6th September 2013 –31st December 2013
Professional ‐ NFE, SYA Same as previous
Mr. K. Devadanam FAO NEX
1st July 2013 – 31st December 2013
Professional – LWM, SYA Same as previous
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 20
1b. List of National Consultants assigned to the project during the reporting period
Name Duration Funding Source
ContributeOutputs
Functions
Mr. Sharat Singh 20th November 2013 – 31st December 2013
GEF‐5570 Output 2.2 Consultant – Agriculture Scientist i) tabulation of crop growing stages of for all crops grown as part of pilot interventions; ii) generation of graphs showing climatic conditions (temperature, humidity, rainfall, evaporation, wind speed and sunshine hours) during different stages of crop growing period generated; iii) Climate impact parameters (soil moisture, Soil organic carbon, pest and disease, water availability and yield) in Season SLWM interventions made across the season for various pilot sites. iv identification and tabulation of non‐climatic factors influencing crop growth/yield; v) input and output costs of cultivation in pilot and control plot tabulated vi) cost‐benefit ratio in each case derived prepare reasons or clue for such activities were tried at one or the other site can be an option help reduce input cost vii) tabulation of crop yields in pilot and control plots; viii) tabulation of input and output costs of cultivation in pilot and control plot and derivation of cost‐benefit ratio in each case; ix) Prepare a list of data matrix and their relationship across components leading to a climate resilient crops; x) listing and description of benefits generated as a result of climate resilient farming practices, such as improved crop variety, soil moisture conservation, efficient water use, nutrient management, integrated/non pesticide management, and inter‐cropping, in each of the SLWM pilots; xi) narration of effectiveness of pilot implementation, including institutional linkages, and possibility of up‐scaling; and complete analysis on impact of climate variability during the season created an impact on
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 21
Name Duration Funding Source
ContributeOutputs
Functions
yield loss or potential fraction of yield loss and menu of adaptation options to adopt xii) drawing conclusions (narration) for making farming (of specific crops targeted in SLWM pilots) more resilient to climate variability/change and xiii) Complete analysis on Participatory Climate Monitoring stations data with yield (following crop calendar) to explain relationship and management practices leading to a plan.
Ms. Amita Bhaduri 20th November 2013 – 31st December 2013
GEF‐5570 Output2.2 Consultant – Climate Change Data Analyst i) collection and review of farmer records kept during SLWM pilot implementation; ii) review and fixing of SLWM database and documentation (farmer records, photographs and training material) available with the field units; iii) assistance in generating graphs showing climatic conditions during different stages of crop growing periods; and iv) assistance in tabulations and compilation.
Ms. M. Veenadhari 20th November 2013 – 31st December 2013
GEF‐5570 Output 2.2 Consultant – Editor i) compilation of narratives, graphs, pictures into a legible document; ii) proof‐reading; iii) editing of text; and iv) finalizing the case‐studies and the baseline study document for printing.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 22
1c. Equipment procured/received during the reporting period
Description Quantity SourceExpendable equipment procured Sunshine recorder cards 365 Nos GEFThermometer (Max & Min) 1 GEFThermometer (Dry & Wet) 2 GEFOpen Pan Evoprimeter Jar 1 GEFRain gauge measuring Jar 5 GEFPCM Tool Kit 1 GEF
1d. Training activities during the reporting period
Training Dates Participants
Nature/Objectives Female Male Total
Activity 1.3.2: CCAC Orientation Camps (2)
August and December
37 45 82 To strengthen CBO leaders’ skills in institutional management
Activity 1.3.4: CBO Leaders Officers and Scientists workshop (2)
July and October
83 76 159 To discuss local issues, and identify adaptation options and technologies.
Activity 1.3.7: CCA Plan workshops (9)
November and
December 106 192 298
To discuss and compare the results of the field trials and pilots and develop a draft plan of action for integration with SLWM, for next few years
Activity 2.1.1: FCS Curriculum Development workshops (9)
November and
December 143 168 311
To capture the implementation experience of FCS Kharif 2013 and develop FCS curriculum
Activity 2.2.1: Training on SLWM pilots planning to staff and pilot farmers (1)
October 11 23 34 Designing of the SLWM Pilots, action plans and interventions strategy
Activity 2.2.12: Field workshops on SLWM pilots (9)
November and
December 342 420 762
Sharing of experiences in the SLWM Pilots results and process to other farmers.
Activity 3.1.2: Crop Water Budging Workshops (9)
October and
November 245 503 748
Crop adoption in accordance with crop water balance
Activity 3.2.2: District‐Level Dissemination workshops (9)
December 276 537 813
To disseminate the experiences and learning of PCM, SLWM pilots, and FCS; To consolidate the functional linkages, between SPACC project farmers and local government functionaries.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 23
C.1 Problems encountered and risks identified
Problems: 1. Long list of products and lengthy procedure for reviews at different levels. Risks (please rate each risk as low, medium or high): 1. Project team unable to deliver all the agreed (in previous HPRs and meetings) products, during
the project period (end of June 2014). MEDIUM C.2 Actions taken to address any project shortcomings, problems or risk encountered
Problem(s) identified in previous PPR
Action(s) completed By whom Completion date
Results
1. Focus on field level handholding in project implementation
2. The budget line “duty travel” under FAO‐NEX became overspent.
3. Fund‐shortages at some of the project units
1. Free the subject experts for field level handholding
2. Find alternative budget lines
3. Keep track of fund position at project units and plan internal transfer of funds
Project Manager Project Manager and FAO Project Holder
31.07.2013
31.07.2013
End of every month
Quality inputs provided at the field level Budget revision agreed for remainder of the project period No fund shortages in the reporting semester
Risks identified in previous PPR
Action(s) completed By whom Completion date
Results
1. Delay in compilation of reports on lessons from SLWM pilots
2. Project implementation may suffer because of very low “travel” budget
3. Lowered staff motivation and bad reputation
1. Hire consultants for the specific purpose of report compilation
2. Propose an overall budget revision
3. Propose a unit level budget revision
Project Holder Project Manager Project Manager
20.11. 2013 31.07.2013 31.07.2013
Report template fine‐tuned Travel budget revision agreed and implemented Realistic allocation funds resulted in high motivation of staff
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 24
C.3 Actions planned to address any project shortcomings, problems or risk encountered
Problem(s) identified Action(s) planned By whom By when (date)
Long list of products and lengthy procedure for reviews at different levels.
Prepare lists of documents, one for internal use and another for sharing with FAO for detailed review
Subject Experts and Project Manager
31.01.2014
Risks identified Project team unable to deliver all the agreed (in previous HPRs and meetings) products, during the project period (end of June 2014).
1. Limit number of products to those listed in the project document
2. Agree with FAO on structure (annotated outline) and chapter responsibilities for delivering of products
3. Hire consultants (if required), based on the agreed annotated outline
1. Subject Experts and Project Manager
2. Subject Experts, NPC‐
LW (FAO), and Project Manager
3. Executive Director, Project Manager, and NPC‐LW (FAO)
31.01.2014
15.02.2014
15.03.2014
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 25
C.4 Budget Revision C, proposed:
To address problem/risks identified in the previous section and to maintain a balance between the GEF and the FAO‐NEX funds and keep the project moving forward, a budget revision is proposed. Changes above 10 percent of the GEF original budget in the project document (Annex 1) are stated and justified in the following table36.
Code Budget Head
Unspent Budgeted funds from Previous Project years
New proposed budget for
2014
Balance Justification for variance with the approved budget
5011 Salaries Professional
16,552 5,956 10,596
The project was originally foreseen to finalize in 2013. But the project start up was delayed and unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014. Further, an unspent balance of USD 10,596 will be moved to line 5012 (Salaries General Services – USD 7,958) and as a part to 5023 (Trainings – 2,638) for 2014.
5012 Salaries General Service
3,125 11,083 (7,958)
As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014 because of delay in project start up. Further, an additional USD 7,958 are needed to match the “market rate” of the salaries of the Accountant, Cashier/ Administrative Assistant, Field Facilitators and Drivers (Salaries General Services’). These funds will be taken from line 5011 (Salaries Professional) (see explanation under these lines) for 2014.
5013 Consultants including their local travel costs
71,896 68,056 3,840
As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014 because of delay in project start up. This includes Project Manager salaries of USD 15,408 for 6 months (previously paid by GEF and FAONEX projects) and USD 4,524 for 6 months salaries of Subject Expert‐WM, and USD 1,996 for 6 months travel for consultants in 2014 (previously paid by the FAO‐NEX project) (please see further explanation and breakdown in table below). Further, overall budget for this line will be reduced with USD 3,840 because of the reduced input of consultants: climate change modelling; Soil Management; Organic Agriculture; Irrigation Management; Integrated Pest Management, and Institution & Gender while the input of consultants: Climate Change
36 Link : http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6_7feb/GEF&%20NEX_Budget_above_10_percent_budgeted&explainations_06‐02‐2014.xls
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 26
Code Budget Head
Unspent Budgeted funds from Previous Project years
New proposed budget for
2014
Balance Justification for variance with the approved budget
Adaptation; and Dry land agriculture; is increased. This is because of ending of research phase and inception of social mobilization and field level support phase. This revision will contribute to outputs: 1.2, 2.2 and 3.2. The USD 3840 will be moved to line 5023 (trainings – 3,595) and 5024 (expandable equipment ‐ 245) for 2014.
5014 Contracts 103,200 101,813 1,387
As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014 because of delay in project start up. Further, an unspent balance of USD 1,387 will be moved to 5024 (Expandable Equipment ) (see explanation under this line) for 2014.
5023
Training including the local travel costs of the facilitators
1,783 8,015 (6,233)
As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014 because of delay in project start up. The proposed USD 5,253 is allocated for training cost and USD 2,762 is allocated for travel costs in 2014. Additionally, USD 6,223 is allocated under this budget line to cover trainings and workshops expenses in 2014. These funds will be taken from line 5011 (Salaries Professional) and 5013 (consultants) (see explanation under this line) for 2014.
5024 Expendable Equipment
57 1,731 (1,674)
As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014 because of delay in project start up. Additionally, USD 1,674 is allocated under this budget line to cover Community Adoption Fund expenses and Implementation of pilots in 2014. These funds will be taken from line 5013 (consultants), 5014 (contracts) and 5025 (Non‐Expendable Equipment) (see explanation under this line).
5025 Non‐expendable Equipment
889
‐ 889
The balance of USD 889 will cover adjustments of minor excess expenditure under line 5023 (Expendable equipment ‐ 42) and 5028 (General Operating Expenses ‐ 846) for 2013 & 2014.
5028 General Operating Expenses
(846) ‐ (846)
As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014 because of delay in project start up. Further, an additional USD 846 is needed to cover
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 27
Code Budget Head
Unspent Budgeted funds from Previous Project years
New proposed budget for
2014
Balance Justification for variance with the approved budget
GEO in 2014. These funds will be taken from line 5025 (Non‐Expendable equipment) (see explanation under this line)
Total 196,654 196,654 0 Mainly because unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014 because of delay in project start up
Changes above 10 percent of the FAO‐NEX original approved budget in the Project Document (Excel sheet communicated by FAO) are stated and justified in the following table.
Code Budget Head
Unspent Budget funds from Previous Project Period
Proposedbudget for Jan‐June 2014
Balance Justification for variance with the
approved budget
5011 Salaries Professional 1,24,579 63,204 61,375
The project was originally foreseen to finalize in 2013. But the project start up was delayed and unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014.
5012 Salaries General Service
17,449 21,155 (3,706)As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014.
5021 Travel (5,366) 5,987 (11,354)As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014.
5023 Training 2,513 3,935 (1,422)As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014.
5024 Expendable Equipment 2,250 4,671 (2,421)As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014.
5025 Non‐expendable Equipment
11,831 ‐ 11,831As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014.
5028 General Operating Expenses
2,203 35,148 (32,945)As explained above unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014.
Total 1,55,460 1,34,101 21,359Mainly because unspent funds are moved from 2010 to 2014 because of delay in project start up
The budget revision proposed, is covering a short‐fall of funds for meeting the expenditure of Fee of the Project Manager and Subject Expert (FAO‐NEX). It is proposed that these essential expenditure is met from the budget line “National Consultants”, under GEF. Break‐down of these expenditures are given in the table below.
Present Budget Line Proposed Budget Line Projected
Budget 2014
GEF 5127 Project Manager GEF 5501 Climate change Adaptation 8,628
FAO 5127 Project Manager GEF 5501 Climate change Adaptation 6,780
FAO 5127 Subject Expert – WM GEF 5501 Irrigation Management 4,524
Total: 19,932
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 28
The budget revision proposed is covering a short‐fall of funds for meeting the expenditure for Travel. It is proposed that this essential expenditure is met from the budget lines “National Consultants” and “Training” under GEF. Break‐down of such expenditure on travel37 given in the table below.
Present Budget Line Proposed Budget Line Projected Budget
2014FAO 5661 Duty Travel GEF 5905 Farmers Filed Schools 1,758FAO 5661 Duty Travel GEF 5905 HU level Meetings 910FAO 5661 Duty Travel GEF 5905 Project Partners Meeting 6,776FAO 5661 Duty Travel GEF 5905 Steering Committee Meeting 447FAO 5661 Duty Travel GEF 5905 Curriculum development workshop 486 FAO 5661 Duty Travel GEF 5905 Policy advocacy workshops 1,900 FAO 5661 Duty Travel GEF 5501 Climate Change Adaptation 1,746 FAO 5661 Duty Travel GEF 5501 Dry land Agriculture 250
Totals: 14,273
37 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6_7feb/Revised_Travel_Plan_under_Trainings&Consultants_Jan‐Jun2014_06‐02‐14.xls
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 29
Revised Project budget C FAO‐GEF resources
Component/output
Total Budget originally approved
Total expenditures cumulative to end of December 2013
Revised budget for the Jan‐Jun 2014 (Revision C)
Component 1: INFORMATION TOOLS 242,866 195,794 39,510 Output 1.1: Completed study on local and scientific knowledge on impacts of climate variability/change on natural resources in Andhra Pradesh.
114,126 119,690 24,101
Indicator a): Balanced representation of gender and vulnerable groups/sectors in at least 9 pilots HU in farmer survey covering key indicators on climate viability and its impact.
91,579 92,846 18,799
Indicator b): Farmers understanding of climate change in pilot HUs documented and combined with available scientific data in completed study document, 9 months from project start.
14,848 7,749 1,446
Indicator c): Climate change impact database established
7,699 19,095 3,856
Output 1.2: Local monitoring system of climate variability and its impacts operating
30,653 19,888 3,951
Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs in pilot HU are collecting data on at least 3 key indicators by the end of the second project year. Along with Average crop yields, water harvested or water saved, soil moisture availability and/or organic carbon content maintained or increased in pilot areas are monitored.
30,653 19,888 3,951
Output 1.3: CBOs with capacities to integrate climate variability adaptation measures in Sustainable Land and Water Management (SLWM) – Climate Resilient Committees
98,087 56,216 11,458
Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs have established climate change adaptation committees 6 months after project start
25,337
27,382 5,614
Indicator b): At least 100 CBO leaders and representatives trained in climate variability monitoring and adaptation measures integrated in SLWM by the end of year two
24,538 19,695 4,010
Indicator c): At least 9 CBOs have participated in and identified adaptation measures with agricultural scientists 18 months after project start
24,106 4,053 802
Indicator d): At least 7 CBOs have local climate change adaptation plans 18 months after project start
24,106 5,085 1,031
Component 2: PILOTS 440,010 316,890 113,789 Output 2.1: Pilots: Farmers acquire skills through participation in FCS
330,008 196,846 70,549
Indicator a): 2 Curriculum developed for FCS with focus on adaptation in drought‐prone areas including methods on identification and field testing of adaptation measures , 18 months after project start
115,503 152,769 55,028
Indicator b): At least 7 FCS are functioning with at least 350 female and male farmers attending and disseminating best experimental practices for adaptation measures by the end of the project
214,505 44,077 15,521
Output 2.2: Technology and Practice Pilots on 110,002 120,045 43,240
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 30
Component/output
Total Budget originally approved
Total expenditures cumulative to end of December 2013
Revised budget for the Jan‐Jun 2014 (Revision C)
alternative adaptation technologies in SLWMIndicator a): At least 3 pilots with the participation of at least 7 CBOs and 50 female and male farmers produce results on adaptation performance of technologies and practices by the end of the project
55,001 103,307 37,186
Indicator b): At least three best adaptation practices and technology manuals by the end of the project
55,001 16,738 6,054
Component 3: DISSEMINATION AND UPTAKE 135,901 55,571 10,476 Output 3.1: Platform for dissemination 15,901 37,790 7,124 Indicator a): Project lessons, results and products available on platform website with 100 visitors per month.
81,541 15,642 2,921
Indicator b): At least 3 dissemination workshops with at least 150 participants have been held by the end of the project
54,360 22,148 4,203
Output 3.2: Institutional linkages reinforced 0 17,781 32,739 Indicator a): Functional relationship established with local (district) level functionaries
0 17,781 32,739
Project management 90,314 144,180 32,879 Total 909,091 712,437 196,654
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 31
D. Work plan and expected output targets by component for the next reporting period
Table D.1 gives the summary of the strategic plan, for achieving the remaining project results/source of verification/deliverable or products, as envisaged in the results based framework of the project document. Table D.2 gives the detailed work plan and expected output targets by component for the period January‐June 2014.
Table D.1: Project results/products/sources of verification to be achieved, Jan‐June 2014
Code Result/Product/Source of verification Due date ResponsiblePM‐3 Report: FAO Half‐yearly Progress Reports 5 Feb PM and EDO1.3‐D Report: SLWM measures and technologies identified by CCAC 15 Feb SE‐SAO3.2‐B Report: 9 HU level Dissemination Workshops 15 Feb SE‐COO2.1‐D Report: Results of Ballot Box Tests 28 Feb SE‐COO2.1‐A Database: FCS curricula 15 March SE‐COO2.1‐B Database: FCS Training Calendars 15 March SE‐COO2.1‐C Report: FCS training reports (including filled‐in feedback forms) 30 April SE‐COO2.2‐F Manual: Adaptation in Scarce Rainfall Agro‐climatic Zone 31 March SE‐WMO2.2‐E Manual: Adaptation in South Telangana Agro‐climatic Zone 15 April SE‐WMO2.2‐D Manual: Adaptation in Southern Agro‐climatic Zone 30 April SE‐WMO2.2‐C Manual: Adaptation in Krishna Agro‐climatic Zone 15 May SE‐WMO3.2‐C Report: State level Dissemination Workshop 15 May PMPM‐12 Report: Internal Audit Reports 5 June Fno‐NodalPM‐13 Report: Field support in finance management 15 June Fno‐NodalPM‐16 Report: Terminal Report (draft) 30 June PMPM‐17 Final Statement of Accounts 30 June ED
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 32
Table D.2: Work plan and expected output targets by component for the next reporting period
Output Activities Target‐2014 Q1 Q2 1st Semester
2014 Jan Feb March April May June
Component 1: INFORMATION TOOLS Outcome 1A: Farmers and Community Based Organisations (CBO) make informed decisions on land and water management taking into account impacts of climate variations based on scientific and local knowledge
Output 1.1: Completed study on local and scientific knowledge on impacts of climate variability/change on natural resources in Andhra Pradesh
Output realized
Indicator a): Balanced representation of gender and vulnerable groups/sectors in at least 9 pilot HU in farmer survey covering key indicators on climate viability and its impact
Indicator b): Farmers understanding of climate change in pilot HUs documented and combined with available scientific data in completed study document, 9 months from project start.
Indicator c): Climate change impact database established
Output 1.2: Local monitoring system of climate variability and its impacts operating
Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs in pilot HU are collecting data on at least 3 key indicators by the end of the second project year. Along with Average crop yields, water harvested or water saved, soil moisture availability and/or organic carbon content maintained or increased in pilot areas are monitored.
Activity 1.2.1: Database on PCM data
810 38 279 252 279
Activity 1.2.2: Maintenance of scientific equipment
2739 9 9 9
Activity 1.2.3: Database on Average crop yields
9 40
9
Activity 1.2.4: Database on Water harvested
9
9
Activity 1.2.5: Database on Water Saved
9
9
Activity 1.2.6: Database on Soil moisture availability
216 41 72 72 72
Activity 1.2.7: Database on Organic carbon content (soil test)
9 42
9
Activity 1.2.8 Compare data 1 1
38 Daily climate variability (Rainfall, maximum and minimum temperature, Humidity, Evaporation, wind speed, wind direction and
sunshine hours) records will be available in 9 HUs across the project 39 Maintenance of scientific equipment will continue every month at 9 Hus. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3. 40 Database on Average crop yields, Water harvested and Water Saved data collection will be carried out at 9 HUs in 9 field units 41 Soil moisture will be measured twice a week in 9 SLWM pilot plots (4 weeks x 2 times x 9 HUs) every month in 9 HUs 42 Post rabi Soil organic content will be analysed at 9 SLWM pilot plots
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 33
Output Activities Target‐2014 Q1 Q2 1st Semester
2014 Jan Feb March April May June
collected in PCM with the SLWM pilots interventions
Outcome 1B: CBOs have capacities to integrate climate variability adaptation measures in Sustainable Land and Water Management (SLWM)
Output 1.3: CBOs with capacities to integrate climate variability adaptation measures in Sustainable Land and Water Management (SLWM) ‐ Climate Resilient Communities
Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs have established climate change adaptation committees 6 months after project start
Activity 1.3.1: HUN Meetings: Handing over of assets and products
9
9
Indicator b): At least 100 CBO leaders and representatives trained in climate variability monitoring and adaptation measures integrated in SLWM by the end of year two
Indicator c): At least 9 CBOs have participated in and identified adaptation measures with agricultural scientists 18 months after project start
Activity 1.3.2: Consolidation of HU‐level CCAC43 plans
1
1
Indicator d): At least 7 CBOs have local climate change adaptation plans 18 months after project start
Activity 1.3.3: Consolidation and compilation of CCA Plans44
9
9
Component 2: PILOTS Outcome 2A: Farmers have acquired skills in managing climate variability and testing adaptation technologies in farming systems through participation in Farmers Climate Schools (FCS)
Output 2.1: FCS Pilots: Farmers acquire skills through participation in FCS
43 Consolidated note of the various measures and technologies identified by CCACs in consultation with officers and scientists in the CBO
Leaders Officers and Scientists workshops conducted in 2012 and 2013. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3. 44 PMO will review the draft CCA plans developed by each of the 9 pilot HU‐CCACs for the major crops grown in kharif and rabi in their
respective HUs. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 34
Output Activities Target‐2014 Q1 Q2 1st Semester
2014 Jan Feb March April May June
Indicator a): 2 Curriculum developed for CFS with focus on adaptation in drought‐prone areas including methods on identification and field testing of adaptation measures, 18 months after project start
Activity 2.1.1: Curriculum evolution workshop45 Rabi (TS)
9 9
Activity 2.1.2: Database on FCS Curricula46
1 1
Indicator b): At least 7 FCS are functioning with at least 350 female and male farmers attending and disseminating best experimental practices for adaptation measures by the end of the project
Activity 2.1.3: Database on FCS Training Calendars47
1 1
Activity 2.1.4: FCS Training Reports48
3 1 2
Activity 2.1.5: Database on NFE Tools/Models49
1
1
Activity 2.1.6: FCS Session50 (TS)
60 20 31 9
Outcome 2B: Adequate adaptation technologies and practices identified based on pilot testing in drought prone areas
Output 2.2: Technology and Practice Pilots on alternative adaptation technologies in SLWM
Indicator a): At least 3 pilots with the participation of at least 7 CBOs and 50 female and male farmers produce results on adaptation performance of
Activity 2.2.1: Technical note 51 on status soil moisture and soil carbon in SPACC Project
1
1
Activity 2.2.2: Technical note (including package of practices) on adaptation to climate variability in pilot crops52
9
9
45 A Curriculum Evolution Workshop will now be conducted at the end of rabi (in March) to evolve a curriculum that will capture the
implementation experience. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3. 46 Database will include FCS curricula developed in different cycles (2012‐13, kharif 2013, and rabi 2013‐14). Additional details are
provided in Attachment 3. 47 Database will include FCS training calendars developed in different cycles (2012‐13, kharif 2013, and rabi 2013‐14). Additional details
are provided in Attachment 3. 48 Three consolidated reports will be prepared at the project‐level to capture the overall implementation experience of FCS in 2012‐13;
kharif 2013; and rabi 2013‐14. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3. 49 Database will include posters, flipcharts, handouts, models, and banners developed by the Field Units. Additional details are provided in
Attachment 3. 50 FCS rabi was initiated in November 2013 and will continue till end of February in four Field Units (BIRDS, CARE, CARVE, and DIPA) and till
March 1st Week in the remaining Field Units (GVS, PARTNER, SAFE, SAID, and SYA). FCS sessions are following the crop cycle under SLWM pilots, at each of the 9 HUs. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3.
51 Consultant–Soil Management hired to accomplish the technical note and note will be completed by April 2014. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3.
52 Crops: Groundnut, Fingermillet, Fodder, Bengalgram, Tomato, Cotton, Rice, Castor and Maize
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 35
Output Activities Target‐2014 Q1 Q2 1st Semester
2014 Jan Feb March April May June
technologies and practices by the end of the project
Activity 2.2.3: SLWM Pilots Implementation 53
9 9 9 9
Indicator b): At least three best adaptation practices and technology manuals by the end of the project
Activity 2.2.4: Manual on Adaptation in Scarce Rainfall Agro Climatic Zone 54
1 1
Activity 2.2.5 : Manual on Adaptation in Southern Telangana Agro‐climatic Zone55
1 1
Activity 2.2.6: Manual on Adaptation in Southern Agro‐climatic Zone 56
1 1
Activity 2.2.7: Manual on Adaptation in Krishna Agro ‐Climatic Zone 57
1 1
Component 3: DISSEMINATION AND UPTAKE Outcome 3A: Dissemination of a package of methods, tools and institutional approaches in support of District and State level natural resource management initiatives to address the impacts of drought
Output 3.1: Platform for dissemination Indicator a): Project lessons, results and products available on platform website with 100 visitors per month.
Activity 3.1.1: Website updating
6 1 1 1 1 1 1
Activity 3.1.2: Database on Record of website visitors
1 1
Activity 3.1.3: Database on Images of events (Field visit, CWBW, WED etc.)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Activity 3.1.4: Scanned document of Press clipping on project activities
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Output 3.2: Institutional linkages reinforced Indicator a): At least 3 dissemination workshops with at least 150 participants have been held by the end of the project
Activity 3.2.1: State‐level Dissemination workshop58
1
1
Activity 3.2.2: Report on State‐level Dissemination workshop
1
1
53 SLWM pilot implementation in 9 pilot HUs in Rabi season will be continued till March 2014 and data collection on crop yield and inputs
on other interventions from field staff, farmer records and monthly formats by end March 2014. 54 Manual: Adaptation in Scarce Rainfall Agro Climatic Zone, Anantapur and Kurnool. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3. 55 Manual: Adaptation in Southern Telangana Agro‐climatic Zone, Mahabubnagar and Nalgonda district. Additional details are provided in
Attachment 3. 56 Manual: Adaptation in Southern Agro ‐Climatic Zone, Chittoor and Kadapa district. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3. 57 Manual: Adaptation in Krishna Agro ‐Climatic Zone, Prakasam district. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3. 58 A three‐day state‐level dissemination workshop is planned for April to share lessons, results, and products from project
implementation. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 36
Output Activities Target‐2014 Q1 Q2 1st Semester
2014 Jan Feb March April May June
Indicator b): Functional relationship established with local (district) level functionaries
Activity 3.2.3: Report on 9 HU level Dissemination workshops59
1
1
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Activity 4.1.1: Project Partner’s Meeting 60
2
1 1
Activity 4.1.2: Monthly Review and Plan Meetings 61
3 1 1 1
Activity 4.1.3: NSC Meetings 1 1 Activity 4.1.4: SLEM Partner Meetings
1
1
Activity 4.1.5: PSC Meeting 62 1 1 Activity 4.1.6: PNGOs contracted (TS)
9 9
Activity 4.1.7: Final Project Review
1
1
Activity 4.1.8: Project Monitoring System
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Activity 4.1.9: Internal Audit 2 1 1 Activity 4.1.10: Field support in Finance Management
2
1
1
Activity 4.1.11: SLEM Half‐yearly Progress Report
1
1
Activity 4.1.12: SLEM Annual Progress Report
1
1
Activity 4.1.13: Half‐yearly Progress Report
1 1
Activity 4.1.14: Terminal Report
1
1
59 9 HU level Dissemination workshops were conducted in December 2013 at each of the pilot HUs to disseminate the experiences and
learning from implementation of PCM, SLWM pilots, and FCS. A consolidated report will be prepared to compile the experiences across the 9 pilot HUs and follow‐up. Additional details are provided in Attachment 3.
60 2 Project Partner’s Meetings will be conduct at GVS‐SPACC Office and PARTNER‐SPACC Office with partner NGOs 61 3 Monthly Review and Plan Meetings will be conduct at Project Management Office with Field Officers 62 PSC meetings will be conduct with Members of PSC included those from: FAO, MoEF GoI, and Ministry of Rural Development of
Government of Andhra Pradesh; Project partner NGOs; and PMO
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 37
E. Reports
SN Title Remark1. Half‐yearly progress report ‐ 5 (January – June 2013) Can be uploaded on FAO website2. FCS session, session wise session guides Used for Internal Circulation 3. FCS session wise report Used for Internal Circulation 4. Half‐yearly Progress Report (1st April 2013 ‐ 30th September
2013) Submitted to: Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Technical Facilitation Organization, Sustainable Land and Ecosystems Management Program, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India
Submitted to TFO, MoEF
5. Strategy Paper on Socio Economic Data Used for Internal Circulation 6. Strategy Paper on Linkages with CMSA program Used for Internal Circulation 7. Strategy Paper on Climate Change Adaptation (CCA) plan Used for Internal Circulation 8. Strategy Paper on District‐level Dissemination workshop Used for Internal Circulation
F. Attachments
Attachment‐1: GEF Financial Statement of Expenditures for Project Six Months Period (July–December 2013)Attachment‐2: FAO NEX Financial Statement of Expenditures for Project Six Months Period (July –December 2013) Attachment‐3: GEF Cash Advances Request (January – June 2014)Attachment‐4: FAO Cash Advances Request (January – June 2014)
Attachment‐5: LC KIND ‐ Detailed statement of expenditures for the reporting period [July 2013] to [December 2013]:
Reporting Officer
Name:
Dr. S. V. Govardhan Das
Date: 10/2/2014
Title:
Project Manager
Signature:
Reviewing Officer
Name:
Dr. Satya Priya
Date: 11/2/2014
Title
National Programme Coordinator (Land and Water)
Signature
Observations: Despite the fact that project has made good progress on several fronts and is nearing completion yet from last two HPRs problems encountered and risks identified in (section C of the HPR) delivering list of products is somewhat not satisfactory. On the contrary, good amount of work and interventions across HUs has taken place and while package of practice has started to evolve the project is yet to document and report this.
Progress reported:In the remaining 5 months, project needs to focus on delivering Output 2.2 and Output 3, more specifically on SLWM pilots Implementation analyses in the form for climate change adaptation lessons for the piloted crops across every HUs combining FCS experiences. This in turn will provide “Manual on Adaptation in Scarce Rainfall Agro Climatic Zone by March; Manual on Adaptation in Southern Telangana Agro‐climatic Zone by Mid‐April; Manual on Adaptation in Southern Agro‐climatic Zone by end of April; and Manual on Adaptation in Krishna Agro ‐Climatic Zone by mid‐May; as per the commitment made in this HPR.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 38
GEF FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES FOR PROJECT SIX MONTHS PERIOD
Project No. : GEF project (ID) – 3882 FAO project symbol: GCP/IND/181/GFF
Project title : Reversing Environmental Degradation and Rural Poverty to Adaptation to Climate Change in Drought Stricken Areas in South India: A Hydrological unit of Pilot Project Approach.
Executing Partner : Bharathi Integrated Rural Development Society (BIRDS)
Project commencing date : December 06, 2010
Project ending date : 30 June, 2014
Reporting Period : [July 2013] to [December 2013]
Table 1: Detailed statement of expenditures for the reporting period [July 2013] to [December 2013]63 64 65:
Expenditure category
Projected Expenditures
(USD) Jul‐Dec'13
Actual expenditures July‐Dec`13
(USD)
Comments ‐breakdown by component outputs
Total component 1: 50,492 40,741
Salaries professionals 3,514 1,081
Includes salaries of Project Manager and Field Officer. Both Project Manager time charged 4% related to the component & Field Officer's time charged 30% to output 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3
Salaries general service 2,805 2,135
Includes salaries of 3 Field Facilitators and 3 Drivers. Both Field Facilitators time charged 30% and Drivers time charged 34% to output 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 and all travel related to the component.
National consultants ‐ ‐
Contracts 42,017 36,837 Includes 8 lump sum contracts for PNGOs charged 41%.
Training 1,788 286
Includes CBO leaders exposure visit, CBO Leaders Officers workshop, HU level meetings, Policy Advocacy workshop time charged 100% output 1.2
Expendable procurement 369 402 Includes the Operation and Maintenance line time charged 100% to output 1.2
Non‐expendable procurement
‐
GOE ‐Total component 2: 90,820 67,201
Salaries professionals 3,514 2,009 Includes salaries of Project Manager and Field Officer. Both Project Manager time charged 6% related to the component & Field
63 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/GEF_Expenditure_statements_Jul‐Dec2013_workings.xls 64 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/Component_wise_expenditure_statement_Jul‐Dec2013_08‐01‐13.xls 65 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/GEF_Consolidated_Jul‐Dec_2013_04‐03‐14.xls
Attachment ‐1
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 39
Expenditure category
Projected Expenditures
(USD) Jul‐Dec'13
Actual expenditures July‐Dec`13
(USD)
Comments ‐breakdown by component outputs
Officer's time charged 60% to output 2.1 &2.2
Salaries general service 4,345 3,347
Includes salaries of 3 Field Facilitators and 3 Drivers. Both Field Facilitators time charged 60% and Drivers time charged 42% to output 2.1, & 2.2
National consultants 24,518 11,085
Includes all National Consultants. Soil Moisture time charged 100%, Organic Agriculture time charged 100%, Climate Change Adoption time charged time charged 100% to output 2.1 & 2.2.
Contracts 47,019 42,228 Includes 8 lump sum contracts for PNGOs. PNGO contracts (8 lump sum) charged 47%
Training 6,369 5,161 Includes Climate Change Field Schools and Curriculum Development workshop time charged 100% to the output 2.1
Expendable procurement 1,106 1,185 Includes Other Field Supplies Execution of Pilots time charged 100%
Non‐expendable procurement
‐
GOE 3,950 2,187 Includes 79% of Extension material charges to the output 2.1 & 2.2.
Total component 3: 17,361 11,100
Salaries professionals 2,440 335
Includes salaries of Project Manager and Field Officer. Both Project Manager charged 1% related to the component & Field Officer's time charged 10% to output 3.1.
Salaries general service 794 558
Includes salaries of 3 Field Facilitators and 3 Drivers. Both Field Facilitators time charged 10% to output 3.1 and Drivers time charged 7% all travel related to the component.
National consultants ‐ ‐
Contracts 10,004 8,086 Includes contract for 8 lump sum contracts for PNGOs. PNGO contracts (8 lump sum) charged 9% to the output 3.1
Training 2,582 1,421 Includes HU level meetings, Policy/ Advocacy workshop line charged 100% to output 3.1
Expendable procurement ‐ ‐ Non‐expendable procurement
‐ ‐
GOE 1,541 700 Includes 21% of Extensional material and 100% of website maintenance charged to the output 3.1 & 3.2
Total Project Management: 19,200 20,834
Salaries professionals 6,967 10,397 Includes Project Manager's salary time charged 89 % and Finance Officer salary time charged 100% to the output 4.1
Salaries general service 5,016 4,844
Includes salaries of Accountant, Cashier‐Administrative Assistant and 3 Drivers. Both Accountant and Cashier‐Administrative Assistant time charged 100% all financial and administrative activities and 3 Drivers time charged 17% all travel related activities to the
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 40
Expenditure category
Projected Expenditures
(USD) Jul‐Dec'13
Actual expenditures July‐Dec`13
(USD)
Comments ‐breakdown by component outputs
Component 4.National consultants ‐
Contracts 1,000 2,695 Includes 8 Lump Sum contracts (8 PNGOs) 3% charged
Training 6,120 2,754 Includes Project Partners Meeting and Steering committee meeting charges 100% to the component 4
Expendable procurementNon‐expendable procurement
GOE 97 143 Includes 100% of Miscellaneous‐staff meetings to the output 4.1
Total Project 177,873 139,876
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 41
Table 2: Statement of Expenditures for total Project GEF resources
Component/output Total Budget
Revised budget for the Jul‐Dec 2013 and
Jan‐Jun 2014 (Revision B)
Prior years
expenditures66
Budget this reporting year in AWPB67 2013
Current year 1st semester expenditures
Current year 2nd semester expenditures68
Current year total
expenditures
Total expenditures cumulative
(a) (b) (c) (d=b+c) (e=a+d)
Component 1: Information tools for decision making and local institutional capacity development
242,866 80,581 122,006 80,002 33,046 40,741 73,787 195,793
Output 1.1: Completed study on local and scientific knowledge on impacts of climate variability/change on natural resources in Andhra Pradesh
114,126 11,281 80,841 11,200 4,626 34,222 38,849 119,690
Indicator a): Balanced representation of gender and vulnerable groups/sectors in at least 9 pilots HU in farmer survey covering key indicators on climate viability and its impact.
91,579 2,256 65,570 2,240 925 26,351 27,277 92,846
Indicator b): Farmers understanding of climate change in pilot HUs documented and combined with available scientific data in completed study document, 9 months from project start.
14,848 6,769 3,946 6,720 2,776 1,027
3,803 7,749
Indicator c): Climate change impact database established
7,699 2,256 11,325 2,240 925 6,844 7,770 19,095
Output 1.2: Local monitoring system of climate variability and its impacts operating
30,653 27,397 5,393 27,201 11,236 3,259 14,495 19,888
Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs in pilot HU are collecting data on at least 3 key
30,653 27,397 5,393 27,201 11,236 3,259 14,495 19,888
66 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/GEF_Consolidated_Jul‐Dec_2013_04‐03‐14.xls 67 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/AWPB_2013_GEF‐Revised_23_April_2013.xls 68 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/Component_wise_expenditure_statement_Jul‐Dec2013_08‐01‐13.xls
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 42
Component/output Total Budget
Revised budget for the Jul‐Dec 2013 and
Jan‐Jun 2014 (Revision B)
Prior years
expenditures66
Budget this reporting year in AWPB67 2013
Current year 1st semester expenditures
Current year 2nd semester expenditures68
Current year total
expenditures
Total expenditures cumulative
(a) (b) (c) (d=b+c) (e=a+d)
indicators by the end of the second project year. Along with Average crop yields, water harvested or water saved, soil moisture availability and/or organic carbon content maintained or increased in pilot areas are monitored. Output 1.3: CBOs with capacities to integrate climate variability adaptation measures in Sustainable Land and Water Management (SLWM) ‐ Climate Resilient Communities
98,088 41,902 35,772 41,601 17,184 3,259 20,443 56,216
Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs have established climate change adaptation committees 6 months after project start
25,339 23,046 17,116 22,880 9,451 815 10,266 27,382
Indicator b): At least 100 CBO leaders and representatives trained in climate variability monitoring and adaptation measures integrated in SLWM by the end of year two
24,538 7,123 15,959 7,072 2,921 815 3,736 19,695
Indicator c): At least 9 CBOs have participated in and identified adaptation measures with agricultural scientists 18 months after project start
24,106 4,609 1,348 4,576 1,890 815 2,705 4,053
Indicator d): At least 7 CBOs have local climate change adaptation plans 18 months after project start
24,106 7,123 1,348 7,072 2,921 815 3,736 5,085
Component 2: PILOTS 440,010 167,325 197,397 127,794 52,292 67,201 119,494 316,890 Output 2.1: FCS Pilots: Farmers acquire skills through participation in Farmer Change Schools (FCS)
330,008 30,118 140,392 23,003 9,413 47,041 56,454 196,846
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 43
Component/output Total Budget
Revised budget for the Jul‐Dec 2013 and
Jan‐Jun 2014 (Revision B)
Prior years
expenditures66
Budget this reporting year in AWPB67 2013
Current year 1st semester expenditures
Current year 2nd semester expenditures68
Current year total
expenditures
Total expenditures cumulative
(a) (b) (c) (d=b+c) (e=a+d)
Indicator a): 2 Curriculum developed for FCS with focus on adaptation in drought‐prone areas including methods on identification and field testing of adaptation measures, 18 months after project start
115,503 7,530 108,079 5,751 2,353 42,337 44,690 152,769
Indicator b): At least 7 FCS are functioning with at least 350 female and male farmers attending and disseminating best experimental practices for adaptation measures by the end of the project
2,14,505 22,589 32,313 17,252 7,059 4,704 11,764 44,077
Output 2.2: Pilot testing of alternative adaptation technologies and practices in SLWM
110,003 137,206 57,005 104,791 42,880 20,160 63,040 120,045
Indicator a): At least 3 pilots with the participation of at least 7 CBOs and 50 female and male farmers produce results on adaptation performance of technologies and practices by the end of the project
55,001 133,090 44,577 101,647 41,593 17,136 58,730 103,307
Indicator b): At least three best adaptation practices and technology manuals by the end of the project
55,001 4,116 12,427 3,144 1,286 3,024 4,310 16,738
Component 3: Platform for land based climate change adaptation measures suitable to drought prone areas
135,901 48,944 33,887 29,734 10,584 11,100 21,684 55,571
Output 3.1: Platform for dissemination 135,901 8,810 33,887 5,352 1,905 1,998 3,903 37,790 Indicator a): Project lessons, results and products available on platform website
81,541 2,291 14,628 1,392 495 519 1,015 15,642
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 44
Component/output Total Budget
Revised budget for the Jul‐Dec 2013 and
Jan‐Jun 2014 (Revision B)
Prior years
expenditures66
Budget this reporting year in AWPB67 2013
Current year 1st semester expenditures
Current year 2nd semester expenditures68
Current year total
expenditures
Total expenditures cumulative
(a) (b) (c) (d=b+c) (e=a+d)
with 100 visitors per month. Indicator b): At least 3 dissemination workshops with at least 150 participants have been held by the end of the project
54,360 6,519 19,260 3,961 1,410 1,479 2,888 22,148
Output 3.2: Institutional linkages reinforced
0 40,134 0 24,382 8,679 9,102 17,781 17,781
Indicator a): Functional relationship established with local (district) level functionaries
0 40,134 0 24,382 8,679 9,102 17,781 17,781
Project Management 90,314 39,682 99,644 48,859 23,703 20,834 44,537 144,181 Total 909,091 336,531 452,934 286,389 119,626 139,876 259,502 712,437
Certified by: Name : V. Paul Raja Rao Date, title : Executive Director
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 45
FAO NEX FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES FOR PROJECT SIX MONTHS PERIOD
Project No. : FAO Project (ID) – 604144
Project title : Reversing Environmental Degradation and Rural Poverty to Adaptation to Climate Change in Drought Stricken Areas in South India: A Hydrological unit of Pilot Project Approach.
Executing Partner : Bharathi Integrated Rural Development Society (BIRDS)
Project commencing date : December 06, 2010
Project ending date : 30 June, 2014
Reporting Period : [July 2013] to [December 2013]
Table 1: Detailed statement of expenditures for the reporting period [July 2013] to [December 2013]69 7071:
Expenditure category Projected
Expenditures Jul‐Dec'13 (USD)
Actual expenditures July to Dec`13
(USD)
Comments ‐breakdown by component outputs
Total component 1: 51,956 46,285
Salaries professionals 23,620 20,698
Includes part salaries of Project Manager time charged 65% to output 1.1 and 1.3 and 2 Subject Expert‐SA charged 21%, Subject Expert‐CO charged 26%, Project Officer‐LWM charged 44%, Project Officer charged 32%, Project Officer‐Doc. charged 21%, and 18 Professionals time charged 36% to output 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3
Salaries general service 9,386 8,289
Includes part salaries of 12 Field Data Collection & Monitoring Assistants. Field Data Collection & Monitoring Assistants time charged 58% to output 1.1 and 1.2
National consultants
Travel 6,131 4,347 Includes duty travel for random field checks on MA Campaign. Duty travel charged 25% to output 1.2 and 1.3.
Training 200 298 Includes activities: CBO training Internal charged 100% to output 1.3
Expendable procurement 1,477 1,148 Includes other expandable equipment time charged 100% to output 1.1
Non‐expendable procurement ‐ ‐
69 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/NEX_Expenditure_Statements_Jul‐Dec2013_workings.xls 70 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/Component_wise_expenditure_statement_Jul‐Dec2013_08‐01‐13.xls 71 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/GEF_Consolidated_Jul‐Dec_2013.xls
Attachment ‐2
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 46
Expenditure category Projected
Expenditures Jul‐Dec'13 (USD)
Actual expenditures July to Dec`13
(USD)
Comments ‐breakdown by component outputs
GOE 11,143 11,505 Includes other operating costs charged 23% to output 1.1 and 1.2.
Total component 2: 71,658 64,075
Salaries professionals 34,842 30,513
Includes part salaries of Project Manager time charged 28% and Subject Expert‐SA charged 39%, Subject Expert‐CO charged 31%, Project Officer‐LWM charged 21%, Project Officer charged 43%, Project Officer‐Doc. charged 7%, and 18 Professionals time charged 58%, Administrative Officer and Finance Officer time charged 13% to output 2.1, and 2.2.
Salaries general service 3,236 2,858
Includes part salaries of 12 Field Data Collection & Monitoring Assistants. Field Data Collection & Monitoring Assistants time charged 20% to output 2.1 and 2.2
National consultants ‐
Travel 12,262 8,694
Includes duty travel for random field checks on MA Campaign and CIG workshops. Duty travel charged 50% to output 2.1 and 2.2
Training ‐ ‐ Expendable procurementNon‐expendable procurement ‐ ‐
GOE 21,317 22,009 Includes other operating costs charged 44% to output 2.1 and 2.2
Total Component 3: 13,556 12,180
Salaries professionals 6,586 5,787
Includes Subject Expert‐SA charged 8%, Subject Expert‐CO charged 12%, Project Officer‐LWM charged 10%, Project Officer charged 7%, Project Officer‐Doc. charged 34%, and 18 Professionals time charged 6%, Administrative Officer and Finance Officer time charged 1% to output 3.1 and 3.2
Salaries general service 1,133 1,000
Includes part salaries of 12 Field Data Collection & Monitoring Assistants. Field Data Collection & Monitoring Assistants time charged 7% to output 3.1 and 3.2
National consultants
Travel 1,962 1,391
Includes duty travel for random field checks on MA Campaign and CIG workshops. Duty travel charged 8% to output 3.1
Training ‐ ‐ Expendable procurementNon‐expendable procurement ‐ ‐
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 47
Expenditure category Projected
Expenditures Jul‐Dec'13 (USD)
Actual expenditures July to Dec`13
(USD)
Comments ‐breakdown by component outputs
GOE 3,876 4,002 Includes Expenses incurred towards other operating costs charged 8% to output 3.1
Total Project Management: 46,151 41,750
Salaries professionals 15,419 13,599
Includes part salaries of Subject Expert‐SA charged 32%, Subject Expert‐CO charged 31%, Project Officer‐LWM charged 25%, Project Officer charged 18%, Project Officer‐Doc. charged 38%, and both Administrative Officer and Finance Officer time charged 86% to component 4.
Salaries general service 14,451 12,689
Includes salaries of Accountant and Office Assistant charged both charged 100% and 12 Field Data Collection and Monitoring Assistants salaries charged 15% to component 4.
National consultants
Travel 4,169 2,956
Includes duty travel charged 17% for personnel and material transport towards field level monitoring of project implementation
Training ‐ ‐ Expendable procurementNon‐expendable procurement ‐ ‐
GOE 12,112 12,505
Includes other operating costs. Expenses incurred towards other operating costs expenses charged 25% to the component 4
Total Project 1,83,322 1,64,289
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 48
Table 2: Statement of Expenditures for total Project NEX resources
Component/output Total Budget Prior years
expenditures72
Budget this reporting year in
AWPB73 2013
Current year 1st semester expenditures
Current year 2nd semester expenditures
74
Current year total
expenditures
Total expenditures cumulative
(a) (b) (c) (d=b+c) (e=a+d) Component 1: Information tools for decision making and local institutional capacity development
3,42,561 2,29,246 1,20,350 60,848 46,285 1,07,133 3,36,379
Output 1.1: Completed study on local and scientific knowledge on impacts of climate variability/change on natural resources in Andhra Pradesh
1,07,476 1,02,957 38,512 19,471 14,811 34,282 1,37,240
Indicator a): Balanced representation of gender and vulnerable groups/sectors in at least 9 pilots HU in farmer survey covering key indicators on climate viability and its impact.
43,360 64,119 19,641 9,930 7,554 17,484 81,603
Indicator b): Farmers understanding of climate change in pilot HUs documented and combined with available scientific data in completed study document, 9 months from project start.
13,937 24,849 10,013 5,063 3,851 8,913 33,762
Indicator c): Climate change impact database established
50,179 13,990 8,473 4,284 3,258 7,542 21,532
Output 1.2: Local monitoring system of climate variability and its impacts operating
1,06,091 23,529 49,343 24,948 18,977 43,924 67,454
Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs in pilot HU are collecting data on at least 3 key indicators by the end of the second project year. Along with Average crop yields, water harvested or water saved, soil moisture availability and/or organic carbon content maintained or increased in pilot areas are monitored.
1,06,091 23,529 49,343 24,948 18,977 43,924 67,454
Output 1.3: CBOs with capacities to integrate climate 1,28,993 1,02,759 32,494 16,429 12,497 28,926 1,31,685
72 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/FAO_NEX_Consolidated_Jul‐Dec_2013.xls 73 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/AWPB_2013_NEX‐Revised_23_March_2013.xls 74 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/Component_wise_expenditure_statement_Jul‐Dec2013_08‐01‐13.xls
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 49
Component/output Total Budget Prior years
expenditures72
Budget this reporting year in
AWPB73 2013
Current year 1st semester expenditures
Current year 2nd semester expenditures
74
Current year total
expenditures
Total expenditures cumulative
(a) (b) (c) (d=b+c) (e=a+d) variability adaptation measures in Sustainable Land and Water Management (SLWM) ‐Climate Resilient Communities Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs have established climate change adaptation committees 6 months after project start
30,792 40,952 9,748 4,929 3,749 8,678 49,630
Indicator b): At least 100 CBO leaders and representatives trained in climate variability monitoring and adaptation measures integrated in SLWM by the end of year two
37,743 40,952 9,098 4,600 1,050 5,650 46,602
Indicator c): At least 9 CBOs have participated in and identified adaptation measures with agricultural scientists 18 months after project start
30,230 10428 5,849 2,957 2,249 5,207 15,634
Indicator d): At least 7 CBOs have local climate change adaptation plans 18 months after project start
30,230 10428 7,799 3,943 2,999 6,942 17,370
Component 2: PILOTS 6,57,237 3,50,634 1,48,238 71,030 64,075 1,35,105 4,85,740 Output 2.1: FCS Pilots: Farmers acquire skills through participation in FCS
4,92,928 2,16,598 62,260 29,833 26,911 56,744 2,73,342
Indicator a): 2 Curriculum developed for CCS with focus on adaptation in drought‐prone areas including methods on identification and field testing of adaptation measures, 18 months after project start
1,72,525 81,053 19,301 9,248 8,343 17,591 98,644
Indicator b): At least 7 CCS are functioning with at least 350 female and male farmers attending and disseminating best experimental practices for adaptation measures by the end of the project
3,20,403 1,35,544 42,959 20,585 18,569 39,153 1,74,698
Output 2.2: Pilot testing of alternative adaptation technologies and practices in SLWM
1,64,309 1,34,037 85,978 41,198 37,163 78,361 2,12,398
Indicator a): At least 3 pilots with the participation of at least 7 CBOs and 50 female and male farmers produce results on adaptation performance of
82,155 59,741 55,886 26,778 24,156 50,935 1,10,675
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 50
Component/output Total Budget Prior years
expenditures72
Budget this reporting year in
AWPB73 2013
Current year 1st semester expenditures
Current year 2nd semester expenditures
74
Current year total
expenditures
Total expenditures cumulative
(a) (b) (c) (d=b+c) (e=a+d) technologies and practices by the end of the projectIndicator b): At least three best adaptation practices and technology manuals by the end of the project
82,155 74,296 30,092 14,419 13,007 27,426 1,01,723
Component 3: Platform for land based climate change adaptation measures suitable to drought prone areas
1,19,521 55,953 29,737 14,201 12,180 26,381 82,335
Output 3.1: Platform for dissemination 1,19,521 55,953 20,518 9,799 8,404 18,203 74,156 Indicator a): Project lessons, results and products available on platform website with 100 visitors per month.
71,713 33,572 5,335 2,548 2,185 4,733 38,305
Indicator b): At least 3 dissemination workshops with at least 150 participants have been held by the end of the project
47,808 22,381 15,184 7,251 6,219 13,470 35,852
Output 3.2: Institutional linkages reinforced 0 0 9,218 4,402 9,988 14,390 14,390 Indicator a): Functional relationship established with local (district) level functionaries
0 0 9,218 4,402 9,988 14,390 14,390
Project management 1,80,681 1,43,281 97,881 55,056 41,750 96,806 2,40,087 Total 13,00,000 7,79,115 3,96,206 2,01,135 1,64,289 3,65,424 11,44,541
Certified by: Name : V. Paul Raja Rao Date, title : Executive Director
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 51
GEF CASH ADVANCES REQUEST
Project No. : GEF project (ID) – 3882 FAO project Symbol: GCP/IND/181/GFF
Project title : Reversing Environmental Degradation and Rural Poverty to Adaptation to Climate Change in Drought Stricken Areas in South India: A Hydrological unit of Pilot Project Approach.
Executing Partner : Bharathi Integrated Rural Development Society (BIRDS)
Project commencing date : December 06, 2010
Project ending date : 30 June, 2014
Next Reporting Period covered by this Cash Transfer Request: [January 2014] to [June 2014] Based on the annual Work Plan and detailed Budget provide a short description of the activities by output to be financed within the next reporting period.
Component 1: Information tools for decision making and local institutional capacity development 11 activities are planned under component 1, in the next reporting period January to June 2014: i) 1.2.1: Database on PCM data; ii) 1.2.2: Maintenance of scientific equipment; iii) 1.2.3: Database on Average crop yields; iv) 1.2.4: Database on Water harvested; v) Activity 1.2.5: Database on Water Saved; vi) Activity 1.2.6: Database on Soil moisture availability; vii) 1.2.7: Database on Organic carbon content (soil test); viii) Activity 1.2.8: Link of PCM and SLWM pilots; ix) 1.3.1: HUN Meetings: Handing over of assets and products; x) 1.3.2: Consolidation of HU‐level CCAC plans; xi) 1.3.3: Consolidation and compilation of CCA plans ‐ will be funded by GEF. Activity 1.2.1: Database on PCM data Climate Data Collection in all Field Units is operational from second week of July 2012. All the seven parameter data is being collected on daily basis by farmer volunteers and updated in display boards. Activity 1.2.2: Maintenance of scientific equipment Maintenance of scientific equipment is a regular work, which is done for climate monitoring stations. In any case if there is any fault, the concerned service provider will be contacted and necessary repair work is initiated. Activity 1.2.3: Database on Average crop yields Data on average crop yields are collected from field on principal crops. This database will be used to compare the SLWM pilot’s yields and necessary amendments can be taken at pilots in next season. The data will be collected in March 2014. Activity 1.2.4: Database on Water harvested Data on water harvested are collected from existing structures available at field level. The data will be used in CWB workshop for planning of water use for next cropping season. The data will be collected in March 2014.
Attachment ‐ 3
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 52
Activity 1.2.5: Database on Water Saved Data on water saved will be collected from farmers who use of micro irrigation equipments and will be used in CWB workshop for planning of water use for next cropping season. The data will be collected in March 2014. Activity 1.2.6: Database on Soil moisture availability Soil moisture availability will be measured using conventional method (gravimetric) by collecting soil samples from pilots field and heating for 24 hrs and measuring the difference of wet soil and dry soil. The activity will be carried out whole year, taking samples on weekly basis. In a month 4 samples will taken by each PNGO Activity 1.2.7: Database on Organic carbon content (soil test) Organic carbon content will be analysed by collecting soil samples from pilots field in pre and post cropping season i.e. March 2014. These samples will be sent to soil testing laboratories for analysis on micro soil nutrients and organic carbon content. Activity 1.2.8: Compare data collected in PCM with the SLWM pilots interventions Climatic Data (PCM) provide SLWM pilots farmer to proper Irrigation Scheduling based on Rainfall and Humidity data and its helps for on soil moisture management and crop pest and diseases measure. Appropriate Rainfall and Max. Min. temp indicate time of fertilizer Applications and other agriculture operations namely Sowing, Inter cultivation weeding and harvesting. Activity 1.3.1: HUN Meetings: Handing over assets and products Each field unit is developing a bottom‐up strategy to sustain community ownership of assets and products (PCM, FCS and SLWM pilots) developed by the project. This involves engaging Habitation‐CCACs, Panchayat institutions, SHGs, and other opinion leaders in the village to develop a strategy and an action plan to sustain community ownership of assets and products (PCM, FCS and SLWM pilots) developed by the project. These strategies and action plans will be consolidated at HU‐CCAC level by March 2014. The process will culminate with handing of assets and products to HU‐CCACs. One HU‐level CCAC meeting is planned at each Field Unit in April 2014.The purpose of this meeting is to handover the assets and products (PCM, FCS and SLWM pilots) created in each of the pilot HUs to the HU‐CCAC by the end of April 2014. Additionally, each HU‐CCAC will be provided a Community Adaptation Fund (CAF). This fund would be used for operation and maintenance of PCM assets. Also, it would serve as a revolving fund to provide seed money to encourage interested farmers to continue to experiment adaptation strategies (soil and water conservation activities and structures, and NPM practices). Activity 1.3.2: Consolidation of HU‐level CCACs plans A consolidated note of the various measures and technologies identified by CCACs in consultation with officers and scientists in the CBO Leaders Officers and Scientists workshops conducted in 2012 and 2013 will be prepared at the project level. The consolidated report of the various measures and technologies could be used in the preparation of the four adaptation manuals (Krishna Agro‐Climatic
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 53
Zone, Southern Agro‐Climatic Zone, Telangana Agro‐Climatic Zone, and Scare Rainfall Agro‐Climatic Zone) under output 2.2. Activity 1.3.3: Consolidation and compilation of CCA plans Each of the 9 pilot HU‐CCACs developed CCA plans for the major crops grown in kharif and rabi in their respective HUs. These plans will be reviewed and finalized by PMO (Subject Expert – Sustainable Agriculture) before handing them over to HU‐CCACs. It is anticipated that the CCA plans will serve as a resource for the farmers to adapt to climate variability in the HU. Also, more robust CCA plans are expected to evolve beyond the project period, based on fresh climate data, in the following years. Component 2: Pilots on SLWM including climate variability adaptation in farming systems in drought
prone areas 13 activities are planned under component 2, in the next reporting period, January to June 2014: i) 2.1.1: Curriculum evolution workshop – Rabi; ii) 2.1.2: Database on FCS Curricula; iii) 2.1.3: Database on FCS Training Calendars; iv) 2.1.4: Report on FCS Training Reports; v) 2.1.6: Database on Images NFE Tools/Models; vi) 2.1.7: FCS Sessions; vii) 2.2.1: Technical on status soil moisture and soil carbon in SPACC Project; viii) 2.2.2: Technical note (including “Package of practices”) on adaptation to climate variability in pilot crops; ix) 2.2.3: SLWM Pilots Implementation (conclusion); x) 2.2.4: Manual on Adaptation in Scarce Rainfall Agro Climatic Zone; xi) 2.2.5: Manual on Adaptation in Southern Telangana Agro‐climatic Zone; xii) 2.2.6: Manual on Adaptation in Southern Agro‐climatic Zone; xiii) 2.2.7: Manual on Adaptation in Krishna Agro ‐Climatic Zone ‐ will be funded by GEF. Activity 2.1.1: Curriculum evolution workshop – Rabi Farmer Climate Schools (FCS), in rabi 2013 are following the crop cycle under SLWM pilots, at each of the 9 HUs. Session Guides are being developed directly for each session, as they progress. The Curriculum Evolution Workshop will now be conducted at the end of rabi (in March) to evolve a curriculum that will capture the implementation experience. Activity 2.1.2: Database on FCS Curricula FCS curricula developed in different cycles (2012‐13, kharif 2013, and rabi 2013‐14) will be compiled into a database on FCS curricula. The database could be disseminated widely and will serve as a resource for other projects and initiatives implementing Farmer Climate Schools. Activity 2.1.3: Database on FCS Training Calendars FCS training calendars developed in different cycles (2012‐13, kharif 2013, and rabi 2013‐14) will be compiled into a database. The database on FCS training calendars could be disseminated widely and will serve as a resource for other projects and initiatives implementing Farmer Climate Schools. Activity 2.1.4: FCS Training Reports Field Units drafted training reports after implementation of each session. Each of those reports includes a feedback form on content and facilitation methods. Three consolidated reports will be prepared at the project‐level to capture the overall implementation experience of FCS in 2012‐13; kharif 2013; and rabi 2013‐14.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 54
Activity 2.1.5: Database on NFE Tools/Models Relevant training materials were developed for FCS sessions to disseminate key messages. Training materials include: posters, flipcharts, handouts, models, and banners. These materials were developed by each of the Field Units. A database of images of NFE Tools/Models will be compiled. The database could be disseminated widely and will serve as a resource for other projects and initiatives working on climate change awareness/adaptation. Activity 2.1.6: FCS Session 18 Farmer Climate Schools (FCS) are being implemented in rabi 2013. The FCS sessions are following the crop cycle under SLWM pilots, at each of the 9 HUs. Session Guides are being developed by PMO for each session, as they progress. FCS rabi was initiated in November 2013 and will continue till end of February in four Field Units (BIRDS, CARE, CARVE, and DIPA), and till March 1st Week in the remaining Field Units (GVS, PARTNER, SAFE, SAID, and SYA). In all 60 sessions (including Field Days) are planned across the nine Field Units for January, February, and March 2014. of these, 20 will be completed in January, 31 in February and 9 in March 1st week. Activity 2.2.1: Technical note on status of soil moisture and organic carbon in SPACC Project. Consultant –Soil Management hired to accomplish the technical note and it will be completed by April 2014 and consultant utilise present data base developed on soil moisture and soil organic carbon in 9 pilots. This report would contribute to prepare adaptation manual in various agro climatic zones and will complete by end of April 2014. Activity 2.2.2: Technical note (including “Package of practices”) on adaptation to climate variability in pilot crops Package of practices prepare across nine hydrological units by use of database which is maintained at project management office. Hiring a team of consultants consists of Agriculture Specialist, Climate Data Analyst and Editor. Consultants will finalise the case studies on SLWM pilots compiled as per the format developed for “climate change adaptation on various crops” piloted in seven districts of Andhra Pradesh”. Assignments which includes are: i) data and documentation (photographs and training material) generated during SLWM pilots organized; ii) analytical material (pictures, tables, graphs) generated for 4 Kharif 2012, 7 Rabi 2012‐13, 9 Kharif 2013, and 9 Rabi 2013‐14 pilots. Activity 2.2.3: SLWM Pilot implementation SLWM pilot implementation in 9 pilot HUs in Rabi season will be continued till March 2014 and data collection on crop yield and inputs on other interventions from field staff, farmer records and monthly formats by end March 2014. Activity 2.2.4: Manual: Adaptation in Scarce Rainfall Agro Climatic Zone Manual: Adaptation in Scarce Rainfall Agro Climatic Zone, Anantapur and Kurnool comes under this zone. Two pilot Hydrological units are covered in it. Learning and experiences of climate adaptation from three components from Participatory climate monitoring, SLWM Pilots and Farmer Climate Schools will be integrated and climate resilient. This Manual will be completed by end March 2014.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 55
Activity 2.2.5: Manual: Adaptation in Southern Telangana Agro‐climatic Zone Manual: Adaptation in Southern Telangana Agro‐climatic Zone, Mahabubnagar and Nalgonda district comes under this zone. Two pilot Hydrological units are covered in it. Learning and experiences of climate adaptation from three components from Participatory climate monitoring, SLWM Pilots and Farmer Climate Schools will be integrated and climate resilient. This Manual will be completed by end April 2014. Activity 2.2.6: Manual: Adaptation in Southern Agro‐climatic Zone Manual: Adaptation in Southern Agro ‐Climatic Zone, Chittoor and Kadapa district comes under this zone. Two pilot Hydrological units are covered in it. Learning and experiences of climate adaptation from three components from Participatory climate monitoring, SLWM Pilots and Farmer Climate Schools will be integrated and climate resilient. This Manual will be completed by end April 2014. Activity 2.2.7: Manual: Adaptation in Krishna Agro ‐Climatic Zone Manual: Adaptation in Krishna Agro ‐Climatic Zone, Prakasam district comes under this zone. Three pilot Hydrological units are covered in it. Learning and experiences of climate adaptation from three components from Participatory climate monitoring, SLWM Pilots and Farmer Climate Schools will be integrated and climate resilient. This Manual will be completed by end May 2014. Component 3: Platform for land based climate change adaptation measures suitable to drought
prone areas 4 activities are planned under component 3, in the next reporting period, January to June 2014: i) 3.1.1: Website updating; ii) 3.2.1: State‐level Dissemination workshop; iii) 3.2.2: Report on State‐level Dissemination workshop; iii) 3.2.3: Report on 9 HU level Dissemination workshops ‐ will be funded by GEF. Activity 3.1.1: Website updating The information for creation of website will be provided by PNGOs and CBOs. Number of visitors to the project website is monitored through usage of the software – Advanced Web Statistics. New information will be uploaded and the existing information will be updated on to the project website, once in every month, which started in the month of February 2012 and will continue till the end of the project. Activity 3.2.1: State‐level Dissemination workshop A three‐day state‐level dissemination workshop is planned for May 2014 to share lessons, results, and products from project implementation. The first two‐days will start with a farmer‐mela followed by discussion of project lessons, results, and products. The third day will be spent on consolidating the experiences and learning. All the stakeholders (agencies involved in similar type of intervention) within the state will be invited to the workshop. Participants would include Chief Secretary; Principal Secretaries of Agriculture, Rural Development, and Environment and Forests; and Representatives from similar projects. The responsibility for organizing the state‐level dissemination workshop lies with the PMO. Each PNGO will set up a stall highlighting a particular theme. Two farmer representatives (one male and one female) and three representatives from each PNGO will participate from each Field Unit.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 56
Activity 3.2.2: Report on State‐level Dissemination workshop A report on the state‐level dissemination workshop will be prepared to document the experiences, learning and follow up actions. A draft report will be prepared and circulated for comments two weeks after the conclusion of the workshop. The report will be finalized in June 2014. Activity 3.2.3: Report on 9 HU level Dissemination workshops 9 HU level Dissemination workshops were conducted in December 2013 at each of the pilot HUs to disseminate the experiences and learning of Participatory Climate Monitoring (PCM), Sustainable Land and Water Management (SLWM) pilots, and Farmer Climate Schools (FCS). District‐level functionaries from various departments and programs were invited to further consolidate the functional linkages between the SPACC project farmers and local government functionaries. A consolidated report will be prepared to compile the experiences across the 9 pilot HUs and follow‐up. Project Management Project Management is the key function of PMO. However, as the Office of the Executing Partner – BIRDS is located elsewhere, fund management is carried out by the Nodal Desk, located in BIRDS Office, Nandyal town, Kurnool district, Andhra Pradesh. 3 activities are planned under Project Management, in the next reporting period, January to June 2014: i) 4.1.1: Project Partner’s Meeting; ii) Activity 4.1.2: Monthly Review and Plan Meetings; iii) 4.1.8: Project Monitoring System ‐ will be funded by GEF. 4.1.1 Project Partner’s Meeting Project Partners Meeting (PPM) will be conducted on a monthly basis. PPM will be attended by the key functionaries of PMO, Nodal Office and Field Units. PPM will provide a platform for all the implementing staff to come together and learn from each other, apart from reviewing the progress in the previous month and work plan for the current month. Minutes of PPM meeting is shared with FAO. 4.1.2: Monthly Review and Plan Meetings Monthly progress review is done at PMO with field officer from all field units and Plan for next month is discussed. The plan and progress is reviewed against the targets and entered in activity progress matrix. 4.1.8 Project Monitoring System PMO, based on the approved AWPB 2013, developed a comprehensive Project Monitoring System for regular monitoring of the project progress, as done in the first year. PMO designed formats in excel format and updated the database, on a monthly basis, based on reports received from the Field Units.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 57
Table 1: Projection of expenditures for the next reporting period [January 2014] to [June 2014]75 76 77:
Expenditure category Projection of Expenditure
(USD) Clarification/breakdown by component output
Total Component 1: 39,510
Salaries professionals 774 Includes 40% of Field Officer time contributing to realization of outputs 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3
Salaries general service 2,053 Includes 30% of 3 Field Facilitators salaries and 34% of 3 Drivers salaries time contributing to realization outputs 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3.
National consultants ‐ ‐
Contracts 34,824 Includes 41% of PNGO Contracts contributing to realization of outputs under Component 1
Training 459 Includes 6% of Training contributing to realization of outputs 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3.
Expendable procurement 1,400 Includes 81% of Expendable Equipment contributing to realization of output 1.2
Non‐expendable procurement
‐
GOE ‐Total component 2: 113,789
Salaries professionals 697 Includes 36% of Field Officer contributing to realization of outputs 2.1 and 2.2
Salaries general service 3,069 Includes 60% of salaries of 3 Field Facilitators and 42% of salaries of 3 Drivers contributing to realization of outputs 2.1 and 2.2.
National consultants 68,056
Includes time of the National Consultants, including: 100% of Soil Management (Output 2.1 and 2.2); 100% of (Project Manager Salary for GEF & NEX) Climate Change Adaptation (Output 2.1 and 2.2); 100% of Subject Expert‐WM salary and Irrigation Management (Output 2.1 and 2.2); 100% of Dryland Agriculture (Output 2.1 and 2.2);
Contracts 39,920 47% of PNGO Contracts contributing to realization of outputs under Component 2
Training 1,716 Includes 21% of Trainings contributing to realization of output 2.1 and 2.2
Expendable procurement 331 Includes 19% of Expendable Equipment contributing to realization of output 2.2
Non‐expendable procurement
‐
GOE ‐Total component 3: 10,476
Salaries professionals 310 Includes 16% of Field Officer salaries contributing to realization of outputs 3.1, and 3.2
Salaries general service 511 Includes 10% of salaries of 3 Field Facilitators and 7% 3 Drivers contributing to realization of outputs 3.1 and 3.2
National consultants ‐ ‐
Contracts 8,614 Includes 8% of PNGO Contracts and 100% of website maintenance contributing to realization of output 3.1.
75 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6_7feb/Cash_Advance_Request_for_Jan‐Jun2014_06‐02‐14.xls 76 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6_7feb/GEF_Revised%20Budget%20for_%20January‐June2014_06‐02‐14.xls 77 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6_7feb/GEF_Budget_Revison_Jan‐Jun2014_06‐02‐2014.xls
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 58
Expenditure category Projection of Expenditure
(USD) Clarification/breakdown by component output
Training 1,041 Includes 13% Training costs budgeted to contribute to realization of outputs 3.1 and 3.2
Expendable procurement ‐Non‐expendable procurement
‐
GOE ‐Total Project Management: 32,879
Salaries professionals 4,175 Includes 100% of Finance Officer and 8% of Field Officer contributing to the Component 4
Salaries general service 5,450 Includes 100% of salary of Accountant and Casher cum Admin Assistant and 17% of 3 Drivers contributing to the Component 4.
National consultants ‐ ‐
Contracts 18,454 Includes 4% of 8lumpsum Contracts costs and 100% of Midterm review contributing to the component 4.
Training 4,799 Includes 60% of Training costs to organize Project Partners meetings and Steering committee meetings contributing to the Component 4.
Expendable procurement ‐Non‐expendable procurement
‐
GOE ‐Total Project 196,654
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 59
Table 2: Fund status in project account as of 31st December 2013 and funds requested for the next reporting period [January 2014] to [June 2014]: 78
Cumulative
Cash received
from FAO in the Project Account
(1)
Net Cumulative Disbursements for project
activities from the Project Account (2)*
Net Cash Position in the Project Account
(3) = (1) ‐ (2)
Projected Cash Requirements for project
activities for the next reporting
period (4)
Projected Net Cash Position by the end of next reporting
period (5 ) = (3) ‐ 4)
Amount of Current Cash Transfer Request for the
Project (6)
750,579 712,437 38,142 196,654 ‐158,512 108,50079
78 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6_7feb/Fund_request_workings_06‐02‐14.xls 79 This amount is requested after deducting USD 50,000 as per clause 4 from Budget proposed
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 60
FAO NEX CASH ADVANCES REQUEST
Project No. : FAO Project (ID) – 604144
Project title : Reversing Environmental Degradation and Rural Poverty to Adaptation to Climate Change in Drought Stricken Areas in South India: A Hydrological unit of Pilot Project Approach.
Executing Partner : Bharathi Integrated Rural Development Society (BIRDS)
Project commencing date : December 06, 2010
Project ending date : 30 June, 2014
Next Reporting Period covered by this Cash Transfer Request: [January 2014] to [June 2014] Based on the annual Work Plan and detailed Budget provide a short description of the activities by output to be financed within the next reporting period. Component 1: Information tools for decision making and local institutional capacity development 1 activity is planned under component 1, in 2014: i) 1.2.1: Database on PCM data ‐ will be funded by FAO‐NEX in the next reporting period. 1.2.1: Database on PCM data Data Classification and Entry includes storing the data collected as part of PCM. Data Classification is completed during the period. PCM volunteers and CBO leaders are collecting Climate and climate impact data from middle of July 2012. The data and information storage is done at the PNGO level and transferred to PMO, on a monthly basis. Component 2: Pilots on SLWM including climate variability adaptation in farming systems in drought
prone areas Professionals and General Service staff funded by FAO NEX will provide technical and programmatic support in the implementation of all the 16 activities planned under component 2. Component 3: Platform for land based climate change adaptation measures suitable to drought
prone areas The Professionals and General Service staff funded by FAO NEX will provide technical and programmatic support in the implementation of 7 activities planned under component 3. Project Management 10 activities are planned under component 2, in the next reporting period, January to June 2014: i) 4.1.3: NSC Meetings; ii) 4.1.4: SLEM Partner Meetings; iii) 4.1.5: PSC Meeting; iv) 4.1.7: Final Project Review Mission; v) 4.1.9: Internal Audit; vi) 4.1.10: Field support in Finance Management; vii) 4.1.12: SLEM Half‐yearly Progress Report; viii) 4.1.13: SLEM Annual Progress Report; ix) 4.1.14: Half‐yearly Progress Report; x) 4.1.15: Terminal Report ‐ will be funded by FAONEX.
Attachment ‐ 4
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 61
Activity 4.1.3: NSC Meetings The National Steering Committee (NSC) of SLEM project meets twice a year to review the progress of projects under its umbrella, apart from formally approving the reports and plans/budgets. The Project Manager and/or the Executive Director will participate in the meetings. Activity 4.1.4: SLEM Partner Meetings SLEM Technical Facilitation Organization (TFO) – ICFRE calls for one or two meetings of SLEM project partners in a year for cross‐learning of the projects and possible up‐scaling at the national level. The Project Manager and/or the Executive Director will participate in the meetings. Activity 4.1.5: PSC Meeting One Project Steering Committee (PSC) meetings will be held during the 1st semester, in March 2014. Apart from reviewing the progress, the PSC will guide the project teams in effective implementation and approving the Reports. PMO acting as secretariat to PSC coordinates with members of PSC and organizes the meeting. Activity 4.1.7: Final Project Review A final project review mission is expected to take place in April 2014. Activity 4.1.9: Internal Audit Internal Auditor, appointed by BIRDS will visit the field units as well as PMO/Nodal to conduct the internal audit. He will submit his recommendations to ED, with a copy to the unit visited, for follow up. Two internal audits are planned in 1st semester 2014. Activity.4.1.10: Field support in Finance Management Finance Officer – Nodal will coordinate the internal audits and provide support to all the field units and PMO for complying with the recommendations of the Internal Auditor. 2 support missions are planned in the 1st semester. Activity 4.1.11: SLEM Half‐yearly Progress Report Prepare a document on Half‐yearly Progress Report (October 2013 – March 2014) for SLEM Activity 4.1.12: SLEM Annual Progress Report Prepare a document on Annual Progress Report (April 2013 – March 2014) for SLEM Activity 4.1.13: Half‐yearly Progress Report Prepare a document on Half –Yearly Progress Report (January‐June 2014) Activity 4.1.14: Terminal Report A draft terminal report will be submitted to FAO in June 2014. The terminal report will include a list of outputs detailing the activities taken under the project, “lessons learnt” and any recommendations to improve the efficiency of similar activities in the future.
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 62
Table 1: Projection of expenditures for the next reporting period [January 2014] to [June 2014] 80 81 82:
Expenditure category Projection of Expenditure
(USD) Clarification/breakdown by component output
Total component 1: 41,563
Salaries professionals 17,681
Includes 21% of Salary of Subject Experts‐SA , 26% of Salary of Subject Expert‐CO, 44% of Project Officer‐LWM, 32% of Project Officer‐NFE, 21% of Project Officer‐Doc., and 36% of Professionals budgeted to contribute to realization of outputs 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3
Salaries general service 6,861 58% of Salaries of FDCMA budgeted to contribute to implementation of activities under Component 1
Travel 1,497 25% of Travel costs budgeted to contribute to realization of outputs 1.2 and 1.3
Training ‐
Expendable procurement 4,671 100% of expandable equipment budgeted to contribute to the component 1
Non‐expendable procurement ‐ ‐
GOE 10,853 31% of GOE Costs budgeted to contribute to realization of outputs 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3
Total component 2: 44,681
Salaries professionals 25,438
Includes 39% of Salary of Subject Expert‐SA , 31% of Salary of Subject Expert‐CO, 21% of Project Officer‐LWM, 43% of Project Officer‐NFE,7% of Project Officer‐Doc., 58% of Professionals, 13% of Finance Officer and Administrative Officer budgeted to contribute to realization of outputs 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3
Salaries general service 2,366 Includes 20% of Salaries of FDCMA budgeted to contribute to implementation of activities under Component 2
Travel 2,994 Includes 50% of Travel costs budgeted to contribute to implementation of activities under Component 2
Training ‐ ‐Expendable procurement ‐ ‐Non‐expendable procurement ‐ ‐
GOE 13,883 Includes 40% of GOE costs budgeted to contribute to realization of output 2.1 and 2.2
Total component 3: 13,226
Salaries professionals 5,460
Includes 8% of Salary of Subject Experts‐SA , 12% of Salary of Subject Experts‐CO, 10% of Project Officer‐LWM, 7% of Project Officer‐NFE,34% of Project Officer‐Doc., 6% of Professionals, 1% of Finance Officer and Administrative Officer budgeted to contribute to realization of outputs 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3
80 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6_7feb/Cash_Advance_Request_for_Jan‐Jun2014_06‐02‐14.xls 81 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6_7feb/NEX_Revised_Budget_for_January‐June2014_06‐02‐14.xls 82 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6_7feb/NEX_Budget_Revison_Jan‐Jun2014_06‐02‐14.xls
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 63
Expenditure category Projection of Expenditure
(USD) Clarification/breakdown by component output
Salaries general service 828 Includes 7% of Salaries of FDCMA budgeted to contribute to implementation of activities under Component 3
Travel 479 Includes 8% of Travel costs budgeted to contribute to implementation of activities under Component 3
Training 3,935 Includes 100% training cost contribute to implementation of activities under component 3
Expendable procurement ‐ ‐Non‐expendable procurement ‐ ‐
GOE 2,524 7% of GOE costs budgeted to contribute to realization of outputs 3.1 and 3.2
Total Project Management: 34,631
Salaries professionals 14,625
Includes 32% of Salary of Subject Expert‐SA , 31% of Salary of Subject Expert‐CO, 25% of Project Officer‐LWM, 18% of Project Officer‐NFE,38% of Project Officer‐Doc., 86% of Finance Officer and Administrative Officer budgeted to contribute to realization of outputs 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3
Salaries general service 11,100
Includes 15% of Salaries of FDCMA; 100% of salaries of Accountant and 13 Office Attendant and 15% of FDCMA budgeted to contribute to implementation of activities under Component 4
Travel 1,018 Includes 17% of Duty Travel costs budgeted to implement Component 4 activities
Training ‐ ‐Expendable procurement ‐ ‐Non‐expendable procurement ‐ ‐
GOE 7,888 Includes 22% of GOE costs budgeted to implement Component 4 activities
Total Project 1,34,101
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 64
Table 2: Fund status in project account as of 31st December 2013 and funds requested for the next reporting period [January 2014] to [June 2014] 83
Cumulative
Cash received
from FAO in the Project Account
(1)
Net Cumulative Disbursements for project
activities from the Project Account (2)*
Net Cash Position in the Project Account
(3) = (1) ‐ (2)
Projected Cash Requirements for project
activities for the next reporting
period (4)
Projected Net Cash Position by the end of next reporting period (5 ) = (3) ‐ 4)
Amount of Current Cash
Transfer Request for the Project
(6)
11,63,575 11,44,541 19,034 1,34,101 ‐1,15,067 65,100 84
83 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6_7feb/Fund_request_workings_06‐02‐14.xls 84 This amount is requested after deducting USD 50,000 as per clause 4 from Budget proposed
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 65
Table 1: LC KIND ‐ Detailed statement of expenditures for the reporting period [July 2013] to [December 2013]: 85 86 87
Expenditure category – LCKIND
Projected Expenditures Jul‐Dec’ 13
(USD)
Actual expenditures Jul‐Dec’13 (USD)
Comments ‐breakdown by component outputs
Total component 1: 32,040 28,163
Salaries professionals ‐
Salaries general service 29,168 27,527
Includes time of Cashier cum Accountant, Farmer contribution (viz. 2118 Observation well volunteers, 188 Rain gauge volunteers, 2775 GMC members, 315 HUN members).
National consultants ‐
Travel 2,873 637
Includes travel undertaken for random field checks to monitor baseline study, climate monitoring stations, selection of pilot HUs, and establish linkages
Training ‐ Expendable procurement ‐ Non‐expendable procurement
‐
GOE ‐
Total component 2: 86,376 69,240
Salaries professionals ‐
Salaries general service 80,631 67,967
Includes time of Cashier cum Accountant, Farmer contribution (viz. 2118 Observation well volunteers, 188 Rain gauge volunteers, 2775 GMC members, 315 HUN members, CRP trainings and Exposures, workshops, Cultural Shows).
National consultants ‐
Travel 5,745 1,274
Includes travel undertaken for random field checks to monitor baseline study, climate monitoring stations, selection of pilot HUs, and establish linkages
Training ‐ Expendable procurement ‐ Non‐expendable procurement
‐
GOE ‐ Total component 3: 10,421 9,216 Salaries professionals ‐
Salaries general service 9,464 9,004
Includes time of Cashier cum Accountant, Farmer contribution (viz. 2118 Observation well volunteers, 188 Rain gauge volunteers, 2775 GMC members, 315 HUN members).
National consultants ‐
85 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/LCKIND_Expenditure_Statement_Jul‐Dec2013_workings.xls 86 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/LC_Kind_Consolidated_Jul‐Dec_2013.xls 87 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/Component_wise_expenditure_statement_Jul‐Dec2013_08‐01‐13.xls
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 66
Expenditure category – LCKIND
Projected Expenditures Jul‐Dec’ 13
(USD)
Actual expenditures Jul‐Dec’13 (USD)
Comments ‐breakdown by component outputs
Travel 958 212
Includes travel undertaken for random field checks to monitor baseline study, climate monitoring stations, selection of pilot HUs, and establish linkages
Training ‐ Expendable procurement ‐ Non‐expendable procurement
‐
GOE ‐ Total Project Management: 46,397 44,640
Salaries professionals 41,563 39,836
Includes time of Executive Director and 8 PNGO Chiefs spent on project activities. Executive Director's time spent on Fiduciary requirements of FAO and GEF.
Salaries general service 4,833 4,804 Includes time of 10 Cashier‐Accountant, 2 Documentation Assistants & Office Attendant.
National consultants ‐ Travel ‐ Training ‐
Expendable procurement ‐ Non‐expendable procurement
‐
GOE ‐ Total Project 1,75,234 1,51,260
Attachment ‐ 5
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 67
Table 2: Statement of Expenditures for total Project LCKIND resources
Component/output Total Budget
Prior years expenditure
(a)
Budget 88 this
reporting year in AWP/B
Current year total 89 90
expenditures (d=b+c)
Total expenditure cumulative (e=a+d)
Component 1: Information tools for decision making and local institutional capacity development
4,32,897 7,26,101 67,860 28,163 7,54,264
Output 1.1: Completed study on local and scientific knowledge on impacts of climate variability/change on natural resources in Andhra Pradesh
34,374 35,975 6,107 2,535 38,510
Indicator a): Balanced representation of gender and vulnerable groups/sectors in at least 9 pilots HU in farmer survey covering key indicators on climate viability and its impact.
17,187 ‐ ‐
Indicator b): Farmers understanding of climate change in pilot HUs documented and combined with available scientific data in completed study document, 9 months from project start.
17,187 ‐ ‐
Indicator c): Climate change impact database established
‐ ‐ ‐
Output 1.2: Local monitoring system of climate variability and its impacts operating
2,30,938 6,02,487 35,966 14,927 6,17,414
Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs in pilot HU are collecting data on at least 3 key indicators by the end of the second project year
2,30,938
‐ ‐
Output 1.3: CBOs with capacities to integrate climate variability adaptation measures in Sustainable Land and Water Management (SLWM)
1,35,445 85,132 21,037 8,731 93,862
Indicator a): At least 9 CBOs have established climate change adaptation committees
68,005 ‐ ‐
Indicator b): At least 100 CBO leaders and representatives trained in climate variability monitoring and adaptation measures integrated in SLWM by the end of year two
45,136 ‐ ‐
Indicator c): At least 9 CBOs have participated in and identified adaptation measures with agricultural scientists 18 months after project start
11,152 ‐ ‐
Indicator d): At least 7 CBOs have local climate change adaptation plans 18 months after project start
11,152 ‐ ‐
Component 2: Pilots on SLWM including climate variability adaptation in farming systems in drought prone areas
9,02,089 2,62,613 1,48,763 69,240 3,31,853
88 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/AWPB_LCKIND_Budget_2013.xls 89 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/LC_Kind_Consolidated_Jul‐Dec_2013.xls 90 Link: http://birds‐spacc.org/hpr6/Component_wise_expenditure_statement_Jul‐Dec2013_08‐01‐13.xls
HPR 6: Final Draft, 4 March, 2014 68
Component/output Total Budget
Prior years expenditure
(a)
Budget 88 this
reporting year in AWP/B
Current year total 89 90
expenditures (d=b+c)
Total expenditure cumulative (e=a+d)
Output 2.1: Farmers acquire skills in managing climate variability and testing adaptation technologies in farming systems through participation in Climate Change Schools (CCS)
6,76,567 1,67,012 1,11,572 51,930 2,18,942
Indicator a): 2 Curriculum developed for CCS with focus on adaptation in drought‐prone areas including methods on identification and field testing of adaptation measures , 18 months after project start
2,36,798 ‐ ‐
Indicator b): At least 7 CCS are functioning with at least 350 female and male farmers attending and disseminating best experimental practices for adaptation measures by the end of the project
4,39,768 ‐ ‐
Output 2.2: Pilot testing of alternative adaptation technologies and practices in SLWM
2,25,522 95,601 37,191 17,310 1,12,911
Indicator a): At least 3 pilots with the participation of at least 7 CBOs and 50 female and male farmers produce results on adaptation performance of technologies and practices by the end of the project
1,12,761 ‐ ‐
Indicator b): At least three best adaptation practices and technology manuals by the end of the project
1,12,761 ‐ ‐
Component 3: Platform for land based climate change adaptation measures suitable to drought prone areas
1,28,108 38,440 19,636 9,216 47,656
Output 3.1: Project lessons, results, and products (CCFS Curriculum, field testing methods, adaptation technology and practices manuals, and institutional approaches) documented and disseminated
1,28,108 38,440 19,636 9,216 47,656
Indicator a): Project lessons, results and products available on platform website with 100 visitors per month.
76,865 ‐ ‐
Indicator b): At least 3 dissemination workshops with at least 150 participants have been held by the end of the project
51,243 ‐ ‐
Project Management 90,470 2,54,263 90,845 44,640 2,98,904
Total 15,53,563 12,81,418 3,27,104 1,51,260 14,32,678