Government of Rajasthan Deptt. Watershed Development & Soil …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed... · 2019-12-15 · Gagarana Project is located in Merta Block,

Government of Rajasthan Deptt. Watershed Development & Soil Conservation District Watershed Development Unit, Nagaur

IWMP (2010-11) (Gagarana) Block :- Merta District :- Nagaur Project Area :- 6625 ha.

Project Cost :- Rs. 997.80 Lacs Convergence Cost :- Rs. 34.44 Lacs Total Cost :- Rs. 1032.24 Lacs Prakash Hatila S.R. Banjara Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer (L.R.) Panchayat Samiti, Merta cum Project Manager, DWDU, Nagaur

CHAPTER – VI EXPECTED OUT COMES1 2 3 4 5 6S.

No.Item Unit of measurement Pre-project Status

Expected Postproject Status

Remarks

1Status of water table (Depth to Ground

water level)Feet 450-680 400-630

2Ground water structures repaired/

rejuvenatedNo. Nill 9

3 Quality of drinking water Description Salty water Less Salty water4 Availability of drinking water Description 6 Month 10 Month5 Change in irrigated Area Ha 1852 21306 Change in cropping/ land use pattern Description Crop rotation7 Area under agricultural crop Ha 6028.22 6305

Area under single crop Ha 5181.04 5300Area under double crop Ha 1852.19 2130

Area under multiple crop Ha 208 Change in cultivated Area Ha 6028.22 63059 yield of major crops of area q/ha

Yield of Bajra q/ha 4.95 5.2Yield of Wheat q/ha 19.50 20.3Yield of Gram q/ha 7.10 7.8

Yield of Mustard q/ha 10.50 11.2510 production of major crops of area ton

Production of Bajra ton 543.5 586Production of Wheat ton 1640.15 1695Production of Gram ton 133.64 145

Production of Mustard ton 494.08 51011 Area under vegetation Ha Nill 2412 Area under horticulture Ha Nill 1513 Area under fuel Ha Nill 1014 Area under Fodder Ha Nill 2415 Fodder production Q 35600 4850016 Milk production Litres/day 1620 183017 SHGs Active No. Nill 2018 No. of livelihoods No. Nill 1519 Income Rs.in la 0.18 Lacs/year 0.36 Lacs/year20 Migration No. 686 Nil21 SHG Federations formed No. Nill 15

Location.Gagarana Project is located in Merta Block, of Nagour district. The project area is between the latitudes 26° to 26° 40' & longitudes 73° 46' to 73° 56'. It is at a distance of 25km from its Block head quarters and 105 Kms from the district head quarters. There are 7 no. of habitations in the Project area and other details are given below.

General features of watershed

S.No. Name of Project(as per GOI) Gagarana Unit(a) Name of Catchment luni

(b)Name of watershed area(local name) Gagarana

(C) Project Area 7138.05 Ha(d) Net treatable Area 6652 Ha(e) Cost of Project 997.8 Lacks(f) Cost/hectare 15000 Rs/ha(g) Year of Sanction 10-11 Year(h) Watershed Code 100

(I)No. of Gram Panchayats in project area 4

(j) No. of villages in project area 7(k) Type of Project Watershed(l) Elevation (metres) 380 to 280 msl

(m) Major streams luni river(n) Slope range (%) 1% to 2%

• CHAPTER – I INTRODUCTION

Mecro Micro Information Village Wise

Macro microCensus code of villages

Area

1829100 461.841829800 236.571829800 69.371833800 175.511833800 73.461829700 50.65

10 1833800 552.6111 1833800 302.65

1833800 269.601833900 250.961829700 561.341833900 417.64

3 1833900 416.721833900 2112.671834500 292.091840700 749.12

17 1 1834500 145.247138.04

GagaranaBasni Narsingh Barsingh

Gagarana

GanthiyaBasni Narsingh Barsingh

GanthiyaGanthiyaGanthiya

Name of Villages Covered

TunkliyaBasni SiyacharnaBasni Siyacharna

Ganthiya

GagaranaGanthiyaGagaranaGagaranaGagarana

GanthiyaGanthiyaGanthiyaGanthiyaGanthiya

Name of Gram Panchayat

TunkliyaGanthiyaGanthiyaGanthiya

16 1

11

15

6

8

9

13 1

2

GagaranaGagaranaLuniyasBargaonLuniyas

Total

BargaonBargaonBargaon

Digrame :- Area Covered in Macro/Micro

Micro 11/6 11/8 11/9 11/10 11/11 13/1 15/2 15/3 16/1 17/1Area 698.41 244.88 124.11 552.61 302.65 520.56 978.98 416.72 3153.88 145.24

S.No. AreaTreatble

Area Avalable in

1 749.12 748.122 437.33 420.833 3198.00 3112.004 1373.83 1342.335 305.94 242.64

6 611.99 385.247 461.84 400.84

7138.05 6652.00

31.5063.30

226.7561.00

486.05

Name of Villages Covered

Barren Rocky, stony waste,Industrial waste

& Minning

Total

BargaonLooniyasGagranaGanthiya

Basnisiya CharanaBasni Narsingh

BarsinghTukliya

1.0016.5086.00

10% 3% 2%

8%

4%

7%

14% 6%

44%

2%

Area 11/6

11/8

11/9

11/10

11/11

13/1

15/2

15/3

16/1

17/1

Digrame :- Area Covered in Village

Village Bargaon Looniyas Gagrana GanthiyaBasnisiya Charana

Basni Narsingh Barsingh

Tukliya

Area 748.12 420.83 3112.00 1342.33 242.64 385.24 400.84

The watershed falls in Agroclimatic Zone C3 The soil texture is Clay loam The average rainfall is 320 cm .The temperatures in the area are in the range between 35 to 48 centigrade during summer and 25 to 6 degree centigrade during winter. The major crops in the area are Mung, Bajara, Jawar, Til & Gawar. 84% land is under cultivation 10% land fallow, 7% land is wasteland. 26% land is irrigated through tube well. 59 No of households are BPL(1.72% households) 51 are landless households(1.48% households) and 2931 household are small and marginal farmers (85.33%household) .Average land holding in the area is 2.08ha. 26% area is single cropped area and 72.58% is double cropped. The main source of irrigation is tube well. The average annual rainfall (5 years) in the area is 320 mm. The Major streams in the Watershed are luni Basin. The major festivals in the village are Holi, Dipawali, Aksay tritaya & Raksa Bandhan. At present this villages is having 11651 population with Communities like Rajput Jat and Megawal.

11% 6%

47%

20%

4% 6% 6%

Area Bargaon

Looniyas

Gagrana

Ganthiya

Basnisiya Charana


Tukliya

Climatic and Hydrological information

123456789

10

2

s.no.

Year June july Aug SeptTotal in

four month

1 2002 32 13 69 2 1162 2003 25 121 177 28 3513 2004 8 103 240 13 3644 2005 85 148 7 108 3485 2006 44 89 68 24 2256 2007 40 208 60 31 3397 2008 80 106 122 73 3818 2009 19 45 66 70 2009 2010 18 195 204 123 540

10 2011 23 80 202 77 382

20102011

226397436

20052006200720082009

388548200

Average Monthly rainfall (last ten years)

1

162359396355

Year

200220032004

Average Annual Rainfall(mm)

Average Annual Rainfall(mm)

123

Max Min1 50 322 28 43 38 15

123

61

2

3Time of return of maximum flood

5 years 10 years In years

4Periodicity of Drought in

village4 2 6

0.080.02

Runoff

15 minute duration 30 minute duration

15 minute duration 65 mm

Peak Rate (cum/hr)Total run off volume of rainy season

(ha.m.)

SummerWinterRainy 0.06

5 Potential Evaporation Transpiration (PET) (mm/day)PET

60 minute duration

Season

4 Temperature (Degree C)Season

60 minute duration72 mm100 mm

30 minute duration

3Maximum rainfall intensity (mm)

Rainfall intensity(mm)Duration

Other Development Schemes in the project area

S.No SchemeName of the department

Key interventions under the Scheme

Targeted Beneficiaries

1 Narega Panchayat Simiti Employment 1100

2 TFC Panchayat Simiti Rural Dovelopment 70

3 SFC Panchayat Simiti Water Potability 34

Details of infrastructure in the project areasS.No

i

ii

iii

iv (P) (S) (HS) (VI)

9 4 - -

v

vi

vii

viii

ix

x

xi

xii (U) (S) (PA) (O) - - Nil -

xiii

xiv

xv

xvi

xvii

xviii

xix34

Nil

11

Nagaur3

NIL

-141

Nil4

cooperative society

NGOs

Credit institutions

(i) Bank

No. of villages with access to Agro-industries

1(ii) Cooperative Society

Agro Service Centre's

Total quantity of surplus milk

No. of milk collection centres

(e.g. Union(U)/ Society(S)/ Private agency(PA)/ others (O))

No. of villages with access to Anganwadi Centre

Any other facilities with no. of villages (please specify)

Nearest KVK

No. of villages with access to Primary Health Centre

No. of villages with access to Veterinary Dispensary

No. of villages with access to Post Office

No. of villages with access to Banks

No. of villages with access to Markets/ mandis

Provisions under the Scheme

Catgary 1 to 9 work

Sanitry & Dovelopment

Water Potability

Primary(P)/ Secondary(S)/ Higher Secondary(HS)/ vocational institution(VI)

78

Nil

Parameters Status

No. of villages connected to the main road by an allweather road

No. of villages provided with electricity

No. of households without access to drinking water

No. of educational (iv) institutions :

Institutional arrangements (SLNA,DWDU,PIA,WDT,WC, Secretary)DWDU Details

1S.No

12345

1S.No

1

2345

WDT Particulars:

S.NoName of WDT

memberM/F Age Qualification

Experience in watershed(Yrs)

Description of professional

trainingRole/ Function

1 Sawaisingh F 24L.S.A.

(Diploma) 2 YearVeterinary

Development

2 SyamLal F B.sc.(Agri.) 1 yearAgri.

Development34

E-mail [email protected]

Address with contact no., websiteAen watershed development & soil consvetion

Merta (Nagaur).Telephone 01590 220043Fax 01590 220511

2 3Particulars Details of DWDU

Name of PIA Aen Watershed

FaxE-mail

PIA particulars

01582 [email protected].

2 3Particulars

PM ,DWDUAddress with contact no., websiteTelephone

Details of DWDUDWDU Nagaur

Project menager of DWDU is XEn watershed01582 - 243270

1 Details of Watershed Committees (WC) Gagrana

S.No Name of WCsDate of Gram Sabha for WC

Date of Registration as

a Society (dd/mm/yy

Designation Name M/FSC/ST/OBC/

GeneralLandless/M

F/SF/BFName of UG/SHG

Educational qualification

President Mahendersing M Gen BFGovt.Land

Development 12th

Secretary Gitendersing M Gen MFGovt.Land

DevelopmentB.A.

Member Amarsing M Gen SFAgri.Land

Development 8th

Member Pappudas M OBC MFArable Land

Development 10th

Member Ravindersing M Gen MFNon Arable

Land Development

12th

Member Narmda Devi F SC -Non Arable

Land Development

5th

Member Jagadish M SC MF Technical 5th

Member Parhlad M Gen MF EPA 10th

Member Mohani F SC EPA 5th

Member Sivnarayan M Gen MFVeterinary

Development 8th

Member Manju Kanwar F Gen SHG 5th

Member Sinod Kanwar F Gen SHG 10th

Member Suman Kanwar F Gen Dairy 8th

1 Gagarana 27-6-2011

Not

Req

uire

d

2 Details of Watershed Committees (WC) Ganthiya



a Society (dd/mm/yy


GeneralLandless/M



President Ramjivan sarma M Gen MF EPA 8Secretary Ramniwas M SC MF M.A. Bed

Member Dharmaram M SC SFAgri.Land

Development

Member Parhladram M OBC MFNon Arable

Land Development

Member Purkharam M SC MF Arable Land

Development

Member Mularam M SC MFNon Arable

Land Development

8

Member Pancharam M SC MF Technical

Member Sayari Devi F OBCVeterinary

Development

Member Bhagawati Devi F SC SHGMember Durga Devi F SC SHG 10Member Rasali Devi F SC SHGMember Kiran Devi F Gen SHG 10

1 Gagarana 15-11-11

Not

Req

uire

d

3 Details of Watershed Committees (WC) Bargaon



a Society (dd/mm/yy


GeneralLandless/M



President Nandkisor m Gen MFAgri.Land

Development8

Secretary Sitaram M OBC MF B.A.

Member Jiwram M SC MFAgri.Land

Development

Member Purkharam M OBC MFNon Arable

Land Development

10

Member Bhivnath M OBC MF Govt. Land

Development5

Member Saroj F OBC SHGMember Sita Devi F OBC SHG 8Member Sarda Devi F SC SHGMember Baburi Devi F SC SHGMember Sumitra F SC SHGMember Ramchander M 5

1 Gagarana 15-11-11

Not

Req

uire

d

Problems and scope of improvement in the project area The socio economic conditions of the area can be improved through increased production which can be achieved through expansion in cultivated area and productivity enhancement. 38 ha land is arable wasteland and 847 ha is fallow can be brought under cultivation. 1852 ha is only irrigated and Having salti water which decreasing production season by season. With efforts this can be increased to 2600 ha. The productivity gap of major crops in the area as compared withdistrict and with areas in the same agro climatic zones indicate potential to increase the productivity. The demonstration of improved package of practices, improved varieties, increased irrigation facilities and soil conservation measures under the project can bridge this gap. Due to small land holdings in the area focus of the project would be on diversification in agriculture (horticulture, vegetables, green houses, Agro forestry, fodder crops)and diversification in Livelihoods(Agriculture, Animal husbandry, self employment)2458.85 Tonns fodder scarcity can be met out through Pasture development .Improved animal Husbandry practices can increase the productivity of livestock. 686 no of persons migrate due to Drought and unemployment .This migration can be checked through creation of employment opportunities in the project area through increase in production and diversification in agriculture and Livelihoods as mentioned above. Specific problem

1 Due to soil errosion and water erosion Productivity is low2 Lack of recharging of wells irrigated area decresing day by day3 Salty water in tubewells decreasing production per ha

CHAPTER – II Socio economic Features, Problems and ScopeTable 2.1 Population & Household Details:

Male Female Total SC ST1 Bargaon 1085 1009 2094 428 02 Looniyas 835 738 1573 67 03 Gagrana 2798 2606 5404 1598 04 Ganthiya 1077 1000 2077 917 05 Basnisiya Charana 134 134 268 59 06 Basni Narsingh Barsingh 111 124 235 0 07 Tukliya 972 919 1891 246 9

7012 6530 13542 3315 9

Digrame :- Population of Village



Tukliya

Population 2094 1573 5404 2077 268 235 1891

Total PopulationS. No.

Village

Total

15%

12%

40%

15%

2% 2% 14%

Population Bargaon

Looniyas

Gagrana

Ganthiya

Basnisiya Charana


Tukliya

BPL house hold

L. LessLarge

FarmerSmall

FarmerM. Farmer

Total house hold

SC house hold

ST house hold

1 Bargaon 7 6 57 61 333 457 86 02 Looniyas 3 3 37 65 204 309 15 03 Gagrana 33 28 215 435 556 1234 320 04 Ganthiya 13 11 123 128 644 906 183 05 Basnisiya Charana 2 2 12 9 176 199 12 06 Basni Narsingh Barsingh 0 0 9 7 14 30 0 07 Tukliya 1 1 166 133 300 49 2

59 51 453 871 2060 3435 665 2

Digrame :- Household of Village



Tukliya

Household 457 309 1234 906 199 30 300

Total

Household DetailsS.

No. Village

13% 9%

36%

26%

6% 1% 9%

Household Bargaon

Looniyas

Gagrana

Ganthiya

Basnisiya Charana


Tukliya

Table 2.2 Development indicators

S. No.

State Project

Area1 16260 135002 0.22 0.183 0.604 0.5404 921 93156

The table indicates poor socio economic conditions.

Table 2.3 Land Use Basnisiya Charana

Private Total190.25 190.2531.62 82.1415.81 15.81

110.65 110.6532.17 32.17

142.82 142.82

32.17 32.17

0.0050.640.00

12.66 14.53202.91 305.94

Land Use

Agriculture LandTemporary fallowPermanent Fallow

Panchayat

Waste LandPasturesOthersTotal

Cultivated RainfedCultivated irrigatedNet Sown Area

Net Area sown more than onceForest Land

Total area in Ha.Community

Sex Ratio Infant mortality rate

Maternal mortality ratio

Development Indicators

Per capita income (Rs.)Poverty ratio Literacy (%)

Government

50.52

50.64

0.001.871.87 101.16

Ganthiya

Private Total1168.41 1168.41121.33 121.3360.67 195.40

562.15 562.15424.26 424.26986.41 986.41424.26 424.26

0.0037.48 62.68

31.396.30 14.10

1174.71 1373.83

Bargaon

Private Total690.61 690.6176.41 76.4119.10 19.10

397.37 397.37197.73 197.73595.10 595.10197.73 197.73

0.0010.7113.42

1.00 34.38691.61 749.12

Land Use Total area in Ha. Panchayat Government Community

Permanent Fallow 10.11 124.62Cultivated Rainfed

Agriculture LandTemporary fallow


Cultivated irrigatedNet Sown Area

Others 3.60 4.20Total 45.10 149.82 4.20

Waste Land 25.20Pastures 31.39




Permanent FallowCultivated Rainfed



Others 33.38Total 13.42 10.71 33.38

Looniyas

Private Total378.86 378.8643.72 43.7210.93 10.93

215.78 215.78108.43 108.43324.21 324.21108.43 108.43

0.0012.1813.47

16.50 32.82395.36 437.33


Private Total472.54 472.5497.55 97.5548.89 48.89

195.54 195.54130.56 130.56326.10 326.10130.56 130.56

0.0087.174.86

44.36 47.42516.90 611.99






Others 12.14 4.18Total 25.61 12.18 4.18








Others 3.06Total 4.86 87.17 3.06

Gagrana

Private Total2730.48 2730.48189.60 189.6047.40 47.40

1548.20 1548.20945.28 945.28

2493.48 2493.48945.28 945.28

0.00276.7561.15

86.00 129.622816.48 3198.00

Tukliya

Private Total397.07 397.0777.42 77.426.73 43.71

299.16 299.1613.76 13.76

312.92 312.9213.76 13.76

0.0014.570.00

10.85 13.22407.92 461.84






Others 27.19 16.43Total 88.34 276.75 16.43





Permanent Fallow 36.98Cultivated Rainfed

Waste Land 14.57Pastures


Others 2.37Total 0.00 51.55 2.37

Compile

Private Total6028.22 6028.22637.65 688.17209.53 381.24

3328.85 3328.851852.19 1852.195181.04 5181.041852.19 1852.19

0.00 0.0037.48 514.700.00 124.29

177.67 286.096205.89 7138.05

Digrame :- Land Use

Land Use Private

Area 6205.89

Others 44.80 0.00 63.62Total 179.20 689.34 63.62

Forest Land 0.00 0.00 0.00Waste Land 0.00 477.22 0.00Pastures 124.29 0.00 0.00

Cultivated irrigated 0.00 0.00 0.00Net Sown Area 0.00 0.00 0.00Net Area sown more than once 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 50.52 0.00Permanent Fallow 10.11 161.60 0.00Cultivated Rainfed 0.00 0.00 0.00

Panchayat Government Community

179.2 689.34 63.62


Agriculture Land 0.00 0.00 0.00Temporary fallow

87%

2% 10%

1%

Area

Private

Panchayat

Government

Community

Digrame :- Land Use

Land UseAgriculture

LandTemporary

fallowPermanent

FallowCultivated

RainfedCultivated irrigated

Net Sown Area

Waste Land

Pastures Others

Area 6028.22 688.17 381.24 3328.85 1852.19 5181.04 514.70 124.29 286.09

33%

4%

2%

18%

10%

28%

3%

1% 1%

Area Agriculture Land

Temporary fallow

Permanent Fallow

Cultivated Rainfed

Cultivated irrigated

Net Sown Area

Waste Land

Pastures

Others

The project area has 38 ha of cultivable wasteland . 847 ha of fallow land (total 885ha) can be brought under cultivation if some irrigation source can be provided through Construction of WHS like Khadin, Tanka, Farm ponds etc. and also through demonstration of rainfed varieties of crops. Construction of WHS can also increase in area under irrigation which is only 12% 748 ha. (4 % of the project area)is under wastelands and can be brought under vegetative cover, with reasonable effort Activities like Earthen check dams, Vegetative filter strip, V-ditches, staggered trenches ,WHS (Johad) Afforestation of wastelands and Pasture development will be taken up on these landsPasture development the land use table shows that there is 124.29 hectare pasture land (2%)This emphasizes the need for taking up pastureland development works through sowing of promising species of grasses and plantation

Table 2.4 .a Agriculture and Horticulture status and fuel availability.

Varieties Area (ha)Production

(Ton)Productivity

(kg/ha)Varieties Area (ha)

Production (Ton)

Productivity (kg/ha)

Area (ha)Production

(Ton)1 Kharif 3328.85 Bajara 1097.98 543.50 495.00 Cotton 541.10 94.69 175.00 1639.08 638.19

Mung 1864.43 369.16 198.00 Mung 168.22 33.31 198.00 2032.65 402.46Moth 366.44 76.95 210.00 Saesmum 376.44 55.71 148.00 742.88 132.67

2 Rabi 1852.19 Wheat 841.10 1640.15 1950.00 841.10 1640.15Gram 188.22 133.64 710.00 188.22 133.64Musterd 470.55 494.08 1050.00 470.55 494.08Cumin 282.33 70.58 250.00 282.33 70.58

3 Zaid 0.00 0.000.00 0.00

Total 5181.04 3328.85 989.61 903.00 2867.96 2522.15 4481.00 6196.81 3511.76

The farmers are using traditional varieties of Bajra, whereas varieties like HHB 50,Raj 171, RHB 121 & WCC 75 can increase the production.The farmers are using traditional varieties of Mung, whereas varieties like Pusa 105 & Pioneer can increase the production.The farmers are using traditional varieties of Wheet, whereas varieties like Raj 1482,3077 can increase the production.

1852.19Nil

Cropping Status

S. No.

SeasonCrop sown

Rain fed Irrigated Total

Table 2.4.b Abstract of cropped Area(ha)Area under Single cropArea under Double cropArea under Multiple crop

5181.04

Crop wise Kharif CropsCrop Cotton Bajara Mung MothArea 541.10 1097.98 2032.65 366.44

Digrame no :- 2.3.1 Kharif crops (Net sown Area)

Crop wise Rabi cropsCrop wheat Gram MusterdArea 841.10 188.22 470.55

Digrame no :- 2.3.2 Rabi crops (Net sown Area)

Cumin282.33

Saesmum376.44

12%

25%

46%

8% 9%

Area

Cotton

Bajara

Mung

Moth

Saesmum

47%

11% 26%

16%

Area

wheat

Gram

Musterd

Cumin

Crop RotationBajra - WheatBajra - FallowMoong - MusteredMoong - FallowFallow - JeeraFallow - IsabgoalFallow - LucernCluster Bean - FallowFallow - TarameeraTil - FallowMoth - Fallow

The table 2.3 shows that only 1852 ha is (27%) is double cropped area. Also the crop rotation shows that fallow lands are there. This indicates that there is scope for change in crop rotation in fields where there are fallow lands through Soil and Water conservation measures, crop demonstration and diversification in agriculture. Soil and Water conservation measures besides putting fallow lands under cultivation can Soil and Water conservation measures

Table 2.4.c Productivity Gap Analysis (The table can also be given in bar chart form)

IndiaHighest Average

in Rajasthan

Highest Average of Agro climatic

zone District Project Area

Bajara 802 655 498 507 495Mung 317 159 210 200 198Moth 144 122 205 271 180cotton 362 317 190 258 175Wheat 2619 2762 1995 2292 1950Gram 808 443 715 905 710Cumin 285 387 265 292 250

Musterd 1177 1232 1050 1320 1050Sesamum 310 149 160 172 148

Name of the crop

Productivity kg/ha

Analysis of the above table indicate that besides national gap there is wide gap in productivity within state and even within same agro climatic zones. The reasons for this variation are• The farmers are using Treditional varieties of Bajra. Whereas the recommended varieties like HHB 50,Raj 171, RHB 121 & WCC 75 provide 4 times yield.• The farmers are using Treditional varieties of Mung. Whereas the recommended varieties like Pusa 105 & Pioneer provide 4 times yield.• The farmers are using Treditional varieties of Wheat. Whereas the recommended varieties like Raj 1482 & Raj 3077 provide 4 times yield.• Lack of Availability of good quality seeds of desired crop and variety in adequate quantities and time to the farmers.• Availability of water for cultivation(27% is irrigated table 2.3)The productivity gap and reasons of it indicate potential to increase the productivity through crop demonstration .Crop demonstrations would be carried out on improved crops/ varieties, improved agronomic practices. INM, IPM, Mixed cropping, distribution of fodder seed mini kit. Demonstration of improved methods and economics of fodder crops cultivation and also distribution foundation seeds of Forage Crops for further multiplication, introduction of fodder crops in the existing crop rotations.

Digrame :- Agriculture status.Cumin Productivity (Kg/Ha)

India Rajasthan Nagaur Gagarana285 387 292 170

0 50

100 150 200 250 300 350 400

India Rajasthan Nagaur Gagarana Series1

Digrame :- Agriculture status.Cotton Productivity (Kg/Ha) Bajara Productivity (Kg/Ha)Botenical Name Gossipium species Botenical Name Pennisetum americanumFamily Malvaceae Family GramineaeOrigen India Origen India / Africa

India Rajasthan Nagaur Gagarana India Rajasthan Nagaur Gagarana362 317 258 175 802 655 507 495

Mung Productivity (Kg/Ha) Moth Productivity (Kg/Ha)Botenical Name Vigna radiata Botenical Name Phaseolus sconlitifoliousFamily Leguminaceae Family LeguminaceaeOrigen India Origen India


Ref. :- VITAL Ag. Statistics & base line survey. Study by Omprakash Ahalavat

0

100

200

300

400

India Rajasthan Nagaur Gagarana Series1 0

200

400

600

800

1000


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350


0

50

100

150

200

250

300


Digrame :- Agriculture status.Wheat Productivity (Kg/Ha) Gram Productivity (Kg/Ha)Botenical Name Triticum species Botenical Name Cice arietinumFamily Gramineae Family LeguminaceaeOrigen India Origen South West Asia


Sesamum Productivity (Kg/Ha) Musterd Productivity (Kg/Ha)Botenical Name Sesamum indicum Botenical Name Brassica compestriesFamily Pedaliaceae Family CruferaeOrigen Africa Origen India


Ref. :- VITAL Ag. Statistics & base line survey. Study by Omprakash Ahalavat

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000


200

400

600

800

1000


0

100

200

300

400


500

1000

1500


Table 2.5 Existing area under horticulture/Vegetables/Floriculture (ha)

Area Species Varieties Recommended varieties Production

Nill Nill Nill Grafted Ber, Gola, Sav 12 Qt./Ha.

Nill Nill Nill Gwar Phali 20 Qt./Ha.

Ker, Kumth 15 Kg./per plant.

Nill Nill Nill Nill NillNill Nill Nill Esbgol 2.5 Qt/Ha

Table 2.6 Land holding Pattern in project area

Irrigated (source) Rainfed Total General SC ST OBC BPL

(i)Large farmer 453 1052 785 1837 680 330 0 827 0(ii) Small farmer 871 634 1865.42 2499.42 925 450 0 1124 0

(iii) Marginal farmer 2060 166.19 648.2 814.39 307 145 0 362 0

(iv) Landless person 51 0 0 0 0 0 0

(V)No. of BPL households 59 30.23 30.23 0 0 0 0 30

Total 3435 1852.19 3328.85 5181.04 1912 925 0 2313 0

Type of FarmerTotal

House holds

Land holding (ha) irrigation source wise Land holding (ha)Social group wise

Activity

Horticulture

Vegetables

FloricultureMedicinal Plants

50% land holdings belong to small and marginal farmers who own 63% of total cultivated area. Horticulture/vegetables could be more economical to Small and marginal farmers with irrigation source. For large farmers with no irrigation facility Horticulture/vegetables will be promoted in a part of land with farm pond/Tanka construction. The following activities will be more beneficial for small land holdings and for diversification and income for large farmersHorticulture plantation, Medicinal and Aromatic Crops, floriculture: As discussed earlier . Horticulture/vegetables could be more economical to Small and marginal farmers with irrigation source. Also the project area has good potential for medicinal & aromatic crops like Sonamukhi, Isabgol, Ashwagandha, Khus, Mehandi etc.Agro forestry plantation: To increase the income of farmers and also for shelter belt plantation as wind velocity is high in the project area.Setting of Vermi Compost Units - Keeping in view the side effect of residues of chemicals and fertilizers on human health the emphasis would be on cultivation of organic produce through motivating farmers and providing assistance for production of organic input, vermi compost.Production and distribution of quality seed – There is need to ensure that good quality seed is available for cultivators for which adequate seed production would be initiated in watershed areas with the assistance of private sector and agriculture department technologies Sprinklers and pipelines for efficient water management practices emphasis on demonstration of sprinklers with adequate financial support and convergence/private partnership.Establishment of Green House - For growing off season vegetables seedlings and other horticultural crops under controlled atmospheric conditions of green house.Establishment of nurseries: Most of the planting material is procured from other parts of the State/ country. The procurement of planting material from distant places causes damage to the planting material and often results in untimely supply. Hence nursery development activity in area.Innovative hi-tech/ export oriented activities: innovative hi-tech/ export oriented projects like mushroom cultivation, floriculture, etc which are in negligible existence at present, can be implemented by individual farmers / private companies.Drip irrigation - Drip irrigation will be promoted in all horticulture plantations, vegetables, green houses and in nurseries for rational use of irrigation higher yields and quality produce.

Table 2.7 Livestock Status - animals/milk production / average yield.

S.No. Description of animals Population in No. Yield(milk/mutton/W

ool) Equ. cow units

Dry matter requirement per year (7Kg per

animal.)

Total requirement in M.T.

1 Cows MilkIndigenous 435 304.5 5 1111425 1111.425

Hybrid 177 265.5 Nil 452235 452.2352 Buffaloes 398 796 3 1016890 1016.893 Goat 1270 254 635 1390650 1390.65

Wool 04 Sheep 1810 905 905 1981950 1981.955 Camel 18 9 Nil 65700 65.76 Poultry Nil NA 07 Piggery Nil NA 0

Total 4108 6018850 6018.85

In spite of the large number of livestock, production is less hence increase in productivity across all species, is a major challenge. To reduce production of unproductive cattle and improve the productivity by improving the breeds by breeding managementfollowing activities will be taken up• Castration• Artificial insemination• Distribution of superior Breeding bulls for use in Cattle and Buffalo• Breeding distribution crossbred ramsBesides breed improvement other animal husbandry practices like better health, hygiene and feeding practices can increase productivity of livestock. Hence Activities like Animal health camps, Urea-Molasses treatment demonstration ,demonstration of improved methods of conservation and utilization of Forage crops are proposed.

Table 2.8 Existing area under fodder (ha)S.No Item Unit Area/Quantity

1 Existing Cultivable area under Fodder Ha Nil2 Production of Green fodder Tonns/year 2503 Production of Dry fodder Tonns/ Year 33104 Area under Pastures Ha Nil5 Production of fodder Tonns/year 35606 Existing area under Fuel wood Ha Nil7 Supplementary feed Kgs/ day 28 Silage Pits No Nil9 Availability of fodder Tonns 356010 Deficiency/excess of fodder Tonns 2458.85

The table above shows there is fodder deficiency (Requirement is 6018.85 and availability 3560)To minimize the large and expanding gap between feed and fodder resource availability and demand there is need for• Increase in area under fodder crops• Increase in productivity of fodder crops• Development of pastures• And reduction in large number of livestock production through replacement by few but productive animals

Table 2.9 Agriculture implements1 2 3

S. No Implements Nos.1 Tractor 602 Sprayers-manual/ power 2003 Cultivators/Harrows 604 Seed drill 605 Any Other 50

Farm mechanization and seed banks: As discussed earlier 85% land holdings belong to small and marginal farmers who own only 78% of total cultivated area so owning of big farm implements by individual farmers is not economical so SHG would be promoted to buy farm implements and rent to farmer

Table 2.10 NREGA Status - No. of Card Holder, activities taken so far, employment status.

S.No. Name of village Total No .of job cards

Employment Status

1 Bargaon 513 20%2 Looniyas 390 18%3 Gagrana 1128 22%4 Ganthiya 425 19%5 Basnisiya Charana 68 15%

6Basni Narsingh

Barsingh25 15%

7 Tukliya 270 23%Total 2819

Table 2.11 Migration Details

Name of village No. of persons migrating

No. of days per year of migration

Major reason(s) for migrating

Distance of destination of

migration from the village (km)

Occupation during

migration

Income from such

occupation (Rs. in lakh)

Bargaon 91 4 months Unemployment 25 0.135Looniyas 62 5 months Unemployment 28 0.135Gagrana 246 2 months Unemployment 20 0.135Ganthiya 181 4 months Unemployment 28 0.135

Basnisiya Charana 40 2 months Unemployment 30 0.135Basni Narsingh

Barsingh6 3 months Unemployment 30 0.135

Tukliya 60 4 months Unemployment 38 0.135Total 686

The migration can be check by creation of employment opportunities, enhancing farm level economy, increases the income of the people engaged in animal husbandry by dairy, poultry and marketing and value addition. (As discussed earlier) and diversification in livelihoods . The existing livelihoods Village are given belowTable 2.12 (a)Major activities (On Farm)

No of House holds3384NillNillNill51

Road, Nadi, Categary 8

Activity taken up so far

Road, Nadi, Categary 4Road, Nadi, Categary 5Road, Nadi, Categary 6Road, Nadi, Categary 7



Average annual income from the15500

NillNill

13500

Name of activitycultivatorsDairyingPoultryPiggery

Landless Agri. Labourers

Nill

Table 2.12 (b) Major activities (Off Farm)

Name of activity Households / individuals

Artisans 5Carpenter 22Blacksmith 10Leather Craft 8Porter 9 Mason 45Others specify (Cycle Repair ,STD,Craft etc)

12

The efforts for increase in income through off farm activities will be made under livelihood component through assistance to SHG or individuals

6000036000

Average annual income from the

2800035000370002200018500

II. Technical Features

Table 2.14 Ground Water

S.No Source No. Functional depth Dry Area

irrigatedWater

availability(days)

i) Dug wells 105 80-100 Fit 105 Nill Nill

ii) Shallow tube wells 0 0 0 0 0

iii) Pumping sets 0 0 0 0 0iv) Deep Tube Wells 127 450 -680 Fit 8 1316.18 365

Total 232 0 113 1316.18 365

Table 2.15 Availability of drinking water

S.No Name of the village

Drinking water

requirement Ltrs/day

Present availability of

drinking water

Ltrs/day

No. of drinking water

sources available

No. functional

No. requires repairs

No. defunct

1 Bargaon 10470 5826 1 Nadi 1 1 02 Looniyas 7865 3955 1 Nadi 1 1 03 Gagrana 27020 10525 2 Nadi 1 2 04 Ganthiya 10385 Nil Nil 0 1 05 Basnisiya Charana 1340 Nil Nil 0 1 06 Basni Narsingh Barsingh 1175 Nil Nil 0 1 07 Tukliya 9455 2310 1 Nadi 1 1 0

Table 2.16 Water Use efficiency

through water saving

devices(Drip/Sprinklers)

through water conserving agronomic practices#

Any other (pl. specify) Total

35 Nil Nil 353 Nil Nil 3

• The tables above indicate need for judicious use of available Water.• Encouraging optimum use of water through installation of sprinklers on every operational wells

Table 2.17 Slope details.

S.No. Area in hectares1 64822 1703 Nil4 Nil

As most of the area has slope less than 3% construction of contour bunds can solve the problemof water erosion in agriculture fields and protect washing of top soil and manures/fertilisers

Slope percentage0 to 3%3 to 8%8 to 25%> 25%

Slope of Watershed

Name of major crop

WheatCumin

Area (Hectare)

Table 2.18 Water BudgetingTable 2.18 (a) Total available runoff(cum) use Stranges table

Macro/Micro Area Type of Catchment Total Runoff

11/6 698.41 Good 163427.9411/8 244.88 Good 57301.9211/9 124.11 Good 29041.74

11/10 552.61 Good 129310.7411/11 302.65 Good 70820.113/1 520.56 Average 9109815/2 978.98 Average 171321.515/3 416.72 Average 7292616/1 3153.88 Average 55192917/1 145.24 Average 25417Total 7138.04 1362593.94

Table 2.18 (b) Details of already stored runoff(Surface Water structuresS.No. No.

1 Nil2 Nil3 134 1

14

STORAGE OF RUNOFF BY PROPOSED STRUCTURES

S.No. Name of Structure No. Storage Capacity

1 MMS 9 1536215362

Table 2.18 (c) Balance available runoff (cum)

Net tapped Runoff

2128122

The water budgeting indicates potential for water harvesting in the area

Total

234234234234234

112760

Yield of runoff from catchment per ha.(cum.) use Stranges

table

2045

Total run off

11362593.94

Name Major Irrigation Project

Medium Irrigation ProjectNadi

AnicutsTotal

175175175175175

Balance Run off

31234471.94

% Runoff trapped

49.40

Storage Capacity (cum)NilNil

10236010400

Area irrigated (ha)NilNilNilNil

Table 2.19 Soil details

AS.No.

1

BS.No.

123

C Soil fertility Status Kg/haN 25P 15K 135

Micronutrients PPM0.2

The analysis of table shows need to improve and maintain soil fertility. Soil health card to everyfarmer every crop season will be provided, which will include the recommendation for Applicationmicro nutrient and fertilizers

Recommended7756

300.

0.6

Soil Depth :Depth (Cms.)0.00 to 7.50

7.50 to 45.00> 45.00

Area in hectares1147.874591.49

Soil ProfileMajor Soil Classes

Sandy loam 5739.36 Area in hectares

Table 2.20 Erosion details

Cause Type of erosionArea

affected (ha)

Run off(mm/y

ear)

a Sheet 3571 300b Rill 720 300c Gully 414 300

4705

The need is:• To check land degradation• To reduce excessive biotic pressure by containing the number and increase of livestock• To check cultivation on sloping lands without adequate precautions of soil and waterconservation measures• To discourage cultivation along susceptible nallah beds• To check Faulty agriculture techniques• To check Uncontrolled grazing and developed cattle tracks• To check Deforestation of steep slopes• To check erosive velocity of runoff, store Runoff, to arrest silt carried by runoff and to rechargeGround Water structures life Earthen check dams, gully plugs, Bank Stabilisation, Loose stonecheck Dams, Gabions, Earthen embankment (Nadi) and Anicuts would be taken up.

Wind erosionTotal for project

Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ year)

Sub-Total 10108.5

5356.514403312

Erosion status in project Area

Water erosion

CHAPTER - III Proposed Development Plan: The Activities are indicative addition/deletion in activities will be as per local conditions(A) Preparatory phase activities Capacity Building Trainings and EPA

The IEC activities like Kalajathas, Group meetings, door to door campaign, slogans and wallwritings etc. were carried out in all the habitations of ten Micro Watershed. A series of meetings were conducted with GP members, community and discussed about the implementation of IWMP programme. User groups were also formed.Grama Sabhas were conducted for approval of EPA (Village), for selecting the watershedcommittee and approval of DPR.

S. No.Date on

which Grama 1 27-6-20112 20-6-20113 15-11-2011

Name of the Gram Panchayat

GagranaBargaonGanthiya

1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

S. No.

Amount earmarked

for EPAEntry Point Activities planned

Estimated cost

Expenditure incurred

Balance Expected outcome Actual outcome

1 4.49Water management &

Arrangement of pure potable water at water source

4.49 1.25 3.24Village public will happy and trust to our project activity &

creation of awareness

Pure water will be avalable through out the year for drinking

purpose



2.52 0 2.52

3 18.67

Water management & Arrangement of pure potable water at water source , water

source development

18.67 14 4.67Village public will happy and trust to our project activity &

creation of awareness

Pure water will be avalable through out the year for drinking

purpose



8.05 0 8.05



1.46 0 1.46



2.31 0 2.31



2.41 0 2.41

39.91 39.91 15.25 24.66

Ganthiya

Basnisiya Charana


Tukliya

Names of village

Bargaon

Looniyas

Gagrana

2

The PRA exercise was carried out in all the villages on the dates shown below:

S. No.

1234567

Transact walk were carried out involving the community for Social mapping, Resource mapping. Detailed discussions anddeliberations with all the primary stakeholders were carried out.Socio-economic survey was carried out during May 2011 to Des. 2011 (dates) period covering all the households and primary dataon demography, Land holdings, Employment status, Community activities etc. was collected as mentioned in chapter 2.

State remote sensing department was assigned the work of preparing various thematic layers using Cartosat-1 and LISS-3imageries for Creation, development and management of geo-spatial database depicting present conditions of land (terrain), water and vegetation with respect to watershed under different ownerships at village level

Various thematic layers provided by SRSAC are :• Delineation of Macro/Micro watershed boundaries.• Digitised Khasara maps of the villages falling in project area.• Network of Drainage lines, existing water bodies, falling in the project area.• Base maps (transport network, village/boundaries, and settlements).• Land Use / Land cover map.• Contours at 1 meter interval, slope mapBased on GIS thematic layers, Field visits , PRA and analysis of benchmark data (as discussed in chapter 2) final Treatment plan on revenue map for implementation has been framed. Thus each intervention identified has been marked on revenue map (map enclosed in DPR as annexure------).The GIS based intervention map, PRA based intervention map are annexed as ------.

05-06-2012

05-08-201221/4/201205-01-201205-05-2012

04-05-2012

04-06-2012

Date on which PRA conducted

Bargaon

Gagrana

Tukliya

Name of the village/Habitation

Basnisiya CharanaBasni Narsingh Barsingh

Looniyas

Ganthiya

MMS Plan

1 Mandir Tunkliya 1 5.58 372 340 Tunkliya 1 4.00 273 339 Tunkliya 1 4.00 274 348 Tunkliya 1 3.35 225 663 Tunkliya 1 3.71 256 664 Tunkliya 1 4.57 307 656 Tunkliya 1 8.14 548 633 Tunkliya 1 7.34 49

8 40.69 271

15/2 9 3247 Gagarana 1 6.90 46

Grand Total 9 47.59 317

LSCD Plan

LocationVillage Name

0.35 7 2.45 16.330.30 7 2.100 14.000.25 7 1.75 11.670.20 7 1.40 9.33

Total 1.10 28.00 7.70 51.33

Micro no

MMS No.

No Cost Area

11/6

Total

Unit Cost Unit No Total Cost

11/6

Near kh.no Village Name

AreaMicro no

Tunkliya

Arable conservation Gagarana

According to land topography and contour mep of watershed we came to know that maximum Land holdingas per cultivator is 2 Ha to 15 ha Such that we prescribe earthen bunds for treatment of arable land

(A)Land Holding

Area Unit cost No Total cost Treated areaLand Holding

Area Unit cost No Total cost Treated areaHa Ha2 0.77 17 13.09 34 2 0.51 18 9.18 365 1.07 15 16.05 75 5 0.62 15 9.3 7510 1.53 10 15.3 100 10 0.8 5 4 5015 1.75 4 7 60 15 0.7 5 3.5 7520 2.05 4 8.2 80 20 0.75 3 2.25 60

50 59.64 349 46 28.23 296

(B)Land Holding


Area Unit cost No Total cost Treated areaHa Ha10 1.65 4 6.6 40 10 0.89 5 4.45 5015 1.96 3 5.88 45 15 0.79 2 1.58 3020 2.38 1 2.38 20 20 0.91 1 0.91 20

8 14.86 105 8 6.94 100

112109.67

850

Earthen Bund with waste weir Only Waste weirMore then 1% slope

Total No.Total cost

Total area treated by earhen bund

Earthen Bund with waste weir Only Waste weirLess then 1% slope

Arable conservation Bargonw


(A)Land Holding


Area Unit cost No Total cost Treated areaHa Ha2 0.77 5 3.85 10 2 0.51 5 2.55 105 1.07 5 5.35 25 5 0.62 5 3.1 2510 1.53 5 7.65 50 10 0.8 6 4.8 6015 1.75 4 7 60 15 0.7 3 2.1 4520 2.05 4 8.2 80 20 0.75 3 2.25 60

23 32.05 225 22 14.8 200

(B)Land Holding



8 14.55 100 7 6.15 85

6067.55610


Total No.Total cost



Arable conservation Ganthiya


(A)Land Holding


Area Unit cost No Total cost Treated areaHa Ha2 0.77 7 5.39 14 2 0.51 7 3.57 145 1.07 7 7.49 35 5 0.62 7 4.34 3510 1.53 7 10.71 70 10 0.8 5 4 5015 1.75 4 7 60 15 0.7 3 2.1 4520 2.05 4 8.2 80 20 0.75 3 2.25 60

29 38.79 259 25 16.26 204

(B)Land Holding



8 14.55 100 8 6.94 100

7076.54663


Total No.Total cost



Arable conservation Tunkliya


(A)Land Holding


Area Unit cost No Total cost Treated areaHa Ha2 0.77 2 1.54 4 2 0.51 2 1.02 45 1.07 2 2.14 10 5 0.62 2 1.24 1010 1.53 0 0 0 10 0.8 0 0 015 1.75 0 0 0 15 0.7 0 0 020 2.05 0 0 0 20 0.75 0 0 0

4 3.68 14 4 2.26 14

(B)Land Holding


Area Unit cost No Total cost Treated areaHa Ha10 1.65 1 1.65 10 10 0.89 2 1.78 2015 1.96 0 0 15 0.79 0 020 2.38 0 0 20 0.91 0 0

1 1.65 10 2 1.78 20

119.3758


Total No.Total cost



Area CostProposed Development Plan 6652 997.8

(A)

Qua

ntity Total

Cost

Cost

from

Pr

ojec

t Fun

d

Conv

erge

nce

Fund

Bene

ficia

ry

Cont

ribut

ion

Admn. 99.78 99.78 99.78Monitoring 9.978 9.978 9.978Evaluation 9.978 9.978 9.978

EPA 39.912 39.912 39.912I & CB 49.89 49.89 49.89DPR 9.978 9.978 9.978

Total (A) 219.52 219.52 219.52

Total

UnitUnit Cost

Activity

Preparatory phase activities capacity building trainings & EPA

(B)

Qua

ntity Total

Cost

Cost

from

Pr

ojec

t Fun

d

Conv

erge

nce

Fund

Bene

ficia

ry

Cont

ribut

ion

Qua

ntity Total Cost

Cost

from

Pr

ojec

t Fun

d

Conv

erge

nce

Fund

Bene

ficia

ry

Cont

ribut

ion

Qua

ntity Total

Cost

Cost

from

Pr

ojec

t Fun

d

Conv

erge

nce

Fund

Bene

ficia

ry

Cont

ribut

ion

Earthen Bund 253 0.00 100 109.67 109.67 0.00 73 67.55 67.55 0.00 80 76.54 76.54 0.00

Tanka (Gen & OBC) 57 1.52 30 45.60 45.60 0.00 4.56 14 21.28 21.28 0.00 2.13 13 19.76 19.76 0.00 1.98

Tanka (SC,ST& BPL) 33 1.52 20 30.40 30.40 0.00 1.52 7 10.64 10.64 0.00 0.53 6 9.12 9.12 0.00 0.46

Khet talai Kachi (Gen & OBC) 10 1.00 5 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.50 2 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.20 3 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.30

Khet talai Kachi (SC,ST& BPL) 5 1.00 3 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.15 1 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.05 1 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.05

Khet talai Paki (Gen & OBC) 15 1.54 10 15.40 15.40 0.00 1.54 2 3.08 3.08 0.00 0.31 3 4.62 4.62 0.00 0.46

Khet talai Paki (SC,ST& BPL) 9 1.54 5 7.70 7.70 0.00 0.39 2 3.08 3.08 0.00 0.15 2 3.08 3.08 0.00 0.15

Renovation of Khet talai 1 9.65 1 9.65 9.65 0.00 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 226.42 226.42 0.00 9.62 108.63 108.63 0.00 3.37 117.12 117.12 0.00 3.40

Pasture Development 3 6.17 1 6.17 6.17 1 6.17 6.17 1 6.17 6.17V - ditch 3 1.13 1 1.13 1.13 1 1.13 1.13 1 1.13 1.13

Total 7.30 7.3 0 0 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00

MMS 1 6.9 1 6.90 6.90 0.00 0.00LSCD Total 1 6.90 6.90 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Grand Total (B) 1 240.62 240.62 0.00 9.62 0 115.93 115.93 0.00 3.37 0 124.42 124.42 0.00 3.40

Conservation measures for arable land(private land)

Conservation measures for non arable land

Drainage line treatment

Natural resource management (56%)

Activity UnitUnit Cost

Gagaran Bargonw Ganthiya

(B)

Qua

ntity Total

Cost

Cost

from

Pr

ojec

t Fun

d

Conv

erge

nce

Fund

Bene

ficia

ry

Cont

ribut

ion

Qua

ntity Total Cost

Cost

from

Pr

ojec

t Fun

d

Conv

erge

nce

Fund

Bene

ficia

ry

Cont

ribut

ion

Earthen Bund 11 0.00 11 9.37 9.37 0.00 264 263.13 263.13 0.00 0.00Tanka (Gen & OBC) 4 1.52 4 6.08 6.08 0.00 0.61 61 92.72 92.72 0.00 9.27Tanka (SC,ST& BPL) 1 1.52 1 1.52 1.52 0.00 0.08 34 51.68 51.68 0.00 2.58

Khet talai Kachi (Gen & OBC) 2 1.00 2 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.20 12 12.00 12.00 0.00 1.20

Khet talai Kachi (SC,ST& BPL) 0 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.25Khet talai Paki (Gen & OBC) 2 1.54 2 3.08 3.08 0.00 0.31 17 26.18 26.18 0.00 2.62Khet talai Paki (SC,ST& BPL) 0 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 13.86 13.86 0.00 0.69

Renovation of Khet talai 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 9.65 9.65 0.00 0.97Total 20 22.05 22.05 0.00 1.19 403 474.22 474.22 0.00 17.58

Pasture Development 1 6.17 1 6.17 6.17 4 24.68 24.68V - ditch 1 1.13 1 1.13 1.13 4 4.52 4.52

Total 2 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 8 29.20 29.20 0.00 0.00

MMS 8 0.00 8 40.69 40.69 9 47.59 47.59LSCD 28 0.00 28 7.70 7.70 28 7.70 7.70Total 36 48.39 48.39 0.00 0.00 37 55.29 55.29 0.00 0.00

Grand Total (B) 58 77.74 77.74 0.00 1.19 448 558.71 558.71 0.00 17.58






Tunkliya Total

(C)

Qua

ntity Total

Cost

Cost

from

Pr

ojec

t Fun

d

Conv

erge

nce

Fund

Bene

ficia

ry

Cont

ribut

ion

Qua

ntity Total Cost

Cost

from

Pr

ojec

t Fun

d

Conv

erge

nce

Fund

Bene

ficia

ry

Cont

ribut

ion

Qua

ntity Total

Cost

Cost

from

Pr

ojec

t Fun

d

Conv

erge

nce

Fund

Bene

ficia

ry

Cont

ribut

ion

Pasture Development (Gen & OBC)

0.35 3 1.05 1.05 0.63 0.21 2 0.70 0.70 0.42 0.14 2 0.70 0.70 0.42 0.14

Pasture Development (SC,ST& BPL)

0.33 2 0.66 0.66 0.42 0.07 2 0.66 0.66 0.42 0.07 2 0.66 0.66 0.42 0.07

Horticulture plantation (Gen & OBC)

0.35 52 18.20 18.20 10.92 3.64 20 7.00 7.00 4.20 1.40 21 7.35 7.35 4.41 1.47

Horticulture plantation (SC,ST& BPL)

0.33 28 9.24 9.24 5.88 0.92 12 3.96 3.96 2.52 0.40 9 2.97 2.97 1.89 0.30

Compost Pit (Gen & OBC) 0.04 95 3.80 3.80 0.76 50 2.00 2.00 0.40 50 2.00 2.00 0.40Compost Pit (SC,ST& BPL) 0.04 31 1.24 1.24 0.12 23 0.92 0.92 0.09 30 1.20 1.20 0.12

Vermi compost (Gen & OBC) 0.33 15 4.95 4.95 0.99 8 2.64 2.64 0.53 10 3.30 3.30 0.66

Vermi compost (SC,ST& BPL) 0.33 5 1.65 1.65 0.17 3 0.99 0.99 0.10 3 0.99 0.99 0.10Crop Demonstration (Gen

& OBC) 0.02 250 5.00 5.00 1.00 60 1.20 1.20 0.24 60 1.20 1.20 0.24Crop Demonstration (SC,ST&

BPL) 0.02 250 5.00 5.00 0.50 60 1.20 1.20 0.12 60 1.20 1.20 0.12

Kitchen Garden (Gen & OBC) 0.02 16 0.32 0.32 0.06 5 0.10 0.10 0.02 5 0.10 0.10 0.02Kitchen Garden (SC,ST& BPL) 0.02 15 0.30 0.30 0.03 5 0.10 0.10 0.01 5 0.10 0.10 0.01

Total 51.41 51.41 17.85 8.47 21.47 21.47 7.56 3.51 21.77 21.77 7.14 3.64(C) Micro Enterprise

(D) Consolidation Grand Total 292.03 292.03 17.85 18.09 137.40 137.40 7.56 6.88 146.19 146.19 7.14 7.04

Production measures for arable land

Production System (10%), Micro enterprise(9%) & Consolidation (3%)Ganthiya


Gagaran Bargonw

(C)

Qua

ntity Total

Cost

Cost

from

Pr

ojec

t Fun

d

Conv

erge

nce

Fund

Bene

ficia

ry

Cont

ribut

ion

Qua

ntity Total

Cost

Cost

from

Pr

ojec

t Fun

d

Conv

erge

nce

Fund

Bene

ficia

ry

Cont

ribut

ion

Pasture Development (Gen & OBC)

0.35 1 0.35 0.35 0.21 0.07 8 2.80 2.80 1.68 0.56


0.33 1 0.33 0.33 0.21 0.03 7 2.31 2.31 1.47 0.23


0.35 8 2.80 2.80 1.68 0.56 101 35.35 35.35 21.21 7.07


0.33 1 0.33 0.33 0.21 0.03 50 16.50 16.50 10.50 1.65

Compost Pit (Gen & OBC) 0.04 2 0.08 0.08 0.02 197 7.88 7.88 0.00 1.58

Compost Pit (SC,ST& BPL) 0.04 1 0.04 0.04 0.00 85 3.40 3.40 0.00 0.34

Vermi compost (Gen & OBC)0.33 1 0.33 0.33 0.07 34 11.22 11.22 0.00 2.24

Vermi compost (SC,ST& BPL) 0.33 1 0.33 0.33 0.03 12 3.96 3.96 0.00 0.40Crop Demonstration (Gen

& OBC)0.02 11 0.22 0.22 0.04 381 7.62 7.62 0.00 1.52

Crop Demonstration (SC,ST& BPL)

0.02 11 0.22 0.22 0.02 381 7.62 7.62 0.00 0.76

Kitchen Garden (Gen & OBC) 0.02 4 0.08 0.08 0.02 30 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.12

Kitchen Garden (SC,ST& BPL) 0.02 4 0.08 0.08 0.01 29 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.06Total 5.19 5.19 2.31 0.91 99.84 99.84 34.86 16.53

(C) Micro Enterprise 89.80 89.80(D) Consolidation 29.93 29.93

Grand Total (A+B+C+D) 82.93 82.93 2.31 2.10 997.80 997.80 34.86 34.11


Production System (10%), Micro enterprise(9%) & Consolidation (3%)


Tunkliya Total

CHAPTER -I VActivity wise Total Abstract of cost

Activity Unit Quantity Unit cost Total costCost from

Project FundConvergence

FundBeneficiary

Contribution*

(A)Admn. 99.78 99.78

Monitoring 9.978 9.978Evaluation 9.978 9.978

EPA 39.912 39.912I & CB 49.89 49.89DPR 9.978 9.978

Total (A) 219.52 219.52 0.00 0.00(B)

Earthen Bund 264 263.13 263.13 0.00 0.00Tanka (Gen & OBC) 61 1.52 92.72 92.72 0.00 9.27Tanka (SC,ST& BPL) 34 1.52 51.68 51.68 0.00 2.58

Khet talai Kachi (Gen & OBC) 12 1.00 12.00 12.00 0.00 1.20

Khet talai Kachi (SC,ST& BPL) 5 1.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.25

Khet talai Paki (Gen & OBC) 17 1.54 26.18 26.18 0.00 2.62

Khet talai Paki (SC,ST& BPL) 9 1.54 13.86 13.86 0.00 0.69Renovation of Khet talai 1 9.65 9.65 9.65 0.00 0.97

Total 474.22 474.22 0.00 17.58

Pasture Development 4 6.17 24.68 24.68 0.00 0.00V - ditch 4 1.13 4.52 4.52 0.00 0.00

Total 29.20 29.20 0.00 0.00

MMS 9 47.59 47.59 0.00 0.00LSCD 28 7.70 7.70 0.00 0.00Total 55.29 55.29 0.00 0.00

Grand Total (B) 558.71 558.71 0.00 17.58


Natural resource management (56%)Conservation measures for arable land(private land)



(C)

Pasture Development (Gen & OBC) 8 0.35 2.80 2.80 1.68 0.56

Pasture Development (SC,ST& BPL) 7 0.33 2.31 2.31 1.47 0.23

Horticulture plantation (Gen & OBC) 101 0.35 35.35 35.35 21.21 7.07

Horticulture plantation (SC,ST& BPL) 50 0.33 16.50 16.50 10.50 1.65

Compost Pit (Gen & OBC) 197 0.04 7.88 7.88 0.00 1.58Compost Pit (SC,ST& BPL) 85 0.04 3.40 3.40 0.00 0.34

Vermi compost (Gen & OBC) 34 0.33 11.22 11.22 0.00 2.24

Vermi compost (SC,ST& BPL) 12 0.33 3.96 3.96 0.00 0.40Crop Demonstration

(Gen & OBC) 381 0.02 7.62 7.62 0.00 1.52Crop Demonstration (SC,ST&

BPL) 381 0.02 7.62 7.62 0.00 0.76

Kitchen Garden (Gen & OBC) 30 0.02 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.12

Kitchen Garden (SC,ST& BPL) 29 0.02 0.58 0.58 0.00 0.06Total 0 99.84 99.84 34.86 16.53

(C) Micro Enterprise 89.80 89.80(D) Consolidation 29.93 29.93

Grand Total (A+B+C+D) 997.80 997.80 34.86 34.11*Tentative and will vary during execution according to beneficiary

Production System (10%), Micro enterprise(9%) & Consolidation (3%)Production measures for arable land

CHAPTER – VAnnual Action Plan : The project period can vary from 4 to 7 years and accordingly the table given below be prepared. Also the activities mentioned below are indicative and can vary from project to project. Also this if PIA feels necessary to make it GP Wise it can add pages. Through Project Fund

Area 6652 Ha Cost Lacs(A)

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

Admn. 10 99.78 1 9.98 1 9.98 2 19.96 2 19.96 2 19.96 1 9.978 1 9.978 10 99.78Monitoring 1 9.978 0.1 1.00 0.1 1.00 0.2 2.00 0.2 2.00 0.2 2.00 0.1 0.998 0.1 0.998 1 9.978Evaluation 1 9.978 0.1 1.00 0.1 1.00 0.2 2.00 0.2 2.00 0.2 2.00 0.1 0.998 0.1 0.998 1 9.978

EPA 4 39.912 4 39.91 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 4 39.912I & CB 5 49.89 1 9.98 1 9.98 1 9.98 0.5 4.99 0.5 4.99 0.5 4.989 0.5 4.989 5 49.89DPR 1 9.978 1 9.98 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1 9.978

Total (A) 22 219.52 7.20 71.84 2.20 21.95 3.40 33.93 2.90 28.94 2.90 28.94 1.70 16.96 1.70 16.96 22 219.52(B)

Earthen Bund 264 0 263.13 44 43.9 44 43.9 44 43.9 44 43.9 44 43.9 44 43.63 264 263.13Tanka (Gen & OBC) 61 1.52 92.72 10 15.2 10 15.2 10 15.2 11 16.72 10 15.2 10 15.2 61 92.72Tanka (SC,ST& BPL) 34 1.52 51.68 6 9.12 6 9.12 6 9.12 6 9.12 6 9.12 4 6.08 34 51.68

Khet talai Kachi (Gen & OBC) 12 1 12.00 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 12

Khet talai Kachi (SC,ST& BPL) 5 1 5.00 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5

Khet talai Paki (Gen & OBC) 17 1.54 26.18 2 3.08 3 4.62 3 4.62 3 4.62 3 4.62 3 4.62 17 26.18Khet talai Paki (SC,ST& BPL) 9 1.54 13.86 1 1.54 1 1.54 2 3.08 2 3.08 2 3.08 1 1.54 9 13.86

Renovation of Khet talai 1 9.65 9.65 1 9.65 0 0 0 0 0 1 9.65Total 474.22 0.00 84.49 77.38 78.92 80.44 78.92 74.07 474.22

Pasture Development 4 6.17 24.68 2 12.34 2 12.34 4 24.68V - ditch 4 1.13 4.52 2 2.26 2 2.26 4 4.52

Total 29.20 14.6 14.6 29.2

MMS 9 0 47.59 1 5.58 1 4.00 2 7.35 2 8.28 2 15.48 1 6.90 9 47.59LSCD 28 0 7.70 4 1.10 4 1.10 5 1.45 5 1.40 5 1.35 5 1.30 28 7.70Total 55.29 0.00 6.68 5.10 8.80 9.68 16.83 8.20 55.29

Grand Total (B) 558.71 0.00 105.77 97.08 87.72 90.12 95.75 82.27 558.71

Activity Unit Total cost

1st year Total2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year 6th year 7th year

997.80

Unit Cost






(C)

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin

Pasture Development (Gen & OBC) 8 0.35 2.8 1 0.35 1 0.35 2 0.7 2 0.7 1 0.35 1 0.35 8 2.8

Pasture Development (SC,ST& BPL) 7 0.33 2.31 1 0.33 1 0.33 1 0.33 2 0.66 1 0.33 1 0.33 7 2.31

Horticulture plantation (Gen & OBC) 101 0.35 35.35 15 5.25 15 5.25 20 7 20 7 16 5.6 15 5.25 101 35.35

Horticulture plantation (SC,ST& BPL) 50 0.33 16.5 10 3.3 8 2.64 8 2.64 8 2.64 8 2.64 8 2.64 50 16.5

Compost Pit (Gen & OBC) 197 0.04 7.88 33 1.32 33 1.32 33 1.32 33 1.32 33 1.32 32 1.28 197 7.88Compost Pit (SC,ST& BPL) 85 0.04 3.4 14 0.56 14 0.56 14 0.56 14 0.56 14 0.56 15 0.6 85 3.4

Vermi compost (Gen & OBC) 34 0.33 11.22 6 1.98 6 1.98 6 1.98 6 1.98 5 1.65 5 1.65 34 11.22Vermi compost (SC,ST& BPL) 12 0.33 3.96 2 0.66 2 0.66 2 0.66 2 0.66 2 0.66 2 0.66 12 3.96

Crop Demonstration (Gen & OBC)

381 0.02 7.62 65 1.3 65 1.3 65 1.3 65 1.3 65 1.3 56 1.12 381 7.62

Crop Demonstration (SC,ST& BPL)

381 0.02 7.62 65 1.3 65 1.3 65 1.3 65 1.3 65 1.3 56 1.12 381 7.62

Kitchen Garden (Gen & OBC) 30 0.02 0.6 5 0.1 5 0.1 5 0.1 5 0.1 5 0.1 5 0.1 30 0.6Kitchen Garden (SC,ST& BPL) 29 0.02 0.58 5 0.1 5 0.1 5 0.1 5 0.1 5 0.1 4 0.08 29 0.58

Total 99.84 0 16.55 15.89 17.99 18.32 15.91 15.18 99.84(C) Micro Enterprise 89.80 89.80

(D) Consolidation 29.93 29.93Grand Total (A+B+C+D) 997.80 71.84 144.27 146.90 134.65 137.38 128.62 114.41 997.80

Activity Unit Total cost

1st year 2nd yearUnit Cost


Production System (10%), Micro enterprise(9%) & Consolidation (3%)3rd year 4th year 5th year 6th year 7th year Total

(B)

Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy Fin Phy FinPasture Development

(Gen & OBC)8 0.21 1.68 1 0.21 1 0.21 1 0.21 2 0.42 1 0.21 2 0.42 8 1.68


7 0.21 1.47 1 0.21 1 0.21 1 0.21 2 0.42 1 0.21 1 0.21 7 1.47


101 0.21 21.21 20 4.2 20 4.2 16 3.36 15 3.15 15 3.15 15 3.15 101 21.21


48 0.21 10.08 8 1.68 8 1.68 8 1.68 8 1.68 8 1.68 8 1.68 48 10.08

Total 34.44 0.00 6.30 6.30 5.46 5.67 5.25 5.46 34.44

Convergence Fund of Drip

Activity Unit Unit Cost

Total cost

1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year 6th year 7th year Total

Model Estimatewaste weir & earthen bund

Gagarana IWMP 10-11

3.01

Design as per contour and field topography Abstruct of cost

Area 10 ha. Cost of waste weir 80456Slope 0 to 1 % Cost of earthen bund 72527maximum h 10 mtr. Total 152983maximum lenth of treval 1000 mtr. Say 1.53 lacs

waste weir & earthen bundData to put A C L H h I Df

10 0.3 1000 10 0.5 10 80 Structural DesignHydrologic Design Gagarana IWMP 10-11

Q=0.0276 CIA Q= Peak rate run off in Cum/Sec. H h d pC= Weighted cofficient of run off 0.9 0.5 0.7 2.3I= Intencity of rain fall in Cm./hr.

for equal to time of constration at a given Frequency 1 Top width of head wall a a=h/(p-1)0.5 h p p-1 (p-1)0.5

A= Catchment area in Hectares 0.44 0.5 2.3 1.3 1.14Q Cofficient I A C Say 0.6

1.8216 0.0276 22 10 0.3 2 Bottom width of head wall b b=h+H/(p-1)0.5 h H H+h p p-1 (p-1)0.5

1.228 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.3 1.3 1.14TC=0.0195 K0.77 TC=Time of constration in minute Say 1.25TC=Time of constration in minute 3 Length of head wall ext l l=H+d+1 H d cofficientK= L3/2/H½ 2.6 0.9 0.7 1L= Max. length of travel in Mtr. 4 Hight of head wall ext H+d H dH=Diffrence elevation in Mtr. 1.6 0.9 0.7

K L L 3/2 H H ½ 5 Bottom width of head wall ext 0.5(H+h) H h H+h cofficient10000 1000 31623 10 3.162 0.7 0.9 0.5 1.4 0.5

0.76 Top width of head wall ext 0.4*H H cofficient

TC Cofficient K K.77 0.36 0.9 0.423.444 0.0195 10000 1202.3 7 Length of basin LB 0.75(H+d)+H H d H+d 0.75(H+d)

22 Use this As I As Reference 2.10 0.9 0.7 1.6 1.210 I=one hour rain fall intensity in cm/hour 8 Thickness of basin t

Hydraulic Design 0.5Q Cofficient L h h1.5 h=head over the crest in mtr 9 Hight of the side wall at head H+d H d1.8216 1.71 3.01 0.5 0.354 L=length of the crest wall in mtr wall joint 1.6 0.9 0.7

9.8827 10 Hight of the side wall at toe 1.5*h cofficient hF Cofficient hw F=free board in mtr wall joint 0.75 1.5 0.50.1878 1.5 0.1252 11 Length of wing wall 2.25*h cofficient h

0.2 1.125 2.25 0.5hw Cofficient Df Df

0.5 Df=fatch length in mtr 12 Height of wing wall 1.5*h cofficient h0.1252 0.014 80 8.94 hw=wave length in mtr 0.75 1.5 0.5

d h F 13 Top width of toe wall 0.450.7 0.5 0.2 14 Height of toe wall 0.3

15 Thickness of side wall 0.6

a = Top width of head wall in m. Gagarana IWMP 10-11b = Bottom width of head wall in m.

Fa = Water force in KgFb = Water force in KgFc = Water force in KgU = uplift force in Kg hρ = Specific gravity of dam material kg/cum(2300kg/cum) Fcw = Unit weight of water in kg/cum(1000 kg/cum)H = Height of head wallh = head over the crestC = Coefficient in uplift (0.5) Fa X1µ = Coefficient of friction (0.65 to 0.75) Fb H

a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.60 1.25 0.9 0.5 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b1242 0.60 0.9 2300

UW2 = ½(b-a)Hρ b a H ρ cofficient

672.75 1.25 0.60 0.9 2300 0.5cw(h+H)

U = ½Cw(H+h)b w H h H+h b cofficient437.5 1000 0.9 0.5 1.4 1.25 0.5

Fa = whH w h H H 0.90450 1000 0.5 0.9 h 0.5 W1 1242

a 0.60 W2 672.75Fb = wH2 / 2 w H H H2 cofficient b 1.25 U 437.5

405 1000 0.9 0.9 0.81 0.5 w 1000 Fa 450Fb 405

Fc = wah w a h Fc 300300 1000 0.60 0.5

b/3 2b/3

awh

Safety against overturningGagarana IWMP 10-11

W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W21242 0.95 300 450 405 437.5 0.60 1.25 672.75

H U0.9 437.5

RM W1x1+Fcx1+W2.2(b-a)/3W1x1 Fcx1 W2.2(b-a)/3b a b-a coffi

1753.51 1179.9 285 288.61 1.25 0.60 0.65 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/3688.5833 202.5 121.5 364.5833

RM OM RM/OM1753.51 688.5833 2.546547 >1.5 Hance safe

Safety against slidingTv W1 W2 Fc U

1777.25 1242 672.75 300 437.5Th Fa Fb Frictional cofficient

855 450 405 0.8C.F*Tv/Th 1.66 >1.3 Hence safe

Safety against tension at baseX=(RM-OM)/Tv RM-OM Tv

0.599 1064.93 1777.25E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.026 0.625 0.599

e b/60.026 0.208 b/6>e

Hance safe

Structural DesignGagarana IWMP 10-11

Top Plan 0.63.01

0.61.25

0.653.15

1.45 2.10

1.10.6

ElivationHead wall extention

1.68

1.11Head wall

1.45 0.45 0.75Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

1.253.15

0.65

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.36

1.25

0.6

1.25

Side wall

1.6

1.2

0.7

0.9

2.6

0.7

0.36

0.45

0.3

Estimate Gagarana IWMP 10-11

Head wall H.W.E Side wa Toe WallAverage 0.925 0.53 2.20 0.675

Sr. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Hight Qty rate amount

1Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight and deposited excavatedmeterial lead op to 150 2B

Head wall 1 3.01 1.25 1.2 4.52Head wall extention 2 2.6 0.7 1.2 4.37

side wall 2 3.15 0.6 1.2 4.54Appron 1 3.01 1.45 0.9 3.93

Toe wall 1 3.01 0.9 1.2 3.25Wing Wall 2 1.125 0.6 0.6 0.81

21.42 99 2120.538

2Cement concrete 1:4:8 (1cement:4 sand:8 concrete) 40/25 mm concrete Using mixture & vibrater 125 B


side wall 2 3.15 0.6 0.3 1.13Appron 1 3.01 1.45 0.3 1.31


5.89 2282 13429.71

3RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6


side wall 2 3.15 0.6 0.9 3.40Appron 1 3.01 1.45 0.15 0.66


13.57 1919 260384 RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 25C


side wall 2 2.20 0.6 0.85 2.24side wall 2 3.15 0.6 0.75 2.84

Appron 1 3.01 1.45 0.00Toe wall 1 3.01 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.75 1.0113.01 1919 24965.11

cf 66553.36

25C

Gagarana IWMP 10-11Sr. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Hight Qty rate amount

5Cement concrete 1:3:6 (1cement:3 sand:6 concrete) 40/25 mm concrete Using mixture & vibrater

125Abf 66553.36



Appron 1 3.01 1.45 0.08 0.350Toe wall 1 3.01 0.45 0.08 0.108

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.08 0.1081.178 2507 2952.931

6 Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 25 mm thick 71A

Head wall 1 3.01 0.6 1.808Head wall 1 3.01 0.9 2.71

Head wall extention 2 2.60 0.36 1.87Head wall extention 2 2.60 1.6 8.32

side wall 2 1.25 0.6 1.5side wall 2 1.68 0.6 2.02side wall 2 3.15 0.75 4.73side wall 2 2.20 0.85 3.74side wall 2 0.60 1.6 1.92

Appron 1 3.01 1.45 4.37Toe wall 1 3.01 1.05 3.16

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 1.35Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.75 1.6875Wing Wall 2 0.75 0.6 0.90

40.08 151 6052.609

7Cement concrete 1:1.5:3 (1cement:1.5 sand:3 concrete) 25 mm concrete Using mixture & vibrater

Appron 126 1 3.01 1.45 0.15 0.66 3587 2350.675

8 Pointing 1:3 (1 Cement : 3 Sand) 73

Head wall 1 3.01 1.11 3.34 60.7 203.0411Total 78112.61

3% contengency 234380456

Say 0.80 lacs

Gagarana IWMP 10-11Earthen bund

Length Left 100Right 107

Maximum cross section Minimum cross section

0.60.6

USDS 2:1 1.6 2:1

2:1 0.6 3:1

3.2 3.2 1.2 1.8

7 3.6

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2

CS 6.08 CS 1.26

Average Cross section 3.67

Sr.no.BSR Itam No Length

Cross secction Qty Unit Rate Amount

139 ii B 100 3.67 367.00107 3.67 392.69

759.69 Cum 92 69891.48 cost of Cumath Seed Row Length To.length interwell No per kg

3 207 621 1 450 1.38 Kg 100 1383 Seed Sowing (Cumtha) 621 621 mtr 0.62 385.02

70414.503% contengency 2112.44

Total 72526.94

Name of work

1

Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight and deposited excavated meterial lead op to 50

2


Gagarana IWMP 10-11

3.08














Hydraulic Design 0.5Q Cofficient L h h1.5 h=head over the crest in mtr 9 Hight of the side wall at head H+d H d

1.863 1.71 3.08 0.5 0.354 L=length of the crest wall in mtr wall joint 1.55 0.9 0.6510.107 10 Hight of the side wall at toe 1.5*h cofficient h

F Cofficient hw F=free board in mtr wall joint 0.75 1.5 0.50.1485 1.5 0.099 11 Length of wing wall 2.25*h cofficient h


0.5 Df=fatch length in mtr 12 Height of wing wall 1.5*h cofficient h0.099 0.014 50 7.07 hw=wave length in mtr 0.75 1.5 0.5d h F 13 Top width of toe wall 0.450.65 0.5 0.15 14 Height of toe wall 0.3




a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.60 1.25 0.9 0.5 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b1242 0.60 0.9 2300


672.75 1.25 0.60 0.9 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 0.90450 1000 0.5 0.9 h 0.5 W1 1242


405 1000 0.9 0.9 0.81 0.5 w 1000 Fa 450Fb 405

Fc = wah w a h Fc 300300 1000 0.60 0.5

b/3 2b/3

awh


W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W21242 0.95 300 450 405 437.5 0.60 1.25 672.75

H U0.9 437.5


1753.51 1179.9 285 288.61 1.25 0.60 0.65 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/3688.5833 202.5 121.5 364.5833






0.599 1064.93 1777.25E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.026 0.625 0.599

e b/60.026 0.208 b/6>e

Hance safe

Page no. 181

Structural Design Gagarana IWMP 10-11

Top Plan 0.63.08

0.61.25

0.653.11

1.41 2.06

1.10.6


1.62

1.11Head wall

1.41 0.45 0.75Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

1.253.11

0.65

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.36

1.25

0.6

1.25

Side wall

1.55

1.2

0.65

0.9

2.55

0.7

0.36

0.45

0.3

Estimate

Gagarana IWMP 10-11Head wall H.W.E Side wa Toe Wall

Average 0.925 0.53 2.18 0.675Sr. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Hight Qty rate amount



side wall 2 3.11 0.6 1.2 4.48Appron 1 3.08 1.41 0.9 3.92


21.44 99 2122.918



side wall 2 3.11 0.6 0.3 1.12Appron 1 3.08 1.41 0.3 1.31


5.89 2282 13440.64



side wall 2 3.11 0.6 0.9 3.36Appron 1 3.08 1.41 0.15 0.65


13.60 1919 26088.984 RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 25C



Appron 1 3.08 1.41 0.00Toe wall 1 3.08 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.75 1.0112.66 1919 24299.81

cf 65952.34

25C



125Abf 65952.34



Appron 1 3.08 1.41 0.08 0.348Toe wall 1 3.08 0.45 0.08 0.111

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.08 0.1081.175 2507 2945.101





Appron 1 3.08 1.41 4.35Toe wall 1 3.08 1.05 3.24


39.36 151 5942.705


Appron 126 1 3.08 1.413 0.15 0.65 3587 2341.924


Head wall 1 3.08 1.11 3.42 60.7 207.6557Total 77389.73


Say 0.79 lacs




0.60.6

USDS 2:1 1.55 2:1

2:1 0.6 3:1

3.1 3.1 1.2 1.8

6.8 3.6

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2

CS 5.735 CS 1.26




139 ii B 150 3.50 524.63199 3.50 696.00


3 349 1047 1 450 2.33 Kg 100 232.66673 Seed Sowing (Cumtha) 1047 1047 mtr 0.62 649.14

113179.543% contengency 3395.39

Total 116574.92

Name of work

1


2


Gagarana IWMP 10-11

3.08























a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.60 1.10 0.75 0.5 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b1035 0.60 0.75 2300


431.25 1.10 0.60 0.75 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 0.75375 1000 0.5 0.75 h 0.5 W1 1035


281.25 1000 0.75 0.75 0.5625 0.5 w 1000 Fa 375Fb 281.25

Fc = wah w a h Fc 300300 1000 0.60 0.5

b/3 2b/3

awh


W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W21035 0.8 300 375 281.25 343.75 0.60 1.10 431.25

H U0.75 343.75


1210.31 828 240 142.31 1.10 0.60 0.50 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/3463.0208 140.625 70.3125 252.0833




656.25 375 281.25 0.8C.F*Tv/Th 1.73 >1.3 Hence safe


0.525 747.29 1422.5E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.025 0.55 0.525

e b/60.025 0.183 b/6>e

Hance safe


Top Plan 0.63.08

0.61.10

0.502.89

1.34 1.84

1.10.6


1.51

0.90Head wall

1.34 0.45 0.75Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

1.102.89

2.45

0.6

0.3

0.45

0.3

0.50

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.3

1.10

0.6

1.10

Side wall

1.45

1.2

0.7

0.75






side wall 2 2.89 0.6 1.2 4.16Appron 1 3.08 1.34 0.9 3.71


19.60 99 1940.494



side wall 2 2.89 0.6 0.3 1.04Appron 1 3.08 1.34 0.3 1.24


5.41 2282 12349.84



side wall 2 2.89 0.6 0.9 3.12Appron 1 3.08 1.34 0.15 0.62





Appron 1 3.08 1.34 0.00Toe wall 1 3.08 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.75 1.0110.45 1919 20049.14

cf 58009.23

25C



125Abf 58009.23



Appron 1 3.08 1.34 0.08 0.330Toe wall 1 3.08 0.45 0.08 0.111

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.08 0.1081.102 2507 2761.876





Appron 1 3.08 1.34 4.12Toe wall 1 3.08 1.05 3.24


36.02 151 5439.567


Appron 126 1 3.08 1.338 0.15 0.62 3587 2217.574


Head wall 1 3.08 0.90 2.78 60.7 168.6018Total 68596.85


Say 0.70 lacs

Dhanapa IWMPEarthen bund



0.60.6

USDS 2:1 1.45 2:1

2:1 0.6 3:1

2.9 2.9 1.2 1.8

6.4 3.6

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2

CS 5.075 CS 1.26




139 ii B 150 3.17 475.13196 3.17 620.83



101702.093% contengency 3051.06

Total 104753.15

Name of work

1


2


Gagarana IWMP 10-11

1.84










K L L 3/2 H H ½ 5 Bottom width of head wall ext 0.5(H+h) H h H+h cofficient2000 200 2828.4 2 1.414 0.575 0.75 0.4 1.15 0.5





6.0268 10 Hight of the side wall at toe 1.5*h cofficient hF Cofficient hw F=free board in mtr wall joint 0.6 1.5 0.4

0.105 1.5 0.07 11 Length of wing wall 2.25*h cofficient h0.1 0.9 2.25 0.4

hw Cofficient Df Df0.5 Df=fatch length in mtr 12 Height of wing wall 1.5*h cofficient h

0.07 0.014 25 5.00 hw=wave length in mtr 0.6 1.5 0.4d h F 13 Top width of toe wall 0.45

0.5 0.4 0.1 14 Height of toe wall 0.315 Thickness of side wall 0.6



a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.60 1.00 0.75 0.4 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b1035 0.60 0.75 2300


345 1.00 0.60 0.75 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 0.75300 1000 0.4 0.75 h 0.4 W1 1035

a 0.60 W2 345Fb = wH2 / 2 w H H H2 cofficient b 1.00 U 287.5

281.25 1000 0.75 0.75 0.5625 0.5 w 1000 Fa 300Fb 281.25

Fc = wah w a h Fc 240240 1000 0.60 0.4

b/3 2b/3

awh


W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W21035 0.7 240 300 281.25 287.5 0.60 1.00 345

H U0.75 287.5


983.58 724.5 168 91.08 1.00 0.60 0.40 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/3374.4792 112.5 70.3125 191.6667



1332.5 1035 345 240 287.5Th Fa Fb Frictional cofficient



0.457 609.10 1332.5E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.043 0.5 0.457

e b/60.043 0.167 b/6>e

Hance safe


Top Plan 0.61.84

0.61.00

0.402.74

1.29 1.69

0.90.6


1.25 1.44

0.85Head wall

1.29 0.45 0.6Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

1.002.74

2.25

0.6

0.3

0.45

0.3

0.40

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.3

1.00

0.6

1.00

Side wall

1.2

0.5

0.75






side wall 2 2.74 0.6 1.2 3.94Appron 1 1.84 1.29 0.9 2.13


14.15 99 1400.705



side wall 2 2.74 0.6 0.3 0.99Appron 1 1.84 1.29 0.3 0.71


3.88 2282 8846.313



side wall 2 2.74 0.6 0.9 2.96Appron 1 1.84 1.29 0.15 0.35





Appron 1 1.84 1.29 0.00Toe wall 1 1.84 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 0.90 0.6 0.6 0.657.71 1919 14796.15

cf 42712.16

25C



125Abf 42712.16



Appron 1 1.84 1.29 0.08 0.189Toe wall 1 1.84 0.45 0.08 0.066

Wing Wall 2 0.90 0.6 0.08 0.0860.795 2507 1991.839





Appron 1 1.84 1.29 2.37Toe wall 1 1.84 1.05 1.93


26.78 151 4043.131


Appron 126 1 1.84 1.288 0.15 0.35 3587 1272.874


Head wall 1 1.84 0.85 1.56 60.7 94.80322Total 50114.81

3% contengency 1503.44451618.25

Say 0.51




0.60.6

USDS 2:1 1.25 2:1

2:1 0.6 3:1

2.5 2.5 1.2 1.8

5.6 3.6

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2

CS 3.875 CS 1.26




139 ii B 52 2.57 133.5152 2.57 133.51



24828.613% contengency 744.86

Total 25573.47

Name of work

1


2


Gagarana IWMP 10-11

4.11























a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.60 1.25 0.9 0.5 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b1242 0.60 0.9 2300


672.75 1.25 0.60 0.9 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 0.90450 1000 0.5 0.9 h 0.5 W1 1242


405 1000 0.9 0.9 0.81 0.5 w 1000 Fa 450Fb 405

Fc = wah w a h Fc 300300 1000 0.60 0.5

b/3 2b/3

awh


W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W21242 0.95 300 450 405 437.5 0.60 1.25 672.75

H U0.9 437.5


1753.51 1179.9 285 288.61 1.25 0.60 0.65 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/3688.5833 202.5 121.5 364.5833






0.599 1064.93 1777.25E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.026 0.625 0.599

e b/60.026 0.208 b/6>e

Hance safe


Top Plan 0.64.11

0.61.25

0.653.13

1.43 2.08

1.10.6


1.65

1.11Head wall

1.43 0.45 0.75Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

1.253.13

2.57

0.7

0.36

0.45

0.3

0.65

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.36

1.25

0.6

1.25

Side wall

1.57

1.2

0.67

0.9






side wall 2 3.13 0.6 1.2 4.50Appron 1 4.11 1.43 0.9 5.28


25.51 99 2525.505



side wall 2 3.13 0.6 0.3 1.13Appron 1 4.11 1.43 0.3 1.76


7.02 2282 16019.46



side wall 2 3.13 0.6 0.9 3.38Appron 1 4.11 1.43 0.15 0.88





Appron 1 4.11 1.43 0.00Toe wall 1 4.11 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.75 1.0113.68 1919 26248.92

cf 75211.82

25C



125Abf 75211.82



Appron 1 4.11 1.43 0.08 0.469Toe wall 1 4.11 0.45 0.08 0.148

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.08 0.1081.398 2507 3504.067





Appron 1 4.11 1.43 5.87Toe wall 1 4.11 1.05 4.31


43.84 151 6619.872


Appron 126 1 4.11 1.428 0.15 0.88 3587 3155.726


Head wall 1 4.11 1.11 4.56 60.7 276.8743Total 88768.36


Say 0.91 lacs




0.60.6

USDS 2:1 1.57 2:1

2:1 0.6 3:1

3.14 3.14 1.2 1.8

6.88 3.6

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2

CS 5.8718 CS 1.26




139 ii B 175 3.57 624.03256 3.57 912.87



142484.063% contengency 4274.52

Total 146758.58

Name of work

1


2


Gagarana IWMP 10-11

3.56






















a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.60 1.10 0.75 0.5 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b1035 0.60 0.75 2300


431.25 1.10 0.60 0.75 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 0.75375 1000 0.5 0.75 h 0.5 W1 1035


281.25 1000 0.75 0.75 0.5625 0.5 w 1000 Fa 375Fb 281.25

Fc = wah w a h Fc 300300 1000 0.60 0.5

b/3 2b/3

awh


W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W21035 0.8 300 375 281.25 343.75 0.60 1.10 431.25

H U0.75 343.75


1210.31 828 240 142.31 1.10 0.60 0.50 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/3463.0208 140.625 70.3125 252.0833






0.525 747.29 1422.5E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.025 0.55 0.525

e b/60.025 0.183 b/6>e

Hance safe


Top Plan 0.63.56

0.61.10

0.502.89

1.34 1.84

1.10.6


1.51

0.90Head wall

1.34 0.45 0.75Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

1.102.89

0.50

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.3

1.10

0.6

1.10

Side wall

1.45

1.2

0.7

0.75

2.45

0.6

0.3

0.45

0.3






side wall 2 2.89 0.6 1.2 4.16Appron 1 3.56 1.34 0.9 4.29


21.33 99 2111.51



side wall 2 2.89 0.6 0.3 1.04Appron 1 3.56 1.34 0.3 1.43


5.89 2282 13445.07



side wall 2 2.89 0.6 0.9 3.12Appron 1 3.56 1.34 0.15 0.71





Appron 1 3.56 1.34 0.00Toe wall 1 3.56 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.75 1.0110.75 1919 20635.56

cf 61702.18

25C



125Abf 61702.18



Appron 1 3.56 1.34 0.08 0.381Toe wall 1 3.56 0.45 0.08 0.128

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.08 0.1081.199 2507 3005.825





Appron 1 3.56 1.34 4.76Toe wall 1 3.56 1.05 3.74


37.82 151 5710.09


Appron 126 1 3.56 1.338 0.15 0.71 3587 2562.53


Head wall 1 3.56 0.90 3.21 60.7 194.8287Total 73175.46


Say 0.75 lacs

Dhanapa IWMPEarthen bund



0.60.6

USDS 2:1 1.45 2:1

2:1 0.6 3:1

2.9 2.9 1.2 1.8

6.4 3.6

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2

CS 5.075 CS 1.26




139 ii B 175 3.17 554.31254 3.17 804.55


3 429 1287 1 450 2.86 Kg 100 2863 Seed Sowing (Cumtha) 1287 1287 mtr 0.62 797.94

126098.833% contengency 3782.96

Total 129881.79

Name of work

1


2


Gagarana IWMP 10-11

2.19






















a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.60 1.10 0.75 0.5 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b1035 0.60 0.75 2300


431.25 1.10 0.60 0.75 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 0.75375 1000 0.5 0.75 h 0.5 W1 1035


281.25 1000 0.75 0.75 0.5625 0.5 w 1000 Fa 375Fb 281.25

Fc = wah w a h Fc 300300 1000 0.60 0.5

b/3 2b/3

awh


W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W21035 0.8 300 375 281.25 343.75 0.60 1.10 431.25

H U0.75 343.75


1210.31 828 240 142.31 1.10 0.60 0.50 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/3463.0208 140.625 70.3125 252.0833






0.525 747.29 1422.5E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.025 0.55 0.525

e b/60.025 0.183 b/6>e

Hance safe


Top Plan 0.62.19

0.61.10

0.502.89

1.34 1.84

1.10.6


1.51

0.90Head wall

1.34 0.45 0.75Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

1.102.89

2.45

0.6

0.3

0.45

0.3

0.50

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.3

1.10

0.6

1.10

Side wall

1.45

1.2

0.7

0.75






side wall 2 2.89 0.6 1.2 4.16Appron 1 2.19 1.34 0.9 2.64


16.39 99 1622.892



side wall 2 2.89 0.6 0.3 1.04Appron 1 2.19 1.34 0.3 0.88


4.52 2282 10315.84



side wall 2 2.89 0.6 0.9 3.12Appron 1 2.19 1.34 0.15 0.44





Appron 1 2.19 1.34 0.00Toe wall 1 2.19 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.75 1.019.88 1919 18960.09

cf 51150.88

Page no. 151

25C



125Abf 51150.88



Appron 1 2.19 1.34 0.08 0.234Toe wall 1 2.19 0.45 0.08 0.079

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.08 0.1080.921 2507 2308.83





Appron 1 2.19 1.34 2.93Toe wall 1 2.19 1.05 2.30


32.70 151 4937.165


Appron 126 1 2.19 1.338 0.15 0.44 3587 1576.942


Head wall 1 2.19 0.90 1.98 60.7 119.8946Total 60093.72


Say 0.62 lacs

Page no. 152




0.60.6

USDS 2:1 1.45 2:1

2:1 0.6 3:1

2.9 2.9 1.2 1.8

6.4 3.6

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2

CS 5.075 CS 1.26




139 ii B 75 3.17 237.5675 3.17 237.56


3 150 450 1 450 1.00 Kg 100 1003 Seed Sowing (Cumtha) 450 450 mtr 0.62 279

44090.503% contengency 1322.72

Total 45413.22

Name of work

1


2


Gagarana IWMP 10-11

3.83










K L L 3/2 H H ½ 5 Bottom width of head wall ext 0.5(H+h) H h H+h cofficient7071.1 1000 31623 20 4.472 0.7 0.9 0.5 1.4 0.5


TC Cofficient K K.77 0.36 0.9 0.417.953 0.0195 7071.1 920.67 7 Length of basin LB 0.75(H+d)+H H d H+d 0.75(H+d)










a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.60 1.25 0.9 0.5 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b1242 0.60 0.9 2300


672.75 1.25 0.60 0.9 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 0.90450 1000 0.5 0.9 h 0.5 W1 1242


405 1000 0.9 0.9 0.81 0.5 w 1000 Fa 450Fb 405

Fc = wah w a h Fc 300300 1000 0.60 0.5

b/3 2b/3

awh


W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W21242 0.95 300 450 405 437.5 0.60 1.25 672.75

H U0.9 437.5


1753.51 1179.9 285 288.61 1.25 0.60 0.65 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/3688.5833 202.5 121.5 364.5833






0.599 1064.93 1777.25E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.026 0.625 0.599

e b/60.026 0.208 b/6>e

Hance safe


Top Plan 0.63.83

0.61.25

0.653.15

1.45 2.10

1.10.6


1.68

1.11Head wall

1.45 0.45 0.75Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

1.253.15

2.6

0.7

0.36

0.45

0.3

0.65

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.36

1.25

0.6

1.25

Side wall

1.6

1.2

0.7

0.9






side wall 2 3.15 0.6 1.2 4.54Appron 1 3.83 1.45 0.9 5.00


24.61 99 2436.589



side wall 2 3.15 0.6 0.3 1.13Appron 1 3.83 1.45 0.3 1.67


6.77 2282 15454.92



side wall 2 3.15 0.6 0.9 3.40Appron 1 3.83 1.45 0.15 0.83





Appron 1 3.83 1.45 0.00Toe wall 1 3.83 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.75 1.0113.69 1919 26277.89

cf 73601.68

25C



125Abf 73601.68



Appron 1 3.83 1.45 0.08 0.445Toe wall 1 3.83 0.45 0.08 0.138

Wing Wall 2 1.13 0.6 0.08 0.1081.352 2507 3389.669





Appron 1 3.83 1.45 5.56Toe wall 1 3.83 1.05 4.03


43.37 151 6548.936


Appron 126 1 3.83 1.45 0.15 0.83 3587 2991.768


Head wall 1 3.83 1.11 4.26 60.7 258.416Total 86790.47


Say 0.89 lacs




0.60.6

USDS 2:1 1.6 2:1

2:1 0.6 3:1

3.2 3.2 1.2 1.8

7 3.6

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2

CS 6.08 CS 1.26




139 ii B 110 3.67 403.70105 3.67 385.35



73135.833% contengency 2194.08

Total 75329.91

Name of work

1


2

Fencing post IWMP GagaranaFor sc & Bpl category

2.1 0.2

0.15No of post 100

S.No Name of work Item no. No Lingth Width Hight Qty Unit Rate1 Cement concrete 1:2:4 100 2.1 0.18 0.15 5.51 Cum 3170 17474.632 Centering & shutering 100 2.1 0.3 63 Sqm 104 6552.00

Mtr Kg/MtrRain forcement with tor bar 8mm bar 400 2.1 840 0.4 336 KGRing specing 0.20 mtr & Hook 6mm 1050 0.5 525 0.282 148.05 KG

484.05 KG 62 30011.10Cost for 100 posts 54038Cost for one post 540

Add 3% contengency 16557

Say 560Area 0.2 Ha Length 178.89 mtr. Specing 8

Say 178 mtr.No of post As per length= Length/specing 22

Fencing will be done by Project Two Aditional post require after every 10 Posts 830.25

S.No Discription Item no. No Length of single wire

Total length Kg/mtr Quantity Unit Rate Amount

1 Supply of barberbed wire fencing 14 gauge 65 6 178 1068 0.08 85.44 Kg 64 5468.162 Supply of cement concrete post mo.est. 30 30.00 No 560 16800.003 Trancepotation of posts 2 km. 194C 30 0.0393 1.18 Cum 66.7 78.64

4 Trancepotation of posts to pit up to one km. 30 30.00 No 18.75 562.505 fixing of Rcc post in 45 cm. deep pit 2B 30 0.45 0.45 0.45 2.73 Cum 68 185.906 Cost of binding wire mo.est. 5.1 Kg 70 357.007 Tidening of barberded wire 5.5/forest 1068 mtr 0.95 1014.6

24466.79Part of production 20% Remaining Add 3% contengency 734.00fencing 25200 25200.80Horticulture 7725 Say 25200Total 32925 6585 26340

Hence safe because it is less then 30000

Model estimate

0.15

3

Abstruct cost of Tanka with Plantation work For Genaral & OBC Category

Project Contribution Total Govt share Farmer share Total90% 10%

1Cost of tanka 152000.00 136800 15200 152000

Conservation measure for water harvesting

80% 20%

2 Cost of Horticulture plantation 7725 6180 1545 7725 Production

3Cost of Barbered wire fencing with post fixing 28000 22400 5600 28000 Production Total for production 35725 28580 7145 35725

90% 10%

10916 0 0 0 9824 1092 10916 Total Cost of tanka unit 198641.00 165380.00 22345.00 187725.00 9824.40 1091.60 10916.00Say 1.98 1.65 0.22 1.87 0.1 0.01 0.11 Lacs

For SC/ BPL


1Cost of tanka 152000.00 136800 15200 152000

Conservation measure for water harvesting

90% 10%

2 Cost of Horticulture plantation 7725 6952.5 772.5 7725 Production

3 Cost of Barbered wire fencing with post fixing 25200 22680 2520 25200 Production Total for production 32925 29632.5 3292.5 32925

90% 10%


Note :- 1 Rates are taken as per GKN Nagaur. & forest dept.2 For Horticulture plantation is as per norms of Agriculture ext. Dept.3 For dovelopment of this unit drip irrigation will be taken in convergence with Agriculture ext. Dept.

4Cost of Drip irrigation system

Sr. noName of work

Project cost Convergence with Ag.Ext dept.

Measures

4

Sr. no Measures


Cost of Drip irrigation system

Name of work

Design of tanka

Collection of Water = Area * rainfall* 60% Capacity as per Structural design

Catchment Area = ^4*D2 (D= 15.00 Cum= ^4*Dt2 * Hight Dt= Inner diameter of tanka

= 176.625 SqmRainfall = 0.3 Mtr Dt= 3

Hight = 3.60Collection of water = 31.7925 Cum

25.434 CumCapacity Cum*1000 Capacity Cum*1000

= 31792.5 = 25434Used during season 6000

for potebilityNet 25792.5

Hence rainfall on catchment area can fillup the tanka by water

ProductionTotal capacity of tanka 25500 LtrUse of water for drinking purpose 30% 7650 LtrAvable water for plantation 60% 17850 LtrOne watering require 15 Ltr

No of watering per Year 20 No

Total Ltr require per plant per year 300 Ltr

No of plant can survive = Avable plantation for Plantation/ water require per plant per year= 59.50

say 55 plant

Capacity 25434 LTR

Gagarana IWMP 10-11 Tanka D d u H h u-3Mtr 3.9 3 3.6 3.90 0.6 0.6

S.No Discription Item no.No

/fector Length Width Hight Qty Rate Amount

1Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight and depositedexcavated meterial lead op to 150 2B

0.785 3.9 3.9 0.3 3.58 99 354.61


0.785 3.9 3.9 1.2 14.33 99 1418.45

3Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight and depositedexcavated meterial lead op to 150 one extra lift 2B+3

0.785 3.9 3.9 1.5 17.91 111 1987.99

4Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight and depositedexcavated meterial lead op to 150 With two Extra lift 2B+3

0.785 3.9 3.9 0.6 7.16 123 881.165 Cement concrete 1:5:10 (1cement:5 sand:10 concrete) 40 mm concrete 10 0.785 3.9 3.9 0.3 3.58 2008 7192.57

RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 A 0.785 3.9 3.9 3.9 46.57B 0.785 3 3 3.9 27.55

A-B 19.01 1919 36483.867 Lintal work supply & fixing in Cement sand mortar 1 : 4 32 4 3.35 0.25 3.35 988 3309.808 Cement Plaster 1 : 4 ( 1 cement : 4 sand) 25 mm thick 70A 3.14 3 3.60 33.91 173 5866.78

Roof on tanka with Jodhpur stone slabe including Pointing of joints & 50mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 A 0.785 3 3 7.07

Gate B 1 0.45 0.45 0.20 A-B 6.86 1246 8550.68 50 mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 (1 cement : 2 sand : 4 concrete) 12mm A 0.785 3.9 3.9 11.94 B B 0.785 3 3 7.07 C 4.87 A+B-C 0.785 3 3 7.07

11.94 247 2949.1412 Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 20 mm thick on stone 71B 3.14 3.9 0.6 7.35 151 1109.49

TOTAL A 70104.53

10 56

51C

25C

Model estimate

6

9

Working period D d H h H-h c/c hAngor wall 15.00 14.40 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.15


/fector Length Width Hight Qty Rate AmountEarth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight A 0.785 15 15 0.3 52.99and deposited excavated meterial lead op to 150 B 0.785 14.4 14.4 0.3 48.83

A-B 4.15 99 411.27Cement concrete 1:5:10 (1cement:5 sand:10 concrete) A 0.785 15 15 0.15 26.4940 mm concrete B 0.785 14.4 14.4 0.15 24.42

A-B 2.08 2008 4170.84RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 A 0.785 15 15 0.85 150.13

B 0.785 14.4 14.4 0.85 138.36 A-B 11.77 1919 22587.19

Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 20 mm thick A 0.785 15 15 176.63on stone B 0.785 14.4 14.4 162.78 A-B 13.85

3.14 15 0.7 32.973.14 14.4 0.7 31.65

78.47 151 11848.76Total B 39018.05

3

1

2

4 71B

2B

10

25C

HodiLw Sw w h Th Lw Sw w h Th0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.1

Lw+2w Sw+w 2Sw+Lw H Lw+2w Sw+w 2Sw+Lw H1.2 0.9 1.8 0.7 1.2 0.9 1.8 0.7

Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight and 1 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.76deposited excavated meterial lead op to 150 1 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.76 A+B 1.51 99 149.69RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 2 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.22

1 1.2 0.3 0.6 0.222 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.221 1.2 0.3 0.6 0.22

A-B 0.86 1919 1658.02 Cement concrete 1 : 5 : 10 (1 cement 1 1.2 0.9 0.1 0.11

1 1.2 0.9 0.1 0.11total 0.22 2008 433.73Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 20 mm thick on stone 1 0.6 0.6 0.36 B 1 1.8 0.6 1.08 C 2 0.6 0.3 0.36 D 1 1.2 0.3 0.36 a 1 0.6 0.6 0.36 b 1 1.8 0.6 1.08 c 2 0.6 0.3 0.36 d 1 1.2 0.3 0.36

4.32 101 436.32Total C 2677.75

soil murram MurramMis Work 0.3 0 0.3

1 Gate as per voucher L .S. 500Jali inlets L. S. 200Spreding And compection of excaveted soil in required profile A 0.784 14.4 14.4 0.3 48.77

B 0.784 3.9 3.9 0.3 3.58 A-B 45.19 40 1807.75

supply of murram A 0.784 14.4 14.4 0.3 48.77B 0.784 3.9 3.9 0.3 3.58A-B 45.19 80 3615.49

Trancepotation of murram up to 5 km A 0.784 14.4 14.4 0.3 48.77B 0.784 3.9 3.9 0.3 3.58A-B 45.19 87.9 3972.52

spreading of binding meterial in require profile including wateringin 15 cm layer 118 b 45.19 38 1717.36compection by plate vibretorwith operator & desal 125b/ 45.19 42 1898.13

analysis7 Hanp - Pamp & Pipe 2000.00

Total D 15711.26

1 2A

2 25C

3 10

5

6

68A

71B

4

4

52

3 116 E

Water tank Capacity 1500 Ltr

Foun. Above Gl Foun. Above Gl1 1.5 0.6 0.3 0.6 1.2 1

S.No Discription

No /fector Length Width Hight Qty Rate Amount

Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight and A 1 2.4 0.6 0.6 0.86deposited excavated meterial lead op to 150 B 2 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.50 A-B 1.37 99 135.43Cement concrete 1:5:10 (1cement:5 sand:10 concrete) 1 2.4 0.6 0.3 0.4340 mm concrete 2 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.25 A-B 0.68 2008 1373.47RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 1 2.4 0.6 0.3 0.43

2 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.251 2.1 0.3 1.2 0.761 2.1 0.3 0.3 0.192 1 0.3 1.2 0.722 2.1 0.3 1 1.262 1 0.3 1 0.60

4.21 1919 8077.073 Dry stone kharnja 52 1 1 1.5 0.3 0.45 957 430.65

4 Cement concrete 1:5:10 (1cement:5 sand:10 concrete) 40 mm concrete 10 1 1 1.5 0.3 1.50 2008 3012.00Cement Plaster 1 : 4 ( 1 cement : 4 sand) 25 mm thick 2 1 1 2.00

2 1.5 1 3.002 2.1 2.2 9.242 1.6 2.2 7.04

21.28 173 3681.44Roof on tanka with Jodhpur stone slabe including Pointing of joints & 50mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 A 1 1 1.5 1.50

Gate B 1 0.45 0.45 0.20 A-B 1.30 1246 1616.69

7 50 mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 (1 cement : 2 sand : 4 concrete) 12mm 56 A 1 1 1.5 1.50 247 370.508 Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 20 mm thick on stone 71B 1 1 1.5 1.50 151 226.509 Nal & Pipe 350.0010 Gate as per voucher L .S. 500.0011 Colour & name 500.00

Total E 20273.75Total (A,B,C,D & E) 147785.34Add 3 % contengency 4433.56Grand total 152218.90

Page no. 207 Say 152000.00

6 51C

2 10

3 25C

5 70A

Length Width Hight

1 2B

PLANGagarana IWMP 10-11

15

Capacity 25434 Ltr3.9

3 1.2

10.5

14.4

15

ROOF 10.5

0.7 0.6 0.3

0.3

3.90 0.93

3.6

cc 1:5:10

3.9

0.6

Fencing post IWMP Gagarana

2.1 0.2

0.15No of post 100





Say 560Area 0.2 Ha Length 178.89 mtr. Specing 6.589









Model estimate

0.15

3

Name of Plant Buded Ber Area 0.20 Ha

Horticulture Cost per plant No. of per ha. Plants 55

Year No./Year

1 Diging of pit 1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.73 cum. 84 61.24 3367.982 Apply of manure

(A) Compost Khad 5.00 kg. 0.4 2.00 110(B) S.S.P. (16%) 1.00 kg. 4 4.00 220(C) Endosulphan (4%) 100 gm 0.10 kg. 30 3.00 165

3Mixing with soil & fillingpit 1 0.9 0.9 0.75 0.61 cum. 39 23.69 1303.088

4 Plant cost 1 1.00 No 15 15.00 8255 Planting tree 1.00 No. 3.1 3.10 170.56 Weeding & hoeing 3 1 3.00 No. 1.3 3.90 214.57 Sprey

(A) Endosulphan (35 ec)3

0.01 Ltr 0.03 Ltr. 280 8.40 462(B) Sulpher 3 0.02 Kg 0.06 200 12.00 660

8

Trancepotation of Plant from Jodhpur 100 km including loading and unloading 1.00 no 1.25 1.25 68.75TOTAL 136.33 7498.07

7500Add 3% contengency 225

Note:- And also Provide 50% subcidy for Bird net 7725Farmer will be traind for Horticulture palntation in Treaning programme be conducted by watershed (PIA)Farmer will ensured for Watch and Ward by himselfFarmer will be benifited by Drip Irrigation by Ag.extention dept. seperetaly.

Problem:- NEEL GAY ( Roz) can destroy all plantation work. Such that six time barberbed wire fencing is require.and farmer do not have much money about 0.33 Lacs for this Such that project will provide Barberd

wire fencing.

Unit Rate AmountAmount for 55 Plants

Model estimate

Hight QtyS.No DiscriptionTotal

Length Width

S. No. Year Discount factor 1/(1+.07)^n

(n=No. of yr.)

Capital cost Benefits Present Worth of actual cost(3X4)

Present worth of Benefit(3X5)

B.C. Ratio

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 I 0.93 197000.00 0.00 184112.15 0.00

2 II 0.87 1020.00 0.00 890.91 0.00

3 III 0.82 1020.00 37500.00 832.62 30611.17

4 IV 0.76 1020.00 37500.00 778.15 28608.57

5 V 0.71 1020.00 37500.00 727.25 26736.98

6 VI 0.67 1020.00 37500.00 679.67 24987.83

7 VII 0.62 1020.00 37500.00 635.20 23353.12

8 VIII 0.58 1020.00 37500.00 593.65 21825.34

9 IX 0.54 1020.00 37500.00 554.81 20397.52

10 X 0.51 1020.00 37500.00 518.52 19063.10

206180 300000.00 190322.93 195583.63

Calculation of B.C. ratio (Amount in lacs)

1.03

Total

Abstruct cost of Kachi Khet Talai with Plantation workGagarana IWMP 10-11 Area 0.20 Ha.

For Genaral & OBC Category


1 Cost of Khet Talai 100000.00 90000 10000 100000Conservation measure for

water harvesting80% 20%

2Cost of Horticulture plantation 7725 6180 1545 7725 Production

3Cost of Barbered wire fencing with post fixing 28000 22400 5600 28000 Production Total Production 35725 28580 7145 35725 90% 10%

4 Cost of Drip irrigation system 21000 0 0 0 18900 2100 21000156725.00 118580 17145 135725 18900 2100 21000

Say 1.57 1.18 0.17 1.35 0.19 0.02 0.21 Lacs For sc & st Category




2Cost of Horticulture plantation 7725 6952.5 772.5 7725 Production

3Cost of Barbered wire fencing with post fixing 25200 22680 2520 25200 Production Total Production 32925 29632.5 3292.5 32925 90% 10%

4 Cost of Drip irrigation system 21000 0 0 0 18900 2100 21000153925.00 119633 13293 132925 18900 2100 21000

Say 1.54 1.2 0.13 1.33 0.19 0.02 0.21 LacsNote :- 1 Rates are taken as per GKN Nagaur. & forest dept.

2 For Horticulture plantation is as per norms of Agriculture ext. Dept.3 For dovelopment of this unit drip irrigation will be taken in convergence with Agriculture ext. Dept.

Sr. noName of work

Project cost Convergence with Ag.Ext dept.Measures

Sr. noName of work


Abstruct of cost

EstimateConservation work

57341.1123088.4123133.68103563.23106.896

Instalation of pipe& handpump 1800108470.1

Say 100000Total

Khet talaiBarbered wire fencing

Over head tankTotal in conservation workAdd 3% contengency work

khet talai

Length Width hight20 20 2.510 10

Avg 15 15

20

10

1020

Gep of pole line 3Pole spacing 4.521No of pole 23.00

Result:- Corner pole 8Total pole require 31

Capacity 562500

Name of work khet talaiName of site GagaranaName of water shed Gagarana

So.No Name of work No Length Width Hight Qty rate amount

1 Earth work excavation in Hard soilup to 1.5 mtr hight Lead Up to 50 Mtr

2/p1 Foundation 31 0.45 0.45 0.45 2.832.83 99 279.6965

2 Earth work excavation for nadi talab 1 15.00 15.00 2.5 562.50139&140 562.50 92 51750p15

3 Cement concrete 1:6:129/p1 1 cement,6 sand,12 concrete 40 mm

Foundation 31 0.45 0.45 0.45 2.832.83 1880 5311.409

57341.11

Meterial analysis

Name of work Cement Stone Sand Concrete 40 mmConcrete 12 mm Labour Karigarfect fect fect fect fect fect fect

1 Excavation 279.7 1.9697 2802 Nadi talab excavation 51750 364.44 517502 c/c 25mm 1:6:12 2.83 2.1 5.933 0.45 1.27 0.9 2.543 2.1 6.0 0.1 0.2825 5176

Total 5.933 0 1.27 2.543 0.00 372.42 0.2825 57206say 6.00 0.00 1.27 2.5 0 310 0.5

B S R rate 300.00 720.00 545 680 758 142 4251800 0 692.15 1700 0 44020 212.5

this amount48424.65

726 Water49151.01975

Model estimate

Length 104 mtr.No of pole 31

Fencing will be done by Project



1Supply of barberbed wire fencing 14 gauge 65 6 104 624 0.08 49.92 Kg 64 3194.88

2 Supply of cement concrete post mo.est. 31 31.0 No 560.00 17362.11

3 Trancepotation of posts 2 km. 194C 31 0.055125 1.70908 Cum 67.4 115.1921

4Trancepotation of posts to pit up to one km. 31 31.0 No 18.75 581.3205

5fixing of Rcc post in 45 cm. deep pit 2B 31 0.45 0.45 0.45 2.82522 Cum 68 192.1148

6 Cost of binding wire 23 15 Kg 70 1050

7 Tidening of barberded wire 5.5/forest 624 mtr 0.95 592.8

23088.41


2.1 0.2

0.15

No of post 100

Name of work Item no. No Lingth Width Hight Qty Unit RateCement concrete 1:2:4 100 2.1 0.175 0.15 5.5125 Cum 3180 17529.8

Centering & shutering 100 2.1 0.3 63 Sqm 105 6615Mtr Kg/Mtr 31.4

Rain forcement with tor bar 8mm bar 400 2.1 840 0.4 336 KG

Ring specing 0.20 mtr & Hook 6mm 1050 0.5 525 0.282 148.05 KG

484.05 KG 62 30011.1

Cost for 100 posts 54155.9

Cost for one post 541.559Add 3% contengency 16.2468

557.805Cum 0.05513

Say 560.00

Model estimate

0.15

Capacity 1766 LTR

L W Th FH sh ShMtr 2.5 1.5 0.4 0.60 0.44 0.62

2.4 1.4 0.3 1


/fector Length Width Hight Qty Rate Amount


1 2.5 1.5 0.60 2.25 99 222.75

2Cement concrete 1:6:12 (1cement:6 sand:12 concrete) 40 mm concrete

91 2.5 1.5 0.3 1.13 1880 2115.00

RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 A 1 2.5 1.5 0.30 1.13B 1 2.5 1.5 1.2 4.50

2 2.4 0.3 1 1.442 0.8 0.3 1 0.48

A-B 7.55 1919 14478.864 Cement Plaster 1 : 4 ( 1 cement : 4 sand) 25 mm thick 70A 2 1.8 1.00 3.60

2 0.8 1.00 1.605.20 173 899.60

Roof on tanka with Jodhpur stone slabe including Pointing of joints & 50mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 A 1 1.8 0.80 1.44

Gate B 1 0.45 0.45 0.20 A-B 1.24 1172 1450.35 50 mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 (1 cement : 2 sand : 4 concrete) 12mm A 1 1.8 0.80 1.44 B B 2 2.4 0.3 1.44 C 2 0.8 0.3 0.48 A+B+C 3.36 247 829.92

7 Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 20 mm thick on stone 71B 2 2.5 1.2 6.002 1.5 1.2 3.602 2.4 1 4.802 1.4 1 2.80

17.20 101 1737.208 gate & tape & wall color 1400.00

TOTAL A 23133.68

6 56

Tanki

3 25C

5 51A

Meterial analysis

Sawaisinghji talanpurName of work Total Cement Stone Sand Concrete 40 Concrete 12 Labour Karigar

fect fect fect fect fect fect fectExcavation 222.75 1.57 223

c/c 40mm 1:6:12 1.13 2.1 2.3625 0 0.45 0.51 0.9 1.0125 0 2.13 2.4 0.10 0.1125 2061Messonary 1:6 7.55 1.4 10.563 1.1 8.2995 0.3 2.26 0 1.40 10.6 0.71 5.357 14155Plastar 1:4 25 mm 5.20 0.23 1.196 0 0.032 0.17 0 0.19 1.0 0.13 0.676 877Plastar 1:6 20 mm 17.20 0.116 1.9952 0 0.025 0.43 0 0.16 2.8 0.06 1.032 1662

Roof 1.24 0.312 0.3861 0 0.022 0.03 0.045 0.0557 0.66 0.8 0.23 0.2846 410c/c 50mm 1:2:4 3.36 0.31 1.0416 0 0.022 0.07 0.045 0.1512 0.23 0.8 0.15 0.504 791

Total 17.544 8.2995 3.47 1.0125 0.21 19.857 7.9661 20179say 18.00 8.30 3.47 1.01 0.21 20.00 8.00

B S R rate 300 720 545 680 758 142 4255400 5976 1891.2 686.8 159.18 2840 3400

this amount20353.13

803 Pati21156

317 Water1400.00 Gate & Jali

22874



Year No./Year







8





wire fencing.

Model estimate

S.No DiscriptionTotal

Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate AmountAmount for 55 Plants


2.1 0.2

0.15No of post 100














Model estimate

0.15

3


2.1 0.2

0.15No of post 100














Model estimate

0.15

3

Fencing post IWMP Dhanapa

2.1 0.15

0.1

No of post 100


Centering & shutering 100 2.1 0.3 63 Sqm 105 6615Mtr Kg/Mtr 31.4

Rain forcement with tor bar 6mm bar 300 2.1 630 0.282 177.66 KG


296.1 KG 62 18358.2



386.193

Say 386.00

Model estimate

0.15

Abstruct cost of Khet Talai with Plantation workGagarana IWMP Area 0.20 Ha.

For Genaral & OBC Category

Project Contribution Total Govt share Farmer share Total90% 10% 75% 25%


water harvesting

80% 20%2 Cost of Horticulture plantation 7725 6180 1545 7725 Production

3Cost of Barbered wire fencing with post fixing 28100 22480 5620 28100 Production Total Production 35825 28660 7165 35825 90% 10%

4 Cost of Drip irrigation system 21000 0 0 0 18900 2100 21000

210825.00 167260 22565 189825 18900 2100 21000Say 2.10 1.67 0.22 1.89 0.19 0.02 0.21 Lacs

For SC/ BPL




2 Cost of Horticulture plantation 7725 6952.5 772.5 7725 Production

3 Cost of Barbered wire fencing with post fixing 25200 22680 2520 25200 Production Total for production 32925 29632.5 3292.5 32925

90% 10%21000 0 0 0 18900 2100 21000

Total Cost of tanka unit 207925.00 168232.50 18692.50 186925 18900.00 2100.00 21000.00Say 2.08 1.68 0.19 1.87 0.19 0.02 0.21 Lacs


Convergence with Ag.Ext dept.

Measures

Sr. noMeasures

Project cost Convergence with Ag.Ext dept.Name of work

4 Cost of Drip irrigation system

Sr. noName of work

Project cost

Gagarana IWMPDesign of Khet talai

Collection of Water = Area * rainfall*30% Capacity as per Structural design

Catchment Area = 0.12 ha. Cum= Area*Hight= 1200 Sqm Area = 69.7

Rainfall = 0.3 MtrHight = 1.50

Collection of water = 108 Cum104.55 Cum

Capacity Cum*1000 Capacity Cum*1000 84= 108000 = 104550 40

2282Hence rainfall on catchment area can fillup the tanka by waterFull capacity 104550Evoporation 30% 31365 1919Daily use for animal and birds 25% 26137.5

Net avalable water for Horticulture Plantation 47047.5

Production 247

One watering require 15 Ltr Ist year II year iii year55 40 173


Total Ltr require per plant per year 300 Ltr 151

No of plant can survive = capacity/ water require per plant per year= 156.825

say 139 plantMinimum 125

Plantation

Model Estimate

Khet Talai Length Width Excavation Above GL Mesonary Wall Width

Water tank For collection of water 8.5 8.2 1.8 0.6 2.1 0.45

Capacity Plant Ha.

Gagarana IWMP 104550 Ltr 55 0.20

S.no Activity No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount

1Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight anddeposited excavated meterial lead op to 150

139/p15 1 8.5 8.2 1.8 125.46 cum. 84 10538.64

2 Spreding And compection of excaveted soil in required profile 5 1 8.5 8.2 1.8 125.46 cum. 40 5018.4

2Cement concrete 1:4:8 (1cement:4 sand:8 concrete) 40/25 mm concrete Using mixture & vibrater 125 B 1 8.5 8.2 0.3 20.91 cum. 2282 47716.62

3 RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 25C 2 7.6 0.45 2.1 14.3642 8.2 0.45 2.1 15.498

29.862 cum. 1919 57305.18

5

50 mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 (1 cement : 2 sand : 4 concrete) 12mm

56

2 7.6 0.45 6.842 8.2 0.45 7.38

14.22 sqm. 247 3512.346 Cement Plaster 1 : 4 ( 1 cement : 4 sand) 25 mm thick 70A 2 7.6 2.1 31.92

2 7.3 2.1 30.6662.58 sqm. 173 10826.34

7Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 25 mm thick on stone 71A

2 8.5 0.6 10.22 8.2 0.6 9.84

20.04 sqm. 151 3026.04137943.6

Excavation will be done by farmer (-) 10538.64Net (a) 127404.9

Hight

Over Head Water tank Capacity 1500 Ltr

Foun. Above Gl Foun. Above Gl1 1.5 0.6 0.3 0.6 1.2 1

S.No Discription No/fector Length Width Hight Qty Rate AmountEarth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight and A 1 2.4 0.6 0.6 0.86deposited excavated meterial lead op to 150 B 2 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.50 A-B 1.37 99 135.43Cement concrete 1:5:10 (1cement:5 sand:10 concrete) 1 2.4 0.6 0.3 0.4340 mm concrete 2 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.25 A-B 0.68 2008 1373.47RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 1 2.4 0.6 0.3 0.43 84.00

2 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.25 40.001 2.1 0.3 1.2 0.76 2282.001 2.1 0.3 0.3 0.192 1 0.3 1.2 0.722 2.1 0.3 1 1.26 1919.002 1 0.3 1 0.60



2 1.5 1 3.00 173.002 2.1 2.2 9.242 1.6 2.2 7.04

21.28 173 151.00Roof on tanka with Jodhpur stone slabe including Pointing of joints &50 mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 A 1 1 1.5 1.50

Gate B 1 0.45 0.45 0.20 A-B 1.30 1246 1616.69

8 50 mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 (1 cement : 2 sand : 4 concrete) 12mm

56 A 1 1 1.5 1.50 247 370.509 Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 25 mm thick on stone 71B 1 1 1.5 1.50 151 226.5010 Nal & Pipe,hand pump 1700.0011 Gate as per voucher L .S. 500.0012 Colour & name 500.00

Total (b) 22407.66Total (a+b) 149812.58

Add 3% contengecy 4494.377154306.96

Say 154000

2 10

7 51C

3 25C

6 70A

Length Width Hight

1 2B

Fencing post IWMP GagaranaFor sc & Bpl category

2.1 0.2

0.15No of post 100














Model estimate

0.15

3


2.1 0.2

0.15No of post 100














Model estimate

0.15

3



Year No./Year




4 Plant cost 1 1.00 No 15 15.00 8255 Planting tree 1.00 No. 3.2 3.20 1766 Weeding & hoeing 3 1 3.00 No. 1.3 3.90 214.57 Sprey



8





wire fencing.


Length Width Unit Rate AmountAmount for 55 Plants

Model estimate

Hight Qty

S. No. Year Discount factor 1/(1+.07)^n

(n=No. of yr.)

Capital cost Benefits Present Worth of actual cost(3X4)

Present worth of Benefit(3X5)

B.C. Ratio

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 I 0.93 210000.00 0.00 196261.68 0.00

2 II 0.87 2836.00 0.00 2477.07 0.00

3 III 0.82 2836.00 104250.00 2315.02 85099.05

4 IV 0.76 2836.00 104250.00 2163.57 79531.83

5 V 0.71 2836.00 104250.00 2022.03 74328.81

6 VI 0.67 2836.00 104250.00 1889.75 69466.18

7 VII 0.62 2836.00 104250.00 1766.12 64921.66

8 VIII 0.58 2836.00 104250.00 1650.58 60674.45

9 IX 0.54 2836.00 104250.00 1542.60 56705.09

10 X 0.51 2836.00 104250.00 1441.68 52995.41

235524 834000.00 213530.09 543722.48

Calculation of B.C. ratio (Amount in lacs)

2.55

Total

Renovatation of Khet talai60

Name of site GagaranaName of water shed Gagarana


1 Earth trancepotation up to 2 Km 461 28 23 2.4 1545.61 16 17 1.2 326.41 28 13 3.6 1310.41 14 18 2.4 604.8

3787.2 62.3 235943

2 Cost of retaining wall 734988

Total 970931

say 9.71 Lacs

Retaining wall

Length Hight cc1:6:12172 0.9 0.6 1.2

Foundation 172 0.9 0.9 0.3mesonary 172 0.9 0.6ss 172 0.75 1.2

Cost 734988

0.6

1.24 1.2

0.90.3

0.9

0.9

Width

Name of work Retaining wallName of site GagaranaName of water shed Gagarana



2/p1 Foundation 1 172.00 0.90 0.9 139.32139.32 99 13792.68


Foundation 1 172.00 0.90 0.3 46.4446.44 1880 87307.2

3 RR stone Mesonary in foundation& plingth in cement sand mortar 1:6

25c/p3 Foundation 1 172.00 0.90 0.6 92.88wall 1 172.00 0.75 1.2 154.80

247.68 1919 475297.94 Plaster 1:6 25 mm

71a/p8 1 172.00 1.2 206.41 172.00 1.24 212.752 0.75 1.2 0.00

419.15 151 63291.995 Copping 50 mm 1:2:4

56/p6 1 172.00 0.60 103.20 247 25490.4

6 Dry stone Pichhing 1 172.00 2 0.15 51.6 938 48400.8713581

Add contengency 3% 21407.43734988.4

Meterial analysis


1 Excavation 13793 102.17 150192 c/c 25mm 1:6:12 46.44 2.1 97.524 0.45 20.90 0.9 41.8 2.1 98.9 0.1 4.644 855823 Messonary 1:6 247.68 1.4 346.75 1.1 272.448 0.3 74.30 1.4 346.8 0.71 175.85 4663944 Plastar 1:6 25 mm 419.15 0.15 64.13 0.032 13.41 0.2 71.3 0.13 54.49 601825 c/c 50mm 1:2:4 103.20 0.31 31.99 0.022 2.27 0.05 4.644 0.2 23.7 0.15 15.48 244236 Dry stone Pichhing 51.60 1.1 56.76 0.5 25.8 0.33 17.028

Total 540.4 329.208 110.89 41.8 4.64 668.63 267.49 651600say 541.00 329.00 111 42 4.6 665 266

B S R rate 300.00 720.00 545 680 758 147 425162300 236880 60495 28560 3486.8 97755 113050

this amount702526.8

10538 Water520 Mixture 0.3294

713584.721407.4 3% contengency

734992.1

Meterial analysis


1 Excavation 1069.2 7.92 11642 c/c 25mm 1:6:12 3.60 2.1 7.56 0.45 1.62 0.9 3.24 2.1 7.7 0.1 0.36 66343 Messonary 1:6 18.00 1.4 25.2 1.1 19.8 0.3 5.40 1.4 25.2 0.71 12.78 338954 Plastar 1:6 25 mm 25.42 0.15 3.89 0.032 0.81 0.2 4.3 0.13 3.3041 36495 c/c 50mm 1:2:4 6.00 0.31 1.86 0.022 0.13 0.05 0.27 0.2 1.4 0.15 0.9 1420

Total 38.509 19.8 7.97 3.24 0.27 46.489 17.344 46763say 39.00 19.80 8 3.25 0.27 47 18

B S R rate 300.00 720.00 545 680 758 147 42511700 14256 4360 2210 204.66 6909 7650

this amount47289.66

709 Water520 Mixture

48519.0049

Retaining wall

Length Hight cc1:6:1210 1.2 0.6 1.2

Foundation 10 1.2 0.9 0.3mesonary 10 1.2 0.6ss 10 0.9 1.2

Cost 49130

0.6

1.34 1.2

1.20.6

0.9

1.2

Width

Name of work Retaining wallName of site GagaranaName of water shed Gagarana



2/p1 Foundation 1 10.00 1.20 0.9 10.8010.80 99 1069.2


Foundation 1 10.00 1.20 0.3 3.603.60 1880 6768

3 RR stone Mesonary in foundation& plingth in cement sand mortar 1:6

25c/p3 Foundation 1 10.00 1.20 0.6 7.20wall 1 10.00 0.9 1.2 10.80

18.00 1919 345424 Plaster 1:6 25 mm

71a/p8 1 10.00 1.2 121 10.00 1.34 13.422 0.90 1.2 0.00

25.42 151 3837.8785 Copping 50 mm 1:2:4

56/p6 1 10.00 0.60 6.00 247 1482

47699.08Add contengency 3% 1430.972

49130.05

Silvi Pasture DevelopmentArea 7 ha Benefit

Abstruct of Cost Area Rate Amount Net return

Net return for three

year

Name of work Cost Ha Kg/ha Kg per kgDhaman seed 6 25 150 120 18000 10 1500 16500 49500

V. Ditch 113000 Dhaman grass 6 2000 12000 5 60000 1 12000 48000 144000Agro Forestry 325062 64500 193500Khet Talai 157000Fencing 135000

730062

Say 7.30 lacs

Note:- This benefit is for initial phase. If we menage it best we can fullfill other requirement of villagerslike fodder problem &, fuel wood problem

Cost Benefit RatioBenefit Cost Ratio

Initial phase 193500 730062 0.27

To get final phase proper menagement require for this through WDF fundWe will get Desi Babul wood for furniture making to support livelihood of land less labours

Note :- Over head tank has been taken to life saving watering for plantation.and to supply drinking waterfor pets animal & birds

Prodoction Expenditure

Gagarana IWMP Silvi Pastu Design of Khet talai

Area 7 haCollection of Water = Area * rainfall*30% Capacity as per Structural design

Catchment Area = 0.186 ha. Cum= Area*Hight= 1860 Sqm Area =

Rainfall = 0.3 MtrHight = 1.50

Collection of water = 167.4 Cum0 Cum

Capacity Cum*1000 Capacity Cum*1000= 167400 = 90738

Hence rainfall on catchment area can fillup the tanka by water

Production Total requirement of water for pasture dovelopment=

No of plant

water require per plant

Total water require

Avable water

Water require from outher source Source

One watering require 15 Ltr 3000 60 180000 Ltr 90738 89262 Anicut


Total Ltr require per plant per year 60 Ltr

No of plant can survive = capacity/ water require per plant per year= 1512.3

say 1500 plant

Model Estimate Silvi Pasture Development

Area 7 ha

Khet Talai Length Width Excavation Above GL Mesonary Wall Width

Water tank For collection of water 8 8 1.8 0.6 2.1 0.45

Capacity Plant Ha.

Gagarana IWMP 90738 Ltr 55 0.20

S.no Activity No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount

1Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight anddeposited excavated meterial lead op to 150

139/p15 1 8 8 1.8 115.2 cum. 99 11404.8

2 Spreding And compection of excaveted soil in required profile 5 1 8 8 1.8 115.2 cum. 40 4608

2Cement concrete 1:4:8 (1cement:4 sand:8 concrete) 40/25 mm concrete Using mixture & vibrater 125 B 1 8 8 0.3 19.2 cum. 2282 43814.4

3 RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 25C 2 7.1 0.45 2.1 13.4192 8 0.45 2.1 15.12

28.539 cum. 1919 54766.34

5

50 mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 (1 cement : 2 sand : 4 concrete) 12mm

56

2 7.1 0.45 6.392 8 0.45 7.2

13.59 sqm. 247 3356.736 Cement Plaster 1 : 4 ( 1 cement : 4 sand) 25 mm thick 70A 2 7.1 2.1 29.82

2 7.1 2.1 29.8259.64 sqm. 173 10317.72

7Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 25 mm thick on stone 71A

2 8 0.6 9.62 8 0.6 9.6

19.2 sqm. 151 2899.2131167.2

Net (a) 131167.2

Hight

Over Head Water tank Capacity 1500 Ltr Silv

Area 7 ha Foun. Above Gl Foun. Above Gl1 1.5 0.6 0.3 0.6 1.2 1

S.No Discription No/fector Length Width Hight Qty Rate AmountEarth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight and A 1 2.4 0.6 0.6 0.86deposited excavated meterial lead op to 150 B 2 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.50 A-B 1.37 99 135.43Cement concrete 1:5:10 (1cement:5 sand:10 concrete) 1 2.4 0.6 0.3 0.4340 mm concrete 2 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.25 A-B 0.68 2008 1373.47RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 1 2.4 0.6 0.3 0.43

2 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.251 2.1 0.3 1.2 0.761 2.1 0.3 0.3 0.192 1 0.3 1.2 0.722 2.1 0.3 1 1.262 1 0.3 1 0.60



2 1.5 1 3.002 2.1 2.2 9.242 1.6 2.2 7.04

21.28 173 3681.44Roof on tanka with Jodhpur stone slabe including Pointing of joints &50 mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 A 1 1 1.5 1.50

Gate B 1 0.45 0.45 0.20 A-B 1.30 1246 1616.69

8 50 mm Cement concrete 1 : 2 : 4 (1 cement : 2 sand : 4 concrete) 12mm

56 A 1 1 1.5 1.50 247 370.509 Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 25 mm thick on stone 71B 1 1 1.5 1.50 151 226.5010 Nal & Pipe,hand pump 1700.0011 Gate as per voucher L .S. 500.0012 Colour & name 500.00

Total (b) 21623.75Total (a+b) 152790.94

Add 3% contengecy 4583.728157374.67

Say 157000

2 10

Length Width Hight

1 2B

3 25C

6 70A

7 51C

Silvi Pasture Development Estimate for V.DitchArea 7 ha

Area Length Width Interwell No of row LengthHa mtr mtr mtr mtr7 700 100 5 140 14000

Dhaman require =5 kg/ha 50 KgSpacing 5 mtrSpacing of grass seed 15 Cm

0.6

0.3

Sr. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount1 Jungal clearence July flora 107 800 60 48000 Sqm 0.5 24000

2

Earth work Excavation in hardsoil up to 1.5 mt Hight anddeposited excavated meterial leadop to 50 139 ii B 0.5 14000 0.60 0.3 1260.00 Cum 84 105840.0

Kg

3

Making of balls of grass seed(1:1:2:2) 1 grass seed:1FYM

: 2 sand : 2 clay3/1/9 forest 50 kg 50.00

Per 6 kg meterial 17 141.7

4Showing of balls of grass seed by dibling method at 30 cm spacing

3/2/9 forest 50 kg 50

Per 6 kg meterial 109 908.3

5 Cost of seed CAZARI Jodhpur 50 Kg 120 6000112890.0

Say 113000

Silvi Pasture Deve Width AreaPlant to pant Spacing 4 Area 7 ha 20 Sqm No of plant 3000

Avalable Area 6 Ha Gap filling 20% 600

Total no of Plants 3600

Agro forestry Cost per plantItem no

Year No./Year

1Diging of pit( kankarboulder soil)

132 ©1 0.45 0.45 0.45 1.00 No 14.6 14.60 52560

2Mixing with soil &filling pit

51 0.45 0.45 0.3 0.06 cum. 40 2.43 8748

3Cost of Plant As per

forest 1.00 No. 5 5.00 180004 Planting tree 133(a) 1.00 No. 4 4.00 144005 Making thavla 137(A) 3 1 1.00 No. 2.7 8.10 243006 Hoeing 136 3 1 3.00 No. 1.3 3.90 11700

7Insectiside treatment Market

rate 30.03 ml 0.009 Ltr 300 2.70 8100

8 Watering 135 3 4 12.000 no 1.9 22.80 68400

9 Watch & ward Minimum

weges 336 36.00 Month 3000 36 108000

Water require per watering

Waterring per year

No of plant

Water requirement

10 Supply of water tanker 196(b) 3 15 4 1 180.00per 1000 ltr 2km 20.1 3.62 10854

TOTAL 103 325062Contengency 3% 9752Grand total 334814

Say 335000Problem & solution:- NEEL GAY ( Roz) can destroy all plantation work. Such that Watch and ward require on agriment

Note :- We have Chokidar for this Area in this estimate. We supplying water by Tanker .Estimate include gap filling 20 %

DiscriptionTotal

S.No Amount for 6 ha.

Model estimate

Rate AmountUnitLength Width Hight Qty

Fencing post Silvi IWMP GagaranaArea 7 ha

2.1 0.2

0.15No of post 100





Say 560Area 6 Ha Length 979.80 mtr. Specing 6.36






4 Trancepotation of posts to pit up to one km. 162 162.09 No 18.75 3039.155 fixing of Rcc post in 45 cm. deep pit 2B 162 0.45 0.45 0.45 14.77 Cum 68 1004.386 Cost of binding wire mo.est. 5.1 Kg 70 357.007 Tidening of barberded wire 5.5/forest 5880 mtr 0.95 5586

131286.32Part of production Add 3% contengency 3938.59fencing 135000 135224.91

Say 135000

Model estimate

0.15

3

Model estimateArea 1 Ha Specing

Length 400 mtr. 8.75No of post As per length= Length/specing 45.7one Aditional post require at corner 4

For Sc & st 49.71Fencing will be done by Project Say 49



1Supply of barberbed wire fencing 14 gauge 65 6 400.00 2400 0.08 192 Kg 64 12288

2 Supply of cement concrete post mo.est. 49 49 No 350 17150

3 Cost of binding wire mo.est. 2 Kg 70 140

29578

Say 29500

Abstruct of cost Gagarana IWMP 10-11

Private Pasture Development(A) For General & OBC

Project Contribution Total80% 20%

1Cost of Agro forestry

plantation 3500 2800 700 3500 Production Cost of Barbered wire fencing with post fixing 32000 25600 6400 32000 Production Total Cost of unit 35500.00 28400 7100 35500Say 0.35 0.28 0.07 0.35 Lacs

(B) For sc & st


1Cost of Horticulture

plantation 3500 3150 350 3500 Production Cost of Barbered wire fencing with post fixing 29500 26550 2950 29500 Production Total Cost of tanka unit 33000.00 29700 3300 33000Say 0.33 0.3 0.03 0.33 Lacs


Sr. noMeasures

Project costName of work

Sr. noName of work

Project costMeasures

Name of Plant Agro forestry plant Area 1 Ha Spacing 10

Cost per plant No. of per ha. Plants 100

For sc & st Gagarana IWMP 10-11 say 100

Year No./Year

1 Diging of pit 1 0.45 0.45 0.45 1.00 cum. 7.4 7.40 7402 Plant cost 1 1.00 No 5 15.00 15003 Planting tree 1.00 No. 3.2 3.10 310

4Trancepotation of Plant from nursury made by shg

1.00 no 1.25 1.25 125

5Soing of dhaman seed By trector Plough 1.00 Hr 300 300.00 300.00

6 Cost of Dhaman seed 5.00 120 600.00 600.00TOTAL 25.50 3575

3500Note :- And also Provide 50% subcidy for Bird net

Farmer will be traind for Agroforestry plant in Treaning programme be conducted by watershed (PIA)

Farmer will ensured for Watch and Ward by & watering himself

Problem :- NEEL GAY ( Roz) can destroy all plantation work. Such that six time barberbed wire fencing is require.and farmer do not have much money about 0.33 Lacs for this Such that project will provide Barberd

wire fencing.

Amount for 100 Plants

Model estimate


Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount

Fencing post IWMP Gagarana 10-11

2.1 0.15

0.1

No of post 100


Centering & shutering 100 2.1 0.3 63 Sqm 105 6615Mtr Kg/Mtr



296.1 KG 62 18358.2


Cost for one post 348.445say 350

Model estimate

0.15

Model estimateArea 1 Ha Specing

Length 400 mtr. 7.7No of post As per length= Length/specing 51.9one Aditional post require at corner 4

For General & OBC 55.95Fencing will be done by Project Say 56






All Labour work will be done by farmer 32028

Say 32000

Model EstimateMinor mesonary Structure 1

Gagarana IWMP 10-11 DLT A to A'

Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. Mandir Tukaliyan

11.86

Cost of MMS 402327 GIS based catchment area = 32Cost of retaining wall 86664 GIS based length of trevel = 530Cost of earthen bund 68656.13Total 557647.3

Say 5.58 lacs

Highest contour level

lowest contour level

level Difference

380 330 50

Minor mesonary StructureData to put A C L H h I Df Micro no. Near Khasra no. Mandir Tukaliyan DLT A to A'

















a = Top width of head wall in m. Gagarana IWMP 10-11b = Bottom width of head wall in m. Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. Mandir Tukaliyan DLT A to A'


a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.80 2.20 1.7 0.85 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b3128 0.80 1.7 2300


2737 2.20 0.80 1.7 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 1.701445 1000 0.85 1.7 h 0.85 W1 3128


1445 1000 1.7 1.7 2.89 0.5 w 1000 Fa 1445Fb 1445

Fc = wah w a h Fc 680680 1000 0.80 0.85

b/3 2b/3

awh

Safety against overturning Gagarana IWMP 10-11Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. Mandir Tukaliyan DLT A to A'

W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W23128 1.8 680 1445 1445 1402.5 0.80 2.20 2737

H U1.7 1402.5


9383.39 5630.4 1224 2528.99 2.20 0.80 1.40 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/34104.083 1228.25 818.8333 2057






1.027 5279.30 5142.5E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.073 1.1 1.027

e b/60.073 0.367 b/6>e

Hance safe

Gagarana IWMP 10-11Structural Design Micro no. 11(6)DLT A to A' Near Khasra no. Mandir Tukaliyan

Top Plan 0.611.86

0.82.20

1.405.16

2.51 3.91

1.90.6


3.02

2.20Head wall

2.51 0.45 1.28Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

2.205.16

3.95

1.3

0.68

0.45

0.3

1.40

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.68

2.20

0.8

2.20

Side wall

2.95

1.5

1.25

1.7

Gagarana IWMP 10-11 Estimate Near Khasra no. Mandir Tukaliyan Micro no. 11(6) DLT A to A'





side wall 2 5.16 0.6 1.5 9.29Appron 1 11.86 2.51 0.9 26.83


108.07 99 10698.44



side wall 2 5.16 0.6 0.3 1.86Appron 1 11.86 2.51 0.3 8.94


25.60 2282 58425.82



side wall 2 5.16 0.6 1.2 7.43Appron 1 11.86 2.51 0.15 4.47





Appron 1 11.86 2.51 0.00Toe wall 1 11.86 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 1.91 0.6 1.275 2.9371.55 1919 137299.7

cf 338929.3

25C



125Abf 338929.3



Appron 1 11.86 2.51 0.08 2.385Toe wall 1 11.86 0.45 0.08 0.427

Wing Wall 2 1.91 0.6 0.08 0.1844.875 2507 12221.94





Appron 1 11.86 2.51 29.81Toe wall 1 11.86 1.05 12.46


144.60 151 21834.68


Appron 126 1 11.86 2.513 0.15 4.47 3587 16037.47


Head wall 1 11.86 2.20 26.13 60.7 1585.867Total 390609.2

3% contengency 11718.28402327.5

Say 4.02 Lacs


Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. Mandir Tukaliyan DLT A to A'Length Left 15

Right 14Maximum cross section Minimum cross section

Top width = Based on seepage line check Slope of seepage line 5:1

4.952.475

USDS 2:1 3.25 3:1

2.55 2:1 0.6 3:1

6.5 9.75 1.2 1.80.8 12.75 7.65

21.2 5.475

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2

CS 42.49375 CS 2.385Average Cross section 22.43938



139 ii B 15 22.44 336.5914 22.44 314.15

650.74 Cum 92 59868.25

2 116 E 29 1.11 32.30 Cum 80 2583.90

3 193 F 32.30 Cum 87.9 2839.064 5 32.30 Cum 40 1291.95

Row Length To.length interwell No per kg3 29 87 1 450 0.19 Kg 100 19.33333

6 Seed Sowing (Cumtha) 87 87 mtr 0.62 53.9466656.44

3% contengency 1999.69368656.13

Name of work

1


5

supply of murramTrancepotation of murram 5Km.

Spreading of murram

cost of Cumath Seed

Retaining WallGagarana IWMP 10-11 Micro no. 11(6) DLT A to A'

Length 20 Near Khasra no. Mandir Tukaliyan0.45

0.9 0.91

0.600.3

Sr.no. Item of work Item no. No Length Width Hight Qty rate Amount

1Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5 mt Hight and deposited excavatedmeterial lead op to 150 2B 2 20.00 0.60 0.60 14.4 99 1425.6

2Cement concrete 1:4:8 (1cement:4 sand:8 concrete) 40/25 mm concrete Using mixture & vibrater 125 B 2 20.00 0.60 0.3 7.2 2282 16430.4

3RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 25C 2 20.00 0.60 0.3 7.2 1919 13816.8

4 RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 25C 2 20.00 0.525 0.9 19 1919 36269.1

5 Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 25 mm thick on stone 71A 2 20.00 0.9 36.002 20.00 0.912 36.49662 20.00 0.45 18

90.50 151 13664.9829

6 Piching 146 2 20.00 0.9 0.15 2.7 938 2532.6

Total 84139.48

3% contengency 2524.18

86663.67

C/C0.6


Gagarana IWMP 10-11 DLT A' to C'

Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 340 Tukaliyan

7.53


Say 4 lacs



level Difference

380 330 50

Minor mesonary StructureData to put A C L H h I Df Micro no. Near Khasra no. 340 Tukaliyan DLT A' to C'

















a = Top width of head wall in m. Gagarana IWMP 10-11b = Bottom width of head wall in m. Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 340 Tukaliyan DLT A' to C'


a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.80 1.90 1.2 0.95 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b2208 0.80 1.2 2300


1518 1.90 0.80 1.2 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 1.201140 1000 0.95 1.2 h 0.95 W1 2208


720 1000 1.2 1.2 1.44 0.5 w 1000 Fa 1140Fb 720

Fc = wah w a h Fc 760760 1000 0.80 0.95

b/3 2b/3

awh

Safety against overturning Gagarana IWMP 10-11Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 340 Tukaliyan DLT A' to C'

W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W22208 1.5 760 1140 720 1021.25 0.80 1.90 1518

H U1.2 1021.25


5554.07 3312 1140 1102.07 1.90 0.80 1.10 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/32265.583 684 288 1293.583






0.949 3288.48 3464.75E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.001 0.95 0.949

e b/60.001 0.317 b/6>e

Hance safe

Gagarana IWMP 10-11Structural Design Micro no. 11(6)DLT A' to C' Near Khasra no. 340 Tukaliyan

Top Plan 0.67.53

0.81.90

1.104.25

1.90 3.00

2.10.6


2.14

1.63Head wall

1.90 0.45 1.43Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

1.904.25

1.10

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.48

1.90

0.8

1.90

Side wall

2.4

1.5

1.2

1.2

3.4

1.1

0.48

0.45

0.3

Gagarana IWMP 10-11 Estimate Near Khasra no. 340 Tukaliyan Micro no. 11(6) DLT A' to C'





side wall 2 4.25 0.6 1.5 7.65Appron 1 7.53 1.90 0.9 12.88


64.91 99 6426.384



side wall 2 4.25 0.6 0.3 1.53Appron 1 7.53 1.90 0.3 4.29


15.16 2282 34597.86



side wall 2 4.25 0.6 1.2 6.12 1.67Appron 1 7.53 1.90 0.15 2.15





Appron 1 7.53 1.90 0.00Toe wall 1 7.53 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 2.14 0.6 1.425 3.6639.61 1919 76015.88

cf 200158.5

25C



125Abf 200158.5



Appron 1 7.53 1.90 0.08 1.145Toe wall 1 7.53 0.45 0.08 0.271

Wing Wall 2 2.14 0.6 0.08 0.2052.872 2507 7199.728





Appron 1 7.53 1.90 14.31Toe wall 1 7.53 1.05 7.91


93.06 151 14051.64


Appron 126 1 7.53 1.9 0.15 2.15 3587 7698.171


Head wall 1 7.53 1.63 12.26 60.7 744.0857Total 229852.1

3% contengency 6895.564236747.7

Say 2.35 Lacs


Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 340 Tukaliyan DLT A' to C' Length Left 34



4.52.25

USDS 2:1 2.7 3:1

2.15 2:1 0.6 3:1

5.4 8.1 1.2 1.80.8 10.75 6.45

18 5.25

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2




139 ii B 34 16.31 554.6332 16.31 522.00

1076.63 Cum 92 99049.50

2 116 E 66 1.01 66.83 Cum 80 5346.00

3 193 F 66.83 Cum 87.9 5873.924 5 66.83 Cum 40 2673.00

Row Length To.length interwell No per kg3 66 198 1 450 0.44 Kg 100 44


3% contengency 3393.275116502.5

Name of work

1


5


Spreading of murram

cost of Cumath Seed

Retaining WallGagarana IWMP 10-11 Micro no. 11(6) DLT A' to C'

Length 11 Near Khasra no. 340 Tukaliyan0.45

0.9 0.91

0.600.3






5 Cement Plaster 1 : 6 ( 1 cement : 6 sand) 25 mm thick on stone 71A 2 11.00 0.9 19.802 11.00 0.912 20.07312 11.00 0.45 9.9

49.77 151 7515.74057

6 Piching 146 2 11.00 0.9 0.15 1.485 938 1392.93

Total 46276.72


47665.02

C/C0.6


Gagarana IWMP 10-11 DLT

Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 339 Tukaliyan

7.61


Say 4 lacs



level Difference

380 325 55

Minor mesonary StructureData to put A C L H h I Df Micro no. Near Khasra no. 339 Tukaliyan DLT 0

















a = Top width of head wall in m. Gagarana IWMP 10-11b = Bottom width of head wall in m. Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 339 Tukaliyan DLT 0


a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.80 1.90 1.2 0.95 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b2208 0.80 1.2 2300


1518 1.90 0.80 1.2 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 1.201140 1000 0.95 1.2 h 0.95 W1 2208


720 1000 1.2 1.2 1.44 0.5 w 1000 Fa 1140Fb 720

Fc = wah w a h Fc 760760 1000 0.80 0.95

b/3 2b/3

awh

Safety against overturning Gagarana IWMP 10-11Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 339 Tukaliyan DLT 0

W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W22208 1.5 760 1140 720 1021.25 0.80 1.90 1518

H U1.2 1021.25


5554.07 3312 1140 1102.07 1.90 0.80 1.10 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/32265.583 684 288 1293.583






0.949 3288.48 3464.75E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.001 0.95 0.949

e b/60.001 0.317 b/6>e

Hance safe

Gagarana IWMP 10-11Structural Design Micro no. 11(6)DLT 0 Near Khasra no. 339 Tukaliyan

Top Plan 0.67.61

0.81.90

1.104.25

1.90 3.00

2.10.6


2.14

1.63Head wall

1.90 0.45 1.43Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

1.904.25

1.10

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.48

1.90

0.8

1.90

Side wall

2.4

1.5

1.2

1.2

3.4

1.1

0.48

0.45

0.3

Gagarana IWMP 10-11 Estimate Near Khasra no. 339 Tukaliyan Micro no. 11(6) DLT 0





side wall 2 4.25 0.6 1.5 7.65Appron 1 7.61 1.90 0.9 13.02


65.41 99 6475.339



side wall 2 4.25 0.6 0.3 1.53Appron 1 7.61 1.90 0.3 4.34


15.28 2282 34867.07



side wall 2 4.25 0.6 1.2 6.12 1.67Appron 1 7.61 1.90 0.15 2.17





Appron 1 7.61 1.90 0.00Toe wall 1 7.61 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 2.14 0.6 1.425 3.6639.75 1919 76275.99

cf 201322

25C



125Abf 201322



Appron 1 7.61 1.90 0.08 1.157Toe wall 1 7.61 0.45 0.08 0.274

Wing Wall 2 2.14 0.6 0.08 0.2052.894 2507 7255.943





Appron 1 7.61 1.90 14.47Toe wall 1 7.61 1.05 7.99


93.47 151 14114.18


Appron 126 1 7.61 1.9 0.15 2.17 3587 7783.706


Head wall 1 7.61 1.63 12.39 60.7 752.3533Total 231228.2

3% contengency 6936.846238165.1

Say 2.35 Lacs


Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 339 Tukaliyan DLT 0Length Left 34



4.52.25

USDS 2:1 2.7 3:1

2.15 2:1 0.6 3:1

5.4 8.1 1.2 1.80.8 10.75 6.45

18 5.25

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2




139 ii B 34 16.31 554.6331 16.31 505.69

1060.31 Cum 92 97548.75

2 116 E 65 1.01 65.81 Cum 80 5265.00

3 193 F 65.81 Cum 87.9 5784.924 5 65.81 Cum 40 2632.50



3% contengency 3341.862114737.3

Name of work

1


5


Spreading of murram

cost of Cumath Seed

Retaining WallGagarana IWMP 10-11 Micro no. 11(6) DLT 0

Length 11 Near Khasra no. 339 Tukaliyan0.45

0.9 0.91

0.600.3







49.77 151 7515.74057

6 Piching 146 2 11.00 0.9 0.15 1.485 938 1392.93

Total 46276.72


47665.02

C/C0.6



Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 348 Tunkaliya

7.59

Cost of MMS 290832 GIS based catchment area = 42Cost of earthen bund 43613.39 GIS based length of trevel = 1030Total 334445

Say 3.35 lacs



level Difference

380 330 50

Minor mesonary StructureData to put A C L H h I Df Micro no. Near Khasra no. 348 Tunkaliya DLT 0

42 0.4 1030 50 1 10 130 Structural DesignHydrologic Design Gagarana IWMP 10-11

Q=0.0276 CIA Q= Peak rate run off in Cum/Sec. H h d pC= Weighted cofficient of run off 1.5 1 1.25 2.3I= Intencity of rain fall in Cm./hr.


A= Catchment area in Hectares 0.88 1 2.3 1.3 1.14Q Cofficient I A C Say 0.9


2.193 1 1.5 2.5 2.3 1.3 1.14TC=0.0195 K0.77 TC=Time of constration in minute Say 2.20TC=Time of constration in minute 3 Length of head wall ext l l=H+d+1 H d cofficientK= L3/2/H½ 3.75 1.5 1.25 1L= Max. length of travel in Mtr. 4 Hight of head wall ext H+d H dH=Diffrence elevation in Mtr. 2.75 1.5 1.25

K L L 3/2 H H ½ 5 Bottom width of head wall ext 0.5(H+h) H h H+h cofficient4674.9 1030 33056 50 7.071 1.25 1.5 1 2.5 0.5




Hydraulic Design 0.5Q Cofficient L h h1.5 h=head over the crest in mtr 9 Hight of the side wall at head H+d H d12.983 1.71 7.59 1 1.000 L=length of the crest wall in mtr wall joint 2.75 1.5 1.25

24.903 10 Hight of the side wall at toe 1.5*h cofficient hF Cofficient hw F=free board in mtr wall joint 1.5 1.5 10.2394 1.5 0.1596 11 Length of wing wall 2.25*h cofficient h

0.25 2.25 2.25 1hw Cofficient Df Df

0.5 Df=fatch length in mtr 12 Height of wing wall 1.5*h cofficient h0.1596 0.014 130 11.40 hw=wave length in mtr 1.5 1.5 1

d h F 13 Top width of toe wall 0.451.25 1 0.25 14 Height of toe wall 0.3


a = Top width of head wall in m. Gagarana IWMP 10-11b = Bottom width of head wall in m. Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 348 Tunkaliya DLT 0


a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.90 2.20 1.5 1 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b3105 0.90 1.5 2300


2242.5 2.20 0.90 1.5 2300 0.5cw(h+H)

U = ½Cw(H+h)b w H h H+h b cofficient1375 1000 1.5 1 2.5 2.20 0.5

Fa = whH w h H H 1.501500 1000 1 1.5 h 1 W1 3105

a 0.90 W2 2242.5Fb = wH2 / 2 w H H H2 cofficient b 2.20 U 1375

1125 1000 1.5 1.5 2.25 0.5 w 1000 Fa 1500Fb 1125

Fc = wah w a h Fc 900900 1000 0.90 1

b/3 2b/3

awh

Safety against overturning Gagarana IWMP 10-11Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 348 Tunkaliya DLT 0

W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W23105 1.75 900 1500 1125 1375 0.90 2.20 2242.5

H U1.5 1375


8932.82 5433.75 1575 1924.07 2.20 0.90 1.30 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/33704.167 1125 562.5 2016.667



4872.5 3105 2242.5 900 1375Th Fa Fb Frictional cofficient



1.073 5228.65 4872.5E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.027 1.1 1.073

e b/60.027 0.367 b/6>e

Hance safe

Gagarana IWMP 10-11Structural Design Micro no. 11(6)DLT 0 Near Khasra no. 348 Tunkaliya

Top Plan 0.67.59

0.92.20

1.304.91

2.26 3.56

2.30.6


2.58

1.98Head wall

2.26 0.45 1.5Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

2.204.91

1.30

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.6

2.20

0.9

2.20

Side wall

2.75

1.5

1.25

1.5

3.75

1.2

0.6

0.45

0.3

Gagarana IWMP 10-11 Estimate Near Khasra no. 348 Tunkaliya Micro no. 11(6) DLT 0





side wall 2 4.91 0.6 1.5 8.84Appron 1 7.59 2.26 0.9 15.46


74.73 99 7398.005



side wall 2 4.91 0.6 0.3 1.77Appron 1 7.59 2.26 0.3 5.15


17.49 2282 39918.59



side wall 2 4.91 0.6 1.2 7.07 1.67Appron 1 7.59 2.26 0.15 2.58





Appron 1 7.59 2.26 0.00Toe wall 1 7.59 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 2.25 0.6 1.5 4.0554.44 1919 104473.7

cf 246789.4

25C



125Abf 246789.4



Appron 1 7.59 2.26 0.08 1.374Toe wall 1 7.59 0.45 0.08 0.273

Wing Wall 2 2.25 0.6 0.08 0.2163.366 2507 8439.109





Appron 1 7.59 2.26 17.18Toe wall 1 7.59 1.05 7.97


112.42 151 16974.91


Appron 126 1 7.59 2.263 0.15 2.58 3587 9242.544


Head wall 1 7.59 1.98 15.07 60.7 914.7809Total 282360.8

3% contengency 8470.823290831.6

Say 2.90 Lacs


Micro no. 11(6) Near Khasra no. 348 Tunkaliya DLT 0Length Left 10



5.552.775

USDS 2:1 3.05 3:1

2.5 2:1 0.6 3:1

6.1 9.15 1.2 1.80.8 12.5 7.5

20.8 5.775

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2




139 ii B 10 21.37 213.749 21.37 192.37

406.11 Cum 92 37362.41

2 116 E 19 1.25 23.73 Cum 80 1898.10

3 193 F 23.73 Cum 87.9 2085.544 5 23.73 Cum 40 949.05



3% contengency 1270.29343613.39

Name of work

1


5


Spreading of murram

cost of Cumath Seed




7.99


Say 3.71 lacs



level Difference

380 320 60








K L L 3/2 H H ½ 5 Bottom width of head wall ext 0.5(H+h) H h H+h cofficient11808 2030 91463 60 7.746 1.1 1.2 1 2.2 0.5












a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.90 2.00 1.2 1 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b2484 0.90 1.2 2300


1518 2.00 0.90 1.2 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 1.201200 1000 1 1.2 h 1 W1 2484

a 0.90 W2 1518Fb = wH2 / 2 w H H H2 cofficient b 2.00 U 1100

720 1000 1.2 1.2 1.44 0.5 w 1000 Fa 1200Fb 720

Fc = wah w a h Fc 900900 1000 0.90 1

b/3 2b/3

awh


W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W22484 1.55 900 1200 720 1100 0.90 2.00 1518

H U1.2 1100


6347.27 3850.2 1395 1102.07 2.00 0.90 1.10 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/32474.667 720 288 1466.667



3802 2484 1518 900 1100Th Fa Fb Frictional cofficient



1.019 3872.60 3802E=b/2-X b/2 X

-0.019 1 1.019

e b/6-0.019 0.333 b/6>e

Hance safe


Top Plan 0.67.99

0.92.00

1.104.39

1.94 3.04

2.30.6


2.16

1.63Head wall

1.94 0.45 1.5Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

2.004.39

3.45

1.1

0.48

0.45

0.3

1.10

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.48

2.00

0.9

2.00

Side wall

2.45

1.5

1.25

1.2






side wall 2 4.39 0.6 1.5 7.90Appron 1 7.99 1.94 0.9 13.93


69.59 99 6889.247



side wall 2 4.39 0.6 0.3 1.58Appron 1 7.99 1.94 0.3 4.64


16.26 2282 37108.11



side wall 2 4.39 0.6 1.2 6.32 1.67Appron 1 7.99 1.94 0.15 2.32





Appron 1 7.99 1.94 0.00Toe wall 1 7.99 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 2.25 0.6 1.5 4.0542.85 1919 82219.57

cf 215184.3

25C



125Abf 215184.3



Appron 1 7.99 1.94 0.08 1.238Toe wall 1 7.99 0.45 0.08 0.288

Wing Wall 2 2.25 0.6 0.08 0.2163.125 2507 7834.77





Appron 1 7.99 1.94 15.48Toe wall 1 7.99 1.05 8.39


99.27 151 14990.3


Appron 126 1 7.99 1.938 0.15 2.32 3587 8328.802


Head wall 1 7.99 1.63 13.01 60.7 789.4594Total 247127.6

3% contengency 7413.829254541.4

Say 2.53 Lacs





4.652.325

USDS 2:1 2.75 3:1

2.2 2:1 0.6 3:1

5.5 8.25 1.2 1.80.8 11 6.6

18.4 5.325

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2




139 ii B 18 16.99 305.9017 16.99 288.90

594.80 Cum 92 54721.89

2 116 E 35 1.05 36.62 Cum 80 2929.50

3 193 F 36.62 Cum 87.9 3218.794 5 36.62 Cum 40 1464.75



3% contengency 1872.70164296.06

Name of work

1


5


Spreading of murram

cost of Cumath Seed


Length 12 Near Khasra no. 663 Tunkaliya0.45

0.9 0.91

0.600.3







54.30 151 8198.98971

6 Piching 146 2 12.00 0.9 0.15 1.62 938 1519.56

Total 50483.69


51998.20

C/C0.6




9.23


Say 4.57 lacs



level Difference

380 325 55



Q=0.0276 CIA Q= Peak rate run off in Cum/Sec. H h d pC= Weighted cofficient of run off 1.5 0.7 1 2.3I= Intencity of rain fall in Cm./hr.




1.930 0.7 1.5 2.2 2.3 1.3 1.14TC=0.0195 K0.77 TC=Time of constration in minute Say 2.00TC=Time of constration in minute 3 Length of head wall ext l l=H+d+1 H d cofficientK= L3/2/H½ 3.5 1.5 1 1L= Max. length of travel in Mtr. 4 Hight of head wall ext H+d H dH=Diffrence elevation in Mtr. 2.5 1.5 1




18 Use this As I As Reference 3.38 1.5 1 2.5 1.87510 I=one hour rain fall intensity in cm/hour 8 Thickness of basin t

Hydraulic Design 0.5Q Cofficient L h h1.5 h=head over the crest in mtr 9 Hight of the side wall at head H+d H d9.2405 1.71 9.23 0.7 0.586 L=length of the crest wall in mtr wall joint 2.5 1.5 1




d h F 13 Top width of toe wall 0.451 0.7 0.3 14 Height of toe wall 0.3




a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.80 2.00 1.5 0.7 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b2760 0.80 1.5 2300


2070 2.00 0.80 1.5 2300 0.5cw(h+H)

U = ½Cw(H+h)b w H h H+h b cofficient1100 1000 1.5 0.7 2.2 2.00 0.5

Fa = whH w h H H 1.501050 1000 0.7 1.5 h 0.7 W1 2760

a 0.80 W2 2070Fb = wH2 / 2 w H H H2 cofficient b 2.00 U 1100

1125 1000 1.5 1.5 2.25 0.5 w 1000 Fa 1050Fb 1125

Fc = wah w a h Fc 560560 1000 0.80 0.7

b/3 2b/3

awh


W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W22760 1.6 560 1050 1125 1100 0.80 2.00 2070

H U1.5 1100


6951.44 4416 896 1639.44 2.00 0.80 1.20 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/32816.667 787.5 562.5 1466.667



4290 2760 2070 560 1100Th Fa Fb Frictional cofficient



0.964 4134.77 4290E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.036 1 0.964

e b/60.036 0.333 b/6>e

Hance safe


Top Plan 0.69.23

0.82.00

1.204.63

2.18 3.38

1.60.6


2.61

1.92Head wall

2.18 0.45 1.05Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

2.004.63

1.20

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.6

2.00

0.8

2.00

Side wall

2.5

1.5

1

1.5

3.5

1.1

0.6

0.45

0.3






side wall 2 4.63 0.6 1.5 8.33Appron 1 9.23 2.18 0.9 18.06


79.21 99 7841.5



side wall 2 4.63 0.6 0.3 1.67Appron 1 9.23 2.18 0.3 6.02


18.59 2282 42421.95



side wall 2 4.63 0.6 1.2 6.66 1.67Appron 1 9.23 2.18 0.15 3.01





Appron 1 9.23 2.18 0.00Toe wall 1 9.23 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 1.58 0.6 1.05 1.9847.83 1919 91780.09

cf 241038.1

25C



125Abf 241038.1



Appron 1 9.23 2.18 0.08 1.605Toe wall 1 9.23 0.45 0.08 0.332

Wing Wall 2 1.58 0.6 0.08 0.1513.606 2507 9040.041





Appron 1 9.23 2.18 20.07Toe wall 1 9.23 1.05 9.69


106.99 151 16155.67


Appron 126 1 9.23 2.175 0.15 3.01 3587 10797.75


Head wall 1 9.23 1.92 17.72 60.7 1075.854Total 278107.4

3% contengency 8343.222286450.6

Say 2.85 Lacs





4.42.2

USDS 2:1 2.8 3:1

2.2 2:1 0.6 3:1

5.6 8.4 1.2 1.80.8 11 6.6

18.4 5.2

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2




139 ii B 7 17.07 119.4915 17.07 256.05

375.54 Cum 92 34549.68

2 116 E 22 0.99 21.78 Cum 80 1742.40

3 193 F 21.78 Cum 87.9 1914.464 5 21.78 Cum 40 871.20




Name of work

1


5


Spreading of murram

cost of Cumath Seed



0.9 0.91

0.600.3







135.74 151 20497.4743

6 Piching 146 2 30.00 0.9 0.15 4.05 938 3798.9

Total 126209.22


129995.50

C/C0.6




18.88


Say 8.14 lacs



level Difference

380 320 60




















a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.90 2.40 1.7 1 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b3519 0.90 1.7 2300


2932.5 2.40 0.90 1.7 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 1.701700 1000 1 1.7 h 1 W1 3519


1445 1000 1.7 1.7 2.89 0.5 w 1000 Fa 1700Fb 1445

Fc = wah w a h Fc 900900 1000 0.90 1

b/3 2b/3

awh


W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W23519 1.95 900 1700 1445 1620 0.90 2.40 2932.5

H U1.7 1620


11520.23 6862.05 1755 2903.18 2.40 0.90 1.50 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/34855.833 1445 818.8333 2592






1.163 6664.39 5731.5E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.037 1.2 1.163

e b/60.037 0.400 b/6>e

Hance safe


Top Plan 0.618.88

0.92.40

1.505.38

2.53 4.03

2.30.6


2.99

2.27Head wall

2.53 0.45 1.5Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

2.405.38

1.50

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.68

2.40

0.9

2.40

Side wall

3.1

1.5

1.4

1.7

4.1

1.4

0.68

0.45

0.3






side wall 2 5.38 0.6 1.5 9.68Appron 1 18.88 2.53 0.9 42.91


164.91 99 16325.71



side wall 2 5.38 0.6 0.3 1.94Appron 1 18.88 2.53 0.3 14.30


39.19 2282 89429.66



side wall 2 5.38 0.6 1.2 7.74 1.67Appron 1 18.88 2.53 0.15 7.15





Appron 1 18.88 2.53 0.00Toe wall 1 18.88 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 2.25 0.6 1.5 4.05100.60 1919 193043.7

cf 498873.8

25C



125Abf 498873.8



Appron 1 18.88 2.53 0.08 3.815Toe wall 1 18.88 0.45 0.08 0.680

Wing Wall 2 2.25 0.6 0.08 0.2167.373 2507 18485.29





Appron 1 18.88 2.53 47.68Toe wall 1 18.88 1.05 19.83


197.61 151 29838.82


Appron 126 1 18.88 2.525 0.15 7.15 3587 25655.64


Head wall 1 18.88 2.27 42.81 60.7 2598.777Total 575452.3

3% contengency 17263.57592715.9

Say 5.90 Lacs





5.42.7

USDS 2:1 3.4 3:1

2.7 2:1 0.6 3:1

6.8 10.2 1.2 1.80.8 13.5 8.1

22.4 5.7

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2




139 ii B 18 24.89 448.0217 24.89 423.13

871.15 Cum 92 80145.80

2 116 E 35 1.22 42.53 Cum 80 3402.00

3 193 F 42.53 Cum 87.9 3737.954 5 42.53 Cum 40 1701.00



3% contengency 2672.25591747.44

Name of work

1


5


Spreading of murram

cost of Cumath Seed



0.9 0.91

0.600.3







135.74 151 20497.4743

6 Piching 146 2 30.00 0.9 0.15 4.05 938 3798.9

Total 126209.22


129995.50

C/C0.6




26.15


Say 7.34 lacs



level Difference

380 305 75










TC Cofficient K K.77 0.6 1.5 0.441.36 0.0195 20902 2121 7 Length of basin LB 0.75(H+d)+H H d H+d 0.75(H+d)










a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.90 2.20 1.5 1 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b3105 0.90 1.5 2300


2242.5 2.20 0.90 1.5 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 1.501500 1000 1 1.5 h 1 W1 3105


1125 1000 1.5 1.5 2.25 0.5 w 1000 Fa 1500Fb 1125

Fc = wah w a h Fc 900900 1000 0.90 1

b/3 2b/3

awh


W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W23105 1.75 900 1500 1125 1375 0.90 2.20 2242.5

H U1.5 1375


8932.82 5433.75 1575 1924.07 2.20 0.90 1.30 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/33704.167 1125 562.5 2016.667






1.073 5228.65 4872.5E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.027 1.1 1.073

e b/60.027 0.367 b/6>e

Hance safe


Top Plan 0.626.15

0.92.20

1.305.03

2.38 3.68

2.30.6


2.76

1.98Head wall

2.38 0.45 1.5Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

2.205.03

1.30

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.6

2.20

0.9

2.20

Side wall

2.9

1.5

1.4

1.5

3.9

1.25

0.6

0.45

0.3






side wall 2 5.03 0.6 1.5 9.05Appron 1 26.15 2.38 0.9 55.89


202.77 99 20073.76



side wall 2 5.03 0.6 0.3 1.81Appron 1 26.15 2.38 0.3 18.63


48.49 2282 110656.6



side wall 2 5.03 0.6 1.2 7.24 1.67Appron 1 26.15 2.38 0.15 9.31





Appron 1 26.15 2.38 0.00Toe wall 1 26.15 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 2.25 0.6 1.5 4.05100.88 1919 193589

cf 566745.1

25C



125Abf 566745.1



Appron 1 26.15 2.38 0.08 4.968Toe wall 1 26.15 0.45 0.08 0.941

Wing Wall 2 2.25 0.6 0.08 0.2169.329 2507 23387.38





Appron 1 26.15 2.38 62.10Toe wall 1 26.15 1.05 27.45


225.48 151 34046.99


Appron 126 1 26.15 2.375 0.15 9.32 3587 33412.91


Head wall 1 26.15 1.98 51.90 60.7 3150.393Total 660742.7

3% contengency 19822.28680565

Say 6.77 Lacs





4.82.4

USDS 2:1 3.2 3:1

2.5 2:1 0.6 3:1

6.4 9.6 1.2 1.80.8 12.5 7.5

20.8 5.4

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2




139 ii B 4 21.65 86.605 21.65 108.25

194.85 Cum 92 17926.20

2 116 E 9 1.08 9.72 Cum 80 777.60

3 193 F 9.72 Cum 87.9 854.394 5 9.72 Cum 40 388.80

Row Length To.length interwell No per kg3 9 27 1 450 0.06 Kg 100 6


3% contengency 599.091820568.82

Name of work

1


5


Spreading of murram

cost of Cumath Seed


Length 7.5 Near Khasra no. 633 Tunkaliya0.45

0.9 0.91

0.600.3







33.94 151 5124.36857

6 Piching 146 2 7.50 0.9 0.15 1.0125 938 949.725

Total 31552.31


32498.88

C/C0.6



Micro no. 15(2) Near Khasra no. 3247 Gagarana

17.43


Say 6.9 lacs



level Difference

330 285 45

Minor mesonary StructureData to put A C L H h I Df Micro no. Near Khasra no. 3247 Gagarana DLT 0









TC Cofficient K K.77 0.6 1.5 0.432.662 0.0195 15383 1675 7 Length of basin LB 0.75(H+d)+H H d H+d 0.75(H+d)








a = Top width of head wall in m. Gagarana IWMP 10-11b = Bottom width of head wall in m. Micro no. 15(2) Near Khasra no. 3247 Gagarana DLT 0


a b H h ρ C w H/3 H/2 W10.90 2.20 1.5 1 2300 0.5 1000 W2

W1 = a Hρ a H ρ w(h+H) b3105 0.90 1.5 2300


2242.5 2.20 0.90 1.5 2300 0.5cw(h+H)


Fa = whH w h H H 1.501500 1000 1 1.5 h 1 W1 3105


1125 1000 1.5 1.5 2.25 0.5 w 1000 Fa 1500Fb 1125

Fc = wah w a h Fc 900900 1000 0.90 1

b/3 2b/3

awh

Safety against overturning Gagarana IWMP 10-11Micro no. 15(2) Near Khasra no. 3247 Gagarana DLT 0

W1 x1 Fc Fa Fb U a b W23105 1.75 900 1500 1125 1375 0.90 2.20 2242.5

H U1.5 1375


8932.82 5433.75 1575 1924.07 2.20 0.90 1.30 0.66OM FaxH/2+FbxH/3+Ux2b/3

FaxH/2 FbxH/3 Ux2b/33704.167 1125 562.5 2016.667






1.073 5228.65 4872.5E=b/2-X b/2 X

0.027 1.1 1.073

e b/60.027 0.367 b/6>e

Hance safe

Gagarana IWMP 10-11Structural Design Micro no. 15(2)DLT 0 Near Khasra no. 3247 Gagarana

Top Plan 0.617.43

0.92.20

1.305.03

2.38 3.68

2.30.6


2.76

1.98Head wall

2.38 0.45 1.5Land Level

0.3Apron

0.60.6

Foundation0.3

2.205.03

1.30

0.9cc 1:4:8

0.6

2.20

0.9

2.20

Side wall

2.9

1.5

1.4

1.5

3.9

1.25

0.6

0.45

0.3

Gagarana IWMP 10-11 Estimate Near Khasra no. 3247 Gagarana Micro no. 15(2) DLT 0





side wall 2 5.03 0.6 1.5 9.05Appron 1 17.43 2.38 0.9 37.26


143.61 99 14217.08



side wall 2 5.03 0.6 0.3 1.81Appron 1 17.43 2.38 0.3 12.42


34.18 2282 77988.19



side wall 2 5.03 0.6 1.2 7.24Appron 1 17.43 2.38 0.15 6.21


90.80 1919 1742484 RR stone mesonary in Cement sand mortar 1 : 6 25C



Appron 1 17.43 2.38 0.00Toe wall 1 17.43 0.675 0 0.00

Wing Wall 2 2.25 0.6 1.5 4.0580.62 1919 154702

cf 421155.2

25C



125Abf 421155.2



Appron 1 17.43 2.38 0.08 3.312Toe wall 1 17.43 0.45 0.08 0.628

Wing Wall 2 2.25 0.6 0.08 0.2166.575 2507 16482.63





Appron 1 17.43 2.38 41.40Toe wall 1 17.43 1.05 18.30


174.71 151 26380.8


Appron 126 1 17.43 2.375 0.15 6.21 3587 22275.27


Head wall 1 17.43 1.98 34.60 60.7 2100.262Total 488394.2

3% contengency 14651.83503046

Say 5.00 Lacs


Micro no. 15(2) Near Khasra no. 3247 Gagarana DLT 0Length Left 22



4.82.4

USDS 2:1 3.2 3:1

2.5 2:1 0.6 3:1

6.4 9.6 1.2 1.80.8 12.5 7.5

20.8 5.4

CS (Tw+Bw) *Hight2




139 ii B 22 21.65 476.3022 21.65 476.30

952.60 Cum 92 87639.20

2 116 E 44 1.08 47.52 Cum 80 3801.60

3 193 F 47.52 Cum 87.9 4177.014 5 47.52 Cum 40 1900.80



3% contengency 2928.893100558.7

Name of work

1


5


Spreading of murram

cost of Cumath Seed


Length 20 Near Khasra no. 3247 Gagarana0.45

0.9 0.91

0.600.3







90.50 151 13664.9829

6 Piching 146 2 20.00 0.9 0.15 2.7 938 2532.6

Total 84139.48


86663.67

C/C0.6

Design for LSCD

Micro DLTLocation :- 6 E to B

As per contour mep and site location

Base :- Top of lower LSCD is at same level to bottom of upper LSCD.



level Difference

Hight of structure

No of structure Say

LSCD in side branch

Total no of LSCD

229 214 15 0.9 16.67 17 8 25

Length of Head wall

No of Lscd

Per Unit Cost Total Cost

7 5 35000 1750006 7 30000 2100005 6 25000 1500004 7 20000 140000

25 675000

Estimate for LSCD

Plan Elevation

1.5 7 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.30.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.30.3

Pit1.6


1

Earth work Excavation in hard soilup to 1.5 mt Hight and depositedexcavated meterial lead op to 150 2B 1 7 1.6 0.3 3.36 99 332.64

2

Earth work Excavation in hard soilup to 1.5 mt Hight and depositedexcavated meterial lead op to 150 2B 1 7 3 0.3 6.3 99 623.7

1 7 1.6 0.3 3.361 7 1.3 0.3 6.31 7 1 0.3 3.361 7 0.7 0.3 6.31 1.5 1.6 1.8 3.361 1.5 1.6 1.8 6.3

28.98 1141 33066.18

34022.52

Add 3% Contengency 1020.676

Total 35043.2Say 35000

0.6

3

Dry stone mesonary

22B

Estimate for LSCD

Plan Elevation

1.5 6 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.30.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.30.3

Pit1.6


1


2

Earth work Excavation in hard soilup to 1.5 mt Hight and depositedexcavated meterial lead op to 150 1 6 3 0.3 5.4 99 534.6

1 6 1.6 0.3 2.881 6 1.3 0.3 5.41 6 1 0.3 2.881 6 0.7 0.3 5.41 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.881 1.5 1.6 1.8 5.4

24.84 1141 28342.44

29162.16


Total 30037.02Say 30000

0.6

3

Dry stone mesonary

22B

Estimate for LSCD

Plan Elevation

1.5 5 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.30.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.30.3

Pit1.6


1


2


1 5 1.6 0.3 2.41 5 1.3 0.3 4.51 5 1 0.3 2.41 5 0.7 0.3 4.51 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.41 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.5

20.7 1141 23618.7

24301.8


Total 25030.85Say 25000

0.6

3

Dry stone mesonary

22B

Estimate for LSCD

Plan Elevation

1.5 4 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.30.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.30.3

Pit1.6


1


2


1 4 1.6 0.3 1.921 4 1.3 0.3 3.61 4 1 0.3 1.921 4 0.7 0.3 3.61 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.921 1.5 1.6 1.8 3.6

16.56 1141 18894.96

19441.44


Total 20024.68Say 20000

0.6

3

Dry stone mesonary

22B

Abstruct of cost Gagarana IWMP 10-11

Horticulture Plantation work with drip(A) For General & OBC



plantation 10200 8160 2040 10200 0 0 0 Production Cost of Barbered wire fencing with post fixing 24000 19200 4800 24000 Production

Total 34200 27360 6840 34200 0 0 090% 10%

21000 0 0 0 18900 2100 21000 Total Cost of unit 55200.00 27360.00 6840.00 34200.00 18900.00 2100.00 21000.00Say 0.55 0.27 0.07 0.34 0.19 0.02 0.21 Lacs

(B) For sc & st



plantation 8500 7650 850 8500 0 0 0 Production Cost of Barbered wire fencing with post fixing 21800 19620 2180 21800 Production

Total 30300 27270 3030 30300 0 0 090% 10%



3

Sr. noMeasures


Cost of Drip irrigation system

Name of work

Sr. noName of work


3 Cost of Drip irrigation system

Name of Plant Buded Ber Area 0.25 Ha Spacing 6.3

Horticulture Cost per plant No. of per ha. Plants 62.98816

For sc & st Gagarana IWMP 10-11 say 63

Year No./Year





(A) Endosulphan (35 ec) 3 0.01 Ltr 0.03 Ltr. 280 8.40 529.2(B) Sulpher 3 0.02 Kg 0.06 200 12.00 756

8



Farmer will be traind for Horticulture palntation in Treaning programme be conducted by watershed (PIA)

Farmer will ensured for Watch and Ward by himself

Farmer will be benifited by Drip Irrigation by Ag.extention dept. seperetaly.


wire fencing.

Hight Qty Unit Rate AmountAmount for 50 Plants

Model estimate


Length Width

Name of Plant Buded Ber Area 0.3 Ha Spacing 6.3

Horticulture Cost per plant No. of per ha. Plants 75.58579

For General & OBC Gagarana IWMP 10-11 say 75

Year No./Year

1 Diging of pit 1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.73 cum. 84 61.24 4592.72 Apply of manure 0



4 Plant cost 1 1.00 No 10 15.00 11255 Planting tree 1.00 No. 2.2 3.10 232.56 Weeding & hoeing 3 1 3.00 No. 0.9 3.90 292.57 Sprey 0

(A) Endosulphan (35 ec) 3 0.01 Ltr 0.03 Ltr. 280 8.40 630(B) Sulpher 3 0.02 Kg 0.06 200 12.00 900

8



Farmer will be traind for Horticulture palntation in Treaning programme be conducted by watershed (PIA)

Farmer will ensured for Watch and Ward by himself

Farmer will be benifited by Drip Irrigation by Ag.extention dept. seperetaly.


wire fencing.

Amount for 75 Plants

AmountUnitS.No Length Width Hight

Model estimate

RateTotal

Discription Qty

Fencing post IWMP Gagarana 10-11

2.1 0.15

0.1

No of post 100


Centering & shutering 100 2.1 0.3 63 Sqm 105 6615Mtr Kg/Mtr



296.1 KG 62 18358.2



386.193

Say 385.00

Model estimate

0.15

Model estimateArea 0.3 Ha Specing

Length 219.089 mtr. 7.5No of post As per length= Length/specing 29.2Two Aditional post require at corner 8

For General & OBC 37.21Fencing will be done by Project Say 37



1Supply of barberbed wire fencing 14 gauge 65 6 219.09 1314.5 0.08 105.163 Kg 64 6730.415



4Trancepotation of posts to pit up to one km. 37 37 No 18.75 693.75



7 Tidening of barberded wire 5.5/forest 1314.53 mtr 0.95 1248.807

23570.38

Add 3% contengency 707.1114

24277.49

Say 24000

Model estimateArea 0.25 Ha Specing

Length 200 mtr. 8.1No of post As per length= Length/specing 24.7Two Aditional post require at corner 8

For sc & st 32.69Fencing will be done by Project Say 32






4Trancepotation of posts to pit up to one km. 32 32 No 18.75 600



7 Tidening of barberded wire 5.5/forest 1200 mtr 0.95 1140

21214.84

Add 3% contengency 636.4452

21851.29

Say 21800

Compost Gagarana IWMP 10-11

Name of work Item No Length Width Hight Qty Rate Amount

1 Earth work excavation 139&140 8 3 2 48 84 4032In Hard soil

4032Say 4000

8For sc & st

Total cost Contributation From project10% 90%

4000 400 3600

2For Gen& OBC

Total cost Contributation From project20% 80% 3

4000 800 3200PIT

Model EstimateGagarana IWMP 10-11 Warmi Composte

So.No Name of work Item no. No Length width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount1 Excavation 2B 6 2 2 2.5 60

Hard soil 1.70 Cum 99 168.372 C/C (1:5:10) 10 6 2 2 1 24

0.68 Cum 2008 1365.993 Stone mesonary 25C 6 2 2 1.5 36

2 16.25 1 1 32.5(1:6) 2 10 1 1 20

88.5 cuf2.51 Cum 1919 4813.82

25C + 26 6 1.25 1.25 7 65.6251.86 Cum 1919 3569.57

4 Pillor mesonary 28 1.86 Cum 548 1019.355 Plaster 70A 6 5 7 210

(1:4) 2 16.25 3 97.525 mm 2 10 3 60

367.5 Sqf34.15 Sqm 151 5157.296

6 Chenal Length Kg/feet Kg3'' * 1.5'' 3 20 60 1.25 75 Kg 68.1 5107.5Angle(1.5"*1.5") 6 5.22 31.32 0.9 28.19 Kg 68.1 1919.66

3 10 30 0.9 27.00 Kg 68.1 1838.7Angle (1"*1") 3 8 24 0.35 8.40 Kg 68.1 572.04

7 Cement sheets 14 6 3 252 023.42 Sqm 251 5878.439

8 color and finising 5009 Warmi 2 Kg 500 1000

32910.72Say 33000

Abstruct of cost Warmi compost unitGagarana IWMP 10-11for gen & obc


33000 26400 6600 33000 Production Say 0.31 0.25 0.06 0.31 Lacs

for sc & st


33000 29700 3300 33000 Production Say 0.31 0.28 0.03 0.31 Lacs

1

Sr. noMeasures

Project cost

Warmi Compost Unit

Name of work

Sr. noName of work

Project costMeasures

1 Warmi Compost Unit

Gagarana IWMP 10-11

Warmi Compost

5.22 1.5

5

710

2.52

110

220

Sprinkler Irrigation

Convergence with Ag. Ext. Dept.Gagarana IWMP 10-11

Marginal & Small farmer

Govt. farmer share Total Govt. farmer share Total Govt. farmer share Total60% 40% 100% 60% 40% 100% 60% 40% 100%

63 mm 6239 4159 10398.3 10196 6797 16993 14720 9813 24533

75 mm 0 0 0 11426 7617 19043 16368 10912 27280

Large farmer

Govt. farmer share Total Govt. farmer share Total Govt. farmer share Total50% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100% 50% 50% 100%

63 mm 5200 5200 10400 8497 8497 16994 12267 12267 24534

75 mm 0 0 0 9522 9522 19044 13640 13640 27280

> 0.40 Ha. 0.40 to 1 ha 1 to 2 Ha

> 0.40 Ha. 0.40 to 1 ha 1 to 2 Ha

Sprinkler IrrigationGagarana IWMP 10-11 Convergence with Ag. Ext. Dept.

Pipe size Area Unit cost No of unit Total costMM Ha Convergence Lacs

63 >0.40 0.062 10 0.62

63 0.40 to 1 0.1 15 1.5Marginal & Small farmer

75 0.40 to 1 0.114 15 1.71

63 1 to 2 0.15 20 3

75 1 to 2 0.17 20 3.410.23

Pipe size Area Unit cost No of unit Total costMM Ha Convergence Lacs

63 >0.40 0.05 10 0.5

63 0.40 to 1 0.084 10 0.84Large farmer

75 0.40 to 1 0.095 15 1.425

63 1 to 2 0.122 10 1.22

75 1 to 2 0.136 10 1.365.345

Documents

Government of Rajasthan Deptt. Watershed Development & Soil …water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed... · 2019-12-15 · Gagarana Project is located in Merta Block,