GOOD - Tennessee · DECK Wearing Surface Comments GOOD Rating Deck - Structural Condition NV HL CRACKS W/EFF. Asphalt overlay. No visible issues Curbs NA Median NONE Sidewalks NONE

Hamilton County

Regular Inspection Report

Location: 33-I0075-01.17-RIGHT Federal ID: 33I00750009 Maintenance Responsibility: State of Tennessee Description: 3 Span Bridge I-75 - Northbound OVER Big Spring Creek Inspection Date: July 19, 2016 Overall Condition Rating:

GOOD

LOCATION MAP

I-75 Exit 2 @ I-24

I-75 Exit 3 E. Brainerd Rd

Tennessee Georgia

Route Direction ON Structure

Traffic Direction ON Structure

Direction of Waterway Flow

33I00750009FED. BRIDGE NO.:

BRIDGE MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

Tennessee Departmentof Transportation

HAMILTON33-I0075-01.17-R1 SPEC. CASE: 0

BIG SPRING CREEK

33

REPAIR LIST NO.:DATE ADDED: 05/01/2001REVISED: 07/26/2012

2

1.11

COUNTY:LOCATION:CO. SEQ.:MILEPOST:

CROSSING:

MAINT. DIST.:

65

71HIGHWAY SYSTEM:BRIDGE WIDTH (CURB TO CURB):BRIDGE WIDTH (OUT TO OUT):APPROACH ROADWAY (W/SHOULDERS):

MAINTAINED BY:MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:MAIN SPAN DESIGN TYPE:APPROACH SPAN MATERIAL:APPROACH SPAN DESIGN TYPE:

INSPECTION DATE: GENERAL CONDITION: GOODEVALUATION DATE: STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT: NOPPRM PIN NUMBER:H TRUCK RATING @ INV.: 20 TONS SUFFICIENCY RATING: 93.0

STATE HIGHWAY AGENCYPRESTRESSED CONCRETE

BOX BEAM OR GIRDERS - MULTIPLEOTHER OR NOT APPLICABLEOTHER OR NOT APPLICABLE

30

1073681

NUMBER OF MAIN SPANS:NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS:BRIDGE LENGTH (FT):MAXIMUM SPAN LENGTH (FT):SKEW ANGLE (DEGREES):

02-INTERSTATE URBANFT 10 IN

IN1FT74FT 11 IN

FACILITY CARRIED: I75

07/19/201607/31/2014113275.00

GENERAL COMMENTS:

THIS BRIDGE REHABILITATION WAS LET ON AUGUST 6, 2010 UNDER CONTRACT # CNJ919TO MID-STATE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. COMPLETION TIME: ON OR BEFORENOVEMBER 15, 2010 BID AMOUNT: $ 291,483.77. REPAIR PLANS ADDED TOFILENET.

Page 1 of 1

STATE OF TENNESSEEDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

33

I0075

0

1

1.17

Revised 07/21/2016

County:

Route:

Special Case:

County Sequence:

Log Mile:

A

A

99

99

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

GOOD CONDITION - SOME MINOR PROBLEMS.

VERY GOOD CONDITION - NOPROBLEMS NOTED.

EXCELLENT CONDITION

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - MINORDETERIORATION OF STRUCTURALELEMENTS.

FAIR CONDITION - ALL PRIMARYSTRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ARE SOUND BUTMAY HAVE MINOR SECTION LOSS,CRACKING, SPALLING OR SCOUR.

POOR CONDITION - ADVANCED SECTIONLOSS, DETERIORATION, SPALLING ORSCOUR.

SERIOUS CONDITION - LOSS OF SECTION,DETERIORATION, SPALLING OR SCOUR HAVESERIOUSLY AFFECTED PRIMARYSTRUCTURAL COMPONENTS. LOCALFAILURES ARE POSSIBLE. FATIGUE CRACKSIN STEEL OR SHEAR CRACKS IN CONCRETEMAY BE PRESENT.

K P

STRC OPEN/CLOSED/POSTED

TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES

MINIMUM V.C. OVER DECK(ROADWAY + SHOULDERS)

MINIMUM V.C. OVER DECK(EXCLUDES SHOULDERS)

Trans. Appr. Rail Terminal SPEED LIMIT1 1 N 55

FT. IN.

FT. IN.

FT. IN.

FT. IN.

41

36

10

520

Br. Rail1

2

1 "IMMINENT" FAILURE CONDITION - MAJORDETERIORATION OR SECTION LOSSPRESENT IN CRITICAL STRUCTURALCOMPONENTS OR OBVIOUS VERTICAL ORHORIZONTAL MOVEMENT AFFECTINGSTRUCTURAL STABILITY. BRIDGE ISCLOSED TO TRAFFIC BUT CORRECTIVE

CRITICAL CONDITION - ADVANCEDDETERIORATION OF PRIMARY STRUCTURALELEMENTS. FATIGUE CRACKS IN STEEL ORSHEAR CRACKS IN CONCRETE MAY BEPRESENT OR SCOUR MAY HAVE REMOVEDSUBSTRUCTURE SUPPORT. UNLESSCLOSELY MONITORED IT MAY BENECESSARY TO CLOSE THE BRIDGE UNTILCORRECTIVE ACTION IS TAKEN.

Bridge Number:(Includes Item 5A)

Feature Intersected:

Evaluation Status:

99

99

N NOT APPLICABLE/ /

ITEM # DESCRIPTION CONDITION CODING GUIDELINES(Values for Coding Items 58, 59, 60 and 62)

90 LAST INSPECTION DATE

Bridge ConditionCoding Form

33I007500091

BIG SPRING CREEK

OTHER ITEM(S) HAVE BEEN CHANGED

CODE ONLY THOSE VALUES WHICH HAVE CHANGEDVALUE

07/19/2016EARLIEST DATE OF NEXTREGULAR INSPECTION

05/20/2018

/ /REVIEW DATETEAM LEADER SIGNATURE

DECK 7

58

7

SUPERSTRUCTURE59

7

SUBSTRUCTURE60

7

N

CHANL/CHANL PROTECTION

CULVERT AND RETAIN WALL

61

62

8WATERWAY ADEQUACY

71

8

521

OVERALL CONDITION

GOOD

72 APPROACH RDWY ALIGNMENT

17 LONGITUDE

0

ACTION MAY PUT IT BACK IN LIGHT SERVICE.

FAILED CONDITION - OUT OF SERVICE ANDBEYOND CORRECTIVE ACTION.

16 LATITUDE

35N

W 85

.0710 12.6440' '

Photographs

Bridge ID#: 33I00750009 Date: 07/19/2016

BRIDGE # - SPAN 1 - RIGHT

LOOKING AHEAD I75 - NB

Photographs

LOOKING BACK I75 - NB

RIGHT SIDEVIEW - OUTLET

Photographs

RIGHT SIDEVIEW - OUTLET

UPSTREAM

Photographs

DOWNSTREAM

ABUTMENT

Photographs

BENT

BEARINGS - ABUTMENT

Photographs

BEARINGS - BENT

WEARING SURFACE

Photographs

TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page No.____

Form BIR 3.0(Rev. 9-22-98)DT-0069

7/19/2016Date23Field Report No. 7/7/2014Date22Previous Report No.

DESIGNPlans:

33I00750009Bridge No.Eleven Digit No.

Bridge Location No. 33 I0075 0117 R- -Co. Route Log Mile

I75

Facility Carried by Structure

over BIG SPRING CREEK *

Crossing

PCBBStructure Type (Main Span)

FRACTURE CRITICAL: NO

FEATURES

Wearing Surface CONCRETE Depth 8.0 (in.)TEAM LEADER

Tays

UNDERWATER INSPECTIONDOT FIELD TEAMTo Be Performed By:

BRIDGE is:

Date

OPEN

COMMENTS:

Supervising Bridge Inspector: Tays BRIDGE RATING: GOOD

Min. Vertical Clearance over Deck 99-99 (ft.-in.)

Min. Lateral Under Clearance Rt. (*.* ft.)

Maximum Span Length 35.7 (**.* ft.)

Deck Out-to-Out 74.0

Sidewalk NARt. NALt.

Structure Name (If Named)

Year Constructed 1959 ACTUAL

Year Widened 1989 ACTUAL Year Rehabilitated 1989 ACTUAL

County 21Maintenance District

Flared Width YES

Navigational Control NO

Median Width NONE

Bridge Skew 81 ° LTHaas

No. Main Spans 3

NAStructure Type (Appr.Spans)

No. Approach Spans 0

WIDTHS (*.* ft.)

Total Length 107.0 (**.* ft.)

Roadway Curb/Curb NA

Roadway Rail/Rail 70.0

*Approach Roadway 48.0*(Does Not Include Shoulders)

Approach Shoulder 10.0Rt.12.0Lt.

CLEARANCES

Min. Vertical Under Clearance NA (ft.-in.)

NA

Min. Lateral Under Clearance Lt. (*.* ft.)NA

(If Yes, Include BIR 3.9)

NBIS Bridge Length (<25 ft.) (ft.-in.)

NOChange in Structural Condition: YESMajor Repairs Made:

INSPECTORS

Weight Limit Posted

Gross..............

NO

Page No.____Form BIR 3.1(Rev. 9-22-98)DT-0080

7/19/2016DateBridge Location No. 33 I0075 0117 R- -Co. Route Log Mile

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONTime of Day Inspected AM Weather Conditions 75F SUNNY

Vehicles Observed ALL TYPES

LIVE LOAD BEHAVIORSubstructure

Horiz./ Vert. Defl. NO

Vibration NO

Superstructure

Horiz./ Vert. Defl. NO

Vibration NO

Comments

APPROACHAlignment GOOD

Slab NA

Joints NA

Pavement GOOD

Embankment GOOD

Drains GOOD

TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURESStandard/

SubStandard

Rating Comments

Yes/No

Comments

Bridgerailing GOOD STANDARD

Transitions GOOD STANDARD

Guardrail GOOD STANDARD

Guardrail Terminal N/A STANDARD >100 FEET

SIGNINGPaddleboards NO

Vertical Clearance (<14'-6")

Yes/ No/ Needed

NO

Narrow Bridge Signs NO

One Lane Bridge Signs NO

Other Signs or Plaques:

Comments Regarding any Problems with Signing:

Rating

Tons

2 Axle............... Tons

3 or more Axles.. Tons

Form BIR 3.2(Rev. 9-22-98)DT-0081


DECKWearing Surface

Comments

GOOD

Rating

Deck - Structural Condition

NV HL CRACKS W/EFF. Asphalt overlay. No visible issues

Curbs NA

Median NONESidewalks NONEParapet N/ARailing N/APaint NADrains FAIRLighting Standards NONEUtilities NONEJoint Leakage NAExpansion Joints NONE

SUPERSTRUCTUREBearing Devices Abutments - None - IntegralGOOD

Girders or Beams G-F HL CRACKS. MINOR SPALLS W/ CABLE EXPOSED.

Alignment of Members

GOOD

Floor Beams NA

Paint NA

Stringers NA

Diaphragms GOODBracing NATrusses - General NA

Portals NA Bracing NA

TEXTURE COATCondition Rating GOODOverall Appearance GOODStaining Rating GOODFading Rating GOODScaling Rating GOOD

Needs Spot Painting NONeeds Repainting NO

Comments

Page No.____Form BIR 3.3(Rev. 9-22-98)DT-0082


SUBSTRUCTURE

ABUTMENTSCaps

Comments

GOOD

Rating

Breastwall HL CRACKS W/ EFF, SPALL, DELAM @ CJs.G-F

Wings GOODBackwall GOODPlumb GOODFooting NAPiles GOODEmbankment SETTLEDGOODBearing Surface GOODSlope Paving NARip Rap GOOD

PIERSCaps N/A

Columns N/A

Plumb N/AFootings N/APiles N/ABearing Surface N/A

BENTSCaps HL cracksGOOD

Columns Walls - HL cracksGOOD

Plumb GOODFootings NVPiles NVBearing Surface GOOD

Piles Need Replacement:

Piles To Be Replaced:

Form BIR 3.8(Rev. 9-22-98)DT-1508


STREAM CHANNEL DATA AND CONDITIONS

Stream Crossing: BIG SPRING CREEK *

I. MUD, SEDIMENT1. Type of bed material?

(Yes/ No/ Not Apparent)

SPECIAL INSPECTION DATA - FOR REASONS OTHER THAN FC OR SCOUR

NO2. Has channel shifted?

GOOD3. Condition of rip-rap? Est. % failed %

GOOD4. Overall condition of channel?

75. Item 61 - Code values 0 thru 9 according to the recording

and coding guide currently in effect:

NO6. Underwater diver inspection recommended?If yes, why?

II.

No1.

Channel and bank stability conditions: (yes if applicable)

Steep bank conditions: Failures upstream NoFailures downstream

No2. Moderate bank erosion

3. Bank vegetation: YESa. low growth YESb. large timber Noc. clear banksNod. dead trees upstream Noe. dead trees downstream

4. NOSediment or gravel accumulation: (Yes/ No/ Unknown)

5. NOChannel altered or straightened: (Yes/ No/ Unknown)

6. Stable conditions: YESa. live growth Yesb. bedrockNoc. boulders Nod. flat slopes (<=2:1)

III. Waterway adequacy and debris characteristics: (yes if applicable)

1. Bridge deck elevations:

a. level with approach roadway. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YESb. higher than approach roadway. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Noc. roadway approach >= 2 ft. above natural ground line. . YES

2. Abutment encroaches into channel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No

3. Large scour (blowhole) under bridge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No

4. Indications that flood waters overtop bridge: (Yes/No)

5. Debris characteristics:

a. debris/drift present Nob. debris/drift likely to accumulate Noc. dead trees upstream No dead trees downstream No

IV. Comments: MACHINE-PLACED RIPRAP BAGS.

I. Does this bridge need a special inspection? NO

II. Reason for special inspection:

NOIf YES, Answer: Occasionally, Frequently, or Unknown

33 I0075 0117 R- -Inspection Team's Summary

Bridge Location No.Page No.___

7/19/2016Inspection DateBridge Rating GOOD

On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 , a Region Two bridge inspection team inspected

this structure and found it to be in GOOD condition.

TYPE SERVICE: I 75 NBLOVER: BIG SPRING CREEK *

TOP OF DECK

BOTTOM OF DECK

SUPERSTRUCTURE

SUBSTRUCTURE

UNDERCLEARANCE

SPECIAL NOTES

Traffic Safety FeaturesBridge Rail: GOOD STANDARD

Transitions: GOOD STANDARD

Approach Rail: GOOD STANDARD

Terminals: N/A STANDARD >100 FEET

Wearing SurfacesApproach Pvmt: GOOD

Deck - Wearing Surface: GOOD

Deck - Structural Condition: NV HL CRACKS W/EFF. Asphalt overlay. No visible issues

Beams: G-F Super-Gird/BeamsComments:HL CRACKS. MINOR SPALLS W/ CABLE EXPOSED.

Bearings: GOOD Super-BearingDevComments:Abutments - None - Integral

Caps: GOOD

Breastwall: G-F HL CRACKS W/ EFF, SPALL, DELAM @ CJs.

Wings: GOOD

Backwall GOOD

Bearing Surface: GOOD

Caps: GOOD HL cracks

Columns: GOOD Walls - HL cracks

Bearing Surface: GOOD

Abutments

Bents

Min Vert Under Clear(ft-in): NA

ELEVATIONS OF DECK PAGE NO._________

BRIDGE LOCATION NO. ___33___ _I-75___1.17 RT 1.88 DATE:_03/04/98___ COUNTY ROUTE LOG MILE LOG km

STATION/LOCATION

TOP OF LT.CURB/RAIL

GUTTER/EDGE DECK

CENTERLINE GUTTER/EDGE DECK

TOP OF RT.CURB/RAIL

ABUT # 1 208.48 207.69 207.48 208.29

BENT # 1 208.49 207.67 207.48 208.33

BENT # 2 208.49 207.67 207.50 208.33

ABUT # 2 208.55 207.74 207.53 208.35

BENCH MARK LOCATION BRIDGE SEAT, ABUT. # 2, RT. SIDE. (NBL)_________________________________________________________

BENCH MARK ELEVATION 678.32 ft - 206.75 m________________________________NOTE: ELEVATIONS TAKEN FROM PREVIOUS REPORT.

RT. EDGE OF BRIDGE PAGE NO.___

BRIDGE LOC. NO.: 33-I75-1.17 RT DATE: 07/26/2012DOWNSTREAM

( m ) LOCATION ELEV '98 CROSSING: BIG SPRING CREEKABUT #1 1.00 206.09 3.00 204.95 6.00 202.83

9.00 201.12EDG WTR 10.30 200.22PIER #1 11.00 199.83

12.00 199.7315.00 199.78

18.00 199.73 BOTTOM FOOTING ELEVATIONSEDG WTR 21.00 200.21 PIER #1 197.02 mPIER #2 22.00 200.57 PIER #2 198.55 m 24.00 201.41 27.00 203.74 BENCH MARK ELEVATION 206.75 m

30.00 205.35 LOCATION : BRIDGE SEAT, ABUT #2ABUT #2 32.00 206.15 RIGHT SIDE. (NBL)

199.00200.00201.00202.00203.00204.00205.00206.00207.00

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00

DISTANCE ( m )

ELEV

ATI

ON

( m

)

ABUT #1 ABUT #2

JJST011

BOTTOM VISIBLE

JJST011

NO CHANGE: 2010, 2012

LEFT EDGE OF BRIDGE PAGE NO.___

BRIDGE LOC. NO.: 33-I75-1.17 RT DATE: 07/26/2012UPSTREAM

( m ) LOCATION ELEV.'98 CROSSING: BIG SPRING CREEKABUT. #1 1.00 206.23

3.00 205.286.00 203.67

9.00 201.77PIER #1 11.00 200.95 BOTTOM FOOTING ELEVATIONSEDG WTR 12.00 200.36 PIER #1 197.02 m 15.00 199.83 PIER #2 198.55 m

18.00 199.84 EDG WTR 21.00 200.18 BENCH MARK ELEVATION 206.75 mPIER #2 22.00 201.11 LOCATION : TOP OF BRIDGE SEAT, ABUT #2

24.00 202.56 RIGHT SIDE (NBL) 27.00 203.64 30.00 205.29ABUT. #2 32.00 206.25

199.00200.00201.00202.00203.00204.00205.00206.00207.00

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00

DISTANCE ( m )

ELEV

ATI

ON

( m

)

ABUT #1 ABUT #2

JJST011

BOTTOM VISIBLE

JJST011

NO CHANGE: 2010, 2012

I-75 NorthboundRoute: To Knoxville

Top Deck 1 OVER: Big Spring CreekFlow: Lt-Rt on I-75

33-I0075-01.17-RIGHT33I00750009

Top Deck 1I-75 Traffic: Northbound

Inspection Date: 07/19/20163 Span Bridge

Embankment: G

App Pvmt: G

App Rail: G

Wearing Surface: G

Bridge Rail: G

This span - Traffic Approach

2016 Changes in RED



33-I0075-01.17-RIGHT33I00750009



Wearing Surface: G

Bridge Rail: G

2016 Changes in RED



33-I0075-01.17-RIGHT33I00750009



Embankment: G

Approach Rail: G

Wearing Surface: G

Bridge Rail: G

This Span - Traffic Departure2016 Changes in RED


Bottom Deck 1 OVER: Big Spring CreekFlow: Lt-Rt on I-75

33-I0075-01.17-RIGHT33I00750009

Bottom Deck 1I-75 Traffic: Northbound


Approach Rail: G Traffic departure end

Beams: G

Deck: GF

cracks are hairline with efflorescence

spalled around holes11" X 9" X 1" deep Live load

noise

2016 Changes in RED

A B C D E F G H I J K L M R N O P Q S T U

Rebar Spall Overhang



33-I0075-01.17-RIGHT33I00750009



Beams: G

Deck: GF

cracks are hairline with efflorescence

Rebar Spall - 5" X 1.1' X 2"

Rebar Spall

2016 Changes in RED




33-I0075-01.17-RIGHT33I00750009



Beams: G 'J' - sag

Deck: GF

Eff leakage between beams

cracks spaced 3'-4' apart

2016 Changes in RED



Abutment 1 OVER: Big Spring CreekFlow: Lt-Rt on I-75

33-I0075-01.17-RIGHT33I00750009

Abutment 1I-75 Traffic: Northbound


Walls: G

Bearings: None Integral

6" wide delaminated at construction joint

hairline-small crack

Spall -1'x8"x3"

2016 Changes in RED

Spall 3" x 6"


Bent 1 OVER: Big Spring CreekFlow: Lt-Rt on I-75

33-I0075-01.17-RIGHT33I00750009

Bent 1I-75 Traffic: Northbound


Pier Wall GF

Cap: GF

Bearings: G Fixed

delaminated 2.3' X 2.2' crack showing through epoxy

all epoxied cracks

hairline-small crackalong const.joint

delaminated 1.4' widewith small crack

delaminated 2' X 2.2'

all epoxied cracks

delaminated 1'-1.3' wide

2016 Changes in RED

Looking Ahead

Looking Back


Bent 2 OVER: Big Spring CreekFlow: Lt-Rt on I-75

33-I0075-01.17-RIGHT33I00750009

Bent 2I-75 Traffic: Northbound


Pier Wall GF

Cap: GF

Bearings: G Fixed

delaminated 1.3' X 2.7' delaminated 3.1' X 2.3'

all epoxied cracks

hairline crackalong const.joint

delaminated 1' widewith epoxied cracks

hairline cracks delaminated 3' X 1.2'

all epoxied cracks

spall 1.5' X 4" X 1" deep

spall 4" X 1.7' X 1" deep delaminated 11" wide

2016 Changes in RED

Looking Ahead

Looking Back


Abutment 2 OVER: Big Spring CreekFlow: Lt-Rt on I-75

33-I0075-01.17-RIGHT33I00750009

Abutment 2I-75 Traffic: Northbound


Walls: G

Bearings: None Integral

cracks are hairline

delaminated 8" X 1.7'

15'

Void - exposed pile - settled 9" & 1.7' back under24'x2'x12" FILLED IN

2016 Changes in RED

Documents

GOOD - Tennessee · DECK Wearing Surface Comments GOOD Rating Deck - Structural Condition NV HL CRACKS W/EFF. Asphalt overlay. No visible issues Curbs NA Median NONE Sidewalks NONE