Upload
phungtu
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Glueball Masses from the Lattice
Biagio LuciniSwansea University
QCD-TNT-III, Trento, September 2013
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Motivations
The existence of gauge-invariant bound states of gluons implied byconfinement
However, glueball states have not yet been convincingly identified inexperiments
Glueball-like states can play a key role also in strongly interacting dynamicsbeyond the standard model
A calculation from first principles using lattice techniques can serve as aguidance to theoretical models and experimental searches
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Outline
1 Lattice setup
2 Glueballs in QCD-like theories
3 Glueballs and (near-)conformal dynamics
4 Conclusions and outlook
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Outline
1 Lattice setup
2 Glueballs in QCD-like theories
3 Glueballs and (near-)conformal dynamics
4 Conclusions and outlook
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
The Lattice
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Lattice action for full QCD
Path integral
Z =
∫(DUµ(i)) (det M(Uµ))Nf e−Sg(Uµν(i))
with
Uµ(i) = Pexp(
ig∫ i+aµ̂
iAµ(x)dx
)and
Uµν(i) = Uµ(i)Uν(i + µ̂)U†µ(i + ν̂)U†ν(i)
Gauge part
Sg = β∑i,µ
(1−
1NRe Tr(Uµν(i))
), with β = 2N/g2
0
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Masses from correlators
Trial operators Φ1(t), . . . ,Φn(t) with the quantum numbers of the state of interest
Cij(t) = 〈0| (Φi(0))† Φj(t)|0〉
= 〈0| (Φi(0))† e−HtΦj(0)eHt|0〉
=∑
n
〈0| (Φi(0))† |n〉〈n|e−HtΦj(0)eHt|0〉
=∑
n
e−∆Ent〈0| (Φi(0))† |n〉〈n|Φj(0)|0〉
=∑
n
c∗incjne−∆Ent = δij∑
n
|cin|2e−amnt →t→∞
δij|ci1|2e−am1t
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Variational principle
1 Find the eigenvector v that minimises
am1(td) = −1td
logv∗i Cij(td)vj
v∗i Cij(0)vj
for some td2 Fit v(t) with the law Ae−m1t to extract m1
3 Find the complement to the space generated by v(t)4 Repeat 1-3 to extract m2, . . . ,mn
Sources of systematics
Need a good overlap of the eigenvectors with the state of interest
Need a large variational basis including all possible states overlapping withthe required one
Need to keep under control finite size and lattice artefacts
Care should be taken in assigning the spin
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Outline
1 Lattice setup
2 Glueballs in QCD-like theories
3 Glueballs and (near-)conformal dynamics
4 Conclusions and outlook
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Glueballs in the quenched approximation
++ −+ +− −−PC
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
r 0mG
2++
0++
3++
0−+
2−+
0*−+
1+−
3+−
2+−
0+−
1−−2−−3−−
2*−+
0*++
0
1
2
3
4
mG (G
eV)
(From Morningstar and Peardon, hep-lat/9901004 )
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
QCD at large N
Generalisation of QCD: SU(N) gauge theory (possibly enlarged with Nf fermions inthe fundamental representation)
Taking the limit g2 → 0, N →∞, λ = g2N fixed simplifies the theory and one cansee that:
Quark loop effects ∝ 1/N ⇒ The N =∞ limit is quenched
Mixing glueballs-mesons ∝ 1/√
N ⇒ No mixing between glueballs andmesons at N =∞Meson decay widths ∝ 1/N ⇒ mesons do not decay at N =∞OZI rule ∝ 1/N ⇒ OZI rule exact at N =∞
↪→ The simpler large N phenomenology can explain features of QCD
phenomenology in a quenched setup that removes most of the practical
computational difficulties for QCD (and SU(3))
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Large N limit on the lattice
The lattice approach allows us to go beyond perturbative and diagrammaticarguments. For a given observable
1 Continuum extrapolationDetermine its value at fixed a and NExtrapolate to the continuum limitExtrapolate to N →∞ using a power series in 1/N2
2 Fixed lattice spacingChoose a in such a way that its value in physical units is common tothe various NDetermine the value of the observable for that a at any NExtrapolate to N →∞ using a power series in 1/N2
Study performed for various observables both at zero and finite temperature for
2 ≤ N ≤ 8
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Glueball masses at large N
[BL, Teper and Wenger, JHEP 0406 (2004) 012]
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Masses at N =∞
0++ m√σ= 3.28(8) +
2.1(1.1)N2
0++∗ m√σ= 5.93(17)− 2.7(2.0)
N2
2++ m√σ= 4.78(14) +
0.3(1.7)N2
Accurate N =∞ value, normal O(1/N2) correction
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Glueball spectrum at aTc = 1/6
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
am
Ground StatesExcitations[Lucini,Teper,Wenger 2004]
A1++ A1
-+ A2+- E++ E+- E-+ T1
+- T1-+ T2
++ T2--T2
-+T1++E-- T2
+-
Figure 20: The spectrum at N = !. The yellow boxes represent the large N extrapolation of masses
obtained in ref. [38].
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
!!M2
2"#
0
1
2
3
J
PC = + +PC = + -PC = - +PC = - -
Figure 21: Chew-Frautschi plot of the glueball spectrum
– 36 –
[BL, Rago and Rinaldi, JHEP 1008 (2010) 119]
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Meson spectrum (at fixed a)
^Fπ
^fρ
ρ a0
a1
b1
π∗ ρ∗a
0
*a
1
*b
1
*
0
1
2
3
4
5
m /
√σ
SU(∞)SU(2)
SU(3)
SU(4)
SU(5)
SU(6)
SU(7)
SU(17)
[Bali et al., JHEP 06 (2013) 071]
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Large N vs. experiments
0
1
2
3
4
5
m /
√σ
Ground statesExcited states
Experiment, √σ = 395 MeV
Experiment, √σ = 444 MeV
mq = m
ud
^Fπ
^fρ
π ρ a0
a1
b1
0
4.6
9.2
13.8
18.4
23.0
m /
^ F
∞
[Bali et al., JHEP 06 (2013) 071]
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Back to QCD
0+ + 0+− 0−+ 0−− 1−− 1+− 1+ + 2+ + 2−+ 2+− 2−− 3−− 3+− 3−+ 3+ +1
2
3
4
5
6
7
M G
eV
PDG exptAnisovich et al.Glueball, this work
[Gregory et al., JHEP 1210 (2012) 170]
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Outline
1 Lattice setup
2 Glueballs in QCD-like theories
3 Glueballs and (near-)conformal dynamics
4 Conclusions and outlook
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
The spectrum for a QCD-like theory
At high fermion masses the theory is nearly-quenched
At low fermion masses the relevant degrees of freedoms are thepseudoscalar mesons
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Locking
All spectral mass ratios depend very mildly on m below the locking scale
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Locking near the Banks-Zaks point
If this scenario is valid beyond BZ, at all scales� Λ
mV/mPS ' 1 + ε
mPS � σ1/2
mG/σ1/2 '
[mG/σ
1/2](YM)
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Spectrum in SU(2) Nf = 2 Adj
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0a mPCAC
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
a M
valu
es a
t mP
CA
C =
∞
PS meson mass0
++ glueball mass
2++
glueball mass
σ1/2 (σ = string tension)
[Del Debbio, BL, Patella, Pica and Rago, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 074507]
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Spectrum in SU(2) Nf = 2 Adj
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0a mPCAC
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0a
M
valu
es a
t mP
CA
C =
∞
PS meson mass0
++ glueball mass
2++
glueball mass
σ1/2 (σ = string tension)
The pseudoscalar is always higher in mass than the 0++ glueball, as predicted bythe locking scenario at high fermion mass
These theories naturally provide a light scalar⇒ is this a route to understanding
the mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking?
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Outline
1 Lattice setup
2 Glueballs in QCD-like theories
3 Glueballs and (near-)conformal dynamics
4 Conclusions and outlook
Biagio Lucini Glueballs
Glueballs
Biagio Lucini
Lattice setup
Configingtheories
(Near-)conformaltheories
Conclusionsand outlook
Conclusions and outlook
Lattice calculations are an (increasingly more) useful tool to understand thefate of glueballs in QCD↪→ Need to control better mixing with scattering and meson states
Valuable information can be provided by lattice calculations in the large Nlimit↪→ Need to take the continuum limit
The dynamics of glueball is heavily influenced by the proximity to theconformal window↪→ New classes of theories need to be explored in order to see if stronglyinteracting BSM dynamics is a viable mechanism of electroweek symmetrybreaking
Biagio Lucini Glueballs