Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
GLONASS PhaseRange biasesin RTK processing
Gleb ZyryanovAshtech
Workshop on GNSS Biases 2012
Bern, Switzerland
January 18-19, 2012
2
Scope
Simplified observation models for GPS
Simplified observation models for GLONASS
FDMA specific: clock and biases
Calibration
GLONASS bias class
3
Make life simple
To make everything simple– Zero baseline (two receivers sharing same antenna)– Start with Single Difference.
Benefits:– No ionosphere– No troposphere– No satellite orbit and clock errors– No antenna variations– Multi-path environment is exactly the same
What is left?– Receiver Clock– Biases– Noise
4
SD GPS Codes
Simplified observation model for Single Difference GPS Code on a zero baseline
noisec BdtP jGPSba
jGPS
ba
jGPS
ba
jGPSba ,
,
,
,
,
,
,,
noisec BdtP jGPSba
jGPS
ba
jGPSba ,
,
,
,
,,
noisec dtP jGPS
ba
jGPSba ,
,
,,
Pdt jGPSba
GPS
ba Meanc ,
,,
1
5
SD GPS Carrier Phase
Simplified observation model for Single Difference GPS Carrier Phase on a zero baseline
noisec bNdt jGPS
ba
jGPS
ba
jGPS
ba
jGPS
ba
jGPS
ba ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
11
noisec bNdt jGPS
ba
jGPS
ba
jGPS
ba
jGPS
ba ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
1
noisec Ndt jGPS
ba
jGPS
ba
jGPS
ba ,
,
,
,
,
,
1
noiseN ijGPS
ba
ijGPS
ba ,,
,
,,
,
6
SD GLONASS Codes
Simplified observation model for Single Difference GLONASS Code on a zero baseline
noisec BdtP jGLOba
jGLO
ba
jGLO
ba
jGLOba ,
,
,
,
,
,
,,
noisec BdtP jGLOba
jGLO
ba
jGLOba ,
,
,
,
,,
Pdt jGLOba
GLO
ba Meanc ,
,,
1
7
SD GLONASS Carrier Phase (same hw)
Simplified observation model for Single Difference GLONASS Carrier Phase on a zero baseline (same h/w)
noisec bNdt jGLO
ba
jGLO
ba
jGLO
baj
jGLO
baj
jGLO
ba ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
11
noisec bNdt jGLO
ba
jGLO
ba
jGLO
baj
jGLO
ba ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
1
noisec Ndt jGLO
ba
jGLO
baj
jGLO
ba ,
,
,
,
,
,
1
noisec Ndt ijGLO
ba
jGLO
baij
ijGLO
ba
,,
,
,
,
,,
,
11
s)frequencieadjacent (for 55621 meters. ms
s)frequencieadjacent (for 80.001876291 meters meter
Pdt jGLOba
GLO
baMean
c ,,,
1
8
SD GLONASS Carrier Phase (different hw)
Simplified observation model for Single Difference GLONASS Carrier Phase on a zero baseline (different hardware)
noisec bNdt jGLO
ba
jGLO
ba
jGLO
baj
jGLO
baj
jGLO
ba ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
11
noisec bNdt jGLO
ba
jGLO
ba
jGLO
baj
jGLO
ba ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
1
Pdt jGLOba
GLO
ba Meanc ,
,,
1
?,
,b jGLO
ba
It is observed, that this bias follows linear pattern.
It may be viewed as a small (fraction of a cycle) bias
Or it may be viewed as delta-clock between Code and Carrier.
9
Calibration
Bias can be non-linear– Though we have observed only minor variations, but we
clearly see small non-linearity in GLONASS carrier phase after passing low-end filters
Generally bias should be estimated for each GLONASS frequency independently (probably as a variation from linear approximation)
Only GLONASS data should be used for calibration (this mainly concerns proper clock estimation prior to carrier phase bias estimation itself)
Only data from corresponding frequency should be used (i.e. only L2 codes should be used for L2 carrier phase biases calibration)
10
What we would like to see happen
Standardized procedure to estimate GLONASS carrier phase biases
Standardized means to specify so call “GLONASS bias class”, which would allow one to apply appropriate biases.
11
Absolute calibration vs. Golden-Receiver
At this stage absolute calibration does not seem to be possible.– Even different simulators would introduce their own specific biases.
Selecting Golden-Receiver may offend some vendors.
A relative calibration center could be established– manufacturers submitting their receivers to a single authority (e.g. IGS).
This authority would provide:– estimated GLONASS carrier phase biases for each pair of receivers– raw data samples (recorded from simulator or in real-time)
Any new manufacturer could submit their receivers– to have them calibrated– to have calibration results against other available receivers published– to have corresponding raw data published– to have GLONASS carrier phase bias class name assigned.
12
Bias variations
Only High-end hardware may guarantee stable performance and negligible variance in hw biases.
Low-end hardware may introduce noticeable bias variations.
Non-Physical reference stations may not exactly mimic biases of a physical receiver.
There is the need to have GLONASS bias class being accompanied by corresponding standard deviation values.
For physical receivers estimates for these STD could be provided by processing data from not one, but few samples of h/w similarly, as it is done with antennae.
13
Final Slide.
Thank you.