View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Global Transport of Mercury (Hg) Compounds
Noelle EckleyEPS Second Year Symposium
22-23 September 2003
Photo: AMAP & Geological Museum, Copenhagen
Outline
• Introduction: What is mercury pollution and why is it an important issue?
• Scientific questions and research methods
• Mercury in the atmosphere: an overview
• Preliminary model results and evaluation
• Future research plans
Why are we interested in mercury transport?
• Mercury (Hg) is a global environmental pollutant– Current atmospheric concentrations are 3x higher
than in pre-industrial times– Accumulates in food webs as methyl mercury; risk to
humans & environment• Fish consumption advisories• Arctic pollution problem
• Regional, national and international policy interest– National regulation by EPA, new proposals under
“Clear Skies” initiative– UNEP Governing Council (2/2003): agreed that
further international policy action needed, but action was blocked by U.S. UNEP will revisit issue in 2005
Historical Record of Mercury from Ice Core Data
• Pre-industrial concentrations indicate natural source
• Episodic volcanic input
• Mining emerges• Industrialization, and
recent decrease
Source: USGS
Scientific Questions & Research Methods
• What are the processes influencing the transport and fate of mercury in the atmosphere?
• How does mercury reach the Arctic environment? What pathways are important in the Arctic atmosphere?
• How do pathways and concentrations change over time? Will mercury transport be influenced by global climatic changes?
• What is the relative importance of natural vs. anthropogenic sources in controlling deposition in different regions?
• Method: Model global transport and chemistry of mercury species using GEOS-CHEM model
Mercury in the Atmosphere
MERCURY SPECIES• Elemental Mercury (Hg0):
– Predominant form in the atmosphere (98%)
– Relatively insoluble
• Divalent Mercury (Hg(II)):– Primarily as HgCl2 in the
atmosphere– Very soluble– Undergoes Wet and Dry
Deposition
• Particulate Mercury (HgP)
MEASUREMENTS• Total Gaseous Mercury
(TGM) = Hg0+Hg(II)(g)
• Reactive Gaseous Mercury (RGM) = Hg(II)(g)
• Particulate Mercury (HgP)
Typical concentrations:
TGM: 1.7 ng m-3 (NH)RGM:10-200 pg m-3
HgP: 1-100 pg m-3
Mercury Atmospheric Cycling
• Oxidation reactions in the gas phase:– Hg0 + OH Hg(II)
• k=8.7(+/-2.8) x 10-14 cm3 s-1 (Sommar et al. 2001) (?)
– Hg0 + O3 Hg(II)• k=3(+/-2) x 10-20 cm3 s-1 (Hall 1995)
• Wet and dry deposition of Hg(II), HgP
• Other reactions (not included in model): aqueous chemistry; HgP chemistry
GEOS-CHEM Hg Budget: Comparison with other models
Shia et al. 1999
Seigneur et al. 2001
Lamborget al. 2001
Bergan et al. 1999
GEOS-GEOS-CHEMCHEM
Anthropogenic 2140 2106.6 2607 2150 2220
Natural Sources Total (incl. reemission)
4000 4000 1805 3900 4000
Total Deposition 6150 4212 6281
Wet Deposition 2860 5330
Dry Deposition 3290 951
Residence Time (yr) 1.7 1.13 1.8 1 (fixed) 0.4
Total Amount in Atmosphere
5215 2569
Production of Hg2 5426
Comparing Model with Measurements: Longitudinal Average TGM
• GEOS-CHEM underestimates TGM concentrations in the Southern hemisphere and overestimates the interhemispheric gradient
Lamborg et al. 2002 GEOS-CHEM
TGM at Cape Point, measured vs. modeled
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Month (1998 modeled, measured average)
TGM, ng/m3Measured
Modeled
TGM at Zeppelin, Measured vs Modeled
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Month (1998 model; 2001 meas)
TGM (ng/m3) Measured
Modeled
Future work: Next Steps
• Model improvements: HgP chemistry, dry deposition; Hg(II) production mechanisms and rates
• Evaluation of pathways and source identification
• Modeling Arctic behavior• Evaluating multimedia behavior of
mercury; linking sources to effects through modeling
Acknowledgments
• Advisor: Prof. Daniel J. Jacob
• Rokjin Park, Bob Yantosca, other postdocs and graduate students of the Jacob group
• Funding sources: NSF Graduate Research Fellowship; Harvard University Committee on the Environment