189
1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TO For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Under the Faculty of Botany Jiwaji University, Gwalior (M.P.) (Year : 2014) Supervised By: Scholar: Dr. R. K. Khare Uday Beer Sharma Professor, Botany M.Sc. (Ag.) Horticulture SMS Govt. Model Science College Gwalior (M.P.) Research Centre SMS Govt. Model Science College, Gwalior Department of Botany Jiwaji University, Gwalior (M.P.) 2014

Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

  • Upload
    ngokiet

  • View
    322

  • Download
    17

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

1

EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS

(Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

THESIS SUBMITTED TO

For the degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

Under the Faculty of Botany

Jiwaji University, Gwalior (M.P.)

(Year : 2014)

Supervised By: Scholar:

Dr. R. K. Khare Uday Beer Sharma Professor, Botany M.Sc. (Ag.) Horticulture SMS Govt. Model Science College Gwalior (M.P.)

Research Centre

SMS Govt. Model Science College, Gwalior

Department of Botany

Jiwaji University, Gwalior (M.P.)

2014

Page 2: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

2

CERTIFICATE OF THE SUPERVISOR (Para 12-C)

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the work entitled “Effect of bio fertilizers and

zinc on gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L .)” is a piece of

research work done by Uday Beer Sharma under my guidance and

supervision for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. That the

candidate has put in attendance of more than 200 days with me .

To best of my knowledge and belief the thesis:

1. Embodies the work of the candidate himself.

2. Rules and regulations mentioned in the ordinance by the Jiwaji

University have been duly followed.

3. Has duly been completed in 200 days.

4. Is up to the standard both in respect of contents and language for being

referred to the examiner.

( Dr. R. K. Khare)

supervisor

Forwarded

Signature of Principal

Page 3: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

3

DECLARATION BY THE CANDIDATE (Para 12-B)

DECLARATION

I hereby declare that to best of my knowledge and belief the

research project entitled “Effect of biofertilizers and zinc on

gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)”, under the guidance of Dr.

R. K. Khare, Professor, being submitted to the department of

Botany, SMS Govt. Model science college, Gwalior (M.P.), embodies

my own work, which is an original piece of research work done by me

and to the best of my knowledge and belief is not substantially the

same as one which has already been submitted for any other

academic qualification of any other University or Examination body in

India.

Signature of the supervisor Signature of the candidate

Dr. R. K. Khare Uday Beer Sharma ( Professor)

Forwarded

Signature of Principal

Page 4: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

4

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

No work can be done alone, but is always supported by a group of

persons in various capacities. Many have left me indebted in the preparations

and presentation of this exercise of mine which has been made such richer in

knowledge and experience.

I am proud enough to express my profound respect and deepest

admiration to my guide, Dr. R. K. Khare, Professor “Department of Botany,

SMS Govt. Model science college, Gwalior (M. P.) for this knowledge, his

suggestions, valuable guidance and constant help throughout the research study,

his critical comments, discussions and ideas have been instrumental in

successful execution of the investigation. I am very much thankful for the

suggestive encouragement provided by him.

I am under deep obligation to Dr. (Mrs.) Sangeeta Sukla, Hon. Vice

Chancellor, Dr. Rajiv M. Agarwal, HOD (Botany) and Dr. (Mrs.) Rekha

Bhadouria, Professor (Botany), Jiwaji University, Gwalior, for prvoiding

necessary facilities and guidance in completing the present investigation.

I cordially thankful Dr. D. R. Pawaiya (Principal), Dr. S. H. Querashi,

Professor and head (Botany), SMS Govt. Model science college, Gwalior

(M.P.) for their valuable suggestions during the course of research.

I am also indebted to Dr. K. N. Nagaich, Professor and head

(Horticulture), Naresh Gupta (Prog. Assit. Soil Science) College of

Agriculture, R.V.S.K.V.V, Gwalior and Dr. Gaurav Sharma (Assit. Prof.-

Horticulture, I. G. K. V. V. Raipur, (C. G.), for critical discussions, suggestions

and providing necessary facilities during the entire course of investigation.

No words will be sufficient to express my gratitude to my mother and

father, for their blessings and continuous moral support.

(Uday Beer Sharma)

Page 5: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

5

LIST OF CONTENTS

Chapter

No.

Title

Page

No.

I INTRODUCTION 1-9

II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 10-35

III MATERIALS AND METHODS 36-58

IV RESULTS 59-134

V DISCUSSION 135-154

VI SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 155-161

SUGGESTION 162

BIBLIOGRAPHY I-XIV

APPENDIX i-xiii

Page 6: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

6

List of Tables

Table

No.

Title Page

No.

3.1 Weekly meteorological data during crop growth period in 2011-12 38

3.2 Weekly meteorological data during crop growth period in 2012-13 39

3.3 Mechanical composition of the soil (0-30cm) 41

3.4 Chemical analysis of experimental soil 42

3.5 Experimental details of field 43

3.6 Treatments and their symbols 44

3.7 Skeleton of analysis of variance 57

4.1 Days taken to 75% sprouting of gladiolus corms as influenced by

bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

61

4.2.1 Plant heights of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels at 30 DAP

63

4.2.2 Plant height of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP

levels at 60 DAS

65

4.2.3 Plant height of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP

levels at 90 DAS

67

4.3.1 Number of leaves of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc

and NP levels at 30 DAP

69

4.3.2 Number of leaves of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc

and NP levels at 60 DAP

71

4.3.3 Number of leaves of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc

and NP levels at 90 DA

73

4.4 Days to emergence of spike in gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

75

4.5 Number of spike per square meter as influenced by bio fertilizer,

zinc and NP levels

77

4.6 Spike length (cm) of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc

and NP level

79

Page 7: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

7

Table

No.

Title Page

No.

4.7 Weight of spike (g) of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizers, zinc

and NP levels

81

4.8 Days taken to flowering (days for opening of first floret) influenced

by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP level

84

4.9 Number of florets per spike of gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

86

4.10 Length of florets (cm) influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels 88

4.11 Diameter of florets influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels 90

4.12 Flowering durations as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP

levels

92

4.13 Number of florets opened at a time (125 DAP) as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

94

4.14 Fresh weight of floret as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP

level

96

4.15 Dry weight of floret as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP level 98

4.16 Yield of spike/ha as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels 100

4.17 Vase life of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP

levels

103

4.18 Nitrogen content (%) in gladiolus leaves as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

105

4.19 Phosphorus content (%) in gladiolus leaves as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

106

4.20 Potassium content (%) in gladiolus leaves as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

107

4.21 Zinc content (ppm) in gladiolus leaves as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

108

4.22 Number of corms/plant in gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer

and various zinc and NP levels

111

4.23 Number of corms/ha in gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc

and NP levels

113

Page 8: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

8

Table

No.

Title Page

No.

4.24 Corms weight (g) of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer and

various zinc and NP levels

116

4.25 Corms diameter (cm) of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer

and various zinc and NP levels

118

4.26 Economics of various treatments (on the basis of mean data of

two year experimentation)

120

4.27 Interaction effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels on number of spike

per square meter

122

4.28 Interaction effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels on weight of spike 123

4.29 Interaction effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels on number of florets

per spike

124

4.30 Interaction effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels on diameter of

florets

125

4.31 Interaction effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels on flowering

durations

126

4.32 Interaction effect of NP and bio fertilizers levels on number of corm

/plant

127

4.33 Interaction effect of NP and bio fertilizers levels on corm weight 128

4.34

Interaction effect of zinc and NP levels on weight of spike 129

4.35 Interaction effect of NP and zinc levels on number of florets per

spike

130

4.36 Interaction effect of NP and zinc levels on flowering duration 131

4.37 Interaction effect of NP and zinc levels on number of florets

opened at 125 DAP

132

4.38 Interaction effect of NP and zinc levels on vase life of flower (Mean

of two year)

133

4.39 Interaction effect of NP and zinc levels on corms diameter (Mean

of two year)

134

Page 9: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

9

List of Figures

Fig.

No.

Title After

Page

3.1 Weekly meteorological data during crop growth period 39

3.2 Layout of experimental field 43

4.1 Days taken to 75% sprouting of gladiolus corms as influenced by

bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

61

4.2 Plant heights of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

67

4.3 Number of leaves of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc

and NP levels

73

4.4 Days to emergence of spike in gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

75

4.5 Number of spike per square meter as influenced by bio fertilizer,

zinc and NP levels

77

4.6 Spike length (cm) of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc

and NP level

79

4.7 Weight of spike (g) of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizers, zinc

and NP levels

81

4.8 Days taken to flowering (days for opening of first floret) influenced

by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP level

84

4.9 Number of florets per spike of gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

86

4.10 Length of florets (cm) influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels 88

4.11 Diameter of florets influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels 90

4.12 Flowering durations as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP

levels

92

4.13 Number of florets opened at a time (125 DAP) as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

94

4.14 Fresh weight of floret as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP

level

96

Page 10: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

10

Fig.

No.

Title After

Page

4.15 Dry weight of floret as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP level 98

4.16 Yield of spike/ha as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels 100

4.17 Vase life of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP

levels

103

4.18 Number of corms/ha in gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc

and NP levels

113

4.19 Corms weight (g) of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer and

various zinc and NP levels

116

4.20 Corms diameter (cm) of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer

and various zinc and NP levels

118

4.21 B: C ratio under different treatment of bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

120

Page 11: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

11

List of Plates

S. No. Title After

Page

1 General view of experimental site 44

2 Taking observations on leaves 73

3 Taking observations on florets 90

4 General view of spike under best treatment combination 100

Page 12: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

12

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviations/

Acronyms

Mining

Ag. Agriculture

& And

et al. And co-workers

Azto Azotobacter

BF Bio fertilizer

dSm-1 Deci Siemens per meter

oC Degree centigrade

Dist. District

DAP Days after planting

EC Electrical conductivity

Fig. Figure

FYM Farm yard manure

g Gram

> Greater than

J. Journal

ha Hectare

Hort Horticulture

IAA Indole Acetic Acid

ICAR Indian Council of Agricultural Research

kg Kilogram

kg ha-1 Kilogram per hectare

< Less than

m Meter

mg kg-1 Milli gram per kilogram

min Minimum

Page 13: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

13

Abbreviations/

Acronyms

Mining

mm Milli meter

' Minutes

viz Namely

No. Number

OC Organic carbon

ppm Parts per million

% Per cent

K Potassium

P Phosphorus

PSB Phosphorus Solubilizing bacteria

RH Relative humidity

pH Soil reaction

Temp. Temperature

t ha-1 Tonnes per hectare

Zn zinc

Page 14: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

14

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus), generally called “Glad”, a member of

family Iridaceae and sub-family Ixiodeae, originated from South Africa, is a

prominent bulbous cut flower plant. It is also known as the Sword Lily, due to its

sword shaped leaves, or Corn Lily. Being an important bulbous ornamental plant,

it occupies a prime position among commercial flower crops which has high

demand in both domestic and international markets. It occupies eighth position in

the world‟s cut flower trade and has a global history (Ahmad et al., 2008).

The major gladiolus producing countries are the United States (Florida

and California), Holland, Italy, France, Poland, Bulgaria, Brazil, India, Australia

and Israel. The fascinating spike bears a large number of florets with varying

sizes and forms with smooth ruffle of deeply crinkled sepals. Presently, in India

the area under bulbous crop is about 3500 ha of which gladiolus occupies about

more than 1200 ha. The main gladiolus growing places are suited to the north

Indian plains. It is grown in the plains as well as hills up to elevation of 2400 m

from mean sea levels (Singh et al., 2012).

Gladiolus also known as „Queen” of the bulbous flowers is one of the

important ornamental flowering crops of the world. It is a popular cut flower owing

to its versatile colours and varieties having larger keeping quality of flower. It has

great economic value for cut flower trade and much valued by the aesthetic world

for beauty and loving people because its prettiness and unparallel elegance

Page 15: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

15

(Sadhu and Bose, 1973). They are widely used as artistic garlands, floral

ornaments, bouquets etc. The long flower spikes are excellent as cut flower for

table decoration when arranged in vases. Gladioli contribute the most important

item for aesthetic, economic and social appeal. Florets open sequentially from

the base of the rachis and extension of longevity of these florets helps in

maintaining the economic value of these flowers for a longer time. The number

of days a flower remains fresh in acceptable condition is the criterion for

describing the keeping quality of flowers.

Flower crops are very much responsive to fertilizer. It is highly capable of

exhausting huge nutrients from native soil. So, it require higher amount of

chemical fertilizer in balance proporation for ensuring maximum flower

production. Fertilizer requirements of gladiolus like other crops, has vital role in

growth, quality, corn and cormel production. There are some reports on the

requirement of Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and other fertilization

in many countries. Major nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium along

with zinc noticeably increase the number of flowers, florets/spike, length of spike

and flowering stem of gladiolus (Afify, 1989).

The ability of the “Plants” to produce more yield is dependent on the

availability of adequate plant nutrients, because cultivation of high yielding

varieties of crop coupled with intensive cropping systems has depleted the soil

fertility, resulting in multi-nutrient deficiencies in soil-plant system. Under such

situation, use of only one or two primary nutrients will not be sufficient for

Page 16: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

16

maintaining the long term sustainability of crop production. Moreover, use of

balanced fertilization is a key component of the crop production technology.

Nitrogen being an essential constituent of protein, is a vitally important

plant nutrient. The soils of Gwalior regions are inherently poor in nitrogen and

crops grown on them show deficiency symptoms in almost all the fields, where it

is not applied. An adequate supply of nitrogen is generally associated with

vigrous vegetative growth of plants and deep green colour of leaves.

Phosphorus application increases the root growth and thus, it helps in

absorption of different plant nutrients. It is concerned, with the formation of

meristmatic tissue and plays a fundamental role in number of enzymatic

reactions. It is an essential component of DNA, RNA, which is needed for protein

synthesis. It also plays a major role in energy transfer system (ADP, ATP).

Obviously, phosphorus is essential for numerous metabolic processes.

Phosphorous (P) is one of the major essential macro nutrients limiting

plant growth, owing to its low bio-availability in soils (Gyaneshwar et al. 2002;

Feng et al. 2004). In soil, both macro and micro nutrients undergo a complex

dynamic equilibrium of solubilization and in solubilization, that is greatly

influenced by the soil pH and micro flora affecting their accessibility to plant roots

for absorption. The dwindling nature of P availability is observed both in acid and

alkaline soils. In acid soils, it is bound with Fe and Al or their oxides, whereas in

alkaline soil it is bound with Ca. Fertilizer P tends to be fixed soon after

application and becomes mostly unavailable, resulting in low recovery by crops

and a considerable P accumulation in soils.

Page 17: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

17

Microorganisms able to solubilize and mineralize P pools in soils are

considered to be vital. Bacteria are among the predominant micro organisms that

solubilize mineral P in soils, and most of them live in the plant rhizosphere (Barea

et al. 2005). Phosphorous Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB) inoculants play an

important role in making phosphorus available to crops. The plant utilizes only

15-25 percent nutrition given through phosphorus and rest is converted in in-

soluble form. PSB convert unavailable P to available form in plant roots. PSB

also increases the capacity of available P in rock phosphate (Gaur and Gaind,

1990).

The growing imbalance of nutrients in soils is posing a threat to sustain

soil health and productivity. Inorganic fertilizers are very costly and their

agronomic efficiency is poor under field conditions. Bio-fertilizers are potential

sources of plant nutrients. It is a substance which contains living

microorganisms which, when applied to seed, plant surfaces, or soil,

colonizes the rhizosphere or the interior of the plant and promote growth

by increasing the supply or availability of primary nutrients to the host

plant. Bio-fertilizers add nutrients through the natural processes of nitrogen

fixation, solubilizing phosphorus and stimulating plant growth through the

synthesis of growth promoting substances.

The microorganisms in biofertilizers restore the soils natural nutrient cycle

and build soil organic matter. Through the use of biofertilizers, healthy plants can

be grown while enhancing the sustainability and the health of soil. Since they

play several roles, a preferred scientific term for such beneficial bacteria is plant

Page 18: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

18

–growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Therefore, they are extremely

advantageous in enriching the soil fertility and fulfilling the plant nutrient

requirements by supplying the organic nutrients through microorganisms and

their by product. Hence, it does not contain any chemicals which are harmful to

the living soil. They are eco friendly organic agro input and more cost effective

than chemical fertilizers.

Certain strains of bio-fertilizers which are being commercially used in

horticultural crops are; Azotobacter, Azospirillum, phosphate solubilizing bacteria

and VAM fungi. As reported in numerous studies, Azospirillum and Azotobacter

are well known symbiotic N-fixing bacteria which help the plants indirectly

through better nitrogen (N) fixation or improving the nutrient availability in the soil.

They have the ability to fix 20-200 kg N ha–1 and increase crop yield by 10-50

(Kennedy et al, 2004), while, Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria (PSB) are used to

increase the availability of phosphorus in soil. Application of 120:65:62.5 kg NPK

per ha-1 + phosphor bacteria + Azospirillum showed better results in vegetative

and reproductive growth in gladiolus (Srivastava, and Govil, 2005).

Bio-fertilizers are microbial culture, which make availability of

certain plant nutrients to crops by various actions. Rhizobium,

Azotobacter and Azospirillum fixes atmospheric nitrogen while certain

bacteria/ fungal culture viz; Bacillus polymyxa/, Aspergillus awamori helps

in phosphate solublization of both native and applied sparingly soluble

phosphate. Looking to the rising price of chemical fertilizers, microbial

Page 19: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

19

cultures can provide an eco-friendly viable support to small and marginal

farmers by partly replacing inorganic fertilizers use in crop production.

Some biofertilizer (Azotobacter spp.) stimulate production of growth

promoting substance like vitamin-B complex, Indole acetic acid (IAA) and

Gibberellic acids etc. phosphorus mobilizing or phosphorus solubilizing

biofertilizers/ microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, mycorrhiza etc.) converts

insoluble soil phosphate into soluble forms by secreting several organic acids

and under optimum conditions they can solubilize/ mobilize about 30-50 kg P2O5

/ha due to which crop yield may increase by 10-20%.

There are reports of reduction in yield even due to constant use of NPK

fertilizers. The reduction in the yield is generally traced due to deficiency of

micronutrients. The micronutrient deficiencies which were sparse and sporadic

initially are now widespread. According to Rattan et al. (2009) more than 2.5 lakh

soil samples were analyzed under all India coordinated research project on

micronutrient from 20 state of the country and found that the 49% of the samples

were deficient in zinc. In Madhya Pradesh, deficiency of zinc was observed in

about 58% soil samples.

The micronutrients play crucial and vital role in gladiolus production as

well as major nutrients in growth and development. To determinate the

commercial value on corm production parameters, the micronutrient contributes

most important role on various metabolism and synthesis processes in plants.

The deficiencies of micronutrients create different abnormalities like chlorosis,

rosetting and scorching etc. (Singh, et al., 2012). It is required in small amount,

Page 20: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

20

Zn is essential for carbon dioxide evolution, utilization of carbohydrate,

phosphorus metabolism and synthesis of RNA. Zinc functions in the plants

largely as a metal activator of several enzymes, an algae, yeast, aldolage,

oxaloacetic-decarboxylase, lecithinase, cystieine, disulphydrase, histidine

deaminase, carbonic anhydrase, dihydropeptidase and glycylglycine diperpidase.

Zinc plays an essential role in plant physiology where it activates some

of the enzymes related to metabolism of carbohydrates, auxins, RNA and

ribosome functions. The beneficial effect of zinc on several ornamental plants

were studied, Farahat et al. (2007) on Cupressus sempervirens L., Halder et al.

(2007) on gladiolus, Razin et al. (1992) on thyme.

Bulbous ornamental crops especially gladiolus are very

sensitive to micronutrient deficiency. The deficiency causes the

visual symptoms and physiological disorders. Zinc is an effective

micronutrient to improve growth including, corm and cormel

production (Parthasarthi and Nagaraju, 1999).

Thus it is evident that zinc plays an important role in carbohydrate, protein,

fat and oil metabolism within the plant and in the energy transfer mechanism.

The deficiency of zinc in soils is increasing due to increased use of zinc free

fertilizers and high input oriented intensive agriculture. Zinc does not only

improve the grain yield but also improves the quality of crops.

Gladiolus is a universally acclaimed prestigious flower. For a better

cropping, it is necessary to have integrated approach of nutrients

management including bio fertilizers and micronutrients (especially zinc).

Page 21: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

21

In gladiolus, zinc deficient plant shows chlorosis or necrosis and

premature shedding of plants (Mishra and Singh, 1993).

Due to the increasing demand for the fresh flowers, area under

gladiolus has increased in recent years and the yield of flower depends

on different yield attributes which are closely associated with nutrient

uptake by the plant. In addition to NPK, micronutrients have a great

bearing in influencing the yield attributes and flower production (Khader et

al., 1985).

Application of micronutrients was found to enhance the foliage and

flower production. Among the micronutrients, iron and zinc foliar sprays

were reported to be conductive for flower production (Kumar and Arora,

2000). These advantages could be due to that micronutrients activate

several enzymes and are involved in various physiological activities

(Sinha et al., 1999) and metabolic function of micronutrients in the plant

system are involved in the synthesis of tryptophan as the precursor for

auxin (Chen et al., 1982).

Bio-fertilizers seem to be a feasible option for sustained agriculture on a

commercial and profitable scale. In addition, they are eco-friendly, easily

available and cost effective .Present study was formulated to investigate the

potential role of bio-fertilizers application for enhancing growth, yield and

improving quality of Gladiolus grandiflorus in a sustainable agricultural production

system in order to reduce the amount of excessive chemical material released to

the environment.

Page 22: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

22

However, information on the sole or combined use of

Azotobacter and PSB along with different NP and zinc levels under

semi- arid conditions of Gwalior region is lacking. Therefore, the

present experiment was designed with varying doses of NP with

different combinations of bio-fertilizer and zinc on gladiolus to find

out the saving of chemical fertilizers with the use of bio fertilizers and

optimum dose of zinc for maximum plant growth, flowering and post

harvest life of gladiolus with the following objectives:

Objectives:

1. To study the effect of bio- fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of gladiolus

in combination with different doses of chemical fertilizers.

2. To find out the optimum concentration of zinc for better performance of

gladiolus.

3. To determine the impact of bio fertilizers, zinc and NP levels on quality

parameters of gladiolus.

4. To work out the economics of treatment combinations for profitable

gladiolus production under agro – climatic conditions of Gwalior region.

Page 23: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

23

CHAPTER – II

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Review of literature is a necessary step for any scientific study. It provides

a theoretical framework, previous work and the basic interpretation of findings to

the study. An attempt has been made to review the literature, which is

meaningful and has direct relevance to this study. The available relevant

references have been reviewed under appropriate heads:

2.1: Effect of bio-fertilizers on gladiolus

2.2: Effect of zinc on gladiolus

2.3: Effect of major nutrients on gladiolus

2.1: Effect of biofertilizers on gladiolus

Bio-fertilizers are microbial culture, which make availability of certain

plant nutrients to crops by various actions. Rhizobium, Azotobacter and

Azospirillum fixes atmospheric nitrogen while certain bacteria/ fungal

culture viz; Bacillus polymyxa/, Aspergillus awamori helps in phosphate

solublization of both native and applied sparingly soluble phosphate.

Looking to the rising price of chemical fertilizers, microbial cultures can

provide an eco-friendly viable support to small and marginal farmers by

partly replacing inorganic fertilizers use in crop production.

Page 24: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

24

Azotobacter, a heterotrophic aerobic organism capable of fixing nitrogen

as non-symbiotic is of wide occurrence in rhizosphere of many plants. Interest in

the use of Azotobacter as bio fertilizer waxed and waned from time to time. The

reasons may be varied, but partly be due to the inconsistent results in its

performance. In Soviet Union, a soil fertilizing Azotobacter chroococum

containing preparation called “Azotobacterin” has been used since 1930. When

the ability of Azotobacter to produce biologically active substances was

ascertained, it is effect on plants was associated not only with the process of

nitrogen fixation and improving nitrogen nutrition of plants, but also with the

supply of biologically active compounds such as vitamins and gibberellins. The

amount of nitrogen fixing varies from 0.026 to 20 kg/ha (Shroff, 1989).

Azotobacter inoculation in tomato resulted increased vitamin-C content

early flowering, plant growth and fruit yield (Azcon and Barea, 1995).

Phosphorous (P) is one of the major essential macro nutrients limiting

plant growth, owing to its low bio-availability in soils (Gyaneshwar et al. 2002;

Feng et al. 2004). In soil, both macro and micro nutrients undergo a complex

dynamic equilibrium of solubilization and insolubilization, which is greatly

influenced by the soil pH and micro flora affecting their accessibility to plant roots

for absorption.

Phosphorus mobilizing or phosphorus solubilizing biofertilizers/

microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, mycorrhiza etc.) converts insoluble soil

phosphate into soluble forms by secreting several organic acids. Under optimum

Page 25: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

25

conditions, they can solubilize/ mobilize about 30-50 kg P2O5 /ha, due to which

crop yield may increase by 10-20 percent.

Application of phosphobacteria in tomato resulted into increased

flowering (Ocampo and Barea, 1998) increased yield, greater phosphorus

uptake and improvement in the quality as well as higher yield (Smith et al.,

1961).

Siddique et al. (1993) reported the effect of Azotobacter inoculation after

one month in mulberry cultivation. The vegetative growth including plant height,

number of leaves and their size were increased significantly with Azotobacter.

Verma and Shinde (1993) noticed that floriculture and vegetables crops

in general and potato, onion and brinjal in particular responded well to

Azotobacter treatment.

In the case of sweet potato increased length of sweet potato vines and

tuber growth was obtained by Azotobactor inoculation along with 50-75% of the

recommended level of nitrogenous fertilizer when compared to chemical fertilizer

without Azotobactor, indicating the possibility of reducing the nitrogenous

fertilizer to the tune of 10-20 kg N/ha per season. (Jadhav et al. 1998).

Mishra (1998) recorded more number of florets/spike, number

of cormels/plant and weight of cormels/plant by treating gladiolus

corms with nafed super culture containing Azotobactor spp. along

with other growth regulating substance.

Page 26: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

26

Gupta et al. (1999) laid out a field experiment during 1996-97

with different combinations of Azotobactor, phosphorus solubilizing

bacteria (PSB) and nitrogen on Tagetes erecta and recorded that

growth and flower yields were highest with Azotobacter + phosphorus

solubilizing bacteria in combination of 75% or 100% nitrogen.

Smith et al. (2002) noticed that the application of phospho-

bacteria (PSB) increased flowering, greater phosphorus uptake and

improvement in the quality as well as in higher yield.

Dubey and Mishra (2005) observed that the combined

inoculation of gladiolus corms with Azotobacter + PSB was found

best for corn weight, corms/plant, cormel/plant, cormel weight and

increased propagation coefficient.

Yadav et al. (2005) reported that the application of Azotobacter

and PSB significantly increase the spike length but the magnitude of

increase was found lower in comparison to nitrogen. Among different

biofertilizers, Azotobacter was found more effective in improving the

quality of spikes.

Godse et al. (2006) evaluated the effect of organic manures

and bioferfilizers with reduced doses of inorganic fertilizers on

growth, yield and quality of gladiolus at Satpuda Botanic Garden,

College of Agriculture, Nagpur during the year 2004-2005. The

results revealed that plants receiving vermicompost 8 t ha-1+

Page 27: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

27

Azotobacter and PSB @25 kg ha-1 each+ 80% RDF significantly

increased growth, yield and quality attributes of gladiolus viz., plant

height, number of leaves, number of spikes ha -1, number of corms

plant-1, weight of corms ha -1, length of spike and number of florets

spike-1 when compared with RDF and other treatments. As regarding

diameter of open floret, the treatments of vermicompost 8 t ha-1

+Azotobacter and PSB @ 25 kg ha-1 each+ 80% RDF, FYM 40 t ha -1

+Azotobacter and PSB @ 25 kg ha-1 each+ 80% RDF, Neemcake 6 t

ha-1+Azotobacter and PSB @ 25 kg ha-1 each+80% RDF and RDF

alone were found significantly at par with each other. FYM 40 t ha -1

+Azotobacter and PSB @ 25 kg ha-1 each+80% RDF and Neem cake

6 t ha-1+Azotobacter and PSB @ 25 kg ha-1 each+80% RDF also

increased growth, yield and quality of gladiolus significantly over

RDF except number of leaves, number of florets spike -1 and diameter

of open floret. As regards B:C ratio, the treatment of vermicompost 8

t ha-1 + Azotobacter and PSB @ 25 kg ha-1 each+80% RDF exhibited

the highest B:C ratio (3.70) when compared with RDF (2.81),

whereas B:C ratio of the treatment of FYM 40 t ha-1

+Azotobacter and PSB @ 25 kg ha-1 each+80% RDF (2.80) was

found equal to RDF.

Srivastava and Govil (2007) found that the biofertilizers

significantly improved different vegetative and floral characters as

compared to control. Vegetative growth was enhanced most

Page 28: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

28

effectively by Azotobacter treatment. However, for quality spike

production PSB was found more effective. It was found that the

treatment of the corms with the biofertilizers increased the total

rhizospheric bacterial population. The maximum c.f.u/g soil (148.2)

was recorded in Azotobacter (at 100 g/L) as compared to (70.0) in

control. This indicates that the improvement in the various characters

of gladiolus is due to the activity of rhizospheric bacteria, which is

enhanced by biofertilizer inoculation.

Dalve et al. (2009) reported that the growth parameters like

plant height and number of leaves, flowering parameters like days

required for emergence of spikes, days required for first pair of

florets, days required for 50% flowering, yield contributing characters

like number of florets/ spike, number of spike/plant, corms and

cormels per plant and per hectare were positively influenced by the

application of both the biofertilizers in combination with nitrogen and

it was maximum under 75% N + 100% PK+ Azotobacter +

Azospirillum and at par with the treatment 100% NPK+ Azotobacter +

Azospirillum. Thus there was 25% saving of nitrogenous a fertilizer

which was replaced by the biofertilizers.

Dongardive et al. (2009) studied the influence of organic

manure and biofertilizers on yield and yield contributing parameters

of corms and cormels in gladiolus cv. White Prosperity at Satpuda

Botanical Garden, College of Agriculture, Nagpur (M.S.) during the

Page 29: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

29

year 2005-2006. The data indicated that, the yield in terms of number

of corms and weight of corms and cormels per plant, weight of corm

and cormels per hectare and diameter of corms were found to be

highly influenced by the treatment where RDF (500:200:200 NPK

kg/ha) applied. The treatment RDF (500:200:200 NPK kg/ha)

produced highest corm yield of 33.70 q/ha with 16.23 g plant -1 yield

of cormels. The treatment of vermicompost 8 t/ha+ (Azotobacter 5

kg/ha)+ PSB 5 kg/ha also showed significant results were producing

corm yield of 32.80 qt/ha and cormels yield weighing 15.36 g plant -1.

Thus significantly the maximum corm and cormels yield were

obtained in the treatment where RDF (500:200:200 NPK kg/ha) was

applied and in the treatment of vermicompost 8 t/ha respectively as

compared to other treatments.

Dubey et al. (2010) revealed that the combined inoculation

of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSB was found best for days to

flowering (114.59 days), first floret diameter (9.08 cm), florets

remaining open (6.46) and days to last floret opening (128.90 days)

among all the bio-fertilizer(s) treatments.

Ahmad Ali et al. (2013) assess the effect of different bio-

fertilizer on growth and flower quality characteristics of Gladiolus

(Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) . The present results have shown that all

the vegetative and reproductive growth accomplished successfully by

application of biofertilizers. However, the treatment containg

Page 30: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

30

Azospirillum (T4) gained highest values in terms of plant height,

florets spike -1, Spike length, Florets fresh weight and earlier

sprouting than rest of the treatments. The role of biofertilizers in

cormels production and nutrient uptake, T4 had also superiority with

more cormels plant-1 and played leading role in nutrient (NPK)

absorption than the control one. So, in this experiment biofertilizer

has been identified as an alternative to chemical fertilizer in order to

increase soil fertility and crop production in sustainable farming.

Sonmez et al. (2013) observed that the highest mean contents

of nitrogen (1.97%), iron (160 ppm) and manganese (128 ppm) in

leaves were obtained in chicken manure application, the highest

mean contents of potassium (2.01%), calcium (1.80%) and

magnesium (0.25 ppm) were determined in waste mushroom compost

application. The highest mean contents of phosphorus (0.30%), zinc

(25.3 ppm) and copper (9.29 ppm) in leaves were found with peat,

control and farmyard manure applications, respectively. The highest

mean contents of phosphorus (0.83%), potassium (1.47%), calcium

(0.57%), manganese (73 ppm) and zinc (67.3 ppm) in corms were

obtained in farmyard manure applications. The highest mean

contents of iron (17.6 ppm) and magnesium (0.20%) in corms were

obtained in peat and waste mushroom compost applications,

respectively. Application of organic fertilizers increased macro and

micro nutrient contents in leaves and corms of hybrid Gladiolus sp.

Page 31: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

31

Chaudhary et al. (2013) carried out study to know the

combined effect of integrated nutrient management on vegetative

growth and flowering characters of gladiolus cv. Snow Princess with

the application of Azospirillum, PSB, vermicompost and FYM with

and without 100, 75 and 50% recommended dose of NPK. The

results showed that plant height was maximum with application of

75% RDF +20 t ha-1 FYM, while number of florets remaining open at

a time was recorded maximum under 100% RDF+FYM, 20 tonnes/ha.

Days to first floret opening and number of days for 50% plant to

sprout were earliest under treatments 75% RDF+FYM,10 tonnes/ha+

vermicompost, 10 tonnes/ha and vermicompost, 20 tonnes/ha,

respectively. The application of 20 t ha-1 FYM produced maximum

number of leaves. The components like diameter of 3 rd florets, length

of rachis, fresh weight of plant and vase life of spike in tap water

were maximum with 50% RDF (60: 40: 40 kg/ha NPK) +10 tonnes/ha

each of FYM and vermicompost; whereas days to first floret opening

was minimum with 75% RDF (90:60:60 kg/ha NPK) +10 tonnes/ha

each of FYM and vermicompost. Application of integrated nutrients,

i.e. 50% RDF (60:40:40 kg/ha NPK) +10 tonnes/ha each of FYM and

vermicompost +2 g/plant each of Azospirillum and PSB produced

significantly maximum length of spike, number of florets per spike,

duration of flowering and yield of corms.

Page 32: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

32

2.2: EFFECT OF ZINC ON GLADIOLUS:

Zinc has vital role in plant life. It is essential for vegetative and

reproductive processes. Its functions in the plants largely as a metal activator of

several enzymes, oxaloacetic- decarboxylase, lecithinase, cystieine,

disulphydrase, histidine deaminase, carbonic anhydrase, dihydropeptidase and

glycylglycine diperpidase. (Reed, 1942). Application of zinc had conspicuous

effect on the vegetative growth of gladioli (Sharova et al., 1977), while number of

bulbils/leaf scale increased following zinc in lily (Kara and Gindina, 1970).

The mobility of zinc in the soil and its uptake by plants is influenced by

the supply of major nutrients and their interaction with zinc in soil react interface

through their chemical reaction and physiological mechanism. A mutual

antagonistic interaction between the micronutrients as well as with certain

macronutrients either in soils or at the absorption sites or within the plant is well

documented (Tiwari and Pathak, 1976; Katyal and Randhawa, 1983).

In many parts of India, zinc as a plant nutrient now stand third in

importance next to nitrogen and phosphorus, the deficiency of zinc under semi

arid climate has emerged as a serious limitations to crop production. Zinc

deficiency is being widely expressed in the light textured soils. Earlier studies

suggest that various crops respond well to zinc (Tiwari and Dwivedi, 1991).

Sharma and Grewal (1998) observed that the zinc applied through

soil (20 kg haˉ¹), foliar sprays (0.2% ZnSO4 solution at 40 and 60 days after

Page 33: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

33

planting) and soaking of seed tubers (0.05% ZnSO4 solution for 3 hours)

increased the yield of potato tubers significantly over control.

Kumar and Arora (2000) reported that sprays of FeSO4, ZnSO4

and MnSO4 at 3-leaf and 6-leaf stages of gladiolus (cv. White

Prosperity) revealed earliness in flowering and increase the plant

height and number of leaves under 0.2% FeSO4. Spike length,

number of florets, weight of spike and size of florets were

significantly increased with FeSO4 + ZnSO4, each at 0.2%. Longest

duration of flowering was observed under 0.4% FeSO4+ 0.2% ZnSO4.

Singh and Singh (2000) noticed that the different levels of

ZnSO4 failed to exert any perceptible influence on number of

cormlets/plant and weight of cormlets/plant. However the 20kg

ZnSO4/ha caused maximum increase in weight of corm and diameter

of corm.

Joshi and Raghav (2002) conducted experiment with potato cultivar Kufri

Jawahar during winter seasons of 2002-03 and 2003-04 at Pant nagar. The tuber

yield increased significantly by the application of zinc sulphate. Recommended

doses (RDF) of NPK + foliar application of ZnSO4 @ 0.5% at 35, 45 and 55

days after planting gave higher yield followed by RDF ZnSO4 @ 1% (foliar) and

RDF + ZnSO4 @ 20 kg/ha as soil application. Foliar application of zinc sulphate

was found superior as compared to soil application.

Page 34: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

34

Kumar et al. (2003) conducted field experiment at C.S.A. University of

Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur during 1998-99 on the gladiolus var. Sylvia

at 3-leaf stage with borax, CaSO4 and ZnSO4 (0.2,0.5 and 0.75%) sprayings and

revealed that ZnSO4 at 0.75% induced earlier flowering (75.81 days) and

increased the number of corms (1.33). Length of leaf (55.75 cm) and length of

floret (8.96 cm) were significantly increased with 0.2% borax + 0.75% ZnSO4 and

0.5% CaSO4 + 0.75% ZnSO4, respectively.

Sharma et al. (2004) reported that the spray of zinc sulphate

(0.6%) were found most effective for enhancing vegetative growth,

spike length, number and size of florets, flowering duration and

number of spike in gladiolus.

Singh and Singh (2004) found that application of the highest

level of ZnSO4 (20.0 kg/ha) resulted in maximum number of

flowers/spike with larger size of spike. They suggested that gladiolus

Cv. Sylvia may be planted at a spacing of 25x20 cm and a dose of

20.0 kg ZnSO4 /ha may be applied during last ploughing.

Jauhari et al. (2005) noticed that the application of zinc

sulphate (0.2%) gave maximum plant height, spike length, rachis

length and florets opened at a time, whereas corm yield and percent

opening of florets in vase were maximum with the application of zinc

sulphate at 0.4%. It was observed that higher concentration of zinc

sulphate (beyond 0.4%) had negative effect on plant growth,

Page 35: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

35

flowering and corm yield. This implies that 0.4% zinc sulphate is the

optimum concentration in gladiolus for better crop performance.

Maximum zinc content of leaf was recorded with 1.0% zinc sulphate

application which was at par with lower concentration (0.6 & 0.8%).

Maximum N and K contents of corm were recorded with application of

zinc sulphate at 0.6 and 0.2%, respectively.

Pratap et al. (2005) conducted experiment in Hyderabad,

Andhra Pradesh, comprised 16 treatment combinations with 4 levels

each of FeSO4 (0, 0.5, 0.75 and 1%) and ZnSO4 (0, 0.25, 0.5 and

0.75%) sprayed at the 3 rd and 6th leaf stage of gladiolus cv. Trader

Horn and found that the foliar spraying of FeSO4 at 0.5%

concentration significantly influenced iron content in the leaves. In

contrast, leaf zinc content was least influenced by spraying of FeSO 4.

Significantly enhanced zinc content in the leaves was recorded by

spraying with ZnSO4 at 0.5%. The combined spraying of FeSO4 and

ZnSO4 at varied concentrations resulted in significant but

inconsistent changes in leaf nutrient accumulation. Foliar spray of

FeSO4 at 0.75% significantly enhanced the cormel weight. The effect

of ZnSO4 alone or in combination with FeSO4 had no significant

effect on corm and cormel production parameters.

Bala et al. (2006) conducted an experiment in Hyderabad,

Andhra Pradesh, India, on gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus) cultivars

Praha, Fiedelio and Jacksonvilla Gold to determine the effect of pre

Page 36: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

36

harvest sprays of ZnSO4 (0, 0.5 and 1%) and planting date (1

November, 16 November and 2 December) on flowering, flower

quality and vase life. Fiedelio was late to open first floret and

complete flowering and produced longer and heavier spikes with

more number of florets per spike. Corms planted on 1 November

were earliest to flower. Flowering was delayed with the increase of

concentration of ZnSO4. In vase life studies, Fiedelio recorded

maximum fresh weight and minimum water loss to uptake ratio.

Jacksonvilla Gold recorded maximum vase life and minimum number

of florets opened per day. The numbers of florets opened per day

were maximum in November plantings coupled with ZnSO4 sprays.

Halder et al. (2007) studied that the different growth characters

(viz; plant height, length of spike, length of rachis & leaves number)

and floral character (viz; floret number, floret size & weight of stick)

significantly responded to the combined application of boron and zinc

at the rate of B2.0 Zn4.54 as compared to other treatment combination.

Pratap et al. (2008) reported that the keeping quality of

gladiolus spikes adjudged on the prolonged shelf life by

micronutrients (FeSO4 & ZnSO4) sprays. Pre harvest foliar spray of

FeSO4 at 0.75 or 1.0% with ZnSO4 at 0.5% concentration and post-

harvest dipping of the cut spikes in preservative chemicals showed

significant improvement in the keeping quality of spikes of gladiolus.

Page 37: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

37

Kumar and Haripriya (2010) carried out an experiment on the

effect of foliar application of iron and zinc on growth, flowering and

yield of Nerium (Nerium odorum L.) using monthly spray of 0.25%,

0.50% and 0.75% of FeSO4 and ZnSO4 and their combination with a

control (water spray). Among different treatments, FeSO4 @ 0.75% +

ZnSO4 @ 0.50% spray gave significantly maximum value of all the

growth attributes like plant height, number of leaves per plant, plant

spread and leaf area. However, significant and superior results on

early flowering, duration of flowering and yield attributes and

estimated flower yield per hectare were observed with FeSO4 @

0.75% + ZnSO4 @ 0.50% spray, followed by FeSO4 @ 0.75% +

ZnSO4 @ 0.75% spray.

Khalifa et al. (2011) conducted pot experiment on sandy soil

during 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 seasons in the green house of the

National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt. This work was aimed

to study the influence the foliar spraying of zinc (as zinc sulphate)

and boron (as boric acid) on growth parameters, bulblet, flower

characteristics, chemical constituents and nutrients content of leaves

and flowers. Zinc sulphate at concentrations of 0.0, 1.5g/l, 3.0g/l and

4.5g/l and boric acid (B) at concentrations of 0.0, 5ppm, 10 ppm and

20 ppm were applied alone and in combinations twice as foliar spray,

where the first spray was after 45days and the second was after 60

days of planting. Results showed that the foliar spraying of zinc

Page 38: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

38

sulphate or boric acid alone at all rates and all combinations

significantly increased growth parameters, flowers characteristics

and bulblet number and yield/plant as compared with the control

treatment. The treatments also significantly increased leaves

carbohydrate, pigment, nutrients, i.e. N, P, K, Fe, Mn, Zn and B

content, as well as carbohydrate and oil of flowers (%) and its

nutrients content as compared with the control. The most promising

results were obtained from plants treated with Zn at 4.5g/l combined

with 20 ppm B.

Lahijie (2012) noted that the solutions of FeSO4 and ZnSO4

significantly affected plant growth and floral characteristics of

gladiolus. Higher contents of both FeSO4 and ZnSO4 speeded the

plant growth and increased flowering characteristics. Application of

1% FeSO4 accelerated flowering earlier than ZnSO4, as well as

elongated days to spike emergence (21.49 days) and first florets

opening (38.28). The results showed that 2% of both FeSO 4 and

ZnSO4 solutions and their mixture delayed the days from basal floret

opening and number of floret at a time. The flowering properties like

plant height (83.47 cm), length of spike (66.03 cm), number of leaves

(9.52/plant) floret number (11.55/spike), and diameter of floret (8.53

cm) were significantly different than other treatments when a mixed

solution of 2% FeSO4 and ZnSO4 was applied.

Page 39: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

39

Katiyar et al. (2012) carried out the experiment on spike

production in gladiolus with foliar application of zinc, calcium and

boron in Horticulture Garden of Chandra Shekhar Azad University of

Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur in Randomized Block Design

with four replications. The experimental plots were 32 with 8

treatments and two levels each of zinc, calcium and boron treated by

zinc sulphate 0.5%, calcium sulphate 0.75% and borax 0.2%,

respectively. The results obtained revealed that the foliar spray of

zinc at 0.5% to gladiolus plant was most effective to influence the

vegetative growth and size of spike.

Singh et al. (2012) reported that the foliar spray of Zn, Fe and

Cu, significantly increased the number of corms per plant in

gladiolus. The number of corms per plant revealed by Zn (1.74), Fe

(1.66) and Cu (1.68) over their respective control. Weight of corms

significantly increased with the application of Zn and Cu (94.38 and

94.82 g, respectively). Diameter of corms influenced significantly with

the application of Zn, Fe and Cu (5.71, 5.77 and 5.81 cm diameter,

respectively. Maximum increase in cormels production per plant was

influenced due to application of zinc (44.97) followed by spray of

copper (43.18) and iron (42.11) over their respective control.

Sharma et al. (2013) carried out an experiment at, Chandra

Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur

during the year 2010-11. The experiment consist two levels each of

Page 40: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

40

Zn (Zn0 and Zn1), Ca (Ca0 and Ca1) and B (B0 and B1) which were

sprayed on gladiolus plant. The dose of foliar spray of Zn, Ca and B

were 0.75%, 0.50% and 0.20%, respectively. The height of plant

significantly increased by foliar application of Zn, B, and Ca (79.55

cm, 79.39 cm and 78.75, respectively) and interaction effect was also

significant between those. The yield of spike increased significantly

with foliar application of zinc and calcium and the maximum yield of

spike (16904.50) was recorded with application of zinc 0.75%. The

length of floret was significantly enhanced by the use of B (8.29) and

Zn (8.23) while, effect of Ca was non-significant. Spray of calcium

was found most effective in prolonging the longevity of spike (17.61

days) as compare to control (14.79 days) and more corms (3.30)

were produced in the plants fertilized with zinc. Among the results

obtained from the application of Zn, B and Ca and its interaction . Zn

exhibited most significant effect on various parameters studied under

the investigation.

Memon et al. (2013) examined the effect of zinc sulphate

(ZnSO4) and iron sulphate (FeSO4) on the growth and flower

production of gladiolus. The results showed that application of 40 g

ZnSO4 +20 g FeSO4 resulted in significantly better performance than

rest of the treatments with 12.44 leaves plant -1 and 115.70 cm length

of leaves. The control treatment resulted in lowest values for almost

all the studied traits. It was concluded that overall growth and flower

Page 41: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

41

production performance of gladiolus was remarkable when the plants

were supplied with combined application of 40 g ZnSO4 + 20 g

FeSO4 and lowest performance was noted in control. Hence, for

achieving high performance in gladiolus, the plants may be fertilized

with 40 g ZnSO4 +20 g FeSO4.

2.3: EFFECT OF MAJOR NUTRIENTS (NPK) ON GLADIOLUS:

In nutritional studies conducted on gladiolus, Woltz (1954) reported

less leaf production, reduced spike weight and blindness due to lack of nitrogen.

Kosugi and Kondo (1960) observed that where nitrogen had been

applied in the previous year, there were increase in the sprouting and flowering

percentage, number of florets, weight of corms and number of cormels.

Deswal et al. (1983) suggested that plant receiving higher N rates

(50-100kg/ha) were tallest (71.60 cm) and produced the greatest number of

florets/spike (4.90) and corn/plant (19.50).

Borrelli (1984) found that increasing N supply (0, 10, 20 or 30 g/m2) in

the form of ammonium nitrate increased number of flowering shoots and

improved all qualitative characteristics ; showing that high rate of N is needed to

counteract decline in spike quality.

Potti and Arora (1986) recorded that application of 60 g N, 20

g P and 20 g K/m2 was found to be beneficial for the production of

Page 42: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

42

gladiolus flowers as well as for corm and cormel production in

gladiolus Cv. Sylvia.

Jhon et al. (1997) studied the effect of N, P2O5 and K2O (0, 50 and

100kg/ha) on gladiolus cv. Oscar and found that application of fertilizers

increased corm size, corm weight, number of cormels/plant and cormel weight.

The highest levels of N, P2O5 and K2O i.e. 100kg/ha also gave significantly

higher vegetative growth, flowering, corm and cormel production.

Pushpalatha et al. (2000) revealed that the cost of

cultivating gladiolus per acre amounted to Rs. 287 974 and 271 816 in the urban

and rural districts of Bangalore (Karnataka, India), respectively. The major cost

components were the planting material and labour in weeding revealing the high

capital and labour intensive nature of the crop. The high rate of return of 1.46 to

1.45 per rupee of investment showed the economic feasibility of

gladiolus cultivation in the two districts. Unavailability of labour and storage

facilities and exploitation by middlemen were the major constraints faced by the

growers in the production and marketing of gladiolus.

Kumar and Chattopadhyay (2001) observed that the G.

grandiflorus cv. Tropic Sea supplied with different levels of N (40, 50 and 60

g/m2) at 2 splits (3 and 6 leaf stages) as side dressing, P2O5 (10, 20 and 30 g/m2)

and K2O at 20 g/m2, in a field experiment in West Bengal, India, during 1990-93.

The fertilizer combination of N at 50 g/m2, P at 10 g/m2 and K at 20 g/m2 resulted

in the highest spike weight, numbers of flowers per spike, flower diameter,

Page 43: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

43

number of open flowers at a time, size and weight of corms, and number of

corms.

Hatibarua et al. (2002) studied the effect of nitrogen dosed (5, 10, 20, 30

and 40 g/m2) on post harvest life of cut spikes of gladiolus cv. Dhanvantari. In

general, increasing N levels markedly improved the characters studied. Nitrogen

at 20 to 40 g/m2 produced bigger diameter of fully open third florets, more life

number of florets/spike, and higher effective useful life and vase life of spikes.

Singh et al. (2002) determined the effects of N (0, 25, 50 and 75 g/m2), P

(0, 20 and 30 g/m2) and K (0 and 20 g/m2) on the N, P and K content of the

leaves of gladiolus (G. grandiflorus) cv. Sylvia in a field experiment conducted in

Hisar, Haryana, India. N, P and K content in the leaves of gladiolus increased

with increasing rates of N, P and K fertilizers. P application increased the N

status in the leaves of the plant. N and K application resulted in the increase in

leaf P content although the increase was not significant. Leaf K content

increased significantly with the application of N and K fertilizers. The effects of P

on K content of the leaves were not significant.

Nagaich et al. (2003) conducted a field experiment to determine the

effects of N (0, 40, 80 or 120 kg/ha) and P (0, 20, 40 or 60 kg/ha) on the growth,

yield and quality of marigold (Tagetes erecta). Flower yield; N, P and K uptake;

net income; and benefit : cost ratio increased with increasing rates of N and was

highest with the application of 60 kg P/ha except for N uptake which was highest

Page 44: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

44

with the application of 20 kg P/ha. Significant interaction effects between N and P

were recorded.

Sehrawat et al. (2003) conducted an investigation to find out the

optimum N, P and K rates for the cultivation of gladiolus cv. Happy End in

Haryana, India, during 1997-98. Four N rates (0, 20, 40, 60 g/m2) three P rates

(0, 15 and 30 g/m2) and/or two K rates (0 and 10 g/m2) were given. The average

leaf number per plant and plant height were highest with 60 g N, 30 g P and 15 g

K/m2. The corm production, duration of flowering, spike and rachis length and

number of florets were maximum with the application of 40 g N, 15 g P and 15 g

K/m2.

Khan and Ahmad (2004) studied the effects of various levels of NPK,

applied after 30 and 45 days of planting, on plant growth and flowering

characteristics of Gladiolus hortulanus cv. Wind Song, in pot experiments as a

means of achieving better management, production and

ascertaining NPK utilization. Plant height (cm), number of leaves, leaf length (cm)

and spike length (cm) was maximum with 10:10:5 g NPK/pot whereas spike

emergence, opening of first and last floret, corm diameter and corm weight was

maximum with 5:5:5 g NPK/pot. The number of florets per spike was maximum

with 10:5:5 g NPK/pot. High N application rate combined with moderate P and K

rates enhanced vegetative growth characteristics while moderate rates

of NPK exhibited more pronounced effect on floral characteristics and corm

development of gladiolus.

Page 45: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

45

Selvaraj (2004) conducted an experiment under poly house conditions

in Ooty, Tamil Nadu, India to evaluate the effect of different NPK levels

(50:50:50, 50:50:100, 50:100:50: 50:100:100, 100:50:50, 100:50:100, 100:100:50

and 100:100:100 kg/ha) on the vegetative and flowering characteristics

of gladiolus cv. Eurovision. NPK at 100:100:100 kg/ha recorded the highest

values for plant height (106.3 cm), number of florets per spike (13) and spike

length (58.4 cm). The untreated control recorded the lowest values for these

parameters.

Deo and Dubey (2005) conducted an investigation in Horticultural

nursery, IGAU, Raipur, Madhya Pradesh, India, during winter season of 2000-

2001. The experiment was laid out on a randomized block design with five

treatments and five replications. Results indicated that the growth characteristics

such as plant height, number of leaves plant-1, leaf area, fresh weight of plant,

weight of corm, diameter of corm and yield of corms were influenced by the

treatment 400 kg N, 200 kg P2O5, and 200 kg K2O ha-1 with N in three splits,

which was found to be superior over all other treatments. The leaf width, weight

of cormels plant-1, dry weight of plant and yield of cormels were found maximum

in 400 kg N, 200 kg P2O5 and 200 kg K2O ha-1 + 50 tonnes farmyard manure ha-

1 with N in two splits and it was found to be superior for these traits over other

treatments.

Mohapatra et al. (2005) studied the effects of N (10, 20 or 30 g/m2), P

(10 or 20 g/m2) and K (10 or 20 g/m2) fertilizers on corm production

in gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus cv. Pink Prospector) in Bhubaneswar, Orissa.

Page 46: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

46

N at 20 and 30 g/m2 resulted in the highest number of cormels per plant (10.73

and 10.14, respectively). The number of cormels per plant did not significantly

vary with the P rate. N, P and K rates, and the interaction among the treatments

had no significant effects on the production of corms. Corm weight per plant was

highest with 20 g N (26.66 g) and 20 g P/m2 (23.89 g); the values of this

parameter did not significantly vary with the K rate. Plants treated with N, P and

K at 20:20:10 and 20:20:20 produced the heaviest corms (32.72 and 29.20 g). N

and P rates had no significant effect on corm diameter. However, the interaction

among N, P and K at 20 g/m2 each gave the greatest corm diameter (15.26 cm).

The results showed that N, P and K at 20 g/m2 were optimum for corm production

in gladiolus.

Dubey et al. (2010) conducted an experiment on two gladiolus varieties

viz. Jester and Sylvia with chemical and bio-fertilizers in Division of Floriculture

and Landscaping, IARI, Pusa, New Delhi. Variety Jester performed significantly

better over Sylvia for early flowering (116.16 days) higher floret diameter (8.37

cm), florets/spike (13.60), floret remaining open (5.86), days to last floret opening

(128.05 days) and enhanced vase life (8.34 days) while variety Sylvia was found

significantly better for more number of days to last floret opening (135.04 days).

Application of full dose of NPK resulted into significant influence on delayed

flowering floret diameter, florets remaining open and enhanced vase life, while

significant effect for days to last floret opening was recorded when there was no

application of NPK. However, the effect of half dose of recommended NPK was

Page 47: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

47

found at par with that of full dose for days to flowering floret diameter and days to

last floret opening.

Jha et al. (2012) conducted an experiment on gladiolus variety

'Candyman' at Horticulture Farm, Department of Horticulture, IGKV Raipur (C.G.)

during the rabi season of 2010-11 to study the effect of FYM and vermicompost

in combination with various doses of inorganic fertilizer. Under the combinations

of various levels of vermicompost, FYM and organic fertilizer, the treatment

receiving 75% RDF+FYM 10 t ha-1 recorded better in days to sprouting, number

of sprouts, number of leaves plant-1, girth of plant base, width of leaf, height of

the plant, days to spike emergence, diameter of corm, weight corm-1, total corm

weights plot-1 and number of corms plant-1. However, length of the spike, number

of florets spikes-1, vase life of cut spikes were found maximum with the

application of 75% RDF+Vermicompost 3 t ha-1. Whereas, treatments with FYM

10 t ha-1 and Vermicompost only 3.0 t ha-1 showed significantly minimum leaves

plant-1, diameter of corm, weight corm-1, total corms weight plot-1 and number of

corms plant-1.

Ocampo et al. (2012) noticed that the gladiolus supplied with 80-80-

80 kg ha-1 NPK showed greater height; stem diameter, leaf area, dry matter and

quality parameters such as length of inflorescence, number and size flowers per

plant. N had the greatest influence on this response. The higher net income was

with 80-80-40 kg ha-1 and the lowest with 0-80-40 of N, P and K. These results

indicate that in warm weather NPK fertilization can improve the income

of gladiolus producers.

Page 48: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

48

Khan et al. (2012) study conducted at the centre of Bangladesh

Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) during the period from November 2006 to

May 2008 to determine the optimum rate of N and K for better growth and yield of

corm and cormel of gladiolus. The treatment combination N150 K200 kg/ha

produced the longest plant (42.1 cm), the broadest leaf (1.93 cm), the maximum

percentage of spikes (88.1%), and corm (97.6%), the heaviest and the largest

corm (19.5 g and 4.11 cm, respectively), cent percent flowering sized corm, and

the highest corm number and cormel yield (1,20,000 and 1.66 t/ha, respectively).

The corm produced from this treatment combination also showed better

performances in the next year in respect of plant emergence (100%),

florets/spike (13.1), spike and rachis length (82.2 cm and 45.4 cm, respectively),

flower stick weight (57.1 g) and percentage of flower sticks (113%).

Page 49: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

49

CHAPTER-III

MATERTIAL AND METHODS

An appropriate research design and methods are the backbone of any

research project. Therefore, the research methodology was designed after

reviewing the relevant literature and the suggestions of members of

research advisory committee and other subject matter experts of discipline.

With a view to obtain higher precision in the results, the present

investigation was conducted during 2011-12 and 2012-13. The materials

used and the techniques adopted for the studies were considered as the

most important ones. Therefore, the ensuring account has been prepared in

the same light. A detailed account of the material employed and methods

followed, during the course of investigation are embodied in this chapter,

under following heads.

3.1: EXPERIMENTAL SITE:

The present experiment entitled “Effect of biofertilizers and

zinc on gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)” was carried out,

during two consecutive Rabi seasons of 2011-12 and 2012-13 at the

SMS Govt. Model science college, Gwalior. The research farm is

situated at 26 14‟ North latitude and 78 14‟ East longitudes and at an

altitude of 206 meters above the mean sea level. It is situated in

northern tract of Madhya Pradesh. The experimental field at farm having

Page 50: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

50

homogenous fertility and uniform textural make up was selected for the field

experimentation.

3.2: CLIMATE AND WEATHER CONDITION:

The SMS Govt. Model Science College, Gwalior, enjoys semi arid and

sub- tropical climate with hot and dry summers, where maximum

temperature exceeds 45oC, with hot desiccating winds in May and June.

The winters are cold and minimum temperature reaches as low as 5oC in

December and January. Frost also expected from the last week of

December to the first week of February. Usually the monsoon arrives in the

second fortnight in June and lasts till September. Occasionally, light rains

are expected during winter. An average precipitation of 700 mm is usually

received from July to September with few showers during winter. The

weather condition prevailing during two crops seasons (2011-12 and 2012-

13) were recorded from the meteorological observatory of meteorological

observatory of the College of Agriculture, Gwalior (M.P.) and the mean values

of important weather parameters for two years are presented in Table 3.1

and 3.2 and the relevant data are also show in fig. 3.1.

3.2.1 Temperature:

It is clear from the data given in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2 that, in

general, both maximum and minimum temperatures ranged between 18.4 to

36.8 and 3.5 to 19.6 during 2011-12 and 16.3 to 36.1 and 3.3 to 18.8 during

2012-13, respectively, during the cropping season.

Page 51: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

51

Table 3.1: Weekly meteorological data during crop growth period in 2011-12

Met.

Week

Date

(2011-12)

Temperature

(0C)

Humidity (%) Rainfall

(mm)

Max. Min. Morning Evening

40 Oct. 1-7 35.7 18.0 80.6 32.2 000.0

41 Oct.8-14 35.5 19.6 78.0 36.5 000.0

42 Oct.15-21 35.7 16.5 78.0 35.7 000.0

43 Oct.22-28 34.5 16.2 81.7 36.1 000.0

44 Oct.-Nov.29-4 33.1 13.3 80.7 24.8 000.0

45 Nov5-11 32.4 14.9 78.5 31.5 000.0

46 Nov12-18 31.8 13.4 87.4 26.1 000.0

47 Nov19-25 27.8 13.1 94.5 51.0 000.0

48 Nov. Dec.26-2 27.2 10.1 90.0 38.8 000.0

49 Dec.3-9 29.5 12.3 87.8 35.7 000.0

50 Dec.10-16 25.8 6.7 89.5 30.0 000.0

51 Dec.17-23 23.3 3.5 96.1 36.7 000.0

52 Dec.24-31 22.0 3.5 94.1 49.0 000.0

01 January 1-7 20.5 10.7 94.2 72.2 020.0

02 January8-14 18.4 4.6 94.0 53.5 000.0

03 January15-21 22.3 6.3 90.4 52.4 000.0

04 January22-28 20.9 4.4 93.7 44.7 000.0

05 Jan. Fab. 29-4 22.3 4.1 95.4 45.8 000.0

06 Fab.5-11 22.0 6.3 85.7 44.4 000.0

07 Fab.12-18 23.7 8.4 81.2 42.8 000.0

08 Fab.19-25 28.9 11.0 80.0 36.2 000.0

09 Fab.-Mar.26-4 27.9 8.8 78.7 27.8 000.0

10 March 5-11 30.0 12.4 69.0 21.4 000.0

11 March 12-18 30.0 11.7 80.0 25.2 000.0

12 March 19-25 33.7 14.1 62.2 21.2 000.0

13 Mar-Apr 26-1 36.8 16.7 67.5 15.5 000.0

Total 20.0

Source: College of agriculture, R.V.S.K.V.V. Metrology Dept

Page 52: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

52

Table 3.2: Weekly meteorological data during crop growth period in 2012-13

Met.

Week Date

Temperature (oC) Humidity (%) Rainfall

(mm) Max. Min. Morning Evening

40 Oct. 1-7 35.9 18.8 80.0 29.2 000.0

41 Oct. 8-14 35.1 16.9 84.2 29.1 000.0

42 Oct. 15-21 34.5 17.1 80.7 33.4 000.0

43 Oct. 22-28 32.4 14.8 83.4 32.7 000.0

44 Oct.-Nov. 29-4 30.7 12.4 91.2 39.8 000.0

45 Nov. 5-11 30.1 12.2 84.2 32.5 000.0

46 Nov. 12-18 29.4 10.3 90.7 34.4 000.0

47 Nov. 19-25 28.1 8.9 93.1 33.1 000.0

48 Nov.-Dec.26-2 29.2 8.1 92.0 40.4 000.0

49 Dec. 3-9 26.8 7.3 95.1 34.8 000.0

50 Dec. 10-16 26.7 10.6 92.2 51.7 000.0

51 Dec. 17-23 24.5 7.5 80.8 39.7 000.0

52 Dec. 24-31 19.1 5.3 96.3 67.1 000.0

01 Jan. 1-7 16.3 3.3 92.0 70.5 000.0

02 Jan. 8-14 19.8 4.3 87.7 51.7 000.0

03 Jan. 15-21 23.5 5.5 87.5 53.2 000.0

04 Jan. 22-28 23.3 7.4 89.8 53.0 000.0

05 Jan. 29- Feb.4 23.3 6.3 89.7 49.5 000.0

06 Feb.5 – 11 28.1 10.5 85.8 44.1 000.0

07 Feb. 12-18 25.0 11.1 87.4 58.0 004.8

08 Feb. 19 - 25 25.0 09.9 88.0 54.8 003.4

09 Feb. 26 – Mar. 04 27.2 11.0 87.7 50.8 000.0

10 Mar. 05-11 28.7 12.2 86.4 51.0 000.0

11 Mar. 12-18 32.1 13.1 93.4 43.0 000.0

12 Mar. 19-25 36.1 15.1 71.2 42.1 000.0

13 Mar. 26-Apr.01 36.0 16.0 78.1 37.1 000.0

Total 8.2

Source: College of agriculture, R.V.S.K.V.V. Metrology Dept

Page 53: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

53

3.2.2 Rainfall (mm):

The total rainfall received during the crop growing season (i. e.

October to March) of 2011-12 and 2012-13 was 20.0 and 8.2 mm,

respectively, which occurred in the month of January and February of the

respective year.

3.2.3 Relative humidity (%):

The relative humidity showed considerable fluctuation throughout the

growth season. The average relative humidity ranged between 66.86 to

84.03 percent and 68.81 to 85.90 percent, during the two cropping season,

respectively.

3.3: SOIL CHARACTERISTICS:

The soil of the experimental field was Gangetic alluvial with

calcareous layer at the depth of about 1.50-2.00 meters and was well drained.

To ascertain the fertility status and other physico-chemical properties of the soil

of experimental area, a composite soil sample from the surface of the soil (0-30

cm depth) was collected, before starting the experimentation with the help of

soil auger and determined physico-chemical properties of the soil. The methods

adopted for different analyses and results obtained are summarized in Table

3.3 and 3.4.

Page 54: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

54

3.3.1 Mechanical analysis of the soil:

A perusal of the Table 3.3 shows that the percentage of sand was more

in comparison to other fractions. Thus, the soil is categorized as Sandy Loam

with low aggregation.

Table 3.3: Mechanical composition of the soil (0-30cm)

Component Percentage by weight Method employed

Coarse Sand 0.38

International pipette

Method (Piper,

1966)

Fine Sand 61.34

Silt 19.82

clay 18.46

Textural class Sandy Loam Triangle method

3.3.2 Chemical composition of the soil:

The chemical composition of the soil collected from 0-30 cm depth

before sowing of Gladiolus is portrayed in Table 3.4.

The data pertaining to various chemical components, presented in

Table -3.4 clearly exhibit that soil of the experimental field was sufficient in

potash content, but low in organic carbon, available nitrogen as well as zinc

(DTPA-Extractable) and medium in available phosphorus contents. It is

slightly alkaline in reaction and had moderate cation exchange capacity.

Page 55: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

55

Table 3.4 : Chemical analysis of experimental soil

S. No. Soil component 2011 2012 Methods used

1 pH(1:2) 7.80 7.74 Glass Electrode pH meter

(Jackson, 1973)

2

Electrical Conductivity

(dS/m)

0.51 0.48

Solubridge method

(Richard, 1954)

3 Organic Carbon (%) 0.41 0.43 Walkley and Black‟s method

(1934)

4 Available Nitrogen

(kg/ha)

187.0 192.5 Alakaline permanganate

method (Subbiah and Asiza,

1956)

5 Available Phosphorus

(kg/ha)

16.5 17.2 Olsen‟s methods

(Olsen et al., 1954)

6 Available Potassium

(kg/ha)

236.2 228.6 Flame Photometer

(Jackson 1973)

7 Available Zinc (ppm)

0.42 0.49 DTPA- Extractable method

Lindsay and Norwell (1978)

Page 56: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

56

3.4: EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS:

The experiment was conducted at the same location of farm of SMS Govt.

Model Science College, Gwalior, during the rabi seasons of 2011-12 and 2012-

13 with same treatments and same site. The layout plan of the experiment is

illustrated in Fig. 3.3 and the details of experiments are given in Table 3.5 and

treatment details with their symbol in Table 3.6.

Table 3.5: Experimental details of field

1. Crop : Gladiolus (Gladiolus

grandiflorus L.)

2. Variety : Manmohak

3. Experimental design : Split-plot Design

4. Replications : 3

5. Main plot treatment biofertilizers : 4

6. Sub plot treatment zinc level : 3

7. Sub-sub plot treatment NP level : 4

8. Treatment combination : 48

9. Total Number of Plots : 144

10. Gross plot size : 2.5 m x1.8 m

11. Net plot size : 2.0 m x 1.5 m

Page 57: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

57

Table 3.6 : Treatments and their symbols.

S. No. Treatments Symbol

Used

Main plot treatment (bio fertilizer) : 4

1 Un inoculated BF0

2 Azotobacter BF1

3 PSB BF2

4 Azotobacter + PSB BF3

Sub plot treatment (zinc levels) : 3

1 Control Zn0

2 0.1% spray of zinc Zn1

3 0.2% spray of zinc Zn2

Ultimate plot treatment (NPlevels) : 4

1 50% NP F1

2 75% NP F2

3 100% NP F3

4 125% NP F4

Methods Used in different treatments:

For bio fertilizers : Corm dip methods

For Zinc : Two foliar spray (at 3 and 6 leaf pair stage I.e. 45 & 75 DAP)

For NP levels : Application in soil

Page 58: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

58

3.5: CULTURAL OPERATION :

An account of operations such as irrigation, weeding and hoeing,

earthling and top dressing of urea, plant protection measures performed during

both the years of investigations is presented below:

Cultural activities:

Fertilization and sowing :

The experimental crop (Cv. Manmohak) was sown with a corm of 20 cm

spacing with row spacing of 50 cm were maintained. Recommended doses of

fertilizers were 120 kg N, 80 kg P2O5 and 100 kg K2O per ha (100% NPK) and

these doses, full dose of phosphorus and potassium and half dose of nitrogen

were applied at the time of sowing. Remaining half dose of nitrogen was applied

two splits doses after first and second irrigations. Corms were treated before

sowing with Azotobecter, PSB as per treatment wise and zinc was applied as two

foliar sprays (3 and 6 leaf pair stage i. e. at 75 and 100 DAP) as per treatment

concentration.

(A) Pre-planting

An account of pre-bulb planting cultural operations is given below:

S. No.

Operations Ist year IInd year

1. Demarcation of area and preparation of field

18-10-20111 28-10-2012

2. Execution of layout plan 31-10-2011 5-11-2012

3. Application of fertilizer 31-10-2011 7-11-2012

4. Planting of corms 2-11-2011 9-11-2012

Page 59: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

59

(B) Post planting

The cultural operations carried out after planting the bulbs were as follows:

Operation Year

1 Irrigation As per required (20-25 days interval)

2 Weeding (hoeing/Hand weeding) 20 day interval

3 Spray of Zinc Two foliar spray (at 3 and 6 leaf pair stage)

4 Cutting of spikes Starting from 120-125 DAP (day after planting)

(C) Harvesting:

The spikes were harvested when 2-3 pairs of flowers from the bottom

of the spike opened .the individual spikes were harvested by cutting from the

bottom.

3.6: OBSERVATION DETAILS :

Performance of crop as affected by various treatments was assessed

by the following studies:

1. Days to 75% sprouting

Number of day‟s required from planting to 75 percent sprouting of corms

was recorded.

2. Plant height

Plant height was measured in cm of five randomly selected plants of each

treatment from the ground level to the top of the plant at 30 day interval from 30

DAP - 90 DAP.

Page 60: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

60

3. Number of leaves per plant

Number of leaves per plant was counted in five randomly selected plants

of each treatment and noted at 30 day interval from 30 DAP-90 DAP.

4. Days to emergence of spike

Day taken for spike initiation was recorded in five randomly selected

plants of each treatment from the date of sowing to spike initiation.

5. Number on spike

Five plants in each treatment were selected randomly and number on

spike was recorded from spike initiation to harvesting.

6. Length of spike

The length of spike was measured in cm from 4th leaf to top of the

spike with measuring scale in randomly selected five plants in each treatment.

7. Weight of spike

Five plants in each treatment were selected randomly and the

weight of spike was measured in gm from 4th leaf to top of the spike with

measuring balance.

8. Day taken for florets opening

Day taken for florets opening was recorded from the date of spike

initiation to first florets opening.

Page 61: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

61

9. Number of florets per spike

Total number of florets on a spike was recorded from five randomly

selected plants of each treatment and the mean values were taken as number of

florets per spike.

10. Length of florets

Five plants in each treatment were selected randomly for the length

of florets was measured in cm with measuring scale.

11. Diameter of florets

Five plants which were selected for length of florets were also used for

the diameters of florets was measured in cm with measuring scale

12. Flowering Duration

Flowering duration in days was also recorded in five randomly selected

plants of each treatment when the first and last flower appears.

13. Number of florets opened at a time (125 DAP)

Five plants in each treatment were selected randomly at 125 DAP for

count the opened number of florets per spike and mean value was taken as

number of florets opened at a time.

14. Fresh and dry weight of florets

After the florets length and diameters was measured, (at 120-125 DAP)

fresh weight of the florets was noted and after sundry for 5-8 days, dry weight of

florets was also determined.

Page 62: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

62

15. Yield of spike per hectare

All the spikes obtained from each treatment were counted in number of

spike in per net plot size (3.0 square meters) and then converted into multiply the

common factor of 3333.33 (10000/3). Thus, find out the number of spikes per

hectare.

16. Vase life of spike

For studies on vase life, five randomly selected spikes of each

treatment were harvested when 1-3 florets started showing colour. The

harvested spikes were given a slanting cut at the basal end and were put in

tap water which was changed daily and the numbers of days taken for

withering of all the florets from all the five spikes were recorded and mean

value was expressed as vase life in days.

17. Number of corms per plant

Total number of corms per plant was recorded at the time of lifting from

five randomly selected plants of each treatment and average value was taken as

number of corms per plant.

18. Diameter of corms

Diameter of corms was measured in centimeter with the help of Vernier

calipers from five randomly selected corms of each treatment and mean value

was taken as diameter of corm.

Page 63: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

63

D: QUALITATIVE STUDIES :

Nutrient (N, P, K & Zn) content and their uptake:

Collection of sample :

At harvest, plant samples (third pair leaves) were collected from each plot

and carried out to the laboratory in polythene bags. The leaves samples were

dried at 700C for 48 hours and oven dry weight were noted. The samples were

powdered and preserved for analysis of N, P, K and Zn content. The analytical

methods for nutrients composition determinations are given below:

Determination of nitrogen :

Nitrogen in plant sample was determined by KEL PLUS nitrogen

estimation system (PELICAN Equipments). Pelicans KEL PLUS System are

developed and designed to perform the Micro – Kjeldahl‟s method (Jackson,

1973) for estimation of nitrogen which consists of the following three processes.

1. Digestion 2. Distillation 3. Titration

Digestion Process:

In this process, 0.5 g of plant sample was transferred to the digestion

tube. 10 ml of concentrated sulphuric acid and 2g of digestion activator (Salt

mixture) to the sample were added. Digestion tubes were loaded in to the

digester and the digestion block was heated. At the end of digestion process, the

sample turned colour less or light green colour.

Page 64: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

64

Distillation process:

During distillation, the ammonium radicals are converted to ammonia

under excess alkali condition after neutralizing the acid in the digested sample

with 40% alkali (NaOH) on heating. In DISTYL-EM, the digested samples are

heated by passing steam and the ammonia librated due to the addition of 40%

NaOH is dissolved in 4% boric acid. The boric acid consisting of ammonia is

taken for titration.

Titration Process:

The solution of boric acid and mixed indicator containing the “distilled off”

ammonia was titrated with the standardized H2SO4. The titration value of a blank

solution of boric acid and mixed indicator was determined.

(Sample titer Blank titer) Normality of H2SO4 14 100 % Nitrogen =

Sample weight (g) 1000

Determination of phosphorus , potassium and zinc

One gram oven dried plant sample was taken and digested in 100 ml

conical flask with 10 ml of di-acid mixture (2:5) consisting of chemically pure

concentrated Perchloric acid and nitric acid respectively and digested material

was filtered through Whatman No. 40 filter paper in 100 ml. volumetric flask

and filtrate was diluted to mark as outlined by Johnson and Ulrich (1959). This

was used for estimation of P, K and Zn.

Page 65: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

65

Phosphorus estimation

5 ml of aliquot from the colour less filtrate was taken in 25 ml., volumetric

flask for determination and then 5 ml of ammonium molybdate vanadate

mixture was added to it and volume was made up to 25 ml. after shaking well.

It was kept for 30 minutes and colour intensity was measured in Spectronic-

20 at 430 nm wave length, after setting the instrument to zero with blank as

described by Jackson (1973).

Potassium estimation

10 ml aliquot of the filtrate was taken in 100 ml volumetric flask and it was

diluted to mark with distilled water. The potassium content in extract was

estimated by flame photometer (Black, 1965).

Zinc estimation

10 ml aliquot of the filtrate was taken in 100 ml volumetric flask and it was

diluted to mark with distilled water. The zinc content in extract was estimated by

AAS (Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer) as proposed by Lindsay and

Norvell (1978).

Determination of nutrient uptake (kg ha-1)

Conversion factor for nutrient uptake in kg ha-1:

Nutrient uptake (kg ha-1) = Nutrient Content (%) X Yield (kg ha-1) 100

Page 66: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

66

E: SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

The representative soil (0-30 cm) samples from each plot were collected,

before sowing with the help of soil auger. Each sample was air-dried and sieved

through 2 mm sieve. The prepared samples were used for the following

determinations by standard methods.

1. Soil pH :

The pH of soil was determined by using glass electrode pH meter using

1:2 soil water suspensions.

2. Electrical conductivity (dSm-1):

The supernatted liquid of the soil suspension formerly used for pH

determination was also used for the determination of electrical conductivity

by conductivity meter.

3. Organic carbon:

Organic carbon was estimated by the Walkley-Black (1934) Method. In

this method organic matter in the soil is oxidized with a mixture of potassium

dichromate (K2Cr2O7) and concentrated H2SO4 utilizing the heat of dilution of

H2SO4. Unused K2Cr2O7 is back titrated with ferrous ammonium sulphate.

4. Determination of available nitrogen :

Available nitrogen was determined by the alkaline permanganate method

as suggested by Subbiah and Asija (1956).

Page 67: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

67

5. Determination of available phosphorus :

Available phosphorus in the soil was determined calorimetrically by

Olsen‟s method (Olsen et al., 1954).

6. Determination of available Potassium :

5.0g of soil was shaken with 25ml of neutral normal ammonium acetate

solution as an extractant in 100 ml conical flask for 5 minutes and then filtered

through filter paper. The potassium content in the extracts was estimated by

flame photometer. The amount of available potassium was calculated as K and

the results were expressed in kg/ha (Jackson, 1973).

7. Determination of available zinc (DTPA Extractable):

Available Zn was determined by Atomic Absorption Spectro photometer

using 0.005M DTPA (Diethylene Triamine Penta Acetic Acid) as an extractant

proposed by Lindsay and Norvell (1978).

In this method, consisted of shaking a few grams of soil with a buffered

solution, containing DTPA (Diethylene Triamine Penta Acetic Acid). This

chemical acts as a mild chelating agent, which extracts the easily soluble zinc,

iron, copper and manganese. The extracting solution is buffered at pH 7.3 by

Triethnolamine (TEA), and in addition, includes calcium chloride to prevent the

dissolution of calcium carbonate. These conditions permit the right amount of

zinc, iron, copper and manganese to be dissolved and CaCl2 is to stabilize the

pH of the extractant.

Page 68: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

68

The dissolved elements in the extract are, then measured by the atomic

absorption spectrophotometer, where in, the extracted sample is converted first

into an atomic vapour, usually by a flame and irradiated by the metal being

sought, the absorption of the light by the vaporized samples is related to the

concentration of the derived metal in it.

F. ECONOMICAL STUDY:

Economics of the treatments: Recommendation and adoption of any

practices by cultivators depends upon its economics. Therefore, it becomes

essential to work out economics of the treatments tested for judging the best

treatments under study, for getting higher net profit per hectare.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6

Ab

so

rba

nce

Available-Zn (ppm)

Sandard curve of available-Zn

Page 69: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

69

Cost of cultivation :

For different treatments total cost was calculated on the basis of

prevailing market rates of fertilizer, field preparation, sowing of seeds, labour

charges, culture and intercultural operations etc.

Gross return :

For different treatments gross returns was calculated on the basis of

prevailing market rate of produce.

Net profit :

It was calculated treatment wise. The cost of cultivation per hectare was

subtracted from the gross income for computing net returns of each treatment.

Net profit (Rs./ha) = Gross return (Rs./ha) - Cost of cultivation (Rs./ha)

Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) :

It was calculated treatment wise. The gross income per hectare of each

treatment was divided by the cost of cultivation of respective treatments.

Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) = Gross return Cost of cultivation

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

All data related to pre and post harvest study of crop collected were

statistically analyzed by using the analysis of variance technique (Fisher,

1958). Data so computed was subjected to Fisher‟s analysis of variance for

judging the effect of various treatments. The skeleton analysis of variance is

presented in the Table 3.7.

Page 70: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

70

Table 3.7: Skeleton of analysis of variance

Due to D. F.

Replication (R ) 2

Bio fertilizers (BF) 3

Error-a 6

Total 11

Zinc (Zn) 2

Bio fertilizers x zinc (BF X Zn ) 6

Error-b 16

Total 35

NP Levels (NP) 3

BF x NP 9

Zn x NP 6

BF x Zn x NP 18

Error-c 72

Total 143

The null hypothesis was tested by the „F‟ test, which revealed the

significance of treatment effect. The standard error means and critical difference

were calculated as follows:

Page 71: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

71

The standard error of mean was calculated by formula:

(1) S. Em. ± = Square root of (EMS/r).

(2) S. Em. ±(For Main treat.) = Square root of (EMS(a)/ r x b x c ).

(3) S. Em. ± (For Sub-treat.) = Square root of (EMS (b) / r x a x c).

(4) S. Em. ± (For Ulti-treat.) = Square root of (EMS (c) / r x b x c)

Where, EMS = Error mean sum of square,

r = replications (3),

a = number of main treatments (4),

b = number of sub treatments (3),

c = number of sub-sub (ulti) treatments (4).

„CD‟ was computed for judging the difference between two treatments. It was

calculated from formula:

CD (at 5%) = r

EMS2 X t value at 5%

Where, S.Em. ± = Standard error of means

PRESENTATION OF DATA:

The results obtained from the field experimentation are consolidated in the

suitable tabular form and summarized in the appendix tables for better

classification. The graphic curves and bar diagrams are also sketched for better

presentation of the results, wherever felt necessary.

Page 72: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

72

CHAPTER – IV

RESULTS

The results of the present investigation “Effect of bio fertilizers

and zinc on gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)” related to the

impact of various bio-fertilizers, zinc and fertility levels treatments,

mainly on growth, floral characters, spike yield, nutrients content,

quality of flower and corms production embodied and explained in

this chapter. The data of the final observations of the various

parameters during growth and flowering phase were subjected to

statistical analysis and the results have, therefore, been presented

through tables and suitable diagrams. All findings of the experiments

were recorded and have been described under following heads:

Biometric studies : Growth and development studies

Post- harvest and qualitative studies : Quality parameters of spike and

floral characteristics

Uptake studies : Nutrients (N, P, K & Zn) content in leaves

Corms studies: Number of corms, its weight and diameter

Economical studies: Effective and economical treatments under study

BIOMETRIC STUDIES:

The progressive data recorded on growth studies viz. Sprouting

percentage (75%), plant height and number of leaves per plant as affected by

various treatments, have been considered and described below in the light of

treatments at progressive stages of crop.

Page 73: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

73

4.1: Days to 75% sprouting:

The data pertaining to days taken to 75% sprouting, as influence by

different treatments have been presented in Table 4.1. In general, first year of

experimentation took more time for 75 percent sprouting as compared to second

year experimentation.

Days taken to 75% sprouting were observed in the range of 11.51

to12.95 and 10.36 to 11.15 under different inoculation treatments of bio fertilizers

during the first and second years of experimentation.

On the basis of two years mean data, combined inoculation of

Azotobacter + PSB (BF3) had significant superiority which took least days of

sprouting (10.94 days) followed by BF2 and BF1. The maximum days (12.05) for

75 percent sprouting observed in control (BF0).

The data on 75 percent sprouting in various levels of zinc were more

or less the same in different treatments during both the years. Days taken to 75

percent sprouting under different zinc levels were observed in the range of

11.14 to 11.67 days in two years mean data.

It is clear from the results (Table 4.1) that the increasing level of NP

decreased the time required for 75 percent sprouting of gladiolus corms. 125%

NP levels had significant superiority which took least days for sprouting (10.87

days) followed by 100% and 75%. The maximum days (12.09) for 75 percent

sprouting observed in 50% NP level (F1) on the basis of two year mean data.

Page 74: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

74

Table 4.1: Days taken to 75% sprouting of gladiolus corms as

influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Days taken to 75% sprouting

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 12.95 11.15 12.05

BF1- Azotobacter 12.09 10.81 11.45

BF2 - PSB 12.12 10.72 11.42

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 11.51 10.36 10.94

SEm ( ) 0.23 0.10 0.14

C.D. (5%) 0.79 0.34 0.47

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 12.27 10.78 11.67

Zn1 –0.1% 12.30 10.77 11.58

Zn2 –0.2% 11.94 10.73 11.14

SEm ( ) 0.16 0.06 0.09

C.D. (5%) NS NS 0.27

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 12.90 11.28 12.09

F2–75% NP 12.33 10.85 11.59

F3 –100% NP 12.05 10.56 11.31

F4 –125% NP 11.39 10.34 10.87

SEm ( ) 0.17 0.07 0.10

C.D. (5%) 0.49 0.21 0.28

Page 75: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

75

4.2: Plant height (cm):

Plant height, a measure of growth of plant was recorded periodically at

an interval of 30 days, starting from 30th day after planting up to 90 DAP stage.

The data pertaining to plant height presented in Table 4.2.1- 4.2.3 which was

clearly indicate that it was enhanced with the advancement of plant growth till 60

DAP; thereafter such an increase was slow up to 90 DAP.

The plant height was found to be influenced significantly due to bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels, during both the years of experimentation and also

on mean basis at all the growth stages.

The variations in plant height at 30 DAP during both the seasons of field

experimentation, under different treatment of bio fertilizer and Zn levels were

quite marginal and could not reach the level of significance. However, at this

stage different NP levels show significant difference in plant height during both

the seasons of field experimentation and also on mean basis.

It is revealed from Table 4.2.1, that the increasing level of NP increased

the plant height significantly. On the basis of two year mean data on plant height,

maximum height (24.22 cm) was noted with 125% NP level which was

significantly superior over rest of other NP levels. Whereas, minimum height

(22.54 cm) noted under 50% NP level.

Page 76: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

76

Table 4.2.1: Plant heights of gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels at 30 DAP

Treatment Plant height (cm) at 30 DAP

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 24.40 21.38 22.89

BF1- Azotobacter 24.39 22.48 23.44

BF2 - PSB 24.33 22.43 23.38

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 24.61 22.94 23.78

SEm ( ) 0.17 0.56 0.32

C.D. (5%) NS NS NS

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 24.03 21.98 23.30

Zn1 –0.1% 24.61 22.46 23.54

Zn2 –0.2% 24.66 22.49 23.57

SEm ( ) 0.21 0.28 0.21

C.D. (5%) NS NS NS

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 23.53 21.54 22.54

F2–75% NP 24.38 22.29 23.34

F3 –100% NP 24.65 22.14 23.39

F4 –125% NP 25.18 23.26 24.22

SEm ( ) 0.16 0.29 0.19

C.D. (5%) 0.47 0.82 0.54

Page 77: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

77

At 60 DAP, plant height show significant variations due to different

treatment of bio fertilizer, Zn and NP levels.

Plant height in this stage ranged from 56.17 to 64.39, 56.31 to 67.80 and

56.24 to 66.10 cm under different inoculation treatments of bio fertilizers during

the first, second year and on mean basis, respectively. It is revealed from Table

4.2.2, that the bio fertilizer treated plots show significantly taller plant over to un-

inoculated treatment. Single inoculation of Azotobacter or PSB recorded

significantly taller plant over un- inoculated treatment, but show non significant

different from each other. Maximum plant height (66.10 cm) was noted with dual

inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB, which was significantly superior over rest of

other bio fertilizer treatments on two year mean basis.

Under different level of zinc, plant height was observed in the range of

56.30 to 63.98, 56.67 to 66.41, and 56.98 to 65.20 cm during the first, second

years of field experimentation and on mean basis, respectively. Maximum height

was observed with the spray of 0.2% of Zn which was significantly higher over

rest of the Zn treatments, however, minimum height was noted under control

during first, second year and also on mean basis.

It is revealed from Table 4.2.2, that the increasing level of NP increased

the plant height significantly. Maximum height was observed in 125% NP level

which was significantly superior over 50, 75 and 100% NP levels during both the

years of field experimentation and also on mean basis.

Page 78: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

78

Table 4.2.2: Plant height of gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels at 60 DAS

Treatment Plant height (cm) at 60 DAP

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 56.17 56.31 56.24

BF1- Azotobacter 58.78 61.57 60.18

BF2 - PSB 59.72 62.07 60.90

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 64.39 67.80 66.10

SEm ( ) 0.97 1.01 0.98

C.D. (5%) 3.34 3.51 3.41

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 56.30 57.66 56.98

Zn1 –0.1% 59.02 61.74 60.38

Zn2 –0.2% 63.98 66.41 65.20

SEm ( ) 0.95 1.00 0.97

C.D. (5%) 2.80 2.96 2.87

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 55.23 57.68 56.46

F2–75% NP 57.89 59.68 58.79

F3 –100% NP 61.91 63.95 62.93

F4 –125% NP 64.02 66.45 65.24

SEm ( ) 0.16 0.14 0.14

C.D. (5%) 0.44 0.41 0.41

Page 79: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

79

At 90 DAP, plant height show significant variations due to different

treatment of bio fertilizer, Zn and NP levels during both the years of study as well

as mean basis.

It is revealed from Table 4.2.3, plant height was observed in the range of

59.07 to 69.37, 63.80 to 74.85 and 61.44 to 72.11 cm under different inoculation

treatments of bio fertilizers during the first, second year and on mean basis,

respectively. Maximum plant height was noted with combined inoculation of

Azotobacter + PSB, which was significantly superior over single inoculation of

Azotobacter or PSB whereas, minimum height was noted with un - inoculated

treatment, during both the years of study as well as mean basis.

Under different level of zinc, plant height was observed in the range of

61.09 to 69.11, 65.91 to 74.54 and 63.50 to 71.83 cm during the first, second

years of field experimentation and on mean basis, respectively. Maximum height

was observed with the spray of 0.2% of Zn which was significantly higher over to

0.1% Zn, during first, second year and on mean basis, respectively.

It is revealed from Table 4.2.3, that the increasing level of NP increased

the plant height significantly. Maximum height was observed in 125% NP levels

which was significantly superior over 50, 75 and 100% NP levels during both the

years of field experimentation.

Mean data of two year on plant height at 90 DAP; maximum height (71.64

cm) was noted with 125% NP level which was show significantly taller plant than

rest of the other NP levels however, minimum height (61.72 cm) was noted in

50% NP level.

Page 80: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

80

Table 4.2.3: Plant height of gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels at 90 DAS

Treatment Plant height (cm) at 90 DAP

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 59.07 63.80 61.44

BF1- Azotobacter 62.19 67.10 64.65

BF2 - PSB 66.53 71.78 69.16

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 69.37 74.85 72.11

SEm ( ) 0.94 1.12 0.93

C.D. (5%) 3.25 3.88 3.20

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 61.09 65.91 63.50

Zn1 –0.1% 62.67 67.70 65.19

Zn2 –0.2% 69.11 74.54 71.83

SEm ( ) 0.79 1.02 0.85

C.D. (5%) 2.33 3.01 2.50

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 59.32 64.10 61.72

F2–75% NP 61.92 66.87 64.40

F3 –100% NP 66.99 72.21 69.60

F4 –125% NP 68.93 74.35 71.64

SEm ( ) 0.52 0.41 0.40

C.D. (5%) 1.48 1.16 1.14

Page 81: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

81

4.3: Number of leaves per plant

The number of leaves per plant was recorded at 30, 60 and 90 DAP stage

and the mean data have been presented in Table 4.3.1- 4.3.3. The results show

that the bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels measures differ significantly with respect

to number of leaves per plant recorded at 30, 60 and 90 DAP stage.

The numbers of leaves per plant increased significantly at 30 DAP with

inoculation of bio fertilizers. The number of leaves was observed in the range of

3.50 to 3.68, 4.26 to 4.47 and 3.88 to 4.07, during first, second years and on

mean basis, respectively.

It is clear from the Table 4.3.1, Maximum leaves noted with combined

inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB, which was significantly superior over un -

inoculated treatment and remains statistically at par with single inoculation of

Azotobacter or PSB. However, minimum leaves noted in un-inoculated (BF0),

during both the years of study as well as mean basis.

At 30 DAP stage; effect of different NP levels and foliar spray of zinc was

more or less similar in all the treatments, during both the years of study as well

as mean basis. At this stage, different NP levels show increasing trend with

increase in NP levels but they not cross the level of significance and show

statistically at par difference from each other.

Page 82: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

82

Table 4.3.1: Number of leaves of gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels at 30 DAP

Treatment Number of leaves at 30 DAP

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 3.50 4.26 3.88

BF1- Azotobacter 3.61 4.39 4.00

BF2 - PSB 3.63 4.44 4.04

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 3.68 4.47 4.07

SEm ( ) 0.04 0.05 0.04

C.D. (5%) 0.13 0.16 0.14

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 3.56 4.34 3.95

Zn1 –0.1% 3.62 4.41 4.02

Zn2 –0.2% 3.63 4.42 4.03

SEm ( ) 0.03 0.04 0.03

C.D. (5%) NS NS NS

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 3.56 4.31 3.94

F2–75% NP 3.58 4.36 3.98

F3 –100% NP 3.63 4.43 4.04

F4 –125% NP 3.64 4.45 4.04

SEm ( ) 0.03 0.04 0.03

C.D. (5%) NS NS NS

Page 83: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

83

At 60 DAP, numbers of leaves per plant show significant variations due to

different treatment of bio fertilizer, Zn and NP levels.

Numbers of leaves per plant was observed in the range of 5.41 to 5.70,

5.71 to 6.10 and 5.56 to 5.90 under different inoculation treatments of bio

fertilizers during the first, second year and on mean basis. It is revealed from

Table 4.3.2, that the bio fertilizer treated plots show significantly higher numbers

of leaves per plant over un-inoculated treatment. Single inoculation of

Azotobacter or PSB recorded significantly more numbers of leaves per plant over

un- inoculated treatment, but show non significant different from each other.

Mean data of two year show the numbers of leaves per plant in the deceasing

order of BF3 > BF1 > BF2 > BF0.

Under different level of zinc, numbers of leaves per plant was observed in

the range of 5.50 to 6.62, 5.85 to 5.96 and 5.67 to 5.79 during the first, second

year of field experimentation and on mean basis, respectively. Maximum

numbers of leaves per plant was observed with the spray of 0.2% of Zn which

was significantly higher over control and statistically at par with 0.1% level.

Whereas, minimum numbers of leaves per plant was noted under control.

It is revealed from Table 4.3.2, that the increasing levels of NP increase

the numbers of leaves per plant significantly. Maximum numbers of leaves per

plant was observed in 125% NP level which was significantly superior over 50

and 75 % NP levels but statistically at par with 100% NP level during both the

years of field experimentation and on mean basis.

Page 84: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

84

Table 4.3.2: Number of leaves of gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels at 60 DAP

Treatment Number of leaves at 60 DAP

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 5.41 5.71 5.56

BF1- Azotobacter 5.55 5.95 5.75

BF2 - PSB 5.59 5.89 5.74

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 5.70 6.10 5.90

SEm ( ) 0.03 0.04 0.03

C.D. (5%) 0.09 0.15 0.12

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 5.50 5.85 5.67

Zn1 –0.1% 5.57 5.92 5.75

Zn2 –0.2% 5.62 5.96 5.79

SEm ( ) 0.03 0.03 0.03

C.D. (5%) 0.09 0.09 0.09

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 5.45 5.73 5.59

F2–75% NP 5.51 5.86 5.69

F3 –100% NP 5.61 6.00 5.81

F4 –125% NP 5.68 6.05 5.86

SEm ( ) 0.04 0.04 0.03

C.D. (5%) 0.10 0.10 0.10

Page 85: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

85

At 90 DAP, numbers of leaves per plant show significant variations due to

different treatment of bio fertilizer, Zn and NP levels, presented in Table 4.3.3.

At 90 DAP, numbers of leaves per plant was observed in the range of

7.59 to 8.21, 7.76 to 8.32 and 7.68 to 8.27 under different inoculation treatments

of bio fertilizers during the first, second year and on mean basis, respectively.

Maximum numbers of leaves per plant was noted with combined inoculation of

Azotobacter + PSB, which was significantly superior over single inoculation of

Azotobacter or PSB whereas, minimum leaves was noted with un - inoculated

treatment, during both the years of study as well as on mean basis.

Under different level of zinc, numbers of leaves per plant was observed in

the range of 7.75 to 8.02, 7.90 to 8.19 and 7.83 to 8.11 during the first, second

years of study and on mean basis, respectively. Maximum leaves per plant was

observed with the spray of 0.2% of Zn which was significantly higher over control

but statistically at par with 0.1% Zn, during first and second years.

It is revealed from Table 4.3.3, that the increasing level of NP increased

the leaves per plant significantly. Maximum leaves per plant was observed in

125% NP level which was superior over 50, 75 and 100% NP levels during both

the years of field experimentation.

On the two year mean data, maximum numbers of leaves per plant (8.20)

noted with 125% NP level which was significantly higher to 50 and 75 % NP

levels but statistically at par with 100% NP level. Whereas, minimum leaves per

plant (7.54) was noted in 50% NP level.

Page 86: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

86

Table 4.3.3: Number of leaves of gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels at 90 DAP

Treatment Number of leaves at 90 DAP

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 7.59 7.76 7.68

BF1- Azotobacter 7.93 8.10 8.02

BF2 - PSB 7.87 8.04 7.96

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 8.21 8.32 8.27

SEm ( ) 0.08 0.05 0.06

C.D. (5%) 0.28 0.17 0.20

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 7.75 7.90 7.83

Zn1 –0.1% 7.93 8.08 8.01

Zn2 –0.2% 8.02 8.19 8.11

SEm ( ) 0.05 0.06 0.05

C.D. (5%) 0.16 0.16 0.15

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 7.43 7.64 7.54

F2–75% NP 8.01 8.11 8.06

F3 –100% NP 8.04 8.19 8.12

F4 –125% NP 8.11 8.29 8.20

SEm ( ) 0.05 0.06 0.05

C.D. (5%) 0.14 0.16 0.14

Page 87: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

87

4.4: Days taken for spike initiation:

The data recorded for emergence of spike (Days taken for spike initiation)

are presented in Table 4.4, revealed that the significant variations due to bio

fertilizer, Zn and NP levels during both the years.

The data on days taken for spike initiation exhibited that the dual

inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB noted the earlier spike initiation which was

significantly earliest spike initiation as compared to single inoculation of

Azotobacter or PSB treatment during second year study. Whereas, in first year

they are statistically at par from each other.

On mean basis, earliest spike initiation (93.84 day) was recorded with dual

inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB (BF3) treatment which was significantly earlier

spike initiation as compared to un-inoculated treatment but statistically at par with

single inoculation of Azotobacter or PSB treatment, respectively.

It is clear from Table 4.4, that the foliar application of Zn show significantly

earlier spike initiation as compared to control. On mean basis, earliest spike

initiation (92.47 day) recorded with 0.2% Zn, which was significantly earlier spike

initiation as compared to 0.1% Zn and control treatment.

Amongst the treatments of NP levels, the best NP levels was recorded

125% which resulted the highest day taken for spike initiation as compared to all

the remaining NP levels whereas, significantly earlier spike initiation was

recorded in case of 50 % NP level during both the years of study as well as on

mean basis.

Page 88: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

88

Table 4.4: Days to emergence of spike in gladiolus as influenced

by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Days to emergence of spike

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 103.91 94.13 98.52

BF1- Azotobacter 100.70 91.28 95.49

BF2 - PSB 99.82 89.32 94.57

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 99.50 86.17 93.84

SEm ( ) 0.72 0.82 0.76

C.D. (5%) 2.48 2.83 2.62

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 103.52 92.61 98.06

Zn1 –0.1% 101.29 90.27 96.28

Zn2 –0.2% 98.13 87.80 92.47

SEm ( ) 0.65 0.50 0.56

C.D. (5%) 1.93 1.47 1.66

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 97.53 86.76 92.14

F2–75% NP 99.98 89.39 94.68

F3 –100% NP 101.20 90.86 96.03

F4 –125% NP 105.23 93.89 99.56

SEm ( ) 0.56 0.59 0.56

C.D. (5%) 1.58 1.68 1.58

Page 89: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

89

4.5: Number of Spike per square meter

The observations pertaining to number of spike per square meter was

recorded at 120 DAP. The mean data so obtained are being presented in Table

4.5. In general, it was observed that number of spike per square meter was more

in second (2012-13) as compared to first (2011-12) season.

The combined inoculation of corms with Azotobacter + PSB produced

maximum number of spike per square meter which was significantly higher than

single inoculated of Azotobacter or PSB. However, Azotobacter or PSB

inoculated alone also recorded significantly higher number of spike per square

meter over un inoculated treatment. The trend in respect of the number of spike

per square meter under various bio fertilizer treatments were in descending order

of BF3> BF2> BF1 > BF0 during both the years of study as well as on mean basis.

The variations in number of spike per square meter due to level of zinc

were found to be significant, where all the treatments under test proved their

significant superiority over control. The perusal of data indicated (Table 4.5) that

the highest levels of zinc (Zn2) produce the spike up to 20.25 and 23.05 per

square meter, being significant superior to the lower zinc levels and control,

respectively, in first and second year of the study.

Mean data of two year revealed that application of zinc at higher

concentration (0.2%) show higher number of spike per square meter over lower

concentration (0.1%) at the same stage. Minimum spike per square meter noted

in control treatment.

Page 90: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

90

Table 4.5: Number of spike per square meter as influenced by

bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Number of spike per square meter

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 18.90 21.53 20.22

BF1- Azotobacter 19.53 22.23 20.88

BF2 - PSB 19.85 22.57 21.21

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 20.55 23.33 21.94

SEm ( ) 0.12 0.12 0.11

C.D. (5%) 0.40 0.40 0.38

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 19.25 21.88 20.57

Zn1 –0.1% 19.62 22.30 20.96

Zn2 –0.2% 20.25 23.05 21.66

SEm ( ) 0.11 0.12 0.09

C.D. (5%) 0.33 0.37 0.26

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 17.89 20.46 19.18

F2–75% NP 19.73 22.23 20.98

F3 –100% NP 20.48 23.18 21.83

F4 –125% NP 20.74 23.79 22.27

SEm ( ) 0.13 0.16 0.12

C.D. (5%) 0.36 0.46 0.35

Page 91: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

91

Number of spike per square meter increased significantly and consistently

with the increasing levels of NP up to 125%. Maximum number of spike per

square meter was recorded at F4 level (125%) of applied NP and it was found

significantly higher over rest of other NP levels. minimum number of spike per

square meter noted in 50% NP (F1) treatment.

4.6 : Length of spike (cm)

The data pertaining to length of spike was recorded and presented in

Table 4.6; which clearly indicate that the spike length was found to be

influenced significantly, due to different treatments of bio fertilizer, zinc and NP

levels. In general, second year of experimentation show longer spike as

compared to first year in all the treatments.

It is clear from the Table 4.6, that the bio fertilizer (Azotobacter / PSB)

applied corms produced significantly longer spike over un –inoculated treatment

(BF0). Combined inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB produced longest spike.

Under single inoculated treatment, PSB applied corms gave longer spike as

compared to Azotobacter treated corms during both the years of study as well

as on mean basis.

Under different levels of zinc, spike length was noted in the range of 65.90

to 74.17, 75.23 to 84.42 and 70.57 to 79.30 cm during first, second year and on

mean basis, respectively. Foliar application of 0.2% Zn produced longest spike

followed by 0.1% treatment. Whereas minimum spike length was noted in

control treatment during both the years of study as well as on mean basis.

Page 92: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

92

Table 4.6: Spike length (cm) of gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Spike length (cm)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 64.77 73.75 69.26

BF1- Azotobacter 67.26 76.50 71.88

BF2 - PSB 70.77 80.89 75.83

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 75.07 84.89 79.98

SEm ( ) 0.60 0.82 0.70

C.D. (5%) 2.08 2.83 2.44

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 65.90 75.23 70.57

Zn1 –0.1% 68.33 77.38 72.85

Zn2 –0.2% 74.17 84.42 79.30

SEm ( ) 0.34 0.47 0.40

C.D. (5%) 1.02 1.39 1.17

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 64.08 73.24 68.66

F2–75% NP 68.72 78.39 73.56

F3 –100% NP 70.50 80.33 75.42

F4 –125% NP 74.56 84.08 79.32

SEm ( ) 0.42 0.47 0.43

C.D. (5%) 1.19 1.35 1.22

Page 93: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

93

Spike length increased significantly and consistently with the increasing

levels of NP up to 125%. Maximum spike length was recorded under 125% of

applied NP which is significantly higher over rest of other NP levels during both

the years of study.

On the basis of two year mean data on spike length, longest spike (79.32

cm) recorded with 125% NP level, which was 15.52, 7.83 and 5.17 percent

higher spike length over to 50, 75 and 100 % NP levels, respectively.

4.7: Weight of spike

The observations pertaining to spike weight was recorded at 120 DAP.

The mean data so obtained are being presented in Table 4.7. In general, second

year of experimentation show heavier spike as compared to first year in all the

treatments under study.

Under different bio fertilizer treatments, spike weight was noted in the

range of 65.70 to 76.23, 69.15 to 79.21 and 67.43 to 77.72 g during first, second

year of study and on mean basis.

The combined inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB produced significantly

heavier spike over un-inoculated and single inoculated treatment. However,

single inoculation by Azotobacter or PSB also recorded significantly heavier

spike over un-inoculated treatment (BF0). The trend in respect of the spike weight

under various bio fertilizer treatments were in order of BF3> BF2> BF1 > BF0

during both the years of study as well as ob mean basis.

Page 94: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

94

Table 4.7: Weight of spike (g) of gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizers, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Weight of spike (g)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 65.70 69.15 67.43

BF1- Azotobacter 68.26 71.66 69.96

BF2 - PSB 71.83 75.75 73.79

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 76.23 79.21 77.72

SEm ( ) 0.84 0.62 0.66

C.D. (5%) 2.90 2.13 2.29

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 66.88 70.21 68.55

Zn1 –0.1% 69.36 72.30 70.83

Zn2 –0.2% 75.27 79.31 77.29

SEm ( ) 0.66 0.36 0.38

C.D. (5%) 1.95 1.05 1.13

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 65.05 68.34 66.70

F2–75% NP 69.73 73.16 71.45

F3 –100% NP 71.56 75.61 73.59

F4 –125% NP 75.68 78.65 77.17

SEm ( ) 0.53 0.46 0.41

C.D. (5%) 1.50 1.31 1.16

Page 95: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

95

Under different foliar spray of zinc, weight of spike was recorded in the

range of 66.88 to 75.27, 70.21 to 79.31 and 68.55 to 77.29 g during first, second

years of experimentation and on mean basis, respectively. Foliar spray of 0.2%

Zn produced heaviest spike which is followed by 0.1% treatment. Whereas

minimum spike weight was noted in control treatment during both the years of

study as well as on mean basis.

The perusal of two year mean data indicate (Table 4.7) that the higher

concentrations of zinc (0.2% Zn) produce the weight of spike up to 77.29 g /plant,

being 12.75 and 9.12 percent significant heavier to control and 0.1% Zn,

respectively.

Under different levels of NP, weight of spike was noted in the range of

65.05 to 75.68, 68.34 to 78.65 and 66.70 to 77.17 g during first, second year of

experimentation and on mean basis.

Weight of spike increased significantly and consistently with the increasing

levels of NP up to 125%. Maximum spike weight was noted with 125% of

applied NP and it was found significantly higher over rest of other NP levels

during both the years of study.

The perusal of mean data indicate (Table 4.7) that the heaviest spike

(77.17 g) noted with 125% NP level, which was 15.70, 8.00 and 4.86 percent

heavier over to 50, 75 and 100 % NP levels, respectively.

Page 96: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

96

4.8: Days taken to flowering of gladiolus

The data recorded for emergence of flower opening (days taken for first

floret) are presented in Table 4.8.

The emergence of flower opening (days taken for first floret opening) was

observed in the range of 102.90 to 114.61, 99.03 to 112.54 days under different

treatments of bio fertilizer during first and second year, respectively. The perusal

of mean data indicate, that the combined inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB

recorded the earlier flower initiation (100.97 day) which was significantly superior

to single inoculation of Azotobacter or PSB treatments. Under single inoculation,

PSB initiated early flowering as compared to Azotobacter treated corms, but not

the cross the level of significance. However, un-inoculated treatment takes more

time for flowering.

It is clear from the Table 4.8, that the foliar application of Zn showed

significantly earlier flower initiation as compared to control. On mean basis,

earliest flower initiation (103.31 day) recorded with 0.2% foliar spray of Zn, which

was 7.03 and 4.61 days significantly earlier flower initiation as compared to 0.1%

foliar spray of Zn and control treatments, respectively.

Under different NP levels, the lowest day taken for flower initiation was

recorded in 50% NP level during both the years of study as well as mean basis.

Among the different NP levels, the 125% NP level resulted significantly delay

flower initiation as compared to 50, 75 % and 100% NP levels in both the years

as well as on mean basis.

Page 97: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

97

Table 4.8: Days taken to flowering (days for opening of first

floret) influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP level

Treatment Days taken to flowering

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 114.61 112.54 113.58

BF1- Azotobacter 108.36 107.21 107.79

BF2 - PSB 106.97 106.11 106.54

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 102.90 99.03 100.97

SEm ( ) 0.97 1.12 0.97

C.D. (5%) 3.35 3.86 3.37

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 111.82 109.52 110.34

Zn1 –0.1% 108.76 106.89 107.92

Zn2 –0.2% 104.05 102.27 103.31

SEm ( ) 0.50 0.66 0.56

C.D. (5%) 1.48 1.95 1.65

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 103.18 102.14 103.16

F2–75% NP 105.87 103.42 104.51

F3 –100% NP 109.26 107.17 108.20

F4 –125% NP 114.54 112.16 112.90

SEm ( ) 0.70 0.68 0.64

C.D. (5%) 1.99 1.93 1.81

Page 98: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

98

4.9: Number of florets per spike

Data in respect of number of florets per spike is preesented in Table 4.9,

indicates that in general, second year (2012-13) show higher number of florets

per spike as compared to first year (2011-12) in all the treatments under study.

The combined inoculation of corms with Azotobacter + PSB produced

maximum number of florets per spike which was significantly higher than single

inoculated of Azotobacter or PSB. However, Azotobacter or PSB inoculated

alone also recorded significantly higher number of florets per spike over un -

inoculated treatment. The trend in respect of the number of florets per spike

under various bio fertilizer treatments were in order of BF3> BF2> BF1 > BF0

during both the years of study as well as on mean basis.

Foliar application of zinc enhanced the number of florets per spike,

however higher concentration (0.2%) show significantly more number of florets

per spike over lower concentration (0.1%). Whereas, minimum number of florets

per spike recorded in control treatment during both the years of study as well as

on mean basis.

Number of florets per spike increased significantly and consistently with

the increasing levels of NP up to 125% during both the years of study. On the

basis of two year mean data, maximum number of florets per spike (18.29) was

observed in F4 (125% NP) which is closely followed by F3 (100% NP) with 18.18

florets and remains statistically at par with each other. Least number of florets

recorded in F1 (50% NP) with 15.74 florets per spike.

Page 99: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

99

Table 4.9: Number of florets per spike of gladiolus as influenced

by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Number of florets per spike

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 16.56 16.94 16.75

BF1- Azotobacter 17.14 17.55 17.35

BF2 - PSB 17.23 17.60 17.42

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 17.77 18.20 17.99

SEm ( ) 0.12 0.13 0.12

C.D. (5%) 0.40 0.45 0.40

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 16.71 17.11 16.91

Zn1 –0.1% 17.20 17.58 17.39

Zn2 –0.2% 17.61 18.03 17.82

SEm ( ) 0.10 0.12 0.10

C.D. (5%) 0.29 0.37 0.31

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 15.50 15.97 15.74

F2–75% NP 17.06 17.52 17.29

F3 –100% NP 18.02 18.33 18.18

F4 –125% NP 18.11 18.47 18.29

SEm ( ) 0.12 0.13 0.12

C.D. (5%) 0.34 0.38 0.35

Page 100: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

100

4.10: Length of florets

The data pertaining to florets length was recorded and presented in Table

4.10; which clearly indicate that the florets length was found to be influenced

significantly, due to different treatments of bio fertilizer, Zn and NP levels.

It is clear from the Table 4.10, that the bio fertilizer (Azotobacter / PSB)

applied corms produced significantly longer florets over un –inoculated

treatment (BF0). Combined inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB produced longest

florets. Whereas, in single inoculated treatment, PSB treated corms gave longer

florets as compared to Azotobacter treated corms, in both the years of study as

well as on mean basis.

Under different foliar spray of zinc, florets length noted in the range of 9.48

to10.49 and 9.62 to 10.77 cm during first and second years of study. Foliar

spray of 0.2% Zn produced longest florets followed by spray of 0.1% Zn

treatment. Whereas smallest florets were recorded in control treatment during

both the years as well as on mean basis.

Florets length increased significantly and consistently with the increasing

levels of NP up to F4 level (125% NP). Maximum florets length was recorded at

125% of applied NP and it was found significantly higher over rest of other NP

levels during both the years of study.

On the basis of two year mean data on florets length, longest florets

(10.68 cm) recorded with 125% NP level, which were 1.38, 0.83 and 0.50 cm

longer over to 50, 75 and 100 % NP levels, respectively.

Page 101: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

101

Table 4.10: Length of florets (cm) influenced by bio fertilizer,

zinc and NP levels

Treatment Florets length (cm)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 9.32 9.46 9.39

BF1- Azotobacter 9.66 9.78 9.72

BF2 - PSB 10.06 10.32 10.19

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 10.55 10.83 10.69

SEm ( ) 0.07 0.08 0.07

C.D. (5%) 0.23 0.29 0.26

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 9.48 9.62 9.55

Zn1 –0.1% 9.72 9.90 9.81

Zn2 –0.2% 10.49 10.77 10.64

SEm ( ) 0.04 0.05 0.05

C.D. (5%) 0.13 0.15 0.14

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 9.22 9.37 9.30

F2–75% NP 9.69 10.00 9.85

F3 –100% NP 10.11 10.24 10.18

F4 –125% NP 10.57 10.78 10.68

SEm ( ) 0.07 0.06 0.06

C.D. (5%) 0.19 0.18 0.17

Page 102: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

102

4.11: Diameter of floret

Data in respect of florets diameter is presented in Table 4.11, indicates the

effect of bio fertilizer, Zn and NP levels was significant. In general, second year

(2012-13) show more diameters of florets as compared to first year (2011-12) in

all the treatments under study.

The combined inoculation of corms with Azotobacter + PSB produced

highest diameter of florets which was significantly higher than single inoculated

treatments. However, single inoculation of Azotobacter or PSB also recorded

significantly higher diameter of florets over un - inoculated treatment. The trend in

respect of the diameter of florets under various bio fertilizer treatments were in

order of BF3> BF2> BF1 > BF0 during both the years of study.

Under different foliar spray of zinc, florets diameter was recorded in the

range of 9.46 to 10.48 and 9.81 to 10.58 cm during first and second year of

experimentation. Spray of Zn @ 0.2% produced highest florets diameter

followed by 0.1% Zn treatment. However, minimum diameter of floret noted with

control, during both the years as well as on mean basis.

Floret diameter increased significantly and consistently with the increasing

levels of NP up to 125%. Maximum floret diameter was noted with F4 level and it

was found significantly higher over rest of other NP levels during both the years.

The perusal of two year mean data indicates (Table 4.11), that the highest

florets diameter (10.61 cm) noted with 125% NP level, which was significantly

higher to 50, 75 and 100 % NP levels.

Page 103: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

103

Table 4.11: Diameter of florets influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc

and NP levels

Treatment Diameter of florets (cm)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 9.28 9.64 9.47

BF1- Azotobacter 9.66 9.98 9.82

BF2 - PSB 10.05 10.52 10.29

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 10.52 11.04 10.78

SEm ( ) 0.07 0.09 0.07

C.D. (5%) 0.25 0.30 0.24

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 9.46 9.81 9.64

Zn1 –0.1% 9.69 10.50 10.10

Zn2 –0.2% 10.48 10.58 10.53

SEm ( ) 0.07 0.05 0.06

C.D. (5%) 0.21 0.15 0.17

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 9.20 9.55 9.38

F2–75% NP 9.95 10.21 10.08

F3 –100% NP 10.13 10.44 10.29

F4 –125% NP 10.24 10.97 10.61

SEm ( ) 0.06 0.06 0.06

C.D. (5%) 0.16 0.18 0.16

Page 104: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

104

4.12: Flowering durations

The observations pertaining to flowering duration were recorded and the

mean data so obtained are being presented in Table 4.12.

Under different bio fertilizer treatments, flowering duration was noted in

the range of 18.41 to 23.77, 18.73 to 24.85 and 18.57 to 24.31 days, during first,

second years of study and on mean basis, respectively.

The single and combined inoculation of Azotobacter or PSB noted

significantly higher flowering duration over un-inoculated treatment. The trend in

respect of the flowering duration under various bio fertilizer treatments were in

order of BF3> BF2> BF1 > BF0 during both the years of study.

The perusal of data indicate, that the highest levels of Zn (Zn2) recorded

highest flowering duration which was significantly higher as compared to Zn1 &

Zn0 in first year, whereas, in second year Zn2 and Zn1 show statistically at par

flowering duration from each other. Mean data indicate, that the flowering

duration was maximum in Zn2 with 22.03 days which is closely followed by 21.14

days with Zn1. However, under control, the duration of flowering was 20.28 days.

Flowering duration increased significantly and consistently with the

increasing levels of NP up to 125%. The perusal of mean data indicates that the

highest flowering duration (23.55 days) recorded with 125% NP level, which was

6.41 and 3.00 days higher over to 50, and 75% NP levels, but statistically at

par with 100% NP level with flowering duration of 23.37 days.

Page 105: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

105

Table 4.12: Flowering durations as influenced by bio fertilizer,

zinc and NP levels

Treatment Flowering durations (days)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 18.41 18.73 18.57

BF1- Azotobacter 20.29 20.58 20.44

BF2 - PSB 20.78 21.78 21.28

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 23.77 24.85 24.31

SEm ( ) 0.22 0.33 0.12

C.D. (5%) 0.75 1.16 0.40

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 20.10 20.46 20.28

Zn1 –0.1% 20.39 21.89 21.14

Zn2 –0.2% 21.96 22.10 22.03

SEm ( ) 0.36 0.17 0.20

C.D. (5%) 1.06 0.49 0.60

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 16.81 17.46 17.14

F2–75% NP 20.37 20.73 20.55

F3 –100% NP 23.05 23.69 23.37

F4 –125% NP 23.02 24.06 23.55

SEm ( ) 0.32 0.17 0.19

C.D. (5%) 0.91 0.47 0.54

Page 106: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

106

4.13: Number of florets opened at a time (125 DAP)

Number of florets opened at a time is important parameter which is directly

related to quality of gladiolus because market price is depend this parameter.

Number of florets opened at a time were recorded at 125 DAP during both the

year and data present in Table 4.13.

More number of florets opened (4.86 & 5.32) at a time was recorded with

combined inoculation of gladiolus corms by Azotobacter + PSB. However, single

inoculation of Azotobacter or PSB also recorded significantly more number of

florets opened at a time over un - inoculated treatment. The trend of number of

florets opened at a time under various bio fertilizer treatments were in order of

BF3> BF2> BF1 > BF0 during both the years of study as well as on mean basis.

It is evident from Table 4.13, that the more number of florets opened at a

time was observed with foliar application of zinc in comparison to control during

both the years of study. Mean data of two year indicate that the number of florets

opened at a time was maximum (5.07) in Zn2 which is significantly higher over

Zn1. However, minimum florets opened at a time (3.72) noted in control (Zn0)

treatment.

Florets opened at a time increased significantly and consistently with the

increasing levels of NP up to 100% NP, thereafter it slightly decreased. The

perusal of two year mean data indicates, that the more number of florets opened

(4.60) at a time recorded with 100% NP level, which was significantly higher to

50 and 75% NP levels, but statistically at par with 125% NP level.

Page 107: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

107

Table 4.13: Number of florets opened at a time (125 DAP) as

influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Number of florets opened at a time (125 DAP)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 3.59 3.68 3.64

BF1- Azotobacter 4.04 4.47 4.26

BF2 - PSB 4.20 4.67 4.43

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 4.86 5.32 5.09

SEm ( ) 0.06 0.02 0.04

C.D. (5%) 0.19 0.07 0.12

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 3.54 3.89 3.72

Zn1 –0.1% 4.12 4.44 4.28

Zn2 –0.2% 4.86 5.27 5.07

SEm ( ) 0.03 0.03 0.02

C.D. (5%) 0.09 0.09 0.06

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 3.75 3.90 3.83

F2–75% NP 4.20 4.64 4.42

F3 –100% NP 4.37 4.83 4.60

F4 –125% NP 4.35 4.77 4.57

SEm ( ) 0.03 0.03 0.02

C.D. (5%) 0.10 0.08 0.06

Page 108: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

108

4.14: Fresh weight of floret

The fresh weight of floret was recorded and the mean data are presented

in Table 4.14.

Under different bio fertilizer treatments, fresh weight of each floret was

recorded in the range of 3.27 to 3.72, 3.34 to 3.83 and 3.31 to 3.77g, during first,

second years of study and on mean basis, respectively.

The single and combined inoculations of Azotobacter or PSB recorded

significantly higher fresh weight of floret over un-inoculated treatment. The trend

in respect of the fresh weight of florets under various bio fertilizer treatments

were in order of BF3> BF2> BF1 > BF0 during both the years of study as well as

mean basis.

The perusal of mean data indicated (Table 4.14) that the foliar spray of

zinc noted significant improvement in fresh weight of floret over control. Highest

level of Zn (Zn2) recorded maximum fresh weight of floret, which was significantly

higher as compared to Zn1 & Zn0 during both the years of experiment as well as

on mean basis.

Fresh weight of floret increased consistently with the increasing levels of

NP up to 125%. The perusal of mean data indicates, that the highest fresh

weight (3.69 g) of floret was recorded with 125% NP level, closely followed by

100% NP level with 3.63 g and those were significantly higher to 50 and 75%

NP levels, but statistically at par from each other.

Page 109: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

109

Table 4.14: Fresh weight of floret as influenced by bio fertilizer,

zinc and NP levels

Treatment Fresh weight of floret (g)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 3.27 3.34 3.31

BF1- Azotobacter 3.45 3.56 3.51

BF2 - PSB 3.50 3.60 3.56

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 3.72 3.83 3.77

SEm ( ) 0.04 0.05 0.05

C.D. (5%) 0.15 0.16 0.16

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 3.29 3.38 3.34

Zn1 –0.1% 3.45 3.54 3.49

Zn2 –0.2% 3.72 3.83 3.78

SEm ( ) 0.02 0.03 0.03

C.D. (5%) 0.07 0.08 0.07

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 3.21 3.31 3.26

F2–75% NP 3.50 3.58 3.54

F3 –100% NP 3.58 3.67 3.63

F4 –125% NP 3.64 3.74 3.69

SEm ( ) 0.03 0.03 0.03

C.D. (5%) 0.08 0.08 0.08

Page 110: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

110

4.15: Dry weight of floret (g)

The dry weight of floret was recorded after the sun dry for 08-10 days with

the help of electronic balance and the mean data are present in Table 4.15.

Under different bio fertilizer treatments, dry weight of floret ranged from

170.12 to 197.59, 180.58 to 212.10 and 175.35 to 204.84 mg, during first,

second year of study and on mean basis, respectively.

The single and combined inoculations of Azotobacter or PSB recorded

significantly higher dry weight of floret over un-inoculated treatment. The trend in

respect of the dry weight of floret under various bio fertilizer treatments were in

order of BF3> BF2> BF1 > BF0 during both the years of study as well as on mean

basis.

The perusal of mean data indicates (Table 4.15) that the foliar spray of

zinc recorded significantly higher dry weight of floret over control. Highest level of

Zn (Zn2) recorded highest dry weight of floret which was significantly higher to

Zn1 & Zn0 during both the years of experiment as well as on mean basis.

Dry weight of floret increased consistently with the increasing levels of NP

up to 125%. The perusal of two year mean data indicates that the highest dry

weight of floret (200.08 mg) was recorded with 125% NP level, closely followed

by 100% NP level with 197.83 mg, and both were significantly higher to 50 and

75% NP levels, but statistically at par from each other.

Page 111: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

111

Table 4.15: Dry weight of floret as influenced by bio fertilizer,

zinc and NP levels

Treatment Dry weight of floret (mg)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 170.12 180.58 175.35

BF1- Azotobacter 180.29 196.22 188.26

BF2 - PSB 188.29 207.54 196.92

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 197.59 212.10 204.84

SEm ( ) 2.17 2.63 2.37

C.D. (5%) 7.49 9.12 8.22

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 173.62 187.11 180.37

Zn1 –0.1% 181.24 196.31 188.77

Zn2 –0.2% 197.35 212.42 204.89

SEm ( ) 1.15 1.25 1.17

C.D. (5%) 3.39 3.70 3.44

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 169.89 184.06 176.97

F2–75% NP 183.36 197.61 190.48

F3 –100% NP 190.21 205.46 197.83

F4 –125% NP 192.83 207.33 200.08

SEm ( ) 1.37 1.45 1.38

C.D. (5%) 3.89 4.13 3.91

Page 112: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

112

Table 4.16: yield of spike (ha)

All the spikes obtained from each treatment were counted in number of

spike in per net plot size (3.0 m2) and then converted into multiply the common

factor of 3333.33 (10000/3). Thus, find out the number of spikes per hectare and

the data presented in Table 4.16.

In general, second year of experimentation (2012-13) recorded higher

spike yield per hectare as compared to first year (2011-12) in all the treatments

under study.

Under different bio fertilizer treatments, spike yield ranged from 124926 to

140241, 128815 to 144222 and 126870 to 142232 spikes /ha, during first,

second years of experiment and on mean basis, respectively.

The bio fertilizer (Azotobacter or PSB) treated gladiolus corms recorded

significantly higher spike yield per hectare over un-inoculated treatment and

trend of the spike yield under various bio fertilizer treatments were in order of

BF3> BF2> BF1 > BF0 during both the years of study as well as on mean basis.

The perusal of two year mean data indicates (Table 4.16) that highest

spike yield(142232/ha) was recorded with combined inoculation of Azotobacter +

PSB (BF3) which gave 6.89 and 5.67 percent significantly higher spike yield over

inoculated ones of Azotobacter or PSB, respectively. Whereas, single inoculation

of Azotobacter or PSB produced 4.87 and 6.09 percent significantly higher spike

yield over un-inoculated treatment.

Page 113: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

113

Table 4.16: Yield of spike/ha as influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc

and NP levels

Treatment Yield of spike (ha)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 124926 128815 126870

BF1- Azotobacter 130926 135185 133056

BF2 - PSB 132704 136500 134602

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 140241 144222 142232

SEm ( ) 2204 2011 2100

C.D. (5%) 7626 6957 7267

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 127542 131222 129382

Zn1 –0.1% 132431 136250 134340

Zn2 –0.2% 136625 141069 138847

SEm ( ) 1081 1026 1037

C.D. (5%) 3190 3027 3059

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 122778 125370 124074

F2–75% NP 131574 136018 133796

F3 –100% NP 135833 140278 138056

F4 –125% NP 138611 143055 140833

SEm ( ) 1101 1127 1099

C.D. (5%) 3125 3201 3123

Page 114: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

114

Foliar spray of zinc recorded significantly higher spike yield over control.

Highest levels of Zn (0.2%) produced highest spike yield/ha which was

significantly higher as compared to Zn1 & Zn0 during both the years of experiment

as well as on mean basis.

It is reveal from mean data (Table 4.16) that highest spike yield

(138847/ha) was recorded with 0.2% Zn which was 7.31 and 3.35 percent

significantly higher as compared to control and 0.1% spray of Zn, respectively.

Under different NP levels spike yield ranged from 122778 to 138611,

125370 to 143055 and 124074 to 140833 spike /ha, during first, second year of

experiments and on mean basis, respectively.

It is evident from the data presented in Table 4.16 that spike yield

increased consistently with the increasing levels of NP up to 125%. The perusal

of mean data indicate that the highest spike yield (140833/ha) was recorded with

125% NP level, closely followed by 100% NP level with 138056 spike/ha, and

both were significantly higher to 50 and 75% NP levels, but statistically at par

from each other. Application of 100% NP level produced 11.27 and 3.18 percent

significantly higher spike yield over 50 and 75% NP levels, respectively.

4.17: Vase life (days)

Vase life is an important criterion to assess the post harvest quality of cut

flowers. The harvested spikes were given a slanting cut at the basal end and

were put in tap water which was changed daily and the numbers of days

taken for withering of all the florets from all the five spikes were recorded

Page 115: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

115

and mean value was expressed in Table 4.17 as vase life in days. In general,

spike produce in the second year (2012-13) show higher vase life as compared

to first year (2011-12) in all the treatments.

Under different bio fertilizer treatments, vase life ranged from 12.95 to

16.54, 13.75 to 17.94 and 13.36 to 17.24 days, during first, second years of study

and on mean basis, respectively.

Our study revealed that the preservative role of bio fertilizer in gladiolus

flower longevity, when corms were treated with this supplement. The highest

vase life was recorded with combined inoculation of gladiolus corms by

Azotobacter + PSB. The single inoculation of Azotobacter or PSB also shows

significantly higher vase life over un-inoculated treatment. The trend in respect of

the vase life under various bio fertilizer treatments were in order of BF3> BF2>

BF1 > BF0 during both the years of study as well as on mean basis.

It is evident from Table 4.16, that the vase life of gladiolus was increase

with application of zinc in comparison to control during both the years of study.

Mean data of indicate that the vase life was maximum in Zn2 with 17.21 days

which was 3.86 and 2.23 days higher over to Zn1 and Zn0 treatments.

Vase life of gladiolus flower increased significantly and consistently with

the increasing levels of NP up to 100%, thereafter it slightly decreased. The

perusal of mean data indicates that the maximum vase life (15.79 days)

recorded with 100% NP level, which was significantly higher to 50 and 75% NP

levels, but statistically at par with 125% NP level, respectively.

Page 116: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

116

Table 4.17: Vase life of gladiolus as influenced by bio fertilizer,

zinc and NP levels

Treatment Vase life (days)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 12.95 13.75 13.36

BF1- Azotobacter 14.49 15.34 14.92

BF2 - PSB 14.68 15.72 15.20

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 16.54 17.94 17.24

SEm ( ) 0.17 0.09 0.07

C.D. (5%) 0.58 0.30 0.23

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 12.87 13.82 13.35

Zn1 –0.1% 14.52 15.43 14.98

Zn2 –0.2% 16.61 17.81 17.21

SEm ( ) 0.10 0.10 0.08

C.D. (5%) 0.29 0.29 0.22

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 13.55 14.64 14.10

F2–75% NP 14.84 15.74 15.29

F3 –100% NP 15.27 16.30 15.79

F4 –125% NP 15.00 16.07 15.54

SEm ( ) 0.12 0.10 0.08

C.D. (5%) 0.34 0.27 0.24

Page 117: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

117

NUTRIENT CONTENT

At harvest, leaves sample (third pair leaves) were collected from each plot

and carried out to the laboratory in polythene bags. The leaves samples were

dried at 700C for 48 hours and oven dry weight were noted. The samples were

powdered and preserved for analysis of N, P, K and Zn content as per standard

method.

4.18: Nutrient (N, P, K & Zn) content in leaves :

It can be seen from the data in Table 4.18 - 4.21 that nutrient content (N,

P, K & Zn) in gladiolus leaves were significantly influenced by bio fertilizer, Zn

and NP levels during both the years of studies. In general, nutrient content (NPK

& Zn) in leaves was higher in year 2012-13 than in 2011-12 in all the treatments

under study.

On the basis of mean data, the N, P and K content in gladiolus leaves

were observed in the range of 2.68 to 3.10 %, 0.436 to 0.496 % and 3.21 to

3.23%, respectively, under different bio fertilizer inoculated treatments.

The combined inoculations of Azotobacter or PSB recorded significantly

higher N and P content over single inoculation or un-inoculated treatments during

both the years of study as well as on mean basis. However, K (Table 4.20) and

zinc (Table 4.21) content in leaves was observed more or less similar in all the

bio fertilizer treatments and show statistically at par difference from each other.

Page 118: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

118

Table 4.18: Nitrogen content (%) in gladiolus leaves as

influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Nitrogen content (%)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 2.65 2.70 2.68

BF1- Azotobacter 2.92 2.96 2.94

BF2 - PSB 2.91 2.93 2.92

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 3.09 3.10 3.10

SEm ( ) 0.04 0.03 0.04

C.D. (5%) 0.13 0.12 0.12

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 2.73 2.81 2.77

Zn1 –0.1% 2.86 2.93 2.90

Zn2 –0.2% 3.09 3.03 3.06

SEm ( ) 0.02 0.02 0.02

C.D. (5%) 0.06 0.05 0.05

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 2.67 2.69 2.68

F2–75% NP 2.92 2.93 2.93

F3 –100% NP 2.96 3.01 2.99

F4 –125% NP 3.02 3.06 3.04

SEm ( ) 0.02 0.02 0.02

C.D. (5%) 0.07 0.06 0.06

Page 119: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

119

Table 4.19: Phosphorus content (%) in gladiolus leaves as

influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Phosphorus content (%)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 0.427 0.444 0.436

BF1- Azotobacter 0.448 0.477 0.463

BF2 - PSB 0.465 0.494 0.480

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 0.488 0.503 0.496

SEm ( ) 0.005 0.005 0.004

C.D. (5%) 0.017 0.017 0.015

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 0.432 0.460 0.446

Zn1 –0.1% 0.462 0.493 0.477

Zn2 –0.2% 0.477 0.485 0.482

SEm ( ) 0.003 0.003 0.002

C.D. (5%) 0.009 0.008 0.007

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 0.420 0.444 0.432

F2–75% NP 0.459 0.482 0.471

F3 –100% NP 0.471 0.494 0.483

F4 –125% NP 0.477 0.499 0.488

SEm ( ) 0.004 0.003 0.003

C.D. (5%) 0.010 0.008 0.008

Page 120: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

120

Table 4.20: Potassium content (%) in gladiolus leaves as

influenced by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Potassium content (%)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 3.14 3.30 3.23

BF1- Azotobacter 3.13 3.31 3.22

BF2 - PSB 3.13 3.29 3.21

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 3.14 3.31 3.22

SEm ( ) 0.01 0.01 0.01

C.D. (5%) NS NS NS

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 3.12 3.28 3.20

Zn1 –0.1% 3.14 3.31 3.22

Zn2 –0.2% 3.15 3.32 3.23

SEm ( ) 0.02 0.02 0.02

C.D. (5%) NS NS NS

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 3.10 3.25 3.17

F2–75% NP 3.14 3.29 3.22

F3 –100% NP 3.16 3.31 3.24

F4 –125% NP 3.16 3.35 3.26

SEm ( ) 0.01 0.01 0.01

C.D. (5%) 0.03 0.03 0.02

Page 121: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

121

Table 4.21: Zinc content (ppm) in gladiolus leaves as influenced

by bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Zinc content (ppm)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 148.4 160.3 154.35

BF1- Azotobacter 145.6 151.1 148.35

BF2 - PSB 151.8 146.1 148.95

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 146.4 151.6 149

SEm ( ) 6.5 6.8 5.5

C.D. (5%) NS NS NS

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 53.4 55.5 54.45

Zn1 –0.1% 160.2 166.1 163.15

Zn2 –0.2% 231.3 235.2 233.25

SEm ( ) 4.7 4.0 3.6

C.D. (5%) 13.8 11.9 10.8

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 146.4 147.1 146.75

F2–75% NP 148.5 157.9 153.2

F3 –100% NP 149.7 153.8 151.75

F4 –125% NP 148.6 150.3 149.45

SEm ( ) 4.2 3.2 3.3

C.D. (5%) NS NS NS

Page 122: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

122

Content of major nutrients (N, P and K) in gladiolus leaves were not

influenced with the foliar application of zinc, whereas significant difference in zinc

content was observed. Maximum zinc content was recorded with higher

concentration of Zn (0.2%) which was significant higher to other lower

concentration and control.

Under different foliar application of zinc treatments, zinc content in leaves

ranged from 53.4 to 231.3, 55.5 to 235.2 and 54.45 to 233.25 ppm (mg kg-1),

during first, second years of study and on mean basis, respectively.

Nutrient (N, P, K & Zn) content increased significantly and consistently

with the increasing levels of NP up to 100% NP, thereafter it increase but not

cross the level of significance. The perusal of two year mean data indicates that

the maximum content of NPK was recorded with 125% NP level, which was

significantly higher to 50 and 75% NP levels, but statistically at par with 100%

NP level. Whereas, zinc content was more or less similar in all the NP levels and

show non significant difference with each other, during both the years of study

as well as on mean basis.

CORMS STUDIES:

After one month harvest of spike, the corms were subjected for studies.

Under corms study, numbers of corms/plant and per plot were counted and

weight and diameter of corms were also recorded.

Page 123: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

123

4.19: Numbers of corms/plant

Data in respect of number of corms/plant is presented in Table 4.22,

indicates the effect of bio fertilizer, Zn and NP levels was significant. In general,

second year (2012-13) recorded higher number of corms/plant as compared to

first year (2011-12) in all the treatments under study.

The combined inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB produced maximum

number of corms/plant which was significantly higher to single inoculation of

Azotobacter or PSB. However, Azotobacter or PSB alone also recorded

significantly higher number of corms/plant over un - inoculated treatment. The

trend in respect of the number of corms/plant under various bio fertilizer

treatments were in order of BF3> BF2> BF1 > BF0 during both the years.

Foliar application of zinc enhanced the number of corms/plant, higher

concentration (0.2%) recorded statistically at par number of corms/plant to lower

concentration (0.1%) but both the treatment recorded significantly higher number

of corms/plant over control treatment, during both the years of study as well as

on mean basis.

Number of corms/plant increased significantly and consistently with the

increasing levels of NP up to 125% during both the years of study. On the basis

of mean data, maximum number of corms/plant (1.59) was observed in F4 (125%

NP) which is closely followed by F3 (100% NP) with 1.57 corms/plant and the

least number of corms (1.37/ plant) was recorded in F1 (50% NP).

Page 124: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

124

Table 4.22: Number of corms/plant in gladiolus as influenced by

bio fertilizer and various zinc and NP levels

Treatment Number of corms/plant

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 1.34 1.35 1.35

BF1- Azotobacter 1.47 1.50 1.48

BF2 - PSB 1.52 1.56 1.54

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 1.56 1.62 1.59

SEm ( ) 0.02 0.02 0.01

C.D. (5%) 0.06 0.08 0.04

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 1.40 1.37 1.38

Zn1 –0.1% 1.51 1.56 1.53

Zn2 –0.2% 1.50 1.60 1.55

SEm ( ) 0.03 0.03 0.03

C.D. (5%) 0.08 0.08 0.08

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 1.34 1.40 1.37

F2–75% NP 1.41 1.43 1.42

F3 –100% NP 1.55 1.58 1.57

F4 –125% NP 1.60 1.59 1.59

SEm ( ) 0.03 0.03 0.02

C.D. (5%) 0.07 0.08 0.07

Page 125: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

125

4.20: Numbers of corms/hectare

All the corms obtained from each treatment were counted in number of

corms in per net plot size (3.0 m2) and then converted into multiply the common

factor of 3333.33 (10000/3). Thus, find out the number of corms per hectare and

the data presented in Table 4.23.

In general, second year of experiment (2012-13) noted higher corms yield

per hectare as compared to first year (2011-12) in all the treatments under study.

Under different bio fertilizer treatments, corms yield ranged from 129387

to 144382, 144538 to 161319 and 136963 to 152850 corms/ha, during first,

second years and on mean basis, respectively.

The bio fertilizer (Azotobacter or PSB) treated plots recorded significantly

higher corms yield per hectare over un-inoculated treatment and trend of the

corms yield under various bio fertilizer treatments were in order of BF3> BF2> BF1

> BF0 during both the years of study as well as on mean basis.

The perusal of mean data indicates (Table 4.23), that highest corms

yield/ha was recorded with combined inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB (BF3)

which gave 5.45 and 4.61 percent significantly higher corms yield over inoculated

ones of Azotobacter or PSB, respectively. Whereas, single inoculation of

Azotobacter or PSB also produced 5.83 and 6.68 percent significantly higher

corms yield over un-inoculated (control) treatment.

Page 126: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

126

Table 4.23: Number of corms/ha in gladiolus as influenced by

bio fertilizer, zinc and NP levels

Treatment Number of corms/ha

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 129387 144538 136963

BF1- Azotobacter 136926 152977 144951

BF2 - PSB 138025 154207 146116

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 144382 161319 152850

SEm ( ) 1417 1627 1522

C.D. (5%) 4902 5630 5266

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 133656 149313 141484

Zn1 –0.1% 137158 153236 145197

Zn2 –0.2% 140726 157232 148979

SEm ( ) 989 1109 1049

C.D. (5%) 2918 3270 3094

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 127087 141986 134537

F2–75% NP 135102 150951 143026

F3 –100% NP 141801 158447 150124

F4 –125% NP 144729 161657 153193

SEm ( ) 1114 1243 1178

C.D. (5%) 3163 3529 3346

Page 127: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

127

Foliar spray of zinc also recorded significantly higher corms yield/ha over

control. Highest levels of Zn (0.2%) noted highest corms yield/ha which was

significantly higher as compared to Zn1 & Zn0 during both the years of experiment

as well as on mean basis.

It is revealed from mean data of two year (Table 4.23), that highest corms

yield (148979/ha) was recorded with 0.2% foliar spray of Zn, which was 5.29 and

2.62 percent significantly higher as compared to control and 0.1% spray of Zn,

respectively.

Under different NP levels, corms yield ranged from 127087 to 144729,

141986 to 161657 and 134537 to 153193 corms /ha, during first, second year of

experimentation and on mean basis, respectively.

It is clear from the data that corms yield increased consistently with the

increasing levels of NP up to 125% level. The perusal of mean data indicates that

the highest corms yield (153193/ha) was recorded with 125% NP level which is

closely followed by 100% NP level with 150124 corms /ha, and both were

significantly higher to 50 and 75% NP levels, but statistically at par from each

other.

It is evident from results that application of 100% NP level produced 11.58

and 4.96 percent significantly higher corms yield/ha over 50 and 75% NP levels,

respectively.

Page 128: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

128

4.21: Corms weight (g)

The weight of corms was recorded and the mean data are present in

Table 4.24.

Under different bio fertilizer treatments, mean weight of corms was

recorded in the range of 23.69 to 26.94, 23.86 to 29.09 and 23.78 to 28.02 g,

during first, second year of study and on mean basis, respectively.

The single and combined inoculations of Azotobacter or PSB recorded

significantly higher corms weight over un-inoculated treatment. The trend in

respect of the weight of corms under various bio fertilizer treatments were in

order of BF3> BF2> BF1 > BF0 during both the years of study as well as on mean

basis.

The perusal of mean data indicates (Table 4.24) that the foliar spray of

zinc noted significantly improvement in weight of corms over control. Highest

levels of Zn (0.2%) recorded highest corms weight which was significantly higher

to Zn1 & Zn0 treatments during both the years of experiment as well as on mean

basis.

Weight of corms increased consistently with the increasing levels of NP up

to 125%, The perusal of mean data indicates that the heaviest corms (27.21 g)

was recorded with 125% NP level which is closely followed by 100% NP level

with 26.84 g, and both were significantly superior to 50 and 75% NP levels, but

statistically at par from each other.

Page 129: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

129

Table 4.24: Corms weight (g) of gladiolus as influenced by bio

fertilizer and various zinc and NP levels

Treatment Corms weight (g)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 23.69 23.86 23.78

BF1- Azotobacter 24.88 27.00 25.94

BF2 - PSB 25.39 27.61 26.50

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 26.94 29.09 28.02

SEm ( ) 0.32 0.29 0.30

C.D. (5%) 1.09 1.00 1.03

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 23.82 25.60 24.71

Zn1 –0.1% 24.98 26.76 25.87

Zn2 –0.2% 26.88 28.31 27.59

SEm ( ) 0.18 0.17 0.16

C.D. (5%) 0.52 0.49 0.48

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 23.28 24.92 24.10

F2–75% NP 25.25 26.94 26.09

F3 –100% NP 25.96 27.72 26.84

F4 –125% NP 26.42 27.99 27.21

SEm ( ) 0.21 0.23 0.20

C.D. (5%) 0.61 0.64 0.58

Page 130: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

130

4.22: Corms diameter

Data in respect of diameter of corms is preesented in Table 4.25, indicate

the effect of bio fertilizer, Zn and NP levels was significant. In general, second

year (2012-13) recorded more corm diameter as compared to first year (2011-12)

in all the treatments under study.

The combined inoculation with Azotobacter + PSB produced highest

corms diameter which was significantly higher to single inoculated treatments.

However, single inoculation of Azotobacter or PSB also recorded significantly

higher corms diameter over un - inoculated treatment. The trend in respect of the

corms diameter under various bio fertilizer treatments were in order of BF3> BF2>

BF1 > BF0 during both the years of study as well as on mean basis.

Under different foliar application of zinc, corms diameter was recorded in

the range of 3.88 to 4.30 and 4.46 to 4.86 cm during first and second years of

experimentation. Spray of Zn @ 0.2% produced highest corms diameter which

is followed by 0.1% Zn treatment. However, minimum diameter noted in control.

Corms diameter increased significantly and consistently with the

increasing levels of NP up to 125%. Maximum corms diameter was noted at F4

which is closely followed by 100% NP level and both were found significantly

superior over rest of lower (50 & 75%) NP levels during both the years. The

perusal of mean data indicates (Table 4.25), that the highest corms diameter

(4.55 cm) was noted with 125% NP level, which is significantly higher to 50 and

75 % levels but statistically at par with 100% NP level.

Page 131: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

131

Table 4.25: Corms diameter (cm) of gladiolus as influenced by

bio fertilizer and various zinc and NP levels

Treatment Corms diameter (cm)

2011-12 2012-13 Mean

Main plot treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un inoculated 3.88 4.41 4.15

BF1- Azotobacter 4.01 4.62 4.31

BF2 - PSB 4.09 4.72 4.41

BF3 - Azotobacter + PSB 4.31 4.94 4.63

SEm ( ) 0.05 0.05 0.04

C.D. (5%) 0.18 0.16 0.14

Sub plot treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 – Control 3.88 4.46 4.17

Zn1 –0.1% 4.04 4.69 4.37

Zn2 –0.2% 4.30 4.86 4.58

SEm ( ) 0.03 0.03 0.02

C.D. (5%) 0.08 0.09 0.07

Ultimate plot treatment (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 3.79 4.30 4.08

F2–75% NP 4.08 4.72 4.40

F3 –100% NP 4.27 4.77 4.52

F4 –125% NP 4.26 4.84 4.55

SEm ( ) 0.03 0.04 0.03

C.D. (5%) 0.10 0.10 0.08

Page 132: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

132

ECONOMICAL STUDIES:

The economic feasibility of different practices or treatments is usually a

deciding factor for its adoption by the farmers for commercialization of any crop

production programme. It is, therefore, of common interest to calculate the

effect of different treatments tested in this study on the cost and returns of

gladiolus crop. The data on economic efficiency of the various treatments of

study, as judged for gross return, net return and benefit : cost ratio.

4.23 : Economic analysis of treatments

Economics of the gladiolus crop cultivation were studied on the basis

of two year mean data and presented in Table 4.26.

4.23.1: Cost of cultivation :

Cost of cultivation of Rs. 198750/- ha was common for all the treatments.

Under bio fertilizers treatment, the cost of each bio fertilizer is added 200/-ha and

foliar spray of zinc and NP levels varied from treatment to treatment. The highest

cost of cultivation (Rs. 201750 /ha) was incurred under foliar spray of zinc @

2.0% treatment.

4.23.2: Gross income:

Data embodied in Table 4.26 revealed that all the bio fertilizers

treatments gave more gross income over un- inoculated treatment. The

maximum gross income of Rs. 612705/-ha was obtained in combined

inoculations of gladiolus corms by Azotobacter +PSB treatment (BF3).

Page 133: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

133

Table 4.26: Economics of various treatments (on the basis of

mean data of two year experimentation)

Treatments

Spike yield (/ha)

Corms yield

(kg/ha)

Cost of cultivation*

(Rs./ha)

Gross monetary

return (Rs./ha)

Net monetary returns (Rs./ha)

B:C ratio

Main treatments (bio fertilizers)

BF0- Un- inocu. 126870 136963 198750 471147 272397 4.50

BF1- AZT. 133056 144951 198950 530101 331151 4.97

BF2 - PSB 134602 146116 198950 576795 377845 5.34

BF3 - AZT + PSB 142232 152850 199150 612705 413555 5.62

Sub treatments (Foliar spray of zinc)

Zn0 –Control 129382 141484 198750 487475 288725 4.63

Zn1 –0.1% 134340 145197 200250 533542 333292 4.92

Zn2 –0.2% 138847 148979 201750 594565 392815 5.32

Ultimate treatments (NP levels)

F1 –50% NP 124074 134537 195250 459489 264239 4.59

F2–75% NP 133796 143026 197000 526917 329917 5.06

F3 –100% NP 138056 150124 198750 595449 396699 5.51

F4 –125% NP 140833 153193 200500 610065 409565 5.52

Page 134: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

134

In the respect of zinc, maximum gross income of Rs. 594565/-ha was

obtained with 0.2% foliar spray treatment (Zn2). Under different NP levels,

maximum gross income of Rs. 610065/-ha in 125% NP level which is closely

followed (Rs. 595449/-ha) by 100% NP level (F3).

4.23.3: Net income :

Data encamped in Table 4.26 Propel that all the bio fertilizers applied

treatments gave more net return over control. The maximum net return of Rs.

413555/-ha was found with combined inoculations of gladiolus corms by

Azotobacter +PSB treatment (BF3).

In point of view zinc, maximum net income of Rs. 392815/-ha was

obtained with 0.2% foliar spray treatment (Zn2). Under different NP levels,

maximum net return of Rs. 409565/-ha in 125% NP levelwhich is closely followed

by (Rs. 396699/-ha) with 100% NP level (F3).

4.23.4: Benefit : cost ratio :

It is apparent from fig. (4.21) that all the bio fertilizers applied

treatments resulted more benefit : cost ratio over un-inoculated. The maximum

benefit cost ratio of 5.62 was recorded with combined inoculations of gladiolus

corms by Azotobacter +PSB treatment (BF3).

In zinc point of view, more benefit : cost ratio 5.32 was obtained with

0.2% foliar spray treatment (Zn2). Under different NP levels, maximum B: C ratio

(5.52) was observed with 125% NP level which is closely followed (5.51) by

100% NP level treatment (F3).

Page 135: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

135

SIGNIFICANT INTERACTIONS

The interaction of different NP levels with bio fertilizers as well as foliar

application of zinc was found significant. Important significant interactions (on

the basis of two year mean data) are presented here under following heads.

4.24: Interactions effect of bio fertilizers and NP levels

4.24.1: Number of spike per square meter

The interaction effect due to bio fertilizers and NP levels on number of

spike per square meter was found to the significant on mean basis and it was

presented in Table 4.27.

Table 4.27: Interaction effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels on number of

spike per square meter (Mean of two year)

Treatments BF0 BF1 BF2 BF3 Mean

F1 18.69 19.02 19.22 19.79 19.18

F2 20.04 21.22 21.11 21.56 20.98

F3 20.67 21.52 22.07 23.06 21.83

F4 21.48 21.76 22.44 23.37 22.27

Mean 20.22 20.88 21.21 21.94

SEm ( ) 0.28

C.D. (5%) 0.79

It is clear from above interaction table that treatment combination F4 x BF3

produced maximum spike per square meter (23.37) which is closely followed by

F3 x BF3 whereas minimum spike per square meter (18.69) under F1 x BF0

treatment combinations.

Page 136: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

136

4.24.2: Weight of spike

The interaction effect due bio fertilizers and NP levels on weight of spike

was found to the significant on mean basis and it was presented in Table 4.28.

Table 4.28: Interaction effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels on weight of

spike (Mean of two year)

Treatments BF0 BF1 BF2 BF3 Mean

F1 63.18 64.15 67.85 71.62 66.70

F2 65.74 68.93 72.60 78.53 71.45

F3 69.25 71.87 74.72 80.50 73.58

F4 71.53 74.89 78.01 82.24 77.17

Mean 67.42 69.96 73.79 77.72

SEm ( ) 0.91

C.D. (5%) 2.60

Bio fertilizer and NP levels interacted significantly in increasing the weight

of spike, which was minimum 63.18 g at F1 x BF0 level and increased to a

maximum of 82.24 g at F4 x BF3 level which was found at par with F3 x BF3 level.

Thus, the treatment combination F3 x BF3 (100% NP with dual inoculation

of AZT +PSB) may be beneficial in respect of weight of spike.

Page 137: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

137

4.24.3: Number of florets per spike

The interaction effect due bio fertilizers and NP levels on number of florets

per spike was found to the significant on mean basis and it was presented in

Table 4.29.

Table 4.29: Interaction effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels on number of

florets per spike (Mean of two year)

Treatments BF0 BF1 BF2 BF3 Mean

F1 15.17 15.72 15.90 16.17 15.74

F2 16.68 17.70 17.06 17.75 17.29

F3 17.36 17.85 18.61 18.89 18.18

F4 17.82 18.12 18.10 19.14 18.29

Mean 16.75 17.35 17.42 17.99

SEm ( ) 0.27

C.D. (5%) 0.78

It is evident from above interaction Table that bio fertilizer and NP levels

interacted synergistically in increasing the number of florets per spike (Table

4.28). Number of florets were found minimum (15.17) at F1 x BF0 and maximum

(19.14) at F4 x BF3 however it was at par with F3 x BF3 and F3 x BF2 level.

Thus, the treatment combination F3 x BF3 (100% NP with dual inoculation

of AZT +PSB) may be beneficial in respect of number of florets per spike.

Page 138: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

138

4.24.4: Diameter of florets

The interaction effect due bio fertilizers and NP levels on diameter of

florets was found to the significant on mean basis and it was presented in Table

4.30.

Table 4.30: Interaction effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels on diameter of

florets (Mean of two year)

Treatments BF0 BF1 BF2 BF3 Mean

F1 8.89 9.01 9.54 10.07 9.38

F2 9.29 9.75 10.30 10.99 10.08

F3 9.73 10.13 10.35 10.95 10.29

F4 9.95 10.41 10.96 11.10 10.61

Mean 9.47 9.82 10.29 10.78

SEm ( ) 0.13

C.D. (5%) 0.36

Bio fertilizer and NP levels interacted significantly in increasing the

diameter of florets, which was minimum 8.89 cm at F1 x BF0 level and increased

to a maximum of 11.10 cm at F4 x BF3 level which was found at par with F2 x

BF3, F4 x BF2 and F3 x BF3 levels.

Page 139: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

139

4.24.5: Flowering duration (days)

The interaction effect due bio fertilizers and NP levels on flowering

durations was found to the significant on mean basis and it was presented in

Table 4.31.

Table 4.31: Interaction effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels on flowering

durations (Mean of two year)

Treatments BF0 BF1 BF2 BF3 Mean

F1 17.51 18.78 19.84 20.41 19.14

F2 18.27 20.12 20.61 23.21 20.55

F3 19.86 20.51 22.26 26.85 22.37

F4 18.65 22.35 22.42 26.77 22.55

Mean 18.57 20.44 21.28 24.31

SEm ( ) 0.43

C.D. (5%) 1.21

It is evident from above interaction Table that bio fertilizer and NP levels

interacted synergistically in increasing the flowering durations (Table 4.31).

Flowering durations were found minimum (17. 51) at F1 x BF0 and maximum

(26.85) at F3 x BF3 however it was at par with F4 x BF3 level.

Thus, the treatment combination F3 x BF3 (100% NP with dual inoculation

of AZT +PSB) may be beneficial in respect of flowering durations.

Page 140: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

140

4.24.6: Number of corm /plant

The interaction effect due bio fertilizers and NP levels on number of corm

/plant was found to the significant on mean basis and it was presented in Table

4.32.

Table 4.32: Interaction effect of NP and bio fertilizers levels on number of

corm /plant (Mean of two year)

Treatments BF0 BF1 BF2 BF3 Mean

F1 1.26 1.35 1.38 1.51 1.37

F2 1.26 1.43 1.49 1.51 1.42

F3 1.43 1.58 1.63 1.64 1.57

F4 1.45 1.58 1.65 1.70 1.59

Mean 1.35 1.48 1.54 1.59

SEm ( ) 0.06

C.D. (5%) 0.16

As far as the interactive effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels on number of

corm per plant was concerned, treatment combination F4 x BF3 gave highest

number of corm per plant (1.70) which was found at par with F4 x BF3, F4 x BF2

and F3 x BF2 levels. Whereas, minimum number of corm (1.26) per plant was

found under F1 x BF0 level.

Page 141: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

141

4.24.7: corm weight (g)

The interaction effect due bio fertilizers and NP levels on corm weight was

found to the significant on mean basis and it was presented in Table 4.33.

Table 4.33: Interaction effect of NP and bio fertilizers levels on corm weight

(Mean of two year)

Treatments BF0 BF1 BF2 BF3 Mean

F1 22.20 23.85 24.17 26.18 24.10

F2 23.46 25.66 27.01 28.25 26.09

F3 24.57 27.05 26.92 28.81 26.84

F4 24.88 27.19 27.91 28.84 27.21

Mean 23.78 25.94 26.50 28.02

SEm ( ) 0.46

C.D. (5%) 1.30

Bio fertilizer and NP levels interacted significantly in increasing the weight

of corms, which was minimum 22.20 g at F1 x BF0 level and increased to a

maximum of 28.84 g at F4 x BF3 combination which was found at par with F3 x

BF3, F2 x BF3 and F4 x BF2 combination.

Thus, the treatment combination F3 x BF3 (100% NP with dual inoculation

of AZT +PSB) may be beneficial in respect of weight of spike.

Page 142: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

142

4.25: INTERACTIONS EFFECT OF ZINC AND NP LEVELS

4.25.1: Weight of spike

The interaction effect due to zinc and NP levels on weight of spike was

found to the significant on mean basis and it was presented in Table 4.34.

Table 4.34: Interaction effect of zinc and NP levels on weight of spike

(Mean of two year)

Treatments Zn0 Zn1 Zn2 Mean

F1 63.31 64.99 71.80 66.70

F2 67.87 69.49 76.98 71.45

F3 69.60 71.90 79.25 73.58

F4 73.41 76.94 81.14 77.17

Mean 68.55 70.83 77.29

SEm ( ) 0.71

C.D. (5%) 2.01

Zinc and NP levels interacted significantly in increasing the weight of

spike, which was minimum 63.31 g at F1 x Zn0 level and increased to a maximum

of 81.14 g at F4 x Zn2 level which was found at par with F3 x Zn2 combination.

Thus, the treatment combination F3 x Zn2 (100% NP with 0.2% foliar spray

of zinc) may be beneficial in respect of weight of spike.

Page 143: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

143

4.25.2: Number of florets per spike

The interaction effect due to zinc and NP levels on number of florets per

spike was found to the significant and it presented in Table 4.35.

Table 4.35: Interaction effect of NP and zinc levels on number of florets per

spike (Mean of two year)

Treatments Zn0 Zn1 Zn2 Mean

F1 15.03 15.64 16.55 15.74

F2 17.03 17.45 17.41 17.29

F3 17.74 18.22 18.57 18.18

F4 17.83 18.28 18.77 18.29

Mean 16.91 17.39 17.82

SEm ( ) 0.21

C.D. (5%) 0.60

It is evident from above interaction Table that zinc and NP levels

interacted synergistically in increasing the number of florets per spike (Table

4.35). Number of florets were found minimum (15.03) at F1 x Zn0 and maximum

(18.77) at F4 x Zn2 however it was at par with F3 x Zn2,, F4 x Zn1 and F3 x Zn1

combination.

Thus, the treatment combination F3 x Zn2 (100% NP with 0.2% foliar spray

of zinc) may be beneficial in respect of number of florets per spike.

Page 144: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

144

4.25.3: Flowering duration (days)

The interaction effect due to zinc and NP levels on flowering durations

was found to the significant and it presented in Table 4.36.

Table 4.36: Interaction effect of NP and zinc levels on flowering duration

(Mean of two year)

Treatments Zn0 Zn1 Zn2 Mean

F1 18.51 18.77 20.14 19.14

F2 19.46 20.52 21.68 20.55

F3 21.19 22.34 23.57 22.37

F4 21.97 21.73 23.94 22.55

Mean 20.28 20.84 22.33

SEm ( ) 0.33

C.D. (5%) 0.94

It is evident from above interaction Table that zinc and NP levels

interacted synergistically in increasing the flowering durations (Table 4.36).

Flowering durations were found minimum (18. 51) at F1 x Zn0 and maximum

(23.94) at F4 x Zn2 however it was at par with F3 x Zn2 (23.57) combination.

Thus, the treatment combination F3 x Zn2 (100% NP with0.2% foliar spray

of zinc) may be beneficial in respect of flowering durations.

Page 145: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

145

4.25.4: Number of florets opened at a time (125 DAP)

The interaction effect due to zinc and NP levels on number of florets

opened at a time was found to the significant and it presented in Table 4.37.

Table 4.37: Interaction effect of NP and zinc levels on number of florets

opened at 125 DAP (Mean of two year)

Treatments Zn0 Zn1 Zn2 Mean

F1 3.60 3.84 4.34 3.93

F2 4.19 4.32 4.76 4.42

F3 4.26 4.47 4.79 4.50

F4 4.42 4.50 4.78 4.57

Mean 4.12 4.28 4.67

SEm ( ) 0.04

C.D. (5%) 0.11

As far as the interactive effect of zinc and NP levels on number of florets

opened at a time was concerned, treatment combination F3 x Zn2 show highest

number of florets opened (4.79) at 125 DAP, which was found at par with F4 x

Zn2 and F2 x Zn2 combination. While, number of florets opened at a time were

found minimum (3.60) at F1 x Zn0 combination.

Page 146: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

146

4.25.5: Vase life of flower (days)

The interaction effect due to zinc and NP levels on vase life of flower

(days) was found to the significant and it presented in Table 4.38.

Table 4.38 : Interaction effect of NP and zinc levels on vase life of flower

(Mean of two year)

Treatments Zn0 Zn1 Zn2 Mean

F1 13.10 14.07 15.12 14.10

F2 14.40 14.98 16.51 15.29

F3 14.71 15.27 16.64 15.54

F4 15.20 15.59 16.57 15.79

Mean 14.35 14.98 16.21

SEm ( ) 0.15

C.D. (5%) 0.42

It is revealed from above interaction, that zinc and NP levels interacted

synergistically in increasing the vase life of flower (Table 4.38). Vase life of

flower were found minimum (13. 10 days) at F1 x Zn0 and maximum (16.64 days)

at F3 x Zn2 however it was at par with F4 x Zn2 (16.57 days) and with F2 x Zn2

(16.5 days) combination.

Thus, the treatment combination F3 x Zn2 (100% NP with 0.2% foliar spray

of zinc) may be beneficial in respect of vase life of flower.

Page 147: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

147

4.25.6: Corms diameter (cm)

The interaction effect due to zinc and NP levels on corms diameter (cm)

was found to the significant and it presented in Table 4.39.

Table 4.39: Interaction effect of NP and zinc levels on corms diameter

(Mean of two year)

Treatments Zn0 Zn1 Zn2 Mean

F1 3.85 4.12 4.26 4.08

F2 4.12 4.48 4.60 4.40

F3 4.27 4.45 4.70 4.47

F4 4.44 4.43 4.78 4.55

Mean 4.17 4.37 4.58

SEm ( ) 0.05

C.D. (5%) 0.14

Zinc and NP levels interacted significantly in increasing the diameter of

corms, which was minimum 3.85 cm at F1 x Zn0 combination and increased to a

maximum of 4.78 cm at F4 x Zn2 level which was found at par with F3 x Zn2

treatment combination.

Page 148: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

148

CHAPTER – V

DISCUSSION

The investigation entitled “Effect of bio fertilizers and zinc on

gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L .)” conducted during two

consecutive rabi seasons of 2011-12 and 2012-13 at the SMS Govt.

Model science college, Gwalior. The salient findings recorded in the

preceding chapter with the object to investigate effect of bio fertilizers

singly and in combination with graded doses of NP levels through chemical

fertilizers and foliar spray of zinc on growth, flowering and corm production

of gladiolus are discussed in detail in this chapter, using probable

causes and effects of analysis in the light of available knowledge and

relevant literature.

The investigation revealed a considerable improvement in almost all

the parameters during both the years. The increase in the second year may

be attributed to the residual or carryover effect of NP and bio fertilizer by

corms as well as by soil. Because, the corms harvested from the first year

crop were replanted in the same plot and were subjected to identical

fertilizer treatments in the second year. The present findings are in

accordance with the reports of Litterell and Waters (1967-68), who

observed that gladiolus, is relatively slow in response to nitrogen and

phosphorus fertilization and the effect might not be apparent in one

season. Favorable environmental conditions in the second year of

experiment might have also aided in this improvement.

Page 149: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

149

5.1: EFFECT OF BIO FERTILIZERS ON GLADIOLUS:

In the light of recent global fertilizer shortage and escalating cost of

production as well as atmospheric pollution due to indiscriminate use of

chemical fertilizers the intensive search for potential sources to supplement

or substitute means has become imperative. Several investigations in the

recent past have indicated the beneficial effects of bio- fertilizer

(Azotobacter & PSB) in nitrogen and phosphorus economy in different crop

plants. However, very little or no information is available until now with

regards to use of these bio fertilizers in floriculture crops especially in

gladiolus for which the present study was initiated to find out the alternative

sources of chemical fertilization. The present investigation revealed

significant improvement in almost all the parameters studied during both the

experimental years.

5.1.1: Effect of bio fertilizers on vegetative characters

All the bio fertilizers under the investigation significantly

influenced the days to 75 percent sprouting of corm. Moreover, dual

inoculation of corms with Azto + PSB (BF3) gave significantly induced

earliness followed by BF2, and BF1 in corm sprouting as compared to

un - inoculated treatment.

This might be due to inoculation with bacterial mixtures

provided a more balance nutrition for plants as well as optimum

absorption of bio fertilizers by corms accelerated the physiological

Page 150: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

150

process and improved the germination phenomenon. These results

are in accordance with the findings of Belimov et al, 1995.

Ukey (1998) also reported beneficial effect of Azotobacter and PSB in

reducing the number of days required for bulb initiation in onion.

The results reported in foregoing pages revealed that all the growth

parameters viz; plant height, number of leaves per plant showed a significant

increase with the combined application of Azto + PSB, followed by single

inoculation by PSB and Azto under the present study and un-inoculated

treatment show least value for these parameters during both the seasons.

Mean data of two year showed that the plant height and numbers of

leaves per plant in the order of BF3 > BF1 > BF2 > BF0.

Improvement in plant height and number of leaves with dual

inoculation of Azto +PSB could be attributed to the proper availability

of nitrogen fixed by Azotobacter as non-symbiotic in the rhizosphere

of inoculated corms, while PSB acts as a potent phosphate

solubilizer and thus facilitates enhanced phosphorus uptake in roots

by which the plants maintain their vegetative growth. Better vigorous

growth may also be result of increased meristematic activities and

increase in number and size of cells due to effect of growth

promoting substances produced by these bio-fertilizers. Similar

findings were observed by Taren et al. (1994), Alfaff (2002) in onion,

Shashidhara and Gopinath (2002) in calendula and Kathiresan and

Venkatesha (2002) in gladiolus.

Page 151: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

151

5.1.2: Effect of bio fertilizers on floral characters

Application of bio fertilizer singly and in different combinations has

significant effect on all the floral characters. Among various bio fertilizers

and their combinations, Azto +PSB were found the best which is followed by

PSB and Azto.

Results reported in foregoing pages reveal that the gladiolus

corms treated with Azto +PSB showed marked earliness in days to

heading (spike) and days to flowering, while un-inoculated corm

delayed it significantly. Kathiresan and Venkatesha (2002) reported

early flowering in gladiolus with bio fertilizers + NPK and

Shashidhara and Gopinath (2002) in calendula. The probable reason

for early heading and flowering may be that the hormones which

enhanced early heading and flowering may be secreted by

Azotobacter and phosphobacteria. The interrelationship between

bacteria and phytohormone production and plant process in

association has not yet, however, been investigated.

Significant increase in spike length, number of florets per spike

and first floret diameter was obtained under combined inoculation of

corm with Azto +PSB, followed by PSB and Azto alone. It might be

due to increased availability of nitrogen and better mobilization,

solubilization of phosphate and better uptake of N and P as well as

also increased activity of gibberellic acid which improved the

vegetative growth, dry matter accumulation and their partitioning

Page 152: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

152

towards the developing spikes. Beneficial effect of bio fertilizers on

floral characters have been reported by Kathiresan and Venkatesha

(2002), Rajadurai and Beaulah (2000) and Yadav et al. (2005).

Significant increase in first floret diameter due to bio fertilizers

was reported by Preeti et al., (1999) in Edward rose. Rajadurai and

Beaulah (2000) in marigold and Dubey and Mishra (2005) in

gladiolus.

Increased number of florets per spike was reported by Mishra

(1998) with application of Nafed super culture containing Azotobacter

spp. Along with other growth regulating substances in gladiolus. It

might be due to accumulation of more and more reserved food

towards spike of gladiolus plant. Similar results were also obtained

by Vasanthi (1994) in Jasmine and Johnson et al. (1982) in

chrysanthemum and Dubey and Mishra (2005) in gladiolus.

Significant increase in number of spike, number of florets

opened at a time, fresh weight and flowering duration was obtained

with dual inoculation of corm with Azto +PSB. Our findings are

harmony with Gupta et al. (1999), Dubey and Mishra (2005), Dalve et

al. (2009) and Dubey et al. (2010).

Fresh weight increased due to biological fixation of nitrogen

and phosphorus in root portion of plants resulting in absorption of

more nutrients and its utilization. Moreover, Azotobacter has a role in

nitrogen fixation and is also involved in the production of IAA, GA

Page 153: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

153

and Cytokinin like substances which enhance the growth of plants.

These findings are in accordance with the results of Rajesh et al.

(2006), stated that application of bio-fertilizers like Azotobacter/

Azospirillum, Phosphate solubilizing bacterium enhanced the flower

fresh weight in carnation.

The perusal of mean data of two year indicates (Table 4.16) that highest

spike yield/ha recorded with combined inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB (BF3)

which gave 6.89 and 5.67 percent significantly higher spike yield over inoculated

ones of Azotobacter or PSB, respectively. Whereas, single inoculation of

Azotobacter or PSB produced 4.87 and 6.09 percent significantly higher spike

yield over un-inoculated treatment.

Significant increase in spike yield with Azto +PSB inoculated

treatment may be due to apart from fixing atmospheric nitrogen,

produces plant growth promoting substances and creates metabolic

changes in roots. This is turn decrease the activity of oxidative

enzymes and increases the development of root hairs thus increasing

the endogenous IAA and minerals as well as water uptake. This

resulted in increase of root development and overall vegetative

growth thereby increasing the yield of crops.

Significantly increased vase life of whole spike resulted from

application of bio fertilizers. The highest vase life was recorded with

combined inoculation of gladiolus corms by Azotobacter + PSB. The

single inoculation of Azotobactor or PSB also shows significantly

Page 154: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

154

higher vase life over un-inoculated treatments. Longer vase life might

be attributed to the better overall food and nutrient status of spike

under these treatments and reduction in ethylene synthesis which

has a harmful effect for flower life. There is no literature available

especially in case of gladiolus to conform these findings. However,

some work has been done with regard to improved vase life and

storability in some other crops. Our findings are harmony with Khan

et al. (2009), who reported that Azotobacter+ Azospir illum inhibit the

action of ethylene and extend the vase life of tulip for 10-12 days.

Significant increase in NPK content in gladiolus leaves with the application

of bio fertilizer (Azto +PSB) inoculated treatment; this could be attributed to the

rapid absorption of these elements by the plant surface and their translocation in

the plant. Similar results were obtained by Khattab and Hassan (1980) on

chrysanthemum. The role of phosphate solubilizing bacteria increases in the

availability of phosphorus in soil through the secretion of phosphatase enzyme

which leads to transfer organic phosphorus to their available from Abou et al;

(2007). Consequently, it enhances phosphorus absorption and accumulation in

plant tissues. The increment in “K” percentage might be due to the effect of

different strain groups and nutrients mobilizing microorganism which help in

availability of metals and their forms in the composted material and increased

levels of extracted minerals (Yada et al; 2013).

Page 155: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

155

5.1.3: Effect of bio fertilizers on nutrient content

Positive impact of bio fertilizers for nutrient content (NPK) by

leaves exhibited remarkable difference than control. These treatment

application significantly increased nitrogen content, this could be

attributed to the rapid absorption of these elements by the plant

surface and their translocation in the plant. Similar results were

obtained by Khattab and Hassan, (1980) on chrysanthemum. The

role of phosphate solubilizing bacteria increases in the availability of

phosphorus in soil through the secretion of phosphatase enzyme

which leads to transfer organic phosphorus to their available form

Abou et al; (2007). Consequently, it enhances phosphorus absorption

and accumulation in plant tissues

5.1.4: Effect of bio fertilizers on corm production

All the parameters with respect to corm production were found

significantly influenced by application of bio fertilizers. There was a marked

difference in almost all the parameters in second year over the previous

season. However, Corm treated with dual inoculation of Azotobacter +

PSB gave significantly higher result with respect to corm production,

followed by PSB and Azotobacter alone. Better nitrogen fixation

under Azotobacter treatment and increased absorption of nitrogen

under PSB treatment and greater solublization of insoluble P and

some other factors such as release of growth promoting substances,

control of plant pathogens and proliferation of beneficial organisms in

Page 156: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

156

rhizosphere (Barea and Brown, 1974). Hence, plant supplied with

sufficient N and P continuously maintained vegetative growth leading

to increase in photosynthetic area, which in turn resulted in more

accumulation of assimilates and partitioning to the developing corms

and cormels. Thus, for increasing the number and weight of corms

the present finding are in line with the result by Mishra (1998),

Kathiresan and Venkatesha (2002) and Dubey and Mishra (2005)

5.2: EFFECT OF FOLIAR SPRAY OF ZINC ON GLADIOLUS

Zinc has vital role in plant life. It is essential for vegetative and

reproductive process (Reed, 1942). In many parts of India, zinc as a plant

nutrient now stand third in importance next to nitrogen and phosphorus, the

deficiency of zinc under semi arid climate has emerged as a serious limitations to

crop production. Zinc deficiency is being widely expressed in the light textured

soils. Earlier studies suggest that various crops respond well to zinc (Tiwari and

Dwivedi, 1991).

5.2.1: Effect of zinc on vegetative growth

The results reported in foregoing pages revealed that the foliar

application zinc increased all the growth parameters viz; plant height,

number of leaves per plant significantly over control. Maximum height

and number of leaves was observed with the spray of 0.2% of Zn

which was significantly higher over the treatment of 0.1% Zn. The

effect of zinc in enhancing the vegetative growth may be ascribed

due to the presence of zinc in the structure of tryptophan, which is

Page 157: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

157

the precursor of auxin. Zinc was most effective in plant height and

increasing leaf size in gladiolus (Sarova et al; 1977).

5.2.2: Effect of zinc on floral characters

Application of zinc as has significant effect on all the floral characters.

Among various concentration, foliar spray of 0.2% Zn was found the best

followed by 0.1% Zn.

Results reported in foregoing pages reveal that the foliar

application of zinc showed marked earliness in days to heading

(spike) and days to flowering, while control delayed it significantly.

Significant increase in spike length, number of florets per spike

and first floret diameter was obtained under 0.2% foliar spray of Zn

followed by 0.1%. Zinc involved in the synthesis of plant hormones

and hence induces early maturity of shoot to induce early flowering

(Chen et al; 1982).

The investigation revealed a significant improvement an all the

parameters with regard to florets ( i.e. number of florets per spike,

first floret length and diameter, number of florets opened at a time,

fresh and dry weight and flowering duration) with foliar application of

zinc during both the years.

The increase in floral characters due to application of zinc increase

vegetative growth and healthy green leaves which is tern resulted in higher

Page 158: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

158

assimilate synthesis thus leads to production of more food material, which is tern

might have been utilized for better development of size and weight of flowers.

Plants sprayed with zinc might have stored more carbohydrates through

effective photosynthesis and zinc helps in synthesis of tryptophan as precursor of

auxin (IAA) and also causes stem elongation (Sharma et al; 1980) resulted in

better growth and flowering (Bala et al; 2006).

More number of florets opened at a time with application of zinc

in comparison to control because of involvement of zinc in several

enzymatic activities which affects the alcohol dehydrogenase and

this enzyme catalyzes the degradation of acetaldehyde to ethanol

(Marschner, 1986) which augmented some role in production of

ethylene that probably resulted in opening and expansion of more

number of florets at a time. Results obtained in this study also

experimentally substantiated by Kumar and Arora (2000) who

observed that application of zinc enhanced duration of flowering in

gladiolus.

Foliar spray of zinc recorded significantly higher spike yield/ha over

control. It is revealed from mean data of two year (Table 4.16) that highest spike

yield (138847/ha) recorded with 0.2% Zn which was 7.31 and 3.35 percent

significantly higher as compared to control and 0.1% spray of Zn, respectively.

The positive response of iris plant growth, yield and yield

components due to Zn foliar spray may be attributed to its deficiency

in studied soil. In addition, the important role of Zn come from its

Page 159: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

159

apparent requirement for the synthesis of optimum tryptophan

(Precursor of IAA) levels and for the activation of enzymes involved

in the synthesis of IAA, (Salisbury and Ross, 1992). Similar results

also were obtained by Hassanien (1997) and Kumar and Arora

(2000), Sharma et al. (2004) and Jauhari et al. (2005) on Gladiolus.

Lahijie (2012) concluded that no application of micronutrients

on gladiolus ornamental at the commercial scale will produce poor

quality of vegetative growth and low number of florets. However, it is

suggested that micronutrients play a vital role on the growth and

development of gladiolus plants, because of its stimulatory and

catalytic effects on flower yield and metabolic processes.

Significantly increased vase life of whole spike resulted from

foliar application of zinc. The highest vase life was recorded with Zn 2

with 17.21 days which was 3.86 and 2.23 days higher over to Zn 1 and

Zn0 treatments. These results lie in the line of the findings reported

by Pratap et al. (2008).

5.2.3: Effect of zinc on nutrient content in gladiolus leaves

Results reported in foregoing pages revealed that the marginal

Increase NPK content and significant increase in Zn content in

gladiolus leaves with the foliar application of zinc. This could be

attributed to the rapid absorption of this nutrient element by the plant

surface and their translocation in the plant. Pratap et al. (2005) also

found that the response of ZnSO4 exhibit a significant effect in the

Page 160: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

160

accumulation of zinc in the leaf tissue of gladiolus. The most

prominent response for maximum enrichment of leaf tissues with zinc

was to spray the crop with ZnSO4 at 0.5% concentration twice during

the crop growth period at 3 rd and 6th leaf stages of crop, as this

element is necessary for control of IAA production levels in plants

(Price et al; 1972) and is known to indirectly influence the water

relations in the plant system (Dutt and Patil; 2000).

5.2.4: Effect of zinc on corm production

All the parameters with respect to corm production were found

significantly influenced by foliar application of zinc. There was a marked

difference in almost all the parameters in second year over the previous

season. Foliar spray @ 2% Zn gave significantly higher result with

respect to corm production, followed by1% Zn spray.

Increased yield of corms/plant and per plot, weight and diameter of corms

with spraying of zinc might be due to translocation of constituents from one part

of other and enhanced production of corms and cormels. This finding is also

corroborated with the results of Lal and Maurya (1981). They further reported that

zinc is responsible factor for increasing size, fresh and dry weight of onion bulbs.

Singh and Singh (2000) also observed that application of zinc enhanced corm

size and weight of corm per plant in gladiolus.

Page 161: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

161

5.3: EFFECT OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS (NP LEVELS) ON

GLADIOLUS

5.3.1: Effect of NP levels on vegetative growth

Days to 75 percent sprouting of corm was significantly

influenced by different doses of NP and application of full or 25%

higher doses of NP induced the early corm sprouting as compared to

half and 75% doses of NP. This earliness in sprouting can be

attributed mainly to availability of sufficient nutrients to the corm for

its normal metabolic activities. While improvement in other vegetative

characters like plant height and number of leaves with the increasing

levels of NP could be attributed to the unique physiological roles of

such nutrients in plant growth and development. Beneficia l effects on

vegetative characters by higher doses of NP were also reported by

Gawda et al. (1988), John et al. (1997) and Sehrawat et al. (2000) in

gladiolus crop.

5.3.2: Effect of NP levels on floral characters

It is clear from the results reported in foregoing pares revealed

that all the floral parameters increased consistently with the

increasing levels of NP up to 125% level but the difference between 100

and 125% was statistically at par in most of the parameters.

Full dose of NP showed significant influence on spike length,

number of florets per spike and first floret length and diameter,

Page 162: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

162

number of florets opened at a time, flowering duration as against

50% NP levels. The possible reason could be due to readily available

N and P which is responsible for improved the vegetative growth, dry

matter accumulation and partitioning towards the developing spikes.

The differential response of these characters to NP doses may also

be ascribed to the differences in NP uptake patterns by the plants at

the spike emergence stage. Beneficial effects of nitrogen and

phosphorus on floral characters have been reported by Gawda et al.

(1988), Mukherjee et al. (1997), Pandey et al. (2000) in gladiolus and

Kawarkhe et al. (2002), Attala et al., (2003) and Mishra et al. (2002)

in tuberose.

The other possible reason of longer spike and bigger size and

more number of florets per spike with the application of full dose of

NPK, could be due to ample supply of nutrient elements, which might

have resulted in increased number and size of cells and enhanced

meristematic activities, leading to marked improvement in these

characters. Corroborative findings were also reported by Dod et al.

(1991) Singh and Bijimol (2000) and Sharma and Singh (2001) in

gladiolus.

Gladiolus plant took minimum days to flowering when NP applied at

lower levels. Application of higher doses, on the other hand, resulted in

plants taking a longer time. The possible reason for the above trend might

be due to the fact that high dose of N and P encouraged vigorous growth

Page 163: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

163

with more photosynthetic area for greater production and mobilization of

photosynthates, which ultimately delayed the reproduction phase. Similar

observations were also made by Shah et al. (1984), Dod et al. (1991)

and John et al. (1997).

The highest number of florets remaining open at a time on the

spikes was recorded on plants treated with 100 and 125% doses of

NP. These findings conform the earlier observations of Deswal and

Patil (1983) and Anserwadekar and Patil (1986).

Longer vase life of whole spike resulted from full dose of NP,

the obvious reasons being that the spikes produced were longer with

more number of florets. Phosphorus applications produces less

succulence and softer flowers thus more deposition of carbohydrate

in the cells, which also helped in increasing vase life as reported by

Hatibarua and Mishra (1999) in gladiolus. Beneficial effects of higher

doses of NP on post harvest characters have been reported by

Deswal and Patil (1983), Hatibarua et al. (2002) and Kathiresan and

Venkatesha (2002) in gladiolus.

5.3.3: Effect of NP levels on nutrient content

It is revealed from results that the nutrient (N, P, K & Zn) content in

gladiolus leaves increased significantly and consistently with the increasing

levels of NP up to 100% NP, thereafter it increase but not the level of

significance. The perusal of two year mean data indicated that the maximum

content of NPK was recorded with 125% NP level, which was significantly higher

Page 164: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

164

to 50 and 75% NP levels, but statistically at par with 100% NP level. This might

be due to more availability of nutrients through higher levels of applied nutrients.

The findings support the result of Singh et al. (2002).

5.3.4: Effect of NP levels on corm production

The investigation revealed a significant improvement in all the parameters

with regards to corm production with higher dose of NP during both the years.

The results from these tests demonstrate that higher dose of NP application

resulted in corms of superior quality in both the years and more number of corm

per plant in second year. This can be attributed to enhanced ammonium

absorption and nitrate absorption (fenn et al; 1994), resulting in increased

photosynthetic activity to produce additional biomass, which was manifested in

bigger and heavier corms. The present findings are in accordance with the

reports of Litterell and Waters (1967-68), who observed that gladiolus, is

relatively slow in response to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization and the effect

might not be apparent in one season.

Higher yield in terms of corms due to higher dose of NPK may be because

of rapid vegetative growth, which resulted in increased fresh and dry matter

production and partitioning to the developing corms. Similar findings were also

reported by, Shah et al. (1984), Singh and Bijimol (2000) and Kathiresan and

Venkatesha (2002) in gladiolus.

Page 165: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

165

5.4: SIGNIFICANT INTERACTIONS

5.4.1: Interactions effect of bio fertilizers and NP levels

Most of the interaction between bio fertilizers and NP levels were

significant in respect of number of spike per square meter, weight of spike,

number of florets per spike, diameter of florets and flowering duration.

Significant increase in floral characters with the application of bio fertilizer

(Azto +PSB) and higher NP levels; this could be attributed to the rapid

absorption of these elements by the plant and their translocation in thefloral

parts. Similar results were obtained by Khattab and Hassan (1980) on

chrysanthemum. The role of phosphate solubilizing bacteria increases in the

availability of phosphorus in soil through the secretion of phosphatase enzyme

which leads to transfer organic phosphorus to their available from Abou et al;

(2007). Consequently, it enhances phosphorus absorption and accumulation in

plant tissues.

As far as the interactive effect of bio fertilizer and NP levels,

corm treated with dual inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB gave

significantly higher result with respect to corm production, followed

by PSB and Azotobacter alone. Better nitrogen fixation under

Azotobacter treatment and increased absorption of nitrogen under

PSB treatment and greater solublization of insoluble P and some

other factors such as release of growth promoting substances,

control of plant pathogens and proliferation of beneficial organisms in

rhizosphere (Barea and Brown, 1974). Hence, plant supplied with

Page 166: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

166

sufficient N and P continuously maintained vegetative growth leading

to increase in photosynthetic area, which in turn resulted in more

accumulation of assimilates and partitioning to the developing corms

and cormels. Thus, for increasing the number and weight of corms

the present finding are in line with the result by Kathiresan and

Venkatesha (2002) and Dubey and Mishra (2005).

5.4.2: Interactions effect of zinc and NP levels

In case of interactive effect of zinc and NP levels, treatment combination

F3 x Zn2 (100% NP with 0.2% foliar spray of zinc) resulted most of the floral

characters (viz; number of florets per spike, flowering duration, number of florets

opened at a time and vase life of flower) significantly superior over control and

lower doses of zinc and NP levels.

The increase in floral characters due to application of zinc increase

vegetative growth and healthy green leaves which is tern resulted in higher

assimilate synthesis thus leads to production of more food material, which is tern

might have been utilized for better development of size and weight of flowers.

Plants sprayed with zinc might have stored more carbohydrates through

effective photosynthesis and zinc helps in synthesis of tryptophan as precursor of

auxin (IAA) and also causes stem elongation (Sharma et al; 1980) resulted in

better growth and flowering (Bala et al; 2006).

As far as the interactive effect of zinc and NP levels, the diameter of

corms, which was minimum (3.85 cm) in F1 x Zn0 combination and increased to

a maximum of 4.78 cm at F4 x Zn2 level which was found at par with F3 x Zn2

Page 167: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

167

treatment combination. Increased corms diameter with spraying of zinc under

different NP levels, might be due to translocation of constituents from one part of

other and enhanced corms diameter. Singh and Singh (2000) also observed that

application of zinc with NPK enhanced corm size and weight of corm per plant in

gladiolus.

5.5: ECONOMICS

Cost of cultivation of Rs. 198750/- ha was common for all the treatments.

The highest cost of cultivation (Rs. 201750 /ha) was incurred under foliar spray of

zinc @ 2.0% treatment. The major cost components were the planting material

and labour in weeding revealing the high capital and labour intensive nature of

the crop. Similar cost of cultivation of gladiolus was also reported by Pushpalatha

et al. (2000) in Bangalore, Karnataka.

The economic feasibility in terms of net monetary return showed that

the maximum net return (Rs. 413555/-ha) and B : C (5.62) ratio was found with

combined inoculations of gladiolus corms by Azotobacter +PSB treatment (BF3).

In point of view zinc, maximum net income (Rs. 392815/-ha) and B : C

ratio (5.32) was obtained with 0.2% foliar spray treatment (Zn2). Under different

NP levels, maximum net return (Rs. 409565/-ha) and B : C ratio (5.52) with125%

NP level which is closely followed by 100% NP level (F3) with 5.51 B : C ratio.

Page 168: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

168

CHAPTER VI

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

The present investigation entitled “Effect of bio fertilizers and zinc on

gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)” conducted during two consecutive rabi

seasons of 2011-12 and 2012-13 at the SMS Government model science

college, Gwalior. The study was made with two objectives i.e. to ascertain

the best performing biofertilizer on growth, yield and quality of gladiolus in

combination with different doses of chemical fertilizers and find out the optimum

concentration of zinc for better performance of gladiolus. For this purpose, two

biofertilizer viz., Azotobacter (Azto), Phosphobacteria (PSB) and their

combination AZT + PSB) were tested along with four doses of NP i.e. 50, 75,

100 and 125% of NP, using three foliar spray of zinc (control, 0.1% & 0.2%) .

The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with three replication and

total of forty eight treatments. The experimental crop (Cv. Manmohak) was sown

with a corm of 20 cm spacing with row spacing of 50 cm were maintained.

Recommended doses of fertilizers were 120 kg N, 80 kg P2O5 and 100 kg K2O

per ha (100% NPK) and these doses, full dose of phosphorus and potassium and

half dose of nitrogen were applied at the time of sowing. Remaining half dose of

nitrogen was applied two splits doses after first and second irrigations. Corms

were treated before sowing with Azotobecter, PSB as per treatment wise and

zinc was applied as two foliar sprays (3 and 6 leaf pair stage i. e. at 75 and 100

DAP) as per treatment concentration. The corms harvested from the first year

crop were replanted in the same plot and were subjected to identical

Page 169: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

169

fertilizer treatments in the second year. Effect of all the three factors (bio

fertilizers, zinc and NP levels) on vegetative growth, floral characters and

corm production were studied. The salient findings are summarized in this

chapter to draw some meaningful conclusion.

EFFECT OF BIO FERTILIZERS ON GLADIOLUS

All the bio fertilizers under the investigation significantly influenced the

days to 75 percent sprouting of corm. Moreover, dual inoculation of corms

with Azto +PSB (BF3) gave significantly induced earliness followed by

BF2, and BF1 in corm sprouting as compared to un - inoculated treatment.

All the growth parameters viz; plant height, number of leaves per plant

showed a significant increase with the combined application of Azto +

PSB, followed by single inoculation by PSB and Azto under the present

study and un-inoculated treatment show least value for these parameters.

Application of bio fertilizer singly and in different combinations has

significant effect on all the floral characters (viz; spike length, number

of florets per spike and first floret length & diameter, flowering durations,

florets open at a time, fresh & dry weight of florets and vase life). Among

various bio fertilizers and their combinations, Azto +PSB were found

the best followed by PSB and Azto and un-inoculated treatment show

least value for these parameters during both the seasons.

Page 170: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

170

The perusal of mean data of two year study indicates, that the highest

spike yield/ha recorded with combined inoculation of Azotobacter + PSB

(BF3) which gave 6.89 and 5.67 percent significantly higher spike yield

over inoculated ones of Azotobacter or PSB, respectively. Whereas, single

inoculation of Azotobacter or PSB produced 4.87 and 6.09 percent

significantly higher spike yield over un-inoculated treatment.

Under present investigation, significant increase in NPK content was

observed in gladiolus leaves with the application of bio fertilizer over to un-

inoculated treatment.

All the parameters with respect to corm production were showed

significantly influenced by application of bio fertilizers. There was a

marked difference in almost all the parameters in second year over

the previous season. However, Corm treated with dual inoculation of

Azotobacter + PSB gave significantly higher result with respect to corm

production, followed by PSB and Azotobacter alone.

The economic feasibility in terms of net monetary return and benefit cost

ratio, showed that the maximum net return (Rs. 413555/-ha) and B : C

(5.62) ratio was found with combined inoculations of gladiolus corms by

Azotobacter +PSB (BF3) treatment.

Page 171: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

171

EFFECT OF FOLIAR SPRAY OF ZINC ON GLADIOLUS

The foliar application of zinc increased all the growth parameters viz; plant

height, number of leaves per plant significantly over control. Maximum

height and number of leaves was observed with the spray of 0.2% of Zn

which was significantly higher over the treatment of 0.1% Zn.

The investigation revealed a significant improvement in all the

parameters with regard to florets ( i.e. number of florets per

spike, first floret length and diameter, number of florets opened

at a time, fresh and dry weight and flowering duration) with

foliar application of zinc. The best performance was obtained

under 0.2% foliar spray of Zn followed by 0.1% during both the

years of study.

Foliar spray of zinc recorded significantly higher spike yield/ha over

control. It is revealed from mean data of two year (Table 4.16) that highest

spike yield (138847/ha) recorded with 0.2% Zn which was 7.31 and 3.35

percent significantly higher to control and 0.1% spray of Zn, respectively.

Significantly increased vase life of whole spike resulted from foliar

application of zinc. The highest vase life was recorded with Zn2 with 17.21

days which was 3.86 and 2.23 days higher over to Zn1 and Zn0

treatments.

Page 172: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

172

Marginal Increase NPK content and significant increase in Zn content in

gladiolus leaves with the foliar application of zinc was observes in present

study.

All the parameters with respect to corm production (corms/plant and

per plot its weight and diameter) were found significantly

influenced by foliar application of zinc. Foliar spray @ 2% Zn gave

significantly higher result with respect to corm production,

followed by1% Zn.

In economical point of view, maximum net income (Rs.

392815/-ha) and B : C ratio (5.32) was obtained with foliar spray

of zinc @ 0.2% (Zn2) treatment.

EFFECT OF NP LEVELS ON GLADIOLUS

Days to 75 percent sprouting of corm was significantly influenced by

different doses of NP and application of full or 25% higher doses of NP

induced the early corm sprouting as compared to half and 75% doses of

NP. Improvement in other vegetative characters like plant height and

number of leaves with the increasing levels of NP.

All the floral parameters increased consistently with the

increasing levels of NP up to 125% level but the difference

between 100 and 125% was statistically at par in most of the

parameters was noticed under present experimentations.

Page 173: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

173

Longer vase life of whole spike noticed from full dose of NP (100% NP),

the obvious reasons being that the spikes produced were longer with more

number of florets under this treatment.

It is revealed from results that the nutrient (N, P, K) content in gladiolus

leaves increased significantly and consistently with the increasing levels of

NP up to 100% NP; thereafter it increases but not the level of significance.

The investigation revealed a significant improvement in all the parameters

with regards to corm production with higher dose of NP during both the

years. The results from these tests demonstrate that higher dose of NP

application resulted in corms of superior quality in both the years and

more number of corm per plant in second year.

Under different NP levels, maximum net return (Rs. 409565/-ha) and B : C

ratio (5.52) with125% NP level which is closely followed by 100% NP level

(F3) with Rs. 396699/-ha of net return and 5.51 B : C ratio.

Page 174: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

174

CONCLUSION:

On the basis of foregoing summary, the results may be concluded as

follows :

Application of bio fertilizer singly and in different combinations has

significant effect on all the vegetative, floral and corms parameters.

Among various bio fertilizers and their combinations, Azotobacter

+PSB were found the best, followed by PSB and Azoto and un-

inoculated treatment show least value for these parameters during both

the seasons of experiment.

Foliar spray of zinc recorded significantly higher vegetative, floral and

corms parameters over control. The best performance was obtained

under 0.2% foliar spray of Zn followed by 0.1% during both the years of

study.

Vegetative, floral and corms parameters increased consistently with the

increasing levels of NP up to 125% level but the difference between 100

and 125% was statistically at par in most of the parameters was

noticed under present experimentation.

Thus, the gladiolus crop sown with combined inoculation of Azotobacter

+ PSB and two foliar spray of zinc @ 0. 2% at 75 and 100 DAP with 100% NP

level of fertilizers produced maximum spike and corms yield as well as higher

quality parameters and also gave higher net return and benefit: cost ratio in

Gwalior district of Gird Agro Climatic Zone of Madhya Pradesh.

Page 175: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

175

SUGGESTION:

1. Bio fertilizers should be fresh and mode of methods properly used.

2. For foliar spray of zinc, neutralization of zinc is must. For this, brunt lime

may be use.

3. Other than zinc, iron will also to be considered for foliar application in

gladiolus.

4. Application of phosphatic fertilizers (in the form of DAP) should be applied at

basal dose in deep.

5. Further, water soluble fertilizers (i.e. mono ammonium phosphate) will also

be tried for foliar spray of N and P nutrients.

Page 176: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

176

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abou El-yazeid A, Abou- Aly E. and M, Moussa, (2007). Enhancing growth

productivity dissolving microorganism (Bio-phosphor) combined

with boron foliar. Agric Biol. Sci, 3 (4): 274-86.

Afify, M. M. (1989) Effect of high fertilizer rates on the growth flowering of three

gladiolus cultivars. Kerleszefi Egyatem Kozlemenyel, 47: 75-82.

Ahmad Ali, Tahir mehmood, Rashid Hussain, Ajmal Bashir, SajjadRaza, Najam-

ud-Din and Adeel Ahmad (2013) Investigation of biofertilizers

influence on vegetative growth, flower quality, bulb yield and

nutrient uptake in gladiolus (gladiolus grandiflorus l.) International

Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences. 4 (1):94-99.

Ahmad, T., Ahmad, I. and Qasim, M. (2008). Present status and future prospects

of gladiolus cultivation in Punjab, Pakistan. J. Agricultural Faculty,

5(3): 227-238.

Altaff, H.A; Saeed, O. S. and Salim, A. Z. (2002). Effect of biofertilizers, inorganic

and foliar application of power four on the productivity of onion.

J. Natural Applied Science. 6(1): 1-4.

Anserwadekar, K. W. and Patil, V. K. (1986). Vase life studies on gladiolus under

different chemicals of N, P, K and spacing. Acta Horticulture; 181 :

279-283.

Attalla, H.K.; Zaghloul, M.A. and Hashish, K.H. (2003). Effect of organic manure

and NPK fertilizers on vegetative growth, flowering and chemical

composition of some gladiolus cultivars. Annals Agric. Sci. 41 (2) :

680- 691.

Azcon, R. and Barea, J. M. (1995). Synthesis of auxins, gibberellins and

cytokinins by Azotobacter vinelandil and Azotobacter beijerinckil

related to effects produced on tomato plants. Cultivos-Topicales. 9

(1): 80-84.

Page 177: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

177

Bala, T. U. Sekhar, R. C.. and Reddy, Y. N. (2006). Effect of pre harvest sprays of

zinc and planting time on flowering, flower quality and vase life of

gladiolus cultivars. Journal of Research ANGRAU; 34(3):8-12.

Barea, J. M. and Brown, M. E. (1974). Effects on plant growth produced by

Azotobactor paspali related to synthesis of plant growth regulating

substance. J. Appl. Bact; 37: 583-586.

Belimov, A. A.; Kojemiakov, A. P. and Chuvarliyeva, C. V. (1995). Interaction

between barley and mixed cultures of nitrogen fixing and

phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Plant and Soil. 173: 29-37.

Borrelli, A. (1984). Planting density and nitrogen fertilizing in the cultivation of

gladiolus in summer and autumn. Rivista delta ortofloroputti

colturea italiana, 68: 201-210.

Brown, M. E. and Burlingham, S. K. (1968). Productivity of plant growth

substance by Azotobacter chroococcum. J. Gen. Microbiol. 53:

135-144.

Chaudhary, Narendra ; Kishan Swaroop; Janakiram, T.; Biswas, D. R.. and Geeta Singh

(2013). Effect of integrated nutrient management on vegetative

growth and flowering characters of gladiolus. Indian Journal of

Horticulture; 70(1):156-159.

Chen, Y; Steinitz, B; Cohen, A. and Elber, Y. (1982). The effect of various iron

containing fertilizers on growth and propagation of Gladiolus

grandiflorus. Scientia hort; 18(2) : 169-175.

Dalve, P. D; Mane, S.V. and Nimbalkar, R.R. (2009). Effect of biofertilizers on

growth, flowering and yield of gladiolus. The Asian journal of

horticulture, 4(1): 227-229.

Deo Shankar and Dubey, P. (2005). Effect of NPK, FYM and NPK+FYM on growth,

flowering and corm yield of gladiolus when propagated through

cormels. Journal of Soils and Crops. 15(1):34-38.

Page 178: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

178

Deswal, K.S. and Patil, V. K. (1983). Vaselife of spikelets of Gladiolus grandiflora

as influenced by soil fertility and induction media. J. Mharashtra

agric. Univ. 8 (1) : 34-36.

Deswal, K.S., Patil, V. K. and Anserwadekar, K.W. (1983) Nutritional and plant

population studies in gladiolus. Indian J. Hort. 40 (3/4) : 254-259.

Dod, V. N; Kala, P. B; Sadawarte, K. T. and Rathi, S. M. (1991). Improved agro

techniques for gladiolus –a-review. Agric review, 18 (4) : 212-238.

Dongardive, S. B.; Golliwar, V. J.; Bhongle, S. A.; and Bhongle, S. A. (2009). Influence of

organic manure and bio fertilizers on corms and cormels yield

of gladiolus. Annals of Plant Physiology; 23(1):114-116.

Dubey, R. K. Misra, R. L. Singh, S. K. and Manisha (2010). Efficacy of bio-and

chemical fertilizers on certain floral qualities of gladiolus. Indian

Journal of Horticulture; 67 (Special Issue):382-385.

Dubey, R.K. and Mishra, R.L. (2005). Response of chemical and bio fertilizers on

corm and cormel production in gladiolus. Progressive Horticulture,

37 (2): 412-418.

Dutt , Manjul and Patil, M. T. (2000). Nutrition for floriculture crops. Floriculture

Today, 5: 36-40.

Farahat, M. M., Soad Ibrahim, S. Lobna Taha and E.M. Fatma and El-Quesni,

(2007). Response of vegetative growth and some chemical

constituents of Cupressus sempervirens L. to foliar application of

ascorbic acid and zinc at Nubaria. World, J. of Agric Sci., 3(4): 496-

502.

Feng, K; Lu, H. M; Sheng, H. J; Wang, X. L. and Mao, J. (2004). Effect of

organic ligands on biological availability of inorganic

phosphorus in soils. Pedosphere, 14: 85-92.

Page 179: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

179

Fenn, L. B; Taylor, R. M. and Burks, C. M. (1994). Calcium stimulation of

ammonium absorption and growth by beet. Agronomy J. 86 (5) :

916-920.

Fisher, R.A. (1958). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd.,

Edinburgh.

Gaur, A. C. and Gaind, Sunita (1990) Role of phosphorus solubilizing

micro organism in crop productivity and enriched organic

manure. National seminar on organic farming org. by JNKVV

Jabalpur and IGKVV, Raipur at college of Agriculture Indore.

20-29 sep. 1992 pp. : 134-142.

Godse, S. B.; Golliwar, V. J.; Neha Chopde; Bramhankar, K. S.. and Kore, M. S. (2006).

Effect of organic manures and bio fertilizers with reduced doses of

inorganic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of gladiolus. Journal

of Soils and Crops; 16(2):445-449.

Gowda, J. V. N; Jayanthi, R. and Raju, B. (1998). Studies on the effect of

nitrogen and phosphorus on flowering in gladiolus cv. Debonair.

Current Res; 17 (6) : 80-81.

Gupta, N. S; Sadavarte, K.T; Mahorkar, V. K.; Jadhad, B. J. and Dorak, S. V.

(1999). Effect of graded levels of nitrogen amd bioinoculants on

growth and yield in marigold (Tagetes erecta). J. Soils Crops. 9 (1) :

80-83.

Gyaneshwar, P; Kumar, G. N; Parekh, L. J. and Poole, P.S. (2002) Role

of soil microorganism in improving P nutrition of plants.

Plants and Soil 245 : 83-89.

Halder, N. K., Ahmed R., Sharifuzzaman, S. M. and Siddiky, M. K. (2007). Effect

of boron and zinc fertilizers on corm and cormel production of

gladiolus in gray terrace soil of Bangladesh. International J.

Sustainable Crop Production. 2(5): 85-89.

Page 180: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

180

Hatibarua, P. and Mishra, R. L. (1999). Effects of nitrogen sources on vegetative

and floral character of gladiolus cv. Dhanvantari. J. Ornam. Hort. 2

(2): 111-114.

Hatibarua, Preeti, Mishra, R. L. and Bhattacharjee, S. K. (2002). Effect of

nitrogen sources and doses on some post harvest characters of

gladiolus. Floriculture Research trend in India, ISOH, pp. 114-117.

Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall of India Private

Limited, New Delhi, India, pp: 82-86.

Jadhav, A.C; Memnae, S.A. and Konde, B.K.(1998) Economics of the use of

bacterial inoculations in sweet potato. J. Maharastra Agri. Univ.

23(1): 33-35.

Jauhari, Shiva; Srivastava, Ranjan and Srivastava, P.C. (2005). Effect of zinc on

growth, flowering, corm attributes, post harvest life and leaf and

corm nutrient status in gladiolus Cv. Red beauty. Progressive

horticulture, 37 (2): 423-428.

Jha, Saurabh ; Sharma, G. L.; Dikshit, S. N.; Patel, K. L.; Tirkey, T. and Sarnaik, D. A.

(2012) Effect of vermin compost and FYM in combination with

inorganic fertilizer on growth, yield and flower quality of

gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus). Journal of Soils and Crops;

22(2):253-257.

John, A.Q.; Paul, T.M. and Siddique, M. A. (1997). Nutritional studies on

gladiolus I. Growth and floral characters. Advance in Plant Science,

10 (1): 45- 49.

Johnson, C. M. and Ulrich, A. (1959). Analytical methods for use in plant analysis.

Calif. Agric. Exp. Sci. Bull. 766.

Johnson, C. R; Menge, J. A. and Johnson, E. L. V. (1982). Effect of vesicular-

arbuscular mycorrhizae on growth of Chrysanthemum morifolium

ramat. Scientia Hort. 17 : 265-269.

Page 181: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

181

Joshi, Neelima and Raghav, Manoj (2002). Response of zinc sulphate on growth,

yield and quality of potato J. Indian Potato Assoc. 33 (3-4): 244-

246.

Jyoti Sharma, Gupta, A. K. Chandan Kumar and Gautam, R. K. S. (2013).

Influence of zinc, calcium and boron on vegetative and flowering

parameters of gladiolus cv. Aldebran. The Bioscan. 8(4): 1153-

1158.

Kara, Ju. M. and Gindina, S. R. (1970). The effective of micro-elements on the

propagation of some lily species. Agrohimija (3) : 75-78.

Kathiresan, C. and Venkatesha, J. (2002). Effect of biofertilizer with levels of N

and P on gladiolus. In: Floriculture research trends in India. Pp -

118-121.

Katiyar, Prashant; Chaturvedi, O. P. and Katiyar, Dheerendra (2012). Effect of

foliar spray of zinc, calcium and boron on spike production

of gladiolus cv. eurovision. Hort Flora Research Spectrum; 2012.

1(4):334-338.

Kattayal, J.C. and Randhawa, N.S. (1983). Micronutrients, F.A.O. fertilizer and

plant nutrient bulletin No. 7, F.A.O. Rome.

Kawarkhe, V. J. Jane, R. N. Kulwant, L. V. and Panchbhai, D. M. (2002). Studies

on nutrition of tuberose in Vidarbha. National Symposium on

Floriculture in the new millennium. Abstract, pp. 57.

Kennedy, I.R; Choudhury, M.A., and Kecskes, M. L. (2004). Non symbiotic

bacterial diazotrophs in crop farming systems: can their potential for

plant growth promotion be better exploited. S. Bio. Biochem, 36 (8):

1229-1244.

Khader, M. A; chezhiyuan, N; Ponnuswami, V; Thamburaj, S. and

Rangaswami, P.(1985).Studies on the effect of micronutrients

on Crossandra. South Indian Hort.; 33 143-144.

Page 182: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

182

Khalifa, R. M., Shaaban S.H.A and Rawia, A. (2011). Effect of foliar application

of zinc sulfate and boric acid on growth, yield and chemical

constituents of iris plants. Ozean Journal of Applied Sciences, 4(2):

129-144.

Khan, F. N. Rahman, M. M. Karim, A. J. M. S. Hossain, K. M. (2012). Effects of

nitrogen and potassium on growth and yield of gladiolus corms.

Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research;. 37(4):607-616.

Khan, F. U., Siddique, M. A. A. Khan, F. A. and. Nazki, I. T. (2009). Effect of

biofertilizers on growth, flower quality and bulb yield in tulip

(Tulipages neriana).Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 79 (4):

248-251.

Khan, M. A. and Ahmad Iftikhar (2004). Growth and flowering

of Gladiolus hortulanus L. cv. Wind Song as influenced by various

levels of NPK. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology;

6(6):1037-1039.

Khattab, M. and Hassan, M.R. (1980). Effect of different ratios and level of

fertilizer on the vegetative growth and flower production of

chrysanthemum. Alex.J.Agric.Res, 28 : 225-231.

Kosugi, K. and Kondo, M. (1960). Studies on blindness in gladiolus. VII. Effect

of fertilizer treatment in the previous year in flowering in the current

year. J. Hort. Assoc. Japan. 29 : 163-168.

Kumar, M. ; Chattopadhyay, T. K. and Das, D. K. (2003) Effect of foliar application

of zinc, copper and iron on the yield and quality of Gladiolus

grandiflorus cv. Mirela. Journal of Interacademicia, 5 (3) :300-303.

Kumar, Mukesh and Chattopadhyay, T. K. (2001). Effect of NPK on the yield and

quality of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) cv. Tropic Sea.

Environment and Ecology. 19(4):868-871.

Kumar, Prabhat and Arora, J.S. (2000). Effect of micronutrients on gladiolus.

Journal of ornamental horticulture, 3(2):91-93.

Page 183: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

183

Kumar, S. and Haripriya, K. (2010). Effect of foliar application of iron and zinc on

growth, flowering and yield of Nerium (Nerium odoruml). Plant

Archives. 10(2): 637-640.

Lahijie, M. F. (2012). Application of micronutrients FeSO4 and ZnSO4 on the

growth and development of Gladiolus variety "Oscar". International

journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 4(11):718-720.

Lal, S. and Maurya, A. N. (1981). Effect of zinc on onion. Haryana J. Hort. Sci.

10: 231-235.

Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of DTPA micronutrient soil

tests for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.,

42: 421-428.

Litterell, R. H. and Waters, W. E. (1967-68). Influence of nitrogen and lime

fertilization on gladiolus corm and flower production and internal

microflora of corms. Proc. Fla State Hort Soc. 80: 405-408.

Marschner, H. (1986). Mineral nutrition in higher plants. London Academic Press.

P. 300-334.

Memon, S. A. Baloch, A. R. Muhammad Ayubbaloch and Mahmooda Buriro

(2013). Effect of zinc sulphate and iron sulphate on the growth and

flower production of gladiolus (Gladiolus hortulanus). International

Journal of Agricultural Technology; 9(6):1621-1630.

Mishra, M. A; Mahapatra, and Mohanty, C. R. (2002). Effect of N, P and spacing

on tuberose. National Symposium on Indian Floriculture in the New

Millennium Abstract. pp.55.

Mishra, R. L. and Singh, B. (1993). Gladiolus In: Commercial Flowers

(Eds Bose, T. K. and L. P. Yadav). Naya Prokash, Calcutta-

700006, pp. 267-353.

Mishra, R.L. (1998). Nafed super culture on growth and corm production in

gladiolus var. melode. Recent Hortic. 4 : 76.

Page 184: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

184

Mohapatra, K. C.; Mohanty, C. and Mallick, R. (2005). Effect of major nutrients on

corm production of gladiolus. Orissa Journal of Horticulture;

33(2):99-102.

Mukherjee, S.; Jana, S.C. and Chatterjee, T.K. (1997). Effect of nitrogen and

phosphorus sources on production of flowers and corms of

Gladiolus grandiflorus, L. Indian Agriculturist, 28: 211- 213.

Nagaich, K.N; Singh; Sukhbir and Singh, V.B. (2003). Effect of nitrogen and

phosphorus on growth and flowering and Yield of marigold

(Tagetes erectaL.) . Environment and Ecology, 21(1): 55-57.

Nazki, I.T and Arora, S. (2000). Effect of GA3 and nitrogen on gladiolus. J.

Ornament. Hortic, 124-127.

Ocampo, J. A. and Barea, J. M. (1998). Effects of microbial fertilizers on

flowering to tomato in the absence of established inocule in the

rhizosphere. Annals de- Edafologia-y-Agrobiologia. 37 (3-4) : 315-

325.

Ocampo- Juarez, H.; Escalante- Estrada, J. A. S.; Rodriguez-Gonzalez, M. T.; Landeros -

Sanchez, F.; Escalante-Estrada, L. E. (2012). Gladiolus production in

relation to nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium. [Spanish] Terra

Latinoamericana;. 30(3):239-248.

Olsen, S.R.,. Cole, C. V; Watanabe S.S. and Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of

available phosphorus in soil by extraction by sodium bicarbonate.

US Dept. Agric., Circular No. 939: 1-19. Roma, Soils Bull., 48: 444.

Pandey, R. K. Puneet Rathore, Singh, M. K. and Rathore, R. (2000). Effect of

different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on gladiolus under Agra

condition. J. Ornam. Hort; 3(1) :60-61.

Parthasarthi, V.A. and Nagaraju, V. (1999). Gladiolus In:T.K.Bose,R. G. Maiti, R.

S. Dhua and P. Das (eds). Floriculture and landscaping. Calcutta,

Naya Prokash. pp. 467-507.

Page 185: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

185

Piper, C.S. (1960). Soil and plant analysis. Intel science Publishers, Inc. New York.

Poti, S.K. and Arora, J.S. (1986). Nutritional studies on gladiolus : effect of N, P

and K on growth, flowering, corm and cormel production. Punjab

Horti. J. 26 (1-4) : 125-128.

Pratap, M.; Reddy, S. A.; Reddy, Y. N. (2005). Response of pre

harvest micronutrient foliar spray on leaf nutrients and corm

production in gladiolus. Journal of Ornamental Horticulture (New

Series); 2005. 8(1):18-22.

Pratap, M; Reddy Amarender S; Reddy, Y.N. (2008). Studies on foliar nutrient

sprays and vase chemicals on keeping quality of gladiolus

(Gladiolus Grandiflorus) Cv. Trader Horn. Indian J. Agric. Res; 42

(1): 1-6.

Preethi, T.L., Pappiah C.M. and Anbu, S. (1999). Studies on the effect of

Azospirillum sp. nitrogen and ascorbic acid on the growth and

flowering of Edward rose (Rosa bourboniana Desp.). J. South

Indian Hort., 47(1-6): 106-110.

Price, C. A; Clark, H. E. and Funkhouser, A. M. (1972). Functioning of

micronutrients in plants. In: Micronutrients in Agriculture, pp. 731-

742. Soil Science Society of America. Madison. Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Pushpalatha, M. C.; Reddy, T. V. and Reddy, B. V. C. (2000). Economics

of gladiolus production in Bangalore District, Karnataka. Mysore

Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 34(2):174-178.

Rajaduari, K. R. and Beaulah, A. (2000). The effect of inorganic fertilizers

Azospirillum + VAM on yield characters of African marigold

(Tagetes erecta). J. Ecotoxicol and Envl. Monitoring. 10(2): 102-

105.

Rajesh, B., Sandeep, D., Dhiman, S.R. and Ritu, J. (2006). Effect of Biofertilizers

and Biostimulants on Growth and Flowering in Standard Carnation

Page 186: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

186

(Dianthus Caryophyllus Linn.) Journal of Ornamental Horticulture, 9

(4): 282-284.

Rattan, R. K; Patel, K. P; Manjaiah, K.M; and Datta, S.P. (2009). Micronutrient in

soil, plant, animal and human health. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 57(4) :

546-558.

Razin, A.M., E.A. Omer, A.M. Refaat and H.F. Ouda, (1992). Response of

Thyme "Thymus vulgaris L." to foliar fertilization with some

micronutrients. Egypt. J. Applied Sci., 7(6): 614.

Reed, H.S. (1942). The relation of zinc to seed production. J. Agric. Res. 64 :

635-644.

Sadhu, M. K. and Bose, T. K. (1973). Tuberose for most artistic garlands. Indian

J. Hort; 18(3) : 17-21.

Salisbury, F.B. and. Ross, C.W (1992). Plant growth regulators. In: Plant

Physiology, 4th ed. Wadsworth Publishing Comp. USA, pp: 116-

135.

Sehrawat, Anil, Ahalawat, V. P. Gupta, A. K. and Sehrawat, A. (2000). Influence

of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium application on growth,

flowering and corm production in gladiolus. Haryana Journal of

Horticultural Sciences, 29 (1-2): 71-72.

Sehrawat, S. K.; Dahiya, D. S.; Sukhbir Singh; Rana, G. S. (2003). Growth, flowering

and corm production in gladiolus as influenced by NPK application.

Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences. 32(3/4): 222-224.

Selvaraj, N. (2004). Effect of NPK on the vegetative and flower characters

of gladiolus (Gladiolus hortensis). South Indian Horticulture; 2004.

52(1/6) : 381-382.

Shah, Achal, lal, S. D. and Seth, J. N. (1984). Effect of different levels of nitrogen

and phosphorus on growth, flowering and corm yield of gladiolus.

Glory. Prog. Hort. 16 (3-4) : 305-307.

Page 187: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

187

Sharma, J.R; Gupta, R.B. and Panwar, P.D. (2004). Growth, flowering and corn

production of gladiolus Cv. Friendship as influenced by foliar

application of nutrients and growth regulators. Journal of

ornamental horticulture, 7 (3-4) : 154-158.

Sharma, S. N; Singh, A. and Tripathi, R.S. (1980). Response of Plamarosa to

nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and zinc. Indian Journal of

Agronomy. 25(4) : 719-723.

Sharma, U.C. and Grewal, J.S. (1998) Relative effectiveness of methods of

micronutrients application to potato. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 36(1):

128-132.

Sharma, Shalini, and Singh, D. B. (2001). Response of nitrogen fertilization on

gladiolus. J. Ornam. Hort. 4(2) : 108-112.

Sharova, N. L; Rybak, Yu. G. and Marina, N.E. (1977). Development of gladiolus

under the influence of micro-elements. Vyvashcivanic Tevetochno-

Dekorat. Rast. Vi. Koldevii. 11-17.

Shashidhera, G. R. and Gopinath, G. (2002). Effect of nutrients and bio-

inoculants on calendula. In: Floriculture Research Trends in India,

pp 206-208, ISOH, New Delhi.

Shroff, V. N. (1989). Role of biofertilizers in crop production in agriculture. In:

biofertilizer Technology transfer (Ed. L. V. Gangawane ), pp. 11-20.

Siddique, S.A; Anamika, N. and Shukla, N. P. (1993). The role of Azotobacter

inoculation in mulberry cultivation. Indian Forester, 119(7): 559-563.

Singh, A. K. and Bijimol, G. (2000). Response of gladiolus cv. Pink friendship to

spacing and nitrogen levels under low hills of Nagaland. South Ind.

Hort. 48 (1-6) : 72-77.

Singh, A.K and Singh, Chetan (2004). Effect of spacing and zinc on growth and

flowering in gladiolus cv. Sylvia. Progressive Horticulture, 36 (1) :

94-98.

Page 188: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

188

Singh, A.K and Singh, Chetan (2000) Effect of spacing and zinc on growth and

corm production in gladiolus raised from cormlets. The Hort. J. 13

(1): 87-92.

Singh, J. P.; Krishna Kumar; Katiyar, P. N. (2012). Effect of zinc, iron and copper

on yield parameters of gladiolus. Horticulture Flora Research

Spectrum. 1(1):64-68.

Singh, W.; Sehrawat, S. K.; Dahiya, D. S.; Singh, K. (2002). Leaf nutrient status

of gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) cv. Sylvia as affected by NPK

application. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences; 31(1/2):49-

51.

Smith, J. H; Allison, F.E. and Soulides, D.A. (1961). Evaluation of phosphor

bacteria as a soil inoculants. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 52 :109-

111.

Sonmez, F.; Cg, A.; Gulser, F.; Basdogan, G. (2013). The effects of some organic

fertilizers on nutrient contents in hybrid Gladiolus. Eurasian Journal

of Soil Science; 2(2):140-144.

Srivastava, R. and Govil, M. (2005). Influence of biofertilizers on growth and

flowering in gladiolus cv. American Beauty, ISHS Acta Horticulture

742: International Conference and Exhibition on Soil less Culture

(ICESC).

Srivastava, Ranjan and Govil Mansee (2007). Influence of bio fertilizers on growth

and flowering in gladiolus cv. American Beauty. Acta Horticulturae;

(742):183-188.

Teran, Z; Espiosa, R. Femandez, F. and Gras, G. (1994). Applications of bio

fertilizers and filter press cake in the production of seedlings of the

onion (Allium cepa L. ). Cultivos-Tropicales. 15(1) : 32-35.

Tiwari, K. N. and Pathak, A. N. (1976). Evaluation of soil tests for zinc in central

alluvial soils of Uttar Pradesh. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 24(2):303-

307.

Page 189: Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) THESIS SUBMITTED TOshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62426/2/final...1 EFFECT OF BIOFERTILIZER AND ZINC ON GLADIOLUS (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.)

189

Tiwari, K.N. and Dwivedi, B.S. (1991). Effect of native and fertilizer Zn on the

tuber yield and zinc uptake by potato in acidic ustochrepts of Utter

Pradesh. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 39:396-398.

Vasanthi, G. (1994). Studies on the effect of graded levels of nitrogen,

phosphorus with Azospirillum and phosphobacterium on growth

and yield of Jasmine M. Sc. (Hort.) Thesis, TNAU, Coimbatore.

Verma, D. P. and Shinde, S. P. (1993). Azotobacter, a bio fertilizer for vegetable

crops. bio fertilizer Newsletter. 1 (2): 6-10.

Woltz, S. S. (1964). Studies on the nutritional requirement of gladiolus. Proc. Fla.

State Hort. Soc. 67: 330-334.

Yada, K.K., Tanwar, A. and Aggarwal, A. (2013). Impact of Arbuscular

Mycorrhizal Fungi and Pseudomonas fluorescens with Various

Levels of Superphosphate on Growth Enhancement and Flowering

Response of Gerbera. Journal of Ornamental Plants, (3): 161-170.

Yadav, S. K.; Kumar, C. and Singh, R. (2005) Effect of bio fertilizers on floral

characters of gladiolus. Orissa Journal of Horticulture; 33(2):66-72.