2
waveguide vs. Simulated field in array of plasmonic coaxial waveguides Geometrical parameters: a1 = 10 nm, d = 7 nm, n = 4 (same as in the article)

Geometrical parameters: a1 = 10 nm, d = 7 nm, n = 4 (same as in the article)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Analytical fields in a plasmonic coaxial waveguide vs. Simulated field in array of plasmonic coaxial waveguides. Geometrical parameters: a1 = 10 nm, d = 7 nm, n = 4 (same as in the article). Animated fields: please use slideshow. Analytical @ f = 695 THz (single coaxial plasmonic waveguide). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Geometrical parameters: a1 = 10 nm, d = 7 nm, n = 4 (same as in the article)

Analytical fields in a plasmonic coaxial waveguide vs. Simulated field in array of plasmonic coaxial waveguides

Geometrical parameters: a1 = 10 nm, d = 7 nm, n = 4 (same as in the article)

Page 2: Geometrical parameters: a1 = 10 nm, d = 7 nm, n = 4 (same as in the article)

x

y z

Ey

Ez

Analytical @ f = 695 THz(single coaxial plasmonic waveguide)

Simulation @ f = 695 THz(unit cell of a waveguide array)

200 nmIncident

plane wavePower flow

Animated fields: please use slideshow

E