Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LA LTEEGEO:EXPLORATION - SERVICES
PHYSIQUE O G l Q U E
41016SW80M 2 .7756 MARION (7)1(7)
GEOPHYSICAL WORK
PROPERTY OF
FALCONBRIDGE NICKEL MINES LIMITED
HEENAN PROJECT HEENAN, MARION l GEONA TOWNSHIPS
PROVINCE OF ONTARIO
NOVEMBER 1982 C. LAVOIE, Ph.D.
RECEIVEDJAN 31 B85
MINING LANDS SECTION
VAl 0. 0t, , OUEBEC , J 9P d N9 r is, I 819 , 8?r.-82i?
INTRODUCTION
A horizontal loop electromagnetic survey was carried out over a property owned by Falconbridge Nickel Mines Limited during the period of October 12 to November l, 1982. this property is located in Heenan and Marion townships, province of Ontario.
The purpose of this H.E.M. survey was to locate and define in the field conductive zones already detected by an Input Airborn survey.
PROPERTY. LOCATION AND ACCESS
The property is located at 60 miles South west of the town of Timmins, along Woman River in Heenan and Marion townships, province of Ontario.
The property includes several claims which arc listed at the ?nd of this report.
Access to the property is possible by plane from Yvanhoe Lake located along Highway 101 at 100 kilome ters West of the tpwn of Timmins. From Yvanhoe Lake, it takes approximately one half (j) hour (50 km) to fly to the property.
GEO LA LTEEP M V S l O U ll O O l U U l
- 2 -
GEOPHYSICAL WORK
During the period of October 12 to November l, 1982, a horizontal loop electromagnetic (H.E.M.) survey wa^ carried out over 200 foot grid systems.
A tptal of 34 miles was surveyed with the electromagnetic horizontal loop method, using an Apex Maxmin II, operating at frequencies of 888 and 3,555 Hz with a co|i l separation of 400 feet. Readings were taken at 100 foot intervals, with some details at 50 foot on the anomalies. Calibration of the instrument was done before getting on the property, on non-conductive areas.
DISCUSSION ON THE METHOD
The horizontal loop electromagnetic method is capable of delineating zones of conductivity that could represent, but not necessarily, massive con centrations of minerals having metallic conductive pro perties. The comnjon minerals are pyrite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, nickel (but not sphalerite) and graphite. In certain areas, the overburden is a conductor and this may require a grea,t experience to di fferientiate these various sources of conductivity.
GEO LA LTEEl' H S S l t) HI l li l,'i l U U l
- 3 -
In presence of material having a high magnetic susceptibility, the in-phase component of a H.E.M. survey is affected which changes the shape of the anomaly.
DESCRIPTION AND ^NTERPRETATION
On the H:E.M. map we have located the main axes with a darker line while the weaker conduc tive axes or the doubtful ones, were defined with a lighter line. The conductive areas are defined with hatchured lines.
Many conductive axes were located on the map and in order to simplify the presentation of these axes we have described the main conductive axes in a tabulated form which you will find at the end of this report. The magnetic survey which was previously done by Falconbridge Nickel was used to find out if there was any magnetic association with the H.E.M. anomaly. The weaker H.E.M. anomaly axes are not described but are indicated on the map in case it may help to define the direction of weak conductive minerals. However, these may also be due to conductive overburden.
Based on the geophysical results many anomalies are strong enough to deserve a diamond drill hole. However, some may be explained in the field by trenching, and a geological mapping along these conduc tors will certainly change our recommendations on the diamond drilling program.
G EO LA LTEEi' M Y S i O U ll O C, l O U l
- 4 -
In first priority, we will recommend to drill a geological section near the line 294 E in qrder to intersect anomalies nos.10, 11 and 14. This seems to be the best geophysical bet. However, many qthers deserve to be drilled and we are giving our recommendations in annex. Some anomalies have to be detailed before drilling because they were detected at the limit of the property and/or because we do not know their direction.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the present geophysical results, many diamond drill holes {at least 7) should be performed on this property. Before proceeding with the diamond drilling program, we should do some detailed geophysical wprk, geological mapping and sampling along the H.E.M. anomaly axis. This may change the recommended diamond drilling program.
Respectfully submitted,
ermont Lavoi'e, Ph.DT
GEO LA LT&EPHYSIQUE L O G l Q U E
i--
t-1
to \D J*. n H^
en
en o Z l S , CTN
rt e
n to
o
to A .u
o U)
x,
o
o o f^ Oo g1 1rt 00 H
-
' S ft
VO W Q
. a
o ro
B* w
M
rot-1
-i-
OR
D
O t-1
to N)
S h-1
O
O w i o , vo l 1 O
0 o tt Ul Oo
Ql
p*
vQ tQ
- 3"
o r
t
s ro
S.
R v
pO
^
t"1
pj
vQ Distorsion
by
the
ma lin
g recorrmended
wit
13
S
14
(section). Q
l r-.
q
Ofi
r*
o vo en W H"
VD to ro Z l-
1ji 1 l l 1 tn
o o L
O * S
"
Pi
C.
w b
ro H-
o u
O
t3
O15
v*rt
Distorsion of
E.
M. f
by
the
mag.
ro t -
a ~
n^
o CO to (T*
to n to O to en
O Z 1 ro 1 H--
C
f\ VD r
tco
cr\
In
S.
o o LO g S rt ro tt
(Ti
(Dto
rt
pt
rop
t
toS
o W
Extension
of
ano.3 b
L.
262
S-
264
E
no mag.
Should
be
drilled- Q)
C
w r
t w RR
l---
:rv)
'
' v.
j "
0 -J to Co
CTi W t--
OD
M en
o z M 1 l-1
.e* 1 1 s* O O to Oo 1 .
O |
tJ ro Very weak conductor
ble.
Weak
priority. "8 w en
t-1
- iO
J
0
cr\
to en O W t--
vo en oo O Z 1 ji 1 to l .1
. V K
J O O U
) en o
Pt
CC
ro ve
p, 3- vD
ro o
3 ro j. H
-
^r
Distorsion of
E.
M. f
Extension of
ano.5.
of-phase
mainly.
g S'
rt t
-1i a
L..
0 en to eo
.C
Ti W VO eo O
0 Z 0 l vo 1. 1 1 h-*
O CO en
O
si
i?fD
v0
S
Ml
f CO ro r-feak
conductor.
Depe
on
geology.
B. w
UJ
O
.
to eo en W to
o o 0 4L* 1 oo l -o l l li
eo
o 0 co "b II' y
CS
(if s: p- rt ir E.
M.
field
distorsio
nag, but
possible co
tor. a3 i
e..
O eo to eo 01 W ro
o JE^
O o Z. l en 1 en l i 8*
0 O"\ Oo |g^
0)
H-
s|
^ o o
3
Oro
MIrt 3
5eo
- ^V
Mi
P)
WO
W
Ci
M*
rt
WH
-
O
M CSP
o(D
Q
rr
d
rt ro o"
n v
;
ro
O IO to en to W to
o vo 0 o Z l -j l eo SS
i*
OD
M ON
O O eo "b 1
* M
iTO
b
tog
) tt
ooor
or*
"||B Sw StS 8^ /tea
k prior
ity. Line
should be
surveyed .
ro Ul
O M
CO
O
I "
to CO o W to 4? en
o Z l -j l en
rt
vo o
co
to
o lo ON o o CO en
O 8 ?
?"
a b*
ti
o S
rt
{^
5 O
-~
D
Mt
D 1
23 T
3 P"
^M
"
s^r Possib
le contac
t. Lo
sout
h of
a more
mag
n formatio
n. Depe
nds o D ro
nrt-
Q)
\jQ M
^t
ro o
ro
r
MAP
N
O.
ANO
MAL
Y
LIN
E
STA
TIO
N
I.
%
0.
%
c-T
MHO
S
DEP
TH
LEN
GTH
AZI
MU
TH
MAG
NET
IC
m 3:
.*
-i S
'
-n 4 ICO
"K P o o o Ml
rt
AS
SO
CIA
TIO
N
70
J*
70 m
o
O m l O
2:
V)
PR
IOR
ITY
o
to
to x* o en W M en
o 4- O
0 Z l •e* CO 1 to to
enen S-
o
o o c* o O
0
*ff
o
rt S *
o ff
i en W
n.
H-
M
t-" 8. S M
to CO VO oo w en 4- en
o Z 1 en 1 en l 1 o 0 VD O 0
•O 1 J *
Possible extension of
ano. 22 .
to
o CO oo s: en ^. en
o en i oo l VO M M
en t
o ffA S-
VO o o ^J o o IS \Q
U
j
I to g tr z
j? S
Q,
Q,
K to
(T
i--
ro
O* (
D (D
8-8 C^
f~^"
pj
*H
-M
0
t-ti
Q.
b
O
L
.^. ^
i
VO
.d 0 S en
co 4- O o en l Co CO 1 M vo
CO
CO
*
en e
n
JS.
M o
o o l l
^Q v
JQ
O (
D If g
f *"
Oj {S*
o
*— i*
3 O J H to
H- 0
t—1
-
(P
*^
H-
O en
D I — '
J'
9-*-
co Xi 0 S CO t-* 4- 0
0 en i to to 1 CO 1 1 l-1
o O o I 1 gsc
H- Cn
&D
- (D
0)
- rt i-" Weak
conductivit
y. Depe
on geology. ?i
ro
t— ' Xi
•C^ s: CO 4- O en i to CO 1 K-
f—*
f*- 5
en t 1 l F" 3
K
R {S
H-(T
) tO
\J
Qw
. y Possible
ext sion
of
ano. Mg Depend
s on diamond dril
results recommended on
ano. 13.
M"
N..
l—"
VO O s: M 1—
'to 4- O
O en l to eo i P~J to 1 1 to
o o .c* o o j
3 r^
5 iQ
vQ
j) *
tr Shape of
a IJr
contuctor in
depth .
Direction
not certain.
be
explained
by a
trench
,
T ff
NJ
I—" en o VD 4- o O en i M IO 1 M O M
CON
J
O O O VO Oo to
S
rt Q
ro
"" 2- M
^T
t-h (D
Depends on geological i
formation.
Better on L. 70
W.
D 1
NJ
l—1
to N) S M 4- o
o en i M 1 to -0 1 1 o 0 en en 0 Contac rt
Possible con
tor between no. 13
and 14 . pi
\ffo
o Extension of ano.ll. Ve
good
conductivity on L.
294 E. To be drilled-
M k*-
M
M CO *. W M en 4- o
o Z l ^ . 1 -j M
tOO
rt
enoo
M o o
o o en o O li 5! ri CO
O
Men
cJs
- O
w ?-
In ' ^
ro ^ |sr O 3
i-h 0
5 gs s (St —
'
to to oo to W M
VO
VO 4- o 0 Z 1 -j , i^i M 1 1 N/
to O o J* o o II &J
H*lo
w b
GO (
D h~
*
p^i
rt* r
^
R '
Possible extension of a
no. 13
D O
ro
rv\p
no.
ANOr
iALY
LINE
STAT
ION
2C
i. s
r1
* K
s z,rT
MHO
S -,,
DEPT
H S
L;
LENG
TH
S jiAZ
IMUT
H 0 M
^ rt
MAGN
ETIC
ASSO
CIATIO
N
73
73 ft RECOMMENDATIO
NS
PRIO
RITY
o CI re* M
1 1
-to .C
t
U)
yo Ji. 1-"
en
(ji
0 Z 1 to .
1 1 1 1 1 o
Direction
not
certain.
Weak.
Needs
to
be
detailec
moire
south-east.
LO
to Ul
l-'
CD K 165+
00 N i u
jC
D to en
CTl
.C
t
0 M to O
O U) S
h^
jf^.
fhi-*
n-
CD r
t
W ft
"s H* i
*- J
?M
B)
SK
TJ o a
en
hW
H
-
H*
0?ro
a ss rt
0
S"
3fc to to t -
MAP
N
O.
AN
OflA
LY
LIN
E
STAT
ION
I.
1,
0.
55
c-T
MHO
S
DEPT
H
LENG
TH
i AZIM
UTH
* m * 3: * * -n
jjjP
N
lin JU
l
o ji 0
0 3M
AGN
ETIC
A
SS
OC
IATI
ON
70
30.
RECOMMENDATIONS
PR
IOR
ITY
o
o M
D.D.H. RECOMENDED
(WORK RECOMMENDED)
&RJD ANOMALY
2
8
10
11
13
14
16
19
20
22
23
LINE
292+80 E
295+00 E
354+00 E
294+00 E
40+00 W
406+00 E
418+00 E
STATION
191+80 N
197+00 N
158+00 N
194+50 N
65+50 S
162+00 N
167+00 N
AZIMUTH
156 0
1560
2100
156 0
1800
210 0
2100
DIP
500
500
50 0
50
500
50 0 ^
50 0
LENGTH
400'
600 '
600'
600'
600'
400'
400'
NOTE
Line 250 E should be surveyedHas to be detailed more
southward before drilling
With a trench, we may explain this anomaly
Detail required before drilling
PRIORITY
1
2
1 '
1
1 i
1
1
1
1
1
LIST OF CLAIMS
HEENAN S MARION
Licence
554667 to 554679 incl.
554685 to 554705 incl.
549613 to 549615 incl.
554017 to 554022 incl.
553222 to 553239 incl.
568516 to 568518 incl.555037 to 555040 incl.
628434 to 628445 incl.
619128 to 619132 incl.
536791 to 536793 incl.536851 to 536852 incl.
536782
624001 to 624003 incl.
622299 to 622300 incl.
634522 to 634523 incl.
549240 to 549242 incl.
554500 to 554519 incl.
536916 to 536922 incl.
554011 to 554016 incl.
583862 to 583873 incl.
583876 to 583886 incl.
J.QWNSI1.LPS
Townshi
HeenanHeenanHeenanHeenanMarion
Marion
Marion
MarionMarion
Marion
Marion
Marion
Marion
Marion
Marion
Marion
Marion
Ma r i on
Marion
Marion
Geona
GEO LA LTEEl' H V S l O H ll o ("l l l) li l
GEO LA LTtEPHYSIQUE L O G l Q U E
EXPLORATION - SERVICES
STATEMENT FOR ASSESSMENT WORK
I, the undersigned, Clermont Lavoie, for Geo!a Limited, certify to the following.
A horizontal loop electromagnetic survey (34,0 km) was carried out over a property owned by Falconbridge Nickel Mines Limited during the period of October 12 to Novembre l, 1982.
The property covered by the survey ik includes the claims listed at the end of this report.
H.E.M. instrument: Apex Maxmin IIFrequencies: 888 and 3,555 Hz. Cable: 400 feet Sensitivity: U.
Operators:
(21 days) Andre" Tessier 398, Murdoch Rouyn, Quebec
(21 days) Jean-Paul Cloutier R.R. #1 D'Alembert, Quebec
Respe/ffully submitted,
Clermont Lavoie, Ph.D.
•l
1020, 3e AVENUE EST (ROUTE 117 SUD), C.P. 418, VAL D'OR (QUEBEC) J9P 4P4 T6I.: (819) 825-8212
GEO LA LTtEPHYSIQUE L O G l Q U E
EXPLORATION - SERVICES
CERTIFICATE
I, the. undersigned, Clermont Lavoie, residing at 1148 Girard Avenue, Vat d'Or, Quebec, graduated with a B .Se.A. degree in Geology faom Ecole. Poly- technique in 1 965. I have, obtained a M .Sc.A degree in Geophy&icA from Ecole Polytechnique in 1973, and received a Ph.D. in Geophy&icA firom McGill
in 1972.
2. I am a membet oj( the. OtudeA. o 6 Engine.eAA o6 Quebec, the. Canadian ILn&tituute. o^ Mining and Metallurgy, the. Quebec P/ioApeatoA^ AiiocxAtcon and the. Society 0(5 Exploration Gwphy&ici&ti*,
3. I do no* ho&f, nor do I expect io leeetve, an0(5 am/ .kind in thue. claim held by FALCOWBRItJGE WICKEL MIWES LIMITED------- - - -------- - ---——— ———no-'i in any otheA mining claim* the.y may have..
4. The. interpretation and re.comme.ndatioM de^cribe^ in re.port are. faaied partly on a personal and technical experience, in tlii* di&trict o (J Quebec.
Signed in Val d'Or, thi* fourteenth (14th) day o (J the month 0 (5 December, one -tlioa&and nine hundred and eighty-
avox.e, Ph.V.
low, msl' :,p. 418, VAL D'OR IQUEBEO J9P4P4 T6i.: (819) 825-8212
•41016SWee04 2 .7756 MARION 900
Mining Lands Section
Control Sheet
File No J, 7 75L
TYPE OF SURVEY ^ GEOPHYSICAL
____ GEOLOGICAL
____ GEOCHEMICAL
EXPENDITURE
MINING LANDS COMMENTS:
Signature of Assessor
Date
1985 05 08 Your File:30/85 Our File: 2.7766
Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 237
Dear Sir:
RE: Notice of Intent dated April 17, 1985 Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey on Mining Claims P 536782, et al, In Henan-MaHon Townships4;..^...^.^-1 1^ ^.^...^......^.^^^^
The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.
Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.
Yours sincerely,
S.E. YundtDI rectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888
S. Hurst:mc
cc: Falconbridge LtdTimmins, OntarioAttention: Barry Manchuk
cc: Geo La LteeVal d'Or, Quebec
cc: Mr. G.HJ.FergusonMining A Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario
cc: Resident GeologistTimmins, Ontario
Encl.
Ministry of Natural
•ources
Technical Assessment Work Credits Date
1985 04 17
File2.7756
Mining Recorder's Report of Work^o. 3QX85
Recorded Holder
FALCONBRIDGE LTDTownship or Area
HENAN-MARION TOWNSHIPS
Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical
Other Hays
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Clslmi Aitasud" column
Geological days
Geochemical rfiys
Man days D Airborne C
Special provision H Ground 03
Dt Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
D Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Mining Claims Assessed
P 536782-91-93 536851-52 549240-41-42 553224-25-27-32-33-38 554500-01-02-03-05 554666-67-69-70 554686-87-89-90-91-92-94-95-99 554700 555037 to 040 inclusive 619128-29-30 628434 to 442 inclusive
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey LX) Insufficient technical data filed
P 536792
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:929 I
itario
Ministry ofNaturalResources
1985 04 17 Your File: 30/85 Our File: 2.7756
i-)
Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7Dear Sir:
Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.
Yours sincerely,
E. Yundt Director Land Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3S. Hurst:mc
Encls.cc: Falconbridge Ltd
167 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2T2Attention: Barry Manchuk
cc: Geo La Ltee1020, 3e Avenue EstClermont LauoieC.P. 131Val d'Or, Quebec J9C 4N9
cc: Mr (J.H. FergusonMining l Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario
845
Ministry ofNaturalResources
Ontario
Notice of Intent
for Technical Reports
1985 04 17
2.7756/30/85
An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.
If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.
If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.
If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the-opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.
646 (83/6)
Ontario v
Ministryor Report of WorkResources (Geophysical, Geological,
Geochemical and Expenditures)
Mining Act
Instructions: Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list,Note: — Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr," columns.
- Do not use shaded areas below.*e of SurvcyU)
"Claim Holder (i)~
t~. i-t~~.~ t j
Township or Area
C. oAddress
Prospector's Licence No
Survey Company
G-e. o / . A t^-T E.Z/9 O S -.
'J T^
Name and Address pf Author (of Geo Technical report) ( L fc. f
O U
Total Miles of line CutDate of Survey (from Si to)
J-^Y-L Mo. l Yr. j Day J Mp. | Vr. | 'Previous
H cnJT L- * UO l E
f i?- Sun) C-P. /3ICredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter totalls) here
)
Geophysical
^/~- E lectromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
i Days per Claim
!-- O
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Days per Claim
Airborne C redits
Note: S pecial provisions Electromagnetic credits do not applyto Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence) P ^ o)
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)",..^.Type of Work Performed ^,* ^ ^ ^ i \' '
Performed on C*aim(sV r^\
Vtvi' ^
Calculation of Expendituri Difyi Credit*' , ,\ '' 1-' '•"l '- "'
Total Expenditures \ 0. " "'
S ^ 1
\ N i u ^\so^|\
Total Days Credits
5 =Instructions
Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Mining ClaimPrefix Number
//-C/
Expend. Days Cr.
Mining ClaimPrefix Number
Expend. Days Cr.
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Date Recorded Record
Date
- 7 7Retjfiyseci Holder or,^?gent IS^gnaiurel
ifaJD(Certification Verifying Report of Work
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
o' Person
~11 H A/fate Certified
t// -
ir h h A r ?'l t' h 3? 1ot*h -J y 9 /P i' A 4 1- ? JH'l'-tt 7//.;/** t' ?
A FA- -U" ? o ? i b i v t, r l b l 7/St-/' t ' 9c? A o ei? e(, f a C ? .f
A -1?.*.-
A J?,*?
A -^-C
^ O C /, C C'
•j -f .c; A-c-t'
j? s r ?j?.cj b r r t" p. c3
T:' t f f. f Sl. T: ??f-?
i :-' t' T T' '-" ...fA ir f s" v j" -
^ z o o o ^46 -7 A. ? .f
-CVj "7 A^ A /, 9 A S .C1
C?/,
h? J?
A' .9 .C1
It-'? (*h ff
Qbl' kfr f
i;' 5 x ir j?
l s t ?rj?r^ L i s '.r
J?
1985 02 06 Your File: Our FI Mf 2.7756
Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
He received reports and maps on January 31* 1985 for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims P 636782 et al in the Townships of Heenan, Marion and Geona.
This material will be examined and assessed and astatement of assessment work credits will be Issued.
We do not have a copy of the report of work which 1s normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.
Yours sincerely,
3.1. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block. Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918
A. Barrisc
cc: Falconbridge Limited P.O. Box 40 Commerce Court West Toronto, Ontario MSL 1B4
cc: Falconbridge Limited l67nH11son Avenue Timmins, Ontario P4K 2T2
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
f TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT l FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT [TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s) Township or Area
Claim Holdcr(s)
A)TS y/a/K
Survey Company_
Author of Report.
Address of Author JGA.
Covering Dates of
/S? l f i
!fc. /h- 6. X/a.
Total Miles of Line Cut
---;-inecutting to office^
r* &S
///S/'^Z
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
~, , . ,GeophysicalDAYS
per claim
—Magnetometer—Radiometric
—O ther —————
GeologicalGeochemical
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do riot apply to airborne surveys)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)
DATE:
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix) (number)
Res. Geol.^. __Qualifications_C* . 3 't* ^
Previous Surveys File No. Date Claim Holder
l
TOTAL CLAIMS.
IND
UCE
D P
OLA
RIZ
ATI
ON
RES
ISTI
VIT
YG
RA
VIT
YEL
ECTR
OM
AG
NET
ICM
AG
NET
ICP
7 ^
? h-
Electrode
array .
Electrode
spacing —
Tvne of
electrode
'
? ?
S !
l s
s s
' 1
r i
2- o-
:
q.
T n
s ^
g ?
?ra
ET
- 3
orq
^
r^
--
oS
r 3
3 c
o' 3 r* 3 o
1 t!
-j^
c 3 D?^
!?
B?
••g
Q
O
•B c
-Z
•^
n)
ra
3
3
O
Ov
^
v^ D o g K 5"
Elevation
accuracy —
Tnctriimnif
to
o W5
r* r-*- o' 3 ET
o ft! 3 1 5' — '
1
Corrections made-
c i; ~ B 3 n —* 3
- -~-l"~"~7 -
Parameters
measured.
Tnstriimnit
1
i
VV
' ^ {
V* } s
? ?
\ I
3 rr
i
~-
*Nf*
\ '*
*\ \ ^D AJ S
-
x fJ"
P-
> (
•J -1 ^ x. S-*
i ^
""',
ft:
y^
3\
~"
"V.
"
1^
IT
) B. Vg VI
— 1
0 "^ "^j
vj^
sjv
\ ^
A•o
D o o t-t- cr
n S s 5' o D K ft: 3'
(T!
fe.
Coil
configuration —-
Coil
senaration 0 X-.
- V)
O
"ft-
^ 1 K
3*
y? -*- 3 3 o 3 ^ ^ •-^
J)
j ^ ^^ ^ ^ N N
/
Accuracy — Scale
con Diurna
l correction
rm Base
Station
check-in
Base
Station
location n;
*^ .
^-t.
c/3
i 3
3
D-
C-
r i - 3
z-
^C
"~-o
*^-^ o c -1 ^^
T^ t -1—4 ! ? 1 •^ ^ • -L * ^s -^ x. C •v
•v
7 L i - ^.
3 2 M 3 r*
O
-I
< K
1
|
0 r? ST -l L ra \ h C \y (7
a: t
s*~
5' cr
\r~
s q
?g
f |
|c'
[2;
\ "
faCi C -"
^ ~
V
3
\ UT*
x a: ~ /-s 1
0i
sP
"0o
|T"
W*
j2
f!
J^D
. i*
*
^-
wS
' ^ Cu
^"
"Xo
^
|- 1
8 p
w o^
*j*
k
*c
o* ri
a;
*™i
'"*
W2.
o
^
>3
"^
o "H
15 50
0
^
ft "*1
*l
*^
era
^O
W
v*
-*"X •it 3* *^ o o "•
v AV.
^ ^\
A
b.
j T
J V^'-5 .3
5" 5'3 ^ 3 ^ c5" 5 Z 2. 2 3
- V 4,6 4- V 4 4 7v t O"
7 oo o 3703^ o 3 "7
6, i "l l 3 o
t* A
t, A ?^ ? i 3 1ijf 6^Fi, ^ p
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument_________________________________________ Range.Survey Method————^—-————————-—^^-—^^^^————.^——————.—..—.
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument -———Values measured .
Energy windows (levels)———--—-—.—^--.———^--—--..——.......—^-^—....—.—.-—Height of instrument____________________________Background Count, Size of detector————-—-————————————^^——.^————-——.—.—--—-Overburden .—-^———^^^—..—...-.—.-.——.—.^——^^—^——..—.—.——...——.—..——
(type, depth - include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)\ Type of survey—————.——-^-—————-—————-——-Instrument .-—^-——————————————.—.—————Accuracy——————.^——.^--—-————.————.———.——Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of survey(s)——— Instrument(s) —————
(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy——^———————————
(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used^—^-———.^——^—^—.--———————.————————.
Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude_________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY ~ PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)
Average Sample Weight.—————— Method of Collection-———————
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain—————————
Drainage Development—————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: percent
p. p. m. p.p. b.
nD D
Cu, Pb,
Others_
Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)
Field Analysis (-Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. —————————-
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ———-
Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——
Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory.— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used————-
.tests)
.tests)
-tests)
General. General.
SjO
t l
l l
l
Cib
00 O
\\
:\
SO
\\
i
V,
OQ
lv Lv
00
\\
\\\
\\\
\\
So"
v si:
-4.
r~i
3,0
4*
'
GEOP
HYSIC
AL L
EGEN
D
ELEC
TROM
AGNE
TIC S
URVE
Y
-f H 30
'
of
possib
le
conducto
r
Co
nd
uct
or
axe
Co
nd
uct
or
axe
po
ssib
le
Co
nd
uct
ivity
- T
hic
kne
ss
in
mh
os
De
ep
Pro
file
s
E.M
.H.
In-
Phqie
O
ut-
of-
Ph
qj*
In-P
ho
iS—
.\;V
Out
-o(-
Phai*
AR
EA
O
F S
UR
VE
YLO
CAT
ION
M
AP
FA
LC
ON
BR
IDG
E
LIM
ITE
D
L lnst
:MA
XM
IN
MFr
e'q:
88
8 H
z
GEOL
A LT
EEj.P
Cto
utier
^
Qfl
EXEC
UTE
PAR:
A
Jts
sie
r O
ct. 8
2
HE
EN
AN
ON
TA
RIO
INTE
RPRE
TE
PAR
C. L
avo
ie
Ph
.D.,
Na
*.8
2
DESS
tNE
PAR
: M
. H
ero
vx
No
v.8
2
EC
HE
LLE
: l"
s 4
00'
O BO
' 20
0'
*00'
60
0'
80
0N
TS
. :
4 J 0/6
PLA
N
No
: 8
2-1
30
-O J
4101
6SW
0084
2
.77
56
M
AR
ION
200
r
GEOP
HYSIC
AL L
EGEN
D
ELEC
TROM
AGNE
TIC S
URVE
Y
Are
a of p
ossi
ble
cond
ucto
r
—y—
C
ondu
ctor
axe
~~~X
T C
ondu
ctor
ax
o po
ssib
le
15
Con
duct
ivity
- Thi
ckne
ss
in
mho
s30
'
Pro
files
E
-M, H
.
Ph
oi*
O
ul-
of-
Ph
o**
In-P
ha
s*-
*!
——
'
l M
••H
fc
ir
fr
AREA OF SURVEY
LOCATION MAP
POUR
: FA
LCO
NB
RID
GE
LI
MIT
ED
LEV
E:
lnst
:MA
XM
IN
11 Fr
e'q:
88
8 Hz
. C
able
:400
'
PAR:
GEO
L A
LTEE
. -
J. P
. CI o
ut iff
•X
ECU
T6
MR
. A
J*sti*r
Ocf-
82
INTE
RPRE
TE
PAR
; C
.Lo
vOl'e
P
hD, ,
No
v.8
2
06SS
INE
PAR
i M.H
erou
x N
ov. 8
2
ApP
tOU
VE
W
R'^
^y^L-U
v fi
REVI
SE
PAR
i
PLA
N
No:
N
.T.5
.: S
2-13
O-O
3 41
O/6
PROJ
ET:
HE
EN
AN
ON
TAR
IO
LAT:
47*
47
' |
LON
G:
829
W^
" fr
*t-
lCt W
1
**
—
4' A
tfS
* -
' L.
. u
,~E
Cn
cLtt
: T
s4U
O0
10
0'
20
ff
*tt
f 6
00
*^0
0'
•:
. "j
. -
J -
i*
- —
-.
-^fc
ir
.--'*-
•-
* •i* '
-••-f
- A .
.'-^
-- ..
. J
. :-:;
i-
/'"j
^•*.^
. ''-
f S
*• •
.4-^
iMM
•" ^
•- "i
' "-
^1
A . ,
-;.^
,'jJ
" -j*B '
i.
--**-t
S.
-. "
-.:^
J
41016SW8004 2.7756 MARION
r
GEOP
HYSI
CAL
LEGE
ND
ELEC
TROM
AGNE
TIC S
URVE
Y
fc—
4101
6SW
00C
K
2.7
75
6
MA
RIO
N2
20
AREA OF SU
RVEY
LOCATION MAP
DES
ROSI
ERS
11 o. t
r
15
30*
of
po
ssib
le
con
du
cto
r
Co
nd
uct
or
axe
Con
duct
or
axe
po
ssib
le
Con
duct
ivity
- Th
ickn
ess
in m
ho
s
Pro
file
s E
M.H
.
Ou
t-o
f-P
ho
*e
1 1h" "
X ;4-
; ••' ^ O
ut -
of-
PK
osi
i,
POUR
FA
LCO
NB
RID
GE
LI
MIT
ED
LEV
E:
InsT
iMA
XM
tN
li Fr
e'q:
355
5 H
z.
PA
R:
GEOL
A LT
EE.
- J.P
CIo
utier
EXEC
UTE
PAR
: A
.Ussie
r O
ct. 82
INTE
HPR
ETE
PAR
C. L
ayo
ff P
hJ)
.,N
o*.
82
DE
SS
INE
PA
R : M
. H
&ow
e N
ov. 8
2
AP
PR
OU
VE
PA
R'- g
t+tt
fitb
m*. vt*
REV
ISE
PAR
-
PLAN
N
o:
82- 1
30-0
2N
T.S
. :
41 O
/6
PRO
JET:
Cab
le: 4
00'
HE
EN
AN
ON
TAR
IO
LAT
: 47
* 4
7'
EC
HE
llE :
0 TO
O'
200'
4
PM
S^H
^—
LONG
: 82
* 21
'
i**
* jif
trt*
-
- — '
X)'
600'
80
0'r
i ' j
. . ,
; '"* f
'1
' -''-
i
J
- -4
.
*^ j
"' 1?
*^c
r
410I6SW0804 2.7756 MARION
230
AREA
OF
SU
RVE
YLO
CAT
ION
M
AP
GEOP
HYSIC
AL L
EGEN
D -
ELEC
TROM
AGNE
TIC S
URVE
Y
Are
a
of p
oss
ible
conduct
or
—fe
- C
ondu
ctor
ax
e
-^r-
C
onduct
or
axe
poss
ible
15
Con
duct
ivity
- Th
ickn
ess
in m
hos
30'
Pro
files
E.M
.H,
In -
P
ho
t*
Ou
t-Q
t-P
.haj
/' '"i' O
ut-
of-
Ptio
sa
50%
= 1
po.
POUR
: FA
LCO
NB
RID
GE
LI
MIT
ED
LEV
E:
lnst
:MA
XM
lN
II F
req:
3555
Hz.
C
able
^QO
'
PA
R:
EXE'C
UTE
PAR:
Aj
f5S
GEOL
A LT
EE
^
Oct
82
P
RO
JE
T:
INTE
RPRE
TS
PAR,
C.la
vo
fe P
kD.,N
o*.8
2 H
EE
NA
N
DE
SS
INE
PA
R -. M
.Hero
ux
No
v.8
?
AP
PR
OU
VE
' P
AR
^^
RE
VtS
fi P
AR
.
PLA
N
No:
82
-130
-O4
1.
——
——
——
47**
l
LAT:
47
*47
' LO
NG
; ^7
* .?
/'
— —
——
——
——
—
ECHE
LLE
; 1"
:400
' N
T, S
.: o
top1
200'
40CL
60
0' ao
o"
^7 O
/6