GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment)

CLASSIFICATION (U)

GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment)

Program Manager Name

Review Date

PROGRAM NAME

The PEO/PM is responsible for ensuring that all files are properly marked with the correct classifications in accordance with SECNAV M-5510.36.

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Key Performance Parameters

Program Requirements

PARAMETER STATUS

Improving Constant Degrading

Legend

Meets Objective

Meets Threshold

Below Threshold

KPP Threshold Performance Objective Status/Basis

Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

Basis Legend

E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data | L = Legacy

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Program Requirements

PARAMETER STATUS

Legend

Meets Objective

Meets Threshold

Below Threshold


KSAs / Other Attributes

KSA Status/Basis Other Attribute Status/

Basis


PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Program Resources

BUDGET AND PLANNINGProgram Funding & Quantities

($ in Millions / Then Year)Prior Years

Current Year

FYDP Yr 1

FYDP Yr 2

FYDP Yr 3

FYDP Yr 4

FYDP Yr 5

FYDP Yr 6

FYDP Yr 1- 6 To Comp Total

RDT&ECurrent $ (PB 08) 5.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 31.0 10.0 47.0Required $ 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 18.0 9.0 28.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) 5.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 1.0 19.0

PROCUREMENTCurrent $ (PB 08) 5.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 31.0 10.0 47.0Required $ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) 5.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 31.0 1.0 38.0

O&MCurrent $ (PB 08) 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 43.0 5.0 53.0Required $ 1.0 3.0 5.0 2.0 9.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 30.0 2.0 36.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) 1.0 0.0 (1.0) 3.0 (2.0) 6.0 3.0 4.0 13.0 3.0 17.0

MPCurrent $ (PB 08) 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 55.0 15.0 79.0Required $ 5.0 6.0 0.0 6.0 11.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 57.0 17.0 85.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) (1.0) (1.0) 6.0 1.0 (2.0) (4.0) (1.0) (2.0) (2.0) (2.0) (6.0)

MILCONCurrent $ (PB 08) 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 43.0 20.0 68.0Required $ 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 33.0 15.0 55.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10.0 5.0 13.0

TOTALCurrent $ (PB 08) 18.0 13.0 18.0 23.0 33.0 38.0 43.0 48.0 203.0 60.0 294.0Required $ 9.0 14.0 12.0 16.0 26.0 24.0 28.0 32.0 138.0 52.0 213.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) 9.0 (1.0) 6.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 65.0 8.0 81.0TOC Objective $ 17.5 13.2 17.0 21.2 31.8 35.5 40.0 44.8 190.3 49.0 270.0 Delta $ (TOC Objective - Current) (0.5) 0.2 (1.0) (1.8) (1.2) (2.5) (3.0) (3.2) (12.7) (11.0) (24.0)

QUANTITIESCurrent (PB 08) 31 25 34 43 61 70 79 88 375.0 0 431Required Qty 18 27 22 30 50 45 52 59 258.0 0 303 Delta Qty (Current - Required) 13 (2) 12 13 11 25 27 29 117 0 128

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Program Resources

Obligations and Expenditures

BUDGET AND PLANNING

Legend

Greater than or equal to

benchmark

1% to <10% below the

benchmark

Greater than 10% below benchmark


Appropriation Cateogry Obligation Expenditure Obligation Expenditure Obligation ExpenditureO&M 100% ---- N/A ---- N/A ----RDT&E 80% 55% 100% 90% N/A ----Procurement 80% ---- 96% ---- 100% ----Advance Proc 100% ---- N/A ---- N/A ----

First Year AvailableCumulative Second Year

AvailableCumulative Third Year

Available

Not Applicable

FY07 OBL/EXP FY08 OBL/EXP FY09 OBL/EXP

RDT&ENOPNSCN/APNWPNO&M, N/MCMPNMILCONPANMCPMC

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Program Resources

MANNINGStaffing Adequacy


Legend

Not Applicable Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria

Does Not Meet Criteria

Contractor Support ServicesMilitary Civilian

OverallProgram Management Y G R G G G G G G G G G G G G Y G G

Engineering Y G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G

Logistics G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G

Test and Evaluation G G G R G G G G G G R G G G G G G G

Contract Management G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G

Financial Management G G G G G G G G G Y G G G G G R G G

Cost Analysis G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G

Depots / Centers G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G

Capability / Resources G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G

G GY G G G

# of Staff Skill of StaffPrevious Current Future Previous Current Future

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Program Resources

MANNING

Staffing Adequacy

SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADERS / PROJECT MANAGERS

O-5/6 / PAYBAND III

NOTE: BREAKOUT BY MAJOR PRODUCT ELEMENT

NOTE: BREAKOUT BY MAJOR PRODUCT COMPONENT’S SUBSYSTEM ELEMENTS

MAY BE ALIGNED WITH PROGRAM OFFICE OR OTHER COMPETENCIES

PAPM / TOC Reduction MANAGER

PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD T&E

PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD BFM

PROGRAM MANAGERDEPUTY PROGRAM MANAGER

ALIGNED WITH OTHER COMPETENCIES AND ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO PROGRAM OFFICE

PAPM / IPT LEADER OF

MAJOR PRODUCT “X”


MAJOR PRODUCT “Y”


MAJOR PRODUCT “N”

. . . . .

. . . . .

FUNCTIONAL LEAD SE

FUNCTIONAL LEAD COST

FUNCTIONAL LEAD CONT

FUNCTIONAL LEAD LEGAL

PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEMIPT LEADER






COMMON ACROSS ALL SYSCOMS

SUB-PRODUCT LEVEL POSITIONS

POSITIONS ALIGNED TO THE PROGRAM OFFICE (PO)POSITIONS ALIGNED TO THE FUNCTIONAL COMPETENCY AND ASSIGNED TO THE POPOSITIONS THAT ARE EITHER

POSITIONS THAT ARE MISSION FUNDED

POSITIONS THAT CAN BE MISSION FUNDED OR WCF

“CO

RE”

PR

OG

RA

M O

FFIC

E“S

UB

-PR

OD

UC

T” L

EVEL

“CORE” FUNCTIONS

REPORTING ALIGNMENT

FUNDING ALIGNMENT MODEL

Program Management Office Framework

PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD LOG

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

TOTAL OWNERSHIP COST ESTIMATING

Event Rating RationalePost-IOC/FDD cost estimates and the projection of the TOC Objective versus SCP baseline are substantiated by assessed fielded systems performance, operations, and sustainment related expenditure to date.

Post-IOC/FDD Cost Estimating


Legend

Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria


Program Planning / Execution

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

T&E Item Rating RationaleMajor deficiencies identified in IOT&E and/or FOT&E reports are available for review.

Approved Test Plans for correction of deficiencies and/or system modifications are aligned with deployment and sustainment strategies and schedules.

TEST AND EVALUATIONProgram Planning / Execution

Test and Evaluation Status


Legend



PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

TEST AND EVALUATION

Note: This slide should be used to report on Operational Test Agency (OTA) findings of deficiency. If all deficiencies are resolved, delete this slide.


Deficiency Rating/Basis Rationale

Vehicle failed to meet Radar Detection Range Threshold

Single Engine Acceleration below threshold

Legend



Status of Major T&E Deficiencies


PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Technology Assessment Maturity Summary

(As Applicable)

TECHNICAL MATURITYProgram Planning / Execution


Basis LegendTRL Legend

Does Not Meet TRL 8

Does Not Meet TRL 9

Previous CurrentE = Estimated | C = Calculated

T = Test Data | L = Legacy LV = Level B = Basis

Key

Critical Technology Elements

Previous Gate Current

TRL MRL IRL TRL MRL IRL

LV B LV B LV B LV B LV B LV B

Rotors 8 C 8 C 8 C 9 T 9 T 8 C

Propulsion 8 E 8 E 8 T 9 E 9 T 8 T

Actuators 8 C 7 C 8 C 9 C 9 T 8 T

UHF Antenna Assembly 7 T 8 T 8 E 8 T 8 E 8 E

Digital Receiver 8 C 8 C 7 C 8 T 8 T 8 T

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

TECHNICAL MATURITYProgram Planning / Execution

PCA and ISR Technical Assessment Summary

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

FY xx FY x1 FY x2 FY x3 FY x4 FY x5

Criti

cal R

eque

st fo

r Act

ion

ClosedTotal

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

FY xx FY x1 FY x2 FY x3 FY x4 FY x5No

n-Cr

itica

l Req

uest

for A

ctio

n

ClosedTotal

SETR Event SETR Date Close-Out Date

Critical Requests for Action Non-Critical Requests for Action

Total Open Closed Total Open Closed

PCAISR

Creation Date

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Sustainment Item Rating RationaleSustainment program logistically supports all system performance capabilities introduced to date, such that KPP/KSA capability parameters are assessed to meet threshold levels.

The Sustainment Program is executing per the LCSP/LRFS.

Sustainment related performance metrics are measured, assessed, reported, and used to revise Sustainment Program planning and execution.

Supply Chain Management to include a program of DMSMS is operating effectively to support operations and maintenance.

SUSTAINMENTProgram Planning / Execution

Legend




Sustainment and Logistics Activities Page 1 of 2

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Sustainment Item Rating RationaleMaintenance is operating to specified levels of repair and is supporting operations.

The training system is operating to plan, is supporting the manpower KPP threshold (if applicable), and is supporting operations and maintenance.

Facilities are in place and environmentally ready to support scheduled systems fielding, deployment, operations, and maintenance.


Sustainment and Logistics Activities

Legend




Page 2 of 2

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Independent Logistics Assessment Item Rating Rationale

ILS Management

Budgeting and Funding

Maintenance Planning/Execution

Design Interface

RAM Maturity Growth

Supply Support

Support and Common Equipment

Human Systems Integration (MPT&E)

Facilities & Platform Integration

Safety & Environment

Product/Technical Data

Computer Resources & SW Support

PHS&T


Legend

Supports Activities Some Gaps Exist Significant Gaps

Exist

Independent Logistics Assessment


PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

SOFTWARESoftware Sub-Metric Ratings


Sub-Metric Events Rating Rationale

Organization

Software sustainment capability (e.g. SSA), facilities, and infrastructure have been established and are supporting systems operations. Experienced software maintenance staff are in place and are being retained.

Quality

Software sustainment is being conducted, as detailed in the LCSP, and is being tracked, analyzed, and reported per established software metrics.

Legend




PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Size / Stability Sub-Metric

Software Size / Stability Remarks / Notes


SOFTWARE

Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the

data table may allow.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Jan.

Feb.

Mar

.

Apr.

May

June Ju

l.

Aug.

Sep.

Oct

.

Nov

.

Dec

.

Date

Num

ber o

f Sof

twar

e U

nits

Planned Units

Actual Units

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Organization Sub-Metric

Software Organization


Remarks / Notes

SOFTWARE



0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Post IB

R

Post C

DRCPD

Pre FRP

Sustai

nmen

t

Pers

onne

l

Total (P lanned)Total (Actual)Experienced (P lanned)Experienced (Actual)

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Cost/Schedule Sub-Metric

Software Cost/Schedule


Remarks / Notes

SOFTWARE



-50

0

50

100

150

200

250

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percentage Complete (%)

Cum

ulat

ive

Valu

es ($

in M

illio

ns)

Actual Costs (AC)P lanned Value (P V)Earned Value (EV)Budget at Completion (BAC)

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Quality Sub-Metric

Software Quality


Remarks / Notes

SOFTWARE



0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Jan.

Feb.

Mar

.

Apr.

May

Jun.

Jul.

Aug.

Sep.

Oct

.

Nov

.

Dec

.

Date

Num

ber o

f Tro

uble

Rep

orts

Total Trouble ReportsTrouble Reports OpenedTrouble Reports Closed

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION

Contract Execution Breakdown

Contractor/Government Performer Rating Rationale

Contractor/Government Performer 1



Legend




Criteria: Contractor/government work performance is meeting program performance metrics and contractual delivery requirements in accordance with scheduled milestones.

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Contractor/Government Performer 1 Rating



Legend





PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

($400,000)

($300,000)

($200,000)

($100,000)

$0

$100,000

$200,000

$300,000

$400,000

Jul-0

4

Aug-0

4

Sep-0

4

Oct-04

Nov-04

Dec-04

Jan-0

5

Thou

sand

s of

Dol

lars

Cost Variance $104,505 Sched Variance ($69,500) Mgmt Reserve $295,000

10% Thresholds PM VAC $318,321 CONTR VAC $0




Contractor 1 Earned Value Metrics

CPI/SPI Legend

>= 0.95 >= 0.90 and < 0.95 < .90

TCPI Legend

| TCPI-CPI | <= 0.05

| TCPI-CPI |<= 0.10 and

> 0.05| TCPI-CPI |

> 0.10

CPI/SPI SummaryCPI SPI TCPI

Jul 2009 0.90 0.92 1.02

Jun 2009 0.93 0.94 1.02

May 2009 0.95 0.96 1.00

Apr 2009 0.97 0.97 1.00

Mar 2009 0.98 0.96 1.00

Feb 2009 1.21 0.96 1.00

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)




Estimates at Completion

$1,500,000

$1,600,000

$1,700,000

$1,800,000

$1,900,000

$2,000,000

1

$ IN

THO

USAN

DS

CUM CPI………………. $1,709,621

CPI*SPI…………………. $1,757,665

CBB…………………….. $1,798,668

LRE……….…………….. $1,798,668

PM EAC………………… $1,800,000

N00019-03-C-9999

Scheduled Completion Date: Dec 2007

Time Now

ABC CorpCORPORATION (IS)

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Non-EVMS Contract Status

Metric ValueSchedule Used / Allocated:

Budget Used / Allocated:

Behind Schedule (Y/N):

Overspending (Y/N):




PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Contractor Performance Assessment Report

B Exceptional P Very Good G Satisfactory Y Marginal R Unsatisfactory

► No Change ▲ Improving ▼ Degrading




B Outstanding P Excellent G Good Y Satisfactory R Unsatisfactory

CPAR Legend

Item: (CPAR or IPAR) IPAR IPAR IPAR CPAR IPAR IPAR IPAR IPAR IPARPeriod Ending: MM/YYYY Sep '08 Apr '08 Sep '08 Apr '08 Sep '08 Apr '08 Sep '08 Apr '08 Sep '08Months Covered: NR 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

Areas to Evaluate a. Technical (Quality of Product) Y ▼ G ► G ► G ► G ► Y ▼ G ► G ► G ► 1. Product Performance G ► G ► B ▼ G ► G ► G ► G ► Y ▲ G ► 2. Systems Engineering G ► G ► G ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► B ▲ 3. Software Engineering G ► Y ▼ G ► G ► G ► P ▲ G ► G ► G ► 4. Logistics Support/Sustainment G ▼ G ► G ► Y ▲ G ► G ► R ▲ G ► P ▲ 5. Product Assurance G ► B ► G ► G ► B ▲ Y ▼ G ► G ► G ► 6. Other Technical Performance G ► P ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► G ►b. Performance Y ▼ G ► R ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► Y ▲ 1. Schedule G ► G ► Y ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ▼ G ▲ G ► 2. Cost Control G ► G ► G ► B ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► G ►c. Management P ▲ G ► G ► G ► Y ▼ G ► G ► G ► G ► 1. Management Responsiveness G ► R ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► Y ▲ G ► G ► 2. Subcontract Management G ► G ► G ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► P ▼ G ► 3. Program Mgmt. and Other Mgmt. R ▲ G ► G ▲ G ► P ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ►d. Other Areas G ► Y ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ▲ G ► G ► G ► 1. Communications G ► G ► G ► B ▼ G ► R ► G ► G ► G ► 2. Risk Management G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► G ▼ G ► G ►

Contract Number: 123456789Estimated Completion Date: MM/DD/YYYYContract Start Date: MM/DD/YYYYContractor: Contractor Name 1

Program: Program Name

IPAR Legend

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

EVMS Contractor Staffing Plan / Execution




-12,000.00

-10,000.00

-8,000.00

-6,000.00

-4,000.00

-2,000.00

0.00

2,000.00

4,000.00

6,000.00

8,000.00

May

-08

Jun-

08

Jul-0

8

Aug-

08

Sep-

08

Oct

-08

Nov

-08

Dec

-08

Jan-

09

Feb-

09

Mar

-09

Apr-

09

May

-09

Jun-

09

Jul-0

9

Aug-

09

Sep-

09

Oct

-09

Nov

-09

Previous Month's Plan Actual Last Month's 6 Month Projection

Current 6 Month Projection Delta to Last Month's Plan Cumulative Delta

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

EVMS Work Package Status




Task Execution Status

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Jan-07

Feb-07

Mar-07

Apr-07

May-07

Jun-07

Jul-07

Aug-07

Sep-07

Oct-07

Nov-07

Dec-07

Jan-08

Feb-08

Mar-08

Apr-08

Contract Period of Performance

Num

ber o

f Tas

ks

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

% o

f Tot

al T

asks

in IM

S

Finish Early

Finish On Time

Finish Lessthan OneMonth LateFinish OverOne MonthLateIncomplete

Cum Planned% of Total

Cum Actual %of Total

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Government Performance Assessment

Event Rating RationaleProgram Office releases funding to contractor(s)/government performer(s) to maintain program schedules and to ensure effective and timely logistics and sustainment products and services.

RMB has been established. Risks are being mitigated per established timelines and are not being realized as issues.


Legend




GOVERNMENT PROGRAM OFFICE PERFORMANCE

PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

Legend




Sub-metric Events Rating RationaleSupply Chain Risk Management (SCRM)

SCRM is active and continually assessing supply chain threats associated with design, procurement, and life cycle sustainment.

TECHNOLOGY PROTECTIONStatus of Technology Protection Sub-Metrics


PROGRAM NAME

GATE 6 Sustainment

(PoPS)

DATE

CLASSIFICATION (U)

External Influencers

INTERDEPENDENCIES

Solid denotes current systemDash denotes future system

Arrow to Program XYZ denotes supports Program XYZArrow from Program XYZ denotes Program XYZ supportsIndicates program are interdependent

No known issues affecting inter-related programs

Resolvable interface issues affecting programs

Unresolvable interface issues affecting programs

Program H

Program I (upgrades)

Program J

Program K

Program L

Program M

Program A

Program B

Program C

Program D

Program E

Program F

Program G

Program XYZ

Program XYZ

C S P

Programs, plus major public/private Sustainment infrastructure Interdependencies

Documents

GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment)