31
GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

GASB Update

Presented by

Corey Arvizu

February 17, 2011Prescott, Arizona

Page 2: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

2

Intangible Assets

• Internally generated software – capitalize only application development costs

• Water rights may or may not be amortized – see related agreements Planned renewals and/or minimum renewal costs

may result in indefinite life

• Reported as capital assets – may or may not need separate presentation in note disclosure

• Application not required for immaterial items

Page 3: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

3

Fund Balance Reporting

GASB position – Most utilized element of governmental financial

information Extensive research and due process completed on

this standard Provides criteria for new fund balance

classifications Clarifies fund type definitions Effective for fiscal year June 30, 2011

Page 4: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

4

Less restrictive More restrictive

Current Standar

ds

New Standar

ds

Current Practice

Effect of Special Revenue Fund Clarifications

Page 5: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

5

Fund Balance Reporting

Required note disclosures Fund balance policies for committed and assigned Fund balance classification usage “sequence” or “priority” Information about encumbrances Detail of balances if not presented on the face of the balance

sheet Information on stabilization accounts or “rainy day funds” Minimum fund balance policies

Prior year must be restated if presented See disclosure checklist attached

Page 6: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

6

General Fund

Highway Fund

School Aid Fund

Other Funds Total

Fund Balances:Nonspendable:

Long-term receivables, inventory, and prepaid items 225,000$ 108,000$ 16,000$ -$ -$ 12,000$ 361,000$

Permanent fund principal 152,000 152,000 Restricted for:

Social services 240,000 240,000 Parks and recreation 80,000 80,000 Education 55,000 55,000 Highways 444,000 444,000 Pothole repairs 24,000 24,000 Debt service revenue 206,000 206,000 School construction 301,000 301,000 Law enforcement 60,000 214,000 274,000 Other capital projects 51,000 51,000 Other purposes 30,000 45,000 75,000

Committed to:Regulatory boards 16,000 16,000 Economic stabilization 210,000 210,000 Education 50,000 103,000 153,000 Health and welfare 125,000 125,000

Assigned to:Parks and recreation 50,000 26,000 76,000 Library acquisitions 50,000 50,000 Highway resurfacing 258,000 258,000 Debt service 306,000 306,000 Public pool 121,000 121,000 City Hall renovation 60,000 60,000 Other capital projects 50,000 471,000 521,000 Other purposes 80,000 73,000 105,000 258,000

Unassigned: 525,000 525,000 Total fund balances 1,846,000$ 390,000$ 192,000$ 512,000$ 1,448,000$ 554,000$ 4,942,000$

MajorSpecial Revenue Funds

Major Capital Projects

Fund

Major Debt

Service Fund

Page 7: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

7

General Fund

Highway Fund

School Aid Fund

Other Funds Total

Fund Balances:Nonspendable 225,000$ 108,000$ 16,000$ -$ -$ 164,000$ 513,000$ Restricted 465,000 24,000 206,000 796,000 259,000 1,750,000 Committed 401,000 103,000 504,000 Assigned 230,000 258,000 73,000 306,000 652,000 131,000 1,650,000 Unassigned 525,000 525,000

Total fund balances 1,846,000$ 390,000$ 192,000$ 512,000$ 1,448,000$ 554,000$ 4,942,000$

Major Major Debt

Service Fund

Major Capital Projects

Fund

Special Revenue Funds

Page 8: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

8

Fund Balance Reporting

Implementation Pointers Restricted, committed and assigned take precedent

over nonspendable reporting Actions to commit resources needs to occur prior to

year end Amount however may be determined after

Fund balance policies should not be vague Stabilization arrangements may not be assigned –

either restricted or committed General ledger and financial statements may differ

Page 9: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

9

Fund Balance Reporting

Implementation Pointers Statutory revenue sources “Significant” revenue threshold for special revenue

fundsMay be less than 50%

Investment income on restricted revenues No encumbrance classification – incorporate into

other categories Modify statistical section template for CAFR

Page 10: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

10

Fund Balance Reporting

Fund Balance Policy Appropriate level, typically percentage of revenues

or expenditures Two months of expenditures

Circumstances in which fund balance may be spent Unanticipated shortfall in excess of ….

Policy for replenishing deficiencies Sales taxes over 5 years

Page 11: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

11

Codification of FASB Standards

• Issued December 2010• Guidance to incorporate pre-1989 FASB and

related standards into GASB’s literature• Exposure draft over 600 pages • Option to apply post-1989 FASB removed• Effective for fiscal year June 30, 2013

Page 12: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

12

Codification of FASB Standards

• Key areas for which guidance is provided – Capitalization of Interest Cost Statement of Net Assets Classification Accounting Changes and Error Corrections Contingencies Leases Sale of Real Estate

Page 13: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

13

Crosswalk provided in exposure draft – not in standard

Page 14: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

14

Service Concession Arrangements

Issued November 2010 Guidance for certain agreements between

governments and private entities or other governments

GASB partnered with international standard setters in development

Flowchart included in standard Effective fiscal year 2013

Page 15: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

15

Service Concession Arrangements

Definition –

1) Government conveys to an operator right to provide services through use of asset/facility in exchange for significant consideration,

2) The operator collects fees from third parties for service provided, and

3) The government has input on services provided by the operator and the fees charged for services.

Page 16: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

16

Service Concession Arrangements

Examples –

1) State transportation department entering into arrangement with a transportation authority for the operation of a tollway

2) City entering into arrangement with a private company for the operation of City owned golf courses

3) County entering into an arrangement for a City to design, build and operate a new jail facility

Page 17: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

17

Service Concession Arrangements

Provides guidance on capital asset recognition and depreciation by the government

Recognition of liabilities for obligations under the arrangement

Guidance for govermental operators to recognize intangible assets (right to use factilty)

Note disclsoure requirements

Page 18: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

18

Component Units

• Issued November 2010 • Objective – amend component unit guidance

for specific issues which have arisen• Modifies certain requirements for inclusion of

component units• Effective for fiscal year June 30, 2013

Page 19: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

19

Component Units

• New blending requirement if CU total debt to be repaid from PG resources

• “Incomplete” removed from misleading guidance

• Enhanced guidance on “major” component unit presentation

• Note disclosure should focus on rationale for inclusion rather than the criteria Explain which criteria apply to the component unit

Page 20: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

20

it

Component unit flowchart

“Incomplete” removed from criteria

Debt repayment requirement added

Additional financial criteria added

Page 21: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

21

Pension Accounting and Reporting

Governments may be required to report its pro-rata share of the pension plan’s unfunded obligations

Will be applicable to nearly all Arizona governments

Many governments will report liabilities in the tens of millions of dollars

Numerous comment letters provided to GASB, including one from ASRS

Exposure draft to be issued this summer

Page 22: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

22

Other GASB Projects

• In research or deliberation – Conceptual framework OPEB accounting and

reporting Economic condition reporting

– fiscal sustainability Electronic financial reporting Fair value measurements Fiduciary responsibilities Financial guarantees Government combinations

• Monitoring or on work plan – Statement 34 implementation OPEB implementation Financial performance

measurements Popular reporting Compensated absences Debt refunding Risk financing

Page 23: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

23

The Future of GASB

• SEC concerns – Municipal bonds market and GAAP reporting

• Opposition from GFOA• Funding sources• Constituents’ concerns with OPEB and

pension reporting• International standard setting

Page 24: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

24

Audit Standards Update

Page 25: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

25

Internal Control Deficiencies

• Consistency with pubic company definitions• New definition for significant deficiency• Changed guidance on “prudent official test”• Clarified level of work to be performed on

compensating controls• Effective for fiscal year June 30, 2010

Page 26: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

26

Internal Control Deficiencies

New definition of significant deficiency

“…less than severe than material weakness, yet important enough to merit the attention of those charged with governance.”

Page 27: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

27

Supplementary Information

• Additional guidance for “in-relation” information Examples – combining section of CAFR, schedule

of expenditure of federal awards, other related schedules

• Very limited guidance in current standards• Three standards developed to address• Effective for fiscal year June 30, 2012

Page 28: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

28

Supplementary Information

• Suggested procedures – Information derived from the same underlying

accounting records used for financial statements Relates to the same period Auditor served as the principal auditor Neither adverse or disclaimer of opinion issued on

financial statements Inquire as to reporting criteria used Obtain representations from management

Page 29: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

29

New Auditors’ Report Language

The combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements.  The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures…

Page 30: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

30

Governmental Audit Quality Center

Communication with regulators and other stake holders

Comment letters to standard setters Tack force committees in response to single

audit study Development of practice aids and resources Development of trainings for webcasts and

conferences Timely email alerts on governmental audit issues

Page 31: GASB Update Presented by Corey Arvizu February 17, 2011 Prescott, Arizona

31

Thank You

Corey Arvizu(520) 742-2611, ext. 101

[email protected]