Upload
stan-holland
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
1/105
CAUTIONARYNOTETO INVESTORS
Proved, Pr obable and Possibl e Reserves
Proved (P90) reserves are estimated quantities of oil and gas that, by analysis of geoscience and
engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date
forward and recoverable in future years from known reservoirs and under existing economic conditions, operating
methods, and governmental regulations, prior to the expiration of the contracts providing the right to operate, unless
evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain. Proved developed reserves are reserves that can be expected
to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods, or in which the cost of the
required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well, and through installed extraction
equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not
involving a well. Proved undeveloped reserves are reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells onundrilled acreage or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Proved
undeveloped reserves on undrilled acreage are limited to: (i) those directly offsetting development spacing areas that
are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes
reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances; and (ii) other undrilled locations if a
development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the
specific circumstances justify a longer time.
Probable (P50) and possible (P10) reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be
recovered than proved reserves but which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered. Whendeterministic methods are used, it is as likely as not that actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum
of estimated proved plus probable reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50%
probability that the actual quantities recovered will equal or exceed the P50 reserves estimates, and a 10%
probability that the actual quantities recovered will equal or exceed the P10 reserves estimates. Probable and
possible reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to proved reserves where data control or
interpretations of available data are less certain, even if the interpreted reservoir continuity of structure or
productivity does not meet the reasonable certainty criterion. Probable and possible reserves may be assigned to
areas that are structurally higher than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.
Probable and possible reserves estimates also include potential incremental quantities associated with a greater
t f th h d b i l th d f d
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
2/105
t f th h d b i l th d f d
The DirectorsFX Energy Inc.3006 Highland Drive 206Salt Lake City,Utah 84106United States of America
BNP Paribas (Suisse)Place de Hollande 2Ch-1204 GenevaSwitzerland
ING Bank N.VBijlmerplein 8881102 MG
AmsterdamThe Netherlands
ECV2060
25thFebruary 2014
Dear Sirs,
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
3/105
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
4/105
Qualifications
RPS is an independent consultancy specialising in petroleum reservoir evaluation and economicanalysis. The provision of professional services has been solely on a fee basis. Mr GordonTaylor, Director, Geoscience for RPS Energy, has supervised the evaluation. Mr. Taylor attendedthe University of Birmingham and graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in GeologicalSciences in 1978 and a Master of Science degree in Foundation Engineering in 1979. Mr. Tayloris a Chartered Geologist and Chartered Engineer in the UK and an AAPG Certified PetroleumGeologist (No 5932); he has in excess of 35 years experience in the hydrocarbon exploration andproduction industry including the conduct of evaluation studies relating to oil and gas fields. Mr.Taylor has not, directly or indirectly, received an interest, and he does not expect to receive aninterest, direct or indirect, in FX Energy, or any associate or affiliate of the company.
M T l i Ch t d G l i t d Ch t d E i ith 30 i i
Gas Price Royalty OPEX
$/Mscf $/Mscf MM $ p.a.
Grabowka 1.61 n/a n/a
Komorze 6.37 0.043 0.140Kromolice-1 6.93 0.043 0.350
Kromolice-South 6.93 0.043 0.350
Lisewo 6.74 0.043 0.561
Roszkow 7.61 0.043 0.808
Sroda 7.29 0.043 0.358
Szymanowice 5.95 0.043 0.140
Winna Gora 6.94 0.043 0.486
Zaniemysl 5.77 0.043 0.602
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
5/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
EVALUATION OF POLISH GAS ASSETS
Prepared for
FX Energy Incorporated
And
BNP P ib (S i )
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
6/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Table of Contents
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................1
2. TECHNICAL EVALUATION ......................................................................................4
2.1 Overview and Evaluation Methodology...........................................................4
2.1.1 Geological Setting ...............................................................................4
2.1.2 GIIP and Reserves Estimation Methodology .......................................5
2.1.3 Parameter Inputs to Static GIIP Estimates ..........................................5
2.1.4 Material Balance Calculations .............................................................8
2.2 Zaniemysl Field ..............................................................................................9
2.2.1 Field Description and Static GIIP Estimate..........................................9
2.2.2 Production History ............................................................................ 10
2.2.3 Gas Reserves Estimation ................................................................. 11
2.3 Roszkow Field .............................................................................................. 122.3.1 Field Description and Static GIIP Estimate........................................ 12
2.3.2 Production History ............................................................................ 13
2.3.3 Gas Reserves Estimation ................................................................. 14
2.4 Kromolice-Sroda Field .................................................................................. 14
2.4.1 Field Description and Static GIIP Estimate........................................ 14
2 4 2 P d ti Hi t 15
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
7/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
2.9.2 Gas Reserves Estimation ................................................................. 26
2.10 Grabowka Fields .......................................................................................... 27
2.10.1 Field Description and Static GIIP Estimate........................................ 27
2.10.2 Production History ............................................................................ 28
2.10.3 Gas Reserves Estimation ................................................................. 29
3. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS .......................................................................................... 32
3.1 Assumptions................................................................................................. 32
3.2 Costing ......................................................................................................... 32
3.3 Results ......................................................................................................... 33
4. RESERVES EVOLUTION 2013-2014 ...................................................................... 35
4.1 Proved Gas Reserves .................................................................................. 35
4.2 Proved plus Probable Gas Reserves ............................................................ 35
4.3 Proved plus Probable plus Possible Gas Reserves ...................................... 36
APPENDIX 1: PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORZANIEMYSL FIELD ............................................................................... 37
APPENDIX 2: PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORTHE ROSZKOW FIELD ......................................................................... 44
APPENDIX 3: PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORSRODA-KROMOLICE FIELD ............................................................... 51
APPENDIX 4: PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FOR
THE KROMOLICE SOUTH FIELD 58
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
8/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
List of Figures
Figure 2.1: FX Energy Licence Areas ...............................................................................4
Figure 2.2: Fences Concession: Rotliegend Gas Accumulations ......................................5
Figure 2.3: Lisewo-1: Sw-Height Function ........................................................................7
Figure 2.4: Zaniemysl Field: Top Rotliegend Depth Structure ........................................ 10
Figure 2.5: Zaniemysl Production History and Forecast ................................................. 11
Figure 2.6: Zaniemysl Pressure Match ........................................................................... 12
Figure 2.7: Roszkow Field - Top Rotliegend Depth Structure ......................................... 13
Figure 2.8: Roszkow Production History and Forecast ................................................... 13
Figure 2.9: Roszkow Pressure Match ............................................................................. 14
Figure 2.10: Kromolice-Sroda Field - Top Rotliegend Depth Structure ............................. 15
Figure 2.11: Sroda-4 Production History and Forecast ..................................................... 16
Figure 2.12: Kromolice-1 Production History and Forecast ............................................... 16
Figure 2.13: Sroda - 4 Pressure Match............................................................................. 17
Figure 2.14: Kromolice1 Pressure Match ..................................................................... 17
Figure 2.15: Kromolice South Field: Original & Current Maps .......................................... 18
Figure 2.16: Kromolice South Production History and Forecast ....................................... 19
Fi 2 17 K li S th P M t h 20
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
9/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
List of Tables
Table 1.1: Gas Reserves attributable to the FX Energy interest (MMscf), as of 31stDecember 2013 ..............................................................................................1
Table 1.2: Reserves Changes from 1/1/2013 to 1/1/2014, 100% Basis ...........................2
Table 1.3: Reserves Changes from 1/1/2013 to 1/1/2014, Net interest ...........................3
Table 2.1: REP Input Parameters ...................................................................................6
Table 2.2: Comparison of Log and volumetric Average Sw .............................................7Table 2.3: Gas Reserves (MMscf) for the Zaniemysl Field at 31st December 2013,
100% Basis .................................................................................................. 12
Table 2.4: Reserves (MMscf) for the Roszkow Field at 31st December 2013, 100%Basis ............................................................................................................ 14
Table 2.5: Gas Reserves (MMscf) for the Kromolice - Sroda Field at 31st December2013 100% Basis ......................................................................................... 18
Table 2.6: Gas Reserves (MMscf) for the Kromolice South Field at 31st December2013, (100% basis) ...................................................................................... 20
Table 2.7: Reserves (MMscf) for the Winna Gora Field at 31st December 2013100% Basis .................................................................................................. 22
Table 2.8: Gas Reserves (MMscf) for the Lisewo Field at 31st December 2013 100%Basis ............................................................................................................ 23
Table 2.9: Gas Reserves (MMscf) for Komorze Field at 31st December 2013 100%B i 25
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
10/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RPS Energy has performed a technical and economic evaluation of FX Energys assets in
Poland. This is an update of a similar evaluation performed by RPS Energy at the end of2012 but accommodating changes that have occurred during 2013.Principally these includeadditional production from the Zaniemysl, Roszkow, Kromolice-Sroda, Kromolice South,Winna Gora, Lisewo and Grabowka fields, and the new discovery Szymanowice. 2013pressure surveys in Zaniemysl, Roszkow, and Kromolice-Sroda provide further data forevaluating GIIP estimates for these fields.
All producing fields and new discoveries were evaluated, including Komorze-3 andSzymanowice. Revised product prices and operating and development costs have been
included in determining asset values as of 31st December 2013.
Our evaluation of Remaining Reserves at 31stDecember 2013 is given inTable 1.1.
Field
Proved Proved +
Probable
Proved + Probable +
Possible Proved
Proved +
Probable
Proved + Probable +
Possible
Grabowka 100.0% 292 1,168 2,081
Zaniemysl 24.5% 793 1,454 2,179Roszkow 49.0% 4,789 6,539 11,272
Sroda-Kromolice 49.0% 12,099 16,878 26,325
Kromolice South 49.0% 1,551 2,629 3,982
Winna Gora 49.0% 4,075 6,869 11,208
Lisewo 49.0% 12,079 19,723 31,620
Komorze 49.0% 2,385 4,135 6,878
Szymanowice 49.0% 3,947 7,275 12,984
Total 41,219 65,216 106,350 793 1,454 2,179
FX Energy Gas Reserves (MMscf)
UndevelopedFX Energy
Interest
Developed
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
11/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2060 2 February 2014
Table 1.2: Reserves Changes from 1/1/2013 to 1/1/2014, 100% Basis
Reserves at 1/1/2013 Production Additions Revisions Reserves at 1/1/2014
Zaniemysl Proved 4,512 370 (904) 3,238
Proved + Probable 9,161 370 (2,858) 5,933Proved + Probable + Possible 14,545 370 (5,281) 8,895
Sroda-Kromolice Proved 26,152 2,838 1 ,379 24,693
Proved + Probable 45,440 2,838 (8,157) 34,445
Proved + Probable + Possible 55,255 2,838 1 ,309 53,725
Winna Gora Proved 10,324 643 (1,363) 8,317
Proved + Probable 17,009 643 (2,347) 14,018
Proved + Probable + Possible 27,495 643 (3,979) 22,873
Roszkow Proved 13,420 3,262 384- 9,773
Proved + Probable 16,984 3,262 (378) 13,345
Proved + Probable + Possible 31,761 3,262 (5,495) 23,004
Grabowka Proved 1,413 99 (1,022) 292
Proved + Probable 7,569 99 (6,302) 1,168Proved + Probable + Possible 19,724 99 (17,545) 2,081
Kromolice South Proved 3,775 1,245 636 3,166
Proved + Probable 5,015 1,245 1,594 5,365
Proved + Probable + Possible 9,421 1,245 (48) 8,128
Lisewo Proved 26,512 88 (1,772) 24,652
Proved + Probable 43,158 88 (2,818) 40,252
Proved + Probable + Possible 69,200 88 (4,581) 64,532
Komorze Proved 4,721 - 147 4,868
Proved + Probable 7,153 - 1,286 8,439
Proved + Probable + Possible 11,146 - 2,891 14,037
Szymanowice Proved - - 8,055 - 8,055
Proved + Probable - - 14,847 - 14,847Proved + Probable + Possible - - 26,497 - 26,497
Totals Proved 90,828 8,545 8,055 (3,285) 87,054
Proved + Probable 151,489 8,545 14,847 (19,980) 137,812
Proved + Probable + Possible 238,548 8,545 26,497 (32,730) 223,770
FX -ENERGY: POLISH INTEREST
RESERVE CHANGES FROM 1/1/2013 TO 1/1/2014
100 % INTEREST
GAS (MMSCF)
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
12/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2060 3 February 2014
Table 1.3: Reserves Changes from 1/1/2013 to 1/1/2014, Net interest
Reserves Production Additions Revisions Reserves
at 1/1/2013 at 1/1/2014
Zaniemysl Proved 1,105 91 (221) 793
Probable 1,139 - - (479) 660
Proved + Probable 2,244 91 (700) 1,454
Proved + Probable + Possible 3,564 91 (1,294) 2,179
Sroda-Kromolice Proved 12,815 1,391 676 12,099
Probable 9,451 - - (4,673) 4,778
Proved + Probable 22,266 1,391 (3,997) 16,878
Proved + Probable + Possible 27,075 1,391 641 26,325
Winna Gora Proved 5,059 315 (668) 4,075
Probable 3,276 - - (482) 2,794
Proved + Probable 8,334 315 (1,150) 6,869
Proved + Probable + Possible 13,473 315 (1,950) 11,208
Roszkow Proved 6,576 1,598 188- 4,789
Probable 1,747 - - 3 1,750
Proved + Probable 8,322 1,598 (185) 6,539
Proved + Probable + Possible 15,563 1,598 (2,693) 11,272
Grabowka Proved 1,413 99 (1,022) 292
Probable 6,156 - - (5,280) 876
Proved + Probable 7,569 99 (6,302) 1,168
Proved + Probable + Possible 19,724 99 (17,545) 2,081
Kromolice South Proved 1,850 610 311 1,551
Probable 608 - - 470 1,077
Proved + Probable 2,458 610 781 2,629
Proved + Probable + Possible 4,616 610 (24) 3,982
Lisewo Proved 12,991 43 (868) 12,079
Probable 8,157 - - (513) 7,644
Proved + Probable 21,148 43 (1,381) 19,723
Proved + Probable + Possible 33,908 43 (2,245) 31,620
Komorze Proved 2,313 - 72 2,385
Probable 1,192 - 558 1,750
Proved + Probable 3,505 - 630 4,135
Proved + Probable + Possible 5,462 - 1,417 6,878
Szymanowice Proved - - 3,947 - 3,947
Probable - - 3,328 - 3,328
Proved + Probable - - 7,275 - 7,275Proved + Probable + Possible - - 12,984 - 12,984
Totals Proved 44,121 4,147 3,947 (1,909) 42,012
Probable 31,724 - 3,328 (10,395) 24,658
Proved + Probable 75,845 4,147 7,275 (12,304) 66,670
Proved + Probable + Possible 123,384 4,147 12,984 (23,692) 108,529
FX -ENERGY: POLISH INTEREST
RESERVE CHANGES FROM 1/1/2013 TO 1/1/2014
NET INTEREST
GAS (MMSCF)
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
13/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
2. TECHNICAL EVALUATION
2.1 Overview and Evaluation Methodology
2.1.1 Geological Setting
The Zaniemysl, Roszkow, Winna Gora, Kromolice-Sroda, Kromolice South, Lisewo, Komorzeand Szymanowice gas accumulations are located in the Fences concession area (Figure2.1)where the Rotliegend sandstone is the reservoir unit; the Grabowka fields are located25km to the southwest in Block 287, in Zechstein dolomites and limestones.
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
14/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Figure 2.2: Fences Concession: Rotliegend Gas Accumulations
2.1.2 GIIP and Reserves Estimation Methodology
RPS has reviewed all aspects of the geology, geophysics, petrophysics and structuralmapping of each accumulation in order to define a range of input parameters for aprobabilistic (static) calculation of GIIP.
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
15/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 6 February 2014
FIELD DIMENSIONS REP INPUT PARAMETERS REP OUTPUT
Name ReservoirSegmen
tArea(km2)
Vert.Relief(m)
Area Uncertainty (%) Gas-Water-Contact (m TVDSS) Net-to-gross (%) Porosity (%) Sw (%) FVF (1/Bg) GIIP (bcf)
Distr. P90 P50 P10 Distr. P90 P50 P10 Distr. P90 P50 P10 Distr. P90 P50 P10 Distr. P90 P50 P10Sw
Vol AvDistr. P90 P50 P10 P90 P50 P10 Mean P10:P90
Grabowka
Zechstein West 3.9 50 N 85 100 115 Single 1565 1565 1565 Single 100.0 100.0 100.0 TR 1.0 4.3 7.0 TR 20.0 43.3 70.0 48.3 TR 150 152 154 3.6 12.6 25.2 13.6 7.00
Zechstein East 1.9 45 N 85 100 115 Single 1550 1550 1550 Single 100.0 100.0 100.0 TR 3.0 5.0 7.0 TR 20.0 43.3 70.0 47.8 TR 141 143 145 1.0 2.2 3.9 2.4 3.90
4.6 14.8 29.1 16.0 6.33
Zaniemysl Rotliegend 2.8 54 LN 70 102 150 Single 2889 2889 2889 Single 1000 1000 1000 N 19.0 21.0 23.0 Single 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 N 259 262 265 29.8 44.9 68.1 30.3 2.29
Roszkow Rotliegend 2.4 47 LN 70 102 150 N 2826 2829 2832 Single 100.0 100.0 100.0 N 17.0 20.0 23.0 Sw-Height Function 52.3 N 259 262 265 30.2 46.6 71.9 49.2 2.38
KromoliceSroda
Rotliegend Kr-1 4.3 55 LN 80 110 150 N 3518 3521 3525 N 80.0 84.0 88.0 N 12.0 15.0 18.0 Sw-Height Function 54.6 N 252 257 262 30.5 46.1 69.4 48.4 2.28
RotliegendCentralHorst
1.1 43 LN 80 110 150 N 3518 3521 3525 N 80.0 90.0 100.0 N 12.0 17.0 22.0 Sw-Height Function 57.4 N 252 257 262 7.4 12.3 19.7 13.1 2.65
Rotliegend Sr-4 1.4 53 LN 80 110 150 N 3518 3521 3525 N 95.0 97.3 99.6 N 15.0 18.5 22.0 Sw-Height Function 59.9 N 252 257 262 19.9 29.4 43.6 30.8 2.19
RotliegendSr-4North
0.7 13 LN 80 110 150 N 3518 3521 3525 N 95.0 97.3 99.6 N 15.0 18.5 22.0 Sw-Height Function 65.8 N 252 257 262 2.5 4.2 7.0 4.5 2.87
60.3 92.0 139.7 96.8 2.32
KromoliceSouth
Rotliegend 1.0 41 LN 80 110 150 Single 3496 3496 3496 N 88.0 93.7 99.4 N 11.0 14.0 16.9 Sw-Height Function 57.2 N 252 257 262 5.1 7.6 11.3 8.0 2.22
WinnaGora
Rotliegend 1.1 64 LN 80 110 150 Single 3486 3486 3486 Single 100.0 100.0 100.0 N 14.0 16.0 18.0 Sw-Height Function 44.6 N 259 262 265 16.1 22.7 32.1 23.5 1.99
Lisewo Rotliegend 2.3 87 LN 80 110 150 Single 3637 3637 3637 N 94.0 97.0 100.0 N 13.0 14.5 16.0 Sw-Height Function 42.0 Single 252 252 252 44.1 61.5 86.3 63.6 1.96
Komorze Rotliegend 1.5 75 LN 80 110 150 Single 3760 3760 3760 N 78.0 83.0 88.0 N 13.0 15.0 17.0 Sw-Height Function 61.4 N 252 257 262 10.7 15.3 21.8 15.9 2.04
Szymanowice
Rotliegend
(lowporosity
1.8 87 LN 55.3 78 110 N 3604 3607 3610 N 24.0 52.0 80.0 N 7.0 11.0 15.0 Sw-Height Function 53.2 N 225 230 235
17.8 26.9 40.9 21.6 2.42Rotliegend
(highporosity
1.8 87 LN 55.3 78 110 N 3604 3607 3610 N 95.0 97.0 99.0 N 14.0 16.0 18.0 Sw-Height Function 63.3 N 225 230 235
Table 2.1: REP Input Parameters
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
16/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Sw Parameters
A review of log data suggests that the previous use of a range of Sw values centred on theaverage well Sw from the pay interval is not a true reflection of the volumetric average valueof Sw. The reservoir interval in most of the fields has a distinctive Sw-Height profile due tolow structural relief and moderate permeability. In such cases, a Sw-Height function shouldbe used in REP to ensure that the varying Sw is correctly weighted in a volumetric sense.
RPS has undertaken a review of the log data from Kromolice-1, Lisewo-1, and Komorze-3. ASw-Height function has been derived from Lisewo-1 (Figure 2.3)which closely matches theSw log profiles in Kromolice-1 and Komorze-3 when using the deepest GWC in each well.These generic Sw-Height functions are also considered to be representative of the Sw log
profiles in Sroda-4, Roszkow-1, Winna Gora-1 and Kromolice South. Another height functionhas been derived from the Szymanowice-1 well, and provides a volumetrically representativeSw profile for the Szymanowice field. Sw-Height functions have been used in REP inpreference to Sw distributions on all fields, with the exception of Zaniemysl (see Section2.3.1 below).The volume averaged Sw values associated with Sw-Height function and thecorresponding log calculated Sws are shown inTable 2.2.
FIELD/WELL Sw COMPARISON
Vol Av. Sw-Height Fn. Log Calculation
Roszkow 52.3 39.9
Kr-1 54.6 42.0
Sr-4 59.9 51.3
Kr-2 57.2 41.0
Winna Gora 44.6 47.5
Lisewo 42.0 45.0
K 61 4 47 0
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
17/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
GRV Parameters
The use of a Sw-Height function in REP requires GRV input in the form of area-depth pairs,rather than the previous three parameter GRV distributions. As noted above, volumetricestimates are sensitive to the velocity model used for depth conversion, and GRV uncertaintyin REP can be captured by inputting an area uncertainty distribution.
Previous RPS work has evaluated the volumetric uncertainty resulting from different velocitymodels, particularly over the Kromolice-Sroda field. A review of this work demonstrates thatGRV uncertainty can be modelled by a log-normal area distribution (P90 80% P10 150%,see Table 2.1). This distribution has been used for all fields mapped on 3D seismic data,where the volumetric uncertainty is primarily velocity-related; for fields mapped on 2D
seismic data (Zaniemysl and Roszkow) the P90 value is reduced to account for additionalmapping uncertainty.
2.1.4 Material Balance Calculations
Based on the available data by field (PVT, well test and production history data) we haveused a material balance program (Mbal) to get the producing estimation of Gas in place(GIIP) and compare it with the volumetric GIIP results using traditional p/z analysistechniques. The Mbal program was also used to predict the future reservoir performance and
well production forecast for a given production schedule and matched well inflow and liftperformance where available. FX Energy has also specified some reservoir managementrate constraints, as advised by Operator, for the forecast by field.
RPS has created various cases based on either single or multiple tanks with transmissibilityconnections between the tanks to reflect potential compartmentalization or later contributionfrom tight pay. These models were used to establish a range of scenarios which aresummarized below for the producing fields:
P90 minimum case- generally based on the P90 volumetric GIIP or less where the p/zd t d t t d ll t d GIIP I if i fl d ll d
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
18/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
require the inclusion of compression at some stage in a number of the fields to gain entry tothe main export pipeline operating at c.900 psi. The tubing curves should allow the impact ofany future water production to be modelled. A number of the forecast profiles terminate
relatively rapidly as a result of water loading in the tubing.
For those models with aquifers, the gas leg pore volume water influx was modelled using theassumption of vertical equilibrium, where the gas-water contact will rise uniformly across thefield and water production would commence when it is at the bottom perforation. Thisattempts to model the encroachment of potential aquifer water to the gas leg and allows Mbalto reflect the impact of water production on the lift curves. It is anticipated this will provide auseful history matching tool in the event of more of the fields starting to produce water in thefuture.
Well performances were forecast including the production and downtime constraintsspecified by FX Energy. The models will allow for better integration of the future flowing wellperformance data and any WGR trends. Individual well target rates are as follows:
Zaniemysl 3: Well on production 1/1/2015 after sidetrack at initial rate of 2.2MMscf/d.
Sroda 4: 2.5 MMscf/d.
Kromolice 1: 5.4 MMscf/d.Kromolice 2: 3.2 MMscf/d.
Roszkow: 7.6 MMscf/d.
Winna Gora: 2.1 MMscf/d.
Lisewo 1: 5.4 MMscf/d.
Lisewo 2: 3.5 MMscf/d from 1/10/2014 when placed on production.
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
19/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Figure 2.4: Zaniemysl Field: Top Rotliegend Depth Structure
Zaniemysl-3 was drilled in a near-crestal location and encountered a 38m gas column with aclear GWC at -2888.8m TVDSS. Zaniemysl is the only Rotliegend field where the genericSw-Height function does not reasonably model the log Sw profile, and so for volumetricestimates a single value Sw of 41% (from the Operators field report) was used.The current
G 2 1
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
20/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
0
40
80
120
160
200
0
4
8
12
16
20
Oct-06
Feb-07
Jun-07
Oct-07
Feb-08
Jun-08
Oct-08
Feb-09
Jun-09
Oct-09
Feb-10
Jun-10
Oct-10
Feb-11
Jun-11
Oct-11
Feb-12
Jun-12
Oct-12
Feb-13
Jun-13
Oct-13
WGR(bbl/MMscf)
Ga
srate(MMscfd)
Zaniemysl Production data
Daily prod. WGR
2000
2500
3000
3500
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
(MMscfd)
Z3ST Production data
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
21/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Figure 2.6: Zaniemysl Pressure Match
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
22/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Figure 2.7: Roszkow Field - Top Rotliegend Depth Structure
Roszkow-1 is located down flank from the crest of the structure and encountered a 29.5mgas column to a depth of -2825.8m TVDSS, with a possible deeper contact (WUT) at -2831.9m TVDSS. A range of possible GWCs has been used in the volumetric assessment.The current Volumetric GIIP estimates are given in Table 2.1.
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
23/105
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
24/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
conversion uncertainties, this is still feasible, though the possibility of separate and hencedisconnected closures cannot be dismissed.
As a result of RPS investigation of the Sw-Height issue, a potentially deeper GWC has beenrecognized in Kromolice-1 (-3540.1m TVDSS). It is difficult to reconcile this with the spillpoints on the current mapping, or on earlier versions of the Top Rotliegend depth map.However, a potentially deeper spill to -3525m TVDSS could be accommodated on thecurrent mapping and this has been used to provide a depth range for GWC uncertainty.
For this exercise, GIIP has been estimated for each anticlinal segment, and the P90 P50 andP10 values summed arithmetically (seeTable 2.1) to give a total GIIP range for the entirefield.Table 2.1 shows the GIIP by individual segments.
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
25/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Figure 2.11: Sroda-4 Production History and Forecast
Kromolice-1
Production started in June 2011, produced intermittently until October 2011, and has beenon continuous production since that time; seeFigure 2.12.
In 2013 the well commenced producing at a rate of 6.7MMscf/d to mid-August when the ratewas reduced to 5.4MMscf/d in response to an increase in produced water salinity. However,water production has remained at condensed water levels, < 2Bbls/MMscf, through to end of
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
0
1
2
3
4
5
Dec-10
Dec-13
Dec-16
Dec-19
Dec-22
Dec-25
Dec-28
Dec-31
Dec-34
Dec-37
Dec-40
Dec-43
Dec-46
Dec-49
Dec-52
Dec-55
Dec-58
WHP(Psia)
Gasrate(MMscfd)
Sroda 4 Production data
Daily prod. P90 Prediction P50 Prediction P10 Prediction FWHP P50 Prediction FWHP
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
26/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Figure 2.13: Sroda - 4 Pressure Match
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
27/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
The recovery factor derived from the P50 Mbal model is 48% of volumetric GIIP. Figure 2.13andFigure 2.14 show the Pressure Match for the Mbal analysis. The remaining gas reservesas of 31st December 2013 for this field, based on the existing wells are summarized inTable
2.5.The gas production forecasts are shown inFigure 2.11 andFigure 2.12 and in Appendix3.
Table 2.5: Gas Reserves (MMscf) for the Kromolice - Sroda Field at 31st December 2013100% Basis
2.5 Kromolice South Field
2.5.1 Field Description and Static GIIP Estimate
The Kromolice South structure was tested by the Kromolice-2 well. The well was located in a
near-crestal location and encountered a 35m gas column with a clear GWC identified at -3496m TVDSS.
RPS evaluation of Kromolice South is based on the current Top Rotliegend depth map(Figure 2.15). The current Volumetric GIIP estimates are given Table 2.1.
Remaining Reserves (MMscf) Evaluation Production Remaining Economic Limit Evaluation
1stJan 2013 during 2013 31stDec 2013 in year 1stJan 2013
Proven 26,152 2,838 23,314 2031 24,693
Proven+Probable 45,440 2,838 42,602 2090 34,445
Proven+Probable+Possible 55,255 2,838 52,416 2090 53,725
2013 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
28/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
2.5.2 Production History
The Kromolice South field was brought on production on July 6th 2011 (Figure 2.16). In 2013the well commenced production at 3.5 MMscf/d to early Sept when the rate was reduced to
3.2 MMscf/d in response to an increase in produced water salinity. Observation oftubing/casing annulus pressure indicated a leak to tubing of high salinity annulus fluid. Aworkover is scheduled to repair the tubing leak in 2014. However, water production hasremained at condensed water levels, < 2Bbls/MMscf, through to end December. The well hasa total gas cumulative production of 2.38 Bscf at 31stDecember 2013.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
0
1
2
3
4
5
Jul-11
Mar-12
Nov-12
Jul-13
Mar-14
Nov-14
Jul-15
Mar-16
Nov-16
Jul-17
Mar-18
Nov-18
Jul-19
Mar-20
Nov-20
Jul-21
Mar-22
Nov-22
Jul-23
Mar-24
Nov-24
Jul-25
WHP(Psia)
Gas
rate(MMscfd)
Kromolice South Production data
Daily prod. P90 Prediction P50 Prediction P10 Prediction FWHP P50 Prediction FWHP
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
29/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Figure 2.17: Kromolice South Pressure Match
2013 2014
Remaining Reserves (MMscf) Evaluation Production Remaining Economic Limit Evaluation
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
30/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Figure 2.18: Winna Gora: Top Rotliegend Depth Structure
The current Volumetric GIIP estimates are given in Table 2.1.
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
31/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
2.6.3 Gas Reserves Estimation
The first static pressure measurement was carried out in Winna Gora in June 2013; it wasincluded in the Mbal model to establish the dynamic GIIP. However, it is too early to establish
the trend from p/z plot. No aquifer has been included in the Mbal model analysis for this field.The Winna Gora forecast estimated a recovery factor of 71% of the volumetric GIIP for theP50 case.
The remaining gas Reserves, at 31st December 2013 for this field are summarized inTable2.7.The gas production forecasts are shown inFigure 2.19 and in Appendix 5.
Table 2.7: Reserves (MMscf) for the Winna Gora Field at 31st December 2013 100% Basis
2.7 Lisewo Field
2.7.1 Field Description and Static GIIP Estimate
Lisewo-1 was drilled as a deviated well to a TD of 3946m MD in late January 2011 to test afault and dip controlled anticlinal structure mapped at Top Rotliegend. The well encounteredthe Top Rotliegend sands at 3814m MD, and a gross, gas-bearing Rotliegend interval of69m. The current depth map is shown inFigure 2.20.
A second well Lisewo-2 was drilled last year which was tested. No pressure gauges were runbut a final gradient survey was made at end of clean up. Preliminary results from the Lisewo-
Remaining Reserves (MMscf) Evaluation Production Remaining Economic Limit Evaluation
1st
Jan 2013 during 2013 31st
Dec 2013 in year 1st
Jan 2014Proven 10,324 643.4 9,680 2043 8,317
Proven+Probable 17,009 643.4 16,365 2062 14,018
Proven+Probable+Possible 27,495 643.4 26,852 2090 22,873
2013 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
32/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Log analysis indicates possible GWCs at either -3617.5m TVDSS or -3636.7m TVDSS.Previous evaluations have favoured the deeper contact, as it coincides with the spill point onone of the main controlling faults (Fault A), and in the absence of additional data, the deeper
contact has been retained in this years GIIP estimate.The current Volumetric GIIP estimatesare given in Table 2.1.
2.7.2 Production History
Lisewo 1 commenced production in Dec 2013. The average rate for the month was 4.2MMscf/d. Water production has remained at condensed water levels, < 2Bbls/MMscf, at endyear. The well has a total gas cumulative production of 88.1 MMscf at 31 stDecember 2013.Figure 2.17 shows the Production Forecast.
0
1250
2500
3750
5000
0
3
5
8
10
Dec-13
Dec-14
Dec-15
Dec-16
Dec-17
Dec-18
Dec-19
Dec-20
Dec-21
Dec-22
Dec-23
Dec-24
Dec-25
Dec-26
Dec-27
Dec-28
Dec-29
Dec-30
Dec-31
Dec-32
Dec-33
Dec-34
Dec-35
WHP(Psia)
Gasrate(MMscfd)
Lisewo Production data
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
33/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
TVDSS. RPS analysis of the log data indicates a likely GWC at -3751.4m TVDSS, but with apossible deeper contact at -3759.6m TVDSS.
RPS generated two alternative depth maps for comparison:
Residual correction applied (gridded) to pre-drill depth structure map
Update of RPS 2-layer model with additional velocity control (a simplified version of theOperators 11-layer velocity model developed from a previous evaluation of the Lisewoarea)
The resulting depth maps are similar and generate identical GIIP distributions. The depthmap from the 2-layer model is shown inFigure 2.22.
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
34/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Table 2.9: Gas Reserves (MMscf) for Komorze Field at 31st December 2013 100% Basis
Remaining Reserves (MMscf) Evaluation Economic Limit Evaluation
1stJan 2013 in year 1stJan 2014
Proven 4,721 2029 4,868Proven+Probable 7,153 2047 8,439
Proven+Probable+Possible 11,146 2085 14,037
20142013
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
Jan-14
Jan-17
Jan-20
Jan-23
Jan-26
Jan-29
Jan-32
Jan-35
Jan-38
Jan-41
Jan-44
Jan-47
Jan-50
Jan-53
Jan-56
Jan-59
Jan-62
Jan-65
Jan-68
Jan-71
Jan-74
Jan-77
Jan-80
Jan-83
Jan-86
WHP(Psia)
Gasrate(MMscfd)
Komorze Production data
Daily prod. P90 Prediction P50 Prediction P10 Prediction P50 Prediction FWHP
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
35/105
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
36/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
P10 GIIPsbecause of the relatively low relief structure. The forecast assumption for the P10case considers an extra well, which would be on stream in 2018 producing at the same rate1.3 MMscf/d to accelerate the production.
Figure 2.25: Szymanowice Production Forecast
The total Szymanowice Gas Reserves are summarised in Table 2.10. The gas productionforecasts are shown in Error! Reference source not found.and in Appendix 8.
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
Dec-15
Dec-17
Dec-19
Dec-21
Dec-23
Dec-25
Dec-27
Dec-29
Dec-31
Dec-33
Dec-35
Dec-37
Dec-39
Dec-41
Dec-43
Dec-45
Dec-47
Dec-49
Dec-51
Dec-53
Dec-55
Dec-57
Dec-59
Dec-61
Dec-63
Dec-65
Dec-67
Dec-69
WHP(Psia)
Gasrate(MMscfd)
Szymanowice Production data
P90 Prediction P50 Prediction P10 Prediction P50 Prediction FWHP
P10 case , considering an
extra well in 2018
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
37/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Figure 2.26: Grabowka Fields: Zechstein Ca1 Depth Structure
Due to poor quality log data, a GWC could not be determined for either field. In GrabowkaWest, structural spill is estimated at 1565m TVDSS, consistent with test data from the G-5and G-7 wells. Similarly, on Grabowka East, a structural spill point of 1550m TVDSS isestimated from mapping rather than from log analysis.
No changes to previous years GIIP estimates have been evaluated which are given in Table2.1. Most of the volume is located in the Grabowka West structure which commencedproduction in 2013 from G-6. The initial production results from G-6 and G-8 suggest asignificant reduction in Grabowka Reserves and a preliminary examination of the prior
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
38/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Figure 2.27: Grabowka Fields - Production Data
0
500
1000
1500
2000
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Jul-09
Sep-09
Nov-09
Jan-10
Mar-10
May-10
Jul-10
Sep-10
Nov-10
Jan-11
Mar-11
May-11
Jul-11
Sep-11
Nov-11
Jan-12
Mar-12
May-12
Jul-12
Sep-12
Nov-12
Jan-13
Mar-13
May-13
Jul-13
Sep-13
Nov-13
WGR(bbl/MMscf)/WHP(Ps
ia)
G
asrate(MMscfd)
Grabowka Production data
Daily prod. FWHP WGR
25002.5
Grabowka Production data (Forecast)
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
39/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
assumption, NTG and possibly the level of the GWC, all contributing to a significantly smallerGIIP.
y = -40x + 2501.50
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
010
20
30
40
50
60
70
P/z(psia)
Gp (MMscf)
Flowing Material Balance Grabowka
Pi/Zi
Flowing P/z
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
40/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Figure 2.30: Grabowka Fields Flowing Material Balance
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
Productivit
yIndex
Gp (mmscf)
Flowing Material Balance Grabowka-6
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
41/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
3. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
3.1 Assumptions
An economic analysis of the Polish Assets of FX Energy was undertaken based on thefollowing price and royalty assumptions (seeTable 3.1). These data have been supplied byFX Energy in US Dollars and are based on Polish Zloty gas prices and exchange rates,taken as the average of the 1stday of the month values throughout 2013.
Notes:1. FX receives $1.61 for gas produced but incurs no costs. For the purpose of forecasting the
economic limit, FX advises that it believes that the field's operator receives a price $6.50/ Mscf (netof royalty) and incurs annual opex of $0.300 MM.
2. Opex value excludes an assumed additional $1.20 MM workover to occur in 2014.3. Opex is for all years after 2014; in 2014 it is assumed to be $0.456 MM.4. Opex is for all years after 2015; in 2015 it is assumed to be $0.129 MM.
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
42/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Roszkow For all three volumetric cases (i.e., the Proved, Proved plus Probable, andProved plus Probable plus Possible), compression capex of US $1.45 MM has beenassumed to be incurred in 2014.
Szymanowice In all three volumetric cases, a $2.70 MM cost to tie-in to the Lisewofacilities is assumed to be incurred in 2014. In the Proved plus Probable plus Possiblecase, costs of $9.00 MM for a second well and $2.00 MM for a tie-in are assumed to beincurred in 2018. Compression costs of $3.00 MM are assumed to be incurred 2018 inthe Proved case, and in 2021 in the Proved plus Probable and Proved plus Probable plusPossible cases.
Winna GoraFor all three volumetric cases, compression capex of US $3.50 MM hasbeen assumed, to be incurred in 2016 in the Proved case, in 2019 in the Proved plusProbable case, and in 2022 in the Proved plus Probable plus Possible case,
Zaniemysl Sidetrack costs of $3.60 MM are assumed to be incurred in 2014. Nocompression is assumed to be required at Zaniemysl due to pressure maintenance fromwater influx.
Operating and Abandonment Costs
Normal operating costs per well have been provided for all the fields and are tabulated in
Table 3.1.In addition to basic operating costs, there is an additional $0.015/mcf additional compressionopex per license, once compression is required.
Assumed abandonment costs of 0.385 MM per well and $0.250 MM per facility have beenprovided by FX Energy.
3.3 Results
The results of our analysis are shown below inTable 3.2. The Net Present Values are stated
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
43/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
Table 3.3: Effect of Gas Price Sensitivities on FX Net Reserves (MMscf)
Table 3.4: Effect of Gas Price Sensitivities on NPV10 (Net to FX Energy) in Million USD
1P 2P 3P 1P 2P 3P 1P 2P 3P
Roszkow 4,789 6,483 11,047 4,789 6,539 11,272 4,842 6,590 11,272
Winna Gora 4,002 6,757 11,131 4,075 6,869 11,208 4,141 7,003 11,208
Kromolice South 1,551 2,629 3,982 1,551 2,629 3,982 1,551 2,629 4,006Zaniemysl 793 1,454 2,177 793 1,454 2,177 793 1,454 2,177
Sroda-Kromolice 12,099 16,878 26,325 12,099 16,878 26,325 12,123 16,878 26,325
Grabowka 292 1,168 2,081 292 1,168 2,081 292 1,168 2,081
Lisewo 12,079 19,723 31,620 12,079 19,723 31,620 12,079 19,723 31,620
Komorze 2,385 4,135 6,878 2,385 4,135 6,878 2,385 4,135 6,878
Szymanowice 3,947 7,275 12,984 3,947 7,275 12,984 3,947 7,275 12,984
Total 41,939 66,502 108,225 42,012 66,670 108,527 42,154 66,855 108,551
FieldsNet Reserves 90% Price Net Reserves 110% PriceNet Reserves Base Price
1P 2P 3P 1P 2P 3P 1P 2P 3P
Roszkow 21.67 27.01 34.05 24.55 30.57 38.48 27.44 34.13 42.92
Winna Gora 9.45 13.39 16.64 10.95 15.30 18.89 12.45 17.21 21.13
Kromolice South 7.03 11.12 14.56 7.97 12.57 16.45 8.91 14.02 18.35
Zaniemysl 1.48 3.05 4.22 1.83 3.59 4.91 2.17 4.13 5.60Sroda-Kromolice 43.44 46.94 56.09 48.89 52.83 63.01 54.35 58.72 69.94
Grabowka 0.41 1.30 1.87 0.41 1.30 1.87 0.41 1.30 1.87
Lisewo 38.24 52.72 66.35 43.30 59.38 74.49 48.36 66.04 82.64
Komorze 6.00 7.81 9.13 6.89 8.89 10.35 7.77 9.98 11.57
Szymanowice 5.11 7.03 10 6.02 8.13 12.08 6.93 9.23 13.94
Total 132.83 170.37 213.13 150.81 192.56 240.53 168.79 214.76 267.96
FieldsNPV10 110% PriceNPV10 Base PriceNPV10 90% Price
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
44/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
4. RESERVES EVOLUTION 2013-2014
4.1 Proved Gas Reserves
Table 4.1: Gas Proved Reserves (MMscf) 100% Basis
Table 4.1 shows the Proved Reserves evolution. In general there are modest reserveschanges (+/- 10-20 %) apart from Grabowka. The inclusion of reserves for the new discoverySzymanowice gives an additional reserves of 8.1 Bscf leading to a net 4.8 Bscf, a 6 %increase in the 2014 evaluation, after 2013 production.
2014Field Evaluation Production Remaining Evaluation MMscf (%)
01-Jan-13 during 2013 31-Dec-13 01-Jan-14
Zaniemysl 4,512 370 4,142 3,238 -904 -22%
Sroda-Kromolice 26,152 2,838 23,314 24,693 1,379 6%
Roszkow 13,420 3,262 10,158 9,773 -384 -4%
Winna Gora 10,324 643 9,680 8,317 -1,363 -14%
Kromolice South 3,775 1,245 2,530 3,166 636 25%
Grabowka 1,413 99 1,314 292 -1,022 -78%
Lisewo 26,512 88 26,424 24,652 -1,772 -7%
Komorze 4,721 0 4,721 4,868 147 3%
Szymanowice 8,055 8,055 0%
Total 90,828 8,545 82,283 87,054 4,771 6%
2013 Variation
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
45/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
4.3 Proved plus Probable plus Possible Gas Reserves
Table 4.3: Gas Proved plus Probable plus Possible Reserves (MMscf) 100% Basis
Table 4.3 shows the Proved plus Probable plus Possible Reserves evolution. For theproducing fields there is a general downward revision of reserves, mainly due to theconstraints imposed on GIIP estimates from reservoir pressure data. These downwardrevisions and the inclusion of reserves from the new discovery Szymanowice result in 3%less reserves (6.2 Bscf), in the 2014 evaluation, after 2013 production .
2014Field Evaluation Production Remaining Evaluation MMscf (%)01-Jan-13 during 2013 31-Dec-13 01-Jan-14
Zaniemysl 14,545 370 14,176 8,895 -5,281 -37%
Sroda-Kromolice 55,255 2,838 52,416 53,725 1,309 2%
Roszkow 31,761 3,262 28,499 23,004 -5,495 -19%
Winna Gora 27,495 643 26,852 22,873 -3,979 -15%
Kromolice South 9,421 1,245 8,176 8,128 -48 -1%
Grabowka 19,724 99 19,625 2,081 -17,545 -89%
Lisewo 69,200 88 69,112 64,532 -4,581 -7%
Komorze 11,146 0 11,146 14,037 2,891 26%
Szymanowice 26,497 26,497 0%
Total 238,548 8,545 230,003 223,770 -6,233 -3%
2013 Variation
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
46/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
APPENDIX 1: PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORZANIEMYSL FIELD
Table A1.1: Gas Production Forecasts for the Zaniemysl Field
Year Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
2015 2.1 21.57 2.1 21.57 2.1 21.57
2016 2.1 22.34 2.1 22.34 2.1 22.342017 2.1 23.11 2.1 23.11 2.1 23.11
2018 2.1 23.88 2.1 23.88 2.1 23.88
2019 0.4 24.04 2.1 24.65 2.1 24.65
2020 2.1 25.42 2.1 25.42
2021 2.1 26.19 2.1 26.19
2022 1.5 26.74 2.1 26.96
2023 2.1 27.73
2024 2.1 28.502025 2.1 29.27
2026 1.1 29.69
Zaniemysl
Proved Proved+Probable Proved +Probable+Possible
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
47/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 38 February 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
48/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 39 February 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
49/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 40 February 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
50/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 41 February 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
51/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 42 February 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
52/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 43 February 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
53/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
APPENDIX 2: PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORTHE ROSZKOW FIELD
Year Gas Rate
(MMscfd)Cumulative
Production (Bscf)Gas Rate(MMscfd)
CumulativeProduction (Bscf)
Gas Rate(MMscfd)
CumulativeProduction (Bscf)
2014 7.27 21.53 7.27 21.53 7.27 21.532015 6.27 23.81 6.93 24.05 7.21 24.16
2016 4.20 25.35 5.17 25.95 5.88 26.312017 2.78 26.37 3.78 27.33 4.56 27.972018 1.87 27.05 2.76 28.33 3.63 29.302019 1.32 27.53 2.06 29.09 2.93 30.372020 0.96 27.89 1.59 29.67 2.42 31.262021 0.73 28.15 1.27 30.13 2.07 32.012022 0.56 28.36 1.03 30.51 1.81 32.672023 0.45 28.52 0.86 30.82 1.61 33.262024 0.36 28.65 0.73 31.09 1.45 33.79
2025 0.30 28.76 0.63 31.32 1.33 34.272026 0.25 28.85 0.54 31.52 1.22 34.722027 0.21 28.92 0.48 31.69 1.14 35.132028 0.18 28.99 0.42 31.85 1.06 35.522029 0.15 29.04 0.38 31.99 1.00 35.882030 0.13 29.09 0.34 32.11 0.94 36.232031 0.11 29.13 0.31 32.23 0.89 36.552032 0.10 29.17 0.29 32.33 0.84 36.862033 0.09 29.20 0.26 32.43 0.80 37.15
Roszkow
Proved Proved+Probable P roved +Probable+Possible
RPS E FX E I E l ti f P li h G A t
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
54/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 45 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy Inc Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
55/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 46 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy Inc Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
56/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 47 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy Inc Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
57/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 48 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy Inc Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
58/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 49 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy Inc Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
59/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
ECV 2003 50 February 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
60/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
APPENDIX 3: PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORSRODA-KROMOLICE FIELD
YearGas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production
(Bscf)
2014 7.55 9.78 7.55 11.96 7.55 11.96
2015 7.58 12.55 7.58 14.72 7.58 14.72
2016 7.58 15.32 7.58 17.50 7.58 17.50
2017 7.58 18.08 7.58 20.26 7.58 20.26
2018 7.03 20.65 7.31 22.93 7.58 23.03
2019 5.39 22.62 5.78 25.04 6.86 25.53
2020 4.35 24.21 4.70 26.76 5.60 27.58
2021 3.74 25.58 4.04 28.23 4.84 29.352022 3.35 26.80 3.65 29.57 4.38 30.94
2023 3.06 27.91 3.39 30.80 4.08 32.43
2024 2.47 28.82 3.20 31.97 3.90 33.86
2025 2.39 29.69 3.05 33.09 3.77 35.24
2026 1.85 30.37 2.89 34.14 3.68 36.58
2027 1.26 30.83 2.16 34.93 3.61 37.90
2028 0.90 31.15 1.63 35.53 3.56 39.20
2029 0.67 31.40 1.34 36.02 3.51 40.48
2030 0.51 31.59 1.14 36.43 3.48 41.75
2031 0.40 31.73 1.03 36.81 3.45 43.01
2032 0.13 31.78 0.93 37.15 3.42 44.26
2033 0.78 37.43 3.40 45.50
2034 0.67 37.68 3.30 46.71
2035 0.57 37.89 2.89 47.76
2036 0.33 38.01 2.61 48.722037 0.33 38.13 2.43 49.60
2038 0.33 38.25 2.18 50.40
2039 0.33 38.37 2.07 51.15
2040 0.31 38.49 1.92 51.85
2041 0.33 38.61 1.27 52.32
2042 0.31 38.72 0.85 52.63
2043 0.33 38.84 0.84 52.93
2044 0.32 38.96 0.82 53.23
2045 0.31 39.07 0.81 53.53
2046 0.31 39.19 0.80 53.82
2047 0.31 39.30 0.78 54.11
2048 0.31 39.42 0.77 54.39
2049 0.30 39.53 0.75 54.66
2050 0 31 39 64 0 74 54 93
Sroda Kromolice
Proved Proved+Probable Proved
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
61/105
gy gy,
ECV 2003 52 February 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
62/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
63/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
64/105
ECV 2003 55 February 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
65/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
66/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
67/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
APPENDIX 4: PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORTHE KROMOLICE SOUTH FIELD
Year Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production(Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production(Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production(Bscf)
2014 3.06 3.50 3.06 3.50 3.06 3.502015 3.07 4.62 3.07 4.62 3.07 4.62
2016 2.55 5.55 3.07 5.74 3.07 5.74
2017 2.84 6.78 3.05 6.852018 1.58 7.35 2.39 7.73
2019 0.82 7.65 1.75 8.36
2020 0.26 7.75 1.34 8.85
2021 1.05 9.242022 0.84 9.54
2023 0.69 9.792024 0.56 10.00
2025 0.47 10.17
2026 0.39 10.312027 0.32 10.43
Kromolice_South
Proved Proved+Probable Proved
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
68/105
ECV 2003 59 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
69/105
ECV 2003 60 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
70/105
ECV 2003 61 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
71/105
ECV 2003 62 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
72/105
ECV 2003 63 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
73/105
ECV 2003 64 February 2014
RPS E FX E I E l ti f P li h G A t
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
74/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
APPENDIX 5: PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORTHE WINNA GORA FIELD
YearGas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
2014 2.01 1.37 2.01 1.37 2.01 1.37
2015 2.01 2.11 2.01 2.11 2.01 2.11
2016 2.01 2.84 2.01 2.84 2.01 2.84
2017 1.91 3.54 2.01 3.58 2.01 3.58
2018 1.62 4.13 2.01 4.31 2.01 4.31
2019 1.38 4.64 2.01 5.05 2.01 5.05
2020 1.20 5.08 1.88 5.74 2.01 5.79
2021 1.05 5.46 1.69 6.35 2.01 6.522022 0.94 5.80 1.53 6.91 2.01 7.26
2023 0.84 6.11 1.39 7.42 2.01 7.99
2024 0.75 6.38 1.27 7.89 1.95 8.71
2025 0.68 6.63 1.17 8.31 1.82 9.37
2026 0.62 6.86 1.08 8.71 1.71 9.99
2027 0.57 7.06 1.01 9.08 1.60 10.58
2028 0.52 7.26 0.94 9.42 1.51 11.13
2029 0.48 7.43 0.87 9.74 1.42 11.65
2030 0.44 7.59 0.82 10.04 1.35 12.14
2031 0.41 7.74 0.77 10.32 1.28 12.61
2032 0.38 7.88 0.72 10.58 1.21 13.05
2033 0.36 8.02 0.68 10.83 1.15 13.47
2034 0.34 8.14 0.64 11.06 1.10 13.87
2035 0.31 8.25 0.61 11.28 1.05 14.262036 0.29 8.36 0.57 11.50 1.00 14.62
2037 0.28 8.46 0.55 11.69 0.96 14.97
2038 0.26 8.56 0.52 11.88 0.92 15.31
2039 0.25 8.65 0.49 12.06 0.88 15.63
2040 0.23 8.73 0.47 12.24 0.84 15.93
2041 0.22 8.81 0.45 12.40 0.81 16.23
2042 0.21 8.89 0.43 12.56 0.78 16.51
2043 0.20 8.96 0.41 12.71 0.75 16.79
2044 0.19 9.03 0.39 12.85 0.72 17.05
2045 0.18 9.10 0.38 12.99 0.69 17.30
2046 0.17 9.16 0.36 13.12 0.67 17.55
2047 0.16 9.22 0.35 13.24 0.65 17.78
2048 0 16 9 28 0 33 13 36 0 62 18 01
Winna Gora
Proved Proved+Probable Proved +Probable+Possible
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
75/105
RPS Energ FX Energ Inc E al ation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
76/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
RPS Energy FX Energy Inc Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
77/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
78/105
ECV 2003 69 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy Inc Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
79/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
RPS Energy FX Energy Inc Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
80/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
RPS Energy FX Energy Inc Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
81/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
APPENDIX 6: PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORLISEWO FIELD
YearGas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
2014 6.00 2.28 6.00 2.28 6.00 2.28
2015 8.53 5.40 8.53 5.40 8.53 5.40
2016 8.52 8.51 8.53 8.52 8.53 8.52
2017 7.92 11.40 8.53 11.63 8.53 11.63
2018 6.47 13.76 8.43 14.71 8.53 14.75
2019 5.06 15.61 7.93 17.60 8.53 17.86
2020 4.09 17.11 7.18 20.23 8.53 20.99
2021 3.38 18.34 6.09 22.45 8.31 24.02
2022 2.83 19.37 5.25 24.37 7.97 26.93
2023 2.38 20.24 4.58 26.04 7.65 29.72
2024 2.03 20.98 4.04 27.52 6.99 32.28
2025 1.74 21.62 3.59 28.83 6.30 34.58
2026 1.49 22.16 3.21 30.00 5.73 36.67
2027 0.98 22.52 2.88 31.05 5.23 38.58
2028 0.89 22.85 2.58 32.00 4.79 40.33
2029 0.81 23.14 2.33 32.85 4.42 41.94
2030 0.81 23.44 2.11 33.62 4.09 43.44
2031 0.75 23.71 1.92 34.32 3.80 44.82
2032 0.69 23.97 1.75 34.96 3.54 46.12
2033 0.63 24.19 1.60 35.54 3.30 47.32
2034 0.57 24.40 1.45 36.07 3.08 48.442035 0.51 24.59 0.99 36.43 2.87 49.49
2036 0.46 24.76 0.94 36.78 2.68 50.47
2037 0.15 24.81 0.89 37.10 2.51 51.39
2038 0.06 24.84 0.84 37.41 2.36 52.25
2039 0.03 24.85 0.80 37.70 2.22 53.06
2040 0.82 38.00 2.09 53.82
2041 0.79 38.29 1.97 54.54
2042 0.74 38.56 1.85 55.22
2043 0.70 38.82 1.75 55.85
2044 0.67 39.06 1.65 56.46
2045 0.63 39.29 1.56 57.03
2046 0.60 39.51 1.48 57.57
2047 0 56 39 71 1 19 58 01
Lisewo
Proved Proved+Probable Proved +Probable+Possible
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
82/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
83/105
ECV 2003 74 February 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
84/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
85/105
ECV 2003 76 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
86/105
ECV 2003 77 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
87/105
gy gy
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
88/105
APPENDIX 7: PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORKOMORZE-3 FIELD
Year Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
2014 1.25 0.42 1.25 0.42 1.25 0.42
2015 1.25 0.87 1.25 0.87 1.25 0.87
2016 1.25 1.33 1.25 1.33 1.25 1.33
2017 1.21 1.77 1.25 1.78 1.25 1.78
2018 1.09 2.17 1.24 2.23 1.25 2.24
2019 0.98 2.53 1.17 2.66 1.25 2.69
2020 0.89 2.86 1.08 3.06 1.24 3.15
2021 0.82 3.15 1.01 3.43 1.19 3.58
2022 0.75 3.43 0.94 3.77 1.12 3.99
2023 0.69 3.68 0.88 4.09 1.06 4.38
2024 0.64 3.91 0.83 4.39 1.01 4.752025 0.60 4.13 0.78 4.67 0.96 5.10
2026 0.56 4.33 0.73 4.94 0.92 5.43
2027 0.52 4.52 0.69 5.19 0.88 5.75
2028 0.49 4.70 0.66 5.44 0.84 6.06
2029 0.46 4.87 0.62 5.66 0.80 6.35
2030 0.59 5.88 0.77 6.63
2031 0.56 6.08 0.74 6.90
2032 0.54 6.28 0.71 7.16
2033 0.51 6.47 0.68 7.41
2034 0.49 6.65 0.66 7.65
2035 0.47 6.82 0.63 7.89
2036 0.45 6.99 0.61 8.11
2037 0.43 7.15 0.59 8.332038 0.42 7.30 0.57 8.53
2039 0.40 7.44 0.55 8.74
2040 0.39 7.59 0.53 8.93
2041 0.37 7.72 0.52 9.12
2042 0.36 7.85 0.50 9.30
2043 0.35 7.98 0.49 9.48
2044 0.33 8.10 0.47 9.65
2045 0.32 8.22 0.46 9.82
2046 0.31 8.33 0.45 9.98
2047 0.30 8.44 0.43 10.14
2048 0.42 10.30
2049 0.41 10.45
Komorze
Proved Proved+Probable Proved +Probable+Possible
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
89/105
ECV 2003 80 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
90/105
ECV 2003 81 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
91/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
92/105
ECV 2003 83 February 2014
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
93/105
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
94/105
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
95/105
APPENDIX 8 PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORSZYMANOWICE FIELD
YearGas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production (Bscf)
2015 1.25 0.42 1.25 0.42 1.25 0.42
2016 1.25 0.87 1.25 0.87 1.25 0.87
2017 1.25 1.33 1.25 1.33 1.25 1.33
2018 1.25 1.78 1.25 1.78 2.49 2.24
2019 1.21 2.22 1.25 2.24 2.49 3.152020 1.12 2.63 1.25 2.69 2.49 4.06
2021 1.04 3.01 1.25 3.15 2.49 4.97
2022 0.97 3.37 1.25 3.60 2.49 5.88
2023 0.91 3.70 1.22 4.05 2.45 6.77
2024 0.86 4.02 1.17 4.48 2.34 7.63
2025 0.81 4.31 1.13 4.89 2.24 8.44
2026 0.76 4.59 1.09 5.29 2.14 9.23
2027 0.72 4.85 1.05 5.67 2.05 9.97
2028 0.69 5.11 1.01 6.04 1.97 10.69
2029 0.65 5.34 0.98 6.40 1.89 11.38
2030 0.62 5.57 0.95 6.74 1.82 12.05
2031 0.59 5.78 0.92 7.08 1.75 12.69
2032 0.56 5.99 0.89 7.40 1.69 13.30
2033 0.54 6.19 0.86 7.71 1.63 13.90
2034 0.52 6.37 0.83 8.02 1.57 14.47
2035 0.49 6.56 0.81 8.31 1.52 15.02
2036 0.47 6.73 0.78 8.60 1.47 15.56
2037 0.45 6.89 0.76 8.88 1.42 16.08
2038 0.44 7.05 0.74 9.15 1.38 16.58
2039 0 42 7 21 0 72 9 41 1 33 17 07
Szymanowice
Proved Proved+Probable Proved +Probable+Possible
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
96/105
ECV 2003 87 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
97/105
ECV 2003 88 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
98/105
ECV 2003 89 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
99/105
ECV 2003 90 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
100/105
ECV 2003 91 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
101/105
ECV 2003 92 February 2014
RPS Energy
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
102/105
APPENDIX 9 PRODUCTION FORECASTS AND CASHFLOW ANALYSIS FORGRABOWKA FIELD
Table A8.1: Gas Production Forecasts for Grabowka
Year Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production
(Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production
(Bscf)
Gas Rate
(MMscfd)
Cumulative
Production
(Bscf)
2014 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6
2015 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.72016 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.8
2017 0.6 1.0 0.3 0.9
2018 0.6 1.3 0.6 1.2
2019 0.6 1.5 0.6 1.4
2020 0.3 1.6 0.6 1.6
2021 0.2 1.7 0.6 1.8
2022 0.6 2.02023 0.6 2.3
2024 0.6 2.5
2025 0.3 2.6
2026 0.1 2.6
Grabowka
Proved Proved+Probable Proved
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
103/105
ECV 2003 94 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
104/105
ECV 2003 95 February 2014
RPS Energy FX Energy, Inc. Evaluation of Polish Gas Assets
8/12/2019 FX Energy 2013 Reserve Report for Poland
105/105