Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Funding ApplicationCompetition Regional TAP
Application Type Bicycle and Pedestrian
Status submitted
Submitted: September 19th, 2017 2:36 PM
Project Information1. Project Title
Olympic Drive Non Motorized Improvemnet Project2. Transportation 2040 ID
N/A3. Sponsoring Agency
Bainbridge Island4. Cosponsors
N/A5. Does the sponsoring agency have "Certification Acceptance" status from
WSDOT?Yes
6. If not, which agency will serve as your CA sponsor?WSDOT Olympic Region in Kitsap County
Contact Information1. Contact name
K. Chris Hammer, PE, PMP2. Contact phone
206-780-37403. Contact email
Project Description1. Project Scope
This project provides pedestrian and bicycle improvements on Olympic Drive SE / SR305 fromWinslow Way to Harborview Drive connecting a busy intersection with commuter traffic to theWashington State Ferries (WSF) Bainbridge Island Terminal and Kitsap Transit Bus Station.
Objectives and corresponding major elements of the project include the following:• Improved pedestrian accommodation and enhanced pedestrian safety. The proposeddesign includes improvements that will address peak level capacity and safety concerns aspedestrians frequently walk in the roadway and cross vehicular traffic lanes haphazardly whentravelling to and from the ferry terminal, as the existing sidewalks are narrow. Improvementswill also address mobility issues for all users as the existing sidewalks are ageing andsubstandard for accessibility.• Enhanced bicycle mobility and safety. Improvements will address potential vehicularconflicts with bicyclists travelling to and from the ferry terminal. Proposed design includessafety alternatives to correct the platooning bicycle traffic from ferry loading and departingimpacting the intersection of SR305 and Winslow Way as well as northbound left turningmovements.
1 of 8
movements.• Preserving and beatifying the SR305 Corridor. SR305 is designated by the State as a scenicand recreational highway. The Way Point Park was a community led effort to redevelop an oldservice station site into a welcoming point for Downtown Bainbridge Island/ Winslow. The WayPoint Woods habitat restoration and trail effort, on the adjacent Washington State Ferriesproperty, preserves a section of the forested corridor and expands in town trail networks. TheBainbridge Island Parks Foundation played a leadership role in the restoration and trail effortsof the park. Many citizen volunteers contributed to both of these efforts including nationallyrenowned landscape architect John Paul Jones and local columnist/ gardening expert AnneLovejoy. These improvements where planned to accommodate Olympic Drive/ Sound toOlympics (STO) Trail.
The proposed design includes: sidewalk widening and accessibility improvements, bikelanes, painted bike boxes, center divider, signal modifications for pedestrian and cyclists,signage, landscaping, and other work. The design is 100% complete. Refer to the attachedplans for more details.
2. Project Justification, Need, or PurposeThe overarching purpose of the project is to support the region's economy and smartcompact growth by improving non-motorized capacity and connectivity; and promoting activemodes of transportation and transit along the SR305 Corridor. More specifically, this project isintended to address the following goals:• Advance the regional infrastructure to meet the demands of a modern economy providingmore effective and efficient multi-modal transportation by improving the non-motorizedcapacity of the ferry system, improving access to bus transit, and expanding non-motorizednetworks including the regional Sound to Olympics (STO) Trail and intergraded multi-use trails,Core 40 Program bike lanes, and Complete Streets program projects including bike lanes andsidewalks.• Link a highly educated work force with housing in Bainbridge Island/ Kitsap County to jobcenters, including the largest employment center in Seattle, ensuring residents have accessto family wage jobs and employers have access to world class talent.• Continue to support new high technology business and entrepreneurship on BainbridgeIsland by providing viable alternatives with affordable office space, that is convenient to theregions largest urban center of Seattle and the Seattle-Tacoma Airport with a more efficientreverse commute.• Foster tourism with walkable and bikable distance of the Seattle-Bainbridge Ferry terminal,including the Seattle waterfront and the historic Main Street town of Winslow on BainbridgeIsland, to the local business climate and enhance Seattle's viability as a global touristdestination.• Encourage compact development in the urban growth area of Downtown Bainbridge Island/Winslow by reducing dependence on the automobile by constructing viable and efficientnon-motorized networks improving livability and quality of life for residents.• Expanding access for persons of all ages and abilities including seniors and persons withdisabilities many of whom choose to live in the mixed use and higher density residentialdistricts within Downtown Bainbridge Island/ Winslow. (22% of population is elderly anddisabled per 2010 census)• Improving the viability and safety of non-motorized modes of transportation and transitencouraging active modes of travelling and providing health benefits.• Reducing greenhouse gas and diesel particulate emissions by improving the efficiency ofpublic transportation and fostering compact growth that is less reliant on the automobile.
This project addresses a gap in non-motorized service between the Bainbridge Island FerryTerminal and recently constructed Complete Streets improvements project on Winslow Wayalong a critical link between Seattle and the greater Kitsap Peninsula and provides for localconnectivity to Downtown Bainbridge Island/Winslow and outlying areas of Bainbridge Island.The Seattle-Bainbridge route has the highest non-motorized ridership of all the WashingtonState Ferry (WSF) routes (3,093,016 walk on passengers in 2015). It also has the highestnumber of bicyclist of all the WSF routes (362,376 in 2011). The proposed improvements arealso intended to compliment the “Complete Streets” planned for Alaskan Way along theSeattle waterfront along with the recent improvements to Winslow Way, and the Sound toOlympics Trail along the SR305 Corridor on Bainbridge Island.
Project Location1. Project Location
SR3052. Please identify the county(ies) in which the project is located.
Kitsap3. Crossroad/landmark nearest the beginning of the project
Harbor Drive4. Crossroad/landmark nearest the end of the project
Winslow Way
2 of 8
5. Map and project graphicsVicinityMap.pdf, ProjectLimits.pdf, TypicalCrossSection.pdf, Plans.pdf, commuterbikes.jpg,crowdedSidewalks.jpeg, familyrideoffferry.jpg
Plan Consistency1. Is the project specifically identified in a local comprehensive plan?
Yes2. If yes, please indicate the (1) plan name, (2) relevant section(s), and (3) page
number where it can be found.Non-motorized facilities for SR305/Olympic Drive are shown in Map D in the appendixes of theIsland-wide Transportation Plan, adopted in February of 2017 as part of the City of BainbridgeIsland's Comprehensive Plan
This project furthers the goals and policies in the City of Bainbridge Comprehensive Plan inthe Transportation Element and include the following:• The project directly addresses most of the "Transportation Issues" identified in the Planincluding; Limited Transportation Choices, SR305 Congestion, Greater Winslow Area TrafficCongestion, Non-motorized Travel, Transit Service, Transportation Network Connectivity,Climate Change, Roadway Intersection Congestion, Storm-water, Livability, and RegionalCoordination.• The project achieves the Goals of the Plan including: Goal 1 Multimodal, Goal 2 Non-Motorized, Goal 3 Ferry Service, Goal 4 Bus Service, Goal 6 Operation and Mobility, Goal 7SR305, Goal 9 Safety and Maintenance, Goal 11 Community Character, Goal 12 Environment,Goal 13 Community Involvement, and Goal 14 Regional Coordination. The proposed projecton Olympic Drive functions as the first segment of the Sound to Olympics (STO) Trailconnecting to the Washington State Ferry terminal. The STO Trail is shown in Map F in theCity's Island-wide Transportation Plan.
This project advances PSRC's Vision 2040, Washington State Ferries Long Range Plan, KitsapTransits Long Range Plan, and comprehensive plan goals and policies of King County, KitsapCounty, City of Seattle, and the City of Bainbridge Island by improving multi-modal connectivityin the Puget Sound Region. Currently, Kitsap Transit is leading a PSRC funded study of theSR305 Corridor to plan for Connecting Washington improvements. Connecting Washingtonimprovements are anticipated to further multi-modal connectivity on the corridor andcompliment the proposed non-motorized improvements to Olympic Drive.
3. If no, please describe how the project is consistent with the applicable localcomprehensive plan, including specific local policies and provisions the projectsupports.N/A
Federal Functional Classification1. Functional class name
14 Urban Principal Arterial
Support for Centers1. Describe the relationship of the project to the center(s) it is intended to support.
For example, is it located within a designated regional, countywide or localcenter, or is it located along a corridor connecting to one of these areas?This project improves connectivity to the Washington State Department of Transportation'sBainbridge Ferry Terminal for pedestrians and bicyclists travelling between Kitsap County,Bainbridge Island, and the Downtown Seattle Centers (specifically Seattle central businessdistrict, Ballard-Interbay, First Hill/Capitol Hill/ Uptown, and University District). The proposedproject is located in and central to Downtown Bainbridge Island/ Winslow which is a PSRC-designated urban growth area. The project links a designed multi-modal hub in DowntownSeattle as well as the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center of Duwamish.
2. Describe how the project supports existing and/or plannedpopulation/employment activity in the center.This project supports existing population and population growth in Seattle/ King County andBainbridge Island/ Kitsap County by improving existing non-motorized facilitiesaccommodating a wider range of users of all ages and abilities and increasing the capacity tosupport alternative modes of transportation. With growth, the region population is becomingever more dependent on the capacity and efficiency of alternative modes. Multi-modal hubsand the ability of the communities served by those hubs to adapt to accommodate transitand active modes is critical.
3 of 8
This project has the potential to realize a key component of the City of Bainbridge Island'scomprehensive planning for an integrated system of non-motorized facility networks servinglocal and regional centers. The City's non-motorized transportation system is comprised ofcomplete streets (sidewalks, bike-lanes, and shoulders) integrated with Island's roadwaynetworks and separated facilities (multi-use pathways both regional and intra-island),connecting pathways in and between neighborhoods, and low volume roadways. This systemis planned to accommodate users of all ages and abilities with routes across the City,respecting the unique environmental and social context of the Island, with efficientconnectivity to the Islands Centers (Downtown Bainbridge Island/ Winslow, Lynwood Center,and Rolling Bay Town Center), the Agate Pass Bridge, Transit stops along SR305, and to themulti-modal hub at the Bainbridge Ferry terminal. The project expands upon the City ofSeattle's Alaska Way reconstruction and non-motorized improvements and the City ofBainbridge Island's reconstruction of its Main street/ Winslow Way and current construction ofthe Sound to Olympics Trail.
The project will benefit the City of Seattle by relieving automobile traffic congestion, providingdesirable housing alternatives for workers, commuting options, recreational opportunities forits residents, and increased tourism for both communities.
The project will benefit designated Centers within the City of Bainbridge Islands by reducingautomobile and parking congestion, providing commuting options for residents, providingrecreational opportunities, and increased tourism.
The projects supports aerospace, business services, clean technology, Informationtechnology, life sciences & global health, maritime, philanthropies, and transportation andlogistics industries in the Seattle center by providing infrastructure for supporting publictransportation for a highly educated work force that commutes from Bainbridge Island andKitsap County.
This project also supports tourism and visitors by furthering investments in transportationthat provide viable transportation alternatives for non-motorized users of all ages and abilitiesand facilitate compact growth creating vibrant districts and an environment that supportstourist oriented businesses.
3. Describe how the project helps the center develop in a manner consistent withthe adopted policies and plans for the center.Improving the viability of active modes of transportation and access to transit is critical tofacilitating development in Designated Centers located within the City of Bainbridge Island. Itis also important for accommodating population growth and supporting the economy in thePuget Sound Region. As a key component of the City's envisioned non-motorized system,the proposed project provides for more compact growth. The project/system is envisioned toimprove quality of life for residents and the social fabric of the community.
This project advances both the Vision 2040 Plan and the Comprehensive Plan policies of KingCounty, Kitsap County, City of Seattle, and the City of Bainbridge Island by improving multi-modal connectivity in the Puget Sound region.
The project furthers the Transportation Vision 2040 Plan and SMART Corridors for addressingcongestion and mobility.
This project supports the policy direction in the King County Comprehensive Plan to"Coordinate and develop multimodal services and facilities” for an integrated and seamlessregional and local transportation system."The project also furthers the Kitsap County Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element byachieving the following goals:
Goal 1 - "Encourage efficient multi-modal transportation systems based on regional prioritiesand in coordination with state, county, tribal, and city comprehensive plans"Goal 18 - "Develop a system of non-motorized facilities that are constructed primarily withinthe right-of-way existing and proposed public streets and roads that provide safetransportation between regional, inter-community, and local county destination for bicyclistsand pedestrians.
The project furthers the goals and policies in the City of Bainbridge Comprehensive Plan inthe Transportation Element including the following:• The project directly addresses most of the "Transportation Issues" identified in the Planincluding; Limited Transportation Choices, SR305 Congestion, Greater Winslow Area TrafficCongestion, Non-motorized Travel, Transit Service, Transportation Network Connectivity,Climate Change, Roadway Intersection Congestion, Storm-water, Livability, and RegionalCoordination.• The achieves the Goals of the Plan including: Goal 1 Multimodal, Goal 2 Non-Motorized,Goal 3 Ferry Service, Goal 4 Bus Service, Goal 6 Operation and Mobility, Goal 7 SR305, Goal 9Safety and Maintenance, Goal 11 Community Character, Goal 12 Environment, Goal 13Community Involvement, and Goal 14 Regional Coordination.
4 of 8
Criteria: Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects1. Describe how the project extends or completes a regional or local bicycle and
pedestrian system, and/or adds facilities to an existing bicycle and pedestriansystem or network.This project addresses a gap in non-motorized service between the Bainbridge Island FerryTerminal and recently constructed complete streets improvements on Winslow Way along acritical link between Seattle and the greater Kitsap Peninsula and provides for localconnectivity to Downtown Bainbridge Island/ Winslow and outlying areas of Bainbridge Island.The proposed improvements are also intended to compliment the pedestrian promenadeand cycle track improvements planned for Alaskan Way along the Seattle waterfront alongwith the recent "complete streets" improvements to Winslow Way, and the Sound to OlympicsTrail along the SR305 Corridor on Bainbridge Island, and multi-use trail and other access/ADAimprovements to the City's Waterfront Park. The improvements complete and tie into theCity's non-motorized system including bike lanes and sidewalks in Downtown BainbridgeIsland/ Winslow (complete streets), the Islands Core 40 Network (roadway shoulders acrossthe island), and a network of regional and intra-island multi-use trails and connectingpathways. For information about the existing and planned non-motorized system refer to theMaps A through D in the City's Island-wide Transportation Plan/ Comprehensive Plan.
2. Describe how the project addresses a need in the community and reduces keybarriers to use and functionality, i.e., safety and comfort, distance, slope, gaps,etc.In 2015 at the Olympic Drive/ Winslow Way intersection, the State Bike/ Ped program countsfor AM peak 2 hour and PM peak two hour and the counts were as follows: Pedestrian(196/471), Bicycle (138/117).
The objectives and corresponding major elements of the project are as follows:• Improved pedestrian accommodation and enhanced pedestrian safety. The proposeddesign includes improvements that will address peak level capacity and safety concerns aspedestrians frequently walk in the roadway and cross vehicular traffic lanes haphazardly whentravelling to and from the ferry terminal, as the existing sidewalks are narrow. Improvementswill also address mobility issues for all users as the existing sidewalks are ageing andsubstandard for accessibility.• Enhanced bicycle mobility and safety. Improvements will address potential vehicularconflicts with bicyclists travelling to and from the ferry terminal. Proposed design includessafety alternatives to correct the platooning bicycle traffic from ferry loading and departingimpacting the intersection of SR305 and Winslow Way as well as northbound left turningmovements.
3. Describe the connections to other multimodal facilities the project provides.This project improves non-motorized capacity and accessibility to the Washington StateFerries (WSF) Bainbridge terminal and co-located Kitsap Transit Bus Station. DowntownBainbridge Island/ Winslow has been identified as high in the Growing CommunitiesOpportunity Index.
While vehicular capacity is limited, WSF plans anticipate a growing passenger walk on andbicycle trips. According to the WSF Long Range Plan, the Seattle-Bainbridge route is expectedto increase 35% between 2006 and 2030, meaning the route will attract over 2 million moreriders per year with non-drivers accounting for 1.5 million of those additional trips. Substantialwalk-on growth is projected and peak hour demand is estimated to be almost 1,400 walk-onsby 2030. This project compliments Washington State Ferries recent terminal buildingrenovations and current Overhead Loading Facility replacement improving capacity andefficiency for growing non-motorized use.
The Kitsap transit Bus Station includes a bike barn and vendor bike rentals in summermonths. This station provides direct connection to all 10 Kitsap bus routes that serveBainbridge Island and beyond to Kitsap County. Kitsap transit is also planning to increasecapacity utilizing double decker buses as soon as funding can be secured for the necessarymaintenance facility improvements.
4. Describe how the project will benefit a variety of user groups, including thosegroups identified in the President's Order for Environmental Justice, seniors,people with disabilities, those located in highly impacted communities and/orareas experiencing high levels of unemployment or chronic underemployment.Commuters to jobs – Most employed Island residents and many Kitsap County residentscommute to family wage paying jobs in Seattle. As employment grows on the Island so doescongestion on SR305. More people are commuting to jobs on Island from Seattle more thanever before w/ the reverse ferry commute being an attractive option for many. With povertyrates of 9.4% in Kitsap County and 10.2% in King County providing efficient public transit toaccess jobs is increasingly important.
Commuters to school – In addition to commuters traveling to places of employment manyresidents of Kitsap enroll in higher education programs and institutions located in Seattle.
5 of 8
Tourists – Bainbridge island is a ferry ride away from downtown Seattle and convenient withinwalking and biking distance. The SR305 Corridor is also a gateway to tourist and recreationalopportunities on the Kitsap Peninsula. Bainbridge is a weekend destination for cyclist and iswell known for organized rides such as the "Chilly Hilly". The Winslow Way main streetcommunity attracts visitors who enjoy a variety of shopping, dining, and cultural experiences.For tourists who prefer not to drive, the walk on ferry route from Bainbridge is an attractiveoption.
East sound and west sound residents – This project benefits residents within walking andbiking distance of the Seattle and Bainbridge Island ferry terminals. With investments in non-motorized facility networks, on both sides of the water, active transportation is becomingmore attractive, improving livability, and encouraging compact development.
Senior citizens and persons with disabilities – Bainbridge residents and visitors benefit frominvestments in non-motorized facilities that improve network viability for all ages and abilitiesand improve connectivity. The City plans for half of the growth on Bainbridge Island to beconcentrated in Downtown Bainbridge / Winslow. Twenty-two percent (22%) of peopleresiding in the downtown area are elderly and 10% are disabled per the 2010 census data.Investing in non-motorized facilities for all ages and abilities is vital to support development toaccommodate our aging demographic.
5. Discuss whether the resource is threatened and if there will be a loss ofopportunity if this project is not funded.
The Olympic Drive Non-Motorized Improvement project addresses current capacitydeficiencies that are needed to serve growing walk and on passenger and cyclist ridership onthe Washington State Ferries Seattle-Bainbridge Route. Note that Washington State Ferrieshas an active project to replace its Overhead Loading Facility to address capacity needs.
The project was bid in June of 2017. Due to rising construction costs the budget was notsufficient. The project is funded in part by a State Ped-Bike Program grant, which is soon tobe at risk. If additional funding is not secured then this and/ or other regionally important non-motorized projects may need to be deferred.
Another risk would be the lost opportunity to get transit and trail facilities in place in time tohelp shape and accommodate more compact development in the center of DowntownBainbridge Island/ Winslow.
PSRC Funding Request1. Has this project received PSRC funds previously?
No2. If yes, please provide the project's PSRC TIP ID
N/A
Phase Year Alternate Year Amountconstruction 2018 2019 $878,320.00
Total Request: $878,320.00
Total Estimated Project Cost and SchedulePE
Funding Source Secured/Unsecured AmountLocal Secured $373,335.00Other State Secured $120,000.00
$493,335.00Expected year of completion for this phase: 2017
Construction
Funding Source Secured/Unsecured AmountLocal Secured $478,100.00
6 of 8
Other State Secured $644,200.00TAP Unsecured $878,320.00
$2,000,620.00Expected year of completion for this phase: 2019
Summary1. Estimated project completion date
October, 20192. Total project cost
$2,493,955.00
Funding Documentation1. Documents
CIP.pdf, SummaryEstimate.xlsx, 2017-07-19_udpated_estimate_for_budgeting.pdf,Olympic_NM_Award_Ltr.pdf
2. 2. Please describe the secure or reasonably expected funds identified in thesupporting documentation. For funds that are reasonably expected, an explanationof procedural steps with milestone dates for completion which will be taken tosecure the funds for the project or program should also be included.City funding is budgeted. State Ped-Bike program grant funds have been obligated for bothdesign and construction.
Project Readiness: PE1. Are you requesting funds for ONLY a planning study or preliminary engineering?
No2. Is preliminary engineering complete?
Yes3. What was the date of completion (month and year)?
May 20174. Have preliminary plans been submitted to WSDOT for approval?
N/A5. Are there any other PE/Design milestones associated with the project? Please
identify and provide dates of completion. You may also use this space to explainany dates above.N/A
6. When are preliminary plans expected to be complete and approved by WSDOT(month and year)?N/A
Project Readiness: NEPA1. What is the current or anticipated level of environmental documentation under
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for this project?Categorical Exclusion (CE)
2. Has the NEPA documentation been approved?No
3. Please provide the date of NEPA approval, or the anticipated date of completion(month and year).9/2018
Project Readiness: Right of Way1. Will Right of Way be required for this project?
No2. How many parcels do you need?
7 of 8
N/A3. What is the zoning in the project area?
N/A4. Discuss the extent to which your schedule reflects the possibility of
condemnation and the actions needed to pursue this.N/A
5. Does your agency have experience in conducting right of way acquisitions ofsimilar size and complexity?N/A
6. If not, when do you expect a consultant to be selected, under contract, andready to start (month and year)?N/A
7. In the box below, please identify all relevant right of way milestones, includingthe current status and estimated completion date of each.N/A
Project Readiness: Construction1. Are funds being requested for construction?
Yes2. Do you have an engineer's estimate?
Yes3. Engineers estimate document
2017-07-19_udpated_estimate_for_budgeting.pdf4. Identify the environmental permits needed for the project and when they are
scheduled to be acquired.SEPA and SHPO acquired in May of 2015. If project is federalized, a NEPA permit will berequired and can be procured by September of 2018.
5. Are Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) approved?Yes
6. Please provide the date of approval, or the date when PS&E is scheduled to besubmitted for approval (month and year).May 2017
7. When is the project scheduled to go to ad (month and year)?Februrary 2019
Other Considerations1. Describe any additional aspects of your project not requested in the evaluation
criteria that could be relevant to the final project recommendation and decision-making process.The Olympic Drive Non-Motorized Improvement project was advertised in June of 2017 butnot awarded due to significantly higher than anticipated construction costs and budgetconstraints. The City is seeking additional grant funds to fully fund the project.
2. Describe the public review process for the project and actions taken to involvestakeholders in the project's development.
The Project was developed in partnership with the City's Multi-modal Transportation AdvisoryCommittee and has broad support in the community. The development of the project involveddiscussions with numerous groups including Squeaky Wheels, Go Bainbridge/ SustainableBainbridge, the West Sound Bicycle Club, Leadership of the Bainbridge Island Senior Center,Bainbridge Island Municipal Parks District, the Parks Foundation, and the North Kitsap TrailAssociation. The project was started in 2013 and involved a series of public meetingsculminating with City Council approval of a preferred alternative.
The City of Bainbridge Island is the lead agency on this project and will perform work as adeveloper in the State's ROW. This project is of regional significance to the Olympic Region,Washington State Ferries, and Kitsap Transit are all stake holders in the project.
3. Final documentsN/A
8 of 8
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
CITY OFBAINBRIDGE
ISLAND
PUBLIC WORKSENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
CITY OFBAINBRIDGE
ISLAND
PUBLIC WORKSENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
CITY OFBAINBRIDGE
ISLAND
PUBLIC WORKSENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
CITY OFBAINBRIDGE
ISLAND
PUBLIC WORKSENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
CITY OFBAINBRIDGE
ISLAND
PUBLIC WORKSENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
CITY OFBAINBRIDGE
ISLAND
PUBLIC WORKSENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
CITY OFBAINBRIDGE
ISLAND
PUBLIC WORKSENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
CITY OFBAINBRIDGE
ISLAND
PUBLIC WORKSENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
to Patty Jenkins, PE
Public Works Department
City of Bainbridge Island from Nathan Polanski PE re Olympic Drive Non-Motorized Improvement Project (MIG|SvR #14008)
Updated cost estimate for budgeting repackaged bid set date July 19, 2017
As requested, we have reviewed and updated our June 2017 summary of probable construction costs. It’s our understanding the updated costs will be used by the City to update the City’s project budget and we will submit a final engineer’s estimate as a part of the repackaging of project documents (PS&Es) for bid advertisement.
Our review and update was completed to address the following:
• Eliminate bid alternatives: Consolidation and repacking of project document to eliminate bid alternatives.
• Refinement for tree preservation: Review and refinement of unit costs associated with tree protection developed as a part of Addendum #2 from the June 2017 bid package.
• Refinement for WSDOT specification modifications: Review and refinement of unit costs associated with modifications to project specifications related to contractor working hours (special provision 1-07.23), liquidated damages (1-08.9) and allowing a flexible start date (1-08.5) as documented in Patty Jenkins email to MIG|SvR on July 12, 2017, which we hear are important to contractor’s.
• Site constraints: review and refinement of unit costs based on City provided feedback from plan holders from the June 2017 bid advertisement and to address multiple small areas of work within a constrained work environment.
• Current market conditions: modifications based on MIG|SvR’s observations for the region’s volatile market, conversations with City staff, and City provided feedback from plan holders from the June 2017 bid advertisement.
For the bid re-advertisement, we also recommend:
• a minimum 4 to 5 week bid period to allow contractors adequate time to understand the plans and prepare their proposal given the busy construction season
• having another optional on-site preproposal meeting to allow contractors to ask questions and see the site similar to the June 2017 bid
Let us know if you have any questions and what the City’s schedule is for repackaging and advertising the project documents.
Olympic Drive Non-Motorized Improvement ProjectMIG|SvR #14008.10 and 14008.20
Prepared by NP/JM; Checked by TvS/MRS
7/19/2017
Repackaged Bid Set for City Budgeting - Updated Summary of Probable Construction Cost (see 7/19/2017 MIG memo for additional information)
Summary of Probable Construction Cost
ITEM #TOTAL
QUANTITYUNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION
Spec. Number
GrantLocal Roads
Local WaterUPDATED UNIT
COSTCOST
PREPARATION1 1 LS MOBILIZATION 1-09 70% 10% 20% $152,500 $152,500
2 1 LS STRUCTURE SURVEYING 1-04 1 $8,000 $8,000
3 1 LS ROADWAY SURVEYING 1-04 70% 10% 20% $12,000 $12,000
4 1 LS SPCC PLAN 1-07 1 $1,500 $1,500
5 1 LS RECORD DRAWINGS (MINIMUM BID $1000) 1-05 70% 10% 20% $1,000 $1,000
6 1 LS CLEARING AND GRUBBING 2-01 90% 10% $13,500 $13,500
7 13 EACH REMOVE TREE 2-01 13 $1,000 $13,000
8 1 LS REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE AND OBSTRUCTION 2-02 40% 20% 40% $40,000 $40,000
9 1 LS REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF ASBESTOS MATERIAL 2-02 1 $5,000 $5,000
10 2 EACH RELOCATE BOULDER 2-02 2 $600 $1,200
11 1 LS SALVAGE WAYFINDING SIGN 2-02 1 $400 $400
12 1 LS SALVAGE NAMEPLATE ROCK 2-02 1 $3,000 $3,000
13 1 LS SALVAGE ROTARY PAVEMENT INLAY 2-02 1 $2,000 $2,000
14 1 LS SALVAGE STONE FACING 2-02 1 $3,000 $3,000
15 1 LS SALVAGE PEDESTRIAN LIGHT AND POLE 2-02 1 $750 $750
16 1 LS SALVAGE BENCH 2-03 1 $250 $250
17 1 LS SALVAGE FLOWER BASKET POLE 2-03 1 $250 $250
18 1 LS TREE PROTECTION 2-05 30% 70% $25,000 $25,000
GRADING19 190 CY ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCL HAUL 2-03 35 25 130 $50 $9,500
20 435 CY STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS A INCL. HAUL 2-09 400 35 $60 $26,100
21 45 CY COMMON BORROW INCL HAUL 2-03 45 $45 $2,025
STORM SEWER22 289 LF UNDERDRAIN PIPE 4 IN. DIAM. 7-01 159 130 $45 $13,005
23 75 LF UNDERDRAIN PIPE 6 IN. DIAM. 7-05 75 $65 $4,875
24 4 EACH CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 7-05 4 $2,500 $10,000
25 1 EACH CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 7-05 1 $4,500 $4,500
26 195 LF SOLID WALL PVC STORM SEWER PIPE 8 IN. DIAM. 7-04 195 $70 $13,650
27 20 LF SOLID WALL PVC STORM SEWER PIPE 18 IN. DIAM. 7-04 20 $110 $2,200
28 78 LF DUCTILE IRON STORM SEWER PIPE 8 IN. DIAM. 7-04 78 $100 $7,800
29 30 LF DRAIN PIPE 4 IN. DIAM. 7-01 30 $50 $1,500
30 3 EACH RAIN GARDEN PLANTER 8-02 3 $2,000 $6,000
31 3 EACH SEWER CLEAN OUT 7-19 3 $750 $2,250
32 20 LF FLOW DISPERSAL TRENCH 7-01 20 $110 $2,200
33 293 LF TESTING STORM SEWER PIPE 7-04 293 $7.00 $2,051
34 2 EACH LOCKING FRAME AND SOLID COVER FOR EXISTING STRUCTURE 7-05 2 $1,000 $2,000
35 3 EACH ADJUST CATCH BASIN 7-05 3 $800 $2,400
WATER LINES36 1 EACH GATE VALVE 6 IN. 7-12 1 $1,400 $1,400
37 4 EACH GATE VALVE 8 IN. 7-12 4 $1,800 $7,200
38 1 EACH TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE ASSEMBLY 6 IN. 7-12 1 $4,500 $4,500
39 1 EACH TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE ASSEMBLY 8 IN. 7-12 1 $5,000 $5,000
40 1 EACH TAPPING SLEEVE AND VALVE ASSEMBLY 12 IN. 7-12 1 $5,500 $5,500
41 815 LF DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR WATER MAIN 8 IN. DIAM. 7-09 815 $150 $122,250
42 90 LF DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR WATER SERVICE 8 IN. DIAM. 7-09 90 $150 $13,500
43 1 EACH HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 7-14 1 $6,500 $6,500
44 1 EACH SERVICE CONNECTION, IRRIGATION, 1.5 IN. DIAM. 7-15 1 $3,800 $3,800
SURFACING45 468 TON CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 4-04 183 40 245 $60 $28,080
46 88 TON CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 4-04 60 28 $70 $6,160
47 2 TON PERMEABLE BALLAST 4-04 2 $200 $400
HOT MIX ASPHALT48 408 TON HMA CL. 1/2" PG 64-22 5-04 83 50 275 $170 $69,360
49 91 SY PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 5-04 56 35 $110 $10,010
IRRIGATION AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM50 1 LS IRRIGATION SYSTEM 8-03 1 $18,000 $18,000
EROSION CONTROL AND ROADSIDE PLANTING51 1 LS EROSION/WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 8-02 90% 10% $40,000 $40,000
52 58 CY TOPSOIL TYPE A 8-02 58 $65 $3,792
53 61 CY FINE COMPOST 8-02 61 $65 $3,943
54 209 SY PLANTING AREA PREPARATION FOR COMMUNITY PLANTING AREA 8-02 209 $4.00 $834
55 125 LF ROOT BARRIER 8-02 125 $12.00 $1,500
56 46 EACH PSIPE - 5 GAL. CONTAINER 8-02 46 $75 $3,450
57 181 EACH PSIPE - 2 GAL. CONTAINER 8-02 181 $50 $9,050
58 381 EACH PSIPE - 1 GAL. CONTAINER 8-02 381 $35 $13,335
59 141 EACH PSIPE - 10 CU. IN. PLUG 8-02 141 $12 $1,692
60 79 CY WOOD CHIP MULCH 8-02 79 $50 $3,950
61
1
LS WAYPOINT PARK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION AT UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING
8-02 1
$5,000 $5,000
62 55 SY SEEDED LAWN INSTALLATION 8-02 55 $10 $550
63 4 EACH PSIPE - 2.5 IN. CAL. TREE 8-02 4 $480 $1,920
64 7 EACH PSIPE - 8 FT.-10 FT. HT. TREE 8-02 7 $325 $2,275
65 5 EACH PSIPE - 7 FT.-8 FT. HT. TREE 8-02 5 $275 $1,375
TRAFFIC66 1 ALLOW. PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL 1-07 70% 10% 20% $180,400 $180,400
67 770 LF CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER 8-04 410 345 15 $60 $46,200
68 87 LF CEMENT CONC. PEDESTRIAN CURB 8-04 84 3 $65 $5,655
69 152 LF CONCRETE CHANNNEL 8-04 152 $75 $11,400
70 60 LF HALF CONCRETE CHANNNEL 8-04 60 $60 $3,600
71 1 LS PERMANENT SIGNING 8-21 1 $6,000 $6,000
72 2836 LF PLASTIC LINE (LANE LINE, EDGE LINE, DOTTED EXTENSION LINE) 8-22 2836 $5.00 $14,180
73 2126 LF PLASTIC (DURABLE TYPE A EXTRUDED) LINE 8-22 2126 $7 $14,882
74 402 LF PLASTIC (DURABLE TYPE A EXTRUDED) CROSSHATCH MARKING 8-22 402 $10 $4,020
75 126 LF PLASTIC (TYPE D MMA) STOP LINE 8-22 126 $20 $2,520
76 37 EACH PLASTIC (TYPE B) BICYCLE LANE SYMBOL 8-22 37 $350 $12,950
Updated cost estimate
for City budgeting
F:\14\14008 Olympic Drive\Cost Estimates\Olympic Drive_repackaged bid for budgeting to city_2017-07-19Bid Set 1 of 2
Repackaged Bid Set for City Budgeting - Updated Summary of Probable Construction Cost (see 7/19/2017 MIG memo for additional information)
Summary of Probable Construction Cost
ITEM #TOTAL
QUANTITYUNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION
Spec. Number
GrantLocal Roads
Local WaterUPDATED UNIT
COSTCOST
77 10 EACH PLASTIC (TYPE D MMA) TRAFFIC ARROW 8-22 10 $250 $2,500
78 380 LF PAINTED CROSSHATCH MARKING 8-22 380 $5 $1,900
79 4 EACH PAINTED TRAFFIC LETTER, 12-INCH HIGH 8-22 4 $25 $100
80 8 EACH PAINTED TRAFFIC LETTER, 24-INCH HIGH 8-22 8 $50 $400
81 20 EACH PLASTIC (TYPE D MMA) TRAFFIC LETTER, 6-FEET HIGH 8-22 20 $150 $3,000
82 572 SF PLASTIC (TYPE D MMA) CROSSWALK LINE 8-22 572 $10 $5,720
83 0.03 MI CENTERLINE RUMBLE STRIP 8-08 0.03 $150,000 $4,500
84 1882 SF GREEN PAVEMENT MARKING 8-22 1882 $12 $22,584
85 1 LS REMOVING PAVEMENT MARKING 8-22 1 $8,000 $8,000
86 32 EACH FLEXIBLE GUIDE POST 8-10 32 $250 $8,000
87 5 EACH FLEXIBLE GUIDE POST (UNINSTALLED) 8-10 5 $100 $500
OTHER88 1 LS SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION CLASS B 2-09 20% 80% $5,000 $5,000
89 1 LS TRAFFIC SIGNAL PAD 6-11 1 $7,500 $7,500
90 260 SF CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 6-11 260 $125 $32,500
91 518 CY GRAVEL BORROW FOR STRUCTURAL EARTH WALL INCL. HAUL 6-13 518 $55 $28,490
92 1086 SF STRUCTURAL EARTH WALL 6-13 1086 $50 $54,300
93 147 LF PEDESTRIAN GUARDRAIL 6-13 147 $150 $22,050
94 1 LS CONCRETE STAIRS 8-19 1 $8,000 $8,000
95 845 SY CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK 8-14 590 245 10 $70 $59,150
96 16 SY CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK, COLORED 8-14 16 $150 $2,400
97 4 EACH CEMENT CONC. CURB RAMP, PERPENDICULAR 8-14 4 $4,500 $18,000
98 50 SF DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE 8-14 18 32 $60 $3,000
99 147 LF CONCRETE WALL CAP 8-04 147 $110 $16,170
100 1 CY COBBLES 8-15 1 $350 $350
101 1160 LF CONDUIT PIPE 4 IN. DIAM. 8-20 1160 $8 $9,280
102 2320 LF CONDUIT PIPE 3 IN. DIAM. 8-20 2320 $18 $41,760
103 1 EACH VAULT TYPE 575-LA 8-20 1 $2,500 $2,500
104 1 EACH VAULT TYPE 444-LA 8-20 1 $4,000 $4,000
105 1 EACH VAULT TYPE 3'X4' MINI-PAD 8-20 1 $2,000 $2,000
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM106 1 LS TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM, HARBORVIEW DRIVE 8-20 1 $126,000 $126,000
107 1 LS TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM, WINSLOW WAY 8-20 1 $17,000 $17,000
108 1 LS ILLUMINATION SYSTEM, STREET LIGHT 8-20 1 $24,000 $24,000
109 1 LS ILLUMINATION SYSTEM, PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS 8-20 1 $40,000 $40,000
110 800 LF INTERCONNECT 8-20 800 $7 $5,600
TOTAL $1,676,800
Assumptions/Notes:General Conditions not included
Taxes and Overhead not included
Agency Utility Connection fees not included (e.g. water meter service for irrigation)
City Permit Fees not included
Shoring was assumed for trench excavation for a catch basin and storm connection pipe and watermain over 4' deep
Project Temporary Traffic Control includes $50,000 for temporary signal at Harborview Drive
PSE to provide conduits and vaults for undergrounding of PSE distribution. Material costs not included in unit cost.
Unit cost for non-PSE franchise owners includes cost for conduit material and installation.
Does not include reimbursement to PSE for utility pole and junction box relocation at police station; estimated cost is $12,000
F:\14\14008 Olympic Drive\Cost Estimates\Olympic Drive_repackaged bid for budgeting to city_2017-07-19Bid Set 2 of 2