FRACTAL DIMENSION OF ELECTRON

prof. Ing. Pavel Ošmera, CSc.

Brno University of Technology

osmera @fme.vutbr.cz

MUDr. Pavel Ošmera – juniorDepartment of Imaging Methods,

Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University St. Anne's University Hospital Brno

osmera @fnusa.cz

 

June 27-29, 2012

MENDEL 2012

Intoduction

We would like to find a better and plausible structure of the electron as a torus and fractal structure. However it is in contradiction with generally accepted knowledge, where the electron has not a structure. Actual properties of the electron cannot be explained by point-like models. This paper is an attempt to improve our previous calculations of the radius of the electron and its fractal dimension. The vortex-fractal theory could possibly help with explanation what the charge, the electron, the proton, the electromagnetic field, etc. actually are.

Main ideas and differences

MENDEL2010

a) spiral structure as the fractal-spiral structure b) fractal-ring structure

Fractals seem to be very powerful in describing natural objects on all scales. Fractal dimension and fractal measure, are crucial parameters for such description.

a) b) c)Vortex structures: a) the vortex VB at the drain hole of bath-tub,

b) the vortex tornado-vortex VT

  c) the vortex in the PET bottle

MENDEL2009

The fractal ring structure of the electron

MENDEL2010

The spin of the electron

Vortex structures with spin 1/2

MENDEL2010

MENDEL2012

The fractal ring structure of the electron

MENDEL2007

0

0

0

0

22sin

C

a

C

a

F

F

F

F

2

2 2

12

sinNr

N

r

e

e

20

0

2sin

NF

F

C

a

02

0

2aa F

NF

2

20

2

2

2

2

21

2

24

2

N

r

S

e

Nr

v

NN

m

r

v

N

m

ee

ee

e

ee

.

2

221

20

2

2 1

8 S

NN

vm

er

eee

2

221

S

NN

1

2

NNS

20

2 1

8 eee

vm

er

MENDEL2012

Fractal dimension of the electron

where N is number of substructures (number of new sticks), ε =1/S is scaling factor, N1 = N2 = 42

S

N

S

NND

log

log

ln

ln

ln

ln

57.1534233

2

NS

48.1log

log

S

ND

2

2

2

2 2 N

r

v

N

mNFF

e

eeaoa

NrNr

r

veFF

e

e

e

oooA

2

2

4222

22

22

Aa FF

NrNr

r

veN

r

v

N

m

e

e

e

oo

e

ee

2

2

422

2

222

222

2

2

2

2

4 e

o

e

oe v

v

m

er

2

cvv eo

mm

er

e

oe

152

2

1089.04

22

2 1

8 ee

oe vm

er

MENDEL2007

The spin of the electron

)( eee vrmS

eeeeee

z vrmvrN

mNS 2

max0

2

1

1

8

ee

e vm

er

h

eve

0

2

max 2

se

eee

eeee

ez mh

e

h

m

em

vm

emv

vm

emS

2

1

22

12

8

1

8

1

8 20

0

2

max0

2

max2max0

2

MENDEL2012

2

22

2

22

22

1

2

1

em

hn

em

hndr

e

o

e

oonen

0263 323 oo rrrr

r1 = 0.7223517245ro ~ 0.382Å,

r2 = 1.792517214ro ~ 0.948Å

on En

E2

1

h

ev

oe 2

2

max 1371

max

ev

c

the couple constant α

Structure the of hydrogen atom

Structure the of the neutron

proton

electron

Conclusions Fractals seem to be very powerful in describing natural objects on all scales. To understand the electromagnetic field requires a high degree of imagination.

The degree of imagination that is required is much more extreme than that required for some of the ancient ideas. The modern ideas are much harder to imagine. We use mathematical equations and rules, and make a lot of pictures. We can’t allow ourselves to seriously imagine things, which are obviously in contradiction to the known laws of nature. And so our kind of imagination is quite a difficult game (or a puzzle). One has to have the imagination to think of something that has never seen before, never been heard before. At the same time the thoughts are restricted or limited by the conditions that come from our knowledge of the way nature really is. The problem of creating something which is new, but which is consistent with everything, which has been seen before, is one of extreme difficulty. Treating the electron as a torus structure rather than the point-like particle is a very challenging .physical topic.