Upload
brigid
View
30
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Forest Ecosystems: Tools to address climate change impacts and adaptation Brent Sohngen Department of Agricultural, Environmental & Development Economics, [email protected]. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Presentation Title
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Forest Ecosystems: Tools to address climate change impacts and
adaptation
Brent SohngenDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental &
Development Economics,[email protected]
The views expressed are those of the presenter and should not be attributed to either UNDP or USAID. Furthermore, it is strongly recommended that both the PowerPoint slides and the videos of the presentation of content included herein are viewed in conjunction in order that statements appearing in the PowerPoint slides are not interpreted out of context.
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Model for measuring economic effects in forestry
Adaptation of Forests and People to Climate Change. 2009. Alexander Buck, Pia Katila and Risto Seppälä. (eds.). IUFRO World Series Volume 22. Helsinki. 224 p.
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Ecosystem impacts that affect forestry
• Productivity changes – Will forests grow faster or slower with climate
change? Where will the changes occur?– CO2 fertilization (e.g., Norby et al., 2006).– Warmer and wetter increases growth; while
warmer and drier slows growth.
– Some current evidence that historical climate change and CO2 change have increased productivity to date (e.g., Myneni et al., 1997; Boisvenue and Running, 2006; McMahon et al., 2010).
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
• Disturbance– Forest fires increase and reduce standing stock
(Westerling et al., 2006; Marlon et al., 2012)– Tropical regions potentially experience increases in
emissions
• Species/biome shifts – Prasad and Iverson; Woodall et al. (2009)
Ecosystem impacts that affect forestry
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
How do ecosystem models work?
Total C = 50 Total C = 65
Per hectare basis:
TotalCt = TotalCt-1 + NPPt-1 – decompt-1 - disturbancet-1
For all hectares, adjust for forest area.
Focus on measuring changes in carbon stock as a functionof various ecological processes affecting carbon
Time
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Ecosystem measurement: DGVM
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
DGVM Output
• MC1 model (MAPPS and Century Model)– Bachelet et al.
• Spatial• Intertemporal• Differs by climate scenario
– A2, A1b scenarios
– CSIRO, Hadley, MIROC models
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Shift in potential forest areaExample for single climate scenario
MIROC A1b 2005
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
MIROC A1b 2095
Shift in potential forest areaExample for single climate scenario
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Shift in total carbonMIROC A1b 2005
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Shift in total carbonMIROC A1b 2095
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Ecosystem Adaptation: Net Primary Productivity 2015-2095 (% change relative
to 2005)
A1B A2
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
A1b A2
Ecosystem Adaptation: Area Change 2015-2095 (% change relative to 2005)
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
A1b A2
Ecosystem Adaptation: % burned per year 2015 - 2095
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Ecosystem Adaptation: Total carbon change 2015-2095 (% change relative to
2005)
A1b A2
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Variation across climate models
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Incorporating humans: Economic modeling
Adaptation of Forests and People to Climate Change. 2009. Alexander Buck, Pia Katila and Risto Seppälä. (eds.). IUFRO World Series Volume 22. Helsinki. 224 p.
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Economic models of forests
• Must:– Manage stocks of trees (harvesting/replanting)– Respond to land use change (conversion/regenerate)– Account for prices (either endogenously or exogenously)
• Many important trends influencing forests already underway– Increasing use of non-indigenous short-rotation species.– Growing demand in developing world, particularly Asia.– Demand rising both for traditional forestry and energy.– Rising opportunity costs for land leading to land use change.– Efforts to protect forests from land use change.
• Climate change adds perturbations to this complex management picture.
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Ecosystem measurement: DGVM
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Integrating ecosystem impacts into forestry models
• Productivity: shift the yield of forests over time in response to climate change
• Shift occurs slowly
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Integrating ecosystem impacts into forestry models
• Disturbance: Stock is lost instantaneously through fires, or other non-human disturbance.
• Increasing evidence these changes occur worldwide.
Va
VCa
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Global Forest and Land Use Model
• Maximize PV of CS minus costs– Single global demand– 250 ecosystem and management types
differentiated by costs. – Land rents account for competition with other
uses (rising land rents induce land use change).
• Climate Scenarios– Adjust yield function– Adjust equation of motion– Impose constraints on available land area.
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Adaptations Incorporated
• Manage existing stock by– changing rotations (e.g., harvest early if dieback
occurring)– salvage
• Adjust where species grow: – Replant new species if growing and economic
conditions (e.g., prices) warrant.
• Manage future stock by – Changing rotations– Changing management & investments
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Analysis
• Climate Change: • A2, A1b scenarios• CSIRO, Hadley, MIROC models
• Ecological Analysis: DGVM• MC1 model (MAPPS and Century Model)
• Economic Analysis:• Global Land Use Model
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Economic Results: Prices
• Change in price range = -7% to +2%• Hadley & Miroc have mostly lower prices • (7% max)
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Economic Results: Forest areaRelative to baseline
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Economic resultsChange in output relative to baseline
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Example: China
• Why do economic and ecological results diverge?• Effective yield increase more modest than NPP
gains projected by ecosystem model
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Example: China
• Markets only use some of the new land available.
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Example: China
• Dieback is increasing…
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Example: China
• Output changes most in NE (down) and South (up)
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Economic results: welfare(million US$/yr)
Consumer Impact
Producer Impact
Net Impact
China $773 ($1,116) ($343)South Asia $223 ($200) $23
SE Asia $361 ($442) ($81)East Asia $11 ($106) ($95)
Consumer Impact
Producer Impact
Net Impact
China $676 ($1,387) ($711)South Asia $195 ($289) ($94)
SE Asia $316 ($283) $33East Asia $10 ($109) ($100)
AVERAGE A1B
AVERAGE A2
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Annual Producer WelfareComparison of A1b and A2 averages
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Annual producer effectsRange across climate scenarios
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Economic model estimates of carbon flux
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Challenges for conservation
• Shifting biomes– Large potential effects across the range of
ecosystems
• Declining forestland area– Particularly in tropics
• Changing productivity and disturbance
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Shifts in potential forest area
MIROC A1b 2005
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
MIROC A1b 2095
Shifts in potential forest area
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Implications for Conservation
Harris et al., 2008
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
China: Change in forest area and carbonMIROC A1b
Forest Area
Forest Area
Forest Carbon Forest Carbon
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
SE Asia change in forest area and carbonMIROCA1b
Forest Area
Forest Carbon
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Issues to consider
• Costs of maintaining existing ecosystems– Harvest, replant, etc.– Opportunity costs (other uses) important.
• Costs of establishing new forests– Length of time to establish a new forest
• Protected area management– When to give up?
Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of AdaptationSupporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action
Conclusions
• Climate change has relatively modest impacts on global forest prices and outputs.– Although large changes in forest management
occur and regional effects are large.
• Output falls in most of Asia, albeit modestly in most areas.– Lower prices lower investments.
• Large range across ecosystem scenarios• Carbon flux is positive in initial periods.• Large implications for conservation based on
protected areas.