1
MAGAZINE CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT Peer Assessment by : Kealiegh Ratcliffe Describe 2 things that they have done professionally: Good use of banner, with pictures. Anchoring main cover photo with a cover line works well. Explain how this work could be improved: The colours don’t link very well. You use blue and yellow, then red out of nowhere. The size of the logo next to the masthead is different. If it were the same size, I think it would work better. LEVEL: 2 Peer Assessment by :Rebekah Haines Describe 2 things that they have done professionally: the colours link well on the front cover and contents page the banner and the pictures look good. Explain how this work could be improved: To include more pages on the contnets page. LEVEL: 2 Peer Assessment by : Helen Settle Describe 2 things that they have done professionally: Masthead is concistant. Main magazine story is clear. Explain how this work could be improved: Masthead needs to be made clearer. Writing of contents is a little hard to read. LEVEL: 2?

Focus group: strenghs and weaknesses of my school magazine

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Focus group: strenghs and weaknesses of my school magazine

MAGAZINE CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENTPeer Assessment by: Kealiegh Ratcliffe

Describe 2 things that they have done professionally:

• Good use of banner, with pictures.

• Anchoring main cover photo with a cover line works well.

Explain how this work could be improved:

• The colours don’t link very well. You use blue and yellow, then red out of nowhere.

• The size of the logo next to the masthead is different. If it were the same size, I think it would work better.

LEVEL: 2

Peer Assessment by:Rebekah Haines

Describe 2 things that they have done professionally:

• the colours link well on the front cover and contents page

• the banner and the pictures look good.

Explain how this work could be improved:

• To include more pages on the contnets page.

LEVEL: 2

Peer Assessment by: Helen Settle

Describe 2 things that they have done professionally:

• Masthead is concistant.

• Main magazine story is clear.

Explain how this work could be improved:

• Masthead needs to be made clearer.

• Writing of contents is a little hard to read.

LEVEL: 2?